Skip to content
Karma Sakha
Sign in

The Texts · Ancient & Specialized Classics

Ārca Jyotiṣa

आर्चज्योतिषम्

Lagadha · c. 1400–1200 BCE by its own stated solstice; the surviving recension is later · ganita

On the dating: The date rests on the verse placing the winter solstice at the beginning of Śraviṣṭhā — an internal astronomical datum, which is why this text is dated more firmly than most and still argued about.

What this text is

The oldest surviving Indian astronomical text — 36 verses of pure calendrical astronomy, with no horoscopy in it at all.

The five-year yuga of 1,830 days, the 62 synodic months and 67 sidereal months it contains, the ratio of the longest to the shortest day, the intercalary months, the nakṣatra list and the rule for finding the parvans.

Its role in this app

The oldest seat for the pañcāṅga itself. It is where the yuga arithmetic the calendar rests on is first stated, and it is the reason the app can say that the nakṣatra list and the tithi are older than the zodiac. NOTHING horoscopic may be cited from it: राशि here is a HEAP, not a sign, and विलग्न means "joined on", not the ascendant — reading either as the later technical term would be an anachronism of a thousand years.

Editions our research holds

  • sanskritdocuments-etext

    Encoded Devanāgarī e-text; the ingested source.

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright · scan quality: good

  • gretil-sarma

    GRETIL romanised, K. V. Sarma edition — consulted for variants, not ingested.

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright · scan quality: good

What our reading found

Findings from this project's own verification passes — recorded because a source's defects are part of citing it honestly.

Verse 14 carries a syllable-mnemonic for the nakṣatras in which this e-text has 26 items where 27 are required, and the run cannot be segmented with confidence — it is transliterated, not decoded. Verses 12, 15, 17, 19 and 30 each carry a form that does not construe; every one is flagged in the verse rather than smoothed. The two printed editions held locally are useless as witnesses in their current form: both OCRs read the Latin script as Devanāgarī throughout, so they need a vision pass.

The text itself

The Ārca Jyotiṣa is here in full. HOW LONG THIS WORK IS, IS NOW ESTABLISHED — from two printed editions, not from our own file. Kuppanna Sastry / K. V. Sarma (INSA 1985, a critical text from 14 manuscripts) heads its Arca section 'अथ आर्चज्योतिषं प्रारभ्यते', numbers the verses 1 to 36 with no gap and no restart, and closes '॥ इति आर्चज्योतिषं समाप्तम् ॥' immediately after verse 36. Sudhakara Dvivedi (Varanasi 1908), an editorial line 77 years older and independent of Sastry's manuscripts, does the same and closes 'इति सुधाकरभाष्यसहितमार्चज्यौतिषं समाप्तम् ।' after his verse 36. Both were read off the page images on 2026-09-08. We hold all 36. READ THE TIER SENTENCE BELOW WITH THIS CORRECTION. On 2026-09-08 this text was collated verse by verse against both of those editions: 25 of the 36 verses had their Sanskrit corrected, 44 divergences were written into the chapter's adjudication ledger, and 8 places are recorded as UNRESOLVED because the editorial lines disagree and nothing on disk decides between them. So the clause 'one encoded source, machine-parsed' is the tier flag speaking and is no longer true of this text. The tier is still 'etext' for exactly two stated reasons: the automated visual gate has not been run over the chapter, and verses 11-13 rest on one exemplar, because the printed page carrying them is missing from the only scan of the 1908 edition we hold. On 2026-09-23 the mūla verification of 2026-09 ruled every one of the 36 verses against every printing this library holds: 3 corrections written, all of them codepoint fixes to the avagraha — 1.8 बहुलेऽप्य for बहुलेप्य, and 1.12 and 1.13, where our file put the anusvāra BEFORE the avagraha and so wrote a form that is no word; 33 verses cleared; 24 variant readings put on the ledger; and 2 corrections HELD, because they rest on what a store read rather than on the page. The length is re-argued and stands: 36 verses in one chapter, because every verse we hold was located in the printings and the colophon-sum of two independent editorial lines closes at 36. A READER SHOULD KNOW WHAT THIS BOOK’S PRINTINGS DO. aj-barhaspatya-1906 sets every verse TWICE, once as the editor’s emendation (साधुपाठः) and once as the vulgate (प्रचलितपाठः); and three of the four stores print the Ārca and the Yājuṣa recensions in one volume. So a census that matches the first occurrence of a verse may be matching the other reading or the other recension. That is measured rather than feared: of the 25 agreements the packet counted before this pass, 17 sat on a page printing the other recension. 36 of this text's 36 verses carry an English translation; 1 of 1 chapters are begun or finished (1). This is the whole work: 36 verses against the 36 it is known to have. The Sanskrit is tier 'etext': one encoded source, machine-parsed, with 1 of 1 chapter(s) carrying a visual-validation record (0 audited) and 1 chapter(s) carrying an adjudication ledger. The app may say "our source reads…", naming the source; it may not say "the text reads…".

36 verses in the original Sanskrit with our own English translation, which is made from that Sanskrit and not adapted from any existing translation. Machine-parsed from sanskritdocuments.org e-text (aarchajyotiSha.txt) by scripts/corpus/ingest-etext.mjs on 2026-09-01. Segmentation rule: THE TEXT HAS NO CHAPTER DIVISION — a single chapter n:1 holds the whole work, and that is what the file contains rather than a division this parse failed to find (अध्याय: 0 hits; प्रकरण/खण्ड/पटल/परिच्छेद: 0; a line opening ॐ/अथ/अथातो: 0; इति: 1, and that one is the terminal colophon). The chapter therefore carries no title: the only heading in the file is the work's own name, printed twice, which is not a chapter heading. VERSE = a pair of consecutive lines, the first closed by a single daṇḍa, the second closed by ॥N॥ in Devanagari digits; the two halves are joined with a single space and the text is TRUNCATED at the number marker. THE HALF-VERSE DAṆḌA IS KEPT in the mūla — it is the hemistich boundary, which the source prints as part of the text and which translation and metre both work on — while the terminal ॥N॥ is reference apparatus and is dropped; that is the convention of every other profile here and of all 852 constituted verses in this corpus. Requiring the digits is what keeps the colophon out — 'the line ends in ॥' yields 37 verses in a 36-verse text. EVERY LINE IS CLASSIFIED and none is skipped: title (×2), half-verse (×36), verse-end (×36), colophon (×1) accounts for all 75 lines, and a line matching none of the four throws rather than being ignored, because a parser that skips what it does not understand produces a clean-looking corpus with holes in it. NO EDITORIAL APPARATUS HAD TO BE DECIDED ABOUT: a character census of the whole file returns zero characters that are neither Devanagari nor space — no bracket, asterisk, footnote mark, ASCII digit or Latin letter anywhere — and the parse asserts that emptiness rather than assuming it. What is printed as the text is the whole of what is printed. NOTHING WAS EMENDED AT INGEST, AND THAT IS NO LONGER THE STATE OF THIS TEXT. The 2026-09-01 ingest reproduced its source's own oddities verbatim (ॠ for ऋ in ॠतुशेषं and निॠति, the spelling वरुणू in v27, मुहुर्त with a short u at 1.16/1.17/1.29, उनस्थाने at 1.11, जावाद्यशैः at 1.15, त्रिंशंत् at 1.16, ऋतून without its virāma at 1.19), because a tier-'etext' ingest does not edit and repairs are earned by reading plates. THE PLATES WERE READ ON 2026-09-08. Every one of those oddities is now corrected, along with 18 further readings, against two printed exemplars — Kuppanna Sastry / K. V. Sarma (INSA 1985, 14 manuscripts) and Sudhākara Dvivedī (Varanasi 1908) — and the halves of verse 30, which we had printed the wrong way round. 25 of the 36 verses changed; every change carries a revisions[] entry on its verse and every surviving divergence carries a row in the chapter's discrepancies[] ledger. What is published is therefore no longer a transcript of one encoded file.

Not yet independently audited. Every reading here was established and recorded by the process described above, but no fresh reader has re-derived these verses from the plates without seeing our record. When that was done for the first text we published, it found real errors — so treat this one as a first edition and check anything you intend to rely on. The evidence behind every verse is committed and readable.

71 reading disagreements were adjudicated and are recorded verse by verse. Every akṣara was legible.

Adhyāya 1 · The Ārca (Ṛgvedic) recension of the Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa, entire — the five-year yuga under Prajāpati, the reckoning of nakṣatras, months and parvans, and the closing claim that whoever knows this śāstra knows the sacrifice

पंचसंवत्सरमयं युगाध्यक्षं प्रजापतिम् । दिनर्त्वयनमासांगं प्रणम्य शिरसा शुचिः

paṃcasaṃvatsaramayaṃ yugādhyakṣaṃ prajāpatim | dinartvayanamāsāṃgaṃ praṇamya śirasā śuciḥ

Having bowed with ⟨my⟩ head, purified, to Prajāpati — who is made of the five years, the overseer of the yuga, whose limbs are the days, the seasons, the ayanas and the months —

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The sentence runs on into verse 2; the main verb is there. 'pañcasaṃvatsaramaya' fixes the five-year yuga that governs the whole text.

प्रणम्य शिरसा कालमभिवाद्य सरस्वतीम् । कालज्ञानं प्रवक्ष्यामि लगधस्य महात्मनः

praṇamya śirasā kālamabhivādya sarasvatīm | kālajñānaṃ pravakṣyāmi lagadhasya mahātmanaḥ

having bowed with ⟨my⟩ head to Time ⟨kāla⟩ and saluted Sarasvatī, I shall declare the knowledge of time ⟨kāla-jñāna⟩ of the great-souled Lagadha.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Completes the sentence begun in verse 1. Lagadha is named as the authority, not as the speaker.

ज्योतिषामयनं कृत्स्नं प्रवक्ष्याम्यनुपूर्वशः । विप्राणां सम्मतं लोके यज्ञकालार्थसिद्धये

jyotiṣāmayanaṃ kṛtsnaṃ pravakṣyāmyanupūrvaśaḥ | viprāṇāṃ sammataṃ loke yajñakālārthasiddhaye

I shall declare in due order the whole 'course of the lights' ⟨jyotiṣām ayanam⟩, approved among the twice-born in the world, for the accomplishment of the purposes of the times of sacrifice.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'jyotiṣām ayanam' is both 'the course of the heavenly lights' and the name of the discipline; the pun is in the Sanskrit and is kept in the Hindi by leaving 'अयन' standing.

निरेकं द्वादशाभ्यस्तं द्विगुणं गतसंज्ञिकम् । षष्ट्या षष्ट्या युतं द्वाभ्यां पर्वणां राशिरुच्यते

nirekaṃ dvādaśābhyastaṃ dviguṇaṃ gatasaṃjñikam | ṣaṣṭyā ṣaṣṭyā yutaṃ dvābhyāṃ parvaṇāṃ rāśirucyate

⟨The elapsed years⟩ less one, multiplied by twelve, ⟨increased by the elapsed months and⟩ doubled — that is what is termed 'elapsed' ⟨gata⟩; increased by two for every sixty and sixty: this is called the heap ⟨rāśi⟩ of parvans.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The arithmetic is exact and checkable: 5 years x 12 months x 2 = 120 parvans, +2 for each 60 = 124, the yuga's parvan total. GLOSSARY NOTE: राशि here is a 'heap/quantity', NOT a zodiacal sign — this text is pre-zodiacal.

स्वराक्रमेते सोमार्कौ यदा साकं सवासवौ । स्यात्तदादियुगं माघस्तपः शुक्लोऽयनं ह्युदक्

svarākramete somārkau yadā sākaṃ savāsavau | syāttadādiyugaṃ māghastapaḥ śuklo'yanaṃ hyudak

When the Moon and the Sun ascend the sky together, in the company of ⟨the nakṣatra of⟩ Vāsava ⟨Śraviṣṭhā⟩, then it is the beginning of the yuga: ⟨the month⟩ Māgha, ⟨the season⟩ Tapas, the bright ⟨fortnight⟩, and the ayana is indeed northward.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'savāsavau' = accompanied by the nakṣatra whose deity is the Vasus, i.e. Śraviṣṭhā/Dhaniṣṭhā (so verse 6 and verse 27 confirm). Tapas is the Vedic name of the month Māgha.

प्रपद्येते श्रविष्ठादौ सूर्याचन्द्रमसावुदक् । सार्पार्धे दक्षिणार्कस्तु माघश्रावणयोः सदा

prapadyete śraviṣṭhādau sūryācandramasāvudak | sārpārdhe dakṣiṇārkastu māghaśrāvaṇayoḥ sadā

The Sun and the Moon begin the northward ⟨course⟩ at the beginning of Śraviṣṭhā; but the Sun ⟨begins⟩ the southward at the middle of Sārpa ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ — always in ⟨the months⟩ Māgha and Śrāvaṇa ⟨respectively⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'Sārpa' = the nakṣatra of the Serpents, Āśleṣā (cf. verse 25, sarpāḥ). The two solstitial points are exactly half the circle apart: Śraviṣṭhā-start and mid-Āśleṣā.

घर्मवृद्धिरपां प्रस्थः क्षपाह्रास उदग्गतौ । दक्षिणे तौ विपर्यासः षण्मुहूर्त्ययनेन तु

gharmavṛddhirapāṃ prasthaḥ kṣapāhrāsa udaggatau | dakṣiṇe tau viparyāsaḥ ṣaṇmuhūrtyayanena tu

In the northward course the increase of the day and the decrease of the night ⟨amount to⟩ a prastha of water; in the southern ⟨course⟩ these two are reversed — at six muhūrtas per ayana.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text reads धर्मवृद्धिः (dharma-); the sense requires घर्मवृद्धिः (gharma- = the daylight/heat), which is the reading of the printed editions, and is what is rendered. The figure 'six muhūrtas per ayana' is exact and is what verse 22 computes from (12 to 18 muhūrtas).

प्रथमं सप्तमं चाहुरयनाद्यं त्रयोदश । चतुर्थं दशमं चैव द्विर्युग्मं बहुलेऽप्यृतौ

prathamaṃ saptamaṃ cāhurayanādyaṃ trayodaśa | caturthaṃ daśamaṃ caiva dviryugmaṃ bahule'pyṛtau

And they call the beginnings of the ayanas the first, the seventh and the thirteenth, and the fourth and the tenth as well; twice the pair, in the dark ⟨fortnight⟩ of the season too.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: CONTESTED, and the contest is now decided on the ink. The ordinals are the mula's own: 1st, 7th, 13th, 4th, 10th. What they count is not stated; the reading that makes the arithmetic close is ritus — an ayana is exactly 3 ritus (183 days = 3 x 61), so the ayanas open at ritus 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, and the set recurs in the yuga's second half at 16, 19, 22, 25, 28. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: this note used to end 'the 1st is not in the mula'. It was — in all fourteen manuscripts INSA collated and in Dvivedi's independent line. What was in neither was 'doubled' (द्विगुणं), which we printed as text and rendered in both languages. The series the note reasoned to and the reading the witnesses carry are the same series.

वसुस्त्वष्टा भवोऽजश्च मित्रः सर्पोऽश्विनौ जलम् । धाता कश्चायनाद्याः स्युरर्धपंचमभस्त्वृतुः

vasustvaṣṭā bhavo'jaśca mitraḥ sarpo'śvinau jalam | dhātā kaścāyanādyāḥ syurardhapaṃcamabhastvṛtuḥ

Vasu ⟨Śraviṣṭhā⟩, Tvaṣṭṛ ⟨Citrā⟩, Bhava ⟨Ārdrā⟩ and Aja ⟨Pūrva Bhādrapadā⟩, Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, Sarpa ⟨Āśleṣā⟩, the Aśvins ⟨Aśvinī⟩, Jala ⟨Pūrvāṣāḍhā⟩, Dhātṛ ⟨Uttara Phalgunī⟩ and Ka ⟨Rohiṇī⟩ — these are the beginnings of the ayanas; and a season is four and a half nakṣatras.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The deities stand for their nakṣatras. The identifications are not guesses: they are forced by the text's own parameters — the Moon advances 6.7 revolutions per ayana (183 x 67/1830), i.e. 18.9 nakṣatras, and stepping that from Śraviṣṭhā reproduces this list in order, closing on Ka = Prajāpati = Rohiṇī. 'ardhapañcamabham' = 4 1/2 nakṣatras = 27/6, one ṛtu of the solar circle.
  • Another reading: THREE LINES DIVERGE IN PADA C AND WE KEEP OURS. INSA reads धाता कश्चायनाद्याश्चाथपञ्च(म)भस्त्वृतुः — the akshara after चा was re-read at 900 dpi and enlarged and is थ, with no repha — and its apparatus says all fourteen manuscripts read पञ्चनभ. Dvivedi reads अर्यमा कोऽयनाद्याः स्युरर्धपञ्चमभस्त्वृतुः. Ours agrees with Dvivedi on the two things that matter to the arithmetic — स्युः and अर्ध- — and 4 1/2 nakshatras is 27/6, which is what one ritu of the circle must be. धाता is kept because INSA and our own line agree on it and the derived list of ten ayana-openers closes on Ka = Rohini either way. All three divergences are in the chapter's ledger.

भांशाः स्युरष्टकाः कार्याः पक्षा द्वादशकोद्गताः । एकादशगुणश्चोनः शुक्लेऽर्धं चैन्दवा यदि

bhāṃśāḥ syuraṣṭakāḥ kāryāḥ pakṣā dvādaśakodgatāḥ | ekādaśaguṇaśconaḥ śukle'rdhaṃ caindavā yadi

The nakṣatra-parts ⟨bhāṃśa⟩ are to be taken in eights; the fortnights raised by twelve; and the deduction is elevenfold; and ⟨add⟩ a half in the bright ⟨fortnight⟩, if ⟨the quantities are⟩ lunar.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: A bare computational rule; the operands are named only by their technical labels (bhāṃśa, ūna) and the verse supplies no worked example. Every numeral is carried across unchanged: eights, twelve, elevenfold, a half. Verse 11 restates the same two slots with different constants, which is the check on this rendering.

कार्या भांशाष्टकास्थाने कला एकान्नविंशतिः । ऊनस्थाने द्विसप्ततिमुद्वपेदूनसम्मिताः

kāryā bhāṃśāṣṭakāsthāne kalā ekānnaviṃśatiḥ | ūnasthāne dvisaptatimudvapedūnasammitāḥ

In place of the eights of nakṣatra-parts, nineteen kalās are to be made; in place of the deduction one should cast out seventy-three ⟨numeral disputed: seventy-two in all fourteen manuscripts⟩, reckoned as the deduction.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: CORRECTED 2026-09-08. The published text read उद्ववपेत् with a doubled व, which is not a form and gives seventeen syllables where anustubh allows sixteen; it now reads उद्वपेत् ('should cast out, subtract'), which is what the rendering always assumed. उनस्थाने likewise now reads ऊनस्थाने, as 1.13's ऊनांश already did. THE NUMERAL IS NOT SETTLED: 73 stands in our text, but INSA prints (त्रि)सप्ततिम् in its emendation brackets and its apparatus says all fourteen of its manuscripts read द्वि — i.e. 72 — in a computational verse. Dvivedi cannot be consulted here: the printed page carrying vv 11-13 is missing from the only scan of his edition we hold. The numeral is a live question and is in the chapter's ledger. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्विसप्ततिमुद्वपेदूनसम्मिताः; this sentence names त्रि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled. Dvivedi's printed p. 63 survives in the second scan of his edition, the pandit reprint (PDF p69). Read by eye at about 1.3x native, it sets ऊनस्थाने द्विसप्ततिमावपे…. The Barhaspatya 1906 (PDF p74, both columns, read by eye at about 1.1x native) and the Chaukhambha 2005 (PDF p466 and p460, read by eye at about 1.6x and 1.3x native) set द्वि too, and INSA's apparatus gives द्वि for all fourteen of its manuscripts. So the mūla now reads द्वि, 72. INSA's bracketed (त्रि) is its editor's conjecture and is kept on the ledger. The arithmetic does not force 73: the store read of the Chaukhambha 2005 commentary (aj-shivaraja-2005 page_0345) reports Tilak reaching the rule's 73 as 1 + 72 with the transmitted द्वि.]

त्र्यंशो भशेषो दिवसांशभागश्चतुर्दशस्याप्यपनीय भिन्नम् । भार्धेऽधिके चाधिगते परेऽंशेद्यावुक्तमेकं नवकैर्भवेद्यः

tryaṃśo bhaśeṣo divasāṃśabhāgaścaturdaśasyāpyapanīya bhinnam | bhārdhe'dhike cādhigate pare'ṃśedyāvuktamekaṃ navakairbhavedyaḥ

A third is the nakṣatra-remainder, ⟨and⟩ the fractional part of the day-part; and having removed the fraction of the fourteenth as well; and when more than half a nakṣatra has been carried over into the further part — ⟨fourth quarter corrupt: as transmitted it seems to say that what was stated as one arises by nines⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: PARTIAL. The fourth pāda (परेंऽशेद्यावुक्तमेकं नवकैर्भवेद्यः) does not construe as transmitted in this e-text; the bracketed clause is a flagged conjecture, not a translation, and rests only on its 'by nines' agreeing with verse 13. Pādas a–c are rendered from the text as it stands. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads परेऽंशेद्यावुक्तमेकं; this sentence names परेंऽशेद्यावुक्तमेकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

पक्षात्पंचदशाच्चोर्ध्वं तद्भुक्तमिति निर्दिशेत् । नवभिस्तूद्गतोऽंशः स्यादूनांशद्वयधिकेन तु

pakṣātpaṃcadaśāccordhvaṃ tadbhuktamiti nirdiśet | navabhistūdgato'ṃśaḥ syādūnāṃśadvayadhikena tu

And beyond the fifteenth of the fortnight one should declare that as 'elapsed' ⟨bhukta⟩; the part arises by nines, but with the deficiency-part increased by two.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Fifteen, nine and two are the mūla's own numerals. 'ūnāṃśa' is the same deduction-slot as in verses 10–11.

जौ द्रा गः खे श्वे ही रो षा श्चिन्मूषक्ण्यः सूमाधाणः । रे मृ घाः स्वापोजः कृष्यो ह ज्येष्ठा इत्यृक्षा लिंगैः

jau drā gaḥ khe śve hī ro ṣā ścinmūṣakṇyaḥ sūmādhāṇaḥ | re mṛ ghāḥ svāpojaḥ kṛṣyo ha jyeṣṭhā ityṛkṣā liṃgaiḥ

⟨The syllables⟩ jau, drā, gaḥ, khe, śve, hī, ro, ṣā, ścin, mū, ṣa, kṇyaḥ, sū, mā, dhā, ṇaḥ, re, mṛ, ghāḥ, svā, po, jaḥ, kṛ, ṣyo, ha, jye, ṣṭhā — thus the nakṣatras ⟨are given⟩ by ⟨abbreviating⟩ marks.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: PARTIAL, and deliberately so. The body of this verse is not language but a syllable-mnemonic in which each abbreviation stands for a nakṣatra; the frame ('ity ṛkṣā liṅgaiḥ') says exactly that. The syllables are transliterated, NOT decoded — assigning the 27 names here would be invention, and it needs Kuppanna Sastry's Notes (INSA 1985 printed pp. 35-60) open. CORRECTED 2026-09-08, and the correction reverses this note: it used to say the run 'has 26 items where 27 nakṣatras are required', that the run श्चिन्मूषक्ण्यः / सूमाधाणः 'cannot be segmented with confidence', and that 'only ज्येष्ठा survives as a full nakṣatra name'. All three are false of both printed editions we hold. Read syllable by syllable on the plates, the mnemonic counts 8 + 4 + 4 + 8 + 3 = 27 on each, and ज्येष्ठा is itself two abbreviations, ज्ये + ष्ठा — which is why the rendering now lists 27 items. What is genuinely open is not the count but the internal spelling: our line is Dvivedi's letter for letter (गः, ही, श्चिन्, मूषक्ण्यः) against INSA's (घः, ऽही, चिन्, मू ष ण्यः), and INSA brackets its own सू मा धा णः because its fourteen manuscripts run those four syllables together as सोमाधानः. That divergence is in the chapter's ledger.

जावाद्यंशैः समं विद्यात् पूर्वार्धे पर्व सूत्तरे । भादानं स्याच्चतुर्दश्यां काष्ठानां देविना कलाः

jāvādyaṃśaiḥ samaṃ vidyāt pūrvārdhe parva sūttare | bhādānaṃ syāccaturdaśyāṃ kāṣṭhānāṃ devinā kalāḥ

By ⟨the syllables⟩ beginning with 'jau' one should know the parvan to be the same in the first half and in the latter ⟨half⟩; the taking of the nakṣatra ⟨bhādāna⟩ falls on the fourteenth; the kalās of the kāṣṭhās ⟨are had⟩ by the 'devin' ⟨word uncertain⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'jāvādya-' picks up the mnemonic of verse 14 ('those beginning with jau'), which is why the two verses must be read together. देविना in the fourth pāda has no settled sense here and is left standing rather than resolved; the printed editions differ at this word.

कला दश सविंशा स्याद् द्वे मुहूर्तस्य नाडिके । द्युस्त्रिंशत् तत्कलानां तु षट्शती त्र्यधिका भवेत्

kalā daśa saviṃśā syād dve muhūrtasya nāḍike | dyustriṃśat tatkalānāṃ tu ṣaṭśatī tryadhikā bhavet

A nāḍikā is ten kalās with a twentieth; two nāḍikās make a muhūrta. The day is thirty ⟨muhūrtas⟩; and of those kalās it comes to six hundred and three.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The three numbers are mutually consistent: 60 nadikas x 10 1/20 kalas = 603 kalas to the day, and 30 muhurtas = 60 nadikas. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: this note used to say that consistency 'is the proof of the reading' सविंशा. It is not, and Dvivedi's own page shows why — he prints कला दश च विंशा and glosses it 'दश कला विंशा च एककलाविंशतिभागाधिका', i.e. ten kalas plus one twentieth of a kala, which is the identical value. The arithmetic is therefore silent between the two readings. On the witnesses our सविंशा is the weaker side: INSA prints (स)विंशा in its emendation brackets, its apparatus says all fourteen manuscripts read च, its own pratika index prints the manuscript form कला दश च, and Dvivedi reads च. It is left as published because it is a printed editor's reading with the same sense, and the divergence is in the chapter's ledger rather than resolved silently. 'saviṃśā' is 'with a twentieth', not 'with twenty'.

नाडिके द्वे मुहूर्तस्तु पंचाशत्पलमाढकम् । आढकात् कुम्भिका द्रोणः कुडवैर्वर्धते त्रिभिः

nāḍike dve muhūrtastu paṃcāśatpalamāḍhakam | āḍhakāt kumbhikā droṇaḥ kuḍavairvardhate tribhiḥ

Two nāḍikās are a muhūrta; fifty palas are an āḍhaka. From the āḍhaka ⟨comes⟩ the kumbhikā; the droṇa increases ⟨beyond it⟩ by three kuḍavas.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: SETTLED 2026-09-08, where this note used to declare the line unrecoverable. Dvivedi 1908 reads आढकात् कुम्भिका द्रोणः कुडवैर्वर्धते त्रिभिः and lemmatises the two disputed words in his own commentary on the same page ('आढकात् प्रसिद्धप्राचीनपरिभाषया कुम्भिका घटिका ज्ञेया'; 'द्रोणश्च कुम्भिकातस्त्रिभिः कुडवैर्वर्धते'), so kumbhika is a vessel-measure and kudava is the standard small measure of the adhaka series. Our published आढाकात्, कुम्भाको and कुटपैः were all three unattested. No ratio has been supplied from the standard tables: fifty palas and three kudavas are the mula's own numbers. INSA reads कुम्भको and कुटपैः and brackets आढ as its own supplement — its fourteen manuscripts read माषकम्/माषकात् there — and that divergence is in the chapter's ledger. These are clepsydra measures, continuing the 'prastha of water' of verse 7.

ससप्तकं भयुक् सोमः सूर्यो द्यूनि त्रयोदश । नवमानि च पंचाह्नः काष्ठाः पंचाक्षराः स्मृताः

sasaptakaṃ bhayuk somaḥ sūryo dyūni trayodaśa | navamāni ca paṃcāhnaḥ kāṣṭhāḥ paṃcākṣarāḥ smṛtāḥ

The Moon is joined with a nakṣatra ⟨for a day⟩ with a seventh ⟨reading disputed⟩; the Sun for thirteen days and five ninths; the kāṣṭhās of the day are declared to be of five syllables.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The solar figure is exact against the text's own year: 366/27 = 13 5/9 days per nakṣatra. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: this note used to call the lunar figure 'transmitted'. It is not. Three editorial lines print three different words in that pāda — ours ससप्तकं, which INSA 1985 prints inside its own emendation brackets; INSA's fourteen manuscripts ससप्तर्कुं; and Dvivedi 1908 ससप्तैकं — and the divergence is recorded as OPEN in the chapter's ledger. So the fact that a day 'with a seventh' does NOT agree with the same system, which gives 1830/1809 = 1 1/87 days, is a fact about a reading no witness confirms, not a fact about the text. The reading is left as published because nothing on disk decides between the three, and both renderings now carry a ⟨reading disputed⟩ hedge so no reader takes the figure as the text's own.

श्रविष्ठाभ्यो गणाभ्यस्तान् प्राग्विलग्नान् विनिर्दिशेत् । सूर्यान् मासान् षडभ्यस्तान् विद्याच्चान्द्रमसानृतून्

śraviṣṭhābhyo gaṇābhyastān prāgvilagnān vinirdiśet | sūryān māsān ṣaḍabhyastān vidyāccāndramasānṛtūn

From Śraviṣṭhā one should declare the ⟨nakṣatras⟩ multiplied by the group ⟨gaṇa⟩ as 'joined-before' ⟨prāg-vilagna⟩; and the months multiplied by six one should know as the lunar seasons.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: GLOSSARY NOTE: विलग्न here is 'attached, joined on', NOT the ascendant — this text has no horoscopy and no lagna in the glossary's sense; rendering it 'ascendant' would be an anachronism. Dvivedi's commentary settles गण independently: 'गणो भगणः सप्तविंशतिः', the gana is the bhagana, twenty-seven. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: this note used to say स्तर्यान् 'is corrupt in this e-text' and that the operation is 'not recoverable here'. It is not a corruption of ours. It is Kuppanna Sastry's own conjecture, and he says so on INSA printed p. 43: he saw all fourteen manuscripts read सूर्यान् and emended su into sta. Dvivedi prints a third reading again, which at 900 dpi reads as स्वाच्चान् or स्वांस्तान् and which his bhasya glosses 'स्वांस्तान् स्वनक्षत्रान्' — 'those, one's own, one's own nakshatras'. Three lines, three readings; the word is left unrendered and the divergence is in the chapter's ledger. The ablative श्रविष्ठाभ्यो in pada a, by contrast, is now supported: INSA's printed Devanagari has the locative श्रविष्ठायां, but Sastry's own romanised rearranged text prints the ablative and Dvivedi prints the ablative too. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्यान्; this sentence names स्तर्यान्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled. The mūla reads सूर्यान्, which INSA's apparatus gives for all fourteen of its manuscripts (printed p. 26, read by eye at about 0.9x native) and which the Barhaspatya 1906 (PDF p84, both columns, read by eye at about 0.9x native) and the Chaukhambha 2005 (PDF p460, read by eye at about 1.3x native) set. INSA's (स्त) is its editor's conjecture and is on the ledger. Dvivedi's third reading, read by eye on the pandit-reprint scan of his edition (PDF p71, printed p. 65) at about 2.7x native, is स्वार्क्षान्, not स्वाच्चान् or स्वांस्तान्: the mark above the second akṣara is a repha, and his bhāṣya's lemma is स्वार्क्षान्. On गण: INSA's apparatus says all its manuscripts read गुणा, and the Barhaspatya and the Chaukhambha print गुणाभ्यस्तान्; our गण rests on Dvivedi's verse line and his gloss, and the rival is on the ledger.]

अतीतपर्वभागेभ्यः शोधयेद् द्विगुणां तिथिम् । तेषु मंडलभागेषु तिथिनिष्ठांगतो रविः

atītaparvabhāgebhyaḥ śodhayed dviguṇāṃ tithim | teṣu maṃḍalabhāgeṣu tithiniṣṭhāṃgato raviḥ

From the parts of the elapsed parvans one should subtract twice the tithi; in those parts of the circle ⟨maṇḍala-bhāga⟩ stands the Sun, having reached the point fixed by the tithi.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: A solar-longitude rule stated purely in the text's own units; the size of the maṇḍala-bhāga is not given in the verse and has not been supplied.

याः पर्वभादानकलास्तासु सप्तगुणां तिथिम् । प्रक्षिपेत्तत् समूहस्तु विद्यादादानिकाः कलाः

yāḥ parvabhādānakalāstāsu saptaguṇāṃ tithim | prakṣipettat samūhastu vidyādādānikāḥ kalāḥ

Whatever are the kalās of the nakṣatra-taking ⟨bhādāna⟩ at the parvan — into those one should cast the tithi multiplied by seven; that sum one should know as the ādānika kalās.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: CORRECTED 2026-09-08. The published text read पक्षिपेत्, which is not a form; it now reads प्रक्षिपेत् ('should add'), which both exemplars print and which the rendering already assumed. पर्वाभादान likewise now reads पर्वभादान. 'Sevenfold' is the mula's own multiplier. Continues the bhadana of verse 15. आदानिकाः is OURS and Dvivedi's against INSA's आदानिकीः and is deliberately kept — see the chapter's ledger.

यदुत्तरस्यायनतो गतं स्याच् छेषं तु यद् दक्षिणतोऽयनस्य । तदेकषष्ट्याद्विगुणं विभक्तं सद्वादशं स्याद् दिवसप्रमाणम्

yaduttarasyāyanato gataṃ syāc cheṣaṃ tu yad dakṣiṇato'yanasya | tadekaṣaṣṭyādviguṇaṃ vibhaktaṃ sadvādaśaṃ syād divasapramāṇam

Whatever has elapsed of the northern ayana, and what remains of the southern ayana — that, doubled and divided by sixty-one, together with twelve, is the measure of the day.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The cleanest rule in the chapter and fully checkable: day = 12 + 2n/61 muhūrtas; at n = 183 this gives 18, and at n = 0 it gives 12 — the 3:2 longest-to-shortest day of verse 7's six-muhūrta swing.

यदर्धं दिनभागानां सदा पर्वणि पर्वणि । ऋतुशेषं तु तद् विद्यात् संख्याय सह पर्वणाम्

yadardhaṃ dinabhāgānāṃ sadā parvaṇi parvaṇi | ṛtuśeṣaṃ tu tad vidyāt saṃkhyāya saha parvaṇām

Whatever is half of the day-parts, always at each parvan — that one should know as the remainder of the season, having reckoned it together with the parvans.

इत्युपायसमुद्देशो भूयोऽप्यह्नः प्रकल्पयेत् । ज्ञेयराशिं गताभ्यस्तं विभजेज्ज्ञानराशिना

ityupāyasamuddeśo bhūyo'pyahnaḥ prakalpayet | jñeyarāśiṃ gatābhyastaṃ vibhajejjñānarāśinā

Such is the statement of the method; and further one should reckon ⟨it⟩ for the day: the quantity to be found ⟨jñeya-rāśi⟩, multiplied by the elapsed ⟨quantity⟩, one should divide by the known quantity ⟨jñāna-rāśi⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the rule of three (trairāśika) stated as a general method — one of the earliest such statements in Sanskrit. GLOSSARY NOTE: राशि again 'quantity', not a zodiacal sign.

अग्निः प्रजापतिः सोमो रुद्रोऽदितिबृहस्पती । सर्पाश्च पितरश्चैव भगश्चैवार्यमापि च

agniḥ prajāpatiḥ somo rudro'ditibṛhaspatī | sarpāśca pitaraścaiva bhagaścaivāryamāpi ca

Agni ⟨Kṛttikā⟩, Prajāpati ⟨Rohiṇī⟩, Soma ⟨Mṛgaśiras⟩, Rudra ⟨Ārdrā⟩, Aditi ⟨Punarvasu⟩ and Bṛhaspati ⟨Puṣya⟩; the Serpents ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ and the Fathers ⟨Maghā⟩; Bhaga ⟨Pūrva Phalgunī⟩ and Aryaman too ⟨Uttara Phalgunī⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Verses 25–27 are one list of the 27 nakṣatra-deities in order from Kṛttikā; the bracketed nakṣatra names are supplied, the deity names are the mūla's. Ten deities here, nine in 26, eight in 27 = 27 exactly.

सविता त्वष्टाथ वायुश्चेन्द्राग्नी मित्र एव च । इन्द्रो निर्ऋतिरापो वै विश्वेदेवास्तथैव च

savitā tvaṣṭātha vāyuścendrāgnī mitra eva ca | indro nirṛtirāpo vai viśvedevāstathaiva ca

Savitṛ ⟨Hasta⟩, Tvaṣṭṛ ⟨Citrā⟩, then Vāyu ⟨Svātī⟩, and Indrāgnī ⟨Viśākhā⟩, and Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩; Indra ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩, Nirṛti ⟨Mūla⟩, the Waters indeed ⟨Pūrvāṣāḍhā⟩, and likewise the All-gods ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Indrāgnī is the dual deity-pair, not two separate nakṣatras; it counts as one (Viśākhā).

विष्णुर्वसवो वरुणोऽज एकपात् तथैव च । अहिर्बुध्न्यस्तथा पूषा अश्विनौ यम एव च

viṣṇurvasavo varuṇo'ja ekapāt tathaiva ca | ahirbudhnyastathā pūṣā aśvinau yama eva ca

Viṣṇu ⟨Śravaṇa⟩, the Vasus ⟨Śraviṣṭhā⟩, Varuṇa ⟨Śatabhiṣaj⟩, and likewise Ajaikapād ⟨Pūrva Bhādrapadā⟩; Ahirbudhnya ⟨Uttara Bhādrapadā⟩, then Pūṣan ⟨Revatī⟩, the Aśvins ⟨Aśvinī⟩, and Yama ⟨Bharaṇī⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text reads वरुणूऽजेकपात्; वरुणोऽजैकपात् is what is rendered. Note that the Vasus here confirm Śraviṣṭhā as the 'Vāsava' of verse 5, and the Serpents in verse 25 confirm 'Sārpa' = Āśleṣā in verse 6. Abhijit is absent: this is a 27-nakṣatra list.

नक्षत्रदेवता एता एताभिर्यज्ञकर्मणि । यजमानस्य शास्त्रज्ञैर्नाम नक्षत्रजं स्मृतम्

nakṣatradevatā etā etābhiryajñakarmaṇi | yajamānasya śāstrajñairnāma nakṣatrajaṃ smṛtam

These are the deities of the nakṣatras; by these, in the work of sacrifice, the nakṣatra-born name of the sacrificer is held ⟨to be fixed⟩ by those who know the śāstra.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The one place in the chapter where the nakṣatras bear on a person rather than on the calendar — and it is a ritual naming, not a prediction.

इत्येतन्मासवर्षाणां मुहूर्तोदयपर्वणाम् । दिनर्त्वयनमासांगं व्याख्यानं लगधोऽब्रवीत्

ityetanmāsavarṣāṇāṃ muhūrtodayaparvaṇām | dinartvayanamāsāṃgaṃ vyākhyānaṃ lagadho'bravīt

Thus Lagadha spoke the exposition of the months and years, of the muhūrtas, the risings and the parvans — ⟨an exposition⟩ whose limbs are the days, the seasons, the ayanas and the months.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'dinartvayanamāsāṅgam' repeats verse 1 verbatim, closing the frame.

सोमसूर्यस्तृचरितं लोकं लोके च सम्मतिम् । सोमसूर्यस्तृचरितं विद्वान् वेदविदश्नुते

somasūryastṛcaritaṃ lokaṃ loke ca sammatim | somasūryastṛcaritaṃ vidvān vedavidaśnute

The world of the course of the Moon, the Sun ⟨and the nakṣatras⟩, and esteem in the world — the Veda-knower who knows the course of the Moon, the Sun ⟨and the nakṣatras⟩ attains ⟨these⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: THE HALVES WERE THE WRONG WAY ROUND UNTIL 2026-09-08, and the chapter's edition field blamed the other witness for it. Both exemplars set the object half first; INSA's apparatus keys its pada labels to that order independently of the typesetting; and Dvivedi writes on his own page, of exactly our arrangement, 'अत्र पूर्वोत्तरार्धयोर्विपरीत्यं लेखकदोषात् इति स्पष्टम्' — the inversion of the halves is a copyist's error, and that is clear. Both renderings were rebuilt on the corrected order. The compound is still corrupt: सोमसूर्यस्तृचरितं has no sense as it stands, and -स्तृ- is very likely a garbling of -र्क्ष- (सोमसूर्यर्क्षचरितं, 'the course of Moon, Sun and nakshatras'), which is why 'and the nakshatras' is bracketed as supplied; INSA brackets (स्तृ) as its own supplement and its apparatus says all mss read सूर्यस्ति. Dvivedi reads सन्ततिम् for सम्मतिम् in pada b; that is in the ledger.

विषुवं तद्गुणं द्वाभ्यां रूपहीनं तु षड्गुणम् । यल्लब्धं तानि पर्वाणि तथार्धं सा तिथिर्भवेत्

viṣuvaṃ tadguṇaṃ dvābhyāṃ rūpahīnaṃ tu ṣaḍguṇam | yallabdhaṃ tāni parvāṇi tathārdhaṃ sā tithirbhavet

⟨Take the serial number of⟩ the viṣuvat; multiplied by two, diminished by one (rūpa), and then multiplied by six — what is obtained, those are the parvans ⟨elapsed⟩; and half of that, that is the tithi.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: rupa is the number-word for one. tatharddham is 'half of that ⟨result⟩', not 'half a tithi'. The arithmetic is exact — parvans = (2n-1)x6 and tithi = half that gives, for n = 1...5, the tithis 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, which is the list of v.33; checked to n = 10, where 114 parvans + 57 tithis = 1738.5 civil days, the midpoint of the tenth ayana of an 1830-day yuga. RESTATED 2026-09-08: that arithmetic is a proof about a RECONSTRUCTION, not about the transmitted text, and this note used to present it as evidence from the mula. Both words doing the confirming are editorial: तथार्धं is Sastry's emendation (INSA brackets त(थार्धं); all fourteen manuscripts read तथोर्ध्वं, and Dvivedi reads तदर्धं), and 33's मथासिते is Sastry's too (all fourteen read मासी त्रयोदशीम्, which Dvivedi quotes and rejects as न साधु). All three readings of 31d yield the same computation, which is why ours is left standing; both are in the chapter's ledger.

माघशुक्लप्रवृत्तस्य पौषकृष्णसमापिनः । युगस्य पंचवर्षस्य कालज्ञानं प्रचक्षते

māghaśuklapravṛttasya pauṣakṛṣṇasamāpinaḥ | yugasya paṃcavarṣasya kālajñānaṃ pracakṣate

Of the five-year yuga, which begins in the bright ⟨fortnight⟩ of Māgha and ends in the dark ⟨fortnight⟩ of Pauṣa, ⟨the teachers⟩ declare the knowledge of time.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: pracaksate is 3rd plural with no expressed subject; the agent ⟨the teachers⟩ is supplied. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: the published mula read प्रपन्नस्य, which is carried by neither exemplar — INSA reads प्रवृत्त and says all fourteen manuscripts read प्रवृत्तस्तु, Dvivedi reads प्रवृत्तस्य, and the Chaukhambha 2005 parallel table prints प्रपन्नस्य in its YAJUSA column. The sense ('begun in') is unchanged.

तृतीयां नवमीं चैव पौर्णमासीमथासिते । षष्ठीं च विषुवान् प्रोक्तो द्वादशीं च समं भवेत्

tṛtīyāṃ navamīṃ caiva paurṇamāsīmathāsite | ṣaṣṭhīṃ ca viṣuvān prokto dvādaśīṃ ca samaṃ bhavet

The viṣuvat is declared ⟨to fall⟩ on the third ⟨tithi⟩, on the ninth, and on the full-moon day (paurṇamāsī); then, in the dark ⟨fortnight⟩, on the sixth — and on the twelfth alike.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: samam is taken adverbially, 'alike / likewise'; it may instead carry the technical sense 'equal ⟨day and night⟩', which is what visuvat itself denotes. The Hindi keeps सम visible so the reading stays open. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: the published mula read षष्ठि, which is no form of the word; it now reads षष्ठीं, as INSA prints it and as all five tithi-words in the verse require (accusatives of time). THE VERSE IS NOT OTHERWISE SETTLED. मथासिते is Sastry's emendation — all fourteen manuscripts read मासी त्रयोदशीम्, and Dvivedi quotes that reading and rejects it ('न साधु') while printing a wholly different, locative recension of his own (तृतीयायां नवम्यां च पौर्णमास्यां त्रिकत्रिकं). Both are in the chapter's ledger.

चतुर्दशीमुपवसथस्तथा भवेद्यथोदितो दिवसमुपैति चन्द्रमाः । माघशुक्लाह्निको भुङ्क्ते श्रविष्ठायां च वार्षिकीम्

caturdaśīmupavasathastathā bhavedyathodito divasamupaiti candramāḥ | māghaśuklāhniko bhuṅkte śraviṣṭhāyāṃ ca vārṣikīm

The upavasatha ⟨fast-day before the sacrifice⟩ would fall on the fourteenth, in the manner in which the Moon, once risen, carries on into the day. ⟨The Moon,⟩ whose daily ⟨reckoning begins⟩ in the bright ⟨fortnight⟩ of Māgha, traverses the yearly ⟨course⟩ in Śraviṣṭhā.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: THE HARD VERSE OF THIS UNIT — read, but not securely construed. (a) Its two halves are in different metres: the first is a pair of 13-syllable padas, the second a bare anustubh half-line, so the verse as transmitted looks conflated; Dvivedi says the same on his own page ('अत्र मन्मते श्लोकोत्तरार्धस्य त्रुटिः'). (b) yatha...tatha are correlative and adjacent, which is why uditah is taken as the participle ('as the risen Moon...') rather than as yathoditah, 'as stated above'; both are defensible. (c) varsikim is a feminine accusative with no expressed noun — ⟨course⟩ is supplied on the strength of v.32 and of RVJ 6. (d) CORRECTED AND PARTLY REVERSED 2026-09-08. One of our three readings was wrong and two were right, and the earlier note had it the other way about. मघ- is wrong: both exemplars read माघ-, the month, as v.32 spells it, and the mula is corrected. दिवसम् and भुङ्क्ते are RIGHT and are kept: Dvivedi prints both — 'यथोदितो दिवसमुपैति चन्द्रमाः', 'माघशुक्लाह्निको भुङ्क्ते' — and glosses भुङ्क्ते in his commentary, so our two readings have a second, older editorial line behind them where INSA reads दिनम् and युङ्क्ते. The metrical argument for दिवसम् (13+13) therefore stands and is now corroborated rather than isolated. Both divergences are in the chapter's ledger.

यथा शिखा मयूराणां नागानां मणयो यथा । तद्वद्वेदांगशास्त्राणां ज्यौतिषं मूर्धनि स्थितम्

yathā śikhā mayūrāṇāṃ nāgānāṃ maṇayo yathā | tadvadvedāṃgaśāstrāṇāṃ jyautiṣaṃ mūrdhani sthitam

As the crest is upon peacocks, and as the gems are upon serpents (nāga), so does jyotiṣa stand at the head of the śāstras that are the limbs of the Veda (vedāṅga).

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ⟨upon their heads⟩ is supplied in the Hindi, where the comparison needs it to land on murdhani; the English carries it in 'upon'. CORRECTED 2026-09-08: the published mula read मूर्धानि, which is not a locative of murdhan and is not a variant — it is an error. Both exemplars and four further quotations of this verse already on disk read मूर्धनि, and none reads मूर्धानि. The vrddhi spelling ज्यौतिषं is a different matter and is KEPT: it is Dvivedi's own spelling here and in his volume's title (आर्चज्यौतिषम्), where INSA prints ज्यो-. Dvivedi also records that the word itself is contested — 'अत्र गणितं स्थाने ज्यौतिषम् इति पाठो न विशेषार्थप्रद' — and Somakara is reported reading गणितं. All three points are in the chapter's ledger.

वेदा हि यज्ञार्थमभिप्रवृत्ताः कालानुपूर्वा विहिताश्च यज्ञाः । तस्मादिदं कालविधानशास्त्रं यो ज्योतिषं वेद स वेद यज्ञान्

vedā hi yajñārthamabhipravṛttāḥ kālānupūrvā vihitāśca yajñāḥ | tasmādidaṃ kālavidhānaśāstraṃ yo jyotiṣaṃ veda sa veda yajñān

The Vedas indeed have gone forth for the sake of sacrifice, and the sacrifices are ordained in the ordered sequence of time. Therefore he who knows this śāstra that ordains time, ⟨that is,⟩ jyotiṣa — he knows the sacrifices.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: CORRECTED 2026-09-08, and the correction is the opposite of what this note used to claim. It said 'This verse rests on ONE witness: the GRETIL/Sarma Rk text stops at 35 and does not carry it.' The GRETIL KEYING stops at 35; the printed Sarma text does not. INSA prints verse 36 in full on printed p. 26, Dvivedi prints it on printed p. 69, our own yajusa-jyotisha v 3 carries the same verse, and the Pyusadhara commentary on Muhurta Cintamani quotes it twice. This is the best-attested verse in the chapter, not the worst. Two readings were corrected on that evidence: वेद हि to वेदा हि (the predicate abhipravrttah is nominative plural, and the upajati pada needs a long second syllable — which this note already argued while the text went on printing the short form) and कालानुपूर्व्या to कालानुपूर्वा (nominative plural feminine agreeing with yajnah ... vihitah).

Use it freely — CC BY 4.0. This Sanskrit transcription and this English translation are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Copy them, print them, build on them; the only condition is attribution to Karma Sakha (karmasakha.com). The underlying work is ancient and in the public domain everywhere.

If you find an error, it is ours and we want it. Every reading on this page is recorded with the evidence behind it, so a disagreement can be argued about concretely rather than asserted.

Readings on this site cite texts at chapter level, with verse numbers only where our research verified the passage in a named edition. How conflicts between texts are resolved is documented on the conventions page.