आयुर्ज्ञानादेव होराफलानां कर्तुं यस्मान्निर्णयः शक्यतेऽत्र । आयुर्दायः सम्प्रदायागतोयं सच्छिष्याणां प्रीतये कथ्यतेऽतः
āyurjñānādeva horāphalānāṃ kartuṃ yasmānnirṇayaḥ śakyate'tra | āyurdāyaḥ sampradāyāgatoyaṃ sacchiṣyāṇāṃ prītaye kathyate'taḥ
Since here the determination (nirṇaya) of the results a horoscope shows — the horā-phalas — can be made only out of a knowledge of the length of life (āyus), therefore this āyurdāya, the allotted life-span reckoned as it has come down through the teachers' tradition (sampradāya), is now set out for the delight ⟨and profit⟩ of good pupils.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ १) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
- About this edition: The page prints श्रीतये, not प्रीतये. The plate reader compared the glyph at 4x with the श्री of श्रीपतिपद्धतिः in this page's own running head and found the two identical, so the print is kept; the sense wants प्रीतये, 'for the pleasure of', and it is read here as a compositor's slip. Sastri (1937) renders the same claim, 'with a view to benefit the community of earnest students'. The verse's number mark is printed open (॥ १) and never closed before the chapter's colophon. The ⟨ ⟩ in the rendering are words I supply, not words in the mūla. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रीतये; this sentence names श्रीतये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.2a reading here is contested एकोनदीधितिसमादिह गच्छतो यद्रूपादिरूपचयसङ्कलितद्वयं स्यात् । चेष्टोच्चरश्मिजमथ स्वमरीचिभक्तं तज्ज्ञायतेत्र गुणकाद्वितयं तदाख्यम्
ekonadīdhitisamādiha gacchato yadrūpādirūpacayasaṅkalitadvayaṃ syāt | ceṣṭoccaraśmijamatha svamarīcibhaktaṃ tajjñāyatetra guṇakādvitayaṃ tadākhyam
Take, for a planet, the number of its ceṣṭā rays (ceṣṭā-raśmi) and the number of its ucca rays (ucca-raśmi) ⟨both found by adhyāya 4⟩. For each of the two separately, form the sum of a series (saṅkalita) whose first term is 1 and whose common increase is also 1 (rūpādi rūpa-caya), run out to a number of terms one less than that ray-number (eka-ūna-dīdhiti-sama) — that is, the sum 1 + 2 + … + (rays − 1), which is (rays − 1) × rays ÷ 2. Then divide each of the two sums by its own ray-number (sva-marīci-bhakta). The two quantities thus known here are the pair of multipliers (guṇaka-dvitaya), and each carries the name of the ray it came from ⟨the ceṣṭā-guṇaka and the ucca-guṇaka⟩.
5 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तज्ज्ञायतेत्र"; alternatives "तज्ज्ञायतेऽत्र" — no avagraha glyph is on the page; read at 3× zoom
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदाह्यम्"; alternatives "तदाह्वयम्" — the conjunct after तदा is small; ह्य is what the ink shows [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदाख्यम्; this sentence names तदाह्यम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(no daṇḍa or verse numeral at the line end)"; alternatives "तदाह्यम् ॥ २ ॥" — the half-verse closes with nothing printed after it, though the line has clear white space to the right margin; the following half-verse pair closes ॥ ३ ॥ and Sastri's heading reads 'Slokas 2 and 3' [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदाख्यम्; this sentence names तदाह्यम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 2.
- About this edition: Two practical points the verse assumes and does not say. (1) The ray-numbers are not whole numbers: on Sastri's own worked page the Sun's ucca-raśmi is 6.742, so 'one less than the rays' is 5.742 and the series-sum must be got by the formula n(n+1)/2, not by adding up terms — 5.742 x 6.742 / 2 = 19.356282, and 19.356282 / 6.742 = 2.871, the Sun's ucca-guṇaka. (2) Reading: the page has तदाह्यम्, and the reader gives तदाह्वयम् as the alternative; आह्वय, 'name, appellation', is what the line needs, and it is rendered here as 'carries the name of'. The press also prints no daṇḍa and no numeral at the end of this half-verse, so its position 2 is ours, not the printer's; Sastri heads the pair 'Slokas 2 and 3'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदाख्यम्; this sentence names तदाह्यम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
ऊने भवेतां निजदीधितिभ्यः श्रेढीफले ते यदि रश्मियुक्ते । तदर्द्धिते स्वांशुभिरुद्धृते ते तद्घातमूलं गुणकः स्फुटः स्यात्
ūne bhavetāṃ nijadīdhitibhyaḥ śreḍhīphale te yadi raśmiyukte | tadarddhite svāṃśubhiruddhṛte te tadghātamūlaṃ guṇakaḥ sphuṭaḥ syāt
But if those two series-results (śreḍhī-phala) should come out less than their own ray-numbers, then find the two multipliers this way instead: add the rays back to each sum (raśmi-yukta), halve what results (tad-ardhita), and divide that by its own rays (sva-aṃśubhir uddhṛta). ⟨And in either case, by verse 2's rule or by this one⟩, the square root of the product of the two (tad-ghāta-mūla) is the exact multiplier, the sphuṭa-guṇaka.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The order of the three steps — add the rays, halve, then divide by the rays — is confirmed by Sastri's worked case, which is a claim and not his wording: Saturn's ucca rays 1.264, series-sum 0.166848 (less than the rays); 0.166848 + 1.264 = 1.430848; halved, 0.715424; divided by 1.264, 0.566, which is the figure his table prints for Saturn's ucca-guṇaka. The sphuṭa-guṇaka of the last quarter is general, not confined to this short case: Sastri gets the Sun's as the square root of 2.871 x 2.158 = 2.489.
5.4a reading here is contested वर्गोत्तमे स्वभवने स्वनवांशके च स्वत्र्यंशके च गुणको द्वितयं निरुक्तम् । अध्यर्द्धरूपमधिमित्रगृहे सुहृद्गे सत्र्यंशकं समगृहे खलु रूपमेकम्
vargottame svabhavane svanavāṃśake ca svatryaṃśake ca guṇako dvitayaṃ niruktam | adhyarddharūpamadhimitragṛhe suhṛdge satryaṃśakaṃ samagṛhe khalu rūpamekam
When a planet stands in a vargottama, in its own house (its own rāśi), in its own navāṃśa, or in its own tryaṃśa — the drekkāṇa, the third part of a sign — the multiplier (guṇaka) is declared to be 2. In the house of an adhimitra (a great friend) it is one and a half, 1½ (adhyardha-rūpa); in a friend's (suhṛd) house one together with a third, 1⅓ (sa-tryaṃśaka); and in a neutral's (sama) house just 1 (rūpam ekam).
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वभवने स्वनवांशके"; alternatives "खभवने खनवांशके" — the two opening ligatures are the same glyph and could be read ख; read at 3× zoom. Sastri's own rendering three lines below says 'in its own house', which is स्व
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वत्र्यंशके"; alternatives "सत्र्यंशके" — read at 3× zoom; this glyph is wider than the one opening the fourth line of the verse, which is a plain स
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अध्यर्द्धरूपम्"; alternatives "अध्यर्द्धंरूपम्" — a small mark sits over the र्द्ध; it is read as the repha of र्द्ध itself, but it could hold an anusvāra as well
- About this edition: Reading: the plate reader flags स्वभवने स्वनवांशके against a possible खभवने खनवांशके, the opening ligatures being the same glyph. स्व is right — Sastri renders 'in its own house', and ख (= 0) would make nonsense of a list of own-positions. तर्यंश here is the drekkāṇa, which verse 8 settles by giving the same list as वर्गोत्तम-आत्मीयनवांश-द्रेक्क. Sastri's values for this list and verse 5's — 2, 1½, 1⅓, 1, ⅔, ½ — agree with the mūla item for item.
5.5a reading here is contested त्र्यंशोनितं रिपुगृहेऽध्यरिभे दलं स्यादेभ्यो गुणो भवति यः खलु कश्चिदेकः । वेदोद्धृतः स भगुणो गणकैः प्रदिष्टः होरादिवर्गगुणकस्तु भवेत्तदर्द्धम्
tryaṃśonitaṃ ripugṛhe'dhyaribhe dalaṃ syādebhyo guṇo bhavati yaḥ khalu kaścidekaḥ | vedoddhṛtaḥ sa bhaguṇo gaṇakaiḥ pradiṣṭaḥ horādivargaguṇakastu bhavettadarddham
In an enemy's (ripu) house ⟨the multiplier is⟩ one diminished by its third, that is ⅔ (tryaṃśonita); in the sign of a bitter enemy (adhyari) a half, ½ (dala). Whichever single one of these multipliers falls to a planet, divided by 4 (veda, the four Vedas), is what the computers have declared to be the bhaguṇa — the multiplier belonging to the rāśi; and the multiplier for the horā and the remaining vargas is half of that ⟨that is, the same quantity divided by 8⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स भगुणो"; alternatives "सभगुणो" — the space between स and भ is narrow
- About this edition: वेद = 4. The division by 4 and the halving are both checkable in Sastri's table of factors: the Moon is in a friend's house, so its multiplier is 1⅓; 1⅓ / 4 = ⅓, which his table prints as the Moon's rāśiguṇaka, and ⅙ as its horā-and-other-varga guṇaka. Saturn, in a neutral's house, has 1 / 4 = ¼ and ⅛. Reading: the reader notes the space in स भगुणो is narrow and could be read सभगुणो; the sense (स = 'that one', भगुण = the rāśi multiplier) requires the division.
5.6a reading here is contested एतेऽपि गुण्या गदिता महाद्भिरपेक्षयानन्तरताडकानाम् । नगांशका रुद्रमिता ह्यधीष्ठराशौ सुहृद्वेश्मनि मूर्छनांशाः
ete'pi guṇyā gaditā mahādbhirapekṣayānantaratāḍakānām | nagāṃśakā rudramitā hyadhīṣṭharāśau suhṛdveśmani mūrchanāṃśāḥ
These ⟨multipliers⟩ too the great ones have declared to be multiplicands (guṇya) with respect to the anantara-tāḍakas, the multipliers stated immediately after ⟨in verses 9 and 10⟩. In the sign of an adhimitra ⟨the rāśi-multiplier is⟩ eleven seventh-parts — naga (7) naming the part and rudra (11) their number, so 11/7; in a friend's (suhṛd) house, so many mūrchanā-parts, that is twenty-first parts, the mūrchanās being 21 ⟨their number, twenty-nine, is given by the first word of the next verse, so that the statement runs across the verse-break⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ताडकानाम्"; alternatives "तारकानाम्", "ताडनानाम्" — the ड of ताड has the hook of ड at 2×, but र and ड are close in this fount
- About this edition: नग = 7 (the seven mountains), रुद्र = 11. मूर्छनांश I read as 'twenty-first part', मूर्छना standing for 21 — the 21 mūrchanās of the music theory (7 to each of the 3 grāmas). Two things support it and neither is Sastri's wording: he gives the mitra value as 29/21, and the numerator 29 is supplied by verse 7's opening नवाश्विनो. The five values of this table, put over 21, are 33, 29, 21, 13, 9 — a symmetric series falling by 4, 8, 8, 4, which only works if the mitra and śatru terms are twenty-firsts. Reading: the reader gives तारकानाम् and ताडनानाम् as alternatives to ताडकानाम्; ताडक, 'multiplier', is what verses 9-10 are, and Sastri's technical term for them is अनन्तरताडक.
5.7a reading here is contested नवाश्विनो रूपमुदासराशौ रुद्रत्र्यंशका विश्वमिता द्विषद्भे । त्रयो नगांशा अधिशत्रुराशावेते भसंज्ञा निजराशिवर्जम्
navāśvino rūpamudāsarāśau rudratryaṃśakā viśvamitā dviṣadbhe | trayo nagāṃśā adhiśatrurāśāvete bhasaṃjñā nijarāśivarjam
⟨Twenty-nine of those twenty-first parts, in a friend's house⟩ — nava (9) and aśvin (2), the digits read from the right, 9-2 reversed, 29. In a neutral's (udāsa, that is sama) sign, 1. In an enemy's (dviṣat) sign, thirteen — viśva, the thirteen Viśve-devāḥ — ⟨of those same twenty-first parts, so 13/21⟩. In the sign of a bitter enemy (adhiśatru), three seventh-parts, 3/7. These are the ones called bha ⟨-guṇas⟩, the multipliers belonging to the rāśi — but they do not apply when the planet is in its own sign (nija-rāśi-varjam).
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रुद्रत्र्यंशका"; alternatives "रुद्रच्यंशका", "कुद्रत्र्यंशका" — the त्र् half-form is a short slanted stroke here and can read as च; the same shape stands in स्वत्र्यंश in the English lines above
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विषद्भे"; alternatives "द्विषड्ढे", "द्विषद्गेहे", "द्विषट्के" — stacked conjunct at 6×: upper member द or ड, lower member भ or ढ, with an े mātrā. Three glyph-units stand between the space and the daṇḍa
- About this edition: The denominator-word for the enemy's value will not decode, and I am not smoothing it. The page reads रुद्रत्र्यंशका विश्वमिता द्विषद्भे. On the ordinary values रुद्र-त्र्यंशक is 'a third of an eleventh' = 1/33, which would make the enemy's figure 13/33 = 0.394 — smaller than the bitter enemy's 3/7 = 0.429, and the table would stop falling, which is absurd. The value has to be 13/21 = 0.619: that keeps the series monotone (33/21, 29/21, 21/21, 13/21, 9/21) and it is what Sastri prints. The metre says the same thing independently — the other three pādas of this verse are 11 syllables each (upajāti), and this one as printed is 12, so a syllable has been added or a word replaced. I have kept the value and not invented a word. नवाश्विनो = 29 by bhūtasaṃkhyā read right to left; विश्व = 13; नग = 7. निजराशिवर्जम् is the exception Sastri illustrates with Jupiter, who is in his own house and therefore takes no factor from verses 6-8.
5.8a reading here is contested वर्गोत्तमात्मीयनवांशदृक्कस्थिते ग्रहे तु द्वितयं गुणश्चेत् । एतैरधीष्ठादिगुणैर्निहन्यादुद्दीरितं राशिगुणं पुनस्तम्
vargottamātmīyanavāṃśadṛkkasthite grahe tu dvitayaṃ guṇaścet | etairadhīṣṭhādiguṇairnihanyāduddīritaṃ rāśiguṇaṃ punastam
But when a planet stands in a vargottama, in its own navāṃśa or in its own drekkāṇa, so that the multiplier ⟨of verse 4⟩ is 2, then one should multiply once again, by these factors — the ones for the adhimitra and the rest just given — that rāśi-multiplier (rāśi-guṇa) which was already stated ⟨in verse 5, namely the 2 divided by 4⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रेक्कस्थिते"; alternatives "दृक्कस्थिते" — the mātrā over द read as े; a ृ subscript is possible [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वर्गोत्तमात्मीयनवांशदृक्कस्थिते; this sentence names द्रेक्कस्थिते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled for the alternative this note names. An eye reading of p. 94 (page_0094.png, store line index 21) at about 5.15x native found that the press sets दृ: the akṣara measures 49 px and 955 dark pixels, against a known दृ on p. 30 at 47 px and 943, and there is no ink above the head-line where an े would stand. The mūla now reads दृक्कस्थिते.]
- About this edition: Sastri's worked chart shows the operation: the Sun and Mars each get ½ from verse 5 (their multiplier 2, for a svatryaṃśa, divided by 4) and are then multiplied again by 11/7 because each sits in an adhimitra's rāśi, giving ½ x 11/7. Jupiter, though in his own drekkāṇa, is also in his own house and so falls under verse 7's exception and takes no second factor. Reading: द्रेक्कस्थिते is the page; the reader allows दृक्कस्थिते. द्रेक्क (drekkāṇa) is what the sense and verse 4's त्र्यंश both require. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वर्गोत्तमात्मीयनवांशदृक्कस्थिते; this sentence names द्रेक्कस्थिते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the reading given here is refuted. The page sets दृक्कस्थिते, read by eye at about 5.15x native on page_0094.png; the vision read's द्रेक्कस्थिते was wrong, and the mūla now reads दृक्कस्थिते. दृक्क is a standard spelling of the decanate, so the sense this note gives does not change.]
गृहादिके वर्गगणे स्वकीये द्विको गुणस्त्र्यंशविवर्जितः सः । अधीष्टभे मित्रगृहे नवांशा विश्वे च रूपं च समस्य गेहे
gṛhādike vargagaṇe svakīye dviko guṇastryaṃśavivarjitaḥ saḥ | adhīṣṭabhe mitragṛhe navāṃśā viśve ca rūpaṃ ca samasya gehe
When the varga-group a planet occupies — the house (rāśi) and the rest — is its own, the multiplier ⟨now being stated, the anantara-tāḍaka⟩ is 2 (dvika). That same 2, less a third, is 5/3 in the sign of an adhimitra (adhīṣṭa). In a friend's house it is thirteen ninth-parts — navāṃśāḥ, ninths, viśve, thirteen — that is 13/9. And in a neutral's (sama) house it is 1 (rūpa).
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Two traps in this verse, both arithmetical. (1) त्र्यंशविवर्जित means 'less one third of a unit', not 'less its own third': 2 − ⅓ = 5/3, which is what Sastri prints, whereas 2 − ⅔ would give 4/3 and break the run 2, 5/3, 13/9, 1, 5/9, ⅓. (2) नवांश here is the fraction 'a ninth part', not the navāṃśa varga — विश्वे नवांशाः is 'thirteen ninths', 13/9. विश्व = 13.
नवांशकाः पञ्च विरोधिराशौ गुणांशकः स्यादधिवैरिणो भे । पूर्वं भपूर्वा गुणका य उक्ता वर्गेषु सप्तस्विह गुण्यसंज्ञाः
navāṃśakāḥ pañca virodhirāśau guṇāṃśakaḥ syādadhivairiṇo bhe | pūrvaṃ bhapūrvā guṇakā ya uktā vargeṣu saptasviha guṇyasaṃjñāḥ
Five ninth-parts, 5/9, in an adversary's (virodhin, that is śatru) sign; and a guṇa-part — guṇa being 3, so one third, 1/3 — in the sign of a bitter enemy (adhivairin). And those multipliers stated earlier, the ones beginning with the bha, the rāśi ⟨verses 4 to 8⟩, throughout the seven vargas, are here called the multiplicands (guṇya).
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: गुणांशक = 'a third part', गुण standing for 3 (the three guṇas); Sastri prints 1/3 for the adhiśatru. The last half-verse is the hinge of the whole calculation: the seven varga-multipliers of verses 4-8 stop being multipliers and become the things multiplied, the anantara-tāḍakas of verses 9-10 being the multipliers.
5.11a reading here is contested गुण्या गुणैः स्वैरधिकारलब्धैरुक्तैर्गुणः स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः । स्मृतो बुधैराश्रयसंज्ञितो यस्तस्य स्फुटस्यापि वधो भवेद्यः
guṇyā guṇaiḥ svairadhikāralabdhairuktairguṇaḥ syādadhimiśritaistaiḥ | smṛto budhairāśrayasaṃjñito yastasya sphuṭasyāpi vadho bhavedyaḥ
The multiplicands (guṇya), each multiplied by its own multiplier as it falls out for that case (adhikāra-labdha) — the multipliers just stated ⟨in verses 9 and 10⟩ — and then all of them thrown together and added up (adhimiśrita), yield the multiplier which the wise have named the āśraya-guṇaka. And whatever product (vadha) arises of that ⟨āśraya-guṇaka⟩ and of the sphuṭa ⟨-guṇaka of verse 3⟩ —
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः"; alternatives "स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः", "स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्ततः" — the final cluster before the daṇḍa is स्त with a visarga; a second ऐ mātrā would be lost in the broken headline [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः; this sentence names स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The sentence does not end with the verse: it runs into verse 12's first half, which supplies the square root. Sastri prints the whole run as 'Slokas 9-11½'. There are seven products, one for each varga, and they are summed: his worked Sun is 55/42 + 5/12 + ½ + ½ + 13/36 + 5/12 + ¼ = 3 95/126 = 3.754, the Sun's āśraya-guṇaka. Reading: the cluster before the daṇḍa in स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः is broken at the headline and the reader allows ...तैः and ...ततः; the sense 'mixed together, summed' is the same on every alternative, and Sastri reads it as the sum-total. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तैः; this sentence names स्यादधिमिश्रितैस्तः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.12a reading here is contested तद्वर्गमूलं खलु कर्मयोग्य आयुर्विधाने गुणकार उक्तः । ग्रहस्य लिप्ताः खखसिद्धभक्ताः प्रोक्ताः कलाः शेषमिहायुषोऽत्र १२
tadvargamūlaṃ khalu karmayogya āyurvidhāne guṇakāra uktaḥ | grahasya liptāḥ khakhasiddhabhaktāḥ proktāḥ kalāḥ śeṣamihāyuṣo'tra 12
— the square root of that product (tad-varga-mūla) is declared to be the guṇakāra fit for the work (karma-yogya), the one used in the computation of the length of life. ⟨Then the next step:⟩ the minutes of a planet — its whole longitude reduced to minutes of arc — are to be divided by 2400 (kha-kha-siddha: kha 0, kha 0, siddha 24; the digits read from the right, 0-0-24, give 2400). The remainder of that division is what is declared here to be the kalās of life, the āyuṣ-kalās.
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्मयोग्य"; alternatives "कर्मयोग्यं" — no anusvāra dot stands over ग्य at 2.2×
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "१२" — zoomed at 3×: the numeral stands alone with NO daṇḍas on either side, unlike ॥ १८ ॥ and ॥१३॥ elsewhere on this page. The avagraha in आयुषोऽत्र is a real ऽ glyph on the page.
- About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 12.
- About this edition: खखसिद्ध = 2400, and the figure is confirmed twice over, neither time by Sastri's wording. He states the divisor as 2400 in his rendering; and Keśava's parallel verse, quoted on the same page, divides the DEGREES by खयुग = 40 — and 2400 minutes is exactly 40 degrees. Sastri's own worked Sun then comes out at 1063.5 āyuṣ-kalās. The square-root half of this verse completes the sentence begun in verse 11, which is why Sastri heads one block 'Slokas 9-11½' and the next 'Slokas 11½ and 12'; the block the script attached to verse 11 in fact carries this verse's first half, and the block it attached to 11 and 12 carries only this verse's second half. The press prints the numeral १२ bare, with no daṇḍas on either side, unlike ॥१३॥ on the same page.
लग्नं ग्रहोनं यदि षड्गृहेभ्यो हीनं तदानीं हरसंभवः स्यात् । नैवाधिके तत्र खगोनलग्ने लिप्तीकृते राशिकलाविभक्ते
lagnaṃ grahonaṃ yadi ṣaḍgṛhebhyo hīnaṃ tadānīṃ harasaṃbhavaḥ syāt | naivādhike tatra khagonalagne liptīkṛte rāśikalāvibhakte
Subtract the planet from the lagna. If ⟨what remains⟩ is less than six signs (ṣaḍ-gṛha), then and only then is a divisor (hara) possible; if it is more, there is no divisor at all. Where one is possible, reduce that lagna-minus-planet to minutes and divide it by the minutes contained in a rāśi ⟨1800⟩ —
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: राशिकला = 1800, one sign of 30 degrees in minutes. Sastri divides by 1800 in every worked case on his notes page: the Moon's lagna-minus-planet of 3 signs 0° 2' 7" = 5402.116 minutes, and 5402.116 / 1800 = 3.001, his divisor for the Moon. The six-sign test has a plain meaning he spells out: lagna minus planet is less than six signs only when the planet lies between the 7th and the 12th house from the lagna, which is the span Varāhamihira's chakra-pātārdha-hāni covers.
5.14a reading here is contested आयुः कलानां स हरः स्फुटः स्याद्रूपाघदोनः सहरस्तदानीम् । रूपाद्विशुद्धो गुणकस्तु तासामेवं हि पापद्युचरोनलग्ने
āyuḥ kalānāṃ sa haraḥ sphuṭaḥ syādrūpāghadonaḥ saharastadānīm | rūpādviśuddho guṇakastu tāsāmevaṃ hi pāpadyucaronalagne
— and that quotient is the exact divisor (sphuṭa hara) of the āyuṣ-kalās. And if that divisor (sa haraḥ) should come out less (ūna) than a rūpa, that is less than unity ⟨one akṣara here, between पा and दो, is still unsettled; verse 15 confirms the sense 'less than a rūpa'⟩, then (tadānīm), taken away from a rūpa, it becomes not a divisor of those kalās but their multiplier (guṇaka). So the work goes when it is a malefic planet (pāpa-dyucara) that has been subtracted from the lagna.
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्रूपाघदोनः"; alternatives "स्याद्रूपार्धदोनः", "स्याद्रूपपादोनः", "स्याद्रूपाग्रदोनः" — zoomed at 3×: the akṣara between पा and दो is heavily inked; it shows two humps and a full vertical, so घ is what is on the page, but the ink spread leaves ध and a ligature open [2026-09-23: an eye reading of p. 101 at about 2.9x native rules out अर्ध here. The whole word स्याद्रूपाघदोनः carries one mark above the head-line, the ो of दो, and a र्ध would put a repha there. That reading did not open the crop that would separate घ from ध, so this note's question between them stands.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहस्तदानाम्"; alternatives "सहस्रदानाम्", "स हस्तदानाम्" — the स्त conjunct is clogged; word division in this compound is not certain from the ink [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सहरस्तदानीम्; this sentence names सहस्तदानाम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled. An eye reading of p. 101 (page_0101.png, store line index 17) at about 2.9x native found that the press sets सहरस्तदानीम् as one word. स, ह, र and स्त stand as four glyphs: the र measures 39 px against this page's own known र at 34 px, and the स्त 70 px against its known स्त at 72 px. The न carries the ī hook that the page's own तदानीं on line 15 carries. The mūla now reads सहरस्तदानीम्.]
- About this edition: The second quarter will not construe as printed and I have not smoothed it. The page reads स्याद्रूपाघदोनः सहस्तदानाम्; the reader flags the akṣara between पा and दो as heavily inked and offers अर्ध, पाद and अग्र as alternatives, and flags the स्त of सहस्तदानाम् as clogged. The metre confirms something is wrong there and not elsewhere: this verse's other three pādas run 11 syllables each (upajāti), and the line holding pādas 1 and 2 runs 21 where it should run 22, so one syllable is missing inside the doubtful stretch. What the quarter has to SAY is fixed by the two quarters on either side of it and by verse 15: the quotient is the divisor; if it falls short of unity, one takes it from unity and multiplies instead. Sastri's copy said the same — 'when this quotient is less than 1, subtract it from a Rūpa and make it a multiplier' — and his worked Mars case does it: divisor 0.5548, multiplier 1 − 0.5548 = 0.445, and 2273.15 x 0.445 = 1011.551. That sense is given in ⟨ ⟩; the words behind it are not recoverable from this witness. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सहरस्तदानीम्; this sentence names सहस्तदानाम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: two claims here are refuted by an eye reading of p. 101 at about 2.9x native. The page sets सहरस्तदानीम्, not सहस्तदानाम्, and the mūla now reads it. So the words are recoverable from this witness: read स हरः तदानीम्, the second pāda is an exact indravajrā at eleven, and the line runs 22. The one akṣara between पा and दो is still open; that reading rules out अर्ध and does not decide between घ and ध. The English and Hindi were rewritten on 2026-09-23 to render the restored words, with a bracket left on that one akṣara.]
5.15a reading here is contested शुभोनलग्ने तु हरो द्विनिघ्न आयुः कलाभ्यो हरलब्धलिप्ताः । विशोधनीया यदि रूपकोनो हरस्तदर्द्धोनितरूपगुण्याः
śubhonalagne tu haro dvinighna āyuḥ kalābhyo haralabdhaliptāḥ | viśodhanīyā yadi rūpakono harastadarddhonitarūpaguṇyāḥ
But when it is a benefic (śubha) that has been subtracted from the lagna, the divisor is doubled (dvi-nighna); then the minutes got by dividing the āyuṣ-kalās with that doubled divisor are to be subtracted from those same āyuṣ-kalās. And if the divisor is less than a rūpa (rūpaka-ūna), then instead the kalās are to be multiplied by a rūpa diminished by half of that divisor (tad-ardha-ūnita-rūpa).
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हरलब्धलिप्ताः"; alternatives "हरलङ्धलिप्ताः" — the ब्ध conjunct is broken at its left, so it can be misread as ङ्ध
- About this edition: Both halves are checkable in Sastri's worked cases, and the claims agree with this reading. Benefic with a divisor above 1 — the Moon: divisor 3.001, doubled to 6.002, and the Moon's 269.65 kalās less a sixth of themselves give 224.618. Benefic with a divisor below 1 — Venus: divisor 0.016, half of it 0.008, multiplier 1 − 0.008 = 0.992, and 842.93 x 0.992 = 836.186. Note the asymmetry the verse is careful about: for a malefic (verse 14) the WHOLE small divisor is taken from unity, for a benefic only HALF of it. Reading: the ब्ध of हरलब्ध is broken at its left and the reader allows हरलङ्ध; लब्ध, 'obtained by dividing', is what the arithmetic needs.
5.16a reading here is contested एवं कार्या चक्रपातार्द्धहानिश्चायुर्दाये ह्यंशजे पिण्डजेऽपि । नैसर्गाख्यो जीवशर्मोदिते च हारं कृत्वा त्वेककोनं गुणं च
evaṃ kāryā cakrapātārddhahāniścāyurdāye hyaṃśaje piṇḍaje'pi | naisargākhyo jīvaśarmodite ca hāraṃ kṛtvā tvekakonaṃ guṇaṃ ca
In this way the cakrapātārdhahāni ⟨the 'half-circle' deduction set out in the preceding verses⟩ is to be carried out in the āyurdāya called aṃśaja ⟨the life-span reckoned from the degrees⟩, and in the piṇḍaja one as well, and in the one named naisarga ⟨the natural allotment⟩, and in the one stated by Jīvaśarman — having formed the hāra ⟨the fractional divisor⟩, ⟨form⟩ also the guṇa ⟨the multiplier⟩, which falls short of a single unit ⟨by that hāra: guṇa = 1 − hāra⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्यंशजे"; alternatives "हंशजे" — zoomed 3× at page_0104 x1600-1950,y555-700: the य subjoined under ह is present, with the anusvāra dot above
- About this edition: The page prints चक्रपातार्द्धहानि here and चक्रार्द्धहानौ at verse 24. They are one process, not two: Sastri's own notes at plate page_0108 use both names for the same operation in consecutive sentences. On the hāra/guṇa pair his worked figures settle the arithmetic — a divisor of ·554 for Mars yields a multiplier of ·445 (page_0108), and a divisor of ·446 yields a multiplier of ·554 (page_0111) — so the guṇa is one minus the hāra, not the hāra re-used.
आयुर्लिप्ताः स्वगुणगुणिता व्योमशून्याश्विभक्ताः ह्यब्दा मासा दिवसघटिकाः स्युर्विनाड्यः क्रमेण । एवं सर्वद्युचरजनितं ह्यायुरानीय लग्नादायुः साध्यं कथितविधिना किन्तु लग्ने विशेषः
āyurliptāḥ svaguṇaguṇitā vyomaśūnyāśvibhaktāḥ hyabdā māsā divasaghaṭikāḥ syurvināḍyaḥ krameṇa | evaṃ sarvadyucarajanitaṃ hyāyurānīya lagnādāyuḥ sādhyaṃ kathitavidhinā kintu lagne viśeṣaḥ
The āyurliptās ⟨the life-minutes, each planet's āyuṣkalās after the above reduction⟩, multiplied by their own guṇa ⟨the karmayogya-guṇaka assigned to that planet⟩ and divided by 200 ⟨vyoma-śūnya-aśvi: vyoma 0, śūnya 0, aśvin 2, the digits read right to left⟩, become years, months, days, ghaṭikās and vināḍīs in that order. Having in this way brought out the āyus produced by every planet, the āyus is to be worked out from the lagna also by the rule already stated — but in the case of the lagna there is a special point ⟨stated in the next verse⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: स्वगुण is the karmayogya-guṇaka of the earlier chapter, not a fresh quantity; Sastri identifies it as the multiplier of his sloka 12. The divisor 200 is confirmed independently by the Keśavapaddhati verse quoted on the same plate (page_0104), which writes it खाभ्रनेत्र — kha 0, abhra 0, netra 2 — a different number-word for the same 200.
5.18a reading here is contested लग्ने तु वीर्याभ्यधिके भतुल्यैर्वर्षैर्युतं तस्य विधेयमायुः । भागादिकादप्यनुपातलब्धमासादिना संयुतमत्र कार्यम्
lagne tu vīryābhyadhike bhatulyairvarṣairyutaṃ tasya vidheyamāyuḥ | bhāgādikādapyanupātalabdhamāsādinā saṃyutamatra kāryam
But when the lagna is abundant in strength, the āyus derived from it is to be made complete by adding years equal to the bhas ⟨one year for each whole rāśi elapsed in the lagna's longitude⟩; and from the degrees and the rest as well, the months and so on obtained by anupāta ⟨simple proportion, thirty degrees to the year⟩ are to be joined on here.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भतुल्यैर्वर्षैर्युतं" — zoomed 3× at page_0105 x1140-1720,y540-700: भ तु ल्यै र्व र्षै र्यु तं, the two rephas and both ै mātrās are present though the type is worn
- About this edition: The mūla says only वीर्याभ्यधिके, 'when it is in excess of strength'. Sastri supplies a threshold the Sanskrit does not state — that this means a strength above 6 rūpas — and his example lagna stands at 9·133 rūpas (plate page_0105). His worked case does fix the proportion, and I have followed it: a lagna of 0s 14°31'46" adds nothing for the signs and ·4843 of a year for the degrees, i.e. 30° = 1 year.
नवेन्दवो बाणयमाः शरक्ष्मा दिवाकराः पञ्चभुवः कुपक्षाः । नखाश्च भास्वत्प्रमुखग्रहाणां पिण्डाश्रयाब्दा निजतुङ्गगानाम्
navendavo bāṇayamāḥ śarakṣmā divākarāḥ pañcabhuvaḥ kupakṣāḥ | nakhāśca bhāsvatpramukhagrahāṇāṃ piṇḍāśrayābdā nijatuṅgagānām
Nineteen ⟨nava-indu: nava 9, indu 1, read right to left⟩, twenty-five ⟨bāṇa 5, yama 2⟩, fifteen ⟨śara 5, kṣmā 1⟩, twelve ⟨divākara, the twelve suns⟩, fifteen ⟨pañca 5, bhū 1⟩, twenty-one ⟨ku 1, pakṣa 2⟩ and twenty ⟨nakha, the twenty nails⟩ — these are the years resting on the piṇḍa ⟨the piṇḍāyurdāya allotment⟩ for the planets beginning with the Sun, each standing in its own exaltation: Sun 19, Moon 25, Mars 15, Mercury 12, Jupiter 15, Venus 21, Saturn 20.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page prints नखाश्व. It is नखाश्च = nakha (20, the twenty nails) + ca: a seventh number is wanted for Saturn, and the metre (upendravajrā) is unchanged because va and ca are both light here. Three witnesses on the same plate give Saturn 20 — Sastri's English, the Sārāvalī verse विंशती रविपुत्रस्य, and the Bṛhajjātaka verse whose seven number-words are each 'together with ten' (9+10, 15+10, 5+10, 2+10, 5+10, 11+10, 10+10 = 19, 25, 15, 12, 15, 21, 20). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नखाश्च; this sentence names नखाश्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
निजोच्चशुद्धः खचरो विशोध्यो भमण्डलात्षड्भवनोनकश्चेत् । यथास्थितः षड्भवनाधिकश्चेत् कलीकृतः संगुणितो निजाब्दैः
nijoccaśuddhaḥ khacaro viśodhyo bhamaṇḍalātṣaḍbhavanonakaścet | yathāsthitaḥ ṣaḍbhavanādhikaścet kalīkṛtaḥ saṃguṇito nijābdaiḥ
The planet diminished by its own exaltation ⟨the planet's longitude minus the longitude of its exaltation point⟩ — if the remainder falls short of six bhavanas ⟨six rāśis⟩, it is to be subtracted from the bhamaṇḍala ⟨the whole circle of twelve signs⟩; if it exceeds six bhavanas, it is kept as it stands. That arc is then turned into kalās ⟨minutes of arc⟩ and multiplied by the planet's own years ⟨the figures of verse 19⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Sastri states the subtraction the other way about — exaltation minus planet — with the condition reversed to match, and the two routes reach the same arc. His Sun stands at 0s 17°43'30" with exaltation 0s 10°: exaltation minus planet gives 11s 22°16'30", kept as it is; planet minus exaltation gives 7°43'30", which is under six signs and so is taken from twelve signs, giving the same 11s 22°16'30" = 21136·5 kalās (plate page_0107). No disagreement, only a different order of the same two terms. The rule is built so that a planet at exaltation keeps its full years and one at debilitation keeps half.
तत्र खाभ्ररसचन्द्रलोचनैरुद्धृते सति यदाप्यते फलम् । वर्षमासदिननाडिकादिकं तद्धि पिण्डभवमायुरुच्यते
tatra khābhrarasacandralocanairuddhṛte sati yadāpyate phalam | varṣamāsadinanāḍikādikaṃ taddhi piṇḍabhavamāyurucyate
When that ⟨product⟩ is divided by 21600 ⟨kha-abhra-rasa-candra-locana: kha 0, abhra 0, rasa 6, candra 1, locana 2, read right to left — the number of minutes in the whole circle⟩, the result obtained, in years, months, days, nāḍikās and the rest, is called the āyus born of the piṇḍa ⟨that planet's piṇḍāyurdāya⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Sastri divides by 21,600 and works the Sun at 21136·5 ÷ 21600 × 19 = 18·5923 years (plate page_0107), which confirms both the divisor and the multiplier of verse 19.
5.22a reading here is contested त्र्यंशकं हरति शत्रुभे ग्रहः स्वायुषोऽत्र न तु वक्रचारगः । सूर्यलुप्तकिरणोर्द्धहारकः प्रोज्झ्य भार्गवदिनेशनन्दनौ
tryaṃśakaṃ harati śatrubhe grahaḥ svāyuṣo'tra na tu vakracāragaḥ | sūryaluptakiraṇorddhahārakaḥ projjhya bhārgavadineśanandanau
A planet standing in the sign of an enemy forfeits a third part of its own āyus here — but not one that is moving in retrogression ⟨vakra⟩. A planet whose rays the Sun has swallowed ⟨astaṅgata, combust⟩ forfeits half, excepting Bhārgava ⟨Venus⟩ and the son of the lord of day ⟨Saturn⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्र्यंशकं"; alternatives "ड्यंशकं" — the त्र् ligature is printed with a hooked head that at first sight reads as ड; the sense (a third part) and Śrīdhara's त्र्यंशं quoted below on this page support त्र्य
- About this edition: The reader marked the त्र्य ligature as possibly ड्य, because this press cuts त्र् with a hooked head. It is त्र्यंशकं, 'a third part': Śrīdhara's verse quoted on the same plate reads वक्रचारं विना त्र्यंशं शत्रुराशौ हरेद्ग्रहः, and Sastri reads a third too. Sastri also records that some take वक्रचारगः as naming Mars and that most reject that; I read it as the plain participle, 'one going in retrograde motion'.
5.23a reading here is contested खेचरो जायते योऽर्द्धत्र्यंशयोरपहारकः । आयुषः स हरेदर्द्धं त्र्यंशं शुक्रशनैश्चरौ
khecaro jāyate yo'rddhatryaṃśayorapahārakaḥ | āyuṣaḥ sa haredarddhaṃ tryaṃśaṃ śukraśanaiścarau
A planet that becomes the forfeiter of both the half and the third ⟨that is, combust and at the same time in an enemy's sign⟩ forfeits half of its āyus ⟨only the larger of the two deductions⟩; but Śukra and Śanaiścara ⟨Venus and Saturn⟩ forfeit the third.
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योऽर्द्ध"; alternatives "योर्द्ध" — a small glyph stands between यो and र्द्ध; at 4× it reads as an avagraha but it touches the र्द्ध ligature and cannot be separated with certainty
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्र्यंश"; alternatives "ड्यंश" — same hooked त्र् ligature this press uses throughout
- About this edition: Two reader marks, neither of which changes the sense or the metre — the anuṣṭubh pāda counts eight syllables either way. (1) The glyph between यो and र्द्ध reads as an avagraha at 4×, giving योऽर्द्ध from यः + अर्द्ध. (2) The same hooked त्र्य ligature as at verse 22. Venus and Saturn come out at a third and not a half because verse 22 has already exempted exactly those two from the combustion-halving; Sastri reads the verse the same way.
चक्रार्द्धहानौ बहुषु द्वयोर्वा खेचारिणोरेकगृहस्थयोस्तु । सत्याभिधानस्य मतेन सत्यं स्वांशं हरत्येव वलोत्कटो यः
cakrārddhahānau bahuṣu dvayorvā khecāriṇorekagṛhasthayostu | satyābhidhānasya matena satyaṃ svāṃśaṃ haratyeva valotkaṭo yaḥ
In the cakrārdhahāni, when many planets, or two, stand in one and the same house — then, by the opinion of the teacher named Satya ⟨Satyācārya⟩, it is truly the one that is overwhelming in strength ⟨balotkaṭa⟩ that forfeits its own portion, ⟨and that one deduction serves for all of them⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page prints वलोत्कटो for बलोत्कटो; this face does not separate व from ब. Sastri's English does not name the authority, but his own note on the same plate (page_0110) says the view is Satyācārya's, which is what सत्याभिधानस्य states in the verse itself. He applies the rule in his example: Mercury, sharing a house with the stronger Mars, escapes the deduction (plate page_0108).
हरयुतिर्विहृता ग्रहसंख्यया स हि हरोऽपचयश्च ततः फलम् । अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो निगदतीति मुनिः किल देवलः
harayutirvihṛtā grahasaṃkhyayā sa hi haro'pacayaśca tataḥ phalam | adhikavīryavato'mbaracāriṇo nigadatīti muniḥ kila devalaḥ
The sum of the hāras ⟨the divisors of the planets that stand together in one rāśi⟩, divided by the number of those planets — that indeed is the ⟨true⟩ hāra; and from it comes the apacaya ⟨the deduction⟩, and from that the result, for the sky-goer that has the greater strength. So, it is said, the sage Devala declares.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page prints अधिकबवीर्यवतो. The ब is an intrusion. The pāda is drutavilambita and अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो scans exactly (˘˘˘ˉ˘˘ˉ˘˘ˉ˘ˉ), while the printed form has one syllable too many and puts a light syllable in the fourth place, where the metre requires a heavy one. The sense — 'of the planet with the greater strength' — is unaffected, and Sastri reads it so. His worked case: Mars and Mercury together in the twelfth bhāva, divisors ·554 and ·338, their mean ·446, giving the multiplier ·554 (plate page_0111). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो; this sentence names अधिकबवीर्यवतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the first sentence is refuted. An eye reading of p. 111 (page_0111.png, store line index 5) at about 3.73x native found that the press sets अधिकवीर्यवतोऽम्बरचारिणो, with no ब between क and वी. The ब came from the vision read of 2026-09-12 and stands in no printing we hold; a machine read of the Telugu 1926 store (page_0064 line 56) also gives the word without it. The mūla now reads अधिकवीर्यवतो. The scansion and Sastri's worked case in this note stand.]
5.26a reading here is contested लिप्तीभूतैर्लग्नभागैर्निहन्यादायुर्दायं खेचराणां पृथक्स्थम् । व्योमाकाशर्त्विन्दुपक्षैर्भजेत् तत् स्वायुर्दायाच्छोध्यमब्दादिलब्धम् ॥
liptībhūtairlagnabhāgairnihanyādāyurdāyaṃ khecarāṇāṃ pṛthakstham | vyomākāśartvindupakṣairbhajet tat svāyurdāyācchodhyamabdādilabdham ||
With the lagna's bhāgas turned into liptās ⟨its degrees and their parts reduced to minutes, the whole signs being left aside⟩ one should multiply the āyurdāya of the planets, each taken separately. That is to be divided by 21600 ⟨vyoma-ākāśa-ṛtu-indu-pakṣa: vyoma 0, ākāśa 0, ṛtu 6, indu 1, pakṣa 2, read right to left⟩, and the years and the rest so obtained are to be subtracted from each planet's own āyurdāya.
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्योमा"; alternatives "ब्योमा" — read at 4×: व and ब are not separable in this face
- About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It is a verse of its own because the printing sets its commentary directly after it, as it does after every verse; it is published at position 26.
- About this edition: The reader could not separate व from ब in व्योमा, but the number-word is settled either way: vyoma and ākāśa are both 0, so the five words give 0,0,6,1,2 = 21600, the minutes in the circle, which is also the divisor Sastri uses. The page prints no verse number after this verse — the number ॥२७॥ stands after the following one — so it is published at position 26, and Sastri translates 26 and 27 as one block. His worked figure for it: lagna 871·76 minutes ÷ 21600 (plate page_0112).
5.27a reading here is contested एतत्क्रूरे लग्नगे सौम्यदृष्टे तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं विशोध्यम् । एतद्दायेनांशसंज्ञे विधेयं पिण्डायुर्वत्कर्म नैसर्गिकेऽपि
etatkrūre lagnage saumyadṛṣṭe tasmāddāyāttatphalārddhaṃ viśodhyam | etaddāyenāṃśasaṃjñe vidheyaṃ piṇḍāyurvatkarma naisargike'pi
This ⟨deduction⟩ holds when a krūra ⟨a malefic⟩ occupies the lagna; and if that malefic is aspected by a benefic, half of that result is to be subtracted from the dāya. It is not to be done in the dāya named aṃśa ⟨the aṃśāyurdāya⟩; and in the naisargika too the operation is as it is for the piṇḍāyus.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्माद्दायाच्चतफलार्द्धं"; alternatives "तस्माद्दायाच्चत्फलार्द्धं", "तस्माद्दायाच्च तत्फलार्द्धं" — read at 4×: one त stands between च्च and फ, and its foot carries a stroke that may be a virāma; the sense wants तत्फल [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं; this sentence names तस्माद्दायाच्चतफलार्द्धं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: superseded. An eye reading of p. 111 (page_0111.png, store line index 20) at about 6.19x native found that the form between दाया and फ is a त-form and not a च; the real च of दायाच्छो, one line above, was compared at 4.75x. The mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं. The 4× in this note is the vision reader's own figure from the ingest of 2026-09-12; chapter 5 records the Sastri 1937 as read by vision.]
- About this edition: Two decisions here. (1) The reader could not tell whether the single त between च्च and फ carries a virāma. Sense and metre want तत्फल, 'that result' — the quantity just computed in verse 26 — and Sastri reads it so. (2) एतद्दायेनांशसंज्ञे is graphically identical whether it is split एतद् दायेन अंशसंज्ञे ('this is to be done with that dāya in the aṃśa-named reckoning') or एतद् दाये न अंशसंज्ञे ('this is not to be done in the dāya named aṃśa'), because न + अंश fuses to नांश. I take the negative. Sastri's note at plate page_0112 says the reduction does not apply to the aṃśāyurdāya, and his two tables prove he computed that way: his aṃśāyurdāya table (page_0105) carries no such reduction, while his piṇḍāyurdāya table (page_0112) is reduced by 871·76 ÷ 21600 × ½ = ·02017 of each planet's dāya. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं; this sentence names च्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: decision (1) is settled on the plate. An eye reading of p. 111 at about 6.19x native found a त-form, not च, between दाया and फ, and the mūla now reads तस्माद्दायात्तत्फलार्द्धं, 'half of that result'. A machine read of the Telugu 1926 store (page_0065 line 24) carries तत्फल independently, in तस्मिन् दाये तत्फलार्थं. Decision (2) is untouched by that reading.]
नखाः शशी द्वौ नवकं धृतिश्च कृतिः खबाणा रविपूर्वकाणाम् । इत्थं निरुक्ता क्रमशो ग्रहाणां नैसर्गिके ह्यायुषि वर्षसंख्या
nakhāḥ śaśī dvau navakaṃ dhṛtiśca kṛtiḥ khabāṇā ravipūrvakāṇām | itthaṃ niruktā kramaśo grahāṇāṃ naisargike hyāyuṣi varṣasaṃkhyā
Twenty ⟨nakha, the nails⟩, one ⟨śaśin, the moon⟩, two, nine, eighteen ⟨dhṛti⟩, twenty ⟨kṛti⟩ and fifty ⟨kha 0, bāṇa 5, read right to left⟩ — thus, in order, is stated the number of years of the planets beginning with the Sun in the naisargika āyus ⟨the natural allotment: Sun 20, Moon 1, Mars 2, Mercury 9, Jupiter 18, Venus 20, Saturn 50⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The Sārāvalī verse quoted on the same plate — विंशतिरेकं द्वितयं नव धृतिरिह विंशतिश्च पञ्चाशत् — gives the same seven numbers in the same order, which settles dhṛti = 18 and kṛti = 20, and Sastri reads the same seven. The page prints ह्यायुपि; the word is ह्यायुषि, the locative of आयुस्, since आयुपि is not a word and the metre (indravajrā) is the same either way. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ह्यायुषि; this sentence names ह्यायुपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
अंशोद्भवं लग्नबलात्प्रसाध्यमायुश्च पिण्डोद्भवमर्कवीर्यात् । नैसर्गिकं चन्द्रबलाधिकत्वे ब्रूमस्त्रयाणामथ वीर्यसाम्ये
aṃśodbhavaṃ lagnabalātprasādhyamāyuśca piṇḍodbhavamarkavīryāt | naisargikaṃ candrabalādhikatve brūmastrayāṇāmatha vīryasāmye
The āyus arising from the aṃśa ⟨the aṃśāyurdāya⟩ is to be established from the lagna's strength ⟨when the lagna is the strongest of the three⟩, the āyus arising from the piṇḍa from the Sun's strength, and the naisargika when the Moon's strength is the greater. Now we shall state ⟨what is to be done⟩ when the strength of the three is equal.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: Sastri's English block for this verse stops at the three choices and leaves the last quarter — ब्रूमस्त्रयाणामथ वीर्यसाम्ये, the announcement of the equal-strength case — to open his next block. The Sārāvalī verse quoted on the same plate, अंशोद्भवं विलग्नात्पैण्डं भानोर्निसर्गजं चन्द्रात्, gives the same three assignments.
अंशोद्भवं लग्नबलेन हन्यात् पिण्डाख्यमायुश्च बलेन भानोः । नैसर्गिकं चन्द्रमसो बलेन सर्वाण्यथैकत्र निधापयेत
aṃśodbhavaṃ lagnabalena hanyāt piṇḍākhyamāyuśca balena bhānoḥ | naisargikaṃ candramaso balena sarvāṇyathaikatra nidhāpayeta
Multiply the aṃśa-born ⟨āyus⟩ by the strength of the lagna, the āyus named piṇḍa by the strength of the Sun, and the naisargika by the strength of the Moon; then let them all be set down in one place ⟨added into a single sum⟩.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page prints निधापयेत without the virāma; the word is निधापयेत्, the optative. This verse is only the first half of the rule. The next verse, standing immediately after it on the same plate, divides that sum by the sum of the three strengths — lagna, Sun and Moon — to give the sphuṭa āyus, and Sastri translates 30 and 31 as one block.
विलग्नतिग्मांशुहिमद्युतीनां हरेद्बलैक्येन ततो यदाप्तम् । वर्षाद्यमायुस्तदिदं स्फुटं स्याच्छ्रीनीलकण्ठादय एवमूचुः
vilagnatigmāṃśuhimadyutīnāṃ haredbalaikyena tato yadāptam | varṣādyamāyustadidaṃ sphuṭaṃ syācchrīnīlakaṇṭhādaya evamūcuḥ
⟨When the lagna, the Sun and the Moon are of equal strength — the case raised in verse 29 and begun in verse 30, where the aṃśāyurdāya is multiplied by the strength of the lagna, the piṇḍāyurdāya by the strength of the Sun, the naisargika āyurdāya by the strength of the Moon, and the three products are set down together in one place — then⟩ divide ⟨that total⟩ by the combined strength of the lagna, of the hot-rayed one ⟨tigmāṃśu, the Sun⟩ and of the cool-rayed one ⟨himadyuti, the Moon⟩. What is obtained from that, in years, months and so on, is the sphuṭa ⟨exact, rectified⟩ āyus. The illustrious Nīlakaṇṭha and the rest have spoken so.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The verse carries only the second half of the procedure — the division. The multiplication step stands in verse 30 (अंशोद्भवं लग्नबलेन हन्यात्…, plate page_0114), and the condition 'when the three are of equal strength' in verse 29 (…अथ वीर्यसाम्ये, page_0113). That is why the attached witness block is labelled Slokas 30-31: it renders both verses at once, and its first half belongs to verse 30, not here. Sastri reads the divisor the same way — the sum of the three strengths.
लग्नसूर्यशशिनो बलशून्याः स्युर्यदाऽत्र परमायुरगांशम् । सर्व एव खचरा ददतीदं जीवशर्मगदितं हि तदायुः
lagnasūryaśaśino balaśūnyāḥ syuryadā'tra paramāyuragāṃśam | sarva eva khacarā dadatīdaṃ jīvaśarmagaditaṃ hi tadāyuḥ
When here the lagna, the Sun and the Moon are all alike śūnya in bala ⟨void of strength⟩, then every one of the khacaras ⟨sky-goers, the seven planets⟩ gives an agāṃśa ⟨aga = 7, the seven mountains, so a seventh part⟩ of the paramāyus ⟨the full human term, 120 years and 5 days⟩. That indeed is the āyus which Jīvaśarman declared.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: aga = 7 (the seven kulaparvatas), so agāṃśa is a seventh part. The decoding is confirmed on the same plate: the Sārāvalī verse quoted on page_0114 states the same rule with svarāṃśa (svara = the seven notes = 7). The seventh part is the CEILING on what one planet may give; the actual amount is computed by verse 33, and reaches the full seventh only when the planet stands on its exaltation point. Sastri reads it the same way. He also glosses 'void of strength' as a ṣaḍbala total under 3 rūpas, following the Dāmodarapaddhati verse he quotes on page_0116 (रूपत्रयाल्पं किल षड्बलैक्यं…); that threshold is the tradition's, not Śरīpati's — his verse says only balaśūnya.
5.33a reading here is contested ग्रहः स्वोच्चहीनः स चेत् षड्भहीनोभचक्राद्विशोध्योऽथ भागीकृतोऽसौ । कुवेदर्तुनागैर्हतो वेदखाक्षैर्विभक्तो दिनाद्यं भवत्येवमायुः
grahaḥ svoccahīnaḥ sa cet ṣaḍbhahīnobhacakrādviśodhyo'tha bhāgīkṛto'sau | kuvedartunāgairhato vedakhākṣairvibhakto dinādyaṃ bhavatyevamāyuḥ
Take the planet diminished by its own exaltation ⟨point — the arc counted from the planet's ucca to the planet⟩. If that arc is less than six rāśis, it is to be subtracted from the bhacakra ⟨the whole circle of twelve rāśis⟩. Then make it into bhāgas ⟨degrees⟩, multiply it by 8641 ⟨ku-veda-ṛtu-nāga = 1, 4, 6, 8, read from the right⟩ and divide by 504 ⟨veda-kha-akṣa = 4, 0, 5, read from the right⟩. What results, in days ⟨ghaṭikās and the rest⟩, is that planet's āyus in this ⟨Jīvaśarman's⟩ reckoning.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भचक्राद्विशोध्योऽथ"; alternatives "भचक्राद्विशोऽध्योऽथ", "भचक्राद्धिशोध्योऽथ" — a mark stands between शो and ध्यो which may be a second avagraha or a broken matra
- About this edition: Both number-words are bhūtasaṃkhyā, read right to left: ku(1)-veda(4)-ṛtu(6)-nāga(8) → 1,4,6,8 → 8641; veda(4)-kha(0)-akṣa(5) → 4,0,5 → 504. The arithmetic closes, which is the strongest check on the reading: a planet standing exactly on its ucca gives an arc of 0, which is less than six rāśis, so it is subtracted from twelve rāśis and becomes 360 degrees; 360 × 8641 ÷ 504 = 6172 1/7 days, and that is exactly one seventh of 120 years and 5 days when the year is reckoned at 360 days (120 × 360 + 5 = 43205; 43205 ÷ 7 = 6172 1/7) — that is, exactly the seventh part verse 32 allows. A planet on its nīca, six rāśis away, keeps 180 degrees and gives half of it. Sastri reads both divisors the same way and derives 8641/504 years per planet in his note on page_0117. The reader marked भचक्राद्विशोध्योथ doubtful (a mark between शो and ध्यो); the reading taken here, bhacakrād viśodhyo 'tha, is the one the arithmetic requires, and Sastri read it so.
5.34a reading here is contested अहोभ्यः खरामैर्हृतेभ्योऽथ मासाः पतङ्गैश्च तेभ्यो भवेयुस्तदाब्दाः । भचक्रार्द्धहान्यादिकोन्यो विधिर्यः स पिण्डोद्भवे यद्वदुक्तस्तथैव
ahobhyaḥ kharāmairhṛtebhyo'tha māsāḥ pataṅgaiśca tebhyo bhaveyustadābdāḥ | bhacakrārddhahānyādikonyo vidhiryaḥ sa piṇḍodbhave yadvaduktastathaiva
From those days, divided by 30 ⟨kha-rāma = 0, 3, read from the right⟩, come the months; and from those months, ⟨divided⟩ by 12 ⟨pataṅga, the sun, for the twelve Ādityas⟩, come the years. And the remaining procedure — the halving for the ⟨invisible⟩ half of the bhacakra and the other reductions that go with it — is exactly as was stated in the raising of the piṇḍa⟨-āyurdāya⟩.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खरामैर्हृतेभ्योऽथ"; alternatives "खरामैर्हतेभ्योऽथ" — the ऋ-matra under हृ is faint
- About this edition: Number-words again right to left: kha(0)-rāma(3) → 0,3 → 30; pataṅga, a name of the sun, stands for 12. ⚠ The attached witness block is labelled Slokas 33-34 but its text stops at the end of verse 33's matter and renders none of this verse. I went to the plate: Sastri's English for verse 34 stands in his note at the head of page_0117, and it agrees — days ÷ 30 gives months, months ÷ 12 gives years, and the four reductions are carried over unchanged from the piṇḍāyurdāya. He names those four as the reduction for the half-circle (चक्रार्द्धहानिः, which is what this verse's bhacakrārdha-hāni means: a planet standing in the invisible half of the circle loses half its share), the reduction in an enemy's rāśi, the reduction for a combust planet, and the reduction for a malefic in the lagna. The reader marked खरामैर्हृतेभ्योथ doubtful (hṛta vs hata, the ṛ-mātrā faint); both spellings give the same sense here, 'divided', and the divisor 30 is unaffected.
आयुस्तथैतेषु बलाढ्यलग्ने त्यक्त्वा तु राशीन् कृतलिप्तिकेऽत्र । भक्ते द्विशत्या फलमब्दपूर्वं यत् स्याद्विलग्नायुषि तच्च योज्यम्
āyustathaiteṣu balāḍhyalagne tyaktvā tu rāśīn kṛtaliptike'tra | bhakte dviśatyā phalamabdapūrvaṃ yat syādvilagnāyuṣi tacca yojyam
The āyus ⟨of the lagna⟩ in these ⟨three reckonings — piṇḍa, naisargika and Jīvaśarman's⟩ is ⟨found⟩ in the same way ⟨as in the aṃśāyurdāya⟩. But when the lagna is balāḍhya ⟨rich in strength⟩, leave out the ⟨completed⟩ rāśis here and turn ⟨what remains, the degrees elapsed within the sign⟩ into liptās ⟨minutes of arc⟩; that being divided by two hundred, whatever result comes, in years and so on, is to be added to the lagna's āyus.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ ३५) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the adhyāya's colophon.
- About this edition: The input's edition note records that the press opens this verse's number mark (॥ ३५) and never closes it before the adhyāya colophon; that is a typesetting fault on the plate, not a gap in the text — the verse itself is complete. The divisor 200 is confirmed three times over on the same plates: Dāmodara's verse quoted on page_0118 divides by kha-kha-netra (0,0,2 → 200) after leaving out the rāśis, and the Laghupaddhati quoted there divides by kha-abhra-aśvi (0,0,2 → 200). The scale is right: a whole rāśi is 1800 liptās, and 1800 ÷ 200 = 9, the nine navāṃśas of a sign. ⚠ The first clause is contested, and Sastri says so: his note on page_0119 records that Śrīpati's own view of lagnāyus stands in verse 18, that he translates this verse in the light of it, and that Divākara Daivajña construes the verse differently. I follow his construction. His gloss of balāḍhya as 'strength exceeding 6 rūpas' is his own threshold; the verse states none.
लग्नार्कयोरर्कशशाङ्कयोश्च लग्नोडुपत्योर्यदि वीर्यसाम्यम् । तदायुषोरैक्यदलं भवेद्यत् तच्छ्रीधराद्यैः स्फुटमायुरुक्तम्
lagnārkayorarkaśaśāṅkayośca lagnoḍupatyoryadi vīryasāmyam | tadāyuṣoraikyadalaṃ bhavedyat tacchrīdharādyaiḥ sphuṭamāyuruktam
If there is equality of vīrya ⟨strength⟩ between the lagna and the Sun, or between the Sun and the Moon, or between the lagna and the uḍupati ⟨lord of the stars, the Moon⟩, then half the sum of the two āyus ⟨-reckonings belonging to that matched pair⟩ — that is what Śrīdhara and the rest have called the sphuṭa ⟨exact⟩ āyus.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This is the miśrāyurdāya, the mixed reckoning: the pair is matched two at a time, and verse 31 above handles the fourth case, where all three are equal. Sastri agrees on every particular. He adds on page_0119 that Divākara Daivajña rejects the attribution to Śrīdhara and quotes Śrīdhara's own verses to the contrary; that is a dispute about who said it, not about what the rule is.
ये धर्मकर्मनिरता विजितेन्द्रिया ये ये पथ्यभोजनजुषो द्विजदेवभक्ताः । लोके नरा दधति ये कुलशीललीलां तेषामिदं कथितमायुरुदारधीभिः
ye dharmakarmaniratā vijitendriyā ye ye pathyabhojanajuṣo dvijadevabhaktāḥ | loke narā dadhati ye kulaśīlalīlāṃ teṣāmidaṃ kathitamāyurudāradhībhiḥ
Those men who are steady in dharma and in ⟨right⟩ works, who have conquered their senses, who keep to pathya food ⟨a wholesome diet that agrees with them⟩, who are devoted to the twice-born and to the gods, and who bear in this world the grace of good family and good conduct ⟨kula-śīla-līlā⟩ — it is for such men that the large-minded ⟨sages⟩ have declared this āyus.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: 'This āyus' means the āyus computed by the whole of this adhyāya: the verse states the condition under which the computation is expected to hold. Sastri agrees on every clause. The same restriction is put in almost the same terms by the Sārāvalī verse quoted on page_0120 (पथ्याशिनां शीलवतां नराणाम्…).
ये पापलुब्धाश्चौरा ये देवब्राह्मणनिन्दकाः । बह्वाशिनश्च ये तेषामकालमरणं ध्रुवम्
ye pāpalubdhāścaurā ye devabrāhmaṇanindakāḥ | bahvāśinaśca ye teṣāmakālamaraṇaṃ dhruvam
Those who are greedy for sin, who are thieves, who revile the gods and the brāhmaṇas, and who are bahvāśin ⟨eaters of too much⟩ — for them death out of season is certain.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: ⚠ The attached witness block for this verse runs on past it. Its first sentence renders this verse; everything after it — the full life-terms of men, elephants, horses, asses, camels, bulls, buffaloes, tigers, sheep and dogs — is the matter of verse 39, and I have used it there. On the plate (page_0120) Sastri's English for this verse stops at 'gluttony'; the animal figures are on page_0121. This verse is metrically an anuṣṭubh, unlike the upajāti verses around it, and the adhyāya colophon (इति श्रीपतिविरचितायां जातकपद्धतावायुर्दायाध्यायः पञ्चमः) is printed immediately after it — so in this edition verse 38 closes the chapter.
5.39a reading here is contested पञ्चाहं नखभूसमा नृकरिणां व्याघ्राद्यजादेर्नृपा गोकाल्योश्च जिनास्तथोष्ट्रखरयोस्तत्वानि सूर्याः शुनाम् । अश्वायुः परमं रदा नृवदिहानीयायुरेषां परायुर्निघ्नं नृपरायुषा च विहृतं तेषां स्फुटायुर्भवेत्
pañcāhaṃ nakhabhūsamā nṛkariṇāṃ vyāghrādyajādernṛpā gokālyośca jināstathoṣṭrakharayostatvāni sūryāḥ śunām | aśvāyuḥ paramaṃ radā nṛvadihānīyāyureṣāṃ parāyurnighnaṃ nṛparāyuṣā ca vihṛtaṃ teṣāṃ sphuṭāyurbhavet
⟨The full term of life is⟩ 120 ⟨nakha-bhū = 20, 1, read from the right⟩ years and five days for men and elephants; 16 ⟨nṛpa, the sixteen kings⟩ for tigers and their like and goats and their like; 24 ⟨jina, the twenty-four Jinas⟩ for the ox and the buffalo ⟨go-kālī⟩; 25 ⟨tattva, the twenty-five tattvas⟩ likewise for the camel and the ass; 12 ⟨sūrya, the twelve Ādityas⟩ for dogs; and the horse's highest āyus is 32 ⟨rada, the thirty-two teeth⟩. Work out the āyus of these ⟨creatures⟩ here exactly as for a man; then that āyus, multiplied by the full term ⟨of the creature in question⟩ and divided by the full term of a man ⟨120 years and 5 days⟩, becomes their exact āyus.
4 notes on this verse
- About this edition: ⛔ NOT ŚRĪPATI'S VERSE. This passage is a QUOTATION that V. Subrahmanya Sastri prints inside his own notes, from केशव (Keśava), the Keśavapaddhati — his own verse 28. It is kept here because the page prints it and a reader following our verse numbers would otherwise find a hole; it is marked `kind: "quotation"` so it does not count toward this work's length.
THE SOURCE LABEL IS ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE — Sastri prints the label in ENGLISH on the facing page (PDF 120, printed folio 105), twice: “Kesava adds”, then a Keśava verse ending ॥ २७ ॥, then “He also states in the sloka overleaf the total life-period of some of the animals other than human beings and the method to be adopted for calculating their longevity.” — pointing forward to this very passage.
HOW IT WAS RULED, on the ink at 600 ppi: Set in the small quotation face, following Keśava's own ॥ २७ ॥ quoted on the facing page. ⛔ AND IT STANDS AFTER THE COLOPHON: printed folio 105 carries Śrīpati's 5.38, then the centred two-line colophon इति श्रीपतिविरचितायां जातकपद्धता- / वायुर्दायाध्यायः पञ्चमः, then Sastri's translation of śloka 38, and only then “Kesava adds”. This passage is on the next leaf, under a running head that already reads [Adh. VI.
THE NUMERAL: ॥ २८ ॥ — and it is KEŚAVA'S number, following his ॥ २७ ॥ on the facing page. Śrīpati's adhyāya 5 runs to ॥ ३८ ॥, so a २८ at its end never belonged to his sequence.
THE METRE: Its content is the lifespans of animals — men and elephants 120 years, horses 32, asses and camels 25, bulls and buffaloes 24, tigers and sheep 16, dogs 12. Sastri renders it with NO “Sloka N.” head and adds “For more details, see Jatakaparijata V-40-44.”
⚠ WHY IT WAS EVER TAKEN FOR ŚRĪPATI'S: the reader who transcribed its page tagged it `role: "mula"`, and they were reading that page alone. A one-page-per-agent reader structurally cannot see a label printed on the page before. The same failure put 72 syllables of Parāśara inside record 3.16, found the same day.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोकाल्योश्च"; alternatives "गोकोलयोश्च", "गोकाल्ययोश्च" — third akṣara is ल with a subscript hook and an o-mātrā; read ल्यो. The word as printed is hard to construe beside Sastri's English 'bulls and buffaloes'. Zoomed 3× and the ā-mātrā on का is certain.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २८ within its adhyāya; it is published at position 39.
- About this edition: Six number-words, all bhūtasaṃkhyā read right to left: nakha(20)-bhū(1) → 1 then 20 → 120; nṛpa = 16; jina = 24; tattva = 25; sūrya = 12; rada = 32. Sastri's English on the same plate gives the same six figures, which is an independent confirmation of every decoding. Worked example of the last rule: if an ox's chart yields 60 years by the human reckoning, its own āyus is 60 × 24 ÷ 120 = 12 years. The reader marked गोकाल्योश्च doubtful (alternatives गोकोलयोश्च, गोकाल्ययोश्च); read go-kālī, 'the ox and the buffalo' — kālī, 'the black one', for the she-buffalo is an unusual word, so the FORM is uncertain while the SENSE is not, since Sastri's copy gave him 'bulls and buffaloes' and the figure 24 fits the standard list (Jātakapārijāta V.40-44). ⚠ ATTRIBUTION — a lead for a second reader, not a ruling: this verse may be Keśava's and not Śrīpati's. Three things on the plates point that way. (1) The adhyāya-5 colophon is printed before it, at the foot of page_0120, right after verse 38. (2) Sastri's note there says Keśava 'also states in the sloka overleaf' the life-terms of animals and the method for computing them — and the sloka overleaf is this one. (3) Its printed number ॥ २८ ॥ continues Keśava's own run of quoted verses across these plates (२१ p.110, २२ p.112, २३ p.113, २४ p.116, २५ p.114, २६ and २७ p.120, then २८ p.121), while Śrīpati's own numbering had already reached 38 — and Śrīpati's verse २८ is a different verse altogether (नखाः शशी द्वौ…, page_0113). Sastri also gives it no 'Sloka N.' heading, unlike every Śrīpati verse in the chapter. Against that, the press set it in the large mūla type and the plate reader tagged it mūla. Rendered as asked; the attribution needs a ruling before this verse is published as Śrīpati's.