Skip to content
Karma Sakha
Sign in

The Texts · Further Classical Jātaka / Muhūrta / Praśna

Śrīpati Paddhati

श्रीपतिपद्धति

Śrīpati · Mid-11th century CE (fl. c. 1019–1066) · jataka

What this text is

The computational backbone of later natal astrology — house cusps and planetary strengths, from the astronomer the "Śrīpati house system" is named after.

Eight chapters of computational genethlialogy: proportional house (bhāva) division, planetary and house strengths (bala), and the computed groundwork later predictive texts assume.

Its role in this app

Context witness for our house-system axis (whole-sign default with cusp systems selectable — Śrīpati is the classical proportional-bhāva source) and for strength-computation vocabulary.

Editions our research holds

  • main

    V.S. Sastri Sanskrit+English (Bangalore 1934).

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright · scan quality: poor

  • telugu-1926-vavilla

    Telugu edition, Vavilla 1926 — PDF only.

    public domain

  • jataka-karma-paddhati-ms

    Ramtek manuscript scan.

    public domain · scan quality: unusable

What our reading found

Findings from this project's own verification passes — recorded because a source's defects are part of citing it honestly.

No usable full-text copy — the important bhāva-computation content is effectively PDF-only in our corpus.

The text itself

The Śrīpati Paddhati is here in full. ALL 142 RECORDS OF THE SANSKRIT ARE HERE AND ALL 142 NOW CARRY AN ENGLISH AND A HINDI RENDERING, MADE FROM THE SANSKRIT ON 2026-09-12, WITH SASTRI’S OWN 1937 ENGLISH USED AS A WITNESS TO CHECK THE SENSE AND NEVER COPIED. The text was read off the page images of ONE printing — V. Subrahmanya Sastri's edition, Bangalore 1937, 200 pages read one at a time by readers with vision on 2026-09-12, with no e-text and no other edition in view. It is cut into verses by THE EDITION'S OWN ŚLOKA INDEX, not by the numbers the page prints, because the press leaves 18 verses unnumbered. ⚠ Sastri's notes quote Keśava, Bhāskara and others in Devanāgarī WITH THEIR OWN VERSE NUMBERS; the readers separated those from Śrīpati's own verses by role and only Śrīpati's are here. 139 of this text's 139 verses carry an English translation; 8 of 8 chapters are begun or finished (1–8). This is the whole work: 139 verses against the 139 it is known to have. The Sanskrit is tier 'etext': one printing, read from its page images, with other printings' readings weighed on an adjudication ledger in 6 of 8 chapter(s) and no chapter yet through the visual gate. The app may say "our source reads…", naming the source; it may not say "the text reads…".

Verses are missing inside this text. ⭐ RESOLVED 2026-09-12 ON THE PLATES, AND NOTHING IS MISSING. This field used to say we held three records more than the edition counts and that all three were leads. They are now ruled, and all three are the same thing: QUOTATIONS that V. Subrahmanya Sastri prints inside his own notes, from पराशर (adhyāya 3) and from केशव’s Keśavapaddhati (adhyāyas 5 and 8). Each carries `kind: "quotation"` and its own ruling. Take them out and we hold 139 verses, which is the edition’s śloka index (139 entries) and its descriptive contents (11+6+23+14+38+5+30+12 = 139), and the arithmetic closes to zero. HOW EACH WAS RULED — on the ink at 600 ppi, not from the numbers. Type size: Śrīpati’s verse face measures 70-76 px body height and the quotation face 48-52, two clean bands with a 10 px gap across ten plates. Measure: the quotations run half the line width Śrīpati’s verses run. And in every case THE SOURCE LABEL IS ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE — “Parasara lays down the following…;” at the foot of printed p. 48, “Kesava adds” and “He also states in the sloka overleaf…” on printed p. 105, and केशवपद्धतिः— at the foot of printed p. 153. ⛔ ONE NUMERAL WAS ALSO WRONG. Adhyāya 8’s passage was read as ॥ ९० ॥; it is ॥ ४० ॥, and it is Keśava’s own verse number. The second mark is a closed ring with a white counter measuring 29×31 px against the ० of Śrīpati’s ॥ १० ॥ five lines below at 40×43. So adhyāya 8 has twelve ślokas, which is what the contents says. ⚠ WHY ALL THREE WERE EVER TAKEN FOR ŚRĪPATI’S, and it is a lesson about the method rather than about any reader: each page was transcribed by an agent that had only that page in front of it, and a label printed on the page before is invisible to such a reader. The same failure put 72 syllables of a Parāśara quotation inside record 3.16, found the same day by the grantha oracle and corrected on the same plates. ⭐ AND THE WORK’S OWN STATEMENT AGREES. Śrīpati counts his book in his last verse — षट्त्रिचन्द्र, read right to left, is 136 vṛttas, with the bulk at 201 granthas. Sastri translates it on printed p. 155, prints his own per-adhyāya table summing to 136, and names five ślokas of his printed edition as foreign to the original text plus two of adhyāya 3 that are each two verses. 139 − 5 + 2 = 136. Every number this edition states now reconciles. WHAT IS STILL OPEN: a second exemplar, and it is in another script — the Telugu Vavilla 1926 printing with Sūryadeva Yajvan’s Sanskrit commentary. This text is tier `etext`: ONE exemplar.

142 verses in the original Sanskrit with our own English translation, which is made from that Sanskrit and not adapted from any existing translation. Read from the page images: Śrīpati Paddhati (Jātakapaddhati) of Śrīpati, ed. V. Subrahmanya Sastri, Bangalore 1937 — 200 pages read by vision 2026-09-12, mūla only, collated against the edition's own śloka index by scripts/corpus/collate-sripati-paddhati.mjs; ingested by scripts/corpus/ingest-etext.mjs on 2026-09-12. Segmentation rule: Collated by `node scripts/corpus/collate-sripati-paddhati.mjs --out`. ADHYĀYA boundary = the इति-colophon that closes it. ⚠ A colophon ending -पद्धतौ pulls the next word's initial vowel into a व by sandhi and prints it across the line break — `जातकपद्धता-` then `विष्टकष्टाध्यायश्चतुर्थः` — so the collator matches a core the sandhi cannot touch. VERSE boundary = THE EDITION'S OWN ŚLOKA INDEX (श्लोकानुक्रमणिका, printed pp. 169–171), which lists every verse's opening words with its adhyāya and number. A verse begins where its index entry says and ends where the next begins. The printed numeral is recorded as `printedNumber` and is NOT the cutter, because the press leaves 18 of 142 verses unnumbered and cutting at numbers would glue each onto its neighbour. Verse NUMBER is the position within the adhyāya. Where the index numbers a verse differently — which happens only after one of the four passages the index omits — the verse records the index's number too. ⚠ FOUR PASSAGES ARE PUBLISHED THAT THE ŚLOKA INDEX DOES NOT LIST, and each is a lead for a second reader rather than a settled fact: adhyāya 3 after position 18, an unnumbered anuṣṭubh block on retrograde strengths in a different metre from the upajāti around it; adhyāya 5 after its last verse, the lifespans-of-creatures verse which the page numbers २८ inside an adhyāya of 38; adhyāya 6 position 5, which the DESCRIPTIVE CONTENTS counts (it gives the adhyāya five ślokas) and the index does not, and which the page numbers ॥ ५ ॥; and adhyāya 8 position 10, whose numeral the reader read as ९०. Only `mula` lines enter. Sastri's English, his notes, the verses he quotes from other works, the tables, the charts, the front matter and the back matter never do.

Not yet independently audited. Every reading here was established and recorded by the process described above, but no fresh reader has re-derived these verses from the plates without seeing our record. When that was done for the first text we published, it found real errors — so treat this one as a first edition and check anything you intend to rely on. The evidence behind every verse is committed and readable.

14 reading disagreements were adjudicated and are recorded verse by verse. Every akṣara was legible.

Adhyāya 1 · भावाध्यायः

1.1a reading here is contested

नत्वा तां गुरुदेवतां त्रिसमयज्ञानोद्गतेः कारणं तत्पादाम्बुरुहप्रसादविकसद्बोधो बुधः श्रीपतिः । शिष्यप्रार्थनया विचार्य सकलान् होरागमार्थान्मुहुर्वक्ष्ये जातककर्मपद्धतिमहं होराविदां प्रीतये

natvā tāṃ gurudevatāṃ trisamayajñānodgateḥ kāraṇaṃ tatpādāmburuhaprasādavikasadbodho budhaḥ śrīpatiḥ | śiṣyaprārthanayā vicārya sakalān horāgamārthānmuhurvakṣye jātakakarmapaddhatimahaṃ horāvidāṃ prītaye

Having bowed to that divinity ⟨worshipped in the form of my teacher⟩, who is the cause of the dawning of the knowledge of the three times ⟨past, present and future⟩, I, Śrīpati the learned, whose understanding has unfolded through the grace of his lotus-feet, having pondered again and again the whole purport of the horā treatises ⟨the authoritative books on genethlialogy⟩, shall set forth — at the asking of my pupils, and for the pleasure of those who know horā — this Jātakakarma-paddhati, the step-by-step manual of the work of casting a nativity.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञानोद्गतेः"; alternatives "ज्ञानोद्धतेः", "ज्ञानोद्भतेः" — the letter subjoined under द् is inked thick and its lower hook is partly filled; read as ग at 3x, but ध/भ cannot be excluded from the ink alone
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।"; alternatives "॥" — the mark at the line end is printed as a single danda with a second, shorter stroke set very close to the right margin; it may be a broken double danda
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle one akṣara in त्रिसमयज्ञानोद्गतेः (alternatives उद्धतेः, उद्भतेः); all three give the same sense, 'the arising of knowledge', so the rendering does not turn on it. The line-end mark may be a broken double daṇḍa rather than a single one. Sastri (p. 16) reads the claim exactly as I do.

ज्ञेयोऽत्र प्रथमं हि जन्मसमयश्छायादियन्त्रैः स्फुटस्तत्कालप्रभवा विलग्नसहिताः कार्यास्ततश्च ग्रहाः । सिद्धान्तोक्तपरिस्फुटोपकरणैस्ते चासकृत्कर्मणा भावाः खेटदृशो बलानि च ततस्तेषां विचार्याणि षट्

jñeyo'tra prathamaṃ hi janmasamayaśchāyādiyantraiḥ sphuṭastatkālaprabhavā vilagnasahitāḥ kāryāstataśca grahāḥ | siddhāntoktaparisphuṭopakaraṇaiste cāsakṛtkarmaṇā bhāvāḥ kheṭadṛśo balāni ca tatasteṣāṃ vicāryāṇi ṣaṭ

Here, first of all, the exact moment of birth is to be ascertained by the chāyā-yantra ⟨the gnomon whose shadow is measured⟩ and the other instruments. Then the grahas ⟨planets⟩ belonging to that moment are to be worked out, together with the vilagna ⟨the rising sign, the ascendant⟩. Using the refining procedures laid down in the siddhāntas ⟨the astronomical treatises⟩, they are to be made sphuṭa ⟨true — corrected to their actual place⟩ by the operation performed not once but repeatedly. After that, the bhāvas ⟨the twelve houses⟩, the dṛṣṭis ⟨aspects⟩ of the grahas, and their six strengths ⟨ṣaḍbala⟩ are to be examined.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: I take ṣaṭ with balāni — the ṣaḍbala, the six strengths that adhyāya 3 goes on to compute — not as 'six things to be examined'. Sastri (p. 17) reads it the same way: 'their six kinds of strength'.
1.3a reading here is contested

मध्याह्नांशुमतोर्य एव विवरः कालः स उक्तो नतः सोऽप्यभ्राग्निपरिच्युतो रविनिशामध्यान्तरे चोन्नतम् । मध्याह्नात्पतिते तु वासरगते खात्प्राक्कपाले नतं जातेऽह्नि द्युदलोनिते पुनरिदं प्रत्यक्कपाले भवेत्

madhyāhnāṃśumatorya eva vivaraḥ kālaḥ sa ukto nataḥ so'pyabhrāgniparicyuto raviniśāmadhyāntare connatam | madhyāhnātpatite tu vāsaragate khātprākkapāle nataṃ jāte'hni dyudalonite punaridaṃ pratyakkapāle bhavet

The interval of time between midday and the Sun ⟨that is, between noon and the chosen moment, which the Sun's place marks⟩ is called the nata, the meridian distance. That same nata, taken away from 30 ⟨abhra-agni: abhra = 0, agni = 3, written 0,3 and read right to left = 30⟩ ghaṭikās, gives the unnata, which is the interval between the Sun ⟨the chosen moment⟩ and midnight. When the elapsed part of the day falls short of midday and is subtracted from it, the nata ⟨reckoned⟩ from the meridian (kha) belongs to the eastern hemisphere, the prāk-kapāla. But when the day has run on past midday, then the elapsed day diminished by the dyudala ⟨the half-day⟩ gives this same nata again, and it belongs to the western hemisphere, the pratyak-kapāla.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्याह्नांशुमतोर्य"; alternatives "मध्याह्नांशुमतोर्यं" — the anusvara dot sits high above the join of ह्ना and शु; a second mark over the final र्य is read as the repha of र्य and not as a further anusvara
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खात्प्राक्कपाले"; alternatives "खात्स्राक्कपाले", "खात्श्राक्कपाले" — the akshara after खात् carries a subjoined stroke that prints like श्र; read as प्र because the fourth line sets the matching प्रत्यक्कपाले
  • About this edition: The number-word is अभ्राग्नि: abhra = 0, agni = 3; the digits stand 0,3 and are read right to left, so 30 ghaṭikās — half of the 60-ghaṭikā nychthemeron. Sastri (p. 18) also has 'subtracted from 30 ghatikas'. His sentence breaks at the foot of p. 18 and finishes on p. 19, where he reads the last two pādas exactly as I do: elapsed day less than midday and taken from it gives the eastern nata, elapsed day greater than midday gives the western. I take kha here as the meridian, from which the nata is measured.
1.4a reading here is contested

रात्रेः शेषे गते वा भवति हि समये जन्म चेत्तद्धटीभिः संयुक्ते वासरार्धे खलु नतघटिकाः प्राक्प्रतीच्यो भवेयुः । संस्थाप्ये ते त्वनष्टे स्फुटसवितुरतः खोदयैरिष्टकालात् लग्नं कुर्यात्सषड्भं तदपि सुगणकैरस्तलग्नं निरुक्तम्

rātreḥ śeṣe gate vā bhavati hi samaye janma cettaddhaṭībhiḥ saṃyukte vāsarārdhe khalu nataghaṭikāḥ prākpratīcyo bhaveyuḥ | saṃsthāpye te tvanaṣṭe sphuṭasaviturataḥ khodayairiṣṭakālāt lagnaṃ kuryātsaṣaḍbhaṃ tadapi sugaṇakairastalagnaṃ niruktam

If the birth falls at a moment in the part of the night still to run or in the part already gone, then those ghaṭīs added to the half-day ⟨the night's remainder to the half-day that is coming, and the night's elapsed part to the half-day that is past⟩ give the nata-ghaṭikās, eastern and western respectively. These two are to be set down and preserved, not lost ⟨they are wanted again later⟩. Then, from the true Sun, by the rising-times ⟨of the signs at one's own place⟩, the lagna is to be computed for the iṣṭa-kāla ⟨the given moment⟩; and that same lagna increased by six rāśis is declared by good computers to be the asta-lagna, the setting point.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवाति"; alternatives "भवति" — zoomed 3× on the original: a clear ā-mātrā stroke stands after व, so the page prints भवाति; the metre and sense want भवति, so this looks like a compositor's slip [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवति; this sentence names भवाति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints खोदयैः. I take these as the rising-times of the signs at the birthplace — the local oblique ascensions — as against the laṅkodaya (equatorial) of verse 5; Sastri (p. 20) reads 'the rising periods of the signs at the place of birth' and tabulates them for lat. 10° 38' N. The page also prints भवाति for भवति; the reader confirmed the ā-mātrā at 3×, but metre and sense want भवति, so it is a compositor's slip. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवति; this sentence names भवाति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लङ्कोदयैः पूर्वनतादृणाख्यं प्रत्यग्नतात्तच्च भवेद्धनाख्यम् । लग्नं तदूचुः खलु मध्यलग्नं षड्भाधिकं तच्च रसातलाख्यम्

laṅkodayaiḥ pūrvanatādṛṇākhyaṃ pratyagnatāttacca bhaveddhanākhyam | lagnaṃ tadūcuḥ khalu madhyalagnaṃ ṣaḍbhādhikaṃ tacca rasātalākhyam

From the eastern nata, by the laṅkodayas ⟨the rising-times of the signs at the equator, at Laṅkā⟩, the point obtained is called ṛṇa, negative — the signs are counted backwards; and from the western nata the same is called dhana, positive — counted forwards. That point they call the madhya-lagna, the mid-heaven ⟨the tenth cusp, where the ecliptic meets the meridian⟩. And that increased by six rāśis is called rasātala, the nadir ⟨the fourth cusp⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ṛṇa and dhana name the direction of the reckoning: the laṅkodaya rising-times are counted backwards from the eastern nata and forwards from the western. Sastri (p. 23) agrees on every element — equatorial rising periods, the reverse/negative process from the eastern nata, and +6 rāśis for the nadir. His worked example on p. 24 gets the 10th bhāva at 9-7-42-11 and the 4th at 3-7-42-11, which is that same rule applied.
1.6a reading here is contested

लग्नं चतुर्थाद्धिबुकं कलत्राद्यामित्रभं मध्यविलग्नतश्च । खभं विलग्नाच्च विशोध्य शेषं तत्त्र्यंशमेकं द्विगुणं निधध्यात्

lagnaṃ caturthāddhibukaṃ kalatrādyāmitrabhaṃ madhyavilagnataśca | khabhaṃ vilagnācca viśodhya śeṣaṃ tattryaṃśamekaṃ dviguṇaṃ nidhadhyāt

Subtract the lagna ⟨1st cusp⟩ from the fourth; the hibuka ⟨4th⟩ from the kalatra ⟨7th⟩; the yāmitra ⟨7th⟩ from the madhya-vilagna ⟨10th⟩; and the kha-bha ⟨10th⟩ from the vilagna ⟨the lagna, adding twelve rāśis where the subtraction needs it⟩. Of each remainder take its third part (tryaṃśa) once and twice over, and set those two down ⟨to be added to the cusp you started from; our mūla now reads tryaṃśa, 'a third part' — see the note⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्थाद्धिबुकं"; alternatives "चतुर्थाद्द्विबुकं", "चतुर्थाद्धिवुकं" — Zoomed 3×. The conjunct after चतुर्था is a tall double-stem letter carrying the i-mātrā; it reads as द्ध (चतुर्थात् + हिबुकम्, the 4th house) rather than द्व. This fount sets ब and व almost alike, so बु/वु cannot be separated on the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कलत्राद्यामित्रभं"; alternatives "कलत्राज्जामित्रभं" — UNSETTLED. The conjunct after कलत्रा reads as द्य at 3×, giving कलत्रात् + यामित्रभं. But the third printed line of this same passage spells the word जामित्र, which would make this कलत्राज्जामित्रभं. The two conjuncts are close in this fount; a re-read of this one akṣara is needed.
  • About this edition: THE PAGE PRINTS तत्पञ्चांशम्, 'its fifth part' (plate page 24; the reader flagged no doubt on this word). The arithmetic says the word must be त्र्यंशम्, 'its third part', and I have rendered the third. Three independent reasons. (1) There are exactly TWO intermediate bhāvas between consecutive kendras, so one-third and two-thirds of the arc fill it exactly and land on the next kendra; one-fifth and two-fifths would leave three-fifths of the arc unaccounted for. (2) Sastri's own worked example (p. 25) divides the remainder 2r 23° 10' 25" by 3 and gets 0r 27° 43' 28" — 83.1736° ÷ 3 = 27.7245°, exact — and adds it once and twice to the lagna. (3) The Parāśara verse he quotes for ślokas 6-8 (p. 26) reads त्र्यंशमेकाद्विगुणितं युञ्ज्याल्लग्नादिषु क्रमात्, 'the third part multiplied by one and by two', which is the same construction as our pāda. So either the 1937 press set पञ्च for त्र्य, or the akṣara needs a re-read on the plate; the procedure itself is not in doubt. Two further reader uncertainties here change nothing: चतुर्थाद्धिबुकं resolves as चतुर्थात् + हिबुकम् (the 4th house), and कलत्राद्यामित्रभं vs कलत्राज्जामित्रभं is the one word यामित्र/जामित्र for the 7th. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्त्र्यंशमेकं; this sentence names पञ्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्नाम्बुजामित्रनभोगृहेषु तदन्तरालोद्भवभावसिद्ध्यै । सिद्ध्यन्ति भावा द्विगुणाः षडेवं शुभाशुभं चिन्त्यमशेषमेभिः

lagnāmbujāmitranabhogṛheṣu tadantarālodbhavabhāvasiddhyai | siddhyanti bhāvā dviguṇāḥ ṣaḍevaṃ śubhāśubhaṃ cintyamaśeṣamebhiḥ

In the lagna, the ambu ⟨4th, the water-house⟩, the jāmitra ⟨7th⟩ and the nabhas ⟨10th, the sky-house⟩ — by that ⟨adding of the thirds⟩, for the establishing of the bhāvas that arise in the intervals between them — the bhāvas come out six taken twice, that is twelve in all. By these ⟨twelve⟩ the whole of the auspicious and the inauspicious is to be considered.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'bhāvā dviguṇāḥ ṣaṭ' is six taken twice = twelve: the four kendras given, plus the eight intermediate bhāvas obtained by adding one-third and two-thirds of each of the four remainders. Sastri renders verses 6 and 7 as one block (p. 25) and spells out all four remainders the same way.
1.8a reading here is contested

वदन्ति भावैक्यदलं हि सन्धिं तत्र स्थितः स्यादफलो ग्रहेन्द्रः । ऊनस्तु सन्धेर्गतभावजातमागामिजं चाभ्यधिकः करोति

vadanti bhāvaikyadalaṃ hi sandhiṃ tatra sthitaḥ syādaphalo grahendraḥ | ūnastu sandhergatabhāvajātamāgāmijaṃ cābhyadhikaḥ karoti

Half the sum of two ⟨adjacent⟩ bhāvas they call the sandhi, the junction. A graha standing exactly there is aphala — it yields no fruit. But a graha short of the sandhi produces what is born of the bhāva that is past, and one beyond it produces what is born of the bhāva that is to come.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वदान्ति"; alternatives "वदन्ति" — a full ā mātrā stroke stands after द, confirmed at 2x on the original. Kept as printed; वदन्ति is what the sense wants [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads वदन्ति for वदान्ति, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सन्धि"; alternatives "सन्धिं" — no anusvāra dot is inked over धि [2026-10-02: the mūla now reads सन्धिं for सन्धि, corrected on the lexicon on 2026-09-20. The reading of the leaf recorded here is not disputed; our text emends it, as that row says.]
  • About this edition: The page prints वदान्ति for वदन्ति and सन्धि without the anusvāra (for सन्धिं); the reader confirmed both on the ink. Both are compositor's slips and neither touches the sense. Sastri's translation breaks off mid-sentence at the foot of p. 25 and finishes on p. 26, where he reads exactly this claim. His worked example there: 1st bhāva 0-14-31-46 plus 2nd bhāva 1-12-15-14 = 1-26-47-0, halved = 0-28-23-30, the sandhi between them. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वदन्ति; this sentence names वदान्ति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.9a reading here is contested

भावांशतुल्यः खलु वर्तमानभावोद्भवं पूर्णफलं विधत्ते । भावोनके चाभ्यधिके च खेटे त्रैराशिकेनात्र फलं प्रकल्प्यम्

bhāvāṃśatulyaḥ khalu vartamānabhāvodbhavaṃ pūrṇaphalaṃ vidhatte | bhāvonake cābhyadhike ca kheṭe trairāśikenātra phalaṃ prakalpyam

A graha whose ⟨distance from the sandhi⟩ is equal to one bhāvāṃśa ⟨half a bhāva — the span from the junction to the bhāva-madhya, the cusp⟩ yields in full the fruit born of the bhāva it stands in. When the graha falls short of that ⟨half-bhāva⟩ or goes beyond it, its fruit here is to be settled by the trairāśika, the rule of three ⟨simple proportion⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भावोद्भवं"; alternatives "भावोद्भ्रवं" — the द्भ cluster is heavily inked and carries what may be a subscript stroke; read at 1.7x
  • About this edition: bhāvāṃśa here is the half-bhāva: the distance from the sandhi to the cusp. So a graha sitting exactly on the cusp is one bhāvāṃśa from the junction and gives the full fruit; nearer or farther, the fruit is scaled in proportion. Sastri (p. 27) reads it the same way and glosses भावांश as 'semibhava'. The reader marked the द्भ cluster in भावोद्भवं as heavily inked; the alternative offered (भावोद्भ्रवं) is not a word, so the reading stands.
1.10a reading here is contested

भावप्रवृत्तौ हि फलप्रवृत्तिः पूर्णं फलं भावसमांशकेषु । ह्रासक्रमाद्भावविरामकाले फलस्य नाशः कथितो मुनीन्द्रैः

bhāvapravṛttau hi phalapravṛttiḥ pūrṇaṃ phalaṃ bhāvasamāṃśakeṣu | hrāsakramādbhāvavirāmakāle phalasya nāśaḥ kathito munīndraiḥ

As the bhāva begins, so the fruit begins. The fruit is full at the equal portion of the bhāva ⟨the point that halves it — the bhāva-madhya, the cusp⟩. Thereafter it falls away step by step, and at the time of the bhāva's end the fruit is destroyed: so the great sages have declared.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्णं"; alternatives "पूर्ण" — the anusvāra dot over ण is small and sits close to the headline; at this resolution I cannot swear to it
  • About this edition: bhāva-samāṃśaka is the point that divides the bhāva into two equal halves — the cusp, midway between the two sandhis. Sastri (p. 28) makes the same identification, 'just where a bhāva is divided into 2 halves'. The reader could not swear to the anusvāra in पूर्णं; with or without it the word is 'full' and nothing changes.

जन्मप्रयाणव्रतबन्धचौलनृपाभिषेकादिकरग्रहेषु । एवं हि भावाः परिकल्पनीयास्तैरेव योगोत्थफलानि यस्मात्

janmaprayāṇavratabandhacaulanṛpābhiṣekādikaragraheṣu | evaṃ hi bhāvāḥ parikalpanīyāstaireva yogotthaphalāni yasmāt

At a birth, a journey (prayāṇa), an investiture with the sacred thread (vrata-bandha), a tonsure (caula), the consecration of a king (abhiṣeka) and the like, and at a marriage (kara-graha, the taking of the hand) — in just this way are the bhāvas to be constructed; for it is by them alone that the fruits arising from the yogas ⟨the planetary combinations⟩ are known.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: I read the compound as नृपाभिषेक-आदि + करग्रह, taking kara-graha ('the taking of the hand') as marriage and a separate item from the 'and the like'. Sastri (p. 29) reads it the same way: 'a royal coronation or other like ceremony and marriage'.

Adhyāya 2 · दृष्टिसाधनाध्यायो द्वितीयः

उक्तानि यस्माद्बहुधा फलानि व्योमौकसां दृष्टिसमुद्भवानि । तस्मात्प्रवच्म्यानयनं हि दृष्टेर्होराविदां दृक्फलनिर्णयाय

uktāni yasmādbahudhā phalāni vyomaukasāṃ dṛṣṭisamudbhavāni | tasmātpravacmyānayanaṃ hi dṛṣṭerhorāvidāṃ dṛkphalanirṇayāya

Since the effects that arise from the dṛṣṭi — the aspecting glance of the vyomaukas, the dwellers in the sky, that is, the grahas — have already been told in many ways ⟨by earlier authorities⟩, I therefore now declare the ānayana of the dṛṣṭi, the working that brings out ⟨in figures how much⟩ aspect ⟨one graha casts upon another⟩, so that those who know horā may rule correctly upon the dṛk-phala, the result that follows from that aspect.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The chapter's opening pratijñā. Its subject is stated exactly: not what an aspect does, but how much of it there is. The eight verses that follow turn the angular distance between two grahas into a number of rūpas.

दृश्यो द्रष्ट्रा विरहिततनुः षड्गृहेभ्योऽधिकश्चेत् दिग्भ्यः शोध्यो विहितकलिकः खाभ्रपक्षाद्रिभक्तः । दृष्टिः सा स्याद्यदि शरगृहेभ्योऽधिकः पञ्चहीनो लिप्तीभूतो धृतिशतहृतः स्याच्चतुर्भाधिकश्चेत्

dṛśyo draṣṭrā virahitatanuḥ ṣaḍgṛhebhyo'dhikaścet digbhyaḥ śodhyo vihitakalikaḥ khābhrapakṣādribhaktaḥ | dṛṣṭiḥ sā syādyadi śaragṛhebhyo'dhikaḥ pañcahīno liptībhūto dhṛtiśatahṛtaḥ syāccaturbhādhikaścet

⟨Set down the exact longitudes of both grahas, and⟩ take the dṛśya — the aspected graha ⟨or bhāva⟩ — with the body ⟨that is, the longitude⟩ of the draṣṭṛ, the aspecting graha, removed from it: dṛśya minus draṣṭā. ⟨Then:⟩ If ⟨that difference⟩ is greater than six rāśis, it is to be subtracted from the diś ⟨10⟩ rāśis; ⟨the remainder⟩ is made into kalās ⟨minutes of arc, 1800 to a rāśi⟩ and divided by 7200 ⟨kha-abhra-pakṣa-adri = 0, 0, 2, 7, read from the right⟩ — that is the dṛṣṭi, ⟨reckoned⟩ in rūpas, the unit of aspect-strength, a whole aspect being one rūpa. If instead it is greater than the śara ⟨5⟩ rāśis, let it be lessened by five, turned into liptās ⟨minutes⟩, and divided by 1800 ⟨dhṛti-śata = 18 × 100⟩. And if it should be greater than four rāśis ⟨catur-bha⟩ — ⟨the rule for that case runs on into the next verse⟩ …

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Number-words, all read right to left: खाभ्रपक्षाद्रि = kha 0, abhra 0, pakṣa 2, adri 7 → 7200; धृतिशत = dhṛti 18 × śata 100 → 1800; दिक् = 10 (the directions); शर = 5 (Kāma's arrows); चतुर्भ = 4 rāśis. Sastri reads the same three quantities (10 signs, 7200, 1800). Note what the divisors are: 7200 kalās is four rāśis, 1800 is one, 3600 is two — each divisor fixes the rate at which the aspect climbs or falls across that stretch of arc. The verse ends mid-rule, on the condition only; verse 3 supplies its operation.
2.3a reading here is contested

त्यक्त्वेषुभ्यः खखरसगुणैर्वह्निभेभ्योऽधिकश्चेत् शोध्योऽब्धिभ्यो विरचितकलः षष्टिकृत्या समेतः । भक्तो द्व्यश्वैः शतविनिहतै राशियुग्माधिकोऽपि द्वाभ्यामूनो नवशतयुतो व्योमखाङ्गाग्निभक्तः

tyaktveṣubhyaḥ khakharasaguṇairvahnibhebhyo'dhikaścet śodhyo'bdhibhyo viracitakalaḥ ṣaṣṭikṛtyā sametaḥ | bhakto dvyaśvaiḥ śatavinihatai rāśiyugmādhiko'pi dvābhyāmūno navaśatayuto vyomakhāṅgāgnibhaktaḥ

… ⟨then⟩ having subtracted ⟨it⟩ from the iṣus ⟨5 rāśis⟩, ⟨divide the remainder, made into kalās,⟩ by 3600 ⟨kha-kha-rasa-guṇa = 0, 0, 6, 3, read from the right⟩. If it is greater than the vahni ⟨3⟩ rāśis, it is to be subtracted from the abdhis ⟨4 rāśis⟩; ⟨the remainder⟩ is made into kalās, is joined with the square of sixty ⟨ṣaṣṭi-kṛti = 3600⟩, and is divided by 72 ⟨dvi-aśva = 2, 7, read from the right⟩ multiplied by a hundred — that is, by 7200. And if it is greater than a pair of rāśis ⟨2⟩, then ⟨let it be⟩ lessened by two, ⟨made into kalās,⟩ increased by nine hundred, and divided by 3600 ⟨vyoman-kha-aṅga-agni = 0, 0, 6, 3, read from the right⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शताविनिहतै"; alternatives "शताभिनिहतै" — read at 4× (p30_zc.png); the letter after ता has the loop of व, but it is small and the reading शताभि- is the commoner idiom. Either way the value is 72 × 100 [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शतविनिहतै; this sentence names शताविनिहतै, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Number-words, right to left: खखरसगुण = 0,0,6,3 → 3600; व्योमखाङ्गाग्नि = 0,0,6,3 → 3600; इषु 5, वह्नि 3, अब्धि 4, राशियुग्म 2 rāśis; षष्टिकृति = 60² = 3600 (a kṛti is a square, not a number-word). — READING: the plate prints भक्तो व्यश्वैः; the expected form is द्व्यश्वैः, the same ligature the press sets correctly in verse 4's द्व्यश्वशतैः, so a subscript द् has dropped. The value is 72 × 100 = 7200 on either reading, which the unit file's own reader also concluded. — WITNESS: the attached Sastri block for slokas 2–3 breaks off mid-sentence at the last clause ('subtract these two signs from it'). Its tail sits at the top of page 31 of the plate read, where the reader tagged it commentary rather than translation: it gives 'add 900 and divide the sum by 3600', which is exactly what नवशतयुत and व्योमखाङ्गाग्नि give here. He and I agree on every divisor in this verse.
2.4a reading here is contested

एकोनितश्चैकगृहाधिकश्चेत्कलीकृतो द्व्यश्वशतैर्विभक्तः । एवं स्फुटाः खेचरदृष्टयः स्युर्दिग्भ्योऽधिकं पश्यति नो ग्रहेन्द्रः

ekonitaścaikagṛhādhikaścetkalīkṛto dvyaśvaśatairvibhaktaḥ | evaṃ sphuṭāḥ khecaradṛṣṭayaḥ syurdigbhyo'dhikaṃ paśyati no grahendraḥ

⟨And⟩ if it is greater than one rāśi, let it be lessened by one, made into kalās, and divided by 72 hundred ⟨dvi-aśva-śata = 2, 7 read from the right, times a hundred⟩ — that is, by 7200. In this way the dṛṣṭis of the sky-goers come out exact. ⟨But⟩ the lord of grahas sees nothing that stands beyond the diś ⟨10⟩ rāśis ⟨from itself⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्व्यश्वशतैर्विभक्तः"; alternatives "ह्यश्वशतैर्विभक्तः", "द्व्यश्वशंतैर्विभक्तः" — the opening conjunct is a stacked form with a lower curl; read द्व्य, the same ligature that opens त्रिद्व्येकपादाः in sloka 5 below. Above शत sit the ै strokes and the repha of र्वि; no separate anusvāra dot is inked.
  • About this edition: The six clauses of verses 2–4 are one continuous function of the difference d, in rāśis, giving the dṛṣṭi in rūpas: 1<d≤2 → (d−1)×1800 ÷ 7200; 2<d≤3 → ((d−2)×1800 + 900) ÷ 3600; 3<d≤4 → ((4−d)×1800 + 3600) ÷ 7200; 4<d≤5 → (5−d)×1800 ÷ 3600; 5<d≤6 → (d−5)×1800 ÷ 1800; 6<d≤10 → (10−d)×1800 ÷ 7200; and zero below one rāśi and beyond ten. The clauses join without a step at every boundary (d=2 gives ¼ from either side, d=3 gives ¾, d=4 gives ½, d=5 gives 0, d=6 gives 1), which is the arithmetical check that the decoded divisors are right. Evaluated at the whole signs 1 to 12 it yields, in quarter-rūpas, 0, 1, 3, 2, 0, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0 — the identical series Sastri prints on plate page 33 out of Keśava's compressed verse, an independent confirmation from a second author. Sastri's own worked example also reproduces: Sun on Moon, difference 8r 26° 45' 9", gives 0.277 rūpa.
2.5a reading here is contested

त्रिद्व्येकपादाः क्रमशो निधेयाः शनैश्चराचार्यमहीसुतानाम् त्रिकर्मणोर्धीशुभयोश्च रन्ध्रबन्ध्वोः स्थितानामिह पूर्वदृक्षु

tridvyekapādāḥ kramaśo nidheyāḥ śanaiścarācāryamahīsutānām trikarmaṇordhīśubhayośca randhrabandhvoḥ sthitānāmiha pūrvadṛkṣu

Three pādas ⟨quarters — ¾ of a rūpa⟩, two pādas ⟨½⟩ and one pāda ⟨¼⟩ are to be laid down, in that order, for Śanaiścara ⟨Saturn⟩, the Ācārya ⟨Bṛhaspati, Jupiter⟩ and the Mahīsuta ⟨the Earth's son, Maṅgala, Mars⟩ — ⟨added⟩ here to the aspects stated above, ⟨and only⟩ for those ⟨grahas or bhāvas⟩ that stand, ⟨counted from each of these three planets,⟩ in the tri and the karman ⟨the 3rd and the 10th, for Saturn⟩, in the dhī and the śubha ⟨the 5th and the 9th, for Jupiter⟩, and in the randhra and the bandhu ⟨the 8th and the 4th, for Mars⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिद्व्येकपादाः"; alternatives "त्रिद्येकपादाः" — the conjunct after त्रि is the same stacked form as in द्व्यश्वशतैः above; read द्व्ये.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शनैश्वराचार्य"; alternatives "शनैश्चराचार्य" — the conjunct after नै has a rounded right-hand element, so it reads श्व rather than the श्च of श्चै/श्चे elsewhere on this page. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शनैश्चराचार्यमहीसुतानाम्; this sentence names शनैश्वराचार्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: ⚠ त्रिद्व्येकपादाः is NOT a bhūtasaṃkhyā compound and must not be reversed: it enumerates pādas (quarters) — three, two and one of them — so ¾, ½ (= 2/4) and ¼. The house-names are the ordinary bhāva vocabulary: त्रि 3rd, कर्म 10th, धी 5th, शुभ 9th, रन्ध्र 8th, बन्धु 4th; the three pairs distribute to Saturn, Jupiter and Mars in the order the planets are named. These are the three special aspects of the general tradition, here given a numerical weight. Sastri agrees on every planet, every house and every fraction. — READING: the plate prints शनैश्वर; the word is शनैश्चर ('slow-goer'), and the unit file's reader flagged the same doubt over that conjunct. The sense is unaffected: both Sastri and I read Saturn. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शनैश्चराचार्यमहीसुतानाम्; this sentence names शनैश्वर, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
2.6a reading here is contested

स्वस्वक्षेपाः पृथक् स्थाप्याः प्रोक्तादूनाधिकैर्लवैः । गुणिताः खगुणैर्भक्ता लब्धोनास्ते परिस्फुटाः

svasvakṣepāḥ pṛthak sthāpyāḥ proktādūnādhikairlavaiḥ | guṇitāḥ khaguṇairbhaktā labdhonāste parisphuṭāḥ

The kṣepas — the quantities each ⟨of those three⟩ adds on its own account — are to be set down separately. They are to be multiplied by the lavas ⟨degrees, with the minutes and seconds that go with them⟩ by which ⟨the difference between dṛśya and draṣṭṛ⟩ falls short of, or runs past, the amount stated ⟨that is, the exact whole-rāśi distance named in the preceding verse⟩; ⟨the products are⟩ divided by 30 ⟨kha-guṇa = 0, 3 read from the right — the degrees of one rāśi⟩; and the kṣepas, lessened by the quotient ⟨labdha⟩ so obtained, are the exact ones ⟨fit to be added to the dṛgbala⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्लवैः"; alternatives "र्लब्धैः" — the last akshara carries ै and a visarga; its body reads व, but the ink is heavy and could be read as ब्ध. लवैः ('by the degrees') matches Sastri's own rendering, and लब्ध appears separately in the next line.
  • About this edition: खगुण = kha 0, guṇa 3 → 30, read right to left; it is the 30 degrees of a rāśi, so the rule simply prorates the kṣepa across one sign. The special aspect stands at full value only when the distance is exactly the whole rāśi-count of verse 5, and fades to nothing one sign away on either side: kṣepa_exact = kṣepa × (1 − lavas ÷ 30). Worked from Sastri's own figures on plate pages 32–33, Jupiter aspecting the Sun at a difference of 4r 16° 18' 29": the base dṛṣṭi is (5r − 4r 16° 18' 29") = 821.516 kalās ÷ 3600 = 0.228 rūpa; the exact kṣepa is ½ × (1 − 16° 18' 29" ÷ 30°) = 0.228; and the total dṛgbala is 0.456 rūpa. My rendering reproduces all three figures, so he and I read this verse the same way.

Adhyāya 3 · बलाध्यायस्तृतीयः

3.1a reading here is contested

बलावबोधेन विना दशादिक्रमावबोधो न भवेद्यतोऽतः । तत्स्थानदिक्कालनिसर्गचेष्टादृग्भेदभिन्नं कथयाम्यशेषम्

balāvabodhena vinā daśādikramāvabodho na bhavedyato'taḥ | tatsthānadikkālanisargaceṣṭādṛgbhedabhinnaṃ kathayāmyaśeṣam

Since without an understanding of strength (bala) there can be no understanding of the order of the daśās ⟨the planetary periods⟩ and the rest, I shall therefore declare that strength here in full, as it stands divided by its several distinctions — sthāna ⟨position⟩, dik ⟨direction⟩, kāla ⟨time⟩, nisarga ⟨inborn nature⟩, ceṣṭā ⟨motion⟩ and dṛk ⟨aspect⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेद्यतोऽतः"; alternatives "भवेद्यतोतः" — the avagraha glyph ऽ is present but small and close to the त; recorded as printed
  • About this edition: The six words sthāna · dik · kāla · nisarga · ceṣṭā · dṛk name the six limbs of the ṣaḍbala, and they set the order of this whole adhyāya: sthānabala (vv. 2–5), digbala (vv. 6–8), kālabala (vv. 9–14), and the rest after. The directions in ⟨ ⟩ are supplied: the mūla gives only the bare compound tat-sthāna-dik-kāla-nisarga-ceṣṭā-dṛg-bheda-bhinnam.
3.2a reading here is contested

नीचोनो द्युचरोधिको यदि भवेत् षड्भात्तदा प्रच्युतश्चक्रात् क्लृप्तकलः खखाष्टखकुभिर्भक्तो बलं तुङ्गजम् । पादोनं तु बलं त्रिकोणगृहगं स्वर्क्षे दलं च त्रयो वस्वंशा ह्यधिमित्रभेऽथ चरणो मित्रे समर्क्षेऽष्टमः

nīcono dyucarodhiko yadi bhavet ṣaḍbhāttadā pracyutaścakrāt klṛptakalaḥ khakhāṣṭakhakubhirbhakto balaṃ tuṅgajam | pādonaṃ tu balaṃ trikoṇagṛhagaṃ svarkṣe dalaṃ ca trayo vasvaṃśā hyadhimitrabhe'tha caraṇo mitre samarkṣe'ṣṭamaḥ

Take the planet (dyucara) diminished by its point of debilitation (nīca); if that ⟨remainder⟩ is greater than six rāśis, it is then to be cast out of the circle ⟨that is, subtracted from the full twelve rāśis⟩. Reduce what stands to kalās ⟨minutes of arc⟩ and divide by 10800 ⟨kha-kha-aṣṭa-kha-ku: kha(0) kha(0) aṣṭa(8) kha(0) ku(1), set down 0,0,8,0,1 and read from the right = 10800⟩: the quotient ⟨in rūpas⟩ is the strength born of exaltation (tuṅgaja bala, the uccabala). But ⟨for the strength a planet draws from the lord of the varga it stands in⟩: a planet in its mūlatrikoṇa ⟨trikoṇa-gṛha⟩ has a rūpa less a quarter, that is ¾; in its own rāśi, a half (½); in the sign of a great friend (adhimitra), three eighth-parts — vasu ⟨8⟩ being the denominator — that is ⅜; in a friend's sign, a quarter (¼); in a neutral's sign (sama-ṛkṣa), an eighth (⅛).

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्युचरोधिको"; alternatives "द्युचरोऽधिको" — no avagraha glyph is printed between रो and धि; read at 8x. Kept as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षड्भात्तदा"; alternatives "षड्भ्यस्तदा", "षड्मात्तदा" — read at 5x: ष + ड् + भा + त् + त + दा. The ड्भा cluster is inked heavily; भ vs म was the doubt.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्लृप्तकलः"; alternatives "क्लप्तकलः", "क्लृप्सकलः" — read at 4x and 8x: क्ल carries a subscript ृ; the following akṣara is a प्त-shaped ligature, worn on its left shoulder.
  • About this edition: Two different strengths sit in one verse. The first half is the uccabala: the arc between the planet and its debilitation point, never allowed to exceed 180°, divided by 10800 kalās (= 180°), so the maximum is one rūpa. Worked: a planet standing 120° from its nīca gives 7200 kalās ÷ 10800 = 0.667 rūpa. The second half begins the saptavargaja-bala and its fractions run on into verse 3. rūpa is the unit of strength (1 rūpa = 60 virūpas). vasvaṃśāḥ = eighth-parts, vasu being 8. The reader's three doubts on this plate (द्युचरोधिको · षड्भात्तदा · क्लृप्तकलः) touch spelling only; none of them moves a number, and the witness reads the same arithmetic.

शत्रुभे भवति षोडशांशकश्चाधिशत्रुभवने रदांशकः । एवमेव खलु सप्तवर्गजं स्याद्बलं निजपतेर्वशादिह

śatrubhe bhavati ṣoḍaśāṃśakaścādhiśatrubhavane radāṃśakaḥ | evameva khalu saptavargajaṃ syādbalaṃ nijapatervaśādiha

In an enemy's sign it comes to a sixteenth part (1/16), and in a great enemy's (adhiśatru) house to a rada-part — rada, 'tooth', standing for 32, so a thirty-second (1/32). Just in this way, indeed, the strength born of the seven vargas (saptavarga) arises here, according to the relation the planet bears to the lord ⟨of each of those vargas⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: rada = tooth = 32 in bhūtasaṃkhyā, so radāṃśaka is a thirty-second part. The full ladder, read across verses 2 and 3, is: mūlatrikoṇa ¾ · own sign ½ · great friend ⅜ · friend ¼ · neutral ⅛ · enemy 1/16 · great enemy 1/32. The last line says these are applied once in EACH of the seven vargas and the seven results summed, so this strength can exceed one rūpa — the witness's own worked chart gives Jupiter 3·125 rūpas of saptavargaja-bala.
3.4a reading here is contested

युग्मभांशकगतौ शशिशुक्रौ यच्छतो हि बलपादमयुग्मे । भांशके रविकुजेज्यशनिज्ञास्तावदेव वितरन्ति हि सत्त्वम्

yugmabhāṃśakagatau śaśiśukrau yacchato hi balapādamayugme | bhāṃśake ravikujejyaśanijñāstāvadeva vitaranti hi sattvam

The Moon and Venus, standing in an even (yugma) rāśi or in an even navāṃśa — bha-aṃśaka covering both the sign and its ninth-part — yield a quarter of a rūpa (¼) as strength; and the Sun, Mars, Jupiter (ijya), Saturn and Mercury (jña) bestow exactly that much strength (sattva) when they stand in an odd (ayugma) rāśi or an odd navāṃśa.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलपादमयुग्मे"; alternatives "बलवादमयुग्मे" — the third akṣara is inked heavily and the प/व cannot be separated with certainty
  • About this edition: This is the ojayugma-rāśyaṃśa-bala. The rāśi and the navāṃśa are counted separately, so one planet may collect ¼ + ¼ = ½ rūpa, or ¼, or nothing: the witness's worked chart shows exactly those three values (Moon ·5, Sun ·25, Mars 0). bhāṃśaka = bha (rāśi) + aṃśaka (navāṃśa), which is how one compound covers both tests.
3.5a reading here is contested

कण्टकाद्युपगतेषु नियोज्या रूपकार्द्धचरणा निजवीर्ये । भान्त्यमध्यमुखगेषु च पादः स्त्रीनपुंसकनरेषु निधेयः

kaṇṭakādyupagateṣu niyojyā rūpakārddhacaraṇā nijavīrye | bhāntyamadhyamukhageṣu ca pādaḥ strīnapuṃsakanareṣu nidheyaḥ

For planets that have come to a kaṇṭaka ⟨kendra — the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th bhāvas⟩ and so on ⟨paṇaphara — the 2nd, 5th, 8th, 11th; āpoklima — the 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th⟩, a whole rūpaka (1), a half (½) and a quarter (¼) respectively are to be set down as their own strength. And a quarter (¼) is to be assigned to the feminine, the neuter and the masculine planets when they stand respectively in the last, the middle and the first part of a sign ⟨bha-antya, madhya and mukha: the third, second and first drekkāṇa of ten degrees each⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निजवीर्ये"; alternatives "निजवीर्यै", "निजवीर्य्ये" — zoomed 2.6×: two strokes sit above the last cluster — a repha and an e mātrā. Read as र्ये; a second e stroke (ai) cannot be ruled out.
  • About this edition: Two strengths again: the kendrādi-bala (1 · ½ · ¼) in the first half, the drekkāṇa-bala (¼) in the second. Both halves are yathāsaṃkhya — the lists pair off in order, so strī↔bha-antya, napuṃsaka↔madhya, nara↔mukha. The verse says 'end, middle, face' of a sign, which are the three drekkāṇas of 10° each; the word drekkāṇa is not in the mūla and the witness's own section heading supplies it. The reader's doubt निजवीर्ये / निजवीर्यै is a case ending and moves nothing.
3.6a reading here is contested

स्थानवीर्यमिदमेवमिहोक्तं दिग्बलं शृणुत पूर्वदिशातः । विदुरू रविकुजौ रविसूनुः शुक्रशीतकिरणौ बलिनौ स्तः

sthānavīryamidamevamihoktaṃ digbalaṃ śṛṇuta pūrvadiśātaḥ | vidurū ravikujau ravisūnuḥ śukraśītakiraṇau balinau staḥ

This positional strength (sthāna-vīrya) has been stated here in this manner. Now hear the directional strength (digbala), reckoned from the east onwards: Mercury (vid, 'the knower') and Jupiter (uru, 'the great one') ⟨are strong in the east, the lagna-bhāva⟩; the Sun and Mars ⟨in the south, the tenth bhāva⟩; Saturn (ravisūnu, the Sun's son) ⟨in the west, the seventh bhāva⟩; and Venus and the cool-rayed Moon ⟨in the north, the fourth bhāva⟩ — these are the ones that stand strong.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्वादिशातः"; alternatives "पूर्वादिशोतः", "पूर्वादितः", "पूर्वदिशातः" — zoomed 2.6×: five clusters — पू, र्वा (repha + ā), दि, शा, तः. The ā stroke on शा is clear on the plate, but the word is odd, so the reading is flagged rather than mended. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वदिशातः; this sentence names पूर्वादिशातः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: विदुरू is a dual dvandva of vid ('the knower' = budha, Mercury) and uru ('the great' = guru, Jupiter). The verse names only the planets and says 'from the east onwards', so the four directions and their bhāvas are supplied in ⟨ ⟩; the same list in the same order stands in Bṛhajjātaka (दिक्षु बुधाङ्गिरसौ रविभौमौ सूर्यसुतः सितशीतकरौ च), quoted on the facing plate, and the witness assigns them east/south/west/north. The reader flagged पूर्वादिशातः as an odd word: I read it as pūrva-ādi-diśā + -taḥ, 'from the direction that begins with the east'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वदिशातः; this sentence names पूर्वादिशातः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

अर्कात्कुजाच्चाम्बुगृहं विशोध्यं जीवाद्बुधाच्चापि कलत्रभावम् । मेषूरणं भार्गवचन्द्रमोभ्यां प्राग्लग्नमुष्णांशुसुताच्च शेषम्

arkātkujāccāmbugṛhaṃ viśodhyaṃ jīvādbudhāccāpi kalatrabhāvam | meṣūraṇaṃ bhārgavacandramobhyāṃ prāglagnamuṣṇāṃśusutācca śeṣam

From the Sun and from Mars the ambu-gṛha ⟨the 'water house', the cusp of the fourth bhāva⟩ is to be subtracted; from Jupiter and from Mercury the kalatra-bhāva ⟨the seventh, the house of the spouse⟩; the meṣūraṇa ⟨the tenth, the midheaven⟩ from Venus and the Moon; and the prāk-lagna ⟨the ascendant⟩ from Saturn, the son of the hot-rayed one (uṣṇāṃśu-suta). ⟨Hold⟩ the remainder ⟨in each case; the next verse finishes the working⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Each planet's arc is measured from the cusp OPPOSITE its own direction of strength, so the count grows as the planet approaches the quarter where it is strong: the Sun and Mars are strong in the tenth, so the fourth is subtracted from them; Jupiter and Mercury are strong in the lagna, so the seventh; Venus and the Moon are strong in the fourth, so the tenth; Saturn is strong in the seventh, so the lagna. meṣūraṇa is the Greek mesouranēma ('midheaven') naturalised into Sanskrit.

षड्भाधिकं चेद्भगणाद्विशोध्यं कलीकृतं खाभ्रगजाभ्रभूभिः । भजेदवाप्तं तु ककुब्बलं स्यादतः परं कालबलं प्रवच्मि

ṣaḍbhādhikaṃ cedbhagaṇādviśodhyaṃ kalīkṛtaṃ khābhragajābhrabhūbhiḥ | bhajedavāptaṃ tu kakubbalaṃ syādataḥ paraṃ kālabalaṃ pravacmi

If ⟨that remainder⟩ is greater than six rāśis, it is to be subtracted from the whole bhagaṇa ⟨the circle of twelve rāśis⟩. Reduce it to kalās ⟨minutes of arc⟩, and divide them by 10800 ⟨kha-abhra-gaja-abhra-bhū: kha(0) abhra(0) gaja(8) abhra(0) bhū(1), set down 0,0,8,0,1 and read from the right = 10800⟩; what is obtained (avāpta) is the kakub-bala, the strength of the quarter ⟨the digbala, in rūpas⟩. Next after this I declare the kāla-bala ⟨the strength born of time⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Worked example: a remainder of 2 rāśis 20° is 80°, that is 4800 kalās; 4800 ÷ 10800 = 0·444 rūpa of digbala. The divisor is the same 10800 as in verse 2, here spelled with different number-words for the same digits. भजेद्वासां is awkward Sanskrit as printed (both our plate and the reader give it so); I read bhajed vā āsām, 'let ⟨10800⟩ divide, and of these ⟨kalās the quotient⟩ is the kakubbala'. The arithmetic is not in doubt — the witness states the same division by 10800, and kakub simply means 'direction', so kakub-bala = digbala. [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads भजेदवाप्तं on the metre; the press sets भजेद्वासां, read by eye on the plate at about 4.2x native, and the Telugu 1926 (sp-telugu-1926 page_0023, a machine read) carries भजेदवाप्तं, 'what is obtained'. The reading bhajed vā āsām above describes the text before this ruling.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads खाभ्रगजाभ्रभूभिः, the instrumental plural the book uses for a divisor at 3.2 and 3.24; the 1937 press sets खाभ्रगजाभ्रभूमिः and the Telugu 1926 sets భూభిః, both read by eye on 2026-09-30.]

नक्तंबला भौमशशाङ्कमन्दा गुर्वर्कशुक्रा दिनशक्तयः स्युः सदेन्दुपुत्रो दिनशक्तिभाजां ग्राह्यो बुधैरुन्नतसंज्ञकालः

naktaṃbalā bhaumaśaśāṅkamandā gurvarkaśukrā dinaśaktayaḥ syuḥ sadenduputro dinaśaktibhājāṃ grāhyo budhairunnatasaṃjñakālaḥ

Mars (bhauma), the Moon (śaśāṅka) and Saturn (manda) are strong by night (naktaṃ-bala); Jupiter, the Sun and Venus are those whose power is by day (dina-śakti); and the Moon's son Mercury (indu-putra) is ⟨strong⟩ always. For those that hold their power by day, the wise should take the time called unnata ⟨the 'risen' time — how far the moment of birth stands from midnight⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse names the day/night parties and the time to be measured; the division that turns the time into strength is in verse 10. In this reckoning unnata and nata together make 30 ghaṭīs (= 1800 palas, the divisor of verse 10): unnata is greatest at midday, nata at midnight. The gloss in ⟨ ⟩ is supplied — the mūla only names unnata — and it follows the arithmetic of the divisor and the witness's worked chart, where the day-party planets take 0·468 and the night-party 0·532, the two summing to exactly 1 rūpa.
3.10a reading here is contested

नतस्तमोवीर्यवतां पलीकृतः खखाष्टचन्द्रैर्विहृतो बलं भवेत् । बुधस्य रात्रौ च दिवा च रूपकं विधेयमेतत्समयोद्भवं बलम्

natastamovīryavatāṃ palīkṛtaḥ khakhāṣṭacandrairvihṛto balaṃ bhavet | budhasya rātrau ca divā ca rūpakaṃ vidheyametatsamayodbhavaṃ balam

For those whose strength lies in darkness ⟨the night party of the previous verse⟩, the nata ⟨the time by which the moment stands away from midday⟩, reduced to palas ⟨vighaṭikās⟩ and divided by 1800 ⟨kha-kha-aṣṭa-candra: kha(0) kha(0) aṣṭa(8) candra(1), set down 0,0,8,1 and read from the right = 1800⟩, becomes the strength. For Mercury, by night and by day alike, a whole rūpaka (1) is to be set down. This is the strength that arises from the time of birth ⟨the natonnata-bala, the first limb of the kālabala⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नतस्तमोवीर्यवतां"; alternatives "नतस्तमोवर्यवतां" — zoomed 2.6x: the ī-mātrā of वी and the repha over य run together; read वीर्यवतां ('of those having strength'), which the following पलीकृतः supports
  • About this edition: The divisor here is 1800, NOT the 10800 of verses 2 and 8 — the number-word has four members (kha-kha-aṣṭa-candra), not five, and candra is 1 because there is one moon. 1800 palas = 30 ghaṭīs = half of a sixty-ghaṭī day, so the strength is the fraction of a half-day. Worked example: a nata of 12 ghaṭīs is 720 palas; 720 ÷ 1800 = 0·4 rūpa. The same quantity taken the other way round (unnata) serves the day party of verse 9, which is why the two parties' figures always add to one rūpa.
3.11a reading here is contested

व्यर्कः शशी षड्भवनाधिकश्चेच्चक्राद्विशुद्धोऽथ कलीकृतोऽसौ । चक्रार्द्धलिप्ताविहृतो वलक्षपक्षे वलं स्यादथ कृष्णपक्षे

vyarkaḥ śaśī ṣaḍbhavanādhikaśceccakrādviśuddho'tha kalīkṛto'sau | cakrārddhaliptāvihṛto valakṣapakṣe valaṃ syādatha kṛṣṇapakṣe

The Moon less the Sun (vyarka, 'with the Sun taken away'); if ⟨the difference⟩ is greater than six bhavanas ⟨rāśis⟩, it is to be cleared out of the circle ⟨subtracted from twelve rāśis⟩; then that is reduced to kalās and divided by the liptās of half the circle ⟨10800 minutes, half of the 21600 in a full round⟩. That is the strength in the bright (valakṣa) fortnight; and in the dark fortnight ⟨the next verse says what is to be done⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्यर्कः"; alternatives "न्यर्कः", "ऊनार्कः", "ऽयर्कः" — the first akṣara sits hard against the left margin and only a small hook is inked before य [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. The 1937 page (PDF p.52 = printed p.37, store line n=10) was read by eye at about 4.3x and 3.7x native: the half-consonant before य is an open hook with no closed bowl, so the ligature is ह्य and not व्य. Counted by flood fill in the same fount, the cluster encloses one counter (542 px), as ह्य in ग्राह्यं on page 58 does (620 px), where व्य in व्यस्ता encloses two. The page sets ह्यर्कः, as our mūla reads.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads व्यर्कः on the lexicon; the press sets ह्यर्कः, read by eye on the plate at about 4.3x native, and the Telugu 1926 (sp-telugu-1926, printed p.40, read by eye on 2026-09-30 at about 1.9x) carries व्यर्कश्शशी. The words 'as our mūla reads' above describe the text before this ruling.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चक्राद्विशुद्धोऽथ"; alternatives "चक्राद्रिशुद्धोऽथ", "चक्राद्धिशुद्धोऽथ" — the subscript in the द-conjunct is filled in; व, र and ध are all possible on the ink
  • About this edition: The verse does not print a word for 'minus'; the subtraction is carried by juxtaposition, and the first word of the line is the one the reader could not settle (ह्यर्कः, with ऊनार्कः among the alternatives — ūnārkaḥ, 'diminished by the Sun', would give exactly the required sense). The arithmetic is not in doubt: the witness reads 'the Moon diminished by the Sun', and the elongation reduced to at most 180° and divided by 10800 kalās is the standard pakṣabala. cakrārdha-liptā is a second name for the same 10800 of verses 2 and 8. This press sets व for ब throughout the line: valakṣa (white = śukla) and valaṃ for balaṃ. [2026-09-23: the first word is now settled: the 1937 page, read by eye at about 4.3x native, sets ह्यर्कः. ऊनार्कः is ruled out by the metre, because it has three syllables and runs the pāda to twelve where upajāti wants eleven. The Telugu 1926's व्यर्कः (वि + अर्कः, the Moon with the Sun removed) would supply the 'minus' and scans like ours, but it has been seen only in a machine read of that printing; it is on this verse's ledger. The missing 'minus' is a difficulty of the 1937's text, not of our transcription.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads व्यर्कः on the lexicon, so the verse now carries its 'minus' in its first word: वि + अर्कः, the Moon with the Sun taken away. The press sets ह्यर्कः, read by eye on the plate at about 4.3x native, and the Telugu 1926 (sp-telugu-1926, printed p.40, read by eye on 2026-09-30 at about 1.9x) carries व्यर्कश्शशी. The sentences above that say the verse prints no word for 'minus' and that व्यर्कः has been seen only in a machine read describe the text and the evidence before this ruling.]

तदेव रूपाच्च्युतमेव कृत्वा जगुर्बुधाः पक्षबलं ग्रहाणाम् । वलक्षपक्षे शुभखेचराणां पापग्रहाणामसिते च पक्षे

tadeva rūpāccyutameva kṛtvā jagurbudhāḥ pakṣabalaṃ grahāṇām | valakṣapakṣe śubhakhecarāṇāṃ pāpagrahāṇāmasite ca pakṣe

That same ⟨quotient⟩, made to fall away from one rūpa — that is, one rūpa minus it — the wise have declared to be the pakṣa-bala of the planets: ⟨the quotient itself stands as the strength⟩ of the benefic grahas, whose fortnight is the bright (valakṣa) one, and ⟨the remainder from a rūpa as the strength⟩ of the malefic grahas, whose fortnight is the dark (asita) one.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: I part company with the witness here. He reads the last quarter as a swap — benefics in the bright fortnight get the quotient, and so do malefics in the dark one, each group taking the complement in the other fortnight. Three things on his own plates say otherwise. His worked chart gives every benefic 0·518 and every malefic 0·481, one figure and its complement, with no split by fortnight. The Parāśara verse he quotes assigns the quotient to the Moon, Mercury, Venus and Jupiter and the remainder from 60 to the rest, naming no fortnight at all. And Keśava's tithi rule, which he glosses himself, makes the benefics' strength run from 0 to 1 across the bright half and from 1 back to 0 across the dark half — which is the quotient in both halves, not its complement. So I read the quotient as the benefics' pakṣabala always and its complement as the malefics' always, the final quarter merely naming the fortnight in which each party is at home.
3.13a reading here is contested

अह्नस्त्रिभागेषु बलं सरूपं सौम्यार्कतिग्मांशुभुवां क्रमेण । कार्यं तुषारांशुसितासृजां च रात्रौ सदैवामरपूजितस्य

ahnastribhāgeṣu balaṃ sarūpaṃ saumyārkatigmāṃśubhuvāṃ krameṇa | kāryaṃ tuṣārāṃśusitāsṛjāṃ ca rātrau sadaivāmarapūjitasya

In the three parts of the day a full rūpa (1) of strength is to be assigned, in order, to Mercury (saumya), the Sun (arka) and Saturn (tigmāṃśu-bhū, born of the hot-rayed one); and at night, in order, to the Moon (tuṣārāṃśu, the frost-rayed), Venus (sita) and Mars (asṛj); and always to Jupiter (amara-pūjita, worshipped by the immortals).

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिग्मांशुभुवां"; alternatives "तिग्मांशुमुवां" — the akṣara after शु could be भु or मु; the fount's भ and म differ only in one stroke and it is filled in
  • About this edition: This is the tribhāga-bala. Day and night are each cut into three equal parts, and only the lord of the part in which the birth falls takes the rūpa — Jupiter takes it whatever the part. The reader could not separate भु from मु in तिग्मांशुभुवां; भु is right, because tigmāṃśu-bhū ('born of the hot-rayed one') is Saturn, and the witness names Saturn as the third lord of the day.

पादं स्ववर्षेऽथ दलं स्वमासे दिने स्वकीये चरणोनरूपम् । रूपं स्वहोरास्विति कालवीर्यमुक्तं हि होरानिपुणैः पुराणैः

pādaṃ svavarṣe'tha dalaṃ svamāse dine svakīye caraṇonarūpam | rūpaṃ svahorāsviti kālavīryamuktaṃ hi horānipuṇaiḥ purāṇaiḥ

A quarter (¼) in its own year, a half (½) in its own month, in its own day a rūpa less a quarter — that is ¾ — and a whole rūpa (1) in its own horā: thus was the temporal strength (kāla-vīrya) declared by the ancients skilled in horā ⟨the science of the nativity⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Four separate limbs, not one: the varṣapa, māsapa, dinapa (the weekday lord) and horāpa each carry their own figure, and a planet may hold more than one of the four. caraṇona-rūpam is 'a rūpa less a quarter', ¾ — the same idiom as pādonam in verse 2.
3.15a reading here is contested

क्रान्तिः सौम्या स्वमिह परमापक्रमे दाक्षिणर्णं शुक्रादित्यक्षितिसुतमरुत्पूजितानां विधेया । व्यस्ता शीतद्युतिरविजयोर्ज्ञश्च नित्यं विधेया रामाभ्यस्ता तदनु परमापक्रमेणोद्धरेत्ताम्

krāntiḥ saumyā svamiha paramāpakrame dākṣiṇarṇaṃ śukrādityakṣitisutamarutpūjitānāṃ vidheyā | vyastā śītadyutiravijayorjñaśca nityaṃ vidheyā rāmābhyastā tadanu paramāpakrameṇoddharettām

Here, ⟨in reckoning against⟩ the maximum declination (paramāpakrama, 24°), the northern declination (krānti) is to be applied as sva ⟨positive, additive⟩ and the southern as ṛṇa ⟨negative, subtractive⟩ in the case of Venus, the Sun, Mars (kṣiti-suta, the Earth's son) and Jupiter (marut-pūjita, worshipped by the Maruts). For the cool-rayed Moon (śīta-dyuti) and Saturn (ravija, the Sun's offspring) it is to be applied reversed; and for Mercury (jña) it is always to be applied ⟨as additive⟩. Then that ⟨sum or difference⟩, multiplied by 3 (rāma, the three Rāmas), is to be divided by the maximum declination ⟨24°⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खमिह"; alternatives "स्वमिह", "ख्यमिह" — the first akṣara is a plain ख in this fount but the ink is heavy where it joins मि [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वमिह; this sentence names खमिह, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दाक्षिणर्णं"; alternatives "दाक्षिणर्ण्यं", "दाक्षिणर्णे" — the final cluster carries a repha and an anusvāra dot; the two marks touch, so the anusvāra could be an e-mātrā
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शीतद्युतिरविजयोर्ज्ञश्च"; alternatives "शीतद्युतिरविजयोर्ज्ञश्व" — long compound set tight; the ज्ञ and the following श्च are crowded against each other
  • About this edition: Three things. (1) Numbers: rāma = 3 (the three Rāmas); paramāpakrama is the greatest declination, which the witness states as 24°. Worked: a planet with no declination gives (24 + 0) × 3 ÷ 24 = 3, read as 3 rāśis = 90° = 5400 kalās, which the NEXT verse divides by 10800 to give exactly ½ rūpa — which is why a planet on the equator has half a rūpa of ayanabala. A planet 12° north gives (24 + 12) × 3 ÷ 24 = 4·5 rāśis = 135° = 8100 kalās ÷ 10800 = 0·75 rūpa. (2) One reading changed: the plate prints खम् (kham, 'sky', which also means zero), and I render the reader's own alternative स्वम् (svam, 'one's own' = dhana, the additive quantity), because the line needs a positive to pair with दाक्षिण-ऋणं and because the arithmetic only works if the northern declination is ADDED to the 24°; the witness likewise reads it as additive. The locative परमापक्रमे is what tells you where the declination is applied — to the 24°, not to zero. (3) The attached witness block overruns this verse: it is headed 'Slokas 15–15¾', so everything after the division — reading the quotient as rāśis, reducing to minutes, dividing by 10800, doubling for the Sun and for the Moon's pakṣabala — belongs to Śrīpati's next verse (ग्राह्यं राशिप्रभृति च फलं लिप्तिकीभूतमेतद् … द्विघ्नं भानोरयनजबलं पक्षवीर्यं तथेन्दोः), not to this one. The second block tied to this verse, on the planetary fight (graha-yuddha), is his 15¾–16½ and renders वीर्यैकत्वं सदृशकलयोः खेटयोः — a different verse altogether, and none of it is in our verse 15.
3.16a reading here is contested

ग्राह्यं राशिप्रभृति च फलं लिप्तिकीभूतमेतद्व्योमाकाशद्विरदखकुभिर्भाजयेदायनं स्यात् । द्विघ्नं भानोरयनजबलं पक्षवीर्यं तथेन्दोः वीर्यैकत्वं सदृशकलयोः खेटयोः प्राग्विधाय

grāhyaṃ rāśiprabhṛti ca phalaṃ liptikībhūtametadvyomākāśadviradakhakubhirbhājayedāyanaṃ syāt | dvighnaṃ bhānorayanajabalaṃ pakṣavīryaṃ tathendoḥ vīryaikatvaṃ sadṛśakalayoḥ kheṭayoḥ prāgvidhāya

⟨The quotient won in the last verse⟩ is to be taken as rāśis and the rest ⟨signs, then degrees and minutes⟩; and this same, turned into liptās (minutes of arc), one should divide by 10800 — vyoman 0, ākāśa 0, dvirada 8 ⟨'the two-tusked one', the elephant⟩, kha 0, ku 1, the word-numerals read from the right — and what comes out is the ayana ⟨the ayana-bala, the strength born of the declination⟩. For the Sun that ayana-born strength is doubled, and the Moon's pakṣa-strength (pakṣa-bala, the fortnightly strength) is doubled in the same way. ⟨Now the planetary war:⟩ having first brought to a single total the strength of each of two planets whose kalās (minutes of longitude) are alike ⟨for that agreement to the very minute is the war⟩ —

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युञ्ज्यान्मेषादिस्थेषु"; alternatives "युंज्यान्मेषादिस्थेषु", "युञ्यान्मेषादिस्थेषु", "युञ्ज्यान्-मेषादिस्थेषु" — Read at 4x. After यु there is one stacked ligature that I take as ञ्ज्, with a dot riding above it; the dot may be an anusvāra of a युं spelling instead. Between न् and मे the press sets a short horizontal stroke that may be the half-na of this fount or an actual hyphen. [2026-09-23: the word this note discusses is no longer in this verse's mūla. It stood in five lines of Parāśara that Sastri quotes in his notes, and those 72 syllables were taken out of this record on 2026-09-12 (see the revisions row of that date). The note is kept as the history of that reading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राश्यादींस्त्रिराशिभ्यस्तु"; alternatives "राश्यादीस्त्रिराशिभ्यस्तु" — The anusvāra dot over दी is small and close to the headline; the following स्त्रि is a dense three-part conjunct. [2026-09-23: the word this note discusses is no longer in this verse's mūla. It stood in five lines of Parāśara that Sastri quotes in his notes, and those 72 syllables were taken out of this record on 2026-09-12 (see the revisions row of that date). The note is kept as the history of that reading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युञ्ज्याद्बुधस्य"; alternatives "युंज्याद्बुधस्य", "युञ्याद्बुधस्य" — Same ligature as line 1, read at 4x: यु + a stacked ñj-type conjunct + या. A dot rides above it. [2026-09-23: the word this note discusses is no longer in this verse's mūla. It stood in five lines of Parāśara that Sastri quotes in his notes, and those 72 syllables were taken out of this record on 2026-09-12 (see the revisions row of that date). The note is kept as the history of that reading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रहाणामायनं बलम्"; alternatives "ग्रहाणामायनं बलम्" — A small curl of ink sits above the line in the space between आयनं and बलम्, clear of both letters. I read it as a broken sort or an offset mark and have not transcribed it as a vowel sign. [2026-09-23: the word this note discusses is no longer in this verse's mūla. It stood in five lines of Parāśara that Sastri quotes in his notes, and those 72 syllables were taken out of this record on 2026-09-12 (see the revisions row of that date). The note is kept as the history of that reading.]
  • About this edition: THE DIVISOR. The plate (page_0058 line 22) sets व्योमाकाशाद्रिरदखकुभिः, and अद्रि-रद decodes to nothing: अद्रि is 7 (Keśava's own verse quoted three plates later, page_0065 line 25, uses अद्रिविहृतं for 'divided by 7'), and रद is 32, which is not a single digit. Read the word as द्विरद ('the two-tusked one', an elephant) = 8, and the compound gives vyoman 0, ākāśa 0, dvirada 8, kha 0, ku 1 — right to left, 10800. That is the figure the arithmetic needs and the figure Sastri prints twice: 'divide this by 10,800 minutes' (page_0059), and his worked sum for the Sun, (4.8599 × 30 × 60) / 10800 = .8099 rūpa (page_0060). द्रि and द्वि differ only in the subscript stroke in this fount, and the reader flagged the same fount's द्वि as heavily inked at verse 24. The mūla is not emended here; this is for the text stage. THE TWO DIVISORS ARE ONE OPERATION: 180° = 10800 minutes, and 180° ÷ 3 = 60 virūpas = 1 rūpa, so dividing minutes by 10800 and dividing degrees by 3 give the same strength in different units. राशित्रय = three rāśis = 90°. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads लिप्तिकीभूतमेतद्व्योमाकाशद्विरदखकुभिर्भाजयेदायनं; this sentence names द्रि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate does not set the form quoted at the start of this note, and the verse stands on line n=23 of page_0058, not line 22. Read by eye at about 4.48x native on .tmp/vision/sripati-paddhati-sastri1937/page_0058.png, the press sets व्योमाकाशद्विरदखकुभिः: a short काश, and a subscript that matches this fount's द्वि in द्विघ्नं on line 24, not the ्र of ग्राह्यं on line 22 (compared side by side at about 3.89x). So the mūla is no longer left for a later stage: it was corrected on this plate reading on 2026-09-23 and now reads द्विरद, 8, giving 10800.]
  • About this edition: THE PRINTED NUMERAL IS ॥ १६ ॥, read on PDF p. 62 at native resolution, set with spaces inside the daṇḍas. Pāda d (वीर्यैकत्वं…) opens the planetary-war (yuddha) topic that verse 17 completes, so the SENSE runs past the verse boundary — Sastri’s translation blocks are labelled "Slokas 15-15¾", "Slokas 15¾-16½", "Slokas 16½-18" for exactly that reason. The page’s numeral decides the verse; the sense boundary is the translator’s problem, not the text’s.
  • About this edition: THE DIVISOR IS 10800 AND EVERY STEP OF IT SURVIVES IN THE ENGLISH. The plate sets व्योमाकाशाद्रिरदखकुभिः, and अद्रि-रद decodes to nothing — adri is 7 and rada is 32, which is not a single digit. The record reads the word as द्विरद, the elephant, 8, so the five word-numerals are 0, 0, 8, 0, 1 and, read right to left, give 10800. The mūla is NOT emended; the reading is stated, not written into the text. WORKED, with our own numbers and not the witness's: a planet with no declination gives (24 + 0) × 3 ÷ 24 = 3 in verse 15; read as 3 rāśis that is 90° = 5400 kalās, and 5400 ÷ 10800 = 0.5 — half a rūpa of ayana-bala, which is why a planet on the equator carries exactly half. The rule's two divisors are one operation: 180° is 10800 minutes, and 180° ÷ 3 is 60 virūpas = 1 rūpa, so dividing minutes by 10800 and dividing degrees by 3 give the same strength in different units. Pāda d opens the planetary-war topic that verse 17 completes, so this English closes on a dash and hands over, exactly as verse 17's English already opens on one. Rendered from the corrected 68-syllable mandākrāntā, after the 72 syllables of Parāśara that Sastri prints in his notes were taken out; the 1937 English attached to this unit was read as a translation witness and agrees on every claim — quotient as rāśis, reduction to minutes, division by 10,800, the doubling for the Sun and for the Moon's pakṣabala, and each planet's total strength computed first in a war — with not a phrase of its wording taken. [2026-09-23: corrected on the plate. The 1937 page (page_0058, line n=23), read by eye at about 4.48x native, sets व्योमाकाशद्विरदखकुभिः, not the form quoted above, so the mūla now carries द्विरद, the reading this note argued for, and is no longer unemended. The English and Hindi already render 10800 and gloss dvirada 8, so they answer to it unchanged.]
3.17a reading here is contested

याम्योदक्स्थद्युचरबलयोर्हानिवृद्धी विधेये युद्धे चेष्वोर्विवरविहृता खेटवीर्यान्तरेण । मध्यस्पष्टद्युचरविवरार्द्धेन युक्ताच्छीघ्रोच्चान्मध्ये स्पष्टादधिकवपुषि न्यूनके वर्जिताच्च

yāmyodaksthadyucarabalayorhānivṛddhī vidheye yuddhe ceṣvorvivaravihṛtā kheṭavīryāntareṇa | madhyaspaṣṭadyucaravivarārddhena yuktācchīghroccānmadhye spaṣṭādadhikavapuṣi nyūnake varjitācca

— and in that war the loss and the gain are to be applied to the strengths of the two planets standing to the south and to the north respectively; ⟨the amount applied is⟩ the difference between the two planets' strengths, divided by the interval between their two iṣus (śaras, the celestial latitudes). ⟨Now the ceṣṭā-kendra:⟩ take the śīghrocca increased by half the interval between the madhya (mean) planet and the spaṣṭa (true) planet, when the mean is the greater in magnitude; and, when the mean is the smaller, take the śīghrocca diminished by that same half —

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "याम्योदक्स्थद्युचरबलयोर्हानिवृद्धी"; alternatives "याम्योदक्स्थद्युचरबलयोर्हानिवृद्धि" — Long unbroken compound; the final ी of वृद्धी is a full mātrā on the plate but sits close to the following word space.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेष्वोर्विवरविहृता"; alternatives "चेष्ट्वोर्विवरविहृता", "चैष्वोर्विवरविहृता", "चेष्वोर्विवरविहता" — Read at 3x. The second akṣara is a ṣ-based conjunct with ो; I take it as ष्वो, giving च + इष्वोः 'of the two arrows' i.e. the two latitudes, which agrees with Sastri's 'the difference in their latitudes'. The ृ under विह is small.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विवरार्द्धेन"; alternatives "विवरार्धेन" — Read at 2.6x. The cluster under the repha is a doubled dha ligature on the plate, but the two members are almost fused.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्ताच्छीघ्रोच्चा-"; alternatives "युक्ताच्छीघ्रोचा-", "युक्ताच्छ्रीघ्रोच्चा-" — Read at 5x. यु + क्ता + a ch-type conjunct with ी + a heart-shaped घ्र with ो + a c-type akṣara with ा, then the hyphen. The last akṣara may be single चा rather than doubled च्चा; the word continues as न्मध्ये on the next line, and Sastri's English names शीघ्रोच्च.
  • About this edition: इषु (iṣu, 'arrow') here is śara, the celestial latitude; the plate reader took चेष्वोः as च + इष्वोः (dual, 'of the two latitudes'), and Sastri's English agrees on the claim — 'the difference in their strength should be divided by the difference in their latitudes; the result is to be added to the strength of the victorious planet in the North and to be subtracted from that of the vanquished planet in the South' (page_0062). So the northern planet is the victor and the southern the vanquished. This verse has no self-standing sense: its first half completes verse 16 and its second half runs on into verse 18, and the press closes it ॥ १७ ॥ in the middle of the ceṣṭā-kendra rule.
3.18a reading here is contested

जह्यान्मध्यग्रहमिति भवेत्तच्च चेष्टाख्यकेन्द्रं षड्राशिभ्योऽधिकमपनयेन्मण्डलाच्छेषकस्य । कृत्वा लिप्ताः शतहतगजाशाभिराप्तं फलं यच्चेष्टावीर्यं तदिह कथितं होरिकैर्बुद्धिवृद्धैः

jahyānmadhyagrahamiti bhavettacca ceṣṭākhyakendraṃ ṣaḍrāśibhyo'dhikamapanayenmaṇḍalāccheṣakasya | kṛtvā liptāḥ śatahatagajāśābhirāptaṃ phalaṃ yacceṣṭāvīryaṃ tadiha kathitaṃ horikairbuddhivṛddhaiḥ

— from that ⟨corrected śīghrocca⟩ subtract the madhya (mean) planet; what remains is the kendra called ceṣṭā ⟨the ceṣṭā-kendra⟩. If it is greater than six rāśis, take it away from the maṇḍala ⟨the whole circle of twelve rāśis⟩. Make the remainder into liptās (minutes) and divide them by 10800 ⟨gaja 8 and āśā 10 — read from the right, 108 — and śata-hata, multiplied by a hundred⟩: the quotient so obtained is what the horā-men, ripe in understanding, have here declared to be the ceṣṭā-vīrya (ceṣṭā-bala).

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जह्यान्मध्यग्रहमिति"; alternatives "जह्यान्मध्यग्रहमिति", "जह्यान्मध्यग्रहमिती" — The opening ज-ह्य conjunct is heavily inked; the subscript य is only just separable from the ह.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शतहतगजाशाभिराप्तं"; alternatives "शतहतगजाशाभिराप्तम्" — Long compound with no word spaces; the anusvāra over the final प्तं is small. Sastri's English ('divide the same by 10,800 minutes') supports गज 8 and आशा 10, read right to left as 108, times शत.
  • About this edition: THE NUMBER: शतहतगजाशाभिः = (gaja 8, āśā 10) read from the right = 108, × 100 (śata-hata) = 10800 — the same divisor as verse 16, and Sastri prints it in words: 'divide the same by 10,800 minutes' (page_0063). A CHECK THAT COSTS NOTHING: Keśava, quoted on the same plate (page_0063 line 22), states the rule in one line — ceṣṭā-kendra = śīghrocca minus half the SUM of the mean and the true planet. śrīpati's two-case rule gives [śīghrocca ± ½(madhya − spaṣṭa)] − madhya, which reduces to śīghrocca − ½(madhya + spaṣṭa). The two are the same quantity, so the reading is sound. Note also that the input file's first note on verse 19 (होरिकैर्बुद्धिवृद्धैः) belongs to THIS verse — those words stand here, at the close of verse 18.
3.19a reading here is contested

षष्टिर्वक्रगते वीर्यमनुवक्रगते दलम् । पादं विकलभुक्तेः स्यादलमेव समागमे ॥ पादं मंदगतेस्तस्य दलं मंदतरस्य च । शीघ्रमुक्तेस्तु पादोनं दलं शीघ्रतरस्य च ॥

ṣaṣṭirvakragate vīryamanuvakragate dalam | pādaṃ vikalabhukteḥ syādalameva samāgame || pādaṃ maṃdagatestasya dalaṃ maṃdatarasya ca | śīghramuktestu pādonaṃ dalaṃ śīghratarasya ca ||

For a graha in vakra (retrograde) motion the strength is sixty ⟨virūpas, a whole rūpa⟩; for one in anuvakra ⟨retrograde motion carrying it back into the previous sign⟩, half of that ⟨30⟩. For vikala motion ⟨stationary, its light overpowered by the Sun⟩ it is a quarter ⟨15⟩, and in samāgama ⟨meeting — Sastri: conjunction with the Moon⟩ just so much ⟨see the note: his figure requires dalam, a half, 30⟩. For manda (slow) motion a quarter ⟨15⟩, and half of that ⟨7½⟩ for mandatara (slower still). For śīghra (fast) motion, ⟨sixty⟩ less a quarter ⟨45⟩; and half ⟨30⟩ for śīghratara (faster still).

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: ⛔ NOT ŚRĪPATI'S VERSE. This passage is a QUOTATION that V. Subrahmanya Sastri prints inside his own notes, from पराशर (Parāśara) — the verses are Bṛhat Parāśara Horā Śāstra ch. 27. It is kept here because the page prints it and a reader following our verse numbers would otherwise find a hole; it is marked `kind: "quotation"` so it does not count toward this work's length. THE SOURCE LABEL IS ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE — Sastri's own English at the foot of printed p. 48 (PDF 63): “Parasara lays down the following for ascertaining the गतिबल (Gatibalas) [i.e. (i) वक्रगति … (vii) शीघ्रतरगति] of planets;” — a semicolon at the page foot, and this passage is the next thing printed. HOW IT WAS RULED, on the ink at 600 ppi: Body height śirorekhā to baseline: this passage 51, 50, 49, 49 px against Śrīpati's ślokas 17-18 on the facing page at 73, 71, 70, 69, 72, 73 — Śrīpati's type is 1.45× taller. Across PDF pp. 60-69 every indented Devanāgarī verse line falls in one of two bands, 45-57 or 67-97, with a clean 10 px gap; this passage sits at 49-51, with the Keśava quotation on p63 (50, 52) and the Parāśara quotation on p65 (49, 49, 49). It also runs half measure — x 707→1910 on a measure of 300→2718 — where Śrīpati's mūla runs to x 2271-2466. THE NUMERAL: THERE IS NO NUMERAL AND NOTHING ELSE EITHER. The four lines end । ॥ । ॥ with last ink at x 1775, 1884, 1769, 1910, and ZERO dark pixels from there to x 2760 on every line. No fraction stroke, no bracket, no damage, no erasure — clean paper. Śrīpati's śloka 19 ends ॥ १९ ॥ and even Keśava's quotation ends ॥ १० ॥. THE METRE: anuṣṭubh, 8 per pāda, all four lines 8+8 (ṣaṣ-ṭir-va-kra-ga-te-vīr-ya | ma-nu-va-kra-ga-te-da-lam) — two complete ślokas. Śrīpati's 17-18 are mandākrāntā at 17 and his 19 is upajāti at 11. Bṛhat Parāśara Horā Śāstra is composed entirely in anuṣṭubh. ⚠ WHY IT WAS EVER TAKEN FOR ŚRĪPATI'S: the reader who transcribed its page tagged it `role: "mula"`, and they were reading that page alone. A one-page-per-agent reader structurally cannot see a label printed on the page before. The same failure put 72 syllables of Parāśara inside record 3.16, found the same day.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "होरिकैर्बुद्धिवृद्धैः"; alternatives "होरिकैर्बुद्धिवृद्धैः" — The two doubled-dha clusters (द्धि, द्धै) are the darkest ink on the line and their members touch.
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 19.
  • About this edition: THE PRESS NUMBERS NOTHING HERE, AND SASTRI TRANSLATES NOTHING HERE, but he does give every value in his English note on the same plate (page_0064, lines 5-18), and the values match this verse term for term: vakra 60, anuvakra 30, vikala 15, manda 15, mandatara 7½, śīghra 45, śīghratara 30. So पादोनं (60 less a quarter = 45) goes with śīghra and दलं (30) with śīghratara, in that printed order — the order is not the one BPHS gives, and Sastri's is the same as ours. ONE FORK REMAINS. At samāgama Sastri prints 30 virūpas, which needs दलम् (half). Our plate reads स्यादलमेव, i.e. स्यात् + अलम्, and अलम् एव most naturally means 'just so much', which would carry the quarter (15) forward. स्यात् + दलम् would be set स्याद्दलमेव, one geminate apart, and the metre allows either. Not emended; the mūla stands as inked and the fork is recorded here. Also: the press sets शीघ्रमुक्तेः where शीघ्रभुक्तेः (fast motion) is wanted; Sastri names śīghra.
3.20a reading here is contested

मन्दावनीसूनुशशाङ्कपुत्रवागीशशुक्रेन्दुदिवाकराणाम् । एकोत्तरं रूपमगैर्विभक्तं नैसर्गिकं वीर्यमुदाहरन्ति

mandāvanīsūnuśaśāṅkaputravāgīśaśukrendudivākarāṇām | ekottaraṃ rūpamagairvibhaktaṃ naisargikaṃ vīryamudāharanti

For Manda ⟨Saturn⟩, the son of the Earth ⟨Mars⟩, the son of the Moon ⟨Mercury⟩, Vāgīśa ⟨Jupiter⟩, Śukra ⟨Venus⟩, Indu ⟨the Moon⟩ and Divākara ⟨the Sun⟩, in that order, one takes rūpas rising by one at a time ⟨1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7⟩, divided by the agas ⟨mountains, 7⟩: this they declare to be the naisargika (natural) strength — that is, 1/7 of a rūpa for Saturn, 2/7 for Mars, 3/7 for Mercury, 4/7 for Jupiter, 5/7 for Venus, 6/7 for the Moon and a whole rūpa for the Sun.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिवाकाराणाम्"; alternatives "दिवाकराणाम्" — read at 3×, the third akṣara plainly carries an ā-mātrā: का. The sense and the metre want दिवाकराणाम्, so this looks like a compositor's error, but का is what is inked. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्दावनीसूनुशशाङ्कपुत्रवागीशशुक्रेन्दुदिवाकराणाम्; this sentence names दिवाकाराणाम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १९ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 20.
  • About this edition: THE ORDER IS SATURN FIRST AND THE SUN LAST, which is the order of increasing strength, and Sastri reads it the same way ('1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Rupas divided by 7', page_0065). Two independent checks on the same plate: his own table gives Sun 1·000, Moon ·857, Venus ·714, Jupiter ·571, Mercury ·428, Mars ·285, Saturn ·142 (page_0066), which is n/7 exactly; and the Parāśara verse he quotes gives the same values in virūpas from the Sun onward — 60, 51, 17, 26, 34, 43, 9 — which is 60 × n/7 rounded. अगैः = 'by the mountains' = 7, and Keśava's parallel verse on the same plate writes the divisor अद्रिविहृतं, अद्रि likewise 7. THE PLATE SETS दिवाकाराणाम् with a long ā in the third syllable; both the sense (Divākara, the Sun) and the metre want दिवाकराणाम्, so this is a compositor's slip. Not emended. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्दावनीसूनुशशाङ्कपुत्रवागीशशुक्रेन्दुदिवाकराणाम्; this sentence names दिवाकाराणाम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

सौम्यैर्दृष्टे दृष्टितुर्यांशयुक्तं वीर्यं पापालोकिते तद्विहीनम् । लग्नस्यापि स्वामिवीर्यं हि वीर्यं युक्तं कार्यं तच्च जीवज्ञदृष्ट्या

saumyairdṛṣṭe dṛṣṭituryāṃśayuktaṃ vīryaṃ pāpālokite tadvihīnam | lagnasyāpi svāmivīryaṃ hi vīryaṃ yuktaṃ kāryaṃ tacca jīvajñadṛṣṭyā

When a ⟨graha⟩ is aspected by benefics, its strength is ⟨the sum of the five balas already taught — sthāna, dik, kāla, ceṣṭā and naisargika —⟩ increased by a fourth part of that aspect (dṛṣṭi-turyāṃśa); when it is looked at by a malefic, it is that same sum less ⟨a fourth of the aspect⟩. ⟨What results is the graha's ṣaḍbala.⟩ The strength of the lagna, too, is simply the strength of its lord; and to that must be joined the aspect of Jīva ⟨Jupiter⟩ and Jña ⟨Mercury⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 21. [2026-09-23: this note's first sentence is wrong, and the plate refutes it. The 1937 page (PDF p.66 = printed p.51, store line n=6) was read by eye at about 2.50x native: after जीवज्ञदृष्ट्या the press sets the bare numeral २०, with no daṇḍa on either side, 63 px clear of the last word where the line's own word gaps measure 39-44 px, and the running head over the page repeats it as Sl. 20. The numeral is the press's verse number for this verse; it has been taken out of the mūla, and the verse is still published at position 21.]
  • About this edition: THE FIVE BALAS ARE NOT NAMED IN THE VERSE; Sastri names them in his translation — sthāna, dik, kāla, ceṣṭā (ayana-bala counted inside it) and naisarga — and his sum + ¼ aspect = ṣaḍbala (page_0066). His worked table on page_0067 shows the operation on real figures: Sun total 8·720, + ·295 for ¼ benefic aspect, ṣaḍbala 9·015; Jupiter 8·808, + ·261, − ·456 for ¼ malefic aspect, 8·613. ON THE SECOND HALF WE READ THE SAME CLAIM AS HE DOES BUT SHOULD FLAG ONE THING HIS ENGLISH ADDS: his note says the aspect of Jupiter and Mercury goes in ENTIRE, not by a quarter like other planets, and his bhāva table on page_0071 carries a separate row 'Gnejyadrigbala' for it. The Sanskrit here says only युक्तं कार्यं तच्च जीवज्ञदृष्ट्या, 'and that is to be joined with the aspect of Jīva and Jña'; the word 'entire' is his, seated in Parāśara's गुरुज्ञाभ्यां couplet which he quotes on page_0069, not in Śrīpati's line. The mūla's trailing २० is the printed verse number, set without daṇḍas. [2026-09-23: confirmed on the plate and acted on. The 1937 page (PDF p.66, store line n=6), read by eye at about 2.50x native, sets २० bare, without daṇḍas, 63 px clear of दृष्ट्या. The numeral has been taken out of the mūla as the printed verse number, so this sentence describes the text as it stood before that change.]

शुभावलोकिते पुनस्तदीयदृष्टिपादयुक् असाधुना निरीक्षिते तदंघ्रिणा विवर्जितम् । नृभे क्षिपेच्च रूपकं चतुष्पदाप्ययोर्दलं न कीटभे च किंचन स्फुटं भवेत्तनोर्बलम्

śubhāvalokite punastadīyadṛṣṭipādayuk asādhunā nirīkṣite tadaṃghriṇā vivarjitam | nṛbhe kṣipecca rūpakaṃ catuṣpadāpyayordalaṃ na kīṭabhe ca kiṃcana sphuṭaṃ bhavettanorbalam

Again, when a ⟨bhāva⟩ is looked upon by a benefic it is joined with a fourth part (pāda) of that planet's aspect, and when it is regarded by an unfriendly ⟨malefic⟩ planet it is deprived of a fourth part (aṅghri) of the same. And ⟨for the first bhāva⟩: if it falls in a human sign (nṛ-bha) throw in one rūpaka ⟨a whole rūpa, 60 virūpas⟩; if in a quadruped or a watery sign, half ⟨a rūpa, 30 virūpas⟩; and in a reptile sign (kīṭa) nothing at all. ⟨With this addition⟩ the exact strength of the tanu ⟨the first bhāva, the lagna⟩ is obtained.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २१ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 22.
  • About this edition: THE ONE RŪPA / HALF RŪPA / NOTHING IS THE LAGNA'S DIGBALA, not its whole strength, and Sastri says so ('put down one Rupa as its Digbala', page_0067). His note explains why the figures are what they are, and the explanation is worth keeping because it makes verse 24 readable: a human sign in the lagna is measured from the 7th bhāva, so the distance is exactly 6 signs and the digbala is a full rūpa; a quadruped sign is measured from the 4th, where the distance is about 3 signs, so the digbala is put down roughly as half. He calls this verse a special instance of the general rule stated in the next-but-one verse (page_0068), and we read it the same way. The press numbers this verse ॥ २१ ॥; it is published at position 22.

जलजचतुष्पदकीटभसंज्ञाः सुखदशमास्तगता बलवन्तः । निजनिजसप्तमगा विबलास्ते तदितरगैरनुपातविधिः स्यात्

jalajacatuṣpadakīṭabhasaṃjñāḥ sukhadaśamāstagatā balavantaḥ | nijanijasaptamagā vibalāste taditaragairanupātavidhiḥ syāt

The rāśis named watery (jalaja), quadruped (catuṣpada) and reptile (kīṭa) are strong when they fall in the sukha ⟨4th⟩, the tenth and the asta ⟨7th⟩ bhāva respectively ⟨one whole rūpa there⟩; they are without strength when they fall in the seventh place from each one's own ⟨strong place — the watery in the 10th, the quadruped in the 4th, the reptile in the lagna⟩; and for the places lying between those two, the strength is to be found by anupāta ⟨the rule of three, proportion⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २२ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 23.
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ २२) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
  • About this edition: THE FOURTH CLASS IS MISSING FROM THIS VERSE AND MUST BE CARRIED IN FROM THE LAST ONE: human signs, which are strong in the lagna and weakest in the 7th. Verse 22 supplies it, and verse 24 states all four together. Sastri reads the verse exactly as we do and adds the two figures the Sanskrit leaves implicit — one rūpa at the strong place, nothing at the weak one (page_0068). The press opens this verse's number ॥ २२ and never closes it: no daṇḍas were set before the adhyāya's colophon.
3.24a reading here is contested

दारान्मनुष्याद्धिबुकं चतुष्पदात्तनुं च कीटाञ्जलजात्खभं च । विशोध्य शेषं त्वधिकं रसाच्चेत् विशोध्य चक्रात्फलमादिवद्दिशेत् ॥ चक्राद्विशोध्य रामैश्च भजेद्भागीकृतं बलात् । भावानां च ग्रहाणां च बलान्येवं विदुर्बुधाः ॥

dārānmanuṣyāddhibukaṃ catuṣpadāttanuṃ ca kīṭāñjalajātkhabhaṃ ca | viśodhya śeṣaṃ tvadhikaṃ rasāccet viśodhya cakrātphalamādivaddiśet || cakrādviśodhya rāmaiśca bhajedbhāgīkṛtaṃ balāt | bhāvānāṃ ca grahāṇāṃ ca balānyevaṃ vidurbudhāḥ ||

Subtract the dāra ⟨the 7th bhāva⟩ from a ⟨bhāva standing in a⟩ human sign, the hibuka ⟨the 4th⟩ from a quadruped sign, the tanu ⟨the 1st⟩ from a reptile sign, and the khabha ⟨the 10th⟩ from a watery sign. If the remainder is greater than rasa ⟨six⟩ rāśis, subtract it from the cakra ⟨the whole circle of twelve rāśis⟩ and declare the result as before ⟨reduce it to minutes and divide by 10800, exactly as the digbala of the grahas was found⟩. ⟨Second couplet, on the plate a quotation and not Śrīpati's — see the note:⟩ Subtract ⟨it⟩ from the cakra ⟨twelve rāśis⟩, reduce ⟨what is left⟩ to bhāgas (degrees), and divide by the Rāmas ⟨three⟩; from that comes the strength ⟨the bhāva's digbala in virūpas⟩. In this way the wise know the strengths both of the bhāvas and of the grahas.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चक्राद्वि"; alternatives "चक्राद्धि" — the conjunct after क्रा is inked heavily; read द्वि. The same word is printed clean on page 57 (page_0072) in the पराशर quotation 'चक्राद्विशोधयेत्', which supports द्वि
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भजेद्भागीकृतं"; alternatives "भजेद्रागीकृतं", "भजेद्भागीकृतं" — the conjunct after जे has a broad two-lobed subscript; read भ, but a र subscript is possible at this inking
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विदुर्बुधाः"; alternatives "विदुद्बुधाः" — the repha over बु is a small worn hook
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 24.
  • About this edition: THE NUMBERS: रस = 6, चक्र = the 12-rāśi circle, राम = 3 (the three Rāmas). Dividing the remaining degrees by 3 gives virūpas, the same operation as dividing the minutes by 10800 (180° = 10800′, and 180° ÷ 3 = 60 virūpas = 1 rūpa), which is why आदिवद् ('as before') and the second couplet describe one procedure in two units. Each bhāva is measured from the point where its own sign-class is weakest: human from the 7th, quadruped from the 4th, reptile from the 1st, watery from the 10th — the weak points of verse 23. ⚠ THE SECOND COUPLET IS ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT ŚRĪPATI'S, AND THE MŪLA SHOULD BE REVIEWED. Three things on the plates say so. (1) The adhyāya's colophon, इति श्रीपतिविरचितायां जातकपद्धतौ बलाध्यायस्तृतीयः, is printed on page_0068 immediately after …फलमादिवद्दिशेत् ॥ — that is, after the FIRST couplet. (2) चक्राद्विशोध्य रामैश्च… stands two plates later, at the top of page_0070, and it completes a sentence left hanging by the Parāśara passage quoted on page_0069: that passage is introduced by Sastri's line 'Also पराशर', lists which signs are measured from which bhāva (नृयुग्मजूकपाथोन… अस्तं सुखं क्रमाल्लग्नं खं हित्वा), and breaks off on a locative absolute, अङ्गाधिके सति, 'when the excess is more than six' — whose main clause is exactly 'subtract from the cakra and divide by three'. (3) Sastri's English for the page_0070 couplet runs inside quotation marks that open on page_0070 and close at 'What is obtained is the Digbala of the Bhava in Virupas.' — he is translating the quotation, not the text. The reader of page_0070 tagged the two lines mula, working without page_0069 in view. One word inside them is sound, at least: चक्राद्वि is confirmed by the clean printing of चक्राद्विशोधयेत् in the Parāśara quotation on page_0072. बलात् is an ablative that reads awkwardly where a nominative बलम् would be expected; Sastri takes the sense to be the resulting bala, and so do we. [2026-09-23: clause (1) is now an eye reading, not only a machine read. On .tmp/vision/sripati-paddhati-sastri1937/page_0068.png (PDF p.68 = printed p.53) the colophon band, y3439-3539, stands directly under the line that ends …फलमादिवद्दिशेत् ॥, and जातकपद्धतौ was read in it by eye at about 3.9x native. That plate ruling opened page 68 only and did not reopen the second couplet on page 70. The mūla verification of 2026-09-20 ruled on the review this note asks for: both couplets stay in the mūla and nothing is proposed against either, because the corpus never removes a verse on an inference.]

Adhyāya 4 · इष्टकष्टाध्यायश्चतुर्थः

इष्टकष्टबलनिर्णयाद्यतो जातकोदितफलस्य निर्णयः । शिष्यमोहविनिवृत्तये ततस्तत्प्रसाधनमथाभिधास्यते

iṣṭakaṣṭabalanirṇayādyato jātakoditaphalasya nirṇayaḥ | śiṣyamohavinivṛttaye tatastatprasādhanamathābhidhāsyate

Because (yataḥ) the settling of the fruit declared in a nativity rests on first settling the iṣṭa and kaṣṭa strengths — iṣṭa being a planet's measured power to do good and kaṣṭa its power to do harm — the working out of those two is now to be told here, so that the confusion of students may be put to rest.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The press sets शिष्यमोहाविनिवृत्तये (p. 72). Read exactly as printed, अ-विनिवृत्तये would mean 'for the NON-removal of the students' delusion', the opposite of the sense. The metre settles it: this verse is rathoddhatā (G L G L L L G L G L G — confirmed on pādas 2 and 4, e.g. jā-ta-ko-di-ta-pha-la-sya-nir-ṇa-yaḥ), and syllable 4 of a pāda must be LIGHT, which मोहा- (long ā) is not and मोहवि- is. So the word is śiṣyamoha-vinivṛttaye, 'for the removal of students' delusion'. Sastri also renders it as removal. I translate the removal and leave the mūla untouched; the fix belongs to a text stage, not a translation stage. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिष्यमोहविनिवृत्तये; this sentence names शिष्यमोहाविनिवृत्तये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिष्यमोहविनिवृत्तये. An eye reading of p. 72 (page_0072.png, store line index 6) at about 5.1x native confirmed that the press does set मोहा: a free-standing ā bar stands after ह, the same mark as the certain ā of सा on that line. So this note's first claim stands. The text stage it asks for came in this pass: the mūla was corrected against the press on the metre and the sense, and a machine read of the Telugu 1926 store gives शिष्यमोहविनिवृत्तये. The mūla is no longer left untouched.]
4.2a reading here is contested

नीचोनिताः स्पष्टतरा ग्रहेन्द्राः षड्भाधिका मण्डलतो विशोध्याः । कलीकृता राशिकलाभिरन्विता भलिप्तिकाप्ताः खलु तुङ्गरश्मयः ॥

nīconitāḥ spaṣṭatarā grahendrāḥ ṣaḍbhādhikā maṇḍalato viśodhyāḥ | kalīkṛtā rāśikalābhiranvitā bhaliptikāptāḥ khalu tuṅgaraśmayaḥ ||

Take the grahas made fully exact ⟨in longitude⟩ and diminish each by its own nīca ⟨the debilitation point of that planet⟩. If the remainder exceeds six rāśis, subtract it from the circle (maṇḍala, the full 12 rāśis). Reduce what is left to kalās (minutes of arc); add to it the kalās of one rāśi — that is 1800; and divide the sum by the liptikās of a bha, again 1800, the minutes contained in one sign. The quotients are indeed the tuṅga-raśmis, the 'rays of exaltation' of the planets.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विशोध्याः"; alternatives "विशोऽध्याः" — a small mark stands between शो and ध्या; it reads as a broken ध rather than an avagraha, but it is not clean
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भलिप्तिकाप्ताः"; alternatives "भलिप्तिकाप्ताः" — the प्ति and प्ता conjuncts are heavily inked
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 2.
  • About this edition: Worked example, and it fixes the range: a planet sitting exactly on its exaltation point stands 6 rāśis = 10800 kalās from its debilitation point, so (10800 + 1800) ÷ 1800 = 7; a planet on its debilitation point gives (0 + 1800) ÷ 1800 = 1. The rays therefore run from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). Sastri arrives at the same procedure, 'add 1800 and divide by 1800'. A verse Sastri quotes on the same page from another author states the identical rule in the other form — नीचोनं तु ग्रहं भार्धाधिक्ये चक्राद्विशोधयेत् । उच्चरश्मिर्भवेद्राशिः सैको द्विघ्नांशसंयुतः — 'the rays are the number of rāśis plus one, joined with twice the degrees ⟨as sixtieths⟩', which is the same quantity: signs + 1 + 2×degrees/60. The reader's two doubts do not touch the sense: विशोध्याः ('are to be subtracted') is demanded by grammar and by both witnesses, and भलिप्तिकाप्ताः was doubted only for heavy ink, the alternative offered being the same string.
4.3a reading here is contested

चेष्टाख्यकेन्द्राणि कुजादिकानामुक्तानि भास्वानयनांशयुक्तः । त्रिभाधिकोऽथेन्दुरिनेन हीनश्चेष्टाख्यकेन्द्रे हि तयोर्भवेताम्

ceṣṭākhyakendrāṇi kujādikānāmuktāni bhāsvānayanāṃśayuktaḥ | tribhādhiko'thendurinena hīnaśceṣṭākhyakendre hi tayorbhavetām

The kendras called cheṣṭā (cheṣṭā-kendra, the arc from which a planet's motional strength is measured) have already been stated for Mars and the rest ⟨the five star-planets, in the earlier adhyāya⟩. The Sun joined with the ayanāṃśa and then increased by three rāśis ⟨is the Sun's cheṣṭā-kendra⟩; and the Moon diminished by the Sun ⟨is the Moon's⟩. These two are the cheṣṭā-kendras of those two lights.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भास्वानयनांशयुक्तः"; alternatives "मास्वानयनांशयुक्तः" — the first akṣara is inked thickly; zoomed 3× it reads भा, but the left limb nearly closes like म
  • About this edition: The reader doubted the first akṣara of भास्वान् (भा or म). भास्वान् is 'the Sun'; मास्वान् is not a word. Sastri reads the Sun, and a verse he quotes on p. 74 from another author gives the same pair of rules — सायनांशार्कं इन्दुश्च सत्रिभो भानुवर्जितः — the sāyana Sun with three rāśis added, and the Moon less the Sun. Note what is added to what: the ayanāṃśa is added to the Sun (making it sāyana), and three rāśis (90°) on top of that.

चेष्टाख्यकेन्द्राण्यधिकानि षड्भाच्चक्राद्विशुद्धानि कलीकृतानि । सराशिलिप्तानि खखाष्टचन्द्रैर्हृतानि चेष्टाख्यमरीचयः स्युः

ceṣṭākhyakendrāṇyadhikāni ṣaḍbhāccakrādviśuddhāni kalīkṛtāni | sarāśiliptāni khakhāṣṭacandrairhṛtāni ceṣṭākhyamarīcayaḥ syuḥ

The cheṣṭā-kendras, if they exceed six rāśis, are to be subtracted from the cakra ⟨the 12 rāśis⟩; reduce them to kalās; add the liptās of one rāśi ⟨1800⟩; and divide by kha-kha-aṣṭa-candra — kha (0), kha (0), aṣṭa (8), candra (1), which written down as 0, 0, 8, 1 and read from the right is 1800. The results are the cheṣṭā rays.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The number-word is read right to left (aṅkānāṃ vāmato gatiḥ): 0-0-8-1 becomes 1800. Sastri divides by 1800 as well. The cheṣṭā rays therefore run from 1 to 7 on exactly the same scale as the tuṅga rays of verse 2.

रूपोनितानां ग्रहदीधितीनां रूपादिना रूपचयेन यत्स्यात् । श्रेढीफलं तत्त्रिगुणांशुभक्तमित्युच्चचेष्टाख्यफले प्रसाध्ये

rūponitānāṃ grahadīdhitīnāṃ rūpādinā rūpacayena yatsyāt | śreḍhīphalaṃ tattriguṇāṃśubhaktamityuccaceṣṭākhyaphale prasādhye

Of the planets' rays (dīdhiti) each diminished by one (rūpa), take the series-sum (śreḍhī-phala) whose first term is one, whose common difference is one, and whose number of terms is that reduced ray-figure; and divide that sum by three times the rays (aṃśu). It is in this way that the two phalas called ucca and cheṣṭā are to be worked out.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Worked example. For rays = 7 (a planet on its exaltation point): 7 − 1 = 6 terms, so the series-sum is 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21, and 21 ÷ (3 × 7 = 21) = 1. For rays = 1: no terms, sum 0, phala 0. For rays = 4: 3 terms, 1+2+3 = 6, and 6 ÷ 12 = ½. So each phala runs from 0 to 1. Note which figure the divisor uses: three times the UNREDUCED rays, not the reduced ones — that is what makes the top value come out at exactly 1, and Sastri reads it the same way ('divide this sum by 3 times the rays'). The whole procedure collapses to (rays − 1) ÷ 6, because (r−1)r/2 ÷ 3r = (r−1)/6. A verse Sastri quotes on p. 75 from another author states the inverse and so confirms it from a second hand: ये चेष्टोच्चबले रसैर्विनिहते सैके निजा रश्मयः — 'the cheṣṭā and ucca strengths multiplied by six (rasa) and increased by one are the rays', i.e. r = 6 × phala + 1.

तद्घातमूलं फलमिष्टसंज्ञं ते तुङ्गचेष्टाप्रभवे फले तु । विशोध्य रूपादवशेषघातमूलं हि कष्टाभिधमामनन्ति

tadghātamūlaṃ phalamiṣṭasaṃjñaṃ te tuṅgaceṣṭāprabhave phale tu | viśodhya rūpādavaśeṣaghātamūlaṃ hi kaṣṭābhidhamāmananti

The square root of the product of those two ⟨the ucca-phala and the cheṣṭā-phala⟩ is the phala named iṣṭa, the good. But as for those same two phalas born of tuṅga (exaltation) and of cheṣṭā — subtract each of them from unity (rūpa), multiply the two remainders together, and the square root of that product is what they hand down under the name kaṣṭa, the evil. That is: iṣṭa = √(ucca-phala × cheṣṭā-phala), and kaṣṭa = √((1 − ucca-phala) × (1 − cheṣṭā-phala)).

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Sastri reads the same two formulas. The verse Sastri quotes on p. 75 from another author states them too — चेष्टातुङ्गबलाहतेः पदमिहेष्टं स्याद्बलोनैकयोः । घातान्मूलमिदं हि कष्टम् — 'the root (pada) of the product of the cheṣṭā and tuṅga strengths is iṣṭa here; of those two each taken from one, the root of the product is kaṣṭa'. Because each phala lies between 0 and 1, both iṣṭa and kaṣṭa also lie between 0 and 1, and they are NOT complements of each other: a planet with ucca-phala 1 and cheṣṭā-phala 0 has iṣṭa 0 and kaṣṭa 0.
4.7a reading here is contested

पृथक् पृथक् खेटबलानि ताभ्यां हन्याद्भवेतां हि बले स्फुटे ते । सर्वग्रहाणां च दृशः फलाभ्यां शुभाशुभाभ्यां निहताः स्फुटाः स्युः ॥

pṛthak pṛthak kheṭabalāni tābhyāṃ hanyādbhavetāṃ hi bale sphuṭe te | sarvagrahāṇāṃ ca dṛśaḥ phalābhyāṃ śubhāśubhābhyāṃ nihatāḥ sphuṭāḥ syuḥ ||

Multiply each planet's own strength (kheṭa-bala, its aggregate ṣaḍbala) separately by those two ⟨iṣṭa and kaṣṭa⟩; the two products are that planet's exact (sphuṭa) strengths, one for good and one for harm. And the aspects (dṛś) of all the planets likewise, struck by those two phalas, the auspicious and the inauspicious, become exact ⟨aspects, again one for good and one for harm⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हन्याद्भवेतां"; alternatives "हन्याङ्ध्वेतां", "हन्याद्ध्वेतां" — the stacked conjunct after हन्या is heavily inked; read as द्भ at 8× (द् over भ, भ's left bowl visible at mid-height). Sastri's own rendering below — 'the products give the rectified strengths' — agrees with हन्याद् भवेतां
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृशः"; alternatives "दशः" — the ṛ-mātrā under द could not be confirmed at this magnification; Sastri renders the word as 'aspect', which is दृश्
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 7.
  • About this edition: Both of the reader's doubts are settled by the sense and by two witnesses. हन्याद्भवेतां ('multiply — the two become…') is what the syntax wants and what Sastri renders. दृशः is dṛś, 'aspect', not दशः; Sastri renders 'aspect', and a verse Sastri quotes on p. 79 from another author says the same thing of both quantities at once — वीर्यं दक्पृथगिष्टकष्टगुणिते, 'the strength and the aspect, separately multiplied by iṣṭa and kaṣṭa'.
4.8a reading here is contested

स्वोच्चे रूपं चरणरहितं स्वत्रिकोणे स्वभेऽर्द्धं नागांशानां त्रयमधिसुहृद्देहगे मित्रभेंऽङ्घ्रिः । अंशोऽष्टानां समगृहगते भूपभागोऽरिगेहे दन्तांशः स्यादधिरिपुगृहे नीचभे शून्यमेव

svocce rūpaṃ caraṇarahitaṃ svatrikoṇe svabhe'rddhaṃ nāgāṃśānāṃ trayamadhisuhṛddehage mitrabheṃ'ṅghriḥ | aṃśo'ṣṭānāṃ samagṛhagate bhūpabhāgo'rigehe dantāṃśaḥ syādadhiripugṛhe nīcabhe śūnyameva

⟨The good — śubha — that a planet yields, graded by the dignity of the sign it holds:⟩ in its own exaltation, a whole rūpa, 1; in its own trikoṇa ⟨mūlatrikoṇa⟩, that less a quarter, ¾; in its own sign, a half, ½; when placed in the house of an adhi-suhṛd, a great friend, three of the nāga-parts — nāga is 8, so ⅜; in a friend's sign, a foot, ¼; when gone to a neutral's house, one part of eight, ⅛; in an enemy's house, a bhūpa-part — bhūpa ('king') is 16, so 1/16; in the house of a great enemy, a danta-part — danta ('tooth') is 32, so 1/32; and in its debilitation sign, nothing whatever, 0.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खोच्चे"; alternatives "स्वोच्चे" — zoomed 3×; the akṣara shows the two lobes of ख, not the स+व of स्व [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वोच्चे; this sentence names खोच्चे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वोच्चे. An eye reading of p. 79 (page_0079.png, store line index 20) at about 2.9x and 3.3x native found that the press sets स्व here, and at स्वत्रिकोणे and स्वभे in the same line. The disputed glyphs measure 78 to 80 px wide, inside this fount's स्व range (77 to 80 px) and above its ख range (71 to 75 px). This uncertainty is resolved against ख.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खभेऽर्द्धं"; alternatives "खभेंऽर्द्धं" — a small mark sits above the seam between भे and the avagraha; it may be an anusvāra or ink from the ो mātrā above [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वभेऽर्द्धं; this sentence names खभेऽर्द्धं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वभेऽर्द्धं. An eye reading of p. 79 at about 3.3x native found स्व, not ख, at this word. That reading did not examine the mark over भे, so this note's question about an anusvāra stands.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मित्रभेंऽङ्घ्रिः"; alternatives "मित्रभेऽङ्घ्रिः" — a dot stands over भे; it may be an anusvāra or a stray. The conjunct ङ्घ्रि is small and could be ङ्ग्रि
  • About this edition: Three number-words, all read as bhūtasaṃkhyā: nāga = 8 (the eight nāgas), bhūpa = 16 (the sixteen kings), danta = 32 (the thirty-two teeth). Sastri gives the same nine values in the same order. On खोच्चे: the plate does print ख (p. 79), and kha- here stands for the planet's own — the same line has खत्रिकोणे and खभे, and verses 9 and 12 have खोच्चादि in the same use. The parallel verse Sastri quotes on p. 82 from another author states this whole table with स्व- instead (स्वोच्चे रूपं त्रिकोणे चरणविरहितं स्वर्क्षगेऽर्धं … भूपांशो वैरिगेहेऽध्यरिभयुजि रदांशश्च नीचे खम्), which confirms the sense and, independently, both of the hard fractions: भूपांश 1/16 for an enemy's house and रदांश (rada, also 'tooth') 1/32 for a great enemy's. The reader's two anusvāra doubts (खभेऽर्द्धं, मित्रभेंऽङ्घ्रिः) change no number and no word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वभेऽर्द्धं and स्वत्रिकोणे; this sentence names खभेऽर्द्धं and खत्रिकोणे, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected them, and they are kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the claim that the plate prints ख is refuted. An eye reading of p. 79 at about 3.3x native, with each glyph's width and shape measured against certain ख and स्व of the same fount, found स्व in all three places in this line. The mūla now reads स्वोच्चे, स्वत्रिकोणे and स्वभे, as the parallel verse Sastri quotes on p. 82 does. The same measurement put the glyph of खोच्चादि in verse 9 (p. 79, line 25) inside the स्व range; that verse's mūla was not changed by this ruling.]
4.9a reading here is contested

एतच्छुभाख्यमशुभं च पुनर्ग्रहेषु स्वोच्चादिवार्तिषु वदन्ति तदूनमेकम् । एवं गृहेषु शुभपापफलार्द्धमन्यवर्गेषु षड्सु नियतं मुनयः पुराणाः

etacchubhākhyamaśubhaṃ ca punargraheṣu svoccādivārtiṣu vadanti tadūnamekam | evaṃ gṛheṣu śubhapāpaphalārddhamanyavargeṣu ṣaḍsu niyataṃ munayaḥ purāṇāḥ

This ⟨scale of nine values⟩ is what is called the śubha, the good. And again, for planets standing in the states that begin with their own exaltation, ⟨the sages⟩ declare the aśubha, the evil, to be one less that — unity minus the good figure. So it stands in the gṛhas ⟨the rāśis, at full value⟩; but in the six other vargas the ancient sages have fixed only half of the good and of the evil phala.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वार्तिषु"; alternatives "वार्त्तिषु" — zoomed 3×; one त under the repha, no doubled त visible
  • About this edition: The six other vargas, with the rāśi making the saptavarga (group of seven), are horā, drekkāṇa, saptāṃśa, navāṃśa, dvādaśāṃśa and triṃśāṃśa; Sastri names them, and verse 11 confirms the list by calling the first of them bhadala, 'half a sign', which is the horā. The print sets षड्सु where षट्सु (six) is standard — a spelling only, and verse 11 spells it षट्सु; the metre (vasantatilakā, which the pāda scans as perfectly) and the sense are untouched. The parallel on p. 82 says both halves of this rule too: तदूनैकमसत् … अथ दलं षट्सु कार्यं तदैक्ये.

ये खेटभोच्चादिफले शुभाशुभे सरूपवर्गार्द्धविभाजिते तथा । विधाय सत्कोष्ठकसप्तकावलीं विधारणीये मुखकोष्ठके ततः

ye kheṭabhoccādiphale śubhāśubhe sarūpavargārddhavibhājite tathā | vidhāya satkoṣṭhakasaptakāvalīṃ vidhāraṇīye mukhakoṣṭhake tataḥ

The two phalas, good and evil, that a planet earns from its signs being its exaltation and the rest ⟨graded by verses 8–9: the rāśi at full value and each of the six vargas at half⟩ are ⟨totalled and⟩ divided by 'unity together with the halves of the vargas' — that is, by 1 + 6 × ½ = 4, which is also the largest that total can reach. Then rule a row of seven well-made cells (koṣṭhaka) and set the two figures down in the first, the mukha-koṣṭhaka ⟨one figure in each of the two rows, the row of good and the row of evil⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Two things had to be decided here. (1) The divisor. sarūpa-vargārdha I read as the number 'one plus the halves of the ⟨six⟩ vargas' = 1 + 6 × ½ = 4, which is exactly the ceiling of the total described in verse 9, so the division normalises the figure to the range 0 to 1. Sastri also divides by 4. (2) What is divided. The compound kheṭa-bha-ucca-ādi-phale could name the rāśi's figure alone, but the total over all seven vargas is right: the parallel Sastri quotes on p. 82 puts in these cells the AIKYA, the sum — पङ्क्त्योः सप्तसु कोष्ठयोः प्रथमयोरिष्टासदैक्ये — and its companion verse ends अथ दलं षट्सु कार्यं तदैक्ये, 'half is to be taken for the six in the totalling of them'. Sastri reads the total too. One grammatical wrinkle I translate past: विभाजिने does not form a neuter dual agreeing with फले (विभाजिते would); I render on the sense, and leave the mūla alone. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सरूपवर्गार्द्धविभाजिते; this sentence names विभाजिने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

तद्राशिसंज्ञं भदलादिकेषु वर्गेषु तस्यार्द्धमतो विधेयम् । शेषेषु कोष्ठेषु च षट्सु तज्ज्ञैः पंक्तिद्वयेऽपि द्युचरस्य तस्य

tadrāśisaṃjñaṃ bhadalādikeṣu vargeṣu tasyārddhamato vidheyam | śeṣeṣu koṣṭheṣu ca ṣaṭsu tajjñaiḥ paṃktidvaye'pi dyucarasya tasya

That ⟨first cell⟩ carries the name rāśi. For the vargas that begin with bha-dala — 'half a sign', which is the horā — half of that same figure is thereafter to be entered by those who know the work in the remaining six cells, and in both rows alike, for that same planet.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: tasya ('of that') means the figure just entered in the first cell, not some fresh figure of each varga: the parallel on p. 82 says it in words that cannot be taken otherwise — संस्थाप्य भदलादिषट्सु च तदर्धं, 'having set it down, ⟨enter⟩ half of it in the six beginning with bhadala'. Sastri reads the same. paṅkti-dvaya, 'the pair of rows', is the good row and the evil row, so the whole figure is a 2 × 7 table for each planet. What then distinguishes the six varga cells from one another is not this entry but the varga-lord's own factor, applied in verses 12–14.

राशीश्वरस्यापि फले तथैव स्वोच्चादिके सप्तगणप्रसूते । शुभाशुभाख्ये च तदीययुत्या सन्ताडयेदादिम कोष्ठकस्थे

rāśīśvarasyāpi phale tathaiva svoccādike saptagaṇaprasūte | śubhāśubhākhye ca tadīyayutyā santāḍayedādima koṣṭhakasthe

Of the lord of that rāśi as well, the two phalas — the ones called good and evil, arising from its own exaltation and the rest, and produced over the group of seven ⟨vargas⟩ (sapta-gaṇa) — are to be found in exactly the same way; and by their sum (tadīya-yuti) one should multiply the two figures standing in the first cell.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The subject changes here from the planet to the LORD of the sign the planet occupies, and his figure is his own saptavarga total, computed by verses 8–9 over his own seven vargas. Sastri reads it the same way. The multiplication is like with like: the lord's good total multiplies the planet's good entry, and his evil total the evil entry.

उभे फले पूर्वनिवेशिते ये कर्मक्रमः शेषगणेऽपि चैवम् । होरादिके खेश्वरजैः फलैस्तु पुनश्च हन्यात्सकलानि तानि

ubhe phale pūrvaniveśite ye karmakramaḥ śeṣagaṇe'pi caivam | horādike kheśvarajaiḥ phalaistu punaśca hanyātsakalāni tāni

It is the two phalas already entered ⟨in that first cell⟩ that are so multiplied; and the same order of work holds for the remaining group as well. For the horā and the rest, again multiply all those figures by the phalas produced by the lords of those ⟨varga signs⟩ (kha-īśvara).

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: kheśvara is the lord of the varga sign concerned — kha- used for the planet's own sign as in verses 8 and 12. So each of the seven cells gets its own multiplier: the horā cell is multiplied by the saptavarga phala of the lord of that horā, the drekkāṇa cell by the lord of that drekkāṇa, and so on. Sastri reads the same, 'multiplying the result of each varga with the corresponding saptavarga result of its lord'. This is what makes the six varga cells differ from one another, since verse 11 filled them all with the same number.
4.14a reading here is contested

वर्गेशतत्स्थग्रहवीर्यघातमूलेन राश्यादिकवर्गजानाम् । इत्थं बलानां भवति स्फुटत्वं शुभाशुभानां मुनिसम्मतं हि

vargeśatatsthagrahavīryaghātamūlena rāśyādikavargajānām | itthaṃ balānāṃ bhavati sphuṭatvaṃ śubhāśubhānāṃ munisammataṃ hi

⟨And multiply⟩ the figures born of the rāśi and the other vargas, each by the square root of the product of the vīrya — the strength ⟨made exact in verse 7⟩ — of the lord of that varga and of the planet standing in it ⟨taking the iṣṭa-weighted strengths for the row of good and the kaṣṭa-weighted ones for the row of evil⟩. In this way the good and the evil strengths reach their exactness, and this is what the sages approve.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्यंघात"; alternatives "वीर्यघात" — a dot stands above र्य at 3× magnification, so an anusvāra is transcribed; it may be an ink speck, since the sense wants वीर्यघात [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वर्गेशतत्स्थग्रहवीर्यघातमूलेन; this sentence names वीर्यंघात, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The print sets वीर्यंघात with an anusvāra over र्य; the reader marked it doubtful and said the sense wants वीर्यघात, and it does — vīrya-ghāta, 'the product of the strengths'. No number is affected. The vīrya meant is the sphuṭa bala of verse 7 (ṣaḍbala multiplied by iṣṭa or by kaṣṭa), and Sastri says so explicitly, 'the good or bad portions, as the case may be, of the entire strength'. The parallel Sastri quotes on p. 82 closes the same way, naming the varga-lord and the planet standing in it (वर्गै… तत्स्थखगौ) under a square root. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वर्गेशतत्स्थग्रहवीर्यघातमूलेन; this sentence names वीर्यंघात, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

Adhyāya 5 · आयुर्दायाध्यायः पञ्चमः

आयुर्ज्ञानादेव होराफलानां कर्तुं यस्मान्निर्णयः शक्यतेऽत्र । आयुर्दायः सम्प्रदायागतोयं सच्छिष्याणां प्रीतये कथ्यतेऽतः

āyurjñānādeva horāphalānāṃ kartuṃ yasmānnirṇayaḥ śakyate'tra | āyurdāyaḥ sampradāyāgatoyaṃ sacchiṣyāṇāṃ prītaye kathyate'taḥ

Since here the determination (nirṇaya) of the results a horoscope shows — the horā-phalas — can be made only out of a knowledge of the length of life (āyus), therefore this āyurdāya, the allotted life-span reckoned as it has come down through the teachers' tradition (sampradāya), is now set out for the delight ⟨and profit⟩ of good pupils.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ १) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
  • About this edition: The page prints श्रीतये, not प्रीतये. The plate reader compared the glyph at 4x with the श्री of श्रीपतिपद्धतिः in this page's own running head and found the two identical, so the print is kept; the sense wants प्रीतये, 'for the pleasure of', and it is read here as a compositor's slip. Sastri (1937) renders the same claim, 'with a view to benefit the community of earnest students'. The verse's number mark is printed open (॥ १) and never closed before the chapter's colophon. The ⟨ ⟩ in the rendering are words I supply, not words in the mūla. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रीतये; this sentence names श्रीतये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.2a reading here is contested

एकोनदीधितिसमादिह गच्छतो यद्रूपादिरूपचयसङ्कलितद्वयं स्यात् । चेष्टोच्चरश्मिजमथ स्वमरीचिभक्तं तज्ज्ञायतेत्र गुणकाद्वितयं तदाख्यम्

ekonadīdhitisamādiha gacchato yadrūpādirūpacayasaṅkalitadvayaṃ syāt | ceṣṭoccaraśmijamatha svamarīcibhaktaṃ tajjñāyatetra guṇakādvitayaṃ tadākhyam

Take, for a planet, the number of its ceṣṭā rays (ceṣṭā-raśmi) and the number of its ucca rays (ucca-raśmi) ⟨both found by adhyāya 4⟩. For each of the two separately, form the sum of a series (saṅkalita) whose first term is 1 and whose common increase is also 1 (rūpādi rūpa-caya), run out to a number of terms one less than that ray-number (eka-ūna-dīdhiti-sama) — that is, the sum 1 + 2 + … + (rays − 1), which is (rays − 1) × rays ÷ 2. Then divide each of the two sums by its own ray-number (sva-marīci-bhakta). The two quantities thus known here are the pair of multipliers (guṇaka-dvitaya), and each carries the name of the ray it came from ⟨the ceṣṭā-guṇaka and the ucca-guṇaka⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तज्ज्ञायतेत्र"; alternatives "तज्ज्ञायतेऽत्र" — no avagraha glyph is on the page; read at 3× zoom
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदाह्यम्"; alternatives "तदाह्वयम्" — the conjunct after तदा is small; ह्य is what the ink shows [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदाख्यम्; this sentence names तदाह्यम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(no daṇḍa or verse numeral at the line end)"; alternatives "तदाह्यम् ॥ २ ॥" — the half-verse closes with nothing printed after it, though the line has clear white space to the right margin; the following half-verse pair closes ॥ ३ ॥ and Sastri's heading reads 'Slokas 2 and 3' [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदाख्यम्; this sentence names तदाह्यम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 2.
  • About this edition: Two practical points the verse assumes and does not say. (1) The ray-numbers are not whole numbers: on Sastri's own worked page the Sun's ucca-raśmi is 6.742, so 'one less than the rays' is 5.742 and the series-sum must be got by the formula n(n+1)/2, not by adding up terms — 5.742 x 6.742 / 2 = 19.356282, and 19.356282 / 6.742 = 2.871, the Sun's ucca-guṇaka. (2) Reading: the page has तदाह्यम्, and the reader gives तदाह्वयम् as the alternative; आह्वय, 'name, appellation', is what the line needs, and it is rendered here as 'carries the name of'. The press also prints no daṇḍa and no numeral at the end of this half-verse, so its position 2 is ours, not the printer's; Sastri heads the pair 'Slokas 2 and 3'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदाख्यम्; this sentence names तदाह्यम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

ऊने भवेतां निजदीधितिभ्यः श्रेढीफले ते यदि रश्मियुक्ते । तदर्द्धिते स्वांशुभिरुद्धृते ते तद्घातमूलं गुणकः स्फुटः स्यात्

ūne bhavetāṃ nijadīdhitibhyaḥ śreḍhīphale te yadi raśmiyukte | tadarddhite svāṃśubhiruddhṛte te tadghātamūlaṃ guṇakaḥ sphuṭaḥ syāt

But if those two series-results (śreḍhī-phala) should come out less than their own ray-numbers, then find the two multipliers this way instead: add the rays back to each sum (raśmi-yukta), halve what results (tad-ardhita), and divide that by its own rays (sva-aṃśubhir uddhṛta). ⟨And in either case, by verse 2's rule or by this one⟩, the square root of the product of the two (tad-ghāta-mūla) is the exact multiplier, the sphuṭa-guṇaka.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The order of the three steps — add the rays, halve, then divide by the rays — is confirmed by Sastri's worked case, which is a claim and not his wording: Saturn's ucca rays 1.264, series-sum 0.166848 (less than the rays); 0.166848 + 1.264 = 1.430848; halved, 0.715424; divided by 1.264, 0.566, which is the figure his table prints for Saturn's ucca-guṇaka. The sphuṭa-guṇaka of the last quarter is general, not confined to this short case: Sastri gets the Sun's as the square root of 2.871 x 2.158 = 2.489.
5.4a reading here is contested

वर्गोत्तमे स्वभवने स्वनवांशके च स्वत्र्यंशके च गुणको द्वितयं निरुक्तम् । अध्यर्द्धरूपमधिमित्रगृहे सुहृद्गे सत्र्यंशकं समगृहे खलु रूपमेकम्

vargottame svabhavane svanavāṃśake ca svatryaṃśake ca guṇako dvitayaṃ niruktam | adhyarddharūpamadhimitragṛhe suhṛdge satryaṃśakaṃ samagṛhe khalu rūpamekam

When a planet stands in a vargottama, in its own house (its own rāśi), in its own navāṃśa, or in its own tryaṃśa — the drekkāṇa, the third part of a sign — the multiplier (guṇaka) is declared to be 2. In the house of an adhimitra (a great friend) it is one and a half, 1½ (adhyardha-rūpa); in a friend's (suhṛd) house one together with a third, 1⅓ (sa-tryaṃśaka); and in a neutral's (sama) house just 1 (rūpam ekam).

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वभवने स्वनवांशके"; alternatives "खभवने खनवांशके" — the two opening ligatures are the same glyph and could be read ख; read at 3× zoom. Sastri's own rendering three lines below says 'in its own house', which is स्व
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वत्र्यंशके"; alternatives "सत्र्यंशके" — read at 3× zoom; this glyph is wider than the one opening the fourth line of the verse, which is a plain स
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अध्यर्द्धरूपम्"; alternatives "अध्यर्द्धंरूपम्" — a small mark sits over the र्द्ध; it is read as the repha of र्द्ध itself, but it could hold an anusvāra as well
  • About this edition: Reading: the plate reader flags स्वभवने स्वनवांशके against a possible खभवने खनवांशके, the opening ligatures being the same glyph. स्व is right — Sastri renders 'in its own house', and ख (= 0) would make nonsense of a list of own-positions. तर्यंश here is the drekkāṇa, which verse 8 settles by giving the same list as वर्गोत्तम-आत्मीयनवांश-द्रेक्क. Sastri's values for this list and verse 5's — 2, 1½, 1⅓, 1, ⅔, ½ — agree with the mūla item for item.
5.5a reading here is contested

त्र्यंशोनितं रिपुगृहेऽध्यरिभे दलं स्यादेभ्यो गुणो भवति यः खलु कश्चिदेकः । वेदोद्धृतः स भगुणो गणकैः प्रदिष्टः होरादिवर्गगुणकस्तु भवेत्तदर्द्धम्

tryaṃśonitaṃ ripugṛhe'dhyaribhe dalaṃ syādebhyo guṇo bhavati yaḥ khalu kaścidekaḥ | vedoddhṛtaḥ sa bhaguṇo gaṇakaiḥ pradiṣṭaḥ horādivargaguṇakastu bhavettadarddham

In an enemy's (ripu) house ⟨the multiplier is⟩ one diminished by its third, that is ⅔ (tryaṃśonita); in the sign of a bitter enemy (adhyari) a half, ½ (dala). Whichever single one of these multipliers falls to a planet, divided by 4 (veda, the four Vedas), is what the computers have declared to be the bhaguṇa — the multiplier belonging to the rāśi; and the multiplier for the horā and the remaining vargas is half of that ⟨that is, the same quantity divided by 8⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स भगुणो"; alternatives "सभगुणो" — the space between स and भ is narrow
  • About this edition: वेद = 4. The division by 4 and the halving are both checkable in Sastri's table of factors: the Moon is in a friend's house, so its multiplier is 1⅓; 1⅓ / 4 = ⅓, which his table prints as the Moon's rāśiguṇaka, and ⅙ as its horā-and-other-varga guṇaka. Saturn, in a neutral's house, has 1 / 4 = ¼ and ⅛. Reading: the reader notes the space in स भगुणो is narrow and could be read सभगुणो; the sense (स = 'that one', भगुण = the rāśi multiplier) requires the division.
5.6a reading here is contested

एतेऽपि गुण्या गदिता महाद्भिरपेक्षयानन्तरताडकानाम् । नगांशका रुद्रमिता ह्यधीष्ठराशौ सुहृद्वेश्मनि मूर्छनांशाः

ete'pi guṇyā gaditā mahādbhirapekṣayānantaratāḍakānām | nagāṃśakā rudramitā hyadhīṣṭharāśau suhṛdveśmani mūrchanāṃśāḥ

These ⟨multipliers⟩ too the great ones have declared to be multiplicands (guṇya) with respect to the anantara-tāḍakas, the multipliers stated immediately after ⟨in verses 9 and 10⟩. In the sign of an adhimitra ⟨the rāśi-multiplier is⟩ eleven seventh-parts — naga (7) naming the part and rudra (11) their number, so 11/7; in a friend's (suhṛd) house, so many mūrchanā-parts, that is twenty-first parts, the mūrchanās being 21 ⟨their number, twenty-nine, is given by the first word of the next verse, so that the statement runs across the verse-break⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ताडकानाम्"; alternatives "तारकानाम्", "ताडनानाम्" — the ड of ताड has the hook of ड at 2×, but र and ड are close in this fount
  • About this edition: नग = 7 (the seven mountains), रुद्र = 11. मूर्छनांश I read as 'twenty-first part', मूर्छना standing for 21 — the 21 mūrchanās of the music theory (7 to each of the 3 grāmas). Two things support it and neither is Sastri's wording: he gives the mitra value as 29/21, and the numerator 29 is supplied by verse 7's opening नवाश्विनो. The five values of this table, put over 21, are 33, 29, 21, 13, 9 — a symmetric series falling by 4, 8, 8, 4, which only works if the mitra and śatru terms are twenty-firsts. Reading: the reader gives तारकानाम् and ताडनानाम् as alternatives to ताडकानाम्; ताडक, 'multiplier', is what verses 9-10 are, and Sastri's technical term for them is अनन्तरताडक.
5.7a reading here is contested

नवाश्विनो रूपमुदासराशौ रुद्रत्र्यंशका विश्वमिता द्विषद्भे । त्रयो नगांशा अधिशत्रुराशावेते भसंज्ञा निजराशिवर्जम्

navāśvino rūpamudāsarāśau rudratryaṃśakā viśvamitā dviṣadbhe | trayo nagāṃśā adhiśatrurāśāvete bhasaṃjñā nijarāśivarjam

⟨Twenty-nine of those twenty-first parts, in a friend's house⟩ — nava (9) and aśvin (2), the digits read from the right, 9-2 reversed, 29. In a neutral's (udāsa, that is sama) sign, 1. In an enemy's (dviṣat) sign, thirteen — viśva, the thirteen Viśve-devāḥ — ⟨of those same twenty-first parts, so 13/21⟩. In the sign of a bitter enemy (adhiśatru), three seventh-parts, 3/7. These are the ones called bha ⟨-guṇas⟩, the multipliers belonging to the rāśi — but they do not apply when the planet is in its own sign (nija-rāśi-varjam).

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रुद्रत्र्यंशका"; alternatives "रुद्रच्यंशका", "कुद्रत्र्यंशका" — the त्र् half-form is a short slanted stroke here and can read as च; the same shape stands in स्वत्र्यंश in the English lines above
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विषद्भे"; alternatives "द्विषड्ढे", "द्विषद्गेहे", "द्विषट्के" — stacked conjunct at 6×: upper member द or ड, lower member भ or ढ, with an े mātrā. Three glyph-units stand between the space and the daṇḍa
  • About this edition: The denominator-word for the enemy's value will not decode, and I am not smoothing it. The page reads रुद्रत्र्यंशका विश्वमिता द्विषद्भे. On the ordinary values रुद्र-त्र्यंशक is 'a third of an eleventh' = 1/33, which would make the enemy's figure 13/33 = 0.394 — smaller than the bitter enemy's 3/7 = 0.429, and the table would stop falling, which is absurd. The value has to be 13/21 = 0.619: that keeps the series monotone (33/21, 29/21, 21/21, 13/21, 9/21) and it is what Sastri prints. The metre says the same thing independently — the other three pādas of this verse are 11 syllables each (upajāti), and this one as printed is 12, so a syllable has been added or a word replaced. I have kept the value and not invented a word. नवाश्विनो = 29 by bhūtasaṃkhyā read right to left; विश्व = 13; नग = 7. निजराशिवर्जम् is the exception Sastri illustrates with Jupiter, who is in his own house and therefore takes no factor from verses 6-8.
5.8a reading here is contested

वर्गोत्तमात्मीयनवांशदृक्कस्थिते ग्रहे तु द्वितयं गुणश्चेत् । एतैरधीष्ठादिगुणैर्निहन्यादुद्दीरितं राशिगुणं पुनस्तम्

vargottamātmīyanavāṃśadṛkkasthite grahe tu dvitayaṃ guṇaścet | etairadhīṣṭhādiguṇairnihanyāduddīritaṃ rāśiguṇaṃ punastam

But when a planet stands in a vargottama, in its own navāṃśa or in its own drekkāṇa, so that the multiplier ⟨of verse 4⟩ is 2, then one should multiply once again, by these factors — the ones for the adhimitra and the rest just given — that rāśi-multiplier (rāśi-guṇa) which was already stated ⟨in verse 5, namely the 2 divided by 4⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रेक्कस्थिते"; alternatives "दृक्कस्थिते" — the mātrā over द read as े; a ृ subscript is possible [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वर्गोत्तमात्मीयनवांशदृक्कस्थिते; this sentence names द्रेक्कस्थिते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled for the alternative this note names. An eye reading of p. 94 (page_0094.png, store line index 21) at about 5.15x native found that the press sets दृ: the akṣara measures 49 px and 955 dark pixels, against a known दृ on p. 30 at 47 px and 943, and there is no ink above the head-line where an े would stand. The mūla now reads दृक्कस्थिते.]
  • About this edition: Sastri's worked chart shows the operation: the Sun and Mars each get ½ from verse 5 (their multiplier 2, for a svatryaṃśa, divided by 4) and are then multiplied again by 11/7 because each sits in an adhimitra's rāśi, giving ½ x 11/7. Jupiter, though in his own drekkāṇa, is also in his own house and so falls under verse 7's exception and takes no second factor. Reading: द्रेक्कस्थिते is the page; the reader allows दृक्कस्थिते. द्रेक्क (drekkāṇa) is what the sense and verse 4's त्र्यंश both require. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वर्गोत्तमात्मीयनवांशदृक्कस्थिते; this sentence names द्रेक्कस्थिते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the reading given here is refuted. The page sets दृक्कस्थिते, read by eye at about 5.15x native on page_0094.png; the vision read's द्रेक्कस्थिते was wrong, and the mūla now reads दृक्कस्थिते. दृक्क is a standard spelling of the decanate, so the sense this note gives does not change.]

गृहादिके वर्गगणे स्वकीये द्विको गुणस्त्र्यंशविवर्जितः सः । अधीष्टभे मित्रगृहे नवांशा विश्वे च रूपं च समस्य गेहे

gṛhādike vargagaṇe svakīye dviko guṇastryaṃśavivarjitaḥ saḥ | adhīṣṭabhe mitragṛhe navāṃśā viśve ca rūpaṃ ca samasya gehe

When the varga-group a planet occupies — the house (rāśi) and the rest — is its own, the multiplier ⟨now being stated, the anantara-tāḍaka⟩ is 2 (dvika). That same 2, less a third, is 5/3 in the sign of an adhimitra (adhīṣṭa). In a friend's house it is thirteen ninth-parts — navāṃśāḥ, ninths, viśve, thirteen — that is 13/9. And in a neutral's (sama) house it is 1 (rūpa).

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Two traps in this verse, both arithmetical. (1) त्र्यंशविवर्जित means 'less one third of a unit', not 'less its own third': 2 − ⅓ = 5/3, which is what Sastri prints, whereas 2 − ⅔ would give 4/3 and break the run 2, 5/3, 13/9, 1, 5/9, ⅓. (2) नवांश here is the fraction 'a ninth part', not the navāṃśa varga — विश्वे नवांशाः is 'thirteen ninths', 13/9. विश्व = 13.

नवांशकाः पञ्च विरोधिराशौ गुणांशकः स्यादधिवैरिणो भे । पूर्वं भपूर्वा गुणका य उक्ता वर्गेषु सप्तस्विह गुण्यसंज्ञाः

navāṃśakāḥ pañca virodhirāśau guṇāṃśakaḥ syādadhivairiṇo bhe | pūrvaṃ bhapūrvā guṇakā ya uktā vargeṣu saptasviha guṇyasaṃjñāḥ

Five ninth-parts, 5/9, in an adversary's (virodhin, that is śatru) sign; and a guṇa-part — guṇa being 3, so one third, 1/3 — in the sign of a bitter enemy (adhivairin). And those multipliers stated earlier, the ones beginning with the bha, the rāśi ⟨verses 4 to 8⟩, throughout the seven vargas, are here called the multiplicands (guṇya).

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: गुणांशक = 'a third part', गुण standing for 3 (the three guṇas); Sastri prints 1/3 for the adhiśatru. The last half-verse is the hinge of the whole calculation: the seven varga-multipliers of verses 4-8 stop being multipliers and become the things multiplied, the anantara-tāḍakas of verses 9-10 being the multipliers.
5.11a reading here is contested

गुण्या गुणैः स्वैरधिकारलब्धैरुक्तैर्गुणः स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः । स्मृतो बुधैराश्रयसंज्ञितो यस्तस्य स्फुटस्यापि वधो भवेद्यः

guṇyā guṇaiḥ svairadhikāralabdhairuktairguṇaḥ syādadhimiśritaistaiḥ | smṛto budhairāśrayasaṃjñito yastasya sphuṭasyāpi vadho bhavedyaḥ

The multiplicands (guṇya), each multiplied by its own multiplier as it falls out for that case (adhikāra-labdha) — the multipliers just stated ⟨in verses 9 and 10⟩ — and then all of them thrown together and added up (adhimiśrita), yield the multiplier which the wise have named the āśraya-guṇaka. And whatever product (vadha) arises of that ⟨āśraya-guṇaka⟩ and of the sphuṭa ⟨-guṇaka of verse 3⟩ —

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः"; alternatives "स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः", "स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्ततः" — the final cluster before the daṇḍa is स्त with a visarga; a second ऐ mātrā would be lost in the broken headline [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः; this sentence names स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The sentence does not end with the verse: it runs into verse 12's first half, which supplies the square root. Sastri prints the whole run as 'Slokas 9-11½'. There are seven products, one for each varga, and they are summed: his worked Sun is 55/42 + 5/12 + ½ + ½ + 13/36 + 5/12 + ¼ = 3 95/126 = 3.754, the Sun's āśraya-guṇaka. Reading: the cluster before the daṇḍa in स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः is broken at the headline and the reader allows ...तैः and ...ततः; the sense 'mixed together, summed' is the same on every alternative, and Sastri reads it as the sum-total. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः; this sentence names स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.12a reading here is contested

तद्वर्गमूलं खलु कर्मयोग्य आयुर्विधाने गुणकार उक्तः । ग्रहस्य लिप्ताः खखसिद्धभक्ताः प्रोक्ताः कलाः शेषमिहायुषोऽत्र १२

tadvargamūlaṃ khalu karmayogya āyurvidhāne guṇakāra uktaḥ | grahasya liptāḥ khakhasiddhabhaktāḥ proktāḥ kalāḥ śeṣamihāyuṣo'tra 12

— the square root of that product (tad-varga-mūla) is declared to be the guṇakāra fit for the work (karma-yogya), the one used in the computation of the length of life. ⟨Then the next step:⟩ the minutes of a planet — its whole longitude reduced to minutes of arc — are to be divided by 2400 (kha-kha-siddha: kha 0, kha 0, siddha 24; the digits read from the right, 0-0-24, give 2400). The remainder of that division is what is declared here to be the kalās of life, the āyuṣ-kalās.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्मयोग्य"; alternatives "कर्मयोग्यं" — no anusvāra dot stands over ग्य at 2.2×
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "१२" — zoomed at 3×: the numeral stands alone with NO daṇḍas on either side, unlike ॥ १८ ॥ and ॥१३॥ elsewhere on this page. The avagraha in आयुषोऽत्र is a real ऽ glyph on the page.
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 12.
  • About this edition: खखसिद्ध = 2400, and the figure is confirmed twice over, neither time by Sastri's wording. He states the divisor as 2400 in his rendering; and Keśava's parallel verse, quoted on the same page, divides the DEGREES by खयुग = 40 — and 2400 minutes is exactly 40 degrees. Sastri's own worked Sun then comes out at 1063.5 āyuṣ-kalās. The square-root half of this verse completes the sentence begun in verse 11, which is why Sastri heads one block 'Slokas 9-11½' and the next 'Slokas 11½ and 12'; the block the script attached to verse 11 in fact carries this verse's first half, and the block it attached to 11 and 12 carries only this verse's second half. The press prints the numeral १२ bare, with no daṇḍas on either side, unlike ॥१३॥ on the same page.

लग्नं ग्रहोनं यदि षड्गृहेभ्यो हीनं तदानीं हरसंभवः स्यात् । नैवाधिके तत्र खगोनलग्ने लिप्तीकृते राशिकलाविभक्ते

lagnaṃ grahonaṃ yadi ṣaḍgṛhebhyo hīnaṃ tadānīṃ harasaṃbhavaḥ syāt | naivādhike tatra khagonalagne liptīkṛte rāśikalāvibhakte

Subtract the planet from the lagna. If ⟨what remains⟩ is less than six signs (ṣaḍ-gṛha), then and only then is a divisor (hara) possible; if it is more, there is no divisor at all. Where one is possible, reduce that lagna-minus-planet to minutes and divide it by the minutes contained in a rāśi ⟨1800⟩ —

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: राशिकला = 1800, one sign of 30 degrees in minutes. Sastri divides by 1800 in every worked case on his notes page: the Moon's lagna-minus-planet of 3 signs 0° 2' 7" = 5402.116 minutes, and 5402.116 / 1800 = 3.001, his divisor for the Moon. The six-sign test has a plain meaning he spells out: lagna minus planet is less than six signs only when the planet lies between the 7th and the 12th house from the lagna, which is the span Varāhamihira's chakra-pātārdha-hāni covers.
5.14a reading here is contested

आयुः कलानां स हरः स्फुटः स्याद्रूपाघदोनः सहरस्तदानीम् । रूपाद्विशुद्धो गुणकस्तु तासामेवं हि पापद्युचरोनलग्ने

āyuḥ kalānāṃ sa haraḥ sphuṭaḥ syādrūpāghadonaḥ saharastadānīm | rūpādviśuddho guṇakastu tāsāmevaṃ hi pāpadyucaronalagne

— and that quotient is the exact divisor (sphuṭa hara) of the āyuṣ-kalās. And if that divisor (sa haraḥ) should come out less (ūna) than a rūpa, that is less than unity ⟨one akṣara here, between पा and दो, is still unsettled; verse 15 confirms the sense 'less than a rūpa'⟩, then (tadānīm), taken away from a rūpa, it becomes not a divisor of those kalās but their multiplier (guṇaka). So the work goes when it is a malefic planet (pāpa-dyucara) that has been subtracted from the lagna.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्रूपाघदोनः"; alternatives "स्याद्रूपार्धदोनः", "स्याद्रूपपादोनः", "स्याद्रूपाग्रदोनः" — zoomed at 3×: the akṣara between पा and दो is heavily inked; it shows two humps and a full vertical, so घ is what is on the page, but the ink spread leaves ध and a ligature open [2026-09-23: an eye reading of p. 101 at about 2.9x native rules out अर्ध here. The whole word स्याद्रूपाघदोनः carries one mark above the head-line, the ो of दो, and a र्ध would put a repha there. That reading did not open the crop that would separate घ from ध, so this note's question between them stands.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहस्तदानाम्"; alternatives "सहस्रदानाम्", "स हस्तदानाम्" — the स्त conjunct is clogged; word division in this compound is not certain from the ink [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सहरस्तदानीम्; this sentence names सहस्तदानाम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled. An eye reading of p. 101 (page_0101.png, store line index 17) at about 2.9x native found that the press sets सहरस्तदानीम् as one word. स, ह, र and स्त stand as four glyphs: the र measures 39 px against this page's own known र at 34 px, and the स्त 70 px against its known स्त at 72 px. The न carries the ī hook that the page's own तदानीं on line 15 carries. The mūla now reads सहरस्तदानीम्.]
  • About this edition: The second quarter will not construe as printed and I have not smoothed it. The page reads स्याद्रूपाघदोनः सहस्तदानाम्; the reader flags the akṣara between पा and दो as heavily inked and offers अर्ध, पाद and अग्र as alternatives, and flags the स्त of सहस्तदानाम् as clogged. The metre confirms something is wrong there and not elsewhere: this verse's other three pādas run 11 syllables each (upajāti), and the line holding pādas 1 and 2 runs 21 where it should run 22, so one syllable is missing inside the doubtful stretch. What the quarter has to SAY is fixed by the two quarters on either side of it and by verse 15: the quotient is the divisor; if it falls short of unity, one takes it from unity and multiplies instead. Sastri's copy said the same — 'when this quotient is less than 1, subtract it from a Rūpa and make it a multiplier' — and his worked Mars case does it: divisor 0.5548, multiplier 1 − 0.5548 = 0.445, and 2273.15 x 0.445 = 1011.551. That sense is given in ⟨ ⟩; the words behind it are not recoverable from this witness. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सहरस्तदानीम्; this sentence names सहस्तदानाम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: two claims here are refuted by an eye reading of p. 101 at about 2.9x native. The page sets सहरस्तदानीम्, not सहस्तदानाम्, and the mūla now reads it. So the words are recoverable from this witness: read स हरः तदानीम्, the second pāda is an exact indravajrā at eleven, and the line runs 22. The one akṣara between पा and दो is still open; that reading rules out अर्ध and does not decide between घ and ध. The English and Hindi were rewritten on 2026-09-23 to render the restored words, with a bracket left on that one akṣara.]
5.15a reading here is contested

शुभोनलग्ने तु हरो द्विनिघ्न आयुः कलाभ्यो हरलब्धलिप्ताः । विशोधनीया यदि रूपकोनो हरस्तदर्द्धोनितरूपगुण्याः

śubhonalagne tu haro dvinighna āyuḥ kalābhyo haralabdhaliptāḥ | viśodhanīyā yadi rūpakono harastadarddhonitarūpaguṇyāḥ

But when it is a benefic (śubha) that has been subtracted from the lagna, the divisor is doubled (dvi-nighna); then the minutes got by dividing the āyuṣ-kalās with that doubled divisor are to be subtracted from those same āyuṣ-kalās. And if the divisor is less than a rūpa (rūpaka-ūna), then instead the kalās are to be multiplied by a rūpa diminished by half of that divisor (tad-ardha-ūnita-rūpa).

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हरलब्धलिप्ताः"; alternatives "हरलङ्धलिप्ताः" — the ब्ध conjunct is broken at its left, so it can be misread as ङ्ध
  • About this edition: Both halves are checkable in Sastri's worked cases, and the claims agree with this reading. Benefic with a divisor above 1 — the Moon: divisor 3.001, doubled to 6.002, and the Moon's 269.65 kalās less a sixth of themselves give 224.618. Benefic with a divisor below 1 — Venus: divisor 0.016, half of it 0.008, multiplier 1 − 0.008 = 0.992, and 842.93 x 0.992 = 836.186. Note the asymmetry the verse is careful about: for a malefic (verse 14) the WHOLE small divisor is taken from unity, for a benefic only HALF of it. Reading: the ब्ध of हरलब्ध is broken at its left and the reader allows हरलङ्ध; लब्ध, 'obtained by dividing', is what the arithmetic needs.
5.16a reading here is contested

एवं कार्या चक्रपातार्द्धहानिश्चायुर्दाये ह्यंशजे पिण्डजेऽपि । नैसर्गाख्यो जीवशर्मोदिते च हारं कृत्वा त्वेककोनं गुणं च

evaṃ kāryā cakrapātārddhahāniścāyurdāye hyaṃśaje piṇḍaje'pi | naisargākhyo jīvaśarmodite ca hāraṃ kṛtvā tvekakonaṃ guṇaṃ ca

In this way the cakrapātārdhahāni ⟨the 'half-circle' deduction set out in the preceding verses⟩ is to be carried out in the āyurdāya called aṃśaja ⟨the life-span reckoned from the degrees⟩, and in the piṇḍaja one as well, and in the one named naisarga ⟨the natural allotment⟩, and in the one stated by Jīvaśarman — having formed the hāra ⟨the fractional divisor⟩, ⟨form⟩ also the guṇa ⟨the multiplier⟩, which falls short of a single unit ⟨by that hāra: guṇa = 1 − hāra⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्यंशजे"; alternatives "हंशजे" — zoomed 3× at page_0104 x1600-1950,y555-700: the य subjoined under ह is present, with the anusvāra dot above
  • About this edition: The page prints चक्रपातार्द्धहानि here and चक्रार्द्धहानौ at verse 24. They are one process, not two: Sastri's own notes at plate page_0108 use both names for the same operation in consecutive sentences. On the hāra/guṇa pair his worked figures settle the arithmetic — a divisor of ·554 for Mars yields a multiplier of ·445 (page_0108), and a divisor of ·446 yields a multiplier of ·554 (page_0111) — so the guṇa is one minus the hāra, not the hāra re-used.

आयुर्लिप्ताः स्वगुणगुणिता व्योमशून्याश्विभक्ताः ह्यब्दा मासा दिवसघटिकाः स्युर्विनाड्यः क्रमेण । एवं सर्वद्युचरजनितं ह्यायुरानीय लग्नादायुः साध्यं कथितविधिना किन्तु लग्ने विशेषः

āyurliptāḥ svaguṇaguṇitā vyomaśūnyāśvibhaktāḥ hyabdā māsā divasaghaṭikāḥ syurvināḍyaḥ krameṇa | evaṃ sarvadyucarajanitaṃ hyāyurānīya lagnādāyuḥ sādhyaṃ kathitavidhinā kintu lagne viśeṣaḥ

The āyurliptās ⟨the life-minutes, each planet's āyuṣkalās after the above reduction⟩, multiplied by their own guṇa ⟨the karmayogya-guṇaka assigned to that planet⟩ and divided by 200 ⟨vyoma-śūnya-aśvi: vyoma 0, śūnya 0, aśvin 2, the digits read right to left⟩, become years, months, days, ghaṭikās and vināḍīs in that order. Having in this way brought out the āyus produced by every planet, the āyus is to be worked out from the lagna also by the rule already stated — but in the case of the lagna there is a special point ⟨stated in the next verse⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: स्वगुण is the karmayogya-guṇaka of the earlier chapter, not a fresh quantity; Sastri identifies it as the multiplier of his sloka 12. The divisor 200 is confirmed independently by the Keśavapaddhati verse quoted on the same plate (page_0104), which writes it खाभ्रनेत्र — kha 0, abhra 0, netra 2 — a different number-word for the same 200.
5.18a reading here is contested

लग्ने तु वीर्याभ्यधिके भतुल्यैर्वर्षैर्युतं तस्य विधेयमायुः । भागादिकादप्यनुपातलब्धमासादिना संयुतमत्र कार्यम्

lagne tu vīryābhyadhike bhatulyairvarṣairyutaṃ tasya vidheyamāyuḥ | bhāgādikādapyanupātalabdhamāsādinā saṃyutamatra kāryam

But when the lagna is abundant in strength, the āyus derived from it is to be made complete by adding years equal to the bhas ⟨one year for each whole rāśi elapsed in the lagna's longitude⟩; and from the degrees and the rest as well, the months and so on obtained by anupāta ⟨simple proportion, thirty degrees to the year⟩ are to be joined on here.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भतुल्यैर्वर्षैर्युतं" — zoomed 3× at page_0105 x1140-1720,y540-700: भ तु ल्यै र्व र्षै र्यु तं, the two rephas and both ै mātrās are present though the type is worn
  • About this edition: The mūla says only वीर्याभ्यधिके, 'when it is in excess of strength'. Sastri supplies a threshold the Sanskrit does not state — that this means a strength above 6 rūpas — and his example lagna stands at 9·133 rūpas (plate page_0105). His worked case does fix the proportion, and I have followed it: a lagna of 0s 14°31'46" adds nothing for the signs and ·4843 of a year for the degrees, i.e. 30° = 1 year.

नवेन्दवो बाणयमाः शरक्ष्मा दिवाकराः पञ्चभुवः कुपक्षाः । नखाश्च भास्वत्प्रमुखग्रहाणां पिण्डाश्रयाब्दा निजतुङ्गगानाम्

navendavo bāṇayamāḥ śarakṣmā divākarāḥ pañcabhuvaḥ kupakṣāḥ | nakhāśca bhāsvatpramukhagrahāṇāṃ piṇḍāśrayābdā nijatuṅgagānām

Nineteen ⟨nava-indu: nava 9, indu 1, read right to left⟩, twenty-five ⟨bāṇa 5, yama 2⟩, fifteen ⟨śara 5, kṣmā 1⟩, twelve ⟨divākara, the twelve suns⟩, fifteen ⟨pañca 5, bhū 1⟩, twenty-one ⟨ku 1, pakṣa 2⟩ and twenty ⟨nakha, the twenty nails⟩ — these are the years resting on the piṇḍa ⟨the piṇḍāyurdāya allotment⟩ for the planets beginning with the Sun, each standing in its own exaltation: Sun 19, Moon 25, Mars 15, Mercury 12, Jupiter 15, Venus 21, Saturn 20.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints नखाश्व. It is नखाश्च = nakha (20, the twenty nails) + ca: a seventh number is wanted for Saturn, and the metre (upendravajrā) is unchanged because va and ca are both light here. Three witnesses on the same plate give Saturn 20 — Sastri's English, the Sārāvalī verse विंशती रविपुत्रस्य, and the Bṛhajjātaka verse whose seven number-words are each 'together with ten' (9+10, 15+10, 5+10, 2+10, 5+10, 11+10, 10+10 = 19, 25, 15, 12, 15, 21, 20). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नखाश्च; this sentence names नखाश्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

निजोच्चशुद्धः खचरो विशोध्यो भमण्डलात्षड्भवनोनकश्चेत् । यथास्थितः षड्भवनाधिकश्चेत् कलीकृतः संगुणितो निजाब्दैः

nijoccaśuddhaḥ khacaro viśodhyo bhamaṇḍalātṣaḍbhavanonakaścet | yathāsthitaḥ ṣaḍbhavanādhikaścet kalīkṛtaḥ saṃguṇito nijābdaiḥ

The planet diminished by its own exaltation ⟨the planet's longitude minus the longitude of its exaltation point⟩ — if the remainder falls short of six bhavanas ⟨six rāśis⟩, it is to be subtracted from the bhamaṇḍala ⟨the whole circle of twelve signs⟩; if it exceeds six bhavanas, it is kept as it stands. That arc is then turned into kalās ⟨minutes of arc⟩ and multiplied by the planet's own years ⟨the figures of verse 19⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Sastri states the subtraction the other way about — exaltation minus planet — with the condition reversed to match, and the two routes reach the same arc. His Sun stands at 0s 17°43'30" with exaltation 0s 10°: exaltation minus planet gives 11s 22°16'30", kept as it is; planet minus exaltation gives 7°43'30", which is under six signs and so is taken from twelve signs, giving the same 11s 22°16'30" = 21136·5 kalās (plate page_0107). No disagreement, only a different order of the same two terms. The rule is built so that a planet at exaltation keeps its full years and one at debilitation keeps half.

तत्र खाभ्ररसचन्द्रलोचनैरुद्धृते सति यदाप्यते फलम् । वर्षमासदिननाडिकादिकं तद्धि पिण्डभवमायुरुच्यते

tatra khābhrarasacandralocanairuddhṛte sati yadāpyate phalam | varṣamāsadinanāḍikādikaṃ taddhi piṇḍabhavamāyurucyate

When that ⟨product⟩ is divided by 21600 ⟨kha-abhra-rasa-candra-locana: kha 0, abhra 0, rasa 6, candra 1, locana 2, read right to left — the number of minutes in the whole circle⟩, the result obtained, in years, months, days, nāḍikās and the rest, is called the āyus born of the piṇḍa ⟨that planet's piṇḍāyurdāya⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Sastri divides by 21,600 and works the Sun at 21136·5 ÷ 21600 × 19 = 18·5923 years (plate page_0107), which confirms both the divisor and the multiplier of verse 19.
5.22a reading here is contested

त्र्यंशकं हरति शत्रुभे ग्रहः स्वायुषोऽत्र न तु वक्रचारगः । सूर्यलुप्तकिरणोर्द्धहारकः प्रोज्झ्य भार्गवदिनेशनन्दनौ

tryaṃśakaṃ harati śatrubhe grahaḥ svāyuṣo'tra na tu vakracāragaḥ | sūryaluptakiraṇorddhahārakaḥ projjhya bhārgavadineśanandanau

A planet standing in the sign of an enemy forfeits a third part of its own āyus here — but not one that is moving in retrogression ⟨vakra⟩. A planet whose rays the Sun has swallowed ⟨astaṅgata, combust⟩ forfeits half, excepting Bhārgava ⟨Venus⟩ and the son of the lord of day ⟨Saturn⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्र्यंशकं"; alternatives "ड्यंशकं" — the त्र् ligature is printed with a hooked head that at first sight reads as ड; the sense (a third part) and Śrīdhara's त्र्यंशं quoted below on this page support त्र्य
  • About this edition: The reader marked the त्र्य ligature as possibly ड्य, because this press cuts त्र् with a hooked head. It is त्र्यंशकं, 'a third part': Śrīdhara's verse quoted on the same plate reads वक्रचारं विना त्र्यंशं शत्रुराशौ हरेद्ग्रहः, and Sastri reads a third too. Sastri also records that some take वक्रचारगः as naming Mars and that most reject that; I read it as the plain participle, 'one going in retrograde motion'.
5.23a reading here is contested

खेचरो जायते योऽर्द्धत्र्यंशयोरपहारकः । आयुषः स हरेदर्द्धं त्र्यंशं शुक्रशनैश्चरौ

khecaro jāyate yo'rddhatryaṃśayorapahārakaḥ | āyuṣaḥ sa haredarddhaṃ tryaṃśaṃ śukraśanaiścarau

A planet that becomes the forfeiter of both the half and the third ⟨that is, combust and at the same time in an enemy's sign⟩ forfeits half of its āyus ⟨only the larger of the two deductions⟩; but Śukra and Śanaiścara ⟨Venus and Saturn⟩ forfeit the third.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योऽर्द्ध"; alternatives "योर्द्ध" — a small glyph stands between यो and र्द्ध; at 4× it reads as an avagraha but it touches the र्द्ध ligature and cannot be separated with certainty
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्र्यंश"; alternatives "ड्यंश" — same hooked त्र् ligature this press uses throughout
  • About this edition: Two reader marks, neither of which changes the sense or the metre — the anuṣṭubh pāda counts eight syllables either way. (1) The glyph between यो and र्द्ध reads as an avagraha at 4×, giving योऽर्द्ध from यः + अर्द्ध. (2) The same hooked त्र्य ligature as at verse 22. Venus and Saturn come out at a third and not a half because verse 22 has already exempted exactly those two from the combustion-halving; Sastri reads the verse the same way.

चक्रार्द्धहानौ बहुषु द्वयोर्वा खेचारिणोरेकगृहस्थयोस्तु । सत्याभिधानस्य मतेन सत्यं स्वांशं हरत्येव वलोत्कटो यः

cakrārddhahānau bahuṣu dvayorvā khecāriṇorekagṛhasthayostu | satyābhidhānasya matena satyaṃ svāṃśaṃ haratyeva valotkaṭo yaḥ

In the cakrārdhahāni, when many planets, or two, stand in one and the same house — then, by the opinion of the teacher named Satya ⟨Satyācārya⟩, it is truly the one that is overwhelming in strength ⟨balotkaṭa⟩ that forfeits its own portion, ⟨and that one deduction serves for all of them⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints वलोत्कटो for बलोत्कटो; this face does not separate व from ब. Sastri's English does not name the authority, but his own note on the same plate (page_0110) says the view is Satyācārya's, which is what सत्याभिधानस्य states in the verse itself. He applies the rule in his example: Mercury, sharing a house with the stronger Mars, escapes the deduction (plate page_0108).

हरयुतिर्विहृता ग्रहसंख्यया स हि हरोऽपचयश्च ततः फलम् । अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो निगदतीति मुनिः किल देवलः

harayutirvihṛtā grahasaṃkhyayā sa hi haro'pacayaśca tataḥ phalam | adhikavīryavato'mbaracāriṇo nigadatīti muniḥ kila devalaḥ

The sum of the hāras ⟨the divisors of the planets that stand together in one rāśi⟩, divided by the number of those planets — that indeed is the ⟨true⟩ hāra; and from it comes the apacaya ⟨the deduction⟩, and from that the result, for the sky-goer that has the greater strength. So, it is said, the sage Devala declares.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints अधिकबवीर्यवतो. The ब is an intrusion. The pāda is drutavilambita and अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो scans exactly (˘˘˘ˉ˘˘ˉ˘˘ˉ˘ˉ), while the printed form has one syllable too many and puts a light syllable in the fourth place, where the metre requires a heavy one. The sense — 'of the planet with the greater strength' — is unaffected, and Sastri reads it so. His worked case: Mars and Mercury together in the twelfth bhāva, divisors ·554 and ·338, their mean ·446, giving the multiplier ·554 (plate page_0111). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो; this sentence names अधिकबवीर्यवतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the first sentence is refuted. An eye reading of p. 111 (page_0111.png, store line index 5) at about 3.73x native found that the press sets अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो, with no ब between क and वी. The ब came from the vision read of 2026-09-12 and stands in no printing we hold; a machine read of the Telugu 1926 store (page_0064 line 56) also gives the word without it. The mūla now reads अधिकवीर्यवतो. The scansion and Sastri's worked case in this note stand.]
5.26a reading here is contested

लिप्तीभूतैर्लग्नभागैर्निहन्यादायुर्दायं खेचराणां पृथक्स्थम् । व्योमाकाशर्त्विन्दुपक्षैर्भजेत् तत् स्वायुर्दायाच्छोध्यमब्दादिलब्धम् ॥

liptībhūtairlagnabhāgairnihanyādāyurdāyaṃ khecarāṇāṃ pṛthakstham | vyomākāśartvindupakṣairbhajet tat svāyurdāyācchodhyamabdādilabdham ||

With the lagna's bhāgas turned into liptās ⟨its degrees and their parts reduced to minutes, the whole signs being left aside⟩ one should multiply the āyurdāya of the planets, each taken separately. That is to be divided by 21600 ⟨vyoma-ākāśa-ṛtu-indu-pakṣa: vyoma 0, ākāśa 0, ṛtu 6, indu 1, pakṣa 2, read right to left⟩, and the years and the rest so obtained are to be subtracted from each planet's own āyurdāya.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्योमा"; alternatives "ब्योमा" — read at 4×: व and ब are not separable in this face
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 26.
  • About this edition: The reader could not separate व from ब in व्योमा, but the number-word is settled either way: vyoma and ākāśa are both 0, so the five words give 0,0,6,1,2 = 21600, the minutes in the circle, which is also the divisor Sastri uses. The page prints no verse number after this verse — the number ॥२७॥ stands after the following one — so it is published at position 26, and Sastri translates 26 and 27 as one block. His worked figure for it: lagna 871·76 minutes ÷ 21600 (plate page_0112).
5.27a reading here is contested

एतत्क्रूरे लग्नगे सौम्यदृष्टे तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं विशोध्यम् । एतद्दायेनांशसंज्ञे विधेयं पिण्डायुर्वत्कर्म नैसर्गिकेऽपि

etatkrūre lagnage saumyadṛṣṭe tasmāddāyāttatphalārddhaṃ viśodhyam | etaddāyenāṃśasaṃjñe vidheyaṃ piṇḍāyurvatkarma naisargike'pi

This ⟨deduction⟩ holds when a krūra ⟨a malefic⟩ occupies the lagna; and if that malefic is aspected by a benefic, half of that result is to be subtracted from the dāya. It is not to be done in the dāya named aṃśa ⟨the aṃśāyurdāya⟩; and in the naisargika too the operation is as it is for the piṇḍāyus.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्माद्दायाच्चतफलार्द्धं"; alternatives "तस्माद्दायाच्चत्फलार्द्धं", "तस्माद्दायाच्च तत्फलार्द्धं" — read at 4×: one त stands between च्च and फ, and its foot carries a stroke that may be a virāma; the sense wants तत्फल [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं; this sentence names तस्माद्दायाच्चतफलार्द्धं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: superseded. An eye reading of p. 111 (page_0111.png, store line index 20) at about 6.19x native found that the form between दाया and फ is a त-form and not a च; the real च of दायाच्छो, one line above, was compared at 4.75x. The mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं. The 4× in this note is the vision reader's own figure from the ingest of 2026-09-12; chapter 5 records the Sastri 1937 as read by vision.]
  • About this edition: Two decisions here. (1) The reader could not tell whether the single त between च्च and फ carries a virāma. Sense and metre want तत्फल, 'that result' — the quantity just computed in verse 26 — and Sastri reads it so. (2) एतद्दायेनांशसंज्ञे is graphically identical whether it is split एतद् दायेन अंशसंज्ञे ('this is to be done with that dāya in the aṃśa-named reckoning') or एतद् दाये न अंशसंज्ञे ('this is not to be done in the dāya named aṃśa'), because न + अंश fuses to नांश. I take the negative. Sastri's note at plate page_0112 says the reduction does not apply to the aṃśāyurdāya, and his two tables prove he computed that way: his aṃśāyurdāya table (page_0105) carries no such reduction, while his piṇḍāyurdāya table (page_0112) is reduced by 871·76 ÷ 21600 × ½ = ·02017 of each planet's dāya. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं; this sentence names च्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: decision (1) is settled on the plate. An eye reading of p. 111 at about 6.19x native found a त-form, not च, between दाया and फ, and the mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं, 'half of that result'. A machine read of the Telugu 1926 store (page_0065 line 24) carries तत्फल independently, in तस्मिन् दाये तत्फलार्थं. Decision (2) is untouched by that reading.]

नखाः शशी द्वौ नवकं धृतिश्च कृतिः खबाणा रविपूर्वकाणाम् । इत्थं निरुक्ता क्रमशो ग्रहाणां नैसर्गिके ह्यायुषि वर्षसंख्या

nakhāḥ śaśī dvau navakaṃ dhṛtiśca kṛtiḥ khabāṇā ravipūrvakāṇām | itthaṃ niruktā kramaśo grahāṇāṃ naisargike hyāyuṣi varṣasaṃkhyā

Twenty ⟨nakha, the nails⟩, one ⟨śaśin, the moon⟩, two, nine, eighteen ⟨dhṛti⟩, twenty ⟨kṛti⟩ and fifty ⟨kha 0, bāṇa 5, read right to left⟩ — thus, in order, is stated the number of years of the planets beginning with the Sun in the naisargika āyus ⟨the natural allotment: Sun 20, Moon 1, Mars 2, Mercury 9, Jupiter 18, Venus 20, Saturn 50⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The Sārāvalī verse quoted on the same plate — विंशतिरेकं द्वितयं नव धृतिरिह विंशतिश्च पञ्चाशत् — gives the same seven numbers in the same order, which settles dhṛti = 18 and kṛti = 20, and Sastri reads the same seven. The page prints ह्यायुपि; the word is ह्यायुषि, the locative of आयुस्, since आयुपि is not a word and the metre (indravajrā) is the same either way. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ह्यायुषि; this sentence names ह्यायुपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

अंशोद्भवं लग्नबलात्प्रसाध्यमायुश्च पिण्डोद्भवमर्कवीर्यात् । नैसर्गिकं चन्द्रबलाधिकत्वे ब्रूमस्त्रयाणामथ वीर्यसाम्ये

aṃśodbhavaṃ lagnabalātprasādhyamāyuśca piṇḍodbhavamarkavīryāt | naisargikaṃ candrabalādhikatve brūmastrayāṇāmatha vīryasāmye

The āyus arising from the aṃśa ⟨the aṃśāyurdāya⟩ is to be established from the lagna's strength ⟨when the lagna is the strongest of the three⟩, the āyus arising from the piṇḍa from the Sun's strength, and the naisargika when the Moon's strength is the greater. Now we shall state ⟨what is to be done⟩ when the strength of the three is equal.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Sastri's English block for this verse stops at the three choices and leaves the last quarter — ब्रूमस्त्रयाणामथ वीर्यसाम्ये, the announcement of the equal-strength case — to open his next block. The Sārāvalī verse quoted on the same plate, अंशोद्भवं विलग्नात्पैण्डं भानोर्निसर्गजं चन्द्रात्, gives the same three assignments.

अंशोद्भवं लग्नबलेन हन्यात् पिण्डाख्यमायुश्च बलेन भानोः । नैसर्गिकं चन्द्रमसो बलेन सर्वाण्यथैकत्र निधापयेत

aṃśodbhavaṃ lagnabalena hanyāt piṇḍākhyamāyuśca balena bhānoḥ | naisargikaṃ candramaso balena sarvāṇyathaikatra nidhāpayeta

Multiply the aṃśa-born ⟨āyus⟩ by the strength of the lagna, the āyus named piṇḍa by the strength of the Sun, and the naisargika by the strength of the Moon; then let them all be set down in one place ⟨added into a single sum⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints निधापयेत without the virāma; the word is निधापयेत्, the optative. This verse is only the first half of the rule. The next verse, standing immediately after it on the same plate, divides that sum by the sum of the three strengths — lagna, Sun and Moon — to give the sphuṭa āyus, and Sastri translates 30 and 31 as one block.

विलग्नतिग्मांशुहिमद्युतीनां हरेद्बलैक्येन ततो यदाप्तम् । वर्षाद्यमायुस्तदिदं स्फुटं स्याच्छ्रीनीलकण्ठादय एवमूचुः

vilagnatigmāṃśuhimadyutīnāṃ haredbalaikyena tato yadāptam | varṣādyamāyustadidaṃ sphuṭaṃ syācchrīnīlakaṇṭhādaya evamūcuḥ

⟨When the lagna, the Sun and the Moon are of equal strength — the case raised in verse 29 and begun in verse 30, where the aṃśāyurdāya is multiplied by the strength of the lagna, the piṇḍāyurdāya by the strength of the Sun, the naisargika āyurdāya by the strength of the Moon, and the three products are set down together in one place — then⟩ divide ⟨that total⟩ by the combined strength of the lagna, of the hot-rayed one ⟨tigmāṃśu, the Sun⟩ and of the cool-rayed one ⟨himadyuti, the Moon⟩. What is obtained from that, in years, months and so on, is the sphuṭa ⟨exact, rectified⟩ āyus. The illustrious Nīlakaṇṭha and the rest have spoken so.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse carries only the second half of the procedure — the division. The multiplication step stands in verse 30 (अंशोद्भवं लग्नबलेन हन्यात्…, plate page_0114), and the condition 'when the three are of equal strength' in verse 29 (…अथ वीर्यसाम्ये, page_0113). That is why the attached witness block is labelled Slokas 30-31: it renders both verses at once, and its first half belongs to verse 30, not here. Sastri reads the divisor the same way — the sum of the three strengths.

लग्नसूर्यशशिनो बलशून्याः स्युर्यदाऽत्र परमायुरगांशम् । सर्व एव खचरा ददतीदं जीवशर्मगदितं हि तदायुः

lagnasūryaśaśino balaśūnyāḥ syuryadā'tra paramāyuragāṃśam | sarva eva khacarā dadatīdaṃ jīvaśarmagaditaṃ hi tadāyuḥ

When here the lagna, the Sun and the Moon are all alike śūnya in bala ⟨void of strength⟩, then every one of the khacaras ⟨sky-goers, the seven planets⟩ gives an agāṃśa ⟨aga = 7, the seven mountains, so a seventh part⟩ of the paramāyus ⟨the full human term, 120 years and 5 days⟩. That indeed is the āyus which Jīvaśarman declared.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: aga = 7 (the seven kulaparvatas), so agāṃśa is a seventh part. The decoding is confirmed on the same plate: the Sārāvalī verse quoted on page_0114 states the same rule with svarāṃśa (svara = the seven notes = 7). The seventh part is the CEILING on what one planet may give; the actual amount is computed by verse 33, and reaches the full seventh only when the planet stands on its exaltation point. Sastri reads it the same way. He also glosses 'void of strength' as a ṣaḍbala total under 3 rūpas, following the Dāmodarapaddhati verse he quotes on page_0116 (रूपत्रयाल्पं किल षड्बलैक्यं…); that threshold is the tradition's, not Śरīpati's — his verse says only balaśūnya.
5.33a reading here is contested

ग्रहः स्वोच्चहीनः स चेत् षड्भहीनोभचक्राद्विशोध्योऽथ भागीकृतोऽसौ । कुवेदर्तुनागैर्हतो वेदखाक्षैर्विभक्तो दिनाद्यं भवत्येवमायुः

grahaḥ svoccahīnaḥ sa cet ṣaḍbhahīnobhacakrādviśodhyo'tha bhāgīkṛto'sau | kuvedartunāgairhato vedakhākṣairvibhakto dinādyaṃ bhavatyevamāyuḥ

Take the planet diminished by its own exaltation ⟨point — the arc counted from the planet's ucca to the planet⟩. If that arc is less than six rāśis, it is to be subtracted from the bhacakra ⟨the whole circle of twelve rāśis⟩. Then make it into bhāgas ⟨degrees⟩, multiply it by 8641 ⟨ku-veda-ṛtu-nāga = 1, 4, 6, 8, read from the right⟩ and divide by 504 ⟨veda-kha-akṣa = 4, 0, 5, read from the right⟩. What results, in days ⟨ghaṭikās and the rest⟩, is that planet's āyus in this ⟨Jīvaśarman's⟩ reckoning.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भचक्राद्विशोध्योऽथ"; alternatives "भचक्राद्विशोऽध्योऽथ", "भचक्राद्धिशोध्योऽथ" — a mark stands between शो and ध्यो which may be a second avagraha or a broken matra
  • About this edition: Both number-words are bhūtasaṃkhyā, read right to left: ku(1)-veda(4)-ṛtu(6)-nāga(8) → 1,4,6,8 → 8641; veda(4)-kha(0)-akṣa(5) → 4,0,5 → 504. The arithmetic closes, which is the strongest check on the reading: a planet standing exactly on its ucca gives an arc of 0, which is less than six rāśis, so it is subtracted from twelve rāśis and becomes 360 degrees; 360 × 8641 ÷ 504 = 6172 1/7 days, and that is exactly one seventh of 120 years and 5 days when the year is reckoned at 360 days (120 × 360 + 5 = 43205; 43205 ÷ 7 = 6172 1/7) — that is, exactly the seventh part verse 32 allows. A planet on its nīca, six rāśis away, keeps 180 degrees and gives half of it. Sastri reads both divisors the same way and derives 8641/504 years per planet in his note on page_0117. The reader marked भचक्राद्विशोध्योथ doubtful (a mark between शो and ध्यो); the reading taken here, bhacakrād viśodhyo 'tha, is the one the arithmetic requires, and Sastri read it so.
5.34a reading here is contested

अहोभ्यः खरामैर्हृतेभ्योऽथ मासाः पतङ्गैश्च तेभ्यो भवेयुस्तदाब्दाः । भचक्रार्द्धहान्यादिकोन्यो विधिर्यः स पिण्डोद्भवे यद्वदुक्तस्तथैव

ahobhyaḥ kharāmairhṛtebhyo'tha māsāḥ pataṅgaiśca tebhyo bhaveyustadābdāḥ | bhacakrārddhahānyādikonyo vidhiryaḥ sa piṇḍodbhave yadvaduktastathaiva

From those days, divided by 30 ⟨kha-rāma = 0, 3, read from the right⟩, come the months; and from those months, ⟨divided⟩ by 12 ⟨pataṅga, the sun, for the twelve Ādityas⟩, come the years. And the remaining procedure — the halving for the ⟨invisible⟩ half of the bhacakra and the other reductions that go with it — is exactly as was stated in the raising of the piṇḍa⟨-āyurdāya⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खरामैर्हृतेभ्योऽथ"; alternatives "खरामैर्हतेभ्योऽथ" — the ऋ-matra under हृ is faint
  • About this edition: Number-words again right to left: kha(0)-rāma(3) → 0,3 → 30; pataṅga, a name of the sun, stands for 12. ⚠ The attached witness block is labelled Slokas 33-34 but its text stops at the end of verse 33's matter and renders none of this verse. I went to the plate: Sastri's English for verse 34 stands in his note at the head of page_0117, and it agrees — days ÷ 30 gives months, months ÷ 12 gives years, and the four reductions are carried over unchanged from the piṇḍāyurdāya. He names those four as the reduction for the half-circle (चक्रार्द्धहानिः, which is what this verse's bhacakrārdha-hāni means: a planet standing in the invisible half of the circle loses half its share), the reduction in an enemy's rāśi, the reduction for a combust planet, and the reduction for a malefic in the lagna. The reader marked खरामैर्हृतेभ्योथ doubtful (hṛta vs hata, the ṛ-mātrā faint); both spellings give the same sense here, 'divided', and the divisor 30 is unaffected.

आयुस्तथैतेषु बलाढ्यलग्ने त्यक्त्वा तु राशीन् कृतलिप्तिकेऽत्र । भक्ते द्विशत्या फलमब्दपूर्वं यत् स्याद्विलग्नायुषि तच्च योज्यम्

āyustathaiteṣu balāḍhyalagne tyaktvā tu rāśīn kṛtaliptike'tra | bhakte dviśatyā phalamabdapūrvaṃ yat syādvilagnāyuṣi tacca yojyam

The āyus ⟨of the lagna⟩ in these ⟨three reckonings — piṇḍa, naisargika and Jīvaśarman's⟩ is ⟨found⟩ in the same way ⟨as in the aṃśāyurdāya⟩. But when the lagna is balāḍhya ⟨rich in strength⟩, leave out the ⟨completed⟩ rāśis here and turn ⟨what remains, the degrees elapsed within the sign⟩ into liptās ⟨minutes of arc⟩; that being divided by two hundred, whatever result comes, in years and so on, is to be added to the lagna's āyus.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ ३५) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
  • About this edition: The input's edition note records that the press opens this verse's number mark (॥ ३५) and never closes it before the adhyāya colophon; that is a typesetting fault on the plate, not a gap in the text — the verse itself is complete. The divisor 200 is confirmed three times over on the same plates: Dāmodara's verse quoted on page_0118 divides by kha-kha-netra (0,0,2 → 200) after leaving out the rāśis, and the Laghupaddhati quoted there divides by kha-abhra-aśvi (0,0,2 → 200). The scale is right: a whole rāśi is 1800 liptās, and 1800 ÷ 200 = 9, the nine navāṃśas of a sign. ⚠ The first clause is contested, and Sastri says so: his note on page_0119 records that Śrīpati's own view of lagnāyus stands in verse 18, that he translates this verse in the light of it, and that Divākara Daivajña construes the verse differently. I follow his construction. His gloss of balāḍhya as 'strength exceeding 6 rūpas' is his own threshold; the verse states none.

लग्नार्कयोरर्कशशाङ्कयोश्च लग्नोडुपत्योर्यदि वीर्यसाम्यम् । तदायुषोरैक्यदलं भवेद्यत् तच्छ्रीधराद्यैः स्फुटमायुरुक्तम्

lagnārkayorarkaśaśāṅkayośca lagnoḍupatyoryadi vīryasāmyam | tadāyuṣoraikyadalaṃ bhavedyat tacchrīdharādyaiḥ sphuṭamāyuruktam

If there is equality of vīrya ⟨strength⟩ between the lagna and the Sun, or between the Sun and the Moon, or between the lagna and the uḍupati ⟨lord of the stars, the Moon⟩, then half the sum of the two āyus ⟨-reckonings belonging to that matched pair⟩ — that is what Śrīdhara and the rest have called the sphuṭa ⟨exact⟩ āyus.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the miśrāyurdāya, the mixed reckoning: the pair is matched two at a time, and verse 31 above handles the fourth case, where all three are equal. Sastri agrees on every particular. He adds on page_0119 that Divākara Daivajña rejects the attribution to Śrīdhara and quotes Śrīdhara's own verses to the contrary; that is a dispute about who said it, not about what the rule is.

ये धर्मकर्मनिरता विजितेन्द्रिया ये ये पथ्यभोजनजुषो द्विजदेवभक्ताः । लोके नरा दधति ये कुलशीललीलां तेषामिदं कथितमायुरुदारधीभिः

ye dharmakarmaniratā vijitendriyā ye ye pathyabhojanajuṣo dvijadevabhaktāḥ | loke narā dadhati ye kulaśīlalīlāṃ teṣāmidaṃ kathitamāyurudāradhībhiḥ

Those men who are steady in dharma and in ⟨right⟩ works, who have conquered their senses, who keep to pathya food ⟨a wholesome diet that agrees with them⟩, who are devoted to the twice-born and to the gods, and who bear in this world the grace of good family and good conduct ⟨kula-śīla-līlā⟩ — it is for such men that the large-minded ⟨sages⟩ have declared this āyus.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'This āyus' means the āyus computed by the whole of this adhyāya: the verse states the condition under which the computation is expected to hold. Sastri agrees on every clause. The same restriction is put in almost the same terms by the Sārāvalī verse quoted on page_0120 (पथ्याशिनां शीलवतां नराणाम्…).

ये पापलुब्धाश्चौरा ये देवब्राह्मणनिन्दकाः । बह्वाशिनश्च ये तेषामकालमरणं ध्रुवम्

ye pāpalubdhāścaurā ye devabrāhmaṇanindakāḥ | bahvāśinaśca ye teṣāmakālamaraṇaṃ dhruvam

Those who are greedy for sin, who are thieves, who revile the gods and the brāhmaṇas, and who are bahvāśin ⟨eaters of too much⟩ — for them death out of season is certain.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ⚠ The attached witness block for this verse runs on past it. Its first sentence renders this verse; everything after it — the full life-terms of men, elephants, horses, asses, camels, bulls, buffaloes, tigers, sheep and dogs — is the matter of verse 39, and I have used it there. On the plate (page_0120) Sastri's English for this verse stops at 'gluttony'; the animal figures are on page_0121. This verse is metrically an anuṣṭubh, unlike the upajāti verses around it, and the adhyāya colophon (इति श्रीपतिविरचितायां जातकपद्धतावायुर्दायाध्यायः पञ्चमः) is printed immediately after it — so in this edition verse 38 closes the chapter.
5.39a reading here is contested

पञ्चाहं नखभूसमा नृकरिणां व्याघ्राद्यजादेर्नृपा गोकाल्योश्च जिनास्तथोष्ट्रखरयोस्तत्वानि सूर्याः शुनाम् । अश्वायुः परमं रदा नृवदिहानीयायुरेषां परायुर्निघ्नं नृपरायुषा च विहृतं तेषां स्फुटायुर्भवेत्

pañcāhaṃ nakhabhūsamā nṛkariṇāṃ vyāghrādyajādernṛpā gokālyośca jināstathoṣṭrakharayostatvāni sūryāḥ śunām | aśvāyuḥ paramaṃ radā nṛvadihānīyāyureṣāṃ parāyurnighnaṃ nṛparāyuṣā ca vihṛtaṃ teṣāṃ sphuṭāyurbhavet

⟨The full term of life is⟩ 120 ⟨nakha-bhū = 20, 1, read from the right⟩ years and five days for men and elephants; 16 ⟨nṛpa, the sixteen kings⟩ for tigers and their like and goats and their like; 24 ⟨jina, the twenty-four Jinas⟩ for the ox and the buffalo ⟨go-kālī⟩; 25 ⟨tattva, the twenty-five tattvas⟩ likewise for the camel and the ass; 12 ⟨sūrya, the twelve Ādityas⟩ for dogs; and the horse's highest āyus is 32 ⟨rada, the thirty-two teeth⟩. Work out the āyus of these ⟨creatures⟩ here exactly as for a man; then that āyus, multiplied by the full term ⟨of the creature in question⟩ and divided by the full term of a man ⟨120 years and 5 days⟩, becomes their exact āyus.

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: ⛔ NOT ŚRĪPATI'S VERSE. This passage is a QUOTATION that V. Subrahmanya Sastri prints inside his own notes, from केशव (Keśava), the Keśavapaddhati — his own verse 28. It is kept here because the page prints it and a reader following our verse numbers would otherwise find a hole; it is marked `kind: "quotation"` so it does not count toward this work's length. THE SOURCE LABEL IS ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE — Sastri prints the label in ENGLISH on the facing page (PDF 120, printed folio 105), twice: “Kesava adds”, then a Keśava verse ending ॥ २७ ॥, then “He also states in the sloka overleaf the total life-period of some of the animals other than human beings and the method to be adopted for calculating their longevity.” — pointing forward to this very passage. HOW IT WAS RULED, on the ink at 600 ppi: Set in the small quotation face, following Keśava's own ॥ २७ ॥ quoted on the facing page. ⛔ AND IT STANDS AFTER THE COLOPHON: printed folio 105 carries Śrīpati's 5.38, then the centred two-line colophon इति श्रीपतिविरचितायां जातकपद्धता- / वायुर्दायाध्यायः पञ्चमः, then Sastri's translation of śloka 38, and only then “Kesava adds”. This passage is on the next leaf, under a running head that already reads [Adh. VI. THE NUMERAL: ॥ २८ ॥ — and it is KEŚAVA'S number, following his ॥ २७ ॥ on the facing page. Śrīpati's adhyāya 5 runs to ॥ ३८ ॥, so a २८ at its end never belonged to his sequence. THE METRE: Its content is the lifespans of animals — men and elephants 120 years, horses 32, asses and camels 25, bulls and buffaloes 24, tigers and sheep 16, dogs 12. Sastri renders it with NO “Sloka N.” head and adds “For more details, see Jatakaparijata V-40-44.” ⚠ WHY IT WAS EVER TAKEN FOR ŚRĪPATI'S: the reader who transcribed its page tagged it `role: "mula"`, and they were reading that page alone. A one-page-per-agent reader structurally cannot see a label printed on the page before. The same failure put 72 syllables of Parāśara inside record 3.16, found the same day.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोकाल्योश्च"; alternatives "गोकोलयोश्च", "गोकाल्ययोश्च" — third akṣara is ल with a subscript hook and an o-mātrā; read ल्यो. The word as printed is hard to construe beside Sastri's English 'bulls and buffaloes'. Zoomed 3× and the ā-mātrā on का is certain.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २८ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 39.
  • About this edition: Six number-words, all bhūtasaṃkhyā read right to left: nakha(20)-bhū(1) → 1 then 20 → 120; nṛpa = 16; jina = 24; tattva = 25; sūrya = 12; rada = 32. Sastri's English on the same plate gives the same six figures, which is an independent confirmation of every decoding. Worked example of the last rule: if an ox's chart yields 60 years by the human reckoning, its own āyus is 60 × 24 ÷ 120 = 12 years. The reader marked गोकाल्योश्च doubtful (alternatives गोकोलयोश्च, गोकाल्ययोश्च); read go-kālī, 'the ox and the buffalo' — kālī, 'the black one', for the she-buffalo is an unusual word, so the FORM is uncertain while the SENSE is not, since Sastri's copy gave him 'bulls and buffaloes' and the figure 24 fits the standard list (Jātakapārijāta V.40-44). ⚠ ATTRIBUTION — a lead for a second reader, not a ruling: this verse may be Keśava's and not Śrīpati's. Three things on the plates point that way. (1) The adhyāya-5 colophon is printed before it, at the foot of page_0120, right after verse 38. (2) Sastri's note there says Keśava 'also states in the sloka overleaf' the life-terms of animals and the method for computing them — and the sloka overleaf is this one. (3) Its printed number ॥ २८ ॥ continues Keśava's own run of quoted verses across these plates (२१ p.110, २२ p.112, २३ p.113, २४ p.116, २५ p.114, २६ and २७ p.120, then २८ p.121), while Śrīpati's own numbering had already reached 38 — and Śrīpati's verse २८ is a different verse altogether (नखाः शशी द्वौ…, page_0113). Sastri also gives it no 'Sloka N.' heading, unlike every Śrīpati verse in the chapter. Against that, the press set it in the large mūla type and the plate reader tagged it mūla. Rendered as asked; the attribution needs a ruling before this verse is published as Śrīpati's.

Adhyāya 6 · रिष्टभङ्गाध्यायः षष्ठः

भवन्ति चेज्जन्मनि रिष्टयोगा न स्यात्तदायुर्गणितागतं हि । स्याद्रिष्टभंगादथ रिष्टभङ्गे विधीयते सम्प्रति निर्णयोऽयम्

bhavanti cejjanmani riṣṭayogā na syāttadāyurgaṇitāgataṃ hi | syādriṣṭabhaṃgādatha riṣṭabhaṅge vidhīyate samprati nirṇayo'yam

If riṣṭa-yogas — the combinations at birth that cut the life short — are present in the nativity, then the āyus that came out of the computation ⟨of the preceding adhyāya⟩ does not hold. It holds only through a riṣṭabhaṅga, the breaking of that riṣṭa. Accordingly this determination concerning riṣṭabhaṅga is now set down.

यच्छुभाशुभबलान्तराद्बलं रिष्टभंगकरखेटयोः पुनः । सैकवर्गदलहृद्धसंज्ञकं तद्दलं भवति शेषवर्गजम्

yacchubhāśubhabalāntarādbalaṃ riṣṭabhaṃgakarakheṭayoḥ punaḥ | saikavargadalahṛddhasaṃjñakaṃ taddalaṃ bhavati śeṣavargajam

Take the two planets — the one that causes the riṣṭa (riṣṭakara) and the one that breaks it (bhaṅgakara) — and for each separately take the strength left over by the difference between its benefic and its malefic strength ⟨its iṣṭa-ṣaḍbala less its kaṣṭa-ṣaḍbala, found in adhyāya 4⟩. Divide that by half of the number of the vargas increased by one: the vargas are seven (the saptavarga), seven and one is 8, and half of 8 is 4. The quotient is the figure designated dha ⟨our mūla reads dha here, which gives no clear sense; the figure is that of the first varga, the rāśi, the first row of the saptavarga table⟩; and half of that figure ⟨the same remainder divided by 8⟩ is the strength arising in each of the remaining six vargas.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Two misprints in this line, and the same printed page proves both. The press sets हृद्धसंज्ञकं and तद्बलं; read हृद्भसंज्ञकं and तद्दलं. On p. 108 (plate page 123) Sastri quotes Śrīvarācārya's parallel verse: गृहादिका (७) वर्गसंख्या रूपयुक्तार्द्धिता तदा । ... स्याद्राश्याख्यं तथान्येषां वर्गाणां तद्दलं बलम् — 'the count of the vargas beginning with gṛha, ⟨namely⟩ 7, increased by one and halved ⟨= 4⟩ ... ⟨the quotient⟩ is called the one named rāśi, and half of it (tad-dalam) is the strength of the other vargas.' भ is the standard abbreviation for rāśi, which is why भसंज्ञकं and not धसंज्ञकं; and तद्दलं, half of it, not तद्बलं. Sastri's worked example on the same page carries the same arithmetic: the Sun's iṣṭa-ṣaḍbala 7·933 less his kaṣṭa-ṣaḍbala 0·811 is 7·122; a fourth of that, 1·780, goes in the rāśi row, and half of 1·780, i.e. 0·890, in each of horā, drekkāṇa, saptāṃśa, navāṃśa, dvādaśāṃśa and triṃśāṃśa. The metre is Rathoddhatā and neither correction disturbs it (भ and ध are both light; तद्दलं and तद्बलं scan alike). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्दलं; this sentence names तद्बलं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of p. 122 (page_0122.png, store line index 19) at about 3.90x to 5.63x native, with type widths measured on the master, corrects this note. The press sets तद्दलं, not तद्बलं: the sort is 49 px wide, one द, where this edition's द्ब measures 65 to 67 px. So तद्बलं was a slip of our transcription, and the mūla now reads तद्दलं. The press does set हृद्ध: a 66 px sort, against this edition's 64 px द्ध and 79 px द्भ. The emendation हृद्भसंज्ञकं is withdrawn, because no printing we hold carries it; the Telugu 1926's store gives हृद्वि. The mūla keeps हृद्ध, and the question stands as an open doubt on this verse.]
6.3a reading here is contested

भादिवर्गपतिवीर्यसङ्गुणं जायते बलमरिष्टकारिणः । रिष्टभङ्गुरपि सप्तवर्गजं तद्धि सर्वबलसंयुतिस्तयोः

bhādivargapativīryasaṅguṇaṃ jāyate balamariṣṭakāriṇaḥ | riṣṭabhaṅgurapi saptavargajaṃ taddhi sarvabalasaṃyutistayoḥ

Multiply the figure standing in each varga — bha, the rāśi, and the rest — by the vīrya (the total ṣaḍbala) of the lord of that varga; the sum of the seven products so got is the strength of the planet that causes the ariṣṭa. The breaker of the riṣṭa too has its saptavarga-born strength, reckoned in the same way; and that total of all the ⟨seven varga⟩ strengths is what stands for each of the two.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्य"; alternatives "वीर्य्य" — there is an extra stroke over the र्य that this press also uses for the doubled र्य्य; not zoomed.
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt here — वीर्य or वीर्य्य — is orthography only: this press doubles य after a repha. Neither sense nor metre changes. वीर्य here is the varga-lord's whole ṣaḍbala, as Sastri's worked example on p. 109 (plate page 124) shows: the Sun's rāśi figure 1·780 is multiplied by 7·731, Mars's ṣaḍbala, because Mars owns the rāśi the Sun stands in; his horā figure 0·890 by 8·197, the Moon's ṣaḍbala, because the Sun is in the Moon's horā; and so through the seven, the column totalling +57·173. तंद्धि on the plate is तद्धि. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्धि; this sentence names तंद्धि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

शुभाशुभत्वं च हिताहितत्वं तुङ्गादिनीचास्तसमाश्रयत्वम् । रिष्टेशभङ्गेश्वरयोर्विचिन्त्यं समानवर्गेषु समानवर्गान्

śubhāśubhatvaṃ ca hitāhitatvaṃ tuṅgādinīcāstasamāśrayatvam | riṣṭeśabhaṅgeśvarayorvicintyaṃ samānavargeṣu samānavargān

In respect of the riṣṭeśa (the planet that authors the riṣṭa) and the bhaṅgeśvara (the planet that breaks it), weigh these things: whether each is benefic or malefic; whether it is hita or ahita, favourable or hostile ⟨standing in a friend's sign or an enemy's⟩; and what it rests upon — exaltation (tuṅga), mūlatrikoṇa and its own sign and the like (ādi), debilitation (nīca), combustion (asta), or a neutral (sama) sign. Then take the like varga figures against the like vargas — rāśi against rāśi, horā against horā, and so on through the seven —

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The press sets रिष्टेशमङ्गेश्वरयोः. Read रिष्टेशभङ्गेश्वरयोः, 'of the riṣṭa-lord and the bhaṅga-lord': म is this press's भ, and riṣṭeśam aṅgeśvarayoḥ yields no sense. Sastri reads the same pair, and Keśava's verse that he quotes on p. 111 (plate page 126) sets भङ्क्तृ beside रिष्टकृत् over exactly these tests — हिताहितशुभासत्वं च नीचोच्चभास्ताद्यस्याश्रयतां विचार्य. The two diamond dots the plate reader saw, in विंचिन्त्यं and समानवर्गेंषु, are ink and not anusvāras: read विचिन्त्यं and समानवर्गेषु. (Both doubts are filed against verse 5 in our record, but the words belong to this verse — the attachment drifted.) The sentence does not close here: its verb is विश्लेष्य in verse 5, which governs समानवर्गान्. Śrīdhara, quoted on the same page, states the step in plain words — शोधयेत्तान् परस्परम्, 'subtract them one from the other'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads समानवर्गेषु and रिष्टेशभङ्गेश्वरयोर्विचिन्त्यं; this sentence names समानवर्गेंषु and विंचिन्त्यं, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
6.5a reading here is contested

विश्लेष्य शेषस्य बलोत्कटत्वं स्याद्रिष्टकर्तुश्च तदा हि रिष्टम् । भङ्गप्रभोश्चेदथ रिष्टभङ्गः समानतायामपि रिष्टमेव

viśleṣya śeṣasya balotkaṭatvaṃ syādriṣṭakartuśca tadā hi riṣṭam | bhaṅgaprabhoścedatha riṣṭabhaṅgaḥ samānatāyāmapi riṣṭameva

— and having subtracted ⟨the one from the other, varga by varga⟩, see on whose side the preponderance of strength in the remainder falls. If it falls to the maker of the riṣṭa, then riṣṭa there is. If it is the bhaṅga-lord's, then the riṣṭa is broken. And when the two come out equal, it is riṣṭa all the same.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योर्विंचिन्त्यं"; alternatives "योर्विचिन्त्यं" — a diamond dot stands above वि, beside the repha; it reads as an anusvāra but the sense wants none
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समानवर्गेंषु"; alternatives "समानवर्गेषु" — a diamond dot stands above गे beside the े mātrā
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्रिष्टकर्तुश्च"; alternatives "साद्रिष्टकर्तुश्च" — the first akṣara carries a faint subscript stroke; at 8× it reads स्या, at tile scale it reads सा
  • About this edition: स्याद्रिष्टकर्तुः, not साद्: the faint subscript stroke the reader saw at 8× is real, and the syntax requires स्यात्. This verse finishes the sentence begun in verse 4 — विश्लेष्य takes its object समानवर्गान् from there — which is why the rendering opens with a dash. One place where I do not follow Sastri: he makes the difference count only if it is 'appreciably great'. The Sanskrit says only बलोत्कटत्वं, that the surplus of strength in the remainder lies on one side, and sets no threshold; and the last quarter already disposes of the tie by awarding it to riṣṭa (समानतायामपि रिष्टमेव), so no threshold is needed. Sastri himself notes on the following page that Keśava rejects this whole rule as unsound, because a planet whose iṣṭa and kaṣṭa are equal comes out neither riṣṭakara nor riṣṭahartā.

Adhyāya 7 · दशान्तर्दशादिविचाराध्यायः सप्तमः

अन्तर्दशाप्रभृतिभेदवतीषु यस्मात् नूनं दशासु निखिलासु शरीरभाजाम् । व्यक्तिः शुभाशुभविमिश्रफलस्य सम्यगस्माद्दशाक्रमविधानमथाभिदध्मः

antardaśāprabhṛtibhedavatīṣu yasmāt nūnaṃ daśāsu nikhilāsu śarīrabhājām | vyaktiḥ śubhāśubhavimiśraphalasya samyagasmāddaśākramavidhānamathābhidadhmaḥ

Since the showing-forth of the fruit of ⟨past⟩ karma — good, bad and mixed together — assuredly comes upon embodied beings in full through all the daśās, which are themselves divided into antardaśā ⟨the sub-period inside a daśā⟩ and the rest ⟨vidaśā, upadaśā⟩, therefore we now declare the rule of the daśākrama — the order in which the daśās fall.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The press sets सम्यक्कस्माद्, i.e. कस्मात् 'from what?'. Pāda a opens with यस्मात्, which needs its correlative तस्मात् 'therefore'; तस्मात् scans identically in the Vasantatilakā pāda (tas-māt for kas-māt), so the metre does not object. Sastri too renders it 'therefore'. I read तस्मात् and have translated accordingly; the printed क is recorded here rather than smoothed away. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सम्यगस्माद्दशाक्रमविधानमथाभिदध्मः; this sentence names सम्यक्कस्माद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
7.2a reading here is contested

पाकं द्वादशधा वदन्ति यवना दिग्भेदभिन्नं तथा माणित्थाः खलु बादरायणमुनिस्तं चाष्टधा प्रोक्तवान् । षड्भेदं खलु सिद्धसेनविबुधस्तं देवलाद्याः पुनः भेदैरब्धिमितैरुदारधिषणः श्रीविष्णुगुप्तस्त्रिभिः

pākaṃ dvādaśadhā vadanti yavanā digbhedabhinnaṃ tathā māṇitthāḥ khalu bādarāyaṇamunistaṃ cāṣṭadhā proktavān | ṣaḍbhedaṃ khalu siddhasenavibudhastaṃ devalādyāḥ punaḥ bhedairabdhimitairudāradhiṣaṇaḥ śrīviṣṇuguptastribhiḥ

The Yavanas declare the pāka ⟨the ripening of past karma, which is read through the daśās⟩ to be of twelve kinds. The followers of Māṇittha likewise ⟨make it⟩ divided by the divisions of the directions — that is, into 10, the diś or quarters being ten. The sage Bādarāyaṇa has declared it eightfold. The learned Siddhasena ⟨makes⟩ it of six divisions. Devala and the rest again ⟨give⟩ it divisions numbering abdhi — 4, the oceans being four. And Śrī Viṣṇugupta of broad understanding ⟨gives⟩ it by three.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षड्भेदं"; alternatives "षड्‍भेदं" — the virāma under ड is a short stroke and nearly touches the following भ
  • About this edition: Two number-words, both read as quantities and not as objects: दिग्भेद = diś, the directions, which are 10 (four cardinal, four intermediate, zenith, nadir); अब्धि = the oceans, which are 4. So the series of authorities runs 12 · 10 · 8 · 6 · 4 · 3, and verse 3 adds Satya's 2. Sastri's English gives exactly the same six figures. The reader's doubt over षड्भेदं (a short virāma under ड) does not touch the number: either way the word is षट् = 6.
7.3a reading here is contested

पाकं द्विभेदं मुनिराह सत्यस्तच्छास्त्रदृष्ट्या कथयाम्यशेषम् । नैसर्गिकः स्यात्प्रथमोऽत्र भेदो दशाक्रमाख्यश्च भवेद्द्वितीयः

pākaṃ dvibhedaṃ munirāha satyastacchāstradṛṣṭyā kathayāmyaśeṣam | naisargikaḥ syātprathamo'tra bhedo daśākramākhyaśca bhaveddvitīyaḥ

Sage Satya has called the pāka twofold. I shall set out the whole subject with the eye of those śāstras. Here the first division is the naisargika ⟨the natural daśā, whose run of years is fixed for each graha by its own nature⟩, and the second is the one called daśākrama ⟨the order of the daśās⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सत्यस्तच्छास्त्रदृष्ट्या"; alternatives "सत्यत्तच्छास्त्रदृष्ट्या" — zoomed 3x: the akṣara after सत्य is a स्त conjunct whose स् half-form is partly filled with ink; read स्त
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt is between सत्यस्तच्छास्त्रदृष्ट्या and सत्यत्तच्छास्त्रदृष्ट्या; only सत्यः + तच्छास्त्र construes, and that is what the reader read at 3×. तच्छास्त्र = 'that śāstra'; Sastri takes it of the foregoing authorities together, and the enumeration that follows in verses 3d–6 is in fact the twelvefold Yavana scheme, which supports his reading. I have rendered it as the plural 'those śāstras' for that reason. The twelve divisions run: 1 naisargika, 2 daśākrama (this verse); 3 antardaśā, 4 vidaśā, 5 rāśi, 6 bhāvaphala (verse 4); 7 yoga, 8 dṛṣṭiphala, 9 aṣṭavarga, 10 horādi-varga (verse 5); 11 the year/month/day/night results, 12 the food-and-enjoyment reading (verse 6).

अन्तर्दशाख्यः कथितस्तृतीयः प्रोक्तश्चतुर्थो विदशाभिधानः । यो राशिसंज्ञः खलु पञ्चमोऽत्र षष्ठस्तथा भावफलाख्यभेदः

antardaśākhyaḥ kathitastṛtīyaḥ proktaścaturtho vidaśābhidhānaḥ | yo rāśisaṃjñaḥ khalu pañcamo'tra ṣaṣṭhastathā bhāvaphalākhyabhedaḥ

The third is called the antardaśā ⟨the sub-period inside a daśā⟩; the fourth is declared to be the one named vidaśā ⟨the sub-period inside an antardaśā⟩; the fifth here is the one named rāśi ⟨the fruit of the rāśi that the lagna or the Moon occupies⟩; and the sixth is the division called bhāvaphala ⟨the fruit of the grahas as they stand in the several bhāvas⟩.

योगाभिधः स्यादिह सप्तमोऽपि स्यादष्टमो दृष्टिफलाभिधानः । प्रोक्तोऽष्टवर्गो नवमो मुनीन्द्रैर्होरादिवर्गो दशमो ग्रहाणाम्

yogābhidhaḥ syādiha saptamo'pi syādaṣṭamo dṛṣṭiphalābhidhānaḥ | prokto'ṣṭavargo navamo munīndrairhorādivargo daśamo grahāṇām

The seventh here is the one called yoga ⟨the named combinations the grahas make by place and conjunction⟩; the eighth is the one named dṛṣṭiphala ⟨the fruit of the aspect that falls on the lord of the daśā⟩; the ninth the chief sages have declared to be the aṣṭavarga ⟨the aṣṭakavarga⟩; and the tenth is the horā and the other vargas of the grahas ⟨horā, drekkāṇa, saptāṃśa, navāṃśa and the rest⟩.

प्रत्यब्दमासद्युनिशाफलैः स्यादेकादशो भोजनमैथुनाद्यैः । सद्वादशः सत्वशरीरधातुस्वरूपभेदैः कथितोऽत्र तज्ज्ञैः

pratyabdamāsadyuniśāphalaiḥ syādekādaśo bhojanamaithunādyaiḥ | sadvādaśaḥ satvaśarīradhātusvarūpabhedaiḥ kathito'tra tajjñaiḥ

The eleventh comes about through the results of each year, each month, each day and each night ⟨as they set in upon the native⟩; and the twelfth, those who know the subject have declared here through food, sexual enjoyment and the rest, ⟨read off⟩ the differing make-up of a man's sattva ⟨his mental disposition⟩, his body and his dhātus ⟨the bodily constituents⟩.

7.7a reading here is contested

प्रायस्तदन्तः पतितास्तु सर्वे दशादिकानां तु दशाः प्रभेदाः । तेनोदिता नैव पृथक् पृथक्त्वे दशाक्रमं संप्रति कीर्तयामः

prāyastadantaḥ patitāstu sarve daśādikānāṃ tu daśāḥ prabhedāḥ | tenoditā naiva pṛthak pṛthaktve daśākramaṃ saṃprati kīrtayāmaḥ

Since nearly all the daśās and their sub-divisions belonging to the tenfold scheme and the rest ⟨10, 8, 6, 4, 3 and 2⟩ fall inside that ⟨twelvefold one⟩, they have not been set out here one by one. We now proceed to declare the daśākrama — the order in which the daśās fall.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वे"; alternatives "सर्वें" — a second small stroke sits above वे; it may be a broken anusvara or a flaw in the type
  • About this edition: दशादिकानाम् is 'of the tenfold and the rest' — daśa = 10, Māṇittha's count from verse 2, with the 8, 6, 4, 3 and 2 of the other authorities following it. Sastri names the same six figures. The press prints पृथक् पृथक्के, and पृथक्के does not construe as it stands; the sense required is the plain adverbial 'one by one', and I have rendered that. The reader's second doubt, सर्वे against सर्वें, does not change the meaning: either way the word is 'all'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पृथक्त्वे; this sentence names पृथक्के, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
7.8a reading here is contested

लग्नादित्योडुपानामधिकबलवतः स्याद्दशाद्या ततोऽन्या तत्केन्द्रादिस्थितानामिह बहुषु पुनर्वीर्यतो वीर्यसाम्ये । बह्वायुर्वर्षदातुः प्रथममिनवशेनोदितस्याब्दसाम्ये ब्रूमश्चातो दशादिक्रमविधिमधुना शिष्यबोधप्रसिद्ध्यै

lagnādityoḍupānāmadhikabalavataḥ syāddaśādyā tato'nyā tatkendrādisthitānāmiha bahuṣu punarvīryato vīryasāmye | bahvāyurvarṣadātuḥ prathamaminavaśenoditasyābdasāmye brūmaścāto daśādikramavidhimadhunā śiṣyabodhaprasiddhyai

Of the lagna, the Sun and the Moon, whichever carries the greater bala ⟨strength⟩ has the first daśā. After that comes the daśā of the grahas standing in a kendra and the further positions ⟨paṇaphara, then āpoklima⟩ reckoned from that first lord; and where many stand together ⟨in one such position⟩, precedence again goes by strength. Where their strength is equal, it goes to the one that gives the larger number of years of āyurdāya ⟨the allotted span of life⟩; and where the years too are equal, to the one that rose first by the Sun's agency ⟨out of combustion — the first to become visible again after being burnt up by the Sun⟩. And so, that pupils may grasp it surely, we now state the rule for the order of the daśās and their sub-periods.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अभिनवशेन"; alternatives "अभिनवांशेन", "अभिनववशेन" — zoomed 3× on the original: the akṣaras read भि-न-व-शे-नो clearly, with one व only and no anusvāra dot over शे; but 'अभिनवशेन' does not construe, so the press may have dropped a sign [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रथममिनवशेनो. The 1937 press dropped no sign: as it prints the pāda, it has one light syllable too many. An eye reading of the Telugu 1926's leaf (its PDF p. 82, folio 154) at about 2.82x native found four akṣaras there, मि न व शे, giving प्रथमम् इनवशेन, 'by the agency of इन, the Sun'. On that printing and the metre the surplus akṣara भि was removed. The 1937's own page was not opened for this ruling.]
  • About this edition: Pāda c is corrupt in the press and the reader flagged it. Printed: प्रथममभिनवशेनोदितस्य, which does not construe. The metre says why: the verse is Sragdharā (21 syllables, m-r-bh-n-y-y-y), and as printed that pāda carries 22 — one light syllable too many inside प्रथममभिनव. Positions 14–21 fit शे-नो-दि-त-स्या-ब्द-सा-म्ये exactly, so the corruption sits before शे, not after it. The CLAIM, however, is not in doubt: 'उदितस्य' with प्रथमम् and अभिनव ('newly') gives 'of the one that rose first, afresh', and three parallels Sastri prints on the facing pages settle it the same way — Bṛhajjātaka तेषां च साम्ये प्रथमोदितस्य, Sārāvalī साम्ये भवेच्च शरदां प्रथमोदितस्य, and Keśavapaddhati मौढ्यात्स्यादुदितक्रमात्, which names the combustion outright. Sastri reads it the same way. I have translated the sense and left the akṣaras to a text-critic. Second point: Sastri's notes add a further tie-break — when strength, āyurdāya and rising are all equal, the fixed order lagna, Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn decides. That is his gloss and the mūla does not say it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रथममिनवशेनोदितस्याब्दसाम्ये; this sentence names प्रथममभिनवशेनोदितस्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the akṣaras are now ruled, so nothing is left to a text-critic. The mūla reads प्रथममिनवशेनो, 'first, by the agency of the Sun'. The metre decides: with it the Sragdharā pāda is exactly 21 syllables with every weight in place. The Telugu 1926 sets मिनवशे, read by eye at about 2.82x native, and its commentary on the same leaf glosses the line अर्कात् पूर्वमुदितस्य पूर्वदशा. The 1937's प्रथममभिनवशेनो is kept on the ledger.]

पूर्वं विलग्नस्य दशा यदा स्यात् भावं तदा खेचरतो विशोध्य । शेषं तु भावान्तरभागखण्डात् संशोध्य वीर्येण ततो निहन्यात्

pūrvaṃ vilagnasya daśā yadā syāt bhāvaṃ tadā khecarato viśodhya | śeṣaṃ tu bhāvāntarabhāgakhaṇḍāt saṃśodhya vīryeṇa tato nihanyāt

When the daśā of the lagna falls first ⟨as it does in an aṃśāyurdāya⟩, then subtract the bhāva ⟨that bhāva's cusp⟩ from the graha ⟨its longitude⟩. Subtract the remainder in its turn from the half-piece of the bhāvāntara ⟨half the distance between that bhāva and the next one, taking whichever neighbouring cusp lies on the graha's side⟩. Then multiply ⟨what is left⟩ by the ⟨graha's⟩ vīrya, that is by its ṣaḍbala.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: भावान्तरभागखण्ड is the half of the bhāvāntara, as verse 10a (भावान्तरांशार्द्ध) confirms and as Sastri's worked figures require. Verses 9–11 are one procedure and Sastri translates them as one block.
7.10a reading here is contested

भावान्तरांशार्द्धविभाजितं तत् पाकक्रमे वीर्यमुदाहरन्ति । भावाद्विशुद्धेऽपि हि खेचरेन्द्रे प्राग्वद्बलं पाकविधौ प्रसाध्यम्

bhāvāntarāṃśārddhavibhājitaṃ tat pākakrame vīryamudāharanti | bhāvādviśuddhe'pi hi khecarendre prāgvadbalaṃ pākavidhau prasādhyam

That ⟨product⟩ divided by half the degrees of the bhāvāntara ⟨the same half-interval used in the subtraction⟩ is what they call the vīrya for the order of the daśās. And even when the graha has to be subtracted from the bhāva instead ⟨that is, when it stands short of the cusp so that the difference runs the other way about⟩, the bala for the daśā is to be worked out exactly as before.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शार्द्धवि"; alternatives "शाद्धवि", "शार्धवि" — the conjunct after शां is the द्ध ligature with a repha hook above it, read at 4x from the original page: र्द्ध, the older printing of अर्ध. Without the hook it would be plain द्ध.
  • About this edition: The rule in one line: daśākrama-bala = (H − d) ÷ H × ṣaḍbala, where d is the distance from the graha to its own bhāva cusp and H is half the bhāvāntara on the graha's side. Sastri's worked case on the facing page, with his own figures: the Sun stands at 0s 17° 43' 30", the 1st bhāva cusp at 0s 14° 31' 46", so d = 3° 11' 44"; the 1st-to-2nd bhāvāntara is 27° 43' 28", so H = 13° 51' 44"; H − d = 10° 40' 0"; and 10° 40' 0" ÷ 13° 51' 44" × 9.015 (the Sun's ṣaḍbala in rūpas) = 6.936. The reader's doubt over शार्द्धवि was resolved on the ink at 4× as र्द्ध, the older printing of अर्ध 'half', and the arithmetic above confirms that it must be a half.

केन्द्रादिगानां द्युसदां बलानि तद्वत्प्रसाध्यान्यधिकं हि यस्य । खचारिणस्तस्य दशाग्रतः स्यादन्तर्दशा वा विदशाह्वया वा

kendrādigānāṃ dyusadāṃ balāni tadvatprasādhyānyadhikaṃ hi yasya | khacāriṇastasya daśāgrataḥ syādantardaśā vā vidaśāhvayā vā

The balas of the grahas ⟨dyusad, the sky-dwellers⟩ standing in a kendra and the further positions are to be worked out in the same way. Whichever graha's comes out the greater — that graha's daśā stands ahead, and so too its antardaśā, or the one called vidaśā.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Sastri prints a variant of this verse from another copy: सर्वस्य नाकद्युसदां बलानि तद्बलसाध्यान्यधिकं हि यस्य । द्युचारिणस्तस्य दशाग्रगा स्यादन्तर्दशा वा विदशाह्वया वा ॥ The claim is the same in both readings, so the translation does not turn on the choice.

आद्या दशा चेत्सवितुर्विधोर्वा तदा बलं संस्कृतमेव तस्य । वेदोद्धृतं राशिबलं तदर्द्धमन्येषु वर्गेषु पुनर्विधेयम्

ādyā daśā cetsaviturvidhorvā tadā balaṃ saṃskṛtameva tasya | vedoddhṛtaṃ rāśibalaṃ tadarddhamanyeṣu vargeṣu punarvidheyam

But if the first daśā belongs to the Sun ⟨as it does in a piṇḍāyurdāya⟩ or to the Moon ⟨as in a naisargika āyurdāya⟩, then take each ⟨competing graha's, and the lagna's⟩ own saṃskṛta ⟨rectified⟩ bala. That divided by 4 ⟨veda — the Vedas being four⟩ is its rāśibala; and half of that figure is to be set down again in each of the other vargas ⟨horā, drekkāṇa, saptāṃśa, navāṃśa, dvādaśāṃśa and triṃśāṃśa — seven vargas in all, counting the rāśi⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: वेद = 4 is a number-word, and Sastri's own table proves the divisor: the Sun's rectified ṣaḍbala there is 8.154 rūpas, his rāśi entry is 2.038 (= 8.154 ÷ 4), and each of his six other varga entries is 1.019, exactly half of 2.038. The lagna runs the same way: 7.345 ÷ 4 = 1.836 in the rāśi row, 0.918 in each of the rest. तस्य ('his') is distributive — it is done for every graha and the lagna whose place in the order is being settled, not only for the Sun or Moon; Sastri reads it so, and his table, which carries a column for all eight, requires it.

स्ववर्गपानां गुणयेद्बलैस्तु यथाक्रमं वर्गबलं तदाहुः । प्राक् पाकनाथग्रहयोर्ग्रहाणां स्याद्यावतां साम्यमथेह तेभ्यः

svavargapānāṃ guṇayedbalaistu yathākramaṃ vargabalaṃ tadāhuḥ | prāk pākanāthagrahayorgrahāṇāṃ syādyāvatāṃ sāmyamatheha tebhyaḥ

Multiply those ⟨seven entries⟩ in their order by the balas of the lords of their own vargas ⟨that is, by the ṣaḍbala of the graha that owns the sign the planet holds in that varga⟩; that, they say, is the vargabala. ⟨Compare⟩ first the lord of the daśā and the graha ⟨whose turn is in question⟩; and of however many grahas there is an equality ⟨of vargabala⟩, then from among those —

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ १३) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
  • About this edition: The verse runs on into verse 14 and is translated with it; the dash at the end is where the sentence continues. Sastri's table proves what 'the lord of its own varga' multiplies into: the Sun's rāśi entry 2.038 stands in a sign owned by Venus, whose ṣaḍbala is 7.719, and 2.038 × 7.719 = 15.731, which is the Sun's rāśi vargabala in his table. The lagna's rāśi entry 1.836 lies in a sign of Mars (ṣaḍbala 7.354) and 1.836 × 7.354 = 13.502, again his figure. The seven products added give the graha's total vargabala. Edition note: the press opens this verse's number mark as ॥ १३ and never closes it — it set no closing daṇḍas before the chapter's colophon.

परस्परं वर्गबलं विशोध्यं दशाक्रमे तद्बलमाहुरार्याः । यस्याधिकं वीर्यमिहावशिष्टं वाच्या दशा वाऽन्तरजा च यस्य ॥

parasparaṃ vargabalaṃ viśodhyaṃ daśākrame tadbalamāhurāryāḥ | yasyādhikaṃ vīryamihāvaśiṣṭaṃ vācyā daśā vā'ntarajā ca yasya ||

— their vargabalas are to be subtracted one from the other ⟨the equal amounts struck off on both sides⟩; what is left the noble ones call the bala in the order of the daśās. Whose vīrya remains the greater here, his is the daśā to be declared, and his too the antardaśā born of it.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 14.
  • About this edition: The press prints no number after this verse; it is published at position 14 because the printing sets Sastri's commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse. Sastri translates 12–14 as one block. What the mutual subtraction does, from his worked case: where two competitors carry the same vargabala figure, that figure is struck off both totals and the remainders are compared — in his example Mars loses his drekkāṇa 5.221 and his navāṃśa 4.643 because Jupiter's saptāṃśa and Saturn's dvādaśāṃśa carry the same two figures. ⚠ His printed totals after subtraction (Mars 39.229, Jupiter 34.202, Saturn 31.401, lagna 42.869) do not all reconcile with the varga table as our reader transcribed it — Mars does (49.093 − 9.864), Jupiter does not — so either his table or the plate read carries a slip. That is a note for a checker, not a doubt about the rule.
7.15a reading here is contested

अर्द्धमेकगृहगस्त्रिकोणगस्त्र्यंशमस्तगृहगः स्वरांशकम् । पादमत्र चतुरस्रसंस्थितः पाचयन्त्यथ निजैः फलैर्ग्रहाः

arddhamekagṛhagastrikoṇagastryaṃśamastagṛhagaḥ svarāṃśakam | pādamatra caturasrasaṃsthitaḥ pācayantyatha nijaiḥ phalairgrahāḥ

A graha standing in the same house ⟨as the lord of the daśā⟩ ripens a half ⟨of that daśā⟩; one standing in a trikoṇa ⟨the 5th and the 9th from him⟩ a third; one in the asta-gṛha ⟨the 7th, the house of setting⟩ a svarāṃśaka — a seventh part, svara, the musical notes, being 7; and one standing in a caturasra ⟨the 4th and the 8th⟩ a quarter. In these shares the grahas ripen ⟨the daśā⟩ by the results that are their own.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गस्त्र्यंशम्"; alternatives "गरूयंशम्", "गस्त्यंशम्" — the conjunct after गः is heavily inked and its parts run together. Read at 6× from the original page: a स् half-form, then a त्र with its descender, then यं with the anusvāra dot. It reads स्त्र्यं.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गस्त्ववगांशकम्"; alternatives "गस्तु + अवगांशकम् (the same letters, split differently)", "गस्त्वष्टांशकम्" — read at 6×: ग, then a conjunct of स् + त् + व, then a separate व, then गां with anusvāra, then श, क, म् with virāma. The two व glyphs are distinct and neither carries a mātrā. The fraction-word expected here by the sense is not obvious from these letters, so a checker should re-read this compound. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अर्द्धमेकगृहगस्त्रिकोणगस्त्र्यंशमस्तगृहगः स्वरांशकम्; this sentence names गस्त्ववगांशकम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: re-read. An eye reading of the 1937 plate (page_0147.png, store line index 29) at up to about 5.0x native found that the press sets no visarga after गृहग, and that the akṣara before श is गां. So the press prints the compound this note transcribes, and the press is defective. The mūla now reads गृहगः स्वरांशकम्, an emendation of the 1937 on the metre and the lexicon. That reading did not settle how the two व forms in the conjunct divide.]
  • About this edition: The four shares are ½ · ⅓ · 1/7 · ¼. The third one needs argument, because the reader could not settle the akṣaras and transcribed गस्त्ववगांशकम्, asking for a re-read. Four things independently fix the word as स्वरांशकम्, a seventh: (1) METRE — the pāda is Rathoddhatā (11 syllables, r-n-r-l-g), and only …गृहगः स्वरांशकम् scans it, giving G L G | L L L | G L G | L G exactly; the printed गस्त्ववगांशकम् has a syllable too many and breaks the pattern. (2) Sastri prints the Horāmakaranda verse on the facing page and it is this verse almost word for word: अर्द्धमेकभवने त्रिकोणयोस्त्र्यंशमस्तगृहगः स्वरांशकम् । पादमत्र चतुरस्रसंस्थिताः पाचयन्ति खचरा निजैर्गुणैः ॥ (3) Sārāvalī says it in plain words: सप्तमे सप्तमं भागं चतुर्थं चतुरश्रयोः, and Bṛhajjātaka स्मरगः स्वरांशम्. (4) Sastri's own table prints 1/2, 1/3, 1/7, 1/4 against the same four positions. I have therefore rendered a seventh and left the reading itself for the text stage to rule on. Two things Sastri's notes add that the mūla does not say: the lord of the daśā himself takes 1, the whole share, and where several grahas stand in one of these positions only the strongest of them gets an antardaśā. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अर्द्धमेकगृहगस्त्रिकोणगस्त्र्यंशमस्तगृहगः स्वरांशकम्; this sentence names गस्त्ववगांशकम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the text stage has ruled. The mūla now reads गृहगः स्वरांशकम्, a seventh, on the metre and the lexicon; a machine read of the Telugu 1926 store gives the same words. An eye reading of the 1937 plate at up to about 5.0x native confirmed that the press itself sets the defective compound, so this is an emendation of the 1937, and its reading is kept on the ledger.]

कृत्वांशकानामिह रूपमादौ छिदां समत्वं च तथा विनाशम् । निजैक्यभक्ताः पृथगंशकाः स्युरन्तर्दशाः स्वस्वसमाविनिघ्नाः

kṛtvāṃśakānāmiha rūpamādau chidāṃ samatvaṃ ca tathā vināśam | nijaikyabhaktāḥ pṛthagaṃśakāḥ syurantardaśāḥ svasvasamāvinighnāḥ

Here, first set rūpa ⟨unity, 1 — the share of the daśā lord himself⟩ at the head of the aṃśakas ⟨the fractional shares laid down in the previous verse: ½ for a graha in the same house as the daśā lord, ⅓ for one in a trikoṇa, 1/7 for one in the seventh, ¼ for one in the fourth or the eighth⟩; then make their chids ⟨denominators⟩ equal ⟨reduce them all to one common denominator⟩, and then destroy those denominators ⟨drop them and keep only the numerators, which are now whole numbers⟩. The several numerators, taken separately, each multiplied by the years of its own ⟨main⟩ daśā and divided by their own sum ⟨nija-aikya, the total of those numerators⟩, are the antardaśās ⟨the sub-periods within that daśā, one for each such graha⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Worked arithmetic, to show that no number is lost: if the shares standing against four grahas are 1, ½, ¼ and 1/7, the common denominator is 28, so the numerators become 28, 14, 7 and 4; their sum is 53; and the four antardaśās are 28/53, 14/53, 7/53 and 4/53 of the daśā's years. The edition sets out this very case. 'rūpam ādau' can also be read 'having made unity the numerator of each share' (write them 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/7); the list produced is the same either way, and Sastri reads it the second way.

अन्तर्दशाभ्यो विदशाः स्युरेवं ताभ्यस्तथैवोपदशाः प्रदिष्टाः । प्रत्यब्दमासद्युनिशाघटीषु फलं निगद्यं सदसच्च ताभ्यः

antardaśābhyo vidaśāḥ syurevaṃ tābhyastathaivopadaśāḥ pradiṣṭāḥ | pratyabdamāsadyuniśāghaṭīṣu phalaṃ nigadyaṃ sadasacca tābhyaḥ

From the antardaśās the vidaśās ⟨the third-level sub-periods⟩ arise in just this same way ⟨the shares are reckoned afresh from the lord of the antardaśā, reduced to a common denominator, and divided by their sum⟩; and from those vidaśās, again in the same way, the upadaśās ⟨the fourth-level sub-periods⟩ are taught. And from these ⟨the finest of the divisions⟩ the result, good and bad alike, is to be pronounced for each year, month, day, night and ghaṭī ⟨one ghaṭī = 24 minutes⟩.

7.18a reading here is contested

जन्मकालकलियातवत्सरोत्पन्नमध्यमरवौ समण्डले । निक्षिपेदथ दशादिजाः समामासवासरघटीविनाडिकाः

janmakālakaliyātavatsarotpannamadhyamaravau samaṇḍale | nikṣipedatha daśādijāḥ samāmāsavāsaraghaṭīvināḍikāḥ

⟨Take⟩ the mean Sun produced from the Kali years elapsed up to the moment of birth, together with its maṇḍalas ⟨the complete revolutions it has made, and the part of the current one⟩; into that one should then cast ⟨add⟩ the years, months, days, ghaṭīs and vināḍīs that arise from the daśā and the rest ⟨the daśā, the antardaśā, the vidaśā and the upadaśā, each expressed in those units⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मकालकलि"; alternatives "जन्मकाल्कलि" — the ल and the following क touch and at low magnification look like one ल्क ligature; read as separate ल + क, which is also what the pāda's syllable count requires
  • About this edition: The reader marked one ligature here: the ल and the following क of जन्मकालकलि touch on the plate and can look like a single ल्क. The syllable count of the pāda requires them separate, and the sense (janma-kāla-kali-yāta-vatsara, 'the Kali years elapsed at the time of birth') is not in doubt. The printed रव्यौ stands where the locative रवौ is expected; I have translated the locative, which is what the syntax and Sastri both require. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जन्मकालकलियातवत्सरोत्पन्नमध्यमरवौ; this sentence names रव्यौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

तादृशो भवति भास्करो यदा मध्यमो परदशा तदा भवेत् । साध्यते दिनगणोनुपाततः खेचराः सविकलादहर्गणात्

tādṛśo bhavati bhāskaro yadā madhyamo paradaśā tadā bhavet | sādhyate dinagaṇonupātataḥ khecarāḥ savikalādahargaṇāt

When the mean Sun becomes such ⟨that is, when it reaches the value got by that addition⟩, then the next daśā ⟨para-daśā, the one following in order⟩ begins. The dina-gaṇa ⟨the heap of days, the ahargaṇa, standing at that moment⟩ is established by anupāta ⟨the rule of three, shown in the next verse⟩; and the khecaras ⟨sky-goers, the planets⟩ are worked out from that ahargaṇa taken with its vikalās ⟨its fractional part, not the whole days alone⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: दिनगणोनुपाततः resolves as दिनगणः + अनुपाततः. परदशा is taken as 'the following daśā', which is how Sastri also read it — he says the daśās, antardaśās and the rest 'next in order have their beginning' when the Sun reaches each sum.
7.20a reading here is contested

युगार्कचक्रैर्युगसूर्यसावनो यदि द्युपिण्डः समवाप्यते तदा । दशाप्रवेशोद्भवसूर्यमण्डलैः सभांशलिप्तादिभिराप्यतेऽत्र कः २०

yugārkacakrairyugasūryasāvano yadi dyupiṇḍaḥ samavāpyate tadā | daśāpraveśodbhavasūryamaṇḍalaiḥ sabhāṃśaliptādibhirāpyate'tra kaḥ 20

If by the yuga's arka-cakras ⟨the number of complete revolutions the Sun makes in a yuga⟩ the yuga's solar sāvana dyupiṇḍa ⟨the heap of civil days contained in that same yuga⟩ is obtained, then by the Sun's maṇḍalas ⟨the revolutions standing completed⟩ that arise at the entry of the daśā — taken with their bha ⟨signs⟩, aṃśa ⟨degrees⟩, liptā ⟨minutes⟩ and the rest — what is obtained here? ⟨This is the rule of three: multiply the civil days of the yuga by the revolutions-and-fraction standing at the daśā's entry, and divide by the Sun's revolutions in a yuga. The quotient is the ahargaṇa, the count of days elapsed up to the beginning of that daśā. The two yuga figures are taken from whichever siddhānta one follows; the verse does not state them.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कः २०"; alternatives "कः ॥ २० ॥" — the numeral stands at the end of the line with no daṇḍas visible around it, unlike ॥ १८ ॥ and ॥१९॥ on the previous page
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आप्यतेऽत्र"; alternatives "आप्यते त्र", "आप्यतेत्र" — a small ऽ glyph appears between ते and त्र; it is thin and sits low
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 20.
  • About this edition: The plate sets the numeral 20 at the end of the line with no daṇḍas around it, unlike ॥ १८ ॥ and ॥१९॥ on the page before; the verse is published at position 20, and Sastri numbers this same verse Sloka 20. The reader also marked a thin, low-set ऽ between ते and त्र (आप्यतेऽत्र); the avagraha is required by the sandhi आप्यते + अत्र and I have translated it so. The claim I render and the claim Sastri renders are the same proportion, in the same order.
7.21a reading here is contested

सविकलादितिसिद्धदिनव्रजात् कथिततन्त्रविधेः कुरु खेचरान् । स्फुटतरानुदयं च निजोदयैरितिविधाय ततोऽत्र विचिन्तयेत्

savikalāditisiddhadinavrajāt kathitatantravidheḥ kuru khecarān | sphuṭatarānudayaṃ ca nijodayairitividhāya tato'tra vicintayet

From the day-heap thus established, together with its vikalās ⟨the fractional part of the ahargaṇa got by the proportion of the previous verse⟩, and by the procedure of the tantra ⟨the siddhānta treatise⟩ that has been named ⟨the one you compute by⟩, work out the khecaras ⟨the planets⟩ very exactly, and the udaya ⟨the lagna, the sign rising at that moment⟩ by the rising-times of one's own place ⟨nija-udaya, the local ascensional periods of the signs⟩. Having done this, one should then consider ⟨the good and the bad of that daśā⟩ here.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सविकलादितिसिद्ध"; alternatives "सविकलादीतिसिद्ध", "सविकलादिति सिद्ध" — read at 1.7×: दि is short and ति follows, set solid with no break; the word division inside the compound is not marked on the page
  • About this edition: The reader could not see the word-division inside सविकलादितिसिद्ध on the page. I read it सविकलात् + इति सिद्ध-दिन-व्रजात् ('from the day-heap so established, with its fraction'), which is also the claim Sastri carries: the ahargaṇa and the portion of it got by the proportion of the previous verse.

दशापतिर्लग्नगतो यदि स्यात् त्रिषड्दशैकादशगश्च लग्नात् । तत्सप्तवर्गोऽप्यथ तत्सुहृद्वा लग्ने शुभो वा शुभदा दशा सा

daśāpatirlagnagato yadi syāt triṣaḍdaśaikādaśagaśca lagnāt | tatsaptavargo'pyatha tatsuhṛdvā lagne śubho vā śubhadā daśā sā

If the daśāpati ⟨the lord of the daśā⟩ stands in the lagna ⟨the sign rising at the moment the daśā begins⟩, or, counted from that lagna, in the 3rd, the 6th, the 10th or the 11th; or if that lagna falls within his saptavarga ⟨the seven divisional charts of the daśā lord, so that the rising sign is a varga of his own⟩; or if a friend of his, or a benefic, stands in the lagna — then that daśā is one that gives good.

7.23a reading here is contested

यावन्ति वर्षाणि दशा च सा स्वाचाराक्रमात्त्र दशापतिः सः । यत्र स्थितस्तद्भवनाद्विधोश्च स्थितेः प्रकल्प्यं सदसत्फलं हि

yāvanti varṣāṇi daśā ca sā svācārākramāttra daśāpatiḥ saḥ | yatra sthitastadbhavanādvidhośca sthiteḥ prakalpyaṃ sadasatphalaṃ hi

Through however many years that daśā runs, the daśāpati ⟨its lord⟩ stands here in one house and another by the order of his own cāra ⟨his actual transit, the motion he makes through the signs during those years⟩; and from that house in which he stands, and from the standing of the Moon as well, the good and the bad result is to be worked out.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सां"; alternatives "सा" — a clear round dot stands over the ा at 3x; taken as an anusvara [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सा; this sentence names सां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled. An eye reading of p. 158 (store line index 18) at about 4.6x and 5.6x native found that the mark over the ा is not an anusvāra of this fount. It measures 11 x 13 px with 88 dark pixels and stands 37 px above the headline, where the two anusvāras in this verse's second line measure 21 x 25 and 18 x 26 px with 266 and 257 dark pixels and stand 11 and 9 px above it. The press sets सा, and the mūla now reads सा.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमात्त्र"; alternatives "क्रमात्र", "क्रमादत्र" — after मा the type shows a doubled त before the र-conjunct [2026-09-23: an eye reading of p. 158 at about 5.6x native found that the press sets क्रमात्त्र, as read here. The sort after मा is a stemless त-form and not द (overlap 0.299 and 0.290 against two द on the same opening, where द against द measures 0.733), and the word-final sort is त्र (0.770). The alternative क्रमादत्र, proposed on the metre on 2026-09-20, is withdrawn. The pāda's one-syllable shortfall is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • About this edition: Two marks on this verse. The reader saw a clear dot over the ा of सा and read सां; the syntax wants the feminine nominative सा ('that daśā'), and I have translated it so. After मा the type shows a doubled त before the र-conjunct (क्रमात्त्र); I read स्वचारक्रमात् + अत्र, which Sastri's copy plainly had too — his rendering says the lord of the daśā occupies the house 'for the time, in its progress through its orbit', which is what स्वचार gives. The reader's alternative क्रमादत्र is the same resolution spelled out. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सा; this sentence names सां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of p. 158 at about 4.6x and 5.6x native settles both marks. The mark over the ा is a speck, not an anusvāra, so the press sets सा, and the mūla now reads सा, the form the syntax wants and the English and Hindi render. After मा the press sets no द, so क्रमादत्र is refused; the mūla keeps क्रमात्त्र as printed, and its pāda is one syllable short, recorded as an open doubt.]

दशाधिनाथस्य सुहृद्गृहस्थस्तदुच्चगो वाऽथ दशाधिनाथात् । स्वरात्रिकोणोपचयस्थितश्च ददाति चन्द्रः खलु सत्फलानि

daśādhināthasya suhṛdgṛhasthastaduccago vā'tha daśādhināthāt | svarātrikoṇopacayasthitaśca dadāti candraḥ khalu satphalāni

The Moon gives good results indeed when he stands in the house of a friend of the daśādhinātha ⟨the lord of the daśā⟩, or in that lord's own exaltation sign, or — counted from the daśādhinātha — in the 7th ⟨svara = 7, the seven notes⟩, in a trikoṇa ⟨the 5th or the 9th⟩, or in an upacaya ⟨the 3rd, 6th, 10th or 11th⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: स्वर is the number-word for 7 (the seven musical notes), so स्वर-त्रिकोण-उपचय names three sets of houses: the 7th, the trikoṇas and the upacayas. The plate prints स्वरात्रिकोण- with a long ā; the extra mātrā is invisible to the metre (both स्वर-त्रि and स्वरा-त्रि scan ⏑ – ⏑, giving a sound Upendravajrā pāda), so it cannot be decided by metre. It is decided by two witnesses: Sastri reads 'the 7th house, a Trikona house, any one of the Upachaya houses', and the Keśavapaddhati verse the edition prints directly below this one says दशानाथात् …नवसप्तमोपचयगो — 9th, 7th, upacaya. I have not altered the mūla.
7.25a reading here is contested

उक्तेषु राशिषु गतस्य विधोः स राशिः स्याज्जन्मकालभवमूर्तिधनादिभावः । तच्चद्विवृद्धिकृदसौ कथितो नराणां तद्भावहानिकृदथेतरराशिसंस्थः

ukteṣu rāśiṣu gatasya vidhoḥ sa rāśiḥ syājjanmakālabhavamūrtidhanādibhāvaḥ | taccadvivṛddhikṛdasau kathito narāṇāṃ tadbhāvahānikṛdathetararāśisaṃsthaḥ

When the Moon has gone into the said ⟨favourable⟩ rāśis, that rāśi of his is to be taken as whichever bhāva it was at the time of birth — the mūrti ⟨tanu, the 1st, the body⟩, the dhana ⟨the 2nd, wealth⟩ and the rest. Standing so, he is declared to bring growth to that very bhāva for men; standing in the other ⟨the unfavourable⟩ rāśis, he brings that same bhāva to loss.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तच्चद्विवृद्धिकृदसौ"; alternatives "तत्तद्वृद्धिकृदसौ", "तच्चाद्विवृद्धिकृदसौ" — at 4x the second and third aksharas are heavily inked; the parallel Kesava line below prints तत्तद्वृद्धिकरोऽथ
  • About this edition: The reader marked तच्चद्विवृद्धिकृदसौ as heavily inked and offered तत्तद्वृद्धिकृदसौ and तच्चाद्विवृद्धिकृदसौ. Metre decides it. The pāda is Vasantatilakā (– – ⏑ – ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ – ⏑ ⏑ – ⏑ – –): तत्तद्विवृद्धिकृदसौ कथितो नराणां scans exactly, and so does the printed तच्चद्वि-, while तत्तद्वृद्धि- is a syllable short and breaks the line. त्त and च्च are near-identical ligatures in this fount. So the sense is तत्तद्विवृद्धिकृत्, 'causing the growth of that respective bhāva' — which is also what the Keśava line printed below reads (तत्तद्वृद्धिकरोऽथ) and what Sastri renders. I have translated that sense and left the mūla untouched.
7.26a reading here is contested

दशाप्रवेशे स्वगृहादिसंस्थे हिमद्युतौ यत्फलमुक्तमाद्यैः । तद्वाच्यमिन्दुर्हि शुभाशुभाख्यं फलं मनोरूपतया ददाति

daśāpraveśe svagṛhādisaṃsthe himadyutau yatphalamuktamādyaiḥ | tadvācyamindurhi śubhāśubhākhyaṃ phalaṃ manorūpatayā dadāti

At the entry of a daśā, when the hima-dyuti ⟨the cold-rayed one, the Moon⟩ stands in his own house and so on ⟨sva-gṛha-ādi — his own sign, and in turn the sign of each other graha⟩, whatever result the ādyas ⟨the earlier authorities, Varāhamihira and the rest⟩ have stated ⟨for that position⟩ is the result to be pronounced; for the Moon gives the result called good and bad in the form of the mind ⟨mano-rūpatayā — as states of mind, as pleasure and pain⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुक्तमाद्यैः"; alternatives "युक्तमाद्यैः" — the ai-matra over द्य is broken into two detached strokes
  • About this edition: Three things. (1) खगृह is read as the house of a khaga (a planet), by haplology for खगगृह; Sastri's copy gave him the same sense — 'his own house or that of other planets' — and the Bṛhat Jātaka verse (VIII.11) the edition quotes underneath begins प्रारब्धा हिमगौ दशा स्वगृहगे, the Moon in his own house. (2) The reader hesitated between मुक्तमाद्यैः and युक्तमाद्यैः because the ai-mātrā over द्य is broken into two strokes; यत् फलम् उक्तम् आद्यैः ('what result the earlier writers stated') is the reading required by the syntax. (3) The witness block attached to this verse breaks off mid-sentence at 'the effect of the Moon being in'; the sentence finishes on the next page of the plate read, and that continuation is what I have compared against. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वगृहादिसंस्थे; this sentence names खगृह, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Point (1) is superseded. Our mūla read खगृह until 2026-09-23 and now reads स्वगृहादिसंस्थे. The plate pass opened the 1937 body line by eye that day (sripati-paddhati.pdf PDF p.159, printed p.144, at about 3.4x native) and found that the press sets स्वगृहादिसंस्थे: the first sort of the second word is स्व, not ख. It is 71 px wide, against 56 and 57 px for two ख sorts of this edition and 65 and 67 px for two स्व sorts. So the defence of खगृह as haplology for खगगृह answered a word the press does not set; our transcription had misread it. A machine read of the edition's own index of first lines (store page_0185, line 23), Sastri's English 'his own house or that of other planets' and the Bṛhat Jātaka VIII.11 line quoted beneath, प्रारब्धा हिमगौ दशा स्वगृहगे, all agree with the body line. Points (2) and (3) stand.]

उत्पादितं हि द्युचरस्य पूर्वं शुभाशुभाख्यं तु फलं यदत्र । तेनानुसारेण दशासु कल्प्यं शरीरभाजामशुभं शुभं च

utpāditaṃ hi dyucarasya pūrvaṃ śubhāśubhākhyaṃ tu phalaṃ yadatra | tenānusāreṇa daśāsu kalpyaṃ śarīrabhājāmaśubhaṃ śubhaṃ ca

Whatever result called good or bad has already been produced here for a dyucara ⟨sky-goer, a planet⟩ ⟨that is, its iṣṭa and kaṣṭa values, worked out in the fourth adhyāya⟩ — following that, the bad and the good for embodied beings is to be reckoned in the daśās.

इष्टोत्कटत्वे हि शुभानि पुंसां फलान्यनिष्टान्यशुभोत्कटत्वे । साम्ये तु मिश्राणि फलानि नूनं फलं त्रिधैवं परिकल्पनीयम् ॥

iṣṭotkaṭatve hi śubhāni puṃsāṃ phalānyaniṣṭānyaśubhotkaṭatve | sāmye tu miśrāṇi phalāni nūnaṃ phalaṃ tridhaivaṃ parikalpanīyam ||

When the iṣṭa ⟨the auspicious portion of a graha's value, the iṣṭa rays⟩ is utkaṭa ⟨in excess, predominant⟩, the results for men are good; when the inauspicious portion ⟨kaṣṭa⟩ is in excess, the results are unwanted. But when the two are equal, the results are assuredly mixed. In these three ways, and no other, the result is to be reckoned.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 28.
  • About this edition: The plate prints no number after this verse, though it closes with ॥; it is published at position 28, and Sastri also numbers it Sloka 28. Our reading and his agree on all three cases and on their order.
7.29a reading here is contested

सप्तवर्गजफलस्य सूरिभिस्तत्प्रभोरिह फलस्य निश्चयात् । एवमेव परिकल्पना स्फुटा शोभनाशुभफलस्य कीर्तिता

saptavargajaphalasya sūribhistatprabhoriha phalasya niścayāt | evameva parikalpanā sphuṭā śobhanāśubhaphalasya kīrtitā

The clear reckoning of the good and bad result that arises from the saptavarga ⟨the seven divisional charts a graha owns⟩ has been declared by the sūris ⟨the learned⟩ to be made in just this same ⟨threefold⟩ way — that is, from the determination here of the result ⟨the iṣṭa and kaṣṭa⟩ of the lord of each such varga.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूरिभिस्"; alternatives "धूरिभिस्" — at tile magnification the स् + ू read as ध; zoomed 3× the स is clear and the ू hangs below it
  • About this edition: The reader noted that स् with its ū-mātrā reads as ध at tile magnification and is clear at 3×; सूरिभिः ('by the learned') is the reading, and it is what the sense requires. Sastri's copy had the same word — he renders it 'say the sages'.

यद्यद्द्रव्यं कथितमृषिभिर्यस्य यस्य ग्रहस्य कर्माजीवोऽपि च तनुभृतां यश्च यश्चोदितोऽत्र । यद्भावोत्थं यदपि गृहजं योगजं दृष्टिजं यत् तत्तत्सर्वं ग्रहबलवशाद्योजनीयं दशासु

yadyaddravyaṃ kathitamṛṣibhiryasya yasya grahasya karmājīvo'pi ca tanubhṛtāṃ yaśca yaścodito'tra | yadbhāvotthaṃ yadapi gṛhajaṃ yogajaṃ dṛṣṭijaṃ yat tattatsarvaṃ grahabalavaśādyojanīyaṃ daśāsu

Whatever dravya ⟨substance, commodity⟩ the ṛṣis have declared to belong to each several graha; and whatever karma ⟨work⟩ and ājīva ⟨livelihood⟩ of embodied beings has been stated here for each; and whatever result arises from a bhāva, whatever from a gṛha ⟨the sign a graha occupies⟩, whatever from a yoga ⟨a combination⟩, whatever from a dṛṣṭi ⟨an aspect⟩ — all of that, every one of them, is to be applied to the daśās according to the strength ⟨bala⟩ of the grahas ⟨that govern them⟩.

Adhyāya 8 · प्रकीर्णकाध्यायोऽष्टमः

बहुप्रकारं बहुधाऽत्र भुज्यते यतः फलं प्राणिगणैः प्रतिक्षणम् । प्रकीर्णरूपस्य फलस्य निर्णयस्ततो मयाऽसावधुनाऽभिधास्यते

bahuprakāraṃ bahudhā'tra bhujyate yataḥ phalaṃ prāṇigaṇaiḥ pratikṣaṇam | prakīrṇarūpasya phalasya nirṇayastato mayā'sāvadhunā'bhidhāsyate

Since the phala (the ripened fruit of past karma), which is of many kinds, is enjoyed here in many ways and at every moment by the hosts of living beings, the settling of phala in its prakīrṇa form — the miscellany, the matters left over that no single earlier adhyāya gathered up — will now be stated by me.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The metre settles a doubled letter in the printed pāda d. The page sets मयाऽसाववधुनाऽभिधास्यते, which counts 13 syllables; the verse is vaṃśastha and wants 12. With a single व — मयाऽसावधुनाऽभिधास्यते, i.e. मया + असौ + अधुना + अभिधास्यते, 'this will now be told by me' — the pāda scans exactly (la-ga-la-ga ga-la-la-ga la-ga-la-ga). अवधुना is no word; the second व is the press's. Sastri agrees on the claim: the subject is the fruit of past karma, enjoyed at every moment, and the chapter will treat it in its miscellaneous aspects. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मयाऽसावधुनाऽभिधास्यते; this sentence names मयाऽसाववधुनाऽभिधास्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

अष्टवर्गजफलं ग्रहस्य यत् साध्वसाध्वपि च तस्य लग्नतः । चन्द्रतोप्युपचयस्थितोच्चभस्वत्रिकोणसुहृदालयेषु तत्

aṣṭavargajaphalaṃ grahasya yat sādhvasādhvapi ca tasya lagnataḥ | candratopyupacayasthitoccabhasvatrikoṇasuhṛdālayeṣu tat

Whatever phala of a graha arises out of the aṣṭakavarga (the eight-fold reckoning of benefic points), be it good or not good — that fruit ⟨is measured by where the graha's own dignities fall⟩: when its ucca-bha (the sign of its exaltation), its sva ⟨-kṣetra, its own sign⟩, its trikoṇa ⟨mūlatrikoṇa⟩ and the house of a friend stand in the upacaya places — the 3rd, 6th, 10th and 11th — counted from the lagna, and counted from the Moon as well, then —

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Verses 2 and 3 are one sentence and Sastri translates them as one block; the rendering is split at the same joint the Sanskrit is. The four dignities are a single compound running across pādas c–d: उच्चभ-स्व-त्रिकोण-सुहृद्-आलयेषु. The house-numbers of the upacayas (3, 6, 10, 11) are supplied in ⟨ ⟩ — the verse names them only by the term upacaya.

पूर्णं शुभं स्यादशुभं च हीनं विपर्यये कष्टफलं हि पुष्टम् । अपुष्टमिष्टं पुनरत्र वाच्यं बलाबलं तस्य विचार्य सम्यक्

pūrṇaṃ śubhaṃ syādaśubhaṃ ca hīnaṃ viparyaye kaṣṭaphalaṃ hi puṣṭam | apuṣṭamiṣṭaṃ punaratra vācyaṃ balābalaṃ tasya vicārya samyak

— then the good is pūrṇa, realised to its full measure, and the bad falls short. In the reverse case ⟨when those dignities do not fall in the upacayas⟩ the kaṣṭa-phala, the painful fruit, is the well-fed one and the iṣṭa, the desired fruit, is the stunted one. And even here the declaration is to be made only after weighing properly the strength and the weakness of that ⟨graha⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Continues verse 2; the two are one sentence. Sastri agrees on every claim: full good and reduced evil in the favourable positions, the reverse elsewhere, and the declaration only after weighing the planet's strong and weak points.

ये राजयोगाः कथिता हि तेषां भङ्गो न चेत्स्यात्सफलास्तदा ते । ज्ञेया बुधैर्योगदवीर्ययोगाद्द्युगामिनां रश्मिफलानि तद्वत्

ye rājayogāḥ kathitā hi teṣāṃ bhaṅgo na cetsyātsaphalāstadā te | jñeyā budhairyogadavīryayogāddyugāmināṃ raśmiphalāni tadvat

The rājayogas that have been declared ⟨earlier in this work⟩ — if no bhaṅga (cancellation) of them occurs, then they bear fruit, and the wise are to know them so from the yoga (the summing) of the strength of the yoga-giving grahas, that is, from the combined strength of the planets that make the yoga. In the same way are to be known the raśmi-phalas, the fruits of the rays of the sky-goers ⟨the iṣṭa and kaṣṭa rays computed in adhyāya 4⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Metre and witness together correct one printed vowel. The page sets ज्ञेया बुधैर्योगादवीर्ययोगाद्, giving yogād a-vīrya-, 'from a yoga without strength', which is both the wrong sense and one syllable-weight out: pāda c is indravajrā (ga-ga-la-ga-ga-la-la-ga-la-ga-ga) and gā at position 6 must be light. Read योगदवीर्ययोगाद् — yoga-da-vīrya-yogāt, 'from the summed strength of the yoga-GIVING grahas' — and the pāda scans exactly. Sastri read it the same way on the claim: the yogas act according to the strength of the planets that produce them. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बुधैर्योगदवीर्ययोगाद्द्युगामिनां; this sentence names बुधैर्योगादवीर्ययोगाद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The first sentence above is wrong about the page. The plate pass opened the exemplar plate by eye that day (page_0165, printed p.150, at about 1.9x, 3.3x and 5.0x native) and found that the press sets ज्ञेया बुधैर्योगदवीर्ययोगाद्: the ग carries no ā-stroke, and the next letter is द. So योगद is the printing's own reading, not an emendation of it. The long ā was a misread in our transcription, and the mūla now reads योगदवीर्य. The metre and the sense argued above stand.]

दशानामरिष्टे तथा चास्य भङ्गे दशारिष्टभङ्गेशवीर्योत्कटत्वात् । दशारिष्टभङ्गौ बुधैः कल्पनीयौ विधाय ग्रहान्किन्तु तत्कालजातान् ॥

daśānāmariṣṭe tathā cāsya bhaṅge daśāriṣṭabhaṅgeśavīryotkaṭatvāt | daśāriṣṭabhaṅgau budhaiḥ kalpanīyau vidhāya grahānkintu tatkālajātān ||

When ariṣṭa (a threatened calamity) stands in the course of the daśās, and likewise when a bhaṅga (a cancelling) of that ariṣṭa also stands, then, by which of them carries the fiercer strength — the lord of the daśā, the lord of the ariṣṭa, or the lord of the bhaṅga — the wise are to settle both the daśā-ariṣṭa and its bhaṅga; but only after casting the grahas as they are born at that very moment ⟨the planets computed afresh for the time the daśā runs, not the positions of birth⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 5.
  • About this edition: The operative instruction is the last pāda: विधाय ग्रहान् किन्तु तत्कालजातान्, 'but having made the grahas as born at that time' — the strengths are to be weighed on planets computed for the moment the daśā runs. Sastri agrees: the preponderance is arrived at from the strengths of the planets at the time of the Dasas. The metre is bhujaṅgaprayāta (la-ga-ga four times) and the verse scans whole, which supports the editors' note that this is a verse in its own right though the press prints no number after it.

क्रूरखेचरदशासमये चेद् दारुणान्तरदशाविनिपातः । तत्करोति बहुधा विपदं स प्राणिनामतितरामरियोगे

krūrakhecaradaśāsamaye ced dāruṇāntaradaśāvinipātaḥ | tatkaroti bahudhā vipadaṃ sa prāṇināmatitarāmariyoge

If, while the daśā of a cruel sky-goer (a malefic graha) is running, the fall of a harsh antardaśā comes down upon it, then that brings calamity upon living beings in many forms — and most of all in an ari-yoga, when the two lords stand to one another as enemies.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: अरियोगे is read as the relation of enmity between the daśā lord and the antardaśā lord, and Sastri reads it the same way.

दशाप्रवेशे बलवान् ग्रहश्चेच्छुभाधिमित्रग्रहवर्गसंस्थः । निरीक्षितः सौम्यसुहृद्ग्रहैश्च दशास्वरिष्टस्य तदा हि भङ्गः

daśāpraveśe balavān grahaścecchubhādhimitragrahavargasaṃsthaḥ | nirīkṣitaḥ saumyasuhṛdgrahaiśca daśāsvariṣṭasya tadā hi bhaṅgaḥ

If at the entry of a daśā the graha ⟨whose period begins⟩ is strong, stands in the varga (the divisional holding) of a benefic or of an adhimitra graha — an adhimitra being the highest grade of friend — and is looked upon by benefic and friendly grahas, then in those daśās the ariṣṭa is broken.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: One small difference from Sastri. He resolves शुभाधिमित्रग्रहवर्ग as a single description, 'the varga of a benefic adhimitra planet'; I read it as a dvandva, 'the varga of a benefic OR of an adhimitra graha', because a graha can be an adhimitra without being a natural benefic and the verse's second condition (aspect by benefic and friendly grahas) already pairs the two categories separately. The practical outcome is the same in most charts and differs only where an adhimitra malefic holds the varga.
8.8a reading here is contested

स्त्रीणामुक्तं जातके यच्च पुंवत् तल्लग्नेन्द्वोर्वीर्यतोऽत्र प्रकल्प्यम् । योगात्तासां यच्छुभं वाऽशुभं वा तन्निःशेषं कल्पयेत् खेटवीर्यात्

strīṇāmuktaṃ jātake yacca puṃvat tallagnendvorvīryato'tra prakalpyam | yogāttāsāṃ yacchubhaṃ vā'śubhaṃ vā tanniḥśeṣaṃ kalpayet kheṭavīryāt

Whatever is declared in the jātaka ⟨-śāstra⟩ concerning women just as it is concerning men is to be settled here from the strength of the lagna and of the Moon. And whatever good or evil is said to come to them out of a yoga, the whole of it, leaving no remainder, one should work out from the strength of the kheṭas (the grahas).

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तल्लग्नेन्द्वोर्वीर्यतोऽत्र"; alternatives "तल्लग्नेन्द्वोर्वीयतोऽत्र" — the long conjunct र्वी…र्य is crowded and partly filled in; the avagraha ऽ before अत्र is clearly printed
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ ८) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
  • About this edition: The reader marked the crowded conjunct in तल्लग्नेन्द्वोर्वीर्यतोऽत्र, offering वीयतो as an alternative. वीर्यतः, 'from the strength', is the word; वीयतः is not a Sanskrit form, and वीर्यतः is what the second half repeats (खेटवीर्यात्). The verse is śālinī and scans exactly with it. The press opens this verse's number (॥ ८) and never closes it before the colophon; the verse itself is complete in four pādas.
8.9a reading here is contested

नैर्याणिका ये कथिताश्च योगाः स्थितिं च तेषामिह भावकॢप्त्या । विज्ञाय धीमान् ग्रहयोगजातं निर्याणमस्मिन् परिकल्पयेच्च

nairyāṇikā ye kathitāśca yogāḥ sthitiṃ ca teṣāmiha bhāvakḷptyā | vijñāya dhīmān grahayogajātaṃ niryāṇamasmin parikalpayecca

The nairyāṇika yogas that have been declared ⟨in the śāstra⟩ — the combinations bearing on niryāṇa, a man's going forth from the body — and how they stand here ⟨in the chart before him⟩, the wise man should ascertain by bhāva-kḷpti, the working out of the bhāvas ⟨the cusp computation of adhyāya 1⟩; and he should then settle the niryāṇa in this ⟨nativity⟩ from what the conjunction of the grahas yields.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भावकॢप्त्या"; alternatives "भावक्लृप्त्या", "भावकॢप्त्या" — zoomed 3×: a subscript loop hangs below the क, so the vowel is ॢ; the press may have set it as a क्लृ ligature
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt over भावकॢप्त्या is resolved by the word itself: kḷpti is from √kḷp and carries the vocalic ḷ, so a subscript loop under the क is right whether the press cut it as ॢ or as a क्लृ ligature. Either cutting gives one heavy syllable before the conjunct pty, so the upendravajrā pāda scans the same way. Sastri agrees on the claim, and his note points the reader to the niryāṇa yogas of other works; that note is his own and is not rendered here.
8.10a reading here is contested

कार्या प्रश्ननिमित्तपूर्वंशकुनैरक्षन्स्वमानं धिया होराज्ञेन सुबुद्धिनात्र बहुशोऽर्कस्य कालो बली

kāryā praśnanimittapūrvaṃśakunairakṣansvamānaṃ dhiyā horājñena subuddhinātra bahuśo'rkasya kālo balī

⟨The reading⟩ is to be made by means of the praśna (the query as it is actually put), the nimitta (the attendant portent) and the other śakunas (omens): let the knower of horā, being of sound understanding, guard his own māna ⟨his standing, the credit he carries as an astrologer⟩ by his judgement; for here, many times over, it is the kāla, the time, of the Sun ⟨arka⟩ that is the strong one.

5 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: ⛔ NOT ŚRĪPATI'S VERSE. This passage is a QUOTATION that V. Subrahmanya Sastri prints inside his own notes, from केशव (Keśava), the Keśavapaddhati — his own verse 40. It is kept here because the page prints it and a reader following our verse numbers would otherwise find a hole; it is marked `kind: "quotation"` so it does not count toward this work's length. THE SOURCE LABEL IS ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE — The label केशवपद्धतिः— stands at the foot of the previous plate. Sastri prints the whole Keśavapaddhati through his edition in the smaller type, verse by verse, keeping Keśava's own numbers. This passage is the last two pādas of a śārdūlavikrīḍita stanza whose first two are at the foot of printed p. 153. HOW IT WAS RULED, on the ink at 600 ppi: Connected-component analysis on the native plate (page_0169.png, 2916×4876, 1-bit at 600 ppi): median glyph height 48 px for this passage against 70-76 px for Śrīpati's verses 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 on the same and facing pages, and 50 px for the Keśava quotation at the foot of p. 168 — the same face. Set width agrees: 64 px per syllable here against Śrīpati's much wider setting. THE NUMERAL: ⛔ THE NUMERAL IS ॥ ४० ॥, NOT ॥ ९० ॥ — corrected on the ink. The second mark is a closed ring with a white counter, a ०, measuring 29 × 31 px (ratio 0.94) against the ० of Śrīpati's own ॥ १० ॥ five lines below at 40 × 43 (ratio 0.93). The double daṇḍa on the same line is 50-51 px tall and this glyph is 31. There is no fraction stroke, no bracket and no damage anywhere in the numeral group. The earlier reading ९० was one of two the brief asked to be told apart; the answer is neither — the first digit is ४. THE METRE: śārdūlavikrīḍita, 19 syllables per pāda. Śrīpati's adhyāya 8 is otherwise upajāti and anuṣṭubh. ⚠ WHY IT WAS EVER TAKEN FOR ŚRĪPATI'S: the reader who transcribed its page tagged it `role: "mula"`, and they were reading that page alone. A one-page-per-agent reader structurally cannot see a label printed on the page before. The same failure put 72 syllables of Parāśara inside record 3.16, found the same day.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्वं"; alternatives "पूर्व" — a repha hook and a separate dot both stand over the व; the dot may be an anusvāra or an ink speck
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रक्षन्स्वमानं"; alternatives "लक्षन्स्वमानं" — the conjunct after र is worn; read क्ष
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९० within its adhyāya; it is published at position 10.
  • About this edition: Read this verse with caution, for three reasons that all point the same way, and the rendering of its second half is provisional. (1) Sastri gives NO translation for it. He translates every other verse of the adhyāya; here he goes straight from his Sloka 9 (our verse 9) to his Sloka 10 (our verse 11). (2) The press numbers it ॥ ९० ॥, which fits nothing: verse 9 before it closes ॥ ९ ॥ and the verse after it closes ॥ १० ॥. (3) Sastri's own tally of the work counts adhyāya 8 as 11 ślokas, and 11 is exactly our thirteen verses less this one and less the closing count-verse, so his text does not count this verse at all. To the Sanskrit itself: pāda a is sound śārdūlavikrīḍita and its metre settles the reader's first doubt — पूर्व, not पूर्वं, since an anusvāra there makes position 9 heavy where the metre requires light, so the dot over the व is ink and not a mark. On the reader's second doubt I read रक्षन् (present participle of √rakṣ, 'guarding'); लक्षन् is not a Sanskrit form. Pāda b, however, counts only 18 syllables where śārdūlavikrīḍita requires 19: the pāda scans cleanly through बहुशो and again from कालो to the end, so the one missing syllable sits in or beside ऽर्कस्य. I have not restored it, and I have not smoothed the syntax it broke; what is rendered above is what the surviving words say.
8.11a reading here is contested

कण्टकादिपरिभाषयानया प्रोक्तया सकलभावजातया । जातकोदितफलस्य निश्चितं प्रत्ययो भवति धीमतामिह

kaṇṭakādiparibhāṣayānayā proktayā sakalabhāvajātayā | jātakoditaphalasya niścitaṃ pratyayo bhavati dhīmatāmiha

By this paribhāṣā, the settled terminology beginning with kaṇṭaka — kaṇṭaka or kendra ⟨the 1st, 4th, 7th and 10th⟩, paṇaphara ⟨the 2nd, 5th, 8th and 11th⟩, āpoklima ⟨the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th⟩ — which has been declared ⟨in this work⟩ and which is framed over the whole body of the bhāvas, the wise here reach a settled pratyaya, a firm conviction, about the fruit declared in jātaka.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परिभाषयानया"; alternatives "परिभापयानया" — the ष is inked heavily and reads close to प
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १० within its adhyāya; it is published at position 11.
  • About this edition: Two things. First, the witness blocks are off by one from here to the end of the chapter: Sastri's Sloka 10 is this verse, his Sloka 11 is our verse 12 and his Sloka 12 is our verse 13, because his text does not count our verse 10. The block attached to our verse 10 by number belonged here, and I have used it here. Second, the reader's doubt over परिभाषया is settled by the lexicon: परिभाषा is the technical term for a settled convention, and परिभापया is no word. The house-numbers of kendra, paṇaphara and āpoklima are supplied in ⟨ ⟩; the verse says only कण्टकादि, 'kaṇṭaka and the rest'. Sastri names the same three terms and, in a note of his own, draws from this verse the conclusion that for Śrīpati these terms belong to the bhāvas and not to the rāśis.

इति जातककर्मपद्धतिं गुरुपादाब्जयुगप्रसादतः । वरशिष्यजनप्रबोधिनीं कृतवान् श्रीपतिरग्रजाग्रणीः

iti jātakakarmapaddhatiṃ gurupādābjayugaprasādataḥ | varaśiṣyajanaprabodhinīṃ kṛtavān śrīpatiragrajāgraṇīḥ

Thus has Śrīpati, foremost among the agrajas (the first-born, the brāhmaṇas), by the grace of the pair of lotus-feet of his guru, made the Jātaka-karma-paddhati, which awakens ⟨the understanding of⟩ the company of worthy pupils.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ११ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 12.
  • About this edition: Sastri's Sloka 11 block belongs to this verse (see the note on verse 11), and he agrees on every claim: the guru's lotus-feet, the title जातककर्मपद्धति, and अग्रजाग्रणीः taken as foremost among the brāhmaṇas.

अध्यायानामष्टके वृत्तसंख्या संजातासां षट्त्रिचन्द्रप्रमाणा । प्रोक्तानुष्टुप्छन्दसा ग्रन्थसंख्या श्लोकेनैकेनाढ्यया हि द्विशत्या

adhyāyānāmaṣṭake vṛttasaṃkhyā saṃjātāsāṃ ṣaṭtricandrapramāṇā | proktānuṣṭupchandasā granthasaṃkhyā ślokenaikenāḍhyayā hi dviśatyā

In the set of eight adhyāyas the number of vṛttas (verses) that have come together amounts to ṣaṭ-tri-candra — ṣaṭ (6), tri (3), candra (1), which set down in that order gives 6,3,1 and is read from the right, by the rule that digits move leftward, as 136. And the grantha-count, reckoned by the anuṣṭubh metre ⟨one grantha being 32 syllables⟩, is declared to be two hundred enriched by a single śloka, that is 201.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १२ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 13.
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ १२) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
  • About this edition: Both numbers are bhūtasaṃkhyā or near it and both are decoded in the rendering. षट्त्रिचन्द्र = 6,3,1 read right to left = 136; Sastri's English gives 136 as well, so the witness confirms the decoding. द्विशत्या ... श्लोकेन एकेन आढ्यया = 200 + 1 = 201, and Sastri gives 201. One caution worth recording: by Sastri's own reckoning this verse is not part of Śrīpati's text. His chapter tally makes adhyāya 8 eleven ślokas, which excludes both this verse and our verse 10, and his note treats this closing count-verse as an addition — the count of 136 it states cannot include the verse that states it. The press opens this verse's number (॥ १२) and never closes it before the colophon.

Use it freely — CC BY 4.0. This Sanskrit transcription and this English translation are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Copy them, print them, build on them; the only condition is attribution to Karma Sakha (karmasakha.com). The underlying work is ancient and in the public domain everywhere.

If you find an error, it is ours and we want it. Every reading on this page is recorded with the evidence behind it, so a disagreement can be argued about concretely rather than asserted.

Readings on this site cite texts at chapter level, with verse numbers only where our research verified the passage in a named edition. How conflicts between texts are resolved is documented on the conventions page.