29.1a reading here is contested युग्मेब्दे जन्मतः स्त्रीणां प्रीतिदं पाणिपीडनम् । एतत्पुंसामयुग्मेब्दे व्यत्यये नाशनं तयोः
yugmebde janmataḥ strīṇāṃ prītidaṃ pāṇipīḍanam | etatpuṃsāmayugmebde vyatyaye nāśanaṃ tayoḥ
For girls, marriage in an even year counted from birth gives affection. For men it is so in an odd year. If the two are reversed, both are destroyed.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The e-mātrā of व्यत्यये is faint at band scale. I re-cropped the word at 6x and the stroke is there. The Nārada Purāṇa (narp_1,56.415) reads the same.
29.2a reading here is contested माघफाल्गुनवैशाखज्येष्ठमासाः शुभप्रदाः । मध्यमः कार्तिको मार्गशीर्षो वै निंदिताः परे
māghaphālgunavaiśākhajyeṣṭhamāsāḥ śubhapradāḥ | madhyamaḥ kārtiko mārgaśīrṣo vai niṃditāḥ pare
Māgha, Phālguna, Vaiśākha and Jyeṣṭha are the months that give good results. Kārttika and Mārgaśīrṣa are middling. The rest are censured.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The plate prints ॥ २ ॥. The Wikisource transcription reads २१ here, which is what puts every later verse of the chapter out of step with its printed number.
न कदाचिद्दशर्क्षेषु भानोरार्द्राप्रवेशनात् । विवाहं देवतानां च प्रतिष्ठां चोपनायनम्
na kadāciddaśarkṣeṣu bhānorārdrāpraveśanāt | vivāhaṃ devatānāṃ ca pratiṣṭhāṃ copanāyanam
Never, in the ten nakṣatras counted from the Sun's entry into Ārdrā, should one do a marriage, the installation of deities, or the upanayana ⟨the thread ceremony⟩.
नास्तंगते सिते जीवे न तयोर्बालवृद्धयोः । न गुरौ सिंहराशिस्थे सिंहांशकगतेपि वा
nāstaṃgate site jīve na tayorbālavṛddhayoḥ | na gurau siṃharāśisthe siṃhāṃśakagatepi vā
Not when Venus or Jupiter has set ⟨is combust⟩, and not when either of them is an infant or aged. Not when Jupiter stands in Leo, nor even when he has gone to a Leo navāṃśa ⟨ninth-part⟩.
29.5a reading here is contested पश्चात् प्रागुदितः शुक्रः पंचसप्तादिनं शिशुः । अस्तकाले तु वृद्धत्वं तद्वदेवगुरोरपि
paścāt prāguditaḥ śukraḥ paṃcasaptādinaṃ śiśuḥ | astakāle tu vṛddhatvaṃ tadvadevagurorapi
Venus risen in the west or in the east is an infant for five and for seven days. At the time of setting there is old age. It is just the same for Jupiter.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. 'पंचसप्तादिनं' as printed; I could not resolve whether the compound joins पञ्च-सप्त to दिनं or to अह-दिनं. The Nārada Purāṇa here reads 'daśatridivasaṃ' (ten and three), a different tradition.
अप्रबुद्धो हृषीकेशो यावत्तावन्न मंगलम् । उत्सवे वासुदेवस्य दिवसे नान्यमंगलम्
aprabuddho hṛṣīkeśo yāvattāvanna maṃgalam | utsave vāsudevasya divase nānyamaṃgalam
As long as Hṛṣīkeśa ⟨Viṣṇu⟩ has not awoken, there is no auspicious rite. On the day of Vāsudeva's festival there is no other auspicious rite.
न जन्ममासे जन्मर्क्षे न जन्मदिवसेपि च । नाद्यगर्भसुतस्याथ दुहितुर्वा करग्रहम्
na janmamāse janmarkṣe na janmadivasepi ca | nādyagarbhasutasyātha duhiturvā karagraham
Not in the birth month, not in the birth nakṣatra, and not on the birth day either. Nor the marriage of a son or a daughter of the first pregnancy.
29.8a reading here is contested नैवोद्वाहो ज्येष्ठपुत्रीपुत्रयोश्च परस्परम् । ज्यैष्ठमासजयोरेकज्यैष्ठ मासे हि नान्यथा
naivodvāho jyeṣṭhaputrīputrayośca parasparam | jyaiṣṭhamāsajayorekajyaiṣṭha māse hi nānyathā
There is no marriage of an eldest daughter and an eldest son with each other. Nor, in the month Jyeṣṭha, of two who were born in that month; where only one of them is so, it may be done — not otherwise.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The second half-line is compressed and its word-division is not certain. I read the sense from the ṭīkā's claim, which I cropped and read at native resolution on PDF 155: it says the marriage of an eldest groom with an eldest daughter, and of a couple both born in Jyeṣṭha, must not be done in Jyeṣṭha.
29.9a reading here is contested उत्पातग्रहणादूर्ध्वं सप्ताहमखिलग्रहे । नाखिले त्रिदिनं चर्क्षं तदा नेष्टमृतुत्रयम्
utpātagrahaṇādūrdhvaṃ saptāhamakhilagrahe | nākhile tridinaṃ carkṣaṃ tadā neṣṭamṛtutrayam
After a portent or an eclipse: seven days when the eclipse is total, three days when it is not total. And the nakṣatra [in which it occurred] is then not desirable for three ṛtus ⟨seasons⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The word after त्रिदिनं reads चर्षं or वर्षं; neither is a word here. I cropped it alone at 3x and still cannot decide. The likely original is चर्क्षं (च + ऋक्षं, 'and the nakṣatra'). I leave the phrase out of the English rather than guess. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सप्ताहमखिलग्रहे । नाखिले त्रिदिनं चर्क्षं; this sentence names चर्षं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the word is no longer undecided. An eye reading of the exemplar (venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.155, line 5) at about 4.6x native, beside a certain र्क्ष (दशर्क्षेषु) and a certain र्ष (मार्गशीर्षो) of the same fount on p.153, found the lower-left knot and descender of क्ष and not the open bowl of ष: the press sets चर्क्षं. The English and Hindi were corrected the same day and now render the phrase, 'and the nakṣatra'.]
ग्रस्तास्ते त्रिदिनं पूर्वं पश्चात् ग्रस्तोदये तथा । संध्याकाले त्रित्रिदिनं निःशेषे सप्तसप्त च
grastāste tridinaṃ pūrvaṃ paścāt grastodaye tathā | saṃdhyākāle tritridinaṃ niḥśeṣe saptasapta ca
When [the luminary] sets eclipsed, three days before; likewise when it rises eclipsed, three days after. At twilight, three days each. When the eclipse is complete, seven and seven.
मासांते पंचदिवसांस्त्यजेद्रिक्तां तथाष्टमीम् । षष्ठीं च परिघाद्यर्द्धं व्यतीपातं सवैधृतिम्
māsāṃte paṃcadivasāṃstyajedriktāṃ tathāṣṭamīm | ṣaṣṭhīṃ ca parighādyarddhaṃ vyatīpātaṃ savaidhṛtim
At the end of a month one should leave out five days, and the riktā tithi ⟨the 4th, 9th and 14th⟩, and the eighth, and the sixth, and the first half of Parigha, and Vyatīpāta together with Vaidhṛti.
पौष्णभत्र्युत्तरामैत्रमरुच्चंद्रार्कपैतृभम् । समूलभं विधेर्भं च स्त्रीकरग्रह इष्यते
pauṣṇabhatryuttarāmaitramaruccaṃdrārkapaitṛbham | samūlabhaṃ vidherbhaṃ ca strīkaragraha iṣyate
The nakṣatra of Pūṣan ⟨Revatī⟩, the three Uttarās, that of Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, of Marut ⟨Svātī⟩, of the Moon ⟨Mṛgaśiras⟩, of the Sun ⟨Hasta⟩, of the Fathers ⟨Maghā⟩, together with Mūla, and the nakṣatra of Vidhi ⟨Rohiṇī⟩ — these are wanted for taking a bride's hand.
विवाहे बलमावश्यं दंपत्योर्गुरुसूर्ययोः । तत्पूजा यत्नतः कार्या दुष्फलप्रदयोस्तयोः
vivāhe balamāvaśyaṃ daṃpatyorgurusūryayoḥ | tatpūjā yatnataḥ kāryā duṣphalapradayostayoḥ
In a marriage the strength of Jupiter and the Sun is necessary for the couple. If those two give bad results, their worship should be done with care.
गोचरं वा वेधजं चाष्टवर्गं रूपजं बलम् । यथोत्तरं बलाधिक्यं स्थूलं गोचरमार्गजम्
gocaraṃ vā vedhajaṃ cāṣṭavargaṃ rūpajaṃ balam | yathottaraṃ balādhikyaṃ sthūlaṃ gocaramārgajam
Strength comes from gocara ⟨transit⟩, or from vedha ⟨piercing⟩, or from the aṣṭakavarga, born of rūpas ⟨counted units of strength⟩. Each later one is the stronger. What comes by way of gocara is coarse.
29.15a reading here is contested चंद्रताराबलं वीक्ष्य ग्रहपश्वांगजं बलम् । तिथिरेकगुणा वारो द्विगुणस्त्रिगुणं च भम्
caṃdratārābalaṃ vīkṣya grahapaśvāṃgajaṃ balam | tithirekaguṇā vāro dviguṇastriguṇaṃ ca bham
Having looked at the strength of the Moon and of the tārā, and the strength born of the planets and the [five] limbs: the tithi counts once, the weekday twice, the nakṣatra three times.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The plate prints पश्वां — I re-cropped the word alone and the श्व ligature is unmistakable. But 'पश्वांग' is not a word, and verses 15–18 weigh exactly the five limbs of the pañcāṅga, so the intended reading is almost certainly पञ्चाङ्गजं. Recorded as printed.
योगश्चतुर्गुणः पंचगुणं तिथ्यर्धसंज्ञकम् । ततो मुहूर्तो बलवांस्ततो लग्नं बलाधिकम्
yogaścaturguṇaḥ paṃcaguṇaṃ tithyardhasaṃjñakam | tato muhūrto balavāṃstato lagnaṃ balādhikam
The yoga counts four times, and what is called the half-tithi ⟨karaṇa⟩ five times. Stronger than these is the muhūrta, and stronger still is the lagna ⟨rising sign⟩.
ततोतिबलिनी होरा द्रेष्काणोतिबली ततः । ततो नवांशो बलवान् द्वादशांशो बली ततः
tatotibalinī horā dreṣkāṇotibalī tataḥ | tato navāṃśo balavān dvādaśāṃśo balī tataḥ
Stronger than that is the horā ⟨half-sign⟩; stronger than that the drekkāṇa ⟨third-part⟩; stronger than that the navāṃśa ⟨ninth-part⟩; and stronger than that the dvādaśāṃśa ⟨twelfth-part⟩.
त्रिंशांशो बलवांस्तस्माद्वीक्ष्यते तद्बलाबलम् । शुभयुक्तेक्षिताः शस्ता विवाहेऽखिलराशयः
triṃśāṃśo balavāṃstasmādvīkṣyate tadbalābalam | śubhayuktekṣitāḥ śastā vivāhe'khilarāśayaḥ
Stronger than that is the triṃśāṃśa ⟨thirtieth-part⟩; their strength and weakness is examined so. In a marriage all the signs are commended when joined to or aspected by benefics.
चंद्रार्केज्यादयः पंच यस्य राशेस्तु खेचराः । इष्टास्तच्छुभदं लग्नं चत्वारोपि बलान्विताः
caṃdrārkejyādayaḥ paṃca yasya rāśestu khecarāḥ | iṣṭāstacchubhadaṃ lagnaṃ catvāropi balānvitāḥ
The sign whose five planets — the Moon, the Sun, Jupiter and the rest — are favourable: that lagna gives good. So too if only four of them are strong.
जामित्रशुद्ध्येकविंशन्महादोषविवर्जितम् । एकविंशतिदोषाणां नामरूपफलानि च
jāmitraśuddhyekaviṃśanmahādoṣavivarjitam | ekaviṃśatidoṣāṇāṃ nāmarūpaphalāni ca
[The lagna should be] clean in the jāmitra ⟨the seventh⟩ and free of the twenty-one great faults. The names, forms and results of the twenty-one faults —
पितामहोक्तान्यावीक्ष्य वक्ष्ये तानि समासतः । पंचांगशुद्धिरहितो दोषस्त्वाद्यः प्रकीर्तितः
pitāmahoktānyāvīkṣya vakṣye tāni samāsataḥ | paṃcāṃgaśuddhirahito doṣastvādyaḥ prakīrtitaḥ
— as told by the Grandfather ⟨Brahmā⟩, I shall look at and state in brief. The first fault declared is want of purity in the pañcāṅga ⟨the five limbs of the almanac⟩.
उदयास्तशुद्धिहीनो द्वितीयः सूर्यसंक्रमः । तृतीयः पापषड्वर्गो भृगुः षष्ठे कुजोष्टमे
udayāstaśuddhihīno dvitīyaḥ sūryasaṃkramaḥ | tṛtīyaḥ pāpaṣaḍvargo bhṛguḥ ṣaṣṭhe kujoṣṭame
The second is want of purity in rising and setting; the Sun's saṃkrama ⟨entry into a sign⟩ is the third; then a malefic ṣaḍvarga; Venus in the sixth; Mars in the eighth;
गंडांतकर्तरीरिःफषडष्टेंदुश्च संग्रहः । दंपत्योरष्टमं लग्नं राशिर्विषघटीभवः
gaṃḍāṃtakartarīriḥphaṣaḍaṣṭeṃduśca saṃgrahaḥ | daṃpatyoraṣṭamaṃ lagnaṃ rāśirviṣaghaṭībhavaḥ
gaṇḍānta ⟨a junction point⟩; kartarī ⟨the scissors⟩; the Moon in the twelfth, sixth or eighth; saṃgraha; a lagna eighth from the couple's sign, or that sign itself; what arises in a viṣa-ghaṭī ⟨poison hour⟩;
29.24a reading here is contested दुर्मुहूर्तो वारदोषः खार्जुरीकः समांघ्रिजः । ग्रहणोत्पातभं क्रूरविद्धर्क्षं क्रूरसंयुतम्
durmuhūrto vāradoṣaḥ khārjurīkaḥ samāṃghrijaḥ | grahaṇotpātabhaṃ krūraviddharkṣaṃ krūrasaṃyutam
a bad muhūrta; a weekday fault; the khārjurīka arising on an even pāda ⟨the ekārgala fault⟩; the nakṣatra of an eclipse or a portent; a nakṣatra pierced by a malefic or joined with a malefic;
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. 'समांघ्रिजः' confirmed by re-cropping the line at 2.2x; the ṭीkā names this the ekārgala fault. The Nārada Purāṇa (narp_1,56.438) reads 'khārjurikasamāṅghribham'.
कुनवांशो महापातो वैधृतिश्चैकविंशतिः । तिथिवारर्क्षयोगानां करणस्य च मेलनम्
kunavāṃśo mahāpāto vaidhṛtiścaikaviṃśatiḥ | tithivārarkṣayogānāṃ karaṇasya ca melanam
a bad navāṃśa; Mahāpāta; and Vaidhṛti — twenty-one in all. The coming together of tithi, weekday, nakṣatra, yoga and karaṇa —
पंचांगमस्य संशुद्धिः पंचांगं समुदाहृतम् । यस्मिन्पंचांगदोषोस्ति तस्मिँल्लग्नं निरर्थकम्
paṃcāṃgamasya saṃśuddhiḥ paṃcāṃgaṃ samudāhṛtam | yasminpaṃcāṃgadoṣosti tasmim̐llagnaṃ nirarthakam
— is the pañcāṅga; its purity is called pañcāṅga-śuddhi. Where there is a fault in the pañcāṅga, the lagna there is worthless.
29.27a reading here is contested लग्नलग्नांशकौ स्वस्वपतिना वीक्षितौ शुभौ । न चेद्रान्योन्यपतिना शुभमित्रेण वा तथा
lagnalagnāṃśakau svasvapatinā vīkṣitau śubhau | na cedrānyonyapatinā śubhamitreṇa vā tathā
The lagna and the lagna's navāṃśa, aspected each by its own lord, are auspicious. If not, then by each other's lords, or likewise by a benefic friend.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The plate prints द्र, not द्व, in 'चेद्रा'. I settled it by comparing the ligature with 'द्रेष्काणो' on PDF 156, where द्र is certain; the shapes match. The sense requires न चेद्वा ('if not, then…'), and the Nārada Purāṇa (narp_1,56.442) reads 'na cedvānyonyapatinā'. Transcribed as printed. [2026-09-23: a second eye reading did not confirm द्र. On venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.159 (printed 152), line 4, read at about 3.3x native beside a certain द्र (द्रेष्काणो) and a certain द्व (द्वादशांशो) cut from p.156 at the same scale, the subjoined consonant under the द is a defective impression. It carries about 55-62% of the ink of a sound one, and its best shape match is 0.46 where genuine forms in the same position return 0.72-0.79. It matches neither letter, so this leaf cannot say which consonant the metal bore, and the comparison above, made with द्र alone, does not identify it. The mūla still carries चेद्रा, which is not a word. The ruling found the text to be चेद्वा on the lexicon: the store's read of this edition's own bhāṣāṭīkā (page_0159) glosses the clause अथवा, the machine reads of ns-vimala-kss40 page_0205 and ns-katyayana page_0220 give चेद्वा, and the Nārada Purāṇa parallel narp_1,56.442 reads na cedvānyonyapatinā. It left the mūla as it stands because the edit it was sent to test rested on the ink. The open doubt on this verse records the question.]
29.28a reading here is contested वरस्य मृत्युः परमो लग्नद्यूननवांशकौ । नैवं तैर्वीक्षितयुतौ मृत्युर्वध्वाः करग्रहे
varasya mṛtyuḥ paramo lagnadyūnanavāṃśakau | naivaṃ tairvīkṣitayutau mṛtyurvadhvāḥ karagrahe
The groom's death is the worst of results. If the lagna, the seventh, and their navāṃśas are not so aspected by and joined to those [lords], there is the bride's death at the marriage.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. At band scale I first read मृत्युर्वैधव्याः. Re-cropped at 1.6x on the line alone it is plainly मृत्युर्वध्वाः, which Wikisource and the Nārada Purāṇa also read.
त्याज्या सूर्यस्य संक्रांतिः पूर्वतः परतः सदा । विवाहादिषु कार्येषु नाड्यः षोडशषोडश
tyājyā sūryasya saṃkrāṃtiḥ pūrvataḥ parataḥ sadā | vivāhādiṣu kāryeṣu nāḍyaḥ ṣoḍaśaṣoḍaśa
The Sun's saṃkrānti ⟨entry into a sign⟩ is always to be avoided, before and after — sixteen nāḍīs each way — in marriage and other rites.
त्रिंशद्भागात्मकं लग्नं होरा तस्यार्धमुच्यते । लग्नत्रिभागो द्रेष्काणो नवमांशो नवांशकः
triṃśadbhāgātmakaṃ lagnaṃ horā tasyārdhamucyate | lagnatribhāgo dreṣkāṇo navamāṃśo navāṃśakaḥ
The lagna consists of thirty degrees. Half of it is called the horā. A third of the sign is the drekkāṇa. The ninth part is the navāṃśa.
द्वादशांशो द्वादशांशः त्रिंशांशस्त्रिंशदंशकः । सिंहस्याधिपतिर्भानुश्चंद्रः कर्कटकेश्वरः
dvādaśāṃśo dvādaśāṃśaḥ triṃśāṃśastriṃśadaṃśakaḥ | siṃhasyādhipatirbhānuścaṃdraḥ karkaṭakeśvaraḥ
The twelfth part is the dvādaśāṃśa; the thirtieth part is the triṃśāṃśa. The Sun is lord of Leo; the Moon is lord of Cancer.
मेषवृश्चिकयोर्भौमः कन्यामिथुनयोर्बुधः । धनुर्मीनद्वयोर्मंत्री शुक्रो वृषतुलेश्वरः
meṣavṛścikayorbhaumaḥ kanyāmithunayorbudhaḥ | dhanurmīnadvayormaṃtrī śukro vṛṣatuleśvaraḥ
Mars is lord of Aries and Scorpio; Mercury of Virgo and Gemini. The counsellor ⟨Jupiter⟩ owns the pair Sagittarius and Pisces. Venus is lord of Taurus and Libra.
29.33a reading here is contested शनिर्मकरकुंभेश इत्येते राशिनायकाः । होरेनविध्वोरोजराशौ समभे चंद्रसूर्ययोः
śanirmakarakuṃbheśa ityete rāśināyakāḥ | horenavidhvorojarāśau samabhe caṃdrasūryayoḥ
Saturn is lord of Capricorn and Aquarius. These are the lords of the signs. In an odd sign the horās belong to the Sun and the Moon ⟨ina and vidhu⟩; in an even sign, to the Moon and the Sun.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. 'होरेनविध्वोरोजराशौ' is a dense sandhi: होरा + इनविध्वोः (genitive dual, 'of the Sun and the Moon') + ओजराशौ. I re-cropped the line at 2.6x. It reads as printed and matches the ṭīkā's claim exactly, so no emendation is needed.
29.34a reading here is contested स्युर्द्रेष्काणे लग्नपंचनंदराशीश्वराः क्रमात् । आरभ्य लग्नराशेस्तु द्वादशांशेश्वराः क्रमात्
syurdreṣkāṇe lagnapaṃcanaṃdarāśīśvarāḥ kramāt | ārabhya lagnarāśestu dvādaśāṃśeśvarāḥ kramāt
In the drekkāṇa the lords are, in order, those of the 1st, the 5th and the 9th sign. The lords of the dvādaśāṃśas run in order beginning from the sign of the lagna.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. THE MŪLA CARRIES NO NUMBER. Both half-lines end with a bare ॥; the ॥३४॥ stands only at the end of the Hindi gloss. I re-cropped the block at 1.9x and 2.0x to be sure. This is a lost terminator caught in the act, and it is why an ingest that splits on ॥N॥ loses this verse. The number 34 is the number the page prints for this unit, on its gloss. Top half of this page is the horā-cakra table, not verse.
29.35a reading here is contested कुजार्कीज्यज्ञशुक्राणां बाणेष्वष्टाद्रिमार्गणाः । भागाः स्युर्विषमे ते तु समराशौ विपर्ययात्
kujārkījyajñaśukrāṇāṃ bāṇeṣvaṣṭādrimārgaṇāḥ | bhāgāḥ syurviṣame te tu samarāśau viparyayāt
Of Mars, Saturn, Jupiter, Mercury and Venus the degrees are five, five, eight, seven and five ⟨bāṇa, iṣu, aṣṭa, adri, mārgaṇa⟩. So in an odd sign; in an even sign they run in reverse.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The bhūta-saṅkhyā words check out against the ṭīkā's digits (५ मंगल, ५ शनि, ८ बृहस्पति, ७ बुध, ५ शुक्र). The top half of this page is the drekkāṇa table, not verse.
29.36a reading here is contested भृगुः षष्ठाह्वयो दोषो लग्नात्षष्ठगते सिते । उच्चगे शुभसंयुक्ते तल्लग्नं सर्वदा त्यजेत्
bhṛguḥ ṣaṣṭhāhvayo doṣo lagnātṣaṣṭhagate site | uccage śubhasaṃyukte tallagnaṃ sarvadā tyajet
The fault named 'Venus-in-the-sixth' arises when Venus stands sixth from the lagna. Even if he is exalted and joined to benefics, that lagna should always be abandoned.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Matches the Nārada Purāṇa (narp_1,56.445) word for word. The top half of this page is the triṃśāṃśa table, not verse.
29.37a reading here is contested कुजाष्टमे महादोषो लग्नादष्टमग कुजे । शुभत्रययुतं लग्नं त्यजेत्तुंगगते यदि
kujāṣṭame mahādoṣo lagnādaṣṭamaga kuje | śubhatrayayutaṃ lagnaṃ tyajettuṃgagate yadi
When Mars stands eighth from the lagna there is the great fault 'Mars-in-the-eighth'. Even a lagna joined by three benefics should be abandoned, even if he is exalted.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two things. 'लग्नादष्टमग कुजे' as printed, without the expected e-mātrā on ग. And the Nārada Purāṇa (narp_1,56.446) reads 'na tyajet' — do NOT abandon — where this printing reads त्यजेत्. Our edition and its own ṭīkā agree on त्यजेत्, so the two traditions genuinely give opposite advice here.
पूर्णानंदाख्ययोस्तिथ्योः संधिर्नाडीद्वयं सदा । गंडांतं मृत्युदं जन्मयात्रोद्वाहव्रतादिषु
pūrṇānaṃdākhyayostithyoḥ saṃdhirnāḍīdvayaṃ sadā | gaṃḍāṃtaṃ mṛtyudaṃ janmayātrodvāhavratādiṣu
The junction of the tithis called Pūrṇā ⟨5th, 10th, 15th⟩ and Nandā ⟨1st, 6th, 11th⟩, two nāḍīs long, is always gaṇḍānta. It gives death in birth, journey, marriage, vows and the like.
कुलीरसिंहयोः कीटचापयोर्मीनमेषयोः । गंडान्तमंतरालं स्याद्घटिकार्धं मृतिप्रदम्
kulīrasiṃhayoḥ kīṭacāpayormīnameṣayoḥ | gaṃḍāntamaṃtarālaṃ syādghaṭikārdhaṃ mṛtipradam
Between Cancer and Leo, between Scorpio and Sagittarius, and between Pisces and Aries, the interval of half a ghaṭikā ⟨about twelve minutes⟩ is gaṇḍānta, and it gives death.
सार्पेन्द्रपौष्णभेष्वंत्यं नाडीयुग्मं तथैव च । तदग्रभेष्वाद्यपादभानां गंडांतसंज्ञिकाः
sārpendrapauṣṇabheṣvaṃtyaṃ nāḍīyugmaṃ tathaiva ca | tadagrabheṣvādyapādabhānāṃ gaṃḍāṃtasaṃjñikāḥ
In the nakṣatras of the Serpent ⟨Āśleṣā⟩, of Indra ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩ and of Pūṣan ⟨Revatī⟩, the last two nāḍīs, and likewise the first quarters of the nakṣatras that follow them, are called gaṇḍānta.
29.41a reading here is contested उग्रं च संधित्रितयं गंडांतत्रितयं महत् । मृत्युप्रदं जन्मयानविवाहस्थापनादिषु
ugraṃ ca saṃdhitritayaṃ gaṃḍāṃtatritayaṃ mahat | mṛtyupradaṃ janmayānavivāhasthāpanādiṣu
And the triad of junctions ⟨saṃdhi — of tithi, of rāśi and of nakṣatra⟩ is fierce; the triad of gaṇḍāntas ⟨the junction-gaps⟩ is a grave matter. It gives death in birth, in journeys, in marriages, in installations and the like.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two words needed settling. (a) The first word: at low magnification it reads इयं; at 8× the उ's bowl and descender are unmistakable, so उग्रं. The Wikisource proofread text and the DLI/Sringeri OCR of this same printing also read उग्रं. (b) संधित्रितयं: my own first low-zoom read was संज्ञा-. Wrong. At 11× the cluster is सं + [ि+ध] + [ि+त्र] — two i-mātrā hooks — and three other witnesses read sandhi: Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.450 saṃdhitritayaṃ, Kashi Sanskrit Series 40 (1984) सन्धि त्रितयं, Kāṭyāyan/Surabhāratī सन्धित्रितयं. (c) REPORTED, NOT CORRECTED: the plate prints गंडांतद्वितयं, a PAIR of gaṇḍāntas — the द्व conjunct's subjoined व loop is clear at 8×. Three independent witnesses read THREE (NP गण्डातं त्रिविधं, Kashi गण्डान्त त्रितय, Kāṭyāyan गण्डान्तं त्रितयं), and this printing's own Hindi ṭīkā says तीन प्रकारका, three kinds. Verses 38-40 have just named exactly three gaṇḍāntas. So द्वितयं is almost certainly a misprint here for त्रितयं. Left as printed. [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads गंडांतत्रितयं on the arithmetic; the press sets गंडांतद्वितयं, read by eye on the plate at about 8.0x (venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.165, printed 158), and machine reads of Vimala KSS 40 (page_0209) and Kātyāyana (page_0222) carry त्रितयं; a machine read of the press's own ṭīkā gives three kinds. Verses 38–40 name three gaṇḍāntas.]
29.42a reading here is contested लग्नस्य पृष्ठाग्रगयोरसाध्वोः सा कर्तरी स्यादृजुवक्रगत्योः । तावेव शीघ्रं यदि वक्रचारौ नो कर्तरीति न्यगदन्मुनींद्रः
lagnasya pṛṣṭhāgragayorasādhvoḥ sā kartarī syādṛjuvakragatyoḥ | tāveva śīghraṃ yadi vakracārau no kartarīti nyagadanmunīṃdraḥ
When two malefics stand behind and in front of the lagna, the one in direct motion and the other retrograde, that is the kartarī ⟨the 'scissors'⟩. But if those same two move swiftly and both retrograde, the chief of sages declared it is not a kartarī.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Set apart by the printing. It opens with an opening quotation mark before लग्नस्य and closes with a closing mark after its Hindi gloss's ॥४२॥, and the ṭīkā ascribes the opinion to the sage Vasiṣṭha. The Nārada Purāṇa lacks this verse entirely (it runs 1,56.450 straight into our 43), which supports reading it as a citation imported into the chapter. It is numbered ४२ all the same, so I return it as a verse. Its metre is Upajāti, not anuṣṭubh, and it runs over three printed lines; the printing sets a ॥ only after गत्योः, which I take as the half-verse break and render as ' । '. The hyphen in स्या- / दृजु at the first line-break is a typesetter's break hyphen, not text.
29.43a reading here is contested लग्नाभिमुखयोः पार्श्वग्रहयोरुभयस्थयोः । सा कर्तरीति विज्ञेया दंपत्योर्मृतिकर्तरी
lagnābhimukhayoḥ pārśvagrahayorubhayasthayoḥ | sā kartarīti vijñeyā daṃpatyormṛtikartarī
Of two planets set on either flank and facing the lagna — that is to be known as the kartarī, a kartarī that kills the couple.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. Two variants against the Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.450d-451a, recorded not resolved: our पार्श्वग्रहयोरुभयस्थयोः (flanking planets standing on both sides) where NP reads pāpagrahayor ṛjuvakrayoḥ (malefics, one direct one retrograde); and our मृतिकर्तरी where NP reads galakartarī (throat-scissors).
29.44a reading here is contested अपि सौम्यग्रहैर्युक्तं गुणैः सर्वैः समन्वितम् । व्ययाष्टरिपुगे चंद्रे लग्नदोषः स संज्ञितः
api saumyagrahairyuktaṃ guṇaiḥ sarvaiḥ samanvitam | vyayāṣṭaripuge caṃdre lagnadoṣaḥ sa saṃjñitaḥ
Even joined with benefics and furnished with every good quality — when the Moon stands in the vyaya ⟨12th⟩, the eighth, or the ripu ⟨6th⟩, that is declared to be a defect of the lagna.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.452 names the same three houses in a different order and wording (ṣaḍaṣṭariṣphage candre) and ends svasaṃjñakaḥ where we read स संज्ञितः. Recorded, not resolved.
29.45a reading here is contested तल्लग्नं वर्जयेद्यत्नाज्जीवशुक्रसमन्वितम् । उच्चगे नीचगे वापि मित्रगे शत्रुराशिगे
tallagnaṃ varjayedyatnājjīvaśukrasamanvitam | uccage nīcage vāpi mitrage śatrurāśige
One should carefully avoid that lagna even when Jupiter ⟨jīva⟩ and Venus ⟨śukra⟩ stand in it — whether the Moon be exalted, debilitated, in a friend's sign, or in an enemy's sign.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.453 reads mitrabhe where we read मित्रगे; same sense.
29.46a reading here is contested अपि सर्वगुणोपेतं दंपत्योर्निधनप्रदम् । शशांके पापसंयुक्ते दोषः संग्रहसंज्ञकः
api sarvaguṇopetaṃ daṃpatyornidhanapradam | śaśāṃke pāpasaṃyukte doṣaḥ saṃgrahasaṃjñakaḥ
Even furnished with every good quality it brings death to the couple. When the Moon ⟨śaśāṅka⟩ is joined with malefics, the defect is called saṃgraha.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. Where we read पापसंयुक्ते the Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.454 reads the vaguer grahasaṃyukte; our reading agrees with this printing's own ṭīkā and is the better one.
29.47a reading here is contested तस्मिन्संग्रहदोषे तद्विवाहं नैव कारयेत् । सूर्येण संयुते चंद्रे दारिद्र्यं भवति ध्रुवम्
tasminsaṃgrahadoṣe tadvivāhaṃ naiva kārayet | sūryeṇa saṃyute caṃdre dāridryaṃ bhavati dhruvam
Under that saṃgraha defect one must not have the marriage performed. When the Moon is joined with the Sun, poverty is certain.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly; दारिद्र्यं checked at 5×. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.455 ends sphuṭam where we read ध्रुवम्; same sense.
29.48a reading here is contested कुजेन मरणं व्याधिर्बुधेन त्वनपत्यता । दौर्भाग्यं गुरुणा चैव सापत्न्यं भार्गवेन तु
kujena maraṇaṃ vyādhirbudhena tvanapatyatā | daurbhāgyaṃ guruṇā caiva sāpatnyaṃ bhārgavena tu
With Mars ⟨kuja⟩, death or disease; with Mercury ⟨budha⟩, childlessness; with Jupiter ⟨guru⟩, ill fortune; and with Venus ⟨bhārgava⟩, a rival wife.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. Our सापत्न्यं (co-wifehood) against the Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.456 sāpatyaṃ (having offspring), which is corrupt there: our reading is the sound one and this printing's own ṭīkā agrees.
29.49a reading here is contested प्रव्रज्या रविपुत्रेण राहुणा कलहः सदा । केतुना संयुते चंद्रे नित्यं कष्टं दरिद्रता
pravrajyā raviputreṇa rāhuṇā kalahaḥ sadā | ketunā saṃyute caṃdre nityaṃ kaṣṭaṃ daridratā
With the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩, renunciation; with Rāhu, unending quarrel. When the Moon is joined with Ketu, constant hardship and poverty.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly; दरिद्रता (short first vowel) checked at 3.4×. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.457 reads mūlasaṃkṣayaḥ (destruction of the stock) for Rāhu where we read कलहः सदा. Both are possible; ours agrees with its own ṭīkā. Recorded, not resolved.
29.50a reading here is contested पापद्वययुते चंद्रे दंपत्योर्मरणं भवेत् । पापग्रहयुते चंद्रे नीचस्थे राहुराशिगे
pāpadvayayute caṃdre daṃpatyormaraṇaṃ bhavet | pāpagrahayute caṃdre nīcasthe rāhurāśige
When the Moon is joined with two malefics, the death of the couple follows. When the Moon is joined with a malefic, stands debilitated, and is in Rāhu's sign —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. The sentence runs on into verse 51; the printing still gives 50 its own number. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.458 reads pāpagrahayute in the first half where we read पापद्वययुते (two malefics); our ṭīkā glosses 'two malefics', so ours is internally consistent. In the second half NP turns positive (śubhagrahayute … svoccasthe mitrarāśige), which is the same material distributed differently across NP 458-460; recorded, not resolved.
29.51a reading here is contested दोषायनं भवेल्लग्नं दंपत्योर्मरणप्रदम् । स्वक्षेत्रगः स्वोच्चगो वा मित्रग्रहगतो विधुः
doṣāyanaṃ bhavellagnaṃ daṃpatyormaraṇapradam | svakṣetragaḥ svoccago vā mitragrahagato vidhuḥ
— then the lagna becomes a seat of defects, giving death to the couple. But if the Moon ⟨vidhu⟩ is in its own sign, in its own exaltation, or in a friendly planet's sign —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly at 5×. दोषायनं is confirmed by Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.459 doṣāyanaṃ.
29.52a reading here is contested युतिदोषाय न भवेद्दंपत्योः श्रेयसे तदा । दंपत्योरष्टमं लग्नं त्वष्टमो राशिरेव च
yutidoṣāya na bhaveddaṃpatyoḥ śreyase tadā | daṃpatyoraṣṭamaṃ lagnaṃ tvaṣṭamo rāśireva ca
— then the conjunction does not amount to a defect; it is then for the couple's good. If the lagna is the eighth from the couple, or indeed the eighth sign —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. REPORTED, NOT CORRECTED. The plate prints षष्ठगं, sixth — verified at 6×. Two witnesses read EIGHTH: Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.460 daṃpatyor aṣṭamaṃ lagnam, and this printing's OWN Hindi ṭīkā, which glosses the line twice over with आठवीं, eighth, and never with sixth. So षष्ठगं is very likely a corruption of अष्टमं. Left as printed. [2026-09-23: a second eye reading confirms the plate. On venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.167 (printed 160), line 16, read at about 3.4x native, the press sets दंपत्योः षष्ठगं लग्नं, our text exactly. On the Vimala KSS 40 leaf (kashi_vimala_hires_scan.pdf p.212), the footnote band, read by eye at about 3.0x, carries note ३, which quotes a ष्ठ-form ending -गं as the मूल पाठ; the ruling reads it as षष्ठगं, while the machine read of that edition's text gives दम्पत्योरष्टमं. So षष्ठगं is the base-text reading of a second line and not a slip peculiar to this press. The correction to अष्टमं was withdrawn.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads दंपत्योरष्टमं on the chapter's own list of the twenty-one faults, which names this one दंपत्योरष्टमं लग्नं राशिः at 29.23 and sets the faults out in that order; the press sets दंपत्योः षष्ठगं here, read by eye on the plate at about 3.4x (venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.167, printed 160), and machine reads of Vimala KSS 40 (page_0212) and Kātyāyana (page_0223) carry दम्पत्योरष्टमं at this verse. Vimala's footnote ३ keeps षष्ठगं as the reading of its base text, so that reading stays on the ledger.]
29.53a reading here is contested यदि लग्नगतः सोपि दंपत्योर्मरणप्रदः । स राशिः शुभयुक्तोपि लग्नं वा शुभसंयुतम्
yadi lagnagataḥ sopi daṃpatyormaraṇapradaḥ | sa rāśiḥ śubhayuktopi lagnaṃ vā śubhasaṃyutam
— if that too falls on the lagna, it gives death to the couple. Even if that sign is joined with benefics, or the lagna is joined with benefics —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly; matches Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.461 almost word for word. Verses 52 and 53 share one Hindi gloss, which closes ॥ ५२ ॥ ५३ ॥; that does not affect the mūla numbering, since each mūla unit carries its own number on the plate.
29.54a reading here is contested लग्नं विवर्जयेद्यत्नात्तदंशांश्च तदीश्वरान् । दंपत्योर्द्वादशं लग्नं राशिर्वा यदि लग्नगम्
lagnaṃ vivarjayedyatnāttadaṃśāṃśca tadīśvarān | daṃpatyordvādaśaṃ lagnaṃ rāśirvā yadi lagnagam
— one should carefully avoid that lagna, and its aṃśas ⟨the navāṃśa divisions⟩ and their lords. If the lagna is the twelfth from the couple, or their sign falls on the lagna —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly at 5×. The plate reads राशिर्वा; the Wikisource transcription of this same printing has राशिर्वै, which is its own error. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.462 agrees with the plate (rāśir vā).
29.55a reading here is contested अर्थहानिस्तयोर्यस्मात्तदंशस्वामिनं त्यजेत् । जन्मराश्युद्गमे चैव जन्मलग्नोदये शुभा
arthahānistayoryasmāttadaṃśasvāminaṃ tyajet | janmarāśyudgame caiva janmalagnodaye śubhā
— since loss of wealth befalls those two, one should reject the lord of that aṃśa. And at the rising of the birth-rāśi and at the rising of the birth-lagna it is auspicious —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The last word is printed शुभा, without visarga — checked at 5×. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.463 reads the nominatives janmarāśyudayaś caiva janmalagnodayaḥ śubhaḥ, 'the rising of the birth-rāśi and the rising of the birth-lagna is auspicious', where our printing has the locatives -उद्गमे / -उदये. So our शुभा is defective for शुभः or शुभाः. This printing's own ṭīkā takes it as 'let benefic planets be there', i.e. शुभाः. Left as printed; my English follows the sense both witnesses share.
29.56a reading here is contested तयोरुपचयस्थाने यदा लग्नं गतं शुभम् । खमार्गणा वेदपक्षाः खरामाः शून्यसागराः
tayorupacayasthāne yadā lagnaṃ gataṃ śubham | khamārgaṇā vedapakṣāḥ kharāmāḥ śūnyasāgarāḥ
— and when the lagna has gone to an upacaya place ⟨a house of growth⟩ from those two, it is auspicious. ⟨The poison-ghaṭīs, from Aśvinī onward:⟩ kha-mārgaṇa ⟨50⟩, veda-pakṣa ⟨24⟩, kha-rāma ⟨30⟩, śūnya-sāgara ⟨40⟩,
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The second half begins the viṣaghaṭī list in bhūta-saṃkhyā (word-numerals, digits read right to left): kha 0, mārgaṇa 5, veda 4, pakṣa 2, rāma 3, śūnya 0, sāgara 4. All four values match the figures this printing's own ṭīkā prints for Aśvinī 50, Bharaṇī 24, Kṛttikā 30, Rohiṇī 40 — an arithmetical check on the transcription. Divergence recorded: Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.464 reads vedamārgaṇāḥ (54) for the fourth where we read शून्यसागराः (40); ours agrees with its own ṭīkā's 40. I have glossed upacaya generically as 'houses of growth' rather than repeat the ṭīkā's list of house numbers, which is not clearly legible.
29.57a reading here is contested वार्द्धिचंद्रा रूपदस्राः खरामा व्योमबाहवः । द्विरामाः खाग्नयः शून्यदस्रकुंजरभूमयः
vārddhicaṃdrā rūpadasrāḥ kharāmā vyomabāhavaḥ | dvirāmāḥ khāgnayaḥ śūnyadasrakuṃjarabhūmayaḥ
vārdhi-candra ⟨14⟩, rūpa-dasra ⟨21⟩, kha-rāma ⟨30⟩, vyoma-bāhu ⟨20⟩, dvi-rāma ⟨32⟩, kha-agni ⟨30⟩, śūnya-dasra ⟨20⟩, kuñjara-bhūmi ⟨18⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Both half-lines checked at 3.4×. Word-numerals: vārdhi 4, candra 1, rūpa 1, dasra 2, kha 0, rāma 3, vyoma 0, bāhu 2, dvi 2, agni 3, kuñjara 8, bhūmi 1. All eight values match the ṭīkā's figures for Mṛgaśira 14, Ārdrā 21, Punarvasu 30, Puṣya 20, Āśleṣā 32, Maghā 30, P. Phālgunī 20, U. Phālgunī 18. Divergence recorded: Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.465 opens vahnicandrā (13) where we read वार्द्धिचंद्रा (14); ours agrees with its own ṭīkā's 14.
29.58a reading here is contested रूपपक्षा व्योमदस्रा वेदचंद्राश्चतुर्दश । शून्यचंद्रा वेदचंद्राः षट्पंच वेदबाहवः
rūpapakṣā vyomadasrā vedacaṃdrāścaturdaśa | śūnyacaṃdrā vedacaṃdrāḥ ṣaṭpaṃca vedabāhavaḥ
rūpa-pakṣa ⟨21⟩, vyoma-dasra ⟨20⟩, veda-candra ⟨14⟩, fourteen ⟨14⟩, śūnya-candra ⟨10⟩, veda-candra ⟨14⟩, ṣaṭ-pañca ⟨56⟩, veda-bāhu ⟨24⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. All eight values match the ṭīkā's figures for Hasta 21, Citrā 20, Svāti 14, Viśākhā 14, Anurādhā 10, Jyeṣṭhā 14, Mūla 56, P. Āṣāḍhā 24. Where we read षट्पंच (56) the Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.466 reads ṣaḍṛkṣā, which does not yield a number; ours is the sound reading. A printer's gathering signature '११' stands at the foot of this page below the verse; it is not text.
29.59a reading here is contested शून्यदस्राः शून्यचंद्राश्शून्यचंद्रा गजेंदवः । तर्कचंद्रा वेदपक्षाः खरामाश्चाश्विनीक्रमात्
śūnyadasrāḥ śūnyacaṃdrāśśūnyacaṃdrā gajeṃdavaḥ | tarkacaṃdrā vedapakṣāḥ kharāmāścāśvinīkramāt
śūnya-dasra ⟨20⟩, śūnya-candra ⟨10⟩, śūnya-candra ⟨10⟩, gaja-indu ⟨18⟩, tarka-candra ⟨16⟩, veda-pakṣa ⟨24⟩, kha-rāma ⟨30⟩ — in order from Aśvinī.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Both half-lines checked at 3.4×. Values match the ṭīkā for U. Āṣāḍhā 20, Śravaṇa 10, Dhaniṣṭhā 10, Śatabhiṣā 18, P. Bhādrapadā 16, U. Bhādrapadā 24, Revatī 30 — completing all 27 nakṣatras across verses 56-59 with no mismatch anywhere. The doubled sibilant in शून्यचंद्राश्शून्यचंद्रा is what the plate prints. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.467 has pūrṇacandrā / gatendravaḥ here, which does not decode to the ṭīkā's figures; ours does.
29.60a reading here is contested आभ्यः पराः स्युश्चतस्रो नाडिका विषसंज्ञिकाः । विवाहादिषु कार्येषु वर्ज्यास्ता विषनाडिकाः
ābhyaḥ parāḥ syuścatasro nāḍikā viṣasaṃjñikāḥ | vivāhādiṣu kāryeṣu varjyāstā viṣanāḍikāḥ
The four nāḍikās ⟨ghaṭīs⟩ that follow these are called the poison ones. In marriage and such acts those poison-nāḍikās are to be shunned.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly at 3×; matches Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.468 in substance.
29.61a reading here is contested ऋक्षाद्यंतघटिमितं विषमानेन ताडितः । षष्टिभिर्हरते लब्धं पूर्वऋक्षेण योजयेत्
ṛkṣādyaṃtaghaṭimitaṃ viṣamānena tāḍitaḥ | ṣaṣṭibhirharate labdhaṃ pūrvaṛkṣeṇa yojayet
The measure in ghaṭīs from the beginning to the end of the asterism ⟨its actual span⟩, multiplied by the poison-figure, is divided by sixty; the quotient one should join to the asterism ⟨reckon it from that asterism's start⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two irregularities, both left as printed. (a) षष्टिभिर्हरते — verified at 7× (repha over ह, then र, then ते); grammar wants ह्रियते or हरेत्. The Wikisource transcription of this printing reads the same. (b) ताडितः is masculine against neuter ...मितं. NOTE: this verse has NO parallel in the Nārada Purāṇa, which runs 1,56.468 straight into our 62, so no independent witness was available for it; the sense above follows the Sanskrit, with the ṭīkā read only to confirm that the rule is for a nakṣatra that does not run a full sixty ghaṭīs. The verse number is ६१ on the plate, twice (mūla and end of gloss); the Wikisource transcription's ६३ is its own error. The Sanskrit rubric इति विषघटी ॥ stands after this verse's gloss; it is a section heading, not a numbered verse.
29.62a reading here is contested भास्करादिषु वारेषु ये मुहूर्ताश्च निंदिताः । विवाहादिशुभे वर्ज्या अपि लग्नगुणैर्युताः
bhāskarādiṣu vāreṣu ye muhūrtāśca niṃditāḥ | vivāhādiśubhe varjyā api lagnaguṇairyutāḥ
The muhūrtas held blameworthy on the weekdays beginning with the Sun's are to be shunned in auspicious acts such as marriage, even when they are furnished with the good qualities of the lagna.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly at 3×. The plate is markedly better than the derivative here: the Wikisource transcription of this same printing garbles the line to भास्करादिषु वार्ज्या मुहूतश्च and वर्ज्य. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.469 reads apilakṣaguṇair, itself a garble of api lagnaguṇair; the plate's लग्नगुणैर्युताः is the sound reading.
29.63a reading here is contested ते वर्ज्या यदि तल्लग्नगुणैर्युक्ताश्च निंदिताः
te varjyā yadi tallagnaguṇairyuktāśca niṃditāḥ
Those are to be shunned; even if joined with the good qualities of that lagna, they remain blameworthy.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. One of the two odd units the brief flagged, and it is exactly as described: a SINGLE half-line (two pādas) carrying its own number ॥ ६३ ॥, verified at 2.2×, with its own Hindi gloss closing ॥ ६३ ॥. I have not padded it. It has no parallel in the Nārada Purāṇa, which goes from 1,56.469 to our 64.
29.64a reading here is contested वारमध्ये तु ये दोषाः सूर्यवारादिषु क्रमात् । अपि सर्वगुणोपेतास्ते वर्ज्याः सर्वमंगले
vāramadhye tu ye doṣāḥ sūryavārādiṣu kramāt | api sarvaguṇopetāste varjyāḥ sarvamaṃgale
And the defects that fall within the weekdays, in order from Sunday — even when furnished with every good quality, they are to be shunned in every auspicious rite.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read cleanly. Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.470 opens nihitāvāradoṣā ye where we read वारमध्ये तु ये दोषाः; the second half agrees word for word.
29.65a reading here is contested एकार्गलः समांघ्रिश्चेत्तत्र लग्नं विवर्जयेत्
ekārgalaḥ samāṃghriścettatra lagnaṃ vivarjayet
If the ekārgala ⟨the 'single bolt' defect⟩ falls samāṅghri ⟨on a matching or even quarter⟩, one should avoid the lagna there.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The second odd unit the brief flagged: a SINGLE half-line with its own number, confirmed at 4×. THE NUMBER IS ६५ ON THE PLATE, not ६८. I checked this the way the brief warns to: I cropped the known ॥ ५८ ॥ at verse 58 on printed 161 as a reference for both digits at once. The ८ there sits on the baseline with no descender; the ५ carries a tail that drops below it. The second digit of this verse's number carries that tail, so it is ५. The Hindi gloss below repeats ॥ ६५ ॥. The derivative transcription's ६८ is its own error. On समांघ्रि the two authorities differ: Nārada Purāṇa 1,56.471 reads ekārgalāṅghritulyaṃ, 'equal to the ekārgala's quarter', i.e. a MATCHING pāda; this printing's ṭīkā takes sama as 'even' (an even number counted from the Sun-Moon yoga). I have kept the Sanskrit and given both senses rather than choose.
29.66a reading here is contested अपि शुक्रेज्यसंयुक्ता विषसंयुक्तदुग्धवत् । ग्रहणोत्पातभं त्याज्यं मंगलेषु त्रिधाऽशुभम्
api śukrejyasaṃyuktā viṣasaṃyuktadugdhavat | grahaṇotpātabhaṃ tyājyaṃ maṃgaleṣu tridhā'śubham
Even when joined with Śukra ⟨Venus⟩ and Ijya ⟨Jupiter⟩, it is like milk mixed with poison. In auspicious rites one must give up the nakṣatra of an eclipse and the nakṣatra of a portent: it is inauspicious in three ways.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read clean at high magnification. The avagraha in त्रिधाऽशुभम् is printed and visible. Number ॥ ६६ ॥ printed, agrees with position. The 1984 Kashi Sanskrit Series edition also numbers this verse ६६, so the number is not peculiar to this printing. 'Inauspicious in three ways' — the Hindi ṭīkā takes त्रिधा with utpāta (a portent of three kinds: sky, earthquake and so on); I have kept the Sanskrit word order instead of adopting that gloss.
29.67a reading here is contested यावच्चरणकं भुक्तं शेषं च दग्धकाष्ठवत् । मंगलेषु त्यजेत्क्रूरं विद्धं भं क्रूरसंयुतम्
yāvaccaraṇakaṃ bhuktaṃ śeṣaṃ ca dagdhakāṣṭhavat | maṃgaleṣu tyajetkrūraṃ viddhaṃ bhaṃ krūrasaṃyutam
However much of a pāda ⟨a quarter of a nakṣatra⟩ has already been consumed, the remainder too is like burnt wood. In auspicious rites one should give up a nakṣatra pierced by a cruel planet ⟨a malefic⟩ and one occupied by a malefic.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read clean. Number ॥ ६७ ॥ printed, agrees with position; the Kashi 1984 śloka index carries an entry '२९।६७', matching.
29.68a reading here is contested अखिलर्क्षं पंचगव्यं सुराबिंदुयुतं तथा । पादमेव शुभैर्विद्धमशुभं नैव कृत्स्नभम्
akhilarkṣaṃ paṃcagavyaṃ surābiṃduyutaṃ tathā | pādameva śubhairviddhamaśubhaṃ naiva kṛtsnabham
The whole nakṣatra [is spoiled], just as the pañcagavya ⟨the five products of the cow⟩ is spoiled by a drop of liquor. But when benefics pierce it, only the pāda ⟨quarter⟩ [is spoiled]; the whole nakṣatra does not become inauspicious.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. First word: I read अखिलर्क्षं (अखिल + ऋक्षं) with the repha over क्ष. Two other printings support it — the Wikisource transcription of this same edition reads अखिलर्क्षं, and the Kashi 1984 and Katyayan/Surabhāratī OCR both read अखिलक्ष (the repha lost in OCR). Number ॥ ६८ ॥ printed, agrees with position.
29.69a reading here is contested क्रूरविद्धयुतं धिष्ण्यं निखिलं चैव पादतः । तुलामिथुनकन्यांशं धनुरंशैश्च संयुताः
krūraviddhayutaṃ dhiṣṇyaṃ nikhilaṃ caiva pādataḥ | tulāmithunakanyāṃśaṃ dhanuraṃśaiśca saṃyutāḥ
A nakṣatra pierced by or joined with a malefic is spoiled entirely, even from one pāda ⟨quarter⟩. The navāṃśas ⟨ninth divisions of a sign⟩ of Tulā ⟨Libra⟩, Mithuna ⟨Gemini⟩ and Kanyā ⟨Virgo⟩, together with the navāṃśas of Dhanus ⟨Sagittarius⟩ —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The sentence does not end here: the second half-line runs on into verse 70. The concord is loose in the printing (…कन्यांशं … संयुताः, neuter singular then masculine plural); I have rendered it as it stands and not repaired it. Number ॥ ६९ ॥ printed. This verse number is independently confirmed: the Kashi 1984 edition's own śloka index lists 'क्रूरविद्धयुतं धिष्ण्यं २९।६९'.
29.70a reading here is contested एते नवांशाः संग्राह्या अन्ये तु कुनवांशकाः । कुनवांशकलग्नं यत्त्याज्यं सर्वगुणान्वितम्
ete navāṃśāḥ saṃgrāhyā anye tu kunavāṃśakāḥ | kunavāṃśakalagnaṃ yattyājyaṃ sarvaguṇānvitam
— these navāṃśas are to be accepted; the rest are ku-navāṃśas ⟨bad ninth-parts⟩. A lagna ⟨rising sign⟩ that falls in a ku-navāṃśa is to be rejected even when it carries every merit.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read clean. Number ॥ ७० ॥ printed, agrees with position. The printing runs verses 69 and 70 together as one mūla block and gives them a single joint Hindi gloss closing '॥ ६९ ॥ ७० ॥', but each mūla verse carries its own number, so I have kept them separate.
29.71a reading here is contested यस्मिन्दिने महापातस्तद्दिनं वर्जयेद्बुधः । अपि सर्वगुणोपेतं दंपत्योर्मृत्युदं यतः
yasmindine mahāpātastaddinaṃ varjayedbudhaḥ | api sarvaguṇopetaṃ daṃpatyormṛtyudaṃ yataḥ
On whatever day mahāpāta ⟨the great pāta yoga⟩ falls, the wise man should avoid that day, even though it carries every merit, because it brings death to the married pair.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. First word contested. The Wikisource transcription of this same edition reads अस्मिन्दिने; the plate reads यस्मिन्दिने. I settled it by putting the glyph beside a confirmed अ (from अपि on the very next line) and beside confirmed य glyphs (यदि in v75, यथा in v85) at 6x — it matches य and not अ. The Hindi ṭīkā also glosses it 'जिस दिन' (= यस्मिन्), and the yad…tad correlative with तद्दिनं requires यस्मिन्. The ṭīkā identifies महापात as Vyatīpāta; I have not put that identification into the rendering. Number ॥ ७१ ॥ printed.
29.72a reading here is contested अनुक्ताः स्वल्पदोषाः स्युर्विद्युन्नीहारवृष्टयः । प्रत्यर्कपरिवेषेंद्रचापांबुघनगर्जनम्
anuktāḥ svalpadoṣāḥ syurvidyunnīhāravṛṣṭayaḥ | pratyarkapariveṣeṃdracāpāṃbughanagarjanam
Those not [already] named are slight faults: lightning, frost and rain; a mock sun ⟨parhelion⟩, a halo, a rainbow, and the thunder of rain-clouds.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The long compound स्युर्विद्युन्नीहारवृष्टयः straddles my crop boundary, so I re-read it in a separate centred crop at 5x to be sure of र्वि and न्नी. नीहार: I render 'frost'; the ṭīkā glosses it as बर्फ ओले (snow and hail). Number ॥ ७२ ॥ printed.
29.73a reading here is contested एवमाद्यास्ततस्तेषां व्यवस्था क्रियतेऽधुना । अकाले संभवंत्येते विद्युन्नीहारवृष्टयः
evamādyāstatasteṣāṃ vyavasthā kriyate'dhunā | akāle saṃbhavaṃtyete vidyunnīhāravṛṣṭayaḥ
Such and the like [are the faults]; the rule about them is now laid down. When these — lightning, frost and rain — occur out of season,
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The Wikisource transcription of this edition reads एवमाद्यस्ततस्तेषां (short a). I re-read the plate at 4.5x: द्या clearly carries the ā-mātra, so the plate prints एवमाद्यास्ततस्तेषां (= एवमाद्याः + ततः). The avagraha in क्रियतेऽधुना is printed and visible. The sentence runs on into verse 74. Number ॥ ७३ ॥ printed.
29.74a reading here is contested प्रत्यर्कपरिवेषेंद्रचापाभ्रघनयोर्यदि । दोषाय मंगले नूनमदोषायैव कालजाः
pratyarkapariveṣeṃdracāpābhraghanayoryadi | doṣāya maṃgale nūnamadoṣāyaiva kālajāḥ
and if a mock sun, a halo, a rainbow, cloud and thundercloud [appear], then in an auspicious rite they certainly bring fault; but those born of their own season bring no fault at all.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. …घनयोर्यदि straddled my crop boundary, so I re-read it centred at 2.4x: it is घनयोः + यदि, written घनयोर्यदि. The dual ending -योः inside the compound is grammatically loose and I have not repaired it. Number ॥ ७४ ॥ printed, and the Kashi 1984 śloka index carries 'प्रत्यक परिवेषन् २९।७४', matching.
29.75a reading here is contested बृहस्पतिः केंद्रगतः शुक्रो वा यदि वा बुधः । एकोपि दोषविलयं करोत्येवं सुशोभनम्
bṛhaspatiḥ keṃdragataḥ śukro vā yadi vā budhaḥ | ekopi doṣavilayaṃ karotyevaṃ suśobhanam
If Bṛhaspati ⟨Jupiter⟩ stands in a kendra ⟨an angle: the 1st, 4th, 7th or 10th house⟩, or Śukra ⟨Venus⟩, or Budha ⟨Mercury⟩ — even one of them dissolves the fault and so makes [the time] very auspicious.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The printing sets एकोपि without the avagraha (not एकोऽपि); I checked this at 3x and record it as printed. Number: the Wikisource transcription of this edition gives ॥ ७६ ॥ here, which is a transcription slip — I zoomed the plate at 5x and the digits are ७५, and the Hindi gloss immediately below closes ॥ ७५ ॥.
29.76a reading here is contested तिर्यक्पंचोर्द्ध्वगाः पंच रेखे द्वे द्वे च कोणयोः । द्वितीयं शंभुकोणेग्निभचक्रं तत्र विन्यसेत्
tiryakpaṃcorddhvagāḥ paṃca rekhe dve dve ca koṇayoḥ | dvitīyaṃ śaṃbhukoṇegnibhacakraṃ tatra vinyaset
Five lines drawn across and five drawn upward, and two lines in each of the corners. At the Śambhu corner ⟨the north-east, Īśāna⟩ one should set down there, at the second [place], the wheel of nakṣatras beginning with Agni's star ⟨Kṛttikā⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. THE ONE READING I AM NOT SURE OF IN THIS RANGE is the ligature in पंचोर्द्ध्वगाः. The word and the sense are certain — ūrdhva-gāḥ, 'running upward', and the ṭīkā says 'पांच रेखा ऊपरको खींचे'. The spelling is not. I compared the cluster at 7x-8x against a confirmed द्ध (विद्धं, v88) and against confirmed द्व ligatures on the same two lines (द्वे द्वे, द्वितीयं): it is a taller, three-part stack, so I read र्द्ध्व, the old-style spelling. Against that: the Wikisource transcription of this same edition reads र्द्ध with no व, and the Kashi 1984 and Katyayan printings both spell it र्ध्व. This printing demonstrably uses BOTH spellings elsewhere (ऊर्द्ध्वमुखसंज्ञक and ऊर्ध्वमुखानि both occur), so its own habit does not decide it. Treat the ligature as unsettled. Also: शंभुकोणेग्निभचक्रं is printed without the avagraha (not कोणेऽग्नि); checked at 2.6x. Number ॥ ७६ ॥ printed — and the closing number of the Hindi gloss on the next page, which at page scale looked like ३६, is ७६ when zoomed to 3.5x.
29.77a reading here is contested भान्यतः साभिजित्येकरेखा खेटेन विद्धभम् । पुरतः पृष्ठतोर्काद्या दिनर्क्षं लत्तयंति च
bhānyataḥ sābhijityekarekhā kheṭena viddhabham | purataḥ pṛṣṭhatorkādyā dinarkṣaṃ lattayaṃti ca
From there onward the nakṣatras, together with Abhijit [are written]. A nakṣatra pierced by a planet on one line [is vedha ⟨piercing⟩]. And the planets beginning with Arka ⟨the Sun⟩ kick ⟨lattā⟩ the day's nakṣatra, both in front and behind.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. भान्यतः: I zoomed the first word to 3.2x — it is भा + न्य + तः, i.e. भानि + अतः. Last word of line 1: the Wikisource transcription reads दिनर्क्षे; at 3.16x the plate shows a repha hook AND a separate anusvāra dot over क्ष, so it is दिनर्क्षं. The mūla lines of this verse are deeply indented, so my first crop cut them; I re-cropped from x=0.22 of the page width. Number ॥ ७७ ॥ printed, and the Kashi 1984 index carries '२९।७७'.
29.78a reading here is contested ज्ञराहुपूर्णेन्दुसिताः स्वपृष्ठे भं सप्तगोजातिशरैर्मितं हि । संलत्तयन्तेर्कशनीज्यभौमा सूर्याष्टतर्काग्निमितं पुरस्तात्
jñarāhupūrṇendusitāḥ svapṛṣṭhe bhaṃ saptagojātiśarairmitaṃ hi | saṃlattayanterkaśanījyabhaumā sūryāṣṭatarkāgnimitaṃ purastāt
Budha ⟨Mercury⟩, Rāhu, the full Moon and Sita ⟨Venus⟩ kick ⟨lattā⟩, behind themselves, the nakṣatra counted by sapta, go, jāti and śara; and Arka ⟨the Sun⟩, Śani ⟨Saturn⟩, Ijya ⟨Jupiter⟩ and Bhauma ⟨Mars⟩ kick, in front, the one counted by sūrya, aṣṭa, tarka and agni.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. THIS IS AN ODD ONE IN THE PRINTING and worth recording: it is set over THREE printed lines with ONE number ॥ ७८ ॥ at the end. That is not a defect — the verse is in an eleven-syllable metre (Upajāti, 4 pādas of 11), not the anuṣṭubh used all around it, so it does not fit two lines of this type. I counted the syllables to check: 11 + 11 + 11 + 11. The first half-line ends with हि and a ॥ at the start of the second printed line; I have joined the two half-verses with ' । ' as the format requires. The word-numbers: I did NOT decode the bhūta-saṃkhyā myself — the Hindi ṭīkā on the same page states them as 7th, 9th, 22nd, 5th (backward) and 12th, 8th, 6th, 3rd (forward), and it prints the second set as digits १२।८।६।३. sapta=7, śara=5, sūrya=12, aṣṭa=8, tarka=6 and agni=3 are standard; go=9 and jāti=22 are not values I can vouch for independently, so a second reader should check those two before the numbers are used. I have therefore kept the Sanskrit number-words in the rendering rather than substituting figures.
29.79a reading here is contested सौराष्ट्रशाल्वदेशेषु लत्तितं भं विवर्जयेत् । कालिंगवंगदेशेषु पातितं भमुपग्रहम्
saurāṣṭraśālvadeśeṣu lattitaṃ bhaṃ vivarjayet | kāliṃgavaṃgadeśeṣu pātitaṃ bhamupagraham
In the countries of Saurāṣṭra and Śālva one should avoid a nakṣatra that has been kicked ⟨lattita⟩. In the countries of Kāliṅga and Vaṅga [one should avoid] the nakṣatra that has been struck down ⟨pātita⟩ and the upagraha.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The Wikisource transcription of this edition normalises the second country to कलिंग. I zoomed the plate to 5x: the क carries a full ā-mātra stroke, so the plate prints कालिंग. Number ॥ ७९ ॥ printed.
29.80a reading here is contested बाह्लिके कुरुदेशे च यस्मिन्देशे न दूषणम् । तिथयो मासदग्धाख्या दग्धलग्नानि तान्यपि
bāhlike kurudeśe ca yasmindeśe na dūṣaṇam | tithayo māsadagdhākhyā dagdhalagnāni tānyapi
In Bāhlika and in the Kuru country, and in whatever country there is no fault, the tithis ⟨lunar days⟩ called māsadagdha ⟨burnt by the month⟩ and the dagdha ⟨burnt⟩ lagnas — those too [are to be shunned].
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two things. (1) The first word: I read बाह्लिके. The Wikisource transcription of this edition reads बाह्विके. Two independent printings support ह्ल — Kashi 1984 reads बाह्लिके and Katyayan/Surabhāratī reads वाह्लीके — and बाह्लीक is a real country name while बाह्विक is not a word. (2) A REAL VARIANT BETWEEN PRINTINGS, not a misreading: our plate prints 'च यस्मिन्देशे' (checked at 4x; the first glyph matches the confirmed य shape), whereas Kashi 1984 and Katyayan both read 'चान्यस्मिन्देशे' — 'and in ANY OTHER country there is no fault'. Their reading gives a much cleaner sentence and matches the pattern of verses 81 and 82 (prohibited in region X, no fault elsewhere). Our plate's यस्मिन् leaves the clause hanging, and my English keeps that awkwardness rather than silently adopting the better reading. Number ॥ ८० ॥ printed.
29.81a reading here is contested मध्यदेशे विवर्ज्याणि न दूष्याणीतरेषु च । पंग्वंधकाणलग्नानि मासशून्याश्च राशयः
madhyadeśe vivarjyāṇi na dūṣyāṇītareṣu ca | paṃgvaṃdhakāṇalagnāni māsaśūnyāśca rāśayaḥ
In Madhyadeśa ⟨the middle country⟩ these are to be avoided; among the others they are not faulty: the lame, blind and one-eyed lagnas, and the signs void of the month ⟨māsaśūnya⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. विवर्ज्याणि is printed with ण, not न — I checked this at 3.6x against the neighbouring न of 'न दूष्याणी'. That is the correct ṇatva after the र of वर्ज्, so the printing is right and this is not an error to fix. The second line's लग्नानि does have plain न (no ṇatva trigger); also checked. Number ॥ ८१ ॥ printed.
29.82a reading here is contested गौडमालवयोस्त्याज्याश्चान्यदेशे न गर्हिताः । दोषदुष्टः सदा काले वर्जनीयः प्रयत्नतः
gauḍamālavayostyājyāścānyadeśe na garhitāḥ | doṣaduṣṭaḥ sadā kāle varjanīyaḥ prayatnataḥ
In Gauḍa and Mālava they are to be rejected; in another country they are not blamed. A time spoiled by a fault must always be shunned with effort.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The Wikisource transcription reads …त्याज्याश्वन्यदेशे (श्व). At 2.98x the plate shows श्चा — त्याज्याः + च + अन्यदेशे — which is also what the sense requires. Number ॥ ८२ ॥ printed.
29.83a reading here is contested अपि भूरिगुणोऽन्यार्थे दोषाल्पत्वं गुणोदयः । परित्यज्य महादोषाञ्छेषयोर्गुणदोषयोः
api bhūriguṇo'nyārthe doṣālpatvaṃ guṇodayaḥ | parityajya mahādoṣāñcheṣayorguṇadoṣayoḥ
Even where the merits are many for some other purpose, [what decides is] the smallness of the fault and the rise of merit. Having discarded the great faults, of the merit and the fault that remain —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The syntax is genuinely hard and the sentence does not close until verse 84; I have left it open rather than smoothing it. The avagraha in भूरिगुणोऽन्यार्थे IS printed (checked at 3.4x) — worth noting, because this printing usually omits it (see verses 75 and 76). The sandhi महादोषान् + शेष → महादोषाञ्छेष is correctly set. Number ॥ ८३ ॥ printed.
29.84a reading here is contested गुणाधिकः स्वल्पदोषः सकलो मंगलप्रदः । दोषो न प्रभवत्येको गुणानां परिसंचये
guṇādhikaḥ svalpadoṣaḥ sakalo maṃgalapradaḥ | doṣo na prabhavatyeko guṇānāṃ parisaṃcaye
— [the time] with more merit and slight fault gives good fortune in every way. A single fault has no power where merits are heaped together.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read clean. Number ॥ ८४ ॥ printed, agrees with position.
29.85a reading here is contested एको यथा तोयबिंदुरुदर्चिषि हुताशने । एवं संचिंत्य गणितशास्त्रोक्तं लग्नमानयेत्
eko yathā toyabiṃdurudarciṣi hutāśane | evaṃ saṃciṃtya gaṇitaśāstroktaṃ lagnamānayet
As a single drop of water [is lost] in a fire whose flames leap up, so, having weighed it in this way, one should compute the lagna as the science of calculation states.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. THE HARDEST WORD IN THE RANGE, and I want the next reader to re-check it. My first reading of the plate was उदार्चिषि (with a long ā). I then noticed that what I had taken for an ā-mātra stroke is the ि-mātra of the following चि, which in this typeface is a tall vertical set to the LEFT of its consonant with an arc over the top. At 6x-8x I count only ONE vertical between द and च, which fits उदर्चिषि and not उदार्चिषि. Three other printings agree: Wikisource (this edition), Kashi 1984 and Katyayan all read what their OCR renders as 'उदचिर्षि', which is उदर्चिषि with the repha character emitted out of order. I therefore record उदर्चिषि (उद् + अर्चिस्, 'with flames rising'). The metre allows either. Number: the Wikisource transcription gives ॥ ८४ ॥ here, which is a slip — I zoomed the plate at 5x and the digits are ८५.
29.86a reading here is contested तल्लग्नं जलयंत्रेण दद्याज्ज्योतिषिकोत्तमः । षडंगुलमितोत्सेधं द्वादशांगुलमायतम्
tallagnaṃ jalayaṃtreṇa dadyājjyotiṣikottamaḥ | ṣaḍaṃgulamitotsedhaṃ dvādaśāṃgulamāyatam
The best of astronomers should determine that lagna by the water instrument ⟨jala-yantra, the water clock⟩ — six aṅgulas ⟨finger-breadths⟩ in height and twelve aṅgulas across.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The Wikisource transcription reads दद्याज्जोतिषिकोत्तमः, dropping a य. At 3.14x the plate shows the full ज्ज्यो cluster, so it is दद्याज्ज्योतिषिकोत्तमः. The sentence runs on into verse 87 and the printing gives 86 and 87 one joint Hindi gloss closing '॥ ८६ ॥ ८७ ॥'; each mūla verse still carries its own number. Number ॥ ८६ ॥ printed.
29.87a reading here is contested कुर्यात्कपालवत्ताम्रपात्रं तद्दशभिः पलैः । पूर्णं षष्टिर्जलपलैः षष्टिर्मज्जति वासरे
kuryātkapālavattāmrapātraṃ taddaśabhiḥ palaiḥ | pūrṇaṃ ṣaṣṭirjalapalaiḥ ṣaṣṭirmajjati vāsare
He should make a copper vessel like a skull-bowl out of ten palas ⟨a weight⟩ of it. Filled with sixty palas of water, it sinks sixty times in a day ⟨an aho-rātra, a day and night⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read clean. The Hindi ṭīkā converts the weights for its reader (10 pala = 40 tolā, 60 pala = 240 tolā) and reads वासरे as अहोरात्र, a full day and night; I have kept the Sanskrit and glossed it once. Number ॥ ८७ ॥ printed.
29.88a reading here is contested माषमात्रत्र्यंशयुतं स्वर्णवृत्तशलाकया । चतुर्भिरंगुलैरापः तथा विद्धं परिस्फुटम्
māṣamātratryaṃśayutaṃ svarṇavṛttaśalākayā | caturbhiraṃgulairāpaḥ tathā viddhaṃ parisphuṭam
[The bowl is bored] with a round gold rod of a māṣa's measure with a third part added, and by four aṅgulas the water [enters]; pierced in this way it is exact.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The syntax here is loose and my English is correspondingly hesitant — do not treat this rendering as settled. आपः is a nominative plural with no finite verb; विद्धं is neuter and must refer back to the vessel of verse 87. The ṭīkā reads it differently from the way the words fall: it says to make a hole the size of an urad grain with a gold needle, bore it in the middle, and fill water to four aṅgulas above — i.e. it attaches 'four aṅgulas' to the water level, not to the rod. The letters themselves are not in doubt: माष is printed with ष (checked at 4.5x), and रापः carries a printed visarga before तथा (checked at 3.6x), where the expected sandhi would be रापस्तथा. Number ॥ ८८ ॥ printed.
29.89a reading here is contested कार्येणाभ्यधिकः षड्भिः पलैस्ताम्रस्य भाजनम् । द्वादशं मुखविष्कंभ उत्सेधः षड्भिरंगुलैः
kāryeṇābhyadhikaḥ ṣaḍbhiḥ palaistāmrasya bhājanam | dvādaśaṃ mukhaviṣkaṃbha utsedhaḥ ṣaḍbhiraṃgulaiḥ
Further, according to the work, [there is] a larger one: a copper vessel of six palas. The diameter of its mouth is twelve, its height six aṅgulas.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. कार्येणाभ्यधिकः is grammatically loose (masculine, while भाजनम् is neuter) and my 'Further, according to the work' is a guess at its force; the ṭīkā simply says 'a copper vessel of six-pala measure is also made'. The Wikisource transcription reads सुखविष्कंभ; at 2.35x the plate clearly shows म, so it is मुखविष्कंभ, 'the mouth's diameter', which is also what the ṭīkā means when it says to make it twelve aṅgulas wide. Number ॥ ८९ ॥ printed.
29.90a reading here is contested स्वर्णमासेन वै कृत्वा चतुरंगुलकात्मकः । मध्यभागे तथा विद्धा नाडिका घटिका स्मृता
svarṇamāsena vai kṛtvā caturaṃgulakātmakaḥ | madhyabhāge tathā viddhā nāḍikā ghaṭikā smṛtā
Made with a gold māsa ⟨a small weight of gold⟩ and consisting of four aṅgulas, and pierced in the middle part — that channel ⟨nāḍikā⟩ is called the ghaṭikā ⟨the hour-bowl⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The plate prints स्वर्णमासेन with plain स, not the expected माषेण — checked at 4.5x, the letter is स and not ष. I have recorded it as printed. The genders do not agree in the printing (चतुरंगुलकात्मकः masculine, विद्धा नाडिका feminine) and I have not repaired that. Number ॥ ९० ॥ printed, agrees with position, and it is the last verse of my range.
29.91a reading here is contested ताम्रपात्रे जलैः पूर्णे मृत्पात्रे वाथ वा शुभे । गंधपुष्पाक्षतैः सार्द्धैरलंकृत्य प्रयत्नतः
tāmrapātre jalaiḥ pūrṇe mṛtpātre vātha vā śubhe | gaṃdhapuṣpākṣataiḥ sārddhairalaṃkṛtya prayatnataḥ
In a copper vessel filled with water, or else in a good earthen vessel — having carefully adorned it together with scented paste, flowers and whole rice-grains ⟨akṣata⟩ —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The word after गंधपुष्पाक्षतैः was hard at low magnification. At 3x I could see the repha above the द्ध plus the ai-mātrā, so it is सार्द्धैः (sārdhaiḥ, 'together with'), not सान्द्रैः. The verse runs on into 92; I have rendered the two as one sentence. Numeral ॥ ९१ ॥ clear, and the ṭīkā repeats ॥ ९१ ॥ ९२ ॥ after its gloss.
29.92a reading here is contested तंदुलस्थे स्वर्णयुते वस्त्रयुग्मेन वेष्टिते । मंडलार्द्धोदयं वीक्ष्य रवेस्तत्र विनिःक्षिपेत्
taṃdulasthe svarṇayute vastrayugmena veṣṭite | maṃḍalārddhodayaṃ vīkṣya ravestatra viniḥkṣipet
— ⟨that vessel⟩ standing on rice-grains, furnished with gold, and wrapped in a pair of cloths: watching for the rising of half the disc of the sun, he should let ⟨the bowl⟩ down into it.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. मंडलार्द्धोदयं: the mark over the द्धो cluster is a repha, not an anusvāra. I settled it by comparing its shape with the repha of स्वर्णयुते on the line above — a thick wedge with a descending tail, the same shape in both. The online proofread transcription of this same printing and the Kashi 1984 edition both read an anusvāra there; the plate does not have one. रवेस्तत्र (not खवेस्) confirmed at 2x. विनिःक्षिपेत् has a clear visarga.
29.93a reading here is contested मंत्रेणानेन पूर्वोक्तलक्षणं यंत्रमुत्तमम् । मुख्यं त्वमसि यंत्राणां ब्रह्मणा निर्मितं पुरा
maṃtreṇānena pūrvoktalakṣaṇaṃ yaṃtramuttamam | mukhyaṃ tvamasi yaṃtrāṇāṃ brahmaṇā nirmitaṃ purā
⟨He should release⟩ with this mantra the excellent instrument of the marks described above: "You are the chief of instruments, fashioned by Brahmā long ago,
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. None. Every akṣara and the numeral ॥ ९३ ॥ legible at 600 ppi. The mantra quoted here runs on into verse 94, so I have left the quotation open.
29.94a reading here is contested भाव्याभव्याय दंपत्योः कालसाधनकारणम् । द्वादशोंगुलकं प्रोक्तमिति शंकुप्रमाणकम्
bhāvyābhavyāya daṃpatyoḥ kālasādhanakāraṇam | dvādaśoṃgulakaṃ proktamiti śaṃkupramāṇakam
the cause by which time is reckoned, for the good and the ill that shall come to the wedded pair." A gnomon ⟨śaṅku⟩ is declared to measure twelve aṅgulas ⟨finger-breadths⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The plate spells the second half-line द्वादशोंगुलकं, with an anusvāra over शो, where द्वादशाङ्गुलकं is the expected form. I have kept the printed spelling. कालसाधन has a long ā (checked at 2.6x); the online transcription of this printing reads कलसाधन, which the plate does not support.
29.95a reading here is contested अन्ययंत्रप्रयोगा ये दुर्लभाः कालसाधने । एवं सुलग्ने दंपत्योः कारयेत्सम्यगीक्षणम्
anyayaṃtraprayogā ye durlabhāḥ kālasādhane | evaṃ sulagne daṃpatyoḥ kārayetsamyagīkṣaṇam
The applications of other instruments for reckoning time are hard to come by. So at a good lagna ⟨the rising sign⟩ one should have the wedded pair duly looked upon ⟨i.e. have the wedding performed⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The numeral is the one the brief warned about. The plate prints ॥ ९५ ॥, not ९९: within the same numeral the first digit has the curved tail of ९ and the second is the open hook with a filled blob that this face uses for ५, and the two are plainly different glyphs. The ṭīkā on the next page (printed 170) closes its gloss with ॥ ९५ ॥, which agrees. The online proofread transcription of this printing reads ९९ and is wrong.
29.96a reading here is contested हस्तोच्छ्रितां चतुर्हस्तैश्चतुरस्रां समंततः । स्तंभैश्चतुर्भिः श्लक्ष्णैर्वा वामभागे स्वसद्मनः
hastocchritāṃ caturhastaiścaturasrāṃ samaṃtataḥ | staṃbhaiścaturbhiḥ ślakṣṇairvā vāmabhāge svasadmanaḥ
⟨Make an altar⟩ raised a hasta ⟨cubit⟩ high, square on every side by four hastas, with four smooth pillars, on the left side of one's own house.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The conjunct च्छ्रि in हस्तोच्छ्रितां checked at 2.6x and is clear. Numeral ॥ ९६ ॥ clear, and the ṭīkā closes its gloss with ॥ ९६ ॥.
29.97a reading here is contested समंडलं चतुर्दिक्षु सोपानैरतिशोभनम् । प्रागुदक्प्रवणारंभास्तंभा हयशुकादिभिः
samaṃḍalaṃ caturdikṣu sopānairatiśobhanam | prāgudakpravaṇāraṃbhāstaṃbhā hayaśukādibhiḥ
⟨Make it⟩ with a circle in the four directions, very handsome with flights of steps; the pillars beginning on ground that slopes east and north, ⟨decorated⟩ with horses, parrots and the like.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two words checked at 2.6–3.4x: समंडलं (the initial स is there; my first low-magnification read had dropped it) and सोपानैः with a clear o-mātrā. The online transcription of this printing reads सपानै, which the plate does not support. प्रागुदक्प्रवणारंभास्तंभा is a run-together compound on the plate; I have not inserted a word break.
29.98a reading here is contested विचित्रितां चित्रकुंभैर्विविधैस्तोरणांकुरैः । भृंगारपुष्पनिचयैर्वर्णकैः समलंकृताम्
vicitritāṃ citrakuṃbhairvividhaistoraṇāṃkuraiḥ | bhṛṃgārapuṣpanicayairvarṇakaiḥ samalaṃkṛtām
— made variegated with painted pots and with manifold festoons and sprouts, well adorned with ewers, heaps of flowers and colours,
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. None. Verses 98 and 99 form one sentence describing the altar, so both are rendered as fragments. Numeral ॥ ९८ ॥ clear.
29.99a reading here is contested विप्राशीर्वचनैः पुण्यस्त्रीभिर्दीपैर्मनोरमाम् । वादित्रनृत्यगीताद्यैर्हृदयानंदिनीं शुभाम्
viprāśīrvacanaiḥ puṇyastrībhirdīpairmanoramām | vāditranṛtyagītādyairhṛdayānaṃdinīṃ śubhām
— charming with the blessings of brāhmaṇas, with auspicious women and with lamps; gladdening the heart with instrumental music, dance, song and the rest; auspicious.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. हृदयानंदिनीं checked at 3x: the ā-mātrā after य is on the plate. The online transcription of this printing reads हृदयनंदिनीं, without it. Numeral ॥ ९९ ॥ clear; the ṭीkā closes with ॥ ९८ ॥ ९९ ॥.
29.100a reading here is contested एवंविधां तामारोहेन्मिथुनं साग्निवेदकम् । त्रिषडायगताः पापाः षष्ठाष्टमं विना विधुः
evaṃvidhāṃ tāmārohenmithunaṃ sāgnivedakam | triṣaḍāyagatāḥ pāpāḥ ṣaṣṭhāṣṭamaṃ vinā vidhuḥ
The couple should mount such an ⟨altar⟩, with the fire and the Veda ⟨as witness⟩. Malefics standing in the third, the sixth and the āya ⟨11th⟩, and the Moon anywhere but the sixth and the eighth —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. साग्निवेदकम् is odd Sanskrit: sa-agni-vedakam, with वेदक used for 'the Veda' or 'the one who makes known'. I read it letter by letter at 2.6x and the plate does print वेदकम्. The 1906 Hindi commentary understands it as 'with fire and the Veda as witness', which is the sense I have given; a corruption of a form like -वेदिकम् (the fire-altar) cannot be ruled out. Numeral ॥ १०० ॥ clear.
29.101a reading here is contested कुर्वंत्यायुर्धनारोग्यं पुत्रपौत्रसमन्विताः । त्रिकोणकेंद्रखत्र्याये शुभं कुर्वंति खेचराः
kurvaṃtyāyurdhanārogyaṃ putrapautrasamanvitāḥ | trikoṇakeṃdrakhatryāye śubhaṃ kurvaṃti khecarāḥ
— bring long life, wealth and health, together with sons and grandsons. In a trine, in a kendra ⟨angle⟩, in the kha ⟨10th⟩, the third and the āya ⟨11th⟩ the planets do good.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. खत्र्याये is a compressed compound: kha (10th) + tri (3rd) + āya (11th). I checked it at 2.8x. The 1906 ṭīkā's own house list on this page reads ९।५। … १०।३।११, which fits that reading. Numeral ॥ १०१ ॥ clear.
29.102a reading here is contested द्यूनकेंद्रभगं शुक्रं हित्वा पुत्रधनान्विताम् । धनत्रिबंधुतनयधर्मखायेषु चंद्रमाः
dyūnakeṃdrabhagaṃ śukraṃ hitvā putradhanānvitām | dhanatribaṃdhutanayadharmakhāyeṣu caṃdramāḥ
Excepting Venus that holds the dyūna ⟨7th⟩ kendra house, ⟨Venus makes the bride⟩ possessed of sons and wealth; and the Moon in the dhana ⟨2nd⟩, the third, the bandhu ⟨4th⟩, the tanaya ⟨5th⟩, the dharma ⟨9th⟩, the kha ⟨10th⟩ and the āya ⟨11th⟩ —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The second half-line begins धन, not द्यून. I zoomed both half-lines at 1.9x side by side: the first opens with the द्यू ligature, the second with a plain ध + न. The reading is also required by the sense, since धन-त्रि-बंधु-तनय-धर्म-ख-आय gives houses 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11 — exactly the list the 1906 ṭīkā prints on the next lines (२।३।४।५।९।१०।११). The online transcription of this printing reads द्यून in both places and is wrong in the second. भगं (bhaga, here 'house') read letter by letter.
29.103a reading here is contested करोति सुतसौभाग्यभोगयुक्तां विवाहिताम् । अस्तगा नीचगाः शत्रुराशिगाश्च पराजिताः
karoti sutasaubhāgyabhogayuktāṃ vivāhitām | astagā nīcagāḥ śatrurāśigāśca parājitāḥ
— makes the wedded woman possessed of sons, good fortune and enjoyment. Planets that are set ⟨combust⟩, that stand in their fall, or that stand in an enemy's sign, are defeated.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. None. Numeral ॥ १०३ ॥ clear; the ṭīkā closes its gloss with ॥ १०३ ॥.
29.104a reading here is contested नाशक्तास्ते फलं दातुं दानमश्रोत्रिये यथा । गुरुरेकोपि लग्नस्थः सकलं दोषसंचयम्
nāśaktāste phalaṃ dātuṃ dānamaśrotriye yathā | gururekopi lagnasthaḥ sakalaṃ doṣasaṃcayam
They are not able to give a result, as a gift ⟨given⟩ to one who is no śrotriya ⟨a brāhmaṇa learned in the Veda⟩ ⟨bears no fruit⟩. Jupiter alone, standing in the lagna, ⟨destroys⟩ the whole heap of defects —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. नाशक्तास्ते: I read this as ना (the metrical form of न) + शक्ताः + ते, 'they are not able' — not as न + अशक्ताः, which would give the opposite sense. Two independent supports: the 1906 ṭīkā says 'वे फल देनेको समर्थ नहीं हैं', and the Kashi 1984 edition's anvaya splits it as शक्ता न. The Katyayan Hindi edition even prints it with a space, ना शक्तास्ते. Verse 104 runs on into 105.
29.105a reading here is contested विनाशयति धर्मांशुरुदितस्तिमिरं यथा । एकोपि लग्नगः काव्यो बुधो वा यदि लग्नगः
vināśayati dharmāṃśuruditastimiraṃ yathā | ekopi lagnagaḥ kāvyo budho vā yadi lagnagaḥ
— destroys, as the risen sun ⟨dharmāṃśu, 'the hot-rayed one'⟩ destroys darkness. Kāvya ⟨Venus⟩ alone standing in the lagna, or Mercury if it stands in the lagna —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two things checked. (1) धर्मांशुरुदितस्तिमिरं at 2.2x: the word is धर्मांशुः (the sun) + उदितः + तिमिरं; the online transcription of this printing reads धर्मगुरुदित, which the plate does not support. (2) The numeral is ॥ १०५ ॥, not १०९: the third digit is the open hook with a filled blob (५), not the closed loop with a curved tail (९). The ṭīkā on the facing page closes its gloss ॥ १०४ ॥ १०५ ॥, which agrees.
29.106a reading here is contested नाशयत्यखिलान्दोषांस्तूलराशिमिवानलः । गुरुरेकोपि केन्द्रस्थः शुक्रो वा यदि वा बुधः
nāśayatyakhilāndoṣāṃstūlarāśimivānalaḥ | gururekopi kendrasthaḥ śukro vā yadi vā budhaḥ
— destroys all the defects, as fire ⟨destroys⟩ a heap of cotton. Jupiter alone standing in a kendra, or Venus, or Mercury —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The plate prints केन्द्रस्थः with a full न् + द्र conjunct here, while verse 107 prints केंद्रगो with an anusvāra. I have kept each as printed rather than normalising. Numeral ॥ १०६ ॥ clear.
29.107a reading here is contested दोषसंघान्निहंत्येव केसरीवेभसंहतिम् । दोषाणां शतकं हंति बलवान् केंद्रगो बुधः
doṣasaṃghānnihaṃtyeva kesarīvebhasaṃhatim | doṣāṇāṃ śatakaṃ haṃti balavān keṃdrago budhaḥ
— strikes down the hosts of defects, just as a lion ⟨strikes down⟩ a herd of elephants. A strong Mercury in a kendra kills a hundred defects.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. केसरीवेभसंहतिम् is केसरी + इव + इभसंहतिम् run together on the plate; I have kept it as one word as printed. Numeral ॥ १०७ ॥ clear.
29.108a reading here is contested शुक्रोऽपहाय वै द्यूनं द्विगुणं लक्षमंगिराः । लग्नदोषाश्च दोषा ये दोषा षड्वर्गजाश्च ये
śukro'pahāya vai dyūnaṃ dviguṇaṃ lakṣamaṃgirāḥ | lagnadoṣāśca doṣā ye doṣā ṣaḍvargajāśca ye
Venus, leaving out the dyūna ⟨7th⟩, ⟨kills⟩ twice as many; Aṅgiras ⟨Jupiter⟩ a lakh. And the defects of the lagna, and those defects that are born of the ṣaḍvarga ⟨the six divisional charts⟩ —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. षड्वर्गजाश्च was the hardest reading in my range. At 5x the cluster is ष + ड् with a small व stacked beneath it + र्ग, and I confirmed the ligature by comparing it with the Hindi word षड्वर्गसे in the ṭīkā four lines below on the same page, where the subscript व is unmistakable. So the plate reads षड्वर्ग, not षडर्ग (the online transcription of this printing) nor षट्वर्ग. लग्नदोषाश्च has a clear ā-mātrā after ष (checked at 3x). Verse runs on into 109.
29.109a reading here is contested हंति ताँल्लग्नगो जीवो मेघसंघमिवानिलः । केंद्रत्रिकोणगे जीवे शुक्रो वा यदि वा बुधः
haṃti tām̐llagnago jīvo meghasaṃghamivānilaḥ | keṃdratrikoṇage jīve śukro vā yadi vā budhaḥ
— Jīva ⟨Jupiter⟩ standing in the lagna kills them, as the wind ⟨scatters⟩ a mass of cloud. When Jīva ⟨Jupiter⟩ stands in a kendra or a trine, or Venus, or Mercury —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. ताँल्लग्नगो carries a candrabindu over the ा, checked at 3x, followed by the ल्ल ligature. Numeral ॥ १०९ ॥ clear — the third digit is the closed loop with a curved tail (९), not the open hook (५). The ṭīkā closes ॥ १०७ ॥ १०८ ॥ above it, and the gloss for 109 on the next page closes ॥ १०९ ॥.
29.110a reading here is contested दोषा विनाशमायांति पापानीव हरिस्मृतेः । गुरुर्बली त्रिकोणस्थः सर्वदोषविनाशकृत्
doṣā vināśamāyāṃti pāpānīva harismṛteḥ | gururbalī trikoṇasthaḥ sarvadoṣavināśakṛt
— the defects come to destruction, as sins ⟨are destroyed⟩ by the remembrance of Hari. A strong Jupiter standing in a trine destroys every defect.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. None. Numeral ॥ ११० ॥ clear; the ṭīkā closes its gloss with ॥ ११० ॥. The verse runs on into 111.
29.111a reading here is contested निहंति निखिलं पापं प्रणाममिव शूलिनः । मुहूर्तपापषड्वर्गकुनवांशग्रहोत्थिताः
nihaṃti nikhilaṃ pāpaṃ praṇāmamiva śūlinaḥ | muhūrtapāpaṣaḍvargakunavāṃśagrahotthitāḥ
It slays every fault, as a bow made to the Trident-bearer ⟨Śiva⟩ ⟨slays sin⟩. ⟨The defects⟩ arisen from the muhūrta, from malefics, from the ṣaḍvarga, from a bad navāṃśa and from the planets —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The numeral is ॥ १११ ॥. I stacked it at 3x beside ॥ ९१ ॥ from printed 169: all three digits here have the straight descender of १, while the ९ of ९१ has a tail that curves down and to the left. The online transcription of this printing reads ३११, which is wrong. षड्वर्ग in the compound shows the same ड् + subscript व stack as in verse 108 (checked at 3x).
29.112a reading here is contested ये दोषास्तान्निहंत्येव यत्रैकादशगः शशी । नाशयंत्यखिलान्दोषान्यत्रैकादशगो रविः
ye doṣāstānnihaṃtyeva yatraikādaśagaḥ śaśī | nāśayaṃtyakhilāndoṣānyatraikādaśago raviḥ
— whatever defects there are, ⟨the chart⟩ in which the Moon stands in the eleventh strikes them down. Where the Sun stands in the eleventh, they destroy all defects.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Two readings checked at 3.2x. (1) यत्रैकादशगः, with the त्र ligature — not यथै, which the online transcription of this printing gives. (2) नाशयंत्य, with an anusvāra, i.e. the plural nāśayanti — while verse 106 four pages earlier prints the singular नाशयत्य without it. The plural sits oddly with the singular subject रविः; I have kept what the plate prints and rendered it as a plural rather than smoothing it.
29.113a reading here is contested गंगायाः स्नानतो भक्त्या सर्वपापानिवाचिरात् । वायूपसूर्यनीहारमेघगर्जनसंभवाः
gaṃgāyāḥ snānato bhaktyā sarvapāpānivācirāt | vāyūpasūryanīhārameghagarjanasaṃbhavāḥ
— just as all sins ⟨are destroyed⟩ quickly by bathing in the Gaṅgā with devotion. ⟨The defects⟩ arising from wind, from a mock sun ⟨upasūrya⟩, from fog, from cloud and from thunder —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. नीहार has a long ā (checked at 3x); the online transcription of this printing reads नीहर. स्नानतो checked at 3x. I read उपसूर्य as the mock sun / solar halo; the 1906 ṭīkā glosses it प्रतिसूर्य, which supports that. Numeral ॥ ११३ ॥ clear.
29.114a reading here is contested दोषा नाशं ययुः सर्वे केन्द्रस्थाने बृहस्पतौ । ये दोषा मासदग्धास्तिथिलग्नसमुद्भवाः
doṣā nāśaṃ yayuḥ sarve kendrasthāne bṛhaspatau | ye doṣā māsadagdhāstithilagnasamudbhavāḥ
— all those defects have gone to destruction when Bṛhaspati ⟨Jupiter⟩ is in a kendra place. And the defects that are the burnt month ⟨māsa-dagdha⟩, and those born of the tithi and the lagna —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The verse straddles the page break: its first half-line is the last line of printed 173 and its second half-line, with the numeral ॥ ११४ ॥, is at the head of the same page's foot. I have assigned it to printed 173, where the number stands. The ṭīkā on printed 174 closes ॥ ११३ ॥ ११४ ॥, which agrees.
29.115a reading here is contested ते सर्वे विलयं यांति केंद्रस्थाने बृहस्पतौ । बलवान् केंद्रगो जीवः परिवेषोत्थदोषहा
te sarve vilayaṃ yāṃti keṃdrasthāne bṛhaspatau | balavān keṃdrago jīvaḥ pariveṣotthadoṣahā
— they all dissolve when Bṛhaspati ⟨Jupiter⟩ is in a kendra place. A strong Jīva ⟨Jupiter⟩ in a kendra destroys the defects that arise from a halo ⟨pariveṣa⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The third numeral in my range that could have gone wrong. The plate prints ॥ ११५ ॥: I stacked it at 3.5x beside ॥ ९५ ॥ (printed 169) and ॥ १११ ॥ (printed 173). The first two digits here have the straight descender of १, and the third is the same open hook with a filled blob that stands as the second digit of ९५. So ११५, in agreement with its position.
29.116a reading here is contested एकादशस्थः शुक्रो वा बलवाञ्छुभवीक्षितः । त्रिविधोत्पातजान् दोषान् हंति केंद्रगतो गुरुः
ekādaśasthaḥ śukro vā balavāñchubhavīkṣitaḥ | trividhotpātajān doṣān haṃti keṃdragato guruḥ
Venus in the eleventh house, strong and aspected by benefics, or Jupiter placed in a kendra ⟨an angle — the 1st, 4th, 7th or 10th house⟩, destroys the faults born of the three kinds of utpāta ⟨portent: those of the sky, of the middle air, and of the earth⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read at 2× then re-checked at 12×. The number ॥ ११६ ॥ agrees with its place in the sequence. बलवाञ्छुभ° is the plate's sandhi of बलवान् + शुभ; केंद्रगतो and हंति carry anusvāra, not a subscript nasal, on this page.
29.117a reading here is contested स्थानादिबलसंपूर्णः पिनाकी त्रिपुरं यथा । लग्नलग्नांशसंभूतान् बलवान्केंद्रगो गुरुः
sthānādibalasaṃpūrṇaḥ pinākī tripuraṃ yathā | lagnalagnāṃśasaṃbhūtān balavānkeṃdrago guruḥ
Jupiter, strong, standing in a kendra and complete in sthāna-bala and the rest ⟨the six sources of a planet's strength, beginning with positional strength⟩, [deals with] the faults arising from the lagna ⟨the rising sign⟩ and from the lagnāṃśa ⟨the navāṃśa of the rising sign⟩ as Pinākin ⟨Śiva, who bears the bow Pināka⟩ [dealt with] Tripura. The sentence is finished by the next verse.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The verse has no finite verb; भस्मीकरोति at the head of v118 supplies it, so the syntax runs across the printed number. बलवान्केंद्रगो is set as one word, with the virāma on न् and no space. Number ॥ ११७ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.118a reading here is contested भस्मीकरोति तान्दोषानिंधनानीव पावकः । अब्दायनर्तुमासोत्था ये दोषा लग्नसंभवाः । सर्वे ते विलयं यांति केंद्रस्थाने बृहस्पतौ
bhasmīkaroti tāndoṣāniṃdhanānīva pāvakaḥ | abdāyanartumāsotthā ye doṣā lagnasaṃbhavāḥ | sarve te vilayaṃ yāṃti keṃdrasthāne bṛhaspatau
He reduces those faults to ashes as fire reduces fuel. Whatever faults arise from the year, the ayana ⟨the sun's northern or southern course, half a year⟩, the ṛtu ⟨season⟩, the month, and the lagna — all of them dissolve when Jupiter stands in a kendra.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. ⚠ THIS IS A FOURTH BREAK OF THE ONE-NUMBER-PER-ŚLOKA PATTERN, beyond the three already reported for this chapter (v34, v141, v162). The printing sets THREE half-lines under one number: half-lines 1 and 2 close with a bare ॥ and carry no number; only the third closes ॥ ११८ ॥. I read the foot of printed p.174 at 2× and again at 2× in two halves to be sure nothing stands between them, and confirmed v117 does close with its own ॥ ११७ ॥ immediately above. The unit ends the page; its Hindi gloss begins on printed p.175. Reported, not corrected.
29.119a reading here is contested उक्तानुक्ताश्च ये दोषास्तान्निहंति बली गुरुः । केंद्रसंस्थः सितो वापि भुजंगं गरुडो यथा
uktānuktāśca ye doṣāstānnihaṃti balī guruḥ | keṃdrasaṃsthaḥ sito vāpi bhujaṃgaṃ garuḍo yathā
Whatever faults have been named and whatever have not, strong Jupiter standing in a kendra — or Venus — destroys them, as Garuḍa destroys a serpent.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. दोषास्तान्निहंति checked at 9×; the doubled न् is inked. Number ॥ ११९ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.120a reading here is contested वर्गोत्तमगते लग्ने सर्वे दोषा लयं ययुः । परमाक्षरविज्ञाने कर्माणीव न संशयः
vargottamagate lagne sarve doṣā layaṃ yayuḥ | paramākṣaravijñāne karmāṇīva na saṃśayaḥ
When the lagna is vargottama ⟨falling in the same sign in the rāśi chart and in the navāṃśa⟩, all faults dissolve, as acts dissolve on the full knowledge of the supreme Imperishable ⟨brahman⟩. There is no doubt of it.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. ⚠ NUMERAL MISPRINT ON THE PAGE, in the gloss and not in the mūla. The mūla closes ॥ १२० ॥, which is what the sequence requires and what I read at 2×. The Hindi gloss below it closes ॥ २२० ॥ — first digit set as २ — read at 2× in both halves. Nothing is corrected; both are reported.
29.121a reading here is contested दुःस्थानस्थग्रहकृताः पापखेटसमुद्भवाः । ते सर्वे लयमायांति केन्द्रस्थाने बृहस्पतौ
duḥsthānasthagrahakṛtāḥ pāpakheṭasamudbhavāḥ | te sarve layamāyāṃti kendrasthāne bṛhaspatau
The faults made by planets standing in duḥsthānas ⟨the ill-placed houses — the 6th, 8th and 12th⟩, and those springing from malefic planets, all dissolve when Jupiter stands in a kendra.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. This verse prints केन्द्रस्थाने with the subscript न् (the न्द conjunct), while v115 and v118 on the facing page print केंद्रस्थाने with anusvāra. Verified at 9×. Both are recorded exactly as set; no spelling has been normalised. Number ॥ १२१ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.122a reading here is contested उच्चस्थो गुरुरेकोपि लग्नगो दोषसंचयम् । हंति दोषान् हरिदिने चोपवासव्रतं यथा
uccastho gururekopi lagnago doṣasaṃcayam | haṃti doṣān haridine copavāsavrataṃ yathā
Jupiter alone, exalted and standing in the lagna, destroys the whole mass of faults; it destroys the faults as the fast kept on Hari's day ⟨ekādaśī, the eleventh lunar day, sacred to Viṣṇu⟩ destroys sin.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. NO AVAGRAHA: the page prints गुरुरेकोपि, not गुरुरेकोऽपि. Checked at 6.5× against the unmistakable ऽ that this same fount sets in युतोऽनलः (v128). Number ॥ १२२ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.123a reading here is contested अष्टधा राशिकूटं च स्त्रीदूरगणराशयः । राशीशयोनिवर्णाख्यशुद्धाश्चेत् पुत्रपौत्रदाः
aṣṭadhā rāśikūṭaṃ ca strīdūragaṇarāśayaḥ | rāśīśayonivarṇākhyaśuddhāścet putrapautradāḥ
The rāśikūṭa ⟨the matching of the bride's and groom's signs and stars⟩ is eightfold: strīdūra ⟨the count of nakṣatras from the bride's star⟩, gaṇa ⟨temperament class⟩, rāśi, and those called rāśīśa ⟨lord of the sign⟩, yoni ⟨animal class⟩ and varṇa ⟨class⟩. If these are clean, they give sons and grandsons.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The verse says eightfold but names only six members. Recorded as printed; not reconciled. शुद्धाश्चेत् carries the ā-mātrā — checked at 8×, against a second modern transcription of this same printing that reads शुद्धश्चेत् without it. The स्त्री ligature of this fount can look like ख्री; I compared it akṣara-for-akṣara at 11× with the same ligature in v125, and the edition's own Hindi reads स्त्रीदूर.
29.124a reading here is contested एकराशौ पृथग् धिष्ण्ये दंपत्योः पाणिपीडनम् । उत्तमं मध्यमं भिन्नराश्यैकर्क्षजयोस्तयोः
ekarāśau pṛthag dhiṣṇye daṃpatyoḥ pāṇipīḍanam | uttamaṃ madhyamaṃ bhinnarāśyaikarkṣajayostayoḥ
When the couple stand in one rāśi but in separate dhiṣṇyas ⟨nakṣatras⟩, their marriage is best; when the two are born in different rāśis but in one nakṣatra, it is middling.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. राश्यै carries the ऐ mātrā — TWO slanted strokes over the श्य, seen at 10×. At 2× I first read a single stroke (राश्ये) and was wrong. The mark over र्क्ष is one repha hook and not an anusvāra; checked at 9×. Number ॥ १२४ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.125a reading here is contested एकर्क्षे त्वेकराशौ च विवाहः प्राणहानिदः । स्त्रीधिष्ण्यादाद्यनवके स्त्रीदूरमतिनिंदितम्
ekarkṣe tvekarāśau ca vivāhaḥ prāṇahānidaḥ | strīdhiṣṇyādādyanavake strīdūramatiniṃditam
But when the nakṣatra is one and the rāśi one as well, the marriage takes life. When [the man's star falls] in the first navaka ⟨group of nine nakṣatras⟩ counted from the woman's star, that strīdūra is much condemned.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The number on the plate is ॥ १२५ ॥. I stacked its digits beside those of v124 and v126 at 8× to separate ५ from ६ — a second transcription of this same printing reads १२६ here, and it is wrong. First word of pāda c: the plate has स्त्री- with the ī-mātrā, not स्त्र्य-; compared at 11× with स्त्रीदूर in v123.
29.126a reading here is contested द्वितीये मध्यमं श्रेष्ठं तृतीये नवके भृशम् । तिस्रः पूर्वोत्तरा धातृयाम्यमाहेशतारकाः
dvitīye madhyamaṃ śreṣṭhaṃ tṛtīye navake bhṛśam | tisraḥ pūrvottarā dhātṛyāmyamāheśatārakāḥ
In the second [navaka] it is middling; in the third navaka, exceedingly good. The three Pūrvās and the three Uttarās, and the stars of Dhātṛ ⟨Rohiṇī⟩, of Yama ⟨Bharaṇī⟩ and of Maheśa ⟨Ārdrā⟩ — the sentence is finished by the next verse.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. धातृ, not घातृ: I set the धा of this word beside the धा of अष्टधा (v123, same page) at 7× and the two glyphs are the same sort. The nine stars named here plus those of v127 are the manuṣya-gaṇa, and nine is what the edition's own Hindi lists. द्वितीये carries the े on य — checked at 10×; a second transcription of this printing drops it.
29.127a reading here is contested इति मर्त्यगणो ज्ञेयः स्यादमर्त्यगणः परः । हयादित्यर्कवाय्विज्यमित्रेन्दुविष्णु चान्त्यभम्
iti martyagaṇo jñeyaḥ syādamartyagaṇaḥ paraḥ | hayādityarkavāyvijyamitrenduviṣṇu cāntyabham
— these are to be known as the martya-gaṇa ⟨the human class⟩. The other, the amartya-gaṇa ⟨the divine class⟩, is: Haya ⟨Aśvinī⟩, Āditya ⟨Punarvasu⟩, Arka ⟨Hasta⟩, Vāyu ⟨Svātī⟩, Ijya ⟨Puṣya⟩, Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, Indu ⟨Mṛgaśiras⟩, Viṣṇu ⟨Śravaṇa⟩, and the last asterism ⟨Revatī⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Pāda d was the hardest line in my range. I read it in four overlapping strips at 6× and then akṣara by akṣara at 12–16×. र्क carries ONE hook, the repha, and no anusvāra — at 2× I had thought I saw a dot and was wrong. The conjunct after वा is य्व, not श्व, which the deity list settles: वायु is needed for Svātī, and reading अश्वि there would name Aśvinī twice and lose Svātī. The nine deities name exactly the nine deva-gaṇa stars the edition's Hindi lists. The plate prints त्यर्क, without the lengthening त्यार्क that the compound would call for.
29.128a reading here is contested रक्षोगणः पितृत्वाष्ट्रद्विदैवानींद्रतारकाः । वसुतोयेशमूलाहितारकाभिर्युतोऽनलः
rakṣogaṇaḥ pitṛtvāṣṭradvidaivānīṃdratārakāḥ | vasutoyeśamūlāhitārakābhiryuto'nalaḥ
The rakṣas-gaṇa ⟨the demon class⟩ is: the stars of Pitṛ ⟨Maghā⟩, of Tvaṣṭṛ ⟨Citrā⟩, the two-deity one ⟨Viśākhā, whose deities are Indra and Agni⟩ and of Indra ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩; together with the stars of Vasu ⟨Dhaniṣṭhā⟩, of Toyeśa ⟨Śatabhiṣā, whose lord is Varuṇa, lord of waters⟩, of Mūla and of Ahi ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ — [and] Anala ⟨Kṛttikā, whose deity is Agni⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. दैवानींद्र: the marks over that न are a ī-flag and an anusvāra, not the two slanted strokes of ऐ — seen at 16× and compared with the दै two strokes three akṣaras earlier in the same word. It parses as द्विदैवानि + इन्द्र-. युतोऽनलः carries a clear avagraha, which is what let me rule against one in v134.
29.129a reading here is contested दंपत्योर्जन्मभमेकगणे प्रीतिरनेकधा । मध्यमा देवमर्त्यानां राक्षसानां तयोर्मृतिः
daṃpatyorjanmabhamekagaṇe prītiranekadhā | madhyamā devamartyānāṃ rākṣasānāṃ tayormṛtiḥ
When the birth-stars of the couple fall in one gaṇa, their affection is manifold. Between deva and martya ⟨god-class and human-class⟩ it is middling; with the rākṣasas, death of the two.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Read at 9×; nothing ambiguous. Number ॥ १२९ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.130a reading here is contested मृत्युः षष्ठाष्टके पंच नवमे त्वनपत्यता । नेष्टं द्विर्द्वादशेन्येषु दंपत्योः प्रीतिरुत्तमा
mṛtyuḥ ṣaṣṭhāṣṭake paṃca navame tvanapatyatā | neṣṭaṃ dvirdvādaśenyeṣu daṃpatyoḥ prītiruttamā
In the sixth-and-eighth, death; in the fifth-and-ninth, childlessness. The second-and-twelfth is not wanted. In the other [placements] the couple's affection is best.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. द्विर्द्वादशे carries a repha over the द्वा — checked at 15×, where the hook is unmistakable. At 9× I had read द्विद्वादशे and was wrong. षष्ठाष्टके has ठ (a closed loop) in the second akṣara and ट in the third.
29.131a reading here is contested एकाधिपे मित्रभावे शुभदं पाणिपीडनम् । द्विर्द्वादशे त्रिकोणे च न कदाचित् षडष्टके
ekādhipe mitrabhāve śubhadaṃ pāṇipīḍanam | dvirdvādaśe trikoṇe ca na kadācit ṣaḍaṣṭake
When the two signs have one lord, or stand in a friendly relation, the marriage gives good — in the second-and-twelfth too, and in the trine; never in the six-and-eight.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. द्विर्द्वादशे again carries both the repha and the ā-mātrā, read at 12×; a second transcription of this printing drops the ā. This verse and v132 stand back to back with no gloss between them; the gloss for 131, 132 and 133 comes as one block on the next page and closes ॥ १३१ ॥ १३२ ॥ १३३ ॥.
29.132a reading here is contested शत्रुषष्ठाष्टके कुंभकन्ययोर्घटमीनयोः । वामोक्षयोर्नृयुक्कीटभयोः कुंभकुलीरयोः
śatruṣaṣṭhāṣṭake kuṃbhakanyayorghaṭamīnayoḥ | vāmokṣayornṛyukkīṭabhayoḥ kuṃbhakulīrayoḥ
The hostile six-and-eight belongs to Kumbha and Kanyā ⟨Aquarius and Virgo⟩, to Ghaṭa and Mīna ⟨Aquarius and Pisces⟩, to Vāmā and Ukṣan ⟨Virgo and Taurus⟩, to Nṛyuj and Kīṭabha ⟨Gemini and Scorpio⟩, to Kumbha and Kulīra ⟨Aquarius and Cancer⟩ — the list is finished by the next verse.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. नृयुक्, not युयुक्: the akṣara carries a repha over a न with the ṛ-vowel below, read at 10×, and the sense settles it — नृयुज् is Gemini, and the edition's own Hindi lists मिथुन-वृश्चिक among these pairs. A second transcription of this printing reads युयुक्. Number ॥ १३२ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.133a reading here is contested पंचास्यमृगयोश्चैव निंदितं तदतीव तु । सितार्कीज्येंदूभौमसो रिपुमित्रसमा रवेः
paṃcāsyamṛgayoścaiva niṃditaṃ tadatīva tu | sitārkījyeṃdūbhaumaso ripumitrasamā raveḥ
— and to Pañcāsya and Mṛga ⟨Leo and Capricorn⟩; that is exceedingly condemned. Sita ⟨Venus⟩ and Ārkī ⟨Saturn⟩; Ijya ⟨Jupiter⟩, Indu ⟨Moon⟩ and Bhauma ⟨Mars⟩; and so ⟨so printed — the planet wanted here is Mercury⟩ are, of the Sun, enemy, friend and neutral in that order.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. ⚠ THE LAST WORD OF PĀDA D IS सो AND I CANNOT MAKE IT A PLANET NAME. Read at 14×: the glyph is स with the single ो flag, not सौ and not ज्ञो. Two things pull in opposite directions. The metre is satisfied as printed — सितार्कीज्येंदूभौमसो is eight syllables, so no letters have dropped out. But the sense needs Mercury (सौम्य or ज्ञ) as the Sun's neutral, and the edition's own Hindi says बुध सम है. I have transcribed the ink and left the problem open. This is also the verse the corpus ingest DROPS entirely; it is present and legible on printed p.178. सितार्की has the ī and ज्येंदू the long ū — both checked at 13×; a second transcription of this printing has neither.
29.134a reading here is contested इन्दोर्न शत्रुरर्कज्ञौ कुजेज्यभृगुसूर्यजाः । कुजस्य ज्ञोर्कचंद्रेज्याः शुक्रसूर्यसुतौ क्रमात्
indorna śatrurarkajñau kujejyabhṛgusūryajāḥ | kujasya jñorkacaṃdrejyāḥ śukrasūryasutau kramāt
The Moon has no enemy; Arka and Jña ⟨Sun and Mercury⟩ [are its friends]; Kuja, Ijya, Bhṛgu and Sūryaja ⟨Mars, Jupiter, Venus and Saturn⟩ [are neutral]. For Mars, Jña ⟨Mercury⟩ [is enemy]; Arka, Candra and Ijya ⟨Sun, Moon and Jupiter⟩ [friends]; Śukra and Sūryasuta ⟨Venus and Saturn⟩ [neutral] — in that order.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. NO AVAGRAHA in ज्ञोर्क, though the sandhi ज्ञः + अर्क would take one. I put this spot beside the plain ऽ of युतोऽनलः (v128, printed p.177) at the same magnification: the ऽ there is a distinct curled sort, and here there is only the ो's vertical. Likewise अर्कज्ञौ in pāda a has ONE hook over the क, the repha, and no anusvāra; the anusvāra in pāda c sits over the च of चंद्रे and not over the क — checked at 17×.
29.135a reading here is contested ज्ञस्येंदुरर्कशुक्रौ च कुजजीवशनैश्चराः । गुरोर्ज्ञशुक्रौ सूर्येन्दुकुजाः स्युर्भास्करात्मजः
jñasyeṃdurarkaśukrau ca kujajīvaśanaiścarāḥ | gurorjñaśukrau sūryendukujāḥ syurbhāskarātmajaḥ
For Mercury, Indu ⟨the Moon⟩ [is enemy]; Arka and Śukra ⟨Sun and Venus⟩ [friends]; Kuja, Jīva and Śanaiścara ⟨Mars, Jupiter and Saturn⟩ [neutral]. For Jupiter, Jña and Śukra ⟨Mercury and Venus⟩ [are enemies]; Sūrya, Indu and Kuja ⟨Sun, Moon and Mars⟩ [friends]; Bhāskarātmaja ⟨Saturn⟩ [neutral].
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The number is ॥ १३५ ॥, read at 9×; the ५ has the same ball-and-tail sort as the ५ of v125. The corpus ingest records १३ here — the plate does not. शनैश्चराः carries श्च (the च tucked below the श), verified at 15×. सूर्येन्दु is set with the subscript न्. A second transcription of this printing drops शुक्रौ from pāda a; the plate has it.
29.136a reading here is contested शुक्रस्येंदुरवी ज्ञार्की कुजदेवेशपूजितौ । शनेरर्केन्दुभूपुत्रा ज्ञशुक्रौ देवपूजितः
śukrasyeṃduravī jñārkī kujadeveśapūjitau | śanerarkendubhūputrā jñaśukrau devapūjitaḥ
For Venus, Indu and Ravi ⟨Moon and Sun⟩ [are enemies]; Jña and Ārkī ⟨Mercury and Saturn⟩ [friends]; Kuja and the one honoured by the lord of the gods ⟨Mars and Jupiter⟩ [neutral]. For Saturn, Arka, Indu and Bhūputra ⟨the Sun, the Moon and Mars, the 'son of the earth'⟩ [are enemies]; Jña and Śukra ⟨Mercury and Venus⟩ [friends]; the one honoured by the gods ⟨Jupiter⟩ [neutral].
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. ⚠ THE PLATE PRINTS भूपत्रा, WITH NO u-MĀTRĀ UNDER THE प. Read at 16×: the ū below भ is inked and the प is bare. The word must be भूपुत्रा, Mars, and the edition's own Hindi says मंगल. Transcribed as printed and reported. अर्केन्दु carries both a repha hook and an े stroke over the क, and a subscript न् — not an anusvāra; checked at 15×. [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads भूपुत्रा on the lexicon; the press sets भूपत्रा, read by eye on the plate at about 4.2x (venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.185, printed 178), and machine reads of Kātyāyana (page_0238) and Vimala KSS 40 (page_0234) carry भूपुत्रा.]
29.137a reading here is contested अश्वेभंमेषसर्पाहिश्वोतुमेषोतुमूषकाः । आखुर्गोमहिषव्याघ्रः श्वाद्विड् व्याघ्रो मृगद्वयम्
aśvebhaṃmeṣasarpāhiśvotumeṣotumūṣakāḥ | ākhurgomahiṣavyāghraḥ śvādviḍ vyāghro mṛgadvayam
Horse, elephant, sheep, serpent, serpent, dog, cat, sheep, cat, rat; rat, cow, buffalo, tiger, the dog's foe ⟨śvādviṣ; the edition's own Hindi takes this fifteenth one as the buffalo⟩, tiger, and a pair of deer — the list is finished by the next verse.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Three things. (1) अश्वेभं carries an anusvāra over the भ where the compound अश्व + इभ needs none; it is inked, seen at 10×, and left as printed. (2) आखुर्गो carries a repha: I put its गो beside the plain गो of v139 at 12× and this one has two marks above where that has one. (3) श्वाद्विड् has a long ā, checked at 15×; the word literally means 'the dog's enemy', and I cannot reconcile it with the buffalo that the edition's Hindi puts at that place. I have not emended it. The verse stands under the centred section heading अथ योनिः ।.
29.138a reading here is contested श्वानोःकपिर्बभ्रुयुग्मं कपिसिंहतुरंगमाः । सिंहगोहस्तिनो भानामेषां योनिर्यथाक्रमात्
śvānoḥkapirbabhruyugmaṃ kapisiṃhaturaṃgamāḥ | siṃhagohastino bhānāmeṣāṃ yoniryathākramāt
— a dog ⟨the page prints śvānoḥ, a dual form I cannot construe here⟩, a monkey, a pair of mongooses, a monkey, a lion and a horse; a lion, a cow, an elephant. These are the yonis ⟨animal classes⟩ of those asterisms, in order.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. श्वानोः is set as one word with कपिः following, and the dual/genitive ending does not fit a list of nominatives; recorded as printed and not emended. कपिर्बभ्रु carries a repha over the ब and no anusvāra — checked at 22×, where the hook is clear and there is no dot. युग्मं, not युग्भं: read at 6×. Number ॥ १३८ ॥ agrees with the sequence.
29.139a reading here is contested वैरं बभ्रूरंगमेषवानरं सिंहदंतिनम् । गोव्याघ्रमाखुमार्जारं महिषाश्वं च शात्रवम्
vairaṃ babhrūraṃgameṣavānaraṃ siṃhadaṃtinam | govyāghramākhumārjāraṃ mahiṣāśvaṃ ca śātravam
The enmities: mongoose and uraṅga ⟨serpent⟩, sheep and monkey, lion and elephant; cow and tiger, rat and cat, and buffalo and horse — these are hostile.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. बभ्रूरंग is बभ्रू + उरंग, the second member being a form of उरग, serpent; the six pairs match the six the edition's Hindi lists. गोव्याघ्रम् has व, not ब — read at 10×. Number ॥ १३९ ॥ agrees with the sequence. The Hindi gloss below closes ॥ १३९ ॥ इति ।, and the centred heading अथ वर्णविचारः । follows before v140.
29.140a reading here is contested मीनालिकर्कटा विप्राः क्षत्री मेषो हरिर्धनुः । शूद्रो युग्मं तुलाकुंभौ वैश्यः कन्या वृषो मृगः
mīnālikarkaṭā viprāḥ kṣatrī meṣo harirdhanuḥ | śūdro yugmaṃ tulākuṃbhau vaiśyaḥ kanyā vṛṣo mṛgaḥ
Mīna, Ali and Karkaṭa ⟨Pisces, Scorpio and Cancer⟩ are brāhmaṇa; Meṣa, Hari and Dhanus ⟨Aries, Leo and Sagittarius⟩ are kṣatriya; Yugma, Tulā and Kumbha ⟨Gemini, Libra and Aquarius⟩ are śūdra; Kanyā, Vṛṣa and Mṛga ⟨Virgo, Taurus and Capricorn⟩ are vaiśya.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. क्षत्री has the ī and no anusvāra; मेषो has ष, not द्य — both read at 10×, against a second transcription of this printing that gives क्षत्री मेद्यो. कर्कटा has one hook over the क, the repha, and no anusvāra — checked at 17×. The number is ॥ १४० ॥, read at 2×; the digits are १ ४ ०. This is the last verse of my range and it opens the varṇa section.
29.141a reading here is contested ( नोत्तमामुद्वहेत्कन्यां हीनवर्णो वरः सदा । आद्यमध्यान्त्यचरममध्याद्या ह्याश्विनीमात् ) । गणयेत्संख्यया चैकनाड्यां मृत्युर्न पार्श्वयोः । प्राजापत्यब्राह्मदैवा विवाहार्षकसंयुताः
( nottamāmudvahetkanyāṃ hīnavarṇo varaḥ sadā | ādyamadhyāntyacaramamadhyādyā hyāśvinīmāt ) | gaṇayetsaṃkhyayā caikanāḍyāṃ mṛtyurna pārśvayoḥ | prājāpatyabrāhmadaivā vivāhārṣakasaṃyutāḥ
(A groom of lower varṇa ⟨social class⟩ must never marry a girl of a higher one. Beginning, middle, last; last, middle, first — the nāḍīs ⟨the three groups the asterisms fall into⟩ run so from Aśvinī onward.) Count them off by number. In one and the same nāḍī there is death; on the two flanks ⟨when the two nāḍīs differ⟩ there is none. The prājāpatya, the brāhma and the daiva marriages, together with the ārṣa —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. This is one of the three places where the printing breaks its one-number-per-śloka pattern: FOUR half-lines carry the single number ॥ १४१ ॥, and the first two stand inside round brackets. I kept the brackets in the mūla because they are the page's own mark of an inserted pair. — हीनर्णो: the plate prints three akṣaras only (ही, न, र्णो), with no व. I checked this at 7x, 9x, 16x and 20x, and confirmed it numerically: the third ink run has exactly three body clusters below the headline (48, 23 and 16 px wide — bowl, stem, ā-stroke), which is one akṣara, and the middle akṣara at 22x is plainly न (an open left arm), not the closed oval this face uses for व. But the half-line then counts 15 syllables where the anuṣṭubh needs 16; the sense needs हीनवर्ण 'of low varṇa'; the 1906 Hindi ṭīkā under the verse glosses हीनवर्ण; the Kashi Sanskrit Series 40 (1984) edition prints हीनवर्ण in its footnote (kashi1984_djvu.txt line 11882); and the Wikisource proofread transcription of this same printing reads हीनवर्णो. A व has dropped out of this forme. The text reads हीनवर्णो. — Second half-line: आद्यमध्यान्त्यचरममध्याद्या ह्याश्विनीमात् also counts 15, not 16. Nothing on the plate is unclear; ह्या carries a plain ā-mātrā at 9x (Wikisource reads ह्य), and ...मात् is set with four akṣaras only (ह्या श्वि नी मात्), so the ...मुखात् one might expect is not what is printed. The loss is in this printing or its exemplar, not in my reading. — The printed numeral ॥ १४१ ॥ was read at 5x and agrees with the sequence. [2026-09-23: the mūla reads हीनर्णो, as the press sets it, and the correction to हीनवर्णो was withdrawn. A second eye reading of venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.187 (printed 180), line 4, at about 2.9x and 3.3x native, found three akṣaras, ही न र्णो, with no व and only 13 px between न and the next body, which leaves no room for a dropped letter; the same fount sets हीनवर्ण with a plain व in the bhāṣāṭīkā four lines below on that leaf. हीनवर्णो stands in no store: what the stores carry is हीनवर्णे, in a footnote of ns-vimala-kss40 (page_0236 l.29). So the note's 'The text reads हीनवर्णो' does not describe our mūla, which keeps the press's हीनर्णो, and the half-line's one-syllable shortfall belongs to the 1906 printing.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads हीनवर्णो on the metre, so the pāda counts 8; the press sets हीनर्णो, read by eye on the plate at about 3.3x (venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.187, printed 180), and the same leaf's bhāṣāṭīkā sets हीनवर्ण, as a footnote of Vimala KSS 40 does (machine read). The note's 'The text reads हीनवर्णो' describes our mūla again.]
29.142a reading here is contested उक्तकाले तु कर्तव्याश्चत्वारः फलदायकाः । आसुरो द्रविणादानात्पैशाचः कन्यकाच्छलात्
uktakāle tu kartavyāścatvāraḥ phaladāyakāḥ | āsuro draviṇādānātpaiśācaḥ kanyakācchalāt
These four, performed at the time stated, bear fruit. The āsura ⟨marriage⟩ arises from the giving of wealth; the paiśāca, from taking the girl by deceit.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Number ॥ १४२ ॥ agrees with the sequence. The Wikisource transcription of this printing prints कन्यकाछलात्; the plate has the doubled च्छ, which is also the correct sandhi after a vowel.
29.143a reading here is contested राक्षसो युद्धहरणाद्गांधर्वः समयान्मिथः । गांधर्वासुरपैशाचराक्षसाख्यास्तु नोत्तमाः
rākṣaso yuddhaharaṇādgāṃdharvaḥ samayānmithaḥ | gāṃdharvāsurapaiśācarākṣasākhyāstu nottamāḥ
The rākṣasa arises from carrying her off in battle; the gāndharva, from an agreement between the two themselves. But those named gāndharva, āsura, paiśāca and rākṣasa are not the best.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. I first read राक्षसाह्यास्तु at 2x. At 8x the akṣara is ख्या, not ह्या — so ...राक्षस-आख्याः, 'those named rākṣasa', which the sense requires and the Wikisource transcription confirms. Corrected. Number ॥ १४३ ॥ agrees.
29.144a reading here is contested चतुर्थमाभिजिल्लग्नमुदयर्क्षात्तु सप्तमम् । गोधूलिकं तदुभयं विवाहे पुत्रपौत्रदम्
caturthamābhijillagnamudayarkṣāttu saptamam | godhūlikaṃ tadubhayaṃ vivāhe putrapautradam
The fourth from the rising asterism is the ābhijit lagna ⟨the ascendant called abhijit⟩, and the seventh is the godhūlika ⟨the 'cow-dust' hour at sunset⟩. Both of these, at a marriage, give sons and grandsons.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. I first read उदयर्क्षातु with a single त at 8x, and was wrong. At 14x the akṣara carries the second horizontal bar below the headline that marks the त्त conjunct in this face — the same structure as the certain त्त in त्रिंशत्तमो at verse 156. The sandhi (उदयर्क्षात् + तु) and the Wikisource transcription both give त्त. Corrected to उदयर्क्षात्तु. — The mark above क्षा is an S-hook, a repha, not the round anusvāra this face uses, so र्क्षा. — Number ॥ १४४ ॥ read at 5x: the digits are १, ४, ४ (the Wikisource transcription misprints १६४).
29.145a reading here is contested प्राच्यानां च कलिंगानां मुख्यं गोधूलिकं स्मृतम् । अभिजित्सर्वदेशेषु मुख्यं दोषविनाशकृत्
prācyānāṃ ca kaliṃgānāṃ mukhyaṃ godhūlikaṃ smṛtam | abhijitsarvadeśeṣu mukhyaṃ doṣavināśakṛt
For the people of the east and of Kaliṅga the godhūlika is held to be the chief one. The abhijit is chief in all countries, and destroys the faults.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. कलिंगानां, not कालिंगानां: at 5x the क carries no ā-mātrā — what looks like one at 2x is the i-mātrā belonging to लि. The metre confirms it (प्राच्यानां च कलिंगानां = 8). Number ॥ १४५ ॥ read at 5x, digits १, ४, ५ (the Wikisource transcription misprints १४४).
29.146a reading here is contested मध्यंदिनगते भानौ मुहूर्तोभिजिताह्वयः । नाशयत्यखिलान्दोषान्पिनाकी त्रिपुरं यथा
madhyaṃdinagate bhānau muhūrtobhijitāhvayaḥ | nāśayatyakhilāndoṣānpinākī tripuraṃ yathā
When the sun has reached midday, the muhūrta ⟨a division of the day⟩ named abhijit arrives. It destroys every fault, as Pinākin ⟨Śiva, bearer of the Pināka bow⟩ destroyed Tripura.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. A narrow vertical mark with a hook stands between तो and भि at 10x, which could be an avagraha (मुहूर्तोऽभि-) or spread ink. I have transcribed WITHOUT it, for two reasons: this printing omits the avagraha at every other place in my range (देवोपि 158, कालोथ 158, योंशो 157, दशमेथ and प्रतिशुक्रोपि 162), and the Wikisource transcription of this printing also reads मुहूर्तोभिजिताह्वयः. The word the text intends is मुहूर्तोऽभिजिताह्वयः. — Second half-line: at 9x the junction after दोषान् is न् + पि (the tall i-mātrā arcs over the प), giving पिनाकी. Wikisource reads the same, and the metre closes exactly at 8 + 8. Number ॥ १४६ ॥ agrees.
29.147a reading here is contested मध्यंदिनगते भानौ सकलं दोषसंचयम् । करोति दोषमाभिजित्तूलराशिमिवानलः
madhyaṃdinagate bhānau sakalaṃ doṣasaṃcayam | karoti doṣamābhijittūlarāśimivānalaḥ
When the sun has reached midday, the ābhijit ⟨the abhijit muhūrta⟩ does to the whole accumulated mass of faults what fire does to a heap of cotton.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. करोति 'makes/does' has no expressed object of destruction; the verse leaves the action to be filled in from the simile of fire and cotton, and the 1906 Hindi ṭīkā under it reads it as destruction. I have rendered करोति literally rather than smoothing it to 'destroys'. — जित्तू carries the त्त conjunct (same 14x test as verse 144); I first read a single त and was wrong. The Wikisource transcription prints जितूल here, which is its slip, since it prints र्क्षात्तु at 144. — Number ॥ १४७ ॥ agrees.
29.148a reading here is contested हंत्येकश्च महादोषो गुणलक्षमपीह सः । पावने पंचगव्यं तु पूर्णकुंभं सुरालयम्
haṃtyekaśca mahādoṣo guṇalakṣamapīha saḥ | pāvane paṃcagavyaṃ tu pūrṇakuṃbhaṃ surālayam
Even one great fault destroys here a lakh of good qualities — as [one drop of liquor] turns the purifying pañcagavya ⟨the five products of the cow⟩, a full pot of it, into a vessel of liquor.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The second half-line is elliptical: it names the purifying pañcagavya, the full pot and सुरालयम् with no verb and no expressed agent. I read सुरालयम् as 'a receptacle of liquor' (सुरा + आलय), the state the pot is reduced to; the 1906 Hindi ṭīkā supplies a drop of liquor as the agent, and I have put that in brackets rather than in the sentence. Number ॥ १४८ ॥ agrees.
29.149a reading here is contested पुत्रोद्वाहात्परं पुत्रीविवाहो न ऋतुत्रये । न तयोर्व्रतमुद्वाहान्मंगले नान्यमंगलम्
putrodvāhātparaṃ putrīvivāho na ṛtutraye | na tayorvratamudvāhānmaṃgale nānyamaṃgalam
After a son's marriage there is to be no marriage of a daughter within three seasons ⟨six months⟩. Nor, in that time, a vow for either of them; and after one auspicious rite, no other auspicious rite.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. ऋतुत्रये is printed without sandhi after न. Number ॥ १४९ ॥ agrees.
29.150a reading here is contested विवाहश्चैकजन्यानां षण्मासाभ्यंतरे यदि । असंशयं त्रिभिर्वर्षैस्तत्रैका विधवा भवेत्
vivāhaścaikajanyānāṃ ṣaṇmāsābhyaṃtare yadi | asaṃśayaṃ tribhirvarṣaistatraikā vidhavā bhavet
If girls born of one mother are married within six months of each other, then beyond doubt one of them becomes a widow within three years.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Number ॥ १५० ॥ read at 5x: digits १, ५, ० (the Wikisource transcription misprints १४०). एकजन्या, 'born of one womb', is glossed by the ṭīkā as sisters by the same mother.
29.151a reading here is contested प्रत्युद्वाहो नैव कार्यो नैकस्मै दुहितुर्द्वयम् । न चैकजन्मनोः पुंसोरेकजन्ये तु कन्यके
pratyudvāho naiva kāryo naikasmai duhiturdvayam | na caikajanmanoḥ puṃsorekajanye tu kanyake
A counter-marriage must not be made; nor a pair of daughters to one man; nor, to two men born of one mother, two girls born of one mother.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. I first read दुहितृद्वयम् at 2x. At 5x a repha stands clearly over the द्व, so the plate reads दुहितुर्द्वयम् (दुहितुः + द्वयम्), which the Wikisource transcription also gives. Corrected. — Wikisource reads नैष for नैव; the plate's glyph at 6x is the closed-loop व this face uses, so नैव stands. — Number ॥ १५१ ॥ agrees (Wikisource misprints १९३).
29.152a reading here is contested नैवं कदाचिदुद्वाहो नैकदा मुंडनद्वयम् । दिवाजातस्तु पितरं रात्रौ तु जननीं तथा
naivaṃ kadācidudvāho naikadā muṃḍanadvayam | divājātastu pitaraṃ rātrau tu jananīṃ tathā
Never a marriage in this way, and never two tonsures at one time. One born by day [destroys] the father, and one born by night the mother —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The verb हंति is not in this verse; it stands in 153 and governs back into this half-line. I have marked the supplied verb with brackets. Number ॥ १५२ ॥ agrees.
29.153a reading here is contested आत्मानं संध्ययोर्हंति नास्ति गंडे विपर्ययः । सुतः सुता वा नियतं श्वशुरं हंति मूलजाः
ātmānaṃ saṃdhyayorhaṃti nāsti gaṃḍe viparyayaḥ | sutaḥ sutā vā niyataṃ śvaśuraṃ haṃti mūlajāḥ
— and one born at the two junctions ⟨the twilights⟩ destroys himself. In the gaṇḍa ⟨the gaṇḍānta, the seam between asterisms⟩ there is no reversal. A son or a daughter born under Mūla destroys the father-in-law without fail.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The first half-line counts 15 syllables, not 16. Nothing on the plate is unclear — I read संध्योर्हंति at 7x and it is good Sanskrit (सन्ध्योः, genitive/locative dual of सन्धि) — so the missing syllable is a loss in this printing or its exemplar, not in my reading. The Wikisource transcription of this printing reads संध्योर्हति, also 15. — मूलजाः is plural against the singular सुतः सुता वा; kept as printed. — Number ॥ १५३ ॥ agrees (Wikisource misprints १९३). [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads संध्ययोर्हंति on the metre, so the first pāda counts 8; the press sets संध्योर्हंति here, read by eye on the plate at about 2.7x (venkateshwar_1906_khemraj.pdf p.189, printed 182), and sets संध्ययोर्हन्ति where the couplet recurs at our 53.35 (p.296, read by eye at about 2.7x), as machine reads of Vimala KSS 40 and Kātyāyana do here.]
29.154a reading here is contested तदंत्यपादजो नैव तथाश्लेषाद्यपादजः । ज्येष्ठांत्यपादजो ज्येष्ठं हंति बालो न बालिका
tadaṃtyapādajo naiva tathāśleṣādyapādajaḥ | jyeṣṭhāṃtyapādajo jyeṣṭhaṃ haṃti bālo na bālikā
One born in its last quarter ⟨the last pāda of Mūla⟩ does not do so, nor one born in the first quarter of Āśleṣā. A boy born in the last quarter of Jyeṣṭhā destroys the eldest; a girl does not.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. तद् in तदंत्यपाद refers back to Mūla in 153; the 1906 ṭīkā reads it so. Number ॥ १५४ ॥ agrees (Wikisource misprints १९१).
29.155a reading here is contested बालिका मूलऋक्षे तु मातरं पितरं तथा । ऐन्द्री धवाग्रजं हंति देवरं तु द्विदैवजा
bālikā mūlaṛkṣe tu mātaraṃ pitaraṃ tathā | aindrī dhavāgrajaṃ haṃti devaraṃ tu dvidaivajā
But a girl born under the asterism Mūla [destroys] her mother and her father. One born under Aindrī ⟨Jyeṣṭhā, whose deity is Indra⟩ destroys the husband's elder brother; one born under the two-deity asterism ⟨Viśākhā, of Indra and Agni⟩ destroys the husband's younger brother.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. धवाग्रजं, not धवाभ्रजं: at 7x the akṣara looked like भ्र, but at 14x it is ग with the ्र subscript — the diagonal subscript is the second stroke that misleads at lower zoom. धव-अग्रज, 'the husband's elder brother', is what the ṭīkā glosses and what the Wikisource transcription reads. — मूलऋक्षे is printed without sandhi. — The verb हंति serves both half-lines. — Number ॥ १५५ ॥ read at 5x (Wikisource misprints १९४).
29.156a reading here is contested स्वस्थे नरे सुखासीने यावत्स्पंदति लोचनम् । तस्य त्रिंशत्तमो भागस्तत्परः परिकीर्तितः
svasthe nare sukhāsīne yāvatspaṃdati locanam | tasya triṃśattamo bhāgastatparaḥ parikīrtitaḥ
For a healthy man seated at ease, as long as the eye takes to blink — the thirtieth part of that is declared to be a tatpara ⟨a unit of time⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The त्त of त्रिंशत्तमो on this line is the exemplar I used to settle the त versus त्त question at verses 144 and 147. Number ॥ १५६ ॥ agrees (Wikisource misprints १४६).
29.157a reading here is contested तत्पराच्छतगो भागस्त्रुटिरित्यभिधीयते । त्रुटेः सहस्रगो योंशो लग्नकालः स उच्यते
tatparācchatago bhāgastruṭirityabhidhīyate | truṭeḥ sahasrago yoṃśo lagnakālaḥ sa ucyate
The hundredth part of a tatpara is called a truṭi. That portion of a truṭi which is its thousandth is called the lagna-kāla ⟨the instant of the ascendant⟩.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. योंशो is printed with the anusvāra and no avagraha; at 7x I see यो with the anusvāra diamond, then शो. The sense is यो ऽंशः, 'that portion which'. The Wikisource transcription of this printing reads the same. Number ॥ १५७ ॥ agrees (Wikisource misprints १९७).
29.158a reading here is contested देवोपि तन्न जानाति किं पुनः प्राकृतो जनः । स कालोथान्यकालो वा पूर्वकर्मवशाद्भवेत्
devopi tanna jānāti kiṃ punaḥ prākṛto janaḥ | sa kālothānyakālo vā pūrvakarmavaśādbhavet
Even a god does not know it — how much less an ordinary man. That moment, or some other moment, comes about by the force of former deeds.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The avagrahas of देवोऽपि and कालोऽथ are not printed; kept as set. Number ॥ १५८ ॥ agrees (Wikisource misprints १९८).
29.159a reading here is contested निमित्तमात्रं दैवज्ञस्तद्वशान्न शुभाशुभम् । न्यग्रोधखदिराश्वत्थरक्तचंदनवृक्षजाः
nimittamātraṃ daivajñastadvaśānna śubhāśubham | nyagrodhakhadirāśvattharaktacaṃdanavṛkṣajāḥ
The astrologer is only an instrument; good and ill do not lie in his power. [Pegs] made from the wood of the nyagrodha ⟨banyan⟩, the khadira ⟨catechu⟩, the aśvattha ⟨pipal⟩ and the red sandal tree —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. The two half-lines are on different subjects: the first closes the thought of 158, the second begins the list of woods that runs on into 160, where शंकु 'peg' finally appears. I have carried the noun forward in brackets. Number ॥ १५९ ॥ read at 5x, digits १, ५, ९ (Wikisource misprints १६९).
29.160a reading here is contested श्रीखंडागरुदंतोत्थं शुभशंकुमकल्मषम् । द्वादशांगुलमुत्सेधं परिणाहे षडंगुलम्
śrīkhaṃḍāgarudaṃtotthaṃ śubhaśaṃkumakalmaṣam | dvādaśāṃgulamutsedhaṃ pariṇāhe ṣaḍaṃgulam
— or one arising from sandalwood, agarwood or ivory: an auspicious, unblemished peg, twelve aṅgulas ⟨finger-breadths⟩ in height and six aṅgulas in girth.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. शंकुम् is the accusative object that governs the whole list begun at 159; the governing verb कल्पयेत् does not arrive until 161. Number ॥ १६० ॥ agrees.
29.161a reading here is contested एवं लक्षणसंयुक्तं कल्पयेत्कालसाधने । आरभ्योद्वाहदिवसात्षष्ठे वाप्यष्टमे दिने
evaṃ lakṣaṇasaṃyuktaṃ kalpayetkālasādhane | ārabhyodvāhadivasātṣaṣṭhe vāpyaṣṭame dine
Let him fashion one furnished with these marks for the reckoning of time. Counting from the day of the marriage, on the sixth or else on the eighth day —
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. Number ॥ १६१ ॥ agrees. The sentence runs on into 162.
29.162a reading here is contested वधूप्रवेशः संपत्त्यै दशमेथ समे दिने । व्ययनं द्वितयं जन्ममासाश्चदिवसानपि । संत्यज्य प्रतिशुक्रोपि यात्रा वैवाहिकी शुभा
vadhūpraveśaḥ saṃpattyai daśametha same dine | vyayanaṃ dvitayaṃ janmamāsāścadivasānapi | saṃtyajya pratiśukropi yātrā vaivāhikī śubhā
— the bride's entry into the house is for prosperity; or on the tenth day, or on an even day. Avoiding the two ayanas ⟨the sun's northward and southward courses⟩, and the birth-month and the birth-days as well, and Venus in front too, the marriage journey is auspicious.
1 note on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: READING NOTES FROM THE PLATE, from the reader who transcribed this verse. This is the second of the three places where the printing breaks its one-number-per-śloka pattern: THREE half-lines carry the single number ॥ १६२ ॥. I have kept all three in the mūla in printed order, separated by the same daṇḍa. — व्ययनं: at 16x the first akṣara is the व्य conjunct (a व half-form joined to a य), and the word is three akṣaras, व्य य नं. It is not a Sanskrit word. The sense and the 1906 ṭīkā (which glosses 'both ayanas') point to द्व्ययनं, 'the two ayanas'; the Wikisource transcription of this printing reads व्द्ययनं, itself no word. I have transcribed what is set and flagged it. — जन्ममासाश्च is printed with no anusvāra at 6x, where the accusative plural मासान् + च requires मासांश्च. — संपत्त्यै carries the त्त conjunct at 12x (Wikisource drops one त). — The avagrahas of दशमेऽथ and प्रतिशुक्रोऽपि are not printed. — Number ॥ १६२ ॥ read at 5x, digits १, ६, २. — The chapter's mūla colophon follows immediately on two lines: इति श्रीनारदीयसंहितायां विवाहाध्याय एकोनत्रिंशत्तमः ॥ २९ ॥ — quoted verbatim; the postposed ordinal word एकोनत्रिंशत्तमः ('the twenty-ninth') and the digits २९ agree with each other here, so the usual disagreement in this book does not arise. The Hindi ṭīkā's own colophon repeats it as इति श्रीनारदीयसंहिताभाषाटीकायां विवाहाध्याय एकोनत्रिंशत्तमः ॥ २९ ॥.