भार्या त्रिवर्गकरणं शुभशीलयुक्ता शीलं शुभं भवति लग्नवशेन तस्याः तस्माद्विवाहसमयः परिचिन्त्यते हि तन्निघ्नतामुपगताः सुतशीलधर्माः
bhāryā trivargakaraṇaṃ śubhaśīlayuktā śīlaṃ śubhaṃ bhavati lagnavaśena tasyāḥ tasmādvivāhasamayaḥ paricintyate hi tannighnatāmupagatāḥ sutaśīladharmāḥ
A wife endowed with auspicious character is the instrument of the three aims ⟨dharma, artha and kāma⟩; and her character becomes auspicious by virtue of the lagna ⟨of the marriage⟩. Therefore the time of marriage is indeed carefully considered, for offspring, character and dharma have come to be multiples of that ⟨lagna⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: tannighnatām upagatāḥ is arithmetical: 'have become multiples of it'. Rendered so rather than the looser 'depend on it'.
आदौ सम्पूज्य रत्नादिभिरथ गणकं वेदयेत्स्वस्थचित्तं कन्योद्वाहं दिगीशानलहयविशिखे प्रश्नलग्नाद्यदीन्दुः दृष्टो जीवेन सद्यः परिणयनकरो गोतुलाकर्कटाख्यं वा स्यात्प्रश्नस्य लग्नं शुभखचरयुतालोकितं तद्विदध्यात्
ādau sampūjya ratnādibhiratha gaṇakaṃ vedayetsvasthacittaṃ kanyodvāhaṃ digīśānalahayaviśikhe praśnalagnādyadīnduḥ dṛṣṭo jīvena sadyaḥ pariṇayanakaro gotulākarkaṭākhyaṃ vā syātpraśnasya lagnaṃ śubhakhacarayutālokitaṃ tadvidadhyāt
First having honoured the gaṇaka ⟨astrologer⟩ with gems and the like, one should announce to him, when his mind is at ease, the marriage of the girl. If the Moon, reckoned from the praśna-lagna, stands in the 10th, 11th, 3rd, 7th or 5th and is aspected by Jupiter, ⟨that⟩ brings the marriage about at once. Or, if the lagna of the query be the one named Taurus, Libra or Cancer, joined with or aspected by benefic grahas, one should perform it.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: digīśānalahayaviśikhe is bhūtasaṃkhyā: dik 10, īśa 11, anala 3, haya 7, viśikha 5. go = Vṛṣabha (Taurus).
विषमभांशगतौ शशिभार्गवौ तनुगृहं बलिनौ यदि पश्यतः रचयतो वरलाभमिमौ यदा युगलभांशगतौ युवतिप्रदौ
viṣamabhāṃśagatau śaśibhārgavau tanugṛhaṃ balinau yadi paśyataḥ racayato varalābhamimau yadā yugalabhāṃśagatau yuvatipradau
If the Moon and Venus, strong, placed in odd signs and odd aṃśas ⟨navāṃśas⟩, aspect the tanu-gṛha ⟨the 1st house, the lagna⟩, these two bring about the gaining of a bridegroom; when they are placed in even signs and even aṃśas, they give a bride.
षष्ठाष्टस्थः प्रश्नलग्नाद्यदीन्दुर्लग्ने क्रूरः सप्तमे वा कुजः स्यात् मूर्ताविन्दुः सप्तमे तस्य भौमो रण्डा सा स्यादष्टसंवत्सरेण
ṣaṣṭhāṣṭasthaḥ praśnalagnādyadīndurlagne krūraḥ saptame vā kujaḥ syāt mūrtāvinduḥ saptame tasya bhaumo raṇḍā sā syādaṣṭasaṃvatsareṇa
If from the praśna-lagna the Moon stands in the 6th or the 8th, and a malefic is in the lagna, or Mars in the 7th; ⟨or⟩ if the Moon is in the mūrti ⟨the 1st house⟩ and Mars in the 7th from it — she will be a widow within eight years.
प्रश्नतनोर्यदि पापनभोगः पञ्चमगो रिपुदृष्टशरीरः नीचगतश्च तदा खलु कन्या सा कुलटा त्वथवा मृतवत्सा
praśnatanoryadi pāpanabhogaḥ pañcamago ripudṛṣṭaśarīraḥ nīcagataśca tadā khalu kanyā sā kulaṭā tvathavā mṛtavatsā
If from the praśna-lagna a malefic sky-goer ⟨graha⟩ is in the 5th, the body ⟨the lagna⟩ is aspected by an enemy ⟨graha⟩, and ⟨that malefic⟩ has gone to debilitation, then that girl is indeed unchaste, or else one whose children die.
यदि भवति सितातिरिक्तपक्षे तनुगृहतः समराशिगः शशाङ्कः अशुभखचरवीक्षितोऽरिरन्ध्रे भवति विवाहविनाशकारकोऽयम्
yadi bhavati sitātiriktapakṣe tanugṛhataḥ samarāśigaḥ śaśāṅkaḥ aśubhakhacaravīkṣito'rirandhre bhavati vivāhavināśakārako'yam
If in the fortnight other than the bright one ⟨the dark fortnight⟩ the Moon stands in an even sign from the tanu-gṛha ⟨the lagna⟩, aspected by inauspicious sky-goers, in the 6th or 8th, this becomes the destroyer of the marriage.
जन्मोत्थं च विलोक्य बालविधवायोगं विधाय व्रतं सावित्र्या उत पैप्पलं हि सुतया दद्यादिमां वा रहः सल्लग्नेऽच्युतमूर्तिपिप्पलघटैः कृत्वा विवाहं स्फुटं दद्यात्तां चिरजीविनेऽत्र न भवेद्दोषः पुनर्भूभवः
janmotthaṃ ca vilokya bālavidhavāyogaṃ vidhāya vrataṃ sāvitryā uta paippalaṃ hi sutayā dadyādimāṃ vā rahaḥ sallagne'cyutamūrtipippalaghaṭaiḥ kṛtvā vivāhaṃ sphuṭaṃ dadyāttāṃ cirajīvine'tra na bhaveddoṣaḥ punarbhūbhavaḥ
And having examined the yoga of early widowhood arising in the birth ⟨chart⟩, having had the daughter perform the vrata of Sāvitrī or indeed of the Pippala, one should give her ⟨in marriage⟩ — or ⟨give⟩ her in secret. Or, in a good lagna, having made a marriage with an image of Acyuta, with a pippala tree or with a pot, one should then plainly give her to a long-lived man; here there arises no fault of her becoming a punarbhū ⟨a twice-married woman⟩.
प्रश्नलग्नक्षणे यादृशापत्ययुक् स्वेच्छया कामिनी तत्र चेदाव्रजेत् कन्यका वा सुतो वा तदा पण्डितैस्तादृशापत्यमस्या विनिर्दिश्यते
praśnalagnakṣaṇe yādṛśāpatyayuk svecchayā kāminī tatra cedāvrajet kanyakā vā suto vā tadā paṇḍitaistādṛśāpatyamasyā vinirdiśyate
If at the moment of the praśna-lagna a woman comes there of her own accord accompanied by a child of whatever kind — a girl or a boy — then the learned declare for her offspring of that same kind.
शङ्खभेरीविपञ्चीरवैर्मङ्गलं जायते वैपरीत्यं तदा लक्षयेत् वायसो वा खरः श्वा शृगालोऽपि वा प्रश्नलग्नक्षणे रौति नादं यदि
śaṅkhabherīvipañcīravairmaṅgalaṃ jāyate vaiparītyaṃ tadā lakṣayet vāyaso vā kharaḥ śvā śṛgālo'pi vā praśnalagnakṣaṇe rauti nādaṃ yadi
By the sounds of the conch, the kettledrum and the lute, auspiciousness arises. But one should mark the contrary if a crow, or an ass, a dog, or a jackal utters a cry at the moment of the praśna-lagna.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: śṛtāla stands for śṛgāla (jackal); no other reading fits the metre or the series.
विश्वस्वातीवैष्णवपूर्वात्रयमैत्रैर्वस्वाग्नेयैर्वा करपीडोचितऋक्षैः वस्त्रालङ्कारादिसमेतैः फलपुष्पैः सन्तोष्यादौ स्यादनु कन्यावरणं हि
viśvasvātīvaiṣṇavapūrvātrayamaitrairvasvāgneyairvā karapīḍocitaṛkṣaiḥ vastrālaṅkārādisametaiḥ phalapuṣpaiḥ santoṣyādau syādanu kanyāvaraṇaṃ hi
On the ṛkṣas ⟨nakṣatras⟩ fit for the taking of the hand — Uttarāṣāḍhā ⟨Viśve⟩, Svātī, Śravaṇa ⟨Vaiṣṇava⟩, the three Pūrvās, Anurādhā ⟨Maitra⟩, and Dhaniṣṭhā ⟨Vasu⟩ or Kṛttikā ⟨Āgneya⟩ — having first gratified ⟨the girl⟩ with cloth, ornaments and the like and with fruits and flowers, the choosing of the girl should follow.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: vabhva is not a nakṣatra epithet. It is one akṣara from vasva (the Vasus = Dhaniṣṭhā), which this chapter uses at 6.25 (vasvajapādbhayoḥ) and 6.29 (vasvindra°); rendered Dhaniṣṭhā on that reading, but the akṣara itself is doubtful and no plate was in view.
धरणिदेवोऽथवा कन्यकासोदरः शुभदिने गीतवाद्यादिभिः संवृतः वरवृतिं वस्त्रयज्ञोपवीतादिना ध्रुवयुतैर्वह्निपूर्वात्रयैराचरेत्
dharaṇidevo'thavā kanyakāsodaraḥ śubhadine gītavādyādibhiḥ saṃvṛtaḥ varavṛtiṃ vastrayajñopavītādinā dhruvayutairvahnipūrvātrayairācaret
A brāhmaṇa ⟨a god upon earth⟩, or else the girl's own brother, on an auspicious day, surrounded by song and instrumental music, should carry out the choosing of the bridegroom with cloth, the sacred thread and the like, in the dhruva ⟨fixed⟩ nakṣatras together with Kṛttikā ⟨Vahni⟩ and the three Pūrvās.
गुरुशुद्धिवशेन कन्यकानां समवर्षेषु षडब्दकोपरिष्टात् रविशुद्धिवशाच्छुभो वराणामुभयोश्चन्द्रविशुद्धितो विवाहः
guruśuddhivaśena kanyakānāṃ samavarṣeṣu ṣaḍabdakopariṣṭāt raviśuddhivaśācchubho varāṇāmubhayoścandraviśuddhito vivāhaḥ
For girls the marriage is auspicious by virtue of the purity of Jupiter, in even years, above the sixth year; for bridegrooms by virtue of the purity of the Sun; and for both by the purity of the Moon.
मिथुनकुम्भमृगाऽलिवृषाजगे मिथुनगेऽपि रवौ त्रिलवे शुचेः अलिमृगाजगते करपीडनं भवति कार्तिकपौषमधुष्वपि
mithunakumbhamṛgā'livṛṣājage mithunage'pi ravau trilave śuceḥ alimṛgājagate karapīḍanaṃ bhavati kārtikapauṣamadhuṣvapi
When ⟨the Sun⟩ is in Gemini, Aquarius, Capricorn, Scorpio, Taurus or Aries — and also when the Sun is in Gemini in a third-part of Śuci ⟨Jyeṣṭha⟩ — and when ⟨the Sun⟩ has gone to Scorpio, Capricorn or Aries, the taking of the hand takes place, in Kārttika, Pauṣa and Madhu ⟨Caitra⟩ as well.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The syntax is compressed: the six solar signs of the first half answer to the lunar months named in the second (Scorpio–Kārttika, Capricorn–Pauṣa, Aries–Madhu/Caitra). trilava = a third part; the verse does not say of what division, so it is left as it stands.
आद्यगर्भसुतकन्ययोर्द्वयोर्जन्ममासभतिथौ करग्रहः नोचितोऽथ विबुधैः प्रशस्यते चेद् द्वितीयजनुषोः सुतप्रदः
ādyagarbhasutakanyayordvayorjanmamāsabhatithau karagrahaḥ nocito'tha vibudhaiḥ praśasyate ced dvitīyajanuṣoḥ sutapradaḥ
For the two — the son and the daughter of the first conception — the taking of the hand is not fit in the month, nakṣatra and tithi of their birth. But for the two of a second birth it is commended by the wise and gives sons.
ज्येष्ठद्वन्द्वं मध्यमं सम्प्रदिष्टं त्रिज्येष्ठं चेन्नैव युक्तं कदाऽपि केचित्सूर्यं वह्निगं प्रोज्झ्य चाऽऽहुर्नैवाऽन्योन्यं ज्येष्ठयोः स्याद्विवाहः
jyeṣṭhadvandvaṃ madhyamaṃ sampradiṣṭaṃ trijyeṣṭhaṃ cennaiva yuktaṃ kadā'pi kecitsūryaṃ vahnigaṃ projjhya cā''hurnaivā'nyonyaṃ jyeṣṭhayoḥ syādvivāhaḥ
A pair of eldest ⟨ones⟩ is declared middling; but if there be three eldest, it is never fit at all. And some, setting aside the Sun's standing in Kṛttikā ⟨Vahni⟩, say that the marriage of two eldest ⟨ones⟩ to one another should never take place.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: jyeṣṭha carries three senses at once here — the eldest son, the eldest daughter and the month Jyeṣṭha — which is why 'three jyeṣṭhas' is the forbidden case. The Sanskrit does not disambiguate and neither does this rendering.
सुतपरिणयात्षण्मासान्तः सुताकरपीडनं न च निजकुले तद्वद्वा मण्डनादपि मुण्डनं न च सहजयोर्देये भ्रात्रोः सहोदरकन्यके न सहजसुतोद्वाहोऽब्दार्धे शुभे न पितृक्रिया
sutapariṇayātṣaṇmāsāntaḥ sutākarapīḍanaṃ na ca nijakule tadvadvā maṇḍanādapi muṇḍanaṃ na ca sahajayordeye bhrātroḥ sahodarakanyake na sahajasutodvāho'bdārdhe śubhe na pitṛkriyā
Within six months of a son's marriage, the taking of a daughter's hand ⟨should⟩ not ⟨be done⟩; nor likewise, in one's own family, a tonsure after an adornment ⟨-rite⟩; nor are two uterine sisters to be given to two brothers; nor ⟨should⟩ the marriage of a brother and of a son ⟨fall⟩ within half a year; nor ⟨should⟩ the rite for the fathers ⟨be done⟩ during an auspicious ⟨rite⟩.
वध्वा वरस्याऽपि कुले त्रिपूरुषे नाशं व्रजेत्कश्चन निश्चयोत्तरम् मासोत्तरं तत्र विवाह इष्यते शान्त्याऽथवा सूतकनिर्गमे परैः
vadhvā varasyā'pi kule tripūruṣe nāśaṃ vrajetkaścana niścayottaram māsottaraṃ tatra vivāha iṣyate śāntyā'thavā sūtakanirgame paraiḥ
If in the family of the bride, or of the bridegroom too, within three generations someone should die after the settlement ⟨of the betrothal⟩, then the marriage is desired there after a month; or, by others, on a propitiatory rite ⟨being done⟩ or on the passing off of the sūtaka ⟨birth-or-death impurity⟩.
चूडा व्रतं चाऽपि विवाहतो व्रताच्चूडा च नेष्टा पुरुषत्रयान्तरे वधूप्रवेशाच्च सुताविनिर्गमः षण्मासतो वाऽब्दविभेदतः शुभः
cūḍā vrataṃ cā'pi vivāhato vratāccūḍā ca neṣṭā puruṣatrayāntare vadhūpraveśācca sutāvinirgamaḥ ṣaṇmāsato vā'bdavibhedataḥ śubhaḥ
The tonsure and the vrata ⟨upanayana⟩ after a marriage, and the tonsure after a vrata, are not desired within three generations. And the going out of a daughter after the entry of a bride is auspicious after six months, or by a difference of a year.
श्वश्रूविनाशमहिजौ सुतरां विधत्तः कन्यासुतौ निऋतिजौ श्वशुरं हतश्च ज्येष्ठाभजाततनया स्वधवाग्रजं च शक्राग्निजा भवति देवरनाशकर्त्री
śvaśrūvināśamahijau sutarāṃ vidhattaḥ kanyāsutau niṛtijau śvaśuraṃ hataśca jyeṣṭhābhajātatanayā svadhavāgrajaṃ ca śakrāgnijā bhavati devaranāśakartrī
A girl and a boy born under Ahi ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ bring about the destruction of the mother-in-law most surely; those born under Nirṛti ⟨Mūla⟩ kill the father-in-law. A daughter born under the Jyeṣṭhā nakṣatra ⟨destroys⟩ her own husband's elder brother; and one born under Śakrāgni ⟨Viśākhā⟩ becomes the destroyer of the husband's younger brother.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: kanyā'sutau: the two verbs of the first half (vidhattaḥ, hataḥ) are dual and want a dual subject, which only the dvandva kanyā-sutau ('a girl and a boy') supplies; the e-text's avagraha would give kanyā + asutau, which yields no sense. Read as kanyāsutau.
- Corroboration: ⚠ THIS VERSE MUST NOT BE READ ALONE, and the reason is a safety one. Taken by itself it tells a family that a girl born under Mūla will destroy her father-in-law. The very next verse withdraws part of that: 6.20 ends तयोः शुभे — 'auspicious for THOSE TWO' — naming neither, and तयोः points back to the śvaśura and śvaśrū of this verse. 6.20 exempts the last pāda of Mūla and the first pāda of Āśleṣā for the father- and mother-in-law, and the first three pādas of Viśākhā for the husband's younger brother. 6.20 is an exception clause with no rule of its own; this verse is a set of death-predictions with its exception removed. Any consumer that quotes 6.19 without 6.20 states something the text does not say. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, span [19,20].
द्वीशाद्यपादत्रयजा कन्या देवरसौख्यदा मूलान्त्यपादसार्पाद्यपादजाते तयोः शुभे
dvīśādyapādatrayajā kanyā devarasaukhyadā mūlāntyapādasārpādyapādajāte tayoḥ śubhe
A girl born in the first three pādas of Dvīśa ⟨Viśākhā⟩ gives happiness to the husband's younger brother. The two born in the last pāda of Mūla and in the first pāda of Sārpa ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ are auspicious for those two ⟨the father-in-law and the mother-in-law⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: tayoḥ ('for those two') points back to the śvaśura and śvaśrū of 6.19, whose destroyers were the Mūla-born and Āśleṣā-born; this verse exempts one pāda of each.
वर्णो वश्यं तथा तारा योनिश्च ग्रहमैत्रकं गणमैत्रं भकूटं च नाडी चैते गुणाधिकाः
varṇo vaśyaṃ tathā tārā yoniśca grahamaitrakaṃ gaṇamaitraṃ bhakūṭaṃ ca nāḍī caite guṇādhikāḥ
Varṇa, vaśya, and likewise tārā, yoni, the friendship of the grahas, gaṇa-friendship, bhakūṭa, and nāḍī — these are pre-eminent among the guṇas.
6.22a reading here is contested द्विजा झषालिकर्कटास्ततो नृपा विशोऽङ्घ्रिजाः वरस्य वर्णतोऽधिका वधूर्न शस्यते बुधैः
dvijā jhaṣālikarkaṭāstato nṛpā viśo'ṅghrijāḥ varasya varṇato'dhikā vadhūrna śasyate budhaiḥ
Pisces, Scorpio and Cancer are twice-born ⟨brāhmaṇa⟩; thereafter ⟨Aries, Leo, Sagittarius⟩ are kings ⟨kṣatriya⟩, ⟨Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn⟩ are viś ⟨vaiśya⟩, ⟨Gemini, Libra, Aquarius⟩ are foot-born ⟨śūdra⟩. A bride higher than the bridegroom in varṇa is not commended by the wise.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
द्विजा झषालिकर्कटास्ततो नृपा विशॐऽघ्रिजाः वरस्य वर्णतोऽधिका वधूर्न शस्यते बुधैः
2 notes on this verse
- What the page would not yield: SOURCE CORRUPTION, carried through unrepaired: the `ॐ` in this verse is not the praṇava. It stands where ों belongs — विशॐऽघ्रिजाः is विशोऽङ्घ्रिजाः, वारॐऽशको is वारोंऽशको — one more collapse of the same encoding path that produced this file's `Þ`. It is left in place for the same reason.
- About this edition: The mūla's `ॐ` in विशॐऽघ्रिजाः is encoding wreckage, not the praṇava: read विशोऽङ्घ्रिजाः. The word is legible and the sense is not in doubt. The three signs of each of the last three varṇas are not named in the verse; they follow from the fixed order of the rāśis and are supplied in ⟨⟩.
हित्वा मृगेन्द्रं नरराशिवश्याः सर्वे तथैषां जलजास्तु भक्ष्याः सर्वेऽपि सिंहस्य वशे विनाऽलिं ज्ञेयं नराणां व्यवहारतोऽन्यत्
hitvā mṛgendraṃ nararāśivaśyāḥ sarve tathaiṣāṃ jalajāstu bhakṣyāḥ sarve'pi siṃhasya vaśe vinā'liṃ jñeyaṃ narāṇāṃ vyavahārato'nyat
Excepting Leo, all the human signs are subject ⟨vaśya⟩ to these ⟨human signs⟩; and the water-born ⟨signs⟩ are their food. All, save Scorpio, are under the sway of Leo. For the human ⟨signs⟩ the rest is to be known from usage.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The verse number २३ is ABSENT from this e-text: verse 22 is followed by four unnumbered lines and then the marker २४. The boundary is set here on the metre — this printing sets one half-verse per line, and the four lines run 22/22/16/16 syllables, so an Upajāti verse ends here and an anuṣṭubh begins. The 1907 Nirṇayasāgara printing with the Pīyūṣadhārā numbers this same line ॥२३॥. Nothing was renumbered and no text was moved; only the missing numeral is supplied.
कन्यर्क्षाद्वरभं यावत् कन्याभं वरभादपि गणयेन्नवहृच्छेषे त्रीष्वद्रिभमसत्स्मृतम्
kanyarkṣādvarabhaṃ yāvat kanyābhaṃ varabhādapi gaṇayennavahṛccheṣe trīṣvadribhamasatsmṛtam
Count from the girl's ṛkṣa ⟨nakṣatra⟩ as far as the bridegroom's ṛkṣa, and the girl's ṛkṣa from the bridegroom's too; divide by nine, and in the remainder the 3rd, the 5th and the 7th ṛkṣa are held to be bad.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: trīṣvadribham resolves as tri + iṣu + adri + bham — bhūtasaṃkhyā, iṣu = 5 and adri = 7. Three numbers, not the locative plural of tri.
अश्विन्यम्बुपयोर्हयो निगदितः स्वात्यर्कयोः कासरः सिंहो वस्वजपाद्भयोः समुदितो याम्यान्त्ययोः कुञ्जरः मेषो देवपुरोहितानलभयोः कर्णाम्बुनोर्वानरः स्याद्वैश्वाभिजितोस्तथैव नकुलश्चान्द्राब्जयोन्योरहिः
aśvinyambupayorhayo nigaditaḥ svātyarkayoḥ kāsaraḥ siṃho vasvajapādbhayoḥ samudito yāmyāntyayoḥ kuñjaraḥ meṣo devapurohitānalabhayoḥ karṇāmbunorvānaraḥ syādvaiśvābhijitostathaiva nakulaścāndrābjayonyorahiḥ
For Aśvinī and Śatabhiṣaj ⟨Ambupa⟩ the horse is declared; for Svātī and Hastā ⟨Arka⟩ the buffalo; the lion is said for Dhaniṣṭhā ⟨Vasu⟩ and Pūrvabhādrapadā ⟨Ajapād⟩; for Bharaṇī ⟨Yāmya⟩ and Revatī ⟨Antya⟩ the elephant; the ram for Puṣya ⟨Devapurohita⟩ and Kṛttikā ⟨Anala⟩; for Śravaṇa ⟨Karṇa⟩ and Pūrvāṣāḍhā ⟨Ambu⟩ the monkey; likewise the mongoose for Uttarāṣāḍhā ⟨Vaiśva⟩ and Abhijit; and for the two yonis of Mṛgaśira ⟨Cāndra⟩ and Rohiṇī ⟨Abja⟩, the serpent.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: abhyupa is not a nakṣatra epithet; read ambupa (Varuṇa) = Śatabhiṣaj, which is the horse-yoni's standard partner to Aśvinī. abja here is Brahmā the lotus-born, i.e. Rohiṇī, the standard serpent-yoni partner to Mṛgaśira; both identifications come from the yoni-series itself and neither akṣara was checked against a plate.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.25–6.26. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The yoni (animal class) of the bride's and the bridegroom's nakṣatras — the fourteen assignments of v.25 and the further seven of v.26 RESULT: the yoni is settled for the two by the pāda; and where there is great mutual enmity between the two nakṣatra-yonis, the match is to be rejected WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.25 is fourteen nakṣatra→animal equations and states NO consequence whatever; the operative instruction — 'where there is great mutual enmity between two nakṣatra-yonis, one should reject it' — stands at the very end of v.26. So the yoni-kūṭa, one of the eight kūṭas listed at v.21, is a rule whose table is in one verse and whose verdict in the next. CAVEATS the apparatus raises inside this span: 'abhyupa is not a nakṣatra epithet' (read ambupa = Śatabhiṣaj); v.26's 'Þ' is encoding wreckage for ध्न् (bu-dhnya = Uttarabhādrapadā); v.26's 'maghāyonyoḥ names only one nakṣatra where the dual wants two', with Pūrvaphalgunī supplied; and 'yoniḥ pādagayoḥ is syntactically obscure'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
6.26a reading here is contested ज्येष्ठामैत्रभयोः कुरङ्ग उदितो मूलार्द्रयोः श्वा तथा मार्जारोऽदितिसार्पयोरथ मघायोन्योस्तथैवोन्दुरुः व्याघ्रो द्वीशभचित्रयोरपि च गौरर्यम्णबुध्न्यर्क्षयोर्योनिः पादगयोः परस्परमहावैरं भयोन्योस्त्यजेत्
jyeṣṭhāmaitrabhayoḥ kuraṅga udito mūlārdrayoḥ śvā tathā mārjāro'ditisārpayoratha maghāyonyostathaivonduruḥ vyāghro dvīśabhacitrayorapi ca gauraryamṇabudhnyarkṣayoryoniḥ pādagayoḥ parasparamahāvairaṃ bhayonyostyajet
For Jyeṣṭhā and Anurādhā ⟨Maitra⟩ the antelope is said; for Mūla and Ārdrā likewise the dog; the cat for Punarvasu ⟨Aditi⟩ and Āśleṣā ⟨Sārpa⟩; and then, in the same way, the rat for Maghā ⟨and Pūrvaphalgunī⟩; the tiger too for Viśākhā ⟨Dvīśa⟩ and Citrā; and the cow for the nakṣatras of Aryaman ⟨Uttaraphalgunī⟩ and Budhnya ⟨Uttarabhādrapadā⟩. The yoni ⟨is settled⟩ for the two by the pāda; where there is great mutual enmity between two nakṣatra-yonis, one should reject it.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
ज्येष्ठामैत्रभयोः कुरङ्ग उदितो मूलार्द्रयोः श्वा तथा मार्जारोऽदितिसार्पयोरथ मघायोन्योस्तथैवोन्दुरुः व्याघ्रो द्वीशभचित्रयोरपि च गौरर्यम्णबुÞयर्क्षयो र्योनिः पादगयोः परस्परमहावैरं भयोन्योस्त्यजेत्
3 notes on this verse
- What the page would not yield: SOURCE CORRUPTION, carried through unrepaired: the character `Þ` (U+00DE) in this verse is not Devanāgarī and is not a reading. It stands where ध्न् belongs — in this e-text it occurs only inside अहिर्बुध्न्य (the nakṣatra Uttara Bhādrapadā's regent) and compounds of it, so बुÞय is to be read बुध्न्य. It is encoding wreckage upstream of us; it is left in place because emending letters with no plate in view is not something a machine parse may do.
- About this edition: Three things in this verse are not clean. (1) The mūla's `Þ` in गौरर्यम्णबुÞयर्क्षयोः is encoding wreckage for ध्न्: बुÞय = बुध्न्य, Ahirbudhnya = Uttarabhādrapadā; the sense is not in doubt because the cow-yoni's pair is fixed. (2) maghāyonyoḥ names only one nakṣatra where the dual wants two; Pūrvaphalgunī is supplied in ⟨⟩ as the standard rat-yoni partner, and the pāda is metrically complete at 19 syllables, so nothing has dropped out of the line. (3) yoniḥ pādagayoḥ is syntactically obscure — 'the yoni of the two who are in the pāda' is the most a literal reading gives; rendered flat rather than smoothed.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.25–6.26. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The yoni (animal class) of the bride's and the bridegroom's nakṣatras — the fourteen assignments of v.25 and the further seven of v.26 RESULT: the yoni is settled for the two by the pāda; and where there is great mutual enmity between the two nakṣatra-yonis, the match is to be rejected WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.25 is fourteen nakṣatra→animal equations and states NO consequence whatever; the operative instruction — 'where there is great mutual enmity between two nakṣatra-yonis, one should reject it' — stands at the very end of v.26. So the yoni-kūṭa, one of the eight kūṭas listed at v.21, is a rule whose table is in one verse and whose verdict in the next. CAVEATS the apparatus raises inside this span: 'abhyupa is not a nakṣatra epithet' (read ambupa = Śatabhiṣaj); v.26's 'Þ' is encoding wreckage for ध्न् (bu-dhnya = Uttarabhādrapadā); v.26's 'maghāyonyoḥ names only one nakṣatra where the dual wants two', with Pūrvaphalgunī supplied; and 'yoniḥ pādagayoḥ is syntactically obscure'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
मित्राणि द्युमणेः कुजेज्यशशिनः शुक्रार्कजौ वैरिणौ सौम्यश्चास्य समो विधोर्बुधरवी मित्रे न चास्य द्विषत् शेषाश्चास्य समाः कुजस्य सुहृदश्चन्द्रेज्यसूर्याः बुधः शत्रुः शुक्रशनी समौ च शशभृत्सूनोः सिताहस्करौ
mitrāṇi dyumaṇeḥ kujejyaśaśinaḥ śukrārkajau vairiṇau saumyaścāsya samo vidhorbudharavī mitre na cāsya dviṣat śeṣāścāsya samāḥ kujasya suhṛdaścandrejyasūryāḥ budhaḥ śatruḥ śukraśanī samau ca śaśabhṛtsūnoḥ sitāhaskarau
The friends of the Sun are Mars, Jupiter and the Moon; Venus and Saturn are his two enemies; and Mercury is neutral to him. Mercury and the Sun are the Moon's friends, and he has no enemy; the rest are neutral to him. Mars's well-wishers are the Moon, Jupiter and the Sun; Mercury is his enemy; Venus and Saturn are neutral. Of Mercury ⟨the Moon's son⟩, Venus and the Sun —
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The sentence about Mercury runs on into 6.28; the two verses are one table and cannot be read apart.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.27–6.28. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The natural friendship, enmity and neutrality of the seven grahas — the graha-maitra kūṭa RESULT: Sun: friends Mars, Jupiter, Moon; enemies Venus, Saturn; neutral Mercury. Moon: friends Mercury, Sun; no enemy; rest neutral. Mars: friends Moon, Jupiter, Sun; enemy Mercury; neutral Venus, Saturn. Mercury: friends Venus and the Sun (27) — enemy the Moon; neutral Jupiter, Saturn, Mars (28). Jupiter, Venus and Saturn as v.28 gives them WHY THIS IS RECORDED: The only dash-flagged pair in this chapter, and the apparatus states it: 'The sentence about Mercury runs on into 6.28; the two verses are one table and cannot be read apart.' Mercury's row is literally split down the middle — his friends are the last words of v.27 and his enemy the first words of v.28 — so a citation of either verse alone yields a friendship table with one graha half-described and three grahas missing. Since graha-maitra is one of the eight kūṭas scored at v.21, half the table means a wrong score. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
मित्रे चाऽस्य रिपुः शशी गुरुशनिक्ष्माजाः समा गीष्पतेर्मित्राण्यर्ककुजेन्दवो बुधसितौ शत्रू समः सूर्यजः मित्रे सौम्यशनी कवेः शशिरवी शत्रू कुजेज्यौ समौ मित्रे शुक्रबुधौ शनेः शशिरविक्ष्माजा द्विषोऽन्यः समः
mitre cā'sya ripuḥ śaśī guruśanikṣmājāḥ samā gīṣpatermitrāṇyarkakujendavo budhasitau śatrū samaḥ sūryajaḥ mitre saumyaśanī kaveḥ śaśiravī śatrū kujejyau samau mitre śukrabudhau śaneḥ śaśiravikṣmājā dviṣo'nyaḥ samaḥ
— are his two friends, and the Moon his enemy; Jupiter, Saturn and Mars are neutral. Jupiter's friends are the Sun, Mars and the Moon; Mercury and Venus are his two enemies; Saturn is neutral. Mercury and Saturn are Venus's two friends; the Moon and the Sun are his two enemies; Mars and Jupiter are neutral. Venus and Mercury are Saturn's two friends; the Moon, the Sun and Mars are his foes; the other ⟨Jupiter⟩ is neutral.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मित्रे चऽस्य रिपुः शशी गुरुशनिक्ष्माजाः समा गीष्पते र्मित्राण्यर्ककुजेन्दवो बुधसितौ शत्रू समः सूर्यजः मित्रे सौम्यशनी कवेः शशिरवी शत्रू कुजेज्यौ समौ मित्रे शुक्रबुधौ शनेः शशिरविक्ष्माजा द्विषोऽन्यः समः
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.27–6.28. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The natural friendship, enmity and neutrality of the seven grahas — the graha-maitra kūṭa RESULT: Sun: friends Mars, Jupiter, Moon; enemies Venus, Saturn; neutral Mercury. Moon: friends Mercury, Sun; no enemy; rest neutral. Mars: friends Moon, Jupiter, Sun; enemy Mercury; neutral Venus, Saturn. Mercury: friends Venus and the Sun (27) — enemy the Moon; neutral Jupiter, Saturn, Mars (28). Jupiter, Venus and Saturn as v.28 gives them WHY THIS IS RECORDED: The only dash-flagged pair in this chapter, and the apparatus states it: 'The sentence about Mercury runs on into 6.28; the two verses are one table and cannot be read apart.' Mercury's row is literally split down the middle — his friends are the last words of v.27 and his enemy the first words of v.28 — so a citation of either verse alone yields a friendship table with one graha half-described and three grahas missing. Since graha-maitra is one of the eight kūṭas scored at v.21, half the table means a wrong score. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
रक्षोनराऽमरगणाः क्रमतो मघाहिवस्विन्द्रमूलवरुणानलतक्षराधाः पूर्वोत्तरात्रयविधातृयमेशभानि मैत्रादितीन्दुहरिपौष्णमरुल्लघूनि
rakṣonarā'maragaṇāḥ kramato maghāhivasvindramūlavaruṇānalatakṣarādhāḥ pūrvottarātrayavidhātṛyameśabhāni maitrāditīnduharipauṣṇamarullaghūni
The rākṣasa, human and deva gaṇas, in order: Maghā, Āśleṣā ⟨Ahi⟩, Dhaniṣṭhā ⟨Vasu⟩, Jyeṣṭhā ⟨Indra⟩, Mūla, Śatabhiṣaj ⟨Varuṇa⟩, Kṛttikā ⟨Anala⟩, Citrā ⟨Takṣan⟩ and Viśākhā ⟨Rādhā⟩; the nakṣatras of the three Pūrvās and the three Uttarās, Rohiṇī ⟨Vidhātṛ⟩, Bharaṇī ⟨Yama⟩ and Ārdrā ⟨Īśa⟩; ⟨and⟩ Anurādhā ⟨Maitra⟩, Punarvasu ⟨Aditi⟩, Mṛgaśira ⟨Indu⟩, Śravaṇa ⟨Hari⟩, Revatī ⟨Pauṣṇa⟩, Svātī ⟨Marut⟩ and the light ones ⟨Aśvinī, Puṣya, Hastā⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: mūrvottarātraya is read pūrvottarātraya ('the three Pūrvās and the three Uttarās'): mūrva is no epithet, the metre is indifferent between मू and पू (both guru in the Vasantatilakā's first syllable), and only that reading yields exactly nine manuṣya-gaṇa nakṣatras with Vidhātṛ, Yama and Īśa. Each of the three lists here comes out at exactly nine, which is the check on the whole verse. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पूर्वोत्तरात्रयविधातृयमेशभानि; this sentence names mūrvottarātraya, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.29–6.30. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The gaṇa (rākṣasa, manuṣya, deva) of the bride's and bridegroom's nakṣatras — the three lists of nine, in v.29 RESULT: within one's own gaṇa the affection is of the very highest; between deva and human, middling; between asura and human, DEATH; between asura and deva, enmity absolutely (v.30) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.29 is three bare lists of nakṣatra-regents and states no consequence; v.30 states four consequences — one of them death — and never says which nakṣatra belongs to which gaṇa. Neither is usable alone, and 'MC 6.30: an asura and a human gives death' is exactly the kind of sentence an app would utter with no way to apply it. The apparatus also records a reading inside v.29 ('mūrvottarātraya is read pūrvottarātraya') justified by the count: 'Each of the three lists here comes out at exactly nine, which is the check on the whole verse' — so the membership itself rests on an arithmetic check across the whole list. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पूर्वोत्तरात्रयविधातृयमेशभानि; this sentence names 'mūrvottarātraya, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
निजनिजगणमध्ये प्रीतिरत्युत्तमा स्या दमरमनुजयोः सा मध्यमा सम्प्रदिष्टा असुरमनुजयोश्चेन्मृत्युरेव प्रदिष्टो दनुजविबुधयोः स्याद्वैरमेकान्ततोऽत्र
nijanijagaṇamadhye prītiratyuttamā syā damaramanujayoḥ sā madhyamā sampradiṣṭā asuramanujayoścenmṛtyureva pradiṣṭo danujavibudhayoḥ syādvairamekāntato'tra
Within one's own gaṇa the affection is of the very highest; between a deva and a human it is declared middling. If it be between an asura and a human, death itself is declared; and between an asura and a deva there is here enmity, absolutely.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.29–6.30. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The gaṇa (rākṣasa, manuṣya, deva) of the bride's and bridegroom's nakṣatras — the three lists of nine, in v.29 RESULT: within one's own gaṇa the affection is of the very highest; between deva and human, middling; between asura and human, DEATH; between asura and deva, enmity absolutely (v.30) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.29 is three bare lists of nakṣatra-regents and states no consequence; v.30 states four consequences — one of them death — and never says which nakṣatra belongs to which gaṇa. Neither is usable alone, and 'MC 6.30: an asura and a human gives death' is exactly the kind of sentence an app would utter with no way to apply it. The apparatus also records a reading inside v.29 ('mūrvottarātraya is read pūrvottarātraya') justified by the count: 'Each of the three lists here comes out at exactly nine, which is the check on the whole verse' — so the membership itself rests on an arithmetic check across the whole list. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
मृत्युः षडष्टके ज्ञेयोऽपत्यहानिर्नवात्मजे द्विर्द्वादशे निर्धनत्वं द्वयोरन्यत्र सौख्यकृत्
mṛtyuḥ ṣaḍaṣṭake jñeyo'patyahānirnavātmaje dvirdvādaśe nirdhanatvaṃ dvayoranyatra saukhyakṛt
Death is to be known in the six-eight ⟨relation of the two moon-signs⟩; loss of children in the nine-five; want of wealth in the two-twelve. Anywhere else ⟨the relation⟩ of the two brings happiness.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.31–6.32. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The bhakūṭa relation of the two moon-signs having been DECLARED BAD (six-eight, nine-five, two-twelve — v.31), and then a single lordship of both signs, or friendship of the two rāśi lords with nāḍī- and nakṣatra-purity (v.32) RESULT: the marriage is nevertheless auspicious WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.32 opens 'prokte duṣṭabhakūṭake' — 'when the bhakūṭa HAS BEEN DECLARED bad' — an explicit backward reference to a declaration made only in v.31; v.32 states no bhakūṭa relation of its own. Cited alone, 6.31 predicts death, childlessness and poverty with the cancellations removed, and 6.32 cancels a fault it never names. CAVEAT: the apparatus says v.32's second half is damaged — 'anyarkṣai'śapayor balitvasasrite is not construable as it stands', and the rendering rests on an emendation that 'is a reading, not a certainty'. v.33 carries further cancellations but is a complete sentence and was not folded in. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
प्रोक्ते दुष्टभकूटके परिणयस्त्वेकाधिपत्ये शुभो ऽथो राशीश्वरसौहृदेऽपि गदितो नाड्यृक्षशुद्धिर्यदि अन्यर्क्षेऽशपयोर्बलित्वसखिते नाड्यृक्षशुद्धौ तथा ताराशुद्धिवशेन राशिवशताभावे निरुक्तो बुधैः
prokte duṣṭabhakūṭake pariṇayastvekādhipatye śubho 'tho rāśīśvarasauhṛde'pi gadito nāḍyṛkṣaśuddhiryadi anyarkṣe'śapayorbalitvasakhite nāḍyṛkṣaśuddhau tathā tārāśuddhivaśena rāśivaśatābhāve nirukto budhaiḥ
Even when the bhakūṭa has been declared bad, marriage is auspicious under a single lordship ⟨of both signs⟩; and it is likewise declared ⟨permissible⟩ when the lords of the two rāśis are friends, provided there is nāḍī- and nakṣatra-purity. ⟨And⟩ when, ⟨the moons standing⟩ in other asterisms, the two navāṃśa lords are possessed of strength and of mutual friendship, and there is nāḍī- and nakṣatra-purity likewise, then by force of tārā-śuddhi ⟨marriage⟩ is declared by the wise even in the absence of the rāśi-relation.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The second half of this e-text line is damaged: `अन्यर्क्षैऽशपयोर्बलित्वसस्रिते` is not construable as it stands. It is rendered here as anya-ṛkṣe aṃśapayoḥ balitva-saṃśrite ('in another asterism, the two aṃśa-lords being established in strength'), which the surrounding rule (v. 33 makes navāṃśa-lord friendship a substitute for bhakūṭa) supports; the ending -sasrite is not a Sanskrit form and the emendation to -saṃśrite is a reading, not a certainty. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads अन्यर्क्षेऽशपयोर्बलित्वसस्रिते; this sentence names अन्यर्क्षैऽशपयोर्बलित्वसस्रिते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बलित्वसखिते for बलित्वसस्रिते, and the conjectural -saṃśrite is withdrawn. The Nirṇayasāgara 1907 (mc-piyushadhara-1907) was read by eye on its 600 ppi master. Its mūla at store p.269 ends …बलित्वसखिते नाड्यृक्षशुद्धौ तथा, the last akṣara ते, read at about 2.3x native (the disputed akṣara, at about 2.7x to 3.0x, reads as a स whose thin tail the bilevel scan partly dropped, and the ruling does not rest on it). Govinda's Pīyūṣadhārā at store p.272, read at about 2.3x native, quotes बलित्वसखिते and parses it बलित्वं च सखिता च प्रथमाद्विवचनांतं पदं, सखिता being परस्परमैत्री. So the second half construes: the two aṃśa lords are possessed of strength and of mutual friendship. This note describes the earlier text.]
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.31–6.32. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The bhakūṭa relation of the two moon-signs having been DECLARED BAD (six-eight, nine-five, two-twelve — v.31), and then a single lordship of both signs, or friendship of the two rāśi lords with nāḍī- and nakṣatra-purity (v.32) RESULT: the marriage is nevertheless auspicious WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.32 opens 'prokte duṣṭabhakūṭake' — 'when the bhakūṭa HAS BEEN DECLARED bad' — an explicit backward reference to a declaration made only in v.31; v.32 states no bhakūṭa relation of its own. Cited alone, 6.31 predicts death, childlessness and poverty with the cancellations removed, and 6.32 cancels a fault it never names. CAVEAT: the apparatus says v.32's second half is damaged — 'anyarkṣai'śapayor balitvasasrite is not construable as it stands', and the rendering rests on an emendation that 'is a reading, not a certainty'. v.33 carries further cancellations but is a complete sentence and was not folded in. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads अन्यर्क्षेऽशपयोर्बलित्वसस्रिते; this sentence names 'anyarkṣai'śapayor, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the caveat no longer holds. The mūla now reads बलित्वसखिते, which the 1907 Nirṇayasāgara's own Pīyūṣadhārā quotes and parses as बलित्वं च सखिता च, read by eye on its plate (store p.272) at about 2.3x native, so v.32's second half construes without an emendation: the two aṃśa lords possessed of strength and of mutual friendship. See the edition note on this verse.]
मैत्र्यां राशिस्वामिनोरंशनाथद्वन्द्वस्यापि स्याद्गणानां न दोषः खेटारित्वं नाशयेत्सद्भकूटं खेटप्रीतिश्चापि दुष्टं भकूटम्
maitryāṃ rāśisvāminoraṃśanāthadvandvasyāpi syādgaṇānāṃ na doṣaḥ kheṭāritvaṃ nāśayetsadbhakūṭaṃ kheṭaprītiścāpi duṣṭaṃ bhakūṭam
When there is friendship of the two rāśi lords, and likewise of the pair of navāṃśa lords, there is no fault of the gaṇas. A good bhakūṭa destroys the enmity of the grahas; and the friendship of the grahas likewise ⟨destroys⟩ a bad bhakūṭa.
6.34a reading here is contested ज्येष्ठारौद्रार्यमाम्भःपतिभयुगयुगं दास्रभं चैकनाडी पुष्येन्दुत्वाष्ट्रमित्रान्तकवसुजलभं योनिबुध्न्ये च मध्या वाय्वग्निव्यालविश्वोडुयुगयुगमथो पौष्णभं चापरा स्याद् दम्पत्योरेकनाड्यां परिणयनमसन्मध्यनाड्यां हि मृत्युः
jyeṣṭhāraudrāryamāmbhaḥpatibhayugayugaṃ dāsrabhaṃ caikanāḍī puṣyendutvāṣṭramitrāntakavasujalabhaṃ yonibudhnye ca madhyā vāyvagnivyālaviśvoḍuyugayugamatho pauṣṇabhaṃ cāparā syād dampatyorekanāḍyāṃ pariṇayanamasanmadhyanāḍyāṃ hi mṛtyuḥ
Jyeṣṭhā, Raudra's ⟨Ārdrā⟩, Aryaman's ⟨Uttara Phalgunī⟩ and the Water-lord's ⟨Śatabhiṣaj⟩ asterisms, taken pair by pair ⟨each with the one following⟩, together with the Dasras' asterism ⟨Aśvinī⟩, are the first nāḍī. Puṣya, Indu's ⟨Mṛgaśīrṣa⟩, Tvaṣṭṛ's ⟨Citrā⟩, Mitra's ⟨Anurādhā⟩, Antaka's ⟨Bharaṇī⟩, the Vasus' ⟨Dhaniṣṭhā⟩, the Waters' ⟨Pūrvāṣāḍhā⟩, Yoni's ⟨Pūrva Phalgunī⟩ and Budhnya's ⟨Uttara Bhādrapadā⟩ asterisms are the middle ⟨nāḍī⟩. Vāyu's ⟨Svātī⟩, Agni's ⟨Kṛttikā⟩, the Serpent's ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ and the Viśvedevas' ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩ asterisms, again pair by pair, and then Pūṣan's ⟨Revatī⟩, are the last. For a couple in one and the same nāḍī, marriage is bad; and in the middle nāḍī ⟨for both⟩ it is death outright.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
ज्येष्ठारौद्रार्यमाम्भःपतिभयुगयुगं दास्रभं चैकनाडी पुष्येन्दुत्वाष्ट्रमित्रान्तकवसुजलभं योनिबुÞये च मध्या वाय्वग्निव्यालविश्वोडुयुगयुगमथो पौष्णभं चापरा स्याद् दम्पत्योरेकनाड्यां परिणयनमसन्मध्यनाड्यां हि मृत्युः
2 notes on this verse
- What the page would not yield: SOURCE CORRUPTION, carried through unrepaired: the character `Þ` (U+00DE) in this verse is not Devanāgarī and is not a reading. It stands where ध्न् belongs — in this e-text it occurs only inside अहिर्बुध्न्य (the nakṣatra Uttara Bhādrapadā's regent) and compounds of it, so बुÞय is to be read बुध्न्य. It is encoding wreckage upstream of us; it is left in place because emending letters with no plate in view is not something a machine parse may do.
- About this edition: The mūla's `बुÞये` carries the e-text's known `Þ` corruption for ध्न् and is read here as बुध्न्ये, i.e. Ahirbudhnya's asterism, Uttara Bhādrapadā; nothing else in the verse is uncertain. The reading is confirmed arithmetically: with बुध्न्य the middle nāḍī comes to exactly nine asterisms (Puṣya, Mṛgaśīrṣa, Citrā, Anurādhā, Bharaṇī, Dhaniṣṭhā, Pūrvāṣāḍhā, Pūrva Phalgunī, Uttara Bhādrapadā), and each of the three nāḍīs to nine, as the yuga-yuga ('pair by pair') instruction in lines 1 and 3 requires.
राश्यैक्ये चेद्भिन्नमृक्षं द्वयोः स्यान्नक्षत्रैक्ये राशियुग्मं तथैव नाडीदोषो नो गणानां च दोषो नक्षत्रैक्ये पादभेदे शुभं स्यात्
rāśyaikye cedbhinnamṛkṣaṃ dvayoḥ syānnakṣatraikye rāśiyugmaṃ tathaiva nāḍīdoṣo no gaṇānāṃ ca doṣo nakṣatraikye pādabhede śubhaṃ syāt
If, the rāśi being one and the same for the two, their asterism is different — and likewise, the asterism being one, the rāśis are two — then there is no nāḍī fault and no fault of the gaṇas. When the asterism is one and the pādas differ, it is auspicious.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: THIS VERSE IS A CANCELLATION AND HAS NO RULE OF ITS OWN. It removes the nāḍī fault stated at 6.34 and the gaṇa fault stated at 6.29–30. Read alone it says that certain faults do not apply, without saying what the faults are; read without it, 6.34 and 6.29–30 state faults the text itself partly withdraws. Neither side is safe alone, and the verses are not adjacent to all of what they cancel. Recorded 2026-09-08 from the `unresolved` block of .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere.
सेव्याधमर्णयुवतीनगरादिभं चेत्पूर्वं हि भृत्यधनिभर्तृपुरादिसद्भात् सेवाविनाशधननाशनभर्तृनाशग्रामादिसौख्यहृदिदङ्क्रमशः प्रदिष्टम्
sevyādhamarṇayuvatīnagarādibhaṃ cetpūrvaṃ hi bhṛtyadhanibhartṛpurādisadbhāt sevāvināśadhananāśanabhartṛnāśagrāmādisaukhyahṛdidaṅkramaśaḥ pradiṣṭam
If the asterism of the one to be served, of the debtor, of the young woman, of the city and the like stands before the good asterism of the servant, of the creditor, of the husband, of the town and the like, then in order are declared: ruin of the service, destruction of wealth, death of the husband, and the taking away of the welfare of the village and the like.
अकचटतपयशवर्गाः खगेशमार्जारसिंहशुनां सर्पाखुमृगावीनां निजपञ्चमवैरिणामष्टौ
akacaṭatapayaśavargāḥ khageśamārjārasiṃhaśunāṃ sarpākhumṛgāvīnāṃ nijapañcamavairiṇāmaṣṭau
The eight classes ⟨of letters, named by their initials⟩ a, ka, ca, ṭa, ta, pa, ya and śa ⟨belong⟩ to the lord of birds ⟨Garuḍa⟩, the cat, the lion, the dog, the serpent, the mouse, the deer and the sheep — and each one's own fifth is its enemy.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अक्रषटतपयशवर्णाः खगेशमार्जारसिंहशुनां सर्षाऽऽखुमृगावीनां निजपञ्चमवैरिणामष्टौ
6.38a reading here is contested पौष्णेशशाक्राद्रससूर्यनन्दाः पूर्वार्धमध्याऽपरभागयुग्मम् भर्ता प्रियः प्राग्युजिभे स्त्रियाः स्यान्मध्ये द्वयोः प्रेम परे प्रिया स्त्री
pauṣṇeśaśākrādrasasūryanandāḥ pūrvārdhamadhyā'parabhāgayugmam bhartā priyaḥ prāgyujibhe striyāḥ syānmadhye dvayoḥ prema pare priyā strī
Pauṣṇa ⟨Revatī⟩, Īśa ⟨Ārdrā⟩, Śākra ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩, Ādra, Sa-, Sūrya and Nanda ⟨constitute⟩ the pairs of the first half, the middle and the latter portion. When ⟨the star⟩ is in the earlier-yoked asterism, the husband is dear to the woman; in the middle, there is love between the two; in the last, the wife is dear ⟨to the husband⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The second half is clear and is rendered fully. The first half is not: the compound पौष्णेशशाक्राद्रससूर्यनन्दाः yields Pauṣṇa, Īśa and Śākra as recognisable regent-names (Revatī, Ārdrā, Jyeṣṭhā) but the remaining members (आद्र, स, सूर्य, नन्द) do not resolve either as regents or as bhūtasaṃkhyā number-words in a way the rest of the verse confirms, and no second witness is in view for this chapter. The four are therefore left transliterated rather than identified; what division of the asterisms the line sets up is unresolved.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: GAP DECLARED 2026-09-08. The FIRST half of this verse cannot be read. पौष्णेशशाक्राद्रससूर्यनन्दाः yields Pauṣṇa (Revatī), Īśa (Ārdrā) and Śākra (Jyeṣṭhā) as regent-names, but the remaining members — आद्र, स, सूर्य, नन्द — resolve neither as regents nor as class-names this chapter uses, so the threefold division the second half applies (earlier-yoked → the husband is dear; middle → mutual love; last → the wife is dear) cannot be reconstructed from our text. The second half IS complete and is rendered in full. This is declared, not translated around: no division is supplied. ② does not reach this verse in a form that settles it, and the reading needs the printed page — find the incipit पौष्णेशशाक्रा… in the 1907's श्लोकानुक्रमः (PDF pp. 478–485) and read the plate it points to, and the 1874 Pramitākṣarā. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, whose `unresolved` block states the same finding.
कुजशुक्रसौम्यशशिसूर्यचन्द्रजाः कविभौमजीवशनिसौरयो गुरुः इह राशिपाः क्रियमृगास्यतौलिकेन्दुभतो नवांशविधिरुच्यते बुधैः
kujaśukrasaumyaśaśisūryacandrajāḥ kavibhaumajīvaśanisaurayo guruḥ iha rāśipāḥ kriyamṛgāsyataulikendubhato navāṃśavidhirucyate budhaiḥ
Mars, Venus, Mercury, the Moon, the Sun, the Moon's son ⟨Mercury⟩, Kavi ⟨Venus⟩, Bhauma ⟨Mars⟩, Jīva ⟨Jupiter⟩, Śani ⟨Saturn⟩, Saura ⟨Saturn⟩ and Guru ⟨Jupiter⟩ are here the lords of the rāśis; and the rule of the navāṃśa is declared by the wise ⟨to be reckoned⟩ from Kriya ⟨Aries⟩, Mṛgāsya ⟨Capricorn⟩, Taulika ⟨Libra⟩ and the Moon's sign ⟨Cancer⟩.
समगृहमध्ये शशिरविहोरा विषमभमध्ये रविशशिनोः सा
samagṛhamadhye śaśiravihorā viṣamabhamadhye raviśaśinoḥ sā
In the middle of an even sign the horā is the Moon's ⟨first⟩ and the Sun's ⟨after⟩; in the middle of an odd sign that ⟨horā⟩ is the Sun's ⟨first⟩ and the Moon's ⟨after⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: horā here is the half-sign division (each rāśi split into two horās), not the ascendant and not the hour.
शुक्रज्ञ जीवशनिभूतनयस्य बाण शैलाष्टपञ्चविशिखाः समराशिमध्ये त्रिंशांशको विषमभे विपरीतमस्माद् द्रेष्काणकाः प्रथमपञ्चनवाधिपानाम्
śukrajña jīvaśanibhūtanayasya bāṇa śailāṣṭapañcaviśikhāḥ samarāśimadhye triṃśāṃśako viṣamabhe viparītamasmād dreṣkāṇakāḥ prathamapañcanavādhipānām
Venus, Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn and the Earth's son ⟨Mars⟩ ⟨receive⟩ five, seven, eight, five and five ⟨degrees⟩ as the triṃśāṃśa within an even sign; in an odd sign, the reverse of this. The drekkāṇas belong to the lords of the first, the fifth and the ninth ⟨signs⟩.
स्याद् द्वादशांश इह राशित एव गेहं होराऽथ दृक्कनवमांशकसूर्यभागाः त्रिंशांशकश्च षडिमे कथितास्तु वर्गाः सौम्यैः शुभं भवति चाऽशुभमेव पापैः
syād dvādaśāṃśa iha rāśita eva gehaṃ horā'tha dṛkkanavamāṃśakasūryabhāgāḥ triṃśāṃśakaśca ṣaḍime kathitāstu vargāḥ saumyaiḥ śubhaṃ bhavati cā'śubhameva pāpaiḥ
The dvādaśāṃśa here ⟨is reckoned⟩ from the sign itself. The house ⟨rāśi⟩, the horā, then the dṛkkāṇa, the navamāṃśa, the Sun's parts ⟨the twelfth-parts⟩ and the triṃśāṃśa — these six are declared the vargas. By benefics ⟨in them⟩ it becomes auspicious, and by malefics inauspicious indeed.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: sūrya-bhāga names the twelfth-parts by the number-word sūrya = 12; it is the dvādaśāṃśa announced in the verse's first words, and its place in the list of six vargas is what fixes the reading.
ज्येष्ठापौष्णभसार्पभान्त्यघटिकायुग्मं च मूलाश्विनी पित्र्यादौ घटिकाद्वयं निगदितं तद्भस्य गण्डान्तकं कर्काल्यण्डजभान्ततोऽर्धघटिका सिंहाश्वमेषादिगा पूर्णान्ते घटिकात्मकं त्वशुभदं नन्दातिथेश्चादिमम्
jyeṣṭhāpauṣṇabhasārpabhāntyaghaṭikāyugmaṃ ca mūlāśvinī pitryādau ghaṭikādvayaṃ nigaditaṃ tadbhasya gaṇḍāntakaṃ karkālyaṇḍajabhāntato'rdhaghaṭikā siṃhāśvameṣādigā pūrṇānte ghaṭikātmakaṃ tvaśubhadaṃ nandātitheścādimam
The last two ghaṭikās of Jyeṣṭhā, of Pūṣan's asterism ⟨Revatī⟩ and of the Serpent's asterism ⟨Āśleṣā⟩, and two ghaṭikās at the beginning of Mūla, Aśvinī and the Fathers' asterism ⟨Maghā⟩ — that is declared the gaṇḍānta of the asterism. Half a ghaṭikā from the end of Karka ⟨Cancer⟩, Ali ⟨Scorpio⟩ and the Egg-born ⟨Pisces⟩, and ⟨half a ghaṭikā⟩ running into the beginning of Siṃha ⟨Leo⟩, the Horse ⟨Sagittarius⟩ and Meṣa ⟨Aries⟩ ⟨is the gaṇḍānta of the sign⟩; and one ghaṭikā at the end of a Pūrṇā tithi and at the beginning of a Nandā tithi is inauspicious.
लग्नात्पापावृज्वनृजू व्ययार्थस्थौ यदा तदा कर्तरी नाम सा ज्ञेया मृत्युदारिद्र्यशोकदा
lagnātpāpāvṛjvanṛjū vyayārthasthau yadā tadā kartarī nāma sā jñeyā mṛtyudāridryaśokadā
When two malefics from the lagna, ⟨one⟩ retrograde and ⟨one⟩ direct, stand in the twelfth and the second, then that is to be known as Kartarī ⟨'the shears'⟩, and it gives death, poverty and grief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नात्पापाघृज्वनृजू व्ययार्थस्थौ यदा तदा कर्तरी नाम सा ज्ञेया मृत्युदारिद्र्यशोकदा
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The e-text printed पापाघृज्व-, and घृज्व is not a Sanskrit form. EMENDED on 2026-09-08 to पापावृज्वनृजू = पापौ + ऋज्वनृजू, 'two malefics, direct and not-direct (retrograde)', which the dual ऋज्वनृजू immediately following requires. ② prints पापावृज्वनृजू. The naming of the yoga (kartarī) and its result were never in doubt; only the qualifier on the two malefics rested on this reading, and it now rests on a witness. The e-text's form is kept in `diplomatic`.
चन्द्रे सूर्यादिसंयुक्ते दारिद्र्यं मरणं शुभं सौख्यं सापत्न्यवैराग्ये पापद्वययुते मृतिः
candre sūryādisaṃyukte dāridryaṃ maraṇaṃ śubhaṃ saukhyaṃ sāpatnyavairāgye pāpadvayayute mṛtiḥ
When the Moon is joined with the Sun and the rest ⟨in order⟩: poverty ⟨with the Sun⟩, death ⟨with Mars⟩, good ⟨with Mercury⟩, happiness ⟨with Jupiter⟩, co-wifehood ⟨with Venus⟩, aversion ⟨with Saturn⟩; and when joined with two malefics, death.
जन्मलग्नभयोर्मृत्युराशौ नेष्टः करग्रहः एकाधिपत्ये राशीशमैत्र्ये वानैव दोषकृत्
janmalagnabhayormṛtyurāśau neṣṭaḥ karagrahaḥ ekādhipatye rāśīśamaitrye vānaiva doṣakṛt
In the death-sign ⟨the 8th⟩ reckoned from the birth-star and from the lagna, the taking of the hand ⟨marriage⟩ is not desired; but under a single lordship, or when the lords of the signs are friends, it works no fault at all.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जन्मलग्नभयोर्मृत्युशाशौ नेष्टः करग्रहः एकाधिपत्ये राशीशमैत्र्ये वानैव दोषकृत्
मीनोक्षकर्कालिमृगस्त्रियोऽष्टमं लग्नं यदा नाष्टमगेहदोषकृत् अन्योन्यमित्रत्ववशेन सा वधूर्भवेत्सुतायुर्गृहसौख्यभागिनी
mīnokṣakarkālimṛgastriyo'ṣṭamaṃ lagnaṃ yadā nāṣṭamagehadoṣakṛt anyonyamitratvavaśena sā vadhūrbhavetsutāyurgṛhasaukhyabhāginī
When the eighth ⟨sign⟩ as lagna is Mīna ⟨Pisces⟩, Ukṣa ⟨Taurus⟩, Karka ⟨Cancer⟩, Ali ⟨Scorpio⟩, Mṛga ⟨Capricorn⟩ or Strī ⟨Virgo⟩, it does not work the fault of the eighth house; and by force of mutual friendship ⟨of the lords⟩ that bride comes to have sons, long life, a home and happiness.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: स्त्री here is the rāśi Kanyā (Virgo, 'the Woman'), not the bride: the six signs named — Pisces, Taurus, Cancer, Scorpio, Capricorn, Virgo — are exactly the six even signs, and the bride is called वधू in the next line.
- Corroboration: This verse is the second exception clause to 6.46 and has no prohibition of its own: it names the aṣṭama-geha-doṣa, a fault stated only in 6.46. The six signs it exempts are the six even signs (स्त्री here is the rāśi Kanyā, not the bride), so the exception is wide — losing it would forbid many marriages the text permits. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, span [46,47].
मृतिभवनांशो यदि च विलग्ने तदधिपतिर्वा न शुभकरः स्यात् व्ययभवनं वा भवति तदंशस्तदधिपतिर्वा कलहकरः स्यात्
mṛtibhavanāṃśo yadi ca vilagne tadadhipatirvā na śubhakaraḥ syāt vyayabhavanaṃ vā bhavati tadaṃśastadadhipatirvā kalahakaraḥ syāt
If the navāṃśa of the house of death ⟨the eighth⟩ falls on the lagna, or its lord ⟨stands there⟩, it will not be productive of good; and if it is the house of loss ⟨the twelfth⟩, or its navāṃśa, or its lord, it will be productive of strife.
खरामतो ३० ऽन्त्यादितिवह्निपित्र्यभे खवेदतः ४० के रदत ३२ श्च सार्पभे खबाणतो ५० ऽश्वे धृतितो १८ ऽर्यमाम्बुपे कृते२० र्भगत्वाष्ट्रभविश्वजीवभे
kharāmato 30 'ntyāditivahnipitryabhe khavedataḥ 40 ke radata 32 śca sārpabhe khabāṇato 50 'śve dhṛtito 18 'ryamāmbupe kṛte20 rbhagatvāṣṭrabhaviśvajīvabhe
Thirty ⟨viṣa-nāḍikās⟩ in the asterisms of Antya ⟨Revatī⟩, Aditi ⟨Punarvasu⟩, Vahni ⟨Kṛttikā⟩ and the Fathers ⟨Maghā⟩; forty in Ka's ⟨Rohiṇī⟩; thirty-two in the Serpent's ⟨Āśleṣā⟩; fifty in the Horse's ⟨Aśvinī⟩; eighteen in Aryaman's ⟨Uttara Phalgunī⟩ and the Water-lord's ⟨Śatabhiṣaj⟩; twenty in the asterisms of Bhaga ⟨Pūrva Phalgunī⟩, Tvaṣṭṛ ⟨Citrā⟩, the Viśvedevas ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩ and Jīva ⟨Puṣya⟩.
4 notes on this verse
- About this edition: This verse belongs to the viṣa-nāḍī passage, where the e-text prints the decoded value of each word-numeral immediately after it (खरामतो ३०, खवेदतः ४०, ऽश्वे धृतितो १८ …) and wraps the line every few akṣaras — a three-verse stretch arrives as 25 short lines. The bare numerals inside the text are those glosses, not verse numbers; the verse's own number is the one it ends on.
- About this edition: The bare numerals in the mūla (३० ४० ३२ ५० १८ २०) are the e-text's own decodings of the word-numerals खराम, खवेद, रद, खबाण, धृति, कृति standing immediately before them, not verse numbers. All six values agree with the received viṣa-nāḍī table.
- About this edition: DO NOT close the space in `कृते२० र्भगत्वाष्ट्रभविश्वजीवभे`. It looks like the repha line-wrap repaired at sixteen other verses in this book, and it is not one: throughout 6.49–51 this e-text prints the decoded value of each word-numeral immediately after it, and here the gloss २० was glued to the left of the word (कृते२०) with the space falling to its right. The Sanskrit is कृतेर्भगत्वाष्ट्रभविश्वजीवभे; the digits are apparatus, and 6.50 shows the same convention breaking a word in the same way at `ऽष्टि १६ तोऽजभे`. Examined 2026-09-08 and deliberately left as it stands, because inserting or deleting a space here would put the e-text's gloss inside our constituted word.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.49–6.51. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The Moon standing in the portion of a nakṣatra measured by the numbers given — Revatī/Punarvasu/Kṛttikā/Maghā 30, Rohiṇī 40, Āśleṣā 32, Aśvinī 50, U-Phalgunī and Śatabhiṣaj 18, P-Phalgunī/Citrā/Uttarāṣāḍhā/Puṣya 20 (v.49); Viśākhā/Svātī/Mṛgaśīrṣa/Jyeṣṭhā 14, Ārdrā and Hasta 21, P-Bhādrapadā 16, U-Bhādrapadā/Pūrvāṣāḍhā/Bharaṇī 24, Anurādhā/Dhaniṣṭhā/Śravaṇa 10 (v.50); Mūla 56 (v.51) RESULT: these are the VIṢA-NĀḌIKĀS, to be shunned in an auspicious undertaking; and the fixed (dhruva) figures, multiplied by the nakṣatra's actual span and divided by sixty, give the true (spaṣṭa) viṣa-nāḍikās WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE NOUN THAT SAYS WHAT THESE NUMBERS ARE OCCURS ONLY IN v.51. Verses 49 and 50 are bare nakṣatra-name-plus-numeral pairs — the translators had to supply ⟨viṣa-nāḍikās⟩ in brackets at v.49 — and the prohibition ('to be shunned in an auspicious undertaking') and the proportioning rule are both in v.51. So 6.49 cited alone is twenty-seven numbers with no unit, no name and no instruction. The apparatus confirms the three verses are one passage in the printing: 'a three-verse stretch arrives as 25 short lines', with the e-text's decoded numerals printed inline; and it notes those inline numerals 'are the e-text's own decodings … not verse numbers'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
6.50a reading here is contested मनो १४ र्द्विदैवानिलसौम्यशाक्रभे कुपक्षतः २१ शैवकरेऽष्टि १६ तोऽजभे युगाश्वितो २४ बुध्न्यभतोययाम्यभे खचन्द्रतो १० मित्रभवासवश्रुतौ
mano 14 rdvidaivānilasaumyaśākrabhe kupakṣataḥ 21 śaivakare'ṣṭi 16 to'jabhe yugāśvito 24 budhnyabhatoyayāmyabhe khacandrato 10 mitrabhavāsavaśrutau
Fourteen in the asterisms of the Two-Deitied ⟨Viśākhā⟩, of Anila ⟨Svātī⟩, of Saumya ⟨Mṛgaśīrṣa⟩ and of Śākra ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩; twenty-one in Śaiva's ⟨Ārdrā⟩ and the Hand ⟨Hasta⟩; sixteen in the Goat's asterism ⟨Pūrva Bhādrapadā⟩; twenty-four in Budhnya's ⟨Uttara Bhādrapadā⟩, the Waters' ⟨Pūrvāṣāḍhā⟩ and Yama's ⟨Bharaṇī⟩ asterisms; ten in Mitra's ⟨Anurādhā⟩, the Vasus' ⟨Dhaniṣṭhā⟩ and Śruti ⟨Śravaṇa⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मनो १४ द्विद्वैवानिलसौम्यशाक्रभे कुपक्षतः २१ शैवकरेऽष्टि १६ तोऽजभे युगाश्वितो २४ बुÞयभतोययाम्यभे खचन्द्रतो १० मित्रभवासवश्रुतौ
5 notes on this verse
- About this edition: This verse belongs to the viṣa-nāḍī passage, where the e-text prints the decoded value of each word-numeral immediately after it (खरामतो ३०, खवेदतः ४०, ऽश्वे धृतितो १८ …) and wraps the line every few akṣaras — a three-verse stretch arrives as 25 short lines. The bare numerals inside the text are those glosses, not verse numbers; the verse's own number is the one it ends on.
- What the page would not yield: SOURCE CORRUPTION, carried through unrepaired: the character `Þ` (U+00DE) in this verse is not Devanāgarī and is not a reading. It stands where ध्न् belongs — in this e-text it occurs only inside अहिर्बुध्न्य (the nakṣatra Uttara Bhādrapadā's regent) and compounds of it, so बुÞय is to be read बुध्न्य. It is encoding wreckage upstream of us; it is left in place because emending letters with no plate in view is not something a machine parse may do.
- About this edition: Two readings underlie this rendering. (1) The mūla's `बुÞय` carries the e-text's known `Þ` corruption for ध्न् and is read बुध्न्य, i.e. Ahirbudhnya's asterism, Uttara Bhādrapadā. (2) The printed द्विद्वैव is read द्विदैव, 'the two-deitied one' — Viśākhā, whose regents are Indrāgnī. Both readings are confirmed arithmetically: with them, all fourteen values in this verse (14, 21, 16, 24, 10) fall on exactly the asterisms the received viṣa-nāḍī table assigns them to, and with verse 49 the twenty-seven asterisms are accounted for without repetition. The bare numerals are the e-text's decodings of मनु, कुपक्ष, अष्टि, युगाश्वि, खचन्द्र, not verse numbers.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.49–6.51. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The Moon standing in the portion of a nakṣatra measured by the numbers given — Revatī/Punarvasu/Kṛttikā/Maghā 30, Rohiṇī 40, Āśleṣā 32, Aśvinī 50, U-Phalgunī and Śatabhiṣaj 18, P-Phalgunī/Citrā/Uttarāṣāḍhā/Puṣya 20 (v.49); Viśākhā/Svātī/Mṛgaśīrṣa/Jyeṣṭhā 14, Ārdrā and Hasta 21, P-Bhādrapadā 16, U-Bhādrapadā/Pūrvāṣāḍhā/Bharaṇī 24, Anurādhā/Dhaniṣṭhā/Śravaṇa 10 (v.50); Mūla 56 (v.51) RESULT: these are the VIṢA-NĀḌIKĀS, to be shunned in an auspicious undertaking; and the fixed (dhruva) figures, multiplied by the nakṣatra's actual span and divided by sixty, give the true (spaṣṭa) viṣa-nāḍikās WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE NOUN THAT SAYS WHAT THESE NUMBERS ARE OCCURS ONLY IN v.51. Verses 49 and 50 are bare nakṣatra-name-plus-numeral pairs — the translators had to supply ⟨viṣa-nāḍikās⟩ in brackets at v.49 — and the prohibition ('to be shunned in an auspicious undertaking') and the proportioning rule are both in v.51. So 6.49 cited alone is twenty-seven numbers with no unit, no name and no instruction. The apparatus confirms the three verses are one passage in the printing: 'a three-verse stretch arrives as 25 short lines', with the e-text's decoded numerals printed inline; and it notes those inline numerals 'are the e-text's own decodings … not verse numbers'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
- Another reading: Two further readings taken 2026-09-08, both from ②. (1) द्विद्वैव → द्विदैव. द्विद्वैव is not a word; द्विदैव, 'the two-deitied one', is Viśākhā, whose regents are Indrāgnī — which is the asterism the viṣa-nāḍī table needs at 14. (2) The lost repha. ② prints मनो १४ र्द्विदैव, and ITS COMMENTARY LEMMATISES THE VERSE AS मनोरिति — the pratīka is मनोः, genitive of मनु (14), in sandhi before द्: मनोः + द्विदैव → मनोर्द्विदैव. Our text had dropped the र्. The same shape stands one verse earlier at 6.49, कृतेः + भग → कृतेर्भग, where ②'s ṭīkā glosses कृतेर्विंशतेः. Where ② is WORSE, ours is kept: ②'s mūla lines print स्वराम, स्ववेद, स्वबाण for our ख-forms at 6.49, and its own ṭīkā's pratīka is खरामेति, so ख is right and ②'s स्व is OCR damage.
मूलेऽङ्गबाणा ५६ द्विषनाडिकाः कृता वर्ज्याः शुभेऽथो विषनाडिका ध्रुवाः निघ्ना भभोगेन खतर्क ६० भाजिताः स्पष्टा भवेयुर्विषनाडिकास्तथा
mūle'ṅgabāṇā 56 dviṣanāḍikāḥ kṛtā varjyāḥ śubhe'tho viṣanāḍikā dhruvāḥ nighnā bhabhogena khatarka 60 bhājitāḥ spaṣṭā bhaveyurviṣanāḍikāstathā
In Mūla, fifty-six. These viṣa-nāḍikās are to be shunned in an auspicious ⟨undertaking⟩. Then the fixed viṣa-nāḍikās, multiplied by the asterism's ⟨actual⟩ span and divided by sixty, become the true viṣa-nāḍikās.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: This verse belongs to the viṣa-nāḍī passage, where the e-text prints the decoded value of each word-numeral immediately after it (खरामतो ३०, खवेदतः ४०, ऽश्वे धृतितो १८ …) and wraps the line every few akṣaras — a three-verse stretch arrives as 25 short lines. The bare numerals inside the text are those glosses, not verse numbers; the verse's own number is the one it ends on.
- About this edition: The numerals ५६ and ६० are the e-text's decodings of अङ्गबाण and खतर्क; the received table likewise gives Mūla 56, the largest of the twenty-seven. bha-bhoga is the asterism's own measured span, by which the tabulated (dhruva, 'fixed') figure is proportioned to give the true (spaṣṭa) one.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.49–6.51. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The Moon standing in the portion of a nakṣatra measured by the numbers given — Revatī/Punarvasu/Kṛttikā/Maghā 30, Rohiṇī 40, Āśleṣā 32, Aśvinī 50, U-Phalgunī and Śatabhiṣaj 18, P-Phalgunī/Citrā/Uttarāṣāḍhā/Puṣya 20 (v.49); Viśākhā/Svātī/Mṛgaśīrṣa/Jyeṣṭhā 14, Ārdrā and Hasta 21, P-Bhādrapadā 16, U-Bhādrapadā/Pūrvāṣāḍhā/Bharaṇī 24, Anurādhā/Dhaniṣṭhā/Śravaṇa 10 (v.50); Mūla 56 (v.51) RESULT: these are the VIṢA-NĀḌIKĀS, to be shunned in an auspicious undertaking; and the fixed (dhruva) figures, multiplied by the nakṣatra's actual span and divided by sixty, give the true (spaṣṭa) viṣa-nāḍikās WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE NOUN THAT SAYS WHAT THESE NUMBERS ARE OCCURS ONLY IN v.51. Verses 49 and 50 are bare nakṣatra-name-plus-numeral pairs — the translators had to supply ⟨viṣa-nāḍikās⟩ in brackets at v.49 — and the prohibition ('to be shunned in an auspicious undertaking') and the proportioning rule are both in v.51. So 6.49 cited alone is twenty-seven numbers with no unit, no name and no instruction. The apparatus confirms the three verses are one passage in the printing: 'a three-verse stretch arrives as 25 short lines', with the e-text's decoded numerals printed inline; and it notes those inline numerals 'are the e-text's own decodings … not verse numbers'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
गिरिशभुजगमित्राः पित्र्यवस्वम्बुविश्वे ऽभिजिदथ च विधाताऽपीन्द्र इन्द्रानलौ च निरृतिरुदकनाथोऽप्यर्यमाथो भगः स्युः क्रमश इह मुहूर्ता वासरे बाणचन्द्राः
giriśabhujagamitrāḥ pitryavasvambuviśve 'bhijidatha ca vidhātā'pīndra indrānalau ca nirṛtirudakanātho'pyaryamātho bhagaḥ syuḥ kramaśa iha muhūrtā vāsare bāṇacandrāḥ
Giriśa ⟨Rudra⟩, the Serpent, Mitra, the Fathers, the Vasus, the Waters, the Viśvedevas, and Abhijit; then Vidhātṛ too, Indra, Indra-and-Agni, Nirṛti, the Lord of Waters ⟨Varuṇa⟩, Aryaman and then Bhaga — these in order are the fifteen muhūrtas in the day.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: bāṇa-candrāḥ is the number-word for fifteen (bāṇa 5, candra 1, read right to left). indrānalau is taken as the single dual deity Indrāgnī, not as two muhūrtas: only then does the list come to exactly fifteen, and it then matches the received day-muhūrta series member for member.
शिवोऽजपादादष्टौ स्युर्भेशा अदितिजीवकौ विष्ण्वर्कत्वाष्ट्रमरुतो मुहूर्ता निशि कीर्तिताः
śivo'japādādaṣṭau syurbheśā aditijīvakau viṣṇvarkatvāṣṭramaruto muhūrtā niśi kīrtitāḥ
Śiva ⟨is the first⟩; then, beginning from Ajapād ⟨Aja Ekapād⟩, eight are the asterism-lords ⟨in their own order⟩; then Aditi and Jīva ⟨Bṛhaspati⟩, Viṣṇu, Arka ⟨the Sun⟩, Tvaṣṭṛ and the Maruts — these are declared the muhūrtas at night.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The eight from Ajapād are the nakṣatra-regents in their own sequence — Ajaikapād, Ahirbudhnya, Pūṣan, the Aśvins, Yama, Agni, Prajāpati, Soma — after which Rudra is skipped, having already stood first as Śiva, and the count resumes at Aditi. The series then comes to fifteen, matching the day's fifteen in verse 52.
रवावर्यमा ब्रह्मरक्षश्च सोमे कुजे वह्निपित्र्ये बुधे चाभिजित्स्यात् गुरौ तोयरक्षो भृगौ ब्रह्मपित्र्ये शनावीशसार्पौ मुहूर्ता निषिद्धाः
ravāvaryamā brahmarakṣaśca some kuje vahnipitrye budhe cābhijitsyāt gurau toyarakṣo bhṛgau brahmapitrye śanāvīśasārpau muhūrtā niṣiddhāḥ
On the Sun's day, Aryaman; on the Moon's, Brahmā and Rakṣas ⟨Nirṛti⟩; on Mars's, Agni and the Fathers; on Mercury's, Abhijit; on Jupiter's, the Waters ⟨Varuṇa⟩ and Rakṣas ⟨Nirṛti⟩; on Venus's, Brahmā and the Fathers; on Saturn's, Īśa ⟨Rudra⟩ and the Serpent — these muhūrtas are forbidden.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: NOT USABLE ALONE. The forbidden muhūrtas this verse names are named by their REGENTS, and the regent-to-muhūrta list is in 6.52–53. Read without those two verses the prohibition has no referents. Recorded 2026-09-08 from the `unresolved` block of .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere.
निर्वेधैः शशिकरमूलमैत्रपित्र्य ब्राह्मान्त्योत्तरपवनैः शुभो विवाहः रिक्ताऽमारहिततिथौ शुभेऽह्नि वैश्व प्रान्त्याङ्घ्रिः श्रुतितिथिभागतोऽभिजित्स्यात्
nirvedhaiḥ śaśikaramūlamaitrapitrya brāhmāntyottarapavanaiḥ śubho vivāhaḥ riktā'mārahitatithau śubhe'hni vaiśva prāntyāṅghriḥ śrutitithibhāgato'bhijitsyāt
Marriage is auspicious — the asterisms being free of vedha — in Śaśi's ⟨Mṛgaśīrṣa⟩, in Kara ⟨Hasta⟩, in Mūla, in Maitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, in Pitrya ⟨Maghā⟩, in Brāhma ⟨Rohiṇī⟩, in Antya ⟨Revatī⟩, in the Uttarās and in Pavana's ⟨Svātī⟩; on a tithi free of the Riktās and of the new moon, on an auspicious day. Abhijit is ⟨made up⟩ of the last quarter of Vaiśva ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩ together with a fifteenth part of Śruti ⟨Śravaṇa⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: śruti-tithi-bhāgataḥ names the fifteenth part (tithi = 15) of Śravaṇa; with Uttarāṣāḍhā's fourth pāda this gives the received definition of the Abhijit muhūrta.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.55–6.57. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The nakṣatras commended for marriage — Mṛgaśīrṣa, Hasta, Mūla, Anurādhā, Maghā, Rohiṇī, Revatī, the three Uttarās and Svātī — PROVIDED they are free of vedha (v.55); the vedha pairs themselves being those of vv.56 and 57 RESULT: marriage is auspicious in them, on a tithi free of the Riktās and the new moon WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.56 opens 'vedho'nyonyam ASAU' — 'THIS vedha is mutual' — a demonstrative whose only antecedent is the 'nirvedhaiḥ' of v.55; and conversely v.55's whole condition turns on a technical term it never defines, the definition running through vv.56 and 57. So the chapter's central marriage-nakṣatra rule and the test that qualifies it are in different verses. NOTE two open points the apparatus records inside the span: 'jāṅghrī and kubhṛdrekhika are left transliterated … this mūla-only e-text carries no commentary that would fix them', and 'the identification of vidhātṛ and vidhi is likewise not secure'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
वेधोऽन्योन्यमसौ विरिञ्च्यभिजितोर्याम्यानुराधर्क्षयोर्विश्वेन्द्वोर्हरिपित्र्ययोर्ग्रहकृतो हस्तोत्तराभाद्रयोः स्वातीवारुणयोर्भवेन्निरृतिभादित्योस्तथोफान्त्ययोः खेटे तत्र गते तुरीयचरणाद्योर्वा तृतीयद्वयोः
vedho'nyonyamasau viriñcyabhijitoryāmyānurādharkṣayorviśvendvorharipitryayorgrahakṛto hastottarābhādrayoḥ svātīvāruṇayorbhavennirṛtibhādityostathophāntyayoḥ kheṭe tatra gate turīyacaraṇādyorvā tṛtīyadvayoḥ
This vedha is mutual: between Viriñci's ⟨Rohiṇī⟩ and Abhijit; between the asterisms Yāmya ⟨Bharaṇī⟩ and Anurādhā; between Viśva's ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩ and Indu's ⟨Mṛgaśīrṣa⟩; between Hari's ⟨Śravaṇa⟩ and the Fathers' ⟨Maghā⟩ — ⟨and it is⟩ made by a graha: between Hasta and Uttarā Bhādrā; between Svātī and Vāruṇa ⟨Śatabhiṣaj⟩; it arises between Nirṛti's asterism ⟨Mūla⟩ and Āditya's ⟨Punarvasu⟩, and so too between Uphā ⟨Uttarā Phalgunī⟩ and Antya ⟨Revatī⟩ — when a graha has gone there, or ⟨when it stands⟩ in the fourth quarter and the first, or in the third of the two.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
वेधोऽन्योन्यमसौ विरिञ्च्यभिजितोर्याम्यानुराधर्क्षयो र्विश्वेन्द्वोर्हरिपित्र्ययोर्ग्रहकृतो हस्तोत्तराभाद्रयोः स्वातीवारुणयोर्भवेन्निरृतिभादित्योस्तथोफान्त्ययोः खेटे तत्र गते तुरीयचरणाद्योर्वा तृतीयद्वयोः
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.55–6.57. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The nakṣatras commended for marriage — Mṛgaśīrṣa, Hasta, Mūla, Anurādhā, Maghā, Rohiṇī, Revatī, the three Uttarās and Svātī — PROVIDED they are free of vedha (v.55); the vedha pairs themselves being those of vv.56 and 57 RESULT: marriage is auspicious in them, on a tithi free of the Riktās and the new moon WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.56 opens 'vedho'nyonyam ASAU' — 'THIS vedha is mutual' — a demonstrative whose only antecedent is the 'nirvedhaiḥ' of v.55; and conversely v.55's whole condition turns on a technical term it never defines, the definition running through vv.56 and 57. So the chapter's central marriage-nakṣatra rule and the test that qualifies it are in different verses. NOTE two open points the apparatus records inside the span: 'jāṅghrī and kubhṛdrekhika are left transliterated … this mūla-only e-text carries no commentary that would fix them', and 'the identification of vidhātṛ and vidhi is likewise not secure'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
शाक्रेज्ये शतभानिले जलशिवे पौष्णार्यमर्क्षे वसु द्वीशे वैश्वसुधांशुभे हयभगे सार्पानुराधे मिथः हस्तोपान्तिमभे विधातृविधिभे मूलादिती त्वाष्ट्रभा जाङ्घ्री याम्यमघे कृशानुहरिभे विद्धे कुभृद्रेखिके
śākrejye śatabhānile jalaśive pauṣṇāryamarkṣe vasu dvīśe vaiśvasudhāṃśubhe hayabhage sārpānurādhe mithaḥ hastopāntimabhe vidhātṛvidhibhe mūlāditī tvāṣṭrabhā jāṅghrī yāmyamaghe kṛśānuharibhe viddhe kubhṛdrekhike
Śākra ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩ and Ijya ⟨Puṣya⟩; Śatabha ⟨Śatabhiṣaj⟩ and Anila ⟨Svātī⟩; Jala ⟨Pūrvāṣāḍhā⟩ and Śiva ⟨Ārdrā⟩; Pauṣṇa ⟨Revatī⟩ and Aryaman's ⟨Uttara Phalgunī⟩ asterism; Vasu ⟨Dhaniṣṭhā⟩ and the Two-lorded ⟨Viśākhā⟩; Vaiśva ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩ and Sudhāṃśu's ⟨Mṛgaśīrṣa⟩; the Horse's ⟨Aśvinī⟩ and Bhaga's ⟨Pūrva Phalgunī⟩; Sārpa ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ and Anurādhā — ⟨these pierce⟩ one another. Hasta and the penultimate asterism ⟨Uttara Bhādrapadā⟩, Vidhātṛ's and Vidhi's asterisms, Mūla and Aditi's ⟨Punarvasu⟩, and Tvaṣṭṛ's ⟨Citrā⟩, are jāṅghrī ⟨'of the shank-line'⟩; Yāmya ⟨Bharaṇī⟩ and Maghā, and Kṛśānu's ⟨Kṛttikā⟩ and Hari's ⟨Śravaṇa⟩, when pierced, are kubhṛd-rekhika ⟨'of the mountain-line'⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: जाङ्घ्री and कुभृद्रेखिक are left transliterated with a literal gloss ('of the shank', 'of the mountain-line'): they name classes or lines of the vedha-cakra, and this mūla-only e-text carries no commentary that would fix them. The identification of विधातृ and विधि is likewise not secure — both are epithets of Brahmā, and taking them as Rohiṇī (Prajāpati) and Abhijit (Brahmā) would repeat the pair verse 56 has already given, so the two are left unidentified here.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.55–6.57. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The nakṣatras commended for marriage — Mṛgaśīrṣa, Hasta, Mūla, Anurādhā, Maghā, Rohiṇī, Revatī, the three Uttarās and Svātī — PROVIDED they are free of vedha (v.55); the vedha pairs themselves being those of vv.56 and 57 RESULT: marriage is auspicious in them, on a tithi free of the Riktās and the new moon WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.56 opens 'vedho'nyonyam ASAU' — 'THIS vedha is mutual' — a demonstrative whose only antecedent is the 'nirvedhaiḥ' of v.55; and conversely v.55's whole condition turns on a technical term it never defines, the definition running through vv.56 and 57. So the chapter's central marriage-nakṣatra rule and the test that qualifies it are in different verses. NOTE two open points the apparatus records inside the span: 'jāṅghrī and kubhṛdrekhika are left transliterated … this mūla-only e-text carries no commentary that would fix them', and 'the identification of vidhātṛ and vidhi is likewise not secure'. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
ऋक्षाणि क्रूरविद्धानि क्रूरभुक्तादिकानि च भुक्त्वा चन्द्रेण मुक्तानि शुभार्हाणि प्रचक्षते
ṛkṣāṇi krūraviddhāni krūrabhuktādikāni ca bhuktvā candreṇa muktāni śubhārhāṇi pracakṣate
Asterisms pierced by a malefic, and those first consumed by a malefic and so on, they declare fit for auspicious ⟨work⟩ once the Moon, having traversed them, has released them.
ज्ञराहुपूर्णेन्दुसिताः स्वपृष्ठे भं सप्तगोजातिशरैर्मितं हि संलत्तयन्तेऽर्कशनीज्यभौमाः सूर्याष्टतर्काग्निमितं पुरस्तात्
jñarāhupūrṇendusitāḥ svapṛṣṭhe bhaṃ saptagojātiśarairmitaṃ hi saṃlattayante'rkaśanījyabhaumāḥ sūryāṣṭatarkāgnimitaṃ purastāt
Mercury, Rāhu, the full Moon and Venus strike ⟨with the lattā⟩ the asterism behind themselves, measured by seven, nine, jāti and five ⟨respectively⟩; the Sun, Saturn, Jupiter and Mars ⟨strike⟩ ahead, measured by twelve, eight, six and three.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Seven of the eight number-words decode securely and all seven agree with the received lattā table — Mercury the 7th behind, Rāhu the 9th behind, Venus the 5th behind; the Sun the 12th ahead, Saturn the 8th, Jupiter the 6th, Mars the 3rd. The eighth, जाति, standing for the full Moon's count, is not a bhūtasaṃkhyā number-word this reader can resolve, and no second witness is in view; it is therefore left untranslated rather than filled in from a table the verse itself has not confirmed.
हर्षणवैधृतिसाध्यव्यतिपातकगण्डशूलयोगानाम् अन्ते यन्नक्षत्रं पातेन निपातितं तत्स्यात्
harṣaṇavaidhṛtisādhyavyatipātakagaṇḍaśūlayogānām ante yannakṣatraṃ pātena nipātitaṃ tatsyāt
Whatever asterism stands at the end of the yogas Harṣaṇa, Vaidhṛti, Sādhya, Vyatīpāta, Gaṇḍa and Śūla — that one is struck down by the pāta ⟨'the fall'⟩.
पञ्चास्याजौ गोमृगौ तौलिकुम्भौ कन्यामीनौ कर्क्यली चापयुग्मे तत्राऽन्योन्यं चन्द्रभान्वोर्निरुक्तं क्रान्तेः साम्यं नो शुभं मङ्गलेषु
pañcāsyājau gomṛgau taulikumbhau kanyāmīnau karkyalī cāpayugme tatrā'nyonyaṃ candrabhānvorniruktaṃ krānteḥ sāmyaṃ no śubhaṃ maṅgaleṣu
Siṃha and Meṣa (aja), Vṛṣa (go) and Makara (mṛga), Tulā and Kumbha, Kanyā and Mīna, Karka and Vṛścika (ali), Dhanus (cāpa) and Mithuna (yugma) — in these ⟨pairs⟩, mutually, equality of declination (krānti-sāmya) of the Moon and the Sun is declared; that is not auspicious in auspicious rites.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The verse number ६१ is ABSENT: verse 60 is followed by four unnumbered lines and then ६२. All four run 22 syllables, so the metre cannot place the boundary; it is placed here because two lines make a complete Upajāti verse in this printing's one-half-verse-per-line setting and because the sense breaks cleanly (rāśi krānti-sāmya, then the yoga list). NOTE, and it is a real divergence: the 1907 Nirṇayasāgara printing numbers this line ॥५९॥, two short of the count this file's own sequence gives — the two printings do not agree about how many verses stand earlier in this chapter. That is reconciliation work for a constituting pass, not a defect of this parse.
- About this edition: The six pairs name all twelve rāśis, and the pairing is the standard krānti-sāmya (equal-declination) set. Rendered against the chapter's own sign-epithets: pañcāsya (five-faced, the lion) = Siṃha, aja = Meṣa, go = Vṛṣa, mṛga = Makara, ali = Vṛścika, cāpa = Dhanus, yugma = Mithuna. On the verse number itself see the edition note carried in the input.
व्याघातगण्डव्यतिपातपूर्वशूलान्त्यवज्रे परिघातिगण्डे योगे विरुद्धे त्वभिजित्समेतः खार्जूरमर्काद्विषमे शशी चेत्
vyāghātagaṇḍavyatipātapūrvaśūlāntyavajre parighātigaṇḍe yoge viruddhe tvabhijitsametaḥ khārjūramarkādviṣame śaśī cet
Vyāghāta, Gaṇḍa, Vyatīpāta, Pūrva ⟨the first, Viṣkambha⟩, Śūla, Antya ⟨the last, Vaidhṛti⟩, Vajra, Parigha and Atigaṇḍa: when the yoga is one of these adverse ones and ⟨the Moon⟩ is joined with Abhijit, the khārjūra ⟨defect⟩ ⟨arises⟩ if the Moon stands in an odd asterism reckoned from the Sun's.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: pūrva and antya are read as position-words inside the yoga sequence — the first (Viṣkambha) and the last (Vaidhṛti) — because there is no yoga named Pūrva, antya is the settled name for Vaidhṛti in this literature, and the reading yields exactly the nine adverse yogas the standard list carries.
- Another reading: ② (1907 Nirṇayasāgara, Pīyūṣadhārā) numbers this verse ॥६०॥ and reads its second half differently: `एकार्गलाख्यो ह्यभिजित्समेतो दोषः शशी चेद्विषमर्क्षगोऽर्कात्` against our `योगे विरुद्धे त्वभिजित्समेतः खार्जूरमर्काद्विषमे शशी चेत्`. Both halves scan as indravajrā (11 syllables to the pāda) and both say the same thing, so neither is a defect; ② names the doṣa ekārgala and treats khārjūra as the cakra it arises from, while ours names the khārjūra. The reading is left as ours and the divergence recorded.
शराष्टदिक्शक्रनगातिधृत्यस्तिथिधृतिश्च प्रकृतेश्च पञ्च उपग्रहाः सूर्यभतोऽब्जताराः शुभा न देशे कुरुबाह्लिकानाम्
śarāṣṭadikśakranagātidhṛtyastithidhṛtiśca prakṛteśca pañca upagrahāḥ sūryabhato'bjatārāḥ śubhā na deśe kurubāhlikānām
Five, eight, ten, fourteen, seven, nineteen, fifteen, eighteen and twenty-one — the upagrahas, ⟨counted⟩ from the Sun's nakṣatra; the Moon's asterisms ⟨so struck⟩ are not auspicious in the country of the Kurus and Bāhlikas.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The number-words are śara 5, aṣṭa 8, diś 10, śakra 14, naga 7, atidhṛti 19, tithi 15, dhṛti 18, prakṛti 21 — nine, and in the ascending order 5,7,8,10,14,15,18,19,21 that the standard upagraha reckoning uses. UNRESOLVED: the mūla reads pañca upagrahāḥ, five upagrahas, against the nine numbers it has just named. I have not translated pañca as a count of the list because that would contradict the list; whether it is a corruption, a sub-grouping, or a word I am misparsing is plate work. The chapter's own verse 69 confirms the second half: the upagraha nakṣatra is rejected specifically among the Kurus and Bāhlikas.
- Corroboration: Non-contiguous corroboration: this verse's country-restriction is confirmed at 6.69, forty-six verses later. A reader or an index that works verse by verse will not meet the two together. Recorded 2026-09-08 from the `unresolved` block of .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere.
पातोपग्रहलत्तासु नेष्टोऽङ्घ्रिः खेटपत्समः वारस्त्रिघ्नोऽष्टभिस्तष्टः सैकः स्यादर्धयामकः
pātopagrahalattāsu neṣṭo'ṅghriḥ kheṭapatsamaḥ vārastrighno'ṣṭabhistaṣṭaḥ saikaḥ syādardhayāmakaḥ
In ⟨the reckoning of⟩ pāta, upagraha and lattā, the quarter (pāda) that answers to the graha's lord is not desirable. The weekday ⟨number⟩ multiplied by three, divided by eight, ⟨the remainder⟩ increased by one — that is the ardhayāma (half-watch).
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Arithmetic checked against the mūla: trighna = ×3, aṣṭabhis taṣṭa = ÷8, saika = +1.
शक्रार्कदिग्वसुरसाब्ध्यश्विनः कुलिका रवेः रात्रौ निरेकास्तिथ्यंशाः शनौ चान्त्योऽपि निन्दितः
śakrārkadigvasurasābdhyaśvinaḥ kulikā raveḥ rātrau nirekāstithyaṃśāḥ śanau cāntyo'pi ninditaḥ
Fourteen, twelve, ten, eight, six, four and two — ⟨these are⟩ the kulikas ⟨of the weekdays⟩ beginning with Sunday, in fifteenth-parts ⟨of the day⟩. At night ⟨they are⟩ each less by one. And on Saturday the last ⟨part⟩ also is condemned.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Number-words: śakra 14, arka 12, diś 10, vasu 8, rasa 6, abdhi 4, aśvin 2 — seven values for the seven weekdays from Sunday. tithyaṃśāḥ is read as the fifteen equal parts of the day (and of the night), which is what makes nirekāḥ (less one) at night give 13, 11, 9, 7, 5, 3, 1.
चापान्त्यगे गोघटगे पतङ्गे कर्काजगे स्त्रीमिथुने स्थिते च सिंहालिगे नक्रधटे समाः स्युस्तिथ्यो द्वितीयाप्रमुखाश्च दग्धाः
cāpāntyage goghaṭage pataṅge karkājage strīmithune sthite ca siṃhālige nakradhaṭe samāḥ syustithyo dvitīyāpramukhāśca dagdhāḥ
When the Sun (pataṅga) stands in Dhanus (cāpa) and Mīna (antya), in Vṛṣa (go) and Kumbha (ghaṭa), in Karka and Meṣa (aja), in Kanyā (strī) and Mithuna, in Siṃha and Vṛścika (ali), and in Makara (nakra) and Tulā (dhaṭa) — ⟨these pairs⟩ are alike, and the tithis beginning with the second are burnt (dagdha) ⟨respectively⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चापान्त्यगे गोघटगे पतङ्गे कर्काजगे स्त्रीमिथुने स्थिते च सिंहालिगे नक्रध्टे समाः स्युस्तिथ्यो द्वितीयाप्रमुखाश्च दग्धाः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Two readings had to be made. (1) The e-text's नक्रध्टे was EMENDED to नक्रधटे on 2026-09-08: ध्ट is not a Sanskrit conjunct, dhaṭa (the balance) = Tulā is the only rāśi otherwise missing so that the six pairs exhaust all twelve signs, and ② prints नक्रधटे. (2) samāḥ syuḥ is rendered as the pairs being alike (i.e. carrying the same dagdha-tithi), and dvitīyā-pramukhāḥ as the burnt tithis running from the second onward, pair by pair. The respective mapping of pair to tithi is not spelled out in the mūla and I have not supplied one.
लग्नाच्चन्द्रान्मदनभवनगे खेटे न स्यादिह परिणयनं किं वा बाणाशुगमितलवगे जामित्रं स्यादशुभकरमिदम्
lagnāccandrānmadanabhavanage kheṭe na syādiha pariṇayanaṃ kiṃ vā bāṇāśugamitalavage jāmitraṃ syādaśubhakaramidam
If a graha stands in the 7th house (madana-bhavana) from the lagna or from the Moon, marriage should not ⟨take place⟩ here. Or again, when ⟨a graha⟩ occupies the navāṃśa (lava) reckoned as fifty-five, that is the jāmitra, and this is a maker of ill.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: bāṇa-āśuga-mita = measured as 55 (bāṇa 5, āśuga 5, read as a two-place bhūtasaṃkhyā). The circle holds 108 navāṃśas, so the navāṃśa diametrically opposite a given one is the 55th counted inclusively — which is why 55 lavas defines the jāmitra (the 7th) in the aṃśa reckoning. The number is left as 55 in the line; the reasoning stays here.
एकार्गलोपग्रहपातलत्ताजामित्रकर्तर्युदयास्तदोषाः नश्यन्ति चन्द्रार्कबलोपपन्ने लग्ने यथार्काभ्युदये तु दोषा
ekārgalopagrahapātalattājāmitrakartaryudayāstadoṣāḥ naśyanti candrārkabalopapanne lagne yathārkābhyudaye tu doṣā
The blemishes of ekārgala, upagraha, pāta, lattā, jāmitra, kartarī, and of rising and setting perish when the lagna is endowed with the strength of the Moon and the Sun — just as night ⟨perishes⟩ at the rising of the Sun.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The last word doṣā is doṣā (feminine, night), not doṣa (blemish) — a deliberate pun closing a verse whose whole subject is doṣas. Rendered as night, which is what carries the simile; the pun cannot be kept in either target language.
- Corroboration: DEFINED TERMS LIVE ELSEWHERE IN THIS CHAPTER, AND THE VERSE NAMES SEVEN OF THEM. This verse cancels the blemishes of ekārgala, upagraha, vāta, lattā, jāmitra, kartarī, and of rising and setting. It defines none of them. In this chapter kartarī is defined at 6.44, lattā at 6.59, upagraha at 6.63 and jāmitra at 6.67 — none of them adjacent — while ekārgala and vāta are defined NOWHERE in chapter 6 (ekārgala is named at 6.62, in its own doṣa verse, and vāta not at all). So the verse is a complete sentence and an unusable instruction on its own: anything that acts on it must carry the four definitions with it, and must not assume the other two are defined here. Recorded 2026-09-08 from the `unresolved` block of .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads एकार्गलोपग्रहपातलत्ताजामित्रकर्तर्युदयास्तदोषाः; this sentence names vāta, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
उपग्रहर्क्षं कुरुबाह्लिकेषु कलिङ्गवङ्गेषु च पातितं भं सौराष्ट्रशाल्वेषु च लत्तितं भं त्यजेत्तु विद्धं किल सर्व देशे
upagraharkṣaṃ kurubāhlikeṣu kaliṅgavaṅgeṣu ca pātitaṃ bhaṃ saurāṣṭraśālveṣu ca lattitaṃ bhaṃ tyajettu viddhaṃ kila sarva deśe
The upagraha nakṣatra ⟨is to be shunned⟩ among the Kurus and Bāhlikas, the nakṣatra struck by pāta among the Kaliṅgas and Vaṅgas, and the lattā-struck nakṣatra among the Saurāṣṭras and Śālvas; but the vedha-struck one is to be rejected in every country indeed.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The mūla's लत्तितं मं reads मं where भं (nakṣatra) is expected — the same word the verse has already used twice (उपग्रहर्क्षं, पातितं भं). I render it as the nakṣatra and record the letter as it stands; भ/म is a single-akṣara slip and correcting the printing is plate work.
शशाङ्कसूर्यर्क्षयुतेर्भशेषे खं भूयुगाङ्गानि दशेशतिथ्यः नागेन्दवोऽङ्केन्दुमिता नखाश्चेद्भवन्ति चैते दशयोगसञ्ज्ञाः
śaśāṅkasūryarkṣayuterbhaśeṣe khaṃ bhūyugāṅgāni daśeśatithyaḥ nāgendavo'ṅkendumitā nakhāścedbhavanti caite daśayogasañjñāḥ
When, from the sum of the Moon's and the Sun's nakṣatras, the remainder ⟨in nakṣatras⟩ is nought, one, four, six, ten, eleven, fifteen, eighteen, nineteen or twenty — then these are named the ten yogas.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Number-words: khaṃ 0, bhū 1, yuga 4, aṅga 6, daśa 10, īśa 11, tithi 15, then nāga-indu as a two-place figure 18 and aṅka-indu 19, and nakha 20. Ten values, matching the verse's own daśa-yoga (ten yogas), and strictly ascending — which is what confirms the two-place readings against taking nāga and indu as separate 8 and 1.
वाताभ्राग्निमहीपचोरमरणं रुग्वज्रवादाः क्षतिर्योगाङ्के दलिते समे मनुयुतेऽथौजे तु सैकेऽर्धिते भं दास्रादथ सम्मितास्तु मनुभी रेखाः क्रमात्संलिखेद् वेधोऽस्मिन् ग्रहचन्द्रयोर्न शुभदः स्यादेकरेखास्थयोः
vātābhrāgnimahīpacoramaraṇaṃ rugvajravādāḥ kṣatiryogāṅke dalite same manuyute'thauje tu saike'rdhite bhaṃ dāsrādatha sammitāstu manubhī rekhāḥ kramātsaṃlikhed vedho'smin grahacandrayorna śubhadaḥ syādekarekhāsthayoḥ
Wind, cloud, fire, king, thief, death, disease, thunderbolt, quarrel, injury ⟨are their names⟩. The yoga-number, when even, is halved and joined with fourteen; when odd, increased by one and halved; ⟨then count⟩ the nakṣatra from Aśvinī (dāsra). Then one should draw lines numbering fourteen in order; in this ⟨figure⟩ the vedha of a graha and the Moon, the two standing in one line, is not a giver of good.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
वाताभ्राग्निमहीपचोरमरणं रुम्बज्रवादाः क्षति र्योगाङ्के दलिते समे मनुयुतेऽयौगे तु सैकेऽर्धिते भं दास्रादथ सम्मितास्तु मनुभी रेखाः क्रमात्संलिखेद् वेधोऽस्मिन् ग्रहचन्द्रयोर्न शुभदः स्यादेकरेखास्थयोः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The ten names answer to the ten yogas of verse 70. The e-text's रुम्बज्रवादाः is read as रुग्-वज्र-वादाः (disease, thunderbolt, quarrel): with kṣatiḥ that gives exactly ten items, and रुम्ब for रुग्व is the sort of ब/व and म्/ग् collapse this file shows elsewhere. Arithmetic checked against the mūla: even — halve, add 14 (manu); odd — add 1, halve; and 14 (manu) lines are drawn. This record is unusually long because the e-text carries what reads as more than one verse under the single number ७१.
- Corroboration: 6.70 and 6.71 are one rule split down the middle: 6.70 gives the ten remainders and says 'these are named the ten yogas' without naming them; this verse gives ten bare nouns and never says what they are. Neither can be applied alone — a remainder cannot be identified with a specific evil from either verse by itself. CAVEAT recorded with the span: this verse is unusually long because the e-text carries what reads as more than one verse under the single number ७१. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, span [70,71].
लग्नेनाढ्या याततिथ्योऽङ्कतष्टाः शेषे नागद्व्यब्धितर्केन्दुसङ्ख्ये रोगो वह्नी राजचौरौ च मृत्युर्बाणश्चायं दाक्षिणात्यप्रसिद्धः
lagnenāḍhyā yātatithyo'ṅkataṣṭāḥ śeṣe nāgadvyabdhitarkendusaṅkhye rogo vahnī rājacaurau ca mṛtyurbāṇaścāyaṃ dākṣiṇātyaprasiddhaḥ
The elapsed tithis increased by the lagna ⟨number⟩ and divided by nine — when the remainder is eight, two, four, six or one, ⟨there is⟩ disease, fire, the king and the thief, and death ⟨respectively⟩; and this is the bāṇa, well known among the southerners.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Number-words: aṅka 9 (the divisor), and the remainders nāga 8, dvi 2, abdhi 4, tarka 6, indu 1 — five remainders answering to the five named results, in that order.
रसगुणशशिनागाब्ध्याढ्यसङ्क्रान्तियातां शकमितिरथ तष्टाऽङ्कैर्यदा पञ्च शेषाः रुगनलनृपचौरा मृत्युसञ्ज्ञश्च बाणो नवहृतशरशेषे शेषकैक्ये सशल्यः
rasaguṇaśaśināgābdhyāḍhyasaṅkrāntiyātāṃ śakamitiratha taṣṭā'ṅkairyadā pañca śeṣāḥ ruganalanṛpacaurā mṛtyusañjñaśca bāṇo navahṛtaśaraśeṣe śeṣakaikye saśalyaḥ
The Śaka reckoning increased by ⟨the days⟩ elapsed since the saṅkrānti and by six, three, one, eight and four, then divided by nine — when five remains, the bāṇa is, ⟨in order⟩, disease, fire, the king, the thief, and the one named death. When, divided by nine, the remainder is five, ⟨and⟩ when the remainders coincide, it is saśalya (barbed).
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Number-words: rasa 6, guṇa 3, śaśi 1, nāga 8, abdhi 4 as the five addends; aṅka 9 as the divisor; śara 5 as the remainder in the last quarter. The word ṣañca in अथ तष्टाऽङ्कैर्यदा षञ्च शेषाः is not a well-formed word here; the likeliest reading is पञ्च (five), which would agree with the five addends and the five results, but I have translated round it rather than emend, and the count of remainders is left unstated in the line. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पञ्च; this sentence names ṣañca and षञ्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
रात्रौ चौररुजौ दिवा नरपतिर्वह्निः सदा सन्ध्ययोर्मृत्युश्चाथ शनौ नृपो विदि मृतिर्भौमेऽग्निचौरौ रवौ रोगोऽथ व्रतगेहगोपनृपसेवायानपाणिग्रहे वर्ज्याश्च क्रमतो बुधै रुगनलक्ष्मापालचौरा मृतिः
rātrau caurarujau divā narapatirvahniḥ sadā sandhyayormṛtyuścātha śanau nṛpo vidi mṛtirbhaume'gnicaurau ravau rogo'tha vratagehagopanṛpasevāyānapāṇigrahe varjyāśca kramato budhai ruganalakṣmāpālacaurā mṛtiḥ
At night, the thief and disease; by day, the king and fire; at the two twilights, always death. Then on Saturday the king, on Mercury's ⟨day⟩ death, on Tuesday fire and the thief, on Sunday disease. And ⟨these⟩ are to be shunned by the wise, in order, in a vow, the keeping of a house, the service of a king, a journey and marriage: disease, fire, the king, the thief, death.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रात्रौ चौररुजौ दिवा नरपतिर्वह्निः सदा सन्ध्ययो र्मृत्युश्चाथ शनौ नृपो विदि मृतिर्भौमेऽग्निचौरौ रवौ रोगोऽथ व्रतगेहगोपनृपसेवायानपाणिग्रहे वर्ज्याश्च क्रमतो बुधे रुगनलक्ष्मापालचौरा मृतिः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Two difficulties, both left standing. (1) विदि and बुधे both name Mercury (vid, the knower, is the same epithet as jña and budha), so the verse appears to assign Mercury's day twice; one of the two is probably corrupt, and I have not chosen which. (2) The five undertakings are read as vrata, geha-gopa (keeping of the house), nṛpa-sevā, yāna, pāṇigraha — five, matching the five bāṇas disease, fire, king, thief, death, which is why geha and gopa are taken as one item and not two. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads बुधै; this sentence names बुधे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
त्र्याशं त्रिकोणं चतुरस्रमस्तं पश्यन्ति खेटाश्चरणाभिवृद्ध्या मन्दो गुरुर्भूमिसुतः परे च क्रमेण सम्पूर्णदृशो भवन्ति
tryāśaṃ trikoṇaṃ caturasramastaṃ paśyanti kheṭāścaraṇābhivṛddhyā mando gururbhūmisutaḥ pare ca krameṇa sampūrṇadṛśo bhavanti
The grahas aspect the third ⟨and tenth⟩, the trikoṇa, the square ⟨the 4th and 8th⟩, and the setting place (asta, the 7th) with increasing quarters ⟨of aspect⟩; Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, and the rest become full in aspect ⟨on these⟩ respectively.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: tryāśa is rendered as the third place; the tenth is supplied because the doctrine the second half states — Saturn full on the first of the four — is the standard 3rd-and-10th full aspect of Saturn, with Jupiter full on 5-9 (trikoṇa), Mars full on 4-8 (caturasra), and all grahas full on the 7th (asta). caturasra is glossed rather than translated as square.
यदा लग्नांशेशो लवमथ तनुं पश्यति युतो भवेद्वाऽयं वोढुः शुभफलमनल्पं रचयति लवद्यूनस्वामी लवमदनभं लग्नमदनं प्रपश्येद्वा वध्वाः शुभमितरथा ज्ञेयमशुभम्
yadā lagnāṃśeśo lavamatha tanuṃ paśyati yuto bhavedvā'yaṃ voḍhuḥ śubhaphalamanalpaṃ racayati lavadyūnasvāmī lavamadanabhaṃ lagnamadanaṃ prapaśyedvā vadhvāḥ śubhamitarathā jñeyamaśubham
When the lord of the lagna's navāṃśa (lagnāṃśeśa) aspects the navāṃśa (lava) or the lagna (tanu), or is joined ⟨with them⟩, he makes no small auspicious result for the bridegroom. ⟨And when⟩ the lord of the 7th of the navāṃśa (lava-dyūna) aspects the 7th sign of the navāṃśa or the 7th from the lagna, ⟨that is⟩ auspicious for the bride; otherwise it is to be known as inauspicious.
6.77a reading here is contested लवेशो लवं लग्नपो लग्नगेहं प्रपश्येन्मिथो वा शुभं स्याद्वरस्य लवद्यूनपोंऽशद्युनं लग्नपोऽस्तं मिथो वेक्षते स्याच्छुभं कन्यकायाः
laveśo lavaṃ lagnapo lagnagehaṃ prapaśyenmitho vā śubhaṃ syādvarasya lavadyūnapoṃ'śadyunaṃ lagnapo'staṃ mitho vekṣate syācchubhaṃ kanyakāyāḥ
⟨When⟩ the lord of the navāṃśa aspects the navāṃśa and the lord of the lagna the lagna-house, or ⟨when the two aspect⟩ each other, it is auspicious for the bridegroom. ⟨When⟩ the lord of the 7th of the navāṃśa aspects the 7th of the aṃśa and the lord of the lagna the 7th (asta), or ⟨when the two aspect⟩ each other, it is auspicious for the bride.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लवेशो लवं लग्नपो लग्नगेहं प्रपश्येन्मिथो वा शुभं स्याद्वरस्य लवद्यूनपॐऽशद्युनं लग्नपोऽस्तं मिथो वेक्षते स्याच्छुभं कन्यकायाः
2 notes on this verse
- What the page would not yield: SOURCE CORRUPTION, carried through unrepaired: the `ॐ` in this verse is not the praṇava. It stands where ों belongs — विशॐऽघ्रिजाः is विशोऽङ्घ्रिजाः, वारॐऽशको is वारोंऽशको — one more collapse of the same encoding path that produced this file's `Þ`. It is left in place for the same reason.
- About this edition: The mūla carries the source corruption the input file records: लवद्यूनपॐऽशद्युनं is लवद्यूनपो ऽंशद्यूनं — the ॐ stands for ों, not the praṇava. The sense is not in doubt (the lord of the navāṃśa 7th, and the 7th of the aṃśa), because the pāda is the exact counterpart of the bridegroom's clause in the first half; only the letter is damaged. Rendered on that reading, with the corruption left unrepaired in the mūla.
लवपतिशुभमित्रं वीक्षतेऽंशं तनुं वा परिणयनकरस्य स्याच्छुभं शास्त्रदृष्टम् मदनलवपमित्रं सौम्यमंशद्युनं वा तनुमदनगृहं चेद्वीक्षते शर्म वध्वाः
lavapatiśubhamitraṃ vīkṣate'ṃśaṃ tanuṃ vā pariṇayanakarasya syācchubhaṃ śāstradṛṣṭam madanalavapamitraṃ saumyamaṃśadyunaṃ vā tanumadanagṛhaṃ cedvīkṣate śarma vadhvāḥ
⟨If⟩ a benefic that is a friend of the lord of the navāṃśa aspects the aṃśa or the lagna (tanu), it is auspicious for the one contracting the marriage — ⟨so it is⟩ seen in the śāstra. ⟨If⟩ a benefic that is a friend of the lord of the 7th navāṃśa aspects the 7th of the aṃśa, or the lagna and the 7th house, ⟨there is⟩ welfare for the bride.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: saumya is read as benefic (the class), not as Mercury, because the parallel clause in the first half has śubha in the same slot; the GLOSSARY requires the choice to be recorded.
विषुवायनेषु परपूर्वमध्यमान्दिवसांस्त्यजेदितरसङ्क्रमेषु हि घटिकास्तु षोडश शुभक्रियाविधौ परतोऽपि पूर्वमपि सन्त्यजेद्बुधः
viṣuvāyaneṣu parapūrvamadhyamāndivasāṃstyajeditarasaṅkrameṣu hi ghaṭikāstu ṣoḍaśa śubhakriyāvidhau parato'pi pūrvamapi santyajedbudhaḥ
At the equinoxes and the two solstices one should avoid the following, the preceding and the middle days; but at the other saṅkramaṇas, sixteen ghaṭikās — in the performance of an auspicious rite the wise man should avoid ⟨them⟩ both after and before.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Sixteen ghaṭikās, on each side, checked against the mūla (ṣoḍaśa).
देवद्व्यङ्कर्तवोऽष्टाष्टौ नाड्योऽङ्काः खनृपाः क्रमात् वर्ज्याः सङ्क्रमणेऽर्कादेः प्रायोऽर्कस्यातिनिन्दिताः
devadvyaṅkartavo'ṣṭāṣṭau nāḍyo'ṅkāḥ khanṛpāḥ kramāt varjyāḥ saṅkramaṇe'rkādeḥ prāyo'rkasyātininditāḥ
Thirty-three, two, nine, six, eight ⟨and⟩ eight nāḍīs, ⟨and⟩ nine — of the sky-kings ⟨the grahas⟩, in order — are to be shunned at the saṅkramaṇa (ingress) of the Sun and the rest; those of the Sun are for the most part exceedingly condemned.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: UNCERTAIN DECODING, recorded rather than hidden. The number-words are deva, dvi, aṅka, ṛtu, aṣṭa, aṣṭau, then aṅka, kha, nṛpa. Taking deva 33, dvi 2, aṅka 9, ṛtu 6, aṣṭa 8, aṣṭau 8, aṅka 9 gives seven values for the seven grahas, which is what saṅkramaṇe arkādeḥ (the ingress of the Sun and the rest) wants — and khanṛpāḥ is then not a number at all but sky-kings, i.e. the grahas, which is how I have rendered it. The alternative reading takes kha 0 and nṛpa 16 as two further numbers, but that yields nine values with a nought among them, which no nāḍī count can be. deva is 33 in the usual bhūtasaṃkhyā; 13 (viśve devāḥ) is possible and would suit verse 79's sixteen ghaṭikās less well. A commentary or the plates would settle it.
घस्रे तुलाली बधिरौ मृगाश्वौ रात्रौ च सिंहाजवृषा दिवान्धाः कन्यानृयुक्कर्कटका निशान्धा दिने घटोऽन्त्यो निशि पङ्गुसञ्ज्ञः
ghasre tulālī badhirau mṛgāśvau rātrau ca siṃhājavṛṣā divāndhāḥ kanyānṛyukkarkaṭakā niśāndhā dine ghaṭo'ntyo niśi paṅgusañjñaḥ
By day Tulā and Vṛścika (ali) are deaf, and by night Makara (mṛga) and Dhanus (aśva, the horse-⟨bodied sign⟩); Siṃha, Meṣa (aja) and Vṛṣa are day-blind; Kanyā, Mithuna (nṛyuj, the human pair) and Karka are night-blind; by day Kumbha (ghaṭa), by night the last ⟨sign, Mīna⟩, is called lame (paṅgu).
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: aśva is read as Dhanus: the twelve rāśis are exhausted by this verse and Dhanus is the only one otherwise unnamed, and the archer is horse-bodied in the standard iconography. Verse 82 immediately confirms it by listing dhanvin among the deaf signs in its own (differing) scheme.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.81–6.83. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The marriage lagna falling in a deaf, day-blind, night-blind or lame (paṅgu/kubja) sign — the memberships being those of v.81, OR those of v.82, WHICH DISAGREE RESULT: poverty from a deaf lagna; widowhood from a day-blind lagna; the death of the child from a night-blind lagna; destruction of all wealth from a lame one — and everywhere the aspects of the lord and of Jupiter remove the blemish (v.83) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE MOST DANGEROUS SPAN IN THIS CHAPTER, and the danger is in the text, not in the citation. v.83 states four grave results and defines none of its four sign-classes; the definitions are in vv.81 and 82 — and the apparatus says of v.82: 'This is a SECOND, DIFFERING SCHEME set beside verse 81 — the times are afternoon and the two twilights rather than day and night, the sign-groups do not agree with 81, and the fourth class is called kubja where 81 called it paṅgu. The disagreement is the text's own and is not smoothed over here.' So a claim seated on 6.83 alone has no memberships at all, and a claim that supplies them from ONE of the two verses silently picks a side in a disagreement the text leaves open. Also inside the span: v.82's verse numeral is ABSENT from the e-text and was restored on the metre, and v.81's 'aśva' is identified as Dhanus by elimination. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
बधिरा धन्वितुलालयोऽपराह्णे मिथुनं कर्कटकोऽङ्गना निशान्धाः दिवसान्धा हरिगोक्रियास्तु कुब्जा मृगकुम्भान्तिमभानि सन्ध्ययोर्हि
badhirā dhanvitulālayo'parāhṇe mithunaṃ karkaṭako'ṅganā niśāndhāḥ divasāndhā harigokriyāstu kubjā mṛgakumbhāntimabhāni sandhyayorhi
In the afternoon Dhanus, Tulā and Vṛścika (ali) are deaf; Mithuna, Karka and Kanyā (aṅganā) are night-blind; Siṃha (hari), Vṛṣa (go) and Meṣa (kriya) are day-blind; and Makara, Kumbha and the last sign ⟨Mīna⟩ are hunchbacked (kubja) at the two twilights.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The verse number ८२ is ABSENT: verse 81 is followed by four unnumbered lines and then ८३. The four run 24/24/26/26 syllables, so the boundary is exactly here. The 1907 printing has lost the same numeral at the same place.
- About this edition: This is a second, differing scheme set beside verse 81 — the times are afternoon and the two twilights rather than day and night, the sign-groups do not agree with 81, and the fourth class is called kubja (hunchbacked) where 81 called it paṅgu (lame). The disagreement is the text's own and is not smoothed over here. On the missing verse numeral see the edition note carried in the input.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.81–6.83. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The marriage lagna falling in a deaf, day-blind, night-blind or lame (paṅgu/kubja) sign — the memberships being those of v.81, OR those of v.82, WHICH DISAGREE RESULT: poverty from a deaf lagna; widowhood from a day-blind lagna; the death of the child from a night-blind lagna; destruction of all wealth from a lame one — and everywhere the aspects of the lord and of Jupiter remove the blemish (v.83) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE MOST DANGEROUS SPAN IN THIS CHAPTER, and the danger is in the text, not in the citation. v.83 states four grave results and defines none of its four sign-classes; the definitions are in vv.81 and 82 — and the apparatus says of v.82: 'This is a SECOND, DIFFERING SCHEME set beside verse 81 — the times are afternoon and the two twilights rather than day and night, the sign-groups do not agree with 81, and the fourth class is called kubja where 81 called it paṅgu. The disagreement is the text's own and is not smoothed over here.' So a claim seated on 6.83 alone has no memberships at all, and a claim that supplies them from ONE of the two verses silently picks a side in a disagreement the text leaves open. Also inside the span: v.82's verse numeral is ABSENT from the e-text and was restored on the metre, and v.81's 'aśva' is identified as Dhanus by elimination. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
दारिद्र्यं बधिरतनौ दिवान्धलग्ने वैधव्यं शिशुमरणं निशान्धलग्ने पङ्ग्वङ्गे निखिलधनानिनाशमीयुः सर्वत्राधिपगुरुदृष्टिभिर्न दोषः
dāridryaṃ badhiratanau divāndhalagne vaidhavyaṃ śiśumaraṇaṃ niśāndhalagne paṅgvaṅge nikhiladhanānināśamīyuḥ sarvatrādhipagurudṛṣṭibhirna doṣaḥ
Poverty ⟨comes⟩ when the lagna is a deaf ⟨sign⟩; widowhood when the lagna is day-blind; the death of the child when the lagna is night-blind; when the ⟨lagna⟩ body is lame, they come to the destruction of all wealth. Everywhere, through the aspects of the lord and of Jupiter, there is no blemish.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The four results are stated flatly in the mūla — dāridrya, vaidhavya, śiśu-maraṇa, nikhila-dhana-nāśa — and are rendered at their weight.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.81–6.83. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The marriage lagna falling in a deaf, day-blind, night-blind or lame (paṅgu/kubja) sign — the memberships being those of v.81, OR those of v.82, WHICH DISAGREE RESULT: poverty from a deaf lagna; widowhood from a day-blind lagna; the death of the child from a night-blind lagna; destruction of all wealth from a lame one — and everywhere the aspects of the lord and of Jupiter remove the blemish (v.83) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE MOST DANGEROUS SPAN IN THIS CHAPTER, and the danger is in the text, not in the citation. v.83 states four grave results and defines none of its four sign-classes; the definitions are in vv.81 and 82 — and the apparatus says of v.82: 'This is a SECOND, DIFFERING SCHEME set beside verse 81 — the times are afternoon and the two twilights rather than day and night, the sign-groups do not agree with 81, and the fourth class is called kubja where 81 called it paṅgu. The disagreement is the text's own and is not smoothed over here.' So a claim seated on 6.83 alone has no memberships at all, and a claim that supplies them from ONE of the two verses silently picks a side in a disagreement the text leaves open. Also inside the span: v.82's verse numeral is ABSENT from the e-text and was restored on the metre, and v.81's 'aśva' is identified as Dhanus by elimination. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
कार्मुकतौलिककन्यायुग्मलवे झषगे वा यर्हि भवेदुपयामस्तर्हि सती खलु कन्या
kārmukataulikakanyāyugmalave jhaṣage vā yarhi bhavedupayāmastarhi satī khalu kanyā
When the marriage (upayāma) takes place in the navāṃśa (lava) of Dhanus (kārmuka), Tulā, Kanyā or Mithuna (yugma), or in that of Mīna (jhaṣa), then the girl is indeed a satī.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: satī is left in Sanskrit in both renderings: it is the chaste and devoted wife, and any single English or Hindi word for it either narrows the sense or imports the later funerary meaning, which is not what the verse says.
अन्त्यनवांशे न च परिणेया काचन वर्गोत्तममिह हित्वा नो चरलग्ने चरलवयोगं तौलिमृगस्थे शशभृति कुर्यात्
antyanavāṃśe na ca pariṇeyā kācana vargottamamiha hitvā no caralagne caralavayogaṃ taulimṛgasthe śaśabhṛti kuryāt
And no girl is to be married in the last navāṃśa, setting aside the vargottama here; nor ⟨is⟩ the conjunction of a movable navāṃśa with a movable lagna ⟨to be made⟩ — ⟨but⟩ one may do it when the Moon stands in Tulā or Makara.
व्यये शनिः खेऽवनिजस्तृतीये भृगुस्तनौ चन्द्रखला न शस्ताः लग्नेट् कविर्ग्लौश्च रिपौ मृतौ ग्लौर्लग्नेट्शुभाराश्च मदे च सर्वे
vyaye śaniḥ khe'vanijastṛtīye bhṛgustanau candrakhalā na śastāḥ lagneṭ kavirglauśca ripau mṛtau glaurlagneṭśubhārāśca made ca sarve
Saturn in the 12th (vyaya), Mars (avanija) in the 10th (kha), Venus (bhṛgu) in the 3rd, the Moon and malefics in the lagna (tanu) — ⟨these are⟩ not commended; the lord of the lagna, Venus (kavi) and the Moon (glau) in the 6th (ripu); the Moon in the 8th; and the lord of the lagna, benefics and Mars (āra) in the 7th (mada) — all ⟨alike are not commended⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: śubhārāḥ is read as śubha + āra, benefics and Mars, the two together in the 7th.
त्र्यायाष्टषट्सु रविकेतुतमोऽर्कपुत्रा स्त्र्यायारिगः क्षितिसुतो द्विगुणायगोऽब्जः सप्तव्ययाष्टरहितौ ज्ञगुरू सितोऽष्ट त्रिद्यूनषड्व्ययगृहान् परिहृत्य शस्तः
tryāyāṣṭaṣaṭsu raviketutamo'rkaputrā stryāyārigaḥ kṣitisuto dviguṇāyago'bjaḥ saptavyayāṣṭarahitau jñagurū sito'ṣṭa tridyūnaṣaḍvyayagṛhān parihṛtya śastaḥ
The Sun, Ketu, Rāhu (tamas) and Saturn (arkaputra) ⟨are commended⟩ in the 3rd, 11th, 8th and 6th; Mars (kṣitisuta) standing in the 3rd, 11th and 6th; the Moon (abja) standing in the 2nd, 3rd and 11th; Mercury (jña) and Jupiter free of the 7th, the 12th and the 8th; Venus (sita) is commended having avoided the 8th, 3rd, 7th (dyūna), 6th and 12th houses.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: House numbers taken one by one from the mūla: try-āya-aṣṭa-ṣaṭ = 3, 11, 8, 6; then stryāyārigaḥ, which is arkaputrāḥ + tryāyārigaḥ run together by visarga sandhi, so the numbers are tri-āya-ari = 3, 11, 6 (there is no strī, woman, in it); dvi-guṇa-āya = 2, 3, 11; sapta-vyaya-aṣṭa = 7, 12, 8; aṣṭa-tri-dyūna-ṣaṭ-vyaya = 8, 3, 7, 6, 12. The GLOSSARY rule to render the house NUMBER, not the epithet's literal sense, governs dyūna, āya and vyaya here.
पापौ कर्तरिकारकौ रिपुगृहे नीचास्तगौ कर्तरी१ दोषो नैव सितेऽरिनीचगृहगे तत्षष्ठदोषोऽपि न भौमेऽस्ते रिपुनीचगे नहि भवेद्भौमोऽष्टमो दोषकृ न्नीचे नीचनवांशके शशिनि रिःफाष्टारिदोषोऽपि न
pāpau kartarikārakau ripugṛhe nīcāstagau kartarī1 doṣo naiva site'rinīcagṛhage tatṣaṣṭhadoṣo'pi na bhaume'ste ripunīcage nahi bhavedbhaumo'ṣṭamo doṣakṛ nnīce nīcanavāṃśake śaśini riḥphāṣṭāridoṣo'pi na
⟨When⟩ the two malefics that make the kartarī are in an enemy's house, debilitated, or set, there is no kartarī blemish at all. ⟨When⟩ Venus is in an enemy's or a debilitation house, that blemish of the 6th also is not. ⟨When⟩ Mars in the 7th (asta) is in an enemy's ⟨sign⟩ or debilitated, ⟨there is none⟩; nor does Mars in the 8th become a maker of blemish. ⟨When⟩ the Moon is debilitated or in a debilitation navāṃśa, the blemish of the 12th (riḥpha), the 8th and the 6th also is not.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The `१` after कर्तरी is not a verse number and not part of the verse: the pāda is a complete 19-syllable Śārdūlavikrīḍita quarter without it, and three more pādas follow before the verse closes at ८८. It is almost certainly a footnote or variant-reading mark from the printing this e-text was keyed from. It is carried through verbatim rather than deleted, because deciding what a mark meant is plate work.
- About this edition: The mūla carries a bare १ after कर्तरी. It is not part of the verse and not a verse number — the input file's edition note identifies it as a footnote or variant mark from the printing this e-text was keyed from, and the pāda is metrically complete without it. It is not translated.
अब्दायनर्तुतिथिमासभपक्षदग्ध तिथ्यन्धकाणबधिराङ्गमुखाश्च दोषाः नश्यन्ति विद्गुरुसितेष्विह केन्द्रकोणे तद्वच्च पापविधुयुक्तनवांशदोषः
abdāyanartutithimāsabhapakṣadagdha tithyandhakāṇabadhirāṅgamukhāśca doṣāḥ naśyanti vidgurusiteṣviha kendrakoṇe tadvacca pāpavidhuyuktanavāṃśadoṣaḥ
The blemishes of the burnt (dagdha) year, ayana, season, tithi, month, nakṣatra and fortnight, ⟨and those⟩ of the tithi, and of the blind, the one-eyed and the deaf ⟨signs⟩, and of the limb and of the face — these perish when Mercury (vid), Jupiter and Venus are here in a kendra or a trikoṇa; and likewise the blemish of a navāṃśa joined with a malefic or with the Moon.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The e-text breaks the long compound across a line at ...पक्षदग्ध / तिथ्यन्ध..., which leaves tithi standing twice — once inside the dagdha series and once at the head of the blemish list. Both are rendered as they stand rather than one being silently dropped; the duplication is a feature of this printing's compound, not of my parse. vid is Mercury (the knower), the same epithet as jña and budha.
केन्द्रे कोणे जीव आये रवौ च लग्ने चन्द्रे वाऽपि वर्गोत्तमे वा सर्वे दोषा नाशमायान्ति चन्द्रे लाभे तद्वद्दुर्मुहूर्तांशदोषाः
kendre koṇe jīva āye ravau ca lagne candre vā'pi vargottame vā sarve doṣā nāśamāyānti candre lābhe tadvaddurmuhūrtāṃśadoṣāḥ
⟨When⟩ Jupiter (jīva) is in a kendra or a trikoṇa and the Sun in the 11th (āya), or ⟨when⟩ the lagna or the Moon is in vargottama, all blemishes go to destruction; and in the same way, ⟨when⟩ the Moon is in the 11th (lābha), the blemishes of an evil muhūrta and of the aṃśa ⟨go to destruction⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
केन्द्रे कोणे जीव आये रवौ च लग्ने चन्द्रे वाऽपि वर्तोत्तमे वा सर्वे दोषा नाशमायान्ति चन्द्रे लाभे तद्वद्दुर्मुहूर्तांशदोषाः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The e-text read वर्तोत्तमे where वर्गोत्तमे (vargottama) is meant — the term the chapter has already used at verse 85. EMENDED in the mūla on 2026-09-08; ② prints वर्गोत्तमे and glosses it वर्गनवांशे. The e-text's form is kept in `diplomatic`.
त्रिकोणे केन्द्रे वा मदनरहिते दोषशतकं हरेत्सौम्यः शुक्रो द्विगुणमपि लक्षं सुरगुरुः भवेदाये केन्द्रेऽङ्गप उत लवेशो यदि तदा समूहं दोषाणां दहन इव तूलं शमयति
trikoṇe kendre vā madanarahite doṣaśatakaṃ haretsaumyaḥ śukro dviguṇamapi lakṣaṃ suraguruḥ bhavedāye kendre'ṅgapa uta laveśo yadi tadā samūhaṃ doṣāṇāṃ dahana iva tūlaṃ śamayati
Mercury (saumya), standing in a trikoṇa or in a kendra other than the 7th (madana), carries off a hundred blemishes; Venus, twice as many; Jupiter, the guru of the gods, even a lakh. And should the lord of the lagna (aṅgapa) or the lord of the navāṃśa (laveśa) stand in the 11th (āya) or in a kendra, then it quells the whole mass of blemishes as fire quells cotton.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: madana, like mada, is the 7th house; aṅgapa is the lord of the aṅga (tanu, the lagna); laveśa the lord of the lava (navāṃśa) — the same lava that verse 100 uses. The counts are exact in the mūla: 100, double that, and a lakh.
द्वौ द्वौ ज्ञभृग्वोः पञ्चेन्दौ रवौ सार्धत्रयो गुरौ रामा मन्दागुकेत्वारे सार्धैकैकं विशोपकाः
dvau dvau jñabhṛgvoḥ pañcendau ravau sārdhatrayo gurau rāmā mandāguketvāre sārdhaikaikaṃ viśopakāḥ
Two each for Mercury (jña) and Venus (bhṛgu); five for the Moon; three and a half for the Sun; three (rāma) for Jupiter; and one and a half each for Saturn (mandāgu, ⟨the slow-rayed⟩), Ketu and Mars (āra) — such are the viśopakas.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: mandāgu is read as one name, 'the slow-rayed' = Saturn, exactly parallel to uṣṇagu for the Sun; on that reading the eight values total 2+2+5+3.5+3+1.5+1.5+1.5 = 20, which is what viśopaka ('of twenty parts') requires. The alternative split manda + agu (= Rāhu) + ketu + āra gives four grahas at one and a half each and a total of 21.5, and is rejected on that arithmetic.
श्वश्रूः सितोऽर्कः श्वशुरस्तनुस्तनुर्जामित्रपः स्याद्दयितो मनः शशी एतद्बलं सम्प्रतिभाव्य तान्त्रिकस्तेषां सुखं सम्प्रवदेद्विवाहतः
śvaśrūḥ sito'rkaḥ śvaśurastanustanurjāmitrapaḥ syāddayito manaḥ śaśī etadbalaṃ sampratibhāvya tāntrikasteṣāṃ sukhaṃ sampravadedvivāhataḥ
Venus is the mother-in-law, the Sun the father-in-law, the lagna (tanu) the body ⟨itself⟩, the lord of the 7th (jāmitra) the beloved ⟨husband⟩, and the Moon the mind. Having well weighed the strength of these, the man versed in the system (tāntrika) should declare the happiness that will come to them from the marriage.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: tanus tanuḥ — the lagna stands for the body itself; the mūla repeats the word rather than naming a person. tāntrika here is the man versed in the tantra (the technical system), not a religious sectarian.
कृष्णे पक्षे सौरिकुजार्केऽपि च वारे वर्ज्ये नक्षत्रे यदि वा स्यात् करपीडा सङ्कीर्णानां तर्हि सुतायुर्धनलाभ प्रीतिप्राप्त्यै सा भवतीह स्थितिरेषा
kṛṣṇe pakṣe saurikujārke'pi ca vāre varjye nakṣatre yadi vā syāt karapīḍā saṅkīrṇānāṃ tarhi sutāyurdhanalābha prītiprāptyai sā bhavatīha sthitireṣā
If the hand-taking (karapīḍā, the wedding) of people of mixed birth (saṅkīrṇa) should fall in the dark fortnight, or on the weekday of Saturn, Mars or the Sun, or in a rejected nakṣatra, then it turns out for the winning of sons, long life, gain of wealth and affection: this is the rule that stands here.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: karapīḍā, 'the pressing of the hand', is pāṇigrahaṇa, the wedding itself. saṅkīrṇa is those of mixed caste: the verse exempts them from the prohibitions the preceding chapter lays down.
गान्धर्वादिविवाहेऽर्काद्वेदनेत्रगुणेन्दवः कुयुगाङ्गाग्निभूरामास्त्रिपद्यामशुभाः शुभाः
gāndharvādivivāhe'rkādvedanetraguṇendavaḥ kuyugāṅgāgnibhūrāmāstripadyāmaśubhāḥ śubhāḥ
In the gāndharva and the other ⟨forms of⟩ marriage, ⟨counting the nakṣatras⟩ from the Sun: four, two, three, one, one, four, six, three, one and three — these ⟨runs⟩, in the tripadī, are inauspicious and auspicious ⟨by turns⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The word-numerals are veda 4, netra 2, guṇa 3, indu 1, ku 1, yuga 4, aṅga 6, agni 3, bhū 1, rāma 3 — ten runs summing to 28, the full circle of nakṣatras reckoned from the Sun's; the closing pair aśubhāḥ śubhāḥ marks them alternately inauspicious and auspicious, so read the first run of four as inauspicious. The referent of tripadyām is not determinable from the mūla alone and is left in Sanskrit; nothing else in the verse depends on it.
विधोर्बलमवेक्ष्य वा दलनकण्डनं वारकं गृहाङ्गणविभूषणान्यथ च वेदिकामण्डपान् विवाहविहितोडुभिर्विरचयेत्तथोद्वाहतो न पूर्वमिदमाचरेत् त्रिनवषण्मिते वासरे
vidhorbalamavekṣya vā dalanakaṇḍanaṃ vārakaṃ gṛhāṅgaṇavibhūṣaṇānyatha ca vedikāmaṇḍapān vivāhavihitoḍubhirviracayettathodvāhato na pūrvamidamācaret trinavaṣaṇmite vāsare
Or else, having looked to the strength of the Moon, one should carry out the splitting and husking ⟨of the grain⟩, the vāraka, the adorning of the house and the courtyard, and further the altar and the pavilion, under the nakṣatras prescribed for marriage; and one should not perform this, reckoned from the wedding, earlier than the day measured by three, nine ⟨or⟩ six.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: trinavaṣaṇmite vāsare keeps the mūla's own order of the numbers — three, nine, six. vāraka stands unglossed in the mūla; in this list of pre-wedding acts it is most naturally the water-jar, but the verse does not say so and the word is left as it stands.
हस्तोच्छ्राया वेदहस्तैः समन्तात्तुल्या वेदी सद्मनो वामभागे युग्मे घस्रे षष्ठहीने च पञ्चसप्ताहे स्यान्मण्डपोद्वासनं सत्
hastocchrāyā vedahastaiḥ samantāttulyā vedī sadmano vāmabhāge yugme ghasre ṣaṣṭhahīne ca pañcasaptāhe syānmaṇḍapodvāsanaṃ sat
The altar (vedī), a hasta in height and equal on every side by four hastas, ⟨is made⟩ on the left side of the house. And on an even day, the sixth excepted, and on the fifth or the seventh, the dismantling (udvāsana) of the pavilion is good.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: Numbers as in the mūla: height one hasta, four hastas on every side; even days with the sixth excluded, plus the fifth and the seventh.
- About this edition: THE EDITION NUMBERS THIS VERSE ॥९५॥, read on the plate at printed p. ३०४. Our numbering runs two ahead of the printing here, and the step between the two comes from our record 98, which the edition places near the end of the chapter (see its note). From our 99 on the offset holds at +3: our 102 = ślo. ९९, our 103 = १००, our 105 = १०२, our 108 = १०५, each from the edition's śloka index.
मेषादिराशिजवधूवरयोर्बटोश्च तैलादिलापनविधौ कथिताऽत्र सङ्ख्या शैला दिशः शरदिगक्षनगाद्रिबाणा बाणाक्षबाणगिरयो विबुधैस्तु कैश्चित्
meṣādirāśijavadhūvarayorbaṭośca tailādilāpanavidhau kathitā'tra saṅkhyā śailā diśaḥ śaradigakṣanagādribāṇā bāṇākṣabāṇagirayo vibudhaistu kaiścit
For a bride and groom born in the rāśis beginning with Meṣa, and for the boy (baṭu), the number stated here in the rite of anointing with oil and the rest is: seven, ten; five, ten, five, seven, seven, five; and five, five, five, seven — so ⟨it is given⟩ by some of the learned.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The word-numerals are śaila 7, diś 10; śara 5, diś 10, akṣa 5, naga 7, adri 7, bāṇa 5; bāṇa 5, akṣa 5, bāṇa 5, giri 7 — twelve values for the twelve rāśis from Meṣa, which is why the whole string is read as one list rather than eight values with four variants. akṣa is taken at 5, the value the next verse's own arithmetic fixes for it (nagākṣāḥ = 57 there); read as 2, the eyes, this verse's third and tenth values would be two instead of five. vibudhais tu kaiścit attributes the enumeration to some authorities, not to all.
- About this edition: THIS VERSE IS IN THE WRONG PLACE IN OUR FILE. The 1907 Nirṇayasāgara's śloka index rows it `मेषादिराशिजवधू — ślo. १०८ — p. ३१३`: the edition puts it near the END of this chapter, about ten places later than our 98. The plates on either side of our position prove it is not here: printed p. ३०४ sets our record 97 as ॥९५॥ and printed p. ३०५ sets our record 99 as ॥९६॥, with nothing but the rubric `अथ प्राच्यशिष्टसंमतं मंडपादौ स्तंभनिवेशनमिंद्रवज्रयाह—` between them. ⚠ THE VERSE HAS NOT BEEN MOVED. Its number is an address that readers and the claim library already cite, and moving it would silently change what those citations point at; the fact is recorded here instead, and the move is a separate decision.
सूर्येऽङ्गनासिंहधटेषु शैवे स्तम्भोऽलिकोदण्डमृगेषु वायौ मीनाजकुम्भे निरृतौ विवाहे स्थाप्योऽग्निकोणे वृषयुग्मकर्के
sūrye'ṅganāsiṃhadhaṭeṣu śaive stambho'likodaṇḍamṛgeṣu vāyau mīnājakumbhe nirṛtau vivāhe sthāpyo'gnikoṇe vṛṣayugmakarke
The Sun standing in Kanyā (aṅganā), Siṃha or Tulā (dhaṭa), the post (stambha) ⟨is to be set⟩ in the Īśāna (śaiva) quarter; in Vṛścika (ali), Dhanus (kodaṇḍa) or Makara, in the Vāyavya; in Mīna, Meṣa (aja) or Kumbha, in the Nairṛta; and in Vṛṣa, Mithuna (yugma) or Karka it is to be set, at the marriage, in the fire-corner (Āgneya).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सूर्येऽङ्गनासिंहधटेषु शैवे स्तम्भोऽलिकोदण्डभृगेषु वायौ मीनाजकुम्भे निरृतौ विवाहे स्थाप्योऽग्निकोणे वृषयुग्मकर्के
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: dhaṭa is the balance, Tulā — not Kumbha, which is named separately in the third group. The e-text's bhṛgeṣu is read as mṛgeṣu, Makara: the four groups of three exhaust the twelve rāśis and Makara is the only sign left unassigned, so the reading is fixed by elimination rather than by conjecture. The four quarters named are the four corners — Īśāna NE, Vāyavya NW, Nairṛta SW, Āgneya SE.
- About this edition: THE EDITION NUMBERS THIS VERSE ॥९६॥, read on the plate at printed p. ३०५. Our numbering runs three ahead of the printing here, and the step between the two comes from our record 98, which the edition places near the end of the chapter (see its note). From our 99 on the offset holds at +3: our 102 = ślo. ९९, our 103 = १००, our 105 = १०२, our 108 = १०५, each from the edition's śloka index.
नास्यामृक्षं न तिथिकरणं नैव लग्नस्य चिन्ता नो वा वारो न च लवविधिर्नो मुहूर्तस्य चर्चा नो वा योगो न मृतिभवनं नैव जामित्रदोषो गोधूलिः सा मुनिभिरुदिता सर्वकार्येषु शस्ता
nāsyāmṛkṣaṃ na tithikaraṇaṃ naiva lagnasya cintā no vā vāro na ca lavavidhirno muhūrtasya carcā no vā yogo na mṛtibhavanaṃ naiva jāmitradoṣo godhūliḥ sā munibhiruditā sarvakāryeṣu śastā
In this ⟨hour⟩ there is no ⟨reckoning of⟩ nakṣatra, no tithi or karaṇa, no thought of the lagna at all, nor weekday, nor the rule of the navāṃśa (lava), nor discussion of the muhūrta, nor yoga, nor the 8th house (mṛtibhavana), nor even the jāmitra blemish: that is the godhūli, declared by the sages, commended in all undertakings.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.100–6.102. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The godhūli hour — defined in v.101 as threefold by season: the Sun still a whole orb in hemanta, half set in the hot season, wholly set in the rains RESULT: in it there is no reckoning of nakṣatra, tithi, karaṇa, lagna, weekday, navāṃśa, muhūrta, yoga, the 8th house or the jāmitra blemish; it is commended in all undertakings (v.100) — EXCEPT that at the Sun's setting on the day of Jupiter, Saturn or the Sun, with the Moon in the 8th, 6th or lagna, the bride is destroyed; with Mars in the 1st, 7th or 8th, the bridegroom; with the Moon in the 11th, 2nd or 3rd, happiness (v.102) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE RULE THAT CANCELS EVERY OTHER RULE IN THE CHAPTER, and it is spread over three verses. v.100 grants the blanket exemption and NEVER SAYS WHEN godhūli is — the moment is fixed only in v.101. v.102 is then the counter-exception, and it has no subject of its own: the apparatus says 'astaṃ yāte has no expressed subject; the Sun is supplied, godhūli being the running subject of 100–101', and 'the word for the groom's ruin is likewise unexpressed and carried over from kanyānāśaḥ'. So 6.100 alone licenses a wedding at an unspecified hour with every safeguard waived, and 6.102 alone predicts the death of a bride from a setting nobody named. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
पिण्डीभूते दिनकृति हेमन्तर्तौ स्यादर्धास्ते तपसमये गोधूलिः सम्पूर्णास्ते जलधरमालाकाले त्रेधा योज्या सकलशुभे कार्यादौ
piṇḍībhūte dinakṛti hemantartau syādardhāste tapasamaye godhūliḥ sampūrṇāste jaladharamālākāle tredhā yojyā sakalaśubhe kāryādau
When the maker of day has become an orb ⟨still whole⟩ — in the hemanta season; when he is half set — in the season of heat; when he is wholly set — in the time of the garlands of rain-clouds: godhūli is threefold, to be applied at the outset of every auspicious act.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The e-text prints gāghūliḥ; the word is godhūli, spelt correctly in verse 100 two lines above, and the threefold division is the standard seasonal one. tapasamaya is the hot season, jaladharamālākāla the rains. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads गोधूलिः; this sentence names gāghūliḥ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.100–6.102. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The godhūli hour — defined in v.101 as threefold by season: the Sun still a whole orb in hemanta, half set in the hot season, wholly set in the rains RESULT: in it there is no reckoning of nakṣatra, tithi, karaṇa, lagna, weekday, navāṃśa, muhūrta, yoga, the 8th house or the jāmitra blemish; it is commended in all undertakings (v.100) — EXCEPT that at the Sun's setting on the day of Jupiter, Saturn or the Sun, with the Moon in the 8th, 6th or lagna, the bride is destroyed; with Mars in the 1st, 7th or 8th, the bridegroom; with the Moon in the 11th, 2nd or 3rd, happiness (v.102) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE RULE THAT CANCELS EVERY OTHER RULE IN THE CHAPTER, and it is spread over three verses. v.100 grants the blanket exemption and NEVER SAYS WHEN godhūli is — the moment is fixed only in v.101. v.102 is then the counter-exception, and it has no subject of its own: the apparatus says 'astaṃ yāte has no expressed subject; the Sun is supplied, godhūli being the running subject of 100–101', and 'the word for the groom's ruin is likewise unexpressed and carried over from kanyānāśaḥ'. So 6.100 alone licenses a wedding at an unspecified hour with every safeguard waived, and 6.102 alone predicts the death of a bride from a setting nobody named. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
अस्तं याते गुरुदिवसे सौरे सार्के लग्नान्मृत्यौ रिपुभवने लग्ने चेन्दौ कन्यानाशस्तनुमदमृत्युस्थे भौमे वोढुर्लाभे धनसहजे चन्द्रे सौख्यम्
astaṃ yāte gurudivase saure sārke lagnānmṛtyau ripubhavane lagne cendau kanyānāśastanumadamṛtyusthe bhaume voḍhurlābhe dhanasahaje candre saukhyam
⟨The Sun⟩ having gone to setting, on the day of Jupiter, of Saturn or of the Sun; and the Moon standing, from the lagna, in the 8th (mṛtyu), in the 6th (ripubhavana), or in the lagna itself — ⟨there is⟩ destruction of the bride. Mars standing in the 1st (tanu), the 7th (mada) or the 8th (mṛtyu) — ⟨destruction⟩ of the bridegroom. The Moon in the 11th (lābha), the 2nd (dhana) or the 3rd (sahaja) — happiness.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: astaṃ yāte has no expressed subject; the Sun is supplied, godhūli being the running subject of 100–101, though a combust Jupiter or Venus is grammatically possible. The word for the groom's ruin is likewise unexpressed and carried over from kanyānāśaḥ. The verse is metrically whole — 52 syllables, four pādas of thirteen — so nothing has dropped out of the e-text here.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.100–6.102. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The godhūli hour — defined in v.101 as threefold by season: the Sun still a whole orb in hemanta, half set in the hot season, wholly set in the rains RESULT: in it there is no reckoning of nakṣatra, tithi, karaṇa, lagna, weekday, navāṃśa, muhūrta, yoga, the 8th house or the jāmitra blemish; it is commended in all undertakings (v.100) — EXCEPT that at the Sun's setting on the day of Jupiter, Saturn or the Sun, with the Moon in the 8th, 6th or lagna, the bride is destroyed; with Mars in the 1st, 7th or 8th, the bridegroom; with the Moon in the 11th, 2nd or 3rd, happiness (v.102) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: THE RULE THAT CANCELS EVERY OTHER RULE IN THE CHAPTER, and it is spread over three verses. v.100 grants the blanket exemption and NEVER SAYS WHEN godhūli is — the moment is fixed only in v.101. v.102 is then the counter-exception, and it has no subject of its own: the apparatus says 'astaṃ yāte has no expressed subject; the Sun is supplied, godhūli being the running subject of 100–101', and 'the word for the groom's ruin is likewise unexpressed and carried over from kanyānāśaḥ'. So 6.100 alone licenses a wedding at an unspecified hour with every safeguard waived, and 6.102 alone predicts the death of a bride from a setting nobody named. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
मेषादिगेऽर्केऽष्टशरा नगाक्षाः सप्तेषवः सप्तशरा गजाक्षाः गोक्षाः खतर्काः कुरसाः कुतर्काः क्वङ्गानि षष्टिर्नवपञ्च भुक्तिः
meṣādige'rke'ṣṭaśarā nagākṣāḥ sapteṣavaḥ saptaśarā gajākṣāḥ gokṣāḥ khatarkāḥ kurasāḥ kutarkāḥ kvaṅgāni ṣaṣṭirnavapañca bhuktiḥ
The Sun standing in Meṣa and the rest: fifty-eight, fifty-seven, fifty-seven, fifty-seven, fifty-eight, fifty-nine, sixty, sixty-one, sixty-one, sixty-one, sixty and fifty-nine — ⟨such is⟩ the ⟨daily⟩ motion.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: Twelve word-numeral pairs, read right to left as the rule aṅkānāṃ vāmato gatiḥ requires: aṣṭaśarā 58, nagākṣāḥ 57, sapteṣavaḥ 57, saptaśarā 57, gajākṣāḥ 58, gokṣāḥ 59, khatarkāḥ 60, kurasāḥ 61, kutarkāḥ 61, kvaṅgāni 61, ṣaṣṭiḥ 60, navapañca 59 — the Sun's daily motion in kalās (minutes of arc) for the twelve rāśis from Meṣa. The values track the true solar velocity, slowest near Mithuna–Karka and fastest near Dhanus–Makara, which is what fixes akṣa at 5 here and in verse 98.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.103–6.104. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The Sun's daily motion in kalās for each of the twelve rāśis from Meṣa — 58, 57, 57, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 61, 61, 60, 59 (v.103) RESULT: that motion, multiplied by the days elapsed since the saṅkrānti and divided by sixty, with the elapsed rāśi added to the quotient in degrees, gives the TRUE SUN (v.104) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.104's operand is the bare word 'matiḥ' ('the reckoning/motion'), with no table in the verse to be the motion of; the twelve values are all in v.103, which in turn states no operation and no purpose. The pair is one procedure — a table and its formula — and either half alone is inert. The apparatus notes the inline '६०' in v.104 'is the decoded value of that word-numeral … a gloss, not a verse number', which matters because a consumer scanning for numbers could otherwise mistake it for a citation. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
सङ्क्रान्तियातघस्राद्यैर्गतिर्निघ्नी खषड् ६० हृता लब्धेनांशादिना योज्यं यातर्क्षं स्पष्टभास्करः
saṅkrāntiyātaghasrādyairgatirnighnī khaṣaḍ 60 hṛtā labdhenāṃśādinā yojyaṃ yātarkṣaṃ spaṣṭabhāskaraḥ
The motion ⟨tabulated above⟩ is to be multiplied by the days and the rest elapsed since the saṅkrānti and divided by kha-ṣaṭ ⟨60⟩; to the quotient, in degrees and the rest, the elapsed rāśi is to be joined: ⟨that is⟩ the true Sun.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The ६० after खषड् is the decoded value of that word-numeral (kha 0, ṣaṭ 6, read right to left = 60), printed inline by this e-text as it is in the viṣa-nāḍī passage. It is a gloss, not a verse number; this verse's number is the १०४ it ends on.
- About this edition: The ६० printed after खषड् is this e-text's inline decoding of that word-numeral (kha 0, ṣaṭ 6, right to left = 60), as the edition note records; it is a gloss, not a verse number. The division by 60 is what turns the kalās of verse 103 into degrees.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 2 VERSES — 6.103–6.104. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The Sun's daily motion in kalās for each of the twelve rāśis from Meṣa — 58, 57, 57, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 61, 61, 60, 59 (v.103) RESULT: that motion, multiplied by the days elapsed since the saṅkrānti and divided by sixty, with the elapsed rāśi added to the quotient in degrees, gives the TRUE SUN (v.104) WHY THIS IS RECORDED: v.104's operand is the bare word 'matiḥ' ('the reckoning/motion'), with no table in the verse to be the motion of; the twelve values are all in v.103, which in turn states no operation and no purpose. The pair is one procedure — a table and its formula — and either half alone is inert. The apparatus notes the inline '६०' in v.104 'is the decoded value of that word-numeral … a gloss, not a verse number', which matters because a consumer scanning for numbers could otherwise mistake it for a citation. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गतिर्निघ्नी for मतिर्निघ्नी, so v.104's operand is gatiḥ, 'motion', the Sun's daily motion that v.103 tabulates. The Nirṇayasāgara 1907 (mc-piyushadhara-1907) store p.326 was read by eye at about 2.7x native: it sets गतिर्निघ्नी, the disputed akṣara a ग, open on the left with a descending hook and no closed counter, unlike the म of the same fount. This note describes the earlier text.]
तनोरिष्टांशकात् पूर्वं नवांशा दशसङ्गुणाः रामाप्ताः लब्धमंशाद्यं तनोर्वर्गादिसाधने
tanoriṣṭāṃśakāt pūrvaṃ navāṃśā daśasaṅguṇāḥ rāmāptāḥ labdhamaṃśādyaṃ tanorvargādisādhane
The navāṃśas ⟨elapsed⟩ before the desired degree of the lagna (tanu), multiplied by ten and divided by three (rāma) — the quotient is in degrees and the rest, in the working out of the lagna's varga and the rest.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: rāma is three. The arithmetic checks: one navāṃśa × 10 ÷ 3 = 3°20′, which is a navāṃśa exactly.
अर्काल्लग्नात्सायनाद्भोग्यभुक्तैर्भागैर्निघ्नात्स्वोदयात्खाग्निभक्तात् भोग्यं भुक्तं चान्तरालोदयाढ्यं षष्ट्या भक्तं स्वेष्टनाड्यो भवेयुः
arkāllagnātsāyanādbhogyabhuktairbhāgairnighnātsvodayātkhāgnibhaktāt bhogyaṃ bhuktaṃ cāntarālodayāḍhyaṃ ṣaṣṭyā bhaktaṃ sveṣṭanāḍyo bhaveyuḥ
From the sāyana Sun and from the sāyana lagna, ⟨take⟩ the degrees to be traversed (bhogya) and already traversed (bhukta); by them the sign's own rising-time (svodaya) is multiplied and divided by kha-agni ⟨thirty⟩. The bhogya and the bhukta ⟨so got⟩, increased by the rising-times of the signs in between, and divided by sixty, become one's own iṣṭa nāḍīs.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: khāgni is kha 0, agni 3, read right to left = 30 — the degrees of a rāśi. The final division by sixty carries palas into nāḍīs.
चेल्लग्नाऽर्कौ सायनावेकराशौ तद्विश्लेषघ्नोदयः खाग्निभक्तः स्वेष्टः कालो लग्नमूनं यदाऽर्काद्रात्रेः शेषोऽर्कात्सषड्भान्निशायाम्
cellagnā'rkau sāyanāvekarāśau tadviśleṣaghnodayaḥ khāgnibhaktaḥ sveṣṭaḥ kālo lagnamūnaṃ yadā'rkādrātreḥ śeṣo'rkātsaṣaḍbhānniśāyām
If the sāyana lagna and Sun stand in one and the same rāśi, the rising-time multiplied by their difference and divided by kha-agni ⟨thirty⟩ is one's own iṣṭa time. When the lagna is less than the Sun, ⟨what is got is⟩ the remainder of the night; and by night ⟨the reckoning is⟩ from the Sun increased by six signs.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: saṣaḍbhāt is the Sun plus six rāśis, the setting point; the mūla gives the night rule elliptically, without a verb.
उत्पातान्सह पातदग्धतिथिभिर्दुष्टांश्च योगांस्तथा चन्द्रेज्योशनसामथास्तमयनं तिथ्याः क्षयर्द्धी तथा गण्डान्तं च सविष्टिसङ्क्रमदिनं तन्वंशपास्तं तथा तन्वंशेशविधूनथाष्टरिपुगान् पापस्य वर्गांस्तथा
utpātānsaha pātadagdhatithibhirduṣṭāṃśca yogāṃstathā candrejyośanasāmathāstamayanaṃ tithyāḥ kṣayarddhī tathā gaṇḍāntaṃ ca saviṣṭisaṅkramadinaṃ tanvaṃśapāstaṃ tathā tanvaṃśeśavidhūnathāṣṭaripugān pāpasya vargāṃstathā
⟨One should abandon⟩ the portents (utpāta) together with the pāta and the burnt tithis; and likewise the corrupt yogas; the heliacal setting of the Moon, of Jupiter (ijya) and of Venus (uśanas); the decrease and the increase of a tithi; the gaṇḍānta; and the day that carries viṣṭi ⟨bhadrā⟩ and the saṅkramaṇa day; and the combustion of the lord of the lagna's navāṃśa; and the lord of the lagna's navāṃśa and the Moon standing in the 8th and the 6th; and likewise the vargas of a malefic.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The verse has no finite verb: it is the first limb of a list that runs through 109 and is governed by santyajet in 110. tanvaṃśapa and tanvaṃśeśa are both the lord of the navāṃśa occupied by the lagna.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.108–6.110. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The whole list of things to be shunned at a wedding: portents with the pāta and burnt tithis, corrupt yogas, the heliacal setting of the Moon, Jupiter and Venus, the decrease or increase of a tithi, the gaṇḍānta, the viṣṭi and saṅkramaṇa days, the combustion of the lagna-navāṃśa lord, that lord and the Moon in the 8th and 6th, a malefic's vargas (v.108); the rising degree held by the Moon and malefics, the impurity of rising and setting, the caṇḍāyudhas, the khārjūra with the ten yogas, the jāmitra, lattā and vyadha, the bāṇa, the upagrahas, the malefic kartari, the corrupt yoga from tithi/nakṣatra/weekday, and the weekday blemishes from ardhayāma and kulika onward (v.109); the nakṣatra oppressed by or just released from a malefic, an eclipse nakṣatra, one a malefic is going to, one struck by the threefold portents or by a comet, one risen at twilight, one in which a bhinna-yuddha occurred (v.110) RESULT: ALL of these one should abandon (santyajet) at a wedding and in auspicious rites, together with the blemishes of the lagna caused by the grahas WHY THIS IS RECORDED: A THREE-VERSE SENTENCE WITH ONE VERB, and the apparatus states it from both ends: at v.108, 'The verse has no finite verb: it is the first limb of a list that runs through 109 and is governed by santyajet in 110'; at v.110, 'This verse carries the finite verb, santyajet, that governs the list begun in 108.' So MC 6.108 and 6.109 are each a bare heap of accusatives — twenty-odd technical terms with nothing said about them — and only v.110 says they are to be avoided. This is the chapter's closing prohibition and the single most citable rule in it. Note also that many of the terms are defined far earlier in the chapter (kartarī v.44, lattā v.59, pāta v.60, upagraha v.63, jāmitra v.67, bāṇa vv.72–73, kulika v.65), none of which a contiguous span can carry. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
सेन्दुक्रूरखगोदयांशमुदयास्ताशुद्धिचण्डायुधान् खार्जूरं दशयोगयोगसहितं जामित्रलत्ताव्यधम् बाणोपग्रहपापकर्तरि तथा तिथ्यृक्षवारोत्थितं दुष्टं योगमथार्धयामकुलिकाद्यान्वारदोषानपि
sendukrūrakhagodayāṃśamudayāstāśuddhicaṇḍāyudhān khārjūraṃ daśayogayogasahitaṃ jāmitralattāvyadham bāṇopagrahapāpakartari tathā tithyṛkṣavārotthitaṃ duṣṭaṃ yogamathārdhayāmakulikādyānvāradoṣānapi
⟨And⟩ the rising degree (udayāṃśa) held by the Moon and by malefic grahas; the impurity of the rising and the setting (udayāsta-aśuddhi); the caṇḍāyudhas; the khārjūra together with the union of the ten yogas; the jāmitra, the lattā and the vyadha; the bāṇa, the upagrahas and the malefic kartari; and likewise the corrupt yoga arisen from tithi, nakṣatra and weekday; and also the weekday blemishes beginning with the ardhayāma and the kulika.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: udayāstāśuddhi carries the negative a-: it is the IMpurity of rising and setting, since the whole string names things to be shunned. daśayoga is named without explanation in the mūla and its content cannot be recovered from this verse; it is left in Sanskrit.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.108–6.110. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The whole list of things to be shunned at a wedding: portents with the pāta and burnt tithis, corrupt yogas, the heliacal setting of the Moon, Jupiter and Venus, the decrease or increase of a tithi, the gaṇḍānta, the viṣṭi and saṅkramaṇa days, the combustion of the lagna-navāṃśa lord, that lord and the Moon in the 8th and 6th, a malefic's vargas (v.108); the rising degree held by the Moon and malefics, the impurity of rising and setting, the caṇḍāyudhas, the khārjūra with the ten yogas, the jāmitra, lattā and vyadha, the bāṇa, the upagrahas, the malefic kartari, the corrupt yoga from tithi/nakṣatra/weekday, and the weekday blemishes from ardhayāma and kulika onward (v.109); the nakṣatra oppressed by or just released from a malefic, an eclipse nakṣatra, one a malefic is going to, one struck by the threefold portents or by a comet, one risen at twilight, one in which a bhinna-yuddha occurred (v.110) RESULT: ALL of these one should abandon (santyajet) at a wedding and in auspicious rites, together with the blemishes of the lagna caused by the grahas WHY THIS IS RECORDED: A THREE-VERSE SENTENCE WITH ONE VERB, and the apparatus states it from both ends: at v.108, 'The verse has no finite verb: it is the first limb of a list that runs through 109 and is governed by santyajet in 110'; at v.110, 'This verse carries the finite verb, santyajet, that governs the list begun in 108.' So MC 6.108 and 6.109 are each a bare heap of accusatives — twenty-odd technical terms with nothing said about them — and only v.110 says they are to be avoided. This is the chapter's closing prohibition and the single most citable rule in it. Note also that many of the terms are defined far earlier in the chapter (kartarī v.44, lattā v.59, pāta v.60, upagraha v.63, jāmitra v.67, bāṇa vv.72–73, kulika v.65), none of which a contiguous span can carry. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.
क्रूराक्रान्तविमुक्तभं ग्रहणभं यत्क्रूरगन्तव्यभं त्रेधोत्पातहतं च केतुहतभं सन्ध्योदितं भं तथा तद्वच्च ग्रहभिन्नयुद्धगतभं सर्वानिमान्सन्त्यजे दुद्वाहे शुभकर्मसु ग्रहकृतान् लग्नस्य दोषानपि
krūrākrāntavimuktabhaṃ grahaṇabhaṃ yatkrūragantavyabhaṃ tredhotpātahataṃ ca ketuhatabhaṃ sandhyoditaṃ bhaṃ tathā tadvacca grahabhinnayuddhagatabhaṃ sarvānimānsantyaje dudvāhe śubhakarmasu grahakṛtān lagnasya doṣānapi
The nakṣatra oppressed by a malefic and ⟨the one just⟩ released ⟨from one⟩; the nakṣatra of an eclipse; the nakṣatra a malefic is going to; ⟨the nakṣatra⟩ struck by portents of the three kinds; the nakṣatra struck by a comet (ketu); the nakṣatra risen at twilight; and likewise the nakṣatra in which a bhinna-yuddha of grahas has taken place — all these one should abandon at a wedding and in auspicious rites, and the blemishes of the lagna caused by the grahas as well.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: This verse carries the finite verb, santyajet, that governs the list begun in 108. The e-text splits it as santyaje dudvāhe; the word division is santyajed udvāhe. tredhotpātahataṃ is the threefold utpāta of the standard reckoning — of the sky, the atmosphere and the earth — which the mūla does not spell out.
- Corroboration: ONE RULE ACROSS 3 VERSES — 6.108–6.110. None of these verses is usable on its own. CONDITION: The whole list of things to be shunned at a wedding: portents with the pāta and burnt tithis, corrupt yogas, the heliacal setting of the Moon, Jupiter and Venus, the decrease or increase of a tithi, the gaṇḍānta, the viṣṭi and saṅkramaṇa days, the combustion of the lagna-navāṃśa lord, that lord and the Moon in the 8th and 6th, a malefic's vargas (v.108); the rising degree held by the Moon and malefics, the impurity of rising and setting, the caṇḍāyudhas, the khārjūra with the ten yogas, the jāmitra, lattā and vyadha, the bāṇa, the upagrahas, the malefic kartari, the corrupt yoga from tithi/nakṣatra/weekday, and the weekday blemishes from ardhayāma and kulika onward (v.109); the nakṣatra oppressed by or just released from a malefic, an eclipse nakṣatra, one a malefic is going to, one struck by the threefold portents or by a comet, one risen at twilight, one in which a bhinna-yuddha occurred (v.110) RESULT: ALL of these one should abandon (santyajet) at a wedding and in auspicious rites, together with the blemishes of the lagna caused by the grahas WHY THIS IS RECORDED: A THREE-VERSE SENTENCE WITH ONE VERB, and the apparatus states it from both ends: at v.108, 'The verse has no finite verb: it is the first limb of a list that runs through 109 and is governed by santyajet in 110'; at v.110, 'This verse carries the finite verb, santyajet, that governs the list begun in 108.' So MC 6.108 and 6.109 are each a bare heap of accusatives — twenty-odd technical terms with nothing said about them — and only v.110 says they are to be avoided. This is the chapter's closing prohibition and the single most citable rule in it. Note also that many of the terms are defined far earlier in the chapter (kartarī v.44, lattā v.59, pāta v.60, upagraha v.63, jāmitra v.67, bāṇa vv.72–73, kulika v.65), none of which a contiguous span can carry. Recorded 2026-09-08 from .tmp/rulespans/muhurta-chintamani__ch6.json, an analysis dated 2026-09-05 that had been sitting in .tmp/ referenced nowhere. The note is repeated on every verse of the span, because a reader meets one verse at a time.