Skip to content
Karma Sakha
Sign in

The Texts · The Foundational Six

Tājika Nīlakaṇṭhī

ताजिकनीलकण्ठी

Nīlakaṇṭha Daivajña · Completed 1587 CE (Śaka 1509) at Kāśī · tajika

What this text is

The defining manual of Tājika (annual-chart) astrology — varṣaphala as the tradition knows it is this book.

Three sections: saṁjñā-tantra (sahams, Tājika aspects, the ithasāla/ishrāfa yoga apparatus), varṣa-tantra (the annual chart, year-lord election, muntha, mudda daśā), and praśna-tantra; usually read with the Kuntala and Jyotī commentaries.

Its role in this app

The sole defining seat of our varṣaphala feature — year-lord election, muntha, Tājika yogas and mudda daśā all trace here, which is why that category’s evidence grades are honest about being single-lineage. Our muntha finding: the classical text puts houses 4 and 7 flatly in the adverse set, against the modern "mixed" softening the engine inherited — registered, not silently flipped.

Editions our research holds

  • nirnaya-sagara-1893

    Nirṇaya Sāgara pothi, Bombay 1893, with Viśvanātha’s Sanskrit commentary and worked examples — read in full from its page images, the verse text only.

    public domain

  • venkateshwara-1888

    Veṅkaṭeśvara Steam Press pothi, Bombay 1888, with the same commentary — a different press, the candidate second witness.

    public domain

  • dli-lithograph

    A lithographed pothi (DLI) — a hand-written line of transmission; its pages are scanned sideways.

    public domain · scan quality: unusable

  • ram-chandra-pathak

    Ram Chandra Pathak edition with Kuntala commentary and Hindi (Chaukhamba).

    in copyright — read for verification only, never republished · scan quality: usable

  • with-hindi-translation

    Old Hindi print, edition unknown.

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright · scan quality: poor

What our reading found

Findings from this project's own verification passes — recorded because a source's defects are part of citing it honestly.

Six printings are held, four of them public domain, found in September 2026. There is no typed e-text of the Sanskrit anywhere, and no OCR of these printings is usable, so the 1893 Nirṇaya Sāgara pothi was read from its page images, the verse text only: 43 sections, 944 verses. That printing sets the verses without spaces between words, and they are stored that way. Its third part, on questions (praśna), is a compilation: it quotes older works by name and numbers some of those verses in its own count, and each such verse names its source. One passage there, the questions on houses 1 to 5, carries no verse numbers at all and is held back until its verses can be divided.

The text itself

The Tājika Nīlakaṇṭhī is here in full. Read from the page images of TWO printings. The text is keyed from the Nirṇaya Sāgara pothi, Bombay 1893, which sets Nīlakaṇṭha's verses in large type between two bands of Viśvanātha's Sanskrit ṭīkā; only the verses are taken. It was then collated, in 2026, against the Śrī Kalpataru press first edition of 1889 — a different house — read end to end. The 1889 attests 941 of these 944 verses and sets 937 of their printed numbers. The three it does not attest (2.17–2.20) are on a leaf physically missing from that copy, and its own commentary proves the edition had them. ⚠ THAT IS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING THE TEXT IS SETTLED. The two printings differ somewhere in about a quarter of their wording, and not one of those places has yet been adjudicated on the page, so every verse is still tier 'etext': the app may say "our source reads…" and may not say "the text reads…". The pothi prints the Sanskrit WITHOUT WORD SPACES; the mūla you read has been divided into words, and the unspaced print is kept beside it in `diplomatic`, so nothing of what the page sets is lost. Verses are numbered by position within each section; where the page prints a different number, or none, the verse says so. In the praśna section the page quotes other works and numbers some of those verses in its own count; each such verse names its source. On 2026-10-01 the mūla verification of 2026-09 ruled every one of the 944 verses against the four independent reads this library holds: the 1889 Kalpataru edition, Pāṭhaka's edition with his word-by-word Kuntalā gloss, Mahīdhara's and Jhā's. It wrote 168 corrections: 125 on a form that is no Sanskrit word, 29 on the metre, 10 on a parallel verse elsewhere in our own text and 4 on arithmetic. 101 of them fall in the praśna section (chapters 25–43), which holds 351 of the 944 verses. The other 776 verses carry a check row, and 70 of those hold a correction that waits for a plate, so 706 were cleared outright. The pass also put 387 variant readings on the ledger, the first this book has had, opened 19 doubts, and moved the English and Hindi of 41 verses with their Sanskrit; a repair pass the same day read the renderings of the other 130 corrected verses and moved 40 more. Nothing was corrected because a store gives a different reading; the 70 held corrections are the ones that would rest on one. So the sentence above, that not one place where the two printings differ has been adjudicated, is out of date: every verse now carries a ruling, made on grammar, metre, arithmetic or a parallel. None was made on the page, and every verse stays tier 'etext'. The length stands at 944, and this pass did not move it: all 944 records were ruled, and none was split, joined or renumbered. Its basis is 'colophon-sum'. The read of the 1893 gives section-closing numbers that sum to 943, plus one verse on p.183 with no number. The read of the 1889 gives 937 of those 943 numbers, and 4 of the other 6 fall on folio 21, a leaf missing from that scan. Two separate settings agreeing on the numbering runs, including four odd runs that no verse count would predict, is what closes it. It counts this recension, the nineteenth-century Bombay vulgate, and the 71 unnumbered half-lines on houses 1 to 5 in the praśna section stay outside it. THE ONE THING A READER SHOULD NOT ASSUME ABOUT THIS BOOK'S EVIDENCE: that 'read from the page images' above means a person read them. A vision model read the 211 plates of the 1893 on 2026-09-11, and nobody has audited that read as a whole. Its letters were checked on enlarged crops of the page the same day for 83 verses on 17 plates, and for no others. The witness store named after the 1893, which agrees with our text on 894 of 944 verses, is that same machine read, so its agreement is the same file read twice and proves nothing. The four independent reads are machine reads too. On 517 verses every independent read placed there differs from us somewhere, most of them at one or two places, which is what four machine reads of the same unspaced text produce. That haze is why no correction here rests on a store alone. 944 of this text's 944 verses carry an English translation; 43 of 43 chapters are begun or finished (1–43). This is the whole work: 944 verses against the 944 it is known to have. The Sanskrit is tier 'etext': one printing, read from its page images, with other printings' readings weighed on an adjudication ledger in 41 of 43 chapter(s) and no chapter yet through the visual gate. The app may say "our source reads…", naming the source; it may not say "the text reads…".

Verses are missing inside this text. Held back, not lost. In the praśna section (the third tantra), the questions about houses 1 to 5 — pp. 179–182 of the 1893 pothi, under the headings अथप्रत्येकंभावप्रश्ननिरूपणम्, अथद्वितीयस्थानपृच्छा, अथतृतीयभावपृच्छा, अथचतुर्थस्थानपृच्छा and अथपंचमस्थानपृच्छा — are 71 half-lines of āryās that the printing numbers NONE of. Weighed, the half-lines include gīti, upagīti and udgīti forms and at least one unit of three half-lines, so cutting them into verses would be a guess; they are kept whole in the page files and wait for a reader to divide them. The section's numbering starts only at the sixth house (our chapter 28). Also not published as verses: the praśna section's connecting prose, the verses it quotes WITHOUT a number (from the Bhuvanadīpaka, the Cintāmaṇi, Caṇḍeśvara's Praśnavidyā, the Jñānamuktāvalī, the Ṣaṭpañcāśikā and others, 9 labelled passages), and two half-lines on p. 195 that weigh as āryā halves but which the reader read as gloss. Nothing in the first two tantras is held.

944 verses in the original Sanskrit with our own English translation, which is made from that Sanskrit and not adapted from any existing translation. Read from the page images: Tājika Nīlakaṇṭhī of Nīlakaṇṭha Daivajña (1587), Nirṇaya Sāgara pothi, Bombay 1893, with Viśvanātha's ṭīkā — 211 plates read by vision 2026-09-11, mūla only, collated by scripts/corpus/collate-plates.mjs; ingested by scripts/corpus/ingest-etext.mjs on 2026-09-11. Segmentation rule: Collated 2026-09-11 by `scripts/corpus/collate-tajika-nilakanthi.sh --out .tmp/tajika-nilakanthi-collated.json`, which holds the full command and says why each option is there. Section boundary = an इति-colophon in the mūla stream (`इतिसंज्ञातंत्रेग्रहाध्यायःप्रथमः`, `इतिधनभावविचारः`, the sandhi form `इत्यष्टमभावः`, and the long tantra colophons), or a restart of the printed numbering WHERE a printed marker stands — a heading, a ṭīkā line that closes a section, or in the praśna section a label naming a new source. A restart with no marker is not cut. Verse boundary = a numeral mark `॥ N ॥`, which in this pothi often falls mid-line. Verse NUMBER is the position within the section; the printed numeral rides alongside as `printedNumber`. ⚠ WHAT THIS POTHI DOES, each seen on the page, and what the collation does about it. (1) It prints prose connectives in the MŪLA'S OWN LARGE TYPE — `अथमिथुनराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥`, `अथसूर्यः ॥`, `इतिस्वप्नचिंता ॥` — between verses and sometimes inside a line; each is lifted out and stands over the next verse as `sectionHeading`. A connective the page NUMBERS stays a verse (p. 190, ॥ ३१ ॥). (2) A printed line can hold two roles; the readers recorded the split in `segments`/`roleSpans`, and the collator reads them. (3) It closes EVERY half-line with ॥, sets a verse's number bare at a line end (`…विचारणेत्थम् २६`, p. 82; also pp. 143, 155), glosses number-words in figures joined by daṇḍas (`१५।१२।८।७।९।७।९`, p. 42), numbers Nīlakaṇṭha's signature stanza twice (`॥ १० ॥ २॥`) and sets it after its section's colophon (it goes back to its section). (4) THE PRAŚNA SECTION (pp. 175–206) IS A COMPILATION, printed without the ṭīkā, and it numbers the verses it QUOTES in its own count: p. 188 opens the particular questions with Samarasiṃha 1–5 and the Cintāmaṇi 6–28, and Nīlakaṇṭha's own verses go on from 29. Those quoted verses are part of the text as printed and are records, each naming its source (the ruling made for Kāla Prakāśikā 43.18–22). A quotation the page does NOT number is not a record. (5) The particular-questions section numbers 1–100 and then 1–100 again with no marker between (p. 195, inside the topic of the thief): the second run is published at positions 101–200 with its printed numbers kept. Only `mula`, `colophon` and `heading` parts enter, and in the praśna section numbered `quotation` parts; the ṭīkā (`commentary`), unnumbered quotations and `unknown` never do. The edition's charts and worked-example captions are `heading` lines and are left out entirely. Each verse names the plates it was read from in `sourcePages`. HELD OUT, AND DECLARED: pp. 179–182, houses 1–5 of the praśna section's particular questions — 71 half-lines of āryās the printing numbers NONE of, under five headings. Weighed, they show gīti, upagīti and udgīti forms and at least one three-half-line unit, so dividing them into verses would be a guess; they wait for a reader. Also held: the section's prose, its unnumbered quotations, and two half-lines on p. 195 that weigh as āryā halves but which the reader read as gloss. Role rulings made on the page files, each with its evidence in the line's `note` and a backup in .tmp/_backup/: pp. 69, 100, 174 — the ṭīkā's colophons and Viśvanātha's two closing verses (dated Śaka 1551) were tagged `colophon` and would have entered the mūla; p. 195 — `इत्थंचौरज्ञाने` belongs to verse १ by metre (the half-line weighs 30 mātrās with it, 18 without).

Not yet independently audited. Every reading here was established and recorded by the process described above, but no fresh reader has re-derived these verses from the plates without seeing our record. When that was done for the first text we published, it found real errors — so treat this one as a first edition and check anything you intend to rely on. The evidence behind every verse is committed and readable.

475 reading disagreements were adjudicated and are recorded verse by verse. Every akṣara was legible.

Adhyāya 1 · इतिसंज्ञातंत्रेग्रहाध्यायःप्रथमः

प्रणम्य हेरंबमथो दिवाकरं गुरोरनंतस्य तथा पदांबुजम् ॥ श्रीनीलकंठो विविनक्ति सूक्तिभिस्तत् ताजिकं सूरिमनःप्रसादकृत्

praṇamya heraṃbamatho divākaraṃ guroranaṃtasya tathā padāṃbujam || śrīnīlakaṃṭho vivinakti sūktibhistat tājikaṃ sūrimanaḥprasādakṛt

Having bowed to Heramba (Gaṇeśa), then to Divākara (the Sun), and likewise to the lotus feet of ⟨my⟩ guru Ananta, Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha sets out clearly, in well-made sayings (sūkti), that Tājika which gives delight to the minds of the learned.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रणम्यहेरंबमथोदिवाकरंगुरोरनंतस्यतथापदांबुजम् ॥ श्रीनीलकंठोविविनक्तिसूक्तिभिस्तत्ताजिकंसूरिमनःप्रसादकृत्

अथ द्वादशराशिस्वरूपमाह । तत्रादौमेषस्य ।

पुमांश्चरोऽग्निः सुदृढश्चतुष्पाद् रक्तोष्णपित्तोऽतिरवोऽद्रिरुग्रः ॥ पीतो दिनं प्राग् विषमोदयोऽल्पसंगप्रजो रूक्षनृपः समोऽजः

pumāṃścaro'gniḥ sudṛḍhaścatuṣpād raktoṣṇapitto'tiravo'drirugraḥ || pīto dinaṃ prāg viṣamodayo'lpasaṃgaprajo rūkṣanṛpaḥ samo'jaḥ

Aries (aja, the Ram) is male, movable (cara), fiery, very firm, four-footed, red, hot, bilious (pitta, the bile humour), very loud-voiced, ⟨dwelling on⟩ mountains, and fierce; yellow, ⟨strong by⟩ day, ⟨lord of the⟩ east, of oblique rising (viṣamodaya, 'rising unequally' ⟨i.e. a sign of short ascension⟩), of little mating and few offspring, dry, royal (nṛpa, a kṣatriya), and equal (sama, ⟨i.e. equinoctial⟩).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुमांश्चरोऽग्निःसुदृढश्चतुष्पाद्रक्तोष्णपित्तोऽतिरवोऽद्रिरुग्रः ॥ पीतोदिनंप्राग्विषमोदयोऽल्पसं गप्रजोरूक्षनृपःसमोऽजः

1.3a reading here is contested

अथवृषराशिस्वरूपमाह ।

वृषः स्थिरः स्त्रीक्षितिशीतरूक्षो याम्येट् सुभूर्वायुनिशाचतुष्पात् ॥ श्वेतोऽतिशब्दो विषमोदयश्च मध्यप्रजासंगशुभोऽपि वैश्यः

vṛṣaḥ sthiraḥ strīkṣitiśītarūkṣo yāmyeṭ subhūrvāyuniśācatuṣpāt || śveto'tiśabdo viṣamodayaśca madhyaprajāsaṃgaśubho'pi vaiśyaḥ

Taurus (vṛṣa) is fixed (sthira), female, earthy, cold, dry, lord of the south (yāmya), ⟨dwelling on⟩ good ground (subhū), windy (vāyu, the wind humour), ⟨strong by⟩ night, and four-footed; white, very loud-voiced, of oblique rising, of moderate offspring and mating, benefic, and a vaiśya.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वृषःस्थिरःस्त्रीक्षितिशीतरूक्षोयाम्येट्सुभूर्वायुनिशाचतुष्पात् ॥ श्वेतोऽति- शब्दोविषमोदयश्चमध्यप्रजासंगशुभोऽपिवैश्यः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "याम्येट्सुभूर्वायु"; alternatives "याम्येड्सुभूर्वायु" — zoomed: ट with a virāma hook below, no dot of ड visible
1.4a reading here is contested

अथमिथुनराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

प्रत्यक्समीरः शुकभाद्विपान्नाद्वंद्वं द्विमूर्तिर्विषमोदयोष्णः ॥ मध्यप्रजासंगवनस्थशूद्रो दीर्घस्वनः स्निग्ध दिनेट् तथोग्रः

pratyaksamīraḥ śukabhādvipānnādvaṃdvaṃ dvimūrtirviṣamodayoṣṇaḥ || madhyaprajāsaṃgavanasthaśūdro dīrghasvanaḥ snigdha dineṭ tathograḥ

Gemini (dvandva, the Pair) is ⟨lord of the⟩ west, airy (samīra), parrot-green in lustre, two-footed, male, dual-bodied (dvimūrti), of oblique rising, and hot; of moderate offspring and mating, dwelling in forests, a śūdra, long-voiced, moist, lord of the day ⟨i.e. strong by day⟩, and likewise fierce.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रत्यक्समीरःशुकभाद्विपान्नाद्वंद्वंद्विमूर्तिर्विषमोदयोष्णः ॥ मध्यप्रजासंगवनस्थशूद्रोदीर्घस्वनःस्निग्ध दिनेट्तथोग्रः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विपान्नाद्वंद्वं"; alternatives "द्विपान्ना द्वंद्वं" — large type, clear; the ना is read as printed (the ṭīkā glosses नापुरुषराशिः)
1.5a reading here is contested

अथकर्कराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

बहुप्रजासंगपदः कुलीरश्चरोंऽगनापाटलहीनशब्दः ॥ शुभः कफी स्निग्धजलांबुचारी समोदयी विप्रनिशोत्तरेशः

bahuprajāsaṃgapadaḥ kulīraścaroṃ'ganāpāṭalahīnaśabdaḥ || śubhaḥ kaphī snigdhajalāṃbucārī samodayī vipraniśottareśaḥ

Cancer (kulīra, the Crab) has many offspring, much mating and many feet; ⟨it is⟩ movable, female, pink (pāṭala), and voiceless (hīna-śabda); benefic, phlegmatic (kapha, the phlegm humour), moist, watery, moving in water, of straight rising (samodaya, 'rising evenly' ⟨i.e. a sign of long ascension⟩), a brahmin, ⟨strong by⟩ night, and lord of the north.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बहुप्रजासंगपदःकुलीरश्चरोंऽगनापाटलहीनशब्दः ॥ शुभःकफीस्निग्धजलांबुचारी समोदयीविप्रनिशोत्तरेशः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरोंऽगना"; alternatives "चरोऽंगना" — the anusvāra dot sits over रो, before the ऽ; recorded in that order as printed

अथसिंहराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

पुमान् स्थिरोऽग्निर्दिनपीतरूक्षः पित्तोष्णपूर्वेशदृढश्चतुष्पात् ॥ समोदयो दीर्घरवोऽल्पसंगप्रजो हरिः शैलनृपोग्रधूम्रः

pumān sthiro'gnirdinapītarūkṣaḥ pittoṣṇapūrveśadṛḍhaścatuṣpāt || samodayo dīrgharavo'lpasaṃgaprajo hariḥ śailanṛpogradhūmraḥ

Leo (hari, the Lion) is male, fixed, fiery, ⟨strong by⟩ day, yellow, dry, bilious, hot, lord of the east, firm, and four-footed; of straight rising, long-voiced, of little mating and few offspring, ⟨dwelling on⟩ mountains, royal (a kṣatriya), fierce, and smoke-coloured (dhūmra).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुमान्स्थिरोऽग्निर्दिनपीतरूक्षःपित्तोष्णपूर्वेशदृढश्चतुष्पात् ॥ समोदयो दीर्घरवोऽल्पसंगप्रजोहरिःशैलनृपोग्रधूम्रः

1.7a reading here is contested

अथकन्याराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

पांडुर्द्विपात् स्त्रीद्वितनुर्यमाशानिशामरुच्छीतसमोदयाक्ष्मा ॥ कन्यार्धशब्दाशुभभूमिवैश्यारूक्षाऽल्पसंगप्रसवाशुभा च

pāṃḍurdvipāt strīdvitanuryamāśāniśāmarucchītasamodayākṣmā || kanyārdhaśabdāśubhabhūmivaiśyārūkṣā'lpasaṃgaprasavāśubhā ca

Virgo (kanyā, the Maiden) is pale (pāṇḍu), two-footed, female, dual-bodied (dvitanu), ⟨lady of⟩ the south, ⟨strong by⟩ night, windy (marut), cold, of straight rising, and earthy; half-voiced, ⟨dwelling on⟩ good ground, a vaiśya, dry, of little mating and few offspring, and benefic. [Our mūla now reads śubha-bhūmi, 'good ground', as the list gives it for Capricorn in v. 11.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पांडुर्द्विपात्स्त्रीद्वितनुर्यमाशानिशामरुच्छीतसमोदयाक्ष्मा ॥ कन्यार्धशब्दाशुभभ्रूमिवैश्यारूक्षाऽल्प संगप्रसवाशुभाच

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभभ्रूमि"; alternatives "शुभभूमि" — zoomed: the भ of भूमि carries a subscript stroke that looks like र under the ū; probably a damaged or mis-set भू. The ṭīkā line 2 reads शुभभूमिः [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कन्यार्धशब्दाशुभभूमिवैश्यारूक्षाऽल्पसंगप्रसवाशुभा; this sentence names शुभभ्रूमि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: शुभभ्रूमि as printed is not a Sanskrit word. The plate reader saw a damaged or mis-set भू, and the ṭīkā reads शुभभूमिः; the rendering follows शुभभूमि and the printed characters are kept. The closing प्रसवाशुभा can be divided प्रसवा शुभा ('benefic') or प्रसवा अशुभा ('malefic'); it is rendered 'benefic' because this list makes every even sign benefic (Taurus, Cancer, Scorpio, Pisces) and every odd sign fierce. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कन्यार्धशब्दाशुभभूमिवैश्यारूक्षाऽल्पसंगप्रसवाशुभा; this sentence names शुभभ्रूमि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

अथतुलाराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

पुमांश्चरश्चित्रसमोदयोष्णः प्रत्यङ्मरुत्स्निग्धरवो न वन्यः ॥ स्वल्पप्रजासंगमशूद्र उग्रस्तुलोद्युवीर्यो द्विपदः समानः

pumāṃścaraścitrasamodayoṣṇaḥ pratyaṅmarutsnigdharavo na vanyaḥ || svalpaprajāsaṃgamaśūdra ugrastulodyuvīryo dvipadaḥ samānaḥ

Libra (tula, the Balance) is male, movable, variegated (citra), of straight rising, hot, ⟨lord of the⟩ west, airy (marut), moist, voiced, and not a forest-dweller; of very little offspring and mating, a śūdra, fierce, strong by day (dyu-vīrya), two-footed, and equal (samāna, ⟨i.e. equinoctial⟩).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुमांश्चरश्चित्रसमोदयोष्णःप्रत्यङ्मरुत्स्निग्धरवोनवन्यः ॥ स्वल्पप्रजासंगमशू द्रउग्रस्तुलोद्युवीर्योद्विपदःसमानः

अथवृश्चिकराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

स्थिरः सितः स्त्रीजलमुत्तरेशनिशा रवो नो बहुपात् कफी च ॥ समोदयो वारिचरोऽतिसंगप्रजः शुभः स्निग्धतनुर्द्विजोऽलिः

sthiraḥ sitaḥ strījalamuttareśaniśā ravo no bahupāt kaphī ca || samodayo vāricaro'tisaṃgaprajaḥ śubhaḥ snigdhatanurdvijo'liḥ

Scorpio (ali) is fixed, white (sita), female, watery, lord of the north, ⟨strong by⟩ night, not voiced, many-footed, and phlegmatic; of straight rising, moving in water, of much mating and many offspring, benefic, moist-bodied, and a brahmin (dvija, 'twice-born').

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्थिरःसितःस्त्रीजलमुत्तरेशनिशारवोनोबहुपात्कफीच ॥ समोदयोवारिचरोऽतिसंगप्रजःशुभःस्निग्धतनुर्द्विजोऽलिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: निशारवोनो is taken as निशा, रवो नो ('⟨strong by⟩ night, not voiced'), reading नो as न उ, 'not'. The division is not certain, so file 2 leaves the letters joined.

अथधनूराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

ना स्वर्णभाः शैलसमोदयोऽतिशब्दो दिनं प्राग् दृढरूक्षपीतः ॥ राजोष्णपित्तो धनुरल्पसूतिसंगो द्विमूर्तिर्द्विपदोऽग्निरुग्रः

nā svarṇabhāḥ śailasamodayo'tiśabdo dinaṃ prāg dṛḍharūkṣapītaḥ || rājoṣṇapitto dhanuralpasūtisaṃgo dvimūrtirdvipado'gnirugraḥ

Sagittarius (dhanus, the Bow) is male, golden in lustre, ⟨dwelling on⟩ mountains, of straight rising, very loud-voiced, ⟨strong by⟩ day, ⟨lord of the⟩ east, firm, dry, and yellow; royal (a kṣatriya), hot, bilious, of few offspring and little mating, dual-bodied, two-footed, fiery, and fierce.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नास्वर्णभाःशैलसमोदयोऽतिशब्दोदिनंप्राग्दृढरूक्षपीतः ॥ राजोष्णपित्तोधनुरल्पसूतिसंगोद्विमूर्तिर्द्विपदोऽ ग्निरुग्रः

1.11a reading here is contested

अथमकरराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

मृगश्चरः क्ष्मार्धरवोयमाशास्त्रीपिंगरूक्षः शुभभूमिशीतः ॥ स्वल्पप्रजासंगसमीररात्रिरादौ चतुष्पाद् विषमोदयो विट्

mṛgaścaraḥ kṣmārdharavoyamāśāstrīpiṃgarūkṣaḥ śubhabhūmiśītaḥ || svalpaprajāsaṃgasamīrarātrirādau catuṣpād viṣamodayo viṭ

Capricorn (mṛga) is movable, earthy, half-voiced, ⟨lady of⟩ the south, female, tawny (piṅga), dry, ⟨dwelling on⟩ good ground, and cold; of very few offspring and little mating, windy (samīra), ⟨strong by⟩ night, four-footed in its first part, of oblique rising, and a vaiśya. [Our mūla now reads viṭ, 'vaiśya', the caste word the list needs.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मृगश्चरःक्ष्मार्धरवोयमाशास्त्रीपिंगरूक्षःशुभभूमिशीतः ॥ स्वल्पप्रजासंगसमीररात्रिरादौचतु ष्पाद्विषमोदयोविद्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्"; alternatives "विट्" — zoomed twice: the letter has the bottom hook of द with a virāma stroke, not the plain curve of ट; the ṭīkā (bottom line 9) glosses विट्वैश्यवर्णः, so विट् may be meant [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विट्; this sentence names विद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Printed विद्. The plate reader saw द with a virāma, not ट, and the ṭīkā glosses विट् वैश्यवर्णः. Every fourth sign from Taurus is a vaiśya in this list (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn), so the rendering follows विट्; the printed characters are kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विट्; this sentence names विद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

अथकुंभराशिस्वरूपमाह ॥

कुंभोपदो ना दिनमध्यसंगप्रसूः स्थिरः कर्बुरवन्यवायुः ॥ स्निग्धोष्णखंडस्वरतुल्यधातुः शूद्रः प्रतीची विषमोदयोग्रः

kuṃbhopado nā dinamadhyasaṃgaprasūḥ sthiraḥ karburavanyavāyuḥ || snigdhoṣṇakhaṃḍasvaratulyadhātuḥ śūdraḥ pratīcī viṣamodayograḥ

Aquarius (kumbha, the Pot) is footless (apada), male, ⟨strong by⟩ day, of moderate mating and offspring, fixed, variegated (karbura), ⟨dwelling in⟩ forests, and airy (vāyu); moist, hot, broken-voiced (khaṇḍa-svara), of balanced humours (tulya-dhātu), a śūdra, ⟨lord of the⟩ west, of oblique rising, and fierce. ['Footless' reads कुंभोपदो as kumbho 'padaḥ; the press sets no avagraha here, though it does at Pisces in v. 13.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुंभोपदोनादिनमध्यसंगप्रसूःस्थिरःकर्बुरवन्यवायुः ॥ स्निग्धोष्णखंडस्वर तुल्यधातुःशूद्रःप्रतीचीविषमोदयोग्रः

1.13a reading here is contested

मीनोऽपदः स्त्रीकफवारिरात्रिर्निःशब्दबभ्रुर्द्वितनुर्जलस्थः ॥ स्निग्धोऽतिसंगप्रसवोऽपि विप्रः शुभोत्तराशेड् विषमोदयश्च

mīno'padaḥ strīkaphavārirātrirniḥśabdababhrurdvitanurjalasthaḥ || snigdho'tisaṃgaprasavo'pi vipraḥ śubhottarāśeḍ viṣamodayaśca

Pisces (mīna, the Fish) is footless, female, phlegmatic (kapha), watery, ⟨strong by⟩ night, voiceless, brown (babhru), dual-bodied, and dwelling in water; moist, of much mating and many offspring, a brahmin (vipra), benefic, lord of the north, and of oblique rising.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मीनोऽपदःस्त्रीकफवारिरात्रिर्निःशब्दबभ्रुर्द्वितनुर्जलस्थः ॥ स्निग्धोऽतिसंगप्रसवोऽपिविप्रःशुभोत्तराशेड् विषमोदयश्च

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बभ्रुर्द्वितनुर्जलस्थः"; alternatives "वभ्रुर्द्वितनुर्जलस्थः" — At 5x the aksara after निःशब्द is plain व. Compared on the same crop with the ब of शब्द two aksaras earlier, which carries an unmistakable inner vertical. Printed reading kept. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): वभ्रुर्द्वितनुर्जलस्थः → बभ्रुर्द्वितनुर्जलस्थः. Re-read at 26x: this bowl has an inner bar across its counter, the वा of वारि on the same line has none. The earlier 5x reading was wrong.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रात्रिर्निः"; alternatives "रात्रिनिः" — repha over नि verified at 5x.
1.14a reading here is contested

धरांबुनोरग्निसमीरयोश्च वर्गे सुहृत्त्वं परतोऽरिभावः ॥ चापांत्यभागस्य चतुष्पदत्वं ज्ञेयं मृगांत्यस्य जलेचरत्वम्

dharāṃbunoragnisamīrayośca varge suhṛttvaṃ parato'ribhāvaḥ || cāpāṃtyabhāgasya catuṣpadatvaṃ jñeyaṃ mṛgāṃtyasya jalecaratvam

Between earth and water ⟨signs⟩, and between fire and air ⟨signs⟩, there is friendship within the group; beyond it, enmity. The last part of Sagittarius (cāpa) is to be known as four-footed, and the last part of Capricorn (mṛga) as moving in water.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

धरांबुनोरग्निसमीरयोश्चवर्गेसुहृत्त्वंपरतोऽरिभा वः ॥ चापांत्यभागस्यचतुष्पदत्वंज्ञेयंमृगांत्यस्यजलेचरत्वम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्गेसुहृत्त्वं"; alternatives "वर्गेंसुहृत्त्वं" — resolved at 9x: repha + e-matra stacked over ग, no anusvara. See the layoutRule trap note.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्गेसुहृत्त्वं"; alternatives "वर्गेंसुहृत्त्वं" — resolved at 9x: repha + e-matra stacked over ग, no anusvara. See the layoutRule trap note.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृगांत्यस्य"; alternatives "मृगान्त्यस्य" — anusvara, not a subscript न; checked at 1.45x - the mark is the same diamond sort used throughout.
1.15a reading here is contested

पित्तानिलौ धातुसमः कफश्च त्रिर्मेषतः सूरिभिरूहनीयाः ॥ राजन्यविट्शूद्रधरासुराश्च सर्वं फलं राश्यनुसारतः स्यात्

pittānilau dhātusamaḥ kaphaśca trirmeṣataḥ sūribhirūhanīyāḥ || rājanyaviṭśūdradharāsurāśca sarvaṃ phalaṃ rāśyanusārataḥ syāt

Bile (pitta) and wind (anila), balanced humours (dhātu-sama) and phlegm (kapha): the learned are to reckon these three times over, starting from Aries; so too kṣatriya (rājanya), vaiśya (viṭ), śūdra and brahmin (dharā-sura, 'god on earth'). Every result follows ⟨the nature of⟩ the sign.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पित्तानिलौधातुसमःकफश्चत्रिर्मेषतःसूरिभिरूहनीयाः ॥ राजन्यविट्शूद्रधरासुराश्चसर्वंफलंराश्यनुसारतःस्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वंफलं"; alternatives "सर्वँफलं" — At 4.5x the mark over र्व is a CANDRABINDU - crescent with a dot - and is visibly a different sort from the plain diamond anusvara over फलं in the same word-group. Recorded as printed. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): सर्वँफलं → सर्वंफलं. At 30x the 'crescent' measures 17x21 px and is the same sort as the lone repha over ज in र्जलस्थः on line 5 (18x19 px); the tika prints the same word at page 13 line 3 with that hook and no dot at all. The 6x6 px dot inside it is a bindu. The mark is repha + anusvara, not a candrabindu - it is smaller than the standalone anusvara over फलं (11x10 px) because the compositor squeezed a small bindu into the repha's hollow.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूरिभिरूहनीयाः"; alternatives "सूरिभिरुहनीयाः" — long ू in रू checked at 1.45x.
1.16a reading here is contested

गताः समाः पादयुताः प्रकृतिघ्नसमागणात् ॥ खवेदा४०प्तघटीयुक्ता जन्मवारादिसंयुताः ॥ अब्दप्रवेशे वारादिसप्ततष्टेऽत्र निर्दिशेत्

gatāḥ samāḥ pādayutāḥ prakṛtighnasamāgaṇāt || khavedā40ptaghaṭīyuktā janmavārādisaṃyutāḥ || abdapraveśe vārādisaptataṣṭe'tra nirdiśet

The elapsed years (samāḥ), increased by a quarter of themselves, ⟨together with⟩ the ghaṭīs (units of 24 minutes) got by dividing by 40 (kha-veda, figured ४०) the count of years multiplied by 21 (prakṛti), and added to the weekday etc. of birth — with seven cast out ⟨i.e. divided by seven and the remainder kept⟩, here one should declare ⟨the result⟩ as the weekday etc. at the entry of the year (abda-praveśa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गताःसमाःपादयुताःप्रकृतिघ्नसमागणात् ॥ खवेदा४०प्तघटीयुक्ताजन्मवारादिसंयुताः ॥ अब्दप्रवेशेवारादिसप्ततष्टेऽत्रनिर्दिशेत्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खवेदा४०प्तघटीयुक्ता"; alternatives "खवेदा४०घटीयुक्ता" — the figure ४० is set inline in the large mula type, between खवेदा and घटी. Recorded where it stands. The same figure recurs in the tika at line 10, so it is the edition's gloss of the word-numeral kha(0)+veda(4) read right to left = 40. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): खवेदा४०घटीयुक्ता → खवेदा४०प्तघटीयुक्ता. The figure is set INSIDE the word खवेदाप्त, not after it: a प्त stands between ४० and घ, verified at 26x against the प्त of सप्त on line 7 and against the स of समागणात् on this line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥"; alternatives "॥." — the line ends with a double danda followed by what looks like a full point or a broken third stroke; recorded as seen at 1.45x. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): ॥. → ॥. Measured at 30x: the mark is 5x6 px and 25 ink pixels, against 11-12 px / 89-96 ink pixels for the visarga dots of संयुताः a few sorts to its left. It is a quarter of the area of any dot this fount casts, so it is dirt, not a point.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सप्ततष्टेऽत्र"; alternatives "सप्तघ्नेऽत्र", "सप्तष्ठेऽत्र" — The घ्न ligature is a bowl with a descending hook. Settled by comparing it at 7x with the same ligature in 'शिवघ्नो' five words later on this line and in 'प्रकृतिघ्न' on line 6 - all three are one sort. The tika at line 11 glosses the operation as सप्तघ्नैःसप्तभिर्भक्ते, which agrees. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): सप्तघ्नेऽत्र → सप्ततष्टेऽत्र. That 7x comparison matched the wrong glyph. The plate has TWO aksaras here (x 944-971 and x 979-1006), not one: त with its right stem, then a conjunct with no right stem at all, which घ्न cannot be because घ्न ends in न. Re-read at 26x the second is ष्टे. The tika at line 11 prints सप्ततष्टेसप्तभिर्भक्ते on the plate, not सप्तघ्नैःसप्तभिर्भक्ते.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सप्ततष्टेऽत्र"; alternatives "सप्तघ्नेऽत्र", "सप्तष्ठेऽत्र" — The घ्न ligature is a bowl with a descending hook. Settled by comparing it at 7x with the same ligature in 'शिवघ्नो' five words later on this line and in 'प्रकृतिघ्न' on line 6 - all three are one sort. The tika at line 11 glosses the operation as सप्तघ्नैःसप्तभिर्भक्ते, which agrees. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): सप्तघ्नेऽत्र → सप्ततष्टेऽत्र. That 7x comparison matched the wrong glyph. The plate has TWO aksaras here (x 944-971 and x 979-1006), not one: त with its right stem, then a conjunct with no right stem at all, which घ्न cannot be because घ्न ends in न. Re-read at 26x the second is ष्टे. The tika at line 11 prints सप्ततष्टेसप्तभिर्भक्ते on the plate, not सप्तघ्नैःसप्तभिर्भक्ते.
1.17a reading here is contested

शिवघ्नोऽब्दः स्वखाद्रींदुलवाढ्यः खाग्निशेषितः ॥ जन्मतिथ्यन्वितस्तत्र तिथावब्दप्रवेशनम्

śivaghno'bdaḥ svakhādrīṃdulavāḍhyaḥ khāgniśeṣitaḥ || janmatithyanvitastatra tithāvabdapraveśanam

The ⟨number of elapsed⟩ years multiplied by 11 (śiva), increased by its own 170th part (kha-adri-indu, 0-7-1 read backwards = 170), with 30 (kha-agni) cast out ⟨i.e. divided by 30 and the remainder kept⟩, and added to the tithi of birth: on that tithi falls the entry of the year.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शिवघ्नोऽब्दःस्वखाद्रींदुलवाढ्यःखाग्निशेषितः ॥ जन्मतिथ्य न्वितस्तत्रतिथावब्दप्रवेशनम्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वखाद्रींदु"; alternatives "स्वखार्द्रींदु", "खखाद्रींदु" — NO REPHA. At 14x the single hook above this aksara joins downward to a vertical on the right: it is the ी matra's headline curl. Compared side by side at the same magnification with the genuine repha of 'निर्दिशेत्' 1200 px to the left, which sits higher and further left and is a separate sort. At 1.45x I had read a repha here and was wrong.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खाग्निशेषितः"; alternatives "खामिशेषितः" — ग्नि, not मि. At 1.45x the ग-with-subscript-न reads convincingly as म. Settled at 7x, and the tika at line 13 prints the same word and glosses it त्रिंशताभक्तः (divided by 30 = kha 0 + agni 3).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वखाद्रींदु"; alternatives "स्वखार्द्रींदु", "खखाद्रींदु" — NO REPHA. At 14x the single hook above this aksara joins downward to a vertical on the right: it is the ी matra's headline curl. Compared side by side at the same magnification with the genuine repha of 'निर्दिशेत्' 1200 px to the left, which sits higher and further left and is a separate sort. At 1.45x I had read a repha here and was wrong.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खाग्निशेषितः"; alternatives "खामिशेषितः" — ग्नि, not मि. At 1.45x the ग-with-subscript-न reads convincingly as म. Settled at 7x, and the tika at line 13 prints the same word and glosses it त्रिंशताभक्तः (divided by 30 = kha 0 + agni 3).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "॥ १७ ॥" — ७ verified at 1.45x against the १६ on the same line-group; the two sorts are clearly distinct.

अथवर्षप्रवेशसमयेस्पष्टाग्रहाःसाध्याः ॥ तत्रापिसुखार्थपंचांगस्थितग्रहेषुचालनमाह ॥

गतैष्यदिवसाद्येन गतिर्निघ्नी खषड्६०हृता ॥ लब्धमंशादिकं शोध्यं योज्यं स्पष्टो भवेद् ग्रहः

gataiṣyadivasādyena gatirnighnī khaṣaḍ60hṛtā || labdhamaṃśādikaṃ śodhyaṃ yojyaṃ spaṣṭo bhaved grahaḥ

The daily motion (gati) ⟨of a planet⟩, multiplied by the days etc. elapsed or yet to come, and divided by 60 (kha-ṣaṭ, figured ६०): the result, in degrees etc., is to be subtracted or added ⟨as the case requires⟩, and the planet becomes true (spaṣṭa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गतैष्यदिवसाद्ये नगतिर्निघ्नीखषड्६०हृता ॥ लब्धमंशादिकंशोध्यंयोज्यंस्पष्टोभवेद्ग्रहः

अथपंचांगस्थनक्षत्राच्चंद्रानयनमाह ॥

खषट् ६०घ्नं भयातं भभोगोद्धृतं तत् खतर्कघ्नधिष्ण्येषु युक्तं द्विनिघ्नम् ॥ नवाप्तं शशी भागपूर्वस्तु भुक्तिः खखाभ्राष्टवेदा४८००० भभोगेन भक्ताः

khaṣaṭ 60ghnaṃ bhayātaṃ bhabhogoddhṛtaṃ tat khatarkaghnadhiṣṇyeṣu yuktaṃ dvinighnam || navāptaṃ śaśī bhāgapūrvastu bhuktiḥ khakhābhrāṣṭavedā48000 bhabhogena bhaktāḥ

The elapsed portion of the ⟨current⟩ nakṣatra (bhayāta), multiplied by 60 (kha-ṣaṭ, figured ६०) and divided by the nakṣatra's whole duration (bhabhoga); that, added to the ⟨elapsed⟩ nakṣatras (dhiṣṇya) multiplied by 60 (kha-tarka), then multiplied by two and divided by nine, is the Moon in degrees and so on. And ⟨its⟩ daily motion (bhukti) is 48000 (kha-kha-abhra-aṣṭa-veda, figured ४८०००) divided by the bhabhoga.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

खषट् ६०घ्नंभयातंभभोगोद्धृतंतत्खतर्कघ्नधिष्ण्येषुयुक्तंद्विनिघ्नम् ॥ नवाप्तंशशीभागपूर्वस्तुभुक्तिः खखाभ्राष्टवेदा४८००० भभोगेनभक्ताः

अथभावसाधनमाह ॥

दिवानिशोरिष्टघटीषु शुद्धं द्युरात्रिखंडं त्वपरं नतं स्यात्

divāniśoriṣṭaghaṭīṣu śuddhaṃ dyurātrikhaṃḍaṃ tvaparaṃ nataṃ syāt

From the desired ghaṭīs of the day or of the night, subtract half the day or half the night ⟨respectively⟩: ⟨the remainder⟩ is the western (apara) nata (the time-distance past the meridian).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिवानिशोरिष्टघटीषुशुद्धंद्युरात्रिखंडंत्वपरंनतंस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints this record as one half-line (two pādas of the metre) under its own number २०. The rendering covers only what the record holds; the eastern nata is not stated in it.

तत्काले सायनार्कस्य भुक्तभोग्यांशसंगुणात् ॥ स्वोदयात् खाग्नि३०लब्धं यद् भुक्तं भोग्यं रवेस्त्यजेत्

tatkāle sāyanārkasya bhuktabhogyāṃśasaṃguṇāt || svodayāt khāgni30labdhaṃ yad bhuktaṃ bhogyaṃ ravestyajet

At that moment, take the elapsed or the remaining degrees (bhukta or bhogya aṃśa) of the sāyana Sun (the Sun with the ayanāṃśa added); multiply the local rising time (sva-udaya) ⟨of its sign⟩ by them and divide by 30 (kha-agni, figured ३०). What results is the Sun's elapsed or remaining ⟨time⟩, and one should subtract it ⟨from the desired time; the rule continues in v. 22⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्कालेसायनार्कस्यभुक्तभोग्यांशसंगुणात् ॥ स्वोदयात्खाग्नि३०लब्धंयद्भुक्तंभोग्यंरवेस्त्यजेत्

इष्टनाडीपलेभ्यश्च गतगम्यान्निजोदयात् ॥ शेषं खत्र्या ३० हतं भुक्तमशुद्धेन लवादिकम्

iṣṭanāḍīpalebhyaśca gatagamyānnijodayāt || śeṣaṃ khatryā 30 hataṃ bhuktamaśuddhena lavādikam

And from the palas of the desired nāḍīs ⟨subtract⟩ the local rising times (nija-udaya) ⟨of the signs⟩ passed or to come; the remainder, multiplied by 30 (kha-tri, figured ३०) ⟨and divided⟩ by the ⟨rising time⟩ that could not be subtracted (aśuddha), is the elapsed ⟨part⟩ in degrees etc.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इष्टनाडीपलेभ्यश्चगतगम्यान्नि जोदयात् ॥ शेषंखत्र्या ३० हतंभुक्तमशुद्धेनलवादिकम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints भुक्तम् ('the elapsed'). A division is needed before अशुद्धेन, and भक्तम् ('divided') would supply it; the rendering supplies the division in ⟨ ⟩ and keeps the printed भुक्तम् as 'the elapsed part'.
1.23a reading here is contested

अशुद्धशुद्धभेहीनयुक्तनुर्व्ययनांशकम् ॥ एवं लंकोदयैर्भुक्तं भोग्यं शोध्यं पलीकृतात्

aśuddhaśuddhabhehīnayuktanurvyayanāṃśakam || evaṃ laṃkodayairbhuktaṃ bhogyaṃ śodhyaṃ palīkṛtāt

Those ⟨degrees⟩, subtracted in the unsubtracted (aśuddha) sign or added in the subtracted (śuddha) signs ⟨respectively⟩, with the ayanāṃśa taken away, give the ascendant (tanu). In the same way, with the rising times at Laṅkā (laṅkodaya, the rising times on the equator), the elapsed or remaining ⟨part⟩ is to be subtracted from ⟨the nata⟩ turned into palas.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अशुद्धशुद्धभेहीनयुक्तनुर्व्ययनांशकम् ॥ एवंलंकोदयैर्भुक्तंभोग्यंशो ध्यंपलीकृतात्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्तनुर्व्ययनांशकम्"; alternatives "युक्तस्तनुर्व्ययनांशकम्" — printed as read; the ṭīkā glosses तनुः, so the sense may want a fuller form — kept as printed

पूर्वपश्चान्नतादन्यत्प्राग्वत् तद्दशमं भवेत् ॥ सषड्भे लग्नखे जायातुर्यौ लग्नोनतुर्यतः

pūrvapaścānnatādanyatprāgvat taddaśamaṃ bhavet || saṣaḍbhe lagnakhe jāyāturyau lagnonaturyataḥ

From the eastern or the western nata, the rest ⟨is done⟩ as before; that becomes the 10th (daśama) ⟨house⟩. The ascendant and the 10th (kha), each with six signs added, are the 7th (jāyā) and the 4th (turya). From the 4th decreased by the ascendant ⟨— the sentence continues; v. 26 takes 'the sixth part'⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पूर्वपश्चान्नतादन्यत्प्राग्वत्तद्दशमंभवेत् ॥ सषड्भेलग्नखेजायातुर्यौलग्नोनतुर्यतः

अग्रे त्रयः षडेवं ते भार्धयुक्ताः परेऽपि षट् ॥ खेटे भावसमं पूर्णफलसंधिसमे तु खम्

agre trayaḥ ṣaḍevaṃ te bhārdhayuktāḥ pare'pi ṣaṭ || kheṭe bhāvasamaṃ pūrṇaphalasaṃdhisame tu kham

Further, three ⟨more houses⟩; thus six. These, increased by half the zodiac (bhārdha, six signs), are the other six as well. When a planet is equal to a bhāva ⟨cusp⟩, the result is full; but when equal to a junction (sandhi), it is nil (kha). [The page prints भावसमं … पूर्णफल; the rendering follows the sense 'equal to the bhāva … full result'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अग्रेत्रयःषडेवंतेभार्धयुक्ताःपरेऽपिषट् ॥ खेटेभावसमंपूर्णफलसंधिसमेतुखम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Order: the procedure this record completes ('further, three more; thus six') is the one v. 26 begins (a sixth part added to the ascendant, three houses with their junctions), yet the pothi prints v. 25 before v. 26. The record is rendered where it stands. Wording: the second half prints भावसमंपूर्णफलसंधिसमे; the locative भावसमे and पूर्णफलं are what the sense needs. The rendering follows that sense and no character is changed.

षष्ठोंऽशयुक् तनुः संधिरग्रे षष्ठांशयोजनात् ॥ त्रयः ससंधयो भावाः षष्ठांशोनैकयुक् सुखात्

ṣaṣṭhoṃ'śayuk tanuḥ saṃdhiragre ṣaṣṭhāṃśayojanāt || trayaḥ sasaṃdhayo bhāvāḥ ṣaṣṭhāṃśonaikayuk sukhāt

The ascendant (tanu) joined with a sixth part ⟨of that arc⟩ is a junction (sandhi); further on, by adding ⟨another⟩ sixth part ⟨the bhāva itself is got⟩. ⟨In this way⟩ three bhāvas together with their junctions ⟨arise⟩; ⟨the last junction⟩ is the 4th (sukha) less one sixth part.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठोंऽशयुक्तनुःसंधिरग्रेषष्ठांशयोजनात् ॥ त्रयःससं धयोभावाःषष्ठांशोनैकयुक्सुखात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The record continues the procedure begun at v. 24 ('the 4th diminished by the ascendant'), whose sixth part this verse takes; the supplied words in ⟨ ⟩ carry that link, and no words are pulled in from v. 24 or v. 25. षष्ठोंऽश is the press's way of writing षष्ठ + अंश (compare चरोंऽगना at v. 5). The last quarter, षष्ठांशोनैकयुक्सुखात्, is compressed: it is read as षष्ठांश-ऊन ('less a sixth part') with एक ('one') and सुखात् ('from the 4th'), which the arithmetic of the six sixth-parts requires. Another division of those syllables would change how the last junction is reached, not the six-fold division itself.
1.27a reading here is contested

भुक्तं भोग्यं स्वेष्टकालान्न शुद्ध्येत्रिंश३०न्निघ्नात् स्वोदयाप्तं लवाद्यम् ॥ हीनं युक्तं भास्करे तत् तनुः स्याद् रात्रौ लग्नं भार्धयुक्ताद् रवेस्तु

bhuktaṃ bhogyaṃ sveṣṭakālānna śuddhyetriṃśa30nnighnāt svodayāptaṃ lavādyam || hīnaṃ yuktaṃ bhāskare tat tanuḥ syād rātrau lagnaṃ bhārdhayuktād ravestu

The elapsed or the remaining ⟨part of a sign⟩ which does not get subtracted from one's own desired time, multiplied by thirty (figured ३०) and divided by its own rising time (svodaya), gives degrees and so on. Subtracted from or added to the Sun ⟨as the case requires⟩, that is the ascendant (tanu). But at night the ascendant ⟨is reckoned⟩ from the Sun increased by half the zodiac (bhārdha, six signs).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भुक्तंभोग्यंस्वेष्टकालान्नशुद्ध्येत्रिंश३०न्निघ्नात्स्वोदयाप्तंलवाद्यम् ॥ हीनंयुक्तंभास्करेतत्तनुः स्याद्रात्रौलग्नंभार्धयुक्ताद्रवेस्तु

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नशुद्ध्येत्रिंश"; alternatives "नशुद्धयेत्रिंश", "नशुद्ध्येत्त्रिंश" — zoomed: a full ये follows the द्ध conjunct and त्रिं follows directly; the ṭīkā has नशुद्ध्येत्, so a त् may be absorbed
1.28a reading here is contested

खेटे संधिद्वयांतस्थे फलं तद् भावजं भवेत् ॥ हीने ऽधिके द्विसंधिभ्यां भावे पूर्वापरे फलम्

kheṭe saṃdhidvayāṃtasthe phalaṃ tad bhāvajaṃ bhavet || hīne 'dhike dvisaṃdhibhyāṃ bhāve pūrvāpare phalam

When a planet (kheṭa) stands between the two junctions ⟨of a bhāva⟩, the result is born of that bhāva. When it is less or more than the two junctions, the result belongs to the preceding or to the following bhāva ⟨respectively⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

खेटेसंधिद्वयांतस्थेफलंतद्भावजंभवेत्॥हीने- ऽधिकेद्विसंधिभ्यांभावेपूर्वापरेफलम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेत्॥हीने-"; alternatives "भवेत्।हीने-" — zoomed: two vertical strokes follow त्, the first thinner; read as a double daṇḍa
1.29a reading here is contested

ग्रहसंध्यंतरं कार्यं विंशत्या २० गुणितं भजेत् ॥ भावसंध्यंतरेणाप्तं फलं विंशोपकाः स्मृताः

grahasaṃdhyaṃtaraṃ kāryaṃ viṃśatyā 20 guṇitaṃ bhajet || bhāvasaṃdhyaṃtareṇāptaṃ phalaṃ viṃśopakāḥ smṛtāḥ

The interval between the planet and the junction (graha-sandhy-antara) is to be taken; multiply it by twenty (figured २०) and divide ⟨the product⟩ by the interval between the bhāva ⟨cusp⟩ and the junction. The quotient is declared to be the viṃśopakas ⟨the twentieth-parts of strength⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ग्रहसंध्यंतरंकार्यंविंशत्या२०गुणितंभजेत्॥भावसंध्यंतरेणाप्तंफलंविंशोपकाःस्मृताः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कार्यं"; alternatives "कार्य" — the anusvāra dot sits against the repha over य
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "णाप्तं" — the प्त conjunct is slightly blurred
1.30a reading here is contested

भौमोशनः सौम्यशशीनवित् सितारेज्यार्किमंदांगिरसो ग्रहेश्वराः ॥ आद्याः कुजाद्या रवितोऽपि मध्यमाः सितात् तृतीयाः क्रियतोदृकाणपाः

bhaumośanaḥ saumyaśaśīnavit sitārejyārkimaṃdāṃgiraso graheśvarāḥ || ādyāḥ kujādyā ravito'pi madhyamāḥ sitāt tṛtīyāḥ kriyatodṛkāṇapāḥ

Mars (Bhauma), Venus (Uśanas), Mercury (Saumya), the Moon (Śaśin), the Sun (Ina), Mercury (Vit), Venus (Sita), Mars (Āra), Jupiter (Ijya), Saturn (Arki), Saturn (Manda) and Jupiter (Āṅgirasa) are the lords of the signs ⟨from Aries onward⟩. The first drekkāṇas (decanates) ⟨have lords⟩ beginning with Mars (kuja), the middle ones from the Sun, and the third ones from Venus (sita) — ⟨so run⟩ the lords of the drekkāṇas, counted from Aries (kriya).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमोशनः सौम्यशशीनवित्सितारेज्यार्किमंदांगिरसोग्रहेश्वराः ॥ आद्याःकुजाद्यारवितोऽपिमध्यमाःसितात्तृ तीयाः क्रियतोट्टकाणपाः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्सिता"; alternatives "वित्‌सिता" — a virāma is printed under त; the conjunct is not formed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ट्ट"; alternatives "दृ", "द्द" — zoomed 4×: a stacked glyph, upper part a ट/द-like curl, lower part a second curl; not a clear ृ hook [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्रियतोदृकाणपाः; this sentence names ट्ट, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The sign-lords are named by epithets: Ina ('the lord') is the Sun and Vit ('the knower') is Mercury, so the list runs Mars, Venus, Mercury, Moon, Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Saturn, Jupiter for Aries through Pisces. The pothi prints ट्टकाण for the decanate here and at v. 39, and द्रेक्काण at v. 42; the reader could not resolve the ligature. The rendering reads it as drekkāṇa and the printed characters are kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्रियतोदृकाणपाः; this sentence names ट्टकाण, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.31a reading here is contested

सूर्यादितुंगर्क्षमजोक्षनक्रं कन्याकुलीरांत्यतुला लवैः स्युः ॥ दिग्भिर्गुणैरष्टयमैः शरैकैर्भूतैर्भसंख्यैर्नखसंमितैश्च

sūryādituṃgarkṣamajokṣanakraṃ kanyākulīrāṃtyatulā lavaiḥ syuḥ || digbhirguṇairaṣṭayamaiḥ śaraikairbhūtairbhasaṃkhyairnakhasaṃmitaiśca

The exaltation signs, beginning with the Sun, are Aries (aja), Taurus (ukṣa), Capricorn (nakra), Virgo (kanyā), Cancer (kulīra), the last sign ⟨Pisces⟩ (antya) and Libra (tulā); ⟨and the exaltation⟩ degrees are ten (dik), three (guṇa), twenty-eight (aṣṭa-yama, 8 and 2 read backwards), fifteen (śara-eka, 5 and 1 read backwards), five (bhūta), twenty-seven (bha-saṃkhyā, the count of the nakṣatras) and twenty (nakha, the count of the nails).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्यादितुंगर्क्षमजोक्षनक्रंकन्याकुलीरांत्यतुलालवैःस्युः ॥ दिग्भिर्गुणैरष्टयमैःशरैकैर्भूतैर्भसं ख्यैर्नखसंमितैश्च

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नक्रं"; alternatives "नक्रं", "नक्रऺ" — anusvara over क्र confirmed at 2.8x.
  • About this edition: Read planet by planet, the verse gives: Sun 10° Aries, Moon 3° Taurus, Mars 28° Capricorn, Mercury 15° Virgo, Jupiter 5° Cancer, Venus 27° Pisces, Saturn 20° Libra.
1.32a reading here is contested

तत्सप्तमं नीचमनेन हीनो ग्रहोऽधिकश्चेद् रसभाद् विशोध्यः ॥ चक्रात् तदंकांशलवो बलं स्यात् क्रियेण तौलींदुभतो नवांशाः

tatsaptamaṃ nīcamanena hīno graho'dhikaśced rasabhād viśodhyaḥ || cakrāt tadaṃkāṃśalavo balaṃ syāt kriyeṇa taulīṃdubhato navāṃśāḥ

The seventh from that ⟨exaltation point⟩ is the debilitation (nīca). The planet is diminished by this; and if ⟨the remainder⟩ is more than six signs (rasa-bha), it is to be subtracted from the circle (cakra, twelve signs). The part ⟨got⟩ from the degrees of that figure is the strength (bala). The navāṃśas ⟨are reckoned⟩ from Aries (kriya), from Libra (taulī) and from the Moon's sign ⟨Cancer⟩ (indu-bha).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्सप्तमंनीचमनेनहीनोग्रहोऽधिकश्चेद्रसभाद्विशोध्यः ॥ च क्रात्तदंकांशलवोबलंस्यात्क्रियेणतौलींदुभतोनवांशाः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रहोऽधिक" — AVAGRAHA VERIFIED at 2.8x and again at 6x - the mark is a full avagraha, not a stray o-stroke.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेद्रसभाद्विशोध्यः"; alternatives "चेद्रसभाद्विशोऽध्यः" — a small mark sits between शो and ध्य; at 6x it resolves as the tail of the o-matra, not an avagraha. | ink ruling 2026-09-11: दि → द्वि (see this line's note). The question about the mark between शो and ध्य is unchanged.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तौलीं"; alternatives "तौर्लीं" — a hook over ली reads as a repha at 2.8x; it is the arm of the long-i matra, the same shape that made सप्तविंशति look like सप्तर्विंशति on line 4.
  • About this edition: चक्रात् is printed in the second half but is construed with विशोध्यः in the first ('subtracted from the circle'); the daṇḍa falls between them. The last quarter names only three signs from which the navāṃśas are counted — Aries, Libra and Cancer. The fourfold rule this belongs to needs a fourth, Capricorn (mṛga), and the pothi does not print it; nothing has been supplied in its place.
1.33a reading here is contested

मेषेंगतर्काष्टशरेषुभागा जीवास्फुजिज्ज्ञारशनैश्चराणाम् ॥ वृषेष्टषण्णागशराऽनलांशाः शुक्रज्ञजीवार्किकुजेशहद्दाः

meṣeṃgatarkāṣṭaśareṣubhāgā jīvāsphujijjñāraśanaiścarāṇām || vṛṣeṣṭaṣaṇṇāgaśarā'nalāṃśāḥ śukrajñajīvārkikujeśahaddāḥ

In Aries the degrees are six, six, eight, five and five (aṅga, tarka, aṣṭa, śara, iṣu), ⟨whose lords are⟩ Jupiter (jīva), Venus (āsphujit), Mercury (jña), Mars (āra) and Saturn (śanaiścara). In Taurus the degrees are eight, six, eight, five and three (aṣṭa, ṣaṇ, nāga, śara, anala), ⟨and⟩ Venus (śukra), Mercury (jña), Jupiter (jīva), Saturn (arki) and Mars (kuja) are the lords of ⟨these⟩ haddās (the Tājika bounds).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषेंगतर्काष्टशरेषुभागाजीवास्फुजिज्ज्ञारशनैश्चराणाम् ॥ वृषेष्टषण्णागश राऽनलांशाःशुक्रज्ञजीवार्किकुजेशहद्दाः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मेषेंग"; alternatives "मेषेऽङ्ग", "मेषेऽंग" — read at 9x: an e-matra with an anusvara dot beside it over षे, then ग. NO avagraha. The press writes the sandhi मेषे+अङ्ग this way; compare सिंहेंग on line 13.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तर्का"; alternatives "तका" — a repha hook stands over the का at 9x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राऽनल" — AVAGRAHA VERIFIED at 5.5x - a full baseline ऽ, unmistakable, and the reference glyph for what an avagraha looks like in this fount. It marks शर+अनल, where no elision occurs; this press uses ऽ after a long aa to show an absorbed अ.
  • About this edition: Both rows total thirty degrees, as every haddā row in a sign must.
1.34a reading here is contested

युग्मेषडंगेषुनगांगभागाः सौम्यास्फुजिज्जीवकुजार्किहद्दाः ॥ कर्केद्रितर्कांगनगाब्धिभागाः कुजास्फुजिज्ज्ञेज्यशनैश्चराणाम्

yugmeṣaḍaṃgeṣunagāṃgabhāgāḥ saumyāsphujijjīvakujārkihaddāḥ || karkedritarkāṃganagābdhibhāgāḥ kujāsphujijjñejyaśanaiścarāṇām

In Gemini the degrees are six, six, five, seven and six (ṣaṭ, aṅga, iṣu, naga, aṅga), ⟨and⟩ Mercury (saumya), Venus (āsphujit), Jupiter (jīva), Mars (kuja) and Saturn (arki) are the lords of ⟨these⟩ haddās. In Cancer the degrees are seven, six, six, seven and four (adri, tarka, aṅga, naga, abdhi), ⟨whose lords are⟩ Mars (kuja), Venus (āsphujit), Mercury (jña), Jupiter (ijya) and Saturn (śanaiścara).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

युग्मेषडंगेषुनगांगभा गाःसौम्यास्फुजिज्जीवकुजार्किहद्दाः ॥ कर्केद्रितर्कांगनगाब्धिभागाःकुजा स्फुजिज्ज्ञेज्यशनैश्चराणाम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्फुजिज्जीव"; alternatives "स्फुजिजीव" — at 10x the conjunct ज्जी is clear - two ja strokes under one head.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्केद्रि"; alternatives "कर्केऽद्रि" — UNSETTLED AND IMPORTANT. At 16x the mark between र्के and द्रि is SMALL and sits ABOVE the headline - an anusvara, NOT the big baseline ऽ of line 11. But the arithmetic needs अद्रि (7): the Cancer bounds here are 7,6,6,7,4 and the table column क on line 5-9 reads मं७ शु६ बु६ गु७ श४. Recorded as the ink shows it. A second reader should re-examine this one aksara. | RULED 2026-09-11 on the ink: no anusvara. Only two marks stand over the क, the e-matra and a compressed repha, and both run down to the headline; this fount's anusvara floats clear of it. Read कर्केद्रि.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "॥३४॥" — set tight, with no spaces inside the dandas - unlike ॥ ३३ ॥ on line 11. A pattern that requires spaces would miss this one.
  • About this edition: कर्केद्रि is read कर्के + अद्रि, giving seven degrees for Cancer's first haddā; the reader ruled on the ink that no anusvāra stands there, and seven is what makes the row total thirty.
1.35a reading here is contested

सिंहेंगभूताद्रिरसांगभागा देवेज्यशुक्रार्किबुधारहद्दाः ॥ स्त्रियो नगाशाब्धिनगाक्षिभागाः सौम्योशनोजीवकुजार्किनाथाः

siṃheṃgabhūtādrirasāṃgabhāgā devejyaśukrārkibudhārahaddāḥ || striyo nagāśābdhinagākṣibhāgāḥ saumyośanojīvakujārkināthāḥ

In Leo the degrees are six, five, seven, six and six (aṅga, bhūta, adri, rasa, aṅga), ⟨and⟩ Jupiter (devejya), Venus (śukra), Saturn (arki), Mercury (budha) and Mars (āra) are the lords of ⟨these⟩ haddās. In Virgo the degrees are seven, ten, four, seven and two (naga, āśā, abdhi, naga, akṣi), ⟨whose⟩ lords are Mercury (saumya), Venus (uśanas), Jupiter (jīva), Mars (kuja) and Saturn (arki).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सिंहेंगभूताद्रिरसांगभागादेवेज्यशुक्रा र्किबुधारहद्दाः ॥ स्त्रियोनगाशाब्धिनगाक्षिभागाःसौम्योशनोजीवकुजा र्किनाथाः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्कि"; alternatives "र्किं" — verified at 5x: a repha over क and the i-matra; no anusvara.
1.36a reading here is contested

तुलेरसाष्टाद्रिनगाक्षिभागाः कोणज्ञजीवास्फुजिदारनाथाः ॥ कीटेनगाब्ध्यष्टशरांगभागा भौमास्फुजिज्ज्ञेज्यशनैश्चराणाम्

tulerasāṣṭādrinagākṣibhāgāḥ koṇajñajīvāsphujidāranāthāḥ || kīṭenagābdhyaṣṭaśarāṃgabhāgā bhaumāsphujijjñejyaśanaiścarāṇām

In Libra the degrees are six, eight, seven, seven and two (rasa, aṣṭa, adri, naga, akṣi), ⟨whose⟩ lords are Saturn (koṇa), Mercury (jña), Jupiter (jīva), Venus (āsphujit) and Mars (āra). In Scorpio (kīṭa) the degrees are seven, four, eight, five and six (naga, abdhi, aṣṭa, śara, aṅga), ⟨whose lords are⟩ Mars (bhauma), Venus (āsphujit), Mercury (jña), Jupiter (ijya) and Saturn (śanaiścara).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तुलेरसाष्टाद्रिनगाक्षिभागाःकोणज्ञजीवास्फुजिदारनाथाः ॥ कीटेनगाब्ध्यष्टशरांगभागाभौमास्फुजिज्ज्ञेज्यशनै श्चराणाम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ब्ध्य"; alternatives "ध्य" — VERIFIED at 8x: avagraha, then a three-part conjunct ब्ध्य. At 1.75x it reads ऽध्य and the ब is lost. | RULED 2026-09-11 on the ink: the avagraha is withdrawn. The mark read as ऽ is the half-ब bowl itself, and blank paper stands between गा and it. The ब is confirmed; only the ऽ was wrong.
1.37a reading here is contested

चापेरवीष्वंबुधिपंचवेदा जीवास्फुजिज्ज्ञारशनैश्चराणाम् ॥ मृगेनगाद्र्यष्टयुगश्रुतीनां सौम्येज्यशुक्रार्किकुजेशहद्दाः

cāperavīṣvaṃbudhipaṃcavedā jīvāsphujijjñāraśanaiścarāṇām || mṛgenagādryaṣṭayugaśrutīnāṃ saumyejyaśukrārkikujeśahaddāḥ

In Sagittarius (cāpa) the degrees are twelve, five, four, five and four (ravi, iṣu, ambudhi, pañca, veda), ⟨whose lords are⟩ Jupiter (jīva), Venus (āsphujit), Mercury (jña), Mars (āra) and Saturn (śanaiścara). In Capricorn (mṛga) the degrees are seven, seven, eight, four and four (naga, adri, aṣṭa, yuga, śruti), ⟨and⟩ Mercury (saumya), Jupiter (ijya), Venus (śukra), Saturn (arki) and Mars (kuja) are the lords of ⟨these⟩ haddās.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चापेरवीष्वंबुधिपंचवेदाजीवास्फुजिज्ज्ञारशनैश्चराणाम् ॥ मृगेनगाब्ध्यष्टयुगश्रुतीनांसौम्येज्यशुक्रार्किकुजेशहद्दाः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रवीष्वंबुधि"; alternatives "रवीष्वम्बुधि" — anusvara, not a subscript म, at 1.75x; not re-checked higher.
  • About this edition: Capricorn is the one row in the haddā table that does not add up: naga 7 + abdhi 4 + aṣṭa 8 + yuga 4 + śruti 4 = 27, where every other sign totals 30. The missing three fall on Jupiter's share, which the four other signs of this table would make seven (a mountain-word such as naga or adri) rather than abdhi, four. The four opening syllables नगाब्ध्यष्ट are the same as those that open Scorpio in v. 36, where 7-4-8 is right. The printed characters are kept and the rendering states the printed numbers. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मृगेनगाद्र्यष्टयुगश्रुतीनां; this sentence names नगाब्ध्यष्ट, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.38a reading here is contested

कुंभेनगांगाद्रिशरेषुभागाः शुक्रज्ञजीवारशनैश्चराणाम् ॥ मीनेऽर्कवेदाऽनलनंदपक्षाः सितेज्यसौम्यारशनैश्चराणाम्

kuṃbhenagāṃgādriśareṣubhāgāḥ śukrajñajīvāraśanaiścarāṇām || mīne'rkavedā'nalanaṃdapakṣāḥ sitejyasaumyāraśanaiścarāṇām

In Aquarius (kumbha) the degrees are seven, six, seven, five and five (naga, aṅga, adri, śara, iṣu), ⟨whose lords are⟩ Venus (śukra), Mercury (jña), Jupiter (jīva), Mars (āra) and Saturn (śanaiścara). In Pisces the degrees are twelve, four, three, nine and two (arka, veda, anala, nanda, pakṣa), ⟨whose lords are⟩ Venus (sita), Jupiter (ijya), Mercury (saumya), Mars (āra) and Saturn (śanaiścara).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुंभेनगांगाद्रिशरेषुभागाःशुक्रज्ञजीवारशनैश्चराणाम् ॥ मीनेऽर्कवेदाऽनलनंदपक्षाःसितेज्यसौम्यारशनैश्चराणाम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मीनेऽर्कवेदा"; alternatives "मीनेऽर्केवेदा" — at 8x two hooks stand over the क: the left one is the repha of र्क, the right one is the e-matra of the FOLLOWING वे, which in this fount overhangs the preceding letter. Read मीनेऽर्कवेदा.
1.39a reading here is contested

त्रिंशत् स्वभे विंशतिरात्मतुंगे हद्देक्षचंद्रा दशकं दृकाणे ॥ मुसल्लहे पंच लवाः प्रदिष्टा विंशोपका वेदलवैः प्रकल्प्याः

triṃśat svabhe viṃśatirātmatuṃge haddekṣacaṃdrā daśakaṃ dṛkāṇe || musallahe paṃca lavāḥ pradiṣṭā viṃśopakā vedalavaiḥ prakalpyāḥ

Thirty ⟨parts are given⟩ in one's own sign, twenty in one's own exaltation, fifteen (akṣa-candra, 5 and 1 read backwards) in the haddā, ten in the drekkāṇa, and five parts are laid down in the musallaha ⟨the navāṃśa⟩; the viṃśopakas are to be reckoned by fourth parts (veda-lava, ⟨dividing the total by four⟩).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिंशत्स्वभेविंशतिरात्मतुंगेहद्देक्षचंद्रादशकंट्टकाणे ॥ मुसल्लहेपंचलवाःप्रदिष्टाविंशोपकावेदलवैःप्रकल्प्याः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंट्टकाणे"; alternatives "कंदृकाणे", "कंद्दकाणे" — zoomed 3×: a stacked glyph (upper curl like ट/द, lower curl like ट), the same form as on page 22 mūla line 3; not a clear ृ hook
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रदिष्टाविंशोपका" — zoomed: no anusvāra over ष्टा; the dot belongs to विं
  • About this edition: This is the pañcavargī, the five-fold strength: 30 + 20 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 80, and 80 divided by four (veda) gives the twenty of the viṃśopaka scale. हद्देक्ष is हद्दे + अक्ष, the press setting no avagraha at the elision (as at मेषेंग in v. 33 and कर्केद्रि in v. 34). The pothi prints ट्टकाण for the drekkāṇa here, as at v. 30. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads दृकाणे; this sentence names ट्टकाण, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.40a reading here is contested

स्वस्वाधिकारोक्तबलं सुहृद्भे पादोनमर्धं समभे रिभेंघ्रिः ॥ एवं समानीय बलं तदैक्ये वेदोद्धृते हीनबलः शरोनः

svasvādhikāroktabalaṃ suhṛdbhe pādonamardhaṃ samabhe ribheṃghriḥ || evaṃ samānīya balaṃ tadaikye vedoddhṛte hīnabalaḥ śaronaḥ

The strength stated for each ⟨varga⟩ in its own case ⟨is full⟩; in a friend's sign it is less by a quarter, half in a neutral's sign, and a quarter (aṅghri, 'a foot') in an enemy's sign. Having in this way brought the strength together, when their sum is divided by four (veda), the one deficient in strength is ⟨further⟩ reduced by five (śara).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वस्वाधिकारोक्त बलंसुहृद्भेपादोनमर्धंसमभेरिभेंघ्रिः ॥ एवंसमानीयबलंतदैक्येवेदोद्धृतेहीनबलःशरोनः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुहृद्भे"; alternatives "सुहृद्धे" — zoomed 2×: the lower member of the conjunct is cramped; read as भ
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिभेंघ्रिः"; alternatives "रिभेऽंघ्रिः" — no avagraha printed; the anusvāra over भे is clear
  • About this edition: The last quarter, हीनबलः शरोनः, is compressed; it is rendered literally as 'the one deficient in strength is reduced by five'. What the five is taken from — the varga total or the viṃśopaka — the record does not say, and nothing has been supplied.
1.41a reading here is contested

क्षेत्रं होरात्र्यब्धिपंचांगसप्तवस्वंकाशेशार्कभागाः सुधीभिः ॥ विज्ञातव्या लग्नसंस्थाः शुभानां वर्गाः श्रेष्ठाः पापवर्गास्त्वनिष्टाः

kṣetraṃ horātryabdhipaṃcāṃgasaptavasvaṃkāśeśārkabhāgāḥ sudhībhiḥ || vijñātavyā lagnasaṃsthāḥ śubhānāṃ vargāḥ śreṣṭhāḥ pāpavargāstvaniṣṭāḥ

The sign (kṣetra), the horā, and the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth (āśā), eleventh (īśa) and twelfth (arka) parts are to be known by the wise as standing in the ascendant. The vargas of benefics are best; those of malefics, on the other hand, are unwanted.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्षेत्रंहोरात्र्यब्धिपंचांगसप्तवस्वंकांशेशार्कभागाःसुधीभिः ॥ विज्ञात- व्यालग्नसंस्थाःशुभानांवर्गाःश्रेष्ठाःपापवर्गास्त्वनिष्टाः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "होरात्र्यब्धि"; alternatives "होराञ्यब्धि" — zoomed: the त्र्य conjunct is set as a hooked glyph before य; read as त्र्य
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यालग्न"; alternatives "ञ्यालग्न" — zoomed: line opens with a closed loop (half व) before या; read as व्या, continuing विज्ञात- of the previous line
  • About this edition: The list is the twelvefold division (dvādaśavargī) that v. 45 names, so it must run 1 to 12. The pothi prints वस्वंकांशेश, which gives 8, 9 and then 11 (īśa, the eleven Rudras) with no word for 10; वस्वंकाशेश — with आशा, the ten directions — would give 8, 9, 10, 11. The tenth is supplied in ⟨ ⟩ on that ground and the printed characters are kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads होरात्र्यब्धिपंचांगसप्तवस्वंकाशेशार्कभागाः; this sentence names वस्वंकांशेश, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.42a reading here is contested

ओजे रवींद्वोः सम इंदुरव्योर्होरे गृहार्धप्रमिते विचिंत्ये ॥ द्रेक्काणपाः स्वेषु नवर्क्षनाथास्तुर्यांशपाः स्वर्क्षजकेंद्रनाथाः

oje ravīṃdvoḥ sama iṃduravyorhore gṛhārdhapramite viciṃtye || drekkāṇapāḥ sveṣu navarkṣanāthāsturyāṃśapāḥ svarkṣajakeṃdranāthāḥ

In an odd sign the horās are of the Sun and the Moon ⟨in that order⟩; in an even sign, of the Moon and the Sun. The horās are to be reckoned as measuring half a sign. The lords of the drekkāṇas are the lords of the signs counted by nines from its own sign; the lords of the turyāṃśas (quarters) are the lords of the kendras (angles) reckoned from its own sign.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ओजेरवींद्वोःसमइंदुरव्योर्होरेगृहार्धप्रमितेविचिंत्ये ॥ द्रेक्काणपाःस्वेषुनवर्क्षनाथास्तुर्यांशपाःस्वर्क्षजकेंद्रनाथाः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रेक्काण"; alternatives "द्रेष्काण" — zoomed at line 1: the conjunct after द्रे is set as a क-type ligature; read as क्क throughout this page
  • About this edition: Counted by nines from the sign itself, the three drekkāṇa lords are the lords of that sign, of the 9th from it and of the 5th — the three trines.

ओजर्क्षे पंचमांशेशाः कुजार्कीज्यज्ञभार्गवाः ॥ समभे व्यत्ययाज्ज्ञेया द्वादशांशाः स्वभात्स्मृताः

ojarkṣe paṃcamāṃśeśāḥ kujārkījyajñabhārgavāḥ || samabhe vyatyayājjñeyā dvādaśāṃśāḥ svabhātsmṛtāḥ

In an odd sign the lords of the fifth parts (pañcamāṃśa) are Mars (kuja), Saturn (arkī), Jupiter (ijya), Mercury (jña) and Venus (bhārgava); in an even sign they are to be known in the reverse order. The twelfth parts (dvādaśāṃśa) are reckoned from the sign itself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ओजर्क्षेपंचमांशे शाःकुजार्कीज्यज्ञभार्गवाः ॥ समभेव्यत्ययाज्ज्ञेयाद्वादशांशाःस्वभात्स्मृताः

1.44a reading here is contested

लवीकृतो व्योमचरोंगशैलवस्वंकदिग्रुद्रगुणाः खरामैः ॥ भक्तो गतास्तर्कनगाष्टनंददिग्रुद्रभागाः कुयुताः क्रियात्स्युः

lavīkṛto vyomacaroṃgaśailavasvaṃkadigrudraguṇāḥ kharāmaiḥ || bhakto gatāstarkanagāṣṭanaṃdadigrudrabhāgāḥ kuyutāḥ kriyātsyuḥ

The planet (vyoma-cara, 'sky-goer') turned into degrees, multiplied by six, seven, eight, nine, ten and eleven (aṅga, śaila, vasu, aṅka, dik, rudra) ⟨respectively⟩ and divided by thirty (kha-rāma, 0 and 3 read backwards): the elapsed sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh parts (tarka, naga, aṣṭa, nanda, dik, rudra), increased by one (ku, 'the earth'), are ⟨to be counted⟩ from Aries (kriya).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लवीकृतोव्योमचरोंगशैलवस्वंकदिग्रुद्रगुणाःखरामैः ॥ भक्तोगतास्तर्कनगाष्टनंददिग्रुद्रभागाःकुयुताःक्रियात्स्युः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिग्रुद्र"; alternatives "दिग्रुद्र (दिक्+रुद्र)" — both occurrences; the conjunct ग्रु is set tight, read as printed
  • About this edition: The same six numbers are named twice: first as the multipliers 6 to 11, then as the names of the six divisions the operation produces. The record is rendered on that reading.
1.45a reading here is contested

एवं द्वादशवर्गी स्याद् ग्रहाणां बलसिद्धये ॥ स्वोच्चमित्रशुभाः श्रेष्ठा नीचारिक्रूरतोऽशुभाः

evaṃ dvādaśavargī syād grahāṇāṃ balasiddhaye || svoccamitraśubhāḥ śreṣṭhā nīcārikrūrato'śubhāḥ

Thus is formed the twelvefold division (dvādaśavargī), for establishing the strength of the planets (graha). ⟨Vargas⟩ of one's own sign, of a friend and of a benefic are the best; those got from debilitation, from an enemy and from a cruel ⟨planet⟩ are inauspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंद्वादशवर्गीस्याद्गृहाणांबलसिद्धये ॥ स्वोच्चमित्रशुभाःश्रेष्ठानीचारिक्रूरतोऽशुभाः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्गृहाणां"; alternatives "स्याद्ग्रहाणां" — zoomed: the conjunct is द्ग with a ṛ-hook below (द्गृ), not the र-stroke of ग्र; the ṭīkā's paraphrase reads ग्रहाणां [2026-10-01: superseded; the mūla now reads ग्रहाणां for गृहाणां. The leaf (page_0029) was read by eye at about 3.0x native and does set गृहाणां, the द्ग with a ṛ-hook this reader saw; the press is emended on the verse's own स्वोच्च/मित्र/शुभ grading, on v. 46's एवं ग्रहाणां and on the press's own ṭīkā.]
  • About this edition: The pothi prints गृहाणां, 'of the signs'; the ṭīkā paraphrases ग्रहाणाम्, 'of the planets', which is what the twelvefold division measures and what v. 46 says in the same words (एवं ग्रहाणां). The English renders the printed word and the Hindi the sense; the printed characters are kept. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads ग्रहाणां for गृहाणां. The leaf was opened (page_0029, read by eye at about 3.0x native) and does print गृहाणां; the mūla is emended on the verse's own स्वोच्च/मित्र grading, v. 46 and the press's own ṭīkā.]

एवं ग्रहाणां शुभपापवर्गपंक्तिद्वयं वीक्ष्य शुभाधिकत्वे ॥ दशाफलं भावफलं च वाच्यं शुभं त्वनिष्टं त्वशुभाधिकत्वे

evaṃ grahāṇāṃ śubhapāpavargapaṃktidvayaṃ vīkṣya śubhādhikatve || daśāphalaṃ bhāvaphalaṃ ca vācyaṃ śubhaṃ tvaniṣṭaṃ tvaśubhādhikatve

Thus, having looked at the two rows — the benefic vargas and the malefic vargas — of the planets: when the benefic ⟨vargas⟩ are the more numerous, the result of the daśā and the result of the bhāva are to be declared auspicious; but when the malefic ⟨vargas⟩ are the more numerous, ⟨they are to be declared⟩ unwanted.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंग्रहाणांशुभपापवर्गपंक्तिद्वयंवीक्ष्यशुभाधिकत्वे ॥ दशाफलंभावफलं च वाच्यंशुभंत्वनिष्टंत्वशुभाधिकत्वे

क्रूरोऽपि सौम्योधिकवर्गशाली शुभोऽतिसौम्यः शुभखेचरश्चेत् ॥ सौम्योऽपि पापाधिकवर्गयोगान्नेष्टोऽतिनिंद्यः खलु पापखेटः

krūro'pi saumyodhikavargaśālī śubho'tisaumyaḥ śubhakhecaraścet || saumyo'pi pāpādhikavargayogānneṣṭo'tiniṃdyaḥ khalu pāpakheṭaḥ

Even a cruel ⟨planet⟩, if it possesses the more benefic vargas, is auspicious; and a benefic planet ⟨so placed⟩ is exceedingly benefic. Even a benefic, through being joined with the more malefic vargas, is not wanted; and a malefic planet ⟨so placed⟩ is indeed exceedingly blameworthy.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरोऽपिसौम्योधिकवर्गशालीशु भोऽतिसौम्यःशुभखेचरश्चेत् ॥ सौम्योऽपिपापाधिकवर्गयोगान्नेष्टोऽतिनिंद्यः खलुपापखेटः

राशीशमित्रोच्चरिपुक्रमेण चिंत्यं तनोरप्यनयैव रीत्या ॥ भावेषु सर्वेष्वपि वर्गचक्रं विलोक्य तत्तत्फलमूहनीयम्

rāśīśamitroccaripukrameṇa ciṃtyaṃ tanorapyanayaiva rītyā || bhāveṣu sarveṣvapi vargacakraṃ vilokya tattatphalamūhanīyam

The sign-lord, a friend, the exaltation ⟨lord⟩ and an enemy, in that order, are to be considered; and by this same method the ascendant (tanu) too. In all the bhāvas as well, one should look at the varga-cakra (the table of divisions) and infer the result of each.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

राशीशमित्रोच्चरिपुक्रमेणचिंत्यंतनोरप्यनयैवरीत्या ॥ भावेषुसर्वेष्वपिवर्गचक्रंविलोक्यतत्तत्फलमूहनीयम्

1.49a reading here is contested

शरीरवर्णचिह्नायुर्वयोमानं सुखासुखम् ॥ जातिः शीलं च मतिमांल्लग्नात्सर्वं विचिंतयेत्

śarīravarṇacihnāyurvayomānaṃ sukhāsukham || jātiḥ śīlaṃ ca matimāṃllagnātsarvaṃ viciṃtayet

Body, complexion, marks ⟨on the body⟩, length of life, age, stature, happiness and unhappiness, caste (jāti) and character — all this a person of understanding should consider from the lagna.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शरीरवर्णचिह्नायु र्वयोमानंसुखासुखम् ॥ जातिःशीलंचमतिमांल्लग्नात्सर्वंविचिंतयेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्वयो"; alternatives "वेयो" — zoomed: the stroke over व curls up from a thick left end like a repha, not the straight slant of an e-mātrā; line-initial repha continuing आयु-
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मतिमांल्लग्नात्"; alternatives "मतिमाँल्लग्नात्" — zoomed: anusvāra dot over मा then a stacked ल्ल ligature before ग्ना

सुवर्णरूप्यरत्नानि धातुर्द्रव्यं सखा धने ॥ विक्रमे भ्रातृभृत्याध्वपित्र्यस्खलनसाहसम्

suvarṇarūpyaratnāni dhāturdravyaṃ sakhā dhane || vikrame bhrātṛbhṛtyādhvapitryaskhalanasāhasam

Gold, silver, gems, metal, goods and a friend ⟨are to be considered⟩ in the 2nd (dhana); brothers, servants, journeys, what comes from the father (pitrya), stumbling and bold deeds in the 3rd (vikrama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुवर्णरूप्यरत्नानिधातुर्द्रव्यंसखाधने ॥ विक्रमेभ्रातृभृत्याध्व पित्र्यस्खलनसाहसम्

1.51a reading here is contested

पितृवित्तं निधिक्षेत्रं गृहं भूमिश्चतुर्यतः ॥ पुत्रे मंत्रधनोपायगर्भविद्यात्मजेक्षणम्

pitṛvittaṃ nidhikṣetraṃ gṛhaṃ bhūmiścaturyataḥ || putre maṃtradhanopāyagarbhavidyātmajekṣaṇam

From the 4th (caturya) ⟨are judged⟩ the father's wealth, buried treasure (nidhi), fields, the house and land. In the 5th (putra) one examines counsel (mantra), the means of getting wealth, pregnancy, learning and children.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पितृवित्तंनिधिक्षेत्रंगृहंभूमिश्चतुर्यतः ॥ पुत्रेमंत्रधनोपायगर्भविद्यात्मजेक्षणम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूमि"; alternatives "भ्रूमि" — a small stroke under भ touches the ू; read as plain भू
1.52a reading here is contested

रिपौ मातुलमांद्यारिचतुष्पाद्बंदभीर्व्रणान् ॥ द्यूने कलत्रवाणिज्यनष्टविस्मृतिसंकथा ॥ हृताध्वकलिमार्गादि चिंत्यं द्यूने ग्रहोऽशुभः

ripau mātulamāṃdyāricatuṣpādbaṃdabhīrvraṇān || dyūne kalatravāṇijyanaṣṭavismṛtisaṃkathā || hṛtādhvakalimārgādi ciṃtyaṃ dyūne graho'śubhaḥ

In the 6th (ripu): the maternal uncle, sickness (māndya), enemies, four-footed animals, bondage (banda), fear and wounds. In the 7th (dyūna): the wife, trade, lost ⟨things⟩, forgotten ⟨things⟩ and talk ⟨about them⟩; the track of stolen ⟨goods⟩, quarrels, journeys and the like are to be considered in the 7th. A graha in the 7th (dyūna) is inauspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिपौमातुलमांद्यारिचतुष्पाद्बंदभीर्व्रणान् ॥ द्यूनेकलत्रवाणिज्यनष्टविस्मृतिसंकथा ॥ हृताध्वकलिमार्गादिचिंत्यंद्यूनेग्रहोऽशुभः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुष्पाद्बंद"; alternatives "चतुष्पाद्वंद" — द्ब conjunct; commentary lemma reads बंदः
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हृताध्व"; alternatives "ह्वताध्व" — the ृ under ह is faint and joined; commentary reads हृतं
  • About this edition: The rendering follows the printed बंद (banda, 'bondage, dependence on others'). The plate reader's alternative वंद gives no sense here. The last clause says a graha in the 7th is inauspicious without naming benefic or malefic; it is rendered as it stands.
1.53a reading here is contested

मृत्यौ चिरंतनं द्रव्यं मृतवित्तं रणो रिपुः ॥ दुर्गस्थानं मृतिर्नष्टं परीवारो मनोव्यथा

mṛtyau ciraṃtanaṃ dravyaṃ mṛtavittaṃ raṇo ripuḥ || durgasthānaṃ mṛtirnaṣṭaṃ parīvāro manovyathā

In the 8th (mṛtyu): long-held (old) wealth, the wealth of the dead, battle, the enemy, a stronghold (durga-sthāna), death, lost ⟨things⟩, the household (parīvāra) and anguish of mind.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मृत्यौचिरंतनंद्रव्यंमृतवित्तंरणोरिपुः ॥ दु र्गस्थानंमृतिर्नष्टंपरीवारोमनोव्यथा

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनोव्यथा"; alternatives "मनोऽव्यथा" — the half-व of व्य is set as a small loop that can look like ऽ; the same glyph opens व्योम्नि in this line, so read as व्य

धर्मे रतिस्तथा पंथा धर्मोपायं विचिंतयेत् ॥ व्योम्नि मुद्रां परं पुण्यं राज्यं वृद्धिं च पैतृकम्

dharme ratistathā paṃthā dharmopāyaṃ viciṃtayet || vyomni mudrāṃ paraṃ puṇyaṃ rājyaṃ vṛddhiṃ ca paitṛkam

In the 9th (dharma) one should consider pleasure (rati), and likewise the road (journeys) and the means to dharma. In the 10th (vyoman, 'the sky'): the ⟨royal⟩ seal (mudrā), the highest merit, kingship, increase, and what comes from the father.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

धर्मेरतिस्तथापंथाधर्मोपायंविचिंतयेत् ॥ व्योम्निमुद्रांपरंपुण्यंराज्यंवृद्धिंचपैतृकम्

1.55a reading here is contested

आये सर्वार्थधान्यार्घकन्यामित्रचतुष्पदाः ॥ राज्ञो वित्तं परीवारो लाभोपायांश्च भूरिशः

āye sarvārthadhānyārghakanyāmitracatuṣpadāḥ || rājño vittaṃ parīvāro lābhopāyāṃśca bhūriśaḥ

In the 11th (āya): gain of every kind (sarvārtha), the price of grain (dhānya-argha), a maiden (kanyā), friends, four-footed animals, the king's wealth, the household, and the many means of gain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आयेसर्वार्थधान्यार्घकन्यामित्रचतुष्पदाः ॥ राज्ञोवित्तंपरीवारोलाभोपायांश्चभूरिशः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूरिशः"; alternatives "भ्रूरिशः" — a small stroke under भ touches the ू, as in भूमि on page 32; read as plain भू (commentary lemma भूरिशः)

व्यये वैरिनिरोधार्तिव्ययादि परिचिंतयेत्

vyaye vairinirodhārtivyayādi pariciṃtayet

In the 12th (vyaya) one should consider obstruction by enemies (vairi-nirodha), affliction, expenditure and the like.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

व्ययेवैरिनिरोधार्तिव्ययादिपरिचिंतयेत्

लग्नांबुद्यूनकर्माणि केंद्रमुक्तं च कंटकम् ॥ चतुष्टयं चात्र खेटो बली लग्ने विशेषतः

lagnāṃbudyūnakarmāṇi keṃdramuktaṃ ca kaṃṭakam || catuṣṭayaṃ cātra kheṭo balī lagne viśeṣataḥ

The lagna (ascendant), the 4th (ambu), the 7th (dyūna) and the 10th (karma) are called kendra (the angles), and also kaṇṭaka and catuṣṭaya. A graha here is strong, and in the lagna most of all.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नांबुद्यूनकर्माणिकेंद्रमुक्तंचकंटकम् ॥ चतुष्टयंचात्रखेटोबलीलग्नेविशेषतः

1.58a reading here is contested

लग्नकर्मास्ततुर्यायसुतांकस्थो बली ग्रहः ॥ यथाऽऽदिमं विशेषेण सत्रिवित्तेषु चंद्रमाः

lagnakarmāstaturyāyasutāṃkastho balī grahaḥ || yathā''dimaṃ viśeṣeṇa satrivitteṣu caṃdramāḥ

A graha standing in the lagna, the 10th (karma), the 7th (asta), the 4th (turya), the 11th (āya), the 5th (suta) or the 9th (aṅka) is strong; the earlier the place stands in this list, the stronger the graha, the first most of all. The Moon ⟨is strong⟩ in these and also in the 3rd (tri) and the 2nd (vitta).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नकर्मास्ततुर्यायसुतांकस्थोबलीग्रहः ॥ यथाऽऽदिमंविशेषेणसत्रिवित्तेषुचंद्रमाः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नकर्मास्त"; alternatives "लग्रकर्मास्त" — the ग्न conjunct here is set more compactly than elsewhere on the line; read as ग्न
1.59a reading here is contested

कुजः सत्रिषु पृच्छायां सूतौ चान्यत्र चिंतयेत् ॥ भावा नवेत्थं शस्ताः स्यू रिःफाष्टरिपवोऽशुभाः ॥ दीप्तांशातिक्रमे शस्ता इमेऽपीति विचिंतयेत्

kujaḥ satriṣu pṛcchāyāṃ sūtau cānyatra ciṃtayet || bhāvā navetthaṃ śastāḥ syū riḥphāṣṭaripavo'śubhāḥ || dīptāṃśātikrame śastā ime'pīti viciṃtayet

Mars ⟨is strong⟩ in these together with the 3rd (tri). One should apply this in a question (pṛcchā), in a nativity (sūti) and elsewhere. Thus nine bhāvas (houses) are favourable; the 12th (riḥpha), the 8th (aṣṭa) and the 6th (ripu) are inauspicious. When the dīptāṃśa (orb) ⟨of the graha in them⟩ is passed, these too are favourable — so one should reason.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुजःसत्रिषुपृच्छायांसूतौचान्यत्रचिंतयेत् ॥ भावानवेत्थंशस्ताःस्यूरिःफाष्टरिपवोऽशुभाः ॥ दीप्तां शातिक्रमेशस्ताइमेऽपीतिविचिंतयेत्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भावानवेत्थंशस्ताः"; alternatives "भावानवेत्त्यंशस्ताः" — Read aksara by aksara at 1.6x as भा वा न वे त्यं श स्ता ः. I cannot divide the words with confidence and have not tried to; recorded exactly as the line stands. ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): भावानवेत्यंशस्ताः → भावानवेत्थंशस्ताः: at 26x the sort after त् is a closed oval joined to a right stem, the same sort as the certain थ of मुंथहा in the mūla of page 35; the certain य of नित्यं in line 8 of this leaf is an open crescent with an upcurving tail and looks nothing like it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यूरिःफाष्ट" — स्यू carries a clear long-u below. The sandhi स्युः + रिःफ -> स्यू रिःफ accounts for it, and रिःफ (12th house) + अष्ट (8th) + रिपु (6th) is what the tika glosses at line 3 as द्वादश, अष्टम, षष्ठ. Not a misprint.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शातिक्रमे" — The line genuinely opens on शा, checked at 3.0x — the word दीप्तांश is split across the line break, दीप्तां ending line 6. Not a defective first sort.
  • About this edition: भावानवेत्थंशस्ताः is read as भावाः नव इत्थं शस्ताः ('thus nine houses are favourable'): twelve houses less the three named as bad. स्यूरिःफ is the regular sandhi of स्युः + रिःफ. The words 'of the graha in them' are supplied.
1.60a reading here is contested

त्रिराशिपाः सूर्यसितार्किशुक्रा दिने निशीज्येंदुबुधक्षमाजाः ॥ मेषाच्चतुर्णां हरिभाद्विलोमं नित्यं परेष्वार्किकुजेज्यचंद्राः

trirāśipāḥ sūryasitārkiśukrā dine niśījyeṃdubudhakṣamājāḥ || meṣāccaturṇāṃ haribhādvilomaṃ nityaṃ pareṣvārkikujejyacaṃdrāḥ

The triplicity lords (trirāśipa): for the four signs from Aries, by day the Sun, Venus (sita), Saturn (ārki) and Venus (śukra); by night Jupiter (ijya), the Moon (indu), Mercury (budha) and Mars (kṣmāja). For the four from Leo (hari-bha), the reverse ⟨: the day lords become the night lords and the night lords the day lords⟩. For the rest ⟨Sagittarius to Pisces⟩, always ⟨by day and by night⟩, Saturn (ārki), Mars (kuja), Jupiter (ijya) and the Moon (candra). ⟨So, day/night: Aries Sun/Jupiter, Taurus Venus/Moon, Gemini Saturn/Mercury, Cancer Venus/Mars; Leo Jupiter/Sun, Virgo Moon/Venus, Libra Mercury/Saturn, Scorpio Mars/Venus; Sagittarius Saturn, Capricorn Mars, Aquarius Jupiter, Pisces the Moon.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिराशिपाःसूर्यसितार्किशुक्रादिनेनिशीज्येंदु बुधक्षमाजाः ॥ मेषाच्चतुर्णांहरिभाद्विलोमंनित्यंपरेष्वार्किकुजेज्यचंद्राः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हरिभाद्विलोमं"; alternatives "हरिआद्विलोमं", "हरेराद्विलोमं" — Read at 1.6x only. The conjunct after आ is a double consonant I could not separate with certainty into द्ध or द्व. The tika's own gloss at line 12 writes हरिभात्सिंहाच्चतुर्णांराशीनांविलोमंविपरीतंज्ञेयम्, which would favour -विलोमं, but I have NOT let that decide the mula reading. Flagged, not resolved. ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): हरिआद्धिलोमं → हरिभाद्विलोमं: at 16x the aksara after हरि is the same sort as the certain भा opening भावान् in line 6 (angular wedge, bar, right stem), and at 30x the conjunct's lower member shows ONE white counter, matching the certain द्वा of ताद्वादश in the ṭīkā line 2 and unlike the two-counter ब.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुध"; alternatives "वुध" — Line-initial. This one reads ब with the internal stroke, where the tika at line 12 sets the same word as वुध without it.
  • About this edition: The verse says only विलोमं ('the reverse') for Leo to Scorpio. The rendering takes it as the exchange of the day and night lords, which is how Viśvanātha's ṭīkā reads it and what its table on the same page shows. The closing table in ⟨ ⟩ is supplied from that reading and is not in the verse.

वर्षेशार्थं दिननिशाविभागोक्तास्त्रिराशिपाः ॥ पंचवर्गीबलाद्यर्थं द्रेक्काणेशान्विचिंतयेत्

varṣeśārthaṃ dinaniśāvibhāgoktāstrirāśipāḥ || paṃcavargībalādyarthaṃ drekkāṇeśānviciṃtayet

The triplicity lords (trirāśipa), stated by the division into day and night, serve to ⟨find⟩ the lord of the year (varṣeśa). For the five-fold strength (pañcavargī bala) and the like, one should consider the lords of the drekkāṇas (the three 10-degree thirds of a sign).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वर्षेशार्थंदिननिशाविभागोक्तास्त्रिराशिपाः ॥ पंचवर्गीबलाद्यर्थंद्रेक्काणेशान्विचिंतयेत्

1.62a reading here is contested

जन्मलग्नपतिरब्दलग्नपो मुंथहाधिप इतस्त्रिराशिपः ॥ सूर्यराशिपतिरह्नि चंद्रभाधीश्वरो निशि विमृश्य पंचकम्

janmalagnapatirabdalagnapo muṃthahādhipa itastrirāśipaḥ || sūryarāśipatirahni caṃdrabhādhīśvaro niśi vimṛśya paṃcakam

The lord of the natal lagna; the lord of the lagna of the year (abda-lagna); the lord of the munthā (muṃthahā, the point of the year that moves one sign a year from the natal lagna); then the triplicity lord (trirāśipa); ⟨and⟩ by day the lord of the Sun's sign, by night the lord of the Moon's sign — having weighed these five ⟨the lord of the year is chosen as the next verse says⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मलग्नपतिरब्दलग्नपोमुंथहाधिपइतस्त्रि राशिपः ॥ सूर्यराशिपतिरह्निचंद्रभाधीश्वरोनिशिविमृश्यपंचकम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इतस्त्रि"; alternatives "इत्थंत्रि", "इतित्रि" — Read at 5.0x as इ + त + स्त्रि, the line breaking inside the word (line 7 opens राशिपः). इतः + त्रिराशिपः gives exactly this sandhi, which is why I prefer it, but the ligature is the last thing before the rule and I cannot rule out a worn sort.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विमृश्य"; alternatives "विशृश्य" — At 1.6x this reads as a श. At 3.9x it is म carrying the subscript ṛ. विमृश्य.
  • About this edition: इतस्त्रिराशिपः is read as इतः त्रिराशिपः ('then the triplicity lord'). The plate reader's alternatives इत्थं or इति would not change which five lords are named. The verse ends on a gerund (विमृश्य, 'having weighed'); its main clause is verse 63.

बलीय एषां तनुमीक्षमाणः स वर्षपो लग्नमनीक्षमाणः ॥ नैवाब्दपो दृष्ट्यतिरेकतः स्याद्बलस्य साम्ये विदुरेवमाद्याः

balīya eṣāṃ tanumīkṣamāṇaḥ sa varṣapo lagnamanīkṣamāṇaḥ || naivābdapo dṛṣṭyatirekataḥ syādbalasya sāmye vidurevamādyāḥ

Whichever of these is strongest and aspects the ascendant (tanu) is the lord of the year (varṣapa). One that does not aspect the lagna is never the year-lord (abdapa). When the strength is equal, ⟨the choice goes⟩ by the greater aspect — so the earlier ⟨teachers⟩ hold.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलीयएषांतनुमीक्षमाणःसवर्षपोलग्नमनीक्षमाणः ॥ नैवाब्दपो दृष्ट्यतिरेकतःस्याद्बलस्यसाम्येविदुरेवमाद्याः

1.64a reading here is contested

दृगादिसाम्येप्यथ निर्बलत्वे वर्षाधिपः स्यान्मुथहेश्वरस्तु ॥ पंचापि चेन्नो तनुमीक्षमाणा वीर्याधिकोऽब्दस्य विभुर्विचिंत्यः

dṛgādisāmyepyatha nirbalatve varṣādhipaḥ syānmuthaheśvarastu || paṃcāpi cenno tanumīkṣamāṇā vīryādhiko'bdasya vibhurviciṃtyaḥ

If ⟨they are⟩ equal also in aspect and the rest, or if ⟨they are all⟩ without strength, the lord of the munthā (muthahā) shall be the year-lord. If none of the five aspects the ascendant (tanu), the one greatest in strength is to be taken as the lord of the year.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दृगादिसाम्येप्यथनिर्बलत्वेवर्षाधिपःस्यान्मुथहेश्वरस्तु ॥ पंचापिचेन्नोतनुमी क्षमाणावीर्याधिकोऽब्दस्यविभुर्विचिंत्यः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृगादिसाम्येप्यथ"; alternatives "दृगादिसाम्येऽप्यथ" — No avagraha is inked between साम्ये and प्य at 2.1x. The fount's avagraha is unmistakable when present (see क्षमाणावीर्याधिकोऽब्दस्य in the next line), so I record the absence rather than supply the mark.
  • About this edition: अथ between the two conditions is rendered 'or': they are two separate cases, not one joint condition. The page sets साम्येप्यथ with no avagraha; the sense is साम्ये अपि अथ either way.

बलादिसाम्ये रविराशिपोऽह्नि निशींदुराशीडिति केचिदाहुः ॥ येनेत्थशालोऽब्दविभुः शशी स वर्षाधिपश्चंद्रभपोऽन्यथात्वे

balādisāmye ravirāśipo'hni niśīṃdurāśīḍiti kecidāhuḥ || yenetthaśālo'bdavibhuḥ śaśī sa varṣādhipaścaṃdrabhapo'nyathātve

Some say: when strength and the rest are equal, by day the lord of the Sun's sign, and by night the lord of the Moon's sign ⟨is the year-lord⟩. If the Moon ⟨comes out as⟩ lord of the year, then the graha with which it has an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) is the year-lord; failing that, the lord of the Moon's sign.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलादिसाम्येरविराशिपोऽह्निनिशींदुराशीडितिकेचिदाहुः ॥ येनेत्थशालोऽब्दविभुःशशीसवर्षाधिपश्चंद्रभपोऽन्यथात्वे

1.66a reading here is contested

स्वजन्मलग्नात्प्रतिवर्षमेकैकराशिभोगान्मुथहा भ्रमेण ॥ स्वजन्मलग्नं रवितष्टयातं शरद्युतं साभमुखेंथिहा स्यात्

svajanmalagnātprativarṣamekaikarāśibhogānmuthahā bhrameṇa || svajanmalagnaṃ ravitaṣṭayātaṃ śaradyutaṃ sābhamukheṃthihā syāt

The munthā (muthahā) moves round from one's own natal lagna, passing through one sign each year. One's own natal lagna, added to the years elapsed (yāta-śarad) and reduced by twelve (ravi) — that, counted from the head of the signs (bha-mukha, i.e. from Aries), is the intihā (the munthā). [Our mūla now reads śaradyutaṃ, 'added to the years (śarad)'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्व जन्मलग्नात्प्रतिवर्षमेकैकराशिभोगान्मुथहाभ्रमेण ॥ स्वजन्मलग्नंरवितष्टयातंशरघ्युतंसाभमुखेंथिहास्यात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शरघ्युतं"; alternatives "शरघ्नयुतं" — zoomed: a half-letter conjunct on य with u-hook; reads घ्यु; sense may want शरघ्न-युतं [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शरद्युतं; this sentence names शरघ्युतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रवितष्टयातं"; alternatives "रवितष्ट्यातं" — ष्ट followed by या; whether a subscript य joins ष्ट is unclear
  • About this edition: EMENDED IN THE RENDERING, NOT IN THE TEXT. The mūla as read has शरघ्युतं, which is no word. The rendering reads शरद्युतं (शरद्, 'year', + युतं, 'added'). Reasons: Viśvanātha's ṭīkā glosses the word as जन्मकालाद्गतवर्षगणेन युक्तं, 'added to the count of years gone since birth'; its worked example adds 37 years to a natal lagna of 5 signs 10°53′50″ and reduces by 12 to get 6 signs 10°53′50″; and द्य and घ्य are easily confused in this fount, so the plate should be re-read at magnification. The reader's alternative शरघ्न-युतं ('multiplied by five and added') does not fit that example. साभमुखेंथिहा is taken as सा भमुखा इंथिहा (भमुखा + इंथिहा → भमुखेंथिहा); इंथिहा (intihā) is another name of the munthā. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शरद्युतं; this sentence names शरघ्युतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.67a reading here is contested

प्रत्यहं शरलिप्ताभिर्वर्धते सानुपाततः ॥ सार्धमंशद्वयं मास इत्याहुः केपि सूरयः

pratyahaṃ śaraliptābhirvardhate sānupātataḥ || sārdhamaṃśadvayaṃ māsa ityāhuḥ kepi sūrayaḥ

Each day it ⟨the munthā⟩ advances by five minutes of arc (śara-liptā), in proportion; some learned men say ⟨it moves⟩ two and a half degrees a month.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रत्यहंशरलिप्ता भिर्वर्धतेसानुपाततः ॥ सार्धमंशद्वयंमासइत्याहुःकेपिसूरयः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केपि"; alternatives "केऽपि" — no avagraha glyph printed

भोग्या राहोर्लवास्तस्य मुखं पृष्ठं गता लवाः ॥ ततः सप्तमभं पुच्छं विमृश्येति फलं वदेत्

bhogyā rāhorlavāstasya mukhaṃ pṛṣṭhaṃ gatā lavāḥ || tataḥ saptamabhaṃ pucchaṃ vimṛśyeti phalaṃ vadet

The degrees of Rāhu yet to be traversed ⟨in its sign⟩ are its face (mukha); the degrees already gone are its back (pṛṣṭha); and the 7th sign from it is its tail (puccha). Having considered this, one should declare the result.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भोग्याराहोर्लवास्तस्यमुखंपृष्ठंगतालवाः ॥ ततःसप्तमभंपुच्छं विमृश्येतिफलंवदेत्

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणं गणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतोऽनंतोऽनंतमतिर्व्यधात्खलमतध्वस्त्यै जनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुः खलु नीलकंठविबुधो विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया संतुष्ट्यै व्यदधाद्ग्रहप्रकरणं संज्ञाविवेकेऽमलम्

śrīgargānvayabhūṣaṇaṃ gaṇitavicciṃtāmaṇistatsuto'naṃto'naṃtamatirvyadhātkhalamatadhvastyai januḥpaddhatim || tatsūnuḥ khalu nīlakaṃṭhavibudho vidvacchivānujñayā saṃtuṣṭyai vyadadhādgrahaprakaraṇaṃ saṃjñāviveke'malam

Cintāmaṇi, the ornament of the illustrious line of Garga, was a master of gaṇita (mathematical astronomy). His son Ananta, of boundless (ananta) mind, composed the Janma-paddhati ('the method for nativities') to overthrow the doctrines of the wicked. His son, the learned Nīlakaṇṭha, by leave of the learned Śiva, composed for ⟨their⟩ satisfaction this flawless section on the grahas in the Saṃjñā-viveka ('the discernment of the technical terms').

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणंगणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतोऽनंतोऽनंतमतिर्व्यधात्खलमतध्वस्त्यैजनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुःखलुनीलकंठविबुधोविद्व च्छिवानुज्ञयासंतुष्ट्यैव्यदधाद्ग्रहप्रकरणंसंज्ञाविवेकेऽमलम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The author's closing verse (praśasti) for the chapter. विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया can be read 'by leave of the learned Śiva' (a person) or 'by leave of the learned and of Śiva (the god)'; the rendering keeps the first and does not decide.

Adhyāya 2 · इतिषोडशयोगाः

2.1a reading here is contested

सूर्यो नृपो ना चतुरस्र मध्यंदिनेंद्रदिक् स्वर्ण चतुष्पदोऽग्रः ॥ सत्वं स्थिरस् तिक्त पशुक्षितिस् तु पित्तं जरन् पाटल मूल वन्यः

sūryo nṛpo nā caturasra madhyaṃdineṃdradik svarṇa catuṣpado'graḥ || satvaṃ sthiras tikta paśukṣitis tu pittaṃ jaran pāṭala mūla vanyaḥ

The Sun is a king (a kṣatriya) and a male ⟨graha⟩; four-cornered ⟨in shape⟩; ⟨strong⟩ at midday; ⟨lord of⟩ Indra's quarter, the east; ⟨lord of⟩ gold; ⟨lord of⟩ four-footed ⟨beasts⟩; fierce. ⟨His guṇa is⟩ sattva; ⟨his nature is⟩ fixed; bitter ⟨in taste⟩; ⟨he ranges⟩ the ground of beasts; ⟨his humour is⟩ pitta; ⟨he is⟩ aged, pāṭala (pale, red mixed with white) ⟨in colour⟩, ⟨lord of what grows from⟩ roots, and forest-ranging.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्योनृपोनाचतुरस्रमध्यंदिनें द्रदिक्स्वर्णचतुष्पदोऽग्रः ॥ सत्वंस्थिरस्तिक्तपशुक्षितिस्तुपित्तंजरन्पाटलमूलवन्यः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्यंदिनें"; alternatives "मध्यंदिने" — anusvāra over final ने; it belongs to the sandhi with इंद्र- on the next line (दिनेंद्रदिक्)
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुष्पदोऽग्रः"; alternatives "चतुष्पदोग्रः" — the ऽ glyph is printed; the ṭīkā glosses उग्रः, so the sandhi is पदः+उग्रः
  • About this edition: The plate breaks the line inside a sandhi: मध्यंदिनें + द्रदिक् is one word, मध्यंदिन + इंद्रदिक्, and the anusvāra belongs to that join. The segmented file closes the break; no character is altered. चतुष्पदोऽग्रः resolves as चतुष्पदः + उग्रः, 'four-footed; fierce', with the avagraha printed. पशुक्षिति is rendered 'the ground of beasts'; the commentary on the same leaf takes the word as ground-ranging.
2.2a reading here is contested

वैश्यः शशी स्त्री जलभूस् तपस्वी गौरोपराह्नांबुग धातु सत्वम् ॥ वायव्यदिक् श्लेष्म भुजंग रूप्य स्थूलो युवा क्षार शुभः सिताभः

vaiśyaḥ śaśī strī jalabhūs tapasvī gauroparāhnāṃbuga dhātu satvam || vāyavyadik śleṣma bhujaṃga rūpya sthūlo yuvā kṣāra śubhaḥ sitābhaḥ

The Moon is a vaiśya, and a female ⟨graha⟩; ⟨her ground is⟩ wet earth; ⟨she is⟩ an ascetic (tapasvin), fair-skinned, ⟨strong⟩ in the afternoon, water-going; ⟨lady of⟩ minerals; ⟨her guṇa is⟩ sattva. ⟨Hers is⟩ the Vāyavya quarter, the north-west; ⟨her humour is⟩ phlegm (śleṣman, kapha); ⟨lady of⟩ serpents and of silver; stout, young, salt ⟨in taste⟩, benefic, and white in hue.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वैश्यःशशीस्त्रीजलभूस्तपस्वीगौरोपराह्नांबुग धातुसत्वम् ॥ वायव्यदिक्श्लेष्मभुजंगरूप्यस्थूलोयुवाक्षारशुभःसिताभः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पराह्नांबुग"; alternatives "पराह्णांबुग", "पराह्लांबुग" — zoomed: ह with a ल-shaped subscript, this font's ह्न ligature as far as I can tell
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वायव्यदिक्श्लेष्म"; alternatives "वायव्यदिक्‌श्लेष्म" — virāma printed under क before श्ले
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle पराह्नांबुग between ह्न, ह्ण and ह्ल. The word is अपराह्न, 'afternoon', on every one of those readings, so nothing in the rendering turns on the doubt. धातु here is the mineral class (ochre and the like), distinct from रूप्य, silver, named later in the same verse.
2.3a reading here is contested

भौमस् तमः पित्त युवोग्र वन्यो मध्याह्न धातुर् यमदिक् चतुष्पात् ॥ ना राट् चतुष्कोण सुवर्णकारो दग्धाऽवनी व्यंग कटुश् च रक्तः

bhaumas tamaḥ pitta yuvogra vanyo madhyāhna dhātur yamadik catuṣpāt || nā rāṭ catuṣkoṇa suvarṇakāro dagdhā'vanī vyaṃga kaṭuś ca raktaḥ

Mars is tamas ⟨in guṇa⟩, pitta ⟨in humour⟩, young, fierce, forest-ranging; ⟨strong⟩ at midday; ⟨lord of⟩ minerals; ⟨lord of⟩ Yama's quarter, the south; ⟨lord of⟩ four-footed ⟨beasts⟩. ⟨He is⟩ male, a king; four-cornered ⟨in shape⟩; ⟨lord of⟩ goldsmiths; he ranges over scorched ground; ⟨he is⟩ maimed ⟨in some limb⟩, pungent ⟨in taste⟩, and red — ⟨lord of red things⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमस्तमःपित्तयुवोग्रवन्योमध्याह्नधातुर्यमदिक्चतुष्पात् ॥ नाराद्चतुष्कोणसुवर्णकारोदग्धाऽवनीव्यंगकटुश्चरक्तः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाराद्"; alternatives "नाराट्" — zoomed: द् with virāma as printed; sense wants राट्
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दग्धाऽवनीव्यंग"; alternatives "दग्धाऽवनीऽव्यंग" — zoomed: the small hook after नी read as half-व of व्यं, not an avagraha; the ऽ after धा is printed
  • About this edition: The page prints नाराद्. It is ना + राट्, 'a male ⟨graha⟩; a king', and is rendered so: the commentary on the same leaf lemmatises the second word in the printed द् form and explains it as 'king', so the sense is settled and the printed characters are left untouched in the segmented file. कटुश्चरक्तः resolves as कटुः + च + रक्तः, 'pungent, and red' — there is no word चर, 'movable', here.
2.4a reading here is contested

ग्राम्यः शुभो नील सुवर्ण वृत्तः शिश्विष्टकोच्चः समधातु जीवः ॥ श्मशान योषोत्तरदिक् प्रभातं शूद्रः खगः सर्वरसो रजो ज्ञः

grāmyaḥ śubho nīla suvarṇa vṛttaḥ śiśviṣṭakoccaḥ samadhātu jīvaḥ || śmaśāna yoṣottaradik prabhātaṃ śūdraḥ khagaḥ sarvaraso rajo jñaḥ

⟨Mercury is⟩ village-ranging, benign, dark blue ⟨in colour⟩, ⟨lord of⟩ gold, round ⟨in shape⟩, a child ⟨in age⟩, ⟨ranging⟩ over high brickwork, of the three humours in equal measure, and of the class of living creatures. ⟨He haunts⟩ the cremation ground; ⟨he is⟩ a woman ⟨that is, a female graha⟩; ⟨lord of⟩ the north; ⟨strong⟩ at dawn; a śūdra; of the bird kind; of all tastes; rajas ⟨in guṇa⟩ — such is Mercury (jña).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ग्राम्यःशु भोनीलसुवर्णवृत्तःशिश्विष्टकोच्चःसमधातुजीवः ॥ श्मशानयोषोत्तरदिक्प्रभातंशूद्रःखगःसर्वरसोरजोज्ञः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शिश्विष्टकोच्चः"; alternatives "शिशुरिष्टकोच्चः" — conjunct श्वि as printed; ṭīkā glosses शिशुः and इष्टकोच्चः
  • About this edition: शिश्विष्टकोच्चः is शिशुः + इष्टकोच्चः, 'a child; ⟨ranging⟩ on high brickwork', fused at the sandhi and therefore left joined in the segmented file. योषा makes Mercury a female graha here, standing beside the masculine शूद्रः and खगः of the same half-line; the text is rendered as it stands and not harmonised.
2.5a reading here is contested

गुरुः प्रभाते नृ शुभेशदिक् द्विजः पीतो द्विपाद् ग्राम्य सुवृत्त जीवः ॥ वाणिज्यमाधुर्य सुरालयेशो वृद्धः सुरत्नं समधातु सत्वम्

guruḥ prabhāte nṛ śubheśadik dvijaḥ pīto dvipād grāmya suvṛtta jīvaḥ || vāṇijyamādhurya surālayeśo vṛddhaḥ suratnaṃ samadhātu satvam

Jupiter ⟨is strong⟩ at dawn; ⟨he is⟩ male, benign, ⟨lord of⟩ Īśāna's quarter, the north-east; a twice-born (a brāhmaṇa); yellow; ⟨lord of⟩ two-footed ⟨creatures⟩; village-ranging; well-rounded ⟨in shape⟩; of the class of living creatures. ⟨He rules⟩ trade; ⟨he is⟩ sweet ⟨in taste⟩, lord of the houses of the gods ⟨temples⟩; old; ⟨lord of⟩ fine gems; of the three humours in equal measure; and sattva ⟨in guṇa⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरुःप्रभातेनृशुभेशदिक् द्विजःपीतोद्विपाद्ग्राम्यसुवृत्तजीवः ॥ वाणिज्यमाधुर्यसुरालयेशोवृद्धःसुरत्नंसमधातुसत्वम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुरत्नं"; alternatives "सुरत्नः" — anusvāra dot over न is small and close to the line
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle the anusvāra in सुरत्नं / सुरत्नः. Either way the word is सुरत्न, 'a fine gem', and Jupiter is its lord, so the claim does not change. नृ here is the male-graha mark, the same attribute that stands as ना in the Sun's and Mars's verses (1 and 3).
2.6a reading here is contested

शुक्रः शुभः स्त्री जलगोऽपराह्नः श्वेतः कफी रूप्य रजोऽम्ल मूलम् ॥ विप्रोऽग्निदिङ् मध्यवयो रतीशो जलावनी स्निग्धरुचिर् द्विपाच् च

śukraḥ śubhaḥ strī jalago'parāhnaḥ śvetaḥ kaphī rūpya rajo'mla mūlam || vipro'gnidiṅ madhyavayo ratīśo jalāvanī snigdharucir dvipāc ca

Venus is benefic, female, water-going, ⟨strong⟩ in the afternoon, white, of kapha ⟨constitution⟩, ⟨lady of⟩ silver, rajas ⟨in guṇa⟩, sour ⟨in taste⟩, ⟨lady of what grows from⟩ roots. ⟨She is⟩ a brāhmaṇa; ⟨hers is⟩ the fire quarter, the south-east; ⟨she is⟩ of middle age; lord of Rati ⟨love-play⟩; she ranges over watery ground; her lustre is smooth and glossy; and ⟨she rules⟩ the two-footed — ⟨human beings⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रःशुभःस्त्रीजलगोऽपराह्नःश्वेतःकफीरूप्यरजोऽम्लमूलम् ॥ विप्रोऽग्निदिङ्मध्यवयोरतीशोजलावनीस्निग्धरुचिर्द्विपाच्च

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽपराह्नः"; alternatives "ऽपराह्णः" — conjunct under ह read as न, same type form as the ṭīkā above
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिङ्मध्य"; alternatives "दिग्मध्य" — conjunct ङ्म as seen in the large type; not zoomed
  • About this edition: रतीशः is rendered 'lord of Rati ⟨love-play⟩'; the commentary on the same leaf takes the word as ruling the delight of play, which agrees. The reader's two doubts touch spelling only: ऽपराह्नः / ऽपराह्णः is अपराह्न, 'afternoon', and दिङ्मध्य / दिग्मध्य is अग्निदिक्, the south-east, on either form.
2.7a reading here is contested

शनिर् विहंगोऽनिल वन्य संध्या शूद्रांगना धातुसमः स्थिरश् च ॥ क्रूरः प्रतीची तुवरोऽतिवृद्धोत्करक्षितीड् दीर्घ सुनील लोहम्

śanir vihaṃgo'nila vanya saṃdhyā śūdrāṃganā dhātusamaḥ sthiraś ca || krūraḥ pratīcī tuvaro'tivṛddhotkarakṣitīḍ dīrgha sunīla loham

Saturn is of the bird kind; he moves in the wind; ⟨he is⟩ forest-ranging; ⟨strong⟩ at twilight; a śūdra; a woman ⟨that is, a female graha⟩; of the three humours in equal measure; and fixed ⟨in nature⟩. ⟨He is⟩ cruel; ⟨lord of⟩ the west; astringent ⟨in taste⟩; extremely old; lord of ground heaped with rubbish; long ⟨in shape⟩; deep blue; ⟨and lord of⟩ iron.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शनि र्विहंगोऽनिलवन्यसंध्याशूद्रांगनाधातुसमःस्थिरश्च ॥ क्रूरःप्रतीचीतुवरोऽतिवृद्धोत्करक्षितीद्दीर्घसुनीललोहम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षितीद्दीर्घ"; alternatives "क्षितीट्दीर्घ" — zoomed: द with virāma before दी, as printed; the ṭīkā below prints उत्करक्षितीट् [2026-10-01: superseded; the mūla now reads क्षितीड् for क्षितीद्. The exemplar's mūla band was read by eye on PDF p. 39 at about 3.9x native and sets क्षितीद्, as this reader saw, and its ṭīkā lemma sets क्षितीट् (read by eye at about 3.1x native); the edit rests on the lexicon, ट् being the pausa form and ड् its voiced form before दीर्घ.]
  • About this edition: The page prints उत्करक्षितीद्; it is उत्करक्षितीट्, 'lord of ground heaped with rubbish', and the commentary on the same leaf sets the ट् form. The printed द् is kept unchanged in the segmented file. अनिल here means 'moving in the wind', not the vāta humour: Saturn's humour is stated separately in the same half-line as धातुसम, all three in equal measure. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads क्षितीड् for क्षितीद्. The exemplar's mūla band sets क्षितीद् (read by eye on PDF p. 39 at about 3.9x native); the edit rests on the lexicon, and Mahīdhara's printing (p. 44 l. 4, read by eye at about 2.3x native) sets क्षितीड्.]

राहुस्वरूपं शनिवन्निषादजातिर्भुजंगोऽस्थिपनैर्ऋतीशः ॥ केतुः शिखी तद्वदनेकरूपः खगस्वरूपात् फलमूह्यमित्थम्

rāhusvarūpaṃ śanivanniṣādajātirbhujaṃgo'sthipanairṛtīśaḥ || ketuḥ śikhī tadvadanekarūpaḥ khagasvarūpāt phalamūhyamittham

Rāhu's nature is like Saturn's. His caste (jāti) is niṣāda; he is a serpent; he rules the bone ⟨among the bodily constituents⟩ and he is lord of the nairṛta quarter (the south-west). Ketu, the crested one (śikhī), is like him, and is of many forms. From the nature of each graha (khaga) the result is to be inferred in this manner.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

राहुस्वरूपंशनिव न्निषादजातिर्भुजंगोऽस्थिपनैर्ऋतीशः ॥ केतुःशिखीतद्वदनेकरूपःखगस्वरूपात्फलमूह्यमित्थम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The supplied ⟨among the bodily constituents⟩ unpacks अस्थिप, 'ruler of bone', which names one of the seven dhātus assigned to the grahas in the preceding verses of this list. The printed मूल joins शनिवन्निषादजातिः across a line break (शनिव / न्निषाद); the word is शनिवत् + निषादजातिः.
2.9a reading here is contested

दृष्टिः स्यान्नवपंचमे बलवती प्रत्यक्षतः स्नेहदा पादोनाऽखिलकार्यसाधनकरी मेलापकाख्योच्यते ॥ गुप्तस्नेहकरी तृतीयभवभे कार्यस्य संसिद्धिदात्र्यंशोना कथिता तृतीयभवने षड्भागदृष्टिर्भवे

dṛṣṭiḥ syānnavapaṃcame balavatī pratyakṣataḥ snehadā pādonā'khilakāryasādhanakarī melāpakākhyocyate || guptasnehakarī tṛtīyabhavabhe kāryasya saṃsiddhidātryaṃśonā kathitā tṛtīyabhavane ṣaḍbhāgadṛṣṭirbhave

The aspect ⟨falling⟩ on the 9th and the 5th is strong; it gives affection openly (pratyakṣataḥ), it is less by a quarter ⟨of the full measure⟩, and it accomplishes every undertaking; it is called melāpaka ⟨'the joiner'⟩. In the sign of the 3rd bhāva ⟨that aspect⟩ makes affection secretly and gives the accomplishment of the undertaking, and is declared to be deficient by a portion (aṃśonā). The ṣaḍbhāga (sixth-part, i.e. sextile) aspect obtains in the 3rd house and in bhava ⟨which the ṭīkā glosses as the 11th place⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दृष्टिःस्यान्नवपंचमेबलवतीप्रत्यक्षतःस्नेहदापादोनाऽखिलकार्यसाधनकरीमेलापकाख्योच्यते ॥ गुप्तस्नेहकरीतृतीयभवभेकार्यस्यसंसि द्धिदात्र्यंशोनाकथितातृतीयभवनेषड्भागदृष्टिर्भवे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कथितातृतीयभवनेषड्भागदृष्टिर्भवे"; alternatives "कथितातृतीयभवने षड्भागदृष्टिर्भवे" — read as printed; the ṭīkā glosses भवे as एकादशस्थाने
  • About this edition: भवे is rendered as the 11th place on the authority of the ṭīkā, which the plate reader recorded in this verse's notes; the mūla itself says only भवे. पादोना is 'less by a quarter', i.e. three-quarters of the full measure; अंशोना is 'less by a portion', and the mūla does not say how large that portion is. The reader's alternative word-division (कथिता तृतीयभवने / षड्भागदृष्टिः भवे) does not change any character and is the division followed here.
2.10a reading here is contested

दृष्टिः पादमिता चतुर्थदशमे गुप्तारिभावा स्मृताऽन्योन्यं सप्तमभे तथैकभवने प्रत्यक्षवैराऽखिला ॥ दुष्टं दृक्त्रितयं क्षुताह्वयमिदं कार्यस्य विध्वंसदं संग्रामादिकलिप्रदं दृश इमाः स्युर्द्वादशांशांतरे

dṛṣṭiḥ pādamitā caturthadaśame guptāribhāvā smṛtā'nyonyaṃ saptamabhe tathaikabhavane pratyakṣavairā'khilā || duṣṭaṃ dṛktritayaṃ kṣutāhvayamidaṃ kāryasya vidhvaṃsadaṃ saṃgrāmādikalipradaṃ dṛśa imāḥ syurdvādaśāṃśāṃtare

The aspect ⟨falling⟩ on the 4th (hibuka) and the 10th (karma) is measured at a quarter; it is held to be hidden (guptā) and of the nature of an enemy. In the 7th sign mutually, and likewise ⟨for two grahas⟩ in one and the same house, the aspect is openly hostile and whole ⟨in measure⟩. This triad of aspects is evil and bears the name kṣuta; it destroys the undertaking and brings battle, quarrel and the like. These aspects obtain within the interval of the twelve divisions ⟨of the circle⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दृष्टिःपादमिताचतुर्थदशमेगुप्तारिभावास्मृताऽन्योन्यंसप्तमभेतथैकभवने प्रत्यक्षवैराऽखिला ॥ दुष्टंदृक्त्रितयंक्षुताह्वयमिदंकार्यस्यविध्वंसदंसंग्रामादिकलिप्रदंदृशइमाःस्युर्द्वादशांशांतरे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृशइमाः"; alternatives "दृश इमाः" — printed without sandhi; kept
  • About this edition: क्षुत is transliterated, not translated: it is given here as a name (क्षुताह्वयम्, 'bearing the name kṣuta') for the malefic triad of aspects, and no gloss of it stands in the mūla. द्वादशांशांतरे is rendered literally as 'within the interval of the twelve divisions'; it could also be read 'within twelve degrees', and the mūla does not decide between them. The reader's alternative दृश इमाः (for printed दृशइमाः) is a word division only and is followed in the segmented file.

अपास्य पश्यं निजदृश्यखेटादेकादिशेषे ध्रुवलिप्तिकाः स्युः ॥ पूर्णं खवेदास्तिथयोऽक्षवेदाः खं षष्टिरभ्रं शरवेदसंख्या

apāsya paśyaṃ nijadṛśyakheṭādekādiśeṣe dhruvaliptikāḥ syuḥ || pūrṇaṃ khavedāstithayo'kṣavedāḥ khaṃ ṣaṣṭirabhraṃ śaravedasaṃkhyā

Subtract the aspecting ⟨graha⟩ from one's own aspected graha; then, according as the remainder is one ⟨sign⟩, two and so on, the dhruva-liptikās (the fixed minutes) are these: full; 40 (kha-veda); 15 (tithi); 42 (akṣa-veda); 0 (kha); 60 (ṣaṣṭi); 0 (abhra); 45 (śara-veda).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अपास्यपश्यंनिजदृश्यखेटादेकादिशेषेध्रुवलिप्तिकाःस्युः ॥ पूर्णंखवेदास्तिथयोऽक्षवेदाःखंषष्टि रभ्रंशरवेदसंख्या

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The numbers are bhūtasaṃkhyā word-numerals, read right to left, and are given here in figures as the brief directs. अक्षवेदाः is read 42 (akṣa = 2, the eyes; veda = 4); if akṣa is taken for 5 (the senses) the value is 45, which the list's later शरवेदसंख्या already supplies. The mūla names the series but does not itself say which remainder takes which of these values; that assignment is not supplied here.
2.12a reading here is contested

तिथ्यः खचंद्रावियदभ्रतर्काः शेषांकयातैष्यविशेषघातात् ॥ लब्धं खरामै ३० रधिकोनकैष्ये स्वर्णं ध्रुवे ताः स्फुटदृष्टिलिप्ताः

tithyaḥ khacaṃdrāviyadabhratarkāḥ śeṣāṃkayātaiṣyaviśeṣaghātāt || labdhaṃ kharāmai 30 radhikonakaiṣye svarṇaṃ dhruve tāḥ sphuṭadṛṣṭiliptāḥ

⟨Continuing the series:⟩ 15 (tithi), 10 (kha-candra), 600 (viyat-abhra-tarka). From the product of the remainder-figure and the difference of the yāta (elapsed) and the eṣya (still to come) ⟨portions⟩, the quotient obtained on division by 30 — kha-rāma, printed also in figures as ३० — is to be added or subtracted on the dhruva, according as the eṣya is greater or less. These are the minutes of the exact aspect (sphuṭa-dṛṣṭi).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तिथ्यःखचंद्रावियदभ्रतर्काःशेषांकयातैष्यविशेषघातात् ॥ लब्धं खरामै ३० रधिकोनकैष्येस्वर्णंध्रुवेताःस्फुटदृष्टिलिप्ताः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वर्णंध्रुवे"; alternatives "स्वर्णध्रुवे" — anusvāra dot over ण small, sits near the repha
  • About this edition: स्वर्णं is svarṇa = sva (plus) + ṛṇa (minus), hence 'to be added or subtracted'. The plate reader doubted the anusvāra in स्वर्णंध्रुवे; the alternative स्वर्णध्रुवे ('the dhruva as plus-or-minus') would not change the operation, and the printed स्वर्णं is followed. The figure ३० stands in the printing inside the word खरामैः, glossing its own number-word.

पश्यन् मित्रदृशा सुहृद् रिपुदृशा शत्रुः समस्त्वन्यथा तिथ्यर्काष्टनगांकशैलखचराः १५।१२।८।७।९।७।९ सूर्यादिदीप्तांशकाः ॥ चक्रे वामदृगुच्यते बलवती मध्याद् यथा वेश्मनीत्येकर्क्षेऽपि दृगुच्यतेऽर्थजननीत्येके विदुः सूरयः

paśyan mitradṛśā suhṛd ripudṛśā śatruḥ samastvanyathā tithyarkāṣṭanagāṃkaśailakhacarāḥ 15|12|8|7|9|7|9 sūryādidīptāṃśakāḥ || cakre vāmadṛgucyate balavatī madhyād yathā veśmanītyekarkṣe'pi dṛgucyate'rthajananītyeke viduḥ sūrayaḥ

A ⟨graha⟩ aspecting with a friendly aspect is a friend; aspecting with an inimical aspect, an enemy; otherwise it is neutral (sama). Tithi (15), arka (12), aṣṭa (8), naga (7), aṅka (9), śaila (7), khacara (9) — that is, 15, 12, 8, 7, 9, 7, 9 — are the dīptāṃśas (orbs) of the grahas beginning with the Sun ⟨Sun 15, Moon 12, Mars 8, Mercury 7, Jupiter 9, Venus 7, Saturn 9⟩. In the circle the left-hand aspect (vāma-dṛś) is said to be the strong one, ⟨reckoned⟩ from the midpoint, as is done in the case of a bhāva. Some learned men hold that even ⟨for two grahas⟩ in one and the same ṛkṣa there is an aspect, and that it produces the object ⟨sought⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पश्यन्मित्रदृशासुहृद्रिपुदृशाशत्रुःसमस्त्वन्यथातिथ्यर्काष्टनगांकशैलखचराः १५।१२।८।७।९।७।९ सूर्यादिदीप्तां शकाः ॥ चक्रेवामदृगुच्यतेबलवतीमध्याद्यथावेश्मनीत्येकर्क्षेऽपिदृगुच्यतेऽर्थजननीत्येकेविदुःसूरयः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The word-numerals and the printed figures agree exactly: तिथि 15, अर्क 12, अष्ट 8, नग 7, अंक 9, शैल 7, खचर 9, which the page itself glosses १५।१२।८।७।९।७।९. The supplied ⟨Sun 15 … Saturn 9⟩ only distributes that same row over सूर्यादि, the grahas beginning with the Sun. मध्याद् यथा वेश्मनि is rendered 'from the midpoint, as is done in the case of a bhāva', i.e. reckoned from the cusp; the mūla is elliptical here.
2.14a reading here is contested

पुरः पृष्ठे स्वदीप्तांशैर्विशिष्टं दृक्फलं ग्रहः ॥ दद्यादतिक्रमे तेषां मध्यमं दृक्फलं विदुः

puraḥ pṛṣṭhe svadīptāṃśairviśiṣṭaṃ dṛkphalaṃ grahaḥ || dadyādatikrame teṣāṃ madhyamaṃ dṛkphalaṃ viduḥ

In front or behind, so long as it is within its own dīptāṃśas ⟨its orb⟩, a graha gives a marked (viśiṣṭa) aspect-result. When those ⟨limits⟩ are overstepped, ⟨the wise⟩ know the aspect-result to be middling (madhyama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुरःपृष्ठेस्वदीप्तांशैर्विशिष्टंदृक्फलंग्रहः ॥ दद्यादतिक्रमेतेषांमध्यमंदृक्फलंविदुः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दीप्तांशै"; alternatives "दीसांशै" — the प्त conjunct is small and could look like स at tile scale
  • About this edition: The plate reader doubted दीप्तांशै against दीसांशै; दीप्तांशैः is followed, and it is confirmed by दीप्तांशकाः in verse 13 of the same chapter, which sets out the very table this verse applies.

प्रागिक्कवालोपर इंदुवारस् तथेत्थशालो ऽपर ईसराफः ॥ नक्तं ततः स्याद् यमया मणाऊ कंबूलतो गैरिकबूलमुक्तम्

prāgikkavālopara iṃduvāras tathetthaśālo 'para īsarāphaḥ || naktaṃ tataḥ syād yamayā maṇāū kaṃbūlato gairikabūlamuktam

First ⟨comes⟩ ikkavāla, after it induvāra, then itthaśāla ⟨the applying aspect⟩, and next īsarāpha ⟨the separating one⟩. After that comes nakta, then yamayā ⟨and⟩ maṇāū; and after kambūla, gairikabūla is declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रागिक्कवालोपरइंदुवारस्तथेत्थशालोऽपरईसराफः॥ नक्तंततःस्याद्यमयामणाऊकंबूलतोगैरिकबूलमुक्तम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the first half of the list of the sixteen Tājika yogas; verse 16 finishes it. The page prints प्रागिक्कवालोपर with no avagraha inked. It divides either as इक्कवालः + उपर ('after it') or as इक्कवालो ऽपर ('the next one'), on the pattern of तथेत्थशालोऽपर in the same line; both give the same order, so nothing in the rendering turns on it. ⟨comes⟩ and ⟨and⟩ supply verbs and connectives the bare list omits. This printing spells the ninth yoga गैरिकबूल here, without the anusvāra it sets in कंबूल two syllables earlier; the printed spelling is kept and rendered as it stands.

खल्लासरं रद्दमथो दुफालिकुत्थं च दुत्थोत्थदिबीरनामा ॥ तंबीरकुत्थौ दुरफश्च योगाः स्युः षोडशैषां कथयामि लक्ष्म

khallāsaraṃ raddamatho duphālikutthaṃ ca dutthotthadibīranāmā || taṃbīrakutthau duraphaśca yogāḥ syuḥ ṣoḍaśaiṣāṃ kathayāmi lakṣma

Khallāsara, then radda, and duphālikuttha, and the one named dutthotthadibīra; tambīra and kuttha, and durapha — ⟨these⟩ are the sixteen yogas. I ⟨now⟩ state their defining marks.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

खल्लासरंरद्दमथोदुफालिकुत्थंचदुत्थोत्थदिबीरनामा ॥ तंबीरकुत्थौदुरफ श्चयोगाःस्युःषोडशैषांकथयामिलक्ष्म

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ⟨these⟩ supplies the subject of स्युः, which the verse leaves to the list itself. The page sets a space inside दुरफ श्च; it is one word-group, दुरफः + च, and is read that way.
2.17a reading here is contested

चेत् कंटके पणफरे च खगाः समस्ताः स्यादिक्कवाल इति राज्यसुखाप्तिहेतुः ॥ आपोक्लिमे यदि खगाः सकलेंदुवारो न स्याच्छुभः क्वचन ताजिकशास्त्रगीतः

cet kaṃṭake paṇaphare ca khagāḥ samastāḥ syādikkavāla iti rājyasukhāptihetuḥ || āpoklime yadi khagāḥ sakaleṃduvāro na syācchubhaḥ kvacana tājikaśāstragītaḥ

If all the grahas ⟨stand⟩ in the kaṇṭaka (angular) and paṇaphara (succedent) houses, that is the ikkavāla ⟨yoga⟩, a cause of gaining sovereignty and comfort. If the grahas ⟨stand⟩ in the āpoklima (cadent) houses, ⟨that is⟩ induvāra entire; it is nowhere auspicious — so the Tājika śāstra sings.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चेत्कंटकेपणफरेचखगाःसमस्ताःस्यादिक्कवालइतिराज्यसुखाप्तिहेतुः ॥ आपोक्लिमेयदि खागाःसकलेंदुवारोनस्याच्छुभःक्कचनताजिकशास्त्रगीतः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खागाः"; alternatives "खगाः" — zoomed: an ā-stroke stands after ख; the ṭīkā glosses खगाः; kept as printed, likely misprint [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads खगाः; this sentence names खागाः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्कचन"; alternatives "क्वचन" — zoomed: the same ligature the press uses in इक्कवाल; sense wants क्वचन [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्वचन; this sentence names क्कचन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints खागाः in the second half where खगाः ('the grahas') is wanted; the plate reader confirmed an ā-stroke after ख and recorded that the ṭīkā glosses खगाः, so it is very likely a misprint. Rendered as 'the grahas', with the printed characters left untouched. The page likewise prints क्कचन for क्वचन ('anywhere'), using the same ligature it uses in इक्कवाल; the sense wants क्वचन and the rendering follows the sense. ⟨stand⟩ and ⟨that is⟩ supply the verb the elliptical second half omits; सकलेंदुवारो is taken as सकल-इंदुवारः, 'induvāra entire', the yoga formed when every graha is cadent. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads खगाः and क्वचन; this sentence names खागाः and क्कचन, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

शीघ्रो ऽल्पभागैर् घनभागमंदेग्रस्थे निजं तेज उपाददीत ॥ स्यादित्थशालो ऽयमथो विलिप्तालिप्तार्धहीनो यदि पूर्णमेतत्

śīghro 'lpabhāgair ghanabhāgamaṃdegrasthe nijaṃ teja upādadīta || syāditthaśālo 'yamatho viliptāliptārdhahīno yadi pūrṇametat

⟨When⟩ the swift graha, holding fewer degrees, takes up its own light while the slow graha, holding more degrees, stands ahead ⟨of it⟩ — this is the itthaśāla. And if it falls short ⟨of exactness⟩ by a vilipta or by half a liptā, this ⟨itthaśāla⟩ is a full one.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शीघ्रोऽल्पभागैर्घनभागमंदेग्रस्थेनिजंतेजउपाददीत ॥ स्यादित्थशालोऽयमथोविलिप्तालिप्तार्धहीनोयदिपूर्णमेतत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: उपाददीत is literally 'would take up'. The parallel definition in verse 19 uses निदधाति तेजः ('deposits ⟨its⟩ light'), so what both verses describe is the swifter graha carrying its light to the slower one — the applying aspect. घनभागमंदेग्रस्थे is मंदे + अग्रस्थे with the avagraha not inked, as in verse 15. ⟨of exactness⟩ and ⟨itthaśāla⟩ are supplied: the verse says only विलिप्तालिप्तार्धहीनो ... पूर्णमेतत्, and the thing that falls short by that tiny arc is the distance still to be closed between the two grahas.
2.19a reading here is contested

शीघ्रो यदा भांत्यलवस्थितः सन् मंदेग्र्यभस्थो निदधाति तेजः ॥ स्यादित्थशालो ऽयमथैष शीघ्रदीप्तांशकांशैरिह मंदपृष्ठे

śīghro yadā bhāṃtyalavasthitaḥ san maṃdegryabhastho nidadhāti tejaḥ || syāditthaśālo 'yamathaiṣa śīghradīptāṃśakāṃśairiha maṃdapṛṣṭhe

When the swift graha, standing in the last degrees of a sign, deposits its light in the slow graha that stands in the sign ahead, this too is an itthaśāla. And further, ⟨when⟩ this swift one stands here behind the slow one by the degrees of ⟨its⟩ dīptāṃśa (orb) ⟨…⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शीघ्रोयदाभांत्यलवस्थितःसन्मंदेग्र्यभस्थोनिदधातितेजः ॥ स्यादित्थशालोऽयमथैषशीघ्रदीप्तांशकांशैरिहमंदपृष्ठे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दीप्तांशकांशैरिह"; alternatives "दीक्षांशकांशैरिह" — प्ता confirmed at 18x: प with त conjoined below-left, plus the aa-matra and anusvara
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सन्मंदे"; alternatives "सन्‌मंदे" — न् is set as a subscript hook under स, a fount habit of this press | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (two readers disagreed; settled on a zoomed crop of the original page): सन्मंदेग्र्यभस्थो
  • About this edition: The second half is a condition whose consequence stands in verse 20 ('then the itthaśāla is to be reckoned as future'); the ⟨…⟩ marks that break, and no words are pulled in from that record. मंदेग्र्यभस्थो is divided मंदे + अग्र्यभस्थो, and the स्थ- is taken with मंद ('the slow one, standing in the sign ahead'), because शीघ्र is already qualified by भांत्यलवस्थितः सन्, 'standing in the last degrees of a sign'; a graha cannot be in both places at once. The plate reader's doubt over दीप्तांशकांशैरिह (alternative दीक्षांशकांशैरिह) was settled on the ink at 18× as दीप्तांश, which is also what the Tājika sense requires — the orb inside which an aspect operates. The second doubt, over सन्मंदे, is about how this press sets the subscript न् and does not change the words.

तदा भविष्यद् गणनीयमित्थशालं त्रिधैवं मुथशीलमाहुः ॥ लग्नेशकार्याधिपयोर् यथैष योगस्तथा कार्यमुशंति संतः

tadā bhaviṣyad gaṇanīyamitthaśālaṃ tridhaivaṃ muthaśīlamāhuḥ || lagneśakāryādhipayor yathaiṣa yogastathā kāryamuśaṃti saṃtaḥ

⟨then⟩ the itthaśāla is to be reckoned as a future (bhaviṣyat) one. In these three ways they speak of the muthaśīla. As this yoga ⟨stands⟩ between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter ⟨enquired about⟩, so, the wise declare, ⟨goes⟩ the matter itself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तदाभविष्यद्गणनीयमित्थशालंत्रिधैवंमुथशीलमाहुः ॥ लग्नेशकार्याधिपयोर्यथैषयोगस्तथाकार्यमुशंतिसंतः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ⟨then⟩ answers the condition left open at the end of verse 19; the condition itself is not repeated here and no words are taken from that record. कार्यमुशंति संतः is elliptical — it names the कार्य but gives it no verb, so ⟨goes⟩ supplies what the wise are said to declare about it.
2.21a reading here is contested

लग्नेशकार्याधिपतत्सहाया यत्र स्युरस्मिन् पतिसौम्यदृष्टे ॥ तदा बलाढ्यं कथयंति योगं विशेषतः स्नेहदृशा ऽपि संतः

lagneśakāryādhipatatsahāyā yatra syurasmin patisaumyadṛṣṭe || tadā balāḍhyaṃ kathayaṃti yogaṃ viśeṣataḥ snehadṛśā 'pi saṃtaḥ

Where the lord of the lagna, the lord of the matter, and their helpers ⟨come together⟩, and in this ⟨combination⟩ the lord is aspected by a benefic, then the wise call the yoga strong in power — and especially so ⟨when the aspect is⟩ with a friendly (sneha) glance.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशकार्याधिपत त्सहायायत्रस्युरस्मिन्पतिसौम्यदृष्टे ॥ तदाबलाढ्यंकथयंतियोगंविशेषतःस्नेहदृशाऽपिसंतः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्नेहदृशाऽपिसंतः" — avagraha clearly inked between दृशा and पि
  • About this edition: The page's space falls inside a word: लग्नेशकार्याधिपत त्सहायाय त्र… divides as लग्नेशकार्याधिपतत्सहायाः + यत्र, which by sandhi prints as -सहाया यत्र. ⟨come together⟩ supplies the sense of यत्र स्युः, and ⟨combination⟩ the referent of अस्मिन्, which the verse leaves to the yoga just defined. स्नेहदृशा is the friendly class of Tājika aspect (the trine and the sextile), set against the hostile class; the avagraha in दृशाऽपि is clearly inked on the plate.
2.22a reading here is contested

स्वर्क्षादिसत्स्थानगतः शुभैश्चेद्युतेक्षितो भूद् भविताऽथवास्ते ॥ तदा शुभं प्रागभवत् सुपूर्णमग्रे भविष्यत्यथ वर्तते च

svarkṣādisatsthānagataḥ śubhaiścedyutekṣito bhūd bhavitā'thavāste || tadā śubhaṃ prāgabhavat supūrṇamagre bhaviṣyatyatha vartate ca

If ⟨a graha⟩ that has gone to a good position — its own sign (svarkṣa) and the rest — was joined with or aspected by benefics, or is going to be, or is so now, then the auspicious result came about in full before, or will come about later on, or is running at present ⟨respectively⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वर्क्षादिसत्स्थानगतःशुभैश्चेद्युते क्षितोभूद्भविताऽथवास्ते ॥ तदाशुभंप्रागभवत्सुपूर्णमग्रेभविष्यत्यथवर्ततेच

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभैश्चेद्युते"; alternatives "शुभैश्वेयुते", "शुभैः शुभैर्युते" — settled at 20x: the subscript under श is a च, and the next akshara is द्यु. At half-page magnification this reads as श्वे+यु and is wrong
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt is about शुभैश्चेद्युते and was settled on the plate at 20×; the rendering follows the printed reading. Two divisions the printed spacing hides: the space after युते falls inside a word — I read युते क्षितो as युत-ईक्षितः, "joined with or aspected by", the standard Tājika pair; and क्षितोभूद् is क्षितः + अभूत्, the avagraha not printed. Both are confirmed by the metre: pāda a ends at शुभैश्चेत् (Indravajrā, 11 syllables) and pāda b युतेक्षितोभूद्भविताऽथवास्ते scans as a clean Upendravajrā, which only works if the अ of अभूत् is elided. The subject is not named in the Sanskrit; ⟨a graha⟩ is supplied. The three tenses of the first half (भूत्, भविता, आस्ते) answer the three of the second (प्रागभवत्, अग्रे भविष्यति, वर्तते) in order.

व्यत्यस्तमस्माद् विपरीतभावे ऽथेष्टर्क्षतो ऽनिष्टगृहं प्रपन्नः ॥ अभूच्छुभं प्रागशुभं त्विदानीं संयातुकामेन च भावि वाच्यम्

vyatyastamasmād viparītabhāve 'theṣṭarkṣato 'niṣṭagṛhaṃ prapannaḥ || abhūcchubhaṃ prāgaśubhaṃ tvidānīṃ saṃyātukāmena ca bhāvi vācyam

⟨The rule⟩ is inverted from this one in the opposite case: ⟨a graha⟩ that has passed from a desirable sign into an undesirable house. The good was there before, but the bad is present now; and what is to come is to be declared from the ⟨place⟩ it is about to enter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

व्यत्यस्तमस्माद्विपरीतभावेऽथेष्टर्क्षतोऽनिष्टगृहंप्रपन्नः॥ अभूच्छुभंप्रागशुभंत्विदानींसंयातुकामेनचभाविवाच्यम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: संयातुकामेन is instrumental with no noun beside it. I take the understood noun to be the sign or house the graha is about to reach, which is what the verse is practically directing the reader to look at; it can also be construed as the graha itself, "by the one that is about to move on", with the same result in use. ⟨The rule⟩ and ⟨place⟩ are supplied.

शीघ्रो यदा मंदगतेरथैकमप्यंशमभ्येति तदेसराफः ॥ कार्यक्षयो मूसरिफे खलोत्थे सौम्येन हिल्लाजमतेन चिंत्यम्

śīghro yadā maṃdagaterathaikamapyaṃśamabhyeti tadesarāphaḥ || kāryakṣayo mūsariphe khalotthe saumyena hillājamatena ciṃtyam

When the swift ⟨graha⟩ moves even one degree away from the slow-moving one, that is īsarāpha (the separating aspect). In a mūsaripha — the same separation — that has arisen from a malefic there is ruin of the undertaking; ⟨when it has arisen⟩ from a benefic ⟨the undertaking prospers⟩. This is to be reckoned according to the opinion of Hillāja.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शीघ्रोयदामंदगतेरथैकमप्यंशमभ्येतितदेसराफः ॥ कार्यक्षयोमूसरिफेखलोत्थेसौम्येनहिल्लाजमतेनचिंत्यम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse names the yoga twice, as ईसराफ and as मूसरिफ; both render the same Arabic term for the separating aspect, and I have kept each spelling where the Sanskrit uses it. Two words are supplied: the verse writes only सौम्येन, "by a benefic", leaving both the participle उत्थे and the favourable result to be understood from the malefic clause beside it. An alternative construction is possible and I record it rather than hide it: सौम्येन could instead qualify मतेन, giving "it is to be reckoned by the gracious opinion of Hillāja", in which case the verse states only the malefic case. I have followed the contrast खल / सौम्य because that pair is the standard one in this book and because सौम्येन opens its own pāda.
2.25a reading here is contested

लग्नेशकार्याधिपयोर् न दृष्टिर् मिथो ऽथ तन्मध्यगतोपि शीघ्रः ॥ आदाय तेजो यदि पृष्ठसंस्थान् न्यसेदथान्यत्र हि नक्तमेतत्

lagneśakāryādhipayor na dṛṣṭir mitho 'tha tanmadhyagatopi śīghraḥ || ādāya tejo yadi pṛṣṭhasaṃsthān nyasedathānyatra hi naktametat

If there is no mutual aspect between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter in hand (kārya), and a swift ⟨graha⟩ stands between the two of them, and it takes the light from the one standing behind and sets it down elsewhere ⟨on the other⟩ — this is nakta.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्ने शकार्याधिपयोर्नदृष्टिर्मिथोऽथतन्मध्यगतोपिशीघ्रः ॥ आदायतेजोयदिपृष्ठसंस्थान्न्यसेदथान्यत्रहिनक्तमेतत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संस्थान्न्यसेद"; alternatives "संस्थान्यसेद" — the न्न्य conjunct is dense; I read a doubled न
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt is about the न्न्य conjunct in संस्थान्न्यसेद. The doubled न is right, and two things confirm it: पृष्ठसंस्थात् + न्यसेत् must give त् + न् → न्न्, and the metre needs पृष्ठसंस्थान् to close pāda c heavy. ⟨a graha⟩ and ⟨on the other⟩ are supplied; the verse writes only अन्यत्र, "elsewhere".

स्त्रीलाभपृच्छा तनुरस्ति कन्या स्वामी बुधः सिंहगतो दशांशैः ॥ सूर्यांशकैर्देवगुरुः कलत्रे दृष्टिस्तयोर्नास्ति मिथोथ चंद्रः

strīlābhapṛcchā tanurasti kanyā svāmī budhaḥ siṃhagato daśāṃśaiḥ || sūryāṃśakairdevaguruḥ kalatre dṛṣṭistayornāsti mithotha caṃdraḥ

⟨A worked example.⟩ The question asked is about gaining a woman (strī-lābha-pṛcchā). The lagna (tanu, the ascendant) is Kanyā (Virgo); its lord Mercury has gone to Siṃha (Leo) at ten degrees; Jupiter, the guru of the gods, is in the 7th (kalatra, the house of the wife) at twelve degrees. Between those two there is no mutual aspect (dṛṣṭi). And then the Moon ⟨— the sentence runs on into the next verse⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्रीलाभपृच्छातनुरस्तिकन्यास्वामीबुधःसिंहगतोदशांशैः ॥ सूर्यांशकैर्देवगुरुःकलत्रेदृष्टिस्तयोर्नास्तिमिथोथचंद्रः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The degrees are number-words: daśa = 10, sūrya = 12 (the twelve Ādityas). The record ends in mid-sentence and verse 27 completes it; the ⟨ ⟩ marks only that link, nothing supplied from the next record.

चापे वृषे चोभयदृश्यमूर्तिः शीघ्रो ऽष्टभागैरथवा भवांशैः ॥ आदाय तेजो बुधतो ददौ यज्जीवाय लाभः परतः स्त्रियाः स्यात्

cāpe vṛṣe cobhayadṛśyamūrtiḥ śīghro 'ṣṭabhāgairathavā bhavāṃśaiḥ || ādāya tejo budhato dadau yajjīvāya lābhaḥ parataḥ striyāḥ syāt

⟨The Moon is⟩ in Cāpa (Sagittarius); ⟨Venus⟩ in Vṛṣa (Taurus); ⟨the Moon's⟩ body is seen by both ⟨Mercury and Jupiter⟩. The swifter graha ⟨the Moon⟩, at eight degrees — or else at eleven degrees — took the light from Mercury and gave it to Jupiter. Therefore the gaining of the woman will come about through another person.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चापेवृषेचोभयदृश्यमूर्तिःशीघ्रोऽष्टभागैरथवाभवांशैः ॥ आदायतेजोबुधतोददौयज्जीवायलाभःपरतःस्त्रियाःस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This completes the nakta example begun in verse 26: the Moon, faster than both, carries the light from one lord to the other, so the matter is settled through an intermediary. bhava = 11 as a number-word. The verse gives two alternative degree figures (eight or eleven) and I have kept both, as printed.
2.28a reading here is contested

अंतःस्थितो मंदगतिस्तु पश्येद्दीप्तांशकैर्द्वावथ शीघ्रतस्तु ॥ नीत्वा महो यच्छति मंदगाय कार्यस्य सिद्ध्यै यमयः प्रदिष्टः

aṃtaḥsthito maṃdagatistu paśyeddīptāṃśakairdvāvatha śīghratastu || nītvā maho yacchati maṃdagāya kāryasya siddhyai yamayaḥ pradiṣṭaḥ

But when a slow-moving ⟨graha⟩ stands between ⟨the two lords⟩ and aspects them both within their dīptāṃśa (orb) degrees, and, taking the light from the swifter, hands it to the slower — then the yamayā is declared, for the accomplishment of the matter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अंतःस्थितोमंदगतिस्तुपश्येद्दीप्तांशकैर्द्वावथशीघ्रतस्तु ॥ नीत्वामहोयच्छतिमंदगायकार्यस्यसिद्ध्यैयमयःप्रदिष्टः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सिद्ध्यैयमयः"; alternatives "सिद्ध्यै इयमयः", "सिद्ध्यैयमयाः" — read as printed; the ध्य conjunct and the ऐ strokes are small
  • About this edition: Read as printed: सिद्ध्यै यमयः. The reader's alternatives (सिद्ध्यै इयमयः, सिद्ध्यैयमयाः) would not change the sense, which names the yamayā.

राज्याप्तिपृच्छा तुललग्ननाथो मेषे सितस्त्वष्टलवैर्वृषस्थः ॥ चंद्रो रसांशैर्यदि राज्यनाथो दृष्टिस्तयोर्नास्ति गुरुस्तु मंदः

rājyāptipṛcchā tulalagnanātho meṣe sitastvaṣṭalavairvṛṣasthaḥ || caṃdro rasāṃśairyadi rājyanātho dṛṣṭistayornāsti gurustu maṃdaḥ

⟨A worked example.⟩ The question asked is about obtaining a kingdom (rājyāpti). The lord of the Tulā (Libra) lagna, Venus, is in Meṣa (Aries) at eight degrees; the Moon is placed in Vṛṣa (Taurus) at six degrees, and it is the lord of the 10th (rājya, the house of rule). Between those two there is no aspect. But Jupiter, the slow one, ⟨— the sentence runs on into the next verse⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

राज्याप्तिपृच्छातुललग्ननाथोमेषेसितस्त्वष्टलवैर्वृषस्थः ॥ चंद्रोरसांशैर्यदिराज्यनाथोदृष्टिस्तयोर्नास्तिगुरुस्तुमंदः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: aṣṭa = 8, rasa = 6 as number-words. For a Tulā lagna the 10th sign is Karka, whose lord is the Moon, which is why the verse calls the Moon rājya-nātha.
2.30a reading here is contested

दिगंशकैः कर्कगतस्तु पश्यन्नुभौ महो दीप्तलवैः सचांद्रं ॥ ददौ सितायेति पदस्य लाभो ऽमात्येन भावीति विमृश्य वाच्यम् ॥

digaṃśakaiḥ karkagatastu paśyannubhau maho dīptalavaiḥ sacāṃdraṃ || dadau sitāyeti padasya lābho 'mātyena bhāvīti vimṛśya vācyam ||

⟨Jupiter⟩ at ten degrees, gone to Karka (Cancer), aspecting them both within the dīptāṃśa degrees, gave to Venus the light together with the Moon's. So ⟨the astrologer⟩ should weigh the matter and declare: the gaining of the post will come about through a minister.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिगंशकैःकर्कगतस्तुपश्यन्नुभौमहोदीप्तलवैःसचांद्रं ॥ ददौसितायेतिपदस्यलाभोऽमात्येनभावीतिविमृश्यवाच्यम् ॥

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दीप्तलवैः"; alternatives "दीप्तलवैः" — प्त conjunct slightly broken at the join; reading secure
  • About this edition: dik = 10 as a number-word. This completes the yamayā example: the slower graha collects the light of the pair and passes it on, so the office is gained through a third person.
2.31a reading here is contested

वक्रः शनिर्वा यदि शीघ्रखेटात् पश्चात् पुरस्तिष्ठति तुर्यदृष्ट्या ॥ एकर्क्षसप्तर्क्षभुवा दृशा वा पश्यन्नथांशैरधिकोनकैश्चेत्

vakraḥ śanirvā yadi śīghrakheṭāt paścāt purastiṣṭhati turyadṛṣṭyā || ekarkṣasaptarkṣabhuvā dṛśā vā paśyannathāṃśairadhikonakaiścet

If a retrograde ⟨graha⟩, or Saturn, stands behind or in front of the swift graha with the fourth aspect (turya-dṛṣṭi), or aspects it with the aspect that arises from the same sign or from the seventh sign, and if ⟨it does so⟩ with degrees greater or fewer ⟨than the orb⟩ — ⟨then it⟩ ⟨continues in the next verse⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वक्रःशनिर्वायदिशीघ्रखेटात्पश्चात्पुरस्तिष्ठतितुर्यदृष्ट्या ॥ एकर्क्षसप्तर्क्षभुवादृशावापश्यन्नथांशैरधिकोन कैश्चेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वक्रःशनिर्वा" — printed as वक्रः; the ṭīkā glosses वक्रोभौमःशनिर्वा
  • About this edition: The mūla prints वक्रः alone, 'the retrograde one'; the ṭīkā glosses it वक्रो भौमः शनिर्वा, 'retrograde Mars or Saturn'. I have rendered the printed reading and not narrowed it to Mars.

तेजो हरेत् कार्यपदेत्थशाली स्थितो ऽपि वासौ मणऊ शुभो न ॥ स्त्रीलाभपृच्छा तनुरस्ति कन्या ऽत्र ज्ञो दिगंशैस्तिथिभिः सुरेज्यः

tejo haret kāryapadetthaśālī sthito 'pi vāsau maṇaū śubho na || strīlābhapṛcchā tanurasti kanyā 'tra jño digaṃśaistithibhiḥ surejyaḥ

— ⟨it⟩ would carry off the light; or even when it stands in an itthaśāla in the pada of the matter, that is the maṇaū, and it is not auspicious. ⟨A worked example.⟩ The question asked is about gaining a woman. The lagna (tanu) is Kanyā (Virgo); here Mercury is at ten degrees and Jupiter, honoured of the gods, at fifteen degrees.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तेजोहरेत्कार्यपदेत्थशालीस्थितोऽपिवासौमणऊशुभोन ॥ स्त्रीलाभपृच्छातनुरस्तिकन्याऽत्रज्ञोदिगंशैस्तिथिभिःसुरेज्यः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: One record holds the end of the maṇaū definition and the opening of the next worked example; both are rendered where the page sets them. tithi = 15 as a number-word.

कलत्रगः खे ऽवनिजो भवांशैः पूर्वं बुधो भौमहृतः स्वतेजाः ॥ जीवेन पश्चान्मिलतीति लाभो नार्यास्तु नो पृष्ठगते ऽथवास्मिन्

kalatragaḥ khe 'vanijo bhavāṃśaiḥ pūrvaṃ budho bhaumahṛtaḥ svatejāḥ || jīvena paścānmilatīti lābho nāryāstu no pṛṣṭhagate 'thavāsmin

⟨Jupiter⟩ stands in the 7th (kalatra); Mars is in the 10th (kha) at eleven degrees. Mercury, whose own light Mars has carried off first, meets Jupiter only afterwards — therefore there is no gaining of the woman. Or ⟨the same holds⟩ when this ⟨Mars⟩ has gone behind ⟨them⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कल त्रगःखेऽवनिजोभवांशैःपूर्वंबुधोभौमहृतःस्वतेजाः ॥ जीवेनपश्चान्मिलतीतिलाभोनार्यास्तुनोपृष्ठगतेऽथवास्मिन्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside कल त्रगः; it is one word, kalatra-gaḥ, 'gone to the 7th'. bhava = 11 as a number-word.

यदीत्थशालोस्त्युभयोः स्वदीप्तहीनाधिकांशैः शनिभूसुतौ चेत् ॥ एकर्क्षगौ लग्नपकार्यपौ स्तस्तेजोहरौ कार्यहरौ निरुक्तौ

yadītthaśālostyubhayoḥ svadīptahīnādhikāṃśaiḥ śanibhūsutau cet || ekarkṣagau lagnapakāryapau stastejoharau kāryaharau niruktau

If there is an itthaśāla between the two ⟨the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter⟩, with degrees fewer or greater than their own dīptāṃśa, and if Saturn and Mars stand in the same sign as the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter, then those two are the takers of the light, and are declared destroyers of the matter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदीत्थशा लोस्त्युभयोःस्वदीप्तहीनाधिकांशैःशनिभूसुतौचेत् ॥ एकर्क्षगौलग्नपकार्यपौस्तस्तेजोहरौकार्यहरौनिरुक्तौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside इत्थशा लो; it is one word, itthaśālaḥ.

राज्याप्तिपृच्छा तुललग्ननाथः कर्के सितोंशैस्तिथिभिर्दिगंशैः ॥ वृषे शशी भूपलवैः कुजश्च हरन् द्वयोर्भां हरते च राज्यम्

rājyāptipṛcchā tulalagnanāthaḥ karke sitoṃśaistithibhirdigaṃśaiḥ || vṛṣe śaśī bhūpalavaiḥ kujaśca haran dvayorbhāṃ harate ca rājyam

⟨A worked example.⟩ The question asked is about obtaining a kingdom. The lord of the Tulā (Libra) lagna, Venus, is in Karka (Cancer) at fifteen degrees; the Moon is in Vṛṣa (Taurus) at ten degrees; and Mars is at sixteen degrees. Carrying off the light of the two, it carries off the kingdom as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

राज्याप्तिपृच्छातुललग्ननाथःकर्केसितोंशैस्तिथिभिर्दिगंशैः ॥ वृषेशशीभूपलवैःकुजश्चहरन्द्वयोर्भांहरतेचराज्यम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: tithi = 15, dik = 10, bhūpa = 16 as number-words. This is the worked example of the light-taking (tejohara) grahas defined in verse 34.
2.36a reading here is contested

लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशालत्रेंद्वित्थशालतः ॥ कंबूलं श्रेष्ठमध्यादिभेदैर्नानाविधं स्मृतम्

lagnakāryeśayoritthaśālatreṃdvitthaśālataḥ || kaṃbūlaṃ śreṣṭhamadhyādibhedairnānāvidhaṃ smṛtam

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter are in an itthaśāla, and here ⟨the Moon too⟩ is in an itthaśāla ⟨with one of them⟩, that is the kambūla; it is held to be of many kinds, by the distinctions best (uttama), middling (madhyama) and the rest. [I render on the reading itthaśāle ’trendvitthaśālataḥ. The source read of the 1893 pothi gives itthaśālatrendhitthaśālataḥ, which is not a word: it lacks the e-stroke and the avagraha of śāle ’tra, and gives dhi where indu + itthaśāla can only give dvi. Half of that emendation is now made in the Sanskrit — on 2026-09-23 dhi became dvi, because indu + ittha admits no other sandhi and all four independent store reads give dvittha. The other half is not made: the e-stroke and the avagraha turn on marks this pass cannot settle, so the Sanskrit still reads -śālatra-.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशालत्रेंद्धित्थशालतः ॥ कंबूलंश्रेष्ठमध्यादिभेदैर्नानाविधंस्मृतम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रित्थशालत्रें"; alternatives "रित्थशालेऽत्रें" — zoomed: no e-stroke on ल; the top stroke and anusvāra sit over त्र. Sense seems to want शालेऽत्रेंदु-; print kept
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्धित्थ"; alternatives "द्वित्थ" — conjunct under the द reads as द्ध; the sense (इंदु + इत्थशाल) wants द्वि [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशालत्रेंद्वित्थशालतः; this sentence names द्धित्थ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशालत्रेंद्धित्थशालतः. A reader dividing this verse judged लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशाले ऽत्रेंद्वित्थशालतः the likely intent — as printed the string is not a word. The sense the chapter requires is itthaśāle 'tra indu-itthaśālataḥ — 'when the two lords are in an itthaśāla and here the Moon too makes one'. Two things are missing from the type: the e-stroke and avagraha of śāle 'tra, and the conjunct dvi that indu + itthaśāla must give (indu + ittha → indvittha). The plate reader independently recorded both spots: 'sense seems to want śāle 'trendu-' and 'the sense (indu + itthaśāla) wants dvi'.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशालत्रेंद्वित्थशालतः; this sentence names लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशालत्रेंद्धित्थशालतः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
2.37a reading here is contested

यदींदुः स्वगृहोच्चस्थस्तादृशौ लग्नकार्यपौ ॥ इत्थशाली कंबूलं तदुत्तमोत्तममुच्यते

yadīṃduḥ svagṛhoccasthastādṛśau lagnakāryapau || itthaśālī kaṃbūlaṃ taduttamottamamucyate

If the Moon stands in its own sign or in its exaltation, and the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter are of the same kind ⟨that is, likewise in their own sign or exaltation⟩, and ⟨the Moon⟩ makes an itthaśāla ⟨with them⟩, that kambūla is called best-of-the-best (uttamottama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदींदुःस्वगृहोच्चस्थस्तादृशोलग्नकार्यपौ ॥ इत्थशालीकंबूलंतदुत्तमोत्तममुच्यते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तादृशो"; alternatives "तादृशौ" — the ṭīkā lemma (line 14) reads तादृशौ; the mūla's vowel sign looks like o, not au [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्वगृहोच्चस्थस्तादृशौ; this sentence names तादृशो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The mūla prints the singular tādṛśo; the ṭīkā's lemma reads the dual tādṛśau, which is what the two lords require, and I have rendered it of both. The printed singular would attach the word to the Moon and say the same thing twice. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्वगृहोच्चस्थस्तादृशौ; this sentence names tādṛśo, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
2.38a reading here is contested

स्वीयहद्दाद्रेक्काणांकभागस्थेनेत्थशालतः ॥ मध्यमोत्तमकंबूलं हीनाधिकृतिनोत्तमम्

svīyahaddādrekkāṇāṃkabhāgasthenetthaśālataḥ || madhyamottamakaṃbūlaṃ hīnādhikṛtinottamam

From an itthaśāla with a graha standing in its own haddā, its own drekkāṇa or its own degree-division ⟨navāṃśa⟩, the kambūla is middling-best (madhyamottama); its dignity being the lesser one, it is not ⟨reckoned⟩ best.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वीयहद्दाद्रेक्काणांकभागस्थेनेत्थशालतः ॥ मध्यमोत्तमकंबूलंहीनाधिकृतिनोत्तमम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृतिनोत्तमम्"; alternatives "क्रतिनोत्तमम्" — zoomed: the ṛ-hook under क and the o-stroke over न are cramped/worn; read as कृतिनो
  • About this edition: I read the close as hīnādhikṛti na uttamam, 'its dignity being lesser, it is not best'. The page sets हीनाधिकृतिनोत्तमम् without word division, and an instrumental hīnādhikṛtinā uttamam is also possible; that reading would say the opposite, so the doubt is real and is recorded rather than hidden.

उत्तमाधमता नीचरिपुगेहस्थितेन चेत् ॥ स्वद्रेक्काणांशगश्चंद्रः स्वभोच्चस्थेत्थशालकृत्

uttamādhamatā nīcaripugehasthitena cet || svadrekkāṇāṃśagaścaṃdraḥ svabhoccasthetthaśālakṛt

⟨The kambūla⟩ is best-and-worst (uttamādhama) if ⟨the itthaśāla is⟩ with a graha standing in its fall (nīca) or in an enemy's house. ⟨And when⟩ the Moon, going in its own drekkāṇa or its own navāṃśa, makes an itthaśāla with a graha standing in its own sign or its exaltation ⟨— continued in the next verse⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उत्तमाधमतानीचरिपुगेहस्थितेनचेत् ॥ स्वद्रेक्काणांशगश्चंद्रःस्वभोच्चस्थेत्थशालकृत्

2.40a reading here is contested

मध्यमोत्तममेतच्च पूर्वस्मान्न विशिष्यते ॥ स्वहद्दादिपदस्थेन कंबूलं मध्यमध्यमम्

madhyamottamametacca pūrvasmānna viśiṣyate || svahaddādipadasthena kaṃbūlaṃ madhyamadhyamam

— this too is middling-best (madhyamottama), and is not distinguished from the former ⟨case⟩. With a graha standing in its own haddā and the rest ⟨of the lesser dignities⟩, the kambūla is middling-middling (madhyamadhyama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मध्यमोत्तममेतच्चपूर्वस्मान्नविशिष्यते ॥ स्वहद्दादिपदस्थेनकंबूलंमध्यमध्यमम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूलं"; alternatives "कंवूलं" — zoomed at 4×: the letter after कं shows an inner diagonal, read as ब; the ṭīkā on this page prints कंवूल with व
  • About this edition: The mūla fount prints कंबूल with ब while the ṭīkā on the same leaf prints कंवूल with व throughout. The reader recorded both as printed; nothing in the sense turns on it.
2.41a reading here is contested

मध्यमं च कंबूलं स्याद्धीनाधिकृतिखेटजम् ॥ मध्यमाधमकंबूलं नीचारिभगखेटजम्

madhyamaṃ ca kaṃbūlaṃ syāddhīnādhikṛtikheṭajam || madhyamādhamakaṃbūlaṃ nīcāribhagakheṭajam

And the kambūla is middling (madhyama) when it is produced by a graha of lesser dignity; it is middling-worst (madhyamādhama) when produced by a graha standing in the sign of its fall or of an enemy.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मध्यमंचकंबूलंस्याद्धीनाधिकृतिखेटजम् ॥ मध्यमाधमकंबूलंनीचारिभगखेटजम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूलं"; alternatives "कंवूलं" — large type, both occurrences look like ब (inner diagonal), as on page 54; the ṭīkā prints कंवूल

इंदुः पदोनः स्वर्क्षोच्चस्थितेनाप्युत्तमं तु तत् ॥ स्वहद्दादिगतेनापि पूर्ववन्मध्यमुच्यते

iṃduḥ padonaḥ svarkṣoccasthitenāpyuttamaṃ tu tat || svahaddādigatenāpi pūrvavanmadhyamucyate

⟨If⟩ the Moon is stripped of dignity (padona), yet ⟨makes the itthaśāla⟩ with a graha standing in its own sign or its exaltation, that ⟨kambūla⟩ is still best (uttama); and with one gone into its own haddā and the rest, it is called middling, as before.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदुःपदोनःस्वर्क्षोच्चस्थितेनाप्युत्तमंतुतत् ॥ स्वहद्दादिगतेनापिपूर्ववन्मध्यमुच्यते

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: padona here is 'lacking a pada', that is, holding none of the five Tājika dignities. The next verse spells the same word pādona.
2.43a reading here is contested

पादोनेनापि मध्यं स्यादिति युक्तं प्रतीयते ॥ नीचारिस्थेनेत्थशाले ऽधमकंबूलमुच्यते

pādonenāpi madhyaṃ syāditi yuktaṃ pratīyate || nīcāristhenetthaśāle 'dhamakaṃbūlamucyate

With a pādona ⟨graha⟩ too it would be middling — this appears to be right. When the itthaśāla is with a graha standing in its fall or in an enemy's sign, it is called the worst kambūla (adhama-kambūla).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पादोनेनापिमध्यंस्यादितियुक्तंप्रतीयते ॥ नीचारिस्थेनेत्थशालेऽधमकंबूलमुच्यते

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूल"; alternatives "कंवूल" — READ AT 3.5x AND COMPARED SIDE BY SIDE WITH THE COMMENTARY'S OWN SPELLING. The mula line prints ब (closed bowl with the left foot-bar) in कंबूलमुच्यते; every one of the ten occurrences in the tika on this page prints व (open bowl, no foot-bar) — कंवूलं. Both recorded as printed. This is a real orthographic split between mula fount and tika fount on the same leaf, not a reading I resolved.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शालेऽधम" — the avagraha IS inked here and is unmistakable at 3.5x — while line 10 quotes the same phrase as शालेइति with no avagraha
  • About this edition: iti yuktaṃ pratīyate, 'this appears to be right', is the author reasoning in his own voice rather than quoting a rule. The avagraha in śāle 'dhama is inked on the plate.
2.44a reading here is contested

नीचशत्रुभगश्चंद्रः स्वभोच्चस्थेत्थशालकृत् ॥ अधमोत्तमकंबूलं पूर्वतुल्यफलप्रदम्

nīcaśatrubhagaścaṃdraḥ svabhoccasthetthaśālakṛt || adhamottamakaṃbūlaṃ pūrvatulyaphalapradam

The Moon standing in the sign of its fall or of an enemy, making an itthaśāla with a graha placed in its own sign or its exaltation — that is the worst-best kambūla (adhamottama), and it gives fruit equal to the former ⟨grade⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नीचशत्रुभगश्चंद्रःस्वभोच्चस्थेत्थशालकृत् ॥ अधमोत्तमकंबूलंपूर्वतुल्यफलप्रदम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूलं"; alternatives "कंवूलं" — ब in the mula fount against व everywhere in the tika on this same leaf — the same split as page 56 line 7
2.45a reading here is contested

चंद्रो नीचारिगेहस्थः स्वहद्दादिगतो न चेत् ॥ इत्थशाली कंबूलं तदुच्यते ऽधममध्यमम्

caṃdro nīcārigehasthaḥ svahaddādigato na cet || itthaśālī kaṃbūlaṃ taducyate 'dhamamadhyamam

The Moon standing in the house of its fall or of an enemy, and not gone into its own haddā or the rest ⟨of the lesser dignities⟩, ⟨yet⟩ making an itthaśāla — that kambūla is called worst-middling (adhamamadhyama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोनीचारिगेहस्थःस्वहद्दादिगतोनचेत् ॥ इत्थशालीकंबूलंतदुच्यतेऽधममध्यमम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदुच्यतेऽधममध्यमम्" — avagraha clearly inked at 2.1x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads स्वहद्दादिगतो न चेत्. A reader dividing this verse judged स्वहद्दादिगतेन चेत् the likely intent — the grade adhama-madhyama names a dignity on each side, and as printed the verse states only the Moon's (nīca or enemy's house). One vowel — e for o — turns svahaddādi-gato na into svahaddādi-gatena, 'with a graha gone into its own haddā and the rest', which supplies the middling half the name requires and matches how verses 38, 40 and 42 word the same condition. Not applied: the page prints o.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: The grade adhama-madhyama names two dignities, one on each side, but as printed the verse states only the Moon's. Reading svahaddādigatena for the printed svahaddādi-gato na — one vowel, e for o — would give 'with a graha gone into its own haddā and the rest', which supplies the missing middling half exactly. I have rendered what the page prints and have not made that change. The avagraha in taducyate 'dhama is inked on the plate.
2.46a reading here is contested

इंदुर्नीचारिगेहस्थः पादोनेनेत्थशालकृत् ॥ कंबूलं मध्यमं ज्ञेयं पूर्वतुल्यफलप्रदम्

iṃdurnīcārigehasthaḥ pādonenetthaśālakṛt || kaṃbūlaṃ madhyamaṃ jñeyaṃ pūrvatulyaphalapradam

The Moon standing in the house of its fall or of an enemy, making an itthaśāla with a pādona ⟨graha, one holding no dignity⟩ — that kambūla is to be known as middling (madhyama), and it gives fruit equal to the former ⟨grade⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदुर्नीचारिगेहस्थःपादोनेनेत्थशालकृत् ॥ कंबूलंमध्यमंज्ञेयंपूर्वतुल्यफलप्रदम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इंदुर्नी"; alternatives "इंदुर्नीं" — at 2.6x a dot appears over the नी; I could not decide between an anusvara and a speck, and an anusvara there would be ungrammatical
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्यमं"; alternatives "मध्यम" — the verse is about the MADHYAMA kambula although the tika below it (line 11) heads the passage 'अथान्यदधमकंवूललक्षणमाह' (ADHAMA). Recorded as printed; the mismatch is the page's, not mine.
  • About this edition: The verse says madhyama, while the ṭīkā printed below it heads the passage athānyad adhama-kaṃvūla-lakṣaṇam āha, 'now he states another mark, of the adhama kambūla'. The mismatch is the page's; the verse is rendered as it prints.
2.47a reading here is contested

नीचारिभस्थखेटेन नीचारिभगतः शशी ॥ इत्थशाली कंबूलं तदधमाधममुच्यते

nīcāribhasthakheṭena nīcāribhagataḥ śaśī || itthaśālī kaṃbūlaṃ tadadhamādhamamucyate

The Moon gone into the sign of its fall or of an enemy, making an itthaśāla with a graha that itself stands in the sign of its fall or of an enemy — that kambūla is called worst-of-the-worst (adhamādhama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नीचारिभस्थखेटेननीचारिभगतःशशी ॥ इत्थशालीकंबूलंतद्धमाधममुच्यते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेटेन" — confirmed at 4.5x — खेट (planet), not स्थे/स्थेट as a lower-magnification pass suggested
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूलं"; alternatives "कंवूलं" — ब in the mula, व throughout the tika on the same leaf

मेषे रविः कुजो वापि वृषे कर्के ऽथवा शशी ॥ तत्रेत्थशाली कंबूलमुत्तमोत्तमकार्यकृत्

meṣe raviḥ kujo vāpi vṛṣe karke 'thavā śaśī || tatretthaśālī kaṃbūlamuttamottamakāryakṛt

The Sun in Meṣa (Aries), or else Mars ⟨there⟩, and the Moon in Vṛṣa (Taurus) or in Karka (Cancer): making an itthaśāla there, the kambūla is best-of-the-best and brings the matter about.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषेरविःकुजोवापिवृषेकर्केऽथवाशशी ॥ तत्रेत्थ शालीकंबूलमुत्तमोत्तमकार्यकृत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: vā is 'or': the Sun or Mars, not both. The Sun is exalted in Meṣa and Mars owns it; the Moon is exalted in Vṛṣa and owns Karka — so both sides of the itthaśāla hold the highest dignity, which is why the grade is uttamottama. The page sets a space inside इत्थ शाली; it is one word.

वृश्चिकस्थः शशी भौमः कर्के तत्रेत्थशालतः ॥ अधमाधमकंबूलं कार्यविध्वंसदुःखदम्

vṛścikasthaḥ śaśī bhaumaḥ karke tatretthaśālataḥ || adhamādhamakaṃbūlaṃ kāryavidhvaṃsaduḥkhadam

The Moon standing in Vṛścika (Scorpio) and Mars in Karka (Cancer): from an itthaśāla there, the kambūla is worst-of-the-worst, destroying the matter and giving sorrow.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वृश्चिकस्थःशशीभौमःकर्केतत्रेत्थशालतः ॥ अधमाधमकंबूलंकार्यविध्वंसदुःखदम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Vṛścika is the Moon's fall and Karka is Mars's fall, so both sides hold the lowest dignity — the mirror image of the example in verse 48.
2.50a reading here is contested

एवं पूर्वोक्तभेदानामुदाहरणयोजना ॥ उक्तलक्षणसंबंधादूहनीया विचक्षणैः

evaṃ pūrvoktabhedānāmudāharaṇayojanā || uktalakṣaṇasaṃbaṃdhādūhanīyā vicakṣaṇaiḥ

In this way the fitting of examples to the kinds stated earlier is to be worked out by the discerning, from their connection with the characteristics already laid down.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंपूर्वोक्तभेदानामुदाहरणयोजना ॥ उक्तलक्षणसंबंधादूहनीयाविचक्षणैः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भेदानामुदाहरणयोजना"; alternatives "भेदानासुदाहरणयोजना" — CHECKED AT 6x. The page sets सु — स with a clear ु — where the grammar needs मु (भेदानाम् + उदाहरण). म and स are unmistakable at that magnification and this one is स. A printed non-word, kept as printed. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): भेदानासुदाहरणयोजना → भेदानामुदाहरणयोजना: at 15x the letter is म, not स. In this fount स carries a long thin diagonal tail that runs from the mid-bar right down the type body — measured on संबंधा of this line (stem x 1501) and on विध्वंसदुःखदम् of line 7 (stem x 2764), the left element still has ink 39+ rows below the headline. म has a short stub that stops: भौमः on line 7 (stem x 1753) stops at 31 rows, मुत्तमोत्तम on line 7 (stem x 791) at 27. This glyph stops at 29 rows, with rows 30-32 empty before the ु begins. It is म. Crops: .tmp/vision/_zoom-2026-09-11/p58_h2_VERDICT_15x.png, p58_h2_aligned_14x.png.
  • About this edition: An earlier pass read the page as bhedānāsu-; a second reading at 15× ruled the letter to be म, giving bhedānām udāharaṇa-yojanā, which is what the grammar needs. The mūla above carries the ruled reading.

मेषस्थे ऽब्जे शनीत्यादिदृष्टांतान् मंदशीघ्रयोः ॥ एकर्क्षावस्थितावित्थशालादीनपरे जगुः

meṣasthe 'bje śanītyādidṛṣṭāṃtān maṃdaśīghrayoḥ || ekarkṣāvasthitāvitthaśālādīnapare jaguḥ

On the strength of examples such as 'the Moon in Meṣa (Aries), Saturn ⟨there as well⟩', and so on, others have declared that the itthaśāla and the rest arise ⟨also⟩ for a slow and a swift graha standing together in one and the same sign.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषस्थेऽब्जेशनीत्यादिदृष्टांतान्मंदशीघ्रयोः ॥ एकर्क्षावस्थितावित्थशालादीनपरेजगुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: abja, 'the water-born', is the Moon. The next verse rejects this opinion, so the two records must be read together.

तदयुक्तं नीचगस्य नीचेन रिपुणा रिपोः ॥ इत्थशालकार्यनाशीत्युक्तं तत्र यतः स्फुटम्

tadayuktaṃ nīcagasya nīcena ripuṇā ripoḥ || itthaśālakāryanāśītyuktaṃ tatra yataḥ sphuṭam

That is not right, because it has been plainly stated there that an itthaśāla of a graha in its fall with one ⟨also⟩ in its fall, and of an enemy with an enemy, destroys the matter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तदयुक्तंनीचगस्यनीचेनरिपुणारिपोः ॥ इत्थशालकार्यनाशीत्युक्तंतत्रयतःस्फुटम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The argument is the author's own: if mere presence in one sign made an itthaśāla, the rule of verse 49 — the Moon in Vṛścika with Mars in Karka destroys the matter — would have nothing to stand on.
2.53a reading here is contested

लग्नकार्यपयोरित्थशाले चैकोस्ति नीचगः ॥ स्वर्क्षादिपदहीनो ऽन्यो ऽत्रेंदुः कंबूलयोगकृत्

lagnakāryapayoritthaśāle caikosti nīcagaḥ || svarkṣādipadahīno 'nyo 'treṃduḥ kaṃbūlayogakṛt

And when the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter are in an itthaśāla, and one of them stands in its fall while the other is stripped of dignity — own sign and the rest — and here the Moon makes the kambūla yoga ⟨— the sentence runs on into the next verse⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नकार्यपयोरित्थशालेचैकोस्तिनीचगः ॥ स्व र्क्षादिपदहीनोऽन्योऽत्रेंदुःकंबूलयोगकृत्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्क्षादिपद"; alternatives "क्षादिपद" — zoomed: a small stub rises above the headline where the i-mātrā of दि begins; read as a repha fused with it, but it may be part of the mātrā

तत्र कार्याल्पता ज्ञेया यथा जात्यन्यमर्थयन् ॥ अन्यजातिः पुमानर्थं तथैतत् कवयो विदुः

tatra kāryālpatā jñeyā yathā jātyanyamarthayan || anyajātiḥ pumānarthaṃ tathaitat kavayo viduḥ

— there one should know the matter will be a small one: as when a man of one caste asks a man of another caste for money ⟨he gets something, but little⟩, so the wise reckon this case.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्रकार्याल्पताज्ञेयायथाजात्यन्यमर्थयन् ॥ अन्यजातिःपुमानर्थंतथैतत्कवयोविदुः

यस्याधिकारः स्वर्क्षादिः शुभो नाप्यशुभोपि च ॥ केनाप्यदृश्यमूर्तिश्च स शून्याध्वग इष्यते

yasyādhikāraḥ svarkṣādiḥ śubho nāpyaśubhopi ca || kenāpyadṛśyamūrtiśca sa śūnyādhvaga iṣyate

The graha whose dignity — own sign and the rest — is neither a good one nor a bad one, and whose body is seen by no ⟨graha⟩ at all, is held to be śūnyādhvaga, 'one going on an empty road'.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यस्याधिकारःस्वर्क्षादिःशुभोनाप्यशुभोपिच ॥ केनाप्यदृश्यमूर्तिश्चसशून्याध्वगइष्यते

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: adṛśyamūrti, 'whose body is not seen', means no graha aspects it. The definition has two legs and both must hold: no dignity of any kind, and no aspect from anyone.

लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशाले शून्याध्वगः शशी ॥ उच्चादिपदशून्यत्वान्नेत्थशालोस्य केनचित्

lagnakāryeśayoritthaśāle śūnyādhvagaḥ śaśī || uccādipadaśūnyatvānnetthaśālosya kenacit

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter are in an itthaśāla and the Moon is śūnyādhvaga — because it is void of the dignities, exaltation and the rest, it has no itthaśāla with anyone ⟨— the example continues⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नकार्येशयोरित्थशाले शून्याध्वगःशशी ॥ उच्चादिपदशून्यत्वान्नेत्थशालोस्यकेनचित्

2.57a reading here is contested

यद्यन्यर्क्षं प्रविश्यैष स्वर्क्षोच्चस्थेत्थशालवान् ॥ गैरिकंबूलमेतत् तु पदोनेनाशुभं स्मृतम्

yadyanyarkṣaṃ praviśyaiṣa svarkṣoccasthetthaśālavān || gairikaṃbūlametat tu padonenāśubhaṃ smṛtam

If, entering another sign, this ⟨Moon⟩ comes to have an itthaśāla with a graha standing in its own sign or its exaltation — that is the gairi-kambūla; but with a graha stripped of dignity (padona) it is held to be inauspicious. [Our mūla now reads svarkṣa-ucca-stha, 'standing in its own sign or exaltation'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यद्यन्यर्क्षंप्रविश्यैषस्वक्षोंच्चस्थेत्थशालवान् ॥ गैरि कंबूलमेतत्तुपदोनेनाशुभंस्मृतम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यद्यन्यर्क्षं"; alternatives "य़द्यन्यर्क्षं" — zoomed: a small hook/dot sits under the initial य; looks like a type blemish, not a letter
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वक्षोंच्चस्थे"; alternatives "स्वर्क्षोच्चस्थे" — zoomed: the mark above क्षो is an anusvāra-like dot, not a repha; print kept. Sense wants स्वर्क्षोच्च [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षोच्चस्थेत्थशालवान्; this sentence names स्वक्षोंच्चस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads स्वक्षोंच्चस्थेत्थशालवान्. A reader dividing this verse judged स्वर्क्षोच्चस्थेत्थशालवान् the likely intent — svakṣoṃcca- is not a word. The condition the chapter states everywhere else is svarkṣa-ucca-stha, 'standing in its own sign or its exaltation' (verses 37, 39, 42, 44). The plate reader recorded the mark above क्षो as an anusvāra-like dot rather than the repha of स्वर्क्ष, and wrote 'sense wants svarkṣocca'. Both readings scan as 8 syllables, so the metre does not decide; the sense does.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षोच्चस्थेत्थशालवान्; this sentence names स्वक्षोंच्चस्थेत्थशालवान् and svakṣoṃcca, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
2.58a reading here is contested

लप्स्ये सुखमिति प्रश्ने सिंहलग्ने रविः क्रिये ॥ अष्टांशैः सुखपः कुंभे भौमोंशैरविभिस्तयोः

lapsye sukhamiti praśne siṃhalagne raviḥ kriye || aṣṭāṃśaiḥ sukhapaḥ kuṃbhe bhaumoṃśairavibhistayoḥ

⟨A worked example.⟩ In a question 'shall I obtain happiness?', with Siṃha (Leo) as the lagna, the Sun is in Kriyā (Aries) at eight degrees; the lord of the 4th (sukha, the house of happiness), Mars, is in Kumbha (Aquarius) at twelve degrees. Between those two ⟨— the sentence runs on into the next verse⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लप्स्येसुखमितिप्रश्नेसिंहलग्नेरविःक्रिये ॥ अष्टांशैःसुखपःकुंभेभौमोंशैरविभिस्तयोः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भौमोंशैरविभिस्तयोः"; alternatives "भौमोंशैर्रविभिस्तयोः" — dense cluster; read as printed
  • About this edition: Kriyā is the Tājika name for Meṣa (Aries). ravi = 12 as a number-word. For a Siṃha lagna the 4th sign is Vṛścika, whose lord is Mars, which is why the verse calls Mars sukha-pa.

इत्थशालोस्ति तत्रेंदुः कन्यायां चरमेंशके ॥ स्वर्क्षादिपदहीनस्य नेत्थशालस्य केनचित्

itthaśālosti tatreṃduḥ kanyāyāṃ carameṃśake || svarkṣādipadahīnasya netthaśālasya kenacit

— there is an itthaśāla. The Moon is there in Kanyā (Virgo), in the last navāṃśa. Being stripped of the dignities — own sign and the rest — it has no itthaśāla with anyone.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इत्थशालोस्तितत्रेंदुःकन्यायांचरमेंशके ॥ स्वर्क्षादिपदहीनस्यनेत्थशालस्यकेनचित्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets netthaśālasya where verse 56 sets netthaśālo 'sya in the same sentence; the genitive is left standing and taken as an elliptical 'there is no ⟨possibility⟩ of an itthaśāla with anyone'.

स स्वोच्चगेन शनिना न्यर्क्षस्थेनेत्थशालकृत् ॥ गैरिकंबूलमन्येन सहायाल्लाभदायकम्

sa svoccagena śaninā nyarkṣasthenetthaśālakṛt || gairikaṃbūlamanyena sahāyāllābhadāyakam

He ⟨the Moon of the previous verse⟩ makes an itthaśāla with Saturn, which has gone to its own exaltation while standing in another sign: ⟨that is⟩ the gairi-kambūla, which gives gain through the help of another.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सस्वोच्चगेनशशिना न्यर्क्षस्थेनेत्थशालकृत् ॥ गैरिकंबूलमन्येनसहायाल्लाभदायकम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Both svoccagena and anyarkṣasthena are instrumental and both can attach to śaśinā, the Moon, so the verse does not make plain which of the two grahas holds the exaltation. I have taken them of the Moon, which is what verse 57 sets up. [2026-10-01: superseded; the mūla now reads शनिना for शशिना. The exemplar's leaf (p. 62, read by eye at about 2.9x native) does set शशिना; the press is emended on the book's own worked example (2.57–2.60) and on its ṭīkā on the same leaf, तुलास्थेनशनिनासह (read by eye at about 3.0x–3.4x native). सः is the Moon of 2.59; स्वोच्चगेन and अन्यर्क्षस्थेन both belong to Saturn, exalted in Tulā.]
2.61a reading here is contested

शून्येध्वनींदुरुभयोर्नेत्थशालो न वा युतिः ॥ खल्लासरो न शुभदः कंबूलफलनाशनः

śūnyedhvanīṃdurubhayornetthaśālo na vā yutiḥ || khallāsaro na śubhadaḥ kaṃbūlaphalanāśanaḥ

The Moon is on an empty road (śūnye adhvani), and between the two ⟨lords⟩ there is neither an itthaśāla nor a conjunction: ⟨that is⟩ the khallāsara. It gives nothing good, and it destroys the fruit of the kambūla.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शून्येध्वनींदुरुभयोर्नेत्थशालोनवायुतिः॥ खल्लासरोनशुभदःकंबूलफलनाशनः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शून्येध्वनींदुरुभयो"; alternatives "शून्येऽध्वनींदुरुभयो" — no avagraha printed in the mūla; the ṭīkā below prints शून्येऽध्व
  • About this edition: The mūla prints śūnyedhvani with no avagraha; the ṭīkā below prints śūnye 'dhva. Nothing in the sense turns on it.

अस्तनीचरिपुवक्रहीनभादुर्बलो मुथशिलं करोति चेत् ॥ नेतुमेष न विभुर्यतो महोंऽते मुखे ऽपि न स कार्यसाधकः

astanīcaripuvakrahīnabhādurbalo muthaśilaṃ karoti cet || netumeṣa na vibhuryato mahoṃ'te mukhe 'pi na sa kāryasādhakaḥ

If a graha made weak — combust (asta), in its fall, in an enemy's sign, retrograde, or in a sign where it is stripped of dignity — makes a muthaśila ⟨the applying aspect⟩, then, since it is not able to carry the light, it brings the matter about neither at the end nor even at the beginning.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तनीचरिपुवक्रहीनभादुर्बलोमुथशिलंकरोतिचेत् ॥ नेतुमेषनविभुर्यतोमहोंऽतेमुखेऽपिनसकार्यसाधकः

केंद्रस्थ आपोक्लिमगं युनक्ति भूत्वादितो नश्यति कार्यमंते ॥ आपोक्लिमस्थो यदि केंद्रयातं विनश्य पूर्वं भवतीह पश्चात्

keṃdrastha āpoklimagaṃ yunakti bhūtvādito naśyati kāryamaṃte || āpoklimastho yadi keṃdrayātaṃ vinaśya pūrvaṃ bhavatīha paścāt

A graha standing in a kendra (an angle: the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th) joins ⟨by aspect⟩ one standing in an āpoklima (a cadent house: the 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th): the matter comes about at the start and perishes at the end. If one standing in an āpoklima ⟨joins⟩ one gone into a kendra, here it is destroyed first and comes about afterwards.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

केंद्रस्थआपोक्लिमगंयुनक्तिभूत्वादितोनश्यतिकार्यमंते ॥ आपोक्लिमस्थोयदिकेंद्रयातंविनश्यपूर्वंभवतीहपश्चात्

मंदस्वभोच्चादिपदे स्थितश्चेत् पदोनशीघ्रेण कृतेत्थशालः ॥ तत्रापि कार्यं भवतीति वाच्यं वक्रादिनिर्वीर्यपदेन चेत् स्यात्

maṃdasvabhoccādipade sthitaścet padonaśīghreṇa kṛtetthaśālaḥ || tatrāpi kāryaṃ bhavatīti vācyaṃ vakrādinirvīryapadena cet syāt

If the slower graha stands in a dignity — its own sign, its exaltation and the rest — and a swifter graha that holds no dignity has made the itthaśāla with it, then one should say that there too the matter comes about; ⟨so too⟩ if it be with a graha whose dignity has been drained of power by retrogression and the like.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदस्वभोच्चादिपदेस्थितश्चेत्पदोनशीघ्रेणकृतेत्थशालः ॥ तत्रापिकार्यंभवतीतिवाच्यंवक्रादिनिर्वीर्यपदेनचेत्स्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The last clause, vakrādi-nirvīrya-padena cet syāt, has no result clause of its own on the page. I have attached it to the same apodosis — 'the matter still comes about'. Attached instead to an unstated negative it would say the opposite, so this is a genuine doubt and not a quibble.
2.65a reading here is contested

वीर्योनितौ कार्यविलग्ननाथौ स्वर्क्षादिगेनान्यतरो युनक्ति ॥ अन्यौ यदाद्वौ बलिनौ तदान्यसाहाय्यतः कार्यमुशंति संतः

vīryonitau kāryavilagnanāthau svarkṣādigenānyataro yunakti || anyau yadādvau balinau tadānyasāhāyyataḥ kāryamuśaṃti saṃtaḥ

When the lord of the matter and the lord of the lagna are both short of strength, and one or other of them joins ⟨by aspect⟩ a graha gone into its own sign or the other dignities — when those other two are strong — then the wise declare that the matter comes about through another's help. [Our mūla now reads yadā dvau, 'when the two'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वीर्योनितौकार्यविलग्ननाथौस्वर्क्षादिगेनान्यतरोयुनक्ति ॥ अन्यौयदाद्धौबलिनौतदान्यसाहाय्यतःकार्यमुशंतिसंतः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदाद्धौ"; alternatives "यदाढ्यौ" — zoomed: the conjunct after दा is compact; read as द्ध, but could be ढ्य [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads यदाद्वौ; this sentence names यदाद्धौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads यदाद्धौ. A reader dividing this verse judged यदाढ्यौ the likely intent — yadāddhau is not a word. yadā āḍhyau, 'when the two are well endowed', gives the sense the second half needs and matches balinau beside it. The plate reader read the conjunct as ddha and named ḍhya as the alternative. Both spellings scan identically in this Indravajrā pāda (ᴗ – – at syllables 3-5), so the metre does not decide; the lexicon does.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads यदाद्वौ; this sentence names yadāddhau and यदाद्धौ, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

बली राश्यंतगोन्यर्क्षगामी दीप्तांशकैर्महः ॥ दत्ते ऽन्यस्मै कार्यकरस्तंबीरो लग्नकार्यपोः

balī rāśyaṃtagonyarkṣagāmī dīptāṃśakairmahaḥ || datte 'nyasmai kāryakarastaṃbīro lagnakāryapoḥ

A strong graha standing at the end of a sign and about to pass into another sign gives its light, within the dīptāṃśa (orb) degrees, to another ⟨graha⟩ and so accomplishes the matter: that is the tambīra of the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलीराश्यंतगोन्यर्क्षगामीदीप्तांशकैर्महः ॥ दत्तेऽन्यस्मैकार्यकरस्तंबीरोलग्नकार्यपोः

2.67a reading here is contested

लग्ने ऽथ केंद्रे निकटेपि वास्य विलग्नदर्शी स्वगृहोच्चदृक्के ॥ मुसल्लहे स्वे निजहद्दगो वा बली ग्रहो मध्यगतिस्त्वशीघ्रः

lagne 'tha keṃdre nikaṭepi vāsya vilagnadarśī svagṛhoccadṛkke || musallahe sve nijahaddago vā balī graho madhyagatistvaśīghraḥ

A graha is strong when it is in the lagna, or in a kendra, or even near ⟨the lagna⟩, or when it looks upon the lagna; when it is in its own sign, its exaltation or its own drekkāṇa; when it is in its own musallaha ⟨triplicity⟩, or gone into its own haddā; and when its motion is middling, not swift.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेऽथकेंद्रेनिकटेपिवास्यविलग्नदर्शींस्वगृहो च्चदृक्के ॥ मुसल्लहेस्वेनिजहद्दगोवाबलीग्रहोमध्यगतिस्त्वशीघ्रः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दर्शींस्वगृहो"; alternatives "दर्शीस्वगृहो" — zoomed: an anusvāra dot sits beside the repha over शी
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्चदृक्के"; alternatives "च्चद्दक्के" — the ṛ-hook under द is small
  • About this edition: musallaha is the Tājika name for the triplicity dignity, the trirāśipa. The list runs on into the next verse; the sentence's verb 'is strong' stands with balī graha here.

कृतोदयो मार्गगतिः शुभेन युतेक्षितः क्रूरखगस्य दृष्ट्या ॥ क्षुताख्ययानाधिगतो न युक्तः क्रूरेण सायं च सितेंदुभौमाः

kṛtodayo mārgagatiḥ śubhena yutekṣitaḥ krūrakhagasya dṛṣṭyā || kṣutākhyayānādhigato na yuktaḥ krūreṇa sāyaṃ ca siteṃdubhaumāḥ

⟨It is strong when it is⟩ newly risen ⟨out of combustion⟩, direct in motion, joined with a benefic or aspected by one, not reached by the aspect of a malefic — the aspect called kṣut ⟨the hostile one⟩ — and not joined with a malefic. And in the evening, Venus, the Moon and Mars ⟨are strong⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कृतोदयोमार्गगतिःशुभेनयुतेक्षितःक्रूरखगस्यदृष्ट्या ॥ क्षुताख्ययानाधिगतोनयुक्तःक्रूरेणसायंचसितेंदुभौमाः

2.69a reading here is contested

यदोदयंते पररात्रिभागैर्जीवार्कजावह्निनराः सवीर्याः ॥ अन्येनिशीनस्य नवैकभागे स्थिताः स्थिरर्क्षे च बलेन युक्ताः

yadodayaṃte pararātribhāgairjīvārkajāvahninarāḥ savīryāḥ || anyeniśīnasya navaikabhāge sthitāḥ sthirarkṣe ca balena yuktāḥ

⟨They are strong⟩ when they rise; Jupiter and Saturn ⟨are strong⟩ in the later watches of the night; ⟨grahas in⟩ fiery and human ⟨signs⟩ are full of strength; and the rest, standing in the ninth or the first part of the Sun and in a fixed sign, are endowed with strength. [The second half is compressed and I am not certain of it: anye niśīnasya can be divided either as anye niśi inasya, 'the others at night, of the Sun', or as anye niśīnasya, 'the others, of the lord of night ⟨the Moon⟩', and the verse never says what the ninth or first part is a part of. The ṭīkā glosses only the first half, jīvārkajau … aparārātribhāge.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदोदयंतेपररा त्रिभागैर्जीवार्कजावह्निनराःसवीर्याः ॥ अन्येनिशीनस्यनवैकभागेस्थिताःस्थिरर्क्षेचबलेनयुक्ताः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिभागैर्जीवार्क"; alternatives "त्रिभागेर्जीवार्क", "त्रिभागेजींवार्क" — zoomed: two strokes stand over ग and a small hook stands over जी beside its ī-loop; whether these are ai + repha or e + anusvāra is not certain. The ṭīkā glosses जीवार्कजौ ... अपररात्रिभागे [2026-10-01: read on the plate at about 3.2x native: the two strokes over ग are the ai-mātrā and the hook over जी is the repha of भागैर्; the alternatives त्रिभागेर्/त्रिभागेजीं are refuted, and the mūla reads त्रिभागैर्जीवार्क as before.]
2.70a reading here is contested

स्त्रियश्चतुर्थात् पुरुषा वियद्भाद्भषट्कगा ओजभगाः पुमांसः ॥ समे परे स्युर्बलिनो विमृश्य विशेषमेतेषु फलं निगद्यम्

striyaścaturthāt puruṣā viyadbhādbhaṣaṭkagā ojabhagāḥ pumāṃsaḥ || same pare syurbalino vimṛśya viśeṣameteṣu phalaṃ nigadyam

Female ⟨grahas⟩ from the 4th, and male ⟨grahas⟩ from the sky-sign (viyat, the 10th), standing in a run of six signs; males in odd signs; and the others in even signs: ⟨these⟩ are strong (balinaḥ). Weighing what is particular among these, the fruit is to be declared. [Our mūla now reads वियद्भाद्भषट्कगा, 'standing in the six signs from the 10th', and बलिनो, 'strong', so the verse is about where each kind of graha is strong.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्रियश्चतुर्थात्पुरुषावियद्गा द्धषट्कगाओजभगाःपुमांसः ॥ समेपरेस्युर्मलिनोविमृश्यविशेषमेतेषुफलंनिगद्यम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वियद्गा"; alternatives "वियद्धा" — zoomed: conjunct at line end reads as द over ग [2026-10-01: superseded; read by eye on page_0065 at about 5.2x–5.6x native, both conjuncts are d+bha, and the mūla now reads वियद्भाद्भषट्कगा. Measured as well: the line-end conjunct correlates 0.940 with a known d+bha and 0.468 with d+ga, so it is neither वियद्गा nor वियद्धा.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्धषट्कगा"; alternatives "द्वषट्कगा", "द्विषट्कगा" — zoomed: the first conjunct looks like द with a ध-like lower member; the lower form is heavy and not clean [2026-10-01: superseded; read by eye on page_0065 at about 5.2x–5.6x native, both conjuncts are d+bha, and the mūla now reads वियद्भाद्भषट्कगा. Measured as well: the lower member at the start of line 7 correlates 0.954 with the line-6 conjunct, 0.928 with a known d+bha and 0.436 with d+va, and no i-sign stands before it.]
2.71a reading here is contested

लग्नात् षष्ठाष्टमेंत्ये ऽनृजुररिगृहगो नीचगो वक्रगामी क्रूरैर्युक्तो ऽस्तगो वा यदि च मुथशिली क्रूरनीचारिभस्थैः ॥ क्षुद्दृष्ट्या क्रूरदृष्टो व्ययरिपुमृतिगैरित्थशालं विधित्सुः कुर्वन् वा निर्बलोयं स्वगृहनगभगो राहुपुच्छास्यवर्ती

lagnāt ṣaṣṭhāṣṭameṃtye 'nṛjurarigṛhago nīcago vakragāmī krūrairyukto 'stago vā yadi ca muthaśilī krūranīcāribhasthaiḥ || kṣuddṛṣṭyā krūradṛṣṭo vyayaripumṛtigairitthaśālaṃ vidhitsuḥ kurvan vā nirbaloyaṃ svagṛhanagabhago rāhupucchāsyavartī

⟨A graha is weak when it stands⟩ in the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (antya) from the lagna; when its motion is crooked; when it is in an enemy's house, in its fall, retrograde, joined with malefics, or combust; and if it makes a muthaśila with grahas standing in malefic, fall or enemy signs; when it is aspected by a malefic with the kṣut aspect; when it is about to make, or is making, an itthaśāla with grahas in the 12th (vyaya), the 6th (ripu) or the 8th (mṛti); when it has gone to the seventh sign from its own house; or when it sits at the mouth or the tail of Rāhu — such a graha has no strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नात्षष्ठाष्टमेंत्येऽनृजुररिगृहगोनीचगोवक्रगामीक्रूरैर्युक्तोऽस्तगोवायदिचमुथशिलीक्रूरनीचारिभस्थैः ॥ क्षुद्दृष्ट्याक्रूरदृष्टोव्ययरिपुमृति गैरित्थशालंविधित्सुःकुर्वन्वानिर्बलोयंस्वगृहनगभगोराहुपुच्छास्यवर्ती

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिली"; alternatives "मुथशीली" — in this mūla line the शि is printed with a short i-mātrā
  • About this edition: nagabha is the seventh sign (naga = 7), so svagṛha-nagabha-ga is a graha in the sign opposite its own — what the Sanskrit tradition treats as an enemy's house. rāhu-puccha-āsya-vartī covers conjunction with either node, the head (Rāhu) or the tail (Ketu).

अनीक्षमाणस्तनुमस्तभागास्थितः स्वभोच्चादिपदैश्च शून्यः ॥ क्रूरे सराफी न सवीर्ययुक्तः कार्यं विधातुं न विभुर्यतोसौ

anīkṣamāṇastanumastabhāgāsthitaḥ svabhoccādipadaiśca śūnyaḥ || krūre sarāphī na savīryayuktaḥ kāryaṃ vidhātuṃ na vibhuryatosau

⟨A graha⟩ that does not look upon the lagna (tanu), that stands within the degrees of combustion, that is void of the dignities — its own sign, its exaltation and the rest — that is in a sarāpha (separating aspect) with a malefic, and that is not endowed with strength: since such a one is not able to accomplish the matter ⟨nothing is to be expected of it⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अनीक्षमाणस्तनुमस्तभागास्थितःस्वभोच्चादिपदैश्चशून्यः ॥ क्रूरेसराफीनसवीर्ययुक्तःकार्यंविधातुंनविभुर्यतोसौ

2.73a reading here is contested

चंद्रः सूर्याद्वादशे वृश्चिकाद्ये खंडे नेष्टोंत्ये तुलायां विशेषात् ॥ राशीशेनादृष्टमूर्तिर्न सर्वैर्दृष्टो ज्ञेयः शून्यमार्गःपदोनः

caṃdraḥ sūryādvādaśe vṛścikādye khaṃḍe neṣṭoṃtye tulāyāṃ viśeṣāt || rāśīśenādṛṣṭamūrtirna sarvairdṛṣṭo jñeyaḥ śūnyamārgaḥpadonaḥ

The Moon in the 12th from the Sun and in the first division of Vṛścika (Scorpio) is not desirable, and in the last ⟨division⟩ in Tulā (Libra) especially so. ⟨A graha⟩ whose body is not seen by the lord of its own sign, and which no graha at all aspects, is to be known as śūnya-mārga (on an empty road) and pādona ⟨stripped of dignity⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रःसूर्याद्वादशेवृश्चिकाद्येखंडेनेष्टोंत्येतुलायांविशेषात् ॥ राशीशेनादृष्टमूर्तिर्नसर्वैर्दृष्टोज्ञेयःशून्यमार्गापदोनः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नेष्टोंत्ये"; alternatives "नेष्टोऽन्त्ये" — the page sets an anusvāra, not an avagraha + subscript न; recorded as printed
  • About this edition: The page sets an anusvāra in neṣṭoṃtye, not an avagraha with a subscript na; the reader recorded it as printed and the division taken here is na iṣṭaḥ + antye.
2.74a reading here is contested

क्षीणो भांते नाशुभो जन्मकाले पृच्छायां वा चंद्र एवं विचिंत्यः ॥ शुक्ले भौमः कृष्णपक्षेर्कसूनुः क्षुद्दृष्ट्येंदुं वीक्षते नो शुभो ऽसौ

kṣīṇo bhāṃte nāśubho janmakāle pṛcchāyāṃ vā caṃdra evaṃ viciṃtyaḥ || śukle bhaumaḥ kṛṣṇapakṣerkasūnuḥ kṣuddṛṣṭyeṃduṃ vīkṣate no śubho 'sau

A waned ⟨Moon⟩, or one at the end of a sign, is not by that alone inauspicious; at a birth, or in a question, the Moon is to be weighed in this way: in the bright fortnight Mars, and in the dark fortnight Saturn, looks upon the Moon with the kṣut (hostile) aspect — that Moon is not auspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्षीणोभांतेनाशुभोजन्मकालेपृच्छायांवाचंद्रएवंविचिंत्यः ॥ शुक्लेभौमःकृष्णपक्षेर्कसूनुःक्षुद्दृष्ट्येंदुंवीक्षतेनोशुभोऽसौ

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षुद्दृष्ट्येंदुं"; alternatives "शुद्दृष्ट्येंदुं" — क्ष vs श decided at 5x by comparing the glyph against क्ष in वीक्षते and श in नोशुभो on the SAME line; the head is the क्ष loop. The ṭīkā (line 12) prints the same word एतौक्षुद्दृष्ट्या, which agrees.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पक्षेर्कसूनुः"; alternatives "पक्षेऽर्कसूनुः" — the mūla prints no avagraha here; the ṭīkā at line 12 DOES print कृष्णपक्षेऽर्कसूनुः. Both recorded as printed.
  • About this edition: The page reads nāśubho, which divides na aśubhaḥ, 'NOT inauspicious', and I have rendered it so. It is not a misprint for na śubhaḥ: the pāda scans as Śālinī (– – – – – ᴗ – – ᴗ – –) and a short na would break it at the fifth syllable, which must be heavy. So the verse is saying that waning, or a sign's end, does not by itself condemn the Moon — what decides is the aspect its second half names. [2026-10-01: the rival actually attested is नो, not a short न. It is long, it scans equally, and F's own ṭīkā on this leaf reads नोशुभो दुष्टफलदः (read by eye at about 2.6x native). Our text keeps the mūla's ना, which F's mūla sets (read by eye at about 3.5x native); the split is recorded as a doubt.]

शुक्ले दिवा नृगृहगोर्कसुतः शशांकं कृष्णे कुजो निशि समर्क्षगतः प्रपश्येत् ॥ दोषाल्पतां वितनुते परथा बहुत्वं प्रश्नेथवा जनुषि बुद्धिमतोहनीयम्

śukle divā nṛgṛhagorkasutaḥ śaśāṃkaṃ kṛṣṇe kujo niśi samarkṣagataḥ prapaśyet || doṣālpatāṃ vitanute parathā bahutvaṃ praśnethavā januṣi buddhimatohanīyam

If in the bright fortnight, by day, Saturn standing in a human sign looks upon the Moon, or in the dark fortnight, by night, Mars standing in an even sign ⟨looks upon it⟩, it makes the fault small; otherwise the fault is great. In a question, or at a birth, the intelligent must reason this out.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्लेदिवानृगृहगोर्कसुतःशशांकंकृष्णेकुजोनिशिसमर्क्षगतःप्रपश्येत् ॥ दोषाल्पतांवितनुतेपरथाबहुत्वंप्रश्नेथवाजनुषिबुद्धिमतोहनीयम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record answers verse 74: the same two malefics that spoil the Moon there lessen the fault here, when the fortnight, the time of day and the sign are right. 'Otherwise' renders parathā, which the page prints where anyathā would be usual. It is not a misprint: the pāda is Vasantatilakā and positions 9-11 must scan ᴗ ᴗ –, which pa-ra-thā fills exactly, while te 'nyathā would leave the pāda a syllable short.

Adhyāya 3 · इतिषोडश योगाध्यायःसमाप्तः

3.1a reading here is contested

नंद९त्रि३षट्६लग्न१भवर्क्ष११पुत्र५व्यया१२ इनाद्धर्षपदं स्वभोच्चम् ॥ त्रिभं त्रिभं लग्नभतः क्रमेण स्त्रीणां नृणां रात्रिदिने च तेषु

naṃda9tri3ṣaṭ6lagna1bhavarkṣa11putra5vyayā12 ināddharṣapadaṃ svabhoccam || tribhaṃ tribhaṃ lagnabhataḥ krameṇa strīṇāṃ nṛṇāṃ rātridine ca teṣu

Counted from the Sun ⟨onward, in the order Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn⟩, the harṣa-pada (harṣa-sthāna, a graha's 'place of joy') is ⟨respectively⟩ the 9th (nanda) 9, the 3rd (tri) 3, the 6th (ṣaṭ) 6, the lagna (the ascendant, 1st) 1, the 11th (bhava) 11, the 5th (putra) 5 and the 12th (vyaya) 12 ⟨house⟩; the graha's own sign and its exaltation sign ⟨are also its places of joy⟩. From the lagna sign, in order, three signs and ⟨then another⟩ three signs ⟨belong alternately⟩ to women and to men ⟨that is, to the female and to the male grahas⟩; and night and day ⟨likewise belong respectively⟩ to them. [The verse does not itself say which grahas count as female and which as male.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नंद९त्रि३षद्६लग्न१भवर्क्ष११पुत्र५व्यया१२इनाद्धर्षपदंस्वभोच्चम् ॥ त्रिभंत्रिभंलग्नभतःक्रमेणस्त्री णांनृणांरात्रिदिनेचतेषु

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षद्६"; alternatives "षट्६" — zoomed: द with virāma; षट् expected, kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads नंद९त्रि३षट्६लग्न१भवर्क्ष११पुत्र५व्यया१२; this sentence names षद्६, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७६ within its section; it is published at position 1.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads षद्६. A reader dividing this verse judged षट्६ the likely intent — the numeral-word 'six' in pausa is षट्; the reader zoomed and saw द with virāma. Sense is unaffected.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads नंद९त्रि३षट्६लग्न१भवर्क्ष११पुत्र५व्यया१२; this sentence names षद्६, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints षद्६ where the grammar expects षट्; the reader zoomed and saw द with virāma. It changes nothing in the sense: the word is 'six', and the page glosses it with the figure ६. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads नंद९त्रि३षट्६लग्न१भवर्क्ष११पुत्र५व्यया१२; this sentence names षद्६, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
3.2a reading here is contested

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणं गणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतो ऽनंतो नंतमतिर्व्यधात् खलमतध्वस्त्यै जनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुः खलु नीलकंठविबुधो विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया योगान् षोडश हर्षभानि च तथा संज्ञाविवेके ऽभ्यधात्

śrīgargānvayabhūṣaṇaṃ gaṇitavicciṃtāmaṇistatsuto 'naṃto naṃtamatirvyadhāt khalamatadhvastyai januḥpaddhatim || tatsūnuḥ khalu nīlakaṃṭhavibudho vidvacchivānujñayā yogān ṣoḍaśa harṣabhāni ca tathā saṃjñāviveke 'bhyadhāt

⟨There was⟩ Cintāmaṇi, the ornament of the lineage of Garga, a master of gaṇita (mathematical astronomy). His son Ananta, of endless intellect, composed a Janma-paddhati (a manual for judging the nativity) to destroy the doctrines of the wicked. His son, the learned Nīlakaṇṭha, by the leave of the learned Śiva, has set out the sixteen yogas and likewise the harṣa places in this Saṃjñāviveka (the 'discernment of the technical terms').

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणंगणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतोऽनंतोनंतमतिर्व्यधात्खलमतध्वस्त्यैजनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुः खलुनीलकंठविबुधोविद्धच्छिवानुज्ञयायोगान्षोडशहर्षभानिचतथासंज्ञाविवेकेऽभ्यधात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्धच्छिवा"; alternatives "विद्वच्छिवा" — zoomed: the conjunct under द has a loop like ध; द्व (sense: विद्वत्+शिव) not excluded [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया; this sentence names विद्धच्छिवा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७७ within its section; it is published at position 2.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads विद्धच्छिवानुज्ञया. A reader dividing this verse judged विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया the likely intent — viddha 'pierced' gives no sense; vidvat + śiva 'the learned Śiva' does. The reader saw a loop like ध under द but did not exclude द्व; this press's द्व ligature is elsewhere confused with द्ध (4.20 योगाद्व्यापार).. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया; this sentence names विद्धच्छिवानुज्ञया, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Praśasti (the author's closing verse for the Saṃjñā section). Reader's doubt: विद्धच्छिवा printed, विद्वच्छिवा (vidvat + śiva) not excluded. The English and Hindi follow विद्वच्छिवा and say so; the Sanskrit keeps the printed characters. Whether 'Śiva' is the god or a learned person of that name the verse does not say; the rendering leaves it as a name. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया; this sentence names विद्धच्छिवा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

Adhyāya 4 · इतिसहमफलविचारः

4.1a reading here is contested

पुण्यं १ गुरु २ र्ज्ञान ३ यशो ४ थ मित्रं ५ माहात्म्य ६ माशा च ७ समर्थता च ८ ॥ भ्राता ९ ततो गौरव १० राज ११ तात १२ माता १३ सुतो १४ जीवित १५ मंबु १६ कर्म १७

puṇyaṃ 1 guru 2 rjñāna 3 yaśo 4 tha mitraṃ 5 māhātmya 6 māśā ca 7 samarthatā ca 8 || bhrātā 9 tato gaurava 10 rāja 11 tāta 12 mātā 13 suto 14 jīvita 15 maṃbu 16 karma 17

⟨These are the names of the sahamas — the sensitive points of the year-chart, each got by adding one longitude to the lagna and subtracting another:⟩ puṇya (merit) 1, guru (the preceptor) 2, jñāna (knowledge) 3, yaśas (fame) 4, then mitra (friend) 5, māhātmya (greatness) 6, āśā (hope) 7, and samarthatā (capability) 8; bhrātṛ (brother) 9, after that gaurava (honour) 10, rāja (the king) 11, tāta (the father) 12, mātṛ (the mother) 13, suta (the son) 14, jīvita (life) 15, ambu (water) 16, karma (work) 17.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुण्यं१गुरु२र्ज्ञान३यशो४थमित्रं५माहात्म्य६माशाच७समर्थताच८ ॥ भ्राता९ततोगौरव१०राज११तात१२माता१३ सुतो१४जीवित१५मंबु१६कर्म१७

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यशो४थमित्रं"; alternatives "यशो४ऽथमित्रं" — no avagraha printed; kept as printed
  • About this edition: A list of sahama names with the printing's own serial figures set inside the words; the figures are rendered. गुरुर्ज्ञान is गुरुः + ज्ञान. यशो४थमित्रं is यशः + अथ मित्रम्: the plate prints no avagraha, as the reader records, and none is supplied here. माहात्म्य६माशा is माहात्म्यम् + आशा and जीवित१५मंबु is जीवितम् + अंबु — in both the numeral stands inside the sandhi, so the item is माहात्म्य (6) / जीवित (15), not माहात्म्यम आशा.
4.2a reading here is contested

माद्यं च १८ मन्मथ १९ कला २० परतः क्षमोक्तं २१ शास्त्रं २२ स बंधुसहमं २३ त्वथ बंदकं च २४ ॥ मृत्योश्च सद्म २५ परदेश २६ धना २७ न्यदारा २८ स्यादन्यकर्म २९ स वणिक् ३० त्वथ कार्यसिद्धिः ३१

mādyaṃ ca 18 manmatha 19 kalā 20 parataḥ kṣamoktaṃ 21 śāstraṃ 22 sa baṃdhusahamaṃ 23 tvatha baṃdakaṃ ca 24 || mṛtyośca sadma 25 paradeśa 26 dhanā 27 nyadārā 28 syādanyakarma 29 sa vaṇik 30 tvatha kāryasiddhiḥ 31

mādya (drink) 18, manmatha (lust) 19, kalā (art) 20; after that kṣamā (forbearance) is named 21, śāstra (learning) 22, and the bandhu (kinsman) sahama 23, and then bandaka 24; and the seat of death, mṛtyu 25, paradeśa (a foreign country) 26, dhana (wealth) 27, anya-dāra (another man's wife) 28, then anya-karma (another's work) 29, and vaṇij (the trader) 30, and then kārya-siddhi (the accomplishment of an undertaking) 31.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

माद्यंच१८मन्मथ१९कला२०परतः क्षमोक्तं२१शास्त्रं२२सबं धुसहमं२३ त्वथबंदकंच२४ ॥ मृत्योश्चसद्म२५परदेश२६धना२७न्यदारा२८स्यादन्यकर्म२९सवणिक्३०त्वथकार्यसिद्धिः३१

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सबं धुसहमं"; alternatives "सवं धुसहमं", "सबंधुसहमं" — zoomed: first akṣara has the inner diagonal of ब; a clear gap is printed between सबं and धु
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बंदकं"; alternatives "बंधकं" — zoomed: printed द, not ध; sense suggests बंधक
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृत्योश्चसद्म"; alternatives "मृत्योश्वसद्म" — श्च/श्व conjunct small
  • About this edition: Item 24 is printed बंदकं. The plate reader checked it at magnification and records a द, not a ध; the sense wants बंधक, 'bondage, a thing pledged'. The printed letters are kept and the word is transliterated, not translated, because on the printed reading its meaning is not certain. धना२७न्यदारा२८ is धन + अन्यदार with the numeral inside the sandhi (धन + अन्य → धनान्य), so 27 is dhana and 28 is anya-dāra. सबं धुसहमं is स + बंधुसहमं; the gap the reader saw in the print falls inside the word बंधु.
4.3a reading here is contested

उद्वाह ३२ सूति ३३ संतापाः ३४ श्रद्धा ३५ प्रीति ३६ र्बलं ३७ तनुः ३८ ॥ जाड्य ३९ व्यापारसहमे ४० पानीयपतनं ४१ रिपुः ४२

udvāha 32 sūti 33 saṃtāpāḥ 34 śraddhā 35 prīti 36 rbalaṃ 37 tanuḥ 38 || jāḍya 39 vyāpārasahame 40 pānīyapatanaṃ 41 ripuḥ 42

udvāha (marriage) 32, sūti (childbirth) 33, saṃtāpa (grief) 34, śraddhā (faith) 35, prīti (affection) 36, bala (strength) 37, tanu (the body) 38; the jāḍya (torpor) 39 and vyāpāra (trade) 40 sahamas, pānīya-patana (falling into water) 41, ripu (the enemy) 42.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उद्वाह३२सूति३३संतापाः३४श्रद्धा३५प्रीति३६र्बलं३७तनुः३८ ॥ जाड्य३९व्यापारसहमे४०पानीयपतनं४१रिपुः ४२

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उद्वाह"; alternatives "उद्धाह" — lower member of conjunct under द unclear
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जाड्य"; alternatives "जाब्य" — conjunct after जा resembles ब्य in the print
  • About this edition: सहमे in जाड्य३९व्यापारसहमे४० is a dual: the two sahamas jāḍya and vyāpāra, one number apiece. The reader flags जाड्य (the conjunct after जा could be read ब्य); जाड्य, 'torpor, dullness', is the reading that gives a word, and it is kept. उद्वाह is likewise flagged against उद्धाह, which is not a word; उद्वाह, 'marriage', is kept.
4.4a reading here is contested

शौर्यो ४३ पाय ४४ दरिद्रत्वं ४५ गुरुतां ४६ बुपथाभिधं ४७ ॥ बंधनं ४८ दुहिता ४९ श्वश्रू ५० पंचाशत् सहमानि हि

śauryo 43 pāya 44 daridratvaṃ 45 gurutāṃ 46 bupathābhidhaṃ 47 || baṃdhanaṃ 48 duhitā 49 śvaśrū 50 paṃcāśat sahamāni hi

śaurya (valour) 43, upāya (expedient) 44, daridratva (poverty) 45, gurutā (weight, being held in respect) 46, the one named ⟨am⟩bu-patha (the water-road, a voyage by sea) 47; bandhana (confinement) 48, duhitṛ (the daughter) 49, śvaśrū (the mother-in-law) 50. These indeed are the fifty sahamas.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शौर्यो४३पाय४४दरिद्रत्वं४५गुरुतां४६बुपथाभिधं४७ ॥ बंधनं४८दुहिता४९श्वश्र५०पंचाशत्सहमा निहि

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्वश्र"; alternatives "श्वश्रू" — no ū-mark visible under श्र; kept as seen
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शौर्यो४३पाय"; alternatives "शौर्यो४३ऽपाय" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The page prints गुरुतां४६बुपथाभिधं४७. The anusvāra written on गुरुतां is the अं of अंबुपथ, and the numeral 46 stands between: so item 46 is गुरुता and item 47 is अंबुपथ, 'the water-road'. The printed characters are kept unchanged. श्वश्र५० is printed with no ū-mark under श्र, as the reader records; the word is श्वश्रू, 'mother-in-law', and nothing else fits a list of relations. पंचाशत्सहमा निहि reads पंचाशत् सहमानि हि, 'these indeed are the fifty sahamas' — the printed word-break falls inside सहमानि.
4.5a reading here is contested

सूर्योन चंद्रान्वितमह्नि लग्नं वींद्वर्कयुक्तं निशि पुण्यसंज्ञम् ॥ शोध्यर्क्षशुद्ध्याश्रयभांतराले लग्नं न चेत्सैकभमेतदुक्तम्

sūryona caṃdrānvitamahni lagnaṃ vīṃdvarkayuktaṃ niśi puṇyasaṃjñam || śodhyarkṣaśuddhyāśrayabhāṃtarāle lagnaṃ na cetsaikabhametaduktam

By day, the lagna joined to ⟨the longitude of the Moon⟩ diminished by the Sun; by night, ⟨the lagna⟩ joined to the Moon and the Sun ⟨in the reversed order — the Moon taken out of the Sun⟩: that is what bears the name puṇya. When the sign to be subtracted (śodhya) has been taken out, if the lagna does not fall in the interval up to the sign taken as the base (āśraya), then the result is to be taken with one ⟨whole round of⟩ signs added.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्योनचंद्रान्वितमह्निलग्नंवींद्वर्कयुक्तंनिशिपुण्यसंज्ञम् ॥ शोध्यर्क्षशुद्ध्याश्रयभांत रालेलग्नंनचेत्सैकभमेतदुक्तम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वींद्वर्क"; alternatives "वींद्धर्क" — zoomed: lower member of the conjunct under द is a hooked stroke, read as व
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुद्ध्याश्रय"; alternatives "शुध्याश्रय" — conjunct close to table edge
  • About this edition: The night half is elliptical in the print: वींद्वर्कयुक्तंनिशि says only 'joined with the Moon and the Sun at night'. The rendering supplies the reversal — Sun minus Moon — in ⟨ ⟩, because that is what makes the two halves a rule and is how verse 6 then speaks of a व्यत्यस्त, a reversed, computation. The printed वीं is best taken as वा ('or') before इन्दु-; the reader's doubt at this place is only about the lower member of the conjunct (द्व against द्ध), and the printed द्व is kept. सैकभम् is literally 'together with one bha'; bha here is a full round of the twelve signs, added so that the remainder is positive.
4.6a reading here is contested

व्यत्यस्तमस्माद् गुरुविद्ययोस्तु संसाधनं पुण्यवियुक् सुरेज्यः ॥ दिवा विलोमं निशि पूर्ववत्तु यशोभिधं तत्सहमं वदंति

vyatyastamasmād guruvidyayostu saṃsādhanaṃ puṇyaviyuk surejyaḥ || divā vilomaṃ niśi pūrvavattu yaśobhidhaṃ tatsahamaṃ vadaṃti

But the working out of the guru and the vidyā ⟨sahamas⟩ is the reverse of this ⟨puṇya⟩. ⟨Take⟩ Jupiter (surejya) diminished by the puṇya ⟨sahama⟩ by day, reversed by night, the rest as before: that sahama they call the one named yaśas, fame.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

व्यत्यस्तमस्माद्गुरुविद्ययोस्तुसंसाधनंपुण्यवियुक्सुरेज्यः ॥ दिवाविलोमंनिशिपूर्ववत्तुयशोभिधंतत्सहमंवदंति

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यशोभिधं" — zoomed: a brown stain lies over यशोभि; the letters are legible under it
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्ववत्तु"; alternatives "पूर्ववत्तु (त्त conjunct)" — conjunct under the stain edge
  • About this edition: The verse's first half disposes of two sahamas in four words — it says only that guru and vidyā are computed व्यत्यस्तम्, 'reversed', from the puṇya rule just given, and does not spell the reversal out. It is rendered as it stands. The second half is a complete rule for the yaśas sahama. A brown stain lies over यशोभि on the plate; the reader records that the letters are legible beneath it, and the word is confirmed by तत्सहमं वदंति that follows.
4.7a reading here is contested

पुण्यसज्ञ गुरुसज्ञतस् त्यजेद् व्यत्ययो निशि सितान्वितं च तत् ॥ सैकता तनुवदुक्तरीतितो मित्रनामसहमं विदुर्बुधाः

puṇyasajña gurusajñatas tyajed vyatyayo niśi sitānvitaṃ ca tat || saikatā tanuvaduktarītito mitranāmasahamaṃ vidurbudhāḥ

From the ⟨sahama⟩ called guru one should take away the one called puṇya — at night the order is inverted — and let that be joined with Venus (sita). The adding of one ⟨round of signs⟩, as with the tanu (the lagna), is by the method already stated. The wise know this as the sahama named mitra, the friend.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुण्यसज्ञगुरुसज्ञतस्त्यजेद्व्यत्ययोनिशिसितान्वितंचतत् ॥ सैकतातनुवदुक्तरीतितोमित्रनामसहमंविदुर्बुधाः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुण्यसज्ञगुरुसज्ञतस्"; alternatives "पुण्यसंज्ञगुरुसंज्ञतस्" — no anusvāra dot seen over either स; the ज्ञ glyph in this font resembles झ
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वदुक्तरीतितो"; alternatives "वदुक्त.रीतितो" — a small dot or broken mark prints after क्त
  • About this edition: सैकतातनुवदुक्तरीतितो is compressed: सैकता ('the state of having one added') + तनुवत् ('as with the tanu, the lagna') + उक्तरीतितः ('by the rule stated'). It is rendered as a back-reference to the सैकभम् correction of verse 5, which is the only stated rule it can point to. पुण्यसज्ञ / गुरुसज्ञ are printed with no anusvāra dot over either स, as the reader records; the words are पुण्यसंज्ञ and गुरुसंज्ञ, and the printed letters are kept.
4.8a reading here is contested

पुण्याद् भौमं शोधयेदुक्तवत् स्यान् माहात्म्यं तन् नक्तमस्माद् विलोमम् ॥ शुक्रं मंदादह्नि नक्तं विलोममाशाख्यं स्यादुक्तवच्छेषमूह्यम्

puṇyād bhaumaṃ śodhayeduktavat syān māhātmyaṃ tan naktamasmād vilomam || śukraṃ maṃdādahni naktaṃ vilomamāśākhyaṃ syāduktavaccheṣamūhyam

Subtract Mars from the puṇya ⟨sahama⟩ and then proceed as already stated ⟨add the lagna, and add one rāśi where the rule of 5 requires it⟩: that is the māhātmya (greatness) sahama. At night it is the reverse of this — ⟨the puṇya sahama taken away⟩ from Mars. By day subtract Venus from Saturn, at night the reverse, and the sahama called āśā (hope, longing) is obtained. The rest is to be supplied as has been stated.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुण्याद्भौमंशोधयेदुक्तवत्स्यान्माहात्म्यंतन्नक्तमस्माद्विलोमम् ॥ शुक्रंमंदादह्निनक्तंविलोममाशाख्यंस्यादुक्तवच्छेषमूह्यम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "माशाख्यं"; alternatives "माशारव्यं" — the ख is set in the two-part form that looks like रव; read as ख
  • About this edition: The plate reader doubted माशाख्यं (the ख is set in the two-part form that can look like रव). Read आशाख्यं: आशा stands as no. 7 in this chapter's own numbered list of the fifty sahamas (verse 1), which settles it. The ⟨ ⟩ in both languages supply the step that उक्तवत् points back to — add the lagna, with the one-rāśi correction stated in verse 5.
4.9a reading here is contested

सामर्थ्यमारात् तनुपं विशोध्य नक्तं विलोमं तनुपे कुजे तु ॥ जीवाद् विशुद्ध्येत् सततं पुरावद् भ्रातार्किहीनाद् गुरुतः सदोह्यः

sāmarthyamārāt tanupaṃ viśodhya naktaṃ vilomaṃ tanupe kuje tu || jīvād viśuddhyet satataṃ purāvad bhrātārkihīnād gurutaḥ sadohyaḥ

⟨For⟩ sāmarthya (capability): subtract the lord of the lagna (tanupa) from Mars ⟨by day⟩; at night the reverse. But when Mars is himself the lord of the lagna, ⟨the subtraction⟩ is to be made from Jupiter instead, constantly ⟨by day and by night alike⟩, ⟨the rest⟩ as before. The bhrātṛ (brother) ⟨sahama⟩ is always to be reckoned from Jupiter with Saturn taken away ⟨by day and by night alike⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सामर्थ्यमारात्तनुपंविशोध्यनक्तंविलोमंतनुपेकुजेतु ॥ जीवाद्विशुद्ध्येत्सततंपुरावद्भ्रातार्किहीनाद्गुरुतःसदोह्यः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विशुद्ध्येत्"; alternatives "विशुध्येत्" — zoomed: stacked conjunct looks like द्ध्य; could be read as ध्य with a small hook
  • About this edition: तनुपे कुजे तु जीवाद् विशुद्ध्येत् is elliptical: the thing subtracted is still the lagna-lord, who in this case is Mars, so the figure is Jupiter minus Mars. The edition's own Sanskrit ṭīkā construes it so and its worked example computes exactly that. सततं and सदा are rendered as 'day and night alike', which is what they mean here: these two sahamas take no night reversal.
4.10a reading here is contested

दिने गुरोश्चंद्रमपास्य नक्तं रवि क्रमादर्कविधू च देयौ ॥ रीत्योक्तया गौरवमर्कमार्केरपास्य वामं निशि राजतातौ

dine guroścaṃdramapāsya naktaṃ ravi kramādarkavidhū ca deyau || rītyoktayā gauravamarkamārkerapāsya vāmaṃ niśi rājatātau

By day subtract the Moon from Jupiter, at night the Sun; and the Sun and the Moon are to be added respectively ⟨the Sun by day, the Moon by night, in place of the lagna⟩. By the method stated, that is the gaurava (esteem) ⟨sahama⟩. Subtracting the Sun from Saturn, and the reverse at night, ⟨gives⟩ the rāja (kingship) and the tāta (father) ⟨sahamas⟩ — one figure serving for both, ⟨with the lagna added⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिनेगुरोश्चंद्र मपास्यनक्तंरविक्रमादर्कविधूचदेयौ ॥ रीत्योक्तयागौरवमर्कमार्केरपास्यवामंनिशिराजतातौ

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मार्केरपास्य"; alternatives "मार्के:पास्य" — the र after के is clear; repha over र्के small
  • About this edition: Two places needed supplying. नक्तं रवि gives the night subtrahend (the Sun), and क्रमात् अर्कविधू च देयौ adds the Sun by day and the Moon by night in place of the lagna — unusual, so stated plainly. Construed with the edition's Sanskrit ṭīkā, whose worked example on this verse is Jupiter minus Moon plus Sun. राजतातौ is a dual: one figure serves both the rāja and the tāta sahama, which verse 1 lists side by side as nos. ११ and १२.
4.11a reading here is contested

मातेंदुतोपास्य सितं विलोमं नक्तं सुतोऽहर्निशमिंदुमीज्यात् ॥ स्याज् जीविताख्यं गुरुमार्कितोह्नि वामं निशीदं सममंबयांबु

māteṃdutopāsya sitaṃ vilomaṃ naktaṃ suto'harniśamiṃdumījyāt || syāj jīvitākhyaṃ gurumārkitohni vāmaṃ niśīdaṃ samamaṃbayāṃbu

The mother's ⟨sahama⟩: subtract Venus from the Moon ⟨by day⟩, the reverse at night. The son's: subtract the Moon from Jupiter, by day and by night alike. Subtracting Jupiter from Saturn by day, and the reverse at night, gives the one called jīvita (life); and ⟨the sahama of⟩ ambu (water) is the same as the mother's.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मातेंदुतोपास्यसितंविलोमंनक्तंसुतोऽहर्निशमिंदुमीज्यात् ॥ स्याज्जीविताख्यंगुरुमार्कितोह्निवामंनिशीदंसममंबयांबु

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मार्कितोह्नि"; alternatives "मार्कितोऽह्नि" — no avagraha printed here, though one is set in सुतोऽहर्निश on the same line
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सममंबयांबु"; alternatives "सममंवयांबु" — ब/व not distinct in this type
  • About this edition: सममंबयांबु is read as समम् अंबया अंबु — 'the ambu ⟨sahama⟩ is the same as the mother's'. The reader's alternative वयां yields no word; the ṭīkā on this verse writes the same word with व (अंवया), which is only this type's ब/व. The order of the four is the order of the chapter's own list in verse 1: माता १३, सुतः १४, जीवित १५, अंबु १६. मार्कितोह्नि is आर्कितः + अह्नि; no avagraha is printed there, though one is printed in सुतोऽहर्निश on the same line.
4.12a reading here is contested

कर्म ज्ञमारान् निशि वाममुक्तं रोगाख्यमिंदुं तनुतः सदैव ॥ स्यान् मन्मथोलग्नपमिंदुतोऽह्नि वामं निशींदुं तनुपं सदार्कात्

karma jñamārān niśi vāmamuktaṃ rogākhyamiṃduṃ tanutaḥ sadaiva || syān manmatholagnapamiṃduto'hni vāmaṃ niśīṃduṃ tanupaṃ sadārkāt

Karma: ⟨subtract⟩ Mercury from Mars; at night the reverse, as stated. The one called roga (disease): ⟨subtract⟩ the Moon from the lagna (tanu), always. Manmatha (desire) is had by ⟨subtracting⟩ the lord of the lagna from the Moon by day, the reverse at night; ⟨but when⟩ the Moon is himself the lord of the lagna, ⟨he is subtracted⟩ always from the Sun.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कर्मज्ञमारान्निशिवामसुक्तंरोगाख्यमिंदुंतनुतःसदैव ॥ स्यान्मन्मथोलग्नपमिंदुतोऽह्निवामंनिशींदुंतनुपंसदार्कात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वामसुक्तं"; alternatives "वाममुक्तं" — zoomed: the print clearly shows स with ु, not मु; sense suggests वामम् उक्तं — kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads वाममुक्तं; this sentence names वामसुक्तं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints वामसुक्तं. The construction and the sense require वामम् उक्तं ('the reverse, as stated'), and the ṭīkā reads it so; the printed letters are left untouched in the Sanskrit and only the rendering follows वामम् उक्तं. The last quarter is compressed: इंदुं तनुपं names the case where the Moon is himself the lord of the lagna, and सदार्कात् then makes the Sun the figure he is subtracted from, day and night alike — the same kind of substitution rule as verse 9 gives for Mars. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads वाममुक्तं; this sentence names वामसुक्तं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

कलिक्षमे स्तो गुरुतो विशुद्धे कुजे विलोमं निशि पूर्वरीत्या ॥ शास्त्रं दिने सौरिमपास्य जीवाद् वामं निशि ज्ञस्य युतिः पुरावत्

kalikṣame sto guruto viśuddhe kuje vilomaṃ niśi pūrvarītyā || śāstraṃ dine saurimapāsya jīvād vāmaṃ niśi jñasya yutiḥ purāvat

Kali (strife) and kṣamā (forbearance) are ⟨had⟩ when Mars is subtracted from Jupiter ⟨by day⟩; at night the reverse, by the earlier method ⟨with the lagna added⟩. Śāstra (learning): by day subtract Saturn from Jupiter, at night the reverse, and Mercury is joined to it ⟨in place of the lagna⟩, as before.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कलिक्षमेस्तोगुरुतोविशुद्धेकुजेविलोमंनिशिपूर्वरीत्या ॥ शास्त्रंदिनेसौरिमपास्यजीवाद्वामंनिशिज्ञस्ययुतिःपुरावत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: कलिक्षमे is a dual: one figure serves both kali and kṣamā, which verses 1–2 list as nos. २० and २१. In the śāstra sahama ज्ञस्य युतिः adds Mercury, not the lagna; that is why it is said so explicitly.

दिवानिशं ज्ञाच्छशिनं विशोध्य बंध्वाख्यमेतन् निशि बंदकं स्यात् ॥ वामं दिवैतन् मृतिरष्टमर्क्षादिंदुं विशोध्योक्तवदार्कियोगात्

divāniśaṃ jñācchaśinaṃ viśodhya baṃdhvākhyametan niśi baṃdakaṃ syāt || vāmaṃ divaitan mṛtiraṣṭamarkṣādiṃduṃ viśodhyoktavadārkiyogāt

By day and by night alike, subtract the Moon from Mercury: this is the one called bandhu (kinsman); when ⟨the year begins⟩ at night this same ⟨figure⟩ is the bandaka (confinement) ⟨sahama⟩. By day it is the reverse ⟨of it, the Moon taken from Mercury being turned about, that gives bandaka⟩. The mṛti (death) ⟨sahama⟩: subtract the Moon from the 8th sign ⟨the cusp of the 8th bhāva⟩ and proceed as stated, with Saturn joined ⟨in place of the lagna⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिवानिशं ज्ञाच्छशिनंविशोध्यबंध्वाख्यमेतन्निशिबंदकंस्यात् ॥ वामंदिवैतन्मृतिरष्टमर्क्षादिंदुंविशोध्योक्तवदार्कियोगात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: निशि बंदकं स्यात् / वामं दिवैतत् is compressed: when the year-entry falls at night the bandhu figure itself is the bandaka sahama, and by day the reversed figure (Moon minus Mercury) is. आर्कियोगात् adds Saturn, not the lagna, and अष्टमर्क्षात् is the cusp of the 8th bhāva, not the 8th sign counted from the lagna — both supplied in ⟨ ⟩.

देशांतराख्यं नवमाद् विशोध्य धर्मेश्वरं संततमुक्तवत् स्यात् ॥ अहर्निशं वित्तपमर्थभावाद् विशोध्य पूर्वोक्तवदर्थसद्म

deśāṃtarākhyaṃ navamād viśodhya dharmeśvaraṃ saṃtatamuktavat syāt || aharniśaṃ vittapamarthabhāvād viśodhya pūrvoktavadarthasadma

Subtract dharmeśvara, the lord of the 9th (dharma), from the 9th ⟨house⟩, and ⟨finish⟩ as was said before ⟨adding the lagna, with a whole round of signs added if the remainder falls short⟩: that is the ⟨sahama⟩ named deśāntara, the foreign country, and it holds continuously ⟨by day and by night alike, without reversal⟩. Day and night alike, subtract vittapa, the lord of wealth (the lord of the 2nd), from the artha-bhāva, the 2nd house, and ⟨finish⟩ as stated earlier: ⟨that is⟩ the seat of wealth, the artha sahama.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

देशांतराख्यंनवमाद्विशोध्यधर्मेश्वरंसंततमुक्तवत्स्यात् ॥ अहर्निशंवित्तपमर्थभावाद्विशोध्यपूर्वोक्तवदर्थसद्म

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Two sahamas: number 26 of the name-list of verses 1–4 (paradeśa, here called deśāntara) and number 27 (dhana, here called artha). नवमात् and अर्थभावात् are the house positions themselves; the lord of that house is the thing subtracted. The ⟨ ⟩ supply the addition of the lagna and the सैकभम् correction of verse 5, which is all that उक्तवत् and पूर्वोक्तवत् can point back to. संततम् and अहर्निशम् state that neither of these two is reversed at night.
4.16a reading here is contested

सितादपास्यार्कमथान्यदाराह्वयं सदा प्राग्वदथान्यकर्म ॥ चंद्राच्छनिं वाममथो निशायां शश्वद् वणिज्यं दिनबंदकोक्त्या

sitādapāsyārkamathānyadārāhvayaṃ sadā prāgvadathānyakarma || caṃdrācchaniṃ vāmamatho niśāyāṃ śaśvad vaṇijyaṃ dinabaṃdakoktyā

Subtract the Sun from Venus (sita) and ⟨add the lagna⟩ always as before: ⟨that is the sahama⟩ named anya-dārā, another man's wife. Then anya-karma, another's work: ⟨subtract⟩ Saturn from the Moon, and at night the reverse ⟨the Moon out of Saturn⟩. The vaṇij ⟨sahama⟩, trade, is always reckoned by the rule stated for the bandaka by day ⟨that is, Mercury taken out of the Moon, with the lagna added⟩; it is not reversed at night.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सितादपास्यार्कमथान्यदाराह्वयंसदाप्राग्वदथान्यकर्म ॥ चंद्राच्छनिंवाममथोनिशायांशश्वद्वणिज्यंदिनबंदकोक्त्या

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिनबंदको"; alternatives "दिनवंदको" — the letter after दिन is not clear at tile resolution between बं and वं; the zoom crop missed it
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कोक्त्या"; alternatives "कोत्क्या" — zoomed: the conjunct is the press's क्त ligature form with य; the loop of त sits before क
  • About this edition: Sahamas 28, 29 and 30 of the name-list. दिनबंदको is दिन + बंदक: the reader's alternative दिनवंदको is ruled out by verse 2, where item 24 of the name-list is printed बंदकं with the same letter. बंदक + उक्त्या fuses to बंदकोक्त्या, so the reader's other alternative, कोत्क्या, gives no word. This record states no formula of its own for vaṇij; it sends the reader back to the daytime bandaka of verse 14, where bandhu is the Moon taken out of Mercury day and night and bandaka is that same figure reversed by day. The bracketed Moon-less-Mercury follows from that back-reference and is not printed here.
4.17a reading here is contested

शनेर् दिवार्कं निशि चंद्रमार्केर् विशोध्य सूर्येंदुभनाथयोगात् ॥ स्यात् कार्यसिद्धिः सततं विशोध्य मंदं सितात् स्यात् तु विवाहसद्म

śaner divārkaṃ niśi caṃdramārker viśodhya sūryeṃdubhanāthayogāt || syāt kāryasiddhiḥ satataṃ viśodhya maṃdaṃ sitāt syāt tu vivāhasadma

Subtract the Sun from Saturn by day, and the Moon from Ārki (Saturn, the Sun's son) at night; then, by joining ⟨to the remainder⟩ the lord of the sign occupied by the Sun ⟨by day⟩ or by the Moon ⟨by night⟩, the kārya-siddhi ⟨sahama⟩, the accomplishment of an undertaking, results — ⟨here the sign-lord is added, not the lagna⟩. Subtract Saturn (manda) from Venus (sita) constantly ⟨by day and by night alike, and add the lagna⟩: that is the seat of marriage, the vivāha sahama. [Our mūla now reads दिवार्कं, the accusative 'the Sun' that the sentence needs, emended on grammar.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शनेर्दिवार्केनिशिचंद्रमार्केर्विशोध्यसूर्येंदुभनाथयोगात् ॥ स्यात्कार्यसिद्धिःसततंविशोध्यमंदंसितात्स्यात्तुविवाहसद्म

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिवार्के"; alternatives "दिवार्कं", "दिवार्कें" — zoomed: above क there are a slanted stroke (read as e-mātrā) and the repha curl with its round head; the head could be taken for an anusvāra dot [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads दिवार्कं for दिवार्के. The plate (page_0075, read by eye at about 3.5x native) shows the second mark is the e-mātrā, joined to the repha with no separate dot, so the press sets दिवार्के; the accusative comes from the ṭīkā and the grammar.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रमार्केर्वि"; alternatives "चंद्रमार्कें र्विं" — zoomed: same repha-plus-stroke cluster over के; the repha of र्वि also has a round head that looks like a dot
  • About this edition: Sahamas 31 (kārya-siddhi) and 32 (udvāha, here named vivāha). चंद्रमार्केर् divides as चन्द्रम् + आर्केः, 'the Moon, out of Ārki'; Ārki, the Sun's son, is Saturn, the same word this text uses at verse 9 (अर्किहीनात्) and verse 14 (आर्कियोगात्). Read that way, the repha the reader flagged before विशोध्य belongs to आर्केः, and the night rule subtracts from the same Saturn as the day rule — which is how the ṭīkā printed with this edition works the example. सूर्येंदुभनाथयोगात् is an ablative of means: the remainder is joined with the lord (नाथ) of the sign (भ) of the Sun or of the Moon, so this sahama does not take the lagna.
4.18a reading here is contested

गुरोर् बुधं प्रोज्झ्य भवेत् प्रसूतिर् वामं निशींदुं शनितो विशोध्य ॥ षष्ठं क्षिपेदुक्तदिशा सदैव संतापसञ्ज्ञाऽरमपास्य शुक्रात्

guror budhaṃ projjhya bhavet prasūtir vāmaṃ niśīṃduṃ śanito viśodhya || ṣaṣṭhaṃ kṣipeduktadiśā sadaiva saṃtāpasañjñā'ramapāsya śukrāt

Subtract Mercury from Jupiter ⟨and add the lagna⟩: prasūti, childbirth, results; at night reversed ⟨Jupiter out of Mercury⟩. Subtract the Moon from Saturn and add the 6th ⟨house⟩ in the manner stated, always ⟨and it is the 6th house that is added here, not the lagna⟩: ⟨that is the sahama⟩ named saṃtāpa, grief. And, subtracting Mars (āra) from Venus — ⟨this clause has no predicate in this record; it is completed at the head of the next one, where the result is named śraddhā⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरोर्बुधंप्रोज्झ्यभवेत्प्रसूतिर्वामंनिशींदुंशनितोविशोध्य॥ षष्ठंक्षिपेदुक्तदिशासदैवसंतापसञ्ज्ञाऽरमपास्यशुक्रात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सञ्ज्ञाऽरम"; alternatives "सञ्ञाऽरम", "संज्ञाऽरम" — zoomed: a stacked ñ-conjunct ligature, different from the ज्ञ glyph in संज्ञे of the next line; read as ञ्ज्ञ
  • About this edition: Sahamas 33 (sūti, here prasūti) and 34 (saṃtāpa). The saṃtāpa rule adds the 6th house and not the lagna: षष्ठं क्षिपेत् says so outright, and उक्तदिशा can only be pointing at the 'add a whole round of signs if the remainder falls short' correction of verse 5. The last four words, आरम् अपास्य शुक्रात्, are the first half of the next record's sentence and are rendered here as the incomplete clause they are; no word is pulled in from verse 19. सञ्ज्ञा is printed with the stacked ñ-conjunct the reader flagged; the word is संज्ञा and the printed letters are kept.

श्रद्धा सदा प्रोक्तदिशाऽथ पुण्यं विद्याख्यतः प्रोज्झ्य सदा पुरोक्त्या ॥ प्रीत्याख्यमुक्तं बलदेहसंज्ञे यशः समे जाड्यमपास्य भौमात्

śraddhā sadā proktadiśā'tha puṇyaṃ vidyākhyataḥ projjhya sadā puroktyā || prītyākhyamuktaṃ baladehasaṃjñe yaśaḥ same jāḍyamapāsya bhaumāt

⟨— and that is the sahama⟩ śraddhā, faith, always, in the manner stated ⟨with the lagna added⟩. Then subtract the puṇya ⟨sahama⟩ from the one named vidyā, always, by the rule already given: ⟨the result⟩ is called prīti, affection. The two named bala, strength, and deha, the body, are the same as yaśas, fame ⟨they are not computed afresh⟩. And, subtracting ⟨Saturn⟩ from Mars, ⟨comes⟩ jāḍya, torpor — ⟨what is to be subtracted stands at the head of the next record⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

श्रद्धासदा प्रोक्तदिशाऽथपुण्यंविद्याख्यतःप्रोज्झ्यसदापुरोक्त्या॥ प्रीत्याख्यमुक्तंबलदेहसंज्ञेयशःसमेजाड्यमपास्यभौमात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Sahamas 35 (śraddhā), 36 (prīti), 37 (bala), 38 (tanu, here deha) and the opening of 39 (jāḍya). The first two words complete the clause left hanging at the end of verse 18: śraddhā is Mars taken out of Venus, with the lagna added. बलदेहसंज्ञे यशःसमे is a dual — the two sahamas named bala and deha have the same value as the yaśas sahama of verse 6, so no separate working is given for them. The last three words, जाड्यम् अपास्य भौमात्, break off in the same way: they name the sahama and the body it is taken out of, and the subtrahend stands at the head of verse 20.
4.20a reading here is contested

शनिर् विलोमं निशि चांद्रयोगाद् व्यापार आराज् ज्ञमपास्य शश्वत् ॥ पानीयपातः शशिनं विशोध्य सौरेर् विलोमं निशि पूर्ववत् स्यात्

śanir vilomaṃ niśi cāṃdrayogād vyāpāra ārāj jñamapāsya śaśvat || pānīyapātaḥ śaśinaṃ viśodhya saurer vilomaṃ niśi pūrvavat syāt

⟨For jāḍya, subtract⟩ Saturn ⟨from Mars⟩; at night reversed ⟨Mars out of Saturn⟩; with the addition of Cāndri ⟨Mercury, the Moon's son⟩. Vyāpāra, business: subtract Mercury (jña) from Mars (āra), always ⟨with the lagna added⟩. Pānīya-pāta, a fall into water: subtract the Moon from Sauri (Saturn); reversed at night, the rest as before ⟨the lagna added⟩. [चांद्र as printed means simply 'lunar'; it is taken here as Cāndri, the Moon's son, that is Mercury, which is the third term this sahama adds in place of the lagna.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शनिर्विलोमंनिशिचांद्रयोगाद्व्यापारआराज्ज्ञमपास्यशश्वत्॥ पानीयपातःशशिनंविशोध्यसौरेर्विलोमंनिशिपूर्ववत्स्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगाद्व्यापार"; alternatives "योगाद्ध्यापार" — zoomed: the द्व ligature, whose lower loop resembles ध; read as द्व
  • About this edition: Sahamas 39 (jāḍya, carried over from verse 19), 40 (vyāpāra) and 41 (pānīya-patana). शनिः is printed in the nominative where the sense wants the accusative: it is the body subtracted, not the subject of the sentence. The printed form is kept and rendered as the subtrahend. चांद्रयोगात् is read as the joining of Cāndri, Mercury — so jāḍya adds Mercury to the remainder instead of the lagna; the ṭīkā printed with this edition glosses the same word बुध and works its example that way. The reader's doubt at योगाद्व्यापार (द्व against ध्य) is settled by the division योगात् + व्यापारः.
4.21a reading here is contested

मंदं कुजात् प्रोज्झ्य रिपुर् विलोमं रात्रौ भवेद् भौमविहीनपुण्यात् ॥ शौर्यं विलोमं निशि पूर्ववत् स्यादुपाय ईज्यं शनितो विशोध्य

maṃdaṃ kujāt projjhya ripur vilomaṃ rātrau bhaved bhaumavihīnapuṇyāt || śauryaṃ vilomaṃ niśi pūrvavat syādupāya ījyaṃ śanito viśodhya

Subtract Saturn (manda) from Mars (kuja) ⟨and add the lagna⟩: the ripu ⟨sahama⟩, the enemy, arises; at night reversed ⟨Mars out of Saturn⟩. From the puṇya ⟨sahama⟩ diminished by Mars comes śaurya, valour; reversed at night, the rest as before ⟨the lagna added⟩. ⟨For⟩ upāya, the expedient, subtract Jupiter (ījya) from Saturn — ⟨the clause is completed in the next record⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदं कुजात्प्रोज्झ्यरिपुर्विलोमंरात्रौभवेद्भौमविहीनपुण्यात्॥ शौर्यंविलोमंनिशिपूर्ववत्स्यादुपायईज्यंशनितोविशोध्य

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शौर्यं"; alternatives "शौर्य" — zoomed: a dot sits at the foot of the repha hook; read as anusvāra, but it is small and fused with the repha
  • About this edition: Sahamas 42 (ripu), 43 (śaurya) and the opening of 44 (upāya). भौमविहीनपुण्यात् is the puṇya sahama of verse 5 diminished by Mars, not Mars diminished by something else. The last four words break off exactly as verse 18's did: the result of Jupiter taken out of Saturn is named in verse 22. शौर्यं is printed with a small anusvāra fused into the repha, which the reader flagged against शौर्य; the accusative शौर्यं is what the sentence takes, and the printed letters are kept.
4.22a reading here is contested

वामं निशि ज्ञं तु विशोध्य पुण्याज् ज्ञयुग् विलोमं निशि तद् दरिद्रम् ॥ सूर्योच्चतः सूर्यमपास्य नक्तं चंद्रं तदुच्चाद् गुरुता पुरोक्त्या

vāmaṃ niśi jñaṃ tu viśodhya puṇyāj jñayug vilomaṃ niśi tad daridram || sūryoccataḥ sūryamapāsya naktaṃ caṃdraṃ taduccād gurutā puroktyā

⟨…and⟩ at night the reverse. Subtract Mercury (ज्ञ) from the Puṇya sahama ⟨and add the lagna⟩; at night the operation runs backwards, Mercury ⟨taken first⟩ — that is the Dāridrya (poverty) sahama. From the Sun's exaltation point subtract the Sun ⟨by day⟩; at night subtract the Moon from the Moon's own exaltation point — that is the Gurutā (weight, dignity) sahama, ⟨finished off⟩ by the rule already stated. [A sahama is a computed sensitive point of the annual chart, Arabic sahm, "lot"; the lagna is the rising point.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वामंनिशिज्ञंतुविशोध्यपुण्याज्ज्ञयुग्विलोमंनिशितद्दरिद्रम् ॥ सूर्योच्चतःसूर्यमपास्यनक्तंचंद्रंतदुच्चाद्गुरुतापुरोक्त्या

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञं"; alternatives "इं", "ङं" — read at 8x: a head-line, a bottom-left hook and a right stem - the NSP ज्ञ ligature. Confirmed by sense: ज्ञ = Budha/Mercury, and the tika on line 2 computes this sahama with बुध
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदुच्चाद्गुरुता"; alternatives "तदुच्चाद्दुरुता" — verified at 7x; the subscript is ग. See line 3
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुरोक्त्या"; alternatives "पुरोक्त्या।" — read at 2.2x; the akshara before the closing danda pair is क्त्या
  • About this edition: The opening words वामं निशि ("at night the reverse") complete the rule stated in the preceding record; they are rendered here only as the link ⟨…and⟩, and nothing has been pulled in from that record. The reader's doubt over ज्ञं (alternatives इं, ङं) is settled in favour of ज्ञ = Budha/Mercury, which is also what the ṭīkā computes with; the rendering follows ज्ञ. तदुच्चाद्गुरुता was verified on the plate against तदुच्चाद्दुरुता; the subscript is ग. गुरुता is the name this printing gives the sahama and is kept as printed and transliterated, not replaced by any other sahama name. In both halves the third term (the lagna) is supplied from the chapter's opening rule and is marked ⟨ ⟩.
4.23a reading here is contested

कर्कार्धतः ३।१५ प्रोज्झ्य शनिं स्याज् जलाध्वान्यथा निशि ॥ पुण्याच्छनिं विशोध्याऽह्नि वामं निशि तु बंधनम्

karkārdhataḥ 3|15 projjhya śaniṃ syāj jalādhvānyathā niśi || puṇyācchaniṃ viśodhyā'hni vāmaṃ niśi tu baṃdhanam

From the middle of Cancer — 3 signs 15 degrees, that is Cancer 15° — subtract Saturn ⟨and add the lagna⟩: that is the Jalādhvan (water-journey) sahama; at night it is otherwise, ⟨the two terms exchanged⟩. By day subtract Saturn from the Puṇya sahama ⟨and add the lagna⟩; at night the reverse — that is the Bandhana (bondage, imprisonment) sahama.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कर्कार्धतः३।१५प्रोज्झ्यशनिंस्याज्जलाध्वान्यथानिशि ॥ पुण्याच्छनिंविशोध्याऽह्निवामंनिशितुबंधनम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "३।१५" — a numeric figure printed INSIDE the verse line in mula type, immediately after कर्कार्धतः. It is not a gloss inserted by the editor - it stands in the same fount and on the same base line as the verse. Recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विशोध्याऽह्नि"; alternatives "विशोध्या ह्नि" — the avagraha is present and clearly inked, verified at 2.8x
  • About this edition: ३।१५ stands inside the verse line in the mūla fount, not as an editor's gloss; it glosses कर्कार्ध in figures — 3 signs and 15 degrees, counting Aries as sign 0, so 15° of Cancer — and is rendered as the number it is. विशोध्याऽह्नि: the avagraha is inked on the plate (विशोध्य + अह्नि), and the rendering follows it — "subtracting … by day". The sahama's name is printed जलाध्वा; it is transliterated, not translated away.

चंद्रः सितादपास्योक्तं सदा कन्याख्यमुक्तवत् ॥ पुण्यादर्कमपास्याययोगादश्वो ऽन्यथा निशि

caṃdraḥ sitādapāsyoktaṃ sadā kanyākhyamuktavat || puṇyādarkamapāsyāyayogādaśvo 'nyathā niśi

⟨Subtract⟩ the Moon from Venus ⟨and add the lagna⟩: the sahama called Kanyā (daughter) is declared, always ⟨the same by day and by night⟩, ⟨computed⟩ as already stated. Subtract the Sun from the Puṇya sahama and add the 11th (āya) ⟨bhāva⟩: that is the Aśva (horse) sahama; at night it is otherwise. [The mūla prints चंद्रः in the nominative where the sense requires the accusative चंद्रं, the Moon being the quantity taken away from Venus; the printed characters are kept.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रःसितादपास्योक्तंसदाकन्याख्यमुक्तवत् ॥ पुण्यादर्कमपास्याययोगादश्वोऽन्यथानिशि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सदा ("always") is taken as the statement that this sahama is not reversed at night, unlike its neighbours; that is why no day/night clause stands in the first half. चंद्रः is nominative where the construction (सितात् … अपास्य) wants the accusative चंद्रं; the reading is reported in the English and the Hindi and the printed characters are left untouched. आययोगात् is read as "by the addition of āya", the 11th bhāva standing in this formula where the lagna stands in the others; read instead as the lord of the 11th, the third term would change, and the ṭīkā's worked example would settle it.
4.25a reading here is contested

स्वनाथहीनं सहमं तदंशाः स्वीयोदयस्था विहृता त्रिशत्या ॥ तत्सद्मपाको दिवसैर्हि लब्धैः स्यात् तद्दशायां तदसंभवे वा

svanāthahīnaṃ sahamaṃ tadaṃśāḥ svīyodayasthā vihṛtā triśatyā || tatsadmapāko divasairhi labdhaiḥ syāt taddaśāyāṃ tadasaṃbhave vā

⟨Take⟩ the sahama less its own lord; those degrees, ⟨reckoned⟩ as standing in their own rising ⟨sign⟩ and divided by three hundred, ⟨yield days⟩: by the days so obtained the ripening (pāka) of that ⟨sahama's⟩ bhāva comes about; or, when that is not possible, ⟨the result⟩ falls in its daśā instead.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वनाथहीनंसहमंतदंशाःस्वीयोदयस्थाविहृतात्रिशत्या ॥ तत्सद्मपाकोदिवसैर्हिलब्धैःस्यात्तद्दशायांतदसंभवेवा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विहृतात्रिशत्या"; alternatives "विहृतास्त्रिशत्या", "विहृतास्त्रिंशत्या" — no anusvāra on त्रि printed (the ṭīkā below also prints त्रिशत्या); read as printed
  • About this edition: The arithmetic is stated in compressed form and this rendering is literal, not reconstructed. त्रिशत्या is rendered "by three hundred" because that is what the plate prints: the reader checked त्रिंशत्या ("by thirty") and records that no anusvāra is inked on त्रि, and that the ṭīkā below the line also prints त्रिशत्या. If the alternative were right the divisor would be 30 and not 300, and every day-count from this rule would change by a factor of ten — so anyone working a chart should test the rule against the ṭīkā's example before using it. विहृता likewise stands in the singular where तदंशाः is plural; the alternative विहृताः (in विहृतास्त्रिशत्या) would make the agreement regular. The printed characters are kept in both places. स्वीयोदयस्था is rendered "standing in their own rising ⟨sign⟩"; it may instead direct that the arc be converted by the rising times (udayamāna) of that sign, which is the sense the divisor would suit.
4.26a reading here is contested

स्वोच्चादिसत्पदगतो यदि लग्नदर्शी वीर्यान्वितः सहमपो यदि नेक्षतेंगं ॥ नासौ वली रविशशिश्रितभेशदर्शपूर्णांतलग्नपवलस्य विचारणेत्थम्

svoccādisatpadagato yadi lagnadarśī vīryānvitaḥ sahamapo yadi nekṣateṃgaṃ || nāsau valī raviśaśiśritabheśadarśapūrṇāṃtalagnapavalasya vicāraṇettham

If ⟨the sahama's lord⟩ stands in a good place beginning with its own exaltation (svocca), looks upon the lagna (the ascendant) and is endowed with strength, ⟨it is strong⟩; ⟨but⟩ if the sahama's lord does not look upon the ⟨sahama's own⟩ point (aṅga), he is not strong. Thus is the reckoning of the strength of the lagna's lord, ⟨a strength⟩ made full by the gaze of the lords of the signs the Sun and the Moon occupy. [The compound पूर्णांत in the last line gives no word as printed; the rendering 'made full' is the best sense it will bear, and the reading is doubtful.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वोच्चादिसत्पदगतोयदिलग्नदर्शीवीर्यान्वितःसहमपोयदिनेक्षतेंगं॥नासौवलीरविशशिश्रितभेशदर्शपूर्णांतलग्नपवलस्यविचारणेत्थम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दर्शपूर्णांत"; alternatives "दर्शपूर्णान्त" — anusvāra over र्णा read as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "२६"; alternatives "॥ २६ ॥" — numeral printed without daṇḍas
  • About this edition: The page sets this verse's number २६ bare, with no daṇḍas, at the end of a printed line; the verse is divided there.
  • About this edition: The reader records the anusvāra over र्णा as printed (दर्शपूर्णांत, not दर्शपूर्णान्त). The long compound रविशशिश्रितभेशदर्शपूर्णांतलग्नपवलस्य cannot be resolved with confidence, because पूर्णांत is not a word; its two halves, रविशशिश्रितभेशदर्श ('the aspect of the lords of the signs occupied by the Sun and the Moon') and लग्नपवलस्य विचारणा इत्थम् ('thus the reckoning of the lagna-lord's strength'), are clear. वलस्य is this press's व for ब, i.e. बलस्य.

पंचवर्गीबलेनोनो न हर्षस्थानमाश्रितः ॥ अबलोऽयं लग्नादर्शी बली स्वल्पेऽस्ति चेत्पदे

paṃcavargībalenono na harṣasthānamāśritaḥ || abalo'yaṃ lagnādarśī balī svalpe'sti cetpade

⟨A graha⟩ deficient in pañcavargī strength (the five-fold strength) and not resting in a harṣa-sthāna (a graha's 'place of joy') is weak. ⟨But⟩ this same one, if it looks upon the lagna, is strong even when it stands in a poor place.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पंचवर्गीबलेनोनोनहर्षस्थानमाश्रितः ॥ अबलोऽयंलग्नादर्शीबलीस्वल्पेऽस्तिचेत्पदे

स्वस्वामिना शुभखगैः सहितं च दृष्टं स्वामी बली च यदि तत्सहमस्य वृद्धिः ॥ यत्स्वामिना शुभखगैश्च न युक्तदृष्टं तत्संभवो न हि भवेदिति चिंत्यमादौ

svasvāminā śubhakhagaiḥ sahitaṃ ca dṛṣṭaṃ svāmī balī ca yadi tatsahamasya vṛddhiḥ || yatsvāminā śubhakhagaiśca na yuktadṛṣṭaṃ tatsaṃbhavo na hi bhavediti ciṃtyamādau

⟨A sahama⟩ joined with and aspected by its own lord and by the benefic grahas, and whose lord is strong — of that sahama there is increase. That which is joined with and aspected neither by its own lord nor by the benefics — its coming about (saṃbhava) does not take place at all. This must be weighed first.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वस्वामिनाशुभखगैःसहितंचदृष्टंस्वामी बलीचयदितत्सहमस्यवृद्धिः ॥ यत्स्वामिनाशुभखगैश्चनयुक्तदृष्टंतत्संभवोनहिभवेदितिचिंत्यमादौ

4.29a reading here is contested

अष्टमाधिपतिना युतेक्षितं पापदृग्युतमथेत्थशालितैः ॥ संभवेऽपि विलयं प्रयाति तत् तेन जन्मनि पुरेदमीक्ष्यताम्

aṣṭamādhipatinā yutekṣitaṃ pāpadṛgyutamathetthaśālitaiḥ || saṃbhave'pi vilayaṃ prayāti tat tena janmani puredamīkṣyatām

⟨A sahama⟩ joined with or aspected by the lord of the 8th (aṣṭama), or joined with the aspect of malefics, or in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with them — even where its coming about (saṃbhava) ⟨was established⟩, it goes to ruin. Therefore let this be looked at beforehand in the nativity.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अष्टमाधिपतिनायुतेक्षितं पापदृग्युतमथेत्थशालितैः ॥ संभवेऽपिविलयंप्रयातितत्तेनजन्मनिपुरेदमीक्ष्यताम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "२९"; alternatives "२२" — the second numeral is lightly inked; its tail reads as ९
4.30a reading here is contested

आदौ जन्मनि सर्वेषां सहमानां बलाबलम् ॥ विमृश्य संभवो येषां तानि वर्षे विचिंतयेत्

ādau janmani sarveṣāṃ sahamānāṃ balābalam || vimṛśya saṃbhavo yeṣāṃ tāni varṣe viciṃtayet

First, in the nativity, having weighed the strength and weakness of all the sahamas, let one consider ⟨in the year⟩ those whose coming about ⟨is established⟩. [The source read of the 1893 pothi gives तानिर्वेष, which is not a Sanskrit word. This pass emends the mūla to तानि वर्षे, 'those, in the year': the 1889 Kalpataru, Mahīdhara and Jhā store reads all give that form, the Pāṭhaka read gives the same two words transposed (वर्षे तानि), and the ṭīkā quoted in this verse's own note gives it too. The rendering above already followed that sense and does not change.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आदौजन्मनिसर्वेषांसहमानांबलाबलम् ॥ विमृश्यसंभवोयेषांतानिर्वेषविचिंतयेत्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तानिर्वेषविचिंतयेत्"; alternatives "तानिर्वैषविचिंतयेत्", "तानिवर्षेविचिंतयेत्" — zoomed: the repha and e-stroke stand over व, not over ष, so the print reads निर्वेष; the ṭīkā has तानिवर्षेविचिंतयेत्, which is probably what was meant (misplaced repha and mātrā). A second faint stroke over व could make it वै [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तानि वर्षे; this sentence names निर्वेष, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads तानिर्वेष. A reader dividing this verse judged तानि वर्षे the likely intent — तानिर्वेष is not a word. The repha and the e-stroke stand over व instead of over र and ष: read तानि वर्षे 'those, in the year', which is what the ṭīkā prints and what the sentence (आदौ जन्मनि … विमृश्य) requires.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तानि वर्षे; this sentence names तानिर्वेष, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The plate reader zoomed and found the repha and the e-stroke standing over व, not over ष, so the print reads निर्वेष; the ṭīkā reads तानि वर्षे. The English follows the ṭīkā's sense and says so; the Sanskrit is unchanged. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तानि वर्षे; this sentence names निर्वेष, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
4.31a reading here is contested

सबले पुण्यसहमे धर्मसिद्धिर्धनागमः ॥ शुभस्वामीक्षितयुतेऽव्यत्ययेऽव्यत्ययं विदुः

sabale puṇyasahame dharmasiddhirdhanāgamaḥ || śubhasvāmīkṣitayute'vyatyaye'vyatyayaṃ viduḥ

When the puṇya-sahama (the sahama of merit) is strong, there is accomplishment in dharma and a coming of wealth. When it is aspected and joined by benefics and by its own lord, ⟨so that⟩ there is no reversal ⟨of these conditions⟩, they declare ⟨the fruit too to be⟩ unreversed. [The page sets two small round marks, read as avagrahas; without them the line reads व्यत्यये व्यत्ययं विदुः, 'in the contrary case they declare the contrary' — the same rule stated from the other side, and the usual idiom.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सबलेपुण्यसहमेधर्मसिद्धिर्धनागमः ॥ शुभस्वा मीक्षितयुतेऽव्यत्ययेऽव्यत्ययंविदुः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युतेऽव्यत्ययेऽव्यत्ययं"; alternatives "युतेव्यत्ययेव्यत्ययं" — zoomed: two small round marks at mid-height after ते and after ये, smaller than this press's usual ऽ; recorded as ऽ because a mark is printed, but the sense (युते व्यत्यये व्यत्ययं) needs no avagraha
  • About this edition: The reader records two small round marks at mid-height, after ते and after ये, smaller than this press's usual avagraha. Read as avagrahas the line says 'no reversal'; read as ink specks it says 'in the reverse case, the reverse'. The claim is the same either way; only its direction of statement changes.
4.32a reading here is contested

लग्नात् षष्ठाष्टरिःफस्थं धर्मभाग्ययशोहरम् ॥ शुभस्वामिदृशां प्रांते सुखधर्मादिसंभवः

lagnāt ṣaṣṭhāṣṭariḥphasthaṃ dharmabhāgyayaśoharam || śubhasvāmidṛśāṃ prāṃte sukhadharmādisaṃbhavaḥ

⟨The puṇya-sahama⟩ standing in the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (riḥpha) from the lagna carries off dharma, fortune and fame. ⟨Where there are⟩ the aspects of the benefics and of its lord, in the latter part ⟨of the year⟩ happiness, dharma and the rest come about.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नात्षष्ठाष्टरिःफस्थंधर्मभाग्ययशोहरम् ॥ शुभस्वामिदृशांप्रांतेसुखधर्मादिसंभवः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफ"; alternatives "रिष्फ" — a visarga-like pair of dots stands between रि and फ; recorded as printed

पापयुक् शुभदृष्टं चेदशुभं प्राक् ततः शुभम् ॥ शुभयुक्तं पापदृष्टमादौ शुभमसत्परे

pāpayuk śubhadṛṣṭaṃ cedaśubhaṃ prāk tataḥ śubham || śubhayuktaṃ pāpadṛṣṭamādau śubhamasatpare

If ⟨the sahama is⟩ joined with a malefic but aspected by a benefic, ⟨the fruit is⟩ inauspicious first and auspicious after that. ⟨If it is⟩ joined with a benefic but aspected by a malefic, ⟨it is⟩ auspicious at the start and bad later.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापयुक्शुभदृष्टंचेदशुभंप्राक्ततःशुभम् ॥ शुभयुक्तंपापदृष्टमादौशुभमसत्परे

यत्राब्दे पुण्यसहमं शुभं सोऽत्र शुभावहः ॥ अनिष्टेऽस्मिन् शुभो नेति पुण्यमादौ विचारयेत्

yatrābde puṇyasahamaṃ śubhaṃ so'tra śubhāvahaḥ || aniṣṭe'smin śubho neti puṇyamādau vicārayet

In whatever year the puṇya-sahama is auspicious, that ⟨year⟩ is a bringer of good in this matter; when it is unfavourable in that ⟨year⟩, there is no good. Therefore one should examine the puṇya ⟨sahama⟩ first.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यत्राब्देपुण्यसहमंशुभंसोऽत्रशुभावहः ॥ अनिष्टेऽस्मिन्शुभोनेतिपुण्यमादौविचारयेत्

4.35a reading here is contested

सूतौ षष्ठाष्टरिःफस्थे मध्ये पापहतं पुनः ॥ पुण्यं धर्मार्थसौख्यघ्नं पत्यौ दग्धे फलं तथा

sūtau ṣaṣṭhāṣṭariḥphasthe madhye pāpahataṃ punaḥ || puṇyaṃ dharmārthasaukhyaghnaṃ patyau dagdhe phalaṃ tathā

When ⟨the puṇya-sahama⟩ stands in the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (riḥpha) at birth, and is again struck by malefics in the middle ⟨of the year⟩, the puṇya ⟨sahama⟩ destroys dharma, wealth and happiness; and when its lord is burnt (dagdha, combust), the fruit is the same. [मध्ये, 'in the middle', is read off broken type; the ṭīkā glosses अब्दे, 'in the year'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूतौषष्ठाष्टरिःफस्थेमध्येपापहतंपुनः ॥ पुण्यंधर्मार्थसौख्यघ्नंपत्यौदग्धेफलंतथा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्ये"; alternatives "म॰ध्ये (broken letter)", "ऽब्दे" — zoomed: between म and ध्ये there is a mark like two dots (worn/broken type); the ṭīkā glosses अब्देवर्षेपुनः, so the intended reading may be ऽब्दे, but the print shows म…ध्ये
  • About this edition: Between म and ध्ये the reader found a mark like two dots, i.e. worn or broken type; the ṭīkā glosses अब्दे वर्षे पुनः, so the intended word may be ऽब्दे. The rendering follows the print, मध्ये.

सहमान्यखिलानीत्थं सूतौ वर्षे विचिंतयेत् ॥ मांद्यारिकलिमृत्यूनां व्यत्ययादादिशेत्फलम्

sahamānyakhilānītthaṃ sūtau varṣe viciṃtayet || māṃdyārikalimṛtyūnāṃ vyatyayādādiśetphalam

Thus should one consider all the sahamas, in the nativity and in the year. For the māndya (illness), ari (enemy), kali (strife) and mṛtyu (death) ⟨sahamas⟩ one should declare the fruit by reversal ⟨of these rules⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सहमान्यखिलानीत्थंसूतौवर्षेविचिंतयेत् ॥ मांद्यारिकलिमृत्यूनांव्यत्ययादादिशेत्फ लम्

कार्यसिद्धिसहमं युतं शुभैर्दृष्टमूथशिलगं जयप्रदम् ॥ संगरेऽथ शुभपापदृष्टियुक् क्लेशतो जय उदीरितो बुधैः

kāryasiddhisahamaṃ yutaṃ śubhairdṛṣṭamūthaśilagaṃ jayapradam || saṃgare'tha śubhapāpadṛṣṭiyuk kleśato jaya udīrito budhaiḥ

The kārya-siddhi sahama (the sahama of the accomplishment of an undertaking), joined with benefics, aspected ⟨by them⟩ and standing in a muthaśila (the applying aspect), gives victory in battle. And when it carries the aspects of benefics and malefics mixed, the wise have declared that victory comes ⟨only⟩ out of distress.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कार्यसिद्धिसहमंयुतंशुभैर्दृष्टमूथशिलगंजयप्रदम् ॥ संगरेऽथशुभपापदृष्टियुक्क्लेशतोजयउदीरितोबुधैः

4.38a reading here is contested

कलिसञ्ज्ञमिश्रखगदृष्टिसंयुतं यदि पापमूथशिलगं कलेर्मृतिम् ॥ अथ तत्र सौम्यसहितावलोकिते जयमेति मिश्रदृशितः कलिव्यथे

kalisañjñamiśrakhagadṛṣṭisaṃyutaṃ yadi pāpamūthaśilagaṃ kalermṛtim || atha tatra saumyasahitāvalokite jayameti miśradṛśitaḥ kalivyathe

If the ⟨sahama⟩ named kali (strife), carrying the aspects of mixed grahas, stands in a muthaśila with a malefic, ⟨it gives⟩ death in the quarrel. But when it is there joined with and looked upon by benefics, one attains victory; from a mixed aspect, ⟨victory comes⟩ amid the pain of the quarrel.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कलिसञ्ज्ञमिश्रखगदृष्टिसंयुतंयदिपापमूथशिलगंकलेर्मृतिम् ॥ अथतत्रसौम्यसहितावलोकितेजयमेतिमिश्रदृशितःकलिव्यथे

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सञ्ज्ञ"; alternatives "संज्ञ", "सज्ञ" — a compact conjunct after स; read as ञ्ज्ञ, not zoomed
4.39a reading here is contested

विवाहसञ्ज्ञाधिपसौम्यदृष्टं युतं शुभैर्मूथशिलं शुभाप्तिम् ॥ कुर्याद्यदा मिश्रसमेतदृष्टं कष्टादथ क्रूरमृतीश्वरैर्न

vivāhasañjñādhipasaumyadṛṣṭaṃ yutaṃ śubhairmūthaśilaṃ śubhāptim || kuryādyadā miśrasametadṛṣṭaṃ kaṣṭādatha krūramṛtīśvarairna

The ⟨sahama⟩ named vivāha (marriage), aspected by its own lord and by benefics, joined with benefics and in a muthaśila, brings about the obtaining of the auspicious ⟨thing, the marriage⟩. When it is joined with and aspected by mixed ⟨grahas⟩, ⟨the marriage comes⟩ out of hardship; and ⟨when it is so held⟩ by cruel grahas and by the lord of death (the 8th), not ⟨at all⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विवाहसञ्ज्ञाधिपसौम्यदृष्टंयुतंशुभैर्मूथशिलंशुभाप्तिम् ॥ कुर्याद्यदामिश्रसमेतदृष्टंकष्टादथक्रूरमृतीश्वरैर्न

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सञ्ज्ञा"; alternatives "संज्ञा" — same compact conjunct as line 5
4.40a reading here is contested

यशोधिपे नैधनगे खलेन युतेक्षिते सद्यशसो विनाशः ॥ पापार्जितस्यायशसोऽस्ति लाभो नष्टौजसि स्यात्कुलकीर्तिनाशः

yaśodhipe naidhanage khalena yutekṣite sadyaśaso vināśaḥ || pāpārjitasyāyaśaso'sti lābho naṣṭaujasi syātkulakīrtināśaḥ

When the lord of the yaśas (fame) ⟨sahama⟩ stands in the 8th (naidhana) and is joined with or aspected by a malefic, good fame is destroyed; ⟨what comes⟩ is the gain of ill-fame earned by wrongdoing. And when ⟨that lord⟩ has lost its vigour, the fame of the family is destroyed.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यशोधिपेनैधनगेखले नयुतेक्षितेसद्यशसोविनाशः ॥ पापार्जितस्यायशसोऽस्तिलाभोनष्टौजसिस्यात्कुलकीर्तिनाशः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नैधनगे"; alternatives "नैंधनगे" — a small mark over नै may be an anusvāra or part of the ai-strokes

शुभेत्थशाले शुभदृग्युते वा बलान्विते स्याद्यशसोऽभिवृद्धिः ॥ युद्धे जयो वाहनशस्त्रलाभः पापे सराफादयशोर्थनाशः

śubhetthaśāle śubhadṛgyute vā balānvite syādyaśaso'bhivṛddhiḥ || yuddhe jayo vāhanaśastralābhaḥ pāpe sarāphādayaśorthanāśaḥ

When ⟨it is⟩ in an itthaśāla with a benefic, or joined with a benefic's aspect, or endowed with strength, there is increase of fame, victory in war, and gain of vehicles and weapons. With a malefic, from a sarāpha (the separating aspect), ⟨there is⟩ ill-fame and loss of wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभेत्थशालेशुभदृग्युतेवाबलान्वितेस्याद्यशसोऽभिवृद्धिः ॥ युद्धेजयोवाहनशस्त्रलाभःपापेसराफादयशोर्थनाशः

आशा तदीशश्च षडष्टरिःफविवर्जितः सौम्ययुतेक्षितश्च । स्याद्वांच्छितार्थांबरवाहनादिलाभः खलेक्षायुतितोऽतिदुःखम्

āśā tadīśaśca ṣaḍaṣṭariḥphavivarjitaḥ saumyayutekṣitaśca | syādvāṃcchitārthāṃbaravāhanādilābhaḥ khalekṣāyutito'tiduḥkham

⟨When⟩ the āśā ⟨sahama⟩ (desire) and its lord are free of the 6th, the 8th and the 12th (riḥpha), and are joined with or aspected by benefics, there is gain of the thing desired, of clothes, of vehicles and the like. From the aspect or conjunction of a malefic, very great sorrow.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आशातदीशश्च षडष्टरिःफविवर्जितःसौम्ययुतेक्षितश्च । स्याद्वांच्छितार्थांबरवाहनादिलाभःखलेक्षायुतितोऽतिदुःखम्

4.43a reading here is contested

मांद्याधिपः पापयुतेक्षितश्च पापः स्वयं रोगकरो विचिंत्यः ॥ चेदित्थशालो मृतिपेन मृत्युस्तदा भवेद्धीनबलेतिकष्टात्

māṃdyādhipaḥ pāpayutekṣitaśca pāpaḥ svayaṃ rogakaro viciṃtyaḥ || ceditthaśālo mṛtipena mṛtyustadā bhaveddhīnabaletikaṣṭāt

The lord of the māndya (illness) sahama, joined with or aspected by malefics and itself a malefic, is to be judged a maker of disease. And if it is in an itthaśāla with the lord of death (the lord of the 8th), then death follows; when ⟨it is⟩ of poor strength, ⟨death comes⟩ out of extreme suffering. [The page sets बलेति with no avagraha; the sense requires बले ऽति.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मांद्याधिपःपापयुतेक्षितश्च पापःस्वयंरोगकरोविचिंत्यः ॥ चेदित्थशालोमृतिपेनमृत्युस्तदाभवेद्धीनबलेतिकष्टात्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलेतिकष्टात्"; alternatives "बलेऽतिकष्टात्" — no avagraha printed; sense needs बले+अति. Kept as printed.
4.44a reading here is contested

स्वस्वामिसौम्येक्षणभाजि मांद्ये नाथे सवीर्येऽष्टषडंत्यवर्जे ॥ रोगस्तदा नैव भवेद् विमिश्रं युतेक्षिते रुग्भयमस्ति किंचित्

svasvāmisaumyekṣaṇabhāji māṃdye nāthe savīrye'ṣṭaṣaḍaṃtyavarje || rogastadā naiva bhaved vimiśraṃ yutekṣite rugbhayamasti kiṃcit

When the māndya ⟨sahama⟩ enjoys the aspect of its own lord and of the benefics, and ⟨its⟩ lord is strong and free of the 8th, the 6th and the 12th (antya), then indeed no disease occurs. When it is joined and aspected mixedly, there is some fear of illness.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वस्वामिसौम्येक्षणभाजिमांद्येनाथेसवी र्येऽष्टषडंत्यवर्जे ॥ रोगस्तदानैवभवेद्धिमिश्रंयुतेक्षितेरुग्भयमस्तिकिंचित्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेद्धिमिश्रं"; alternatives "भवेद्विमिश्रं" — conjunct read as द्धि; sense (मिश्र 'mixed') may want द्वि/भवेद्वि-; not zoomed [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads भवेद् विमिश्रं for भवेद्धि मिश्रं. The leaf sets द्व, read by eye on page_0087 at about 2.8x–3.5x native and measured against a द्व and a द्ध on the same page (overlap 0.801 against 0.624).]
  • About this edition: The conjunct in भवेद्धि was read without zoom; भवेद्धि (bhavet + hi, 'indeed occurs') is what this rendering takes. The reader's alternative भवेद्वि- would not change the claim, only the emphasis. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads भवेद् विमिश्रं for भवेद्धि मिश्रं. The leaf sets द्व, read by eye on page_0087 at about 2.8x–3.5x native and measured against a द्व and a द्ध on the same page; there is no हि, and the emphasis comes from नैव.]
4.45a reading here is contested

अर्थाख्यं शुभनाथदृष्टसहितं द्रव्यागमात्सौख्यदं पापैर्दृष्टयुतं च वित्तविलयं कुर्यादथो पापयुक् ॥ सद्दृष्टं च शुभेत्थशालि यदि तत्पूर्वं धनं नाशयेत्पश्चादर्थसमुद्भवं च ससुखं व्यत्यासतो व्यत्ययः

arthākhyaṃ śubhanāthadṛṣṭasahitaṃ dravyāgamātsaukhyadaṃ pāpairdṛṣṭayutaṃ ca vittavilayaṃ kuryādatho pāpayuk || saddṛṣṭaṃ ca śubhetthaśāli yadi tatpūrvaṃ dhanaṃ nāśayetpaścādarthasamudbhavaṃ ca sasukhaṃ vyatyāsato vyatyayaḥ

The ⟨sahama⟩ named artha (wealth), aspected by and joined with the benefics and its own lord, gives happiness through the coming of wealth; aspected by and joined with malefics, it brings about the loss of wealth. And again, if it is joined with a malefic, aspected by a benefic and in an itthaśāla with a benefic, it first destroys wealth and afterwards ⟨grants⟩ a rising of wealth together with happiness; in the reverse arrangement, the reverse.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अर्थाख्यंशुभनाथदृष्टसहितंद्रव्यागमात्सौख्यदंपापैर्दृष्टयुतंचवित्तविलयंकुर्यादथोपापयुक् ॥ सद्दृष्टंचशुभेत्थशालियदितत्पूर्वंधनंनाश येत्पश्चादर्थसमुद्भवंचससुखंव्यत्यासतोव्यत्ययः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्पूर्वं"; alternatives "तत्पूर्वँ" — the mark over र्वं is broad, could be candrabindu-shaped; read as anusvāra
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यत्यासतोव्यत्ययः"; alternatives "व्यत्यासतोऽयत्ययः", "व्यत्यासतोऽव्यत्ययः" — zoomed: between तो and य stands ONE small hooked glyph; read as half-व (the ṭīkā has व्यत्ययइति), but it is shaped much like this press's avagraha

रिपुदृष्ट्या रिपोर्भीतिस्तस्करादेर्धनक्षयः ॥ मित्रदृष्ट्या मित्रयोगाद्धनं मानो यशः सुखम्

ripudṛṣṭyā riporbhītistaskarāderdhanakṣayaḥ || mitradṛṣṭyā mitrayogāddhanaṃ māno yaśaḥ sukham

By the aspect of an enemy ⟨graha⟩, fear from an enemy and loss of wealth through thieves and the like; by the aspect of a friend ⟨graha⟩, wealth, honour, fame and happiness through union with a friend.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिपुदृष्ट्यारिपोर्भीतिस्तस्करादेर्धनक्षयः ॥ मित्रदृष्ट्यामित्रयोगाद्धनंमानोय शःसुखम्

सत्स्वामिदृष्टं युतमात्मजस्य लाभं सुखं यच्छति पुत्रसद्म ॥ पापान्वितं सौख्यखगेत्थशाली प्राग्दुःखदं पुत्रसुखाय पश्चात्

satsvāmidṛṣṭaṃ yutamātmajasya lābhaṃ sukhaṃ yacchati putrasadma || pāpānvitaṃ saukhyakhagetthaśālī prāgduḥkhadaṃ putrasukhāya paścāt

Aspected by benefics and by its own lord and joined ⟨with them⟩, the putra-sadman (the house, that is the sahama, of the son) grants the gain of a son and happiness. Joined with malefics ⟨but⟩ in an itthaśāla with the graha of happiness, it gives sorrow first and afterwards makes for the happiness of a son.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सत्स्वामिदृष्टंयुतमात्मजस्यलाभंसुखंयच्छतिपुत्रसद्म ॥ पापान्वितंसौख्यखगेत्थशालीप्राग्दुःखदंपुत्रसुखायपश्चात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सौख्यखग, 'the graha of happiness', is not defined here. It is either the lord of the 4th (sukha) or the benefic that signifies happiness; the verse does not say which.

पापान्वितं पापकृतेसराफं नाशाय पुत्रस्य गतौजसीशे ॥ सूतौ सुतेशः सहमेश्वरोऽब्दे पुत्रस्य लब्ध्यै शुभमित्रदृष्टः

pāpānvitaṃ pāpakṛtesarāphaṃ nāśāya putrasya gataujasīśe || sūtau suteśaḥ sahameśvaro'bde putrasya labdhyai śubhamitradṛṣṭaḥ

Joined with a malefic and in a sarāpha (the separating aspect) made by a malefic, ⟨the sahama⟩ makes for the destruction of the son, when its lord has lost its vigour. ⟨But⟩ the lord of the 5th (suta) in the nativity and the lord of the sahama in the year, aspected by benefics and by friendly ⟨grahas⟩, make for the obtaining of a son.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापान्वितंपापकृतेसराफंनाशायपुत्रस्यगतौजसीशे ॥ सूतौसुतेशःसहमेश्वरोऽब्देपुत्रस्यलब्ध्यैशुभमित्रदृष्टः

पित्र्यं सदीक्षितयुतं पतियुक्तदृष्टं तातस्य यच्छति धनांबरमानसौख्यम् ॥ पत्यौ गतौजसि मृतौ खलमूसराफे नाशः पितुश्चरगृहे परदेशयानात्

pitryaṃ sadīkṣitayutaṃ patiyuktadṛṣṭaṃ tātasya yacchati dhanāṃbaramānasaukhyam || patyau gataujasi mṛtau khalamūsarāphe nāśaḥ pituścaragṛhe paradeśayānāt

The paternal ⟨sahama⟩ (the tāta sahama, of the father), aspected by and joined with the benefics and joined with and aspected by its lord, grants the father wealth, clothes, honour and happiness. When its lord has lost its vigour, or stands in the 8th (mṛti), or is in a mūsarāpha (mūsaripha, the separating aspect) with a malefic, ⟨there is⟩ destruction of the father; and in a movable sign (cara), ⟨that comes⟩ through a journey to a foreign land.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पित्र्यंसदीक्षित युतंपतियुक्तदृष्टंतातस्ययच्छतिधनांबरमानसौख्यम् ॥ पत्यौगतौजसिमृतौखलमूसराफेनाशःपितुश्चरगृहेपरदेशयानात्

शुभेत्थशाले खलखेटयोगे गदप्रकोपः प्रथमं महान्स्यात् ॥ पश्चात्सुखं विंदति पूर्णवीर्ये नाथे नृपान्मानयशोऽभिवृद्धिः

śubhetthaśāle khalakheṭayoge gadaprakopaḥ prathamaṃ mahānsyāt || paścātsukhaṃ viṃdati pūrṇavīrye nāthe nṛpānmānayaśo'bhivṛddhiḥ

When there is an itthaśāla with a benefic ⟨but⟩ conjunction with a malefic graha, at first there will be a great outbreak of disease, and afterwards he finds happiness. When the lord is of full strength, ⟨there is⟩ increase of honour and fame from the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभे त्थशालेखलखेटयोगेगदप्रकोपःप्रथमंमहान्स्यात् ॥ पश्चात्सुखंविंदतिपूर्णवीर्येनाथेनृपान्मानयशोऽभिवृद्धिः

बंधनाख्यसहमं युतेक्षितं स्वामिना न हि तदास्ति बंधनम् ॥ पापवीक्षितयुतेऽस्ति बंधनं पापजे मुथशिले विशेषतः

baṃdhanākhyasahamaṃ yutekṣitaṃ svāminā na hi tadāsti baṃdhanam || pāpavīkṣitayute'sti baṃdhanaṃ pāpaje muthaśile viśeṣataḥ

When the sahama named bandhana (bondage, imprisonment) is joined with and aspected by its own lord, then there is no imprisonment. When it is aspected and joined by malefics there is imprisonment — especially in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) formed by a malefic.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बंधनाख्यसहमं युतेक्षितंस्वामिनानहितदास्तिबंधनम् ॥ पापवीक्षितयुतेऽस्तिबंधनंपापजेमुथशिलेविशेषतः

गौरवाख्यसहमं युतेक्षितं स्वामिना शुभखगैः सुखाप्तये ॥ राजगौरवयशोंबराप्तये पापवीक्षितयुते पदक्षतिः

gauravākhyasahamaṃ yutekṣitaṃ svāminā śubhakhagaiḥ sukhāptaye || rājagauravayaśoṃbarāptaye pāpavīkṣitayute padakṣatiḥ

The sahama named gaurava (honour), joined with and aspected by its own lord and by the benefic grahas, makes for the attaining of happiness, and for royal honour, fame and clothes. When it is aspected and joined by malefics, ⟨there is⟩ loss of station (pada).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गौरवाख्यसहमंयुतेक्षितंस्वामिनाशुभखगैःसुखाप्तये ॥ राजगौरवयशोंबराप्तयेपापवीक्षितयुतेपदक्षतिः

4.53a reading here is contested

शुभाशुभैर्दृष्टयुतं खलैश्चेत्कृतेत्थशालं धनमाननाशम् ॥ पूर्वं विधत्ते चरमे शुभेत्थाशाले सुखं वाहनशस्त्रलाभम्

śubhāśubhairdṛṣṭayutaṃ khalaiścetkṛtetthaśālaṃ dhanamānanāśam || pūrvaṃ vidhatte carame śubhetthāśāle sukhaṃ vāhanaśastralābham

Aspected by and joined with both benefics and malefics, if it has an itthaśāla made by malefics, it first brings about the loss of wealth and honour; in the latter ⟨part⟩, when there is an itthaśāla with a benefic, ⟨it brings⟩ happiness and the gain of vehicles and weapons.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभाशुभैर्दृष्टयुतंख लैश्चेत्कृतेत्थशालंधनमाननाशम् ॥ पूर्वंविधत्तेचरमेशुभेत्थाशालेसुखंवाहनशस्त्रलाभम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभेत्थाशाले"; alternatives "शुभेत्थशाले" — the a-matra after त्थ is clear at 1.9x; the same line sets कृतेत्थशालं WITHOUT it a few aksharas earlier, so the edition is inconsistent within one line. Recorded as printed.
  • About this edition: The page sets शुभेत्थाशाले with a long ā in the second occurrence and कृतेत्थशालं without it a few akṣaras earlier in the same line; the edition is inconsistent within one line. The word is the same, itthaśāla.
4.54a reading here is contested

कर्मभावसहमाधिपाः शुभैः स्वामिना मुथशिला बलान्विताः ॥ हेमवाजिगजभूमिलाभदाः पापदृष्टियुतितोऽशुभप्रदाः

karmabhāvasahamādhipāḥ śubhaiḥ svāminā muthaśilā balānvitāḥ || hemavājigajabhūmilābhadāḥ pāpadṛṣṭiyutito'śubhapradāḥ

The lords of the karma-bhāva (the 10th house) and of the ⟨karma⟩ sahama, ⟨joined⟩ with benefics, in a muthaśila with ⟨its⟩ lord and endowed with strength, give gain of gold, horses, elephants and land; from the aspect and conjunction of malefics they give what is inauspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कर्मभावसहमाधिपाःशुभैःस्वामिना मुथशिलाबलीन्विताः ॥ हेमवाजिगजभूमिलाभदाःपापदृष्टियुतितोऽशुभप्रदाः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलीन्विताः"; alternatives "बलान्विताः" — at 6x the matra over ल is a hooked ii, not a plain aa. The tika on this same page (bottom band, line 1) glosses the word as बलान्विताः with aa. Recorded as the mula prints it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads बलान्विताः; this sentence names बलीन्विताः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The mūla prints बलीन्विताः with a hooked ī; the ṭīkā on the same page glosses it बलान्विताः. Both give 'endowed with strength', which is how it is rendered; the mūla is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads बलान्विताः; this sentence names बलीन्विताः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

दग्धा वक्राः कर्मवैकल्यदास्ते युक्ता दृष्टाः सौरिणा ते विशेषात् ॥ राज्यभ्रंशः कर्मनाशश्च राजकर्मेशौ चेन्मूसरीफौ खलेन

dagdhā vakrāḥ karmavaikalyadāste yuktā dṛṣṭāḥ sauriṇā te viśeṣāt || rājyabhraṃśaḥ karmanāśaśca rājakarmeśau cenmūsarīphau khalena

Burnt (combust) or retrograde, they cause the failure of work — especially when joined with or aspected by Saturn. And if the lords of the rāja ⟨sahama⟩ and of karma are in a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) with a malefic, ⟨there is⟩ loss of kingdom and destruction of work.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दग्धावक्राःकर्मवैकल्यदास्तेयुक्तादृष्टाः सौरिणातेविशेषात् ॥ राज्यभ्रंशःकर्मनाशश्चराजकर्मेशौचेन्मूसरीफौखलेन

उपदेष्टा गुरुर्ज्ञानं विद्या शास्त्रं श्रुतिस्मृती ॥ मोहो जाड्यं बलं सैन्यमंगं देहो जलं द्युतिः

upadeṣṭā gururjñānaṃ vidyā śāstraṃ śrutismṛtī || moho jāḍyaṃ balaṃ sainyamaṃgaṃ deho jalaṃ dyutiḥ

⟨Now what the sahama-names stand for:⟩ the guru ⟨sahama is⟩ the instructor; jñāna, knowledge; vidyā, śāstra, śruti and smṛti; ⟨jāḍya,⟩ delusion and dullness; bala, strength and an army; ⟨tanu,⟩ the limb, the body; ⟨ambu,⟩ water; ⟨and⟩ radiance.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उपदेष्टागुरुर्ज्ञानंविद्याशास्त्रंश्रुतिस्मृती ॥ मोहोजाड्यंबलंसैन्यमंगंदेहोजलंद्युतिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse is a bare string of nominatives glossing the sahama names listed at 4.1–4; nothing in the line marks which word glosses which name. The pairing shown in ⟨ ⟩ is supplied from those lists and is not in the text. जलं द्युतिः in particular may be two glosses or one.

गुरुता मंडलेशत्वं गौरवं मानशालिता ॥ निग्रहानुग्रहविभू राजा छत्रादिलिंगभाक्

gurutā maṃḍaleśatvaṃ gauravaṃ mānaśālitā || nigrahānugrahavibhū rājā chatrādiliṃgabhāk

Gurutā ⟨means⟩ lordship of a province (maṇḍaleśatva); gaurava, the possession of honour; ⟨rāja,⟩ the king, who commands punishment and favour and bears the parasol and the other emblems ⟨of royalty⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरुतामंडलेशत्वंगौरवंमानशालिता ॥ निग्रहानुग्रहविभूराजाछत्रादिलिंगभाक्

4.58a reading here is contested

माहात्म्यं मंत्रगांभीर्यं धृतिबुद्ध्यादिशालिता ॥ सामर्थ्यं देहजा शक्तिः शौर्यं यत्नोऽरिनिग्रहे

māhātmyaṃ maṃtragāṃbhīryaṃ dhṛtibuddhyādiśālitā || sāmarthyaṃ dehajā śaktiḥ śauryaṃ yatno'rinigrahe

Māhātmya ⟨means⟩ depth in counsel and the possession of steadiness, intelligence and the like; sāmarthya, the strength that is born of the body; śaurya, exertion in the subduing of enemies.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

माहात्म्यंमंत्रगांभीर्यंधृतिबुद्ध्यादिशालिता ॥ सामर्थ्यंदेहजाशक्तिःशौर्यंयत्नो ऽरिनिग्रहे

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽरिनिग्रहे" — the AVAGRAHA is unmistakable at 7x - an S-curve standing clear of the head-line. The word runs on from शौर्यंयत्नो at the end of the line above: यत्नोऽरिनिग्रहे.

आशेच्छोक्ता मतिर्धर्म्या श्रद्धा बंदः पराश्रयः ॥ पानीयपतनं वृष्टिर्जलेऽकस्माच्च मज्जनम्

āśecchoktā matirdharmyā śraddhā baṃdaḥ parāśrayaḥ || pānīyapatanaṃ vṛṣṭirjale'kasmācca majjanam

Āśā is said to be desire; ⟨śraddhā,⟩ a mind turned to dharma; banda ⟨the bandaka sahama⟩, dependence on another; pānīya-patana, rain and a sudden sinking in water.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आशेच्छोक्तामतिर्धर्म्याश्रद्धाबंदःपराश्रयः ॥ पानीयपतनंवृष्टिर्जलेऽकस्माच्चमज्जनम्

4.60a reading here is contested

आधिव्याधी तापमांद्ये सपिंडा बंधवः स्मृताः ॥ सत्यालीकं वणिग्वृत्तिराधानं प्रसवः स्मृतः

ādhivyādhī tāpamāṃdye sapiṃḍā baṃdhavaḥ smṛtāḥ || satyālīkaṃ vaṇigvṛttirādhānaṃ prasavaḥ smṛtaḥ

Tāpa ⟨saṃtāpa⟩ and māndya ⟨mean⟩ affliction of the mind (ādhi) and disease of the body (vyādhi); the bandhu ⟨sahama's⟩ kinsmen are declared to be sapiṇḍas; ⟨...⟩ truth and falsehood; vaṇij ⟨means⟩ the trader's livelihood; sūti is declared to be conception and birth. [Our mūla now reads आधिव्याधी, the pair ādhi and vyādhi.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आधिऽयाधीतापमांद्येसपिंडाबंधवः स्मृताः ॥ सत्यालीकंवणिग्वृत्तिराधानंप्रसवःस्मृतः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आधिऽयाधी"; alternatives "आधिर्व्याधी", "आधिव्याधी" — zoomed: after धि the glyph is shaped like an avagraha ऽ joined to या; the sense (ṭīkā: आधिः … व्याधिः) needs व्या; may be the press's form of a half-व or a र्व ligature. Kept as the glyph looks. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads आधिव्याधी; this sentence names आधिऽयाधी, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads आधिऽयाधी. A reader dividing this verse judged आधिर्व्याधी the likely intent — आधिऽयाधी is not a word. The pair wanted here is ādhi (affliction of the mind) and vyādhi (disease of the body), glossing the two sahamas named in the same line, तापमांद्ये. The reader saw an avagraha-shaped glyph joined to या where this press's र्व ligature belongs; the ṭīkā reads आधिः … व्याधिः.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads आधिव्याधी; this sentence names आधिऽयाधी, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The reader zoomed and found a glyph shaped like an avagraha joined to या after धि, where this press's र्व ligature belongs; the ṭīkā reads आधिः … व्याधिः. सत्यालीकं, 'truth and falsehood', stands in the line without a name beside it; which sahama it glosses is not said.

दासत्वं परकर्मोक्तमन्यत्स्पष्टं स्वनामतः ॥ निरूप्याणि यथायोग्यं कुलजातिस्वरूपतः

dāsatvaṃ parakarmoktamanyatspaṣṭaṃ svanāmataḥ || nirūpyāṇi yathāyogyaṃ kulajātisvarūpataḥ

Para-karma (another's work) is said to be servitude; the rest is plain from its own name. ⟨These⟩ are to be determined as befits ⟨the case⟩, according to family, caste and ⟨the native's own⟩ condition.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दासत्वंपरकर्मोक्तमन्यत्स्पष्टंस्वनामतः ॥ निरूप्याणियथायोग्यंकुल जातिस्वरूपतः

4.62a reading here is contested

शुभयोगेक्षणात्सौख्यं पत्युर्वीर्यानुसारतः ॥ दारिद्र्यमृतिमांद्यारिकलिषूक्तो विपर्ययः

śubhayogekṣaṇātsaukhyaṃ patyurvīryānusārataḥ || dāridryamṛtimāṃdyārikaliṣūkto viparyayaḥ

From the conjunction and aspect of benefics ⟨there is⟩ happiness, in proportion to the strength of the lord. In ⟨the sahamas of⟩ dāridrya (poverty), mṛti (death), māndya (illness), ari (the enemy) and kali (strife), the reverse is declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभयोगेक्षणात्सौख्यंपत्युर्वीर्यानुसारतः ॥ दारिद्र्यमतिमांद्यारिकलिपूक्तोविपर्ययः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads कलिपूक्तो. A reader dividing this verse judged कलिषूक्तो the likely intent — कलिपू is not a word. कलिषु + उक्तः → कलिषूक्तः 'in ⟨the sahamas of⟩ … kali the ⟨reverse⟩ is declared' — the locative plural the list दारिद्र्य-…-अरि- requires, and the same rule 4.36 states for मांद्यारिकलिमृत्यूनाम्. ष and प differ only by the loop and the top bar in this fount.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads दारिद्र्यमृतिमांद्यारिकलिषूक्तो; this sentence names कलिपूक्तो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads दारिद्र्यमति. A reader dividing this verse judged दारिद्र्यमृति the likely intent — मति ('thought') has no place in a list of afflictions and is not a sahama name. मृति 'death' is, and 4.36 lists exactly मांद्य, अरि, कलि and मृत्यु as the sahamas whose fruit is read in reverse. The ṛ-stroke under म is easily lost in this print.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads दारिद्र्यमृतिमांद्यारिकलिषूक्तो; this sentence names दारिद्र्यमति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Two misprints in one pāda. कलिषु + उक्तः gives कलिषूक्तः, the locative plural the list requires; ष and प differ only by a loop and the top bar in this fount. And 4.36 names exactly मांद्य, अरि, कलि and मृत्यु as the sahamas whose fruit is read in reverse, so मति stands for मृति, whose ṛ-stroke is easily lost. Without both corrections the second half has no construction at all. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads दारिद्र्यमृतिमांद्यारिकलिषूक्तो; this sentence names मति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

प्रश्नकालेपि सहमं विचार्य प्रष्टुरिच्छया ॥ सर्वेषामुपयोगोत्र चित्रं पृच्छंति यज्जनाः

praśnakālepi sahamaṃ vicārya praṣṭuricchayā || sarveṣāmupayogotra citraṃ pṛcchaṃti yajjanāḥ

At the time of a question (praśna) too the sahama is to be considered, according to the questioner's desire. Here every one of them has its use, since the things people ask about are of every kind.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रश्नकालेपि सहमंविचार्यप्रष्टुरिच्छया ॥ सर्वेषामुपयोगोत्रचित्रंपृच्छंतियज्जनाः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints प्रश्नकालेपि and उपयोगोत्र without avagrahas, for प्रश्नकाले ऽपि and उपयोगो ऽत्र; the rendering takes the words as the sense requires and the mūla is left as printed.

Adhyāya 5 · इतिताजिकनीलकंठ्यांसंज्ञातंत्रंसमाप्तम्

5.1a reading here is contested

स्पष्टान् सलग्नान् खचरान् विधाय राशीन् विनात्यल्पलवं तु पूर्वम् ॥ निवेश्य तस्मादधिकाधिकांशक्रमादयं स्यात् तु दशाक्रमोब्दे

spaṣṭān salagnān khacarān vidhāya rāśīn vinātyalpalavaṃ tu pūrvam || niveśya tasmādadhikādhikāṃśakramādayaṃ syāt tu daśākramobde

Having made the grahas exact ⟨in longitude⟩ together with the lagna ⟨at the moment the year enters⟩, and ⟨setting them down⟩ without their rāśis — that is, keeping only the degrees elapsed within the sign — place first the one whose degree-portion is the very smallest; and from that one onward place ⟨the rest⟩ in the order of ever greater degrees. This will be the order of the daśās in the year.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्पष्टान्सलग्नान्खचरान्विधायराशीन्विनात्यल्पलवंतुपूर्वम् ॥ निवेश्यतस्मादधिकाधिकांशक्रमादयंस्यात्तुदशाक्र मोब्दे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमादयंस्यात्तुदशाक्र"; alternatives "क्रमादयंस्याच्चुदशाक्र" — zoomed: स्यात्तु is clear
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "॥१॥" — numeral १ printed in a narrow form, set tight without spaces, as is ॥२॥
5.2a reading here is contested

ऊनं विशोध्याधिकतः क्रमेण शोध्यं विशुद्धांशकशेषकैक्यम् ॥ सर्वाधिकांशोन्मितमेव तत् स्यादनेन वर्षस्यमितिस् तु भाज्या

ūnaṃ viśodhyādhikataḥ krameṇa śodhyaṃ viśuddhāṃśakaśeṣakaikyam || sarvādhikāṃśonmitameva tat syādanena varṣasyamitis tu bhājyā

Subtract the lesser ⟨degree-figure⟩ from the greater, and so subtract in order ⟨each from the one standing above it⟩. The sum of the remainders of the purified degrees (viśuddhāṃśaka, the śuddhāṃśas) will come out measured exactly by the largest degree-figure of all ⟨which is the check that the working is right⟩. By this ⟨sum⟩ the measure of the year is to be divided.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ऊनंविशोध्याधिकतःक्रमेणशोध्यंविशुद्धांशकशेषकैक्यम् ॥ सर्वाधिकांशोन्मितमेवतत्स्यादनेनवर्षस्थमितिस्तुभाज्या

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्षस्थमितिस्तु"; alternatives "वर्षस्यमितिस्तु" — थ/य hard to tell at tile scale; a zoom crop missed the lower half
  • About this edition: The plate reader could not decide between वर्षस्थमितिः ('the measure standing in the year') and वर्षस्यमितिः ('the measure of the year'); the printed reading is rendered, and the two do not differ in claim. The verse does not say what the year's measure is; it is the length of the year in whatever unit the computer uses.

शुद्धांशकांस्तान् गुणयेदनेन लब्धध्रुवांकेन भवेद् दशायाः ॥ मानं दिनाद्यं खलु तद्ग्रहस्य फलान्यथासां निगदेत् तु शास्त्रात्

śuddhāṃśakāṃstān guṇayedanena labdhadhruvāṃkena bhaved daśāyāḥ || mānaṃ dinādyaṃ khalu tadgrahasya phalānyathāsāṃ nigadet tu śāstrāt

Multiply those śuddhāṃśas by this dhruvāṅka ⟨the constant got by that division⟩; ⟨the product⟩ will be the measure of that graha's daśā, in days and the rest. And their results one should declare from the śāstra.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुद्धांशकांस्तान्गुणयेदनेनलब्धध्रुवांकेनभवेद्दशायाः ॥ मानंदिनाद्यंखलुतद्ग्रहस्यफलान्यथासांनिगदेत्तुशास्त्रात्

5.4a reading here is contested

शुद्धांशसाम्ये बलिनो दशाद्या बलस्य साम्ये ऽल्पगतेस् तु पूर्वा ॥ साम्ये विलग्नस्य खगेन चिंत्या बलादिका लग्नपतेर्विचिंत्या

śuddhāṃśasāmye balino daśādyā balasya sāmye 'lpagates tu pūrvā || sāmye vilagnasya khagena ciṃtyā balādikā lagnapaterviciṃtyā

When the śuddhāṃśas are equal, the daśā of the stronger ⟨of the two⟩ comes first. When the strength too is equal, then ⟨the daśā⟩ of the one of slower motion comes first. When the lagna is equal with a graha, ⟨the question⟩ is to be settled by strength and the rest; and ⟨for the lagna⟩ it is the strength of the lord of the lagna that is to be considered. [Our mūla now reads विचिंत्या, without the anusvāra, and the Upendravajrā pāda scans exactly.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुद्धांश- साम्येबलिनोदशाद्याबलस्यसाम्येऽल्पगतेस्तुपूर्वा ॥ साम्येविलग्नस्यखगेनचिंत्याबलादिकालग्नपतेर्विंचिंत्या

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खगेनचिंत्या"; alternatives "खगेर्नचिंत्या", "खगेनर्चिंत्या" — at tile scale a mark over the न/ि-bar could be a repha or only the ि hook; zoom confirms चिं carries only its ि hook and dot
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पतेर्विंचिंत्या"; alternatives "पतेर्विचिंत्या" — zoomed: over वि sit the repha, the ि hook and a dot; the dot may belong to नि/चिं spacing or be a stray anusvāra [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नपतेर्विचिंत्या; this sentence names पतेर्विंचिंत्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads पतेर्विंचिंत्या. A reader dividing this verse judged पतेर्विचिंत्या the likely intent — The pāda is an Upendravajrā and its ninth syllable must be short; विं with the anusvāra is long, and without it the pāda scans exactly. The plate reader also recorded the dot over वि as possibly a stray mark.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नपतेर्विचिंत्या; this sentence names पतेर्विंचिंत्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.5a reading here is contested

दशामानं समामानं प्रकल्प्योक्तेन वर्त्मना ॥ अंतर्दशा साधनीया प्राक् पात्यांशवशेन तु ॥ आदावंतर्दशा पाकपतेस् तत्क्रमतोपरा

daśāmānaṃ samāmānaṃ prakalpyoktena vartmanā || aṃtardaśā sādhanīyā prāk pātyāṃśavaśena tu || ādāvaṃtardaśā pākapates tatkramatoparā

Reckoning the measure of the ⟨running⟩ daśā as ⟨though it were⟩ the measure of the year, by the method already stated, the antardaśā is to be worked out by means of the pātyāṃśas as before. First comes the antardaśā of the lord of the running daśā (pāka-pati), and after it the others in that same order.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशामानंसमामानंप्रकल्प्योक्तेनवर्त्मना ॥ अंतर्दशासाधनीयाप्राक्पात्यांशवशेनतु ॥ आदावंतर्दशापाकपतेस्तत्क्रमतोपरा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दशामानं"; alternatives "दशामानं" — the first akṣaras of the line are faintly inked but legible
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्क्रमतोपरा"; alternatives "तत्क्रमतोऽपरा" — no avagraha printed; recorded as printed

एकैकराशिवृद्ध्या चेत् तुल्यों ऽशाद्यैर्यदा रविः ॥ तदा मासप्रवेशो द्युप्रवेशश् चेत् कलासमः

ekaikarāśivṛddhyā cet tulyoṃ 'śādyairyadā raviḥ || tadā māsapraveśo dyupraveśaś cet kalāsamaḥ

When the Sun, growing by one rāśi at a time, becomes equal ⟨to its place at birth⟩ from the degrees onward, then it is the month-entry (māsa-praveśa); and it is the day-entry (dyu-praveśa) if it is equal from the kalās ⟨minutes⟩ onward ⟨that is, when it grows by one degree at a time⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एकैकराशिवृद्ध्याचेत्तुल्योंऽशाद्यैर्यदारविः ॥ तदामासप्रवेशोद्युप्रवेशश्चेत्कलासमः

5.7a reading here is contested

मासार्कस्य तदासन्नपंक्त्यर्केण सहांतरम् ॥ कलीकृत्वार्कगत्याप्त दिनाद्येन युतोनितम्

māsārkasya tadāsannapaṃktyarkeṇa sahāṃtaram || kalīkṛtvārkagatyāpta dinādyena yutonitam

Take the difference of the month-Sun (māsārka) with the Sun of the ⟨almanac⟩ row nearest to it; turn ⟨that difference⟩ into kalās and divide by the ⟨Sun's⟩ motion, and by the days and the rest so obtained ⟨the row's time⟩ is increased or diminished.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मासार्कस्यतदासन्नपंक्त्यर्केणसहांतरम् ॥ कली कृत्वार्थगत्याप्तदिनाद्येनयुतोनितम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृत्वार्थगत्याप्त"; alternatives "कृत्वार्कगत्याप्त" — zoomed: the print clearly sets र्थ; the ṭīkā glosses अवधिस्थार्कगत्याभाज्याः, so र्क may be meant. Print kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कलीकृत्वार्कगत्याप्त; this sentence names कृत्वार्थगत्याप्त, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads कृत्वार्थगत्याप्त. A reader dividing this verse judged कृत्वार्कगत्याप्त the likely intent — The quantity divided by here is the Sun's daily motion; अर्थगति is no quantity in this working, while अर्कगति is the one the next verse's correction needs. र्थ and र्क differ by a single stroke in this fount.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कलीकृत्वार्कगत्याप्त; this sentence names कृत्वार्थगत्याप्त, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

तत्पंक्तिस्थं वारपूर्वं मासार्के ऽधिकहीनके ॥ तद्वाराद्ये मासवेशो द्युवेशोप्येवमेव च

tatpaṃktisthaṃ vārapūrvaṃ māsārke 'dhikahīnake || tadvārādye māsaveśo dyuveśopyevameva ca

When the month-Sun is greater or less ⟨than that row's Sun⟩, ⟨the correction is applied to⟩ the weekday and what follows it standing in that row; at that ⟨corrected⟩ weekday and hour the month-entry falls. The day-entry too is exactly in this same way.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्पंक्तिस्थंवारपूर्वंमासार्केऽधिकहीनके ॥ तद्वाराद्येमासवेशोद्युवेशोप्येवमेवच

5.9a reading here is contested

भूः१ पंचचंद्राः१५ कुगुणाः३१ कुरामाः३१ सिद्धा२४ गताब्दैर्गुणिताः समेताः ॥ खेना०ब्धिदस्रै२४र्गुणलोचनैश्च२३ तष्टा नगै७रर्कमुखो ऽब्दपः स्यात्

bhūḥ1 paṃcacaṃdrāḥ15 kuguṇāḥ31 kurāmāḥ31 siddhā24 gatābdairguṇitāḥ sametāḥ || khenā0bdhidasrai24rguṇalocanaiśca23 taṣṭā nagai7rarkamukho 'bdapaḥ syāt

⟨Set down⟩ 1 (bhū, 'earth'), 15 (pañca-candra), 31 (ku-guṇa), 31 (ku-rāma) and 24 (siddha) — ⟨these are the day, the ghaṭīs, the palas, the vipalas and the place after them⟩ — multiplied by the elapsed years and brought together; joined with 0 (kha), 24 (abdhi-dasra) and 23 (guṇa-locana), and divided by 7 (naga), ⟨the remainder⟩ will be the lord of the year, ⟨counted⟩ with the Sun at the head ⟨so that 1 is the Sun's day⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भूः१पंचचंद्राः१५कुगुणाः३१कुरामाः३१सिद्धा२४गताब्दैर्गुणिताःसमेताः ॥ खेना०ब्धिदस्रै२४र्गुणलोचनैश्च२३तष्टानगै७रर्कमुखोऽब्द पःस्यात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूः१"; alternatives "भूः" — the numeral glosses (१, १५, ३१, ३१, २४, ०, २४, २३, ७) are set inside the large-type line in smaller figures; kept as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेना०ब्धिदस्रै२४"; alternatives "खेनाब्धिदस्रै२४" — a small ० is printed after ना, inside the word
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १ within its section; it is published at position 9.
  • About this edition: The five figures are printed inside the line in small type beside their number-words, and the verse itself does not name their units; they are the successive sexagesimal places of the annual advance (one day, 15 ghaṭī, 31 palā, 31 vipalā, 24). The units are supplied in ⟨ ⟩ and are not in the Sanskrit. The small ० after खेना is printed inside the word, as the reader recorded.
5.10a reading here is contested

अब्दौघतः शैलनखै२०७र्विनिघ्नात् पुनर्मनुघ्नं गतवर्षवृंदम् ॥ शराब्धिभक्तं४५ घटिकादि लब्धं युतं नभोश्व्यग्नि३२० युतात् खखेभैः८०० ॥ हृतादिनाद्यं गतवर्षयुक्तं सप्तोद्धृतं मेषमुखो ऽब्दपः स्यात्

abdaughataḥ śailanakhai207rvinighnāt punarmanughnaṃ gatavarṣavṛṃdam || śarābdhibhaktaṃ45 ghaṭikādi labdhaṃ yutaṃ nabhośvyagni320 yutāt khakhebhaiḥ800 || hṛtādinādyaṃ gatavarṣayuktaṃ saptoddhṛtaṃ meṣamukho 'bdapaḥ syāt

⟨Take⟩ the heap of years multiplied by 207 (śaila-nakha); and again ⟨take⟩ the collection of elapsed years multiplied by manu (14) and divided by 45 (śara-abdhi) — the quotient, in ghaṭikās and the rest, is added ⟨to it⟩. From ⟨that sum⟩ increased by 320 (nabhas-aśvin-agni) and divided by 800 (kha-kha-ibha), ⟨comes a quantity⟩ in days and the rest; joined with the elapsed years and divided by 7 (sapta), ⟨the remainder⟩ will be the lord of the year, ⟨counted⟩ with Meṣa at the head. [The page sets हृतादिनाद्यं with a single द; हृतात् is the ablative that answers to युतात् in the line before, and त् + द gives द्द, so the word is हृताद्दिनाद्यम्. The Sanskrit above is left as printed.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दौघतःशैलनखै२०७र्विनिघ्नात्पुनर्मनुघ्नंगतवर्षवृंदम् ॥ शराब्धिभक्तं४५घटिकादिलब्धंयुतंनभोश्व्यग्नि३२०युतात्खखेभैः८०० ॥ हृतादिनाद्यंगतवर्षयुक्तंसप्तोद्धृतंमेषमुखोऽब्दपःस्यात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नभोश्व्यग्नि"; alternatives "नभोऽश्व्यग्नि" — zoomed: the glyph after भो may carry a fused avagraha stroke; no separate ऽ is clear, so recorded without
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २ within its section; it is published at position 10.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads हृतादिनाद्यं. A reader dividing this verse judged हृताद्दिनाद्यं the likely intent — हृतात् is the ablative that answers to युतात् in the pāda before it, and त् + द gives द्द; the press sets a single द, so one consonant is missing.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: मनु is not glossed in figures on the page; manu = 14 is the standard number-word. This verse and verse 9 are two ways of reaching the same thing, and each names the point the count starts from differently — verse 9 'with the Sun at the head', this one 'with Meṣa at the head'. Both are rendered as the Sanskrit has them.
5.11a reading here is contested

आसीदसीमगुणमंडितपंडिताग्र्यो व्याख्यद् भुजंगपगवीः श्रुतिवित् सुवृत्तः ॥ साहित्यरीतिनिपुणो गणितागमज्ञश् चिंतामणिर्विपुलगर्गकुलावतंसः

āsīdasīmaguṇamaṃḍitapaṃḍitāgryo vyākhyad bhujaṃgapagavīḥ śrutivit suvṛttaḥ || sāhityarītinipuṇo gaṇitāgamajñaś ciṃtāmaṇirvipulagargakulāvataṃsaḥ

There was Cintāmaṇi, foremost among paṇḍitas, adorned with measureless merits, who expounded the utterances of the Serpent-lord ⟨Patañjali⟩, who knew the Veda and was of good conduct, skilled in the ways of literature and versed in the science of computation — the crest-jewel of the broad line of Garga.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आसीदसीमगुणमंडितपंडिताग्र्योव्याख्यद्भुजंगपगवीःश्रुतिवित्सुवृत्तः ॥ साहित्यरीतिनिपुणोगणितागमज्ञश्चिंतामणिर्विपुलगर्गकु लावतंसः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पंडिताग्र्योव्याख्यद्"; alternatives "पंडिताग्र्योऽव्याख्यद्" — zoomed: a curl sits between ो and व्या that may be a fused avagraha; recorded without, since no separate ऽ glyph is clear
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १ within its section; it is published at position 11.
5.12a reading here is contested

तदात्मजो ऽनंतगुणो ऽस्त्यनंतो यो ऽधोक् तदुक्तीः किल कामधेनुम् ॥ सत्तुष्टये जातकपद्धतिं च न्यरूपयद् दुष्टमतं निरस्य

tadātmajo 'naṃtaguṇo 'styanaṃto yo 'dhok taduktīḥ kila kāmadhenum || sattuṣṭaye jātakapaddhatiṃ ca nyarūpayad duṣṭamataṃ nirasya

His son is Ananta, whose merits too are without end (ananta), who indeed milked the wish-granting cow ⟨the Kāmadhenu⟩ for those utterances of hers; and who, casting out corrupt doctrine, set forth the Jātaka-paddhati for the pleasure of the good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तदात्मजोऽनंतगुणोऽस्त्यनंतोयोऽधोक्तदुक्तीःकिलकामधेनुम् ॥ सत्तुष्टयेजातकपद्धतिंचन्यरूपयद्दुष्टमतंनिरस्य

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योऽधोक्तदुक्तीः"; alternatives "योऽधोक्षदुक्तीः" — the mūla prints क्त where the ṭīkā line 5 prints क् + दु; kept as printed
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २ within its section; it is published at position 12.
  • About this edition: The printed योऽधोक्तदुक्तीः is divided here as यो ऽधोक् तदुक्तीः — अधोक् is the imperfect of दुह् 'to milk', which takes two accusatives (he milked the cow for the utterances). Nothing in the Sanskrit is changed; only the word boundary is read this way, and the plate reader recorded that the ṭīkā's own division differs.
5.13a reading here is contested

पद्मांबयाऽसावि ततो विपश्चिच् छ्रीनीलकंठः श्रुतिशास्त्रनिष्ठः ॥ विद्वच्छिवप्रीतिकरं व्यधात् तं संज्ञाविवेकं सहमावतंसम्

padmāṃbayā'sāvi tato vipaścic chrīnīlakaṃṭhaḥ śrutiśāstraniṣṭhaḥ || vidvacchivaprītikaraṃ vyadhāt taṃ saṃjñāvivekaṃ sahamāvataṃsam

From him, by Padmāmbā ⟨his mother⟩, was born this learned Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha, steadfast in the Veda and the śāstras; and he made this Saṃjñāviveka, which gives delight to the learned and to Śiva, and which is crowned with the sahamas.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पद्मांबयाऽसाविततो विपश्चिच्छ्रीनीलकंठःश्रुतिशास्त्रनिष्ठः॥विद्वच्छिवप्रीतिकरंव्यधात्तंसंज्ञाविवेकंसहमावतंसम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पद्मांबयाऽसाविततो"; alternatives "पद्मांबयाऽसावितितो" — read as असावि ततो (the ṭīkā glosses असाविप्रसूतः); the vowel after वि is read as short i on वि followed by त
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३ within its section; it is published at position 13.

Adhyāya 6 · इत्यब्दपफलाध्यायः

स्वस्वाभिलाषं न हि लब्धुमीशा निर्विघ्नमीशानमुखाः सुरौघाः ॥ विना प्रसादं किल यस्य नौमि तं ढुंढिराजं मतिलाभहेतुम्

svasvābhilāṣaṃ na hi labdhumīśā nirvighnamīśānamukhāḥ suraughāḥ || vinā prasādaṃ kila yasya naumi taṃ ḍhuṃḍhirājaṃ matilābhahetum

Without whose grace the hosts of gods, Īśāna ⟨Śiva⟩ at their head, are certainly not able to obtain each his own desire unhindered — him, Ḍhuṇḍhirāja ⟨Gaṇeśa⟩, the cause of the gaining of understanding, I salute.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वस्वाभिलाषंनहिलब्धुमीशानिर्विघ्नमीशानमुखाःसुरौघाः ॥ विनाप्रसादंकिलयस्यनौमितंढुंढिराजंमतिलाभहेतुम्

जातकोदितदशाफलं च यत् स्थूलकालफलदं स्फुटं नृणाम् ॥ तत्र न स्फुरति दैवविन्मतिस् तद् ब्रुवे ऽब्दफलमादिताजिकात्

jātakoditadaśāphalaṃ ca yat sthūlakālaphaladaṃ sphuṭaṃ nṛṇām || tatra na sphurati daivavinmatis tad bruve 'bdaphalamāditājikāt

The result of the daśās declared in jātaka ⟨natal astrology⟩ plainly gives men the fruit of a coarse stretch of time; in that ⟨finer reckoning⟩ the astrologer's mind does not flash out. Therefore I state the result of the year from the original Tājika ⟨works⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जातकोदितदशाफलंचयत्स्थूलकालफलदंस्फुटंनृणाम् ॥ तत्रनस्फुरतिदैवविन्मतिस्तद्ब्रुवेऽब्दफलमादिताजिकात्

गताः समाः पादयुताः प्रकृतिघ्नसमागणात् ॥ खवेदाप्तघटीयुक्ता जन्मवारादिसंयुताः

gatāḥ samāḥ pādayutāḥ prakṛtighnasamāgaṇāt || khavedāptaghaṭīyuktā janmavārādisaṃyutāḥ

The elapsed years, increased by a quarter ⟨of themselves⟩; and from the count of years multiplied by prakṛti ⟨21⟩, the ghaṭīs obtained by dividing by kha-veda ⟨40⟩ are added; ⟨and the whole is⟩ joined with the weekday and hour of birth — ⟨the sentence is finished in the next record⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गताःसमाःपादयुताःप्रकृतिघ्नसमागणात् ॥ खवेदाप्तघटीयुक्ताजन्मवारादिसंयुताः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: प्रकृति stands here for 21 and खवेद for 40 (kha 0, veda 4, read from the right); neither is glossed in figures on this page. The value 21 is what the arithmetic requires: after the quarter-day is taken out, 21/40 of a ghaṭī is the part of the annual excess that is left, and no other number fits.

अब्दप्रवेशे वारादिः सप्ततष्टेत्र निर्दिशेत् ॥ शिवघ्नो ऽब्दः स्वखाद्रींदुलवाढ्यः खाग्निशेषितः

abdapraveśe vārādiḥ saptataṣṭetra nirdiśet || śivaghno 'bdaḥ svakhādrīṃdulavāḍhyaḥ khāgniśeṣitaḥ

⟨That total⟩ divided by seven — here one should declare the weekday and hour at the year's entry. ⟨Next:⟩ the ⟨elapsed⟩ years multiplied by śiva ⟨11⟩, increased by their own one-hundred-and-seventieth (kha-adri-indu) part, and made a remainder by kha-agni ⟨30⟩ — ⟨the sentence is finished in the next record⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दप्रवेशेवारादिःसप्ततष्टेत्रनिर्दिशेत् ॥शि वघ्नोऽब्दःस्वखाद्रींदुलवाढ्यःखाग्निशेषितः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: शिव = 11, खाद्रींदु = 170 (kha 0, adri 7, indu 1) and खाग्नि = 30 (kha 0, agni 3); none is glossed in figures here. The record holds the end of one rule and the beginning of another, as the page sets it.
6.5a reading here is contested

जन्मतिथ्यान्वितस् तत्र तिथावब्दप्रवेशनं ॥ तत्कालेर्को जन्मकालरविणा स्याद् यतः समः

janmatithyānvitas tatra tithāvabdapraveśanaṃ || tatkālerko janmakālaraviṇā syād yataḥ samaḥ

⟨That remainder⟩ joined with the tithi of birth: on that tithi falls the entry of the year, because at that time the Sun would be equal with the Sun of the birth-moment.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मतिथ्यान्वितस्तत्रतिथावद्धप्रवेशनं ॥ तत्कालेर्कोजन्मकालरविणास्याद्यतःसमः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिथावद्धप्रवेशनं"; alternatives "तिथावब्दप्रवेशनं" — zoomed 4x: the conjunct after व looks like द्ध; the sense wants अब्द (as in अब्दप्रवेशे on the line above), so it may be this fount's ब्द ligature or a misprint. Kept as seen. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तिथावब्दप्रवेशनं; this sentence names तिथावद्धप्रवेशनं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads तिथावद्ध. A reader dividing this verse judged तिथावब्द the likely intent — The word is अब्दप्रवेशनम्, 'the entry of the year' — the half-line above begins अब्दप्रवेशे. This fount's ब्द ligature is easily taken for द्ध, and the plate reader recorded the doubt.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तिथावब्दप्रवेशनं; this sentence names तिथावद्ध, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

एकैकराशिवृद्ध्या चेत् तुल्योंशाद्यैर्यदा रविः ॥ तदा मासप्रवेशो द्युप्रवेशश् चेत् कलासमः

ekaikarāśivṛddhyā cet tulyoṃśādyairyadā raviḥ || tadā māsapraveśo dyupraveśaś cet kalāsamaḥ

When the Sun, growing by one rāśi at a time, becomes equal ⟨to its place at birth⟩ from the degrees onward, then it is the month-entry (māsa-praveśa); and it is the day-entry (dyu-praveśa) if it is equal from the kalās ⟨minutes⟩ onward.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एकैकराशिवृद्ध्याचेत्तुल्योंशाद्यैर्यदारविः ॥ तदामासप्रवेशोद्युप्रवेशश्चेत्कलासमः

6.7a reading here is contested

तात्कालिकास् तु खचराः सुधिया विधेयाः स्पष्टा विलग्नमुखभावगणो विधेयः ॥ वीर्यं तथोक्तविधिना निखिलग्रहाणामब्दाधिपस्य विधये कथयामि युक्तिम्

tātkālikās tu khacarāḥ sudhiyā vidheyāḥ spaṣṭā vilagnamukhabhāvagaṇo vidheyaḥ || vīryaṃ tathoktavidhinā nikhilagrahāṇāmabdādhipasya vidhaye kathayāmi yuktim

The grahas of that moment are to be made exact by a discerning man, and the set of bhāvas beginning with the lagna is to be made ⟨exact as well⟩. The strength (vīrya) of all the grahas ⟨is to be found⟩ by the method already stated; and for the determining of the lord of the year I ⟨now⟩ declare the rule.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तात्कालिकास्तुखचराःसुधियाविधेयाः स्पष्टाविलग्नमुखभावगणोविधेयः ॥ वीर्यंतथोक्तविधिनानिखिलग्रहाणामब्दाधिपस्यविधयेकथयामियुक्तिम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधये"; alternatives "विषये" — the second akṣara reads as ध at tile resolution; ष not excluded
  • About this edition: The plate reader could not rule out विषये ('in the matter of') for विधये ('for the determining of') at this spot; the printed reading is rendered, and on either reading the half-line only says that the rule for the lord of the year follows.

द्विघ्नं प्रश्नांगभागाद्यं शरलब्धं स्फुटेंतिहा ॥ प्रश्नांगाद्धायनफले तुर्येशो लग्नपो भवेत्

dvighnaṃ praśnāṃgabhāgādyaṃ śaralabdhaṃ sphuṭeṃtihā || praśnāṃgāddhāyanaphale turyeśo lagnapo bhavet

The praśnāṅga's degrees and the rest, doubled and divided by śara ⟨5⟩, ⟨give⟩ the exact intihā. From the praśnāṅga, in the year-result (hāyana-phala), the lord of the fourth (turya) becomes the lord of the lagna.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

द्विघ्नंप्रश्नांगभागा द्यंशरलब्धंस्फुटेंतिहा ॥ प्रश्नांगाद्धायनफलेतुर्येशोलग्नपोभवेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse is very compressed and states no unit for the praśnāṅga, so both operations are rendered exactly as the words stand and nothing is supplied. इंतिहा (intihā) is the Arabic-derived Tājika name of the year's progressed point, the munthā; it occurs only here in this book.
6.9a reading here is contested

जन्मलग्नपतिरब्दलग्नपो मुंथहाधिप इति त्रिराशिपः ॥ सूर्यराशिपतिरह्नि चंद्रभाधीश्वरो निशि विमृश्य पंचकम्

janmalagnapatirabdalagnapo muṃthahādhipa iti trirāśipaḥ || sūryarāśipatirahni caṃdrabhādhīśvaro niśi vimṛśya paṃcakam

The lord of the natal lagna; the lord of the year's lagna; the lord of the munthā; then the tri-rāśi-pa ⟨the lord of the triplicity⟩; ⟨and⟩ by day the lord of the sign the Sun occupies, by night the lord of the sign the Moon occupies — having weighed these five ⟨the lord of the year is found⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मलग्नपतिरब्दलग्नपोमुंथहाधिपइतित्रिराशिपः ॥ सूर्यराशिपति रह्निचंद्रभाधीश्वरोनिशिविमृश्यपंचकम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुंथहाधिप"; alternatives "मुथहाधिप" — a dot sits over मु; could be an anusvāra or a speck. The ṭīkā above prints मुथहाधिपः without it.
  • About this edition: The page sets मुंथहाधिप with an anusvāra over मु, and the reader wondered whether the dot was a speck. The metre settles it: this is a Rathoddhatā pāda whose first syllable must be long, and मु without the anusvāra is short.

वली य एषां तनुमीक्षमाणः स वर्षपो लग्नमनीक्षमाणः ॥ नैवाब्दपो दृष्ट्यतिरेकतः स्याद् वलस्य साम्ये विदुरेवमाद्याः

valī ya eṣāṃ tanumīkṣamāṇaḥ sa varṣapo lagnamanīkṣamāṇaḥ || naivābdapo dṛṣṭyatirekataḥ syād valasya sāmye vidurevamādyāḥ

Whichever of these is strong and aspects the lagna (tanu), he is the lord of the year. One that does not aspect the lagna is not the lord of the year at all. When the strength is equal, ⟨the lord of the year⟩ follows from the excess of aspect. So the ancients know it.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वलीयएषांतनुमीक्षमाणःसवर्षपोलग्नमनीक्षमाणः ॥ नैवाब्दपोदृष्ट्यतिरेकतःस्याद्वलस्यसाम्येविदुरेवमाद्याः

दृगादिसाम्येप्यथ निर्वलत्वे वर्षाधिपः स्यान् मुथहेश्वरस् तु ॥ पंचापि नो चेत् तनुमीक्षमाणा वीर्याधिकोब्दस्य विभुर्विचिंत्यः

dṛgādisāmyepyatha nirvalatve varṣādhipaḥ syān muthaheśvaras tu || paṃcāpi no cet tanumīkṣamāṇā vīryādhikobdasya vibhurviciṃtyaḥ

When aspect and the rest are equal, or again when ⟨they are all⟩ without strength, the lord of the munthā becomes the lord of the year. If the five ⟨candidates⟩ do not aspect the lagna at all, then the one greater in strength is to be reckoned the lord of the year.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दृगादिसाम्ये प्यथनिर्वलत्वेवर्षाधिपःस्यान्मुथहेश्वरस्तु ॥ पंचापिनोचेत्तनुमीक्षमाणावीर्याधिकोब्दस्यविभुर्विचिंत्यः

वलादिसाम्ये रविराशिपो ऽह्नि निशींदुराशीडिति केचिदाहुः ॥ येनेत्थशालो ऽब्दविभुः शशी स वर्षाधिपश् चंद्रभपोन्यथात्वे

valādisāmye ravirāśipo 'hni niśīṃdurāśīḍiti kecidāhuḥ || yenetthaśālo 'bdavibhuḥ śaśī sa varṣādhipaś caṃdrabhaponyathātve

Some declare that, when strength and the rest are equal, ⟨the lord of the year is⟩ the lord of the Sun's sign by day and the lord of the Moon's sign by night. ⟨And where⟩ the Moon is the lord of the year, that graha with which it has an itthaśāla is the lord of the year; in the other case ⟨where the Moon makes no itthaśāla⟩, the lord of the Moon's sign ⟨is the lord of the year⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वलादिसाम्येरविराशि पोऽह्निनिशींदुराशीडितिकेचिदाहुः ॥ येनेत्थशालोऽब्दविभुःशशीसवर्षाधिपश्चंद्रभपोन्यथात्वे

6.13a reading here is contested

अब्दाधिपो व्ययषडष्टमभिन्नसंस्थो लब्धोदयो ऽब्दजनुषोः सदृशो वलेन ॥ निःशेषमुत्तमफलं विदधाति काये नैरुज्यराज्यवललब्धिरतीव सौख्यम्

abdādhipo vyayaṣaḍaṣṭamabhinnasaṃstho labdhodayo 'bdajanuṣoḥ sadṛśo valena || niḥśeṣamuttamaphalaṃ vidadhāti kāye nairujyarājyavalalabdhiratīva saukhyam

The lord of the year, standing in a place other than the 12th (vyaya), the 6th and the 8th, having gained its rising, and matched in strength in the year's chart and the birth chart, works an unqualifiedly excellent result: freedom from disease in the body, the gaining of kingdom and of power, and exceeding happiness.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दाधिपोव्ययषडष्टमभिन्नसं स्थोलब्धोदयोऽब्दजनुषोःसदृशोवलेन ॥ निःशेषमुत्तमफलंविदधातिकायेनैरुज्यराज्यवललब्धिरतीवसौख्यम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अब्दाधिपोव्यय"; alternatives "अब्दाधिपोऽव्यय" — zoomed 4x: the mark after पो is read as the looped half-व of व्य, not an avagraha; it is smaller and rounder than the ऽ in पोऽह्नि on the same line
6.14a reading here is contested

वलपूर्णे ऽब्दपे पूर्णं शुभं मध्ये च मध्यमं ॥ अधमे दुःखशोकारिभयानि विविधाः शुचः

valapūrṇe 'bdape pūrṇaṃ śubhaṃ madhye ca madhyamaṃ || adhame duḥkhaśokāribhayāni vividhāḥ śucaḥ

When the lord of the year is full in strength, the auspicious result is full; when it is middling, ⟨the result is⟩ middling; when it is lowest, there are pain, grief, fear from enemies, and sorrows of many kinds.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वलपूर्णेऽब्दपेपूर्णंशुभंमध्येचमध्यमं ॥ अधमेदुःखशोकारिभयानिविविधाःशुचः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्णंशुभं"; alternatives "पूर्णशुभं" — zoomed: a dot sits beside the repha over the second ण; read as anusvāra, but it touches the repha
6.15a reading here is contested

अथसूर्यः ॥

सूर्ये ऽब्दपे वलिनि राज्यसुखात्मजार्थलाभः कुलोचितविभुः परिवारसौख्यम् ॥ पुष्टं यशो गृहसुखं विविधा प्रतिष्ठा शत्रुर्विनश्यति फले जनिखेटयुक्त्या

sūrye 'bdape valini rājyasukhātmajārthalābhaḥ kulocitavibhuḥ parivārasaukhyam || puṣṭaṃ yaśo gṛhasukhaṃ vividhā pratiṣṭhā śatrurvinaśyati phale janikheṭayuktyā

When the Sun is lord of the year and strong: the comfort of a kingdom, gain of sons and of wealth, a mastery befitting his family, comfort from his household, thriving fame, comfort at home, distinction of many kinds, and his enemy perishes — the result ⟨being read⟩ from the way ⟨the Sun⟩ joins the natal grahas.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्येऽब्दपेवलिनिराज्यसुखा त्मजार्थलाभःकुलोचितविभुःपरिवारसौख्यम् ॥ पुष्टंयशोगृहसुखंविविधाप्रतिष्ठाशत्रुर्विनश्यतिफलेजनिखेटयुक्त्या

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विभुः"; alternatives "विभु" — visarga after भु small
6.16a reading here is contested

मध्ये रवौ फलमिदं निखिलं तु मध्यं स्वल्पं सुखं स्वजनतोपि विवादमाहुः ॥ स्थानच्युतिर्न च सुखं कृशता शरीरे भीतिर्नृपान् मुथशिलो न शुभेन चेत् स्यात्

madhye ravau phalamidaṃ nikhilaṃ tu madhyaṃ svalpaṃ sukhaṃ svajanatopi vivādamāhuḥ || sthānacyutirna ca sukhaṃ kṛśatā śarīre bhītirnṛpān muthaśilo na śubhena cet syāt

When the Sun is middling, this whole result is middling: little comfort, and they say there is quarrelling even with one's own people; fall from position, no comfort, emaciation in the body, and fear from the king — if there is no muthaśila ⟨applying aspect⟩ with a benefic. [Our mūla now reads कृशता, 'emaciation'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मध्येरवौफल मिदंनिखिलंतुमध्यंस्वल्पंसुखंस्वजनतोपिविवादमाहुः ॥ स्थानच्युतिर्नचसुखंकृशृताशरीरेभीतिर्नृपान्मुथशिलोनशुभेनचेत्स्यात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृशृता"; alternatives "कृशता" — zoomed: a small ृ-like hook sits under श, detached; may be a stray sort or broken ink rather than a mātrā [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कृशता; this sentence names कृशृता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलो"; alternatives "मुथशीलो" — mūla here prints short i शि, not the long ī the brief expected; read from tile, zoom missed this spot
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads कृशृता. A reader dividing this verse judged कृशता the likely intent — कृशता, 'emaciation', is the word the list needs and the one verse 20 sets in the same phrase शरीरे. The plate reader saw a small detached ṛ-hook under श and judged it might be a stray sort or broken ink.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कृशता; this sentence names कृशृता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
6.17a reading here is contested

सूर्ये वलेन रहिते ऽब्दपतौ विदेशयानं धनक्षयशुचो ऽरिभयं च तंद्रा ॥ लोकापवादभयमुग्ररुजोतिदुःखं पित्रादितोपि न सुखं सुतमित्रभीतिः

sūrye valena rahite 'bdapatau videśayānaṃ dhanakṣayaśuco 'ribhayaṃ ca taṃdrā || lokāpavādabhayamugrarujotiduḥkhaṃ pitrāditopi na sukhaṃ sutamitrabhītiḥ

When the Sun is lord of the year and bereft of strength: going abroad, loss of wealth, griefs, fear from enemies, and lethargy; fear of public censure, fierce illnesses, great suffering, no comfort even from the father and his like, and fear for sons and friends.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्येवलेनरहितेऽब्दपतौविदेशयानंधनक्षयशुचोऽरिभयंचतंद्रा॥लोकापवादभयमुग्ररुजोतिदुःखंपित्रादितोपिनसुखंसुतमित्रभीतिः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "॥१७"; alternatives "॥१७॥" — the closing daṇḍas after १७ are not visible at the line end
  • About this edition: The printing lost the closing daṇḍa after this verse, so it arrived joined to the next; it was split at its own half-verse number १७.
6.18a reading here is contested

चंद्रे ऽब्दपे मुथशिलं येनासावब्दपो ऽस्य चेत् ॥ कंबूलमिंदुना जन्म निशि वर्षं तदोत्तमम्

caṃdre 'bdape muthaśilaṃ yenāsāvabdapo 'sya cet || kaṃbūlamiṃdunā janma niśi varṣaṃ tadottamam

When the Moon is lord of the year, ⟨take⟩ the graha with which it makes a muthaśila — he is the lord of the year. If this one has a kambūla with the Moon, and the birth was by night, then the year is of the best.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेऽब्दपेमुथशिलंयेनासावब्दपोऽस्यचेत् ॥ कंबूलमिंदुनाजन्मनिशिवर्षंतदोत्तमम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूल"; alternatives "कंवूल" — ब/व in large type; read ब, the ṭīkā has कंवूल
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलं"; alternatives "मुथशीलं" — zoomed: short i शि
6.19a reading here is contested

अथचंद्रः ॥

वीर्यान्विते शशिनि वित्तकलत्रपुत्रमित्रालयस्य विविधं सुखमाहुरार्याः ॥ स्रग्गंधमौक्तिकदुकूलसुखानि भूतिर्लाभः कुलोचितपदस्य नृपैः सखित्वं

vīryānvite śaśini vittakalatraputramitrālayasya vividhaṃ sukhamāhurāryāḥ || sraggaṃdhamauktikadukūlasukhāni bhūtirlābhaḥ kulocitapadasya nṛpaiḥ sakhitvaṃ

When the Moon ⟨as lord of the year⟩ is endowed with strength, the noble ones declare varied happiness in wealth, wife, sons, friends and house: garlands, perfumes, pearls and fine cloth; prosperity; the gaining of a station befitting his family; and friendship with kings.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वीर्यान्वितेशशिनिवि त्तकलत्रपुत्रमित्रालयस्यविविधंसुखमाहुरार्याः॥ स्रग्गंधमौक्तिकदुकूलसुखानिभूतिर्लाभःकुलोचितपदस्यनृपैःसखित्वं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्रग्गंध"; alternatives "स्त्रग्गंध" — conjunct स्र/स्त्र
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूतिर्"; alternatives "भ्रूतिर्" — the भू carries an extra stroke that may be broken type

वर्षाधिपे शशिनि मध्यवले फलानि मध्यान्यमूनि रिपुता सुतमित्रवर्गैः ॥ स्थानांतरे गतिरथो कृशता शरीरे श्लेष्मोद्भवश् च यदि पापकृतेसराफः

varṣādhipe śaśini madhyavale phalāni madhyānyamūni riputā sutamitravargaiḥ || sthānāṃtare gatiratho kṛśatā śarīre śleṣmodbhavaś ca yadi pāpakṛtesarāphaḥ

When the Moon is lord of the year and of middling strength, these results are middling: enmity from the circle of sons and friends, going to another place, emaciation in the body, and the rising of phlegm ⟨disorders⟩ — if there is an īsarāpha ⟨separating aspect⟩ made by a malefic.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वर्षाधिपेश शिनिमध्यवलेफलानिमध्यान्यमूनिरिपुतासुतमित्रवर्गैः ॥ स्थानांतरेगतिरथोकृशताशरीरेश्लेष्मोद्भवश्चयदिपापकृतेसराफः

6.21a reading here is contested

नष्टे ऽब्दपे शशिनि शीतकफादिरोगश् चौर्यादिभीः स्वजनविग्रहमप्युशंति ॥ दूरे गतिः सुतकलत्रसुखाक्षयश् च स्यान् मृत्युतुल्यमतिहीनबले शशांके

naṣṭe 'bdape śaśini śītakaphādirogaś cauryādibhīḥ svajanavigrahamapyuśaṃti || dūre gatiḥ sutakalatrasukhākṣayaś ca syān mṛtyutulyamatihīnabale śaśāṃke

When the Moon is ruined ⟨in strength⟩ as lord of the year, ⟨they⟩ declare illness from cold and phlegm and the like, fear of theft and so on, and strife with one's own people; going far away, and the destruction of the happiness of sons and wife; and when the Moon is exceedingly weak, ⟨the year⟩ is the equal of death. [The page sets सुखाक्षयश्च; as printed that word means the opposite — 'no destruction of happiness' — which cannot stand in a list of evils. सुखक्षयश्च is meant. The Sanskrit is left as printed.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नष्टेऽब्द पेशशिनिशीतकफादिरोगश्चौर्यादिभीःस्वजनविग्रहमप्युशंति॥ दूरेगतिःसुतकलत्रसुखाक्षयश्चस्यान्मृत्युतुल्यमतिहीनबलेशशांके

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मप्युशंति"; alternatives "मप्युशांति" — left tile suggests an ā-stroke, right tile shows शं; zoom missed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुखाक्षयश्च"; alternatives "सुखक्षयश्च" — zoomed: the ā-stroke after ख is printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हीनबले"; alternatives "हीनवले" — ब/व in large type
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सुखाक्षयश्च. A reader dividing this verse judged सुखक्षयश्च the likely intent — As printed, सुख + अक्षय says 'no destruction of happiness', the opposite of what a list of evils can hold; सुखक्षय, 'destruction of happiness', is meant. The plate reader confirmed the ā-stroke after ख is printed, so the error is the press's, not the reading's.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the page was opened and sets सुखाक्षयश्च with the ā (page_0105, read by eye at about 2.8x native); the correction stays unwritten as a doubt, because the machine read of Sītārām Jhā's printing gives सुखाप्तयश्च (with दूरे गताः), a second sense-bearing reading beside the सुखक्षयश्च that the machine read of Pāṭhaka's gives.]
6.22a reading here is contested

अथभौमः ॥

भौमे ऽब्दपे बलिनि कीर्तिजयारिनाशः सेनापतित्वरणनायकता प्रदिष्टा ॥ लाभः कुलोचितधनस्य नमस्यता च लोकेषु मित्रसुतवित्तकलत्रसौख्यम्

bhaume 'bdape balini kīrtijayārināśaḥ senāpatitvaraṇanāyakatā pradiṣṭā || lābhaḥ kulocitadhanasya namasyatā ca lokeṣu mitrasutavittakalatrasaukhyam

When Mars is lord of the year and strong: fame, victory, destruction of enemies; the office of a commander of armies and leadership in battle are declared; gain of wealth befitting his family, and being honoured among people; and the comfort of friends, sons, wealth and wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेऽब्दपेबलिनिकीर्तिजयारिनाशःसेनापतित्वरणनायकताप्रदिष्टा ॥ लाभःकुलोचितधनस्यनमस्यताचलोकेषुमित्र सुतवित्तकलत्रसौख्यम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलिनि"; alternatives "वलिनि" — ब/व in large type
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रदिष्टा"; alternatives "प्रदिष्ठा" — ष्ट vs ष्ठ
6.23a reading here is contested

मध्ये ऽब्दपे ऽवनिसुते रुधिरस्रुतिश् च कोपो ऽधिको झकटशस्त्रहतिक्षतानि ॥ स्वामित्वमात्मगणतो वलगौरवं च मध्यं सुखं निखिलमुक्तफलं विचिंत्यम्

madhye 'bdape 'vanisute rudhirasrutiś ca kopo 'dhiko jhakaṭaśastrahatikṣatāni || svāmitvamātmagaṇato valagauravaṃ ca madhyaṃ sukhaṃ nikhilamuktaphalaṃ viciṃtyam

When Mars is lord of the year and middling: flow of blood, excessive anger, and wounds from brawls and from the strokes of weapons; mastery over his own circle, and prestige of strength; and the whole of the result stated is to be reckoned as middling in comfort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मध्येऽब्दपेऽवनिसुतेरुधिरस्त्रुतिश्चकोपोऽधिकोझकटशस्त्रहतिक्षतानि ॥ स्वामित्वमात्मगणतोवलगौ रवंचमध्यंसुखंनिखिलमुक्तफलंविचिंत्यम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रुधिरस्त्रुति"; alternatives "रुधिरस्रुति" — conjunct स्त्र/स्र [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads रुधिरस्रुतिश्; this sentence names रुधिरस्त्रुति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कोझकट" — printed as seen; sense unclear
  • About this edition: झकट, which the plate reader recorded as printed and could not place, is taken here as the vernacular word for a brawl (compare Hindi झगड़ा); it fits the compound झकट-शस्त्र-हति-क्षतानि, 'wounds from brawls and from the strokes of weapons'.
6.24a reading here is contested

हीने ऽब्दपेसृजि भयं रिपुतस्कराग्निलोकापवादभयमात्मधिया विनाशः ॥ कार्यस्य विघ्नमतिरोगभयं विदेशयानं क्षयो ऽपनयतो गुरुदृष्ट्यभावे

hīne 'bdapesṛji bhayaṃ riputaskarāgnilokāpavādabhayamātmadhiyā vināśaḥ || kāryasya vighnamatirogabhayaṃ videśayānaṃ kṣayo 'panayato gurudṛṣṭyabhāve

When Mars is lord of the year and deficient: fear in the matter of blood ⟨bleeding⟩; fear from enemies, thieves, fire and public censure; ruin through his own judgement; obstruction of his work, great fear of illness, going abroad, and loss through misconduct — ⟨all this⟩ when Jupiter's aspect is absent. [The word is असृजि, the locative of असृज् 'blood'; the press prints no avagraha after अब्दपे, as it does not elsewhere on these leaves.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

हीनेऽब्दपेसृजिभयंरिपुतस्कराग्निलोकापवादभयमात्मधियाविनाशः ॥ कार्यस्यवि घ्नमतिरोगभयंविदेशयानंक्षयोऽपनयतोगुरुदृष्ट्यभावे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सृजि"; alternatives "ऽसृजि" — no avagraha printed; sense wants असृजि
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्कराग्नि"; alternatives "तस्कराम्नि" — ग्न ligature resembles म्न
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घ्न"; alternatives "ध्न" — घ/ध at line start
6.25a reading here is contested

अथबुधः ॥

सौम्येब्दपे बलवति प्रतिवादलेख्यसच्छास्त्रसद्व्यवहृतौ विजयो ऽर्थलाभः ॥ ज्ञानं कलागणितवैद्यभवं गुरुत्वं राजाश्रयेण नृपता नृपमंत्रिता वा

saumyebdape balavati prativādalekhyasacchāstrasadvyavahṛtau vijayo 'rthalābhaḥ || jñānaṃ kalāgaṇitavaidyabhavaṃ gurutvaṃ rājāśrayeṇa nṛpatā nṛpamaṃtritā vā

When Mercury is lord of the year and strong: victory in debate, in writing, in the good śāstras and in honest dealing, and gain of wealth; knowledge arising from the arts, from computation and from medicine; eminence; and, through a king's patronage, kingship, or ⟨the office of⟩ a king's minister.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्येब्दपेबलवतिप्रतिवादलेख्यसच्छास्त्रसद्व्यवहृतौविजयोऽर्थलाभः ॥ ज्ञानंकलागणितवैद्यभवंगुरुत्वंराजाश्रयेणनृपतानृप मंत्रितावा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौम्येब्दपे"; alternatives "सौम्येऽब्दपे" — zoomed: no avagraha printed here, though the press sets ऽ in सौम्येऽब्दपे two lines below; kept as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सद्व्यवहृतौ"; alternatives "सद्ध्यवहृतौ" — conjunct द्व्य tightly set

अब्दाधिपे शशिसुते खलु मध्यवीर्ये स्यान् मध्यमं निखिलमेतदथाध्वयानम् ॥ वाणिज्यवर्तनमथात्मजमित्रसौख्यं सौम्येत्थशालवशतोपरथा न सम्यक्

abdādhipe śaśisute khalu madhyavīrye syān madhyamaṃ nikhilametadathādhvayānam || vāṇijyavartanamathātmajamitrasaukhyaṃ saumyetthaśālavaśatoparathā na samyak

When Mercury (śaśi-suta, 'the Moon's son') is lord of the year (abdādhipa, the graha that rules the whole year) and of middling strength, all this is middling: travel on the road, trade and livelihood, and happiness from sons and friends — ⟨and these come⟩ by virtue of an itthaśāla (the applying aspect, in which the faster graha is still closing on the slower) with a benefic; otherwise, not properly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दाधिपेशशिसुतेखलुमध्यवीर्येस्यान्मध्यमंनिखिलमेतदथाध्वयानम् ॥ वाणिज्यवर्तनमथात्मजमित्रसौख्यंसौम्ये त्थशालवशतोपरथानसम्यक्

सौम्ये ऽब्दपे ऽधमबले बलबुद्धिहानिर् धर्मक्षयः परिभवो निजवाक्यदोषात् ॥ निक्षेपतो विपदतीव मृषैव साक्ष्यं हानिः परव्यवहृतेः सुतवित्तमित्रैः

saumye 'bdape 'dhamabale balabuddhihānir dharmakṣayaḥ paribhavo nijavākyadoṣāt || nikṣepato vipadatīva mṛṣaiva sākṣyaṃ hāniḥ paravyavahṛteḥ sutavittamitraiḥ

When Mercury is lord of the year and of the lowest strength: loss of strength and of judgement, decay of dharma, humiliation through the fault of his own speech; from a deposit ⟨entrusted to him⟩ a severe calamity; his testimony is nothing but false; and loss from other people's dealings, and through sons, wealth and friends.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्येऽब्दपेऽधमबलेबलबुद्धिहानिर्धर्मक्षयःपरिभवोनिजवाक्यदोषात् ॥ निक्षेपतोविपदतीवमृषै वसाक्ष्यंहानिःपरव्यवहृतेःसुतवित्तमित्रैः

अथगुरुः ॥

जीवे ऽब्दपे बलयुते परिवारसौख्यं धर्मो गुणग्रहिलता धनकीर्तिपुत्राः ॥ विश्वास्यता जगति सन्मतिविक्रमाप्तिर् लाभो निधेर् नृपतिगौरवमप्यरिघ्नं

jīve 'bdape balayute parivārasaukhyaṃ dharmo guṇagrahilatā dhanakīrtiputrāḥ || viśvāsyatā jagati sanmativikramāptir lābho nidher nṛpatigauravamapyarighnaṃ

When Jupiter (jīva) is lord of the year and endowed with strength: happiness of family and retinue, dharma, an eagerness to take up good qualities, wealth, fame and sons; being trusted in the world; the gaining of good sense and of valour; the finding of a hoard; honour from the king; and the destroying of enemies.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवेऽब्दपेबलयुतेपरिवारसौख्यंधर्मोगुणग्रहिलताधनकीर्तिपुत्राः ॥ वि श्वास्यताजगतिसन्मतिविक्रमाप्तिर्लाभोनिधेर्नृपतिगौरवमप्यरिघ्नं

अब्दाधिपे सुरगुरौ किल मध्यवीर्ये स्यान् मध्यमं फलमिदं नृपसंगमश्च ॥ विज्ञानशास्त्रपरताप्यशुभे सराफे दारिद्र्यमर्थविलयश्च कलत्रपीडा

abdādhipe suragurau kila madhyavīrye syān madhyamaṃ phalamidaṃ nṛpasaṃgamaśca || vijñānaśāstraparatāpyaśubhe sarāphe dāridryamarthavilayaśca kalatrapīḍā

When the lord of the year is Jupiter (sura-guru, 'teacher of the gods') and of middling strength, this result is middling; there is meeting with a king, and application to science and śāstra as well. In an inauspicious sarāpha (īsarāpha, the separating aspect, in which the two grahas are moving apart): poverty, the dissolution of wealth, and affliction of the wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दाधिपेसुरगुरौकिलमध्यवीर्येस्यान्मध्यमंफलमिदंनृपसंग मश्च ॥ विज्ञानशास्त्रपरताप्यशुभेसराफेदारिद्र्यमर्थविलयश्चकलत्रपीडा

जीवे ऽब्दपे ऽधमबले धनधर्मसौख्यहानिस् त्यजंति सुतमित्रजनाः सभार्याः ॥ लोकापवादभयमाकुलतातिकष्टं वृत्तिस् तनौ कफरुजो रिपुभीः कलिश्च

jīve 'bdape 'dhamabale dhanadharmasaukhyahānis tyajaṃti sutamitrajanāḥ sabhāryāḥ || lokāpavādabhayamākulatātikaṣṭaṃ vṛttis tanau kapharujo ripubhīḥ kaliśca

When Jupiter is lord of the year and of the lowest strength: loss of wealth, of dharma and of happiness; sons, friends and his people, together with his wife, abandon ⟨him⟩; fear of public censure; agitation; a very hard livelihood; diseases of phlegm in the body; fear of enemies; and quarrelling.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवेऽब्दपेऽधमबलेधनधर्मसौख्यहानिस्त्यजंतिसुतमि त्रजनाःसभार्याः ॥ लोकापवादभयमाकुलतातिकष्टंवृत्तिस्तनौकफरुजोरिपुभीःकलिश्च

अथशुक्रः ॥

शुक्रे ऽब्दपे बलिनि नीरुजता विलाससच्छास्त्ररत्नमधुराशनभोगतोषाः ॥ क्षेमप्रतापविजया वनिताविलासो हास्यं नृपाश्रयवशेन धनं सुखं च

śukre 'bdape balini nīrujatā vilāsasacchāstraratnamadhurāśanabhogatoṣāḥ || kṣemapratāpavijayā vanitāvilāso hāsyaṃ nṛpāśrayavaśena dhanaṃ sukhaṃ ca

When Venus (śukra) is lord of the year and strong: freedom from disease; pleasures, good śāstras, jewels, sweet food, enjoyments and contentments; security, majesty and victories; dalliance with women; mirth; and wealth and happiness by dependence on a royal patron.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेऽब्दपेबलिनिनी रुजताविलाससच्छास्त्ररत्नमधुराशनभोगतोषाः ॥ क्षेमप्रतापविजयावनिताविलासोहास्यंनृपाश्रयवशेनधनंसुखंच

6.32a reading here is contested

अब्दाधिपे भृगुसुते खलु मध्यवीर्ये स्यान् मध्यमं निखिलमेतदथाल्पवृत्तिः ॥ गुप्तं च दुःखमखिलं सुनिबद्धवृत्तिः पापारिवीक्षितयुते विपदो ऽर्थनाशः

abdādhipe bhṛgusute khalu madhyavīrye syān madhyamaṃ nikhilametadathālpavṛttiḥ || guptaṃ ca duḥkhamakhilaṃ sunibaddhavṛttiḥ pāpārivīkṣitayute vipado 'rthanāśaḥ

When the lord of the year is Venus (bhṛgu-suta, 'son of Bhṛgu') and of middling strength, all this is middling, and then the livelihood is scant; all his sorrow is kept hidden, and his livelihood is tightly tied down. If ⟨Venus is⟩ aspected by, or joined with, malefics or enemy grahas: calamities and the destruction of wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दाधिपेभृगुसुतेखलुमध्यवीर्येस्यान्मध्यमंनिखिलमेतदथाल्पवृत्तिः ॥ गुप्तंचदुःखमखिलंसुनिबद्धवृत्तिःपापारिवीक्षितयुतेविपदोऽर्थना शः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुप्तं"; alternatives "तुसं", "गूसं" — EXAMINED AT 18x AND STILL UNSETTLED, and it matters because this is mula. Both akṣaras were compared against certain exemplars on this same page: the second matches the सं of संयुक्तत्वं (line 2) exactly; the first has ग's open left curve (not स's closed loop, not म's) with a SHORT u-hook, matching the गु of भृगुसुते on this same line. So the ink says गुसं. But the pāda is vasantatilakā (गु-सं-च-दुः-ख-म-खि-लं-सु-नि-ब-द्ध-वृ-त्तिः = 14 syllables, and every other syllable of this verse and of verse 34 scans perfectly), and position 1 must be HEAVY, which गु is not. Either the press is wrong or the mātrā is a long ू that this scan does not distinguish. Recorded as printed; NOT corrected. ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): गुसं → गुप्तं: at 22x the akṣara has no knot and a tall closed counter, and measures 23 px against 31-32 px for this page's certain स (समता, समत्वे in line 10); it matches the certain प्त of आप्तं (page 22 line 9) and नवाप्तं (page 17 line 6).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपदोऽर्थना" — the avagraha IS set here and was verified at 2.3x — worth saying because this press omits it elsewhere on this page (see line 5).
  • About this edition: The plate reader settled गुप्तं at 22x against a first reading गुसं; the rendering follows गुप्तं, 'hidden'. सुनिबद्धवृत्तिः is rendered 'his livelihood is tightly tied down' — the compound can also be read favourably, 'a well-secured livelihood', but the half-line it stands in is a list of afflictions and opens with अल्पवृत्तिः, 'a scant livelihood'.
6.33a reading here is contested

शुक्रे ऽब्दपेधमबले मनसोतितापो लोकापहासविपदो निजवृत्तिनाशः ॥ द्वेषः कलत्रसुतमित्रजनेषु कष्टादन्नाशनं च विफलक्रियता न सौख्यम्

śukre 'bdapedhamabale manasotitāpo lokāpahāsavipado nijavṛttināśaḥ || dveṣaḥ kalatrasutamitrajaneṣu kaṣṭādannāśanaṃ ca viphalakriyatā na saukhyam

When Venus is lord of the year and of the lowest strength: extreme burning of the mind, public ridicule and calamities, the ruin of his own livelihood; hatred among wife, sons and friends; food got only with difficulty; action that bears no fruit; and no happiness. [The page prints ऽब्दपेधमबले and मनसोतितापो with the avagraha left out; the words are abdape 'dhama-bale and manaso 'titāpaḥ, and that is what is rendered.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेऽब्दपेधमबलेमनसोतितापोलोकापहासविपदोनिजवृत्तिनाशः ॥ द्वेषःकलत्रसुतमित्रजनेषुकष्टादन्नाशनंचविफल क्रियतानसौख्यम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्रेऽब्दपेधमबले" — verified at 4.5x: the avagraha is set after शुक्रे but NOT between पे and ध, where the sense wants पेऽधमबले. Likewise मनसोतिताप for मनसोऽतिताप. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वेषः"; alternatives "देहः" — at 2x this reads देहः or देषः. At 14x the द carries a subscript व (द्व) and the second akṣara is ष, giving द्वेषः — which also fits कलत्रसुतमित्रजनेषु. Settled at 14x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads ऽब्दपेधमबले. A reader dividing this verse judged ऽब्दपेऽधमबले the likely intent — the sense and the parallel verses (27 and 30 both print सौम्ये ऽब्दपे ऽधमबले / जीवे ऽब्दपे ऽधमबले) want अधमबले, 'of lowest strength'. The plate reader verified at 4.5x that the press sets the avagraha after शुक्रे but not between पे and ध. धमबल is not a word.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads मनसोतितापो. A reader dividing this verse judged मनसोऽतितापो the likely intent — manasaḥ + atitāpaḥ. The same reader's note records that this press omits the avagraha here; the reading is unaffected, only the mark is missing.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
6.34a reading here is contested

अथशनिः ॥

मंदे ऽब्दपे बलिनि नूतनभूमिवेश्मक्षेत्राप्तिरर्थनिचयो यवनावनीशात् ॥ आरामनिर्मितिजलाशयसौख्यमंगपुष्टिः कुलोचितपदाप्तिगुणाग्रणित्वम्

maṃde 'bdape balini nūtanabhūmiveśmakṣetrāptirarthanicayo yavanāvanīśāt || ārāmanirmitijalāśayasaukhyamaṃgapuṣṭiḥ kulocitapadāptiguṇāgraṇitvam

When Saturn (manda) is lord of the year and strong: the getting of new land, a house and fields; a heaping-up of wealth from a Yavana ruler; the making of pleasure-gardens and the comfort of ⟨building⟩ reservoirs; robustness of the body; the attainment of a rank befitting his family; and first place among men of merit.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेऽब्दपेबलिनिनूतनभूमिवेश्मक्षेत्राप्तिरर्थनिचयोयवनावनीशात् ॥ आरामनिर्मितिजलाश यसौख्यमंगपुष्टिःकुलोचितपदाप्तिगुणाग्रणित्वम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलिनिनूतन"; alternatives "बलिनिन्वतन" — at 2x the नू reads as a न्व conjunct; at 5.5x it is न with a ū-mātrā. Settled as नूतन.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निचयो"; alternatives "निचययो" — at 5.5x I counted an extra य; at 15x the च is followed by a single य carrying the ो mātrā. Settled as निचयो. This is the clearest case on the page for the zoom rule.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षेत्राप्तिरर्थ"; alternatives "क्षेत्राऽसिरथै" — no avagraha is set between त्रा and सि; checked at 5.5x. ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): क्षेत्रासि → क्षेत्राप्ति: the akṣara that the ि belongs to is 25 px wide with no knot and a tall closed counter — this page's certain स is 31-32 px and carries a knot with a long descending diagonal. ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): रथै → रर्थ: above the śirorekhā sits ONE hooked crook, the same mark as the repha of र्थ in विपदोऽर्थना on line 4; the ai-mātrā, printed as TWO slanted strokes in वै of जनवैर on line 9, is not what stands here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुणाग्रणित्वम्"; alternatives "गुणाग्रणीत्वम्" — the णि carries a short i-mātrā at 2x; not re-checked at higher zoom, so the ि/ी distinction here is a weaker reading than the rest of this line.
6.35a reading here is contested

अब्दाधिपे रविसुते खलु मध्यवीर्ये स्यान् मध्यमं निखिलमन्नभुजिस् तु कष्टात् ॥ दासोष्ट्रमाहिषकुलान्यरतस् तु लाभः पापं फलं भवति पापयुगीक्षणेन

abdādhipe ravisute khalu madhyavīrye syān madhyamaṃ nikhilamannabhujis tu kaṣṭāt || dāsoṣṭramāhiṣakulānyaratas tu lābhaḥ pāpaṃ phalaṃ bhavati pāpayugīkṣaṇena

When the lord of the year is Saturn (ravi-suta, 'the Sun's son') and of middling strength, all is middling, but food is got with difficulty. Slaves, camels and herds of buffalo — and gain therefrom. The result turns evil when ⟨Saturn is⟩ joined with, or aspected by, malefics. [The word the page sets between the herds and the gain is अरतस्, which is not a word; this rendering takes it as ततस्, 'therefrom', which is what the sense wants and what the metre allows. The Sanskrit is left exactly as printed.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दाधिपेरविसुतेखलुमध्यवीर्येस्यान्मध्यमंनिखिलमन्नभुजिस्तुकष्टात् ॥ दासोष्ट्रमाहिषकुलान्यरतस्तुलाभःपापंफलंभवतिपापयुगीक्षणेन

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दासोष्ट्र"; alternatives "दासोऽश्व" — my first pass off the whole page read दासोऽश्व; at 2x the conjunct is ष्ट्र, giving दास-उष्ट्र-माहिष (slaves, camels, buffalo), which the following कुलानि supports. Settled as दासोष्ट्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads कुलान्यरतस्. A reader dividing this verse judged कुलानि ततस् the likely intent — kulāni + aratas yields no sense: arata- is not a word that can govern lābhaḥ here. ततस्तु लाभः, 'and gain from these', gives the sense the list of slaves, camels and buffalo needs, and scans identically — the pāda is vasantatilakā and both readings put a light syllable at position 10 and a heavy at 11. One letter, र for त.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
6.36a reading here is contested

मंदे बलेन रहिते ऽब्दपतौ क्रियाणां वंध्यत्वमर्थविलयो विपदोरिभीतिः ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रमित्रजनवैरकदन्नभुक्तं सौम्येत्थशालयुजि सौख्यमपीषदाहुः

maṃde balena rahite 'bdapatau kriyāṇāṃ vaṃdhyatvamarthavilayo vipadoribhītiḥ || strīputramitrajanavairakadannabhuktaṃ saumyetthaśālayuji saukhyamapīṣadāhuḥ

When Saturn is lord of the year and destitute of strength: barrenness of undertakings, dissolution of wealth, calamities, fear of enemies; enmity with wife, sons, friends and his people; and bad food eaten. If ⟨Saturn⟩ is joined in an itthaśāla with a benefic, they say there is a little happiness as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेबलेनरहितेऽब्दपतौक्रियाणांवंध्यत्वमर्थविलयोविपदोरिभी तिः ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रमित्रजनवैरकदन्नभुक्तंसौम्येत्थशालयुजिसौख्यमपीषदाहुः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंदेबलेन"; alternatives "मंदेवलेन" — ब/व not re-checked at high zoom on this occurrence; this fount distinguishes them by an internal stroke that is legible only above ~7x.
6.37a reading here is contested

वर्षेश्वरो भवति यः स दशाधिपोब्दे ज्ञेयोखिलेब्दजनुषोर् बलमस्य चिंत्यम् ॥ वीर्यान्वितेत्र निखिलं शुभमब्दमाहुर् हीने त्वनिष्टफलता समता समत्वे

varṣeśvaro bhavati yaḥ sa daśādhipobde jñeyokhilebdajanuṣor balamasya ciṃtyam || vīryānvitetra nikhilaṃ śubhamabdamāhur hīne tvaniṣṭaphalatā samatā samatve

Whoever becomes lord of the year (varṣeśvara), he is to be known as the lord of the daśā for the whole year; and his strength must be weighed in both the year-chart and the nativity. When he is endowed with strength here, they call the whole year auspicious; when he is deficient ⟨in strength⟩, the results are unwanted; when his strength is middling, ⟨the year is⟩ middling. [The page omits the avagraha in दशाधिपोब्दे and ज्ञेयोखिले; the readings are daśādhipo 'bde and jñeyo 'khile.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वर्षेश्वरोभवतियःसदशाधिपोब्देज्ञेयोखिलेब्दजनुषो र्बलमस्यचिंत्यम् ॥ वीर्यान्वितेत्रनिखिलंशुभमब्दमाहुर्हीनेत्वनिष्टफलतासमतासमत्वे

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञेयोखिलेब्दजनुषो"; alternatives "ज्ञेयोऽखिलेऽब्दजनुषो" — verified at 7x: the avagraha is set before ब्द but NOT before खिले, where the sense wants ज्ञेयोऽखिले. Recorded as printed. The last akṣara is षो with no repha — the repha that belongs to it is set on the FIRST letter of line 10 (see that line). ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): ज्ञेयोखिलेऽब्दजनुषो → ज्ञेयोखिलेब्दजनुषो: at 14x ले is followed straight by the oval half-ब, with no avagraha between them.
6.38a reading here is contested

येनेत्थशालोब्दपतेर् ग्रहो ऽसौ स्वीयस्वभावात् सुफलं ददाति ॥ शुभे सराफे शुभमस्ति किंचिदनिष्टमेवाशुभमूसरीफे

yenetthaśālobdapater graho 'sau svīyasvabhāvāt suphalaṃ dadāti || śubhe sarāphe śubhamasti kiṃcidaniṣṭamevāśubhamūsarīphe

The graha with which the lord of the year has an itthaśāla gives good results according to that graha's own nature. When the sarāpha ⟨īsarāpha⟩ is with a benefic there is some good; when the mūsarīpha is with a malefic there is nothing but the unwanted.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

येनेत्थशालोब्दपतेर्ग्रहोऽसौस्वीयस्वभावात्सुफलंददाति ॥ शुभेसराफेशुभमस्तिकिंचिदनिष्टमेवाशुभमूसरीफे

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "येनेत्थशालोब्दपते"; alternatives "येनेत्थशालोऽब्दपते" — no avagraha seen at tile scale before ब्द (the press sets ऽ in ग्रहोऽसौ on the same line); not zoomed
6.39a reading here is contested

हद्दे यादृशि यः खेट आधत्ते ऽत्र च यो महः ॥ जन्मन्यब्दे च तादृक् चेत् तदात्मफलदस् त्वसौ

hadde yādṛśi yaḥ kheṭa ādhatte 'tra ca yo mahaḥ || janmanyabde ca tādṛk cet tadātmaphaladas tvasau

In whatever haddā (the Tājika term-division of a sign) a graha stands, and whatever dignity (mahas) it holds here ⟨in the year-chart⟩ — if it is of that same kind in the nativity and in the year, then it gives its own result.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

हद्देयादृशियः खेटआधत्तेऽत्रचयोमहः ॥ जन्मन्यब्देचतादृक्चेत्तदात्मफलदस्त्वसौ

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तादृक्चेत्"; alternatives "ताद्दक्चेत्" — NSP दृ ligature, which resembles द्द at tile scale; transcribed as दृ
6.40a reading here is contested

यो जन्मनि फलं दातुं विभुर् मूसरिफोस्य चेत् ॥ अब्दलग्नाब्दपभवस् तस्मिन्नब्दे न तत्फलम्

yo janmani phalaṃ dātuṃ vibhur mūsariphosya cet || abdalagnābdapabhavas tasminnabde na tatphalam

If a graha that is able to give a result in the nativity has a mūsaripha ⟨the separating aspect⟩ arising from the year-lagna or from the lord of the year, then in that year that result does not come.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

योजन्मनिफलंदातुंविभुर्मूसरिफोस्यचेत् ॥ अब्दलग्ना ब्दपभवस्तस्मिन्नब्देनतत्फलम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूसरिफोस्यचेत्"; alternatives "मूसरिफोऽस्यचेत्" — no avagraha printed; short रि here against मूसरीफे two lines above; both kept as printed

व्यत्यासे फलमादेश्यमित्थशाले विशेषतः ॥ नोभयं चेत् तदाप्यस्ति जन्माश्रयमिति स्फुटम्

vyatyāse phalamādeśyamitthaśāle viśeṣataḥ || nobhayaṃ cet tadāpyasti janmāśrayamiti sphuṭam

In the reverse case — when there is an itthaśāla — the result is to be declared, and emphatically so. And if neither of the two is present, even then it holds, resting on the nativity: this is plain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

व्यत्यासेफलमादेश्यमित्थशालेविशेषतः ॥ नोभयंचेत्तदाप्यस्तिजन्माश्रयमितिस्फुटम्

6.42a reading here is contested

उदाहरणम् ॥

पुत्राधिपो जन्मनि पुत्रभावं पश्यन् सुतं दातुमसौ समर्थः ॥ वर्षेशपुत्राधिपमूसरीफे पुत्रस्य नाशो भवतीति वर्षे

putrādhipo janmani putrabhāvaṃ paśyan sutaṃ dātumasau samarthaḥ || varṣeśaputrādhipamūsarīphe putrasya nāśo bhavatīti varṣe

⟨An example.⟩ In the nativity the lord of the 5th (putra) aspects the 5th house (putra-bhāva), and so is able to give a son. ⟨But⟩ when there is a mūsarīpha between the lord of the year and the lord of the 5th, then 'in that year the son is destroyed'.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुत्राधिपोजन्मनिपुत्रभावंपश्यन्सुतंदातुमसौसमर्थः॥वर्षेशपुत्राधिपमूसरीफेपुत्रस्यनाशोभतीतिवर्षे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाशोभतीति"; alternatives "नाशोभवतीति" — zoomed 4×: the press prints भतीति, with no व; kept as printed, intended reading given here [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भवतीति; this sentence names भतीति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads नाशोभतीति. A reader dividing this verse judged नाशोभवतीति the likely intent — nāśaḥ bhavati iti. The plate reader zoomed 4x and confirmed the press sets भतीति with no व; भति is not a form of any verb, and भवति is what the syntax requires.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भवतीति; this sentence names भतीति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
6.43a reading here is contested

अब्देश्वरो गुरुर् मित्रहद्दे मित्रदृशा शशी ॥ महोत्रादादमूदृक् स वर्षे ऽब्दस् तेन शोभनः

abdeśvaro gurur mitrahadde mitradṛśā śaśī || mahotrādādamūdṛk sa varṣe 'bdas tena śobhanaḥ

⟨In the worked example⟩ the lord of the year is Jupiter, in a friend's haddā, and the Moon ⟨looks on him⟩ with a friendly aspect. He gave dignity (mahas) here, and he is of that same kind in the year; the year is therefore auspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्देश्वरोगुरुर्मित्रहद्देमित्रदृशाशशी ॥ महोत्रादादमूदृक्सवर्षेऽब्दस्तेनशोभनः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्षेऽब्द"; alternatives "वर्षेब्द" — ऽ glyph is printed; recorded as seen
  • About this edition: The second half, महोत्रादादमूदृक् स वर्षे ऽब्दस् तेन शोभनः, is construed as mahaḥ atra adāt — amūdṛk sa varṣe — abdas tena śobhanaḥ, matching the तादृक् of verse 39. The word division of अमूदृक् स वर्षे is not certain; स्ववर्षे ('in his own year') would also fit the ink, and the page prints सवर्षे.
6.44a reading here is contested

एवमुन्नेयमन्यच्च शुभाशुभफलं वुधैः ॥ वलावलविवेकेन योगत्रयविमर्शतः

evamunneyamanyacca śubhāśubhaphalaṃ vudhaiḥ || valāvalavivekena yogatrayavimarśataḥ

In this way the wise should infer the rest of the auspicious and inauspicious results too, by discriminating strength and weakness, and by weighing the three yogas. [The press writes व for ब throughout this verse: वुधैः for बुधैः, वलावल for बलाबल.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवमुन्नेयमन्यच्चशुभाशुभफलंवुधैः ॥ वलावल विवेकेनयोगत्रयविमर्शतः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वुधैः"; alternatives "बुधैः" — large type; ब/व not zoomed; वलावल at the line end is confirmed व by zoom

Adhyāya 7 · इतिमुंथाभावफलं

7.1a reading here is contested

अथमुथहानिरूपणं ॥

स्वजन्मलग्नात् प्रतिवर्षमेकैकराशिभोगान् मुथहाभ्रमेण ॥ स्वजन्मलग्नं रवितष्टयातशरद्युतं साभमुखेन्थिहा स्यात्

svajanmalagnāt prativarṣamekaikarāśibhogān muthahābhrameṇa || svajanmalagnaṃ ravitaṣṭayātaśaradyutaṃ sābhamukhenthihā syāt

From one's own natal lagna the munthā (muthahā, also spelt inthihā here — the year's progressed ascendant) travels on by the enjoyment of one rāśi for every year. ⟨To find her:⟩ one's own natal lagna, increased by the elapsed years after they have been cast out by twelve (ravi) — with that sign at her head, the munthā stands.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वजन्मलग्नात्प्रतिवर्षमेकैकराशिभोगान्मुथहाभ्रमेण ॥ स्वजन्मलग्नंरवितष्टयातशरद्युतंसाभमुखेन्थिहास्यात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रवितष्टयात"; alternatives "रवितृष्टयात" — a small mark sits under त of तष्ट; may be a stray or a ृ
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४५ within its section; it is published at position 1.
  • About this edition: रवि stands for twelve (the twelve Ādityas), and तष्ट means 'divided', so रवितष्टयातशरद् is 'the elapsed years divided by twelve'. The plate reader saw a small mark under the त of तष्ट and could not rule out तृष्ट; तृष्ट yields no sense, and तष्ट is what the arithmetic requires. साभमुखे is rendered 'with that sign at her head'; it can also be divided सा भमुखे, 'she stands at the head of the sign', which comes to the same rule.

प्रत्यहं शरलिप्ताभिर् वर्धते सानुपाततः ॥ सार्धमंशद्वयं मासे इत्याहुः केपि सूरयः

pratyahaṃ śaraliptābhir vardhate sānupātataḥ || sārdhamaṃśadvayaṃ māse ityāhuḥ kepi sūrayaḥ

Day by day she ⟨the munthā⟩ increases by five (śara) liptās (minutes of arc), taken by proportion — two and a half aṃśas (degrees) in a month. So some authorities say.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रत्यहंशरलिप्ताभिर्वर्धतेसानुपाततः ॥ सार्धमंशद्वयंमासेइत्याहुःके पिसूरयः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४६ within its section; it is published at position 2.
  • About this edition: The arithmetic is self-consistent: 5′ a day over 30 days is 150′, that is 2°30′ a month, and twelve such months make 30° — one whole sign, which is exactly the rate verse 1 gives. This verse records the continuous reckoning of the munthā as a second opinion (के ऽपि सूरयः, 'some authorities'); verse 1 gives the whole-sign one.

स्वामिसौम्येक्षणात् सौख्यं क्षुतदृष्ट्या भयं रुजः ॥ भावालोकनसंयोगात् फलमस्या निरूप्यते

svāmisaumyekṣaṇāt saukhyaṃ kṣutadṛṣṭyā bhayaṃ rujaḥ || bhāvālokanasaṃyogāt phalamasyā nirūpyate

From the aspect of ⟨the munthā's⟩ lord, or of a benefic, there is happiness; by a kṣuta aspect there is fear and there are illnesses. The result of the munthā is determined from the house ⟨she occupies⟩, from the aspects on her, and from her conjunction.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वामिसौम्येक्षणात्सौख्यंक्षुतदृष्ट्याभयंरुजः ॥ भावालोकनसंयोगात्फलमस्यानिरूप्यते

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४७ within its section; it is published at position 3.
  • About this edition: kṣuta is this book's own name for the three hostile Tājika aspects, defined at 2.10: the quarter-aspect from the 4th and the 10th (a concealed enemy), the full mutual aspect from the 7th, and two grahas in one and the same sign (open enmity). The term is glossed here once for the whole chapter; verse 17 uses it again.

वर्षलग्नात् सुखास्तांत्यरिपुरंध्रेष्वशोभना ॥ पुण्यकर्मायगा स्वाम्यं दत्तेन्यत्रोद्यमाद् धनम्

varṣalagnāt sukhāstāṃtyaripuraṃdhreṣvaśobhanā || puṇyakarmāyagā svāmyaṃ dattenyatrodyamād dhanam

Reckoned from the year-lagna, ⟨the munthā⟩ is inauspicious in the 4th (sukha), the 7th (asta), the 12th (antya), the 6th (ripu) and the 8th (randhra). Standing in the 9th (puṇya), the 10th (karma) or the 11th (āya) she gives lordship; in the other ⟨houses⟩, wealth through effort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वर्षलग्नात्सुखास्तांत्यरिपुरंध्रेष्वशोभना ॥ पुण्यकर्मायगास्वाम्यंदत्तेन्यत्रोद्यमाद्धनम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४८ within its section; it is published at position 4.
7.5a reading here is contested

शत्रुक्षयं मानसुतास्वलाभं प्रतापवृद्धिर् नृपतेः प्रसादं ॥ शरीरपुष्टिं विविधोद्यमाश्च ददाति वित्तं मुथहा तनुस्था

śatrukṣayaṃ mānasutāsvalābhaṃ pratāpavṛddhir nṛpateḥ prasādaṃ || śarīrapuṣṭiṃ vividhodyamāśca dadāti vittaṃ muthahā tanusthā

The munthā standing in the 1st (tanu) gives: the destruction of enemies; the gaining of honour, of sons and of property; increase of majesty; the king's favour; robustness of the body; undertakings of many kinds; and wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शत्रुक्षयंमानसुतास्वलाभंप्रतापवृद्धिर्न पतेःप्रसादं ॥ शरीरपुष्टिंविविधोद्यमाश्चददातिवित्तंमुथहातनुस्था

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मानसुतास्वलाभं"; alternatives "मानसुताश्वलाभं" — the conjunct after सुता read as स्व; zoom crop fell short of it
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विविधोद्यमाश्च"; alternatives "विविधोद्यमांश्च" — no anusvāra seen over मा; check
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४९ within its section; it is published at position 5.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads वृद्धिर्नपतेः. A reader dividing this verse judged वृद्धिर्नृपतेः the likely intent — napateḥ is not a word; nṛpateḥ prasādam, 'the king's favour', is what the phrase must be, and this chapter sets it twice more — v.9 नृपतेःप्रसादः and v.14 नृपप्रसादं. The vowel-mark ृ is missing from the न. Both readings scan (र्न and र्नृ are one syllable either way), so the metre does not settle it; the lexicon does.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads नृपतेः; this sentence names napateḥ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
7.6a reading here is contested

उत्साहतोर्थागमनं यशश्च स्वबंधुसन्माननृपाश्रयाश्च ॥ मिष्टान्नभोगो बलपुष्टिसौख्यं स्यादर्थभावे मुथहा यदाब्दे

utsāhatorthāgamanaṃ yaśaśca svabaṃdhusanmānanṛpāśrayāśca || miṣṭānnabhogo balapuṣṭisaukhyaṃ syādarthabhāve muthahā yadābde

When in that year the munthā is in the 2nd (artha-bhāva): the coming of wealth through enterprise, and fame; honour from one's own kinsmen and the shelter of a king; the enjoyment of sweet food; strength, robustness and comfort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उत्साहतोर्थागमनंयशश्चस्वबंधुसन्माननृपाश्रयाश्च ॥ मि ष्टान्नभोगोबलपुष्टिसौख्यंस्यादर्थभावेमुथहायदाब्दे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वबंधु"; alternatives "स्ववंधु" — ब/व not zoomed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बल"; alternatives "वल" — ब/व not zoomed; on p.109 this press set वलावल
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५० within its section; it is published at position 6.

पराक्रमाद् वित्तयशःसुखानि सौंदर्यसौख्यं द्विजदेवपूजा ॥ सर्वोपकारस् तनुपुष्टिकीर्तिर् नृपाश्रयश्चेन् मुथहा तृतीया

parākramād vittayaśaḥsukhāni sauṃdaryasaukhyaṃ dvijadevapūjā || sarvopakāras tanupuṣṭikīrtir nṛpāśrayaścen muthahā tṛtīyā

If the munthā is in the 3rd: wealth, fame and comforts through valour; beauty and enjoyment; the worship of brahmins and of the gods; helpfulness towards everyone; robustness of the body; renown; and the shelter of a king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पराक्रमाद्वित्तयशःसुखानिसौंदर्यसौख्यंद्विजदेवपूजा ॥ सर्वोपकारस्तनु पुष्टिकीर्तिर्नृपाश्रयश्चेन्मुथहातृतीया

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५१ within its section; it is published at position 7.

शरीरपीडा रिपुभीः स्ववर्ग्यवैरं मनस्तापनिरुद्यमत्वे ॥ स्यान् मुंथहायां सुखभावगायां जनापवादामयवृद्धिदुःखम्

śarīrapīḍā ripubhīḥ svavargyavairaṃ manastāpanirudyamatve || syān muṃthahāyāṃ sukhabhāvagāyāṃ janāpavādāmayavṛddhiduḥkham

When the munthā stands in the 4th (sukha-bhāva): pain in the body, fear of enemies, enmity with the people of one's own circle, burning of the mind and want of any exertion; public censure, the growth of disease, and sorrow.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शरीरपीडारिपुभीःस्ववर्ग्यवैरंमनस्तापनिरुद्यमत्वे ॥ स्यान्मुंथहायांसुखभावगायांजनाप वादामयवृद्धिदुःखम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५२ within its section; it is published at position 8.
7.9a reading here is contested

यदींथिहा पंचमगाब्दवेशे सद्बुद्धिसौख्यात्मजवित्तलाभः ॥ प्रतापवृद्धिर् विविधा विलासा देवद्विजार्चा नृपतेः प्रसादः

yadīṃthihā paṃcamagābdaveśe sadbuddhisaukhyātmajavittalābhaḥ || pratāpavṛddhir vividhā vilāsā devadvijārcā nṛpateḥ prasādaḥ

If at the entry of the year (abda-veśa) the munthā is in the 5th: good sense, happiness, the gaining of sons and of wealth; increase of majesty; pleasures of many kinds; the worship of the gods and of brahmins; and the king's favour.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदींथिहापंचमगाब्दवेशेसद्बुद्धिसौख्यात्मजवित्तलाभः ॥ प्रतापवृद्धिर्विविधाविलासादेवद्विजार्चानृप तेःप्रसादः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पंचमगाब्दवेशे"; alternatives "पंचमगाव्दवेशे", "पंचमगाब्दपेशे" — ब/व in अब्द not zoomed; वेशे printed, the sense may want -पेशे (year-lord); kept as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सद्बुद्धि"; alternatives "सद्वुद्धि" — ब/व not zoomed
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५३ within its section; it is published at position 9.
  • About this edition: अब्दवेशे is taken as abda-veśa, 'the entry of the year' — the varṣa-praveśa, the moment the Sun returns to its natal longitude, at which the year-chart is cast. The plate reader wondered whether the page meant -पेशे, the year-lord; veśa needs no emendation and is the standard term, so the printed reading stands.
7.10a reading here is contested

कृशत्वमंगेषु रिपूदयश्च भयं रुजस् तस्करतो नृपाद् वा ॥ कार्यार्थनाशो मुथहारिगा चेद् दुर्बुद्धिवृद्धिः स्वकृतोनुतापः

kṛśatvamaṃgeṣu ripūdayaśca bhayaṃ rujas taskarato nṛpād vā || kāryārthanāśo muthahārigā ced durbuddhivṛddhiḥ svakṛtonutāpaḥ

If the munthā is in the 6th (ari): emaciation in the limbs, the rising up of enemies, fear, diseases, ⟨trouble⟩ from a thief or from the king, the ruin of his work and of his wealth, the growth of bad judgement, and remorse for what he has done himself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कृशत्वमंगेषुरिपूदयश्चभयंरुजस्तस्करतोनृपाद्वा ॥ कार्यार्थनाशोमुथहारिगाचेद्दुर्बुद्धिवृद्धिःस्वकृतोनुतापः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेद्दुर्बुद्धि"; alternatives "चेदुर्बुद्धि" — conjunct after चे read as द्दु; zoom crop fell short
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५४ within its section; it is published at position 10.
7.11a reading here is contested

कलत्रबंधुव्यसनारिभीतिरुत्साहभंगो धनधर्मनाशः ॥ द्यूनोपगा चेन् मुथहा तनोः स्याद् रुजा मनोमोहविरुद्धचेष्टा

kalatrabaṃdhuvyasanāribhītirutsāhabhaṃgo dhanadharmanāśaḥ || dyūnopagā cen muthahā tanoḥ syād rujā manomohaviruddhaceṣṭā

If the munthā comes to the 7th (dyūna): misfortune to wife and kinsmen, fear of enemies, the breaking of enthusiasm, the loss of wealth and of dharma; there is disease in the body, confusion of mind, and conduct that goes against itself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कलत्रबंधुव्यसनारिभीतिरुत्साहभंगोधनधर्मनाशः ॥ द्यूनोपगाचेन्मुथहातनोःस्याद्रुजामनोमोहविरुद्धचेष्टा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कलत्रबंधु"; alternatives "कलत्रवंधु" — ब/व not zoomed
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५५ within its section; it is published at position 11.
7.12a reading here is contested

भयं रिपोस् तस्करतो विनाशो धर्मार्थयोर् दुर्व्यसनामयश्च ॥ मृत्युस्थिता चेन् मुथहा नराणां बलक्षयः स्याद् गमनं सुदूरे

bhayaṃ ripos taskarato vināśo dharmārthayor durvyasanāmayaśca || mṛtyusthitā cen muthahā narāṇāṃ balakṣayaḥ syād gamanaṃ sudūre

If the munthā stands in the 8th (mṛtyu): fear from an enemy, ruin from a thief, ⟨ruin⟩ of dharma and of wealth, bad addiction and disease; men suffer loss of strength, and there is a journey to a far place.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भयंरिपोस्तस्कर तोविनाशोधर्मार्थयोर्दुर्व्यसनामयश्च ॥ मृत्युस्थिताचेन्मुथहानराणांबलक्षयःस्याद्गमनंसुदूरे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलक्षयः"; alternatives "वलक्षयः" — ब/व not zoomed
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५६ within its section; it is published at position 12.

स्वामित्वमर्थोपगमो नृपेभ्यो धर्मोत्सवः पुत्रकलत्रसौख्यं ॥ देवद्विजार्चा परमं यशश्च भाग्योदयो भाग्यगतेंथिहायाम्

svāmitvamarthopagamo nṛpebhyo dharmotsavaḥ putrakalatrasaukhyaṃ || devadvijārcā paramaṃ yaśaśca bhāgyodayo bhāgyagateṃthihāyām

When the munthā is in the 9th (bhāgya): lordship; the coming of wealth from kings; festivals of dharma; the happiness of sons and of wife; the worship of the gods and of brahmins; the highest fame; and the rise of good fortune.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वामित्वमर्थोपगमोनृपेभ्योधर्मो त्सवःपुत्रकलत्रसौख्यं ॥ देवद्विजार्चापरमंयशश्चभाग्योदयोभाग्यगतेंथिहायाम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५७ within its section; it is published at position 13.
7.14a reading here is contested

नृपप्रसादं स्वजनोपकारं सत्कर्मसिद्धिं द्विजदेवभक्तिम् ॥ यशो ऽभिवृद्धिं विविधार्थलाभं दत्ते ऽम्बरस्था मुथहा पदाप्तिम्

nṛpaprasādaṃ svajanopakāraṃ satkarmasiddhiṃ dvijadevabhaktim || yaśo 'bhivṛddhiṃ vividhārthalābhaṃ datte 'mbarasthā muthahā padāptim

The munthā standing in the 10th (ambara, the sky, that is the mid-heaven) gives: the king's favour, help from one's own people, success in good works, devotion to brahmins and to the gods, the increase of fame, the gaining of wealth of many kinds, and the attainment of rank.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नृपप्रसादंस्वजनोपकारंसत्कर्मसिद्धिंद्विजदेव भक्तिम् ॥ यशोऽभिवृद्धिंविविधार्थलाभंदत्तेऽम्बरस्थामुथहापदाप्तिम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दत्तेऽम्बरस्था"; alternatives "दत्तेंऽबरस्था", "दत्तेऽवरस्था" — both ऽ glyphs on this line are printed; the conjunct after ऽ (म्ब / ब / व) and a possible dot over ते are not certain; zoom crop fell short
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लाभं"; alternatives "लाभ" — anusvāra dot not seen clearly in the zoom crop, whose top edge cut it
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५८ within its section; it is published at position 14.
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle the conjunct after the avagraha in दत्तेऽम्बरस्था (म्ब, ब or व). अम्बरस्था, 'standing in the 10th', is what the chapter's own order requires: this verse falls between the 9th (v.13) and the 11th (v.15), and it is the only house left for it.

यदींथिहा लाभगता विलाससौभाग्यनैरुज्यमनःप्रसादाः ॥ भवंति राजाश्रयतो धनानि सन्मित्रपुत्राभिमताप्तयश्च

yadīṃthihā lābhagatā vilāsasaubhāgyanairujyamanaḥprasādāḥ || bhavaṃti rājāśrayato dhanāni sanmitraputrābhimatāptayaśca

If the munthā is in the 11th (lābha): pleasures, good fortune, freedom from disease and serenity of mind come about; wealth through royal patronage; and the gaining of good friends, of sons, and of the things one wants.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदींथिहालाभगताविलाससौभाग्यनैरुज्यमनःप्रसादाः ॥ भवं तिराजाश्रयतोधनानिसन्मित्रपुत्राभिमताप्तयश्च

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५९ within its section; it is published at position 15.

व्ययो ऽधिको दुष्टजनैश्च संगो रुजा तनौ विक्रमतोप्यसिद्धिः ॥ धर्मार्थहानिर् मुथहा व्ययस्था यदा तदा स्याज् जनतोपि वैरं

vyayo 'dhiko duṣṭajanaiśca saṃgo rujā tanau vikramatopyasiddhiḥ || dharmārthahānir muthahā vyayasthā yadā tadā syāj janatopi vairaṃ

When the munthā is in the 12th (vyaya): expenditure beyond measure, company with wicked people, disease in the body, no success even where there is valour, the loss of dharma and of wealth; and then there is enmity even from ordinary people.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

व्ययोऽधिकोदुष्टजनैश्चसंगोरुजातनौविक्रमतोप्यसिद्धिः ॥ धर्मार्थहानिर्मुथहा व्ययस्थायदातदास्याज्जनतोपिवैरं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६० within its section; it is published at position 16.

क्रूरैर् दृष्टः क्षुतदृशा यो भावो मुथहात्र चेत् ॥ शुभं तद्भावजं नश्येदशुभं चापि वर्धते

krūrair dṛṣṭaḥ kṣutadṛśā yo bhāvo muthahātra cet || śubhaṃ tadbhāvajaṃ naśyedaśubhaṃ cāpi vardhate

Whatever house is aspected by malefics with a kṣuta aspect — if the munthā is there, the good that arises from that house is destroyed, and its evil increases as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरैर्दृष्टःक्षुतदृशायोभावोमुथहात्रचेत् ॥ शुभंतद्भावजंनश्येदशुभंचापिवर्धते

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६१ within its section; it is published at position 17.

Adhyāya 8 · इतिमुथहानिरूपणम्

8.1a reading here is contested

शुभस्वामियुक्तेक्षिता वीर्ययुक् सेंथिहा स्वामिसौम्येत्थशालं प्रपन्ना ॥ शुभं भावजं पोषयेन्नाशुभं साऽन्यथात्वेन्यथा भाव ऊह्यो विमृश्य

śubhasvāmiyuktekṣitā vīryayuk seṃthihā svāmisaumyetthaśālaṃ prapannā || śubhaṃ bhāvajaṃ poṣayennāśubhaṃ sā'nyathātvenyathā bhāva ūhyo vimṛśya

When she — the munthā (this printing spells it both muthahā and iṃthihā: the point of the year's chart that moves forward one sign for each completed year of life) — is joined with or aspected by a benefic or by the lord ⟨of the bhāva she occupies⟩, is possessed of strength, and has entered into an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with that lord or with a benefic, she nourishes the good that arises from that bhāva and not the evil. In the contrary case she does the contrary. The ⟨result of each⟩ bhāva is to be inferred by reflection.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभस्वामियुक्तेक्षितावीर्य युक्सैंथिहास्वामिसौम्येत्थशालंप्रपन्ना ॥ शुभंभावजंपोषयेन्नाशुभंसाऽन्यथात्वेन्यथाभावऊह्योविमृश्य

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्सैंथिहा"; alternatives "युक्सेंथिहा" — zoomed: two strokes plus a dot above स; printed as सैं, sense wants सेन्/से [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सेंथिहा; this sentence names सैं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऊह्यो"; alternatives "ऊह्या" — small ligature
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६२ within its section; it is published at position 1.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सैंथिहा. A reader dividing this verse judged सेंथिहा the likely intent — सा + इंथिहा gives सेंथिहा (ā + i = e). The plate reader records the same: 'printed as सैं, sense wants सेन्/से'. Sense unaffected.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सेंथिहा; this sentence names सैंथिहा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints सैंथिहा. सा + इंथिहा gives सेंथिहा, and that is how the word is read here (the plate reader records the same doubt: 'printed as सैं, sense wants सेन्/से'). Nothing else in the verse turns on it. The reader also doubts ऊह्यो / ऊह्या; both give 'is to be inferred'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सेंथिहा; this sentence names सैंथिहा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

जनुर्लग्नतोस्तांत्यषण्मृत्युबंधुस्थिताब्दे हता क्रूरखेटैस्तु सा चेत् ॥ विनश्येत् स यत्रेन्थिहा भाव एवं शुभस्वामिदृष्टौ न नाशः शुभं च

janurlagnatostāṃtyaṣaṇmṛtyubaṃdhusthitābde hatā krūrakheṭaistu sā cet || vinaśyet sa yatrenthihā bhāva evaṃ śubhasvāmidṛṣṭau na nāśaḥ śubhaṃ ca

If she, standing from the natal lagna (the ascendant of the birth chart) in the 7th (asta), the 12th (antya), the 6th (ṣaṣ), the 8th (mṛtyu) or the 4th (bandhu), is in the year ⟨chart⟩ struck by cruel grahas, then the bhāva in which the munthā stands is destroyed in just this way; but where a benefic or the lord ⟨of that bhāva⟩ aspects her there is no destruction, and good ⟨follows⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जनुर्लग्नतोस्तांत्यषण्मृत्युबंधु स्थिताब्देहताक्रूरखेटैस्तुसाचेत् ॥ विनश्येत्सयत्रेन्थिहाभावएवंशुभस्वामिदृष्टौननाशःशुभंच

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६३ within its section; it is published at position 2.

यदोभयत्रापि हता भावो नश्येत् स सर्वथा ॥ उभयत्र शुभत्वे तु भावोऽसौ वर्धतेतराम्

yadobhayatrāpi hatā bhāvo naśyet sa sarvathā || ubhayatra śubhatve tu bhāvo'sau vardhatetarām

When she is struck in both ⟨the birth chart and the year's chart⟩, that bhāva is destroyed altogether. But when there is benefic influence in both, that same bhāva grows exceedingly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदोभयत्रापिहताभावोनश्येत्ससर्व था ॥ उभयत्रशुभत्वेतुभावोऽसौवर्धतेतराम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६४ within its section; it is published at position 3.
8.4a reading here is contested

वर्षेप्यनिष्टगेहस्था यद्भावे जनुषि स्थिता ॥ क्रूरोपघातात् तं भावं नाशयेच्छुभयुक्शुभा

varṣepyaniṣṭagehasthā yadbhāve januṣi sthitā || krūropaghātāt taṃ bhāvaṃ nāśayecchubhayukśubhā

Standing in an unwanted house in the year ⟨chart⟩ as well, she destroys, through the blow of cruel grahas, that very bhāva in which she stood at birth; ⟨whereas⟩ joined with a benefic she is benefic ⟨and nourishes it⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वर्षेप्यनिष्टगेहस्थायद्भावेजनुषिस्थिता ॥ क्रूरोपघातात्तंभावंनाशयेच्छुभयुक्शुभा

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्शुभा"; alternatives "युक्छुभा" — zoomed: letter after क् has the श-form of this font; sandhi would give युक्छुभा
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६५ within its section; it is published at position 4.
  • About this edition: The second half is elliptical: शुभयुक् शुभा has no verb, and the contrasting 'nourishes it' is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. The page prints युक्शुभा where sandhi would give युक्छुभा; the reader zoomed and confirmed the श-form. The sense is unaffected.

जनुर्लग्नतस्तुर्यगा सौम्ययुक्ताब्दवेशे पितृस्वस्य लाभं विधत्ते ॥ नृपाद्भीतिदा पापयुक्तातिकष्टाष्टमादावपीत्थं विमर्शो विधेयः

janurlagnatasturyagā saumyayuktābdaveśe pitṛsvasya lābhaṃ vidhatte || nṛpādbhītidā pāpayuktātikaṣṭāṣṭamādāvapītthaṃ vimarśo vidheyaḥ

Standing in the 4th (turya) from the natal lagna and joined with benefics, she brings at the ingress of the year (abda-veśa) the gain of the father's wealth (pitṛ-sva). Joined with malefics she gives fear from the king and is very hard ⟨to bear⟩. In the 8th and the rest too the reflection is to be made in this manner.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जनुर्लग्नतस्तुर्यगासौम्ययुक्ताब्दवेशेपैतृकस्यलाभंविधत्ते ॥ नृपाद्भीतिदापापयुक्तातिकष्टाष्टमादावपीत्थंविमर्शोविधेयः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६६ within its section; it is published at position 5.

यस्मिन्भावे स्वामिसौम्येक्षिता चेद्भावो जन्मन्येष यस्तस्य वृद्धिः ॥ एवं पापैर्नाश उक्तस्तु तस्येत्यूह्यं वीर्याद्वर्षपः सौख्यमेव

yasminbhāve svāmisaumyekṣitā cedbhāvo janmanyeṣa yastasya vṛddhiḥ || evaṃ pāpairnāśa uktastu tasyetyūhyaṃ vīryādvarṣapaḥ saukhyameva

In whichever bhāva ⟨she stands⟩, if she is aspected by that bhāva's lord or by a benefic, then whatever that bhāva is in the nativity, there is growth of it. In the same way destruction of it is declared ⟨when she is aspected⟩ by malefics — so it is to be inferred. And by ⟨his own⟩ strength the lord of the year (varṣapa) gives happiness and nothing but happiness.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यस्मिन्भा वेस्वामिसौम्येक्षिताचेद्भावोजन्मन्येषयस्तस्यवृद्धिः ॥ एवंपापैर्नाशउक्तस्तुतस्येत्यूह्यंवीर्याद्वर्षपःसौख्यमेव

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६७ within its section; it is published at position 6.
8.7a reading here is contested

यदींथिहा सूर्यगृहे युता वा सूर्येण राज्यं नृपसंगमं च ॥ दत्ते गुणानां परमामवाप्तिं स्थानांतरस्येति फलं दृशोपि

yadīṃthihā sūryagṛhe yutā vā sūryeṇa rājyaṃ nṛpasaṃgamaṃ ca || datte guṇānāṃ paramāmavāptiṃ sthānāṃtarasyeti phalaṃ dṛśopi

If the munthā is in the Sun's house ⟨Leo⟩, or joined with the Sun, she gives kingship and a meeting with the king, the highest attainment of good qualities, and ⟨the change⟩ of place. This is the result of ⟨the Sun's⟩ aspect as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदींथिहासूर्यगृहेयु तावासूर्येणराज्यंनृपसंगमंच ॥ दत्तेगुणानांपरमामवाप्तिंस्थानांतरस्येतिफलंदृशोपि

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदींथिहा"; alternatives "यदीन्थिहा" — zoomed: anusvāra dot clearly printed over दी
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परमामवाप्तिं"; alternatives "परमावाप्तिं" — sequence म-म-व is as printed; the ṭīkā reads परभागं
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६८ within its section; it is published at position 7.
  • About this edition: स्थानांतरस्य stands in the genitive with no noun governing it; 'the change of place' is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. The page prints परमामवाप्तिं (paramām avāptiṃ, 'the highest attainment'); the reader records the variant परमावाप्तिं, which gives the same sense, and notes that the ṭīkā on the plate reads परभागं instead — not followed here.

चंद्रेण युक्तेंदुगृहेथ दृष्टेंदुनापि वा धर्मयशोभिवृद्धिम् ॥ नैरुज्यसंतोषमतिप्रवृत्तिं ददाति पापेक्षणतोऽतिदुःखम्

caṃdreṇa yukteṃdugṛhetha dṛṣṭeṃdunāpi vā dharmayaśobhivṛddhim || nairujyasaṃtoṣamatipravṛttiṃ dadāti pāpekṣaṇato'tiduḥkham

Joined with the Moon, or in the Moon's house ⟨Cancer⟩, or else aspected by the Moon, she gives increase of dharma and of fame, freedom from illness, contentment and an active mind; from a malefic's aspect, very great sorrow.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेणयुक्तेंदुगृहेथदृष्टेंदुनापिवाधर्मयशोभि वृद्धिम् ॥ नैरुज्यसंतोषमतिप्रवृत्तिंददातिपापेक्षणतोऽतिदुःखम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६९ within its section; it is published at position 8.

कुजेन युक्ता कुजभे कुजेन दृष्टा च पित्तोष्णरुजं करोति ॥ शस्त्राभिघातं रुधिरप्रकोपं सौरीक्षिता सौरिगृहे विशेषात्

kujena yuktā kujabhe kujena dṛṣṭā ca pittoṣṇarujaṃ karoti || śastrābhighātaṃ rudhiraprakopaṃ saurīkṣitā saurigṛhe viśeṣāt

Joined with Mars, or in Mars's sign, or aspected by Mars, she causes illness of bile and heat, a blow from a weapon, and disorder of the blood — especially when she is aspected by Saturn or stands in Saturn's house.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुजेनयुक्ताकुजभेकुजेनदृष्टाचपित्तोष्णरुजंकरोति ॥ शस्त्राभिघातंरुधिरप्रकोपंसौरीक्षितासौरिगृहेविशेषात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७० within its section; it is published at position 9.
8.10a reading here is contested

बुधेन शुक्रेण युतेक्षिता वा तद्भेपि वा स्त्रीमतिलाभसौख्यम् ॥ धर्मं यशश्चाप्यतुलं विधत्ते कष्टं च पापेक्षणयोगतः स्यात्

budhena śukreṇa yutekṣitā vā tadbhepi vā strīmatilābhasaukhyam || dharmaṃ yaśaścāpyatulaṃ vidhatte kaṣṭaṃ ca pāpekṣaṇayogataḥ syāt

Joined with or aspected by Mercury ⟨or⟩ Venus, or ⟨standing⟩ in their sign, she gives women, intelligence, gain and ease; she gives dharma and unequalled fame; and from a malefic's aspect or conjunction there is hardship.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बुधेनशुक्रेणयुते क्षितावातद्धेपिवास्त्रीमतिलाभसौख्यम् ॥ धर्मंयशश्चाप्यतुलंविधत्तेकष्टंचपापेक्षणयोगतःस्यात्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्धेपि"; alternatives "तद्भेपि" — zoomed: lower member of the conjunct under द is unclear, ध or भ; sense suggests तद्भे (in their sign); kept as it looks [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तद्भेपि; this sentence names तद्धेपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्मंयश"; alternatives "धर्मयश" — dot above र्म read as anusvāra
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७१ within its section; it is published at position 10.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads तद्धेपि. A reader dividing this verse judged तद्भेपि the likely intent — तद्धे yields no sense; तद्भे 'in their sign' is what the line needs and what the plate reader's own note proposes ('lower member of the conjunct under द is unclear, ध or भ'). Not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तद्भेपि; this sentence names तद्धेपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints तद्धेपि, which yields no sense; the rendering follows तद्भे 'in their sign', which is what the reader's own note proposes and what the line needs. The Sanskrit is left as printed. The reader also doubts धर्मं / धर्म; both give 'dharma'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तद्भेपि; this sentence names तद्धेपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
8.11a reading here is contested

युतेक्षिता वा गुरुणा गुरोर्भे यदींथिहा पुत्रकलत्रसौख्यं ॥ ददाति हेमांबररत्नभोगं शुभेत्थशालादिह राज्यलाभः

yutekṣitā vā guruṇā gurorbhe yadīṃthihā putrakalatrasaukhyaṃ || dadāti hemāṃbararatnabhogaṃ śubhetthaśālādiha rājyalābhaḥ

If the munthā is joined with or aspected by Jupiter, or stands in Jupiter's sign, she gives the happiness of sons and of a wife and the enjoyment of gold, clothes and jewels; and from an itthaśāla with a benefic there is, in this ⟨year⟩, the gain of a kingdom.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

युतेक्षितावागुरुणागुरोर्भेयदींथि हापुत्रकलत्रसौख्यं ॥ ददातिहेमांबररत्नभोगंशुभेत्थशालादिहराज्यलाभः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदींथि"; alternatives "यदीत्थि" — zoomed: anusvāra dot plus long ī clearly printed; sense wants यदीत्थिहा (muthahā)
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७२ within its section; it is published at position 11.
  • About this edition: The reader doubts यदींथि / यदीत्थि here and suggests the sense wants इत्थिहा. No emendation is needed: this book's own spelling of the munthā is इंथिहा (यदि + इंथिहा = यदींथिहा), as at 8.7, 8.12, 8.17 and 9.18.
8.12a reading here is contested

शनेर्गृहे तेन युतेक्षिता वा यदींथिहा वातरुजं विधत्ते ॥ मानक्षयं वह्निभयं धनस्य हानिं च जीवेक्षणतः शुभाप्तिं

śanergṛhe tena yutekṣitā vā yadīṃthihā vātarujaṃ vidhatte || mānakṣayaṃ vahnibhayaṃ dhanasya hāniṃ ca jīvekṣaṇataḥ śubhāptiṃ

If the munthā is in Saturn's house, or joined with him or aspected by him, she causes disease of wind (vāta), the wasting of honour, fear of fire and loss of wealth; from Jupiter's aspect, the gaining of good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शनेर्गृहेतेनयुतेक्षितावायदींथिहावातरुजंविधत्ते ॥ मानक्षयंवह्निभयंधनस्यहानिंचजीवेक्षणतःशुभाप्तिं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदींथिहा"; alternatives "यदीत्थिहा" — same form as the line above; anusvāra over दी
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७३ within its section; it is published at position 12.

तमोमुखे चेन्मुथहा धनाप्तिं यशः सुखं धर्मसमुन्नतिं च ॥ सितेज्ययोगेक्षणतः पदाप्तिं सुवर्णरत्नांबरलब्धयश्च

tamomukhe cenmuthahā dhanāptiṃ yaśaḥ sukhaṃ dharmasamunnatiṃ ca || sitejyayogekṣaṇataḥ padāptiṃ suvarṇaratnāṃbaralabdhayaśca

If the munthā is at the mouth of Tamas (Rāhu), ⟨she gives⟩ the gaining of wealth, fame, ease and the rise of dharma; and from conjunction with, or the aspect of, Venus and Jupiter, the attainment of rank and the gaining of gold, jewels and clothes.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तमोमुखेचेन्मुथहाधनाप्तिंयशःसुखंधर्मसमुन्नतिंच ॥ सितेज्ययोगेक्षणतःपदा प्तिंसुवर्णरत्नांबरलब्धयश्च

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७४ within its section; it is published at position 13.

भोग्या राहोर्लवास्तस्य मुखं पृष्ठं गता लवाः ॥ ततः सप्तमभं पुच्छं विमृश्येति फलं वदेत्

bhogyā rāhorlavāstasya mukhaṃ pṛṣṭhaṃ gatā lavāḥ || tataḥ saptamabhaṃ pucchaṃ vimṛśyeti phalaṃ vadet

The degrees of Rāhu still to be traversed are his mouth; the degrees already gone by are his back. The seventh sign from him is his tail. Having weighed this, one should declare the result accordingly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भोग्याराहोर्लवास्तस्यमुखंपृष्ठंगतालवाः ॥ ततःसप्तमभंपुच्छंविमृश्येतिफलंवदेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७५ within its section; it is published at position 14.

तत्पृष्ठभागे न शुभप्रदा स्यात् तत्पुच्छभागाद्रिपुभीतिकष्टम् ॥ पापेक्षणादर्थसुखस्य हानिश्चेज्जन्मनीत्थं ग्रहवित्तनाशः

tatpṛṣṭhabhāge na śubhapradā syāt tatpucchabhāgādripubhītikaṣṭam || pāpekṣaṇādarthasukhasya hāniścejjanmanītthaṃ grahavittanāśaḥ

In his back part she would not be a giver of good; from his tail part ⟨come⟩ fear of enemies and hardship. From a malefic's aspect ⟨comes⟩ loss of wealth and of ease; and if it stands so in the nativity too, there is seizure and the destruction of wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्पृष्ठभागे नशुभप्रदास्यात्तत्पुच्छभागाद्रिपुभीतिकष्टम् ॥ पापेक्षणादर्थसुखस्यहानिश्चेज्जन्मनीत्थंग्रहवित्तनाशः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७६ within its section; it is published at position 15.
  • About this edition: ग्रहवित्तनाशः: ग्रह is rendered 'seizure' (capture, being laid hold of), which the preceding 'fear of enemies' supports; it can equally be read as 'the grahas'', giving 'the grahas' destruction of wealth'. The verse does not settle it. The page breaks the line at तत्पृष्ठभागे न, which is read as न ('not'), not as the instrumental ending -भागेन.
8.16a reading here is contested

ये जन्मकाले बलिनोब्दकाले चेद्दुर्बलास्तैरशुभं समांते ॥ विपर्यये पूर्वमनिष्टमुक्तं तुल्यं फलं स्यादुभयत्र साम्ये

ye janmakāle balinobdakāle ceddurbalāstairaśubhaṃ samāṃte || viparyaye pūrvamaniṣṭamuktaṃ tulyaṃ phalaṃ syādubhayatra sāmye

Those ⟨grahas⟩ which are strong at the time of birth — if at the time of the year they are weak, then through them ⟨comes⟩ evil at the end of the year (samā). In the reverse case the evil declared ⟨falls⟩ in the earlier ⟨part⟩. Where they are equal in both, the result is even.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

येजन्मकालेबलिनोब्दकालेचेद्दुर्बलास्तैरशुभंसमांते ॥ विपर्ययेपूर्वमनिष्टमुक्तंतुल्यंफलंस्यादुभयत्रसाम्ये

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलिनोब्द"; alternatives "बलिनोऽब्द" — no ऽ seen between नो and ब्द at tile resolution; zoom crop missed the spot
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७७ within its section; it is published at position 16.
8.17a reading here is contested

षष्ठेऽष्टमेंऽत्ये भुवि वेंथिहेशोऽस्तगोऽथ वक्रोऽशुभदृष्टयुक्तः ॥ क्रूराच्चतुर्थास्तगतश्च भव्यो न स्याद्रुजं यच्छति वित्तनाशं

ṣaṣṭhe'ṣṭameṃ'tye bhuvi veṃthiheśo'stago'tha vakro'śubhadṛṣṭayuktaḥ || krūrāccaturthāstagataśca bhavyo na syādrujaṃ yacchati vittanāśaṃ

If the lord of the munthā stands in the 6th, the 8th, the 12th (antya) or the 4th (bhū), or is combust, or is retrograde, or is joined with or aspected by a malefic, or has gone to the 4th or the 7th (asta) from a malefic — he will not be favourable; he gives disease and the loss of wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठेऽष्टमेंऽत्येभुविवें थिहेशोऽस्तगोऽथवक्रोशुभदृष्टयुक्तः ॥ क्रूराच्चतुर्थास्तगतश्चभव्योनस्याद्रुजंयच्छतिवित्तनाशं

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भुविवें"; alternatives "भुविवेन्" — zoomed: anusvāra over वे clearly printed; word continues on next line as थिहेशो (इंथिहेशः)
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वक्रोशुभ"; alternatives "वक्रोऽशुभ" — no ऽ printed here though the two before it are [2026-10-01: confirmed on the plate: F p. 114 sets no avagraha there (read by eye at about 3.0x native); the mūla now reads वक्रोऽशुभ for वक्रोशुभ, on the verse's own conclusion and the press's ṭīkā अशुभैः पापग्रहैः.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७८ within its section; it is published at position 17.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads वक्रोशुभदृष्टयुक्तः. A reader dividing this verse judged वक्रोऽशुभदृष्टयुक्तः the likely intent — Every other item in this list is an affliction and the line concludes भव्यो न स्यात् ('he will not be favourable'), so अशुभ- is wanted. The reader notes the avagraha is absent here though the two earlier in the line are printed. Not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads वक्रोऽशुभ for वक्रोशुभ. F p. 114 was read by eye at about 3.0x native and sets no avagraha there; the edit rests on the verse's own conclusion and the press's ṭīkā अशुभैः पापग्रहैः.]
  • About this edition: The page prints वक्रोशुभदृष्टयुक्तः with no avagraha, and the reader notes that the two avagrahas earlier in the line ARE printed. The rendering follows वक्रोऽशुभदृष्टयुक्तः, 'retrograde, ⟨or⟩ aspected by or joined with a malefic', because every other item in the list is an affliction. Read exactly as printed it would say 'retrograde ⟨though⟩ aspected by or joined with a benefic', which contradicts the conclusion 'he will not be favourable'. The Sanskrit is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads वक्रोऽशुभ for वक्रोशुभ. F p. 114 was read by eye at about 3.0x native and sets no avagraha there; the edit rests on the verse's own conclusion and the press's ṭīkā अशुभैः पापग्रहैः.]

यद्यष्टमेशेन युतोऽथ दृष्टः क्षुताख्यदृष्ट्या न शुभस्तदापि ॥ योगद्वये स्यान्निधनं यदैकयोगस्तदा मृत्युसमत्वमाहुः

yadyaṣṭameśena yuto'tha dṛṣṭaḥ kṣutākhyadṛṣṭyā na śubhastadāpi || yogadvaye syānnidhanaṃ yadaikayogastadā mṛtyusamatvamāhuḥ

If ⟨that lord⟩ is joined with the lord of the 8th, or is aspected ⟨by him⟩ with the aspect called kṣuta — the hostile aspect, which this book defines as the quarter-aspect from the 4th or 10th, the whole aspect from the 7th, and their standing together in one and the same sign (2.10) — then too he is not auspicious. When both yogas occur there is death; when one yoga alone occurs, they call it the equal of death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यद्यष्टमेशेनयुतोऽथदृष्टःक्षुता ख्यदृष्ट्यानशुभस्तदापि ॥ योगद्वयेस्यान्निधनंयदैकयोगस्तदामृत्युसमत्वमाहुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७९ within its section; it is published at position 18.

मुथहा तत्पतिर्वापि जन्मनीक्षितयुक् शुभैः ॥ वर्षारंभे शुभं धत्तेऽब्दे चेदंतेन्यथाऽशुभम्

muthahā tatpatirvāpi janmanīkṣitayuk śubhaiḥ || varṣāraṃbhe śubhaṃ dhatte'bde cedaṃtenyathā'śubham

The munthā, or her lord, aspected by or joined with benefics in the nativity, gives good at the beginning of the year; if ⟨it is so⟩ in the year ⟨chart instead⟩, then at its end; otherwise, evil.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मुथहातत्पतिर्वापिजन्मनीक्षितयुक्शुभैः ॥ वर्षारंभेशुभंधत्तेऽब्देचेदंतेन्यथाऽशुभम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८० within its section; it is published at position 19.

Adhyāya 9 · इत्यरिष्टाध्यायः

अथवर्षारिष्टविचारः ॥

लग्नेशेऽष्टमगेऽष्टेशे तनुस्थे वा कुजेक्षिते ॥ ज्ञजीवयोरस्तगयोः शस्त्रघातो विपन्मृतिः

lagneśe'ṣṭamage'ṣṭeśe tanusthe vā kujekṣite || jñajīvayorastagayoḥ śastraghāto vipanmṛtiḥ

When the lord of the lagna (the ascendant) stands in the 8th, or the lord of the 8th stands in the 1st (tanu), and it is aspected by Mars, and Mercury and Jupiter are combust — ⟨there is⟩ a wound from a weapon, calamity, death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशेऽष्टमगेऽष्टेशेतनुस्थेवाकुजेक्षिते ॥ ज्ञजीवयोरस्तगयोःशस्त्रघातोविपन्मृतिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८१ within its section; it is published at position 1.

अब्दलग्नेशरंध्रेशौ व्ययाष्टहिबुकोपगौ ॥ मुथहासंयुतौ मृत्युप्रदौ तद्धातुकोपतः

abdalagneśaraṃdhreśau vyayāṣṭahibukopagau || muthahāsaṃyutau mṛtyupradau taddhātukopataḥ

The lord of the year's lagna and the lord of the 8th (randhra), standing in the 12th (vyaya), the 8th or the 4th (hibuka) and joined with the munthā (the point of the year's chart that moves forward one sign for each completed year of life), give death through the aggravation of the bodily humour (dhātu) that belongs to them.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दलग्नेशरंध्रेशौव्यया ष्टहिबुकोपगौ ॥ मुथहासंयुतौमृत्युप्रदौतद्धातुकोपतः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८२ within its section; it is published at position 2.
9.3a reading here is contested

जन्मलग्नाधिपोऽवीर्यो मृतीशो लग्नपो यदा ॥ सूर्यदृष्टो मृतिं धत्ते कुष्ठं कंडूं तथापदः

janmalagnādhipo'vīryo mṛtīśo lagnapo yadā || sūryadṛṣṭo mṛtiṃ dhatte kuṣṭhaṃ kaṃḍūṃ tathāpadaḥ

When the lord of the natal lagna is without strength (avīrya), and the lord of death (the 8th) is ⟨also⟩ the lord of the lagna and is aspected by the Sun, he gives death, leprosy (kuṣṭha), itching (kaṇḍū) and likewise calamities.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मलग्नाधिपोवीर्योमृतीशोलग्नपोयदा ॥ सूर्यदृष्टोमृतिंधत्तेकुष्ठंकंडूं तथापदः

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मलग्नाधिपोवीर्यो"; alternatives "जन्मलग्नाधिपोऽवीर्यो" — no avagraha printed; the ṭīkā glosses अवीर्यः. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads जन्मलग्नाधिपोऽवीर्यो for जन्मलग्नाधिपो वीर्यो. F p.115 was read by eye at about 3.0x native and sets the string unbroken with no avagraha; the division rests on the lexicon and the press's own ṭīkā अवीर्यः.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंडूं"; alternatives "कंडू" — a dot above ड़ू at line end, small; may be anusvāra
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तथापदः"; alternatives "तथाऽपदः" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८३ within its section; it is published at position 3.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads वीर्यो. A reader dividing this verse judged अवीर्यो the likely intent — An ariṣṭa rule wants the natal lagna-lord WEAK, and the reader records that the ṭīkā glosses अवीर्यः. The avagraha of जन्मलग्नाधिपोऽवीर्यो is not printed. Not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the emendation is now made; the mūla now reads जन्मलग्नाधिपोऽवीर्यो. F p.115 was read by eye at about 3.0x native: the press sets जन्मलग्नाधिपोवीर्योमृतीशोलग्नपोयदा as one unbroken string with no avagraha and no space, so the page does not choose between वीर्यो and अवीर्यो. वीर्य is a neuter noun and cannot stand as an adjective beside अधिपः, अवीर्यः can, and the press's ṭīkā on the same leaf glosses अवीर्यः.]
  • About this edition: The page prints वीर्यो with no avagraha, 'possessed of strength', and that is what is rendered. Read with the avagraha — अवीर्यो, 'without strength' — the line means 'when the lord of the natal lagna is weak', which is what a rule about ariṣṭa wants and what the reader records the ṭīkā as glossing. The sense turns entirely on this one unprinted mark. The reader also doubts कंडूं / कंडू and तथापदः / तथाऽपदः; neither changes the sense. [2026-10-01: superseded. F p.115, read by eye at about 3.0x native, sets the unbroken string जन्मलग्नाधिपोवीर्यो, which divides either way; the mūla now reads जन्मलग्नाधिपोऽवीर्यो, 'without strength', on the lexicon and the press's own ṭīkā अवीर्यः.]

अस्तगौ मुथहालग्ननाथौ मंदेक्षितौ यदा ॥ सर्वनाशो मृतिः कष्टमाधिव्याधिभयं रुजः

astagau muthahālagnanāthau maṃdekṣitau yadā || sarvanāśo mṛtiḥ kaṣṭamādhivyādhibhayaṃ rujaḥ

When the lord of the munthā and the lord of the lagna are both combust and aspected by Saturn (manda), ⟨there follows⟩ the ruin of everything, death, hardship, fear of affliction of mind and body, and sicknesses.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तगौमुथहालग्ननाथौमंदेक्षितौयदा ॥ सर्वनाशोमृतिःकष्टमाधिव्याधिभयंरुजः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८४ within its section; it is published at position 4.
9.5a reading here is contested

क्रूरमूसरिफोऽब्देशो जन्मेशः क्रूरितः शुभैः ॥ कंबूलेपि विपन्मृत्युरित्थमन्याधिकारितः

krūramūsaripho'bdeśo janmeśaḥ krūritaḥ śubhaiḥ || kaṃbūlepi vipanmṛtyuritthamanyādhikāritaḥ

When the lord of the year (abdeśa) is in a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) with a malefic, and the lord of the nativity is afflicted by malefics, then even where there is a kambūla with benefics there is calamity and death. So too ⟨is the judgement to be made⟩ from the other office-holders (adhikārins).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरमूसरिफोऽब्देशोजन्मेशःक्रूरितःशुभैः ॥ कंबूलेपिविपन्मृत्युरित्थमन्याधिकारितः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबूलेपि"; alternatives "कंबूलेऽपि" — zoomed: no avagraha printed; ब is clear
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८५ within its section; it is published at position 5.
  • About this edition: अन्याधिकारितः, 'from the other adhikārins' — the officers of the year's chart, the set from which the year-lord is elected (this book lists them at 6.9: the lord of the natal lagna, the lord of the year's lagna, the lord of the munthā, the trirāśipa, and the lord of the Sun's sign by day or the Moon's by night). The reader notes कंबूलेपि is printed without the avagraha of कंबूलेऽपि; the sense is unaffected.
9.6a reading here is contested

क्रूरा वीर्याधिकाः सौम्या निर्बला रिपुरंध्रगाः ॥ तदाधिव्याधिभीतिः स्यात् कलिर्हानिस्तथा विपत्

krūrā vīryādhikāḥ saumyā nirbalā ripuraṃdhragāḥ || tadādhivyādhibhītiḥ syāt kalirhānistathā vipat

When malefics exceed in strength, and benefics are without strength and stand in the 6th (ripu) and the 8th (randhra), then there is fear of affliction of mind and body, quarrel, loss and calamity.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरावीर्याधिकाःसौम्यानिर्बलारिपुरंध्रगाः ॥ तदाधिव्याधिभीतिःस्यात्कलिर्हानिस्तथाविपत्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निर्बला"; alternatives "निर्वला" — zoomed: large-type letter after the repha reads as ब with its inner stroke; the ṭīkā spells निर्वलाः
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८६ within its section; it is published at position 6.
  • About this edition: The reader doubts निर्बला / निर्वला and records that the ṭīkā spells निर्वलाः; both are the same word, 'without strength'.

नीचे शुक्रो गुरुः शत्रुभागे सौख्यलवोपि न ॥ लग्नेशेष्टमगेष्टेशे तनौ वा मृतिमादिशेत्

nīce śukro guruḥ śatrubhāge saukhyalavopi na || lagneśeṣṭamageṣṭeśe tanau vā mṛtimādiśet

⟨When⟩ Venus is in its sign of fall (nīca) and Jupiter stands in an enemy's portion, there is not even a fragment of ease. When the lord of the lagna is in the 8th, or the lord of the 8th is in the 1st (tanu), one should declare death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नीचेशुक्रोगुरुःशत्रुभागेसौख्य लवोपिन ॥ लग्नेशेष्टमगेष्टेशेतनौवामृतिमादिशेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८७ within its section; it is published at position 7.
9.8a reading here is contested

निर्बलौ धर्मवित्तेशौ दुष्टखेटास्तनौ स्थिताः ॥ लक्ष्मीश्चिरार्जिता नश्येद्यदि शक्रोपि रक्षिता

nirbalau dharmavitteśau duṣṭakheṭāstanau sthitāḥ || lakṣmīścirārjitā naśyedyadi śakropi rakṣitā

When the lords of the 9th (dharma) and of the 2nd (vitta) are without strength and evil grahas stand in the 1st (tanu), wealth long earned is destroyed — even were Indra himself its guard.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

निर्बलौधर्मवित्तेशौदुष्टखेटास्तनौस्थिताः ॥ लक्ष्मीश्चिरार्जितानश्येद्यदिश क्रोपिरक्षिता

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लक्ष्मीश्चिरार्जिता"; alternatives "लक्ष्मीश्चिराजिता" — zoomed: repha over जि is clear
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८८ within its section; it is published at position 8.
9.9a reading here is contested

नीचे चंद्रेस्तगाः सौम्या वियोगः स्वजनैः सह ॥ शरीरपीडा मृत्युर्वा साधिव्याधिभयं द्रुतम्

nīce caṃdrestagāḥ saumyā viyogaḥ svajanaiḥ saha || śarīrapīḍā mṛtyurvā sādhivyādhibhayaṃ drutam

When the Moon is in its sign of fall and the benefics are combust, there is separation from one's own people, bodily pain, or death, together with the fear of affliction of mind and body — and quickly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नीचेचंद्रेस्तगाःसौम्यावियोगःस्वजनैःसह ॥ शरीरपीडामृत्युर्वासाधिव्याधिभयंद्रुतम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रुतम्"; alternatives "द्रुतम्।" — a small stray mark follows म् before ॥; read as a speck, not a daṇḍa
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८९ within its section; it is published at position 9.

अब्दलग्नं जन्मलग्नराशिभ्यामष्टमं यदा ॥ कष्टं महाव्याधिभयं मृत्युः पापयुतेक्षणात्

abdalagnaṃ janmalagnarāśibhyāmaṣṭamaṃ yadā || kaṣṭaṃ mahāvyādhibhayaṃ mṛtyuḥ pāpayutekṣaṇāt

When the lagna of the year is the 8th from the birth sign ⟨the Moon's sign⟩ and from the lagna sign ⟨both⟩, ⟨there is⟩ hardship, fear of great illness, and death — from the conjunction or the aspect of malefics.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दलग्नंजन्म लग्नराशिभ्यामष्टमंयदा ॥ कष्टंमहाव्याधिभयंमृत्युःपापयुतेक्षणात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९० within its section; it is published at position 10.
9.11a reading here is contested

जन्मन्यष्टमगः पापो वर्षलग्ने रुगाधिदः ॥ चंद्राब्दलग्नपौ नष्टबलौ चेत् स्यात् तदा मृतिः

janmanyaṣṭamagaḥ pāpo varṣalagne rugādhidaḥ || caṃdrābdalagnapau naṣṭabalau cet syāt tadā mṛtiḥ

A malefic that stands in the 8th in the nativity, ⟨coming⟩ into the lagna of the year, gives disease and affliction of mind; and if the Moon and the lord of the year's lagna have lost their strength, then there is death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मन्यष्टमगःपापोवर्षलग्नेरुगाधिदः ॥ चंद्राब्दलग्नपौनष्ट बलौचेत्स्यात्तदामृतिः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्राब्दलग्नपौ"; alternatives "चंद्राव्दलग्नपौ" — ब/व in the conjunct ब्द not distinct at this size
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९१ within its section; it is published at position 11.

जन्माब्दलग्नपौ पापयुक्तौ पतितभस्थितौ ॥ रोगाधिदौ मृत्युकरावस्तगौ नेक्षितौ शुभैः

janmābdalagnapau pāpayuktau patitabhasthitau || rogādhidau mṛtyukarāvastagau nekṣitau śubhaiḥ

The lord of the natal lagna and the lord of the year's lagna, joined with malefics and standing in a fallen sign (patita-bha), give disease and affliction of mind; combust and unaspected by benefics, they bring death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्माब्दलग्नपौपापयुक्तौपतितभस्थितौ ॥ रोगाधिदौमृत्युकरावस्तगौनेक्षितौशुभैः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९२ within its section; it is published at position 12.
  • About this edition: पतितभस्थितौ is rendered literally, 'standing in a fallen sign'. Neither this verse nor the surrounding chapter says which signs count as patita, so nothing is supplied for it.
9.13a reading here is contested

व्ययांबुनिधनारिस्था जन्मेशाब्दपमुंथहाः ॥ एकर्क्षगास्तदा मृत्युः पापक्षुतदृशा ध्रुवम्

vyayāṃbunidhanāristhā janmeśābdapamuṃthahāḥ || ekarkṣagāstadā mṛtyuḥ pāpakṣutadṛśā dhruvam

The lord of the nativity, the lord of the year and the munthā standing in the 12th (vyaya), the 4th (ambu), the 8th (nidhana) or the 6th (ari) — when they go into one and the same sign, then death is certain, ⟨and⟩ under the kṣuta aspect of a malefic — the hostile aspect, which this book defines as the quarter-aspect from the 4th or 10th, the whole aspect from the 7th, and standing together in one sign (2.10).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

व्ययांबुनिधनारिस्थाजन्मेशाब्दपमुंथहाः ॥ एकर्क्षगास्तदामृत्युःपापक्षुतदृशाध्रुवम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापक्षुतदृशा"; alternatives "पापक्रूरदृशा" — क्षु read at 5.4x; unusual word, but the ṭīkā's own gloss on this plate (line 11) sets पापग्रहैःक्षुतदृष्ट्या, so the edition means क्षुत
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९३ within its section; it is published at position 13.
  • About this edition: The reader read पापक्षुतदृशा at 5.4× against the alternative पापक्रूरदृशा, and records that the ṭīkā's own gloss on the same plate sets पापग्रहैःक्षुतदृष्ट्या. क्षुत is the technical term this book defines at 2.10 and repeats at 7.3, 7.17, 8.18 and 16.3.
9.14a reading here is contested

चंद्रो व्यये शनियुतः शुभः षष्ठोऽथ नाशकृत् ॥ चित्तवैकल्यमशुभे सराफान्न शुभेक्षणात्

caṃdro vyaye śaniyutaḥ śubhaḥ ṣaṣṭho'tha nāśakṛt || cittavaikalyamaśubhe sarāphānna śubhekṣaṇāt

The Moon in the 12th joined with Saturn, or a benefic in the 6th, then works ruin. ⟨There comes⟩ derangement of the mind from a sarāpha (the separating aspect) with a malefic; not so from a benefic's aspect.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोव्ययेशनियुतःशुभःषष्ठोऽथनाशकृत्॥ चित्तवैकल्यमशुभेसराफान्नशुभेक्षणात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठोऽथ"; alternatives "पष्ठोऽथ" — same ष/प glyph test as line 4; the spur is present. Avagraha clearly inked.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९४ within its section; it is published at position 14.
  • About this edition: शुभः is taken as a second subject, 'a benefic ⟨in⟩ the 6th'; it can also be read with the first clause, 'the Moon in the 12th joined with Saturn is auspicious, but in the 6th works ruin'. The verse supplies no verb either way.
9.15a reading here is contested

चंद्रोऽर्कमंडलगतो रिपुरिःफाष्टबंधुगः ॥ त्रिदोषतस्तस्य रुजा विविधेज्यदृशा शुभम्

caṃdro'rkamaṃḍalagato ripuriḥphāṣṭabaṃdhugaḥ || tridoṣatastasya rujā vividhejyadṛśā śubham

The Moon gone into the Sun's disc ⟨combust⟩ and standing in the 6th (ripu), the 12th (riḥpha), the 8th or the 4th (bandhu) — from that ⟨come⟩ his diseases of many kinds, arising from the three doṣas; by Jupiter's (ijya) aspect, good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोऽर्कमंडलगतोरिपुरिःफाष्टबंधुगः ॥ त्रिदोषतस्तस्यरुजाविविधेज्यदृशाशुभम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रोऽर्क" — avagraha verified at 3.1x — present and well inked
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९५ within its section; it is published at position 15.

हद्दाहायनलग्नेशौ सप्ताष्टांत्ये खलान्वितौ ॥ स्वदशायां निधनदौ शुभदृष्ट्या शुभं वदेत्

haddāhāyanalagneśau saptāṣṭāṃtye khalānvitau || svadaśāyāṃ nidhanadau śubhadṛṣṭyā śubhaṃ vadet

The lord of the haddā (the Tājika term-division of a sign) and the lord of the year's lagna, joined with a malefic in the 7th, the 8th or the 12th (antya), give death in their own daśā; with a benefic's aspect one should declare good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

हद्दाहायनलग्नेशौसप्ताष्टांत्येखलान्वितौ ॥ स्वदशायांनिधनदौशुभदृष्ट्याशुभंवदेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९६ within its section; it is published at position 16.

अब्दलग्नादृज्वनृजू व्ययार्थस्थौ रुजा तदा ॥ एवं वर्षाब्दलग्नेशजन्मेशैरपि बंधनम्

abdalagnādṛjvanṛjū vyayārthasthau rujā tadā || evaṃ varṣābdalagneśajanmeśairapi baṃdhanam

From the lagna of the year, a graha in direct motion and a graha retrograde standing in the 12th (vyaya) and the 2nd (artha) — then ⟨comes⟩ illness. In the same way, by the lord of the year's lagna and the lord of the nativity ⟨so placed⟩, there is imprisonment.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दलग्नादृज्वनृजूव्ययार्थस्थौरुजातदा ॥ एवंवर्षाब्दलग्नेशजन्मेशैरपिबंधनम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९७ within its section; it is published at position 17.
  • About this edition: ऋज्वनृजू is a dual: 'the direct one and the not-direct ⟨retrograde⟩ one'. The verse does not say which of the two takes which house.
9.18a reading here is contested

नीचे त्रिराशिपे पापदृष्टे कार्यं विनश्यति ॥ इंथिहेशेऽब्दपे वारिभेऽस्तं याते रुजा विपत्

nīce trirāśipe pāpadṛṣṭe kāryaṃ vinaśyati || iṃthiheśe'bdape vāribhe'staṃ yāte rujā vipat

When the lord of the triplicity (trirāśipa) is in its sign of fall and is aspected by a malefic, the undertaking is ruined. When the lord of the munthā, or the lord of the year, standing in an enemy's sign (ari-bha), goes to setting ⟨combustion⟩, ⟨there is⟩ illness and calamity.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नीचेत्रिराशिपेपापदृष्टेकार्यंविनश्यति ॥ इंथिहेशेऽब्दपेवारिभेऽस्तंयातेरुजाविपत्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कार्यं"; alternatives "कार्य" — anusvāra dot sits beside the repha over र्य; small
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९८ within its section; it is published at position 18.
  • About this edition: वारिभे is read as वा + अरिभे, 'or in an enemy's sign'; the word अरि also names the 6th house in this book (as at 9.6 and 9.13), so 'in the 6th sign' is an equally open reading. The reader doubts कार्यं / कार्य; both give 'the undertaking'.
9.19a reading here is contested

चंद्रो रिःफषडष्टभूद्युनगतो दृष्टोऽशुभैर्नो शुभैः सोऽरिष्टं विदधाति मृत्युमथवा भौमेक्षणादग्निभीः ॥ शस्त्राद्वा शनिराहुकेतुभिररेर्भीतिं रुजं वायुजां दारिद्र्यं रविणाशुभं शुभदृशेज्यालोकनादादिशेत्

caṃdro riḥphaṣaḍaṣṭabhūdyunagato dṛṣṭo'śubhairno śubhaiḥ so'riṣṭaṃ vidadhāti mṛtyumathavā bhaumekṣaṇādagnibhīḥ || śastrādvā śanirāhuketubhirarerbhītiṃ rujaṃ vāyujāṃ dāridryaṃ raviṇāśubhaṃ śubhadṛśejyālokanādādiśet

The Moon standing in the 12th (riḥpha), the 6th, the 8th, the 4th (bhū) or the 7th (dyūna), aspected by malefics and not by benefics — he works ariṣṭa, or death itself. From Mars's aspect, the fear of fire, or ⟨harm⟩ from a weapon; from Saturn, Rāhu and Ketu, fear of an enemy, illness born of wind, and poverty; from the Sun, what is inauspicious. By a benefic's aspect, ⟨and⟩ by Jupiter's (ijya) look, one should declare ⟨good⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोरिःफषडष्टभूद्युनगतोदृष्टोऽशुभैर्नोशुभैःसोऽरिष्टंविदधातिमृत्युमथवाभौमेक्षणादग्निभीः ॥ शस्त्राद्वाशनिराहुकेतुभिररेर्भीतिंरुजंवायु जांदारिद्र्यंरविणाशुभंशुभदृशेज्यालोकनादादिशेत्

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभैर्नोशुभैः"; alternatives "शुभैर्नोंशुभैः" — marks above नो (repha, possibly an anusvāra dot) are crowded; not zoomed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टोऽशुभै"; alternatives "दृष्टोशुभै" — zoomed दृ glyph (hook under द) confirmed; ऽ glyph is printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दारिद्र्यं"; alternatives "दारिभ्रं", "दारिध्र्यं" — zoomed: ligature after रि is the old द्र्य form with anusvāra; its shape resembles भ्र at tile size
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफ"; alternatives "रिष्फ" — printed with a visarga-like sign before फ
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९९ within its section; it is published at position 19.
  • About this edition: The last clause has no object: 'good' is supplied in ⟨ ⟩ from the contrast with रविणाशुभं (रविणा + अशुभं). The reader records four doubts on this long verse — शुभैर्नोशुभैः / शुभैर्नोंशुभैः, दृष्टोऽशुभै / दृष्टोशुभै, दारिद्र्यं / दारिभ्रं / दारिध्र्यं, रिःफ / रिष्फ — and none of them changes what the verse claims.

क्रूरान्वितेक्षितयुता शनिनेंत्थिहाधिव्याधिप्रदा जनुषि रिःफसुखारिरंध्रे ॥ द्यूने च वर्षतनुनैधनगा मृतिं सा दत्ते खलेक्षितयुतेत्यपि चिंत्यमार्यैः

krūrānvitekṣitayutā śanineṃtthihādhivyādhipradā januṣi riḥphasukhāriraṃdhre || dyūne ca varṣatanunaidhanagā mṛtiṃ sā datte khalekṣitayutetyapi ciṃtyamāryaiḥ

The munthā accompanied by, aspected by or joined with malefics — and with Saturn — standing in the nativity in the 12th (riḥpha), the 4th (sukha), the 6th (ari), the 8th (randhra) or the 7th (dyūna), gives affliction of mind and body; and standing in the 1st (tanu) or the 8th (naidhana) of the year, aspected by or joined with a malefic, she gives death. This too is to be weighed by the noble ⟨astrologers⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरान्वितेक्षितयुताशनिनेंत्थिहाधिव्याधिप्रदाजनुषिरिःफसुखारिरंध्रे॥द्यूनेचवर्षतनुनैधनगामृतिंसादत्तेखलेक्षितयुतेत्यपिचिंत्यमार्यैः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १०० within its section; it is published at position 20.
  • About this edition: The page opens this verse's number mark (॥ १००) and never closes it: the press set no closing daṇḍas before the section's colophon.

Adhyāya 10 · इत्यरिष्टभंगाध्यायः

10.1a reading here is contested

अथारिष्टभंगः ॥

लग्नाधिपो बलयुतः शुभेक्षितयुतोपि वा ॥ केन्द्रत्रिकोणगो ऽरिष्टं नाशयेत् सुखवित्तदः

lagnādhipo balayutaḥ śubhekṣitayutopi vā || kendratrikoṇago 'riṣṭaṃ nāśayet sukhavittadaḥ

The lord of the lagna (the ascendant), endowed with strength — or else aspected by or joined with a benefic — and standing in a kendra (an angle: the 1st, 4th, 7th or 10th) or in a trikoṇa (a trine: the 5th or 9th), destroys the ariṣṭa (the evil that threatens) and gives comfort and wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपोबलयुतःशुभेक्षितयुतोपिवा ॥ केन्द्रत्रिकोणगोऽरिष्टंनाशयेत्सुखवित्तदः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युतोपिवा"; alternatives "युतोऽपिवा" — no avagraha printed here, though केन्द्रत्रिकोणगोऽरिष्टं on the same line has one
  • About this edition: The page prints युतोपिवा with no avagraha; the word is अपि, 'or even'. वा makes the two conditions alternatives — strength, OR benefic aspect/conjunction — and I have kept them so. The reading does not turn on the missing avagraha.
10.2a reading here is contested

गुरुः केंद्रे त्रिकोणे वा पापादृष्टः शुभेक्षितः ॥ लग्नचंद्रेंत्थिहारिष्टविनाशार्थसुखं दिशेत्

guruḥ keṃdre trikoṇe vā pāpādṛṣṭaḥ śubhekṣitaḥ || lagnacaṃdreṃtthihāriṣṭavināśārthasukhaṃ diśet

Jupiter (guru) in a kendra or in a trikoṇa, unaspected by malefics and aspected by benefics, in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect, here spelt iṃtthihā) with the lagna and the Moon, grants the destruction of the ariṣṭa, wealth and comfort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरुःकेंद्रेत्रिकोणेवापापादृष्टःशुभेक्षितः ॥ लग्नचंद्रेंत्थिहारिष्टविनाशार्थसुखंदिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नचंद्रेंत्थिहा"; alternatives "लग्नचंद्रेत्थिहा" — zoomed: stroke and dot above द्रे, read as ें
  • About this edition: The book spells the applying aspect three ways — इत्थशाल, इंत्थिहा, इंथिहा — and all three are the same Tājika term. The reader's alternative here, इत्थिहा without the anusvāra, changes nothing.
10.3a reading here is contested

सुखं स्वामियुतं सद्भिर्दृष्टं सौख्ययशोऽर्थदम् ॥ लग्ने तृतीये ऽथ गुरुर्जन्मेट् सौख्यार्थदः सुखे

sukhaṃ svāmiyutaṃ sadbhirdṛṣṭaṃ saukhyayaśo'rthadam || lagne tṛtīye 'tha gururjanmeṭ saukhyārthadaḥ sukhe

The 4th house (sukha), joined with its own lord and aspected by the good ⟨grahas, the benefics⟩, gives comfort, fame and wealth. And Jupiter, ⟨being⟩ lord of the nativity (janmeṭ, the lord of the natal lagna), in the lagna, in the 3rd, or in the 4th (sukha), gives comfort and wealth. [Our source read गुरुर्जन्मेद्, and जन्मेद् is no Sanskrit word. The text now reads जन्मेट्, the nominative of जन्मेश्, 'lord of the nativity', formed as this book forms वर्षेट्, 'lord of the year', at 15.2 and याम्येट्, 'lord of the south', at 1.3. जन्मेट् keeps the pāda at eight syllables, where जन्मेशः would make nine. The line can also be read as two conditions: Jupiter in the lagna or the 3rd, and the lord of the nativity in the 4th.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुखंस्वामियुतंसद्भिर्दृष्टंसौख्ययशोऽर्थदम् ॥ लग्नेतृतीयेऽथगुरुर्जन्मेद्सौख्यार्थदःसुखे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मेद्सौख्या"; alternatives "जन्मेट्सौख्या" — zoomed: द with a virāma; kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गुरुर्जन्मेट् सौख्यार्थदः; this sentence names जन्मेद्सौख्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads गुरुर्जन्मेद्सौख्यार्थदः. A reader dividing this verse judged गुरुर्जन्मेसौख्यार्थदः the likely intent — जन्मेद् is no Sanskrit word. The pāda scans as anuṣṭubh with or without the द्, so the metre allows the द् to be a stray. It does NOT allow जन्मेशः, the book's own word for 'lord of the nativity' (three times elsewhere in this printing): जन्-मे-शः-सौ-ख्यार्-थ-दः-सु-खे is nine syllables where eight are wanted. The reader zoomed and saw द with a virāma (alternative ट्).. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गुरुर्जन्मेट् सौख्यार्थदः; this sentence names गुरुर्जन्मेद्सौख्यार्थदः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: जन्मेद् is unintelligible as printed and I have not mended the Sanskrit. The plate reader zoomed and saw द with a virāma (alternative ट्). The emendation I judge likeliest — the द् is a stray — is recorded as a suspect in the word-division file, not applied. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गुरुर्जन्मेट् सौख्यार्थदः; this sentence names जन्मेद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्ने द्युनेशस्तनुगः सुरेज्यः क्रूरैरदृष्टः शुभमित्रदृष्टः ॥ रिष्टं निहंत्यर्थयशःसुखाप्तिं दिशेत् स्वपाके नृपतिप्रसादम्

lagne dyuneśastanugaḥ surejyaḥ krūrairadṛṣṭaḥ śubhamitradṛṣṭaḥ || riṣṭaṃ nihaṃtyarthayaśaḥsukhāptiṃ diśet svapāke nṛpatiprasādam

The lord of the 7th (dyūna) standing in the lagna, and Jupiter (surejya) gone to the tanu (the 1st), unaspected by the cruel ⟨grahas⟩ and aspected by benefics and by friendly ⟨grahas⟩ — ⟨these⟩ destroy the riṣṭa (the evil), grant the winning of wealth, fame and comfort, and in ⟨their⟩ own daśā (svapāka, the graha's own ripening period) give the favour of the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेद्युनेशस्तनुगःसुरेज्यःक्रूरैरदृष्टःशुभमि त्रदृष्टः ॥ रिष्टंनिहंत्यर्थयशःसुखाप्तिंदिशेत्स्वपाकेनृपतिप्रसादम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्ने and तनुगः name the same house, the 1st; the verse varies the word for the metre and puts both grahas there. द्युनेश is printed with a short u, and the book sets both द्यून and द्युन elsewhere.
10.5a reading here is contested

बलान्वितौ धर्मधनाधिनाथौ क्रूरैरदृष्टौ तनुगौ यदा स्ताम् ॥ राज्यं गजाश्वांबररत्नपूर्णं रिष्टस्य नाशोप्यतुलं यशश्च

balānvitau dharmadhanādhināthau krūrairadṛṣṭau tanugau yadā stām || rājyaṃ gajāśvāṃbararatnapūrṇaṃ riṣṭasya nāśopyatulaṃ yaśaśca

When the lords (adhinātha) of the 9th (dharma) and of the 2nd (dhana), endowed with strength and unaspected by the cruel ⟨grahas⟩, both stand in the tanu (the 1st) — ⟨then there is⟩ a kingdom full of elephants, horses, garments and jewels; the destruction of the riṣṭa as well; and fame beyond compare.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलान्वितौधर्मधनादिनाथौक्रूरैरदृष्टौतनुगौयदास्ताम् ॥ राज्यं गजाश्वांबररत्नपूर्णंरिष्टस्यनाशोप्यतुलंयशश्च

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्णंरिष्टस्य"; alternatives "पूर्णरिष्टस्य", "पूर्णमरिष्टस्य" — zoomed: a dot sits beside the repha over ण; read as anusvāra
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाशोप्यतुलं"; alternatives "नाशोऽप्यतुलं" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The reader read पूर्णं with an anusvāra (alternatives पूर्णरिष्टस्य, पूर्णमरिष्टस्य). On the printed reading पूर्णं closes 'a kingdom full of…' and रिष्टस्य नाशः opens the next clause, which is how I render it; the alternatives give the same sense by a different join.
10.6a reading here is contested

त्रिषष्ठलाभोपगतैरसौम्यैः केंद्रत्रिकोणोपगतैश्च सौम्यैः ॥ रत्नांबरस्वर्णयशःसुखाप्तिर्नाशोप्यनिष्टस्य तनोश्च पुष्टिः

triṣaṣṭhalābhopagatairasaumyaiḥ keṃdratrikoṇopagataiśca saumyaiḥ || ratnāṃbarasvarṇayaśaḥsukhāptirnāśopyaniṣṭasya tanośca puṣṭiḥ

With the non-benefic ⟨grahas⟩ placed in the 3rd (tri), the 6th (ṣaṣṭha) and the 11th (lābha), and with the benefics placed in the kendras and trikoṇas — ⟨there follows⟩ the winning of jewels, garments, gold, fame and comfort; the destruction of what is unwanted (aniṣṭa) as well; and the thriving of the body (tanu).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिषष्ठलाभोपगतैरसौम्यैःकेंद्रत्रिकोणोपगतैश्चसौम्यैः ॥ रत्नांबरस्वर्णयशःसुखाप्तिर्ना शोप्यनिष्टस्यतनोश्चपुष्टिः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शोप्यनिष्टस्य"; alternatives "शोऽप्यनिष्टस्य" — no avagraha printed
10.7a reading here is contested

यदा सवीर्योमुथहाधिनाथो लग्नाधिपो जन्मविलग्नपो वा ॥ केंद्रत्रिकोणायधनस्थितास्ते सुखार्थहेमांबरलाभदाः स्युः

yadā savīryomuthahādhinātho lagnādhipo janmavilagnapo vā || keṃdratrikoṇāyadhanasthitāste sukhārthahemāṃbaralābhadāḥ syuḥ

When the lord of the munthā (the progressed ascendant of the year), or the lord of the lagna ⟨of the year⟩, or the lord of the natal ascendant is full of strength, and these stand in a kendra, a trikoṇa, the 11th (āya) or the 2nd (dhana), they become givers of comfort, wealth, gold, garments and gain. [Our mūla now reads मुथहा, this book's own name for the munthā; the earlier सुथहा, which is no word, is corrected.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदासवीर्योंसुथहाधिनाथोलग्नाधिपोजन्मविलग्नपोवा॥ केंद्रत्रिकोणायधनस्थितास्तेसुखार्थहेमांबरलाभदाःस्युः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सवीर्योंसुथहा"; alternatives "सवीर्योमुथहा", "सवीर्योंमुथहा" — zoomed: a dot sits with the repha and o-stroke on यो; the next akṣara looks like सु, though the text elsewhere has मुथहा [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सवीर्योमुथहाधिनाथो; this sentence names सवीर्योंसुथहा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सवीर्योंसुथहाधिनाथो. A reader dividing this verse judged सवीर्योमुंथहाधिनाथो the likely intent — The word is मुथहा / मुंथहा (munthā), which this printing sets more than twenty times, and सुथहा nowhere else. The plate reader saw a dot with the repha and o-stroke on यो and a next akṣara shaped like सु, and recorded मुथहा as the alternative. The lord of the munthā is one of the three office-holders this verse lists beside the year-lagna lord and the natal-lagna lord.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सवीर्योमुथहाधिनाथो; this sentence names सवीर्योंसुथहाधिनाथो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: वा makes the three office-holders alternatives, not a joint condition. The सु-for-मु misprint is recorded as a suspect in the word-division file and the Sanskrit is left as printed.
10.8a reading here is contested

तुंगे शनिर्वा भृगुजो गुरुर्वा शुभेत्थशालाद्यवनाद्धनाप्तिम् ॥ बली कुजो वित्तगतो यशोर्थतेजांस्यकस्माच्च सुखानि दद्यात्

tuṃge śanirvā bhṛgujo gururvā śubhetthaśālādyavanāddhanāptim || balī kujo vittagato yaśorthatejāṃsyakasmācca sukhāni dadyāt

Saturn (śani) in exaltation (tuṅga), or Venus (bhṛgu-ja), or Jupiter — ⟨these give⟩ the gaining of wealth from a Yavana (a Turk, a Muslim lord) through an auspicious itthaśāla. Mars (kuja), strong and placed in the 2nd (vitta), gives fame, wealth and splendour, and comforts that come unlooked for (akasmāt).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तुंगेशनिर्वाभृगुजोगु रुर्वाशुभेत्थशालाद्यवनाद्धनाप्तिम् ॥ बलीकुजोवित्तगतोयशोर्थतेजांस्यकस्माच्चसुखानिदद्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रुर्वाशु"; alternatives "रुर्वांशु" — zoomed: one curl above वा, read as repha only; could hide an anusvāra
  • About this edition: तुंगे governs all three grahas: Saturn, Venus or Jupiter, in exaltation. यवन is the Tājika texts' own word for a Turk or Muslim, and the verse makes him the source of the money. The reader's alternative रुर्वांशु (an anusvāra hidden in the curl over वा) would break गुरुर्वा शुभेत्थशालात् and is not followed.
10.9a reading here is contested

सूर्येज्यशुक्रा मिथ इत्थशालं कुर्युस्तदा राज्ययशःसुखार्थाः ॥ सूर्यः कुजो वोपचये ददाति भद्रं यशो मंगलमिंथिहायाः

sūryejyaśukrā mitha itthaśālaṃ kuryustadā rājyayaśaḥsukhārthāḥ || sūryaḥ kujo vopacaye dadāti bhadraṃ yaśo maṃgalamiṃthihāyāḥ

If the Sun, Jupiter (ijya) and Venus make an itthaśāla with one another, then ⟨come⟩ kingdom, fame, comfort and wealth. The Sun, or Mars, in an upacaya (the 3rd, 6th, 10th or 11th) gives good fortune, fame and the auspicious fruit of the itthaśāla (iṃthihā).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्येज्यशुक्रामिथइत्थशालंकुर्यु स्तदाराज्ययशःसुखार्थाः ॥ सूर्यःकुजोवोपचयेददातिभद्रंयशोमंगलमिंथिहायाः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुजोवोपचये"; alternatives "कुजोवापचये" — o-stroke on वो
  • About this edition: वा is 'or': the Sun or Mars, not both. The printed वोपचये (वा + उपचये) is what carries that 'or'; the reader's alternative वापचये would leave उपचय unspelt.
10.10a reading here is contested

शुक्रज्ञचंद्रा हद्दे स्वे पापास्त्र्यायगता यदि ॥ स्वबाहुबलतो हेमसुखकीर्तीर्नरो ऽश्नुते

śukrajñacaṃdrā hadde sve pāpāstryāyagatā yadi || svabāhubalato hemasukhakīrtīrnaro 'śnute

If Venus, Mercury (jña) and the Moon are each in their own haddā (the Tājika bound, a division of the sign), and the malefics have gone to the 3rd (tri) and the 11th (āya), a man enjoys gold, comfort and fame by the strength of his own arm.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रज्ञचंद्राहद्देस्वेपापात्र्यायगतायदि ॥ स्व बाहुबलतोहेमसुखकीर्तीर्नरोऽश्नुते

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापात्र्याय"; alternatives "पापास्त्र्याय" — zoomed: one ligature between पा and या, shaped like त्र्य/स्त्र्य; no visarga after पापा [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पापास्त्र्यायगता; this sentence names पापात्र्याय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कीर्तीर्नरो"; alternatives "कीर्तीनरो" — repha on न, touching the ī-stroke
  • About this edition: The page prints पापा with no visarga before त्र्याय; the reader's alternative पापास्त्र्याय writes the visarga as स् and gives the same sense — 'the malefics ⟨placed⟩ in the 3rd and the 11th'. Nothing in the rule turns on it. कीर्तीर्नरो (कीर्तीः + नरः) is the reading I follow; the alternative कीर्तीनरो would drop the sandhi र् and leave the accusative plural unmarked.

बुधशुक्रौ मुसरिफौ गुरुर्विक्रमभावगः ॥ तदा राज्ययशोहेममुक्ताविद्रुमलब्धयः

budhaśukrau musariphau gururvikramabhāvagaḥ || tadā rājyayaśohemamuktāvidrumalabdhayaḥ

Mercury and Venus in a musaripha (mūsaripha, the separating aspect) with each other, and Jupiter placed in the vikrama bhāva (the 3rd) — then ⟨come⟩ gains of kingdom, fame, gold, pearls and coral.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बुधशुक्रौमुसरिफौगुरुर्विक्रमभावगः॥ तदाराज्ययशोहेममुक्ताविद्रुमलब्धयः

भौमो मित्रगृहे ऽब्देशः कंबूली स्वगृहादिगैः ॥ गजाश्वहेमांबरभूलाभं दत्ते सुखादिकम्

bhaumo mitragṛhe 'bdeśaḥ kaṃbūlī svagṛhādigaiḥ || gajāśvahemāṃbarabhūlābhaṃ datte sukhādikam

Mars, being the lord of the year (abdeśa), in the house of a friend, and holding a kambūla with ⟨grahas⟩ standing in their own houses and the like, gives the gain of elephants, horses, gold, garments and land, and comforts as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमो मित्रगृहेऽब्देशःकंबूलीस्वगृहादिगैः॥ गजाश्वहेमांबरभूलाभंदत्तेसुखादिकम्

10.13a reading here is contested

इत्थं जन्मनि वर्षे च योगकर्तुर्बलाबलम् ॥ विमृश्य कथयेद्राजयोगं तद्भंगमेव च

itthaṃ janmani varṣe ca yogakarturbalābalam || vimṛśya kathayedrājayogaṃ tadbhaṃgameva ca

In this manner, having weighed the strength and weakness of the graha that makes the yoga, in the nativity and in the year ⟨chart⟩ alike, one should declare the rājayoga — and its breaking (bhaṅga) in the same way.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इत्थंजन्मनिवर्षेचयोगकर्तुर्बलाबलम् ॥ विमृश्यकथयेद्राजयोगंतद्भंगमेवच

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राजयोगं"; alternatives "राजय्ोगं" — a broken stroke hangs below यो; read as यो
10.14a reading here is contested

अब्देंत्थिहेशादिखगाः खलैश्चेद्युतेक्षिता अस्तगनीचगा वा ॥ सौम्या बलोना नृपयोगभंगं तदा भवेद्वित्तसुखक्षयांश्च

abdeṃtthiheśādikhagāḥ khalaiścedyutekṣitā astaganīcagā vā || saumyā balonā nṛpayogabhaṃgaṃ tadā bhavedvittasukhakṣayāṃśca

If the grahas beginning with the lord of the year and the lord of the itthaśāla (iṃtthihā) are joined with or aspected by malefics, or are combust (astaga) or in debilitation (nīca), and the benefics are short of strength — then there is a breaking of the royal yoga (nṛpayoga), and losses of wealth and of comfort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्देंत्थिहेशादिखगाःखलैश्चेद्युतेक्षिताअस्तगनीच गावा ॥ सौम्याबलोनानृपयोगभंगंतदाभवेद्वित्तसुखक्षयांश्च

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेद्वित्त"; alternatives "भवेद्धित्त" — zoomed: the conjunct after भवे is shaped like द्व or द्ध; read द्व
  • About this edition: इंत्थिहेश I take as 'lord of the iṃtthihā', the book's own spelling of the itthaśāla (compare 10.2, 10.9 and 11.3). The standard Tājika set of office-holders — year-lord, munthā-lord, year-lagna lord, natal-lagna lord — would also be served by reading a munthā here, but this printing writes मुथहा for the munthā and इंत्थिहा / इंथिहा for the applying aspect, and I follow its own usage.
10.15a reading here is contested

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणं गणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतो ऽनंतो नंतमतिर्व्यधात् खलमतध्वस्त्यै जनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुः खलु नीलकंठविबुधो विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया ऽवोचद्वर्षपमुंथहाफलमथारिष्टादिसद्योगयुक्

śrīgargānvayabhūṣaṇaṃ gaṇitavicciṃtāmaṇistatsuto 'naṃto naṃtamatirvyadhāt khalamatadhvastyai januḥpaddhatim || tatsūnuḥ khalu nīlakaṃṭhavibudho vidvacchivānujñayā 'vocadvarṣapamuṃthahāphalamathāriṣṭādisadyogayuk

⟨There was⟩ Cintāmaṇi, the ornament of the lineage of Garga, a knower of gaṇita (mathematical astronomy). His son Ananta, of unending intellect, made a Janma-paddhati (a manual for judging the nativity) to destroy the doctrines of the wicked. His son indeed, the learned Nīlakaṇṭha, by the leave of the learned Śiva, has declared the fruit of the lord of the year (varṣapa) and of the munthā, together with the ariṣṭa and the good yogas ⟨that break it⟩. [Our source read वर्षमसुंथहा, which is no word. The text now reads वर्षपमुंथहा, 'the lord of the year and the munthā', the pair this book names at 9.13 as अब्दपमुंथहाः. The metre needs one light syllable between वर्ष and मुं, so वर्षमुंथहा would leave the line a syllable short.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणंगणितविच्चिंतामणि स्तत्सुतोऽनंतोनंतमतिर्व्यधात्खलमतध्वस्त्यैजनुःपद्धतिम्॥तत्सूनुःखलुनीलकंठविबुधोविद्वच्छिवानुज्ञयाऽवोचद्वर्षमसुंथहाफलमथारिष्टा दिसद्योगयुक्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया"; alternatives "विद्धच्छिवानुज्ञया", "विद्वच्छिवाज्ञया" — the letter after छिवा is small, read as नु
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वर्षमसुंथहा"; alternatives "द्वर्षमुंथहा" — zoomed: a separate म is followed by a स-like glyph with u-sign and anusvāra; kept as seen [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ऽवोचद्वर्षपमुंथहाफलमथारिष्टादिसद्योगयुक्; this sentence names द्वर्षमसुंथहा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page sets this verse AFTER its section's colophon. It continues this section's numbering, so it is published here, at the section's end.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads वर्षमसुंथहाफलमथ. A reader dividing this verse judged वर्षमुंथहाफलमथ the likely intent — The closing verse names what the book has just taught: वर्ष-मुंथहा-फलम्, 'the fruit of the year and of the munthā'. The plate reader saw a separate म followed by a स-like glyph carrying the u-sign and the anusvāra, and recorded द्वर्षमुंथहा as the alternative. The same सु-for-मु slip stands at 10.7.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ऽवोचद्वर्षपमुंथहाफलमथारिष्टादिसद्योगयुक्; this sentence names वर्षमसुंथहाफलमथ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The author's own closing verses (praśasti): his grandfather Cintāmaṇi, his father Ananta, and himself. The page sets this record after the section's colophon but continues this section's numbering — that is about the numbering only and is not rendered. The reader's alternatives विद्धच्छिवानुज्ञया and विद्वच्छिवाज्ञया do not change the claim: Nīlakaṇṭha wrote with the learned Śiva's leave.

Adhyāya 11 · अथभावविचारः ॥ (closed by इतिप्रथमभावविचारः)

11.1a reading here is contested

अथभावविचारः ॥

यो भावः स्वामिसौम्याभ्यां दृष्टो युक्तोयमेधते ॥ पापदृष्टयुतो नाशो मिश्रैर्मिश्रफलं वदेत्

yo bhāvaḥ svāmisaumyābhyāṃ dṛṣṭo yuktoyamedhate || pāpadṛṣṭayuto nāśo miśrairmiśraphalaṃ vadet

Whichever bhāva (house) is aspected by, or joined with, its own lord and the benefics — that one flourishes. ⟨A bhāva⟩ aspected by or joined with malefics ⟨suffers⟩ ruin; and where the two are mixed, one should declare a mixed result.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

योभावःस्वामिसौम्याभ्यांदृष्टोयुक्तोयमेधते ॥ पापदृष्टयुतोनाशोमिश्रैर्मिश्रफलंवदेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्तोयमेधते"; alternatives "युक्तोऽयमेधते" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The page prints युक्तोयमेधते with no avagraha; the words are युक्तः + अयम् + एधते, 'that one, ⟨so⟩ joined, flourishes'. The reader's alternative युक्तोऽयमेधते writes the same thing with the avagraha, and nothing in the sense turns on it.

लग्नाधिपे वीर्ययुते सुखानि नैरुज्यमर्थागमनं विलासः ॥ स्यान्मध्यवीर्ये ऽल्पसुखार्थलाभः क्लेशाधिकत्वं विपदल्पवीर्ये

lagnādhipe vīryayute sukhāni nairujyamarthāgamanaṃ vilāsaḥ || syānmadhyavīrye 'lpasukhārthalābhaḥ kleśādhikatvaṃ vipadalpavīrye

When the lord of the lagna is endowed with strength — comforts, freedom from illness (nairujya), the coming in of wealth, and enjoyment. When it is of middling strength, the gain of comfort and wealth is small. When it is of little strength, distress grows great, and calamity ⟨follows⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपेवीर्ययुतेसुखानिनैरुज्यमर्थागमनंविलासः ॥ स्यान्मध्यवीर्येऽल्पसुखार्थलाभःक्लेशाधिकत्वंविपदल्पवीर्ये

11.3a reading here is contested

जन्माब्दांगपतींथिहापतिसमानाथाद्यधीकारवान्सूर्यो नष्टबलस्त्वगक्षिविलयं कुर्यान्निरुत्साहताम् ॥ नीचत्वं पितृमातृतोप्यभिभवश्चंद्रेक्षिकार्यक्षयो दारिद्र्यं च पराभवो ग्रहकलिर्व्याध्याधिभीतिस्तदा

janmābdāṃgapatīṃthihāpatisamānāthādyadhīkāravānsūryo naṣṭabalastvagakṣivilayaṃ kuryānnirutsāhatām || nīcatvaṃ pitṛmātṛtopyabhibhavaścaṃdrekṣikāryakṣayo dāridryaṃ ca parābhavo grahakalirvyādhyādhibhītistadā

The Sun, holding office (adhikāra) as lord of the natal or of the year's ascendant, as lord of the iṃthihā (the itthaśāla, the applying aspect), as lord of the year (samā-nātha) and so forth, and with its strength destroyed, would bring on the wasting of the skin and the eyes, and loss of drive. ⟨There follow⟩ lowness ⟨of station⟩ and humiliation even from father and mother. When ⟨it is⟩ the Moon ⟨that holds such an office and is spent⟩ — then the ruin of the eyes and of one's work, poverty, defeat, strife over the household, and the fear of disease (vyādhi) and of mental affliction (ādhi).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्माब्दांग पतींथिहापतिसमानाथाद्यधीकारवान्सूर्योनष्टबलस्त्वगक्षिविलयंकुर्यान्निरुत्साहताम् ॥ नीचत्वंपितृमातृतोप्यभिभवश्चंद्रेक्षिकार्यक्षयोदा रिद्र्यंचपराभवोग्रहकलिर्व्याध्याधिभीतिस्तदा

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पतींथिहापति"; alternatives "पतीइंथिहापति" — the ī-stroke and anusvāra over त are small; ṭīkā below reads इंथिहापतिः
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यधीकारवान्"; alternatives "द्यधिकारवान्" — long ī-mātrā as printed; sense needs अधिकार
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिद्र्यं"; alternatives "रिद्रं" — zoomed: a ya-limb seems joined to द्र under the anusvāra; conjunct is compressed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रहकलि"; alternatives "गृहकलि" — र-stroke under ग read as repha-less ग्र; sense would be गृह-
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads समानाथाद्यधीकारवान्. A reader dividing this verse judged समानाथाद्यधिकारवान् the likely intent — The word is अधिकार, 'office, charge' — a graha 'holding office' as lord of the year, of the lagna, and so on. अधीकार is not a word. The plate reader recorded the printed mātrā as long ī and noted that the sense needs अधिकार.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: Two printed forms are doubtful and I have kept both. (1) धीकार- is set with a long ī where the word is अधिकार, 'office'; the plate reader noted the same. (2) ग्रहकलि, 'strife of the grahas', is what the page sets; the reader's alternative गृहकलि, 'strife in the household', is what the Moon's own subject matter wants, and that is the sense I render, saying so here. The chapter's frame, carried over from the verse before, is a graha that holds one of these annual offices and has lost its strength.
11.4a reading here is contested

भौमे चलत्वं भीरुत्वं बुधे मोहपराभवौ ॥ जीवे धर्मक्षयः कष्टफला जीवनवृत्तयः

bhaume calatvaṃ bhīrutvaṃ budhe mohaparābhavau || jīve dharmakṣayaḥ kaṣṭaphalā jīvanavṛttayaḥ

When it is Mars ⟨that holds the office and is spent⟩ — instability and timidity. When Mercury — delusion and defeat. When Jupiter (jīva) — the wasting of dharma, and occupations of livelihood whose fruit is hardship.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेचलत्वंभीरुत्वंबुधेमोहपराभवौ ॥ जीवेधर्मक्षयःकष्टफलाजीवनवृत्तयः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कष्टफला"; alternatives "कष्टफलाः" — no visarga seen after ला
  • About this edition: The page sets कष्टफला with no visarga; कष्टफलाः, agreeing with वृत्तयः, is the same claim.
11.5a reading here is contested

शुक्रे विलाससौख्यानां नाशः स्त्रीभिः समं कलिः ॥ सौरे भृत्यजनाद्दुःखरुजो वातप्रकोपतः

śukre vilāsasaukhyānāṃ nāśaḥ strībhiḥ samaṃ kaliḥ || saure bhṛtyajanādduḥkharujo vātaprakopataḥ

When Venus — the ruin of enjoyments and comforts, and quarrel with women. When Saturn (saura) — sorrow from servants, and illnesses arising from a derangement of vāta (wind).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेविलाससौख्यानांनाशःस्त्रीभिःसमंकलिः ॥ सौरेभृत्यजनाद्दुःखरुजोवातप्रकोपतः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जनाद्दुःख"; alternatives "जनादुःख" — not zoomed (zoom missed); the akṣara after ना looks like a द्द conjunct but is small [2026-10-01: the exemplar was opened at PDF p.124 and read by eye at about 3.6x native. The press sets जनाद्दुःखरुजो, with the द्द conjunct and no anusvāra over ख: above the headline there, 0 pixels are darker than 100, against 79 over the anusvāra of समं on the same line. Our text is the press's reading, and the held correction to दुःखं रुजो is withdrawn.]
11.6a reading here is contested

लग्नं पापयुतं सौम्यैरदृष्टं सहितं नृणाम् ॥ विवादं वंचनां दुष्टमशनं चापि विंदति

lagnaṃ pāpayutaṃ saumyairadṛṣṭaṃ sahitaṃ nṛṇām || vivādaṃ vaṃcanāṃ duṣṭamaśanaṃ cāpi viṃdati

The lagna joined with malefics and unaspected by benefics brings men quarrel, deceit, and foul food besides. [The page prints सहितं, 'accompanied ⟨by them⟩'; the ṭīkā below the line glosses असहितम्, 'unaccompanied ⟨by benefics⟩', which is the sense the rule needs. I render the rule the ṭīkā's way and leave the printed word unaltered.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नंपापयुतंसौम्यैरदृष्टंसहितंनृणाम् ॥ विवादंवंचनांदुष्टमशनंचापिविंदति

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रदृष्टंसहितं"; alternatives "रदृष्टमसहितं" — zoomed: printed रदृष्टंसहितं with anusvāra; the ṭīkā glosses अदृष्टं असहितं, so the sense wants असहितम्. Kept as printed.
  • About this edition: This is a rendering that follows a reading the mūla does not print: सहितम् as set would repeat the conjunction already stated by पापयुतं, and the ṭīkā's असहितम् is what makes the second condition say something. The Sanskrit is left as the press set it.
11.7a reading here is contested

जन्माब्दांगपरंध्रपाब्दमुथहानाथा बलाढ्यास्तदा रम्यं वर्षमुशंति सर्वमतुलं सौख्यं यशो ऽर्थागमः ॥ षष्ठाष्टांत्यगता न चेदिह पुनस्ते दुःखभीतिप्रदा निर्वीर्या यदि वर्षमेतदशुभं वाच्यं शुभेक्षां विना

janmābdāṃgaparaṃdhrapābdamuthahānāthā balāḍhyāstadā ramyaṃ varṣamuśaṃti sarvamatulaṃ saukhyaṃ yaśo 'rthāgamaḥ || ṣaṣṭhāṣṭāṃtyagatā na cediha punaste duḥkhabhītipradā nirvīryā yadi varṣametadaśubhaṃ vācyaṃ śubhekṣāṃ vinā

When the lord of the natal ascendant and of the year's ascendant, the lord of the 8th (randhra), and the lords of the year and of the munthā are rich in strength, then they call the year a fine one: in every way comfort beyond compare, fame, and the coming in of wealth. If it is not so here — if these ⟨same lords⟩ have gone to the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (antya) — then they give sorrow and fear instead; and if they are without strength, this year is to be called inauspicious, unless a benefic aspects ⟨them⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्माब्दांगपरंध्रपाब्दमुथहानाथाबलाढ्यास्तदारम्यं वर्षमुशंतिसर्वमतुलंसौख्यंयशोऽर्थागमः॥ षष्ठाष्टांत्यगतानचेदिहपुनस्तेदुःखभीतिप्रदानिर्वीर्यायदिवर्षमेतदशुभंवाच्यंशुभेक्षांविना

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परंध्रपा"; alternatives "पररंध्रपा" — as printed; one र may be lost by haplography
  • About this edition: The page prints परंध्रप, where the compound wants -प + रंध्रप, 'the lord ⟨of the ascendants⟩ and the lord of the randhra (the 8th)'; the plate reader records that one र may have been lost by haplography, and I read it so. शुभेक्षां विना, 'without a benefic's aspect', is a condition on the inauspicious verdict, not an extra promise: a benefic's aspect lifts it.

सूतौ धनप्रदः खेटो धनाधीशश्च तौ यदि ॥ वर्षे नष्टौ वित्तनाशान्यनिक्षेपापवाददौ

sūtau dhanapradaḥ kheṭo dhanādhīśaśca tau yadi || varṣe naṣṭau vittanāśānyanikṣepāpavādadau

The graha (kheṭa) that gives wealth in the nativity (sūti), and the lord of the 2nd (dhana) — if those two are spent in the year ⟨chart⟩, they become givers of the loss of wealth, of ⟨the loss of⟩ what has been deposited with another, and of ill repute.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूतौधनप्रदःखेटोधनाधीशश्चतौयदि ॥ वर्षेनष्टौवित्तनाशान्यनिक्षेपापवाददौ

11.9a reading here is contested

एवं समस्तभावानां सूतौ नाथाश्च पोषकाः ॥ अब्दे नष्टबलास्तेषां नाशायोह्या विचक्षणैः

evaṃ samastabhāvānāṃ sūtau nāthāśca poṣakāḥ || abde naṣṭabalāsteṣāṃ nāśāyohyā vicakṣaṇaiḥ

In this same way, for all the bhāvas: ⟨take⟩ their lords in the nativity (sūti), and the grahas that nourish them. When those have lost their strength in the year ⟨chart⟩, the discerning are to infer ⟨that they work⟩ for the ruin of those ⟨bhāvas⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंसमस्तभावानांसूतौनाथाश्चपोषकाः ॥ अब्दे नष्टबलास्तेषांनाशायोह्याविचक्षणैः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाशायोह्या"; alternatives "नाशायोह्या (नाशाय ऊह्या)" — zoomed: printed exactly नाशायोह्या
  • About this edition: The page prints नाशायोह्या exactly as the reader records it; the words are नाशाय + ऊह्याः, 'are to be inferred ⟨as working⟩ for the ruin'.

Adhyāya 12 · इतिधनभावविचारः

12.1a reading here is contested

अथधनभावविचारः ॥

वित्ताधिपो जन्मनि वित्तगो ऽब्दे जीवो यदा लग्नपतीत्थशाली ॥ तदा धनाप्तिः सकलेपि वर्षे क्रूरे सराफे धनधान्यहानिः

vittādhipo janmani vittago 'bde jīvo yadā lagnapatītthaśālī || tadā dhanāptiḥ sakalepi varṣe krūre sarāphe dhanadhānyahāniḥ

When Jupiter (jīva), who is lord of the 2nd (vitta) in the birth ⟨chart⟩, stands in the 2nd in the year ⟨chart⟩ and is in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with the lord of the lagna, then wealth is gained through the whole year. When ⟨he is⟩ in a sarāpha (the separating aspect) with a malefic, there is loss of wealth and of grain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वित्ताधिपोजन्मनिवित्तगोऽब्देजीवोयदालग्नपतीत्थशाली ॥ तदाधनाप्तिःसकलेपिवर्षेक्रूरेसराफेधनधान्यहा निः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सकलेपि. A reader dividing this verse judged सकलेऽपि the likely intent — सकले + अपि: the press sets no avagraha here though it sets one in वित्तगोऽब्दे in the same half-line and in षष्ठोऽब्दे at v.5. The reading is unaffected; only the mark is missing.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
12.2a reading here is contested

जन्मन्यर्थावलोकी ज्यो ऽब्देब्देशो बलवान् यदा ॥ तदा धनाप्तिर्बहुला विनायासेन जायते

janmanyarthāvalokī jyo 'bdebdeśo balavān yadā || tadā dhanāptirbahulā vināyāsena jāyate

When Jupiter (jya), who aspects the 2nd (artha) in the birth ⟨chart⟩, becomes lord of the year (abdeśa) in the year ⟨chart⟩ and is strong, then abundant gain of wealth comes about without effort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मन्यर्थावलोकीज्योऽब्देब्देशोबलवान्यदा ॥ तदाधनाप्तिर्बहुलाविनायासेनजायते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads ज्योऽब्देब्देशो. A reader dividing this verse judged ज्योऽब्देऽब्देशो the likely intent — ज्यः + अब्दे + अब्देशः needs TWO elisions and the pothi prints one avagraha. Without the second, ब्देशो is not a word. The metre is unchanged either way (an avagraha carries no syllable), and the ṭīkā on the same leaf construes अब्दे वर्षे अब्देशो वर्षस्वामी.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: The pothi prints ज्योऽब्देब्देशो with a single avagraha. The sense needs two elisions — ज्यः + अब्दे + अब्देशः — and this rendering follows that; an avagraha carries no syllable, so the metre is the same either way.

एवं यद्भावपो जन्मन्यब्दे तद्भावगो गुरुः ॥ लग्नेशेनेत्थशाली चेत् तद्भावजसुखं भवेत्

evaṃ yadbhāvapo janmanyabde tadbhāvago guruḥ || lagneśenetthaśālī cet tadbhāvajasukhaṃ bhavet

In the same way: whichever house Jupiter is lord of in the birth ⟨chart⟩, if in the year ⟨chart⟩ he stands in that same house and is in an itthaśāla with the lord of the lagna, then the happiness born of that house comes about.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंयद्भावपोजन्मन्यब्दे तद्भावगोगुरुः ॥ लग्नेशेनेत्थशालीचेत्तद्भावजसुखंभवेत्

12.4a reading here is contested

तथा जनुषि यं पश्येद् भावमब्दे ऽब्दपो गुरुः ॥ तदा तद्भावजं सौख्यमुक्तं ताजिकवेदिभिः

tathā januṣi yaṃ paśyed bhāvamabde 'bdapo guruḥ || tadā tadbhāvajaṃ saukhyamuktaṃ tājikavedibhiḥ

Likewise, whichever house Jupiter — being lord of the year (abdapa) — aspects in the birth ⟨chart⟩ and in the year ⟨chart⟩, the happiness born of that house is what those who know Tājika have declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तथाजनुषियंपश्येद्भावमब्देऽब्दपोगुरुः ॥ तदातद्भावजंसौख्यमुक्तंता जिकवेदिभिः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदातद्भावजं"; alternatives "तदातद़्भावजं" — a dot sits under the द of तद्भावजं; taken as a speck, not a nukta
  • About this edition: अब्दपो गुरुः sets two nominatives side by side. They are rendered here as apposition, 'Jupiter, being lord of the year'. Read as two subjects, 'the lord of the year and Jupiter', the singular verb पश्येत् would have to serve both.
12.5a reading here is contested

जन्मषष्ठाधिपः सौम्यः षष्ठो ऽब्दे स्वल्पलाभदः ॥ पापार्दिते गुरौ रंध्रे ऽर्थे वा दंडः पतेद्ध्रुवम्

janmaṣaṣṭhādhipaḥ saumyaḥ ṣaṣṭho 'bde svalpalābhadaḥ || pāpārdite gurau raṃdhre 'rthe vā daṃḍaḥ pateddhruvam

Mercury (saumya), lord of the 6th in the birth ⟨chart⟩ and standing in the 6th in the year ⟨chart⟩, gives only a small gain. When Jupiter, afflicted by a malefic, is in the 8th (randhra) or in the 2nd (artha), a fine falls ⟨on the native⟩ for certain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मषष्ठाधिपःसौम्यःषष्ठोऽब्देस्वल्पलाभदः ॥ पापार्दितेगुरौरंध्रेऽर्थेवादंडःपतेद्ध्रुवम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पतेद्ध्रुवम्"; alternatives "पतेध्रुवम्" — conjunct द्ध्र is dense; a द्-stroke before ध्रु appears present
  • About this edition: सौम्य carries two senses and the verse does not disambiguate: it names Mercury, and it also means simply 'a benefic'. Mercury is taken here; the ṭīkā printed on the same leaf glosses it बुधः. Read the other way the rule would be 'the lord of the 6th at birth, if he is a benefic'.

गुरुर्वित्ते शुभैर्दृष्टयुतो वा राज्यसौख्यदः ॥ जन्मन्यब्दे च मुथहाराशिं पश्यन् विशेषतः

gururvitte śubhairdṛṣṭayuto vā rājyasaukhyadaḥ || janmanyabde ca muthahārāśiṃ paśyan viśeṣataḥ

Jupiter in the 2nd (vitta), aspected by or joined with benefics, gives sovereignty and happiness — and especially so when, in the birth ⟨chart⟩ and in the year ⟨chart⟩, he aspects the rāśi that the munthā occupies.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरुर्वित्तेशुभैर्दृष्टयुतोवाराज्यसौख्यदः ॥ जन्मन्यब्देचमुथहाराशिंपश्यन्विशेषतः

एवं सिते ऽब्दपे भूरि द्रव्यं धान्यं च जायते ॥ वित्तलग्नेशसंयोगो वित्तसौख्यविनाशदः

evaṃ site 'bdape bhūri dravyaṃ dhānyaṃ ca jāyate || vittalagneśasaṃyogo vittasaukhyavināśadaḥ

In the same way, when Venus is lord of the year (abdapa) ⟨and so placed⟩, abundant wealth and grain come about. A conjunction of the lord of the 2nd (vitta) with the lord of the lagna destroys wealth and happiness.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंसितेऽब्दपेभूरिद्रव्यंधान्यंचजायते॥ वित्तलग्ने शसंयोगोवित्तसौख्यविनाशदः

12.8a reading here is contested

एवंविधे सवीर्ये स्याल्लिपिज्ञानोद्यमैर् धनं ॥ जन्मलग्नगताः सौम्या वर्षे ऽर्थे धनलाभदाः

evaṃvidhe savīrye syāllipijñānodyamair dhanaṃ || janmalagnagatāḥ saumyā varṣe 'rthe dhanalābhadāḥ

When ⟨a graha⟩ of this kind is possessed of strength, wealth ⟨comes⟩ through the exertions of writing and learning (lipi-jñāna). Benefics that stand in the natal lagna ⟨and stand⟩ in the 2nd (artha) in the year give gain of wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंविधेसवीर्येस्याल्लिपिज्ञानोद्यमैर्धनं ॥ जन्मलग्नगताःसौम्यावर्षेऽर्थेधनलाभदः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads धनलाभदः. A reader dividing this verse judged धनलाभदाः the likely intent — The subject सौम्याः is nominative plural; the predicate is printed singular. The plural धनलाभदाः is five syllables like the singular, so the metre permits it, and the ṭīkā paraphrases with धनलाभदाः स्युः.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धनलाभदाः; this sentence names धनलाभदः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: एवंविधे names no graha; the record leaves the subject to be carried in from what stands before it. The half-line also prints the singular धनलाभदः against the plural subject सौम्याः. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धनलाभदाः; this sentence names धनलाभदः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
12.9a reading here is contested

मालसद्मनि वित्ते वा बुधेज्यसितसंयुते ॥ तैर्वा दृष्टे धनं भूरि स्वकुले राज्यमाप्नुयात्

mālasadmani vitte vā budhejyasitasaṃyute || tairvā dṛṣṭe dhanaṃ bhūri svakule rājyamāpnuyāt

When the māla-sadman — the sahama of wealth — or the 2nd (vitta) is joined with Mercury, Jupiter (ijya) and Venus, or is aspected by them, wealth is abundant, and he obtains sovereignty within his own family.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

माल सद्मनिवित्तेवाबुधेज्यसितसंयुते ॥ तैर्वादृष्टेधनंभूरिस्वकुलेराज्यमाप्नुयात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वकुलेराज्यम"; alternatives "स्वकुलेऽराज्यम" — a small dot sits under ले; no avagraha glyph is printed, taken as a speck
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सद्मनि"; alternatives "सझनि" — the द्म ligature is set in the stacked form that resembles झ
  • About this edition: माल-सद्मन् occurs nowhere else in this text. The ṭīkā printed on the same leaf states that in the Yavana (Perso-Arabic) tongue माल means wealth and सद्म means sahama, so the compound names the Dhana-sahama; the rendering rests on that. Without it the term is opaque, since the verse sets it beside वित्त with वा, 'or', so the two cannot be one house.
12.10a reading here is contested

अर्थार्थसहमेशौ चेच्छुभैर् मित्रदृशेक्षितौ ॥ बलिनौ सुखतो लाभप्रदौ यत्नादरेर् दृशा

arthārthasahameśau cecchubhair mitradṛśekṣitau || balinau sukhato lābhapradau yatnādarer dṛśā

If the lord of the 2nd (artha) and the lord of the Artha-sahama are aspected by benefics with a friendly aspect, and are strong, the two give gain easily; by the aspect of an enemy, ⟨they give it⟩ only through effort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अर्थार्थसहमेशौचेच्छुभैर्मित्रदृशेक्षितौ ॥ बलिनौसुखतोलाभप्रदौयत्नादरेर्दृशा

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यत्नादरेर्दृशा"; alternatives "यत्नादरेर्द्दशा" — zoomed: repha over द with a curl below, the दृ glyph of this font
12.11a reading here is contested

मित्रदृष्ट्या मुथशिले ऽर्थांगयोः सुखतो धनं ॥ तयोर्मूसरिफे वित्तनाशदुर्नयभीतयः

mitradṛṣṭyā muthaśile 'rthāṃgayoḥ sukhato dhanaṃ || tayormūsariphe vittanāśadurnayabhītayaḥ

By a friendly aspect, when there is a muthaśila between the lords of the 2nd (artha) and of the lagna (aṅga), wealth comes easily. When the two are in a mūsaripha, there are loss of wealth, crooked dealing and fears.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मित्रदृष्ट्यामुथशिलेऽर्थांगयोःसुखतोधनं ॥ तयो मूसरिफेवित्तनाशदुर्नयभीतयः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूसरिफे"; alternatives "मूसरीफे" — mūla prints short ि; the ṭīkā spells मूसरीफ
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads तयो मूसरिफे. A reader dividing this verse judged तयोर्मूसरिफे the likely intent — तयोः is the genitive dual required by the sense ('when the TWO are in mūsaripha'); the pothi prints तयो with the visarga gone and a word space where the sandhi र् belongs. Syllable count is unchanged.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: The pothi prints तयो where the genitive dual तयोः is wanted, with a word space standing where the sandhi र् belongs.

जन्मनीज्यो ऽस्ति यद्राशौ स राशिर्वर्षलग्नगः ॥ शुभस्वामीक्षितयुतो नैरुज्यस्वाम्यवित्तदः

janmanījyo 'sti yadrāśau sa rāśirvarṣalagnagaḥ || śubhasvāmīkṣitayuto nairujyasvāmyavittadaḥ

Whatever rāśi Jupiter (ījya) occupies in the birth ⟨chart⟩ — if that same rāśi becomes the lagna of the year, and is aspected by or joined with benefics ⟨or⟩ with its own lord — gives freedom from illness, lordship and wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मनीज्योऽस्तियद्राशौसराशिर्वर्षलग्नगः ॥ शुभस्वामीक्षितयुतोनैरुज्यस्वाम्यवित्तदः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: शुभस्वामीक्षितयुतः is a compound without वा; 'or' is supplied between the benefics and the lord because the verse offers them as two ways the rāśi may be favoured.
12.13a reading here is contested

सूतौ लग्ने रविर्वर्षे धनस्थो धनसौख्यदः ॥ शनौ वित्ते कार्यनाशो लाभो ऽल्पो ऽथ धनव्ययः

sūtau lagne ravirvarṣe dhanastho dhanasaukhyadaḥ || śanau vitte kāryanāśo lābho 'lpo 'tha dhanavyayaḥ

The Sun, ⟨standing⟩ in the lagna at birth (sūti) and in the 2nd (dhana) in the year, gives wealth and happiness. When Saturn is in the 2nd (vitta), undertakings are ruined, gain is small, and then wealth is spent.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुतौलग्नेरविर्वर्षेधनस्थोधनसौख्यदः ॥ शनौवित्तेकार्यनाशोलाभोऽल्पोऽथधनव्ययः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सुतौ. A reader dividing this verse judged सूतौ the likely intent — सुतौ cannot be a locative of सुत (that is सुते). The word is सूतौ, 'at birth', the locative of सूति — the same stem this text uses at 13.7 सूत्यब्दयोः. The ṭīkā's pratīka for this verse reads सूताविति.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सूतौ; this sentence names सुतौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The pothi prints सुतौ, which cannot be a locative of सुत. The word is सूतौ, 'at birth' — the locative of सूति, the stem this text uses again at 13.7 in सूत्यब्दयोः — and the rendering follows that reading. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सूतौ; this sentence names सुतौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

भ्रातृसौख्यं गुरुयुते भूतयः स्युः शुभेक्षणात् ॥ क्रूरयोगेक्षणात् सर्वं विपरीतं फलं भवेत्

bhrātṛsaukhyaṃ guruyute bhūtayaḥ syuḥ śubhekṣaṇāt || krūrayogekṣaṇāt sarvaṃ viparītaṃ phalaṃ bhavet

⟨When that Saturn in the 2nd is⟩ joined with Jupiter, there is happiness born of brothers, and from the aspect of a benefic there are riches (bhūtayaḥ). By conjunction with, or aspect of, a malefic, every result turns into its opposite.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भ्रातृसौख्यंगुरुयुतेभूतयःस्युःशुभेक्षणात् ॥ क्रूरयोगेक्षणात्सर्वंविपरीतंफलंभवेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record names no subject of its own. The condition runs on from the record before it, where Saturn stands in the 2nd, and the supplied words say so.
12.15a reading here is contested

वित्तेशो जन्मनि गुरुर्वर्षे वर्षेशतां दधत् ॥ यद्भावगस्तमाश्रित्य लाभदो लग्न आत्मनः

vitteśo janmani gururvarṣe varṣeśatāṃ dadhat || yadbhāvagastamāśritya lābhado lagna ātmanaḥ

Jupiter, ⟨who is⟩ lord of the 2nd (vitta) in the birth ⟨chart⟩ and who bears the lordship of the year in the year ⟨chart⟩, gives gain by way of whichever house he occupies. In the lagna, ⟨gain⟩ from one's own self;

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वित्तेशोजन्मनिगुरुर्वर्षेवर्षेशतांदधत् ॥ यद्भावगस्तमाश्रित्यलाभदोलग्नआत्मनः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दधत् ॥"; alternatives "दधत् ।" — the mark after दधत् falls on the tile seam; the right tile shows a double daṇḍa
  • About this edition: This record opens a run of four that place the same graha in each of the twelve houses; the list begins here with the lagna and is carried on by the records that follow.
12.16a reading here is contested

वित्ते सुवर्णरूप्यादेर् भ्रात्रादेः सहजर्क्षगः ॥ पितृमातृक्षमादिभ्यो वित्तं सुहृदि पंचमे

vitte suvarṇarūpyāder bhrātrādeḥ sahajarkṣagaḥ || pitṛmātṛkṣamādibhyo vittaṃ suhṛdi paṃcame

in the 2nd (vitta), ⟨wealth⟩ of gold, silver and the like; standing in the rāśi of the 3rd (sahaja), ⟨wealth⟩ from brothers and the like; in the 4th (suhṛd), wealth from father, mother, land (kṣamā) and the like; in the 5th (pañcama) —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वित्तेसुवर्णरूप्यादेर्भ्रात्रादेःसहजर्क्षगः ॥ पितृमातृक्षमादिभ्योवित्तंसुहृदिपंचमे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहजर्क्षगः"; alternatives "सहजर्क्षगः" — repha over क्ष confirmed at 3.1x.
  • About this edition: सुहृद् ('friend') names the 4th house here, standing in the list between the 3rd and the 5th. The item for the 5th is only begun in this record: its source is named at the start of the next one.
12.17a reading here is contested

सुहृत्तनयतः षष्ठे ऽरिवर्गाद्धानिभीतिदः ॥ स्त्रीभ्यो द्यूने ऽष्टमे मृत्युरर्थहेतुः पथों ऽकगे

suhṛttanayataḥ ṣaṣṭhe 'rivargāddhānibhītidaḥ || strībhyo dyūne 'ṣṭame mṛtyurarthahetuḥ pathoṃ 'kage

⟨in the 5th, wealth⟩ from friends and children; in the 6th he gives loss and fear from the host of enemies; in the 7th (dyūna), from women; in the 8th, death; when in the 9th (aṅka, the word for nine), he is a cause of wealth — ⟨which comes⟩ from travel.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुहृत्तनयतःषष्ठेऽरिवर्गाद्धानिभीतिदः ॥ स्त्रीभ्योद्यूनेऽष्टमेमृत्युरर्थहेतुःपथोंऽकगे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पथोंऽकगे"; alternatives "पथोऽङ्कगे", "पथोंऽकगे" — TWO marks examined at 7x-10x. (a) There IS an anusvara dot over पथो, the same diamond used for anusvara elsewhere on this page (compare तां, line 1) - yet an avagraha cannot follow an anusvara, so either the compositor set a dot that does not belong or I am wrong about the dot. I record the dot. (b) The akshara between the avagraha and गे is a conjunct with a reduced loop at its lower left joined to क; I read ङ्क. The tika's pratika for the same word is अंकगे (anusvara + plain क), which is NOT the same spelling - that difference is itself evidence and I have not smoothed it away. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (checked on a 1.6–2.2× crop of the original page): settled as पथोंऽकगे
  • About this edition: The house-word पंचमे stands at the end of the previous record and its source here, so the link is supplied. अंक is the number-word for nine and names the 9th house. The pothi sets an anusvāra over पथों before the avagraha, where an avagraha cannot follow one; the reading is unaffected.
12.18a reading here is contested

खे नृपादेर् नृपकुलादायें ऽत्ये व्ययदो भवेत् ॥ इत्थं विमृश्य सुधिया वाच्यमित्थं परे जगुः

khe nṛpāder nṛpakulādāyeṃ 'tye vyayado bhavet || itthaṃ vimṛśya sudhiyā vācyamitthaṃ pare jaguḥ

In the 10th (kha), ⟨wealth⟩ from the king and the like; in the 11th (āya), from the royal family; in the 12th (antya) he becomes a giver of expenditure. Having weighed it thus with a sound understanding, ⟨the result⟩ is to be declared: so have other ⟨teachers⟩ sung it.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

खेनृपादेर्नृपकुलादायेंऽत्येव्ययदोभवेत् ॥ इत्थंविमृश्यसुधियावाच्यमित्थंपरेजगुः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दायेंऽत्ये"; alternatives "ऽल्ये", "ऽस्ये" — the conjunct after the avagraha is not crisp even at 8x. I read न्त्ये because the tika on line 5 glosses this word as अंत्ये द्वादशभावे and the metre needs four syllables दा-यें-न्त्ये-व्य. Marked doubtful because the ink alone does not settle it. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (checked on a 1.6–2.2× crop of the original page): settled as दायेंऽत्ये

Adhyāya 13 · इतिसहजभावविचारः

अथसहजभावविचारः॥

अब्देशे ऽर्के सिते वापि सबले पापवर्जिते ॥ सौख्यं मिथः सोदराणां व्यत्ययाद् व्यत्ययं वदेत्

abdeśe 'rke site vāpi sabale pāpavarjite || saukhyaṃ mithaḥ sodarāṇāṃ vyatyayād vyatyayaṃ vadet

When the lord of the year (abdeśa) is the Sun, or Venus, and is strong and free of malefics, there is mutual happiness among uterine brothers. From the reverse ⟨of these conditions⟩ one should declare the reverse.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्देशेऽर्केसितेवापिसबलेपापवर्जिते ॥ सौख्यंमिथःसोदराणांव्यत्ययाद्व्यत्ययंवदेत्

13.2a reading here is contested

दग्धे कलिः सहजपे ऽब्दपतौ तयोर्वा जीवे बलेन रहिते सहजे सहोत्थैः ॥ वैरं तृतीयभवनाधिपती सराफे मांद्यं कलिं स्वजनसोदरतश्च विंद्यात्

dagdhe kaliḥ sahajape 'bdapatau tayorvā jīve balena rahite sahaje sahotthaiḥ || vairaṃ tṛtīyabhavanādhipatī sarāphe māṃdyaṃ kaliṃ svajanasodarataśca viṃdyāt

When the lord of the 3rd, or the lord of the year, or either of the two ⟨the Sun and Venus of the preceding rule⟩, is burnt (dagdha, combust), there is strife. When Jupiter (jīva), stripped of strength, is in the 3rd, there is enmity with the co-born. When the lords ⟨of the year and⟩ of the third house stand in a sarāpha (the separating aspect), one meets with bodily sickness, and with strife from one's own people and from brothers.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दग्धेकलिःसहजपेऽब्दपतौतयोर्वाजीवेबलेनरहितेसहजेसहोत्थैः ॥ वैरंतृतीय भवनाधिपतीसराफेमांद्यंकलिंस्वजनसोदरतश्चविंद्यात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तयोर्वा"; alternatives "तयोर्वां" — a mark sits above the र्वा in addition to the repha; it may be an anusvara or may be part of the repha. Not settled at 3.1x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवनाधिपतीसराफे"; alternatives "भवनाधिपतीईसराफे" — printed as one word with no space. सराफ and ईसराफ are both Tajika yoga names, so the sandhi पती + ईसराफे would print exactly like this; the ink cannot separate them.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वैरंतृतीय भवनाधिपती" — the word space falls after तृतीय, which splits the compound तृतीयभवनाधिपती. Recorded as printed.
  • About this edition: तयोः, 'of the two', has no antecedent inside this record; it is taken to point back to the Sun and Venus of v.1, which is also how the ṭīkā construes it, and the link is supplied. तृतीयभवनाधिपती is a dual while the record names one lord, so the second is supplied as the year's. The half-line is a Vasantatilakā pāda of exactly fourteen syllables with सराफे, which is what the pothi prints; the reader's alternative ईसराफे would make fifteen.

यदेत्थशालः सहजेश्वरेण गुरुस् तृतीये सहजात् सुखाप्तिः ॥ सारे विधौ स्यात् कलहस् तृतीये दृष्टौ युतौ नो गुरुणा यदा तौ

yadetthaśālaḥ sahajeśvareṇa gurus tṛtīye sahajāt sukhāptiḥ || sāre vidhau syāt kalahas tṛtīye dṛṣṭau yutau no guruṇā yadā tau

When there is an itthaśāla with the lord of the 3rd, and Jupiter is in the 3rd, happiness is gained from a brother. When the Moon is together with Mars (sāra) in the 3rd, and the two are neither aspected by Jupiter nor joined with him, there will be quarrel.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदेत्थशालःसहजेश्वरेणगुरुस्तृतीयेसहजात्सुखाप्तिः ॥ सारेविधौस्यात्कलहस्तृतीयेदृष्टौयुतौनोगुरुणायदातौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सार is a name of Mars here, the same graha the text calls आर and भौम; the ṭīkā on this leaf glosses सारे as आरेण भौमेन.

सहजे सहजाधीशे ऽधिकारिणि समापतेः ॥ लग्नपो वा मुथशिले मिथः सौख्यं सहोत्थयोः

sahaje sahajādhīśe 'dhikāriṇi samāpateḥ || lagnapo vā muthaśile mithaḥ saukhyaṃ sahotthayoḥ

When the lord of the 3rd stands in the 3rd and holds a dignity (adhikārin — one of the five vargas), and there is a muthaśila with the lord of the year (samāpati), or with the lord of the lagna, there is mutual happiness of the two co-born.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सहजेसहजाधी शेऽधिकारिणिसमापतेः ॥ लग्नपोवामुथशिलेमिथःसौख्यंसहोत्थयोः

13.5a reading here is contested

क्रूरे सराफे कलहः शनौ भौमर्क्षगे रुजः ॥ ज्ञर्क्षे ऽसृज्यनुजे मांद्यं वदेत् सहजगे स्फुटम्

krūre sarāphe kalahaḥ śanau bhaumarkṣage rujaḥ || jñarkṣe 'sṛjyanuje māṃdyaṃ vadet sahajage sphuṭam

When a malefic is in a sarāpha ⟨with the lord of the 3rd⟩, quarrel; when Saturn is in a rāśi of Mars, illnesses; when Mars (asṛj) is in a rāśi of Mercury (jña) and stands in the 3rd (sahaja), one should declare sickness plainly for the younger brother (anuja).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरेसराफेकलहःशनौभौमर्क्षगेरुजः ॥ ज्ञर्क्षेसृज्यनुजेमांद्यं वदेत्सहजगेस्फुटम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads ज्ञर्क्षेसृज्यनुजे. A reader dividing this verse judged ज्ञर्क्षेऽसृज्यनुजे the likely intent — The word is असृज् ('blood'), a name of Mars, in the locative असृजि; असृजि + अनुजे gives ऽसृज्यनुजे and needs an avagraha the pothi does not set. As printed, सृज्यनुजे is not a word. The ṭīkā glosses the place असृजि भौमे, 'Mars'. No syllable is added or lost.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the exemplar was opened at PDF p.130 at about 3.6x native. The pothi sets ज्ञर्क्षेसृज्यनुजे with no avagraha, while the same line sets one in शेऽधिकारिणि. The emendation is now made on the lexicon: the mūla now reads ज्ञर्क्षे ऽसृज्यनुजे, with Pathak (page-216 l.20) and the Kalpataru 1889 (page_0149 l.4) carrying ऽसृज्यनुजे and the press's own ṭīkā glossing असृजि भौमे.]
  • About this edition: असृज् ('blood') is a name of Mars and अनुज is the younger brother, not the 3rd house; the house is named separately in this record by सहजगे. The pothi sets no avagraha where असृजि + अनुजे demands one, so it prints सृज्यनुजे, which is not a word. [2026-10-01: confirmed by eye at PDF p.130 at about 3.6x native: the pothi sets सृज्यनुजे with no avagraha. The mūla now reads ज्ञर्क्षे ऽसृज्यनुजे, emended on the lexicon.]

मंदर्क्षगे ऽसृजि बुधे कुजर्क्षे सहजे शुभैः ॥ युतेक्षिते सोदराणां मिथः सौख्यं सुखं बहु

maṃdarkṣage 'sṛji budhe kujarkṣe sahaje śubhaiḥ || yutekṣite sodarāṇāṃ mithaḥ saukhyaṃ sukhaṃ bahu

When Mars (asṛj) stands in a rāśi of Saturn (manda), and Mercury in a rāśi of Mars, in the 3rd, joined with or aspected by benefics, there is much mutual happiness and affection among uterine brothers.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदर्क्षगेऽसृजिबुधेकुजर्क्षेसहजेशुभैः ॥ युतेक्षितेसोदराणांमिथःसौख्यंसुखंबहु

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The two placements cannot both hold at once: Mars in a sign of Saturn and Mercury in a sign of Mars cannot occupy one and the same third house. So the record states two separate rules, not one compound condition. The ṭīkā makes the same objection.
13.7a reading here is contested

जन्माब्दपौ बुधसितौ सबलौ तृतीये सोदर्यबंधुगणसौख्यकरौ गुरुश्च ॥ वीर्यान्वितेंदुगृहगो भृगुजो ऽधिकारी सूत्यब्दयोः सहजबंधुगणस्य वृद्ध्यै

janmābdapau budhasitau sabalau tṛtīye sodaryabaṃdhugaṇasaukhyakarau guruśca || vīryānviteṃdugṛhago bhṛgujo 'dhikārī sūtyabdayoḥ sahajabaṃdhugaṇasya vṛddhyai

Mercury and Venus, ⟨being⟩ the lords of the birth and of the year, strong and in the 3rd, bring happiness to the uterine brother and to the circle of kinsmen — and so does Jupiter. Venus (bhṛgu-ja), endowed with strength, standing in the Moon's own sign and holding a dignity (adhikārin), makes for the increase of the circle of brothers and kinsmen in both the birth and the year ⟨charts⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्माब्दपौबुधसितौसबलौतृतीयेसोदर्यबंधुगण सौख्यकरौगुरुश्च ॥ वीर्यान्वितेंदुगृहगोभृगुजोऽधिकारीसूत्यब्दयोःसहजबंधुगणस्यवृद्ध्यै

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृद्ध्यै"; alternatives "वृद्धै" — the conjunct under the ai-strokes is crowded
  • About this edition: The pothi reads जन्माब्दपौ, 'the lords of the birth and of the year', and that is what is rendered. The ṭīkā on this leaf argues for the variant जन्माब्दयोः, 'in the birth and the year ⟨charts⟩', which would drop the lordship from the condition and leave only strength and the placement in the 3rd.

पापान्विते तु सहजे सहमेशभावनाथेक्षणेन रहिते सहजस्य दुःखं ॥ एवं सहोत्थसहमे ऽपि वदेत् तदीशौ दग्धौ यदा सहजनाशकरौ विचिंत्यौ

pāpānvite tu sahaje sahameśabhāvanāthekṣaṇena rahite sahajasya duḥkhaṃ || evaṃ sahotthasahame 'pi vadet tadīśau dagdhau yadā sahajanāśakarau viciṃtyau

When the 3rd is joined with malefics and is deprived of the aspect of the lord of the sahama and of the lord of the house, there is sorrow concerning the brother. Say the same of the Sahotthā-sahama, the sahama of the co-born, as well. And when the lords of those ⟨two⟩ are burnt (dagdha, combust), they are to be reckoned destroyers of the brother.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापान्वितेतुसहजेसहमेशभावनाथे क्षणेनरहितेसहजस्यदुःखं ॥ एवंसहोत्थसहमेऽपिवदेत्तदीशौदग्धौयदासहजनाशकरौविचिंत्यौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The pothi sets a word space inside सहमेशभावनाथेक्षणेन, after भावनाथे, which splits the sandhi भावनाथ + ईक्षणेन; the aspect-word ईक्षण is what the second half of the condition turns on.
13.9a reading here is contested

तृतीयपादब्दपतौ द्युनस्थे लग्नेश्वरे वा सहजैर् विवादः ॥ तृतीयपो जन्मनि तादृगब्दे शुभेक्षितस् तत्र सहोत्थतुष्ट्यै

tṛtīyapādabdapatau dyunasthe lagneśvare vā sahajair vivādaḥ || tṛtīyapo janmani tādṛgabde śubhekṣitas tatra sahotthatuṣṭyai

When the lord of the year, or the lord of the lagna, stands in the 7th (dyūna) reckoned from the lord of the 3rd, there is dispute with brothers. The lord of the 3rd in the birth ⟨chart⟩, and of the same kind (tādṛś) in the year ⟨chart⟩, aspected by benefics, thereby makes for the contentment of the co-born.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तृतीयपादब्दपतौद्युनस्थेलग्नेश्वरेवासहजैर्विवादः ॥ तृतीयपोजन्मनितादृगब्देशुभेक्षितस्तत्रसहोत्थतुष्ट्यै

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तादृगब्दे"; alternatives "ताद्दगब्दे" — zoomed: द carries an inner hook read as ṛ

Adhyāya 14 · इतिचतुर्थभावः

14.1a reading here is contested

अथचतुर्थभावविचारः ॥

तुर्ये रवींदू पितृमातृपीडा पापान्वितौ पापनिरीक्षितौ च ॥ जन्मस्थसूर्यर्क्षगतेऽर्कपुत्रेऽवमानना वैरकली च पित्रा

turye ravīṃdū pitṛmātṛpīḍā pāpānvitau pāpanirīkṣitau ca || janmasthasūryarkṣagate'rkaputre'vamānanā vairakalī ca pitrā

When the Sun and Moon stand in the 4th (turya), joined with malefics and aspected by malefics, ⟨there is⟩ affliction of the father and of the mother. When Saturn (arkaputra, the Sun's son) goes to the sign in which the Sun stands in the birth chart, ⟨there follow⟩ humiliation, and enmity and quarrelling with the father.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तुर्येरवींदूपितृमातृपीडापापान्वितौपापनिरीक्षितौच ॥ जन्मस्थसूर्यर्क्षगतेऽर्कपुत्रेऽवमाननावैरकलींचपित्रा

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वैरकलींच"; alternatives "वैरकलीच" — zoomed: a dot sits over ली; it may be an anusvāra or a speck [2026-10-01: the exemplar was opened at PDF p.132 at about 3.6x native. No anusvāra stands over ली: the dot the first reader saw is not on the leaf, and the press sets वैरकली, as its own ṭīkā does (पित्रासहवैरकलीस्यातां). The mūla now reads वैरकली.]

चंद्रे जनन्यैवमुशंति बंधौ सुखाधिपे प्रीतिसुखानि पित्रोः ॥ तुर्याधिपे लग्नपतीत्थशाले वीर्यान्विते सौख्यमुशंति पित्रोः

caṃdre jananyaivamuśaṃti baṃdhau sukhādhipe prītisukhāni pitroḥ || turyādhipe lagnapatītthaśāle vīryānvite saukhyamuśaṃti pitroḥ

⟨When Saturn goes to the sign the⟩ Moon ⟨holds at birth⟩, they declare the same for the mother. When the lord of the 4th (sukha) stands in the 4th (bandhu), ⟨there are⟩ affection and comforts of the parents. When the lord of the 4th (turya) is in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with the lord of the lagna and is possessed of strength, they declare the happiness of the parents.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेजनन्यैवमुशंतिबंधौसुखाधिपेप्रीतिसुखानिपित्रोः ॥ तुर्याधिपेलग्नपतीत्थशालेवीर्यान्वितेसौख्यमुशंतिपित्रोः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The first pāda says only 'in the case of the Moon, they declare the same for the mother' — it names no placement. The condition is carried over from 14.1's second half, Saturn going to the sign of the natal luminary, and is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. Nothing is pulled in from the neighbouring record's words.
14.3a reading here is contested

सौख्याधिपो जनुषि नष्टबलोऽब्दसूत्योः पित्रोरनिष्टकृदथो सहमे तयोस्तु ॥ दग्धे तुरीयगृहगे च यदींथिहायां नाशस्तयोः सहमयोरपि दग्धयोः स्यात्

saukhyādhipo januṣi naṣṭabalo'bdasūtyoḥ pitroraniṣṭakṛdatho sahame tayostu || dagdhe turīyagṛhage ca yadīṃthihāyāṃ nāśastayoḥ sahamayorapi dagdhayoḥ syāt

The lord of the 4th (saukhya), its strength destroyed in the birth ⟨chart⟩, does harm to the parents in the year-chart and in the birth-chart ⟨alike⟩; and so too ⟨when it stands⟩ in the sahama of those two. And when it is combust and stands in the 4th house, and if ⟨it stands⟩ in the munthā (inthihā, the point of the year's chart that moves forward one sign for each completed year of life), ⟨there follows⟩ the ruin of those two; it comes about also when the two sahamas ⟨of the parents⟩ are combust.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौख्यादिपोज नुषिनष्टबलोऽब्दसूत्योःपित्रोरनिष्टकृदथोसहमेतयोस्तु ॥ दग्धेतुरीयगृहगेचयदींथिहायांनाशस्तयोःसहमयोरपिदग्धयोःस्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदींथिहायां"; alternatives "यदीथिहायां" — anusvāra dot over दी is small
  • About this edition: इंथिहा is this book's own name for the munthā. It writes इंथिहा, इंथिहायाम्, इंथिहापति, इंथिहानाथ, इंथिहाधिप and इंथिहालग्न in some twenty other places (1.66, 7.1, 7.9, 7.13, 7.15, 8.1, 8.7, 8.12, 9.20, 10.2, 10.9, 11.3, 16.13, 17.7, 17.8, 17.12, 18.3, 18.21, 19.10, 20.3, 24.14). यदि + इंथिहायाम् gives exactly the printed यदींथिहायां, so the anusvāra the reader marked as doubtful is required by the word and is not optional — compare 7.9 यदींथिहापंचमगा and 7.15 यदींथिहालाभगता. Whose combustion the second half means is not stated; the subject is carried over from the first half.

जन्मन्यंबुगृहं यच्च तत्पतिस्तत्पदोपगौ ॥ शन्यारौ क्लेशदौ पित्रोर्न चेत् सौम्यनिरीक्षितौ

janmanyaṃbugṛhaṃ yacca tatpatistatpadopagau || śanyārau kleśadau pitrorna cet saumyanirīkṣitau

Whatever ⟨sign⟩ is the 4th house (ambugṛha, the water-house) in the birth chart, and ⟨whatever sign holds⟩ its lord — Saturn and Mars, coming to those places (tatpada), give trouble to the parents, if they are not aspected by a benefic.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मन्यंबुगृहंयच्चतत्पतिस्तत्पदोपगौ ॥ शन्यारौक्लेशदौपित्रोर्नचेत्सौम्यनिरीक्षितौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: तत्पद, 'that one's place', is defined by this book at 15.8: the sign a graha occupies in the birth chart is called that graha's pada.
14.5a reading here is contested

मातुः पितुश्च सहमे तनुपेत्थशाले तुर्येपि चेत्थमवगच्छ सुखानि पित्रोः ॥ चेदष्टमाधिपतिना कृतमित्थशालं पित्रोर्विपद्भयमनिष्टकृते सराफे

mātuḥ pituśca sahame tanupetthaśāle turyepi cetthamavagaccha sukhāni pitroḥ || cedaṣṭamādhipatinā kṛtamitthaśālaṃ pitrorvipadbhayamaniṣṭakṛte sarāphe

When the lord of the lagna (tanupa) is in an itthaśāla with the sahama of the mother and with that of the father, and in the 4th (turya) as well — understand the comforts of the parents in this way. If an itthaśāla is formed with the lord of the 8th, ⟨there is⟩ fear of calamity for the parents; and ⟨so too⟩ when the separating aspect (sarāpha) is one that works ill. [Our mūla now reads पित्रोर्विपद्भयम्, 'fear of calamity'; the earlier anusvāra on वि would not scan in this Vasantatilakā and is corrected.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मातुःपितुश्चसहमेतनुपेत्थशालेतुर्येपिचेत्थमवग च्छसुखानिपित्रोः ॥ चेदष्टमाधिपतिनाकृतमित्थशालंपित्रोर्विंपद्भयमनिष्टकृतेसराफे

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्विंप"; alternatives "र्विप" — zoomed: a dot sits beside the repha over वि; may be an anusvāra or a speck [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पित्रोर्विपद्भयमनिष्टकृते; this sentence names र्विंप, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्भय"; alternatives "द्धय" — conjunct below द: lower member looks like भ (loop), could be ध
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "॥५॥" — numeral shape unusual but reads ५
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads पित्रोर्विंपद्भयम. A reader dividing this verse judged पित्रोर्विपद्भयम the likely intent — The pāda is Vasantatilakā and its third syllable must be light; विं is heavy and the line will not scan. विंपद् is no Sanskrit word, while विपद्भयम् ('fear of calamity') is, and पित्रोर्विपद्भयमनिष्टकृते scans – – ⏑ – ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ – ⏑ ⏑ – ⏑ – – exactly. The reader already marked the dot beside the repha as possibly a speck. Not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पित्रोर्विपद्भयमनिष्टकृते; this sentence names पित्रोर्विंपद्भयम, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The metre decides the reader's first doubt and rules out the second at the same time. Vasantatilakā requires ⏑ at syllable 3 of the pāda, so पित्रोर्विंप… cannot stand and पित्रोर्विपद्भयमनिष्टकृते scans perfectly. That also settles द्भ against द्धय: विपद्भयम् is a word, विपद्धयम् is not. The Sanskrit in the corpus and in the segmentation file is untouched. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पित्रोर्विपद्भयमनिष्टकृते; this sentence names पित्रोर्विंप, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

Adhyāya 15 · इतिपंचमभावः

15.1a reading here is contested

अथपंचमभावविचारः ॥

पुत्रायगो वर्षपतिर्गुरुश्चेत् सूर्यारसौम्योशनसोऽथवेत्थं ॥ सत्पुत्रसौख्याय खलार्दितास्ते दुःखप्रदाः पुत्रत एव चिंत्याः

putrāyago varṣapatirguruścet sūryārasaumyośanaso'thavetthaṃ || satputrasaukhyāya khalārditāste duḥkhapradāḥ putrata eva ciṃtyāḥ

If the lord of the year and Jupiter stand in the 5th (putra) or the 11th (āya), or if the Sun, Mars, Mercury and Venus (uśanas) stand so likewise, ⟨that makes⟩ for the happiness of good sons. Those same grahas, tormented by malefics, are givers of sorrow. They are to be considered from the 5th (putra) itself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुत्रायगोवर्षपतिर्गुरुश्चेत्सूर्यारसौम्योशनसोऽथवेत्थं ॥ सत्पुत्रसौख्यायखलार्दितास्तेदुःखप्रदाःपुत्रतएवचिंत्याः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सोऽथ" — avagraha glyph is printed here
  • About this edition: पुत्रायगः is read as पुत्र-आय-गः, 'standing in the 5th (putra) or the 11th (āya)'. The book builds house-lists as dvandvas ending in आय elsewhere — त्रिषडायगतो भौमः (23.23), केंद्रत्रिकोणायगताः (24.13, 24.19), षट्त्र्यायगाः (24.18), पापा त्र्यायगता (10.10), पुण्यकर्मायगा (7.4) — where आय is plainly the 11th. The avagraha the reader notes in सोऽथ is सूर्यारसौम्योशनसः + अथवा.
15.2a reading here is contested

पुत्रे सुतस्य सहमे सबले सुताप्तिः सौम्येक्षितेऽप्यतिसुखं यदि तत्र वर्षेट् ॥ सौम्येक्षितः सुतगृहे सकुजो बुधश्चेत् पुत्रायगः सुतसुखं विबलः सुतार्तिम्

putre sutasya sahame sabale sutāptiḥ saumyekṣite'pyatisukhaṃ yadi tatra varṣeṭ || saumyekṣitaḥ sutagṛhe sakujo budhaścet putrāyagaḥ sutasukhaṃ vibalaḥ sutārtim

When the sahama of the son stands in the 5th (putra) and is strong, ⟨there is⟩ the obtaining of a son; aspected by a benefic as well, ⟨there is⟩ very great happiness — and ⟨more so⟩ if the lord of the year is there. If Mercury, aspected by a benefic, stands in the 5th (sutagṛha) in company with Mars, ⟨and⟩ stands in the 5th (putra) or the 11th (āya), ⟨he gives⟩ happiness from a son; ⟨if he is⟩ weak, ⟨he gives⟩ distress about the son.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुत्रेसुतस्यसह मेसबलेसुताप्तिःसौम्येक्षितेऽप्यतिसुखंयदितत्रवर्षेट् ॥ सौम्येक्षितःसुतगृहेसकुजोबुधश्चेत्पुत्रायगःसुतसुखंविबलःसुतार्तिम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षितेऽप्यति" — avagraha glyph is printed here
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सकुजोबुधश्चेत्"; alternatives "सकुजोवुधश्चेत्" — zoomed: बु with the inner diagonal
  • About this edition: The second half names the 5th twice — first सुतगृहे, then पुत्रायगः ('standing in the 5th or the 11th'). It is rendered as the page has it. The repetition may mean the two placements are meant as alternatives for Mercury, but the verse does not say 'or', so nothing of the kind is written into the rendering.
15.3a reading here is contested

जीवो जन्मनि यद्राशावब्देसौ सुतगो बली ॥ पुत्रसौख्याय भौमोज्ञो वर्षेशोऽत्र सुताप्तिदः

jīvo janmani yadrāśāvabdesau sutago balī || putrasaukhyāya bhaumojño varṣeśo'tra sutāptidaḥ

Whatever sign Jupiter occupies in the birth chart — when in the year-chart that same ⟨sign⟩ falls in the 5th (suta) and is strong, ⟨it makes⟩ for the happiness of sons. Mars, Mercury ⟨or⟩ the lord of the year, ⟨standing⟩ here ⟨in the 5th⟩, gives the obtaining of a son.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवोजन्मनियद्राशावब्देसौसुतगोबली ॥ पुत्रसौख्यायभौमोज्ञोवर्षेशोऽत्रसुताप्तिदः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शोऽत्र" — avagraha glyph is printed
15.4a reading here is contested

यत्रेज्यो जनुषि गृहे विलग्नमेतत् पुत्राप्त्यै बुधसितयोरपीत्थमूह्यम् ॥ यद्राशौ जनुषि शनिः कुजश्च सोऽब्दे पुत्रार्तिं तनुसुतगः करोति नूनम्

yatrejyo januṣi gṛhe vilagnametat putrāptyai budhasitayorapītthamūhyam || yadrāśau januṣi śaniḥ kujaśca so'bde putrārtiṃ tanusutagaḥ karoti nūnam

The house in which Jupiter stands in the birth chart — when that becomes the ⟨year's⟩ lagna, ⟨it makes⟩ for the obtaining of a son; the same is to be inferred for Mercury and Venus (sita) too. Whatever sign Saturn and Mars ⟨hold⟩ at birth — that ⟨sign⟩, standing in the year-chart as the 1st (tanu) or the 5th (suta), certainly causes distress about sons.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यत्रेज्योजनुषिगृहेविलग्नमेतत्पुत्राप्त्यैबुधसि तयोरपीत्थमूह्यम् ॥ यद्राशौजनुषिशनिःकुजश्चसोऽब्देपुत्रार्तिंतनुसुतगःकरोतिनूनम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सोऽब्दे" — avagraha glyph is printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रार्तिं"; alternatives "पुत्रार्ति" — anusvāra dot beside the repha over ति
  • About this edition: The anusvāra the reader doubted in पुत्रार्तिं is required by the metre. The verse is Praharṣiṇī (– – – ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – –), whose third syllable is heavy; र्ति without the anusvāra is light and the pāda will not scan. The avagraha in सोऽब्दे is सः + अब्दे.

पुत्रे पुण्यस्य सहमं पुत्राप्त्यै शुभदृष्टियुक् ॥ लग्नपुत्रेश्वरौ पुत्रे पुत्रदौ बलिनौ यदि

putre puṇyasya sahamaṃ putrāptyai śubhadṛṣṭiyuk || lagnaputreśvarau putre putradau balinau yadi

The sahama of puṇya ⟨standing⟩ in the 5th (putra), joined with a benefic aspect, ⟨makes⟩ for the obtaining of a son. The lord of the lagna and the lord of the 5th, ⟨standing⟩ in the 5th, give a son if they are strong.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुत्रेपुण्यस्यसहमंपुत्राप्त्यैशुभदृष्टियुक् ॥ लग्नपुत्रेश्वरौपुत्रेपुत्रदौबलिनौयदि

चंद्रो जीवोऽथवा शुक्रः स्वोच्चगः सुतदः सुते ॥ वक्री भौमः सुतस्थश्चेदुत्पन्नसुतनाशनः

caṃdro jīvo'thavā śukraḥ svoccagaḥ sutadaḥ sute || vakrī bhaumaḥ sutasthaścedutpannasutanāśanaḥ

The Moon, or Jupiter, or Venus, standing in its own exaltation (svocca) in the 5th (suta), gives a son. If Mars, retrograde, stands in the 5th, he destroys the son that has been born.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोजीवोऽथवाशुक्रःस्वोच्चगःसुतदःसुते ॥ वक्रीभौमःसुतस्थश्चेदुत्पन्नसुतनाशनः

सुताधिपो जन्मनि भार्गवोऽब्दे पुत्रे विलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाली ॥ पुत्रप्रदो मंदपदस्थपुत्रे पापाधिकारीक्षित आत्मजार्तिः

sutādhipo janmani bhārgavo'bde putre vilagnādhipatītthaśālī || putraprado maṃdapadasthaputre pāpādhikārīkṣita ātmajārtiḥ

If the lord of the 5th in the birth chart is Venus (bhārgava), and in the year-chart he stands in the 5th in an itthaśāla with the lord of the lagna, he gives a son. When the 5th falls in Saturn's place (mandapada) and is aspected by a malefic that holds office (adhikārin), ⟨there is⟩ distress from one's own son (ātmaja).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुताधिपोजन्मनिभार्गवोऽब्देपुत्रेविलग्नाधि पतीत्थशाली ॥ पुत्रप्रदोमंदपदस्थपुत्रेपापाधिकारीक्षितआत्मजार्तिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: पापाधिकारीक्षित is divided as पाप-अधिकारिन्-ईक्षितः, 'aspected by a malefic that holds office'. The book uses अधिकारिन् of a graha at 17.7 (अधिकारिपदस्थेऽर्के, 'when the Sun stands in the pada of the adhikārin') and अधिकार of office and rank at 19.11, but it nowhere says what gives a graha its अधिकार, so the force of the word here is not settled. The compound admits other divisions. मंदपद is Saturn's pada in the sense defined at 15.8.

यद्राशिगो ग्रहः सूतौ स राशिस्तत्पदाभिधः ॥ बली जन्मोत्थसौख्याय वर्षे तद्दुःखदोऽन्यथा

yadrāśigo grahaḥ sūtau sa rāśistatpadābhidhaḥ || balī janmotthasaukhyāya varṣe tadduḥkhado'nyathā

Whatever sign a graha occupies at birth, that sign is called that graha's pada (tatpada). ⟨That pada⟩, being strong, makes in the year for the happiness that arises from the birth ⟨chart⟩; otherwise it gives sorrow.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यद्राशिगोग्रहःसूतौसराशिस्तत्पदाभिधः ॥ बलीजन्मोत्थ सौख्यायवर्षेतद्दुःखदोऽन्यथा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the book's definition of तत्पद, the term it uses at 14.4 (तत्पदोपगौ) and at 15.7 (मंदपद). The third pāda, बली जन्मोत्थसौख्याय, is compressed: बली is masculine and can agree either with the graha or with the sign called its pada, and 'the happiness arising from the birth chart' is what जन्मोत्थसौख्य says, without saying whose happiness. Both are rendered as they stand.

Adhyāya 16 · इतिष ष्ठभावः

16.1a reading here is contested

अथषष्ठभावविचारः ॥

मंदे ऽब्दपे ऽनृजुगतौ पतिते रुगार्तिः स्यात् सन्निपातभवभीररिगे ऽत्र शूलं ॥ गुल्माक्षिरोगविषमज्वरभीर् गुरौ तु पापार्दिते ऽनिलरुजोपि कबूलशून्ये

maṃde 'bdape 'nṛjugatau patite rugārtiḥ syāt sannipātabhavabhīrarige 'tra śūlaṃ || gulmākṣirogaviṣamajvarabhīr gurau tu pāpārdite 'nilarujopi kabūlaśūnye

When Saturn is the lord of the year (abdapa) and has fallen into crooked motion — that is, gone retrograde — there is affliction by disease, and the fear of a sannipāta ⟨fever, in which all three humours are deranged at once⟩; and when he stands in the 6th (ari) here, ⟨there is⟩ colic (śūla). But when Jupiter is afflicted by malefics, there is fear of gulma (a swelling or knot in the belly), of eye-disease, and of irregular fever; and when he is void of kabūla (the kambūla yoga, which the Moon forms by an itthaśāla — the applying aspect — with a graha that is itself in one), diseases of wind (vāta) as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेऽब्दपेऽनृजुगतौपतितेरुगार्तिःस्यात्सन्निपातभवभीररि गेऽत्रशूलं ॥ गुल्माक्षिरोगविषमज्वरभीर्गुरौतुपापार्दितेऽनिलरुजोपिकबूलशून्ये

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंदेऽब्दपे"; alternatives "मंदेब्दपे" — zoomed: the avagraha is fused into the ब्द ligature; a curve below दे runs into the half-ब loop; the ṭīkā lemma prints मंदेऽब्दप with a free-standing ऽ
  • About this edition: Two Tājika terms are glossed here once for the whole chapter: itthaśāla (the applying aspect) and kambūla, which the page spells कबूल without the anusvāra. The reader's doubt is only over whether the avagraha in मंदेऽब्दपे is printed free-standing or fused into the ligature; either way the words are मंदे and अब्दपे and nothing in the sense turns on it.

स्यात् कामलाख्यरुगपीत्थमसृज्यसृग्भीः पित्तं च रिःफगरवौ दृशिशूलरोगः ॥ पित्तं पुना रिपुगृहे ऽत्र भृगौ नृभे ऽरौ श्लेष्माभयेक्षितयुते ऽपि कफो ऽरिगेंदौ

syāt kāmalākhyarugapītthamasṛjyasṛgbhīḥ pittaṃ ca riḥphagaravau dṛśiśūlarogaḥ || pittaṃ punā ripugṛhe 'tra bhṛgau nṛbhe 'rau śleṣmābhayekṣitayute 'pi kapho 'rigeṃdau

There would also be the disease called kāmalā (jaundice); in the same way fear of a blood ⟨disorder⟩ (asṛk), and bile (pitta); and when the Sun is in the 12th (riḥpha), a disease of piercing pain in the eye. Bile again, when Venus is here in the house of the enemy (the 6th); when ⟨a graha stands⟩ in a human sign in the 6th (ari), fear of phlegm (śleṣman); and phlegm (kapha) too, when the Moon is in the 6th (ari), even aspected or joined ⟨by another⟩. [The word the page sets before 'fear of blood', asṛjya, cannot be construed as it stands. Its syllables scan correctly in the Vasantatilakā metre, so nothing shorter can be substituted for it; I render only what is certain and supply no reading of my own.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्यात्कामलाख्यरुगपीत्थमसृज्यसृग्भीःपित्तंचरिःफगरवौदृशिशूलरोगः ॥ पित्तंपुनारिपुगृहेऽत्रभृगौनृभेऽरौश्लेष्माभयेक्षितयुतेऽपिक फोऽरिगेंदौ

एवं बुधे पापयुते ऽब्दपे ऽरौ वातोत्थरोगो जनिलग्ननाथः ॥ पापो ऽब्दपेन क्षुतदृष्टिदृष्टो रोगप्रदो मृत्युकरः सपापः

evaṃ budhe pāpayute 'bdape 'rau vātottharogo janilagnanāthaḥ || pāpo 'bdapena kṣutadṛṣṭidṛṣṭo rogaprado mṛtyukaraḥ sapāpaḥ

Likewise when Mercury is joined with a malefic, and when the lord of the year is in the 6th (ari), ⟨there arises⟩ a disease born of wind (vāta). The lord of the natal lagna, being himself a malefic and looked upon by the lord of the year with the kṣuta aspect, gives disease; and if he is with a malefic, he causes death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंबुधेपापयुतेऽब्दपेऽरौवातोत्थरोगोजनिलग्ननाथः ॥ पापोऽब्दपेनक्षुतदृष्टिदृष्टोरोगप्रदोमृत्युकरःसपापः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: kṣuta is this book's own name, defined at 2.10, for the three hostile Tājika aspects: the quarter-aspect from the 4th and the 10th, the full mutual aspect from the 7th, and two grahas standing in one and the same sign. It is glossed here once for the chapter and recurs at 16.5 and 16.11.

सूत्यार्किभे लग्नगते रुक्षशीतोष्णरुग्भयं ॥ शनीक्षिते याप्यता स्यात् सपापे मृत्युमादिशेत्

sūtyārkibhe lagnagate rukṣaśītoṣṇarugbhayaṃ || śanīkṣite yāpyatā syāt sapāpe mṛtyumādiśet

When the ⟨year's⟩ lagna falls in the sign Saturn holds in the nativity, there is fear of dry, of cold and of hot disease. Aspected by Saturn it becomes yāpya — a disease that can be held in check but not cured; and if ⟨Saturn is⟩ with a malefic, declare death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूत्यार्किभेलग्नगतेरुक्षशीतोष्णरुग्भयं ॥ शनीक्षितेयाप्यतास्यात्सपापेमृत्युमादिशेत्

एवं भौमे क्षुतदृशा रक्तपित्तरुजो ऽग्निभिः ॥ ततो ऽन्ये बहुला रोगाः शुभदृष्टौ रुगल्पता

evaṃ bhaume kṣutadṛśā raktapittarujo 'gnibhiḥ || tato 'nye bahulā rogāḥ śubhadṛṣṭau rugalpatā

Likewise when Mars ⟨looks upon it⟩ with the kṣuta aspect, there are diseases of blood and bile (rakta-pitta), and ⟨harm⟩ from fires; and from that cause many other diseases besides. Under a benefic's aspect the illness is slight.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंभौमेक्षुतदृशारक्तपित्तरुजोऽग्निभिः ॥ ततोऽन्येबहुलारोगाःशुभदृष्टौरुगल्पता

लग्नाधिपाब्दपतिषष्ठपतीत्थशाले रोगप्रदः खचरधातुविकारतः स्यात् ॥ कांदर्पिकामयभयं पतिते सिते ऽर्कस्थाने ऽथ षष्ठ इह रुक्सहमं सपापं

lagnādhipābdapatiṣaṣṭhapatītthaśāle rogapradaḥ khacaradhātuvikārataḥ syāt || kāṃdarpikāmayabhayaṃ patite site 'rkasthāne 'tha ṣaṣṭha iha ruksahamaṃ sapāpaṃ

When there is an itthaśāla among the lord of the lagna, the lord of the year and the lord of the 6th, it gives disease, and the disease comes of a derangement of the bodily element (dhātu) belonging to ⟨that⟩ graha. There is fear of a disease of lust (kāndarpika — the venereal kind) when Venus has fallen in the Sun's place; and so too when the sahama of illness (ruk-sahama) stands here in the 6th with a malefic.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपाब्दपतिषष्ठपतीत्थशालेरोगप्रदःखचरधातुविकारतःस्यात् ॥ कांदर्पिकामयभयंपतितेसितेऽर्कस्थानेऽथषष्ठइहरुक्सहमंसपापं

16.7a reading here is contested

सपापे गुरौ रंध्रगे लग्न आरे सतंद्रास्ति मूर्च्छांगनाशः सचंद्रे ॥ खलाः सूतिकेंद्रे ऽब्दलग्ने रुगाप्त्यै कफोद्व्यंघ्रिगैरीक्ष्यमाणे सिते स्यात्

sapāpe gurau raṃdhrage lagna āre sataṃdrāsti mūrcchāṃganāśaḥ sacaṃdre || khalāḥ sūtikeṃdre 'bdalagne rugāptyai kaphodvyaṃghrigairīkṣyamāṇe site syāt

When Jupiter with a malefic is in the 8th (randhra) and Mars is in the lagna, there is lethargy (tandrā); and when ⟨Mars is⟩ with the Moon, fainting and the loss of a limb. Malefics in a kendra ⟨counted⟩ from the birth ⟨chart⟩, or in the lagna of the year, make for the getting of disease; and phlegm (kapha) results when Venus is looked upon by ⟨grahas⟩ standing in biped signs. [Our mūla now reads kaphodvyaṃghrigaiḥ, dvyaṃghri-gaiḥ, 'by those standing in two-footed ⟨signs⟩'; the earlier kaphodyaṃghrigaiḥ, which is no word, is corrected.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सपापेगुरौरंध्रगेलग्नआरेसतंद्रास्तिमूर्च्छांगनाशःसचंद्रे ॥ खलाःसूतिकेंद्रेऽब्दलग्नेरुगाप्त्यैकफोद्यंघ्रिगैरीक्ष्यमाणेसितेस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कफोद्यंघ्रिगै"; alternatives "कफोद्व्यंघ्रिगै" — zoomed: the conjunct looks like द्य with anusvāra; the ṭīkā (line 10) glosses द्व्यंघ्रिगैः, so द्व्य may be meant or the व may be lost in the ligature [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कफोद्व्यंघ्रिगैरीक्ष्यमाणे; this sentence names कफोद्यंघ्रिगै, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
16.8a reading here is contested

दिने ऽब्दप्रवेशो विलग्ने ऽब्दसूत्योर् यदा दृक्कहद्दागृहाद्यो ऽधिकारः ॥ रवेर् वा कुजस्यात्र पीडा ज्वरात् स्यादृशा सौम्यखेटोत्थयान्ते सुखाप्तिः

dine 'bdapraveśo vilagne 'bdasūtyor yadā dṛkkahaddāgṛhādyo 'dhikāraḥ || raver vā kujasyātra pīḍā jvarāt syādṛśā saumyakheṭotthayānte sukhāptiḥ

When the year's ingress (abda-praveśa) falls in the daytime, and in the ascendant of the year and of the birth ⟨chart⟩ the office (adhikāra) — by drekkāṇa (the third part of a sign), by haddā (the Tājika 'term', a portion of a sign) or by sign-lordship and the rest — belongs to the Sun, or to Mars, then there is affliction here from fever; and by an aspect arising from a benefic graha, comfort is gained at the end.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिनेऽब्दप्रवेशोविलग्नेऽब्दसूत्योर्यदादृक्कहद्दागृहाद्योऽधिकारः ॥ रवेर्वाकुजस्यात्रपीडाज्वरात्स्यादृशासौम्यखेटोत्थयान्तेसुखाप्तिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदादृक्क"; alternatives "यदाहक्क" — zoomed: the akṣara after दा is द with a ṛ-hook below, close to ह in shape; ṭīkā has दृक्कोद्रेष्काणः
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्वरात्स्यादृशा"; alternatives "ज्वरात्स्या दृशा" — a visible gap after स्या, likely justification spacing
  • About this edition: वा is 'or': the office belongs to the Sun OR to Mars, not to both. The page prints स्यादृशा with a single द where स्यात् + दृशा wants स्याद्दृशा; the pāda of the Bhujaṅgaprayāta metre ends at स्यात्, which is where the reader saw a printed gap, and the sense is untouched.

निशि सूतौ वर्धमाने चंद्रे भौमेत्थशालतः ॥ रुग् नश्येदेधते मंदेत्थशालाद् व्यत्ययो ऽन्यथा

niśi sūtau vardhamāne caṃdre bhaumetthaśālataḥ || rug naśyededhate maṃdetthaśālād vyatyayo 'nyathā

If the birth was by night and the Moon is waxing, then through an itthaśāla with Mars the disease perishes, and through an itthaśāla with Saturn it grows. Otherwise — that is, ⟨for a birth⟩ by day or with a waning Moon — it is the other way about.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

निशिसूतौवर्धमानेचंद्रेभौमेत्थशालतः ॥ रुग्नश्येदेधतेमंदेत्थशालाद्व्यत्ययोऽन्यथा

रवावीदृशि वित्केतुयुते ऽब्दं निखिलं गदाः ॥ अधिकारी बली सूतावब्दे केतुज्ञयुक् तथा

ravāvīdṛśi vitketuyute 'bdaṃ nikhilaṃ gadāḥ || adhikārī balī sūtāvabde ketujñayuk tathā

When the Sun is in such ⟨a condition as has been described⟩ and is joined with Mercury (vid) and Ketu, diseases run the whole year through; and so too when the graha that holds office (adhikārin) and is strong in the nativity is, in the year ⟨chart⟩, joined with Ketu and Mercury (jña).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रवावीदृशिवित्केतुयुतेऽब्दंनिखिलंगदाः ॥ अधि कारीबलीसूतावब्देकेतुज्ञयुक्तथा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: वित् and ज्ञ are both names of Mercury, 'the knowing one'; the verse uses one in each half.

चतुर्थे ऽस्ते च मुथहा क्षुतदृष्ट्या शनीक्षिता ॥ शूलपीडा पापखगैर् दृष्टे तत्परिणामजम्

caturthe 'ste ca muthahā kṣutadṛṣṭyā śanīkṣitā || śūlapīḍā pāpakhagair dṛṣṭe tatpariṇāmajam

The munthā (muthahā — the year's ascendant, which moves forward one sign for each completed year) in the 4th, or in the 7th (asta), aspected by Saturn with the kṣuta aspect, ⟨gives⟩ the pain of colic (śūla); and when it is aspected by malefic grahas, ⟨the illness⟩ is what follows as the consequence of that.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चतुर्थेऽस्तेचमुथहाक्षुतदृष्ट्याशनीक्षिता ॥ शूलपीडापापखगैर्दृष्टेतत्परिणामजम्

16.12a reading here is contested

जन्मस्थजीवसितराशिगते महीजे सूर्यांशुगे पिटकशीतलिकादिमांद्यम् ॥ शीतोष्णगंडभवरुक् सबुधे च सेंदौ कुष्ठं भगंदररुजो ऽपि सगंडमालाः

janmasthajīvasitarāśigate mahīje sūryāṃśuge piṭakaśītalikādimāṃdyam || śītoṣṇagaṃḍabhavaruk sabudhe ca seṃdau kuṣṭhaṃ bhagaṃdararujo 'pi sagaṃḍamālāḥ

When Mars stands in the sign that Jupiter (jīva) or Venus (sita) occupies at birth, and has gone into the Sun's rays ⟨that is, is combust⟩, there is sickness beginning with boils (piṭaka) and śītalikā ⟨the pox⟩; disease arising from cold and hot swellings (gaṇḍa); and when ⟨he is⟩ with Mercury and with the Moon, leprosy (kuṣṭha), fistula-diseases (bhagandara), and scrofula (gaṇḍamālā) as well. [Our mula now reads mahīje, Mars; the earlier mahījye, which is no graha-name, is emended on the lexicon.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मस्थजीवसितराशिगतेमहीज्येसूर्यांशुगेपिटकशीतलिकादिमांद्यम् ॥ शीतोष्णगंडभवरुक्सबुधेचसेंदौकुष्ठंभगंदररुजोऽपिसगंडमा लाः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सबुधे"; alternatives "सवुधे" — ब vs व not zoomed; the ṭīkā on this page prints वुध
16.13a reading here is contested

जन्मलग्नेंथिहानाथौ षष्ठौ पापान्वितेक्षितौ ॥ निर्बलौ ज्वरपीडांगवैकल्याद्यतिकष्टदौ

janmalagneṃthihānāthau ṣaṣṭhau pāpānvitekṣitau || nirbalau jvarapīḍāṃgavaikalyādyatikaṣṭadau

The lord of the natal lagna and the lord of the iṃthihā, both standing in the 6th, joined with malefics and aspected by them, and without strength, give the pain of fever, deformity of the body and the like — exceedingly great distress.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मलग्नेंथिहानाथौषष्ठौपापान्वितेक्षितौ ॥ निर्बलौज्वरपीडांगवैकल्याद्यतिकष्टदौ

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मलग्नेंथिहानाथौ"; alternatives "जन्मलग्नेथिहानाथौ" — zoomed: a clear anusvāra dot sits over ग्ने; kept as printed though sandhi (लग्ने + अथ) would give लग्नेऽथ
  • About this edition: iṃthihā is the munthā, which this printing spells both मुथहा (as at 16.11 and 16.14) and इंथिहा; a point that has a lord and occupies a house is the munthā and not the itthaśāla. The reader records a clear anusvāra over ग्ने, so the page reads जन्मलग्नें- and not the जन्मलग्नेऽथ that ordinary sandhi would give; the word division above follows what is printed.

मुथहालग्नतन्नाथाः पापांतःस्थास्तु रोगदाः ॥ षष्ठेशे षष्ठगे सौम्ये स्त्रियः प्राप्तिरितीर्यते

muthahālagnatannāthāḥ pāpāṃtaḥsthāstu rogadāḥ || ṣaṣṭheśe ṣaṣṭhage saumye striyaḥ prāptiritīryate

The munthā (muthahā), the lagna, and the lords of those two, standing hemmed in between malefics, give disease. When the lord of the 6th is a benefic and stands in the 6th, the gaining of a woman is declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मुथहालग्नतन्नाथाःपापांतःस्थास्तुरोगदाः॥ षष्ठेशेषष्ठगेसौम्येस्त्रियःप्राप्तिरितीर्यते

रोगकर्ता यत्र राशावंशे स्यादनयोर् बली ॥ तत्स्थानं तस्य रोगस्य वाच्यं राशिस्वरूपतः

rogakartā yatra rāśāvaṃśe syādanayor balī || tatsthānaṃ tasya rogasya vācyaṃ rāśisvarūpataḥ

In whichever rāśi (sign), or in whichever aṃśa (divisional sign), the maker of the disease stands — taking whichever of these two is the stronger — the seat of that disease is to be declared from the nature (svarūpa) of that rāśi.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रोगकर्तायत्रराशावंशेस्यादनयोर्बली॥ तत्स्था नंतस्यरोगस्यवाच्यंराशिस्वरूपतः

जन्मषष्ठाधिपे भौमे वर्षे षष्ठगते रुजा ॥ क्रूरेत्थशाले विपुलः शुभदृग्योगतस् तनुः

janmaṣaṣṭhādhipe bhaume varṣe ṣaṣṭhagate rujā || krūretthaśāle vipulaḥ śubhadṛgyogatas tanuḥ

When Mars is lord of the 6th in the nativity and in the year ⟨chart⟩ goes to the 6th, there is disease. Under an itthaśāla with a malefic it is large; through the aspect or the conjunction of a benefic, slight.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मषष्ठाधिपेभौमेवर्षेषष्ठगतेरुजा॥ क्रूरेत्थशालेविपुलःशुभदृग्योगतस्तनुः

Adhyāya 17 · इतिजायाभावविचारः

17.1a reading here is contested

अथसप्तमभावः॥

बली सितो ऽब्दाधिपतिः स्मरस्थः स्त्रीपक्षतः सौख्यकरो विचिंत्यः ॥ ईज्येक्षितो ऽत्यंतसुखं कुजेनाधिकारिणा प्रीतिकरो मिथः स्यात्

balī sito 'bdādhipatiḥ smarasthaḥ strīpakṣataḥ saukhyakaro viciṃtyaḥ || ījyekṣito 'tyaṃtasukhaṃ kujenādhikāriṇā prītikaro mithaḥ syāt

Venus, strong, being the lord of the year and standing in the 7th (smara, the house of desire), is to be reckoned a maker of happiness on the wife's side. Aspected by Jupiter (ījya), ⟨he gives⟩ the utmost happiness; ⟨aspected⟩ by Mars holding office (adhikāra), he makes affection between the two of them.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलीसितोऽब्दाधिपतिःस्मरस्थःस्त्रीपक्षतःसौख्यकरोविचिंत्यः॥ ईज्येक्षितोऽत्यंतसुखंकुजेनाधिकारिणाप्री तिकरोमिथःस्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विचिंत्यः"; alternatives "विचिन्त्यः" — anusvāra dot over चि faint
  • About this edition: Terms glossed once for this chapter: itthaśāla (the applying aspect), sahama (a computed sensitive point), munthā (the year's ascendant, moving forward one sign per completed year), adhikāra (the office or dignity a graha holds in the year's chart). The reader's only doubt here is विचिंत्यः against विचिन्त्यः — the same word either way.
17.2a reading here is contested

बुधेक्षिते जारता स्याल्लघ्व्या मंदेन वृद्धया ॥ गुरुदृष्ट्या नवा भार्या संततिस्त्वरितं ततः

budhekṣite jāratā syāllaghvyā maṃdena vṛddhayā || gurudṛṣṭyā navā bhāryā saṃtatistvaritaṃ tataḥ

Aspected by Mercury, ⟨Venus gives⟩ adultery (jāratā) with a young woman; by Saturn, with an old one. By Jupiter's aspect, a new wife, and offspring quickly after that.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बुधेक्षितेजारतास्याल्लघ्व्यामंदेनवृद्धया ॥ गुरुदृष्ट्यानवाभार्यासंततिस्त्वरितंततः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जारतास्याल्लघ्व्या"; alternatives "जारतास्यात् लघ्व्या" — printed solid; the double ल is the sandhi of स्यात् + लघ्व्या.
17.3a reading here is contested

जन्मलग्नाधिपे ऽस्तस्थे दारसौख्यं बलान्विते ॥ जन्मशुक्रर्क्षमस्ते ऽब्दे स्त्रीलाभाय सिते ऽब्दपे

janmalagnādhipe 'stasthe dārasaukhyaṃ balānvite || janmaśukrarkṣamaste 'bde strīlābhāya site 'bdape

When the lord of the natal lagna, endowed with strength, stands in the 7th (asta), there is happiness from the wife. When in the year ⟨chart⟩ the sign that Venus occupies at birth becomes the 7th (asta), and Venus is the lord of the year, that makes for the gaining of a wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मलग्नाधिपेऽस्तस्थेदारसौख्यंबलान्विते ॥ ज न्मशुक्रर्क्षमस्तेऽब्देस्त्रीलाभायसितेऽब्दपे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽस्तस्थे" — avagraha PRESENT and verified at 4.5x; the same mark recurs on line 8 four times.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽब्दपे"; alternatives "ऽब्दप" — the e-matra on प is present; checked at 4.5x.

लग्नास्तनाथयोरित्थशाले स्त्रीलाभमादिशेत् ॥ सहमेशो भावपो वा विनष्टः कष्टदः स्त्रियः

lagnāstanāthayoritthaśāle strīlābhamādiśet || sahameśo bhāvapo vā vinaṣṭaḥ kaṣṭadaḥ striyaḥ

When there is an itthaśāla between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (asta), declare the gaining of a wife. But the lord of the sahama, or the lord of the bhāva, if he is destroyed ⟨in strength⟩, gives distress in the matter of the wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नास्तनाथयोरित्थशालेस्त्रीलाभमादिशेत्॥ सहमेशोभावपोवाविनष्टःकष्टदःस्त्रियः

17.5a reading here is contested

नष्टेन्दौ शुक्रपदगे मैथुनं स्वल्पमादिशेत् ॥ जन्मशुक्रर्क्षगो भौमः स्त्रीसुखोत्सवकृद् बली

naṣṭendau śukrapadage maithunaṃ svalpamādiśet || janmaśukrarkṣago bhaumaḥ strīsukhotsavakṛd balī

When the Moon is spent (naṣṭa — without light) and stands in the pada of Venus, declare sexual union to be very little. Mars, strong, standing in the sign Venus occupies at birth, makes the festivity of pleasure with a woman.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नष्टेन्दौशुक्रपदगेमैथुनंस्वल्पमादिशेत्॥ जन्मशुक्रर्क्षगोभौमःस्त्रीसुखोत्सवकृद्बली

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृद्बली"; alternatives "कृद्वली" — zoomed: the lower member of the द-conjunct has a diagonal stroke that suggests ब, but the ligature is dense
17.6a reading here is contested

जन्मास्तपे ऽब्दपसितेन युगीक्षिते स्यात् स्त्रीसंगमो बहुविलाससुखप्रधानः ॥ केंद्रत्रिकोणगगुरौ जनिशुक्रभस्थे स्त्रीसौख्यमुक्तमिति हद्दविवाहयोश्च

janmāstape 'bdapasitena yugīkṣite syāt strīsaṃgamo bahuvilāsasukhapradhānaḥ || keṃdratrikoṇagagurau janiśukrabhasthe strīsaukhyamuktamiti haddavivāhayośca

When the lord of the natal 7th is joined with, and aspected by, Venus as lord of the year, there is union with a woman in which much dalliance and pleasure is the chief thing. When Jupiter, standing in a kendra (an angle) or a trikoṇa (a trine), is in the sign Venus occupies at birth, happiness from women is declared — and so it is said of the haddā ⟨-lord⟩ and of ⟨the lord of⟩ marriage too.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मास्तपेऽब्दपसितेनयुगीक्षितेस्यात्स्त्रीसंगमोबहुविलाससुखप्रधानः॥ केंद्रत्रिको णगगुरौजनिशुक्रभस्थेस्त्रीसौख्यमुक्तमितिहद्दविवाहयोश्च

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हद्दविवाहयोश्च"; alternatives "हद्द विवाहयोश्च" — a small gap is printed after हद्द
  • About this edition: The closing words इति हद्दविवाहयोश्च are elliptical as printed: they extend the rule to two further significators without naming what is to be done with them, and the ⟨ ⟩ above supply 'the lord of'. The reader records a small printed gap after हद्द, which is justification spacing; the word is हद्दा.

अधिकारिपदस्थे ऽर्के स्त्रीभ्यो ऽव्याकुलताऽनिशं ॥ इंथिहाधिकृतस्थाने गुरुदृष्ट्या विवाहकृत्

adhikāripadasthe 'rke strībhyo 'vyākulatā'niśaṃ || iṃthihādhikṛtasthāne gurudṛṣṭyā vivāhakṛt

When the Sun stands in a place where it holds office (adhikāra), there is freedom from agitation on account of women, and that without a break. The iṃthihā in a place of ⟨its⟩ office, aspected by Jupiter, brings about marriage.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अधिकारिपदस्थेऽर्केस्त्रीभ्योऽव्याकुलताऽनिशं ॥ इंथिहाधिकृतस्थानेगुरुदृष्ट्याविवाहकृत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: iṃthihā is the munthā, which this printing spells both मुथहा (as at 17.13) and इंथिहा; a point that occupies a house and has a lord is the munthā and not the itthaśāla.

इंथिहार्कारयुग् द्यूने क्रूरिते सहमे स्त्रियाः ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रेभ्यो भवेत् कष्टं पापदृष्ट्या विशेषतः

iṃthihārkārayug dyūne krūrite sahame striyāḥ || strīputrebhyo bhavet kaṣṭaṃ pāpadṛṣṭyā viśeṣataḥ

The iṃthihā (munthā), joined with the Sun and Mars, in the 7th (dyūna), ⟨and⟩ the sahama of the wife afflicted by a malefic: there will be trouble from wife and from sons, and under a malefic's aspect especially.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंथिहार्कारयुग्द्यूनेक्रूरितेसहमेस्त्रियाः ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रेभ्योभवेत्कष्टंपापदृष्ट्याविशेषतः

सूतौ द्यूनाधिपः शुक्रो ऽब्दे द्यूने बलवान् भवेत् ॥ लग्नेशेनेत्थशालश्चेत् स्त्रीलाभं कुरुते ध्रुवं

sūtau dyūnādhipaḥ śukro 'bde dyūne balavān bhavet || lagneśenetthaśālaścet strīlābhaṃ kurute dhruvaṃ

If Venus is lord of the 7th (dyūna) in the nativity, and in the year ⟨chart⟩ is strong in the 7th, and if he is in an itthaśāla with the lord of the lagna, then he assuredly brings about the gaining of a wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूतौद्यूनाधिपःशुक्रोऽब्देद्यूनेबलवान्भवेत् ॥ लग्नेशेनेत्थशालश्चेत्स्त्रीलाभंकुरुतेध्रुवं

17.10a reading here is contested

भौमे ऽब्दपे सितदृशा शुक्रे ऽब्देशे कुजेक्षया ॥ तद्दृष्टे दारसहमे स्त्रीलाभो भवति ध्रुवम्

bhaume 'bdape sitadṛśā śukre 'bdeśe kujekṣayā || taddṛṣṭe dārasahame strīlābho bhavati dhruvam

When Mars is lord of the year, by Venus's aspect; when Venus is lord of the year, by Mars's aspect — and when the dāra-sahama (the sahama of the wife) is aspected by that ⟨same graha⟩ — the gaining of a wife assuredly comes about.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेऽब्दपेसितदृशाशुक्रेऽब्देशेकुजेक्षया ॥ तद्दृष्टेदारसहमेस्त्रीलाभोभवतिध्रुवम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्दृष्टेदारसहमे"; alternatives "तदृष्टेदारसहमे" — the द्दृ conjunct is compressed; one or two द not certain
  • About this edition: The reader doubts whether one द or two stand in तद्दृष्टे; either way the word is तद्-दृष्टे, 'aspected by that one', and the sense does not turn on it.
17.11a reading here is contested

सूतौ वा दारसहमे तद्दृष्टे योषिदाप्यते ॥ स्वामिदृष्टं स्त्रीसहमं शुक्रदृष्टं विवाहकृत्

sūtau vā dārasahame taddṛṣṭe yoṣidāpyate || svāmidṛṣṭaṃ strīsahamaṃ śukradṛṣṭaṃ vivāhakṛt

Or ⟨when⟩ the dāra-sahama of the birth ⟨chart⟩ is aspected by that ⟨same graha⟩, a woman is obtained. The sahama of the wife aspected by its own lord, or aspected by Venus, brings about marriage.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूतौवादारसहमेतद्दृष्टेयोषिदाप्यते ॥ स्वामि दृष्टंस्त्रीसहमंशुक्रदृष्टंविवाहकृत्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहमेतद्दृष्टेयोषिदाप्यते"; alternatives "सहमेतदृष्टेयोषिदाप्यते" — same conjunct
17.12a reading here is contested

सूतौ द्यूनाधिपे वर्षसहमेशे स्त्रियाः सुखम् ॥ जन्मास्तपेंथिहानाथवर्षेशः खे द्युने तथा

sūtau dyūnādhipe varṣasahameśe striyāḥ sukham || janmāstapeṃthihānāthavarṣeśaḥ khe dyune tathā

When the lord of the 7th (dyūna) in the nativity is ⟨also⟩ the lord of the sahama in the year, there is happiness of the wife. Likewise when the lord of the natal 7th, the lord of the iṃthihā (munthā) and the lord of the year stand in the 10th (kha) or in the 7th (dyūna).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूतौद्यूनाधिपेवर्षसहमेशेस्त्रियाःसुखम् ॥ जन्मास्तपेंथिहानाथवर्षेशःखेद्युनेतथा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेद्युनेतथा"; alternatives "खेद्यूनेतथा" — zoomed: short u under द्य as printed; sense (द्यून) wants long ū
  • About this edition: The page prints खेद्युने with a short u; the word is द्यून, the 7th house, which wants a long ū. I render it as the 7th and leave the printed vowel alone. Here खे is the 10th, 'the sky'.

मुथहातो द्यूनसंस्थः स्वगृहोच्चगतः शशी ॥ विदेशगमनं कुर्यात् क्लेशः पापेक्षणाद् भवेत्

muthahāto dyūnasaṃsthaḥ svagṛhoccagataḥ śaśī || videśagamanaṃ kuryāt kleśaḥ pāpekṣaṇād bhavet

The Moon standing in the 7th (dyūna) counted from the munthā (muthahā), and placed in its own house or in its exaltation, causes a journey to a foreign land; from a malefic's aspect there will be distress.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मुथहातोद्यूनसंस्थःस्वगृहोच्चगतःशशी ॥ विदेशगमनंकुर्यात्क्लेशःपापेक्षणाद्भवेत्

Adhyāya 18 · इत्यष्टमभावः

18.1a reading here is contested

अथाष्टमभावविचारः ॥

भौमे ऽब्दपे क्रूरहते ऽयसा घातो बलो ज्झिते ॥ अग्निभीरग्निभे क्रूरनराद्विपदभे मृतिः

bhaume 'bdape krūrahate 'yasā ghāto balo jjhite || agnibhīragnibhe krūranarādvipadabhe mṛtiḥ

Mars being lord of the year (abdapa), struck by a malefic and stripped of strength: a blow from iron. In a fiery sign (agni-bha — Aries, Leo, Sagittarius), fear from fire; in a two-footed sign (dvipada-bha, a human sign), death at the hands of a cruel man. [The Sanskrit is given as krūranarād-vipadabhe. The virāma that the first read of the plate put on the d of -pad- is not kept: the pāda needs eight syllables, and Viśvanātha's commentary on the same page and the reads of all four other printings give the full syllable, dvipadabhe. The compound is still written with a single d where the sense needs krūranarād dvipadabhe, 'from a cruel man, in a biped sign'. The pairing of sign-class with cause of death, the commentary's own division krūranarāt … dvipadabhe, and verse 6's catuṣpadbhyaḥ 'from quadrupeds' are what settle it. None of the printings' reads writes the second d, so the Sanskrit keeps the single one.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेऽब्दपेक्रूरहतेऽयसाघातोबलो ज्झिते ॥ अग्निभीरग्निभेक्रूरनराद्विपद्भेमृतिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विपद्भेमृतिः"; alternatives "द्विपदभेमृतिः" — zoomed: a slanting stroke under द read as virāma
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads क्रूरनराद्विपद्भे. A reader dividing this verse judged क्रूरनराद्द्विपद्भे the likely intent — the half-line pairs a sign-class with a cause of death: अग्निभीर् अग्निभे, 'fear from fire in a fiery sign', then this. The pair wants क्रूरनरात् + द्विपद्भे, 'from a cruel man, in a two-footed (human) sign' — and त् + द् is written द्द. The page sets one द् where two belong. Verse 6 of this chapter uses the matching चतुष्पद्भ्यः, 'from quadrupeds'. Left joined and unsplit here because the division is exactly what is in doubt.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्रूरनराद्विपदभे; this sentence names क्रूरनराद्विपद्भे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: This chapter judges the 8th house (randhra / mṛtyu) of the year-chart: death, its cause, and the ariṣṭa that threatens it. Reader's doubt on द्विपद्भे: alternative द्विपदभे — a slanting stroke under द read as a virāma. Either way the word is the sign-class. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्रूरनराद्विपदभे; this sentence names द्विपद्भे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

वियत्यवनिपामात्यरिपुतस्करजं भयम् ॥ तुर्ये मातुः पितृव्याद् वा मातुलात् पितृतो गुरोः

viyatyavanipāmātyariputaskarajaṃ bhayam || turye mātuḥ pitṛvyād vā mātulāt pitṛto guroḥ

⟨With the malefic⟩ in the 10th (viyat, 'the sky'), the fear comes of the king, of the minister, of an enemy or of a thief. In the 4th (turya), ⟨it comes⟩ from the mother, or from the father's brother, or from the mother's brother, from the father, from the teacher.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वियत्यवनिपामात्यरिपुतस्करजंभयम् ॥ तुर्येमातुःपितृव्याद्वामातुलात्पितृतोगुरोः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets this verse's number २ bare, with no daṇḍas, at the end of a printed line; the verse is divided there.
  • About this edition: The page sets this verse's number २ bare, with no daṇḍas, at the end of a printed line. That is about the numbering only.
18.3a reading here is contested

लग्नेंथिहापतिसमापतयो मृतीशाश्चेदित्थशालिन इमे निधनप्रदाः स्युः ॥ चेत् पाकरिष्टसमये मृतिरेव तत्र सार्के कुजे नृपभयं दिवसे ऽब्दवेशे

lagneṃthihāpatisamāpatayo mṛtīśāśceditthaśālina ime nidhanapradāḥ syuḥ || cet pākariṣṭasamaye mṛtireva tatra sārke kuje nṛpabhayaṃ divase 'bdaveśe

If the lord of the lagna, ⟨the lord of⟩ the munthā (inthihā) and the lords of the year (samā-pati) stand in an itthaśāla — the applying aspect — with the lords of death (mṛtīśa, the 8th), these become givers of death. If so, death comes at just that time, the time of the pāka's riṣṭa ⟨the harming stretch of the daśā then running⟩. There, with Mars joined to the Sun (sārka), fear from the king; ⟨and so too⟩ when the year's ingress (abda-veśa) falls in the day-time.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेंथिहापतिसमापतयोमृतीशाश्चेदित्थशालिनइमेनिधनप्रदाःस्युः ॥ चेत्पाकरिष्टसमयेमृतिरेवतत्रसार्केकुजेनृपभयंदिवसेऽब्दवेशे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्चेदित्थ"; alternatives "श्चेदिंत्थ" — a dot-like mark over दि seen in the tile; may be a speck or an anusvāra
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समयेमृति"; alternatives "समयेम्मृति" — same मृ glyph as commentary line 3; zoom on योमृ in this line shows a plain मृ
  • About this edition: Reader's doubts: श्चेदित्थ (a dot-like mark over दि may be a speck or an anusvāra) and समयेमृति (alternative समयेम्मृति); neither changes the sense. समापति is 'lord of the year' — samā is the year.
18.4a reading here is contested

सूर्ये मूसरिफे सितेन जनने वर्षेधिकारी तथा केंद्रे राजगदाद् भयं च रुगसृक्स्थाने ऽधिकारींदुजे ॥ सौम्ये क्रूरदृशा कुजस्य रुगसृग्दोषा दिनांशुस्थिते दग्धे बंधमृती विदेशत इति प्राहुर्बुधे तादृशे

sūrye mūsariphe sitena janane varṣedhikārī tathā keṃdre rājagadād bhayaṃ ca rugasṛksthāne 'dhikārīṃduje || saumye krūradṛśā kujasya rugasṛgdoṣā dināṃśusthite dagdhe baṃdhamṛtī videśata iti prāhurbudhe tādṛśe

The Sun in a mūsaripha — the separating aspect — with Venus (sita), and adhikārin ('in office') in the birth chart and in the year chart alike, standing in a kendra (an angle): fear from the king and from disease, and sickness and bleeding. ⟨When⟩ the adhikārin stands in Mercury's place (indu-ja, 'the Moon's son'): with Mercury (saumya) under the malefic aspect of Mars, the ills of disease and of blood; and when he is placed with the day-maker (dināṃśu, the Sun) and so burnt — combust — bondage and death away from home. So they say, when Mercury is in such a state.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुर्येमूसरिफेसितेनजननेवर्षेधिकारीतथाकेंद्रेराजगदाद्भयंचरुगसृक्स्थानेऽधिकारींदुजे ॥ सौम्येक्रूरदृशाकुजस्यरुगसृग्दाषोदिनांशुस्थिते दग्धेबंधमृतीविदेशतइतिप्राहुर्बुधेतादृशे

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुर्ये"; alternatives "सूर्ये" — zoomed: short-u hook printed under स; commentary line 5 has सूर्ये [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सूर्ये; this sentence names सुर्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्षेधिकारी"; alternatives "वर्षेऽधिकारी" — no avagraha printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दाषोदिनां"; alternatives "दोषादिनां", "दोषोदिनां" — zoomed: ा after द, ो on ष; sense wants दोषादि — likely misplaced mātrās; kept as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बंध"; alternatives "वंध" — ब/व not zoomed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्बुधे"; alternatives "र्वुधे" — this press sets बुध as वुध in the ṭīkā (zoom on p.145); ब vs व not resolved at this size
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads रुगसृग्दाषो. A reader dividing this verse judged रुगसृग्दोषा the likely intent — the word is रुज्-असृज्-दोषाः, 'the ills of disease and of blood', standing as the result of सौम्ये क्रूरदृशा कुजस्य. दाषो is no form. The reader zoomed and saw ा after द and ो on ष, and recorded it as two mātrās set in the wrong places.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads रुगसृग्दोषा; this sentence names रुगसृग्दाषो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सुर्ये. A reader dividing this verse judged सूर्ये the likely intent — the Sun is सूर्य with a long ū. The reader zoomed and saw a short-u hook under स, and records that the ṭīkā on printed line 5 of this plate has सूर्ये.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सूर्ये; this sentence names सुर्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Reader's doubts on this verse: सुर्ये printed for सूर्ये (the ṭīkā of printed line 5 has सूर्ये); वर्षेधिकारी with no avagraha printed for वर्षे ऽधिकारी; बंध / वंध and र्बुधे / र्वुधे not separable at this type size. None of them changes the claim. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सूर्ये; this sentence names सुर्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

भौमस्थाने ऽधिकारींदौ गुप्तं नृपभयं रुजः ॥ मंदो ऽधिकारी खे लोहहते पीडाकरः स्मृतः

bhaumasthāne 'dhikārīṃdau guptaṃ nṛpabhayaṃ rujaḥ || maṃdo 'dhikārī khe lohahate pīḍākaraḥ smṛtaḥ

The Moon as adhikārin in Mars's place (bhauma-sthāna): something concealed, fear from the king, diseases. Saturn as adhikārin in the 10th (kha), that house struck by Mars (loha), is held to be a giver of affliction.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमस्थानेऽधिकारींदौगुप्तंनृपभयंरुजः ॥ मंदोऽधिकारीखेलोहहतेपीडाकरःस्मृतः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'X's place' renders X-sthāna / X-pada, the term this book uses throughout (bhauma-sthāna, manda-sthāna, budha-pada, śaneḥ pada) for a division a graha owns. The verse does not say which division, so the rendering does not either.
18.6a reading here is contested

भौमे ऽष्टमे भयं वह्नेः प्रहारो वा नृपाद् भयम् ॥ आरे खस्थे चतुष्पद्भ्यः पातो दुःखं रुजोसृजा

bhaume 'ṣṭame bhayaṃ vahneḥ prahāro vā nṛpād bhayam || āre khasthe catuṣpadbhyaḥ pāto duḥkhaṃ rujosṛjā

Mars in the 8th: fear of fire, or a blow, or fear from the king. Mars (āra) standing in the 10th (kha): a fall from four-footed animals, sorrow, and diseases with bleeding.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेऽष्टमेभयंवह्नेःप्रहारोवानृपाद्भयम् ॥ आरे खस्थेचतुष्पद्भ्यःपातोदुःखंरुजोसृजा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रुजोसृजा"; alternatives "रुजोऽसृजा" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: रुजोसृजा is printed with no avagraha, so रुजोऽसृजा (rujaḥ + asṛjā) is not marked as such. The rendering takes it as rujaḥ asṛjā, 'diseases, with blood'.
18.7a reading here is contested

वित्ताष्टगेज्यो धनहा यद्यब्देशो ऽशुभेक्षितः ॥ मंदे द्यूने दुर्वचनापवादकलिभर्त्सनम्

vittāṣṭagejyo dhanahā yadyabdeśo 'śubhekṣitaḥ || maṃde dyūne durvacanāpavādakalibhartsanam

Jupiter (ījya) in the 2nd (vitta) or the 8th destroys wealth, if he is lord of the year and is aspected by a malefic. Saturn in the 7th (dyūna): foul words, slander, quarrelling and being reviled.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वित्ताष्टगेज्योधनहायद्यब्देशोऽशुभेक्षितः ॥ मंदेद्यूनेदुर्वचनापवादकलिभर्त्सनम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गेज्यो"; alternatives "गेऽज्यो" — no avagraha; ṭīkā glosses ईज्यो
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: गेज्यो printed with no avagraha; the ṭīkā glosses ईज्यो, which is what the rendering follows.
18.8a reading here is contested

पतिते ज्ञे क्रूरदृशा ऽऽरेत्थशाले मृतिं वदेत् ॥ कुजहद्दास्थिते नाशः सौम्यदृष्ट्या शुभं भवेत्

patite jñe krūradṛśā ''retthaśāle mṛtiṃ vadet || kujahaddāsthite nāśaḥ saumyadṛṣṭyā śubhaṃ bhavet

When Mercury (jña) is fallen (patita, in the sign of his debility), is under a malefic aspect and stands in an itthaśāla with Mars (āra), declare death. ⟨Mercury⟩ standing in Mars's haddā — the Tājika term-division of a sign — ⟨brings⟩ ruin; under a benefic aspect it turns out well. [The page prints dṛṣṭyā śubhaṃ, 'under a benefic aspect it becomes good'. The reader records that no avagraha is printed; with one the word would be aśubhaṃ, 'becomes bad', which reverses the verdict.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पतितेज्ञेक्रूरदृशाऽऽरेत्थशालेमृतिंवदेत् ॥ कुजहद्दास्थितेनाशःसौम्यदृष्ट्याशुभंभवेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्ट्याशुभं"; alternatives "दृष्ट्याऽशुभं" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The page sets a double avagraha ऽऽ before आरेत्थशाले, marking the elided ā. That is the printing's own mark and is kept.
18.9a reading here is contested

लग्नाधिपे नष्टदग्धे योषिद्वादो ऽशुभान्विते ॥ जन्मन्यष्टमगो जीवो नाधिकारी कलिः पृथुः

lagnādhipe naṣṭadagdhe yoṣidvādo 'śubhānvite || janmanyaṣṭamago jīvo nādhikārī kaliḥ pṛthuḥ

When the lord of the lagna is destroyed and burnt ⟨combust⟩ and is joined with a malefic: a quarrel over a woman. Jupiter (jīva) standing in the 8th in the birth chart and not adhikārin: a wide, far-reaching quarrel.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपेनष्टदग्धेयोषिद्वादोऽशुभान्विते ॥ जन्मन्यष्टमगोजीवोनाधिकारीकलिःपृथुः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दग्धेयोषिद्वादो" — a stray vertical stroke is printed between ये and षि; not recorded as a daṇḍa
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: a stray vertical stroke is printed between ये and षि in दग्धेयोषिद्वादो, and was not recorded as a daṇḍa.
18.10a reading here is contested

जयः शुक्रेक्षणादुक्तः प्रत्युत्तरवशेन तु ॥ भौमें ऽत्यगे धने सूर्ये वादात् क्लेशं विनिर्दिशेत्

jayaḥ śukrekṣaṇāduktaḥ pratyuttaravaśena tu || bhaumeṃ 'tyage dhane sūrye vādāt kleśaṃ vinirdiśet

Victory is declared from Venus's aspect — but by force of answering back. Mars in the 12th (antya) and the Sun in the 2nd (dhana): declare distress arising out of a dispute.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जयःशुक्रेक्षणादुक्तःप्रत्युत्तरवशेनतु ॥ भौमेंऽत्यगेधनेसूर्येवादात्क्लेशंविनिर्दिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भौमेंऽत्यगे"; alternatives "भौमेऽत्यगे" — a dot sits above मे before the avagraha
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: a dot sits above मे before the avagraha in भौमेंऽत्यगे, so भौमेऽत्यगे is not excluded. It concerns only the anusvāra, not the sense.

रिपुगोत्रकलिर्भीतिः संख्ये कुजहते ऽब्दपे ॥ दग्धो जन्मांगपो वर्षे ऽष्टमो रोगकली दिशेत्

ripugotrakalirbhītiḥ saṃkhye kujahate 'bdape || dagdho janmāṃgapo varṣe 'ṣṭamo rogakalī diśet

When the lord of the year is struck by Mars: a quarrel with enemies and with one's own kin (gotra), and fear in battle (saṃkhya). The lord of the birth lagna, burnt ⟨combust⟩ and standing in the 8th in the year chart, indicates disease and strife, the two together.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिपुगोत्रकलिर्भीतिः संख्येकुजहतेऽब्दपे ॥ दग्धोजन्मांगपोवर्षेऽष्टमोरोगकलीदिशे त्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside दिशे त् at a printed line break; it is one word, diśet. रोगकली is the dual of roga-kali, 'disease and quarrel', which is why the rendering says 'the two together'.
18.12a reading here is contested

सूत्यब्दयोरधिकृतो भौमस्थाने गुरुर्हतः ॥ पापैर्वादः स्फुटोप्येवं तादृशींदौ शनेः पदे

sūtyabdayoradhikṛto bhaumasthāne gururhataḥ || pāpairvādaḥ sphuṭopyevaṃ tādṛśīṃdau śaneḥ pade

Jupiter, adhikṛta ('in office') in the birth chart and the year chart alike, standing in Mars's place (bhauma-sthāna) and struck by malefics: an open dispute. Judge the like when the Moon is in Saturn's place.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूत्यब्दयोरधिकृतोभौमस्थानेगुरुर्हतः ॥ पापैर्वादःस्फुटोप्येवंतादृशींदौशनेःपदे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तादृशींदौ" — दृ in the old द-with-hook form, looks like द्द
  • About this edition: तादृशींदौ is unclear as printed: the locative wanted is तादृशे इंदौ, 'the Moon being in like case'. The rendering takes it that way. The reader records दृ set in the old द-with-hook form, which looks like द्द. Nothing in the Sanskrit is changed.

सूत्यब्दयोरधिकृते चंद्रे बुधपदे हते ॥ क्रूरैर्विदेशगमनं वादः स्याद् विमनस्कता

sūtyabdayoradhikṛte caṃdre budhapade hate || krūrairvideśagamanaṃ vādaḥ syād vimanaskatā

The Moon, adhikṛta in the birth chart and in the year chart, standing in Mercury's place (budha-pada) and struck by malefics: going abroad, dispute, and lowness of spirits.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूत्यब्दयोरधिकृतेचंद्रेबुधपदेहते ॥ क्रूरैर्विदेशगमनंवादःस्याद्विमनस्कता

मेषे सिंहे धनुष्यारे वृषे रंध्रे ऽसितो भयम् ॥ मृतौ मृतीशलग्नेशौ मृत्युदौ पापदृग्युतौ

meṣe siṃhe dhanuṣyāre vṛṣe raṃdhre 'sito bhayam || mṛtau mṛtīśalagneśau mṛtyudau pāpadṛgyutau

Mars in Aries, in Leo, in Sagittarius; Saturn (asita) in Taurus, in the 8th (randhra): fear. The lord of the 8th (mṛtīśa) and the lord of the lagna, both standing in the 8th (mṛti) and joined with or aspected by malefics, are givers of death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषेसिंहेधनुष्यारेवृषेरंध्रेऽसितोभयम् ॥ मृतौमृतीशलग्ने शौमृत्युदौपापदृग्युतौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside लग्ने शौ at a printed line break; it is one word, lagneśau. The four locatives of the first half-line are not assigned to one house by the verse, and the rendering does not assign them either.
18.15a reading here is contested

यत्रर्क्षे जन्मनि कुजः सो ऽब्दलग्नोपगो यदा ॥ बुधो वर्षपतिर्नष्टवलस्तत्र न शोभनं

yatrarkṣe janmani kujaḥ so 'bdalagnopago yadā || budho varṣapatirnaṣṭavalastatra na śobhanaṃ

When the sign Mars occupied at birth comes up as the lagna of the year, and Mercury is lord of the year with his strength destroyed (naṣṭa-bala), nothing there is auspicious. [The page prints naṣṭa-vala; the word is naṣṭa-bala, and the reader records that the ṭīkā on this plate reads naṣṭabalo. The Sanskrit keeps the printed letter.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यत्रर्क्षेजन्मनिकुजःसोऽब्दलग्नोपगोयदा ॥ बुधोवर्षपतिर्नष्टवलस्तत्रनशोभनं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नष्टवलस्त"; alternatives "नष्टबलस्त" — zoomed: the letter is व, with no inner stroke of ब; the ṭīkā on this page reads नष्टबलो
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads नष्टवलस्तत्र. A reader dividing this verse judged नष्टबलस्तत्र the likely intent — the word is नष्ट-बल, 'his strength destroyed', which this book uses elsewhere (19.9 कुजे ऽब्दपे नष्टबले). The reader zoomed and saw व with no inner stroke of ब, and records that the ṭīkā on this same plate reads नष्टबलो.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.

सार्के शनौ भौमयुते खाष्टस्थे वाहनाद् भयम् ॥ सार्के भौमे ऽष्टमस्थे तु पतनं वाहनाद् भवेत्

sārke śanau bhaumayute khāṣṭasthe vāhanād bhayam || sārke bhaume 'ṣṭamasthe tu patanaṃ vāhanād bhavet

Saturn with the Sun (sārka) and joined with Mars, standing in the 10th (kha) or the 8th: fear from a vehicle. But Mars with the Sun standing in the 8th: there will be a fall from a vehicle.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सार्केशनौभौ मयुतेखाष्टस्थेवाहनाद्भयम् ॥ सार्केभौमेऽष्टमस्थेतुपतनंवाहनाद्भवेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside भौ मयुते at a printed line break; it is one word, bhaumayute.
18.17a reading here is contested

सारे ऽब्दपे ऽष्टमे मृत्युश्चंद्रेंत्यारिमृतौ मृतिः ॥ उदिते मृतिसद्मेशे निर्बले जीविते मृतिः

sāre 'bdape 'ṣṭame mṛtyuścaṃdreṃtyārimṛtau mṛtiḥ || udite mṛtisadmeśe nirbale jīvite mṛtiḥ

The lord of the year with Mars (sāra) in the 8th: death. The Moon in the 12th (antya), the 6th (ari) or the 8th (mṛti): death. When the lord of the house of death (the 8th) is risen ⟨standing in the lagna⟩ and life is feeble: death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सारेऽब्दपेऽष्टमेमृत्युश्चंद्रेंत्यारिमृतौमृतिः ॥ उदितेमृतिस द्मेशेनिर्बलेजीवितेमृतिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रेंत्यारि"; alternatives "चंद्रेऽंत्यारि" — no avagraha is printed between चंद्रे and अंत्यारि; recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्मेशे"; alternatives "झेशे" — the द्म ligature of this type looks like झ; read as द्म (सद्म)
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside मृतिस द्मेशे at a printed line break; it is one word, mṛtisadmeśe. Reader's doubts: चंद्रेंत्यारि printed with no avagraha; and the द्म ligature of this fount looks like झ, read here as द्म (सद्म).

पुण्यसद्मेश्वरः पुण्यसहमादष्टगो यदा ॥ सूत्यष्टमेशः पुण्यस्थो मृतिदः पापदृग्युतः

puṇyasadmeśvaraḥ puṇyasahamādaṣṭago yadā || sūtyaṣṭameśaḥ puṇyastho mṛtidaḥ pāpadṛgyutaḥ

When the lord of the house holding the puṇya-sahama stands in the 8th from that puṇya-sahama ⟨death is to be feared⟩; and the lord of the 8th of the birth chart, standing in the puṇya-sahama and joined with or aspected by malefics, is a giver of death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुण्यसद्मेश्वरःपुण्यसहमादष्टगोयदा ॥ सूत्यष्टमेशःपुण्यस्थोमृतिदःपापदृग्युतः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The puṇya-sahama is the 'sahama of merit', one of the Tājika sensitive points: an arc measured between two grahas is laid off from the lagna, and where it ends is the sahama. Verses 18, 19, 20 and 24 all judge death from it.
18.19a reading here is contested

सूत्यष्टमगतो राशिः पुण्यसद्मनि नाथयुक् ॥ अब्दलग्ना ऽष्टमर्क्षे वा चेदित्थं स्यान्मृतिस्तदा

sūtyaṣṭamagato rāśiḥ puṇyasadmani nāthayuk || abdalagnā 'ṣṭamarkṣe vā ceditthaṃ syānmṛtistadā

⟨When⟩ the sign that stood in the 8th of the birth chart falls on the house of the puṇya-sahama together with its lord, or ⟨falls⟩ in the 8th sign from the lagna of the year — if it is so, then death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूत्यष्टमगतोराशिःपुण्यसद्मनिनाथयुक् ॥ अब्दलग्नाऽष्टमर्क्षेवाचेदित्थंस्यान्मृतिस्तदा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सद्म"; alternatives "सझ" — the glyph read as the द्म ligature looks like झ in this fount; same glyph in mūla and ṭīkā, glossed पुण्यसहम
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: the glyph read as the द्म ligature looks like झ in this fount; it is the same glyph in the mūla and in the ṭīkā, which glosses it पुण्यसहम.
18.20a reading here is contested

पुण्यसद्माशुभाक्रांतं मृतीशों ऽत्यारिरंध्रगः ॥ मुथहेशो ऽब्दपो वापि मृत्युं तत्र विनिर्दिशेत्

puṇyasadmāśubhākrāṃtaṃ mṛtīśoṃ 'tyāriraṃdhragaḥ || muthaheśo 'bdapo vāpi mṛtyuṃ tatra vinirdiśet

The house of the puṇya-sahama overrun by malefics, and the lord of the 8th (mṛtīśa) standing in the 12th (antya), the 6th (ari) or the 8th (randhra) — or the lord of the munthā, or the lord of the year, ⟨so standing⟩: declare death then.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुण्यसद्माशुभाक्रांतंमृतीशोंऽत्यारिरंध्रगः॥ मुथहेशोऽब्दपोवापिमृत्यंतत्रविनिर्दिशेत्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृतीशोंऽत्यारि"; alternatives "मृतीशोऽंत्यारि", "मृतीशोऽत्यारि" — a dot stands above शो/ऽ; ṭīkā glosses अंत्या, so the anusvāra may belong to त्या; kept where it appears to sit
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृत्यंतत्र"; alternatives "मृत्युंतत्र" — zoomed: no u-mātrā under त्य, anusvāra over य; misprint for मृत्युं likely (ṭīkā has मृत्युं)
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads मृत्यं तत्र. A reader dividing this verse judged मृत्युं तत्र the likely intent — the accusative of मृत्यु is मृत्युम्; मृत्यं is no form. The reader zoomed and found no u-mātrā under त्य, only an anusvāra over य, and records that the ṭīkā has मृत्युं.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मृत्युं; this sentence names मृत्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: a dot stands above शो/ऽ in मृतीशोंऽत्यारि; the ṭīkā glosses अंत्या, so the anusvāra may belong to त्या. It was kept where it appears to sit.

सक्रूरे जन्मपे मृत्यौ मृतिश्चेदिंथिहार्कियुक् ॥ भौमक्षुतेक्षणे तत्र मृत्युः स्यादात्मघाततः

sakrūre janmape mṛtyau mṛtiścediṃthihārkiyuk || bhaumakṣutekṣaṇe tatra mṛtyuḥ syādātmaghātataḥ

The lord of the birth ⟨lagna⟩ together with a malefic in the 8th (mṛtyu): death — if the munthā (inthihā) is joined with Saturn (arki). There, ⟨when it is⟩ struck by Mars and under his aspect, death would come by one's own hand (ātma-ghāta, suicide). [bhaumakṣutekṣaṇe is not clear as printed: kṣuta is no ordinary form, and the rendering takes it as 'struck, crushed' by Mars. Nothing in the Sanskrit is changed.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सक्रूरेजन्मपेमृत्यौमृतिश्चेदिंथिहार्कियुक् ॥ भौमक्षुतेक्षणेतत्रमृत्युःस्यादात्मघाततः

मंदो ऽष्टमे मृतीशेत्थशालान् मृत्युकरः स्मृतः ॥ शुभेत्थशालात् सर्वे ऽपि योगा नाशुभदायकाः

maṃdo 'ṣṭame mṛtīśetthaśālān mṛtyukaraḥ smṛtaḥ || śubhetthaśālāt sarve 'pi yogā nāśubhadāyakāḥ

Saturn in the 8th, through an itthaśāla with the lord of the 8th (mṛtīśa), is held to be a maker of death. ⟨But⟩ through an itthaśāla with a benefic, all these yogas, every one of them, cease to be givers of evil.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदोऽष्टमेमृतीशेत्थशालान्मृत्युकरःस्मृतः ॥ शुभेत्थशालात्सर्वेऽपियोगानाशुभदायकाः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the cancellation rule for every death-yoga stated in this chapter: a benefic itthaśāla removes the evil of all of them. na aśubha-dāyakāḥ, 'not givers of evil' — not nāśa-aśubha, 'givers of ruin and evil', which the same letters could also carry; the benefic condition in the same half-line is what settles it.

सूतिरंध्रपतिर्मंदो ऽष्टमो ऽब्दे लग्नपेन चेत् ॥ इत्थशाली क्रूरदृशा तत्कालं मृत्युदायकः

sūtiraṃdhrapatirmaṃdo 'ṣṭamo 'bde lagnapena cet || itthaśālī krūradṛśā tatkālaṃ mṛtyudāyakaḥ

Saturn, lord of the 8th (randhra) of the birth chart, standing in the 8th in the year chart, if he is in an itthaśāla with the lord of the lagna and under a malefic aspect, is a giver of death at that very time.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूतिरंध्रपतिर्मंदोऽष्टमोऽब्देलग्नपेनचेत् ॥ इत्थशालीक्रूरदृशातत्कालंमृत्युदायकः

18.24a reading here is contested

पुण्यसद्मनि विधुस्तनौ तथा ऽस्ते खलो मृतिरथार्थरिष्फगौ ॥ मृत्युदौ खलखगावथो जनुर्वर्षवेशतनुपौ मृतौ मृतिः

puṇyasadmani vidhustanau tathā 'ste khalo mṛtirathārthariṣphagau || mṛtyudau khalakhagāvatho janurvarṣaveśatanupau mṛtau mṛtiḥ

The Moon in the house of the puṇya-sahama, and a malefic (khala) in the lagna (tanu) and likewise in the 7th (asta): death. Or two malefic grahas standing in the 2nd (artha) and the 12th (riṣpha) are givers of death. And further, the lord of the lagna of the birth chart and the lord of the lagna of the year's ingress (varṣa-veśa), both standing in the 8th (mṛti): death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुण्यसद्मनिविधुस्तनौतथाऽस्तेखलोमृतिरथा र्थरिष्फगौ ॥ मृत्युदौखलखगावथोजनुर्वर्षवेशतनुपौमृतौमृतिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सद्म"; alternatives "सझ" — the glyph read as the द्म ligature looks like झ in this fount (same glyph as on p.148)
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जनुर्वर्षवेश"; alternatives "जनुर्वर्षेशतनुपौ" — crowded repha and e-strokes over र्षवे; read as printed at tile resolution
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside अथा र्थरिष्फगौ at a printed line break; it is one word, athārtha-riṣphagau. Reader's doubt on जनुर्वर्षवेश: the repha and e-strokes over र्षवे are crowded, and जनुर्वर्षेशतनुपौ was not excluded. The printed reading, varṣa-veśa ('the year's ingress'), agrees with abda-veśa in verse 3 of this chapter.

Adhyāya 19 · इतिनवमभावविचारः

अथभाग्यभावविचारः ॥

भौमे ऽब्दपे त्रिनवगे क्रूरायुक्ते बलान्विते ॥ गुणावहस्तदा मार्गश्चिरं कार्यं स्थिरं ततः

bhaume 'bdape trinavage krūrāyukte balānvite || guṇāvahastadā mārgaściraṃ kāryaṃ sthiraṃ tataḥ

When Mars is the lord of the year (abdapa, the varṣeśa) and stands in the 3rd (tri, sahaja) or the 9th (dharma, the house of fortune), unjoined by any malefic and possessed of strength, then the road (mārga — the journey) brings good; the business ⟨undertaken on it⟩ is long-lasting, and steady thereafter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेऽब्दपेत्रिनवगे क्रूरायुक्तेबलान्विते ॥ गुणावहस्तदामार्गश्चिरंकार्यंस्थिरंततः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This chapter judges the 9th house (bhāgya/dharma) of the year-chart: journeys, the road, and standing with the king. 'Lord of the year' renders abdapa/varṣeśa, the graha elected to rule the annual chart.
19.2a reading here is contested

त्रिधर्मस्थो ऽब्दपः सूर्यः कंबूली मार्गसौख्यदः ॥ अन्यप्रेषणयानं स्यात् स चेन् नाधिकृतो भवेत्

tridharmastho 'bdapaḥ sūryaḥ kaṃbūlī mārgasaukhyadaḥ || anyapreṣaṇayānaṃ syāt sa cen nādhikṛto bhavet

The Sun as lord of the year (abdapa), standing in the 3rd (tri) or the 9th (dharma) and being kambūlī — holding the kambūla yoga — gives ease on the road. But if he is not adhikṛta ('put in office', that is, not holding dignity in the chart), the travelling will be a going on somebody else's errand, at another's sending.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिधर्मस्थोऽब्दपःसूर्यःकंबलीमार्गसौख्यदः ॥ अन्यप्रेषणयानंस्यात्स चेन्नाधिकृतोभवेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कंबली"; alternatives "कंवली" — ब and व differ only by a small inner stroke in this small type; not separable at tile resolution [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कंबूली; this sentence names कंबली, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing spells the yoga कंबली; the reader could not separate ब from व at this type size, so कंवली is not excluded. Either way the word is the kambūla yoga of the sixteen. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कंबूली; this sentence names कंबली, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
19.3a reading here is contested

शुक्रे ऽब्दपे त्रिनवगे मार्गे सौख्यं विलोमगे ॥ अस्ते वा कुगतिः सौम्ये देवयात्रा तथाविधे

śukre 'bdape trinavage mārge saukhyaṃ vilomage || aste vā kugatiḥ saumye devayātrā tathāvidhe

Venus as lord of the year in the 3rd (tri) or the 9th (dharma) ⟨gives⟩ comfort on the road; if he is retrograde (vilomaga, going backwards) or combust (asta), the journey goes badly. With Mercury (saumya) placed in the same way, ⟨there is⟩ a journey to a god — a pilgrimage. [Our mūla now reads the locative saumye, which pairs with tathāvidhe, 'likewise placed'; the source read gave saumyai, which is no form here, and the text is corrected on the grammar, as the ṭīkā's saumye budhe also has it.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेऽब्दपेत्रिनवगेमार्गेसौख्यंविलोमगे ॥ अस्तेवाकुगतिःसौम्यैदेवयात्रातथाविधे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौम्यैदेव"; alternatives "सौम्येदेव" — zoomed: two strokes over म्य, so ऐ as printed; ṭīkā reads सौम्ये बुधे
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सौम्यै. A reader dividing this verse judged सौम्ये the likely intent — सौम्यै is no form that fits: the sentence needs a locative to pair with तथाविधे, 'Mercury being likewise placed'. The reader saw two strokes over म्य and recorded ऐ as printed, and notes that the ṭīkā on this plate reads सौम्ये बुधे.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सौम्ये; this sentence names सौम्यै, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt: the plate shows two strokes over म्य, so ऐ as printed; the ṭīkā has सौम्ये बुधे. The rendering follows सौम्ये and says so.

क्रूरार्दिते कुयानं स्याद् गुरावेवं विचिंतयेत् ॥ इत्थशाले लग्नधर्मपत्योर्यात्रास्त्यचिंतिता

krūrārdite kuyānaṃ syād gurāvevaṃ viciṃtayet || itthaśāle lagnadharmapatyoryātrāstyaciṃtitā

If ⟨that graha⟩ is afflicted by malefics (krūrārdita), the journey will be a bad one; judge Jupiter in the same way. When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 9th (dharma) stand in an itthaśāla with each other — the applying aspect, the graha behind coming up to the one ahead — a journey arrives that was never thought of.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरार्दितेकुयानंस्याद्गुरावेवंविचिंतयेत् ॥ इत्थशालेलग्नधर्मपत्योर्यात्रास्त्यचिंतिता

19.5a reading here is contested

लग्नेशो धर्मपं यच्छन् स्वं महश्चिंतिताध्वदः ॥ एवं लग्नाब्दयोर्योगे मुथहांगपयोरपि

lagneśo dharmapaṃ yacchan svaṃ mahaściṃtitādhvadaḥ || evaṃ lagnābdayoryoge muthahāṃgapayorapi

The lord of the lagna, handing his own ⟨disposition⟩ over to the lord of the 9th (dharma-pa), is a giver of splendour and of the journey that was intended. The same ⟨holds⟩ when the lagna and the year ⟨-lord⟩ come into yoga, and likewise the munthā and the lord of the lagna (aṅgapa). [The Sanskrit is corrected to mahaś- (mahas, 'splendour, festivity'), which is what accounts for the ś at all. The read of this leaf gave mahāś-, which yields no construction, and three independent printings give mahaś-.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशोधर्मपंयच्छन्स्वंमहाश्चिंतिताध्वदः ॥ एवंलग्नाब्दयोर्योगेमुथहांगपयोरपि

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महाश्चिंतिताध्वदः"; alternatives "महाश्विंतिताध्वदः", "महश्चिंतिताध्वदः" — zoomed: a vertical ā-bar stands after ह; the conjunct under श has a looped lower member that could be च or व. Sense may want महश्; print appears to show महा. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads महश्चिंतिताध्वदः; this sentence names महाश्चिंतिताध्वदः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads महाश्चिंतिताध्वदः. A reader dividing this verse judged महश्चिंतिताध्वदः the likely intent — the compound is महस् ('splendour, festivity') + चिंतित-अध्व-द, 'giver of splendour and of the journey that was intended' — which is why the श् is there at all; महा- would leave the श् unexplained. The reader recorded the ā-bar after ह as doubtful and named महश् as an alternative.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads महश्चिंतिताध्वदः; this sentence names महाश्चिंतिताध्वदः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt on महाश्चिंतिताध्वदः: alternatives महाश्विंतिता-, महश्चिंतिता-. The rendering follows महश् (mahas) and says so. यच्छन् स्वं is the Tājika idiom of one graha 'giving its own' to another, i.e. the itthaśāla transfer of the verse before. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads महश्चिंतिताध्वदः; this sentence names महाश्चिंतिताध्वदः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

गुरुस्थाने कुजे धर्मे सद्यात्रा भृत्यवित्तदा ॥ ज्ञस्थाने लग्नपो भौमो दृष्टः सद्यानसौख्यदः

gurusthāne kuje dharme sadyātrā bhṛtyavittadā || jñasthāne lagnapo bhaumo dṛṣṭaḥ sadyānasaukhyadaḥ

Mars in Jupiter's place (guru-sthāna, the sign or division Jupiter rules) and in the 9th (dharma): the journey is a good one, and it gives servants and wealth. When Mars is lord of the lagna, stands in Mercury's place (jña-sthāna) and is aspected, he gives a good journey and the comfort of it.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरुस्थानेकुजेधर्मेसद्यात्राभृत्यवित्तदा ॥ ज्ञस्थानेलग्नपोभौमोदृष्टःसद्यानसौख्यदः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'X's place' renders X-sthāna / X-pada, which this book uses throughout (bhauma-sthāna, manda-sthāna, budha-pada, śaneḥ pada) for the division a graha owns. The verse does not say which division, so the rendering does not either.

स्वस्थानगो वा बलवान् लग्नदर्शी सुयानदः ॥ जन्माधिकारी ज्ञो मंदस्थाने क्रूरयुतो यदा

svasthānago vā balavān lagnadarśī suyānadaḥ || janmādhikārī jño maṃdasthāne krūrayuto yadā

Or ⟨Mars⟩, standing in his own place (sva-sthāna), strong, and looking at the lagna, gives a good journey. When Mercury (jña), who is adhikārin — 'in office' — in the birth chart, stands in Saturn's place (manda-sthāna) joined with a malefic, ⟨then the result is the one stated next⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वस्थानगोवाबलवान्लग्नदर्शीसुयानदः ॥ जन्माधिकारीज्ञोमंदस्थानेक्रूरयुतोयदा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The record ends on a 'when' clause; its result stands at the head of verse 8. The link is supplied in ⟨ ⟩ and nothing is pulled across from the next record.
19.8a reading here is contested

पंथा रिपोर्झकटकाद् गुरुरध्वेंदुजीवयोः ॥ धर्मे शनिर्नाधिकारी पंथानमशुभं वदेत्

paṃthā riporjhakaṭakād gururadhveṃdujīvayoḥ || dharme śanirnādhikārī paṃthānamaśubhaṃ vadet

⟨Then⟩ the journey comes of a quarrel with an enemy. A long road, ⟨when⟩ the Moon and Jupiter ⟨are likewise placed⟩. Saturn in the 9th (dharma) and not adhikārin — declare the road inauspicious. [indujīvayoḥ stands at the end of the first half-line with no house named with it; it may instead be governed by dharme at the head of the second half, giving 'a long road when the Moon and Jupiter are in the 9th'. Both readings are in the printed words; nothing here is supplied to settle it.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पंथारिपोर्झकटकाद्गुरुरध्वेंदुजीवयोः ॥ धर्मे शनिर्नाधिकारीपंथानमशुभंवदेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "काद्गुरु"; alternatives "काद्वुरु" — zoomed: द with a stacked lower member read as ग; ligature is compact.
  • About this edition: झकटक is the vernacular word for a quarrel (Hindi झगड़ा) taken into the verse. The first half is the result of verse 7's 'when' clause; the link is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. guru in guru-adhvā is the adjective 'heavy, long', not Jupiter — Jupiter is named separately as jīva in the same half-line.

इत्थं गुरौ दूरयात्रा नृपसंगस्ततो गुणः ॥ कुजे ऽब्दपे नष्टबले स्वजनाद् दूरतो गतिः

itthaṃ gurau dūrayātrā nṛpasaṃgastato guṇaḥ || kuje 'bdape naṣṭabale svajanād dūrato gatiḥ

In just this way with Jupiter ⟨so placed⟩: a distant journey, the company of the king, and benefit from that. When Mars is lord of the year and his strength is destroyed (naṣṭa-bala), the going is far away from one's own people.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इत्थंगुरौदूरयात्रानृपसंगस्ततोगुणः ॥ कुजेऽब्दपेनष्टबलेस्वजनाद्दूरतोगतिः

19.10a reading here is contested

द्यूनेंथिहा धर्म इंदौ सबले ऽध्वा विदेशगः ॥ वर्षेशो बलवान् पापायुतः केंद्रे ऽधिकारवान्

dyūneṃthihā dharma iṃdau sabale 'dhvā videśagaḥ || varṣeśo balavān pāpāyutaḥ keṃdre 'dhikāravān

The munthā (inthihā, this book's other name for her — the year's ascendant, which moves on one rāśi for each completed year) in the 7th (dyūna), and the Moon in the 9th (dharma) with strength: the journey goes abroad. The lord of the year, strong, unjoined by a malefic and in a kendra (an angle — the 1st, 4th, 7th or 10th), holds authority. [The page prints dharma without the e-mātrā where the locative dharme is required; the reader re-read the marks over म at 10–14× and ruled the single mark to be the repha alone.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

द्यूनेंथिहाधर्मइंदौसबलेऽध्वाविदेशगः ॥ वर्षेशोबलवा न्पापायुतःकेंद्रेऽधिकारवान्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सबलेऽध्वाविदेशगः"; alternatives "सबलेऽद्वाविदेशगः" — the conjunct after the avagraha was re-read at 6.2x and 12.6x and is at the edge of this scan's resolution. Taken as ध्व because the ṭīkā on this same plate (printed line 9) glosses it अध्वामार्गोभवति, and because a certain ध्वा on printed line 2 of this plate has the same body shape. AVAGRAHA ऽ is unambiguous here and in कुजेऽब्दपे.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्मइंदौ"; alternatives "धर्मेंइंदौ" — two marks stand over र्म+इ: a repha hook and one round dot. Compared at the same 6.2x against the ṭīkā's certain धर्मेइंदौ on printed line 5, the dot belongs to इं (इंदौ needs it) and the hook carries र् merged with े. Recorded धर्मे. · ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): re-read at 10-14x beside a certain repha (गतिर्जयः, this plate) and a certain े (बले, वर्षे, this line). The single mark over म is the repha alone, so the plate prints धर्म. Text corrected to धर्मइंदौ.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads धर्म इंदौ. A reader dividing this verse judged धर्मे इंदौ the likely intent — the word is a locative pairing with इंदौ सबले, 'the Moon strong in the 9th'. The plate prints धर्म with no e-mātrā: the reader re-read the marks over म at 10–14× beside a certain repha and a certain े on the same plate and ruled that the single mark is the repha alone, so the printing drops the े.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: इंथिहा and मुथहा are the same thing in this book: 7.1 sets both words side by side for the progressed ascendant of the year.
19.11a reading here is contested

अधिकारो गतिः संख्ये सेनापत्येपि वा वदेत् ॥ एवं बुधे कुजे जीवयुतेर्कान् निर्गते पुनः

adhikāro gatiḥ saṃkhye senāpatyepi vā vadet || evaṃ budhe kuje jīvayuterkān nirgate punaḥ

⟨Then⟩ one should declare office, a going, ⟨success⟩ in battle (saṃkhya), or even command of an army (senāpatya). The same with Mercury, and with Mars, when he is joined with Jupiter and has come out from the Sun ⟨that is, is free of combustion⟩ — and further, ⟨the results stated next⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अधिकारोगतिःसंख्येसेनापत्येपिवावदेत् ॥ एवंबुधेकुजेजीवयुतेर्कान्निर्गतेपुनः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जीवयुतेर्कान्निर्गते"; alternatives "जीवयुतेकोऽनिर्गते", "जीवयुतेऽर्कान्निर्गते" — at 2.9x this read as कोऽनि; at 7.2x it is र्का + न्नि, and there is NO avagraha between युते and र्का. The ṭīkā on printed line 11 writes अर्कान्निर्गतेउदिते, which settles it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सेनापत्येपिवावदेत्"; alternatives "सेनापत्येऽपिवावदेत्" — checked at 6.1x: no avagraha is printed before पि
  • About this edition: The reader settled arkān nirgate against the ṭīkā of printed line 11 (अर्कान्निर्गते उदिते) and confirmed at 7.2× that no avagraha stands between युते and र्का. The record again ends on a condition whose result opens verse 12; the link is supplied in ⟨ ⟩.

परसैन्योपरि गतिर्जयः ख्यातिसुखावहः ॥ जीवान् नवमगे भौमे शुभा यात्रा नृणां भवेत्

parasainyopari gatirjayaḥ khyātisukhāvahaḥ || jīvān navamage bhaume śubhā yātrā nṛṇāṃ bhavet

⟨There is⟩ a march upon the enemy's army, victory, and it brings fame and comfort. When Mars stands in the 9th from Jupiter (jīva), the journey of men will be auspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

परसै न्योपरिगतिर्जयःख्याति सुखावहः ॥ जीवान्नवमगेभौमेशुभायात्रानृणांभवेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a space inside परसै न्य and again after ख्याति; both fall at a printed line break and neither is a word boundary. The words are parasainyopari and khyāti-sukhāvahaḥ.

Adhyāya 20 · इतिराज्यभावविचारः

अथदशमभावविचारः ॥

सबलेऽब्दपतौ खस्थे राज्यार्थसुखकीर्तयः ॥ स्थानांतराप्तिरन्यस्मिन् केंद्रे गृहसुखाप्तयः

sabale'bdapatau khasthe rājyārthasukhakīrtayaḥ || sthānāṃtarāptiranyasmin keṃdre gṛhasukhāptayaḥ

When the lord of the year (abdapati) is strong and stands in the 10th (kha), ⟨there come⟩ sovereignty (rājya), wealth, happiness and fame. When he stands in any other kendra ⟨the 1st, the 4th or the 7th⟩, ⟨there come⟩ the gaining of a post elsewhere (sthānāntara) and the gaining of a house and comfort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सबलेऽब्दपतौखस्थेराज्यार्थसुखकीर्तयः ॥ स्थानांतराप्तिरन्यस्मिन्केंद्रेगृहसुखाप्तयः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse; it runs straight into the next, which carries the next number. It is a verse of its own because the block holds exactly twice as many half-lines as its numbers account for, and this printing closes every half-line with ॥.
  • About this edition: The page sets no number after this record; the reader treated it as a verse of its own because the block holds twice as many half-lines as its numbers account for. अन्यस्मिन् केंद्रे is 'in another kendra' — another of the four angles, the 10th having just been named.
20.2a reading here is contested

इत्थं बली रविर्भूस्थः पूर्वार्जितपदाप्तिकृत् ॥ एकादशेऽस्मिन् सख्यं स्यान् नृपामात्यगणोत्तमैः

itthaṃ balī ravirbhūsthaḥ pūrvārjitapadāptikṛt || ekādaśe'smin sakhyaṃ syān nṛpāmātyagaṇottamaiḥ

The Sun, strong in this same way ⟨as the lord of the year just described⟩, standing in the 4th (bhū, the earth-point opposite kha the 10th), brings the regaining of a post earned before. When this one ⟨the Sun⟩ is in the 11th (ekādaśa), there is friendship with kings, with ministers, and with the foremost men of ⟨their⟩ retinue (gaṇa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इत्थंबलीरविर्भूस्थःपूर्वा र्जितपदाप्तिकृत् ॥ एकादशेऽस्मिन्सख्यंस्यान्नृपामात्यगणोत्तमैः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गणोत्तमैः"; alternatives "गुणोत्तमैः" — zoomed: the mūla clearly prints गण; the ṭīkā has गुण. Possible misprint either side; print kept.
  • About this edition: भूस्थः is rendered 'standing in the 4th'. भू is the earth-point, the angle opposite ख (the 10th), which verse 1 has just named — but the word occurs nowhere else in this book, which calls the 4th तुर्य (1.51, 14.1, 18.2, 24.40) and हिबुक (9.2, 28.1, 40.39). The reader's doubt is on गणोत्तमैः: the mūla prints गण ('of the retinue, of the troop') and the ṭīkā has गुण. With गुणोत्तमैः the line would read 'with kings, ministers and men foremost in virtue' — the persons named would be the same, but their rank would come from character, not from office.
20.3a reading here is contested

रविस्थानेंथिहा लग्ने खे वा राज्याप्तिसौख्यदा ॥ नीचेऽर्कः पापसंयुक्तो भूपाद् बंधवधं दिशेत्

ravisthāneṃthihā lagne khe vā rājyāptisaukhyadā || nīce'rkaḥ pāpasaṃyukto bhūpād baṃdhavadhaṃ diśet

The munthā (inthihā, this book's own name for it — the year's ascendant, which moves on one rāśi for each completed year) standing in the Sun's place (ravi-sthāna, the sign the Sun holds at birth), or in the lagna, or in the 10th (kha), is a giver of sovereignty and of comfort. The Sun in his fall (nīca), joined with a malefic, would indicate imprisonment and killing at the king's hands (bhūpāt).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रविस्थानेंथिहालग्नेखेवाराज्याप्तिसौख्यदा ॥ नीचेऽर्कःपाप संयुक्तोभूपाद्बंधवधंदिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूपाद्बंध"; alternatives "भ्रूपाद्बंध", "भूपाद्वंध" — zoomed: a small extra stroke under भ beside the ू could be a र-foot; lower member of the द-conjunct read as ब.
  • About this edition: इंथिहा is this book's second name for the munthā; it writes it so in some twenty places (1.66, 7.1, 7.9, 8.1, 9.20, 10.2, 16.13, 17.7, 18.3, 19.10, 24.14 among them), and 7.1 sets मुथहा and इंथिहा side by side. The reader could not settle भूपाद्बंध: a small extra stroke under भ may be a र-foot, which would give भ्रूपाद् — but भ्रूपाद् yields no sense here, while भूपात् ('from the king') is what the chapter on kingship wants; the lower member of the द-conjunct could also be ब, giving वंध for बंध, which is the same word. The rendering follows भूपाद्बंधवधं.

सिंहे रविर्बली खस्थः स्थानलाभो नृपाश्रयः ॥ स्थानांतराधिकाराप्तिरिंदुरारपदे बली

siṃhe ravirbalī khasthaḥ sthānalābho nṛpāśrayaḥ || sthānāṃtarādhikārāptiriṃdurārapade balī

The Sun, strong in Leo (siṃha) and standing in the 10th (kha): ⟨there is⟩ gain of position and the king's patronage. The Moon (indu), strong in Mars's pada (āra-pada — the rāśi Mars holds at birth), ⟨gives⟩ the gaining of a post elsewhere and of office (adhikāra).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सिंहेरविर्बलीखस्थःस्थानलाभोनृपाश्रयः ॥ स्थानांतराधिकाराप्तिरिंदुरारपदेबली

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: पद is used in the sense this book defines at 15.8: 'whatever rāśi a graha occupies at birth, that rāśi is called that graha's pada'. स्थानांतराधिकाराप्तिः is divided स्थानांतर + अधिकार + आप्तिः, 'the gaining of another place and of office'; it can equally be read as one thing, 'the gaining of office in another place', which is the same transfer said more tightly.

खेशलग्नेशवर्षेशेत्थशालो राज्यदायकः ॥ वर्षेशे राज्यसहमेऽर्केत्थशाले महानृपः

kheśalagneśavarṣeśetthaśālo rājyadāyakaḥ || varṣeśe rājyasahame'rketthaśāle mahānṛpaḥ

An itthaśāla (the applying aspect) ⟨among⟩ the lord of the 10th (kha), the lord of the lagna and the lord of the year is a giver of sovereignty. When the lord of the year stands in the sahama of sovereignty (rājya-sahama) and is in an itthaśāla with the Sun (arka), ⟨the man is⟩ a great king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

खेशलग्ने शवर्षेशेत्थशालोराज्यदायकः ॥ वर्षेशेराज्यसहमेऽर्केत्थशालेमहानृपः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: खेशलग्नेशवर्षेशेत्थशालः is a compound and does not say which two of the three make the itthaśāla; it is rendered as it stands. In the second half वर्षेशे and राज्यसहमे are two locatives: the reading followed is 'the lord of the year ⟨standing⟩ in the rājya-sahama'. They can also be taken as two separate parties each in an itthaśāla with the Sun — 'when the lord of the year and the rājya-sahama are in an itthaśāla with the Sun' — which would make the yoga easier to obtain.

शनिस्थाने कुजः पश्यन् मुथहा पापकर्मतः ॥ नृपभीतिं वित्तनाशं दद्याद् दशमगो यदि

śanisthāne kujaḥ paśyan muthahā pāpakarmataḥ || nṛpabhītiṃ vittanāśaṃ dadyād daśamago yadi

If Mars, ⟨standing⟩ in Saturn's place (śani-sthāna, the rāśi Saturn holds), aspects the munthā and himself stands in the 10th (daśama), he gives fear of the king and loss of wealth through a crime (pāpa-karman).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शनिस्थानेकुजःपश्यन्मुथहापापकर्मतः ॥ नृपभीतिंवित्तनाशंदद्याद्दशमगोयदि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: पश्यन् is masculine and belongs to कुजः, so मुथहा is its object; the page prints मुथहा without the anusvāra the accusative मुथहां wants. The word is a foreign one and may simply not decline here, so the Sanskrit is left as printed. पापकर्मतः is taken as 'on account of an evil deed' — the crime for which the king punishes; it could also be read as a placement, 'from the 10th ⟨held⟩ by a malefic', but the result named (royal fear and loss of property) is the standard fruit of a punished offence.
20.7a reading here is contested

ईदृशे त्रिनवस्थेऽस्मिन् दग्धनष्टेऽघसंचयः ॥ मंदोऽब्दपोधिकारी त्रिधर्मगो धर्मवृद्धिदः

īdṛśe trinavasthe'smin dagdhanaṣṭe'ghasaṃcayaḥ || maṃdo'bdapodhikārī tridharmago dharmavṛddhidaḥ

When this one ⟨Mars⟩, placed as described, stands in the 3rd or the 9th (tri-nava) and is burnt (dagdha, combust) and ruined, ⟨there follows⟩ a heap of sin. Saturn (manda), ⟨being⟩ lord of the year and an office-holder (adhikārin), standing in the 3rd or the 9th (dharma), is a giver of increase in dharma.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ईदृशेत्रिनवस्थेऽस्मिन्दग्धनष्टेऽघसंचयः ॥ मं दोऽब्दपोधिकारीत्रिधर्मगोधर्मवृद्धिदः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽब्दपोधिकारी"; alternatives "ऽब्दपोऽधिकारी" — no avagraha printed before धिकारी (sandhi would want one); kept as printed.
  • About this edition: The page prints अब्दपोधिकारी with no avagraha where the sandhi wants अब्दपोऽधिकारी; the reader recorded it and it is kept as printed. धर्म in त्रिधर्मगः is the 9th house, and धर्मवृद्धिदः puns on the same word in its ordinary sense of religious merit.

तस्मिन् दग्धे विनष्टे च पापकृद् धर्मनिंदकः ॥ ईदृशीदृक्फलं सूर्ये गुरावित्थं नयार्थभाक्

tasmin dagdhe vinaṣṭe ca pāpakṛd dharmaniṃdakaḥ || īdṛśīdṛkphalaṃ sūrye gurāvitthaṃ nayārthabhāk

When that one ⟨Saturn⟩ is burnt (dagdha) and ruined, ⟨the man is⟩ a doer of sin and a reviler of dharma. In such ⟨a case⟩ the result is of the same kind when it is the Sun ⟨that stands so⟩; and when it is Jupiter that stands thus, ⟨the man⟩ has a share in statecraft (naya) and in wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तस्मिन्दग्धेविनष्टेचपापकृद्धर्मनिंदकः ॥ ईदृशीदृक्फलंसूर्येगुरावित्थंनयार्थभाक्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ईदृशीदृक्फलं is divided ईदृशि + ईदृक्फलं, 'in such ⟨a case⟩, such a result'. Whose combustion the second half means is not restated; the subject carries over from the first half.

तत्रस्था मुथहा पुण्यागमं पापं खलाश्रयात् ॥ सूतौ खेशे रवौ खस्थे वर्षे मुथशिलं यदि

tatrasthā muthahā puṇyāgamaṃ pāpaṃ khalāśrayāt || sūtau kheśe ravau khasthe varṣe muthaśilaṃ yadi

The munthā standing there ⟨in the 9th, dharma⟩ ⟨gives⟩ the coming of merit (puṇya); ⟨it gives⟩ sin through the company of a malefic (khala). If in the year there is a muthaśila (the applying aspect) ⟨made⟩ by the lord of the 10th (kheśa) of the birth ⟨chart⟩, or by the Sun standing in the 10th (kha) ⟨— the other party and the result are stated in the next record⟩ …

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्रस्थामुथहापुण्यागमंपापंखलाश्रयात् ॥ सूतौखेशेरवौखस्थेवर्षेमुथशिलंयदि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The record's second half is a protasis with no apodosis: the sentence runs on into verse 10, which supplies both the other party to the muthaśila (the lord of the lagna) and the result (the obtaining of sovereignty). Nothing has been pulled in from verse 10; the link is marked in ⟨ ⟩. सूतौ is 'at birth', as at 15.8.

लग्नाधिपेन राज्याप्तिरुक्ता वीर्यानुमानतः ॥ धर्मकर्माधिपौ दग्धौ धर्मराज्यक्षयावहौ

lagnādhipena rājyāptiruktā vīryānumānataḥ || dharmakarmādhipau dagdhau dharmarājyakṣayāvahau

⟨… then⟩ the obtaining of sovereignty ⟨through that muthaśila⟩ with the lord of the lagna is declared, ⟨and how much of it is to be judged⟩ from the inference of strength (vīrya). The lord of the 9th (dharma) and the lord of the 10th (karma), ⟨when⟩ burnt (dagdha, combust), bring about the destruction of dharma and of sovereignty.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपेनराज्याप्तिरुक्तावीर्यानुमानतः ॥ ध र्मकर्माधिपौदग्धौधर्मराज्यक्षयावहौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The first half completes the sentence begun in the second half of verse 9; the condition is there and not repeated here. लग्नाधिपेन is instrumental, 'with the lord of the lagna', the other party to the muthaśila.

Adhyāya 21 · इत्यायभावविचारः

21.1a reading here is contested

अथाऽऽयभावविचारः ॥

अब्दपे ज्ञेऽर्थगे लाभो वाणिज्याच्छुभदृग्युते ॥ सेंथिहेऽस्मिन् लग्नगते लाभः पठनलेखनात्

abdape jñe'rthage lābho vāṇijyācchubhadṛgyute || seṃthihe'smin lagnagate lābhaḥ paṭhanalekhanāt

When Mercury (jña) is the lord of the year, stands in the 2nd (artha) and is joined with a benefic aspect, ⟨there is⟩ gain from trade. When this one ⟨Mercury⟩, together with the munthā (inthihā, as this book calls her), has gone to the lagna, ⟨there is⟩ gain from reading and writing.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अब्दपेज्ञेऽर्थगेलाभोवाणिज्याच्छुभदृग्युते ॥ सेंथिहेऽस्मिन्लग्नगतेलाभःपठनलेखनात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽस्मिन्लग्नगते"; alternatives "ऽस्मिँल्लग्नगते" — न् with virāma before ल, as printed.
  • About this edition: इंथिहा is this book's second name for the munthā, the year's progressed ascendant; 7.1 sets मुथहा and इंथिहा side by side, and सेंथिहे here is स + इंथिहे, 'having the inthihā ⟨with him⟩'. The reader's doubt is over how the न् before ल is set — ऽस्मिन्लग्नगते as printed, against ऽस्मिँल्लग्नगते — which changes nothing in the sense: either way the word is अस्मिन् followed by लग्नगते. वाणिज्यात् and शुभदृग्युते are left joined in the divided text because the sandhi त् + श → च्छ fuses them into one letter.

अस्मिन् षष्ठाष्टांत्यगते सक्रूरे नीचकर्मकृत् ॥ क्रूरेक्षणेन वा लाभोऽस्तंगते लिखनादितः

asmin ṣaṣṭhāṣṭāṃtyagate sakrūre nīcakarmakṛt || krūrekṣaṇena vā lābho'staṃgate likhanāditaḥ

When this one ⟨Mercury⟩ goes to the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (antya) in the company of a malefic, ⟨the man⟩ does base work — or ⟨he does it equally⟩ from a malefic's aspect ⟨alone⟩. When ⟨Mercury⟩ is combust (astaṃgata), gain ⟨comes⟩ from writing and the like.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्मिन्षष्ठाष्टां त्यगतेसक्रूरेनीचकर्मकृत् ॥ क्रूरेक्षणेनवालाभोऽस्तंगतेलिखनादितः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: अस्तंगते is rendered in its usual sense, 'combust, set in the Sun's beams'. It can also be read as a placement — अस्तं गते, 'gone to the 7th', अस्त being a name of that house — which would put the line in the same series of placements as the first half; the book, however, calls the 7th द्यून in the very next verse. Read either way the line promises gain from a weakened Mercury, and no negative word stands in the record.
21.3a reading here is contested

जीवेऽब्दपे क्रूरहते लग्ने हानिर्भयं नृपात् ॥ अस्मिन्नधिकृते द्यूनेऽव्यवहाराद् धनाप्तयः

jīve'bdape krūrahate lagne hānirbhayaṃ nṛpāt || asminnadhikṛte dyūne'vyavahārād dhanāptayaḥ

When Jupiter (jīva) is the lord of the year, is struck by a malefic and stands in the lagna, ⟨there is⟩ loss, and fear from the king. When this one ⟨Jupiter⟩ holds office (adhikṛta) and stands in the 7th (dyūna), ⟨there are⟩ gains of wealth from dealings (vyavahāra). [The page prints an avagraha — द्यूनेऽव्यवहारात् — which makes the word अव्यवहारात्, 'from improper dealings'. The rendering follows व्यवहारात्, which is what the 7th house and the sense require; the avagraha looks like a misprint, and the printed characters are kept unchanged in the Sanskrit.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवेऽब्दपेक्रूरहतेलग्नेहानिर्भयंनृपात् ॥ अस्मिन्नधिकृते द्यूनेऽव्यवहाराद्धनाप्तयः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूनेऽव्यवहारा"; alternatives "द्यूनेव्यवहारा" — zoomed: a ऽ glyph is printed after ने although the sense (द्यूने व्यवहारात्) needs none; kept as printed.
  • About this edition: The reader recorded the avagraha as printed and noted that the sense needs none. The English says which reading it follows. व्यवहार in the 7th (dyūna) covers trade, contracts and litigation alike.
21.4a reading here is contested

लग्नायेशेत्थशाले स्याल् लाभः स्वजनगौरवं ॥ सर्वेपि लाभे वित्ताप्त्यै सबला निर्बला न तु

lagnāyeśetthaśāle syāl lābhaḥ svajanagauravaṃ || sarvepi lābhe vittāptyai sabalā nirbalā na tu

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 11th (āya) are in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect), there is gain and honour among one's own people. All ⟨the grahas⟩ too, ⟨standing⟩ in the 11th (lābha), serve for the obtaining of wealth ⟨when they are⟩ strong — but not ⟨when they are⟩ weak.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नायेशेत्थशालेस्याल्लाभःस्वजनगौरवं ॥ सर्वेपिलाभेवित्ताप्त्यैसबलानिर्बलानतु

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वेपि"; alternatives "सर्वेऽपि" — no avagraha printed.
  • About this edition: The page prints सर्वेपि with no avagraha where सर्वेऽपि (सर्वे + अपि) is wanted; the reader recorded it and it is kept as printed. सबला निर्बला न तु is सबलाः … निर्बलाः न तु, the visargas lost before the following voiced sounds.

सवीर्यो ज्ञः समुथहो लग्नेऽर्थसहमे शुभाः ॥ तदा निखातद्रव्यस्य लाभः पापदृशा न तु

savīryo jñaḥ samuthaho lagne'rthasahame śubhāḥ || tadā nikhātadravyasya lābhaḥ pāpadṛśā na tu

⟨When⟩ Mercury (jña), strong and with the munthā, ⟨stands⟩ in the lagna, and benefics ⟨stand⟩ in the sahama of wealth (artha-sahama), then ⟨there is⟩ the gaining of buried treasure (nikhāta-dravya) — but not under a malefic's aspect.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सवीर्योज्ञःसमुथहोलग्नेऽर्थसहमेशुभाः ॥ तदानिखातद्रव्यस्यलाभःपापदृशानतु

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्नेऽर्थसहमे is taken as two separate places — Mercury in the lagna, the benefics in the artha-sahama — since शुभाः is plural and cannot be governed by the same single position as ज्ञः. पापदृशा is one instrumental, 'by a malefic's aspect'.

Adhyāya 22 · इतिव्ययभावविचारः

22.1a reading here is contested

अथव्ययभावविचारः ॥

लग्नाब्दपौ हतबलौ व्ययषण्मृतिस्थौ यद्राशिगौ तदनुसारि फलं विचिंत्यम् ॥ षष्ठेऽब्दपे भृगुसुतेऽथ विनष्टवीर्ये दृष्टे खलैः क्षुतदृशा द्विपदर्क्षसंस्थे

lagnābdapau hatabalau vyayaṣaṇmṛtisthau yadrāśigau tadanusāri phalaṃ viciṃtyam || ṣaṣṭhe'bdape bhṛgusute'tha vinaṣṭavīrye dṛṣṭe khalaiḥ kṣutadṛśā dvipadarkṣasaṃsthe

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the year (abdapa) have had their strength struck down and stand in the 12th (vyaya), the 6th or the 8th (mṛti), the result is to be worked out according to whichever rāśi the two of them occupy. ⟨Further:⟩ when the lord of the year is Venus (bhṛgusuta) and he is in the 6th, or his strength is destroyed, and he is aspected by malefics with a wounding glance (kṣuta-dṛś) while standing in a biped sign (dvipada-ṛkṣa) — ⟨then the result stated in the next record follows⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाब्दपौहतबलौव्ययषण्मृतिस्थौयद्राशिगौतदनुसारिफलंविचिंत्यम् ॥ षष्ठेऽब्दपेभृगुसुतेऽथविनष्टवीर्येदृष्टेखलैःक्षुतदृशाद्विपदर्क्षसंस्थे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "१" — a lone numeral-like mark ends the line after संस्थे with no daṇḍas (zoomed); it may be a half-verse or continuation mark rather than a verse number
  • About this edition: The page sets this verse's number १ bare, with no daṇḍas, at the end of a printed line; the verse is divided there.
  • About this edition: The record's second half is all condition and carries no result; the result — loss of servants, and a quadruped sign giving loss of horses — stands in the next record, and is not pulled in here. क्षुतदृशा as printed is not a word; the sense wants क्षतदृशा, 'with a wounding aspect', and the rendering follows that with the printed characters kept in the Sanskrit. The reader's doubt on this verse concerns only the printed number १, which the page sets bare at the end of a line, not the text.
22.2a reading here is contested

भृत्यक्षतिस्तुरगहा चतुरंघ्रिभस्थेऽन्यस्मिन्नपीदमुदितं फलमब्दनाथे ॥ खस्थे कुजे शशियुते तुरगादिनाशः स्याद्व्याकुलत्वमशुभोपहते व्यये वा

bhṛtyakṣatisturagahā caturaṃghribhasthe'nyasminnapīdamuditaṃ phalamabdanāthe || khasthe kuje śaśiyute turagādināśaḥ syādvyākulatvamaśubhopahate vyaye vā

⟨There is⟩ loss of servants; and ⟨the lord of the year⟩ is a destroyer of horses when he stands in a quadruped sign (catur-aṅghri-bha). This same result is declared for another ⟨graha⟩ too when it is the lord of the year. When Mars (kuja) stands in the 10th (kha) joined with the Moon (śaśi), there is destruction of horses and the like; or ⟨there is⟩ agitation of mind when the 12th (vyaya) is struck by a malefic.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भृत्यक्षतिस्तुरगहाचतुरंघ्रिभस्थेऽन्यस्मिन्नपीदमुदितंफलपब्दनाथे ॥ खस्थेकुजेशशियुतेतुरगादिनाशःस्याद्व्याकुलत्वमशुभोपहतेव्यये वा

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलपब्दनाथे"; alternatives "फलमब्दनाथे" — zoomed 4x: the letter before ब्द has the open hooked form of प, not the closed loop of म; the sense wants फलम् + अब्दनाथे. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads फलमब्दनाथे; this sentence names फलपब्दनाथे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्व्याकुलत्व"; alternatives "स्याद्ध्याकुलत्व" — zoomed: द carries a loop below, read as half-व (the press's व् loop glyph); could be ध
  • About this edition: The page prints फलपब्दनाथे. The reader zoomed to 4× and found प, not म, but the sense needs फलम् + अब्दनाथे (फलमब्दनाथे); the rendering follows that and the printed characters are kept unchanged. The reader's second doubt, स्याद्व्याकुलत्व against स्याद्ध्याकुलत्व, does not change the sense: either way the words are स्यात् and व्याकुलत्वम्. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads फलमब्दनाथे; this sentence names फलपब्दनाथे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
22.3a reading here is contested

षष्ठे रवौ खलहते चतुरंघ्रिभस्थे भृत्यैः समं कलिरथाष्टमरिःफगेऽपि ॥ मंदेऽब्दपे बलयुते रिपुरिःफसंस्थे भूवासनद्रुमजलाशयनिर्मितिश्च

ṣaṣṭhe ravau khalahate caturaṃghribhasthe bhṛtyaiḥ samaṃ kalirathāṣṭamariḥphage'pi || maṃde'bdape balayute ripuriḥphasaṃsthe bhūvāsanadrumajalāśayanirmitiśca

When the Sun (ravi) is in the 6th, struck by malefics, and standing in a quadruped sign, ⟨there is⟩ strife with servants — and so too when he has gone to the 8th or the 12th (riḥpha). When Saturn (manda) is the lord of the year, possessed of strength, and stands in the 6th (ripu) or the 12th (riḥpha), ⟨there is besides⟩ the making of land, dwellings, groves and water-tanks.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठेरवौखलहतेचतुरंघ्रिभस्थेभृत्यैःसमंकलिरथाष्टमरिःफगेऽपि ॥ मंदेऽब्दपेबलयुतेरिपुरिःफसंस्थेभूवासनद्रुमजलाशयनिर्मि तिश्च

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलयुते"; alternatives "वलयुते" — व/ब not separable at this size; the press often sets व for ब
  • About this edition: The reader could not separate ब from व in बलयुते at this size and recorded वलयुते as an alternative; बलयुते, 'endowed with strength', is the only reading that gives sense, and it is the condition the chapter states elsewhere for a good Saturn result. भूवासनद्रुमजलाशयनिर्मिति is taken as भू (land), वासन (dwelling), द्रुम (trees) and जलाशय (tank), all governed by निर्मिति, 'construction'.
22.4a reading here is contested

स्वर्क्षोच्चगे कर्मणि सूर्यपुत्रे नैरुज्यमर्थाधिगमश्च जीवे ॥ सूर्ये नृपाद्बाहुबलात्कुजेऽर्थो बुधे भिषग्ज्योतिषकाव्यशिल्पैः

svarkṣoccage karmaṇi sūryaputre nairujyamarthādhigamaśca jīve || sūrye nṛpādbāhubalātkuje'rtho budhe bhiṣagjyotiṣakāvyaśilpaiḥ

When Saturn (sūryaputra, the Sun's son) stands in the 10th (karman) in his own rāśi or in exaltation, ⟨there is⟩ freedom from illness; and gain of wealth when Jupiter (jīva) ⟨stands there⟩. With the Sun ⟨there⟩, wealth ⟨comes⟩ from the king; with Mars (kuja), by strength of arm; with Mercury (budha), through medicine, jyotiṣa, poetry and craft.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वर्क्षोच्चगेकर्मणिसूर्यपुत्रेनैरुज्यमर्थाधिगमश्चजीवे ॥ सूर्येनृपाद्बाहुबलात्कुजेऽर्थोबुधेभिषग्ज्योतिषकाव्यशिल्पैः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नृपाद्बाहुबलात्"; alternatives "नृपाद्वाहुबलात्", "नृपाद्बाहुवलात्" — zoomed 3x: द with a loop below then ा; the loop is the half-ब/व glyph; बलात् reads ब but thin
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधे"; alternatives "वुधे" — व/ब not separable at this size; the press often sets व for ब
  • About this edition: Both of the reader's doubts here are the press's ब/व, which it sets almost alike: नृपाद्बाहुबलात् against नृपाद्वाहुवलात्, and बुधे against वुधे. Neither alternative is a word, and the reading followed is the one the sense fixes — नृपात् बाहुबलात्, 'from the king, by strength of arm', and बुधे, 'when Mercury ⟨is there⟩'.
22.5a reading here is contested

मंदेऽब्दपे गतबले नैराश्यं दौःस्थ्यमादिशेत् ॥ सूर्येऽब्देशे शशिस्थाने मंदेऽब्दजनुषोर्हते

maṃde'bdape gatabale nairāśyaṃ dauḥsthyamādiśet || sūrye'bdeśe śaśisthāne maṃde'bdajanuṣorhate

When Saturn (manda) is the lord of the year and has lost his strength, one should declare hopelessness and a wretched condition. ⟨Further:⟩ when the Sun is the lord of the year, Saturn stands in the Moon's place (śaśi-sthāna), and ⟨the Moon⟩ is struck in the year-chart and the birth-chart alike — ⟨then the result stated in the next record follows⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेऽब्दपेगतबलेनैराश्यंदौःस्थ्यमादिशेत् ॥ सूर्येऽब्देशेशशिस्थानेमंदेऽब्दजनुषोर्हते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नैराश्यं"; alternatives "नैराश्यम्" — anusvāra dot is small but present
  • About this edition: The second half is condition only; its result, 'failure in all undertakings', opens the next record and is not pulled in here. अब्दजनुषोः is the dual 'of the year ⟨chart⟩ and of the birth ⟨chart⟩', and हते is taken of the Moon, whose place Saturn occupies. The reader's doubt, नैराश्यं against नैराश्यम्, is only how the nasal is written and changes nothing.

सर्वकर्मसु वैकल्यं वक्रेऽस्ते च तथा पुनः ॥ कर्मकर्मेशसहमनाथाः शनियुतेक्षिताः

sarvakarmasu vaikalyaṃ vakre'ste ca tathā punaḥ || karmakarmeśasahamanāthāḥ śaniyutekṣitāḥ

⟨There is⟩ failure in every undertaking; and the same again when ⟨the lord of the year is⟩ retrograde or combust. ⟨Further:⟩ when the 10th (karman), the lord of the 10th and the lord of the karman-sahama are joined with Saturn or aspected ⟨by him⟩ — ⟨the condition continues into the next record, which carries the result⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सर्वकर्मसुवैकल्यंवक्रेऽस्तेचतथापुनः ॥ कर्मकर्मेशसहमनाथाःशनियुतेक्षिताः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The record opens on the result of the condition set in the previous one and closes on a fresh condition whose result stands in the next; neither neighbour's words are brought in. सहम is the Tājika sahama, a computed sensitive point; कर्मसहम is the sahama of action, belonging to the 10th.

षडष्टव्ययगेऽब्देशे कर्मेशे च बलोज्झिते ॥ सूतावब्दे च न शुभं तत्राऽब्दे मृतिपे तथा

ṣaḍaṣṭavyayage'bdeśe karmeśe ca balojjhite || sūtāvabde ca na śubhaṃ tatrā'bde mṛtipe tathā

⟨And when⟩ the lord of the year and the lord of the 10th go to the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (vyaya) and are stripped of strength — then in the birth-chart (sūti) and in the year-chart there is nothing good; and it is the same there, in the year-chart, when the lord of the 8th (mṛtipa) ⟨is so placed⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षडष्टव्ययगेऽब्देशेकर्मेशेचबलोज्झिते ॥ सूताव ब्देचनशुभंतत्राऽब्देमृतिपेतथा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सूताव ब्दे is printed with a space inside the word; read without it, सूतावब्दे is सूतौ + अब्दे, 'in the natal ⟨chart⟩ and in the year ⟨chart⟩'. The page sets तत्राऽब्दे with an avagraha where तत्राब्दे (तत्र + अब्दे) is wanted; the printed characters are kept.
22.8a reading here is contested

यत्र भावे शुभफलो दुष्टो वा जन्मनि ग्रहः ॥ वर्षे तद्भावगस्तादृक्तत्फलं यच्छति ध्रुवं

yatra bhāve śubhaphalo duṣṭo vā janmani grahaḥ || varṣe tadbhāvagastādṛktatphalaṃ yacchati dhruvaṃ

In whatever bhāva a graha gives good fruit in the birth chart, or is evil there, that same graha standing in that bhāva in the year chart assuredly yields a result of that same kind.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यत्रभावेशुभफलोदुष्टोवाजन्मनिग्रहः ॥ वर्षेतद्भावगस्तादृक्तत्फलंयच्छतिध्रुवं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तादृक्"; alternatives "ताद्दक्" — same NSP दृ ligature as in the ṭīkā
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt is over the shape of the दृ ligature in तादृक् — the alternative read, ताद्दक्, is not a word, and तादृक्, 'of that kind', is what the line requires.

ये जन्मनि स्युः सबला विवीर्या वर्षे शुभं प्राक् चरमे त्वनिष्टम् ॥ दद्युर्विलोमं विपरीततायां तुल्यं फलं स्यादुभयत्र साम्ये

ye janmani syuḥ sabalā vivīryā varṣe śubhaṃ prāk carame tvaniṣṭam || dadyurvilomaṃ viparītatāyāṃ tulyaṃ phalaṃ syādubhayatra sāmye

Those ⟨grahas⟩ that are strong in the birth chart but without strength in the year chart give good in the earlier ⟨part of the year⟩ but the unwanted in the later part. In the reverse case they give it the other way round. Where strength is equal in both ⟨charts⟩, the result is uniform.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

येज न्मनिस्युःसबलाविवीर्यावर्षेशुभंप्राक्चरमेत्वनिष्टम् ॥ दद्युर्विलोमंविपरीततायांतुल्यंफलंस्यादुभयत्रसाम्ये

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints ये ज न्मनि with a space inside the word; read without it, येजन्मनि is ये + जन्मनि. विपरीततायां, 'in the reverse case', covers the graha weak at birth and strong in the year: the order of the two halves of the year is then exchanged.
22.10a reading here is contested

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणो गणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतोऽनंतोऽनंतमतिर्व्यधात् खलमतिध्वस्त्यै जनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुः खलु नीलकंठविबुधो विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया सत्तुष्ट्यै व्यदधाद्विवेचनमिदं भावेषु सत्ताजिकात्

śrīgargānvayabhūṣaṇo gaṇitavicciṃtāmaṇistatsuto'naṃto'naṃtamatirvyadhāt khalamatidhvastyai januḥpaddhatim || tatsūnuḥ khalu nīlakaṃṭhavibudho vidvacchivānujñayā sattuṣṭyai vyadadhādvivecanamidaṃ bhāveṣu sattājikāt

Cintāmaṇi, ornament of the illustrious Garga line and a knower of computation ⟨had a son⟩; his son Ananta, of unending understanding, made the Januḥpaddhati — the manual of nativities — for the undoing of wrong-headed opinion. His son indeed, the learned Nīlakaṇṭha, by the leave of the learned Śiva, composed this examination of the bhāvas out of the good Tājika ⟨books⟩, for the satisfaction of good men.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणोगणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतोऽनंतोऽनंतमतिर्व्यधात्खलमतिध्वस्त्यैजनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुःखलुनीलकंठविबुधोविद्व च्छिवानुज्ञयासत्तुष्ट्यैव्यदधाद्विवेचनमिदंभावेषुसत्ताजिकात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सत्तुष्ट्यै"; alternatives "सत्तुष्टयै" — conjunct ष्ट्य small in large type; reading as seen
  • About this edition: The page sets a second number, २, straight after this verse's own number १०.
  • About this edition: The page sets this verse AFTER its section's colophon. It continues this section's numbering, so it is published here, at the section's end.
  • About this edition: This is the author's own closing verse (praśasti) for the section on the bhāvas: his grandfather Cintāmaṇi, his father Ananta, and himself. विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया is विद्वत् + शिव + अनुज्ञया and is rendered 'by the leave of the learned Śiva'; it can also be read as two parties, 'by the leave of the learned and of Śiva', and Śiva may be a man or the god. The reader's doubt on सत्तुष्ट्यै against सत्तुष्टयै is how the ष्ट्य conjunct is set; both spell the dative सत्तुष्ट्यै, 'for the satisfaction of the good'. The page sets a second number, २, straight after this verse's own १०, and sets the verse after the section's colophon; that concerns the numbering only.

Adhyāya 23 · अथदशाक्रमविचारः॥

अथदशाक्रमविचारः॥

स्पष्टान् सलग्नान् खचरान् विधाय राशीन् विनात्यल्पलवं तु पूर्वम् ॥ निवेश्य तस्मादधिकाधिकांश्च क्रमादयं स्यात् तु दशाक्रमोऽब्दे

spaṣṭān salagnān khacarān vidhāya rāśīn vinātyalpalavaṃ tu pūrvam || niveśya tasmādadhikādhikāṃśca kramādayaṃ syāt tu daśākramo'bde

Having computed the grahas (khacara) exactly, together with the lagna, and ⟨setting⟩ the rāśis aside, place first the one whose degrees (lava) are smallest, and after it, in order, those with more and more ⟨degrees⟩. This is the order of the daśās in the year.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्पष्टान्सलग्नान्खचरान्विधायराशी न्विनात्यल्पलवंतुपूर्वम् ॥ निवेश्यतस्मादधिकाधिकांश्चक्रमादयंस्यात्तुदशाक्रमोऽब्दे

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the setting-up of the daśā order the chapter goes on to time: the eight significators are the seven grahas and the lagna, and the quantity compared is the degrees WITHIN the sign, the sign itself being discarded (राशीन् विना). लव is used here for अंश, 'degree'.
23.2a reading here is contested

न्यूनं विशोध्याधिकतः क्रमेणांशाद्यं विशुद्धांशकशेषकैक्यम् ॥ सर्वाधिकांशोन्मितमेव तत् स्यादनेन वर्षस्य मितिस्तु भाज्या

nyūnaṃ viśodhyādhikataḥ krameṇāṃśādyaṃ viśuddhāṃśakaśeṣakaikyam || sarvādhikāṃśonmitameva tat syādanena varṣasya mitistu bhājyā

Subtracting in order the smaller from the greater — the degrees and the rest ⟨of the parts⟩ — the sum of the purified remainders of degrees will be exactly the measure of the greatest degrees. By this ⟨sum⟩ the measure of the year is to be divided.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

न्यूनंविशोध्याधिकतःक्रमेणांशाद्यंविशुद्धां शकशेषकैक्यम् ॥ सर्वाधिकांशोन्मितमेवतत्स्यादनेनवर्षस्यमितिस्तुभाज्या

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्स्यादनेन"; alternatives "तत्स्याद्नेन" — the द before नेन looks joined, possibly with a virāma stroke; not resolved
  • About this edition: The check built into the rule: because each remainder is one step of the ascending series, the remainders must add up to the largest degree value itself, so an arithmetical slip shows at once. वर्षस्य मिति is the length of the solar year in days and parts, which is divided by that sum to give the constant used in the next verse. The reader's doubt, तत्स्यादनेन against तत्स्याद्नेन, is only how the द is set; both read तत् स्यात् अनेन.
23.3a reading here is contested

शुद्धांशकास्तान् गुणयेदनेन लब्धध्रुवांकेन भवेद् दशायाः ॥ मानं दिनाद्यं खलु तद्ग्रहस्य फलान्यथासां निगदेत् तु शास्त्रात्

śuddhāṃśakāstān guṇayedanena labdhadhruvāṃkena bhaved daśāyāḥ || mānaṃ dinādyaṃ khalu tadgrahasya phalānyathāsāṃ nigadet tu śāstrāt

Multiply those purified degrees by this obtained constant (dhruvāṅka); ⟨what results⟩ will be the measure of that graha's daśā, in days and the rest. Then one should declare the results of these ⟨daśās⟩ from the śāstra.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुद्धांशकास्तान्गुणयेदनेनलब्धध्रुवांकेनभवेद्दशा याः॥ मानंदिनाद्यंखलुसद्ग्रहस्यफलान्यथासांनिगदेत्तुशास्त्रात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुणयेदनेन"; alternatives "गुणयेद्नेन" — same shape as तत्स्यादनेन; a zoom crop missed the spot
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यथासांनिगदेत्तु"; alternatives "यथासांनिगदेतु" — त्त conjunct read from the tile
  • About this edition: The page prints शुद्धांशकास्तान्, where the object of गुणयेत् needs the accusative plural शुद्धांशकान्, whose sandhi before त is शुद्धांशकांस्तान्; the anusvāra is missing in the print and the printed characters are kept. The second reader's doubt, यथासांनिगदेत्तु against यथासांनिगदेतु, does not change the sense: the word is निगदेत्, 'one should declare'. [2026-10-01: the leaf was read by eye at PDF p.158 at about 3.2x native. The press sets शुद्धांशकास्तान् with one anusvāra, over द्धां, and none over का, while its first setting of the same verse (p.93, our 5.3) sets शुद्धांशकांस्तान्. The plate ruling keeps our form: शुद्धांशकाः + तान् is regular sandhi, and तान् takes the purified degrees up again as the object of गुणयेत्. The accusative stands on the ledger as the rival.]

शुद्धांशसाम्ये बलिनो दशाद्या बलस्य साम्येऽल्पगतेस्तु पूर्वा ॥ साम्ये विलग्नस्य खगेन चिंत्या बलाधिका लग्नपतेर्विचिंत्या

śuddhāṃśasāmye balino daśādyā balasya sāmye'lpagatestu pūrvā || sāmye vilagnasya khagena ciṃtyā balādhikā lagnapaterviciṃtyā

Where the purified degrees are equal, the daśā of the stronger ⟨graha⟩ comes first. Where strength too is equal, that of the one with the slower motion (alpa-gati) comes first. Where the tie is between the lagna and a graha, ⟨the order⟩ is to be settled by strength — the one greater in strength ⟨goes first⟩ — and for the lagna it is the lord of the lagna's ⟨strength⟩ that is to be reckoned.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुद्धांशसाम्येबलिनोदशाद्याबलस्यसाम्येऽल्पगतेस्तुपूर्वा ॥ साम्ये विलग्नस्यखगेनचिंत्याबलाधिकालग्नपतेर्विचिंत्या

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्नपतेर्विचिंत्या is taken as the rule for weighing the lagna itself: the lagna has no strength of its own, so its lord's strength stands for it. This is the tie-break of the daśā order set up in verse 1.

हेममुक्ताफलद्रव्यलाभमारोग्यमुत्तमम् ॥ कुरुते स्वामिसन्मानं दशा लग्नस्य शोभना

hemamuktāphaladravyalābhamārogyamuttamam || kurute svāmisanmānaṃ daśā lagnasya śobhanā

A fine (śobhanā) daśā of the lagna brings gain of gold, pearls and goods, excellent health, and honour from one's master.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

हेममुक्ताफलद्रव्यलाभमारोग्यमुत्तमम् ॥ कुरुतेस्वामिसन्मानंदशालग्नस्यशोभना

23.6a reading here is contested

लाभं दृष्टेन वित्तस्य मानहीनस्य सेवनं ॥ मनसो विकृतिं कुर्याद् दशा लग्नस्य मध्यमा

lābhaṃ dṛṣṭena vittasya mānahīnasya sevanaṃ || manaso vikṛtiṃ kuryād daśā lagnasya madhyamā

A middling daśā of the lagna gives gain of wealth through one who is known (dṛṣṭa), service of a man without honour, and a disturbance of mind.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लाभंदृष्टेनवित्तस्यमानहीनस्यसेवनं ॥ मनसोविकृतिंकुर्याद्दशालग्नस्यमध्यमा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टेन"; alternatives "दुष्टेन" — printed with the NSP दृ ligature; the sense may want दुष्टेन, print kept
  • About this edition: The page prints दृष्टेन with the NSP दृ ligature and the reader recorded दुष्टेन as the alternative. दुष्टेन, 'through a wicked man', matches the line beside it — service of a man without honour — better than 'through one who is known'; the rendering follows the print, and the alternative would change who the wealth comes from, not what it costs.
23.7a reading here is contested

विदेशगमनं क्लेशबुद्धिनाशं कदव्ययम् ॥ मानहानिं करोत्येव कष्टा लग्नदशाफलं

videśagamanaṃ kleśabuddhināśaṃ kadavyayam || mānahāniṃ karotyeva kaṣṭā lagnadaśāphalaṃ

A hard (kaṣṭā) lagna-daśā's result: it certainly brings travel abroad, distress, ruin of judgement, bad expenditure (kad-vyaya), and loss of honour.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विदेशगमनंक्लेशबुद्धिनाशंकदव्ययम् ॥ मानहानिंकरोत्येवकष्टालग्नदशाफलं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कदव्ययम्"; alternatives "कद्व्ययम्" — zoomed: द stands full, followed by the NSP half-व + य (व्य) glyph; no virāma visible
  • About this edition: कदव्ययम् is कद् + व्यय, 'ill-spent expenditure'; the reader looked for a virāma to make कद्व्ययम् and found none, and the word reads the same either way.

क्रूरलग्नदशा मध्या सौख्यं स्वल्पं धनव्ययं ॥ अंगपीडां त्वपुष्टिं च कुरुते मृत्युविग्रहम्

krūralagnadaśā madhyā saukhyaṃ svalpaṃ dhanavyayaṃ || aṃgapīḍāṃ tvapuṣṭiṃ ca kurute mṛtyuvigraham

A middling daśā of a cruel (krūra) lagna gives very little comfort, waste of wealth, pain in the limbs, want of nourishment, and a quarrel that threatens life (mṛtyu-vigraha).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरलग्नदशामध्यासौख्यंस्वल्पंधनव्ययं ॥ अंगपीडांत्वपुष्टिंचकुरुतेमृत्युविग्रहम्

दशा रवेः पूर्णबलस्य लाभं गजाश्वहेमांबररत्नपूर्णम् ॥ मानोदयं भूमिपतेर्ददाति यशश्च देवद्विजपूजनादेः

daśā raveḥ pūrṇabalasya lābhaṃ gajāśvahemāṃbararatnapūrṇam || mānodayaṃ bhūmipaterdadāti yaśaśca devadvijapūjanādeḥ

The daśā of a Sun of full strength gives gain filled with elephants, horses, gold, garments and jewels, a rise in honour from the king (bhūmipati), and fame from the worship of gods and brāhmaṇas and the like.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशारवेःपूर्णबलस्यलाभंगजाश्वहेमांबररत्नपूर्णम् ॥ मानोदयंभूमिपतेर्ददातियशश्चदेवद्विजपूजनादेः

23.10a reading here is contested

दशा रवेर्मध्यबलस्य पूर्वमिदं फलं मध्यममेव दत्ते ॥ ग्रासाधिकारव्यवसायधैर्यैः कुलानुमानाच्च सुखादिलाभः

daśā ravermadhyabalasya pūrvamidaṃ phalaṃ madhyamameva datte || grāsādhikāravyavasāyadhairyaiḥ kulānumānācca sukhādilābhaḥ

The daśā of a Sun of middling strength gives this same result stated before, but only in middling measure: gain of comfort and the rest through charge of provisions (grāsa-adhikāra), enterprise and steadiness, and in proportion to one's family ⟨standing⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशारवेर्मध्यबलस्यपूर्व मिदंफलंमध्यममेवदत्ते ॥ ग्रासाधिकारव्यवसायधैर्यैःकुलानुमानाच्चसुखादिलाभः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रासाधिकार"; alternatives "ग्रामाधिकार" — zoomed: second akṣara has the left loop of स rather than म; sense may want ग्राम; print kept [2026-10-01: the exemplar was read by eye at PDF p.158 at about 3.4x native: the press sets ग्रास, with the open hook-and-bowl of the स of व्यवसाय on the same line and none of the closed loop of its म. The Kalpataru 1889 setting (p.183 line 5, read by eye at about 3.4x native) sets ग्राम. The two exemplars split, so our text keeps ग्रास, ग्राम stands on the ledger, and the question is an open doubt.]
  • About this edition: The reader zoomed and read ग्रासाधिकार, noting ग्रामाधिकार — 'authority over a village' — as the alternative, which is the commoner phrase for an office and fits धैर्य and व्यवसाय beside it. The rendering follows the print, ग्रास being a mouthful of food, hence charge of provisions.

दशा रवेरल्पबलस्य पुंसां ददाति दुःखं स्वजनैर्विवादात् ॥ मतिभ्रमं पित्तरुजं स्वतेजोविनाशनं धर्षणमप्यरिभ्यः

daśā raveralpabalasya puṃsāṃ dadāti duḥkhaṃ svajanairvivādāt || matibhramaṃ pittarujaṃ svatejovināśanaṃ dharṣaṇamapyaribhyaḥ

The daśā of a Sun of little strength gives men sorrow from quarrelling with their own people, confusion of mind, bilious illness, destruction of their own lustre, and violence from enemies as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशारवेरल्पबलस्यपुंसांददातिदुःखंस्वजनैर्विवादात् ॥ मतिभ्रमंपित्तरुजंस्वतेजोविनाशनंधर्षणमप्यरिभ्यः

दशा रवेर्नष्टबलस्य पुंसां नृपाद्रिपोर्वा भयमर्थनाशम् ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रमित्रादिजनैर्विवादं करोति बुद्धिभ्रममामयं च

daśā ravernaṣṭabalasya puṃsāṃ nṛpādriporvā bhayamarthanāśam || strīputramitrādijanairvivādaṃ karoti buddhibhramamāmayaṃ ca

The daśā of a Sun whose strength is destroyed brings men fear from the king or from an enemy, loss of wealth, quarrel with wife, sons, friends and the rest, confusion of intellect, and illness.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशारवेर्नष्टबलस्यपुं सांनृपाद्रिपोर्वाभयमर्थनाशम् ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रमित्रादिजनैर्विवादंकरोतिबुद्धिभ्रममामयंच

23.13a reading here is contested

लग्नाद्रविः षट्त्रिदशायसंस्थो निंद्योपि दत्ते शुभमर्धमेव ॥ मध्यत्वमूनः शुभतां च मध्यो यातीत्थमत्यंतशुभः शुभः स्यात्

lagnādraviḥ ṣaṭtridaśāyasaṃstho niṃdyopi datte śubhamardhameva || madhyatvamūnaḥ śubhatāṃ ca madhyo yātītthamatyaṃtaśubhaḥ śubhaḥ syāt

The Sun standing from the lagna in the 6th, the 3rd, the 10th or the 11th (āya), even when he is blameworthy ⟨in strength⟩, still gives only half the good: the deficient one attains middling rank, the middling one goodness, and so the good one becomes exceedingly good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाद्रविःषट्त्रिदशायसंस्थोनिंद्योपिदत्तेशुभ मर्थमेव ॥ मध्यत्वमूनःशुभताचमध्योयातीत्थमत्यंतशुभःशुभःस्यात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षट्त्रि"; alternatives "षद्त्रि", "षड्त्रि" — the half-letter before त्रि is small; ट् vs द् not certain
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभताच"; alternatives "शुभतांच" — no anusvāra seen over ता here; the parallel line for verse 18 prints शुभतांच
  • About this edition: The rule raises the Sun's daśā by one grade for these four houses; verse 18 states the same ladder for the Moon and verse 23 for Mars. The reader's first doubt is the half-letter in षट्त्रि, where षड् or षद् would be the alternative shapes — the number six is meant either way. The second, शुभता against शुभतां, is the anusvāra: verse 18's parallel line prints शुभतां, and the accusative is what यातीत्थम् governs, so the sense is unchanged. The page prints निंद्योपि without the avagraha of निंद्योऽपि, as it does again in verse 18; the printed characters are kept.
23.14a reading here is contested

अथचंद्रदशाफलम् ॥

इंदोर्दशा पूर्णबलस्य दत्ते शुक्लांबरस्रङ्मणिमौक्तिकाद्यम् ॥ स्त्रीसंगमं राज्यसुखं च भूमिलाभं यशःकांतिबलाभिवृद्धिम्

iṃdordaśā pūrṇabalasya datte śuklāṃbarasraṅmaṇimauktikādyam || strīsaṃgamaṃ rājyasukhaṃ ca bhūmilābhaṃ yaśaḥkāṃtibalābhivṛddhim

The daśā of a Moon of full strength gives white garments, garlands, gems, pearls and the like, union with women, the comfort of rule, gain of land, and increase of fame, beauty and strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदोर्दशापूर्णबलस्यदत्तेशुक्लांबरस्त्रङ्मणि मौक्तिकाद्यम्॥स्त्रीसंगमंराज्यसुखंचभूमिलाभंयशःकांतिबलाभिवृद्धिम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्लांबरस्त्रङ्मणि"; alternatives "शुक्लांबरस्रङ्मणि" — zoomed: the print shows स्त्र followed by a ङ्म ligature; स्रङ् is what the sense (garland) suggests [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शुक्लांबरस्रङ्मणिमौक्तिकाद्यम्; this sentence names शुक्लांबरस्त्रङ्मणि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page sets शुक्लांबरस्त्रङ्मणि. The reader noted that the sense needs स्रङ् (स्रज्, a garland) and not स्त्रङ्, and the rendering follows that; the printed characters are kept unchanged. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शुक्लांबरस्रङ्मणिमौक्तिकाद्यम्; this sentence names शुक्लांबरस्त्रङ्मणि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

इंदोर्दशा मध्यबलस्य सर्वमिदं फलं मध्यममेव दत्ते ॥ वाणिज्यमित्रांबरगेहसौख्यं धर्मे मतिं कर्षणतोऽन्नलाभम्

iṃdordaśā madhyabalasya sarvamidaṃ phalaṃ madhyamameva datte || vāṇijyamitrāṃbaragehasaukhyaṃ dharme matiṃ karṣaṇato'nnalābham

The daśā of a Moon of middling strength gives all this same result, but only in middling measure: comfort in trade, friends, clothes and house; a mind turned to dharma; and gain of grain from ploughing.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदोर्दशामध्यबलस्यसर्वमिदंफलंमध्यममेवदत्ते ॥ वाणिज्य मित्रांबरगेहसौख्यंधर्मेमतिंकर्षणतोऽन्नलाभम्

इंदोर्दशा स्वल्पबलस्य दत्ते कफामयं कांतिविनाशमाहुः ॥ मित्रादिवैरं जननं कुमार्या धर्मार्थनाशं सुखमल्पमत्र

iṃdordaśā svalpabalasya datte kaphāmayaṃ kāṃtivināśamāhuḥ || mitrādivairaṃ jananaṃ kumāryā dharmārthanāśaṃ sukhamalpamatra

The daśā of a Moon of very little strength gives, they say, disease of phlegm (kapha) and loss of beauty, enmity with friends and the rest, the birth of a daughter, ruin of dharma and wealth, and little happiness here.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदोर्दशास्वल्पबलस्यदत्तेकफामयंकांतिविनाशमाहुः ॥ मित्रादिवैरंजननंकुमार्या धर्मार्थनाशंसुखमल्पमत्र

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: जननं कुमार्याः, 'the birth of a daughter', stands in the text's own list of unwanted results and is rendered flat. The page prints कुमार्या without the visarga of the genitive कुमार्याः; the printed characters are kept.

इंदोर्दशा नष्टबलस्य लोकापवादभीतिं धनधर्मनाशम् ॥ शीतामयं स्त्रीसुतमित्रवैरं दौःस्थ्यं च दत्ते विरसान्नभुक्तिम्

iṃdordaśā naṣṭabalasya lokāpavādabhītiṃ dhanadharmanāśam || śītāmayaṃ strīsutamitravairaṃ dauḥsthyaṃ ca datte virasānnabhuktim

The daśā of a Moon whose strength is destroyed gives fear of public scandal, loss of wealth and dharma, disease from cold, enmity with wife, sons and friends, wretchedness, and the eating of tasteless food.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदोर्दशानष्टबलस्यलोकापवादभीतिंधनधर्मनाशम्॥शीतामयंस्त्रीसुतमित्रवैरंदौःस्थ्यंचदत्तेविरसान्नभुक्ति म्

षष्ठाष्टमांत्येतरराशिसंस्थो निंद्योपि दत्तेऽर्धसुखं दशायाम् ॥ मध्यत्वमूनः शुभतां च मध्यो यातीत्थमिंदुः सुशुभः शुभः स्यात्

ṣaṣṭhāṣṭamāṃtyetararāśisaṃstho niṃdyopi datte'rdhasukhaṃ daśāyām || madhyatvamūnaḥ śubhatāṃ ca madhyo yātītthamiṃduḥ suśubhaḥ śubhaḥ syāt

⟨The Moon⟩ standing in a rāśi other than the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (antya), even when he is blameworthy ⟨in strength⟩, gives half of happiness in his daśā: the deficient one attains middling rank and the middling one goodness, and so the Moon, ⟨already⟩ auspicious, becomes well-auspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठाष्टमांत्येतरराशिसंस्थोनिंद्योपिदत्तेऽर्धसुखंदशायाम् ॥ मध्यत्वमूनःशुभतांचमध्योयातीत्थमिंदुःसुशुभःशुभःस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is the Moon's form of the ladder stated for the Sun in verse 13; the houses named are the ones it EXCLUDES, so every other house lifts the grade. सुशुभः is the predicate of शुभः — the good becomes better.

अथभौमदशाफलम् ॥

दशापतिः पूर्णबलो महीजः सेनापतित्वं तनुते नराणाम् ॥ जयं रणे विद्रुमहेमरत्नवस्त्रादिलाभं प्रियसाहसत्वम्

daśāpatiḥ pūrṇabalo mahījaḥ senāpatitvaṃ tanute narāṇām || jayaṃ raṇe vidrumahemaratnavastrādilābhaṃ priyasāhasatvam

When the lord of the daśā is Mars (mahīja) of full strength, he extends to men command of an army, victory in battle, gain of coral, gold, jewels, garments and the like, and a liking for bold deeds.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतिःपूर्णबलोमहीजःसेनापतित्वंतनुतेनराणाम् ॥ जयंरणेविद्रुमहेमरत्नवस्त्रादिलाभंप्रियसाहसत्वम्

दशापतिर्मध्यबलो महीजः कुलानुमानेन धनं ददाति ॥ राजाधिकारोप्यथ तत्परत्वं तेजस्विता कांतिबलाभिवृद्धिं

daśāpatirmadhyabalo mahījaḥ kulānumānena dhanaṃ dadāti || rājādhikāropyatha tatparatvaṃ tejasvitā kāṃtibalābhivṛddhiṃ

When the lord of the daśā is Mars of middling strength, he gives wealth in proportion to one's family; also royal office and devotion to it, lustre, and increase of beauty and strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतिर्मध्यबलोमहीजःकुलानुमानेनधनंददाति ॥ राजाधिकारोप्यथतत्परत्वंतेजस्विताकांतिबलाभिवृद्धिं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints राजाधिकारोप्यथ without the avagraha of राजाधिकारोऽप्यथ; the words are राजाधिकारः + अपि + अथ, and the printed characters are kept.
23.21a reading here is contested

दशापतिः स्वल्पबलो महीजो ददाति पित्तोष्णरुजं शरीरे ॥ रिपोर्भयं बंधनमास्यतोऽसृक्स्रवं च वैरं स्वजनैश्च शश्वत्

daśāpatiḥ svalpabalo mahījo dadāti pittoṣṇarujaṃ śarīre || riporbhayaṃ baṃdhanamāsyato'sṛksravaṃ ca vairaṃ svajanaiśca śaśvat

When the lord of the daśā is Mars of very little strength, he gives bilious and feverish illness in the body, fear from an enemy, imprisonment, a flow of blood from the mouth, and unceasing enmity with one's own people.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतिःस्वल्पबलो महीजोददातिपित्तोष्णरुजंशरीरे ॥ रिपोर्भयंबंधनमास्यतोऽसृक्स्रवंचवैरंस्वजनैश्चशश्वत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽसृक्स्रवं"; alternatives "ऽसृक्स्त्रवं" — the conjunct after क् is small and dense; स्र vs स्त्र not certain
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle the conjunct after क् in ऽसृक्स्रवं against ऽसृक्स्त्रवं; either way the word is असृक्-स्रव, 'a flow of blood', and the sense does not turn on it.
23.22a reading here is contested

दशापतिर्नष्टबलो महीजो विवादमुग्रं जनयेद्रणं वा ॥ चौराद्भयं रक्तरुजं ज्वरं च विपत्तिमन्यस्वहृतिं च खर्जूम्

daśāpatirnaṣṭabalo mahījo vivādamugraṃ janayedraṇaṃ vā || caurādbhayaṃ raktarujaṃ jvaraṃ ca vipattimanyasvahṛtiṃ ca kharjūm

When the lord of the daśā is Mars whose strength is destroyed, he stirs up fierce quarrel, or war; fear from thieves, disease of the blood, fever, calamity, the seizing of one's own property by another, and itch (kharjū).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतिर्नष्टबलोमहीजोविवादमु ग्रंजनयेद्रणंवा ॥ चौराद्भयंरक्तरुजंज्वरंचविपत्तिमन्यस्वहृतिंचखर्जूम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रणं"; alternatives "द्व्रणं" — zoomed: the print clearly sets द्र (द with a र stroke); व्रणं (wound) is what the sense suggests; kept as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्यस्वहृतिं"; alternatives "मन्यस्वहृतिं", "मन्यस्वहृतिम्" — the ह-ऋ ligature is dense; reading taken from the tile
  • About this edition: जनयेद्रणं is जनयेत् + रणं, 'produces battle', which reads straight with विवादमुग्रं beside it; the reader noted व्रणं, 'a wound', as the alternative and found the print clearly sets द्र. The second doubt is only the density of the ह-ऋ ligature in अन्यस्वहृतिं, 'the carrying off of one's property by another'.

त्रिषडायगतो भौमो नष्टवीर्यः शुभार्धदः ॥ मध्यो हीनः शुभो मध्यः शुभोऽत्यंतं शुभावहः

triṣaḍāyagato bhaumo naṣṭavīryaḥ śubhārdhadaḥ || madhyo hīnaḥ śubho madhyaḥ śubho'tyaṃtaṃ śubhāvahaḥ

Mars gone to the 3rd, the 6th or the 11th (āya), even with his strength destroyed, gives half of the good: the deficient one ⟨becomes⟩ middling, the middling one good, and the good one brings exceedingly good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिषडायगतोभौमोनष्टवीर्यःशुभार्धदः ॥ मध्योहीनः शुभोमध्यःशुभोऽत्यंतंशुभावहः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Mars's form of the ladder stated for the Sun in verse 13 and the Moon in verse 18. The houses differ for each graha: 3, 6, 10 and 11 for the Sun; every house but the 6th, 8th and 12th for the Moon; 3, 6 and 11 for Mars.
23.24a reading here is contested

अथबुधदशाफलम् ॥

दशापतिः पूर्णबलो बुधश्चेद्यशोऽभिवृद्धिं गणितात् सुशिल्पात् ॥ तनोति सेवां सफलां नृपादेर्दूत्यं च वैदूष्यगणोदयं च

daśāpatiḥ pūrṇabalo budhaścedyaśo'bhivṛddhiṃ gaṇitāt suśilpāt || tanoti sevāṃ saphalāṃ nṛpāderdūtyaṃ ca vaidūṣyagaṇodayaṃ ca

If the lord of the daśā is Mercury of full strength, he extends increase of fame through computation and fine craft, fruitful service of the king and others, the office of an envoy, and a rise among the company of the learned (vaidūṣya-gaṇa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतिःपूर्णबलोबुधश्चेद्यशोऽभिवृद्धिंगणितात्सुशिल्पात् ॥ तनोतिसेवां सफलांनृपादेर्दूत्यंचवैदूष्यगणोदयंच

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वैदूष्य"; alternatives "वैदुष्य" — the u-mātrā under द looks long (ू); वैदुष्य is the usual form
  • About this edition: The reader read a long u-mātrā in वैदूष्य and noted that the usual form is वैदुष्य, 'learnedness'; the vowel length does not change the word's sense and the print is kept.

दशापतिर्मध्यबलो बुधश्चेद्गुरोः सुहृद्भ्यो लिपिकाव्यशिल्पैः ॥ धनाप्तिदायी सुतमित्रबंधुसमागमान्मध्यममेव सौख्यम्

daśāpatirmadhyabalo budhaścedguroḥ suhṛdbhyo lipikāvyaśilpaiḥ || dhanāptidāyī sutamitrabaṃdhusamāgamānmadhyamameva saukhyam

If the lord of the daśā is Mercury of middling strength, he is a giver of the obtaining of wealth from a teacher (guru) and from friends, through writing, poetry and craft; and ⟨there is⟩ only middling comfort from meeting sons, friends and kinsmen.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतिर्मध्यबलोबुधश्चेद्गुरोःसुहृद्भ्योलिपिकाव्यशिल्पैः ॥ धनाप्तिदायीसुतमित्रबंधुसमा गमान्मध्यममेवसौख्यम्

23.26a reading here is contested

दशापतौ स्वल्पबले बुधे स्यान् मानस्य नाशः स्वजनापवादः ॥ अकार्यकोपस्खलनाद्यनिष्टं धनव्ययं रोगभयं च विंद्यात्

daśāpatau svalpabale budhe syān mānasya nāśaḥ svajanāpavādaḥ || akāryakopaskhalanādyaniṣṭaṃ dhanavyayaṃ rogabhayaṃ ca viṃdyāt

When Mercury (budha) is the lord of the daśā and is of small strength, honour is lost and one's own kin speak ill ⟨of the man⟩; and he meets with the evils that begin with improper acts, anger and blunders, with expenditure of wealth, and with fear of disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतौस्वल्पबलेबुधेस्यान्मानस्यनाशःस्वजनापवादः ॥ अकार्यकोपस्खलनाद्यनिष्टंधनव्ययंरोगभयंच विंद्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विंद्यात्"; alternatives "विद्यात्" — an anusvāra dot is printed over वि; kept as printed
  • About this edition: The page prints विंद्यात् with an anusvāra over वि, and it is rendered as printed — 'he meets with, he comes by' ⟨these evils⟩. The reader's alternative विद्यात् would make it 'one should know ⟨that these follow⟩'. The list of results is the same under either reading; only who is spoken to changes.

दशापतौ हीनबले बुधे स्यात् स्वबुद्धिदोषो वधबंधभीतिः ॥ दूरे गतिर् वातकफामयार्तिर् निखातवित्तस्य च नापि लाभः

daśāpatau hīnabale budhe syāt svabuddhidoṣo vadhabaṃdhabhītiḥ || dūre gatir vātakaphāmayārtir nikhātavittasya ca nāpi lābhaḥ

When Mercury (budha) is the lord of the daśā and is destitute of strength, there is a fault in one's own judgement, fear of being killed and of being bound ⟨in prison⟩, travel to a far place, the pain of diseases of wind and phlegm (vāta and kapha), and not even the recovery of wealth one has buried ⟨in the ground⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशापतौहीनबलेबुधेस्यात्स्वबुद्धिदोषोवधबंधभीतिः ॥ दूरेगतिर्वातकफामयार्तिर्निखातवित्तस्यचनापिलाभः

षडष्टांत्येतरर्क्षस्थो नष्टो ज्ञोऽर्धशुभप्रदः ॥ मध्यो हीनः शुभो मध्यः शुभोऽत्यंतं शुभावहः

ṣaḍaṣṭāṃtyetararkṣastho naṣṭo jño'rdhaśubhapradaḥ || madhyo hīnaḥ śubho madhyaḥ śubho'tyaṃtaṃ śubhāvahaḥ

⟨Mercury⟩ whose strength is destroyed, if it stands in a sign other than the 6th, the 8th and the 12th (antya), gives half the good ⟨it would otherwise give⟩: the weak one becomes middling, the middling one becomes good, and the good one brings exceeding good fortune.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षडष्टांत्येतरर्क्षस्थोनष्टोज्ञोऽर्धशुभप्रदः ॥ मध्योहीनःशुभोमध्यःशुभोऽत्यंतंशुभावहः

अथगुरुदशाफलं ॥

गुरोर् दशा पूर्णबलस्य दत्ते मानोदयं राजसुहृद्गुरुभ्यः ॥ कीर्त्यर्थलाभोपचयं सुखानि राज्यं सुताप्तिं रिपुरोगनाशम्

guror daśā pūrṇabalasya datte mānodayaṃ rājasuhṛdgurubhyaḥ || kīrtyarthalābhopacayaṃ sukhāni rājyaṃ sutāptiṃ ripuroganāśam

The daśā of Jupiter (guru) at full strength gives a rise of honour from the king, from friends and from elders; an increase of fame and of gain of wealth; comforts; rulership; the obtaining of sons; and the destruction of enemies and of disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरोर्दशापूर्णबलस्यद त्तेमानोदयंराजसुहृद्गुरुभ्यः ॥ कीर्त्यर्थलाभोपचयंसुखानिराज्यंसुताप्तिंरिपुरोगनाशम्

गुरोर् दशा मध्यबलस्य धर्मे मतिं सखित्वं नृपमंत्रिवर्गैः ॥ तनोति मानार्थसुखाभिलाभं सिद्धिं सदुत्साहबलातिरेकाम्

guror daśā madhyabalasya dharme matiṃ sakhitvaṃ nṛpamaṃtrivargaiḥ || tanoti mānārthasukhābhilābhaṃ siddhiṃ sadutsāhabalātirekām

The daśā of Jupiter of middling strength spreads out a mind turned to dharma, friendship with the king and with the body of ministers, the full gain of honour, wealth and comfort, and success attended by an excess of right enthusiasm and strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरोर्दशामध्यबलस्यधर्मेमतिंसखित्वंनृ पमंत्रिवर्गैः ॥ तनोतिमानार्थसुखाभिलाभंसिद्धिंसदुत्साहबलातिरेकाम्

दशा गुरोरल्पबलस्य दत्ते रोगं दरिद्रत्वमथारिभीतिम् ॥ कर्णामयं धर्मधनप्रणाशं वैराग्यमर्थं च गुणं न किंचित्

daśā guroralpabalasya datte rogaṃ daridratvamathāribhītim || karṇāmayaṃ dharmadhanapraṇāśaṃ vairāgyamarthaṃ ca guṇaṃ na kiṃcit

The daśā of Jupiter of little strength gives disease, poverty, and then fear from enemies; disease of the ear; the ruin of dharma and of wealth; disgust with the world (vairāgya); and nothing whatever of wealth or of merit.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशागुरोरल्पबलस्यदत्तेरोगंदरिद्रत्वमथारिभीतिम् ॥ कर्णामयंधर्मधनप्रणाशंवैराग्यमर्थंचगुणंनकिंचित्

गुरोर् दशा नष्टबलस्य पुंसां ददाति दुःखानि रुजं कफार्तिम् ॥ कलत्रपुत्रस्वजनारिभीतिं धर्मार्थनाशं तनुपीडनं च

guror daśā naṣṭabalasya puṃsāṃ dadāti duḥkhāni rujaṃ kaphārtim || kalatraputrasvajanāribhītiṃ dharmārthanāśaṃ tanupīḍanaṃ ca

The daśā of Jupiter whose strength is destroyed gives men sorrows, sickness and the affliction of phlegm (kapha); fear on account of wife, sons, kinsfolk and enemies; the ruin of dharma and of wealth; and bodily pain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुरोर्दशानष्टबलस्यपुं सांददातिदुःखानिरुजंकफार्तिम् ॥ कलत्रपुत्रस्वजनारिभीतिंधर्मार्थनाशंतनुपीडनंच

23.33a reading here is contested

षडष्टरिःफेतरगो गुरुर् निंद्योर्धसत्फलः ॥ मध्यो हीनः शुभो मध्यः शुभोऽत्यंतं शुभावहः

ṣaḍaṣṭariḥphetarago gurur niṃdyordhasatphalaḥ || madhyo hīnaḥ śubho madhyaḥ śubho'tyaṃtaṃ śubhāvahaḥ

Jupiter (guru) gone to a house other than the 6th, the 8th and the 12th (riḥpha), though blameworthy ⟨in strength⟩, gives half a good result: the weak one becomes middling, the middling one becomes good, and the good one brings exceeding good fortune.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षडष्टरिःफेतरगोगुरुर्निंद्योर्धसत्फलः ॥ मध्योहीनःशुभोमध्यःशुभोऽत्यंतंशुभावहः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुरुर्निंद्योर्धसत्फलः"; alternatives "गुरुर्निंद्योऽर्धसत्फलः" — zoomed: no avagraha printed before र्ध here, though the parallel line for Venus (line 8) prints ऽ; kept as printed
  • About this edition: The page sets निंद्योर्धसत्फलः with no avagraha, although the sandhi निंद्यः + अर्ध calls for one; the same edition prints the avagraha further along the very same line (शुभोऽत्यंतं), and it does print it in the parallel line for Venus (v.38). The reading itself is not in doubt: निंद्यः + अर्धसत्फलः.

अथशुक्रदशाफलं ॥

दशा भृगोः पूर्णबलस्य सौख्यं स्रग्गंधहेमांबरकामिनीभ्यः ॥ हयादिलाभः सुतकीर्तितोषा नैरुज्यगांधर्वरतिः पदाप्तिः

daśā bhṛgoḥ pūrṇabalasya saukhyaṃ sraggaṃdhahemāṃbarakāminībhyaḥ || hayādilābhaḥ sutakīrtitoṣā nairujyagāṃdharvaratiḥ padāptiḥ

The daśā of Venus (bhṛgu) at full strength ⟨brings⟩ happiness from garlands, perfumes, gold, garments and women; the gain of horses and the like; sons, fame and contentment; freedom from disease; a taste for music (gāndharva); and the attaining of rank.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाभृगोःपूर्णबलस्यसौख्यंस्रग्गंधहेमांबरकामिनीभ्यः ॥ हयादिलाभःसुतकीर्तितोषानैरुज्यगांधर्वरतिःपदाप्तिः

23.35a reading here is contested

दशा भृगोर् मध्यबलस्य दत्ते वाणिज्यतोर्थागमनं कृषेश्च ॥ मिष्टान्नपानांबरभोगलाभं मित्रांश्च योषित्सुतसौख्यलाभम्

daśā bhṛgor madhyabalasya datte vāṇijyatorthāgamanaṃ kṛṣeśca || miṣṭānnapānāṃbarabhogalābhaṃ mitrāṃśca yoṣitsutasaukhyalābham

The daśā of Venus of middling strength gives the coming of wealth from trade and from agriculture, the gain of the enjoyment of sweet food, drink and clothing, friends, and the gain of happiness from wife and sons.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाभृगोर्मध्यबलस्यदत्तेवाणिज्यतोर्थागमनंकृषेश्च ॥ मिष्टान्नपानांबर भोगलाभंमित्रांश्चयोषित्सुतसौख्यलाभम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाणिज्यतोर्थागमनं"; alternatives "वाणिज्यतोऽर्थागमनं" — no avagraha visible; not zoomed
  • About this edition: वाणिज्यतोर्थागमनं is वाणिज्यतः + अर्थागमनं; the page prints no avagraha at the join, as the reader records.

दशा भृगोरल्पबलस्य दत्ते मतिभ्रमं ज्ञानयशोऽर्थनाशम् ॥ कदन्नभोज्यं व्यसनामयार्तिं स्त्रीपक्षवैरं कलिमप्यरिभ्यः

daśā bhṛgoralpabalasya datte matibhramaṃ jñānayaśo'rthanāśam || kadannabhojyaṃ vyasanāmayārtiṃ strīpakṣavairaṃ kalimapyaribhyaḥ

The daśā of Venus of little strength gives confusion of mind; the ruin of learning, fame and wealth; bad food to eat; the distress of vice and of disease; enmity on the women's side; and quarrel from enemies as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाभृगोरल्पबलस्यदत्तेमतिभ्रमंज्ञानयशोऽर्थनाशम् ॥ कदन्नभोज्यंव्यसनामया तिंस्त्रीपक्षवैरंकलिमप्यरिभ्यः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints व्यसनामयातिं, without the repha. I take आति as standing for आर्ति, 'distress' — the very word this same series uses in v.27 (वातकफामयार्तिः, 'the distress of diseases of wind and phlegm'), built the same way on -आमय-. The syllable count of the pāda is eleven under either spelling, so the metre does not decide it; the parallel does. The Sanskrit is left exactly as the page sets it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads व्यसनामयार्तिं; this sentence names व्यसनामयातिं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
23.37a reading here is contested

दशा भृगोर् नष्टबलस्य दत्ते विदेशयानं स्वजनैर् विरोधम् ॥ पुत्रार्थभार्याविपदो रुजश्च मतिभ्रमोपि व्यसनं महच्च

daśā bhṛgor naṣṭabalasya datte videśayānaṃ svajanair virodham || putrārthabhāryāvipado rujaśca matibhramopi vyasanaṃ mahacca

The daśā of Venus whose strength is destroyed gives travel to a foreign country, conflict with one's own people, calamities touching sons, wealth and wife, diseases, confusion of mind as well, and great vice.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाभृगोर्नष्टबलस्यदत्तेविदेशयानंस्वजनैर्विरोधम् ॥ पुत्रार्थभार्याविपदोरुजश्चमतिभ्रमोपिव्य सनंमहच्च

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मतिभ्रमोपिव्य"; alternatives "मतिभ्रमोऽपिव्य" — no avagraha visible at line end; not zoomed

षडष्टरिःफेतरगो भृगुर् निंद्योऽर्धसत्फलः ॥ मध्यो हीनः शुभो मध्यः शुभोऽत्यंतं शुभावहः

ṣaḍaṣṭariḥphetarago bhṛgur niṃdyo'rdhasatphalaḥ || madhyo hīnaḥ śubho madhyaḥ śubho'tyaṃtaṃ śubhāvahaḥ

Venus (bhṛgu) gone to a house other than the 6th, the 8th and the 12th (riḥpha), though blameworthy ⟨in strength⟩, gives half a good result: the weak one becomes middling, the middling one becomes good, and the good one brings exceeding good fortune.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षडष्टरिःफेतरगोभृगुर्निंद्योऽर्धसत्फलः ॥ मध्योहीनःशुभोमध्यःशुभोऽत्यंतंशुभावहः

23.39a reading here is contested

अथशनिदशाफ लम् ॥

दशा शनेः पूर्णबलस्य दत्ते नवीनवेश्मांबरभूमिसौख्यम् ॥ आरामतोयाश्रयनिर्मितिश्च म्लेच्छातिसंगान् नृपतेर् धनाप्तिः

daśā śaneḥ pūrṇabalasya datte navīnaveśmāṃbarabhūmisaukhyam || ārāmatoyāśrayanirmitiśca mlecchātisaṃgān nṛpater dhanāptiḥ

The daśā of Saturn (śani) at full strength gives the happiness of a new house, new clothes and land; the making of pleasure-gardens and of water-tanks; and, through close association with mlecchas ⟨people outside the Vedic fold⟩, the obtaining of wealth from the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाशनेःपूर्णबलस्यदत्तेनवीनवेश्मांबरभूमिसौख्यम् ॥ आरामतोयाश्रयनिर्मितिश्चम्लेंच्छातिसंगान्नृपतेर्धनाप्तिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूमि"; alternatives "भ्रूमि" — zoomed: the ū-stroke under भ has an extra loop that could be read as a र-sign; most likely plain भू
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "म्लेंच्छा"; alternatives "म्लेच्छा" — zoomed: an anusvāra dot is clearly printed on ले; kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads म्लेच्छातिसंगान्; this sentence names म्लेंच्छा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints म्लेंच्छ with an anusvāra on ले, which the reader verified at magnification; the word is म्लेच्छ. The reader also weighed भूमि against भ्रूमि on the ink and settled on भूमि, 'land', which is what is rendered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads म्लेच्छातिसंगान्; this sentence names म्लेंच्छ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
23.40a reading here is contested

दशा शनेर् मध्यबलस्य दत्ते खरोष्ट्रपाखंडजतो धनाप्तिं ॥ वृद्धांगनासंगमदुर्गरक्षाधिकारचिंताविरसान्नभोगः

daśā śaner madhyabalasya datte kharoṣṭrapākhaṃḍajato dhanāptiṃ || vṛddhāṃganāsaṃgamadurgarakṣādhikāraciṃtāvirasānnabhogaḥ

The daśā of Saturn of middling strength gives the obtaining of wealth from asses, camels and heretics (pākhaṇḍa); union with an old woman; the guarding of a fort; the worry of holding office; and the eating of tasteless food.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाशनेर्मध्यबलस्यदत्तेखरोष्ट्रपाखंडजतोधनाप्तिं ॥ वृद्धांगनासंगमदुर्गरक्षाधिकारचिंताविरसान्नभोगः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनाप्तिं"; alternatives "धनाप्ति", "धनाप्तिः" — zoomed: a thickened blob sits at the end of the i-mātrā curve over प्ति; may be an anusvāra or only a heavy mātrā; no visarga
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धिकारचिंता"; alternatives "धिकारर्चिंता" — zoomed: no repha over चिं; only the anusvāra and i-curve
23.41a reading here is contested

दशा शनेः स्वल्पबलस्य पुंसां तनोति दुःखं रिपुतस्करेभ्यः ॥ दारिद्र्यमात्मीयजनापवादं रोगं च शीतानिलकोपमुग्रम्

daśā śaneḥ svalpabalasya puṃsāṃ tanoti duḥkhaṃ riputaskarebhyaḥ || dāridryamātmīyajanāpavādaṃ rogaṃ ca śītānilakopamugram

The daśā of Saturn of very little strength spreads out for men sorrow from enemies and thieves, poverty, reproach from one's own people, disease, and a fierce disorder of cold and wind. ⟨Our mūla now reads the accusative दुःखं, 'sorrow', the object of तनोति.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाशनेःस्वल्पबल स्यपुंसांतनोतिदुःखेरिपुतस्करेभ्यः ॥ दारिद्र्यमात्मीयजनापवादंरोगंचशीतानिलकोपमुग्रम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुःखेरिपु"; alternatives "दुःखेऽरिपु" — no avagraha printed; not zoomed
  • About this edition: दुःखे is printed where the construction wants दुःखं (तनोति दुःखं रिपुतस्करेभ्यः). The Sanskrit is left as printed; the rendering follows the accusative, and nothing in the list of results depends on the choice. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads दुःखं; this sentence names दुःखे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
23.42a reading here is contested

दशा शनेर् नष्टबलस्य पुंसामनेकधातुव्यसनानि दत्ते ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रमित्रस्वजनैर् विरोधं रोगाभिवृद्धिं मरणेन तुल्यम्

daśā śaner naṣṭabalasya puṃsāmanekadhātuvyasanāni datte || strīputramitrasvajanair virodhaṃ rogābhivṛddhiṃ maraṇena tulyam

The daśā of Saturn whose strength is destroyed gives men the ruin of many dhātus ⟨the body's constituent tissues⟩, conflict with wife, sons, friends and kinsfolk, and a growth of disease that is the equal of death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशाशनेर्नष्टबलस्यपुंसामनेकधातुव्यसनानिदत्ते ॥ स्त्रीपुत्रमित्रस्वजनैर्विरोधंरोगाभिवृद्धिंमरणेनतुल्यम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रोगाभिवृद्धिं"; alternatives "रोगाभिवृर्द्धिं" — Read at 10.4x. What looks at 3x like a repha over the द्ध is the head-curve of the ि matra, which in this fount rises from a full vertical stroke to the left of the consonant; a true repha (compared against शनेर्नष्ट on the same line at 7.5x) is a detached flag ABOVE the headline with no descending stroke. Anusvara diamond present.
23.43a reading here is contested

त्रिषष्ठलाभोपगतो मंदो निंद्योर्धसत्फलः ॥ मध्यो हीनः शुभो मध्यः शुभोऽत्यंतं शुभावहः

triṣaṣṭhalābhopagato maṃdo niṃdyordhasatphalaḥ || madhyo hīnaḥ śubho madhyaḥ śubho'tyaṃtaṃ śubhāvahaḥ

Saturn (manda) gone to the 3rd, the 6th or the 11th (lābha), though blameworthy ⟨in strength⟩, gives half a good result: the weak one becomes middling, the middling one becomes good, and the good one brings exceeding good fortune.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिषष्ठलाभोपगतोमं दोनिंद्योर्धसत्फलः ॥ मध्योहीनःशुभोमध्यःशुभोऽत्यंतंशुभावहः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिषष्ठलाभोपगतोमं"; alternatives "त्रिष्ठलाभोपगतोमं", "त्रिषड्लाभोपगतोमं" — Read at 9.3x. Two aksharas stand between त्रि and ला; I read ष + ष्ठ (the second carrying a closed circle below the headline = subscript ठ). NOT FULLY SETTLED at this scan's resolution. The anushtubh count supports it: त्रि-ष-ष्ठ-ला-भो-प-ग-तो = 8 for the first pada, with मं-दो-निं-द्यो-र्ध-स-फ-लः = 8 for the second.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निंद्योर्धसत्फलः"; alternatives "निद्योर्धसफलः", "निंद्योऽर्धसफलः" — The mark over नि is a solid diamond = anusvara (verified 7.8x). The mark over ध is a detached flag above the headline = repha, NOT a ि matra (verified 10x, compared against the वृद्धिं case on the line above). NO avagraha is printed between निंद्यो and र्ध, though the sandhi निन्द्यः + अर्ध would call for one - this edition does print avagraha elsewhere on this very line (शुभोऽत्यंतं), so its absence here is the page's own spelling, not a reading of mine. · ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): at 13x a half त् is printed between स and फ, on its own headline segment at x 763-780; the plate reads निंद्योर्धसत्फलः.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभोऽत्यंतंशुभावहः"; alternatives "शुभोऽप्यंतंशुभावहः" — Verified at 5.6x: the avagraha is unmistakable and the akshara after it is त्य, not प्य. Both anusvara diamonds clearly inked.
  • About this edition: Two houses are named here by number-words and the third by name: त्रि-षष्ठ-लाभ = the 3rd, the 6th and the 11th. The reader settled ष + ष्ठ at 9.3× and checked it against the anuṣṭubh count (त्रि-ष-ष्ठ-ला-भो-प-ग-तो = eight syllables), and read the half त् of सत्फलः at 13×. As in v.33, no avagraha is printed at निंद्यो + अर्ध.
23.44a reading here is contested

दशा तनोः स्वामिबलेन तुल्यं फलं ददातीत्यपरो विशेषः ॥ चरे शुभा मध्यफलाऽधमा च द्विमूर्तिभे स्माद् विपरीतमूह्यम्

daśā tanoḥ svāmibalena tulyaṃ phalaṃ dadātītyaparo viśeṣaḥ || care śubhā madhyaphalā'dhamā ca dvimūrtibhe smād viparītamūhyam

Another special rule ⟨is this⟩: the daśā of the lagna (tanu) gives a result matching the strength of the lagna's lord. In a movable (cara) ⟨lagna⟩ it is auspicious, of middling fruit ⟨in a fixed one⟩ and poor ⟨otherwise⟩; and in a dual-natured (dvimūrti) sign one should infer the opposite of this ⟨movable case⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशातनोःस्वामिबलेनतुल्यंफलंददातीत्यपरोविशेषः ॥ चरेशुभामध्यफलाऽधमाचद्विमूर्तिभेस्माद्विपरीतमूह्यम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरेशुभा"; alternatives "चरेषुभा" — Verified at 5.8x: the akshara after चरे is शु, identical in shape to the शु of शुभावहः on the line above, not षु. The tika at line 2 (चरेचरलग्नेसति) glosses चरे as a catchword and supports it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विमूर्तिभेस्माद्विपरीतमूह्यम्"; alternatives "द्विमूर्तिभेऽस्माद्विपरीतमूह्यम्" — NO avagraha is printed between भे and स्मा (verified 5.6x), though the sense (भे + अस्मात्, glossed in the tika at line 3 as अस्माच्चरलग्नात्) requires one. Recorded as printed.
  • About this edition: The verse names only two of the three sign-classes — चरे 'in a movable sign' and द्विमूर्तिभे 'in a dual-natured sign' — while giving three grades of result (शुभा, मध्यफला, अधमा). Which grade falls to the fixed sign and which to the dual is therefore supplied, not stated, and the supplied words stand in ⟨ ⟩. The ṭīkā's catchwords, quoted by the plate reader, take चरे as चरलग्ने सति and स्मात् as अस्माच्चरलग्नात्, i.e. 'the opposite of this MOVABLE lagna'. The page prints भेस्मा with no avagraha although the sense (भे + अस्मात्) requires one; the Sanskrit is left as printed.
23.45a reading here is contested

अनिष्टमिष्टं च समस्थिरर्क्षे क्रमाद् दृकाणैः फलमुक्तमाद्यैः ॥ सत्स्वामियोगेक्षणतः शुभं स्यात् पापेक्षणात् कष्टफलं च वाच्यम्

aniṣṭamiṣṭaṃ ca samasthirarkṣe kramād dṛkāṇaiḥ phalamuktamādyaiḥ || satsvāmiyogekṣaṇataḥ śubhaṃ syāt pāpekṣaṇāt kaṣṭaphalaṃ ca vācyam

⟨The result is⟩ unfavourable and favourable in an even (sama) sign and in a fixed (sthira) sign respectively; and the result has been declared, in order, by the drekkāṇas (dṛkāṇa, the third-part of a sign) beginning with the first. From conjunction with, or the aspect of, a benefic and of the lord there will be good; and from a malefic's aspect an evil result is to be declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अनिष्टमिष्टंचसमस्थिरर्क्षेक्रमाद्दृकाणैःफलमुक्तमाद्यैः ॥ सत्स्वामियोगेक्षण तःशुभंस्यात्पापेक्षणात्कष्टफलंचवाच्यम्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमाद्दृकाणैः"; alternatives "क्रमाद्द्रेष्काणैः", "क्रमाद्रष्काणैः" — REFUSING THE OBVIOUS CORRECTION, AND HERE IS THE MEASUREMENT. There is NO e-matra over this cluster. The M3 headline runs y=817-822; a column scan of x=2190..2440 over y=782..816 finds the first real ink at x=2378, which is the ai-matra of णै - 0 dark pixels over the aksharas themselves. A known द्रे on the same page (line 3, x=655..700) carries 142 dark pixels in the equivalent band. The tika's own paraphrase on line 10 spells द्रेष्काणैर्द्रेष्काणवशात् with the matra, so the mula band here is a press omission. I could not settle whether the stacked akshara is द्द्र or द्र. · ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): the akṣara before ा measures 38 px, the same as the certain क of क्र on this line, while the ṭīkā spells the word with a cluster 59 px wide at mūla scale — so no ष् is printed. The stack matches the certain दृ of यादृशं (ṭīkā line 2) and shows no र-subscript. Text corrected to क्रमाद्दृकाणैः; whether the stack holds one द or two is still not settled by the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलमुक्तमाद्यैः"; alternatives "फलमुक्रमाद्यैः" — Verified at 5.4x: the cluster is क्त, not क्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सत्स्वामियोगेक्षण" — Verse 45 opens here and runs on into the next mula line; its pratika सत्स्वामीति appears in the tika at line 10.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty about the PRINTED VERSE NUMBER, not the text: read "॥४५॥" — TWO verse numerals close on this one printed line - ॥४५॥ mid-line and ॥४६॥ at the end. verseNumber above records the closing one only; both are in verseNumbersSeen.
  • About this edition: Two things in this verse are not settled. (1) समस्थिरर्क्षे: the book nowhere defines सम in a list of sign-classes, so it is rendered 'an even sign', its ordinary meaning; if सम is instead a name for the dual-natured signs, the first half assigns the unfavourable result to them and not to the even signs. The metre is sound as printed (upendravajrā, L H L H H L L H L H H). (2) दृकाणैः: the plate reader measured the cluster twice and found no e-mātrā over it (0 dark pixels in the band where a known द्रे on the same page carries 142), so the mūla is left at क्रमाद्दृकाणैः even though the ṭīkā spells the word द्रेष्काणैः. The word is the drekkāṇa either way; whether the stack holds one द or two is still not settled by the ink.
23.46a reading here is contested

दशामानं समामानं प्रकल्प्योक्तेन वर्त्मना ॥ अंतर्दशाः साधनीयाः प्राक् पात्यांशवशेन तु

daśāmānaṃ samāmānaṃ prakalpyoktena vartmanā || aṃtardaśāḥ sādhanīyāḥ prāk pātyāṃśavaśena tu

Having fixed the measure of the daśā ⟨and⟩ the measure of the year by the method already stated, the antardaśās are to be worked out by means of the pātyāṃśas ⟨given⟩ earlier.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशामानंसमामानंप्रकल्प्योक्तेनवर्त्मना ॥ अंतर्दशाःसाधनीयाःप्राक्पात्यांशवशेनतु

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राक्पात्यांशवशेनतु"; alternatives "प्राक्प्रात्यांशवशेनतु" — Verified at 5.4x for पात्यांशवशेन; the प्राक् before it read at strip magnification only.
  • About this edition: The 'pātyāṃśas given earlier' are the śuddhāṃśas of 23.1–4, from which the main daśā order and lengths of this chapter are built; this verse says the sub-periods are divided on the same quantities.
23.47a reading here is contested

आदावंतर्दशा पाकपतेस् तत्क्रमतोऽपराः ॥ शुभेक्षणान्वयान् मैत्र्या तत्फलं परिचिंतयेत्

ādāvaṃtardaśā pākapates tatkramato'parāḥ || śubhekṣaṇānvayān maitryā tatphalaṃ pariciṃtayet

First ⟨comes⟩ the antardaśā of the lord of the running daśā (pāka-pati); the rest ⟨follow⟩ in that same order. One should consider their result from a benefic's aspect, from association ⟨with one⟩, and from friendship.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आदावंतर्दशापाकपतेस्तत्क्रमतोऽपराः ॥ शुभेक्षणान्वयान्मैत्र्यातत्फलंपरिचिंतयेत्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मैत्र्यातत्फलं"; alternatives "मैत्र्यात्तत्फलं" — read as a single त before त्फ; not zoomed
23.48a reading here is contested

चंद्रारजीवाः सौम्येज्यशुक्रा रविविधू तथा ॥ मंदेज्यशुक्राः सूर्येंदुभौमाः सौम्येज्यसूर्यजाः

caṃdrārajīvāḥ saumyejyaśukrā ravividhū tathā || maṃdejyaśukrāḥ sūryeṃdubhaumāḥ saumyejyasūryajāḥ

⟨For the Sun's daśā the auspicious antardaśās are⟩ the Moon, Mars and Jupiter; ⟨for the Moon's⟩ Mercury, Jupiter and Venus; and likewise ⟨for Mars's⟩ the Sun and the Moon; ⟨for Mercury's⟩ Saturn, Jupiter and Venus; ⟨for Jupiter's⟩ the Sun, the Moon and Mars; ⟨for Venus's⟩ Mercury, Jupiter and Saturn.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रारजीवाःसौम्येज्यशुक्रारविविधूतथा ॥ मंदेज्यश्शुक्रासूर्येंदुभौमाःसौम्येज्यसूर्यजाः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंदेज्यश्शुक्रा"; alternatives "मंदेज्यश्चुक्रा", "मंदेज्यशुक्रा" — zoomed: श followed by a small stacked conjunct with u below; read as श्शु, but the ligature resembles this font's श्च [2026-10-01: read by eye at about 6x-8x native against the plain शु and the श्च of the same leaf; the press sets श्शु, not श्च. The mūla now reads मंदेज्यशुक्राः, emended on grammar.]
  • About this edition: This record holds only the list; the words that say what the list IS stand in the next verse (49), which names the seventh group — Saturn's — and then closes the rule. The names of the daśā-lords the groups belong to are nowhere in the two verses: they are supplied from the fixed order Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, and the anuṣṭubh count (8+8+8+8) confirms the grouping. मंदेज्यश्शुक्रा as printed is मंदेज्यः + शुक्राः by the regular visarga sandhi before श; the reader records that the ligature could also be read श्च. [2026-10-01: superseded. The plate shows the press sets श्शु, not श्च, and no visarga after शुक्रा. The mūla now reads मंदेज्यशुक्राः on grammar, as the Pathak, Mahīdhara and Sītārām Jhā printings set it. The श् is the press's misplaced visarga, not visarga sandhi, because मन्देज्यः cannot stand as a singular for two planets.]

जीवज्ञशुक्राः सूर्यादेः शुभा अंतर्दशा इमाः ॥ अन्येषामशुभा ज्ञेया इति वामनभाषितं

jīvajñaśukrāḥ sūryādeḥ śubhā aṃtardaśā imāḥ || anyeṣāmaśubhā jñeyā iti vāmanabhāṣitaṃ

⟨and for Saturn's daśā⟩ Jupiter, Mercury and Venus. These are the auspicious antardaśās of ⟨the planets⟩ beginning with the Sun; those of the others are to be known as inauspicious. So it has been said by Vāmana.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवज्ञशुक्राःसूर्यादेःशुभाअंतर्दशाइमाः ॥ अन्येषामशुभाज्ञेयाइतिवामनभाषितं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'Beginning with the Sun' (सूर्यादेः) covers the seven groups set out in v.48 and in the first quarter of this verse. Vāmana is named as the authority; the verse attributes the rule to him and not to the author.

इतिग्रहदशाफलानि ॥ अथभावस्थग्रहफलान्युच्यंते ॥

सूर्यारमंदास् तनुगा ज्वरार्तिं धनक्षयं पापयुगिंदुरित्थम् ॥ शुभान्वितः पुष्टतनुश्च सौख्यं जीवज्ञशुक्रा धनधान्यलाभम्

sūryāramaṃdās tanugā jvarārtiṃ dhanakṣayaṃ pāpayugiṃdurittham || śubhānvitaḥ puṣṭatanuśca saukhyaṃ jīvajñaśukrā dhanadhānyalābham

The Sun, Mars and Saturn standing in the 1st (tanu) ⟨give⟩ the affliction of fever and the loss of wealth; the Moon joined with a malefic ⟨gives⟩ the same. ⟨The Moon⟩ attended by a benefic ⟨gives⟩ a well-nourished body and happiness; and Jupiter, Mercury and Venus ⟨give⟩ the gain of wealth and grain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्यारमंदास्तनुगाज्वरार्तिंधनक्षयंपापयुगिंदुरित्थम् ॥ शुभान्वितः पुष्टतनुश्चसौख्यंजीवज्ञशुक्राधनधान्यलाभम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This verse opens the section on planets standing in the bhāvas: the line the page sets above it closes the daśā results and announces the new topic. तनुग, 'standing in the body ⟨-house⟩', is the 1st house, and the twelve houses then run in order to v.61.

चंद्रज्ञजीवा स्फुजितो धनस्था धनागमं राज्यसुखं च दद्युः ॥ पापा धनस्था धनहानिदाः स्युर् नृपाद् भयं कार्यविघातमार्किः

caṃdrajñajīvā sphujito dhanasthā dhanāgamaṃ rājyasukhaṃ ca dadyuḥ || pāpā dhanasthā dhanahānidāḥ syur nṛpād bhayaṃ kāryavighātamārkiḥ

The Moon, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus (sphujit) standing in the 2nd (dhana) would give the coming of wealth and the happiness of rulership. Malefics standing in the 2nd would be givers of loss of wealth; and Saturn ⟨gives⟩ fear from the king and the wrecking of one's undertaking.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रज्ञजीवास्फुजितोधनस्थाधनागमंराज्यसुखंचदद्युः ॥ पापाधनस्थाधनहानिदाः स्युर्नृपाद्भयंकार्यविघातमार्किः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: स्फुजित् is this book's own name for Venus. Its haddā tables settle it: at 1.33 the terms of Aries run जीव, स्फुजित्, ज्ञ, अर, शनैश्चर and at 1.34 those of Taurus run शुक्र, ज्ञ, जीव, अर्कि, कुज — the received term-tables put Jupiter, VENUS, Mercury, Mars, Saturn in Aries, so स्फुजित् stands exactly where शुक्र stands.

दुश्चिक्यगाः खलखगा धनधर्मराज्यलाभप्रदा बलयुताः क्षितिलाभदाः स्युः ॥ सौम्याः सुखार्थसुतमानयशोविलासलाभाय हर्षमतुलं किल तत्र चंद्रः

duścikyagāḥ khalakhagā dhanadharmarājyalābhapradā balayutāḥ kṣitilābhadāḥ syuḥ || saumyāḥ sukhārthasutamānayaśovilāsalābhāya harṣamatulaṃ kila tatra caṃdraḥ

Malefic planets gone to the 3rd (duścikya) give wealth, dharma, rulership and gain; endowed with strength they would give the gain of land. Benefics ⟨there conduce⟩ to the gain of happiness, wealth, sons, honour, fame and pleasures; and the Moon there ⟨gives⟩ joy beyond compare.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दुश्चिक्यगाःखलखगाधनधर्मराज्यलाभप्रदाबलयुताःक्षितिलाभदाःस्युः ॥ सौम्याःसुखार्थसुतमा नयशोविलासलाभायहर्षमतुलंकिलतत्रचंद्रः

चंद्रः सुखे खलयुतो व्यसनं रुजं च पुष्टः शुभेन सहितः सुखमातनोति ॥ सौम्यः सुखं विविधमत्र खलाः सुखार्थनाशं रुजं व्यसनमप्यतुलं भयं च ॥

caṃdraḥ sukhe khalayuto vyasanaṃ rujaṃ ca puṣṭaḥ śubhena sahitaḥ sukhamātanoti || saumyaḥ sukhaṃ vividhamatra khalāḥ sukhārthanāśaṃ rujaṃ vyasanamapyatulaṃ bhayaṃ ca ||

The Moon in the 4th (sukha) joined with a malefic ⟨gives⟩ vice and disease; but full-orbed and accompanied by a benefic it spreads out happiness. Mercury (saumya) here ⟨gives⟩ happiness of many kinds; malefics ⟨give⟩ the destruction of happiness and of wealth, disease, vice, and fear beyond measure.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रःसुखेखलयुतोव्यसनंरुजंचपुष्टःशुभेनसहितःसुखमातनोति ॥ सौम्यःसुखंविविधमत्रखलाःसुखार्थनाशंरुजंव्यसनमप्यतुलंभयंच ॥

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सौम्यः here is singular where the malefics beside it are plural (खलाः), and the same line has already used शुभ for 'a benefic' (शुभेन सहितः), so सौम्य is taken in its other sense, Mercury. Read instead as 'a benefic', the claim becomes the weaker one that any benefic in the 4th gives manifold happiness.

पुत्रवित्तसुखसंचयं शुभाः पुत्रगा भृगुसुतोऽतिहर्षदः ॥ पुत्रवित्तधनबुद्धिहारकास् तस्करामयकलिप्रदाः खलाः

putravittasukhasaṃcayaṃ śubhāḥ putragā bhṛgusuto'tiharṣadaḥ || putravittadhanabuddhihārakās taskarāmayakalipradāḥ khalāḥ

Benefics gone to the 5th (putra) ⟨give⟩ an accumulation of sons, wealth and happiness, and the son of Bhṛgu ⟨Venus⟩ is a giver of exceeding joy. Malefics carry off sons, wealth, money and understanding, and give thieves, disease and strife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुत्रवित्तसुखसंचयंशुभाःपुत्रगाभृगुसुतोऽतिहर्षदः ॥ पुत्रवित्तधनबुद्धिहारकास्तस्करामयकलिप्रदाःखलाः

षष्ठे पापा वित्तलाभं सुखाप्तिं भौमोऽत्यंतं हर्षदः शत्रुनाशं ॥ सौम्या भीतिं वित्तनाशं कलिं च चंद्रो रोगं पापयुक्तः करोति

ṣaṣṭhe pāpā vittalābhaṃ sukhāptiṃ bhaumo'tyaṃtaṃ harṣadaḥ śatrunāśaṃ || saumyā bhītiṃ vittanāśaṃ kaliṃ ca caṃdro rogaṃ pāpayuktaḥ karoti

Malefics in the 6th ⟨give⟩ gain of wealth and the attaining of happiness, and Mars ⟨there⟩ is a giver of exceeding joy and of the destruction of enemies. Benefics ⟨give⟩ fear, loss of wealth and strife; and the Moon joined with a malefic causes disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठेपापा वित्तलाभंसुखाप्तिंभौमेऽत्यंतंहर्षदःशत्रुनाशं ॥ सौम्याभीतिंवित्तनाशंकलिंचचंद्रोरोगंपापयुक्तःकरोति

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: भौमेऽत्यंतं is printed where the sense wants भौमोऽत्यंतं: हर्षदः is a masculine nominative and needs a nominative subject. Both spellings are metrically identical (भौ-मे and भौ-मो are alike heavy), so the metre does not decide it. The Sanskrit is left exactly as the page sets it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भौमोऽत्यंतं; this sentence names भौमेऽत्यंतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

सपापः शशी सप्तमो व्याधिभीतिं खलाः स्त्रीविनाशं कलिं भृत्यभीतिम् ॥ शुभाः कुर्वते वित्तलाभं सुखाप्तिं यशो राजमानोदयं बंधुसौख्यम्

sapāpaḥ śaśī saptamo vyādhibhītiṃ khalāḥ strīvināśaṃ kaliṃ bhṛtyabhītim || śubhāḥ kurvate vittalābhaṃ sukhāptiṃ yaśo rājamānodayaṃ baṃdhusaukhyam

The Moon in the 7th together with a malefic ⟨gives⟩ fear of disease; malefics ⟨there give⟩ the destruction of the wife, strife, and fear from servants. Benefics make gain of wealth, the attaining of happiness, fame, a rise of honour at the king's ⟨hands⟩, and the happiness of kinsfolk.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सपापःशशीसप्तमोव्या धिभीतिंखलाःस्त्रीविनाशंकलिंभृत्यभीतिम् ॥ शुभाःकुर्वतेवित्तलाभंसुखाप्तिंयशोराजमानोदयंबंधुसौख्यम्

23.57a reading here is contested

चंद्रोऽष्टमे निधनदः खलखेटयुक्तः पापाश्च तत्र मृतितुल्यफलं च विंद्यात् ॥ सौम्याः स्वधातुवशतो रुजमर्थहानिं मानक्षयं मुथशिले शुभजे शुभं च

caṃdro'ṣṭame nidhanadaḥ khalakheṭayuktaḥ pāpāśca tatra mṛtitulyaphalaṃ ca viṃdyāt || saumyāḥ svadhātuvaśato rujamarthahāniṃ mānakṣayaṃ muthaśile śubhaje śubhaṃ ca

The Moon in the 8th joined with a malefic planet is a giver of death; and malefics there ⟨likewise⟩ — one should reckon a result equal to dying. Benefics ⟨give⟩, according to the dhātu each governs, disease, loss of wealth and decline of honour; but where the muthaśila (the applying aspect) is made with a benefic, ⟨the result is⟩ good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोऽष्टमेनिधन दःखलखेटयुक्तःपापाश्चतत्रमृतितुल्यफलंचविंद्यात् ॥ सौम्याःस्वधातुवशतोरुजमर्थहानिंमानक्षयंमुथशिलेशुभजेशुभंच

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विंद्यात्"; alternatives "विद्यात्" — A dot sits above वि; it may be an anusvāra or a speck of ink. Kept as seen.
  • About this edition: मुथशिल is the Tājika applying aspect (muthaśila / itthaśāla): the faster graha is approaching exact aspect with the slower, so the matter comes about. Here it is the one thing that turns the 8th-house verdict from death-like to good. विंद्यात् is printed with a dot over वि which the reader could not tell from a speck of ink; either विंद्यात् or विद्यात् gives 'one should reckon / should know', with no change to the claim.
23.58a reading here is contested

तपसि सोदरभीः पशुपीडनं खलखगेतिमुदो रविरत्र चेत् ॥ शुभखगा धनधर्मविवृद्धिदाः खलखगेपि शुभान्यपरे जगुः

tapasi sodarabhīḥ paśupīḍanaṃ khalakhagetimudo raviratra cet || śubhakhagā dhanadharmavivṛddhidāḥ khalakhagepi śubhānyapare jaguḥ

In the 9th (tapas), when a malefic planet ⟨stands there⟩, ⟨there is⟩ fear on account of brothers and harm to cattle; ⟨but⟩ very great joy, if the Sun is here. Benefic planets ⟨there⟩ give an increase of wealth and of dharma; and others have declared good results even for a malefic planet ⟨in this house⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तपसि सोदरभीःपशुपीडनंखलखगेतिमुदोरविरत्रचेत् ॥ शुभखगाधनधर्मविवृद्धिदाःखलखगेपिशुभान्यपरेजगुः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभखगाधनधर्म"; alternatives "शुभखगाःधनधर्म" — No visarga is visible after शुभखगा; the ṭīkā has शुभखगाः. Kept as printed.
  • About this edition: शुभखगा is printed without its visarga; the ṭīkā has शुभखगाः, which is what the grammar wants (nominative plural, agreeing with -दाः). The Sanskrit is left as printed. खलखगेतिमुदो is खलखगे + अतिमुदः, the avagraha not printed. The last quarter is an explicit disagreement: 'others' (अपरे) allow a good result in the 9th even for a malefic, against the first half of this same verse.
23.59a reading here is contested

गगनगो रविजः पशुवित्तहा रविकुजौ व्यवसायपराक्रमौ ॥ धनसुखानि परे च धनात्मजाऽवनिपसंगमुखानि वितन्वते

gaganago ravijaḥ paśuvittahā ravikujau vyavasāyaparākramau || dhanasukhāni pare ca dhanātmajā'vanipasaṃgamukhāni vitanvate

Saturn (ravija) gone to the 10th (gagana) destroys cattle and wealth; the Sun and Mars ⟨there give⟩ enterprise and valour. And the other ⟨planets⟩ spread out wealth and comforts, foremost among them money, sons and meeting with the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गगनगोरविजःपशु वित्तहारविकुजोव्यवसायपराक्रमौ ॥ धनसुखानिपरेचधनात्मजाऽवनिपसंगमुखानिवितन्वते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संगमुखानि"; alternatives "संगसुखानि" — Zoomed at 4x: the letter has the closed left loop and no middle hook, so it reads म as printed; the sense would want सु.
  • About this edition: The word-break in the middle of this verse is fixed by the metre and is not the obvious one. The metre is drutavilambita (L L L H L L H L L H L H), and the first quarter closes on ...पशुवित्तहा — पशुवित्तहा being the nominative singular of पशुवित्तहन्, 'the destroyer of cattle and wealth'. What follows is therefore रविकुजो, the Sun and Mars, and not विकुजो; the second quarter रविकुजो व्यवसायपराक्रमौ scans the same pattern exactly. The dual व्यवसायपराक्रमौ then asks for the dual रविकुजौ, and the page prints रविकुजो; ओ and औ are alike heavy, so the metre does not catch it. संगमुखानि as printed is right and needs no correction: -मुख at the end of a compound means 'headed by, chief among which', which is why the reader's suggested संगसुखानि is not needed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads रविकुजौ; this sentence names रविकुजो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लाभे धनोपचयसौख्ययशोभिवृद्धिं सन्मित्रसंगबलपुष्टिकराश्च सर्वे ॥ क्रूरा बलेन रहिताः सुतवित्तबुद्धिनाशं शुभास् तु तनुतां स्वफलस्य कुर्युः

lābhe dhanopacayasaukhyayaśobhivṛddhiṃ sanmitrasaṃgabalapuṣṭikarāśca sarve || krūrā balena rahitāḥ sutavittabuddhināśaṃ śubhās tu tanutāṃ svaphalasya kuryuḥ

In the 11th (lābha) all ⟨the planets⟩ ⟨give⟩ an increase of wealth, comfort and fame to grow, and make the company of good friends, strength and nourishment. But malefics there bereft of strength ⟨give⟩ the destruction of sons, wealth and understanding; and benefics ⟨so weakened⟩ would make their own good result thin.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लाभेधनोपचयसौख्ययशोभि वृद्धिंसन्मित्रसंगबलपुष्टिकराश्चसर्वे ॥ क्रूराबलेनरहिताःसुतवित्तबुद्धिनाशंशुभास्तुतनुतांस्वफलस्यकुर्युः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: बलेन रहिताः, 'bereft of strength', is read with both halves of the second sentence: it is what makes the malefics destructive and what thins the benefics' own good result (तनुतां स्वफलस्य कुर्युः).
23.61a reading here is contested

पापा व्यये नेत्ररुजं विवादं हानिं धनानां नृपतस्करादेः ॥ सौम्या व्ययं सद्व्यवहारमार्गे कुर्युः शनिर् हर्षविवृद्धिमत्र

pāpā vyaye netrarujaṃ vivādaṃ hāniṃ dhanānāṃ nṛpataskarādeḥ || saumyā vyayaṃ sadvyavahāramārge kuryuḥ śanir harṣavivṛddhimatra

Malefics in the 12th (vyaya) ⟨give⟩ eye-disease, quarrel, and the loss of wealth through the king, thieves and the like. Benefics would make expenditure on the path of honest dealing; and Saturn here ⟨makes⟩ an increase of joy.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापाव्ययेनेत्ररुजंविवादंहानिंधनानांनृपतस्करादेः ॥ सौम्याव्ययंसद्व्यवहारमार्गेंकुर्युःशनिर्हर्षविवृद्धिमत्र

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मार्गेंकुर्युः"; alternatives "मार्गेकुर्युः" — The marks above र्गे look like repha + e-stroke + a dot; the dot may be an anusvāra or part of the repha. Zoom used elsewhere; unresolved.
  • About this edition: मार्गें is printed with a dot the reader could not separate from the repha above र्गे; it is rendered as the locative मार्गे, 'on the path of', which is what the sentence needs. The Sanskrit is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सद्व्यवहारमार्गे; this sentence names मार्गें, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

इतिभावस्थग्रहफला नि ॥

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणो गणितविच् चिंतामणिस् तत्सुतोऽनंतोऽनंतमतिर् व्यधात् खलमतिध्वस्त्यै जनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुः खलु नीलकंठविबुधो विद्वच्छिवानुज्ञया भावस्थग्रहपाकदौःस्थ्यसुखतायुक्तं फलं सोऽभ्यधात्

śrīgargānvayabhūṣaṇo gaṇitavic ciṃtāmaṇis tatsuto'naṃto'naṃtamatir vyadhāt khalamatidhvastyai januḥpaddhatim || tatsūnuḥ khalu nīlakaṃṭhavibudho vidvacchivānujñayā bhāvasthagrahapākadauḥsthyasukhatāyuktaṃ phalaṃ so'bhyadhāt

Cintāmaṇi, an ornament of the illustrious line of Garga and a master of calculation ⟨there was⟩; his son Ananta, of boundless understanding, made the Januḥpaddhati for the undoing of wrong-headed opinion. His son indeed, the learned Nīlakaṇṭha — he, by the leave of the learned Śiva, has declared this fruit ⟨of the year⟩, comprising the planets standing in the bhāvas and the misery and the ease of the daśās (pāka).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

श्रीगर्गान्वयभूषणोगणितविच्चिंतामणिस्तत्सुतोऽनंतोऽनंतमतिर्व्यधात्खलमतिध्वस्त्यैजनुःपद्धतिम् ॥ तत्सूनुःखलुनीलकंठविबु धोविद्वच्छिवानुज्ञयाभावस्थग्रहपाकदौःस्थ्यसुखतायुक्तंफलंसोऽभ्यधात्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets a second number, ३, straight after this verse's own number ६२.
  • About this edition: The closing praśasti of this section, in two half-verses of śārdūlavikrīḍita. It gives the author's descent — grandfather Cintāmaṇi, father Ananta, himself Nīlakaṇṭha — which is the same descent CLAUDE.md records for this work. जनुःपद्धति, 'the manual on births', is named as Ananta's own composition. विद्वच्छिव is taken as a person, 'the learned Śiva', a teacher or kinsman whose leave the author says he had; it could also be read as the god Śiva, which would make the line a claim of divine sanction rather than of human permission. The second number ३ that the page sets after this verse's own ६२ is a matter of numbering and is not rendered.

Adhyāya 24 · अथमासप्रवेशफलानि ॥ (closed by इतिश्रीगर्गवंशोद्भवश्रीदैवज्ञानंतसुतश्रीनीलकंठदैवज्ञविरचि तंवर्षतंत्रंसमाप्तम्)

अथमासप्रवेशफलानि ॥

मासार्कस्य तदासन्नपंक्तिस्थेन सहांतरम् ॥ कलीकृत्वार्कगत्याप्तं दिनाद्येन युतोनितम्

māsārkasya tadāsannapaṃktisthena sahāṃtaram || kalīkṛtvārkagatyāptaṃ dinādyena yutonitam

⟨To find the moment at which a month of the year begins:⟩ take the difference between the Sun of the month ⟨-entry⟩ and the Sun standing in the nearest row ⟨of the table⟩, reduce it to kalās (minutes of arc), and divide it by the Sun's ⟨daily⟩ motion. By the ⟨quotient, read as⟩ days and the rest, ⟨the time given in that row⟩ is increased or diminished.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मासार्कस्यतदासन्नपं क्तिस्थेनसहांतरम् ॥ कलीकृत्वार्कगत्याप्तंदिनाद्येनयुतोनितम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: मासार्क is the Sun's longitude at the month-entry being sought; पंक्ति is a line of the ephemeris table. दिनाद्य (days, ghaṭīs and the rest) is the unit of the quotient; the verse does not say here which way to apply it — verse 2 does.

तत्पंक्तिस्थं वारपूर्वं मासार्केऽधिकहीनके ॥ तद्वाराद्ये मासवेशो द्युवेशोप्येवमेव हि

tatpaṃktisthaṃ vārapūrvaṃ māsārke'dhikahīnake || tadvārādye māsaveśo dyuveśopyevameva hi

⟨Take⟩ what stands in that row, beginning with the weekday: when the month's Sun is greater ⟨than the tabulated Sun, add; when it is⟩ less, ⟨subtract⟩. At that weekday and ⟨time⟩ falls the entry of the month; and the entry of the day (dyu-praveśa) is found in just this same way.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्पंक्तिस्थंवारपूर्वंमासार्केऽधिकहीनके ॥ तद्वाराद्येमासवेशोद्युवेशोप्येवमेवहि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse states only 'when greater or less' (अधिकहीनके); which of the two takes the plus sign is supplied here from the arithmetic — a tabulated Sun behind the wanted Sun needs the quotient added.

मासप्रवेशकाले ज्ञो ग्रहान् भावांश्च साधयेत् ॥ तत्र मासतनोर्नाथो मुंथहो जन्मपस्तथा

māsapraveśakāle jño grahān bhāvāṃśca sādhayet || tatra māsatanornātho muṃthaho janmapastathā

At the time of the month-entry the knowing man should compute the grahas and the bhāvas. There ⟨the candidates for lord of the month are⟩: the lord of the month's tanu (the lagna of the month-entry), the munthā (muṃthaha), and the lord of the birth ⟨lagna⟩ (janmapa);

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मासप्रवेशकालेज्ञोग्रहान्भावांश्चसाधयेत् ॥ तत्रमास तनोर्नाथोमुंथहोजन्मपस्तथा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The list runs on into verse 4 and is closed in verse 5; this record holds only the first three names.
24.4a reading here is contested

त्रिराशिपो दिननिशोरवींदू भपतिस्तथा ॥ अब्दप्रवेशलग्नेश एषां वीर्याधिकस्तनुम्

trirāśipo dinaniśoravīṃdū bhapatistathā || abdapraveśalagneśa eṣāṃ vīryādhikastanum

⟨and⟩ the lord of the triplicity (trirāśipa); the Sun by day and the Moon by night; likewise the lord of the ⟨birth⟩ nakṣatra-sign (bhapati); and the lord of the lagna of the year-entry. Of these, the one greatest in strength, ⟨which⟩ the lagna (tanu)—

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिराशिपोदिननिशोरवींदूभपतिस्तथा ॥ अब्दप्रवेशलग्नेशएषांवीर्याधिकस्तनुम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रवींदू"; alternatives "रवींदु" — the ū-stroke under द sits close to the line below; read as long ū
  • About this edition: The reader records a doubt over रवींदू against रवींदु; the sense (a dual, 'the Sun and Moon') is the same either way. The sentence is completed by verse 5.
24.5a reading here is contested

पश्यन् मासपतिर्ज्ञेयस्ततो वाच्यं शुभाशुभम् ॥ अपरे मासलग्नेशं मासाधिपतिमूचिरे

paśyan māsapatirjñeyastato vācyaṃ śubhāśubham || apare māsalagneśaṃ māsādhipatimūcire

—aspects, is to be known as the lord of the month (māsapati); from him the good and the evil ⟨of that month⟩ is to be told. Others have called the lord of the month-entry lagna the lord of the month.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पश्यन्मासपति र्ज्ञेंयस्ततोवाच्यंशुभाशुभम् ॥ अपरेमासलग्नेशंमासाधिपतिमूचिरे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्ज्ञेंय"; alternatives "र्ज्ञेय" — zoomed: a repha, an e-stroke and a dot all sit over ज्ञ; the anusvāra dot looks printed, perhaps a misprint [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मासपतिर्ज्ञेयस्ततो; this sentence names र्ज्ञेंय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printed र्ज्ञेंय carries an anusvāra the reader thinks may be a misprint for र्ज्ञेय (ज्ञेयः, 'is to be known'); the sense is unaffected and is rendered so. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मासपतिर्ज्ञेयस्ततो; this sentence names र्ज्ञेंय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

दिनेशं दिनलग्नेशं तथा प्रोचुर्विचक्षणाः ॥ मासघस्रेशयोर्वाच्यं फलं वर्षेशवद्बुधैः

dineśaṃ dinalagneśaṃ tathā procurvicakṣaṇāḥ || māsaghasreśayorvācyaṃ phalaṃ varṣeśavadbudhaiḥ

The discerning have likewise declared the lord of the ⟨week⟩day and the lord of the day-entry lagna ⟨to be the lord of the day⟩. The fruit of the lord of the month and of the lord of the day is to be told by the wise exactly as the ⟨fruit⟩ of the lord of the year (varṣeśa) ⟨is told⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिनेशंदिनलग्नेशंतथाप्रोचुर्विचक्षणाः ॥ मासघस्रेशयोर्वाच्यंफलंवर्षे शवद्बुधैः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: घस्र in māsa-ghasreśayoḥ is 'day'; the pair named is the month-lord and the day-lord.
24.7a reading here is contested

लग्नांशाधिपतिर्विलग्नपनवांशेशेन मैत्रीदृशा दृष्टो वा सहितः शशी च यदि तौ मैत्रीदृशा लोकते ॥ तस्मिन् मासि तनौ सुखं बहुविधं नैरुज्यमित्थं फलं तावद्यावदिमे स्युरित्थमथ तान् संचार्य वाच्यं फलम्

lagnāṃśādhipatirvilagnapanavāṃśeśena maitrīdṛśā dṛṣṭo vā sahitaḥ śaśī ca yadi tau maitrīdṛśā lokate || tasmin māsi tanau sukhaṃ bahuvidhaṃ nairujyamitthaṃ phalaṃ tāvadyāvadime syuritthamatha tān saṃcārya vācyaṃ phalam

If the lord of the lagna's navāṃśa is aspected with a friendly aspect (maitrī-dṛś) by the lord of the navāṃśa held by the lagna-lord, or is joined with him, and if the Moon too looks upon those two with a friendly aspect, then in that month there is happiness of many kinds for the body (tanu, the 1st bhāva) and freedom from disease. This fruit lasts just so long as these ⟨planets⟩ stand thus; then, having moved them forward ⟨by their transit⟩, the fruit is to be declared ⟨afresh⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नांशाधिपतिर्विलग्नपनवांशेशेनमैत्रीदृशादृष्टोवासहितःशशीचयदितौमैत्रीदृशालोकते ॥ तस्मिन्मासितनौसुखंबहुवि धंनैरुज्यमित्थंफलंतावद्यावदिमेस्युरित्थमथतान्संचार्येवाच्यंफलम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संचार्येवाच्यं"; alternatives "संचार्यैवाच्यं" — zoomed: one stroke over र्य beside the repha; read as e-mātrā, could be ai [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads संचार्य वाच्यं; this sentence names संचार्येवाच्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: संचार्येवाच्यं is left undivided: the printed े gives संचार्य + एवाच्यं, which is no word, while the reader's alternative ै gives संचार्यैव वाच्यं, 'is to be told only after moving them on'. Rendered on the sense both readings share. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads संचार्य वाच्यं; this sentence names संचार्येवाच्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

तौ चेच्छत्रुदृशा मिथश्च शशिना दृष्टौ मनोदुःखदौ रोगाधिक्यकरौ च कश्चिदनयोर्नीचोस्तगो वा यदि ॥ कष्टात् सौख्यमिह द्वयं यदि पुनर्नीचास्तगं स्यान्मृतिः सूत्यब्दोद्भवरिष्टतो मृतिसमं स्यादन्यथेत्यूचिरे

tau cecchatrudṛśā mithaśca śaśinā dṛṣṭau manoduḥkhadau rogādhikyakarau ca kaścidanayornīcostago vā yadi || kaṣṭāt saukhyamiha dvayaṃ yadi punarnīcāstagaṃ syānmṛtiḥ sūtyabdodbhavariṣṭato mṛtisamaṃ syādanyathetyūcire

But if those two ⟨look⟩ at each other, and the Moon ⟨looks⟩ at them, with an enemy aspect (śatru-dṛś), they give grief of mind and an increase of disease. And if one of the two is in its fall (nīca) or is combust (astaga), happiness here ⟨comes only⟩ out of hardship. If, further, the pair are ⟨both⟩ in fall and combust, ⟨there is⟩ death — ⟨when⟩ the ariṣṭa arising in the birth chart and in the year ⟨chart agrees⟩; otherwise ⟨what comes⟩ will be the equal of death. So they have said.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तौचेच्छत्रुदृशामिथश्चशशिनादृष्टौमनोदुःखदौरोगाधिक्यकरौ चकश्चिदनयोर्नीचोस्तगोवायदि ॥ कष्टात्सौख्यमिहद्वयंयदिपुनर्नीचास्तगंस्यान्मृतिःसूत्यब्दोद्भवरिष्टतोमृतिसमंस्यादन्यथेत्यूचिरे

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The death-rule is conditional on both charts: सूत्यब्दोद्भवरिष्टतो मृतिः — 'death, from the ariṣṭa arising in the birth and in the year ⟨chart⟩'; without that agreement the text lowers the claim itself to 'the equal of death'.
24.9a reading here is contested

भावांशाधिपतिः स्वभावपनवांशेशेन मैत्रीदृशा दृष्टो वा सहितः शशी च यदि तौ मैत्रीदृशा लोकते ॥ तद्भावोत्थसुखं विलोक्यमथ तद्व्यत्यासतः कीर्तितं नीचास्तादिफलं च लग्नवदिदं विद्वद्भिरूह्यं धिया

bhāvāṃśādhipatiḥ svabhāvapanavāṃśeśena maitrīdṛśā dṛṣṭo vā sahitaḥ śaśī ca yadi tau maitrīdṛśā lokate || tadbhāvotthasukhaṃ vilokyamatha tadvyatyāsataḥ kīrtitaṃ nīcāstādiphalaṃ ca lagnavadidaṃ vidvadbhirūhyaṃ dhiyā

⟨For any bhāva:⟩ if the lord of that bhāva's navāṃśa is aspected with a friendly aspect by the lord of the navāṃśa held by that bhāva's own lord, or is joined with him, and if the Moon looks upon those two with a friendly aspect, the happiness arising from that bhāva is to be seen. And from the reverse of that, ⟨the reverse⟩. The fruit of fall, combustion and the rest has been told as for the lagna; the learned should infer this ⟨for every bhāva⟩ with their wit.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भावांशाधिपतिःस्वभावपनवांशेशेनमैत्रीदृशादृष्टोवासहितःशशीचयदितौमैत्रीदृशालोकते ॥ तद्भावोत्थसुखंविलोक्यमथतद्व्यत्यासतः कीर्तितंनीचास्तादिफलंचलग्नवदिदंविद्वद्भिरूह्यंधिया

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्व्यत्यासतः"; alternatives "तद्यत्यासतः" — zoomed: the first conjunct reads as द्व्य, the second as त्या; the ṭīkā lemma below prints the same

लग्नेशमासेशसमेश्वरांशनाथा यदंशाधिपमित्रदृष्ट्या ॥ दृष्टा युता वा शशिना च तत्तद्भावोत्थसौख्याय न चेदनिष्टम्

lagneśamāseśasameśvarāṃśanāthā yadaṃśādhipamitradṛṣṭyā || dṛṣṭā yutā vā śaśinā ca tattadbhāvotthasaukhyāya na cedaniṣṭam

The lords of the navāṃśas held by the lord of the lagna, by the lord of the month and by the lord of the year (sameśa): if they are aspected with the friendly aspect of the lord of the navāṃśa ⟨each occupies⟩, or are joined ⟨with him⟩, or ⟨are so aspected or joined⟩ by the Moon, ⟨this is⟩ for the happiness arising from each respective bhāva; if not, ⟨the result is⟩ unwanted.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशमासेशसमेश्वरांशनाथायदंशाधिपमित्रदृष्ट्या ॥ दृष्टायुतावाशशि नाचतत्तद्भावोत्थसौख्यायनचेदनिष्टम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: समेश (and समेश्वर here) is the lord of the year: समा is 'year'. The same four-name list — लग्नेश, मासेश, समेश, मुंथाधीश — is set out in verse 12.

निर्बला व्ययषष्ठाष्टांशपाः सत्फलदायकाः ॥ अन्ये सवीर्याः शुभदा व्यत्यये व्यत्ययः स्मृतः

nirbalā vyayaṣaṣṭhāṣṭāṃśapāḥ satphaladāyakāḥ || anye savīryāḥ śubhadā vyatyaye vyatyayaḥ smṛtaḥ

The lords of the navāṃśas of the 12th (vyaya), the 6th and the 8th give good fruit when they are weak (nirbala). The others give good when they are endowed with strength. In the reverse ⟨case⟩ the reverse is taught.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

निर्बलाव्ययषष्ठाष्टांशपाःसत्फलदायकाः ॥ अन्येसवीर्याःशुभदाव्यत्ययेव्यत्ययःस्मृतः

लग्नेशमासेशसमेशमुंथाधीशाः षडष्टोपगताः सपापाः ॥ दृष्टाः खलैः शत्रुदृशात्र मासे व्याध्यादिविद्विड्भयदुःखदाः स्युः

lagneśamāseśasameśamuṃthādhīśāḥ ṣaḍaṣṭopagatāḥ sapāpāḥ || dṛṣṭāḥ khalaiḥ śatrudṛśātra māse vyādhyādividviḍbhayaduḥkhadāḥ syuḥ

The lord of the lagna, the lord of the month, the lord of the year (sameśa) and the lord of the munthā, gone to the 6th or the 8th and accompanied by malefics, or aspected by malefics with an enemy aspect — in that month they give disease and the like, enemies, fear and grief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशमासेशसमेशमुंथाधीशाःषडष्टो पगताःसपापाः ॥ दृष्टाःखलैःशत्रुदृशात्रमासेव्याध्यादिविद्विड्भयदुःखदाःस्युः

24.13a reading here is contested

केंद्रत्रिकोणायगतास्तु लग्नमासाब्दपा वीर्ययुता नराणाम् ॥ नैरुज्यशत्रुक्षयराज्यलाभमानोदयात्यद्भुतकीर्तिदाः स्युः

keṃdratrikoṇāyagatāstu lagnamāsābdapā vīryayutā narāṇām || nairujyaśatrukṣayarājyalābhamānodayātyadbhutakīrtidāḥ syuḥ

But the lords of the lagna, of the month and of the year, gone to a kendra, a trikoṇa or the 11th (āya) and endowed with strength, give men freedom from disease, the destruction of enemies, the gain of a kingdom, the rise of honour, and exceedingly wonderful fame. ⟨Our mūla now reads नराणाम्, 'of men', the form the metre requires.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

केंद्रत्रिकोणायगतास्तुलग्नमासाब्दपावीर्ययु तानरणाम् ॥ नैरुज्यशत्रुक्षयराज्यलाभमानोदयात्यद्भुतकीर्तिदाःस्युः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तानरणाम्"; alternatives "तानराणाम्" — zoomed: I see न-र-ण-ा-म्, no ā-stroke after र; metre and sense expect नराणाम्. Could be an old-style ण read wrongly by me
  • About this edition: SUSPECTED MISPRINT, not emended: the plate reads वीर्ययुतानरणाम्. Scanned as indravajrā the pāda मासाब्दपावीर्ययुतानराणाम् requires a guru at syllable 10, so नराणाम्. The reader records the same doubt from the ink. The Sanskrit is left exactly as printed.

इंथिहालग्नपो राशिर्यो बली तत्र हद्दपाः ॥ दशेशाः स्वांशतुल्याहैरित्युक्तं कैश्चिदागमात्

iṃthihālagnapo rāśiryo balī tatra haddapāḥ || daśeśāḥ svāṃśatulyāhairityuktaṃ kaiścidāgamāt

Of the munthā (inthihā) and the lord of the lagna, whichever rāśi is the strong one — the haddā-lords in that ⟨rāśi⟩ are the daśā-lords, ⟨their periods running⟩ in days equal to their own portions ⟨of the term⟩. So some have said, on the authority of tradition (āgama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंथिहालग्नपोराशिर्योबलीतत्रहद्दपाः ॥ दशेशाःस्वांश तुल्याहैरित्युक्तंकैश्चिदागमात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This is a haddā-based daśā: the terms (haddā) of the chosen rāśi supply both the order of the daśā-lords and the length of each period, one day per degree of the term. The book reports it as the view of 'some' and answers it in verse 15.

रवींद्वोरसमावेशान्नैतद्युक्तं परे जगुः ॥ दशांतरदशाच्छेदे फलमाब्दं तु युज्यते

ravīṃdvorasamāveśānnaitadyuktaṃ pare jaguḥ || daśāṃtaradaśācchede phalamābdaṃ tu yujyate

Others have declared this improper, because the Sun and the Moon are not equally taken in ⟨by that scheme⟩. ⟨They hold that⟩ at the cutting-off point of a daśā and of an antardaśā it is the fruit belonging to the year that properly applies.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रवींद्वोरसमावेशान्नैतद्युक्तंपरेजगुः ॥ दशांतरदशाच्छेदेफलमाब्दंतुयुज्यते

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: असमावेश, 'unequal inclusion', is the objection; the haddās are the terms of the five star-planets, so a haddā daśā has no place for the Sun and the Moon. The verse states the objection without spelling out that ground, and it is not supplied in the rendering.

दिनप्रवेशकालेऽपि ग्रहान् भावांश्च साधयेत् ॥ चंद्रलग्नांशकाभ्यां तु फलं तत्र वदेद्बुधः

dinapraveśakāle'pi grahān bhāvāṃśca sādhayet || caṃdralagnāṃśakābhyāṃ tu phalaṃ tatra vadedbudhaḥ

At the time of the day-entry (dina-praveśa) too one should compute the grahas and the bhāvas; and there the wise man should tell the fruit from the Moon and from the lagna's navāṃśa (lagnāṃśaka).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिनप्रवेशकालेऽपिग्रहान्भावांश्चसाधयेत् ॥ चंद्रलग्नां शकाभ्यांतुफलंतत्रवदेद्बुधः

चतुष्कमिंथिहेशादिदिनमासाब्दलग्नपाः ॥ एषां बली तनुं पश्यन् दिनेशः परिकीर्तितः

catuṣkamiṃthiheśādidinamāsābdalagnapāḥ || eṣāṃ balī tanuṃ paśyan dineśaḥ parikīrtitaḥ

⟨There is⟩ a set of four — the lord of the munthā (inthihā) and the rest, that is, the lords of the lagnas of the day, of the month and of the year. Of these, the strong one that aspects the lagna (tanu) is declared the lord of the day (dineśa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चतुष्कमिंथिहेशादिदिनमासाब्दलग्नपाः ॥ एषांबलीतनुंपश्यन्दिनेशःपरिकीर्तितः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse says चतुष्कम्, 'a tetrad', so इंथिहेशादि is read as the first member of a group of four and दिनमासाब्दलग्नपाः as the other three (the lords of the day-, month- and year-entry lagnas). Reading दिन, मास, अब्द and लग्न as four separate lords would make five names against the verse's own count.

त्रिकोणकेंद्रायगताः शुभाश्चेच्चंद्रात्तनोर्वा बलिनः खलास्तु ॥ षट्त्र्यायगास्तत्र दिने सुखानि विलासमानार्थयशोयुतानि

trikoṇakeṃdrāyagatāḥ śubhāśceccaṃdrāttanorvā balinaḥ khalāstu || ṣaṭtryāyagāstatra dine sukhāni vilāsamānārthayaśoyutāni

If the benefics have gone to a trikoṇa, a kendra or the 11th (āya) from the Moon or from the lagna (tanu), and the malefics, though strong, have gone to the 6th, the 3rd or the 11th (āya), then on that day ⟨there are⟩ comforts, joined with enjoyment, honour, wealth and fame.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिको णकेंद्रायगताःशुभाश्चेच्चंद्रात्तनोर्वाबलिनःखलास्तु ॥ षट्त्र्यायगास्तत्रदिनेसुखानिविलासमानार्थयशोयुतानि

षडष्टरिःफोपगता दिनाब्दमासेन्थिहेशाः खलखेटयुक्ताः ॥ गदप्रदा मानयशोहराश्च केंद्रत्रिकोणायगताः सुखाप्त्यै

ṣaḍaṣṭariḥphopagatā dinābdamāsenthiheśāḥ khalakheṭayuktāḥ || gadapradā mānayaśoharāśca keṃdratrikoṇāyagatāḥ sukhāptyai

The lords of the day, of the year, of the month and of the munthā (inthihā), gone to the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (riḥpha) and joined with malefic planets, give disease and carry off honour and fame; ⟨but the same lords⟩ gone to a kendra, a trikoṇa or the 11th (āya) are for the winning of happiness.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षडष्टरिः फोपगतादिनाब्दमासेन्थिहेशाःखलखेटयुक्ताः ॥ गदप्रदामानयशोहराश्चकेंद्रत्रिकोणायगताःसुखाप्त्यै

लग्नांशकः सौम्यखगैः समेतो दृष्टोपि वा मित्रदृशेंदुनापि ॥ नैरुज्यराज्यादिशरीरपुष्टिर्मासोक्तिवद्दुःखमतोऽन्यथात्वे

lagnāṃśakaḥ saumyakhagaiḥ sameto dṛṣṭopi vā mitradṛśeṃdunāpi || nairujyarājyādiśarīrapuṣṭirmāsoktivadduḥkhamato'nyathātve

⟨When⟩ the lagna's navāṃśa is occupied by benefic planets, or is aspected by them with a friendly aspect, or by the Moon as well — ⟨there is⟩ freedom from disease, sovereignty and the rest, and a well-nourished body. In the contrary case ⟨there is⟩ grief, just as was said for the month.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नांशकःसौम्यखगैः समेतोदृष्टोपिवामित्रदृशेंदुनापि ॥ नैरुज्यराज्यादिशरीरपुष्टिर्मासोक्तिवद्दुःखमतोऽन्यथात्वे

24.21a reading here is contested

यदंशकः सौम्ययुतेक्षितो वा स्निग्धेक्षणाद्भावजसौख्यकृत् सः ॥ दुःखप्रदः प्रोक्तवदन्यथात्वे सर्वेषु भावेष्वियमेव रीतिः

yadaṃśakaḥ saumyayutekṣito vā snigdhekṣaṇādbhāvajasaukhyakṛt saḥ || duḥkhapradaḥ proktavadanyathātve sarveṣu bhāveṣviyameva rītiḥ

Whichever ⟨bhāva's⟩ navāṃśa is joined with benefics, or is looked at by them with an affectionate glance (snigdhekṣaṇa), that ⟨navāṃśa⟩ makes the happiness born of that bhāva. In the contrary case it gives grief, as has been said. In all the bhāvas this is the very rule.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदंशकःसौम्ययुतेक्षितोवास्निग्धेक्षणाद्भावजसौख्यकृत्सः ॥ दुःखप्रदःप्रोक्तवदन्यथात्वेसर्वेषुभावेष्वियमेवरीतिः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वेषु"; alternatives "सर्वेंषु" — zoomed: repha and e-stroke over व crowd together; a small mark could be read as an anusvāra, probably not

षष्ठांशकः सौम्ययुतो रोगदः पापयुक् शुभः ॥ व्ययांशे शुभयुग्दृष्टे सद्व्ययः पापतस्त्वसत्

ṣaṣṭhāṃśakaḥ saumyayuto rogadaḥ pāpayuk śubhaḥ || vyayāṃśe śubhayugdṛṣṭe sadvyayaḥ pāpatastvasat

The navāṃśa of the 6th, joined with benefics, gives disease; joined with malefics it is auspicious. When the navāṃśa of the 12th (vyaya) is joined with, or aspected by, benefics, the spending is good; from malefics, however, it is bad.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठांशकःसौ म्ययुतोरोगदःपापयुक्शुभः ॥ व्ययांशेशुभयुग्दृष्टेसद्व्ययःपापतस्त्वसत्

जायांशः सौम्ययुग्दृष्टः स्वस्त्रीसौख्यविलासकृत् ॥ पापैर्गृहकलिर्दुःखं पापांतस्थे मृतिं वदेत्

jāyāṃśaḥ saumyayugdṛṣṭaḥ svastrīsaukhyavilāsakṛt || pāpairgṛhakalirduḥkhaṃ pāpāṃtasthe mṛtiṃ vadet

The navāṃśa of the 7th (jāyā), joined with or aspected by benefics, makes the happiness and the pleasure of one's own wife. By malefics, ⟨there is⟩ quarrel in the house and grief; when it stands between malefics ⟨on both sides⟩, one should declare death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जायांशःसौम्ययुग्दृष्टःस्वस्त्रीसौख्यविलासकृत् ॥ पा पैर्गृहकलिर्दुःखंपापांतस्थेमृतिंवदेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: पापांतस्थे is the pinching of a place between two malefics — the kartarī named in its own word at verse 26.
24.24a reading here is contested

शुभमध्यस्थिते त्र्यंशे बहुलं कामिनीसुखं ॥ स्वस्यां रतिर्गुरावन्यखगेऽन्यासु रतिं वदेत्

śubhamadhyasthite tryaṃśe bahulaṃ kāminīsukhaṃ || svasyāṃ ratirgurāvanyakhage'nyāsu ratiṃ vadet

When the tryaṃśa ⟨of the 7th⟩ stands in the middle of benefics, the happiness of women is abundant. With Jupiter ⟨there, his⟩ delight is in his own ⟨wife⟩; with another planet, one should declare delight in other women.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभमध्यस्थितेत्र्यंशेबहुलंकामिनीसुखं ॥ स्वस्यांरतिर्गुरावन्यखगेऽन्यासुरतिंवदेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कामिनीसुखं ॥"; alternatives "कामिनीसुखं ।" — at the column seam the left tile shows a single daṇḍa, the right tile a double; recorded ॥ from the fuller view
  • About this edition: त्र्यंश is the drekkāṇa, a third of a rāśi. The verse does not name the bhāva; the 7th is supplied from verse 23 before it and from स्वस्यां ('in his own ⟨wife⟩') here, and the supply is marked. The reader's doubt at this verse is about the daṇḍa at the column seam only.
24.25a reading here is contested

मृत्यंशे मृत्युगे सौम्यैर्युग्दृष्टे मरणं रणे ॥ मिश्रैर्मिश्रं खलैः सौख्यं वर्षलग्नानुसारतः

mṛtyaṃśe mṛtyuge saumyairyugdṛṣṭe maraṇaṃ raṇe || miśrairmiśraṃ khalaiḥ saukhyaṃ varṣalagnānusārataḥ

When the navāṃśa of the 8th (mṛtyu), itself gone to the 8th, is joined with or aspected by benefics, ⟨there is⟩ death in battle; with mixed ⟨planets⟩, a mixed ⟨fruit⟩; with malefics, happiness — ⟨all⟩ according to the lagna of the year.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मृत्यंशेमृत्युगेसौम्यैर्युग्दृष्टेमरणंरणे ॥ मिश्रैर्मिश्रंखलैःसौख्यंवर्षलग्नानुसारतः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खलैःसौख्यं"; alternatives "खलैरसौख्यं" — print sets खलैःसौख्यं; the sense (malefics) suggests असौख्यं was meant. Kept as printed
  • About this edition: The reader suspects खलैः सौख्यं for खलैरसौख्यं ('unhappiness from malefics'). The printed reading is kept and is probably right: it is the same inversion the chapter states twice already — verse 11 (the navāṃśa-lords of the 6th, 8th and 12th do good when weak) and verse 22 (the 6th's navāṃśa is auspicious with malefics, diseased with benefics).

द्विर्द्वादशे खला हानिं व्यये सौम्याः शुभव्ययम् ॥ कर्तरी पापजा रोगं करोति शुभजा शुभम्

dvirdvādaśe khalā hāniṃ vyaye saumyāḥ śubhavyayam || kartarī pāpajā rogaṃ karoti śubhajā śubham

Malefics in the 2nd and the 12th ⟨give⟩ loss; benefics in the 12th (vyaya), auspicious spending. A kartarī (the scissors — a place hemmed in on both sides) made by malefics produces disease; one made by benefics produces good.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

द्विर्द्वादशेखलाहानिंव्ययेसौम्याःशुभव्ययम् ॥ कर्तरीपापजारोगंकरोतिशुभजाशुभम्

लग्नेऽष्टमे वा क्षीणेंदुर्मृत्युदः पापदृग्युतः ॥ रोगो वा ग्रहणं वापि रिपुतः शत्रुभीरपि

lagne'ṣṭame vā kṣīṇeṃdurmṛtyudaḥ pāpadṛgyutaḥ || rogo vā grahaṇaṃ vāpi riputaḥ śatrubhīrapi

A waning Moon in the lagna or in the 8th, aspected by or joined with malefics, gives death; or disease, or being seized, and fear from an enemy as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेऽष्टमेवाक्षीणेंदुर्मृत्युदःपापदृग्युतः ॥ रोगो वाग्रहणंवापिरिपुतःशत्रुभीरपि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ग्रहण here is 'being seized' — capture or arrest; the word can also be read as an eclipse, and the verse does not decide between them.
24.28a reading here is contested

चंद्रे सभौमे निधनारिसंस्थे नृणां भयं शस्त्रकृतं रिपोर्वा ॥ पापैर्मुखस्थैः पतनं गजाश्वयानात् तनौ स्याद्बहुला च पीडा

caṃdre sabhaume nidhanārisaṃsthe nṛṇāṃ bhayaṃ śastrakṛtaṃ riporvā || pāpairmukhasthaiḥ patanaṃ gajāśvayānāt tanau syādbahulā ca pīḍā

When the Moon, together with Mars, stands in the 8th (nidhana) or the 6th (ari), men have fear caused by a weapon, or from an enemy. With malefics standing in the mukha ⟨the 1st, 'the face'⟩, ⟨there is⟩ a fall from an elephant- or horse-carriage, and there would be much pain in the body.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेसभौमेनिधनारिसंस्थेनृणांभयंशस्त्रकृतंरिपोर्वा ॥ पापैर्मुखस्थैःपतनंगजाश्वयानात्तनौस्याद्बहुला चपीडा

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्बहुला"; alternatives "स्याद्वहुला" — the conjunct after स्या is small; ब and व are hard to separate here
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शस्त्रकृतं"; alternatives "शस्त्रकृतं" — स्त्र conjunct crowded at the column seam
  • About this edition: मुख is taken as the lagna, 'the face' of the chart; the word can also name the 2nd (the mouth), and the verse gives no ground to choose. तनु in the last pāda is the body, not the bhāva.

शुभा द्यूने विजयदा द्यूतादर्थसुखावहाः ॥ नवमे धर्मभाग्यार्थराजगौरवकीर्तिताः

śubhā dyūne vijayadā dyūtādarthasukhāvahāḥ || navame dharmabhāgyārtharājagauravakīrtitāḥ

Benefics in the 7th (dyūna) give victory and bring wealth and comfort from gambling (dyūta). In the 9th they are declared ⟨to give⟩ dharma, good fortune, wealth and honour from the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभाद्यूनेविजयदाद्यूतादर्थसुखावहाः ॥ नवमेधर्मभाग्यार्थराजगौरवकीर्तिताः

24.30a reading here is contested

दिनप्रवेशेऽस्ति विधुरवस्थायां तु यादृशि ॥ तदवस्थातुल्यमसौ फलं दत्ते न संशयः

dinapraveśe'sti vidhuravasthāyāṃ tu yādṛśi || tadavasthātulyamasau phalaṃ datte na saṃśayaḥ

In whatever avasthā (state) the Moon stands at the day-entry, he gives a fruit matching that state — of this there is no doubt.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिनप्रवेशेऽस्तिविधुरवस्थायांतुयादृशि ॥ तदवस्थातुल्यमसौफलंदत्तेनसंशयः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधुरवस्थायां"; alternatives "विधुर्यवस्थायां" — read र with no conjunct; sense विधुः + अवस्थायां
24.31a reading here is contested

विहाय राशिं चंद्रस्य भागाद्विघ्नाः शरोद्धृताः ॥ लब्धं गता अवस्थाः स्युर्भोग्यायाः फलमादिशेत्

vihāya rāśiṃ caṃdrasya bhāgādvighnāḥ śaroddhṛtāḥ || labdhaṃ gatā avasthāḥ syurbhogyāyāḥ phalamādiśet

Setting the rāśi aside, ⟨take⟩ the degrees of the Moon, doubled, and divide by five (śara). The quotient gives the avasthās that have gone by; one should declare the fruit of the one still to be undergone (bhogyā).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विहायराशिंचंद्रस्यभागाद्विघ्नाःशरोद्धृताः ॥ लब्धंगताअवस्थाःस्युर्भोग्यायाःफलमादिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भागाद्विघ्नाः"; alternatives "भागाद्द्विघ्नाः" — zoomed: single द्वि printed; sense (twice) would need द्द्वि. Kept as printed
  • About this edition: The pothi prints भागाद्विघ्नाः, which gives no sense; the arithmetic needs भागाद् द्विघ्नाः, 'doubled from the degrees'. The reader records the same doubt from the ink and kept the printed form. Doubled degrees divided by five yields the twelve avasthās of verses 32–33, one to each 2°30′.

प्रवासः प्रवासोपगे रात्रिनाथेऽर्थनाशस्तु नष्टोपगे मृत्युभीतिः ॥ मृतावस्थिते स्याज्जयायां जयस्तु विलासस्तु हास्योपगे कामिनीभिः

pravāsaḥ pravāsopage rātrināthe'rthanāśastu naṣṭopage mṛtyubhītiḥ || mṛtāvasthite syājjayāyāṃ jayastu vilāsastu hāsyopage kāminībhiḥ

When the lord of night ⟨the Moon⟩ has gone to ⟨the avasthā called⟩ pravāsa, ⟨there is⟩ a journey abroad; when to naṣṭa, loss of wealth; when he stands in mṛtā, fear of death; when in jayā, victory; when gone to hāsyā, enjoyment with women.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रवासःप्रवासोपगेरात्रिनाथेऽर्थनाशस्तुनष्टोपगेमृत्युभीतिः ॥ मृतावस्थितेस्याज्जयायांजयस्तुविलासस्तुहास्योपगेकामिनीभिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: These are the first five of the twelve avasthās of the Moon counted in verse 31; the remaining seven are named in verse 33.
24.33a reading here is contested

रतौ स्याद्रतिः क्रीडिता सौख्यदात्री प्रसुप्तापि निद्रां कलिं देहपीडां ॥ भयं तापहानी सुखं स्यात्तु भुक्ता ज्वरा कंपिता सुस्थिता सुक्रमेण

ratau syādratiḥ krīḍitā saukhyadātrī prasuptāpi nidrāṃ kaliṃ dehapīḍāṃ || bhayaṃ tāpahānī sukhaṃ syāttu bhuktā jvarā kaṃpitā susthitā sukrameṇa

In rati ⟨there is⟩ delight; krīḍitā gives happiness; prasuptā too ⟨gives⟩ sleep; and quarrel, bodily pain, fear, and the ending of distress with happiness ⟨come⟩ from bhuktā, jvarā, kampitā and susthitā, in that due order.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रतौस्याद्रतिःक्रीडितासौख्यादात्रीप्रसुप्तापिनिद्रांकलिंदेहपीडां ॥ भयंतापहानीसुखंस्यात्तुभुक्ताज्वराकंपितासुस्थितासुक्रमेण

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौख्यादात्री"; alternatives "सौख्यदात्री" — the ā-stroke after ख्य is clear at tile scale; the ṭīkā reads सौख्यदात्री; kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सौख्यदात्री; this sentence names सौख्यादात्री, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Four names carry five result-words, so the last pair is grouped: तापहानी सुखं is read together under सुस्थिता ('well-established'), which fits its name, and it leaves ज्वरा with bodily pain and कंपिता with fear. Grouping तापहानी with कंपिता instead and leaving सुखं alone to सुस्थिता is possible, and the verse does not settle it. The plate prints सौख्यादात्री, readable as सौख्य-आदात्री, 'taker of happiness'; the ṭīkā's lemma reads सौख्यदात्री, 'giver of happiness', which is what is rendered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सौख्यदात्री; this sentence names सौख्यादात्री, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
24.34a reading here is contested

अथमृगयाविचारः ॥

सवीर्यौ कुजज्ञौ नृपाखेटसिद्ध्यै न सिद्धिर्यदा वीर्यहीनाविमौ स्तः ॥ जलाखेटमाहुः सवीर्यैर्ग्रहर्क्षैर्जलाख्यैर्नगाख्यैर्नगाखेटमाहुः

savīryau kujajñau nṛpākheṭasiddhyai na siddhiryadā vīryahīnāvimau staḥ || jalākheṭamāhuḥ savīryairgraharkṣairjalākhyairnagākhyairnagākheṭamāhuḥ

Mars and Mercury, when endowed with strength, ⟨make⟩ for the success of the king's hunt; when those two are without strength, there is no success. When the strong planets and signs are those called watery (jala), they call it a water-hunt; when they are those called mountain (naga), they call it a mountain-hunt.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सवीर्यौकुजज्ञौनृपाखेटसिद्ध्यैनसिद्धिर्यदावीर्यहीनाविमौस्तः ॥ जलाखेटमाहुःसवीर्यैर्ग्रहर्क्षैर्जलाख्यैर्नगाख्यैर्नगाखे टमाहुः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सवीर्यौ"; alternatives "सवीयौं" — zoomed: above यौ are the au-strokes and a small round mark; read as the repha, but it looks like an anusvāra
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सवीर्यैर्ग्रहर्क्षैर्जलाख्यैर्"; alternatives "सवीयैंग्रहक्षैंर्जलाख्यैर्" — repha on यै and on क्षै printed as small marks after the ai-strokes; not zoomed
  • About this edition: The page sets अथ मृगयाविचारः above this verse: the section on hunting begins here.
24.35a reading here is contested

लग्नास्तनाथौ केंद्रस्थौ निर्बलौ क्लेशदायिनी ॥ मृगयोक्ता शुभफला वीर्याढ्यौ यदि तौ पुनः

lagnāstanāthau keṃdrasthau nirbalau kleśadāyinī || mṛgayoktā śubhaphalā vīryāḍhyau yadi tau punaḥ

When the lords of the lagna and of the 7th (asta) stand in a kendra but are weak, the hunt is said to be one that gives trouble; but if those two are rich in strength, ⟨the hunt is⟩ of auspicious fruit.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नास्तनाथौकेंद्रस्थौनिर्बलौक्लेशदायिनी ॥ मृगयोक्ताशुभफलावीर्याढ्यौयदितौपुनः

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्लेशदायिनी"; alternatives "क्केशदायिनी" — the conjunct is printed as a stacked ligature that looks like क्के; read as क्ले

अथभोजनचिंता ॥

लग्नाधिपो भोज्यदाता सुखेशो भोज्यमीरितं ॥ बुभुक्षा मदपः कर्मपतिर्भोक्तेति चिंतयेत्

lagnādhipo bhojyadātā sukheśo bhojyamīritaṃ || bubhukṣā madapaḥ karmapatirbhokteti ciṃtayet

The lord of the lagna is the giver of the food; the lord of the 4th (sukha) is said to be the food itself; the lord of the 7th (mada) is the appetite; and the lord of the 10th (karma) is the eater — so one should consider.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपोभोज्यदातासुखेशोभोज्यमीरितं ॥ बुभुक्षामदपःकर्मपतिर्भोक्तेतिचिंतयेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets अथ भोजनचिंता above this verse: the section on food begins here. मदप is read as the lord of the 7th, मद being one of that bhāva's names (मदन); the alternative division बुभुक्षाम् + अदपः yields no Sanskrit word, so the split is taken.

लग्ने लाभे च सत्खेटयुतदृष्टे सुभोजनम् ॥ जीवे लग्ने सिते वापि सुभोज्यं दुःस्थितावपि

lagne lābhe ca satkheṭayutadṛṣṭe subhojanam || jīve lagne site vāpi subhojyaṃ duḥsthitāvapi

When the lagna and the 11th (lābha) are joined with or aspected by good planets, ⟨there is⟩ good eating. With Jupiter in the lagna, or Venus ⟨there⟩, the food is good even though the two be ill-placed.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेलाभेचसत्खेटयुतदृष्टेसुभोजनम् ॥ जीवेलग्नेसितेवापिसुभोज्यंदुःस्थितावपि

मंदे तमसि वा लग्ने सूर्येणालोकिते युते ॥ लभ्यते भोजनं नात्र शस्त्रभीतिस्तदा क्वचित्

maṃde tamasi vā lagne sūryeṇālokite yute || labhyate bhojanaṃ nātra śastrabhītistadā kvacit

When Saturn (manda) or Rāhu (tamas) is in the lagna, and ⟨the lagna is⟩ aspected by or joined with the Sun, food is obtained; and then there is no fear of weapons anywhere.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेतमसिवालग्नेसूर्येणालोकितेयुते ॥ लभ्य तेभोजनंनात्रशस्त्रभीतिस्तदाक्कचित्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: नात्र is read as न + अत्र with न negating शस्त्रभीतिः, not भोजनं: verse 39 states the opposite case — the lagna NOT aspected or joined by the Sun gives fasting — so here the Sun's contact must give the food. The printed क्कचित् is a misprint for क्वचित्. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्वचित्; this sentence names क्कचित्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
24.39a reading here is contested

रविदृष्टं युतं वापि लग्नं न यदि तत्र हि ॥ उपवासस्तदा वाच्यो नक्तं वा विरसाशनम्

ravidṛṣṭaṃ yutaṃ vāpi lagnaṃ na yadi tatra hi || upavāsastadā vācyo naktaṃ vā virasāśanam

If the lagna is not aspected by the Sun, nor joined ⟨with him⟩, then fasting is to be declared there — or a meal at night, or tasteless food.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रविदृष्टंयुतंवापिलग्नंनयदितत्रहि ॥ उपवासस्तदावाच्योनक्तंवाविरसाशनम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविदृष्टंयुतंवापि"; alternatives "रविदृष्ट्यंयुतंवापि" — at 3x the ष्ट looked to carry a subscript य; at 8x it does not -- what reads as a subscript is the ट's own tail inside ष्ट. The anusvara over ष्ट is real.
  • About this edition: नक्तं here is the plain word 'at night' (a night meal), not the Tājika yoga of the same name.

चंद्रे कर्मगते भोज्यमुष्णं शीतसुखे कुजे ॥ तुर्ये खेटस्य वसतो भोज्यान्ने रसमादिशेत्

caṃdre karmagate bhojyamuṣṇaṃ śītasukhe kuje || turye kheṭasya vasato bhojyānne rasamādiśet

When the Moon has gone to the 10th (karma), the food is hot; ⟨when⟩ Mars ⟨is⟩ in the 4th (sukha), ⟨it is⟩ cold. From the planet dwelling in the 4th (turya) one should declare the taste (rasa) in the food eaten.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेकर्मगतेभोज्यमुष्णंशीतसुखेकुजे ॥ तुर्येखेटस्यवसतोभोज्यान्नेरसमादिशेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: शीतसुखे is read as शीतं सुखे, the anusvāra not being printed; the division is left joined in the Sanskrit. The rule runs against the planets' own natures (the Moon giving hot food, Mars cold), and the text is rendered as it stands.
24.41a reading here is contested

स्निग्धमन्नं सिते तुर्ये तैलसंस्कृतमर्कजे ॥ नीचोपगे कदशनं विरसं न च संस्कृतं

snigdhamannaṃ site turye tailasaṃskṛtamarkaje || nīcopage kadaśanaṃ virasaṃ na ca saṃskṛtaṃ

With Venus in the 4th (turya), the food is unctuous; with Saturn (arkaja) ⟨there⟩, it is dressed with oil. With ⟨a planet⟩ gone to its fall (nīca), ⟨there is⟩ poor food, tasteless and not well dressed.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्निग्धमन्नंसितेतुर्येतैलसंस्कृतमर्कजे ॥ नी चोपगेकदशनंविरसंनचसंस्कृतं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तैलसंस्कृतमर्कजे"; alternatives "तैलसंस्कृतमर्केजे" — SETTLED ON THE INK AT 18x, and it is the finest call on this leaf. The क carries ONE mark above the headline: a tall hook that rises and curls LEFT. This fount draws the repha exactly so (compare कर्म on the same line, measured side by side) and draws े as a SHORT diagonal tick (compare the जे immediately following). One mark = repha only, so र्क, not र्के. Two akṣaras earlier on line 8 the same fount sets तिलान्नमर्के with BOTH marks, hook plus tick -- so the distinction is real in this type and the compositor observed it.
  • About this edition: The reader settled मर्के (र्क, the repha alone) against मर्केजे at 18x on the ink, so the word is अर्कजे, Saturn.
24.42a reading here is contested

सूर्यादिभिर्लग्नगतैः सवीर्यै राजादिगेहे भुजिमामनंति ॥ सुखे सुखेशे सबले सुभोज्यं चरादिकं स्यादसकृत् सकृद्विः

sūryādibhirlagnagataiḥ savīryai rājādigehe bhujimāmanaṃti || sukhe sukheśe sabale subhojyaṃ carādikaṃ syādasakṛt sakṛdviḥ

With the Sun and the rest ⟨of the planets⟩ gone to the lagna and endowed with strength, they hold that the meal is in the house of a king and so on. When the 4th (sukha) and its lord are strong, the food is good; and by ⟨the sign being⟩ movable and the rest, ⟨the eating happens⟩ many times, once, ⟨or⟩ twice ⟨in that order⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्यादिभिर्लग्नगतैःसवीर्यैराजादिगेहेभुजिमामनंति ॥ सुखेसुखेशेसबलेसुभोज्यंचरादिकंस्यादस कृत्सकृद्विः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृत्सकृद्विः"; alternatives "कृत्सकृद्धिः" — read at 14x. The stack is द + द्वि, not द + धि. The tika on line 12 of this same leaf glosses it as 'सकृदेकवारं ... द्विवारम्' -- it is unpacking सकृत् and द्विः separately, which only works for द्द्विः. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): द्द्विः → द्विः: the stack is TWO decks, not three: the row profile over x676-712 shows two dense bands (y602-608 and y622-637) and a total depth of 44 px, the same as a plain स (45 px), and it matches the tika's द्वि on line 13 glyph for glyph
  • About this edition: चरादिकं names the three sign-classes in order — movable, fixed, dual — and असकृत् सकृद् द्विः pairs with them: many times, once, twice. The reader's second ink reading settled द्विः against द्द्विः, and the ṭīkā on the same leaf glosses सकृत् as एकवारं and द्विः as द्विवारम्.

मूलत्रिकोणगे खेटे लग्ने पितृगृहेऽशनम् ॥ मित्रालये मित्रभस्थे शत्रुगेहेऽरिगेहगे

mūlatrikoṇage kheṭe lagne pitṛgṛhe'śanam || mitrālaye mitrabhasthe śatrugehe'rigehage

When the planet in the lagna stands in its mūlatrikoṇa, the eating is in the father's house; when it stands in a friend's sign, in a friend's house; when it is in an enemy's sign, in an enemy's house.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मूलत्रिकोणगेखेटेलग्नेपितृगृहेऽशनम् ॥ मित्रालयेमित्रभस्थेशत्रुगेहेऽरिगेहगे

24.44a reading here is contested

शुभेक्षितयुते लग्ने बलाढ्ये स्वगृहे भुजिः ॥ गृहराशिस्वभावेन यत्नादन्यत्र चिंतयेत्

śubhekṣitayute lagne balāḍhye svagṛhe bhujiḥ || gṛharāśisvabhāvena yatnādanyatra ciṃtayet

When the lagna is aspected by or joined with benefics and is rich in strength, the meal is in one's own house. Elsewhere, one should work it out with care (yatnāt) by the nature of the sign of the ⟨relevant⟩ house.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभेक्षितयुतेलग्नेबलाढ्ये स्वगृहेभुजिः ॥ गृहराशिस्वभावेनयत्तादन्यत्रचिंतयेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यत्तादन्यत्र"; alternatives "यत्तदन्यत्र" — the ता is inked long (a clear ा stroke) at 16x. Recorded as printed; यत्तद् is what the sense wants, so this is very likely the compositor's long-a. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads यत्नादन्यत्र; this sentence names यत्तादन्यत्र, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The plate prints यत्ताद् with a clear long ā, which the reader verified at 16x; the word the sense wants is यत् तद्. Rendered on यत् तद् and the Sanskrit left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads यत्नादन्यत्र; this sentence names यत्ताद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
24.45a reading here is contested

तिलान्नमर्के हिमगौ सुतंडुला भौमे मसूराश्चणकाश्च भोज्यम् ॥ बुधे समुद्गाः खलु राजमाषा गुरौ सगोधूमभुजिः सवीर्ये

tilānnamarke himagau sutaṃḍulā bhaume masūrāścaṇakāśca bhojyam || budhe samudgāḥ khalu rājamāṣā gurau sagodhūmabhujiḥ savīrye

With the Sun, food of sesame; with the Moon (himagu, the cold-rayed), fine rice; with Mars, lentils (masūra) and chickpeas (caṇaka) are the food; with Mercury, indeed, cow-pea (rājamāṣa) together with green gram (mudga); with Jupiter strong, a meal that includes wheat (godhūma).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तिलान्नमर्केहिमगौसुतंडुलाभौमेमसूराश्चणकाश्चभोज्यम् ॥ बुधेस मुद्गाःखलुराजमाषागुरौसगोधूमभुजिःसवीर्ये

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मसूराश्चणकाश्च"; alternatives "मसूराश्वणकाश्व" — the श-ligature in this fount reads as श्व at low magnification. At 14x the two instances here and a third on line 12 (स्त्रियःसुरूपाश्च) are the SAME glyph, and the only Sanskrit that fits is मसूराः + च + चणकाः + च. Read श्च throughout this batch.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुरौ"; alternatives "उरौ", "यिरौ" — read गु at 10x -- ग with the ु hook below. I misread it as उ at 3x, and made the same misreading again on line 12 (वार्तागुरौ) before zooming. Both are Jupiter, and both fit the planet-by-planet list.
  • About this edition: बुधेस मुद्गाः on the plate is divided as बुधे समुद्गाः, 'with Mercury, ⟨beans⟩ accompanied by mudga'. The reader settled the श्च of मसूराश्चणकाश्च and the गु of गुरौ on the ink at 14x and 10x.
24.46a reading here is contested

शुक्रे यवावाजरिकायुगंधराः शनौ कुलित्थादि समाषमन्नम् ॥ भोज्यं तृषान्नं शिखिराहुवीर्याच्छुभेक्षणालोकनतः सहर्षम्

śukre yavāvājarikāyugaṃdharāḥ śanau kulitthādi samāṣamannam || bhojyaṃ tṛṣānnaṃ śikhirāhuvīryācchubhekṣaṇālokanataḥ saharṣam

With Venus, barley, vājarikā and yugandhara ⟨grains⟩; with Saturn, horse-gram (kulittha) and the like, food together with black gram (māṣa). From the strength of Ketu (śikhin) and Rāhu, the food is food that brings thirst; and from being looked at with a benefic aspect, ⟨it is taken⟩ with joy.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेयवावाजरिकायुगंधराःशनौकुलित्थादिसमाषमन्नम् ॥ भोज्यंतृषान्नंशिखिरा हुवीर्याच्छुभेक्षणालोकनतःसहर्षम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तृषान्नं"; alternatives "नृषान्नं" — UNSETTLED. At 26x the first akṣara is a single stroke that leaves the headline, curves down-left and hooks right, with no separate left vertical -- that is this fount's त, not न. But तृपान्न is not a word and नृपान्न ('a king's food') is. I record the ink and refuse to correct it. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): पा → षा: the counter carries the internal diagonal of ष: the left block widens from 7 to 9-10 px at y767-769 and then narrows, with a grey trace running down and right -- row for row the same as the ष of समाष earlier on this line, while the प of चोपगे (line 6) has a wholly clean counter
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यवावाजरिकायुगंधराः" — read clearly at 14x but I cannot vouch for the word division; वाजरिका is not a term I can check without lookup, which is forbidden here.
  • About this edition: तृषान्नं is kept as printed. The reader's second ink reading fixed the ष (against प), so नृपान्न, 'a king's food', which would otherwise fit the sense, is ruled out by both letters. यवावाजरिकायुगंधराः is left undivided: the reader could not vouch for its division and a dvandva compound is as likely as three separate nominatives.
24.47a reading here is contested

सूर्ये मूलं पुष्पमिंदौ कुजे स्यात् पत्रं शाखा चापि शाकं सवीर्ये ॥ शुक्रेज्यज्ञैर्व्यंजनं भूरिभेदं मंदेनेत्थं सामिषं राहुकेत्वोः

sūrye mūlaṃ puṣpamiṃdau kuje syāt patraṃ śākhā cāpi śākaṃ savīrye || śukrejyajñairvyaṃjanaṃ bhūribhedaṃ maṃdenetthaṃ sāmiṣaṃ rāhuketvoḥ

With the Sun ⟨there would be⟩ a root; with the Moon, a flower; with Mars, a leaf, and a stalk as well — ⟨all of these as⟩ greens (śāka), when ⟨the planet is⟩ strong. By Venus, Jupiter (ijya) and Mercury, a relish (vyañjana) of many kinds; by Saturn likewise; and flesh-food (sāmiṣa) from Rāhu and Ketu.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्येमूलंपुष्पमिंदौकुजेस्यात्पत्रंशाखाचापिशाकंसवीर्ये ॥ शुक्रेज्यज्ञैर्व्यंजनंभूरिभेदंमंदेने त्थंसामिषंराहुकेत्वोः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंदेने"; alternatives "मंदेनै" — checked at 24x BECAUSE the join with line 11 ('...मंदेनेत्यंसामिषं...') gives no word I can parse. Each े on दे and ने is a SINGLE tick, so ने and not नै. The reading is certain; the word division is not, and I leave it undivided.
  • About this edition: मंदेनेत्थं is read as मंदेन + इत्थं, 'by Saturn, likewise', which keeps the instrumental parallel with शुक्रेज्यज्ञैः. Reading मंदे + न + इत्थं, 'with Saturn, not so', is grammatically possible; the Sanskrit is left undivided, as the reader recorded.
24.48a reading here is contested

अथस्वप्नचिंता ॥

लग्नांशगेऽर्के तनुगेऽपि वास्मिन् दुःस्वप्नमीक्षेत यथार्कबिंबम् ॥ रक्तांबरं वह्निमथापि चंद्रे शुभ्राश्वरत्नांबरपुष्पवज्रम्

lagnāṃśage'rke tanuge'pi vāsmin duḥsvapnamīkṣeta yathārkabiṃbam || raktāṃbaraṃ vahnimathāpi caṃdre śubhrāśvaratnāṃbarapuṣpavajram

When the Sun is in the lagna's navāṃśa, or is in the lagna itself, one sees an ill dream — such as the disc of the Sun, a red garment, or fire as well. And with the Moon, ⟨one sees⟩ white things: a horse, a jewel, a garment, a flower, a diamond.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नांशगेऽर्केतनुगेऽपिवास्मिन्दुःस्वप्नमीक्षेतयथार्कबिंबम् ॥ रक्तांबरंवह्निमथापिचंद्रेशुभ्रा श्वरत्नांबरपुष्पवज्रम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यथार्कबिंबम्"; alternatives "यथार्कंबिंबम्" — at 16x the क carries TWO marks: the repha hook and a separate anusvara dot. Recorded as printed. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): र्कं → र्क: only ONE mark sits above the क, the repha hook at x2393-2415; the diamond dot at x2458 belongs to the following बिं, whose ि flag runs x2432-2458
  • About this edition: The page sets अथ स्वप्नचिंता above this verse: the section on dreams begins here. The reader's second ink reading settled यथार्कबिंबम् (one mark over the क, the repha), against यथार्कं बिंबम्.
24.49a reading here is contested

स्त्रियः सुरूपाश्च कुजे सुवर्णरक्तांबरस्रङ्मणिविद्रुमाणि ॥ बुधे हयस्वर्गतिधर्मवार्ता गुरौ रतिर्धर्मकथासुरेक्षा

striyaḥ surūpāśca kuje suvarṇaraktāṃbarasraṅmaṇividrumāṇi || budhe hayasvargatidharmavārtā gurau ratirdharmakathāsurekṣā

⟨With the Moon, also⟩ women of good form; and with Mars, gold, red garments, a garland, gems and coral. With Mercury, horses, going to heaven, and talk of dharma; with Jupiter, delight, discourse on dharma, and the sight of gods.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्रियःसुरूपाश्चकुजेसुवर्णरक्तांबरस्त्रङ्मणिविद्रुमाणि ॥ बुधेहयस्वर्गतिधर्मवार्तागुरौरतिर्धर्मकथासुरेक्षा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रङ्"; alternatives "स्रङ्" — read at 14x: स with र below, then ङ् -- स्रङ् (स्रज्, a garland), which is what the list of ornaments wants. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): स्र → स्त्र: the cluster is identical stroke for stroke with the स्त्रि of स्त्रियः earlier on this same line: half-स, then त, then the र diagonal [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुवर्णरक्तांबरस्रङ्मणिविद्रुमाणि; this sentence names स्त्रङ्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: स्त्रियः सुरूपाश्च continues the Moon's list from verse 48; the link is supplied and marked. The plate prints स्त्रङ्, settled on the ink at the second reading; the word must be स्रङ् (स्रज्, a garland), which is what the string of ornaments requires. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुवर्णरक्तांबरस्रङ्मणिविद्रुमाणि; this sentence names स्त्रङ्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

सद्बंधुसंगश्च सिते जलानां पारे गतिर्दैवरतिर्विलासः ॥ शनावरण्याद्रिगतिश्च नीचः संगश्च राहौ शिखिनीत्थमेव

sadbaṃdhusaṃgaśca site jalānāṃ pāre gatirdaivaratirvilāsaḥ || śanāvaraṇyādrigatiśca nīcaḥ saṃgaśca rāhau śikhinītthameva

With Venus, the company of good kinsmen, a crossing to the far side of waters, delight in ⟨what is⟩ divine, and enjoyment. With Saturn, a going to forest or mountain, and the company of a low man; and with Rāhu ⟨and⟩ Ketu (śikhin), just the same.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सद्बंधुसंगश्चसितेजलानांपारेगतिर्दैवरतिर्विलासः ॥ शनावरण्याद्रिगतिश्चनीचःसंगश्चराहौशिखिनीत्थमेव

सहजधीमदनायरिपुस्थितो यदि शशी गुरुभानुसितेक्षितः ॥ नवमकेंद्रगतेषु शुभग्रहे स्वबलया मनुजो रमते तदा

sahajadhīmadanāyaripusthito yadi śaśī gurubhānusitekṣitaḥ || navamakeṃdragateṣu śubhagrahe svabalayā manujo ramate tadā

If the Moon stands in the 3rd (sahaja), the 5th (dhī), the 7th (madana), the 11th (āya) or the 6th (ripu), and is aspected by Jupiter, the Sun and Venus, and a benefic graha, ⟨being⟩ in its own strength, has gone to the 9th or to a kendra (1st, 4th, 7th, 10th) — then the man takes his delight ⟨at that time⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सहजधीमदनाय रिपुस्थितोयदिशशीगुरुभानुसितेक्षितः ॥ नवमकेंद्रगतेषुशुभग्रहेस्वबलयामनुजोरमतेतदा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The five houses are one dvandva compound (सहज-धी-मदन-आय-रिपु-स्थितः), so the Moon occupies one of them: rendered "or", never "and". स्वबलया is an irregular feminine instrumental of बल; the metre (drutavilambita, ∪∪∪ –∪∪ –∪∪ –∪–, which all four pādas keep exactly) confirms the printed syllables, so it is rendered as printed, "in its own strength", and not emended. शुभग्रहे is a locative absolute (singular) while गतेषु is plural with the houses; I take गतेषु with नवम-केंद्र ("the 9th and the kendras") and शुभग्रहे as the absolute. This verse falls under the section the next page closes with इतिस्वप्नचिंता ("thus the consideration of dreams"), so रमते may be about what the dream portends; the verse itself says only that the man delights, and nothing about a dream is supplied.
24.52a reading here is contested

इतिस्वप्नचिंता ॥

आसीदसीमगुणमंडितपंडिताग्र्यो व्याख्यद् भुजंगपगवीः श्रुतिवित् सुवृत्तः ॥ साहित्यरीतिनिपुणो गणितागमज्ञश्चिंतामणिर् विपुलगर्गकुलावतंसः

āsīdasīmaguṇamaṃḍitapaṃḍitāgryo vyākhyad bhujaṃgapagavīḥ śrutivit suvṛttaḥ || sāhityarītinipuṇo gaṇitāgamajñaściṃtāmaṇir vipulagargakulāvataṃsaḥ

There was ⟨in that line⟩ one foremost among the learned, adorned with virtues that have no limit, who expounded the speech of the Serpent-lord ⟨Patañjali, i.e. the Mahābhāṣya⟩, a knower of śruti and of excellent conduct; skilled in the modes (rīti) of literature, knowing the tradition of gaṇita (mathematics), Cintāmaṇi ⟨by name⟩, the crest-jewel of the broad Garga line.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आसीदसीमगुण मंडितपंडिताग्र्योव्याख्यद्भुजंगपगवीःश्रुतिवित्सुवृत्तः ॥ साहित्यरीतिनिपुणोगणितागमज्ञाश्रितामणिर्विपुलगर्गकुलावतंसः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्याख्यद्भुजंगपगवीः"; alternatives "व्याख्यद्धुजंगपगवीः" — zoomed: the stacked conjunct before ु reads द्भ; its lower member is small
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गणितागमज्ञाश्रितामणिर्"; alternatives "गणितागमज्ञश्रितामणिर्" — zoomed: the ā-stroke after ज्ञ is printed; kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गणितागमज्ञश्चिंतामणिर्; this sentence names गणितागमज्ञाश्रितामणिर्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The praśasti begins here; the man's name is not printed in this record. Verse 53 calls Ananta "his son", and the chapter colophon places the family in the Garga line, so this is the author's grandfather — and आश्रितामणिः, "a maṇi to those who resorted to him", echoes the name Cintāmaṇi. I have not written the name into the rendering, because the record does not print it. Reader's doubt व्याख्यद्भुजंगप / व्याख्यद्धुजंगप: only द्भु yields sense (व्याख्यद् + भुजंगप), and it is what the zoomed plate reads. Second doubt गणितागमज्ञाश्रित- / गणितागमज्ञश्रित-: the ā-stroke is kept as printed. Pādas 1–3 are exact Vasantatilakā; the fourth, as printed with the ā, runs one syllable long (आश्रितामणिर्विपुलगर्गकुलावतंसः = 15), so the printing is metrically defective at this point whichever of the two readings is taken. The rendering does not depend on the difference. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गणितागमज्ञश्चिंतामणिर्; this sentence names गणितागमज्ञाश्रित, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
24.53a reading here is contested

तदात्मजोनंतगुणोस्त्यनंतो यो ऽधोक् सदुक्तिं किल कामधेनुम् ॥ संतुष्टये जातकपद्धतिं च न्यरूपयद् दुष्टमतं निरस्य

tadātmajonaṃtaguṇostyanaṃto yo 'dhok saduktiṃ kila kāmadhenum || saṃtuṣṭaye jātakapaddhatiṃ ca nyarūpayad duṣṭamataṃ nirasya

His son is Ananta, of endless virtues, who milked good speech as ⟨though it were⟩ the wish-granting cow (kāmadhenu); and for ⟨men's⟩ contentment he set forth the Jātakapaddhati, casting out corrupt doctrine.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तदात्मजोनंतगुणोस्त्यनंतोयोऽधोक्सदुक्तिंकिलकामधेनुम् ॥ संतुष्टयेजातकपद्धतिंचन्यरूपयद्दुष्टमतंनिरस्य

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्यरूपयद्दुष्टमतं"; alternatives "न्यरूपयदुष्टमतं" — not zoomed: the द्दु conjunct is small
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt न्यरूपयद्दुष्टमतं / न्यरूपयदुष्टमतं: the printed द्दु is also what the metre requires — the pāda is Upendravajrā (∪–∪– –∪∪– ∪––), and single दु would make यद् light and break it. अधोक् is the aorist of दुह्, "he milked"; सदुक्तिं … कामधेनुम् stand in apposition, so good speech IS the wish-cow. The four pādas are Upajāti (Upendravajrā, Indravajrā, Indravajrā, Upendravajrā).
24.54a reading here is contested

पद्मांबयासाविनतो विपश्चित् श्रीनीलकंठः श्रुतिशास्त्रनिष्ठः ॥ विद्वच्छिवप्रीतिकरं व्यधासीत् समाविवेकं मृगयावतंसम्

padmāṃbayāsāvinato vipaścit śrīnīlakaṃṭhaḥ śrutiśāstraniṣṭhaḥ || vidvacchivaprītikaraṃ vyadhāsīt samāvivekaṃ mṛgayāvataṃsam

⟨Born⟩ of mother Padmā, this learned man, bowed ⟨in reverence⟩ — Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha, steadfast in śruti and śāstra — made the Samāviveka ⟨"the discernment of the year": this treatise on the year⟩, which brings delight to the learned and to Śiva, a crest-ornament of ⟨every⟩ quest. [The printing sets पद्मांबयासाविनतो; the sense requires पद्मांबयासौ विनतो (पद्मांबया + असौ, "this one, of mother Padmā"), and I have rendered it so. The printed सा is not emended in the Sanskrit.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पद्मांबयासाविन तोविपश्चित्श्रीनीलकंठःश्रुतिशास्त्रनिष्ठः ॥ विद्वच्छिवप्रीतिकरंव्यधासीत्समाविवेकंमृगयावतंसम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्वच्छिव"; alternatives "विद्वच्छ्रिव" — not zoomed: dense conjunct at tile scale
  • About this edition: Two things are uncertain and both are said in the English. (1) सा vs सौ: the metre is Upajāti and both scan identically (सा and सौ are equally heavy at the fifth syllable), so the metre cannot decide it; only the sense can, and the sense needs असौ. (2) मृगयावतंसम् is obscure as printed — मृगया is "the hunt, the quest" and अवतंस "crest-ornament"; I render it flatly as "a crest-ornament of ⟨every⟩ quest" rather than invent a smoother sense. समाविवेकं is taken as the title of the work (समा = the year), which verse 55's समातंत्रं and the chapter's own colophon वर्षतंत्रं समाप्तम् both support. Reader's doubt विद्वच्छिव / विद्वच्छ्रिव: only विद्वत् + शिव gives sense, and Nīlakaṇṭha's own name is a name of Śiva.
24.55a reading here is contested

शाके नंदाभ्रबाणेंदु १५०९ मित आश्विनमासके ॥ शुक्ले ऽष्टम्यां समातंत्रं नीलकंठबुधो ऽकरोत्

śāke naṃdābhrabāṇeṃdu 1509 mita āśvinamāsake || śukle 'ṣṭamyāṃ samātaṃtraṃ nīlakaṃṭhabudho 'karot

In the Śaka ⟨year⟩ measured by nanda-abhra-bāṇa-indu — nanda 9, abhra 0, bāṇa 5, indu 1, read from the right: 1509 ⟨the page itself sets १५०९⟩ — in the month of Āśvina, on the eighth of the bright fortnight, the wise Nīlakaṇṭha made this Samātantra ⟨"the treatise on the year"⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शाकेनंदाभ्रबाणेंदु १५०९ मितआश्विनमासके ॥ शुक्लेऽष्टम्यांसमातंत्रंनीलकंठबुधोऽकरोत्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्लेऽष्टम्यां"; alternatives "शुक्केऽष्टम्यां" — the क्ल ligature looks like क्क; read as क्ल
  • About this edition: Reader's doubt शुक्लेऽष्टम्यां / शुक्केऽष्टम्यां: शुक्के is not a word, and शुक्ले + अष्टम्यां (the eighth of the bright fortnight) is the standard date formula, so the क्ल ligature is read as printed. The verse is anuṣṭubh in four pādas of eight. मित stands where मिते (locative, agreeing with शाके) would be expected; rendered "measured by" without emending. The bhūtasaṃkhyā is read right to left (अंकानां वामतो गतिः), and the printing glosses it in figures on the same line.

Adhyāya 25 · अथ ताजिकनीलकंठ्यास्तृतीयं प्रश्नतंत्रं प्रारभ्यते ॥ · अथप्रश्नविचारस्यप्रयोजनमाह वराहः ॥ · अथप्रश्नविचारस्यप्रयोजनमाह वराहः ॥

दैवज्ञस्य हि दैवेन सदसत्फलवांछया ॥ अवश्ये गोचरे मर्त्यः सर्वः समुपनीयते

daivajñasya hi daivena sadasatphalavāṃchayā || avaśye gocare martyaḥ sarvaḥ samupanīyate

For it is by fate (daiva) that every mortal, through his longing for a good or a bad result, is brought into the inescapable range ⟨of vision⟩ of an astrologer (daivajña).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दैवज्ञस्यहिदेवेनसदसत्फलवांछया ॥ अवश्ये गोचरेमर्त्यःसर्वःसमुपनीयते

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: वराहः; वराहः (verse १, introduced on line 1); verse २ carries no attribution of its own.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "वराहः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: ⟨ ⟩ supplies the agency implied by the instrumental देवेन and the word दृष्टि behind गोचरे ('range of sight'); nothing is added to the claim. The page sets the label वराहः ॥ before this verse. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads दैवेन; this sentence names देवेन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
25.2a reading here is contested

अश्रौषीच्च पुरा विष्णोर्ज्ञानार्थे समुपस्थितः ॥ वचनं लोकनाथोपि ब्रह्मा प्रश्नादिनिर्णयं

aśrauṣīcca purā viṣṇorjñānārthe samupasthitaḥ || vacanaṃ lokanāthopi brahmā praśnādinirṇayaṃ

And in former times even Brahmā, the lord of the world, having approached Viṣṇu for the sake of knowledge, heard from him the utterance that is the settled determination of questions (praśna) and the rest.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अश्रौषीच्चपुराविष्णोर्ज्ञानार्थेसमुपस्थितः ॥ वचनंलोकनाथोपिब्रह्माप्रश्नादिनिर्णयं

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लोकनाथोपि" — Zoomed: no avagraha printed between थो and पि; recorded as printed.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: वराहः (verse १, introduced on line 1); verse २ carries no attribution of its own.
  • About this edition: The reader records that no avagraha is printed in लोकनाथोपि; the sandhi is लोकनाथः + अपि and the sense is unaffected. The two half-lines are printed with their words interlaced (subject and verb in the first, object in the second); the rendering restores the order.
25.3a reading here is contested

तस्मान्नृपः कुसुमरत्नफलाग्रहस्तः प्रातः प्रणम्य वरयेदपि प्राङ्मुखस्थः ॥ होरांगशास्त्रकुशलान् हितकारिणश्च संहत्य दैवगणकान् सकृदेव पृच्छेत्

tasmānnṛpaḥ kusumaratnaphalāgrahastaḥ prātaḥ praṇamya varayedapi prāṅmukhasthaḥ || horāṃgaśāstrakuśalān hitakāriṇaśca saṃhatya daivagaṇakān sakṛdeva pṛcchet

Therefore the king, holding flowers, gems and fruit foremost in his hand, standing facing east at dawn, should bow and formally choose (varayet) astrologers who are skilled in the science of horā and its limbs and who seek his welfare; and having assembled them together he should question them once only.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तस्मान्नृपःकुसुमरत्नफलाग्रहस्तःप्रातःप्रणम्यवरयेदपिप्राङ्मुखस्थः ॥ होरांगशास्त्रकुशलान्हितकारिणश्चसंहत्यदै वगणकान्नसकृदेवपृच्छेत्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुसुमरत्नफलाग्रहस्तः" — Zoomed: त्न is set as a ligature; read रत्न.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: unattributed on this line (introductory verse ३); वराहः.
  • About this edition: न सकृदेव ('not once only') is rendered flat; ⟨but again and again⟩ spells out what the negation implies. The reader confirms the ligature त्न, so the compound is कुसुम-रत्न-फल-अग्र-हस्तः. The page breaks दैवगणकान् across a line as दै वगणकान्; that is typography, not two words.

दशभेदं ग्रहगणितं जातकमवलोक्य निरवशेषमपि ॥ यः कथयति शुभमशुभं तस्य न मिथ्या भवेद्वाणी

daśabhedaṃ grahagaṇitaṃ jātakamavalokya niravaśeṣamapi || yaḥ kathayati śubhamaśubhaṃ tasya na mithyā bhavedvāṇī

He whose words declare what is auspicious and what is inauspicious only after he has examined, leaving nothing out, the ten-fold computation of the planets (grahagaṇita) and the natal chart (jātaka) — his speech does not turn out false.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशभेदंग्रहगणितंजातकमवलोक्यनिरवशेषमपि ॥ यःकथयतिशुभमशुभंतस्यनमिथ्याभवे द्वाणी

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: उत्पलः.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "उत्पलः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: दशभेदं ग्रहगणितं is rendered as 'the ten-fold computation of the planets'; the verse does not list the ten divisions and none is supplied. The page sets the label उत्पलः ॥ before this verse.

विनयावनताय दीयमाना प्रभवेत् कल्पलतेव सत्फला येति

vinayāvanatāya dīyamānā prabhavet kalpalateva satphalā yeti

⟨That science⟩ which, when it is given to one bowed down in humility, comes to bear good fruit like the wish-granting creeper (kalpalatā) — thus ⟨runs the quoted passage⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विनयावनतायदीयमानाप्रभवेत्कल्पलतेवसत्फला येति

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसार.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "समरसारे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: This record is a single half-line and is grammatically incomplete: the relative या has no antecedent inside it, and इति closes a quotation whose opening the page does not carry here. ⟨That science⟩ is supplied from the context of the introductory verses (the astrologer's learning); no word is taken from a neighbouring record. The page sets the label समरसारे ॥ before this verse.

Adhyāya 26 · यस्तत्रप्रष्टाकुटिलःसरलोवेतिज्ञानंप्रश्नतंत्रे ॥

ऋजुरयमनृजुर्वायं प्रष्टा पूर्वं परीक्ष्य लग्नबलात् ॥ गणकेन फलं वाच्यं दैवं तच्चित्तगं स्फुरति

ṛjurayamanṛjurvāyaṃ praṣṭā pūrvaṃ parīkṣya lagnabalāt || gaṇakena phalaṃ vācyaṃ daivaṃ taccittagaṃ sphurati

Is this querent (praṣṭṛ) straight (ṛju), or is he crooked (anṛju)? The astrologer (gaṇaka) should test that first from the strength of the lagna, and ⟨only then⟩ pronounce the result; for fate (daiva), lodged in that one's mind, flashes forth ⟨of itself⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ऋजुरयमनृजुर्वायंप्रष्टापूर्वंपरीक्ष्यलग्नबलात् ॥ गणकेनफलंवाच्यंदैवं तच्चित्तगंस्फुरति

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: तच्चित्तगं says only "gone to that one's mind". It may point at the querent, into whose mind fate puts the question, or at the astrologer, in whose mind the answer flashes; the Sanskrit does not say which, and I have kept the ambiguity. ⟨only then⟩ and ⟨of itself⟩ are supplied. The word division leaves ऋजुरयमनृजुर्वायं joined: ऋजुः + अयम् + अनृजुः + वा + अयम् fuse into shared letters (ḥ → र्, म् + अ → म, वा + अयम् → वायम्), so no space can be put in without moving a character.
26.2a reading here is contested

लग्नस्थे शशिनि शनौ केंद्रस्थे ज्ञे दिनेशरश्मिगते ॥ भौमज्ञयोः समदृशा लग्नगचंद्रेऽनृजुः प्रष्टा

lagnasthe śaśini śanau keṃdrasthe jñe dineśaraśmigate || bhaumajñayoḥ samadṛśā lagnagacaṃdre'nṛjuḥ praṣṭā

When the Moon (śaśin) stands in the lagna, Saturn stands in a kendra (an angle: the 1st, 4th, 7th or 10th), Mercury (jña) has gone into the Sun's rays ⟨is combust⟩, and the Moon in the lagna ⟨is looked upon⟩ by an equal aspect (samadṛś) of Mars and Mercury — the querent is not straight ⟨he is crooked⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नस्थेशशिनिशनौकेंद्रस्थेज्ञेदिनेशरश्मिगते ॥ भौमज्ञयोःसमदृशालग्नगचंद्रेऽऋजुःप्रष्टा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रेऽऋजुः" — Zoomed: the press sets ऽ followed by a full ऋ (i.e. चंद्रे + अऋजुः), not ऽनृजुः. Recorded as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नगचंद्रेऽनृजुः; this sentence names चंद्रेऽऋजुः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The verdict word is printed चंद्रेऽऋजुः — an avagraha and then a full ऋ. The plate reader zoomed in and confirms it is not ऽनृजुः. An avagraha can stand only for an elided अ, so the word is the privative a-ṛju, "not straight", and I render it so; the spelling expected before a vowel is अनृजुः (चंद्रेऽनृजुः), and that spelling would not change the sense. The sense WOULD reverse if the avagraha were itself a slip, for then the word is ऋजुः, "straight" — I follow the printed avagraha and do not emend. The verse sets its conditions side by side with no वा, so it does not say whether they are alternatives or must all hold together; I have listed them without inventing a connective. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नगचंद्रेऽनृजुः; this sentence names चंद्रेऽऋजुः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्ने शुभग्रहयुते सरलः क्रूरान्विते भवेत् कुटिलः ॥ लग्नेऽस्ते सौम्यदृशा विधुगुरुदृष्ट्या च सरलोऽयं

lagne śubhagrahayute saralaḥ krūrānvite bhavet kuṭilaḥ || lagne'ste saumyadṛśā vidhugurudṛṣṭyā ca saralo'yaṃ

When the lagna is joined by a benefic graha, ⟨the querent is⟩ straight (sarala); when it is joined by a cruel one (krūra), he turns out crooked (kuṭila). When the lagna and the 7th (asta, the setting house) ⟨stand⟩ under a benefic's aspect, and under the aspect of the Moon and Jupiter as well, this ⟨querent⟩ is straight.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशुभग्रहयुतेसरलः क्रूरान्वितेभवेत्कुटिलः ॥ लग्नेऽस्तेसौम्यदृशाविधुगुरुदृष्ट्याचसरलोऽयं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्नेऽस्ते is लग्ने + अस्ते, "in the lagna ⟨and⟩ in the 7th"; the divided text leaves it joined because e + a fuses into one letter with the avagraha. ⟨stand⟩ is supplied: the second half has no verb.

यदि गुरुबुधयोरेकः पश्यत्यस्ताधिपं च रिपुदृष्ट्या ॥ तत् कुटिलः प्रष्टा खल्वनयोरेकस्तयोः साधुः

yadi gurubudhayorekaḥ paśyatyastādhipaṃ ca ripudṛṣṭyā || tat kuṭilaḥ praṣṭā khalvanayorekastayoḥ sādhuḥ

If one of Jupiter and Mercury looks upon the lord of the 7th (astādhipa) as well with an enemy's aspect (ripu-dṛṣṭi), then the querent is crooked. But ⟨if⟩ one of these two ⟨looks upon it otherwise⟩, then of the two ⟨verdicts⟩ he is the honest one (sādhu).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिगुरुबुधयोरेकःपश्यत्यस्ताधिपंचरिपुदृष्ट्या ॥ तत्कुटिलःप्रष्टा खल्वनयोरेकस्तयोःसाधुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The second half carries no verb: खल्वनयोरेकस्तयोः साधुः is literally "indeed one of these two — of those two, honest". I supply ⟨looks upon it otherwise⟩ as the missing condition, on the pattern of the straight-or-crooked pair in the record before this one, and read तयोः as "of the two verdicts". The record itself states neither, and a reader should treat the supplied half as my reconstruction. च after अस्ताधिपं has nothing explicit in this record to join, so I render it "as well".

Adhyāya 27 · अथग्रहस्वरूपम् ॥ · अथप्रश्नजातंकस्माल्लग्नादिभावाद्वि (closed by इतिसामान्यतोभावनिरूपणं)

27.1a reading here is contested

यो यो भावः स्वामिदृष्टो युतो वा सौम्यैर्वा स्यात् तस्य तस्यास्ति वृद्धिः ॥ पापैरेवं तस्य भावस्य हानिर्निर्देष्टव्या पृच्छता जन्मतो वा

yo yo bhāvaḥ svāmidṛṣṭo yuto vā saumyairvā syāt tasya tasyāsti vṛddhiḥ || pāpairevaṃ tasya bhāvasya hānirnirdeṣṭavyā pṛcchatā janmato vā

Whichever bhāva is looked upon by its own lord, or is joined ⟨by him⟩, or ⟨is looked upon or joined⟩ by benefics — of that very bhāva there is increase. In the same way, from malefics, loss of that bhāva is to be declared — ⟨whether the judgment is taken⟩ from the querent ⟨'s question-figure⟩ or from the birth ⟨chart⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

योयोभावःस्वामिदृष्टोयुतोवासौम्यैर्वास्यात्तस्य तस्यास्तिवृद्धिः ॥ पापैरेवंतस्यभावस्यहानिर्निर्देष्टव्यापृच्छताजन्मतोवा

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हानिर्निर्देष्टव्या"; alternatives "हानिर्निर्दिष्टव्या" — the mātrā on द after the repha reads as e; small type
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका.
  • About this edition: पृच्छता is the instrumental of the participle पृच्छत्, "the one who asks"; the contrast drawn is between the praśna figure and the natal figure, and I render it that way. Our own Ṣaṭpañcāśikā carries the same verse at 1.3 and reads पृच्छतां, the genitive plural, with the same contrast — a second witness to the word, not to this printing. The plate reader's doubt is between निर्देष्टव्या and निर्दिष्टव्या; both mean "is to be declared", so nothing in the rule turns on it. ⟨by him⟩ and ⟨is looked upon or joined⟩ are supplied: the verse gives one verb for lord and benefics alike.

सौम्ये विलग्ने यदि वा स्ववर्गे शीर्षोदये सिद्धिमुपैति कार्यम् ॥ अतो विपर्यस्तमसिद्धिहेतु कृच्छ्रेण संसिद्धिकरं विमिश्रम्

saumye vilagne yadi vā svavarge śīrṣodaye siddhimupaiti kāryam || ato viparyastamasiddhihetu kṛcchreṇa saṃsiddhikaraṃ vimiśram

When the lagna (vilagna) is a benefic ⟨sign⟩, or ⟨falls⟩ in its own varga (divisional division), or is a sign of head-rising (śīrṣodaya), the matter comes to accomplishment. The reverse of this is the cause of failure; a mixed ⟨condition⟩ brings it to accomplishment with difficulty.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्येविलग्नेयदिवास्ववर्गेशीर्षोदयेसिद्धिमुपैतिकार्यम् ॥ अतोविपर्यस्तमसिद्धिहेतुकृच्छ्रेणसंसिद्धिकरंविमिश्रम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका.
  • About this edition: This printing reads यदि वा स्ववर्गे, "or in its own varga". Our own Ṣaṭpañcāśikā carries the same verse at 1.4 and reads यदि वास्य वर्गे, "or in the varga of this ⟨benefic⟩"; both put the lagna in a benefic's division, so the rule is the same either way. This printing also reads असिद्धिहेतु, the neuter agreeing with विपर्यस्तम्, where that witness reads असिद्धिहेतुः. I have not emended either word. ⟨falls⟩ and ⟨condition⟩ are supplied.

Adhyāya 28 · अथषष्ठस्थानपृच्छा ॥

अथचंद्रः ॥

रोगादयमुत्थास्यति न वेति लग्नं भिषक् द्यूनं ॥ व्याधिर्दशमं रोगी हिबुकं भेषजमिहाहुराचार्याः

rogādayamutthāsyati na veti lagnaṃ bhiṣak dyūnaṃ || vyādhirdaśamaṃ rogī hibukaṃ bheṣajamihāhurācāryāḥ

⟨To the question⟩ "will this man get up from his disease or not?" — the lagna ⟨is⟩ the physician (bhiṣak), the 7th (dyūna) the disease, the 10th the patient, and the 4th (hibuka) the medicine: so the teachers declare here.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रोगादयमुत्थास्यतिनवेतिलग्नंभिषक्द्यूनं ॥ व्याधिर्दशमंरोगीहिबुकंभेषजमिहाहुराचार्याः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥", "तत्रैव ॥", "प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The eight words run house-signification, house-signification, four times over, so the pairing is लग्नं=भिषक्, द्यूनं=व्याधिः, दशमं=रोगी, हिबुकं=भेषजम्. Verses 2 and 3 confirm it from inside the text: v.2 makes an afflicted lagna mean "no benefit from the physician", and v.3 makes an afflicted 7th mean the disease itself and an afflicted 4th (बंधु) the medicine. So this printing puts the physician on the lagna and the patient on the 10th, which is the reverse of the more familiar praśna scheme (lagna = patient, 7th = physician); I render what this text says. The page sets the source-labels प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥ / तत्रैव ॥ before the verse; the attribution is not part of the verse and is not rendered into it.

क्रूरार्दिते विलग्ने वैद्यान् न गुणस्तदौषधाद् रोगः ॥ वृद्धिमुपयाति दशमे क्रूरैर् निजबुद्धितोप्यगुणः

krūrārdite vilagne vaidyān na guṇastadauṣadhād rogaḥ || vṛddhimupayāti daśame krūrair nijabuddhitopyaguṇaḥ

When the lagna (vilagna) is afflicted by malefics, there is no benefit from the physician: from his medicine the disease only grows. When the 10th ⟨is afflicted⟩ by malefics, there is no benefit even from ⟨the patient's⟩ own judgement.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरार्दितेविलग्नेवैद्यान्नगु णस्तदौषधाद्रोगः ॥ वृद्धिमुपयातिदशमेक्रूरैर्निजबुद्धितोप्यगुणः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The lagna is the physician and the 10th the patient, both by v.1 of this section; so निजबुद्धितः, "from his own judgement", is the patient treating himself. वृद्धिमुपयाति stands in the second half-line but completes the sentence of the first — the record is one verse, and I render it as one.
28.3a reading here is contested

अस्ते च क्रूरयुते मांद्यान् मांद्यं तथौषधाद् वंधौ ॥ सौम्योपगतैरेतैररोगता रोगिणो भवति

aste ca krūrayute māṃdyān māṃdyaṃ tathauṣadhād vaṃdhau || saumyopagatairetairarogatā rogiṇo bhavati

And when the 7th (asta) is joined with malefics, illness ⟨grows⟩ out of illness; and in the same way, when the 4th (bandhu) ⟨is so joined⟩, ⟨illness grows⟩ out of the medicine. When these same ⟨houses⟩ are occupied by benefics, the patient becomes free of disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तेचक्रूरयुतेमांद्यान्मांद्यंतथौषधाद्वंधौ ॥ सौम्योपगतैरेतैररोगतारोगि णोभवति

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वंधौ"; alternatives "द्बंधौ" — व and ब are hard to separate in this conjunct.
  • About this edition: The plate reader could not separate व from ब in the conjunct and read द्वंधौ, with द्बंधौ as the alternative; either spelling is बंधु, the 4th house, and nothing in the rule turns on it. The 7th is the disease and the 4th the medicine, both by v.1, which is what makes मांद्यान्मांद्यं and औषधात् intelligible: the second half supplies "⟨illness⟩" for the 4th from the first half's मांद्यं.

लग्नेशेंद्वोः सौम्येत्थशालतो रोगनाशनं वाच्यम् ॥ वक्रे तु तत्र खेटे भूयोपि गदः समुपयाति

lagneśeṃdvoḥ saumyetthaśālato roganāśanaṃ vācyam || vakre tu tatra kheṭe bhūyopi gadaḥ samupayāti

When the lord of the lagna and the Moon form an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with a benefic, destruction of the disease is to be declared. But if that graha is retrograde, the disease comes on all over again.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशेंद्वोःसौम्येत्थशालतोरोगनाशनंवाच्यम् ॥ वक्रेतुतत्रखेटेभूयोपिगदःसमुपयाति

28.5a reading here is contested

भूमिस्थलग्नस्थद्यूनस्थशशिमुथशिले भवेन् मृत्युः ॥ लग्नस्थे रंध्रपतौ लग्नपशशिनोर् विनाशे वा

bhūmisthalagnasthadyūnasthaśaśimuthaśile bhaven mṛtyuḥ || lagnasthe raṃdhrapatau lagnapaśaśinor vināśe vā

If the Moon — standing in the 4th (bhūmi), in the lagna, or in the 7th (dyūna) — is in a muthaśila ⟨with a malefic⟩, death follows; ⟨so too⟩ when the lord of the 8th (randhra) stands in the lagna, or when the lord of the lagna and the Moon are destroyed.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भूमिस्थलग्नस्थद्यूनस्थश शीमुथशिलेभवेन्मृत्युः ॥ लग्नस्थेरंध्रपतौलग्नपशशिनोर्विनाशेवा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूमिस्थ"; alternatives "श्रूमिस्थ" — zoomed: first akṣara has a hooked top like श्र; read as this font's भू (same glyph as page 181 line 2).
  • About this edition: The plate reader read भूमिस्थ and offered श्रूमिस्थ as the alternative shape; श्रूमि is not a word, so भूमि stands and nothing is at stake. The verse does not say with WHOM the Moon's muthaśila is made; ⟨with a malefic⟩ is supplied from the death the verse declares, and a reader checking a chart should treat the partner as unstated. विनाश is left as "destroyed" because the verse does not say whether it means combustion, defeat in a graha-war, or affliction.

लग्नाधिपे च सूर्ये चंद्रः सप्तेशमुथशिलविधायी ॥ सप्तेशे षष्ठस्थे तन्मरणं रोगिणो वाच्यम्

lagnādhipe ca sūrye caṃdraḥ sapteśamuthaśilavidhāyī || sapteśe ṣaṣṭhasthe tanmaraṇaṃ rogiṇo vācyam

And when the lord of the lagna ⟨is⟩ with the Sun, and the Moon is one that makes a muthaśila with the lord of the 7th, and the lord of the 7th stands in the 6th — then the death of the patient is to be declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपेचसूर्येचंद्रःसप्तेशमुथशिलविधायी ॥ सप्तेशेषष्ठस्थेतन्म रणंरोगिणोवाच्यम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सूर्ये is a bare locative with no verb: I take लग्नाधिपे च सूर्ये as the lagna-lord standing with the Sun, that is combust, because v.7 and v.8 both make combustion the death-signature in this run. If instead it means "in the Sun's own sign", the condition is Leo rising's lord in Leo, which is a different rule; the Sanskrit does not decide between them.

रंध्रेशेन विनष्टेनास्तमितेनापि केंद्रस्थे ॥ लग्नेशस्थमुथशिले मृत्युः स्याद् रोगपृच्छायाम्

raṃdhreśena vinaṣṭenāstamitenāpi keṃdrasthe || lagneśasthamuthaśile mṛtyuḥ syād rogapṛcchāyām

When a muthaśila that stands in a kendra and rests on the lord of the lagna is made with the lord of the 8th (randhra) — ⟨that lord being himself⟩ ruined, or even combust — death is the answer in a question about disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रंध्रेशेनविनष्टेनास्तमितेनापिकेंद्रस्थे ॥ लग्नेशस्थमुथशिलेमृत्युःस्याद्रोगपृच्छायाम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: केंद्रस्थे and लग्नेशस्थमुथशिले are both locatives and I take केंद्रस्थे as an adjective of मुथशिले (which is neuter, as ch.29 v.1's मुथशिलं shows): the applying aspect itself falls in a kendra. Read instead as a separate absolute, it would say the 8th lord stands in a kendra — the same chart in most cases, but not in all.
28.8a reading here is contested

अथवा तयोश् च केंद्रे मुथशिलतः क्रूरपीडिते मरणम् ॥ सूर्यं द्वादशभागं प्रविष्टे लग्नेश्वरेप्येवम्

athavā tayoś ca keṃdre muthaśilataḥ krūrapīḍite maraṇam || sūryaṃ dvādaśabhāgaṃ praviṣṭe lagneśvarepyevam

Or ⟨death comes⟩ from a muthaśila of those two in a kendra, when ⟨it is⟩ afflicted by a malefic. ⟨It is⟩ the same when the lord of the lagna too has entered the Sun by a twelfth part, ⟨that is, has come within the Sun's rays⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथवातयोश्चकेंद्रेसु थशिलतःक्रूरपीडितेमरणम् ॥ सूर्यंद्वादशभागं प्रविष्टेलग्नेश्वरेप्येवम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सुथशिलतः. A reader dividing this verse judged मुथशिलतः the likely intent — the Tājika term is मुथशिल, and this section prints it so at vv. 5, 6, 7, 10 and 12; सुथशिल is not a word. The English already renders it as the muthaśila.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मुथशिलतः; this sentence names सुथशिलतः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints सुथशिलतः. The word is मुथशिल, the applying aspect, everywhere else in this section (vv. 5, 6, 7, 10, 12), so I read मुथशिलतः and say so rather than emending the text; the printed सु stands in the mūla. तयोः, "of those two", carries over from v.7: the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 8th. सूर्यं द्वादशभागं प्रविष्टे I render as coming within a twelfth part of the Sun, that is, being burnt by his rays; it can also be read as entering the Sun's dvādaśāṃśa, the twelfth division, which would be a different placement. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मुथशिलतः; this sentence names सुथशिलतः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्ने चरे च रोगी क्षणे क्षणे स्यादरुक् सरुक् चापि ॥ द्विशरीरे पररोगः स्थिरे गदस्यैव रोगत्वम्

lagne care ca rogī kṣaṇe kṣaṇe syādaruk saruk cāpi || dviśarīre pararogaḥ sthire gadasyaiva rogatvam

When the lagna is a movable (cara) sign, the patient is free of pain one moment and in pain the next. In a dual-bodied (dviśarīra) sign, ⟨there comes⟩ a further disease; in a fixed (sthira) sign, the disease keeps its disease-nature ⟨and settles in⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेचरेचरोगीक्षणेक्षणेस्यादरुक्सरुक्चापि ॥ द्विशरीरेपररोगःस्थिरेगदस्यैवरोगत्वम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse; it runs straight into the next, which carries the next number. It is a verse of its own because the block holds exactly twice as many half-lines as its numbers account for, and this printing closes every half-line with ॥.
  • About this edition: पररोगः I render as a further, second disease; it can also be read as "a disease got from another person", which the Sanskrit allows equally. गदस्यैव रोगत्वम्, literally "the disease-ness of the disease itself", is the fixed sign holding the illness where it is; I do not push it as far as "incurable", which the verse does not say.
28.10a reading here is contested

शशिनो वक्रमुथशिले स्थिररोगो मंदमुथशिले पूर्वं ॥ मूत्रनिरोधाद् रोगोत्पत्तिर् ज्ञेया कृतप्रश्ने

śaśino vakramuthaśile sthirarogo maṃdamuthaśile pūrvaṃ || mūtranirodhād rogotpattir jñeyā kṛtapraśne

When the Moon is in a muthaśila with a retrograde ⟨graha⟩, the disease is a lasting one; when ⟨she is⟩ in a muthaśila with Saturn (manda), the arising of the disease is to be known, in the question as put, as coming from an earlier retention of urine.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शशिनोवक्रमुथशिलेस्थि ररोगोमंदमुथशिलेपूर्वं ॥ मूत्रनिरोधाद्रोगोत्पत्तिर्ज्ञेयाकृतप्रश्ने

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ररोगो"; alternatives "रोगो" — zoomed: two र glyphs are printed at line start; the first presumably ends a word carried over from the previous page
  • About this edition: वक्र I take as "retrograde", the sense this text uses at v.4 (वक्रे तु तत्र खेटे); paired against मंद it could instead be the planet-name Mars, which would make the rule Moon-with-Mars rather than Moon-with-any-retrograde-graha. The plate reader saw two र glyphs at the line start and read स्थिररोगो, with रोगो as the alternative; स्थिररोग, "a fixed disease", is what the contrast with मंद…पूर्वं needs, so I follow the printed reading.

अथ पृच्छायाः पूर्वं सप्ताहानि च विलोक्य चत्वारि ॥ यदि तेषु शशांकरवी शुभयुतदृष्टौ तदा शस्तम्

atha pṛcchāyāḥ pūrvaṃ saptāhāni ca vilokya catvāri || yadi teṣu śaśāṃkaravī śubhayutadṛṣṭau tadā śastam

Now, having examined the four weeks (saptāha, spans of seven days) that precede the question: if in them the Moon and the Sun are joined with benefics or looked at by them, then ⟨the answer is⟩ favourable.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथपृच्छायाःपूर्वंसप्ताहानिचविलोक्यचत्वारि ॥ यदितेषुशशांकरवी शुभयुतदृष्टौतदाशस्तम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: चत्वारि सप्ताहानि I read as four seven-day spans, twenty-eight days, agreeing as neuter plurals; the same letters also allow "seven days, and four", i.e. eleven days, since सप्त + अहानि gives the identical form. I take the first because a run of four weeks is the reckoning by which an illness is judged at its seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eighth day.

मंदोऽयमथ न वेति प्रश्ने लग्नेश्वरोऽथ चंद्रो वा ॥ षष्ठेशमुथशिली स्यादस्तमितो वा तदा मंदः

maṃdo'yamatha na veti praśne lagneśvaro'tha caṃdro vā || ṣaṣṭheśamuthaśilī syādastamito vā tadā maṃdaḥ

⟨To the question⟩ "is this man ill or not?" — if in the question the lord of the lagna, or else the Moon, is in a muthaśila with the lord of the 6th, or is combust, then he is ill.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथमंदोऽयमथनवेतिप्रश्नेलग्नेश्वरोऽथचंद्रोवा ॥ षष्ठेशमुथशिलीस्यादस्तमितोवातदामंदः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints no number after this verse. It ends where the heading "अथस्वामिभृत्यचतुष्पादप्रकरणम् ॥" opens the next topic, whose first verse the page numbers १; it is published at position 12, the last of its section.
  • About this edition: मंदः here is "sick", the noun behind मांद्य in v.3, and not Saturn; the whole section is on the 6th house and its diseases. वा is "or" in both places: the lagna-lord OR the Moon, and the muthaśila OR the combustion — any one of them answers the question, and none of them is required alongside another.

Adhyāya 29 · अथस्वामिभृत्यचतुष्पादप्रकरणम् ॥

ईशोऽन्यो मम भविता न वेति लग्नेश्वरस्य यदि केंद्रे ॥ नो भवति मुथशिलं षष्ठांत्यपतिभ्यां तदा नान्यः

īśo'nyo mama bhavitā na veti lagneśvarasya yadi keṃdre || no bhavati muthaśilaṃ ṣaṣṭhāṃtyapatibhyāṃ tadā nānyaḥ

⟨To the question⟩ "will I have another master or not?" — if the lord of the lagna, ⟨standing⟩ in a kendra, makes no muthaśila with the lord of the 6th or with the lord of the 12th (antya), then there is no other ⟨master⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ईशोऽन्योममभवितानवेतिलग्नेश्वरस्ययदिकेंद्रे ॥ नोभवतिमुथशिलंषष्ठांत्यपतिभ्यांतदानान्यः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: षष्ठांत्यपतिभ्यां is a dual instrumental: the two lords are named together, and the muthaśila must fail with both for the answer to be "no other master".

वक्री वान्येन समं लग्नपतिः सहजनवमसंस्थेन ॥ कुरुते यदीत्थशालं तदान्यनाथो भवेत् प्रष्टुः

vakrī vānyena samaṃ lagnapatiḥ sahajanavamasaṃsthena || kurute yadītthaśālaṃ tadānyanātho bhavet praṣṭuḥ

If the lord of the lagna is retrograde, or makes an itthaśāla with another ⟨graha⟩ placed in the 3rd (sahaja) or in the 9th, then the querent will have another master.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वक्रीवान्येनसमंलग्नपतिःसहजनवमसंस्थेन ॥ कुरुतेयदीत्थशालंतदान्यनाथोभवेत्प्रष्टुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: वा is "or": retrograde motion alone answers the question, and so does the itthaśāla alone. Neither is required alongside the other.

लग्नपतौ केंद्रस्थे रिपुदृष्ट्या क्रूरवीक्षिते पुण्ये ॥ रविरश्मिगतेथ भवेद् यावज्जीवं च नान्यपतिः

lagnapatau keṃdrasthe ripudṛṣṭyā krūravīkṣite puṇye || raviraśmigatetha bhaved yāvajjīvaṃ ca nānyapatiḥ

When the lord of the lagna stands in a kendra, and a benefic — looked at by a malefic with the enemy-aspect (ripu-dṛṣṭi) — has gone into the Sun's rays ⟨and so is burnt⟩, then there will be no other master for as long as ⟨the querent⟩ lives.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपतौकेंद्रस्थेरिपुदृष्ट्याक्रूरवीक्षि तेपुण्ये ॥ रविरश्मिगतेथभवेद्यावज्जीवंचनान्यपतिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: क्रूरवीक्षिते, पुण्ये and रविरश्मिगते are three locatives in a row; I take all three of the benefic, so the benefic is both squared by a malefic and combust. रविरश्मिगते can instead be read of the lagna-lord, which would put the combustion on him and leave the benefic only afflicted — a different chart, and the Sanskrit does not decide. रिपुदृष्टि is the hostile Tājika aspect, the square and the opposition, against the friendly trine and sextile.
29.4a reading here is contested

अयमीशो भद्रो मे पृच्छायां लग्नपस्य कंबूले ॥ स्वामी स एव भव्यो द्यूनेशस्य च शुभोन्येशः

ayamīśo bhadro me pṛcchāyāṃ lagnapasya kaṃbūle || svāmī sa eva bhavyo dyūneśasya ca śubhonyeśaḥ

⟨To the question⟩ "is this master of mine a good one?" — in the question, if there is a kambūla of the lord of the lagna, that very master is the fortunate one; and if ⟨there is a kambūla⟩ of the lord of the 7th (dyūna), it is another master who is the auspicious one.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अयमीशोभद्रोमेपृच्छायांलग्नपस्यकंबूले ॥ स्वामीसएवभव्योद्यूनेशस्यचशु भोन्येशः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भव्योद्यूनेशस्य"; alternatives "भव्यो द्यूनेशस्य" — no avagraha printed; recorded as printed
  • About this edition: The page prints no avagraha at भव्योद्यूनेशस्य or at शुभोन्येशः; the reader recorded the first as a doubt. I read भव्यः + द्यूनेशस्य and शुभः + अन्येशः, which is what gives the verse its two halves — the present master by the lagna-lord, a different master by the lord of the 7th. Read भव्यो ऽद्यूनेशस्य instead and the second half loses its subject.

ग्रहभूमिस्थानानां लग्नप्रश्ने पुरोक्त एव विधिः ॥ सम्यग् विचार्य वाच्यं शुभमशुभं पृच्छतः स्वधिया

grahabhūmisthānānāṃ lagnapraśne purokta eva vidhiḥ || samyag vicārya vācyaṃ śubhamaśubhaṃ pṛcchataḥ svadhiyā

For the grahas and their standings in the bhāvas, the rule is exactly the one already stated under the question of the lagna. Having weighed it properly, ⟨the astrologer⟩ is to declare by his own judgement what is good and what is bad for the one who asks.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ग्रहभूमिस्थानानांलग्नप्रश्नेपुरोक्तएवविधिः ॥ सम्यग्विचार्यवाच्यंशुभमशुभंपृच्छतःस्वधिया

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: स्वधिया, "by his own judgement", is the astrologer's, not the querent's: the verse hands the reading of a servant-or-cattle question back to the general rules and asks him to apply them himself.

भृत्यचतुष्पदलाभं प्रश्ने लग्नेशशीतगू षष्ठे ॥ षष्ठेशमुथशिलो वा लग्ने षष्ठेश्वरोथ तल्लाभः

bhṛtyacatuṣpadalābhaṃ praśne lagneśaśītagū ṣaṣṭhe || ṣaṣṭheśamuthaśilo vā lagne ṣaṣṭheśvarotha tallābhaḥ

⟨As to⟩ the gaining of a servant or of a four-footed beast: if in the question the lord of the lagna and the Moon (śītagu, the cool-rayed) are in the 6th, or ⟨they are⟩ in a muthaśila with the lord of the 6th, or the lord of the 6th is in the lagna — then that gain ⟨comes about⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भृत्यचतुष्पदलाभं प्रश्नेलग्नेशशीतगूषष्ठे ॥ षष्ठेशमुथशिलोवालग्नेषष्ठेश्वरोथतल्लाभः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्नेशशीतगू I divide as लग्नेश-शीतगू, a dvandva in the dual: the lagna-lord and the Moon. शीतगु, "the cool-rayed", is a name of the Moon. The three conditions are joined by वा and each stands on its own; the servant and the quadruped are both read off the 6th.
29.7a reading here is contested

भृत्यस्य वाहनस्य च यद्वा प्रश्ने च लग्नलग्नपती ॥ अर्थी दाता सप्तमसप्तमपौ तद्वलात् प्राप्तिः

bhṛtyasya vāhanasya ca yadvā praśne ca lagnalagnapatī || arthī dātā saptamasaptamapau tadvalāt prāptiḥ

Or ⟨when the question is⟩ about a servant or about a vehicle: in the question, the lagna and the lord of the lagna ⟨stand for⟩ the seeker (arthin), the 7th and the lord of the 7th ⟨stand for⟩ the giver; from the strength of those ⟨two sides⟩ comes the obtaining.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भृत्यस्यवाहनस्यचयद्वाप्रश्नेचलग्नलग्नपती ॥ अर्थीदातासप्तम सप्तमपौतद्वलात्प्राप्तिः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यद्वा"; alternatives "यद्वा (यद्धा)" — conjunct below द small; read as व
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्वलात्"; alternatives "तद्धलात्", "तद्बलात्" — zoomed: looped subscript under द; the same glyph shape stands for द्व in द्वयो on page 184 line 2, so read द्व; ध not excluded
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads तद्वलात्. A reader dividing this verse judged तद्बलात् the likely intent — the sense is "from the strength (bala) of those two" — the seeker's side against the giver's. This press sets व where ब belongs, and the plate reader listed तद्बलात् among the readings she could not exclude. The English already renders it as strength.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: The page prints तद्वलात्. The sense is तद्बलात्, "from the strength of those two", and the plate reader listed तद्बलात् among the shapes she could not exclude; this press sets व for ब throughout, so I read बल and say so rather than change the printed letter. The reader's second doubt, यद्वा against यद्धा, does not touch the rule: यद्वा is "or". The four names pair inwards — लग्नलग्नपती with अर्थी, सप्तमसप्तमपौ with दाता.

Adhyāya 30 · अथसप्तमस्थानपृच्छा ॥

स्त्रीलाभस्य प्रश्ने स्मराधिपे लग्नपेन शशिना वा ॥ कृतमुथशिले युवत्या अयाचिता या भवेल्लाभः

strīlābhasya praśne smarādhipe lagnapena śaśinā vā || kṛtamuthaśile yuvatyā ayācitā yā bhavellābhaḥ

In a question about gaining a woman: when the lord of the 7th (smara, the house of desire) has made a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with the lord of the lagna, or with the Moon, there will be gain of the young woman — she who ⟨comes⟩ unasked for.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्रीलाभस्यप्रश्नेस्मराधिपेलग्नपेनशशिनावा ॥ कृतमुथशिलेयुवत्याअयाचिता याभवेल्लाभः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets युवत्या अयाचिता या with the hiatus unelided (आ + अ would normally fuse). The metre defends the print: the second half counts 27 mātrās only with अयाचिता या, and 26 with a single word अयाचितया. The relative या has no correlative; it is taken with the young woman, on the pattern of the next verse's अयाचितां स्त्रियं लभते. The supplied ⟨comes⟩ carries that ellipsis.
30.2a reading here is contested

यदि लग्नपो विधुर्वा द्यूने तदयाचितां स्त्रियं लभते ॥ लग्नेशान्मूसरिफे चंद्रेस्तपमुथशिले स्वयं लाभः

yadi lagnapo vidhurvā dyūne tadayācitāṃ striyaṃ labhate || lagneśānmūsariphe caṃdrestapamuthaśile svayaṃ lābhaḥ

If the lord of the lagna, or the Moon, is in the 7th (dyūna), then he obtains that woman unasked for. When the Moon is in a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) from the lord of the lagna and in a muthaśila with the lord of the 7th (asta-pa), the gain comes of its own accord.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिलग्नपोविधुर्वाद्यूनेतदयाचितांस्त्रियंलभते ॥ लग्नेशान्मूसरिफेचंद्रेस्तपमुथशिलेस्वयंलाभः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रेस्तप"; alternatives "चंद्रेऽस्तप" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The reader's doubt is the absent avagraha: the page prints चंद्रेस्तप. It is read चंद्रे ऽस्तप- , 'the Moon ⟨being⟩ in a muthaśila with the lord of the 7th'. The sense does not turn on it, since चंद्रे is locative either way. This printing sets the avagraha elsewhere (ch. 31.2 प्रतिवादिनोऽस्ति), so the omission is the press's lapse, not a different word.

येन समं तु मुथशिलस्तत्र विनष्टे च पापयुतदृष्टे ॥ निकटीभूय तदा किल विनश्यति स्त्रीगतं कार्यं

yena samaṃ tu muthaśilastatra vinaṣṭe ca pāpayutadṛṣṭe || nikaṭībhūya tadā kila vinaśyati strīgataṃ kāryaṃ

The ⟨planet⟩ with which the muthaśila ⟨is made⟩ — when that one is ruined there and is joined with or aspected by a malefic, then indeed the business concerning the woman, having come close ⟨to completion⟩, perishes.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

येनसमंतुमुथशिल स्तत्रविनष्टेचपापयुतदृष्टे॥ निकटीभूयतदाकिलविनश्यतिस्त्रीगतंकार्यं

30.4a reading here is contested

पापेत्र रंध्रनाथे स्त्रीजातेरेव विघटते कार्यम् ॥ सहजपतौ भ्रातृभ्यस्तुर्येशे पितृव्य एव नान्येभ्यः

pāpetra raṃdhranāthe strījātereva vighaṭate kāryam || sahajapatau bhrātṛbhyasturyeśe pitṛvya eva nānyebhyaḥ

If the malefic here is the lord of the 8th (randhra), the business breaks down from the woman's own side alone; if ⟨it is⟩ the lord of the 3rd (sahaja), from brothers; if the lord of the 4th (turya), from the paternal uncle alone, and from no one else.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापेत्ररंध्रनाथेस्त्रीजातेरेवविघटतेकार्यम् ॥ सहजपतौभ्रातृभ्य स्तुर्येशेपितृव्यएवनान्येभ्यः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रंध्र"; alternatives "रंध्र (रन्ध्र)" — anusvāra dot small but visible
  • About this edition: पापेत्र is read पापे ऽत्र (पापे + अत्र), the avagraha again not printed; 'here' is the 7th house, this chapter's subject. The supplied ⟨it is⟩ carries the locative absolutes सहजपतौ and तुर्येशे, which name no noun of their own. The reader's doubt over the anusvāra in रंध्र does not touch the sense.

सौम्यकृतयुक्तिदृग्भ्यां पूर्वोक्तस्थानतः शुभं वाच्यं

saumyakṛtayuktidṛgbhyāṃ pūrvoktasthānataḥ śubhaṃ vācyaṃ

From the conjunction and the aspect made by a benefic (saumya), the auspicious ⟨result⟩ is to be declared from the house stated above.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्यकृतयुक्तिदृग्भ्यांपूर्वोक्तस्थानतःशुभंवाच्यं

Adhyāya 31 · अथस्त्रीस्नेहः ॥

31.1a reading here is contested

प्रीतिस्थानप्रश्ने स्मरपतिलग्नेशमुथशिले स्नेहः ॥ झकटकदृशा झकटकः शशिकंबूले तु सापि शुभा

prītisthānapraśne smarapatilagneśamuthaśile snehaḥ || jhakaṭakadṛśā jhakaṭakaḥ śaśikaṃbūle tu sāpi śubhā

In a question about the house of affection (prīti-sthāna): when the lord of the 7th (smara) and the lord of the lagna are in a muthaśila, ⟨there is⟩ affection. By a jhakaṭaka aspect ⟨the hostile sight⟩ there is a jhakaṭaka ⟨a quarrel⟩; but when the Moon is in a kambūla, that ⟨aspect⟩ too is auspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रीतिस्थानप्रश्नेस्मरपतिलग्ने शमुथशिलेस्नेहः ॥ झकटकदृशाझकटकःशशिकंबूलेतुसापिशुभा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "झकटक"; alternatives "इकटक" — zoomed: the glyph is झ as printed
  • About this edition: सा in सापि शुभा is feminine and is taken as the दृश् (aspect) just named — the kambūla turns the quarrelsome aspect good. It could instead be the woman ('she too is favourable'). The reader zoomed the plate and confirmed the glyph is झ, not इ.

यदि मंदो लग्नेशः केंद्रे च स्यात्तदा बली प्रष्टा ॥ अस्तेश्वरे च मंदे केंद्रे प्रतिवादिनोऽस्ति बलम्

yadi maṃdo lagneśaḥ keṃdre ca syāttadā balī praṣṭā || asteśvare ca maṃde keṃdre prativādino'sti balam

If Saturn (manda) is the lord of the lagna and stands in a kendra (an angle), then the querent (praṣṭā) is the strong one. And if Saturn is the lord of the 7th (asta) and stands in a kendra, the strength belongs to the opposing party (prativādin).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिमंदोलग्नेशःकेंद्रेचस्यात्तदाबलीप्रष्टा ॥ अस्तेश्वरेचमंदेकेंद्रे प्रतिवादिनोऽस्तिबलम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: मंदो लग्नेशः is taken as apposition — 'Saturn, ⟨being⟩ the lord of the lagna' — because the second half sets the matching अस्तेश्वरे च मंदे, Saturn as lord of the 7th. Read instead as two subjects ('Saturn and the lord of the lagna'), the rule would demand both planets in kendras; the parallel is against that.
31.3a reading here is contested

उभयोरेकस्थितयोर्ज्ञातव्या झकटकं तयोः प्रीतिः ॥ सूर्ये न शुभं विबले नरस्य शुक्रे स्त्रियो द्वयोर्द्वितयौ

ubhayorekasthitayorjñātavyā jhakaṭakaṃ tayoḥ prītiḥ || sūrye na śubhaṃ vibale narasya śukre striyo dvayordvitayau

When the two ⟨the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th⟩ stand in one ⟨sign⟩, the affection between them is to be known ⟨as⟩ a jhakaṭaka ⟨a quarrelsome one⟩. When the Sun is weak there is no good for the man; when Venus ⟨is weak, none⟩ for the woman; when both ⟨are weak, none⟩ for the pair of them.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उभयोरेकस्थितयोर्ज्ञातव्याझकटकंतयोःप्रीतिः ॥ सूर्येनशुभंविबलेनरस्यशुक्रेस्त्रियोद्वयोर्द्वितयौ

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वयोर्द्वितयौ"; alternatives "द्वयोर्द्धितयौ" — zoomed: both conjuncts have the same looped subscript under द; read द्व in both
  • About this edition: Two loose places. (a) ज्ञातव्या is feminine and agrees with प्रीतिः, while झकटकं is neuter; it is rendered as the predicate of that sentence. Were झकटकं a slip for the locative झकटके, the line would read 'when the two stand in one ⟨sign⟩, or in a jhakaṭaka, affection between them is to be known' — the opposite verdict on a conjunction. The printed letters are kept. (b) सूर्येन is divided सूर्ये न, 'when the Sun ⟨is weak⟩, no ⟨good⟩'; taken as the instrumental सूर्येण it would need the press to have set न for ण, and the parallel with शुक्रे स्त्रियो would break. विबले is supplied to शुक्रे and द्वयोः from the one place it is printed.

मम गृहिणी रुष्टा पुनरेष्यति नो वाथ भूम्यधःस्थरवौ ॥ भूपरिगते च शुक्रे नैति पुनर्वक्रितेऽभ्येति

mama gṛhiṇī ruṣṭā punareṣyati no vātha bhūmyadhaḥstharavau || bhūparigate ca śukre naiti punarvakrite'bhyeti

⟨The question:⟩ 'My wife is angry ⟨and gone⟩ — will she come back, or not?' Now: when the Sun stands below the earth and Venus has passed round the earth ⟨that is, stands above it⟩, she does not come; but when ⟨Venus is⟩ retrograde she comes back.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ममगृहिणीरुष्टापुनरेष्यतिनोवाथभूम्यधःस्थरवौ ॥ भूपरिगतेचशुक्रेनैतिपुनर्वक्रितेऽभ्येति

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: भूपरिगते is rendered as the counterpart of भूम्यधःस्थ in the same line — Venus gone round on the upper side of the earth, that is above the horizon. The verse does not gloss the compound; the reading is an inference from that contrast and no more.
31.5a reading here is contested

सूर्यान्निर्गतशुक्रे वक्रेपि समेति चान्यथा रुष्टा ॥ क्षीणेंदौ बहुदिवसैः पूर्णविधौ च द्रुतमुपैति

sūryānnirgataśukre vakrepi sameti cānyathā ruṣṭā || kṣīṇeṃdau bahudivasaiḥ pūrṇavidhau ca drutamupaiti

When Venus has come out from the Sun ⟨free of its beams⟩ and is retrograde as well, she is reconciled; otherwise she stays angry. When the Moon is waning ⟨she comes⟩ after many days; and when the Moon is full she comes quickly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्यान्निर्गतशुक्रेवक्रेपि समेतिचान्यथारुष्टा ॥ क्षीणेंदौबहुदिवसैःपूर्णविधौचद्रुतमुपैति

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वक्रेपि"; alternatives "वक्रेऽपि" — no avagraha printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चद्रुतमुपैति"; alternatives "चद्दुतमुपैति", "चद्रुतसुपैति" — zoomed: subscript under द is a looped curl with u; read द्रु. The next akṣara read as मु
  • About this edition: वक्रेपि is वक्रे ऽपि, the avagraha not printed, as the reader saw; the sense is unaffected. चद्रुतमुपैति is read च द्रुतम् उपैति, which is the reading the plate reader settled on at magnification.

Adhyāya 32 · अथकन्यापरीक्षा ॥

एषा कुमारिका किल निर्दोषा किन्न वेति पृच्छायाम् ॥ लग्ने स्थिरे स्थिरर्क्षे लग्नपशशिनोश्च निर्दोषा

eṣā kumārikā kila nirdoṣā kinna veti pṛcchāyām || lagne sthire sthirarkṣe lagnapaśaśinośca nirdoṣā

In the question, "Is this maiden indeed unblemished, or is she not?" — when the lagna is a fixed (sthira) sign, and the lord of the lagna and the Moon are ⟨likewise⟩ in a fixed sign, ⟨she is⟩ unblemished.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एषाकुमारिकाकिलनिर्दोषाकिन्नवेतिपृच्छायाम् ॥ लग्नेस्थिरेस्थिरर्क्षेलग्नपशशिनोश्चनिर्दोषा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: किन्न वेति is किं न वा इति, "or not, thus"; the printing runs it together. The metre is āryā and comes out exact as printed — 30 mātrās in the first half, 27 in the second, with the ja-gaṇa न वे ति at the sixth gaṇa of the first half and the single laghu च (of शशिनोश्च) at the sixth gaṇa of the second — so nothing is missing here. निर्दोषा is literally "without fault"; what the fault is, verse 3 says flatly. ⟨likewise⟩ is supplied: स्थिरर्क्षे governs both the lagna-lord and the Moon.

चरराशिगतैरेतैरियं कुमार्यपि च जातदोषा स्यात् ॥ द्विशरीरस्थे चंद्रे चरलग्ने स्वल्पदोषा स्यात्

cararāśigatairetairiyaṃ kumāryapi ca jātadoṣā syāt || dviśarīrasthe caṃdre caralagne svalpadoṣā syāt

When these ⟨same three — the lagna, its lord and the Moon⟩ have gone to movable (cara) signs, this maiden too would be one in whom a blemish has arisen. When the Moon stands in a dual-bodied (dviśarīra) sign and the lagna is movable, she would be of slight blemish.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चरराशिगतैरेतैरियंकुमार्यपिचजातदोषास्यात् ॥ द्विशरीरस्थेचंद्रेचरलग्नेस्वल्पदोषा स्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: एतैः, "by/with these", has no antecedent inside this record. It picks up the three things verse 1 named — लग्न, लग्नप, शशिन् — and I supply them in ⟨ ⟩ rather than pull the words across from the neighbouring verse. अपि च I render "too", continuing verse 1's case. जातदोषा is literally "one in whom a fault has been born".

शशिभौमावेकर्क्षे स्थिरवर्जे तत्परेण गुप्तमियम् ॥ रमिता शनिचंद्रमसोर् लग्नगयोः प्रकटमुपभुक्ता

śaśibhaumāvekarkṣe sthiravarje tatpareṇa guptamiyam || ramitā śanicaṃdramasor lagnagayoḥ prakaṭamupabhuktā

⟨If⟩ the Moon and Mars are in one and the same sign, that sign not being a fixed one, then she has been made love to in secret by another man. When Saturn and the Moon are ⟨both⟩ in the lagna, she has been openly enjoyed.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शशिभौमावेकर्क्षेस्थिरवर्जेतत्परेणगुप्तमियम् ॥ रमिताशनिचंद्रमसोर्लग्नगयोःप्रकटमुपभुक्ता

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: I divide तत्परेण as तत् परेण, "then, by another ⟨man⟩", and keep it joined in the word-divided file because the division is not certain: read as one word, तत्परेण would be "by a man bent on that". The sense of the verse is the same either way, since परेण/तत्परेण is the outsider in both. The metre settles nothing here — तत् and परेण fall in different gaṇas, which suits either reading. गुप्तम् is adverbial, "secretly", against प्रकटम्, "openly", in the second half; the contrast is between a concealed affair and one that is public knowledge. स्थिरवर्जे agrees with एकर्क्षे: the shared sign must not be a fixed one.

यदि भौमशनी केंद्रे विधुदृष्टो वृश्चिकेऽथ शुक्रः स्यात् ॥ तद्द्रेष्काणेऽथ तदा निर्भ्रांतं जातदोषैषा

yadi bhaumaśanī keṃdre vidhudṛṣṭo vṛścike'tha śukraḥ syāt || taddreṣkāṇe'tha tadā nirbhrāṃtaṃ jātadoṣaiṣā

If Mars and Saturn are in a kendra (an angle — the 1st, 4th, 7th or 10th), and Venus, aspected by the Moon, is in Scorpio, or is in the drekkāṇa (decanate) of that ⟨sign⟩ — then without error this girl has a blemish.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिभौमशनीकेंद्रेवि धुदृष्टोवृश्चिकेऽथशुक्रःस्यात् ॥ तद्द्रेष्काणेऽथतदानिभ्रांतंजातदोषैषा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints निभ्रांतं. निभ्रान्त is not a word; I render it as निर्भ्रान्तम्, "unerringly, without error" — a dropped repha, which is the commonest loss on these plates. The metre is identical either way (both scan ni/nir as heavy before भ्र), so it cannot decide. The same printed letters could also be divided न भ्रान्तं, "there is no error", with the same sense, but that would want न without the i-mātrā. विधुदृष्टो is singular and so attaches to शुक्रः, not to the dual भौमशनी. The input mūla carries a space inside वि धुदृष्टो; that is the plate's line break (the leaf breaks after ...केंद्रेवि), not a word division, and I close it. अथ is "or" in both places: Scorpio, or that sign's drekkāṇa. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads निर्भ्रांतं; this sentence names निभ्रांतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

Adhyāya 33 · अथस्वपरप्रसूतिपरीक्षा ॥

33.1a reading here is contested

एषा किल प्रसूता सिते घटे ज्ञे हरौ च नो सूता ॥ अनयोरलिवृषगतयोः सूता नारी परिज्ञेया

eṣā kila prasūtā site ghaṭe jñe harau ca no sūtā || anayoralivṛṣagatayoḥ sūtā nārī parijñeyā

⟨In the question⟩ "has this woman indeed given birth?" — Venus in the Pot (ghaṭa, Aquarius) and Mercury in Hari (Leo): she has not given birth. When these two have gone to the Scorpion (ali, Scorpio) and the Bull (vṛṣa, Taurus), the woman is to be known as one who has given birth. [Our mūla now reads हरौ, "in Leo", and what follows divides as च नो, "and not". See the note.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एषाकिलप्रसूतासितेघटेज्ञेह रोचनोसूता ॥ अनयोरलिवृषगतयोःसूतानारीपरिज्ञेया

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रोचनोसूता"; alternatives "रोचनोऽसूता" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The plate reader's doubt here was whether an avagraha was meant (रोचनोसूता against रोचनोऽसूता). My reading needs no avagraha at all. हरो is not a locative of any word; हरौ is the locative of हरि, a standing name of Leo, and the remaining akṣaras then divide च नो सूता, "and she has not given birth" (नो = न + उ). The division is metrically exact: the first half is a perfect āryā of 30 mātrās with the ja-gaṇa ह रौ च at the sixth gaṇa, and रौ scans heavy exactly as रो does, so the metre neither objects nor decides. Two things decide it. First, the ṭīkā printed immediately below on this same leaf glosses the pair as Mercury in Leo with Venus in Aquarius. Second, that gloss is checkable and it is right about the astronomy: Mercury never stands more than about 28° from the Sun and Venus never more than about 47°, so the two can never be six signs apart, and the ṭīkā accordingly reads the two conditions as alternatives rather than as a pair. The same is true of Scorpio and Taurus in the second half. The verse as printed states them side by side and I render it so; it does not print वा, so I have not written "or" into the rendering. Taken in the order of the words, the second half gives Venus in Scorpio and Mercury in Taurus, but the verse does not spell the pairing out. I have not changed the Sanskrit: हरो stands in the word-divided file as the page prints it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads हरौ; this sentence names हरो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

भौमबुधशुक्रचंद्रा द्विशरीरे चापवर्जिते चेत् स्युः ॥ अग्रेऽस्ति तत्प्रसूतिश् चापेनाग्रे न पृष्ठतः सूता

bhaumabudhaśukracaṃdrā dviśarīre cāpavarjite cet syuḥ || agre'sti tatprasūtiś cāpenāgre na pṛṣṭhataḥ sūtā

If Mars, Mercury, Venus and the Moon are in a dual-bodied (dviśarīra) sign, Sagittarius (cāpa) excepted, her delivery lies ahead ⟨it has not happened yet⟩. With Sagittarius it does not lie ahead: she has given birth behind ⟨it is already past⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमबुधशुक्रचंद्राद्विशरीरेचापवर्जितेचेत्स्युः ॥ अग्रेऽस्तितत्प्रसूतिश्चापेनाग्रेनपृष्ठतःसूता

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: अग्रे and पृष्ठतः are "in front" and "behind", and I take them of time, because this chapter's question is whether she has borne a child yet and the verse ends with the same verb सूता that verse 1 used. Read of place they would say the birth happened in front of, or behind, the querent; the words allow that and the verse does not settle it. The exclusion of Sagittarius follows the head-rising / back-rising division of the dual signs: Gemini and Virgo rise head-first, Sagittarius rises back-first, Pisces both ways — which is why the one back-rising dual sign is pulled out and given the "behind" result. This verse is a gīti, not an āryā: both halves run to 30 mātrās, the second with the ja-gaṇa न पृष् ठ at its sixth gaṇa. That matters, because counted against an āryā's 27 the second half looks three mātrās long and would read as padded. It is not; it is complete and regular as printed.

क्रूरश् चेच् चरराशौ परतः सूता स्थिरे तु निजपत्युः ॥ मिश्रे तु मिश्रमूह्यं जातकसंदेहपृच्छायाम्

krūraś cec cararāśau parataḥ sūtā sthire tu nijapatyuḥ || miśre tu miśramūhyaṃ jātakasaṃdehapṛcchāyām

If a malefic ⟨stands⟩ in a movable (cara) sign, she has borne the child by another man; but in a fixed ⟨sign⟩, by her own husband. In a mixed ⟨that is, dual⟩ ⟨sign⟩ a mixed ⟨result⟩ is to be inferred. — In a question of doubt about a child's parentage ⟨what follows applies⟩:

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूर श्चेच्चरराशौपरतःसूतास्थिरेतुनिजपत्युः ॥ मिश्रेतुमिश्रमूह्यंजातकसंदेहपृच्छायाम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse does not say WHICH malefic, or in which house; it names only the kind of sign. The ṭīkā on this leaf supplies the missing subject — one of the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 5th, when that one is a malefic — and I record that here rather than write it into the rendering, because the verse itself does not carry it. The last quarter, जातकसंदेहपृच्छायाम्, opens the case that verse 4 answers; the page nevertheless numbers it with this verse, so I render it here and mark the hinge with a dash. The input mūla carries a space inside क्रूर श्चेच्च; that is the plate's line break, not a word division, and I close it: the word is क्रूरः + चेत्. मिश्र is "mixed", and in this idiom the mixed sign is the dual one, which is why I gloss it.
33.4a reading here is contested

गुर्विण्येषा स्वपत्युः परपुरुषाद्वेति लग्नसुतपत्योः ॥ शुभयुतिदृग्भ्यां स्वपतेः शनिभौमदृशाऽन्यतो गुर्वी

gurviṇyeṣā svapatyuḥ parapuruṣādveti lagnasutapatyoḥ || śubhayutidṛgbhyāṃ svapateḥ śanibhaumadṛśā'nyato gurvī

⟨The question:⟩ "Is this pregnant woman with child by her own husband, or by another man?" — by the conjunction and the aspect of benefics upon the lords of the lagna and of the 5th (suta), ⟨she is with child⟩ by her own husband; by the aspect of Saturn and Mars, she is pregnant from another.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुर्विण्येषास्वपत्युःपरपुरुषादेतिलग्नसुतपत्योः ॥ शुभयुतिदृग्भ्यांस्वपतेःशनिभौम दृशाऽन्यतोगुर्वीं

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुर्वीं"; alternatives "गुर्वी" — a small dot sits over the वी; it could be an anusvāra or a speck of the paper's grain [2026-10-01: settled on the plate. The exemplar, read by eye at about 4.0x native (F 1893 page_0185 line 1), sets गुर्वी with no anusvāra; the dot is the small head of the र्वी ligature, measured against the र्वी of शत्रुभिर्वीक्ष on page_0189. The mūla now reads गुर्वी.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुर्वीं"; alternatives "गुर्वी" — a small dot sits over the वी; it could be an anusvāra or a speck of the paper's grain [2026-10-01: settled on the plate. The exemplar, read by eye at about 4.0x native (F 1893 page_0185 line 1), sets गुर्वी with no anusvāra; the dot is the small head of the र्वी ligature, measured against the र्वी of शत्रुभिर्वीक्ष on page_0189. The mūla now reads गुर्वी.]
  • About this edition: The verse does not print वा. The "or" is carried by the two ablatives स्वपत्युः and परपुरुषात् standing side by side under one verb एति, which is the ordinary form of a two-way question here; I have not added a condition the text does not state. The plate reader doubted a dot over the वी of गुर्वीं — anusvāra or a speck of the paper. I render the printed गुर्वीं, the accusative, which wants a supplied "declare her"; the alternative गुर्वी would be the nominative, "she is pregnant". The claim is the same either way, and the metre is the same (both scan heavy), so nothing in the rule turns on it. That same doubt is recorded twice on this verse in the input; it is one doubt, about one akṣara. The input mūla carries a space inside शनिभौम दृशा; that is the plate's line break (the leaf breaks after ...शनिभौम), not a word division, and I close it — शनिभौमदृशा is one compound, "by the aspect of Saturn and Mars". [2026-10-01: The exemplar was read by eye at about 4.0x native (F 1893 page_0185 lines 0-1). It prints परपुरुषाद्वेति, with वा, and गुर्वी with no anusvāra; the dot was a stroke of the र्वी ligature, measured against र्वी on page_0189. The 1889 printing sets the same (page_0213 line 9, page_0214 line 0). The mūla now reads both forms, so the sentences above on the missing वा and on the accusative गुर्वीं describe the superseded transcription.]

Adhyāya 34 · अथपातिव्रत्यपरीक्षा ॥

कुलटा सतीयमथवेति लग्नपतिश्चंद्रमाश्च भौमेन ॥ एकांशे मुथशिलकृत् तदैव भवने भजत्यन्यम्

kulaṭā satīyamathaveti lagnapatiścaṃdramāśca bhaumena || ekāṃśe muthaśilakṛt tadaiva bhavane bhajatyanyam

⟨The question is⟩ 'Is this woman a kulaṭā (an unchaste woman) or a satī (a faithful wife)?' — when the lord of the lagna and the Moon have made a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with Mars (bhauma) in one aṃśa, then she consorts with another man in the house itself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुलटासतीयमथवेतिलग्नपतिश्चंद्रमाश्चभौमेन ॥ एकांशेमुथशिलकृततदैवभवनेभजत्यन्य म्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets मुथशिलकृत — a bare stem with no case ending — standing between two locatives. The sense requires either मुथशिलकृते (a locative absolute, 'a muthaśila having been made') or मुथशिलकृतौ (dual nominative, agreeing with the lagna-lord and the Moon); both also bring this half to the āryā's 27 mātrās, which the printed form leaves at 26. The rendering follows that sense. The Sanskrit is left exactly as printed, and nothing here decides between the two endings. तदैव भवने is taken as तदा एव भवने, 'then, in the home itself' — which is the contrast the next record draws, where she goes away to another land.

यदि गृहनिजगो भौमस् तदान्यदेशं प्रयाति जारकृते ॥ रविणेति मुथशिले सत्युपभुक्ता सा तु राजपुरुषेण

yadi gṛhanijago bhaumas tadānyadeśaṃ prayāti jārakṛte || raviṇeti muthaśile satyupabhuktā sā tu rājapuruṣeṇa

If Mars stands in his own house (gṛha-nija-ga), then she goes away to another land for a lover's sake. When the muthaśila is with the Sun in the same way, she has been enjoyed by a royal officer (rāja-puruṣa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिगृहनिजगोभौमस्तदान्यदेशंप्रयातिजारकृते ॥ रविणेतिमुथशिलेसत्युपभुक्तासातुराजपुरुषेण

सौम्येन लेखकवणिग् निजभे शुक्रेण योषयैव स्त्री ॥ एतैर्योगैरसती विपरीते सुचरितेति विज्ञेयम्

saumyena lekhakavaṇig nijabhe śukreṇa yoṣayaiva strī || etairyogairasatī viparīte sucariteti vijñeyam

⟨When the muthaśila is⟩ with Mercury (saumya), ⟨the lover is⟩ a scribe or a merchant; ⟨when it is⟩ with Venus in its own sign, the woman ⟨is enjoyed⟩ by a woman herself. By these yogas she is unchaste (asatī); in the contrary case she is to be known as of good conduct (sucaritā).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्येनलेखकवणिग् निजभेशुक्रेणयोषयैवस्त्री ॥ एतैर्योगैरसतीविपरीतेसुचरितेतिविज्ञेयम्

34.4a reading here is contested

लग्नपतिनाथ शशिना मूसरिफे भूसुते भवेज्जारः ॥ युक्तः पुनर्गुरुदृशा पुत्रभयाद्रविदृशा च राजभयात्

lagnapatinātha śaśinā mūsariphe bhūsute bhavejjāraḥ || yuktaḥ punargurudṛśā putrabhayādravidṛśā ca rājabhayāt

When there is a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) with the lord of the lagna, or with the Moon, and Mars (bhūsuta, the Earth's son) ⟨is so placed⟩, there would be a lover (jāra). Further, ⟨when that graha is⟩ joined with Jupiter's aspect, ⟨she gives him up⟩ from fear of a son; and by the Sun's aspect, from fear of the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपतिनाथशशिनामूसरिफेभ्रूसुतेभवेजारः ॥ युक्तः पुनर्गुरुदृशापुत्रभयाद्रविदृशाचराजभयात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भ्रूसुते"; alternatives "ग्भूसुते", "भ्रुसुते" — zoomed 4x: the akṣara after मूसरिफे carries a ra-hook below and a ū stroke; the ra-hook and the ū stroke touch, so भ्रू and ग्भू cannot be separated at this magnification [2026-10-01: settled on the plate. The exemplar's leaf (PDF p.185, read by eye at about 5.0x native) sets भूसुते: the sign under the भ is this fount's ū alone, the same sort as the ū of मूसरिफे on the same line, with no ra-hook. The mūla now reads भूसुते, Mars.]
  • About this edition: Three things in this record, and none of them is altered in the Sanskrit. (1) भ्रूसुते: bhrū-suta, 'son of the brow', names no graha, and this is the only place in the whole printing that sets the word; the same printing sets भृगुसुते (Venus) three times and भूसुत (Mars) twice. The plate reader could not separate भ्रू from ग्भू at 4×, and the ग their alternative preserves is the ग of भृगु, so भृगुसुते — Venus — is the likeliest intent. The rendering leaves the printed word transliterated rather than choose for the reader. (2) भवेजारः: the optative भवेत् before जारः gives भवेज्जारः, and the press sets a single ज; the rendering takes it as 'there would be'. (3) The verb that governs the ablatives पुत्रभयात् and राजभयात् stands in the NEXT record (5), which closes पतति जारं सा. The supplied ⟨she gives him up⟩ marks that link; no words are pulled in from record 5. [2026-10-01: the exemplar's leaf (PDF p.185, read by eye at about 5.0x native) sets भूसुते and भवेज्जारः. The sign under the भ is this fount's ū alone, the same sort as the ū of मूसरिफे on the same line, with no ra-hook, and the verb carries the conjunct ज्ज. Both are written into the mūla; the conjecture भृगुसुते (Venus) is refuted, and the graha is Mars.]

सितदृष्ट्या परनारीभयात् सितज्ञैकराशिगतदृष्ट्या ॥ जारस्य स्थविरत्वाल्लज्जित्वात् पतति जारं सा

sitadṛṣṭyā paranārībhayāt sitajñaikarāśigatadṛṣṭyā || jārasya sthaviratvāllajjitvāt patati jāraṃ sā

By Venus's (sita) aspect, ⟨she gives him up⟩ from fear of another woman; by the aspect of Venus and Mercury gone to one rāśi, because the lover is aged, and out of shame — she falls away from the lover.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सितदृष्ट्यापरनारीभयात्सितज्ञैकराशिगतदृष्ट्या ॥ जारस्यस्थविरत्वाल्लज्जित्वात्पतति जारंसा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verb the record prints is पतति, 'she falls', which is intransitive, so the accusative जारं beside it is irregular. The string of ablative causes — fear of another woman, the lover's old age, shame — requires the sense 'she gives the lover up', and that is how it is rendered. One misprint would remove the difficulty: जारात्, 'from the lover', which is what पत् wants and which scans the same as जारं. That is not applied; the Sanskrit above is what the page sets. The ablatives of record 4 (fear of a son, fear of the king) run into this same verb, which is why the supplied phrase appears there too.

Adhyāya 35 · अथाष्टमस्थानपृच्छा ॥

35.1a reading here is contested

नृपसंग्रामप्रश्ने विलग्नलग्नेशसंस्थितात् खेटात् ॥ शशिमूसरिफात् प्रष्टास्तास्तपसंस्थेंदुमुथशिलाच्छत्रुः

nṛpasaṃgrāmapraśne vilagnalagneśasaṃsthitāt kheṭāt || śaśimūsariphāt praṣṭāstāstapasaṃstheṃdumuthaśilācchatruḥ

In a question about a king's battle (nṛpa-saṃgrāma): the querent (praṣṭā) ⟨is judged⟩ from the graha (kheṭa) standing in the lagna or with the lord of the lagna, by the Moon's mūsaripha (the separating aspect) ⟨with it⟩; the enemy, from the Moon's muthaśila (the applying aspect) with ⟨the graha⟩ standing in the 7th (asta) or with the lord of the 7th (asta-pa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नृपसंग्रामप्रश्नेविलग्नलग्नेशसंस्थितात्खेटात् ॥ शशिमूसरिफात्प्रष्टास्तात्पसंस्थेंदुमुथशिलाच्छत्रुः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टास्तात्पसंस्थेंदु"; alternatives "प्रष्टाऽस्तात्पसंस्थेंदु", "प्रष्टास्ताप्तसंस्थेंदु" — the त्प / प्त cluster after स्ता is small and the two limbs touch [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टास्तास्तपसंस्थेंदुमुथशिलाच्छत्रुः; this sentence names प्रष्टास्तात्पसंस्थेंदु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टास्तात्पसंस्थेंदु"; alternatives "प्रष्टाऽस्तात्पसंस्थेंदु", "प्रष्टास्ताप्तसंस्थेंदु" — the त्प / प्त cluster after स्ता is small and the two limbs touch [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टास्तास्तपसंस्थेंदुमुथशिलाच्छत्रुः; this sentence names प्रष्टास्तात्पसंस्थेंदु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The reader could not separate the त्प / प्त cluster after स्ता. As printed the word is अस्तात्प, which is not Sanskrit. अस्तप, 'the lord of the 7th', is what the sense wants: it answers लग्नेश in the first half exactly as the 7th house — the enemy's own lagna — answers the lagna, which is the querent's. It also brings this half to the āryā's 27 mātrās, which the printed form leaves at 28. The rendering follows अस्तप; the Sanskrit is left as the page sets it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टास्तास्तपसंस्थेंदुमुथशिलाच्छत्रुः; this sentence names त्प, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

अथवा शनिकुजजीवाः शीघ्रेभ्यो बलयुता उपरिचराः ॥ बुधसितचंद्रास्तेभ्यश्च दुर्बलाधश्चराश्च संचिंत्याः

athavā śanikujajīvāḥ śīghrebhyo balayutā uparicarāḥ || budhasitacaṃdrāstebhyaśca durbalādhaścarāśca saṃciṃtyāḥ

Or else: Saturn, Mars and Jupiter are strong in comparison with the swift ones (śīghra), and move above (upari-cara); Mercury, Venus and the Moon are to be reckoned weak in comparison with those, and moving below (adhaś-cara).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथवाशनिकुजजीवाःशीघ्रेभ्योबलयुताउपरिचराः ॥ बुधसितचंद्रास्तेभ्यश्चदुर्बलाधश्चराश्चसंचिंत्याः

35.3a reading here is contested

लग्नपतावस्तपतेः षट्त्रिदृशाथ मुथशिले द्वयोः स्नेहः ॥ वर्गद्वयमध्याधःपतितः सोऽन्येन बध्यः स्यात्

lagnapatāvastapateḥ ṣaṭtridṛśātha muthaśile dvayoḥ snehaḥ || vargadvayamadhyādhaḥpatitaḥ so'nyena badhyaḥ syāt

When the lord of the lagna stands to the lord of the 7th (asta-pa) in a six-and-three aspect (ṣaṭ-tri-dṛś), and they are then in a muthaśila, there is affection between the two. He who has fallen below, between the two camps (varga-dvaya), will be bound by the other.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपतावस्तपतेःषद्त्रिदृशाथमुथ शिलेद्वयोःस्नेहः ॥ वर्गद्वयमध्याधःपतितःसोऽन्येनबध्यःस्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षद्त्रिदृशाथ"; alternatives "षड्त्रिदृशाथ", "षट्त्रिदृशाथ" — zoomed 4x: the press sets ष + द् (a द with virāma-join) + त्रि, not the ड्/ट् the word would normally take [2026-10-01: the exemplar's leaf (PDF p.185, read by eye at about 3.7x native) sets षद्त्रिदृशाथ as this reader saw it. The mūla now reads षट्त्रिदृशाथ: षद् is emended on the lexicon.]
  • About this edition: The press sets ष + द् + त्रि, which is neither षट् nor षड्; the reader zoomed 4× and recorded exactly that. 'Six and three' most probably counts distance in rāśis — six signs is the opposition, three signs the square — because in Tājika the sixth HOUSE casts no aspect at all, so the numbers cannot be house numbers here. Rendered literally, with the ambiguity left standing. [2026-10-01: the exemplar's leaf (PDF p.185, read by eye at about 3.7x native) sets षद्त्रिदृशाथ exactly as transcribed. षद् is emended to षट् on the lexicon (ष् before त् gives ट्), which all four independent printings carry as their machine reads give them; दृशाथ is the press's own reading and is kept, with the upacaya reading षट्त्रिदशाय recorded as a doubt.]

वर्गद्वयाधिपानां मूसरिफेऽस्तंगतेन रणदैर्घ्यं ॥ लग्नस्वामिनि मंदे कंबूले उपरिगे जयः प्रष्टुः

vargadvayādhipānāṃ mūsariphe'staṃgatena raṇadairghyaṃ || lagnasvāmini maṃde kaṃbūle uparige jayaḥ praṣṭuḥ

When the lords of the two camps (varga-dvaya) are in a mūsaripha with one that has gone to setting (astaṅgata, combust), the battle is drawn out. When the lord of the lagna is Saturn (manda), stands in a kambūla and moves above (upari-ga), victory is the querent's.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वर्गद्वयाधिपानांमूसरिफेऽस्तंगतेनरणदैर्घ्यं ॥ लग्नस्वामिनिमंदेकंबू लेउपरिगेजयःप्रष्टुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्नस्वामिनि मंदे is taken as one locative-absolute phrase, 'the lord of the lagna being Saturn'. It can also be read as two items — 'when the lord of the lagna and Saturn are in a kambūla and move above' — which would make the rule turn on two grahas rather than one. Nothing in the record decides between them.
35.5a reading here is contested

एवं गुणे तु तस्मिन्वि प्रविनष्टेस्तपतितनीचस्थे ॥ केंद्रेऽस्ते वास्तपतौ प्रष्टुर्हानिः प्रवक्तव्या

evaṃ guṇe tu tasminvi pravinaṣṭestapatitanīcasthe || keṃdre'ste vāstapatau praṣṭurhāniḥ pravaktavyā

But when that ⟨graha⟩ is wholly destroyed (pravinaṣṭa) in the quality just described, and has fallen to setting and stands in debilitation; and when the lord of the 7th (asta-pa) is in a kendra (an angle) or is set (asta, combust) — the querent's loss is to be declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंगुणेतुतसिन्निप्रविनष्टेस्तपतितनीचस्थे ॥ केंद्रेऽस्तेवास्तपतौप्रष्टुर्हानिःप्रवक्तव्या

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तुतसिन्निप्रविनष्टे"; alternatives "तुतस्मिन्प्रविनष्टे", "तुतसिन्विप्रविनष्टे" — zoomed 4x and still unresolved; the same fount's स्मि conjunct, read clearly on page 186 line 11 (तस्मिन्धनपे), looks very like सि followed by a न at this size, so तस्मिन् is the likely print
  • About this edition: The reader could not resolve तसिन्नि and recorded that तस्मिन् is the likely print: in this fount the स्मि conjunct, read clearly on page 186 line 11 (तस्मिन्धनपे), looks like सि followed by न at this size. The rendering follows तस्मिन्, 'that ⟨graha⟩'; the Sanskrit above is left as the reader read it. The second half is elliptical — केंद्रेऽस्ते वास्तपतौ is taken as केंद्रे अस्ते वा अस्तपतौ, so both conditions belong to the lord of the 7th. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्मिन्वि; this sentence names तसिन्नि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
35.6a reading here is contested

लग्नादधः शुभे सति उपरि च मंदे शुभः सहायः स्यात् ॥ लग्नपतौ रंध्रस्थे रंध्रपतिमुथशिले मतिः प्रष्टुः

lagnādadhaḥ śubhe sati upari ca maṃde śubhaḥ sahāyaḥ syāt || lagnapatau raṃdhrasthe raṃdhrapatimuthaśile matiḥ praṣṭuḥ

When a benefic is below the lagna and Saturn (manda) is above, there will be a good ally (sahāya). When the lord of the lagna is in the 8th (randhra) and in a muthaśila with the lord of the 8th, the querent's thought ⟨is on that house⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नादधःशुभे सतिउपरिचमंदेशुभःसहायःस्यात् ॥ लग्नपतौरंध्रस्थेरंध्रपतिमुथशिलेमतिःप्रष्टुः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नादधःशुभे"; alternatives "लग्नाद्धःशुभे" — the द and the धः are set tight; I could not tell a द + धः pair from a द्ध conjunct
  • About this edition: The reader could not tell a द + धः pair from a द्ध conjunct in लग्नादधः. Read as लग्नात् + अधः, 'below the lagna', which is the only word the letters make and which answers उपरि, 'above', in the same line. मतिः प्रष्टुः carries no verb; the supplied ⟨is on that house⟩ follows this book's use of the phrase for working out what the querent is actually asking about.

सप्तेशे धनसंस्थे धनेशकृतमुथशिले रिपोर्नाशः ॥ लग्नेशदशमपत्योर्मुथशिलतः पृच्छकस्य जयवीर्ये

sapteśe dhanasaṃsthe dhaneśakṛtamuthaśile ripornāśaḥ || lagneśadaśamapatyormuthaśilataḥ pṛcchakasya jayavīrye

When the lord of the 7th (sapteśa) is placed in the 2nd (dhana) and the lord of the 2nd has made a muthaśila ⟨with it⟩, the enemy is destroyed. From a muthaśila of the lords of the lagna and the 10th come the questioner's victory and vigour.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सर्वेशेधनसंस्थेधनेशकृतमुथशिलेरिपोर्नाशः ॥ लग्ने शदशमपत्योर्मुथशिलतःपृच्छकस्यजयवीर्ये

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सर्वेश, 'the lord of all', stands here and nowhere else in this whole printing, and the book never defines it. It is left transliterated rather than resolved to a particular graha. [2026-10-01: the printing does not set सर्वेश here. PDF p.185 of the Nirṇayasāgar 1893, read by eye at about 3x native, prints सप्तेशे, the lord of the 7th; सर्वेशे was a misreading of प्त as र्व in the machine read our text was made from, now corrected.]

तुर्यास्तपयोरेवं शत्रोर्योगे जयो ज्ञेयः ॥ उभयवर्गेपि केंद्रे तत्पतिकृतमुथशिले बलं ज्ञेयम्

turyāstapayorevaṃ śatroryoge jayo jñeyaḥ || ubhayavargepi keṃdre tatpatikṛtamuthaśile balaṃ jñeyam

Of the lords of the 4th (turya) and the 7th (asta) in the same way: when they are in yoga, the enemy's victory is to be known. When ⟨grahas⟩ of both camps are in a kendra as well, and their lords have made a muthaśila, ⟨each side's⟩ strength is to be known ⟨from that⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तुर्यास्तपयोरेवंशत्रोर्योगेजयोज्ञेयः ॥ उभयवर्गेपिकेंद्रेतत्पतिकृतमुथशिलेबलंज्ञेयम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The 7th is the enemy's own lagna and the 4th is the tenth from it, so the lords of the 4th and the 7th stand to the enemy exactly as the lords of the lagna and the 10th (record 7) stand to the questioner. That parallel is what fixes शत्रोः as the genitive of जयः, 'the enemy's victory', rather than as part of शत्रोर्योगे, 'in a yoga with the enemy'.
35.9a reading here is contested

चरराशौ सबलत्वं जित्वा प्रांते विनाशस्तु ॥ लग्नपतावंत्यस्थे प्रष्टा नश्यति परोऽस्तपे षष्ठे

cararāśau sabalatvaṃ jitvā prāṃte vināśastu || lagnapatāvaṃtyasthe praṣṭā naśyati paro'stape ṣaṣṭhe

In a movable (cara) rāśi there is strength; but after conquering, there is destruction in the end. When the lord of the lagna is in the 12th (antya), the querent perishes; the other ⟨perishes⟩ when the lord of the 7th (asta-pa) is in the 6th.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चरराशौसबलत्वंजित्वाप्राप्तिविनाशस्तु ॥ लग्नपतावंत्यस्थेप्रष्टानश्यतिपरोऽस्तपे षष्ठे

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठे"; alternatives "पष्ठे" — zoomed 4x: both akṣaras carry the same left-hand form, and it differs from the प of खपतौ later in the same crop, so ष is the reading
35.10a reading here is contested

खपतौ लग्ने प्रष्टुस्तुर्येशेऽस्ते रिपोः सहायबलम् ॥ यन्मुथशिलौ रवींदू तस्य बलं मुसरिफे हानिः

khapatau lagne praṣṭusturyeśe'ste ripoḥ sahāyabalam || yanmuthaśilau ravīṃdū tasya balaṃ musariphe hāniḥ

When the lord of the 10th (kha-pa) is in the lagna, the strength of allies is the questioner's; when the lord of the 4th (turyeśa) is in the 7th (asta), it is the enemy's. With whichever of the two the Sun and the Moon stand in a muthaśila, his is the strength; in a mūsaripha, his is the loss.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

खपतौलग्नेप्रष्टुस्तुर्येशेऽस्तेरिपोःसहायबलम् ॥ यन्मुथशिलौरवींदूतस्यबलंमुसरिफेहानिः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुसरिफे"; alternatives "मूसरिफे" — set with a short u here, against the मूसरिफे of page 185 lines 4, 6, 9 and 10; recorded as printed
  • About this edition: The page sets मुसरिफे with a short u here, against the मूसरिफे of page 185 lines 4, 6, 9 and 10. Recorded as printed; the term is the same one.

Adhyāya 36 · अथनवमस्थानपृच्छा ॥

36.1a reading here is contested

मम गमनं भविताकिं न वेति लग्नेश्वरे नवा केंद्रे ॥ नवमेशमुथशिले सति नवमेशे वा भवेद् गमनं

mama gamanaṃ bhavitākiṃ na veti lagneśvare navā keṃdre || navameśamuthaśile sati navameśe vā bhaved gamanaṃ

⟨The question is⟩ 'Will my journey come about or not?'. When the lord of the lagna stands in the 9th (nava) or in a kendra (an angle), and a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with the lord of the 9th takes place — or when it is the lord of the 9th ⟨that stands so⟩ — the journey comes about. [The printed नवा is rendered 'in the 9th'; the same letters can also be divided न वा, 'or not'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ममगमनंभवितार्किनवेतिलग्नेश्वरेनवाकेंद्रे ॥ नवमेशमुथशिलेसतिनवमेशेवाभवेद्गमनं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवितार्किनवेति"; alternatives "भविताकिंनवेति", "भवितार्कीनवेति" — a repha sits over the कि where the sense (भविता किं न वा इति) wants an anusvāra; recorded as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भविताकिं; this sentence names भवितार्कि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: भवितार्कि: a repha sits over the कि where the sense (भविता किं न वा इति, 'will it be or not?') wants an anusvāra; the rendering follows किं and the printed letters are kept. लग्नेश्वरे नवा केंद्रे: the metre is a clean āryā first half (12 + 18 mātrās) with नवा exactly as printed, so no word has been dropped — but नवा is not a form of नवम, and the division न वा ('or not') is the alternative. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भविताकिं; this sentence names भवितार्कि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
36.2a reading here is contested

लग्नस्थे नवमपतौ लग्नाधिपमुथशिले च संचारात् ॥ रहितो याति पुनर्ना नवमदृशा वर्जिते योगे

lagnasthe navamapatau lagnādhipamuthaśile ca saṃcārāt || rahito yāti punarnā navamadṛśā varjite yoge

When the lord of the 9th stands in the lagna and there is a muthaśila with the lord of the lagna, ⟨the querent⟩ sets out, free of ⟨further⟩ moving about (saṃcāra); but the man (nā) ⟨does not set out⟩ again when the yoga is deprived of an aspect from the 9th. [Our mula now reads पुनर्ना, with ना 'the man'; the negation is supplied from the sense, because a yoga without the 9th's aspect denies the journey.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नस्थेनवमपतौलग्नाधिपमुथशिलेचसंचारा त् ॥ रहितोयातिपुनर्नर्नानवमदृशावर्जितेयोगे

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुनर्नर्नानवम"; alternatives "पुनर्ननवम", "पुनर्नर्तानवम" — zoomed 4x: two repha-topped न akṣaras stand in a row, the second with an ā stroke; the zoom did not separate them [2026-10-01: the plate, read by eye at about 4.5x native, sets पुनर्ना with ONE repha-topped न; पुनर्नर्ना was a misread of the 2026-09-11 vision reader, and the mūla now reads पुनर्ना.]
  • About this edition: पुनर्नर्ना: two repha-topped न stand in a row on the plate and the 4x zoom could not separate them. The āryā second half has 27 mātrās; with पुनर्न it counts 26 and with पुनर्नर्ना 29, so one akṣara is surplus. The rendering follows the plate reader's own alternative पुनर्न. [2026-10-01: the plate, read by eye at about 4.5x native, sets पुनर्ना with ONE repha-topped न; पुनर्नर्ना was a misread of the 2026-09-11 vision reader, and the mūla now reads पुनर्ना.]
36.3a reading here is contested

लग्नपतौ केंद्रस्थे सहजग्रहमुथशिले च विक्रूरे ॥ गमनं स्यादस्मिन् वा केंद्रे क्रूरे च नास्ति गतिः

lagnapatau keṃdrasthe sahajagrahamuthaśile ca vikrūre || gamanaṃ syādasmin vā keṃdre krūre ca nāsti gatiḥ

When the lord of the lagna stands in a kendra and there is a muthaśila with the graha of the 3rd (sahaja) that is free of a malefic (vikrūra), the journey takes place; but if a malefic is in that ⟨same place⟩ or in a kendra, there is no going.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपतौकेंद्रस्थेसहजग्रहमुथशिलेचविक्रूरे ॥ गमनंस्यादसिन्वाकेंद्रेक्रूरेचनास्ति गतिः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यादसिन्वा"; alternatives "स्यादस्मिन्वा" — same सि/स्मि ambiguity as page 185 line 11; तस्मिन् is set clearly on line 11 of this page
  • About this edition: स्यादसिन्वा is rendered as स्यात् + अस्मिन् + वा, the plate reader's own alternative: सि and स्मि are not distinguishable in this printing, and अस्मिन् is what the sentence needs.

अस्ते क्रूरेपि च यत्कार्ये निर्याति विघ्नमत एव ॥ आकाशस्थे पापे राजकुलाज्ज्येष्ठतो निजाद् वापि

aste krūrepi ca yatkārye niryāti vighnamata eva || ākāśasthe pāpe rājakulājjyeṣṭhato nijād vāpi

And when a malefic is in the 7th (asta) as well, in whatever business he sets out ⟨upon⟩ there is an obstacle for that very reason. When a malefic stands in the ākāśa (the 10th, the mid-heaven), ⟨the obstacle comes⟩ from the royal court, from an elder, or from his own ⟨people⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तेक्रूरेपिचयत्कार्येनिर्यातिविघ्नमतएव ॥ आकाशस्थेपापेराजकुलाज्ज्येष्ठतोनिजाद्वापि

नवमेशे मुथशिलगे लग्नाधीशेन पापरिपुदृष्टे ॥ गमनेवसानतः स्यात् प्रष्टुः कष्टं क्षयोऽर्थस्य

navameśe muthaśilage lagnādhīśena pāparipudṛṣṭe || gamanevasānataḥ syāt praṣṭuḥ kaṣṭaṃ kṣayo'rthasya

When the lord of the 9th enters a muthaśila with the lord of the lagna and is aspected by a malefic and by the lord of the 6th (ripu), then at the end (avasāna) of the journey there is hardship for the querent and loss of his wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नवमेशेमुथशिलगेलग्ना धीशेनपापरिपुदृष्टे ॥ गमनेवसानतःस्यात्प्रष्टुःकष्टंक्षयोऽर्थस्य

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: गमनेवसानतः is गमने + अवसानतः, 'at the end of the journey'; the pothi prints no avagraha and the letters are kept as they stand.

लग्नेशे नवमेशे मुथशिलकृति रंध्रसप्तमे कष्टम् ॥ उदये यस्मिन् यायाद्विनिःसृतिः स्यात् सुखकरः पंथाः

lagneśe navameśe muthaśilakṛti raṃdhrasaptame kaṣṭam || udaye yasmin yāyādviniḥsṛtiḥ syāt sukhakaraḥ paṃthāḥ

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 9th make their muthaśila in the 8th (randhra) or the 7th, ⟨the journey brings⟩ hardship; ⟨but when it is made⟩ in the rising sign (udaya) in which he would set out, the setting out (vi-niḥsṛti) ⟨is good⟩ and the road will be one that gives ease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशेनवमेशेमुथशिलकृतिरंध्रसप्तमेकष्टम् ॥ उदयेयस्मिन्यायाद्दिनिः सृतिःस्यात्सुखकरःपंथाः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: दिनिःसृतिः is taken as दिन-निःसृतिः / दिनि निःसृतिः, 'the going out on ⟨that⟩ day'. The second half counts 29 mātrās against the āryā's 27, so a syllable here is probably mis-set; the word division above is the best one the printed letters allow. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads यायाद्विनिःसृतिः; this sentence names दिनिःसृतिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
36.7a reading here is contested

लग्नान्मार्गानुभवो व्योम्नः कार्यं स्मराद्गतिस्थानम् ॥ भूमेः कार्यं परिणतिरेवं लग्ने शरीरसुखम्

lagnānmārgānubhavo vyomnaḥ kāryaṃ smarādgatisthānam || bhūmeḥ kāryaṃ pariṇatirevaṃ lagne śarīrasukham

From the lagna, the experience of the road ⟨is known⟩; from the ākāśa (the 10th), the business ⟨he travels for⟩; from the 7th (smara), the place he goes to; from the earth-place (bhūmi, the 4th), the ripening (pariṇati) of the business; and so too, from the lagna, the body's comfort. [Our mūla now reads स्मराद्गतिस्थानम्, which is what the rendering follows.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नान्मार्गानुभवोव्योम्नःकार्यंस्माराद्वतिस्थानम् ॥ भूमेःकार्यंपरिणतिरेवंलग्नेशरीरसुखम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्माराद्वतिस्थानम्"; alternatives "स्मराद्गतिस्थानम्", "स्माराद्धतिस्थानम्" — zoomed 4x: the subscript under the द is a rounded bowl, which reads as व but could be ध; the sense (from the 7th, smara) would want स्मरात् [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्मराद्गतिस्थानम्; this sentence names स्माराद्वतिस्थानम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: स्माराद्वतिस्थानम्: the subscript under the द is a rounded bowl that reads as व; द्वति is no word, and the sense (from smara, the 7th) wants स्मरात् गतिस्थानम्. The rendering follows that; the printed letters are kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्मराद्गतिस्थानम्; this sentence names स्माराद्वतिस्थानम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

दशमे शुभे च सिद्धिः कार्यस्यास्ते प्रयाति यत्स्थाने ॥ तत्र शुभं च चतुर्थे परिणामः सुंदरः कार्ये

daśame śubhe ca siddhiḥ kāryasyāste prayāti yatsthāne || tatra śubhaṃ ca caturthe pariṇāmaḥ suṃdaraḥ kārye

When a benefic is in the 10th, the business succeeds; ⟨when one is⟩ in the 7th (asta), in whatever place he goes there is good for him there; and ⟨when one is⟩ in the 4th, the outcome of the business is a fine one.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशमे शुभेचसिद्धिःकार्यस्यास्तेप्रयातियत्स्थाने ॥ तत्रशुभंचचतुर्थेपरिणामःसुंदरःकार्ये

लग्नेशं शशिनं वा यः क्रूरस्तुदति तत्र मनुजर्क्षे ॥ मनुजत्रिराशिके वा तदा भयं द्विपदतो गंतुः

lagneśaṃ śaśinaṃ vā yaḥ krūrastudati tatra manujarkṣe || manujatrirāśike vā tadā bhayaṃ dvipadato gaṃtuḥ

Whichever malefic strikes (tudati) the lord of the lagna or the Moon — if it stands there in a human sign (manuja-ṛkṣa), or in a human triplicity (trirāśika), then the traveller has danger from a two-footed ⟨creature, that is, from a man⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशंशशिनंवायःक्रूरस्तुदतितत्रमनुजर्क्षे ॥ म नुजत्रिराशिकेवातदाभयंद्विपदतोगंतुः

जलराशौ वारिभयं चतुष्पदर्क्षे तथाश्वादेः ॥ घटचापेद्रुमकंटकभयं हरौ व्याघ्रसिंहादेः

jalarāśau vāribhayaṃ catuṣpadarkṣe tathāśvādeḥ || ghaṭacāpedrumakaṃṭakabhayaṃ harau vyāghrasiṃhādeḥ

In a water sign, danger from water; in a four-footed sign, from a horse and the like; in Aquarius (ghaṭa) and Sagittarius (cāpa), danger from trees and thorns; in Leo (hari), from a tiger, a lion and the like.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जलराशौवारिभयंचतुष्पदर्क्षेतथाश्वादेः ॥ घटचापद्रुमकंटकभयंहरौव्याघ्रसिंहादेः

नगरप्रवेशतोऽस्मान् फलमस्ति न वा प्रवेशलग्नमिह ॥ तस्मिन् धनपे वक्रे नो रहणं कार्यसिद्धिर्वा

nagarapraveśato'smān phalamasti na vā praveśalagnamiha || tasmin dhanape vakre no rahaṇaṃ kāryasiddhirvā

'Is there a result for us from entering the city, or not?' — here ⟨one takes⟩ the lagna of the entry (praveśa-lagna). In it, if the lord of the 2nd (dhana) is retrograde, there is no staying (rahaṇa) and no accomplishment of the business.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नगरप्रवेशतोऽस्मान्फलमस्तिनवाप्रवेशलग्नमिह ॥ तस्मिन्धनपेवक्रेनोरहणंकार्यसिद्धिर्वा

अतिचरिते बहुदिवसं रहणं नो कार्यसिद्धिरीषदपि ॥ नवमतृतीयगतेस्मिन् कार्यं कृत्वाशु निजपुरं याति

aticarite bahudivasaṃ rahaṇaṃ no kāryasiddhirīṣadapi || navamatṛtīyagatesmin kāryaṃ kṛtvāśu nijapuraṃ yāti

When ⟨that lord⟩ is in swift motion (aticarita), the stay is of many days and there is no accomplishment of the business, not even a little. When it has gone to the 9th or the 3rd, he does his business and goes swiftly to his own city.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अतिचरिते बहुदिवसंरहणंनोकार्यसिद्धिरीषदपि ॥ नवमतृतीयगतेस्मिन्कार्यंकृत्वाशुनिजपुरंयाति

36.13a reading here is contested

लग्ने कर्मण्याये धनपयुते शोभनं ज्ञेयम् ॥ सक्रूरसप्तमस्थे पथि विघ्नाज्झकटकश्चतुर्थस्थे

lagne karmaṇyāye dhanapayute śobhanaṃ jñeyam || sakrūrasaptamasthe pathi vighnājjhakaṭakaścaturthasthe

When the lagna, the 10th (karman) or the 11th (āya) is joined by the lord of the 2nd (dhanapa), ⟨the result⟩ is to be known as a fine one. When it stands in the 7th together with a malefic, there is an obstruction on the road, and a quarrel (jhakaṭaka) out of that obstruction when it stands in the 4th. [Our mūla now reads विघ्नाज्झ, 'out of the obstruction'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेकर्मण्यायेधनपयुतेशोभनंज्ञेयम् ॥ स क्रूरसप्तमस्थेपथिविघ्राज्झकटकश्चतुर्थंस्थे

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विघ्राज्झ"; alternatives "विघ्नाज्झ", "विग्राज्झ", "विघ्राज्ज" — 6x zoom: घ with a subscript stroke that reads as ्र, then a half-ja hook + झ. Both the subscript and the conjunct are ambiguous. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विघ्नाज्झकटकश्चतुर्थस्थे; this sentence names विघ्राज्झ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्थंस्थे"; alternatives "चतुर्थस्थे" — a small mark over र्थ that may be an anusvāra or ink [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विघ्नाज्झकटकश्चतुर्थस्थे; this sentence names चतुर्थंस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विघ्राज्झ"; alternatives "विघ्नाज्झ", "विग्राज्झ", "विघ्राज्ज" — 6x zoom: घ with a subscript stroke that reads as ्र, then a half-ja hook + झ. Both the subscript and the conjunct are ambiguous. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विघ्नाज्झकटकश्चतुर्थस्थे; this sentence names विघ्राज्झ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्थंस्थे"; alternatives "चतुर्थस्थे" — a small mark over र्थ that may be an anusvāra or ink [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विघ्नाज्झकटकश्चतुर्थस्थे; this sentence names चतुर्थंस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: विघ्राज्झ: at 6x the घ carries a subscript stroke read as ्र, then a half-ja hook and झ. विघ्न + आत् + झकटकः gives the sense and is the plate reader's own alternative; the printed letters are kept. चतुर्थंस्थे carries a mark over र्थ that may be an anusvāra or ink; the rendering is the same either way. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विघ्नाज्झकटकश्चतुर्थस्थे; this sentence names चतुर्थंस्थे and विघ्राज्झ, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

Adhyāya 37 · अथदशमस्थानपृच्छा ॥

37.1a reading here is contested

राज्याप्तिप्रश्नलग्ने लग्नेशे शशिनि वा नभःपतिना ॥ कृतमुथशिलेंबरदृशा राज्यं रूपक्रमाद् भवति

rājyāptipraśnalagne lagneśe śaśini vā nabhaḥpatinā || kṛtamuthaśileṃbaradṛśā rājyaṃ rūpakramād bhavati

In the lagna of a question about winning sovereignty (rājyāpti): when the lord of the lagna, or the Moon, has a muthaśila (the applying aspect) made with the lord of the sky (nabhaḥpati, the lord of the 10th) by an aspect from the 10th (ambara), sovereignty comes ⟨to him⟩ in the measure of his own standing (rūpa-krama).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

राज्याप्तिप्रश्नलग्नेलग्नेशेशशिनिवानभःपतिना ॥ कृतमुथशिलेंब रदृशाराज्यंरूपक्रमाद्भवति

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रदृशा"; alternatives "र्दृशा" — continues line 1's 'कृतमुथशिलेंब'; reads as ra + dṛ at 3x, no repha seen
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रूपक्रमाद्भवति"; alternatives "नृपक्रमाद्भवति" — रू is clear at 3x but the following क्र is heavily inked
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रदृशा"; alternatives "र्दृशा" — continues line 1's 'कृतमुथशिलेंब'; reads as ra + dṛ at 3x, no repha seen
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रूपक्रमाद्भवति"; alternatives "नृपक्रमाद्भवति" — रू is clear at 3x but the following क्र is heavily inked
  • About this edition: रूपक्रमात् is rendered 'in the measure of his own standing'. The plate reader's alternative नृपक्रमात् would give 'by royal succession'; the claim the verse makes is the same either way. कृतमुथशिलेंबरदृशा is कृतमुथशिले + अंबरदृशा, the initial अ elided and no avagraha printed.
37.2a reading here is contested

अन्योन्यभवनगमना क्रूराभावेऽर्थचिंतितप्राप्तिः ॥ लग्नस्थेनान्येन च सौम्येनांबरस्य मुथशिलेप्येवम्

anyonyabhavanagamanā krūrābhāve'rthaciṃtitaprāptiḥ || lagnasthenānyena ca saumyenāṃbarasya muthaśilepyevam

From ⟨the two lords⟩ going into each other's houses, when no malefic is present, the thing thought of is obtained. It is the same also when the ⟨lord of the⟩ 10th (ambara) has a muthaśila with another benefic that stands in the lagna.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अन्योन्यभवनगमनाक्रूराभावेऽर्थचिंतितप्राप्तिः ॥ लग्नस्थेनान्येनचसौ म्येनांबरस्यमुथशिलेप्येवम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलेप्येवम्"; alternatives "मुथशिलेऽप्येवम्" — no avagraha glyph is printed here, though sandhi wants one; kept as printed
37.3a reading here is contested

पापार्दिते तु मंदे निकटीभूयोत्तरत्यधो राज्यं ॥ भूमिस्थे क्रूरदृशा त्वपवादः शुभदृशा कीर्तिः

pāpārdite tu maṃde nikaṭībhūyottaratyadho rājyaṃ || bhūmisthe krūradṛśā tvapavādaḥ śubhadṛśā kīrtiḥ

But when the slow-moving ⟨graha⟩ is afflicted by a malefic, the sovereignty comes close and then sinks away downward. When ⟨that graha⟩ stands in the 4th (bhūmi), a malefic's aspect ⟨brings⟩ ill-repute (apavāda) and a benefic's aspect fame.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापार्दितेतुमंदेनिकटीभूयोत्तरत्यधोराज्यं ॥ भूमिस्थेक्रूरदृशाल्वपवादःशुभदृशाकीर्तिः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रूरदृशाल्वपवादः"; alternatives "क्रूरदृशाऽपवादः", "क्रूरदृशाल्पवादः" — 6x zoom shows three units between शा and वादः: a ल-form, a व-form, then प. The pairing with शुभदृशाकीर्तिः suggests अपवाद, but the extra units are on the page and are kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्रूरदृशा त्वपवादः; this sentence names क्रूरदृशाल्वपवादः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: क्रूरदृशाल्वपवादः: at 6x the plate shows three units between शा and वादः — a ल-form, a व-form, then प. अपवाद is what the pairing with शुभदृशा कीर्तिः requires; the surplus units are on the page and are kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads क्रूरदृशा त्वपवादः; this sentence names क्रूरदृशाल्वपवादः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

मंदग्रहे बलवति क्रूरवियुक्ते यदा शशी विबलः ॥ मंदे बलेन भ्रमणात् राज्यप्राप्तिर्भवेत् प्रष्टुः

maṃdagrahe balavati krūraviyukte yadā śaśī vibalaḥ || maṃde balena bhramaṇāt rājyaprāptirbhavet praṣṭuḥ

When the slow-moving graha is strong and free of a malefic, and the Moon is weak at that time, then by the strength of the slow one, through going about (bhramaṇa), the querent obtains sovereignty.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदग्रहेबलवतिक्रूरवियुक्तेयदाशशीविबलः ॥ मंदेबलेनभ्रमणात्राज्यप्राप्ति भवेत्प्रष्टुः

लग्नाधिपतौ स्वगृहे लाभो राज्यस्य तुंगगे भौमे ॥ लग्नांबराधिपौ यदि कंबूलौ केंद्रगेंदुमुथशिलतः

lagnādhipatau svagṛhe lābho rājyasya tuṃgage bhaume || lagnāṃbarādhipau yadi kaṃbūlau keṃdrageṃdumuthaśilataḥ

When the lord of the lagna is in his own house, there is gain of sovereignty; ⟨so too⟩ when Mars is in his exaltation (tuṅga). If the lords of the lagna and of the 10th (ambara) stand in a kambūla, then from a muthaśila with the Moon placed in a kendra (an angle) —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपतौस्वगृहेलाभोराज्यस्यतुंगगेभौमे ॥ लग्नांबराधिपौयदिकंबूलौकेंद्रगेंदुमुथशिलतः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The sentence runs on into verse 6, which supplies its result; the link is marked with a dash and the supplied words in verse 6 stand in ⟨ ⟩.
37.6a reading here is contested

उत्तमराज्यावाप्तिः स्वर्क्षस्थे चेंदुतो विपुला ॥ यत्रर्क्षे लग्नेशस्तत्पतिरशुभे गृहे तदा कार्यम्

uttamarājyāvāptiḥ svarkṣasthe ceṃduto vipulā || yatrarkṣe lagneśastatpatiraśubhe gṛhe tadā kāryam

⟨— there is⟩ the winning of an excellent sovereignty; and when ⟨the Moon⟩ stands in its own sign, ⟨what comes⟩ from the Moon is ample. In whichever sign the lord of the lagna stands, if the lord of that sign is in an inauspicious house, then the business —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उत्तमराज्यावाप्तिःस्वर्क्ष स्थेचेंदुतोविपुला ॥ यत्रर्क्षेलग्नेशस्तत्पतिरशुभेगृहेतदाकार्यम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यत्रर्क्षे"; alternatives "यत्रक्षै" — 6x zoom shows two marks over क्ष: a hook at the upper right (read as repha) and a slanted stroke at the upper left (read as e-mātrā). Read together they could equally be one ai-mātrā.
  • About this edition: The record opens with the result of verse 5 and its last words run on into verse 7 (न स्यात्, '⟨does⟩ not come about'); both links are supplied in ⟨ ⟩. यत्रर्क्षे: the plate carries two marks over क्ष which read together could be a single ai-mātrā (यत्रक्षै); the rendering follows the printed यत्र + ऋक्षे.
37.7a reading here is contested

न स्यादस्ते कष्टाद् दशमदृशा कटुकता कार्ये ॥ राज्यप्राप्तौ सत्यां यदि पृच्छति कोपि परिणतिं च तदा

na syādaste kaṣṭād daśamadṛśā kaṭukatā kārye || rājyaprāptau satyāṃ yadi pṛcchati kopi pariṇatiṃ ca tadā

⟨—⟩ does not come about. ⟨When the lord of the lagna is⟩ in the 7th (asta), ⟨the business comes⟩ with hardship; and by an aspect from the 10th there is bitterness in the business. And if, sovereignty having been obtained, anyone asks about the outcome (pariṇati) as well, then —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नस्यादस्तेकष्टाद्दशमदृशाकटुकताकार्ये ॥ राज्यप्राप्तौसत्यांयदिदृ च्छतिकोपिपरिणतिंचतदा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कोपिपरिणतिं"; alternatives "कोऽपिपरिणतिं" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: दृच्छति is no form in this sentence. पृच्छति ('asks') is what the chapter's own idiom and the following verse — a list of houses to be read for the answer — require, and द for प is a single mis-set type. The printed letters are kept. कोपि is कोऽपि with no avagraha printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पृच्छति; this sentence names दृच्छति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
37.8a reading here is contested

लग्नं शरीरकार्यं गृहकर्मास्तं नभश्च राज्यार्थं ॥ लाभो मित्रस्यार्थे चतुर्थकं कर्मणोवसितये च

lagnaṃ śarīrakāryaṃ gṛhakarmāstaṃ nabhaśca rājyārthaṃ || lābho mitrasyārthe caturthakaṃ karmaṇovasitaye ca

⟨then read:⟩ the lagna ⟨shows⟩ the body and the matter itself; the 7th (asta) the household work; the 10th (nabhas) the object of sovereignty; the 11th (lābha) a friend's affair; and the 4th the finishing (avasiti) of the work.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नंशरीरकार्यंगृहकर्मास्तंनभश्चराज्यार्थं ॥ लाभोमित्रस्यार्थेचतुर्थंकंकर्मणोवसितयेच

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्थंकंकर्मणोवसितयेच"; alternatives "चतुर्थंकंकर्मणोऽवसितयेच" — the sequence 'र्थंकंक' is unusual; all four akṣaras are clearly inked, so it is kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चतुर्थकं; this sentence names चतुर्थंकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: चतुर्थंकं is printed with an anusvāra the sense does not want; all four akṣaras are clearly inked and are kept. कर्मणोवसितये is कर्मणः + अवसितये, 'for the finishing of the work'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चतुर्थकं; this sentence names चतुर्थंकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

द्रव्यं धनाय सहजं भृत्येभ्यो रिपुश्च वैरिभ्यः ॥ एतैः शुभैः शुभं स्यादशुभे वामं च सर्वकार्याणाम्

dravyaṃ dhanāya sahajaṃ bhṛtyebhyo ripuśca vairibhyaḥ || etaiḥ śubhaiḥ śubhaṃ syādaśubhe vāmaṃ ca sarvakāryāṇām

The 2nd (dravya) for wealth, the 3rd (sahaja) for servants, and the 6th (ripu) for enemies. When these are benefic the result is good; when malefic, the result of all matters is adverse (vāma).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

द्रव्यंधनाय सहजंभृत्येभ्योरिपुश्चवैरिभ्यः॥ एतैःशुभैःशुभंस्यादशुभेवामंचसर्वकार्याणाम्

37.10a reading here is contested

वित्तस्वामिनि भौमे नौचित्ये पारदारिके व्ययकृत् ॥ जीवेधर्माय रिपौ गुरुपूजायै सिते विलासाय

vittasvāmini bhaume naucitye pāradārike vyayakṛt || jīvedharmāya ripau gurupūjāyai site vilāsāya

When Mars is ⟨joined⟩ with the lord of wealth (vitta), ⟨the money goes⟩ on what is improper and on adultery: he becomes a waster. With Jupiter, ⟨it goes⟩ for dharma; ⟨with it⟩ in the 6th (ripu), for the worship of elders and teachers (guru-pūjā); and with Venus (sita), for pleasure (vilāsa).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वित्तस्वामिनिभौमेनौचित्येपारदारिकेव्ययकृत् ॥ जीवेध र्मायरिपौगुरुश्चजायेसितेविलासाय

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जीवेध"; alternatives "जीविध" — the e-stroke on जी…वे is faint at the r2c2 seam; the word continues as धर्माय on line 9, which supports जीवे + ध
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पारदारिकेव्ययकृत्"; alternatives "पारदारिकेव्ययकृत" — virāma under त is small but present
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्माय"; alternatives "मांय" — 6x zoom: the mark above म is a curved hook, not a round dot, so it is read as a repha; it completes जीवेध + र्माय from line 8
  • About this edition: जीवेधर्माय is जीवे + धर्माय; the word runs across the plate's line break (जीवेध on line 8, र्माय on line 9) and the mark above the म is a curved hook, read as a repha.

वाणिज्याय ज्ञे पुनरिंदौ मुथशिलिनि चान्यथान्यार्थम् ॥ लग्नपतौ पतितस्थे विबले राज्यात्ययस्तु कंबूले

vāṇijyāya jñe punariṃdau muthaśilini cānyathānyārtham || lagnapatau patitasthe vibale rājyātyayastu kaṃbūle

With Mercury (jña), ⟨it goes⟩ for trade; and again, when the Moon is in a muthaśila, ⟨it goes⟩ otherwise, for some other purpose. When the lord of the lagna is in a fallen place (patita) and weak, there is loss (atyaya) of the sovereignty; but with a kambūla —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वाणिज्यायज्ञेपुनरिंदौमुथशिलिनिचान्यथान्यार्थम् ॥ लग्नपतौपतितस्थेविबलेराज्यात्यय स्तुकंबूले

37.12a reading here is contested

कोपि गुणः स्यात् पापाक्रांतैरशुभं च्युतो भवति ॥ नरपतिसचिवस्नेहप्रश्ने कंबूललग्नसप्तमयोः

kopi guṇaḥ syāt pāpākrāṃtairaśubhaṃ cyuto bhavati || narapatisacivasnehapraśne kaṃbūlalagnasaptamayoḥ

⟨—⟩ there is still some merit (guṇa). When ⟨they are⟩ overrun by malefics, the result is bad: he falls ⟨from his place⟩. In a question about the affection between a king and his minister, a kambūla of the lagna and the 7th —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कोपिगुणःस्यात्पापाक्रांतैरशुभंच्युतोभवति ॥ नरपतिसचिवस्नेहप्रश्नेकंबूललग्नसप्तमयोः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कोपिगुणःस्यात्पापाक्रांतैरशुभंच्युतोभवति"; alternatives "कोऽपिगुणःस्यात्पापाक्रांतैरशुभंच्युतोभवति" — no avagraha printed after को
  • About this edition: कोपि is कोऽपि, with no avagraha printed. The record's first words complete verse 11 and its last words run on into verse 13; both links are marked.

मुथशिलयोः शुभदृष्ट्या शुभता राज्ये मिथःस्नेहः ॥ राज्यं चरं स्थिरं वा लग्नपगगनेशयोः सहयोः

muthaśilayoḥ śubhadṛṣṭyā śubhatā rājye mithaḥsnehaḥ || rājyaṃ caraṃ sthiraṃ vā lagnapagaganeśayoḥ sahayoḥ

⟨—⟩ or a muthaśila of the two, with a benefic's aspect, ⟨gives⟩ good in the realm and affection between them. Whether the sovereignty is movable (cara, passing) or fixed (sthira, lasting) ⟨is told⟩ from the lord of the lagna and the lord of the sky (the 10th) when the two stand together.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मुथशिलयोःशुभ दृष्ट्याशुभताराज्येमिथःस्नेहः ॥ राज्यंचरंस्थिरंवालग्नपगगनेशयोःसहयोः

37.14a reading here is contested

यद्येको मंदः स्यात् केंद्रे तत्स्थितमतोन्यथा वाच्यम् ॥ यदि वासवाममार्गे भूमौ वा प्रच्युतिर्भवेत् पूर्वम्

yadyeko maṃdaḥ syāt keṃdre tatsthitamatonyathā vācyam || yadi vāsavāmamārge bhūmau vā pracyutirbhavet pūrvam

If one ⟨of the two⟩ — the slow one — should be in a kendra, ⟨the sovereignty is⟩ as that one stands; otherwise it is to be declared the other way. Or if ⟨it stands⟩ in a leftward course (savāma-mārga), or in the earth-place (bhūmi, the 4th), the fall ⟨from the place⟩ would come earlier.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यद्येकोमंदःस्यात्केंद्रेतत्स्थितमतोन्यथावाच्यम् ॥ य दिवासवाममार्गेभूमौवाच्युतिर्भवेत्पूर्वम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मतोन्यथावाच्यम्"; alternatives "मतोऽन्यथावाच्यम्" — no avagraha printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिवासवाममार्गे"; alternatives "दिवासव्याममार्गे" — continues line 11's trailing य, giving यदिवास…; the second वा is clear
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिवासवाममार्गे"; alternatives "दिवासव्याममार्गे" — continues line 11's trailing य, giving यदिवास…; the second वा is clear
  • About this edition: यदिवासवाममार्गे is divided यदि वा सवाममार्गे ('or in a leftward course'); the plate reader's alternative यदिवासव्याममार्गे would give a different word, and the division of this half is not certain. मतोन्यथा is मतः + अन्यथा, with no avagraha printed.

कंबूले सति लभते शीघ्रं त्वथ मुसरिफे न पुनः

kaṃbūle sati labhate śīghraṃ tvatha musariphe na punaḥ

When there is a kambūla, he obtains ⟨it⟩ quickly; but when there is a mūsaripha (the separating aspect), not again — ⟨he does not obtain it⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कंबूलेसतिलभतेशीघ्रंत्वथमुसरिफेनपुनः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page numbers this single half-line as verse १५ on its own and closes the chapter with it. मुसरिफे is set with a short u here, against the मूसरिफे of the neighbouring pages.

Adhyāya 38 · अथैकादशस्थानपृच्छा ॥

38.1a reading here is contested

नृपते गौरवलाभाशादि मम स्यान्न वेति च प्रश्ने ॥ आयेशलग्नपत्योः स्नेहदृशा मुथशिले द्रुतं भवति

nṛpate gauravalābhāśādi mama syānna veti ca praśne || āyeśalagnapatyoḥ snehadṛśā muthaśile drutaṃ bhavati

⟨In the question⟩ "shall honour from the king, gain, the thing hoped for and the like be mine, or not?" — when the lord of the 11th (āya) and the lord of the lagna stand in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) by a friendly aspect, it comes to pass quickly. [The Sanskrit reads नृपते, which as it stands is the vocative 'O king'; 'from the king' renders the genitive नृपतेः, which three of the four independent reads give as नृपतेर्.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नृपतेगौरव लाभाशादिममस्यान्नवेतिचप्रश्ने ॥ आयेशलग्नपत्योःस्नेहदृशामुथशिलेद्दुतंभवति

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलेद्दुतंभवति"; alternatives "मुथशिलेद्रुतंभवति", "मुथशिलेऽद्भुतंभवति" — 5x zoom shows two stacked rounded elements plus a u-hook, read as द्दु; द्रु would give the expected sense 'quickly'. The same conjunct recurs on line 11. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्रुतं; this sentence names द्दु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads द्दुतं. A reader dividing this verse judged द्रुतं the likely intent — द्दुत is not a Sanskrit word. The sense the verse needs is 'quickly', which is द्रुतं, and the plate reader records द्रुतं as an alternative — at 5x the conjunct is two stacked rounded elements with a u-hook, which is how a subscript र reads at this size. Recorded, not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्रुतं; this sentence names द्दुतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The mūla prints मुथशिलेद्दुतंभवति. द्दुतं is not a Sanskrit form; the rendering follows द्रुतं "quickly", which the plate reader names as the expected sense (the reader also lists मुथशिलेऽद्भुतं, "wonderfully"). The printed characters are kept unchanged in the segmentation. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्रुतं; this sentence names द्दुतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
38.2a reading here is contested

रिपुदृष्ट्या वहुदिवसैः केंद्रे चायेशचंद्रकंबूले ॥ वाच्या पूर्णेवाशा चरस्थिरद्विभावगे स्वनामफलं

ripudṛṣṭyā vahudivasaiḥ keṃdre cāyeśacaṃdrakaṃbūle || vācyā pūrṇevāśā carasthiradvibhāvage svanāmaphalaṃ

By an enemy ⟨planet's⟩ aspect ⟨the thing comes⟩ only after many days. And when the lord of the 11th (āya) and the Moon are in a kendra and in a kambūla, the hope is to be pronounced as good as fulfilled. According as ⟨the two⟩ occupy a movable, a fixed or a dual sign, the result answers to the name that sign bears.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिपुदृष्ट्यावहुदिवसैःकेंद्रेचायेशचंद्रकंबूले ॥ वा च्यापूर्णेवाशाचरस्थिरद्विभावगेस्वनामफलं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वहुदिवसैः"; alternatives "बहुदिवसैः" — the press sets व; no distinguishing stroke for ब is visible
  • About this edition: The plate reader flags वहुदिवसैः: the press sets व and no stroke distinguishes ब. The word is बहु "many" either way, so the sense does not turn on it. पूर्णेवाशा is read as पूर्णा इव आशा, "the hope as though fulfilled".
38.3a reading here is contested

मंदे क्रूरोपहते भूत्वाशाशु प्रणाशमुपयाति ॥ क्रूरायुक्ते च शुभयुज्यधिकारवशेन लब्ध्याशा

maṃde krūropahate bhūtvāśāśu praṇāśamupayāti || krūrāyukte ca śubhayujyadhikāravaśena labdhyāśā

When Saturn is struck by a malefic, the hope, once it has formed, quickly comes to nothing. And when ⟨the significator⟩ is joined with a malefic and also with a benefic, the hope is gained by the force of authority ⟨that is, through someone holding office⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेक्रूरोपहतेभूत्वाशाशुप्रणाशमुपयाति ॥ क्रूरायुक्तेचशुभयुज्यधिकारवशेनलब्ध्याशा

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रूरायुक्ते"; alternatives "क्रूरयुक्ते", "क्रूरैर्युक्ते" — 5x zoom: रा carries a clear ā-mātrā, so the long vowel is printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शाशुप्रणाशमुपयाति"; alternatives "शाऽऽशुप्रणाशमुपयाति" — no avagraha printed at the word join
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads लब्ध्याशा. A reader dividing this verse judged लब्धाशा the likely intent — लब्ध्या is the instrumental of लब्धि and leaves आशा with no predicate. The clause needs लब्धा आशा → लब्धाशा, 'the hope is obtained', answering प्रणाशम् उपयाति in the first half. Recorded, not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed.
  • About this edition: The plate reader confirms क्रूरा carries a printed ā-mātrā (alternatives क्रूरयुक्ते, क्रूरैर्युक्ते); the instrumental sense "joined with a malefic" is the same on all three. लब्ध्याशा is printed; the expected form is लब्धाशा, "the hope is obtained", and that is how it is rendered. The Sanskrit is left as printed.

मित्रेण सह प्रीतिर्भविता लग्नेश्वरायपत्योश्च ॥ प्रियदृष्ट्या मुथशिलतः प्रीतिर्वान्योन्यगृहयानात्

mitreṇa saha prītirbhavitā lagneśvarāyapatyośca || priyadṛṣṭyā muthaśilataḥ prītirvānyonyagṛhayānāt

There will be affection with a friend when the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 11th (āya) ⟨look at each other⟩ with a friendly aspect; or affection ⟨arises⟩ from a muthaśila between them, or from their going into each other's houses ⟨an exchange of signs⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मित्रेणसहप्रीतिर्भवितालग्नेश्वरायपत्योश्च ॥ प्रियदृष्ट्यामुथशिलतःप्रीतिर्वान्योन्यगृहयानात्

केंद्रस्थितयोरनयोर्मैत्री किल पूर्वजातैव ॥ पणफरगतौ पुरस्तादापोक्लिमतो महाप्रीतिः

keṃdrasthitayoranayormaitrī kila pūrvajātaiva || paṇapharagatau purastādāpoklimato mahāprītiḥ

If these two stand in kendras, the friendship is surely one already formed ⟨of old⟩; if they have gone to paṇaphara ⟨houses⟩, it lies ahead; from āpoklima ⟨houses⟩, great affection.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

केंद्रस्थितयोरनयोर्मैत्रीकिलपूर्वजा तैव ॥ पणफरगतौपुरस्तादापोक्लिमतोमहाप्रीतिः

38.6a reading here is contested

गुप्तं कार्यमिदं मे सिध्यति लग्नेश्वरेऽथ चंद्रमसि ॥ शुभमुथशिलगे केंद्रे तन्निकटे वाथ सिद्धिः स्यात्

guptaṃ kāryamidaṃ me sidhyati lagneśvare'tha caṃdramasi || śubhamuthaśilage keṃdre tannikaṭe vātha siddhiḥ syāt

⟨In the question⟩ "will this secret undertaking of mine succeed?" — when the lord of the lagna, and likewise the Moon, stand in a muthaśila with a benefic and are in a kendra, or close to one, then there is success. [Our source read gave सिद्विः, which is no word; our mūla now reads सिद्धिः, "success".]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुप्तंकार्यमिदंमेसिध्यतिलग्नेश्वरेऽथचंद्रमसि ॥ शुभमुथशिलगेकेंद्रेतन्निकटेवाथसि द्विःस्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The plate reads सिद्विः. A reader dividing this verse judged सिद्धिः the likely intent — सिद्वि is not a word, and the verse opens with सिध्यति — the noun wanted at the end is सिद्धिः, 'success'. The press has set the conjunct द्वि where द्धि belongs. Recorded, not applied.. NOT applied: the mūla above is what the source sets, and the emendation needs the page before it is made. Recorded so the question is adjudicated rather than absorbed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सिद्धिः; this sentence names सिद्विः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The mūla prints अथसि द्विःस्यात्. Read as अथ सिद्धिः स्यात्; सिद्विः is not a word and the conjunct द्वि stands where द्धि is required. The printed characters are kept unchanged in the segmentation. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सिद्धिः; this sentence names सिद्विः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

Adhyāya 39 · अथद्वादशस्थानपृच्छा ॥ (closed by इतिसंक्षेपतोद्वादशभावप्रश्ननिरूपणम्)

रिपुविग्रहपृच्छायां बलवति षष्ठे रिपुः सबलः ॥ द्वादशपे शुभदृष्टे बलवति वाच्यं बलं प्रष्टुः

ripuvigrahapṛcchāyāṃ balavati ṣaṣṭhe ripuḥ sabalaḥ || dvādaśape śubhadṛṣṭe balavati vācyaṃ balaṃ praṣṭuḥ

In a question about a quarrel with an enemy: if the 6th ⟨house⟩ is strong, the enemy is the stronger. If the lord of the 12th is aspected by a benefic and is strong, the strength is to be declared the questioner's.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिपुविग्रहपृच्छायांबलवतिषष्ठेरिपुःसबलः॥ द्वादशपेशुभदृष्टेबलवतिवाच्यंबलंप्रष्टुः

रिपुविग्रहपृच्छायां नामोच्चारे रिपोर्बलिन्यस्ते ॥ गुप्ते च द्वादशपे बलवति वाच्यं बलं प्रष्टुः

ripuvigrahapṛcchāyāṃ nāmoccāre riporbalinyaste || gupte ca dvādaśape balavati vācyaṃ balaṃ praṣṭuḥ

In a question about a quarrel with an enemy ⟨judged⟩ at the uttering of the name: if the 7th (asta) is strong, ⟨the strength⟩ is the enemy's; and if the lord of the 12th is hidden and strong, the strength is to be declared the questioner's.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिपुविग्रह पृच्छायांनामोच्चारेरिपोर्बलिन्यस्ते ॥ गुप्तेचद्वादशपेबलवतिवाच्यंबलंप्रष्टुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: गुप्ते is rendered flatly as "hidden". The word can mean the 12th lord standing in a place where it is not seen (an unaspected or occulted position); the verse does not say which, and nothing is supplied. रिपोः is taken with the elided बलं वाच्यं of the second half, on the parallel the two halves make.
39.3a reading here is contested

शुभयुतदृष्टे सद्व्ययमशुभेक्षणयोगतो व्ययमनर्थात् ॥ एवं भावेष्वखिलेषूह्यं सदसत्फलं सुधिया

śubhayutadṛṣṭe sadvyayamaśubhekṣaṇayogato vyayamanarthāt || evaṃ bhāveṣvakhileṣūhyaṃ sadasatphalaṃ sudhiyā

When ⟨the 12th⟩ is joined with or aspected by a benefic, the spending is on worthy ends; through the aspect or conjunction of a malefic, the outgo comes of misfortune. In this way, in all the bhāvas alike, the good and the bad result is to be inferred by a man of sound judgement.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभयुतदृष्टेसद्व्ययमशुभेक्षणयोगतोन्ययमनर्थात् ॥ एवंभावे ष्वखिलेषूह्यंसदसत्फलंसुधिया

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सदसत्फलं"; alternatives "सदसतफलं" — 5x zoom shows the half-त joined to फ, so सत्फलं
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सदसत्फलं"; alternatives "सदसतफलं" — 5x zoom shows the half-त joined to फ, so सत्फलं
  • About this edition: The page sets योगतोन्ययमनर्थात्, divided here as योगतो न्ययम् अनर्थात्. न्यय (nyaya) is the lexicon's synonym of व्यय, "outgo, expenditure", so the half-line sets सद्व्ययम् ("worthy spending") against न्ययम् … अनर्थात् ("outgo that comes of misfortune"), and nothing needs emending. The plate reader's two notes on सदसत्फलं both confirm the half-त joined to फ, which is the reading rendered. This verse closes the twelve-house section, as its colophon इति संक्षेपतो द्वादशभावप्रश्ननिरूपणम् says. [2026-10-01: read on the plate (NSP 1893 page_0188, line 5, by eye at about 3.5x native), the page sets योगतोव्ययमनर्थात्, with this fount's half-व, the same shape as in व्यये on page_0189 line 9. The न्यय discussed above was a misreading of the exemplar, and the mūla now reads व्ययमनर्थात्.]

Adhyāya 40 · अथकेचिद्विशेषतःप्रश्नाः ॥ · ताजिकेसमरसिंहे ॥

40.1a reading here is contested

आगमने पृच्छायां लग्नेशे लग्नमध्यसंस्थेन ॥ कृतमुथशिले समेति हि सुखमस्ततुरीयगे कष्टात्

āgamane pṛcchāyāṃ lagneśe lagnamadhyasaṃsthena || kṛtamuthaśile sameti hi sukhamastaturīyage kaṣṭāt

In a question about ⟨a traveller's⟩ coming home: when the lord of the lagna forms a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with a planet standing in the middle of the lagna, he does come, and in comfort; ⟨when that planet stands⟩ in the 7th (asta) or the 4th (turīya), he comes with hardship. [Our mūla now reads सुखमस्ततुरीयगे: the त of अस्त is restored, so the pair of houses stands in the text.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आगमनेपृच्छायांलग्नेशेलग्नमध्यसंस्थेन ॥ कृतमुथशिलेसमेतिहिसुखमस्तुरीयगेकष्टात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुखमस्तुरीयगे"; alternatives "सुखमस्ततुरीयगे" — no word break is printed; the reading of the join is uncertain [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुखमस्ततुरीयगे; this sentence names सुखमस्तुरीयगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "समरसिंहे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The second half is one mātrā short as printed. An āryā's second half runs to 27 mātrās; सुखमस्तुरीयगे counts 26, and the plate reader's own alternative सुखमस्ततुरीयगे counts exactly 27. The sense wants the same thing, because अस्तुरीय is no word while अस्त (the 7th) and तुरीय (the 4th) are a standing pair of houses. The first half counts a regular 30, so the metre is otherwise sound. I have not altered the Sanskrit: the word-divided file keeps the printed akṣaras. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुखमस्ततुरीयगे; this sentence names सुखमस्तुरीयगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

स्थानाच् चलितः प्रश्ने लग्नपतौ सहजनवमगृहसंस्थे ॥ लग्नस्थेन मुथशिले पंथानं वहति पथिकोऽयं

sthānāc calitaḥ praśne lagnapatau sahajanavamagṛhasaṃsthe || lagnasthena muthaśile paṃthānaṃ vahati pathiko'yaṃ

In a question ⟨asked⟩ about a man who has set out from his place: when the lord of the lagna stands in the 3rd (sahaja) or the 9th house, and a muthaśila is formed with a planet standing in the lagna, this traveller is on the road ⟨and travelling still⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्थानाच्चलितःप्रश्नेलग्न पतौसहजनवमगृहसंस्थे ॥ लग्नस्थेनमुथशिलेपंथानंवहतिपथिकोऽयं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
40.3a reading here is contested

रंध्रेथ धने तस्मिन्नाकाशस्थेन मुथशिलेप्येवं ॥ केंद्रस्थिते त्थशाले लग्नेक्षणवर्ज्यमेति न कदापि

raṃdhretha dhane tasminnākāśasthena muthaśilepyevaṃ || keṃdrasthite tthaśāle lagnekṣaṇavarjyameti na kadāpi

⟨So too⟩ when that ⟨lord of the lagna⟩ is in the 8th (randhra) or in the 2nd (dhana) and the muthaśila is with a planet standing in the ākāśa (the 10th): the same ⟨result⟩. When the itthaśāla is with a planet standing in a kendra but there is no aspect on the lagna, he never comes at all.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रंध्रेथधनेतस्मिन्नाकाशस्थेनमुथशिलेप्येवं ॥ केंद्रस्थिते त्थशालेलग्नेक्षणवर्ज्यमेतिनकदापि

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रंध्रेथधने"; alternatives "रंध्रेऽथधने" — no avagraha printed, though one IS printed on the same line in पथिकोऽयं
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलेप्येवं"; alternatives "मुथशिलेऽप्येवं" — no avagraha printed
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
  • About this edition: The press sets रंध्रेथ and मुथशिलेप्येवं without an avagraha; I read रंध्रे ऽथ and मुथशिले ऽप्येवं, the ordinary elision of an initial अ, which changes no sense. The word-divided file keeps the akṣaras as printed. The last quarter reads लग्नेक्षणवर्ज्यम् एति न कदापि, where -वर्ज्यम् is a neuter agreeing with nothing in the sentence; I take it adverbially of the itthaśāla, 'devoid of an aspect on the lagna'. ईक्षण could instead be read with लग्ने, giving 'no aspect while in the lagna'; the printing does not settle it.
40.4a reading here is contested

लग्नाधिपतौ वक्रे लग्नं पश्यत्यमुत्र चंद्रे वा ॥ वक्रगमूथशिले सति समेति पथिकः सुखं शीघ्रं

lagnādhipatau vakre lagnaṃ paśyatyamutra caṃdre vā || vakragamūthaśile sati sameti pathikaḥ sukhaṃ śīghraṃ

When the lord of the lagna is retrograde and aspects the lagna from where it stands — or when the Moon ⟨is so placed⟩ — and a mūthaśila is made with that retrograde planet, the traveller comes home in comfort and quickly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपतौवक्रेलग्नंपश्यत्यमुत्रचंद्रेवा ॥ वक्रगमूथशिलेसतिसमेतिपथिकःसुखंशीघ्रं

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूथशिले"; alternatives "मुथशिले" — 5x zoom: म carries a ू (long u) here, against मुथशिल- everywhere else on these two pages. Kept as printed.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
  • About this edition: The page prints मूथशिले with a long ū here, against मुथशिल- everywhere else on these two leaves; the plate reader checked it at 5× and kept it, and I render it as the same term. अमुत्र, 'yonder', I take of the retrograde planet's own place, hence 'from where it stands'.
40.5a reading here is contested

अंत्यस्थितलग्नपतौ शशिना कृतमुथशिले द्रुतमुपैति ॥ लग्नाद् वापि चतुर्थाच् छुभाद् द्वितीयतृतीयगा वापि

aṃtyasthitalagnapatau śaśinā kṛtamuthaśile drutamupaiti || lagnād vāpi caturthāc chubhād dvitīyatṛtīyagā vāpi

When the lord of the lagna stands in the 12th (antya) and a muthaśila is made with the Moon, he arrives swiftly. Or again ⟨he arrives swiftly when the Moon stands⟩ in the 2nd or the 3rd from the lagna, or from the 4th, or from a benefic.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अंत्य स्थितलग्नपतौशशिनाकृतमुथशिलेद्दुतमुपैति ॥ लग्नाद्वापिचतुर्थांच्छुभाद्द्वितीयतृतीयगावापि

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलेद्दुतमुपैति"; alternatives "मुथशिलेद्रुतमुपैति" — the same conjunct as line 1; read as द्दु from the ink [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्रुतमुपैति; this sentence names द्दु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
  • About this edition: द्दुतम् as printed is not a word; द्रुतम्, 'swiftly', is meant, and the plate reader records the same conjunct at the same spot in the line above. I render द्रुतम् and leave the printed akṣaras in the word-divided file. चतुर्थांच् carries an anusvāra for which the sandhi has no room — चतुर्थात् + शुभात् gives चतुर्थाच् छुभात् — and I read it without. The second half names the places but neither the planet nor the result; both are carried over from the first half and are marked as supplied. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चतुर्थाच्; this sentence names चतुर्थांच्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.6a reading here is contested

कथयंति नष्टलाभं प्रवासिनश् चागमं त्वरितम् ॥ ग्रहः षष्ठेऽथ जामित्रे वाक्पतिः कंटके स्थितः ॥ पथिकागमनं ब्रूते सिते ज्ञे वा त्रिकोणगे

kathayaṃti naṣṭalābhaṃ pravāsinaś cāgamaṃ tvaritam || grahaḥ ṣaṣṭhe'tha jāmitre vākpatiḥ kaṃṭake sthitaḥ || pathikāgamanaṃ brūte site jñe vā trikoṇage

⟨They⟩ declare the recovery of what was lost, and the swift arrival of the man who is abroad. — A planet in the 6th, or in the 7th (jāmitra), ⟨and⟩ Jupiter (vākpati) standing in a kendra (kaṇṭaka): ⟨this⟩ declares the traveller's arrival; or Venus, or Mercury, standing in a trine.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कथयंतिनष्टलाभंप्रवासिनश्चागमं त्वरितम् ॥ ग्रहःषष्ठेऽथजामित्रेवाक्पतिःकंटकेस्थितः ॥ पथिकागमनंब्रूतेसितेज्ञेवात्रिकोणगे

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8); चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The label "चिंतामणौ ॥" stands INSIDE this verse's span, after "…कथयंतिनष्टलाभंप्रवासिनश्चागमं त्वरितम् ॥". The words before the label may close the quotation before it rather than open this verse; the page does not say.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label चिंतामणौ ॥, 'in the Cintāmaṇi', INSIDE this record, after कथयंति नष्टलाभं प्रवासिनश्चागमं त्वरितम् ॥. So the first half-line probably closes the quotation that runs through verses 1–5 rather than opening this one; its subject stands in a verse the page has already numbered, and I supply it as 'they'. The page marks where a quotation opens and never where it closes. ब्रूते is singular while two conditions precede it, so the verse is loose about whether the planet in the 6th or 7th and Jupiter in a kendra are one condition or two.
40.7a reading here is contested

षष्ठोदये पापदृष्टे शुभदृग्वर्जिते बुधः ॥ लग्नात् षष्ठे यदा पापा यातुश् च निधनं वदेत्

ṣaṣṭhodaye pāpadṛṣṭe śubhadṛgvarjite budhaḥ || lagnāt ṣaṣṭhe yadā pāpā yātuś ca nidhanaṃ vadet

When the 6th and the ascendant (udaya) are aspected by malefics and have no benefic's aspect at all, and when malefics stand in the 6th from the lagna, the wise man should declare the traveller's death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठोदयेपापदृष्टेशुभदृ ग्वर्जितेबुधः ॥ लग्नात्षष्ठेयदापापायातुश्चनिधनंवदेत्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्वर्जितेबुधः"; alternatives "वर्जितेबुधः", "ग्रवर्जितेबुधः" — the first akṣara of the page carries a subscript and continues a word broken at the previous page; it reads ग्व
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: बुधः here is 'the wise man', the subject of वदेत् in the second half, and not the planet Mercury: the verse gives a planet no verb, and the same idiom stands in verse 12 (वदेत् सुधीः). The first akṣara of the page, ग्व, continues शुभदृग्वर्जिते, a word broken across the page turn; the plate reader's alternatives वर्जिते and ग्रवर्जिते would leave that compound without its दृग्.

यदा क्रूरास् तृतीयस्था देशाद्देशांतरं गतः ॥ चौरेणैव हृतस्वश् च पथिकः केंद्रगा यदि

yadā krūrās tṛtīyasthā deśāddeśāṃtaraṃ gataḥ || caureṇaiva hṛtasvaś ca pathikaḥ keṃdragā yadi

When malefics stand in the 3rd, ⟨the man⟩ has gone from one country to another; and if they stand in a kendra, the traveller has had his goods carried off by a thief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदाक्रूरास्तृतीयस्थादेशादेशांतरंगतः ॥ चौरेणैवहृतस्वश्चपथिकःकेंद्रगायदि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
40.9a reading here is contested

पापैः षष्ठत्रिलाभस्थैः कंटकस्थैः शुभग्रहैः ॥ प्रवासी सुखमायाति दूरस्थोपि सुनिश्चितम्

pāpaiḥ ṣaṣṭhatrilābhasthaiḥ kaṃṭakasthaiḥ śubhagrahaiḥ || pravāsī sukhamāyāti dūrasthopi suniścitam

With malefics standing in the 6th, the 3rd and the 11th (lābha), and with benefic planets standing in the kendras, the man abroad comes home in comfort, far off though he is — and this is quite certain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापैःषष्ठत्रिलाभस्थैःकंटकस्थैःशुभग्रहैः ॥ प्रवासीसुखमायातिदूरस्थोपिसुनिश्चितम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दूरस्थोपि"; alternatives "दूरस्थोऽपि" — no avagraha glyph is printed here; kept as set
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

चतुरस्रे त्रिकोणे वा पापगेहस्थितः शनिः ॥ पापदृष्टश् च नियतं बंधनं यातुरादिशेत्

caturasre trikoṇe vā pāpagehasthitaḥ śaniḥ || pāpadṛṣṭaś ca niyataṃ baṃdhanaṃ yāturādiśet

When Saturn stands in a caturasra or in a trine, ⟨or⟩ in the sign of a malefic, and is aspected by a malefic, one should declare imprisonment for the traveller, and declare it as certain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चतुरस्रेत्रिकोणेवापापगेहस्थितःश निः ॥ पापदृष्टश्चनियतंबंधनंयातुरादिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: चतुरस्र, 'the square', names the 4th house, and in much of this literature the 8th along with it; the verse does not say which, so I have not chosen for it. पापगेह is 'the house of a malefic', that is a sign owned by Mars or Saturn, and not a house of the chart.
40.11a reading here is contested

शुभयुक्ते स्थिरे लग्ने स्थिरो बंधश् चरेऽन्यथा ॥ द्वितनौ सौम्यसंयुक्ते बंधमोक्षौ क्रमेण तु

śubhayukte sthire lagne sthiro baṃdhaś care'nyathā || dvitanau saumyasaṃyukte baṃdhamokṣau krameṇa tu

When the lagna is a fixed sign joined with a benefic, the confinement lasts; in a movable ⟨sign⟩ it is otherwise. In a dual-bodied ⟨sign⟩ (dvitanu) joined with a benefic, confinement and release come in that order.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभयुक्तेस्थिरेलग्नेस्थिरोबंधश्चरेऽन्यथा ॥ द्वितनौसौम्यसंयुक्तेबंधमोक्षौक्रमेणतु

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरेऽन्यथा"; alternatives "चरेन्यथा" — an avagraha glyph IS set here, unlike दूरस्थोपि on line 2; small but present
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
40.12a reading here is contested

पापास् त्रिकोणजामित्रे विलग्ने षष्ठकोदये ॥ शत्रुभिर् वीक्ष्यमाणाश् च यातुः कष्टं वदेत् सुधीः

pāpās trikoṇajāmitre vilagne ṣaṣṭhakodaye || śatrubhir vīkṣyamāṇāś ca yātuḥ kaṣṭaṃ vadet sudhīḥ

Malefics standing in a trine, in the 7th (jāmitra), in the lagna ⟨and⟩ in the 6th from the ascendant, and aspected by planets that are their enemies — the wise man should declare hardship for the traveller.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापास्त्रिकोणजामित्रविलग्नेषष्ठकोदये ॥ शत्रुभिर्वीक्ष्यमाणाश्चयातुःकष्टंवदेत्सुधीः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठकोदये"; alternatives "षष्ठगोदये" — the को akṣara is small and its left hook could be ग
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: The compound names विलग्न and उदय one after the other and both are the ascendant. I read षष्ठक-उदये as 'the 6th from the ascendant', which is how verse 7 writes the same count (लग्नात् षष्ठे); taken as a flat list the two members merely repeat one another. The plate reader could not rule out षष्ठगोदये against षष्ठकोदये, and that reading gives the same house. [2026-10-01: read on the plate (NSP 1893 page_0189, line 3, by eye at about 3.5x native), the page sets जामित्रेविलग्ने with the e-mātrā on त्र. The mūla now reads जामित्रे विलग्ने. षष्ठकोदये was not re-read on that crop.]

मार्गस्थानगतैः सौम्यैर् मार्गं तस्य शुभं वदेत् ॥ क्रूरैर् दुःखं विलग्नस्थैः पापैः क्लेशमवाप्नुयात्

mārgasthānagataiḥ saumyair mārgaṃ tasya śubhaṃ vadet || krūrair duḥkhaṃ vilagnasthaiḥ pāpaiḥ kleśamavāpnuyāt

With benefics gone to the house of the road (mārga-sthāna), one should declare his journey auspicious; with malefics, suffering; and with malefics standing in the lagna, he meets with distress.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मार्गस्थानगतैःसौम्यैर्मार्गंतस्यशुभंवदेत् ॥ क्रूरैर्दुःखंविलग्नस्थैःपापैःक्लेशमवाप्नुयात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

चरलग्ने चरांशे वा चतुर्थे चंद्रमाः स्थितः ॥ प्रवासी सुखमायाति कृतकार्यश् च वेश्मनि

caralagne carāṃśe vā caturthe caṃdramāḥ sthitaḥ || pravāsī sukhamāyāti kṛtakāryaś ca veśmani

When the Moon stands in a movable lagna, or in a movable aṃśa, or in the 4th, the man abroad comes home in comfort, and with his business done.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चरलग्नेचरांशेवाचतुर्थेचंद्रमाःस्थितः ॥ प्रवासीसुखमायातिकृतकार्यश्चवेश्मनि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

कंटकैः सौम्यसंयुक्तैः पापग्रहविवर्जितैः ॥ प्रवासी सुखमायाति निधनस्थे सुधाकरे

kaṃṭakaiḥ saumyasaṃyuktaiḥ pāpagrahavivarjitaiḥ || pravāsī sukhamāyāti nidhanasthe sudhākare

When the kendras (kaṇṭaka) are occupied by benefics and free of malefic planets, the man abroad comes home in comfort — even with the Moon standing in the 8th (nidhana).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कंटकैःसौम्यसंयुक्तैःपापग्रहविवर्जितैः ॥ प्रवासीसुखमायातिनिधनस्थेसुधाकरे

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

गमागमौ तु न स्यातां योगे दुरुधराकृते ॥ शुभैः शुभकृतो रोधः पापैस् तस्करतो भयम्

gamāgamau tu na syātāṃ yoge durudharākṛte || śubhaiḥ śubhakṛto rodhaḥ pāpais taskarato bhayam

Neither going nor coming takes place when a durudharā yoga has been formed ⟨by planets standing in the 2nd and the 12th from the Moon⟩. If benefics form it, the detention is one made by something good; if malefics, ⟨there is⟩ danger from a thief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गमागमौतुनस्यातांयोगेदुरुधराकृते ॥ शुभैःशुभ कृतोरोधःपापैस्तस्करतोभयम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: durudharā is the yoga of planets standing in the 2nd and the 12th from the Moon. The verse names it and does not define it, so the definition is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. शुभकृतो रोधः says who makes the detention, not what it is.

गमागमौ हि न स्यातां स्थिरराशौ विलग्नगे ॥ न रोगोपशमो नाशो द्रव्याणां न पराभवः

gamāgamau hi na syātāṃ sthirarāśau vilagnage || na rogopaśamo nāśo dravyāṇāṃ na parābhavaḥ

Neither going nor coming takes place when a fixed sign is the lagna: no easing of illness, no loss of goods, and no defeat.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गमागमौहिनस्यातांस्थिरराशौविलग्नगे ॥ नरोगोपशमोनाशोद्रव्याणांनपराभवः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

विपरीतं चरे वाच्यं फलं मिश्रं द्विमूर्तिषु ॥ स्थिरवत् प्रथमे खंडे परार्धे चरराशिवत्

viparītaṃ care vācyaṃ phalaṃ miśraṃ dvimūrtiṣu || sthiravat prathame khaṃḍe parārdhe cararāśivat

In a movable ⟨sign⟩ the opposite is to be declared. In dual-bodied (dvimūrti) signs the result is mixed: as with a fixed sign in the first half ⟨of the sign⟩, and as with a movable sign in the latter half.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वि परीतंचरेवाच्यंफलंमिश्रंद्विमूर्तिषु ॥ स्थिरवत्प्रथमेखंडेपरार्धेचरराशिवत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

प्रवासी शीघ्रमायाति गुरुशुक्रौ त्रिवित्तगौ ॥ चतुर्थस्थानगावेतौ शीघ्रमायाति कार्यकृत्

pravāsī śīghramāyāti guruśukrau trivittagau || caturthasthānagāvetau śīghramāyāti kāryakṛt

The man abroad comes home quickly ⟨when⟩ Jupiter and Venus stand in the 3rd and the 2nd (vitta); and when these two stand in the 4th house, he comes home quickly with his work done.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रवासीशीघ्रमायातिगुरुशुक्रौत्रिवित्तगौ ॥ चतुर्थ स्थानगावेतौशीघ्रमायातिकार्यकृत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

इंदुः सप्तमगो लग्नात् पथिकं वक्ति मार्गगम् ॥ मार्गाधिपश् च राश्यर्धात्परभागे व्यवस्थितः

iṃduḥ saptamago lagnāt pathikaṃ vakti mārgagam || mārgādhipaś ca rāśyardhātparabhāge vyavasthitaḥ

The Moon in the 7th from the lagna declares the traveller to be on the road; so does the lord of the road, when it stands in the part that lies beyond the half of its sign ⟨past 15°⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदुःसप्तमगोलग्नात्पथिकंवक्तिमार्गगम् ॥ मार्गाधिपश्चराश्यर्धांतपरभागेव्यवस्थितः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
40.21a reading here is contested

शुक्रार्कजीवसौम्यानामेकोपि स्याद् धरायगः ॥ तदाशु गमनं ब्रूयात् प्रष्टुर् न गमनं व्यये

śukrārkajīvasaumyānāmekopi syād dharāyagaḥ || tadāśu gamanaṃ brūyāt praṣṭur na gamanaṃ vyaye

If even one of Venus, the Sun, Jupiter and Mercury should stand in the 4th or the 11th (dharā-āya), then one should declare a swift going; for the querent there is no going when ⟨that planet stands⟩ in the 12th (vyaya).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रार्कजीवसौम्यानामेकोपिस्याद्धरायगः ॥ तदाशुगमनंब्रूयात्प्रष्टुर्नगमनंव्यये

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्धरायगः"; alternatives "स्याच्छरायगः", "स्याद्धोरायगः" — the conjunct after स्या is inked heavily and could be द्ध or च्छ; no reading here is certain and the word does not resolve for me
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: The plate reader records that this word does not resolve for him either, and offers स्याच्छरायगः and स्याद्धोरायगः beside the printed स्याद्धरायगः. स्याद् is certain, the optative of अस्. What follows names a position, because the second half sets it against व्यये, 'in the 12th'. If the ending -आयगः is आय-गः, 'standing in the 11th', the rule would oppose the 11th (āya) to the 12th (vyaya), which is the pair this literature usually opposes — but that is a conjecture and I have not rendered it as the text. The metre decides nothing: द्ध and च्छ both leave the syllable light, and the pāda is a regular pathyā either way.

लग्नाद् यावतिथे स्थाने बली खेटो व्यवस्थितः ॥ ब्रूयात् तावतिथे मासे पथिकस्य निवर्तनम्

lagnād yāvatithe sthāne balī kheṭo vyavasthitaḥ || brūyāt tāvatithe māse pathikasya nivartanam

In whatever house counted from the lagna a strong planet (kheṭa) stands, in that same month one should declare the traveller's return.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाद्यावतिथेस्थानेबलीखेटोव्यवस्थितः ॥ ब्रूयात्तावतिथेमासेपथिकस्यनिवर्तनम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

एवं कालं चरांशस्थे द्विगुणं च स्थिरांशके ॥ द्विस्वभावांशगे खेटे त्रिगुणं चिंतयेत् सुधीः

evaṃ kālaṃ carāṃśasthe dviguṇaṃ ca sthirāṃśake || dvisvabhāvāṃśage kheṭe triguṇaṃ ciṃtayet sudhīḥ

The time is reckoned thus when ⟨the planet⟩ stands in a movable aṃśa; twofold in a fixed aṃśa; and when the planet is in a dual-natured aṃśa, the wise man should reckon it threefold.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंकालंचरांशस्थेद्विगुणंचस्थिरांशके ॥ द्विस्वभावांशगेखेटेत्रिगुणंचिंतयेत्सुधीः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

यातुर्विलग्नाज्जामित्रभवनाधिपतिर् यदा ॥ करोति वक्रमावृत्तेः कालं तु ब्रुवते परे

yāturvilagnājjāmitrabhavanādhipatir yadā || karoti vakramāvṛtteḥ kālaṃ tu bruvate pare

When the lord of the house that stands 7th (jāmitra) from the traveller's lagna turns retrograde — that, others say, is the time of his return.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यातुर्विलग्नाजामित्रभवनाधिपतिर्यदा ॥ करोतिवक्रमावृत्तेःकालंतुब्रुवतेपरे

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

चतुर्थे दशमे वापि यदि सौम्यग्रहो भवेत् ॥ तदा न गमनं क्रूरैस् तत्रस्थैर् गमनं भवेत्

caturthe daśame vāpi yadi saumyagraho bhavet || tadā na gamanaṃ krūrais tatrasthair gamanaṃ bhavet

If a benefic planet is in the 4th or in the 10th, then there is no going; with malefics standing there, going does take place.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चतुर्थेदशमेवापियदिसौम्यग्रहोभवेत् ॥ तदा नगमनंक्रूरैस्तत्रस्थैर्गमनंभवेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

लग्नाद् वा लग्ननाथाद् वा यत्संख्याः क्रूरखेचराः ॥ नवमे द्वादशे वापि तत्संख्याः स्युरुपद्रवाः

lagnād vā lagnanāthād vā yatsaṃkhyāḥ krūrakhecarāḥ || navame dvādaśe vāpi tatsaṃkhyāḥ syurupadravāḥ

However many malefic planets stand in the 9th or the 12th — counted from the lagna, or from the lord of the lagna — that many are the calamities ⟨on the journey⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाद्वालग्ननाथाद्वायत्संख्याःक्रूरखेचराः ॥ नवमेद्वादशेवापितत्संख्याःस्युरुपद्रवाः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

लग्नाद् वा लग्ननाथाद् वा यावंतः सौम्यखेचराः ॥ मार्गे तत्रोदया वाच्याः स्थाने स्थाने विचक्षणैः

lagnād vā lagnanāthād vā yāvaṃtaḥ saumyakhecarāḥ || mārge tatrodayā vācyāḥ sthāne sthāne vicakṣaṇaiḥ

However many benefic planets ⟨stand in those houses⟩, counted from the lagna or from the lord of the lagna, that many risings ⟨of fortune⟩ on the road are to be declared by the discerning, at one place after another.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाद्वालग्ननाथाद्वायावंतःसौम्यखेचराः ॥ मार्गेतत्रोदयावाच्याःस्थानेस्थानेविचक्षणैः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
  • About this edition: उदय is literally a 'rising'. In a question about a journey it is the favourable turn — a gain, an advancement — and स्थाने स्थाने distributes one such turn to each stage of the road.

क्रूरयुक्तेक्षितो मंदः शुभदृग्योगवर्जितः ॥ धर्मस्थस् तनुते व्याधिं प्रोषितस्याष्टगो मृतिम्

krūrayuktekṣito maṃdaḥ śubhadṛgyogavarjitaḥ || dharmasthas tanute vyādhiṃ proṣitasyāṣṭago mṛtim

Saturn joined with malefics and aspected by them, and without any benefic's aspect or conjunction, standing in the 9th (dharma), stretches out illness for the man who is abroad; standing in the 8th, death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरयुक्तेक्षितोमंदःशुभदृग्योगवर्जितः ॥ धर्मस्थस्तनुतेव्याधिंप्रोषितस्याष्टगोमृतिम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).

जामित्रस्य शुभोत्थे याता नायाति दुरुधरायोगे ॥ मित्रस्वामिनिषेधात् पापोत्थे शत्रुरुक्चौरात्

jāmitrasya śubhotthe yātā nāyāti durudharāyoge || mitrasvāminiṣedhāt pāpotthe śatrurukcaurāt

When a durudharā yoga of the 7th (jāmitra) is formed by benefics, the man who went does not come — because a friend or his master forbids it. When it is formed by malefics, ⟨he is stopped⟩ by an enemy, by illness, or by a thief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जामित्रस्यशुभोत्थेयातानायातिदुरुधरायोगे ॥ मित्रस्वामिनिषेधात्पापोत्थेशत्रु रुक्चौरात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This repeats verse 16 with the causes named: durudharā (planets in the 2nd and the 12th from a point) stops both going and coming, benefics detaining a man well and malefics ill. Here the yoga is reckoned on the 7th rather than on the Moon, which is what जामित्रस्य states.

चंद्रार्कयोश् छिद्रगयोर् यमेन संदृष्टयोः स्यात् परशस्त्रभीतिः ॥ रंध्रे सिते ज्ञे च सुखाप्तिरारे मंदे भयं पापयुगीक्षितेऽध्वनि

caṃdrārkayoś chidragayor yamena saṃdṛṣṭayoḥ syāt paraśastrabhītiḥ || raṃdhre site jñe ca sukhāptirāre maṃde bhayaṃ pāpayugīkṣite'dhvani

When the Moon and the Sun stand in the 8th (chidra) and are aspected by Saturn (yama), there is fear of another man's weapon. With Venus and Mercury in the 8th (randhra) there is a gain of comfort; with Mars ⟨or⟩ Saturn there, joined with malefics and aspected by them, there is danger on the road.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रार्कयोश्छिद्रगयोर्यमेनसंदृष्टयोःस्यात्परशस्त्रभीतिः ॥ रंध्रेसितेज्ञेचसुखाप्तिरारेमंदेभयंपापयुगीक्षितेऽध्वनि

40.31a reading here is contested

अथ दूरस्थो जीवति मृतोथवेत्थं यदा प्रश्नः

atha dūrastho jīvati mṛtothavetthaṃ yadā praśnaḥ

Now, ⟨the case⟩ when the question is put thus: "is the man who is far away alive, or dead?"

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथदूरस्थोजीवतिमृतोथवेत्थंयदाप्रश्नः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृतोथवेत्थं"; alternatives "मृतोऽथवेत्थं" — no avagraha glyph is set here, although the SAME line prints ऽ twice, in शीतकरेऽथषष्ठे and तुर्येऽष्टमे
  • About this edition: One half-line, which the page numbers on its own. It opens the topic that verses 32 to 36 answer; it states no rule itself. The press sets मृतोथवेत्थं without an avagraha, though it prints ऽ twice on the same line; I read मृतो ऽथवेत्थं.

लग्नेश्वरे शीतकरेऽथ षष्ठे तुर्येऽष्टमे वाप्यतिनीचगे वा ॥ अस्तंगते छिद्रपतीत्थशालयुक्ते शुभैर् दूरगतो मृतः स्यात्

lagneśvare śītakare'tha ṣaṣṭhe turye'ṣṭame vāpyatinīcage vā || astaṃgate chidrapatītthaśālayukte śubhair dūragato mṛtaḥ syāt

When the lord of the lagna, or the Moon (śītakara), is in the 6th, the 4th (turya) or the 8th, or has gone very deep into its fall (atinīca), or is combust, and is joined in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 8th (chidra), ⟨and is unaspected⟩ by benefics — the man far away must be dead.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश्वरेशीतकरेऽथषष्ठेतुर्येऽष्टमेवाप्यतिनीचगेवा ॥ अस्तंगतेछिद्रपतीत्थ शालयुक्तेशुभैर्दूरगतोमृतःस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: शुभैः stands in this record with no participle of its own. Verses 33 and 35 both spell the same condition out as सौम्यैरदृष्टे, 'unaspected by benefics', and I supply the negative from them, marking it as supplied. Read without the negative the instrumental would say 'joined with benefics', which would contradict the death this verse declares.

भूमेरधःस्थेन च वक्रगेण यदीत्थशालं कुरुते शशांकः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टे मरणं प्रकुर्याद् दूरस्थितस्यापि विदेशगस्य

bhūmeradhaḥsthena ca vakrageṇa yadītthaśālaṃ kurute śaśāṃkaḥ || saumyairadṛṣṭe maraṇaṃ prakuryād dūrasthitasyāpi videśagasya

If the Moon forms an itthaśāla with a planet that stands below the earth ⟨in the houses under the horizon⟩ and is retrograde (vakra), and is unaspected by benefics, it brings about death even for a man who stands far off, gone to a foreign country.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भूमेरधःस्थेनवचक्रगेणयदीत्थशालंकुरुतेशशांकः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टेमरणंप्रकुर्याद्दूरस्थितस्यापि विदेशगस्य

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The akṣaras भूमेरधःस्थेनवचक्रगेण divide two ways and only one gives words: भूमेरधःस्थे नवचक्रगेण, which I follow. The other, भूमेरधःस्थेन वचक्रगेण, leaves वचक्र, which is no word. नवचक्र I take as the navāṃśa circle; the verse does not gloss it, and this chapter uses no other 'ninefold' figure. [2026-10-01: superseded. The 1893 leaf does set स्थेनवचक्रगेण (PDF p.190, read by eye at about 4.5x native), but every other printing reads वक्र as their machine reads give them, and two set भूमेरधःस्थेन च वक्रगेण; the mūla now reads that on the lexicon, taking the 1893 to have transposed व and च.]
40.34a reading here is contested

सौम्यैः षष्ठांत्यरंध्रस्थैर् विबलैश् च शुभेक्षितैः ॥ पापयुक्तौ शशांकार्कौ तदा दूरस्थितो मृतः

saumyaiḥ ṣaṣṭhāṃtyaraṃdhrasthair vibalaiś ca śubhekṣitaiḥ || pāpayuktau śaśāṃkārkau tadā dūrasthito mṛtaḥ

With benefics standing in the 6th, the 12th (antya) and the 8th (randhra), weak and aspected by benefics, and with the Moon and the Sun joined by malefics — then the man far away is dead.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्यैःषष्ठांत्यरंध्रस्थैर्विंबलैश्चशुभेक्षितैः ॥ पापयुक्तौशशांकार्कौतदादूरस्थितोमृतः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थैर्विंबलैश्च"; alternatives "स्थैर्विबलैश्च", "स्थैर्बिंबलैश्च" — zoomed 5×: a clear anusvāra dot stands over वि under the repha. Kept as printed; the sense would want विबलैः, 'weak'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विबलैश्; this sentence names विंबलैश्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints विंबलैः with a clear anusvāra, which the plate reader checked at 5× and kept. The word the sense needs is विबलैः, 'weak', and I render it so; I have not altered the Sanskrit. शुभेक्षितैः as printed says 'aspected by benefics', and I render it flat even though it sits oddly in a list of afflictions; the expected अशुभेक्षितैः would show as चाशुभ- after च, and the page sets च शुभ-.

पृष्ठोदये पापयुते त्रिकोणकेंद्राष्टषष्ठोपगतैश् च पापैः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टैः परदेशसंस्थो मृतो गदार्तो नवमे च सूर्ये

pṛṣṭhodaye pāpayute trikoṇakeṃdrāṣṭaṣaṣṭhopagataiś ca pāpaiḥ || saumyairadṛṣṭaiḥ paradeśasaṃstho mṛto gadārto navame ca sūrye

When a back-rising (pṛṣṭhodaya) sign ⟨rises⟩ joined with a malefic, and malefics have gone to the trines, the kendras, the 8th and the 6th, unaspected by benefics, the man living in a foreign country is dead — or, with the Sun in the 9th, stricken with disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पृष्ठोदयेपापयुतेत्रि कोणकेंद्राष्टषष्ठोपगतैश्चपापैः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टैःपरदेशसंस्थोमृतोगदार्तोनवमेचसूर्ये

तुर्योपरिस्थेन खगेन चंद्रमा यदीत्थशालं कुरुते शुभेक्षितः ॥ सौम्यैर् युतो वा परदेशसंस्थितः सुखी च जीवेत् पथि सौख्यमेति

turyoparisthena khagena caṃdramā yadītthaśālaṃ kurute śubhekṣitaḥ || saumyair yuto vā paradeśasaṃsthitaḥ sukhī ca jīvet pathi saukhyameti

If the Moon, aspected by benefics or joined with benefics, forms an itthaśāla with a planet standing above the 4th (turya-upari), the man settled in a foreign country lives, and lives happily, and meets with ease on the road.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तुर्येपरिस्थेनखगेनचंद्रमायदीत्थशालंकुरुते शुभेक्षितः ॥ सौम्यैर्युतोवापरदेशसंस्थितःसुखीचजीवेत्पथिसौख्यमेति

मार्गान् निवर्तते शत्रुः पापैः शत्रुग्रहाश्रितैः ॥ चतुर्थगैरपि प्राप्तः शत्रुर् भग्नो निवर्तते

mārgān nivartate śatruḥ pāpaiḥ śatrugrahāśritaiḥ || caturthagairapi prāptaḥ śatrur bhagno nivartate

The enemy turns back from the road when malefics have attached themselves to the enemy's planet; and with malefics in the 4th as well, the enemy who has already arrived is broken and turns back.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मा र्गान्निवर्ततेशत्रुःपापैःशत्रुग्रहाश्रितैः ॥ चतुर्थगैरपिप्राप्तःशत्रुर्भग्नोनिवर्तते

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).

झषालिकुंभकर्कटा रसातले यदा स्थिताः ॥ रिपोः पराजयस् तदा चतुष्पदैः पलायनम्

jhaṣālikuṃbhakarkaṭā rasātale yadā sthitāḥ || ripoḥ parājayas tadā catuṣpadaiḥ palāyanam

When ⟨planets⟩ stand in Pisces (jhaṣa), Scorpio (ali), Aquarius (kumbha) or Cancer (karkaṭa) in the rasātala ⟨the nether quarter of the chart, below the earth⟩, then the enemy is defeated, and the flight is on four-footed beasts.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

झषालिकुंभकर्कटारसातलेयदास्थिताः ॥ रिपोःपराजय स्तदाचतुष्पदैःपलायनम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).
  • About this edition: रसातल is the nether world, and in a chart the quarter below the earth, whose centre is the 4th (pātāla); the verse names the region and not a single house. The four signs it lists are the watery ones. चतुष्पदैः पलायनम् is flight by means of four-footed beasts, that is on horseback, not flight of the beasts themselves.

मेषधनुःसिंहवृषा यद्युदयस्था भवंति हिबुके वा ॥ शत्रुर् निवर्तते तदा ग्रहसहिता वा वियुक्ता वा

meṣadhanuḥsiṃhavṛṣā yadyudayasthā bhavaṃti hibuke vā || śatrur nivartate tadā grahasahitā vā viyuktā vā

If Aries, Sagittarius, Leo or Taurus stand in the ascendant, or in the 4th (hibuka), then the enemy turns back — whether those signs hold a planet or are empty of one.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषधनुःसिंहवृषायद्युदयस्थाभवंतिहिबुकेवा ॥ शत्रुर्निवर्ततेतदाग्रहसहितावावियुक्तावा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).

नागच्छति परचक्रं यदार्कचंद्रौ चतुर्थभवनस्थौ ॥ गुरुबुधशुक्रा हिबुके यदा तदा शीघ्रमायाति

nāgacchati paracakraṃ yadārkacaṃdrau caturthabhavanasthau || gurubudhaśukrā hibuke yadā tadā śīghramāyāti

The enemy's army (paracakra) does not come when the Sun and the Moon stand in the 4th house; and when Jupiter, Mercury and Venus are in the 4th (hibuka), then it comes quickly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नागच्छतिपरचक्रंयदार्कचंद्रौचतुर्थभवनस्थौ ॥ गुरुबुधशुक्राहिबुकेयदातदाशीघ्रमायाति

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).
40.41a reading here is contested

स्थिरोदये जीवशनैश्चरे स्थिते गमागमौ नैव वदेत् तु पृच्छतः ॥ त्रिपंचषष्ठा रिपुसंगमाय पापाश् चतुर्था विनिवर्तनाय

sthirodaye jīvaśanaiścare sthite gamāgamau naiva vadet tu pṛcchataḥ || tripaṃcaṣaṣṭhā ripusaṃgamāya pāpāś caturthā vinivartanāya

When a fixed sign rises and Jupiter and Saturn stand ⟨in it⟩, one should declare neither a going nor a coming for the querent. Malefics in the 3rd, the 5th and the 6th make for an encounter with the enemy; malefics in the 4th, for turning back.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्थिरोदयेजीवशनैश्चरेस्थितेगमागमौ नैववदेत्तुपृच्छतः ॥ त्रिपंचषष्ठारिपुसंगमायपापाश्चतुर्थाविनिवर्तनाय

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापाश्चतुर्थाविनिवर्तनाय"; alternatives "पापाश्चतुर्थांविनिवर्तनाय", "पापाश्चतुर्थेविनिवर्तनाय" — a small hook sits over र्था; I read it as the repha of र्थ, but it could be an anusvāra. The ā-stroke after थ is clear, so I did not read र्थे.
  • About this edition: Part of this verse stands in lines the reader marked as a quotation (षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json)); the rest stands in lines marked as the work's own. The printing numbers it in this text's own count.
  • About this edition: The plate reader could not decide whether the mark over र्था is a repha or an anusvāra. I read पापाश् चतुर्था, a nominative plural agreeing with पापाः, 'malefics in the 4th'; his alternative चतुर्थां and चतुर्थे would name the same house.
40.42a reading here is contested

दशमोदयसप्तमगाः सौम्या नगराधिपस्य विजयकराः ॥ आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताः प्रभंगदौ विजयदा नवमे

daśamodayasaptamagāḥ saumyā nagarādhipasya vijayakarāḥ || ārārkijñagurusitāḥ prabhaṃgadau vijayadā navame

Benefics gone to the 10th, the ascendant and the 7th bring victory to the lord of the city. In the 9th, Mars and Saturn are the two that bring ruin, and Mercury, Jupiter and Venus the givers of victory.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दशमोदयसप्तमगाःसौम्यानगराधिपस्यविजयकराः ॥ आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताःप्रभंगदौविजयदानवमे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताःप्रभंगदौविजयदानवमे"; alternatives "आरार्किप्रभंगदौज्ञगुरुसिताविजयदानवमे" — the gloss that follows on this same line (भौमशनी भंगदौ, बुधगुरुशुक्रा विजयदा) pairs the words in the opposite order from the one I read off the plate; the word order and the division here should be re-read at higher magnification.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताःप्रभंगदौविजयदानवमे"; alternatives "आरार्किप्रभंगदौज्ञगुरुसिताविजयदानवमे" — the gloss that follows on this same line (भौमशनी भंगदौ, बुधगुरुशुक्रा विजयदा) pairs the words in the opposite order from the one I read off the plate; the word order and the division here should be re-read at higher magnification.
  • About this edition: The plate reader marked the word order here as doubtful, because the gloss printed on the same line (भौमशनी भंगदौ, बुधगुरुशुक्रा विजयदा) seemed to him to pair the words the other way about. It does not: the verse names five planets and then two predicates, प्रभंगदौ in the DUAL and विजयदा in the plural, so the dual can only take the first two names, Mars and Saturn, and the plural the remaining three. The gloss and the plate agree, and the grammar settles it without a re-read.
40.43a reading here is contested

उदयर्क्षाच् चंद्रर्क्षं भवति च यावद् दिनैश् च तावद्भिः ॥ आगमनं स्याच् छत्रोर् यदि न हि मध्ये ग्रहः कश्चित्

udayarkṣāc caṃdrarkṣaṃ bhavati ca yāvad dinaiś ca tāvadbhiḥ || āgamanaṃ syāc chatror yadi na hi madhye grahaḥ kaścit

In as many days as the Moon's sign stands from the rising sign, the enemy's arrival takes place — if there is no planet at all in between.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उदयक्षांचंद्रर्क्षंभवतिचयावद्दि नेश्चतावद्भिः ॥ आगमनंस्याच्छत्रोर्यदिनहिमध्येग्रहःकश्चित्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उदयक्षांचंद्रर्क्षं"; alternatives "उदयर्क्षांचंद्रर्क्षं", "उदयर्क्षाच्चंद्रर्क्षं" — I could not see a repha over उदय-क्ष at tile resolution; it may be there.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उदयक्षांचंद्रर्क्षं"; alternatives "उदयर्क्षांचंद्रर्क्षं", "उदयर्क्षाच्चंद्रर्क्षं" — I could not see a repha over उदय-क्ष at tile resolution; it may be there.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तावद्भिः"; alternatives "तावद्धिः" — zoomed at 9x: the subjoined letter has a left loop and a right stem, which I read as भ; ध cannot be ruled out.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तावद्भिः"; alternatives "तावद्धिः" — zoomed at 9x: the subjoined letter has a left loop and a right stem, which I read as भ; ध cannot be ruled out.
  • About this edition: Two words are doubtful and neither changes the rule. उदयक्षां as printed is no word; the plate reader could not see a repha at tile resolution and offers उदयर्क्षां and उदयर्क्षाच्, and the ablative उदयर्क्षात्, 'from the rising sign', is what the sentence needs. दिनेश् likewise is no form; दिनैश् च, 'and by days', is, and the ए for ऐ is a single stroke. I render both corrected readings and leave the printed akṣaras in the word-divided file. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads उदयर्क्षाच् and दिनैश्; this sentence names उदयक्षां and दिनेश्, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
40.44a reading here is contested

दैत्येज्यवाचस्पतिसोमपुत्रैरेकर्क्षगैर् लग्नगतैर् बलाढ्यैः ॥ द्वाभ्यामथेज्ये भृगुजेऽथ लग्ने हन्याद् रणे यायिनृपं पुरेशः

daityejyavācaspatisomaputrairekarkṣagair lagnagatair balāḍhyaiḥ || dvābhyāmathejye bhṛguje'tha lagne hanyād raṇe yāyinṛpaṃ pureśaḥ

When Venus (daityejya), Jupiter (vācaspati) and Mercury (somaputra) stand in one sign, in the lagna, and full of strength — or two of them, or Jupiter, or Venus, in the lagna — the lord of the city kills the invading king in battle.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दैत्येज्यवाचस्पतिसोमपुत्रैरेकर्क्षगैर्लग्नगतैर्बला ढ्यैः ॥ द्वाभ्यामथेज्येभृगुजेऽथलग्नेहन्याद्रणेयायिनृपंपुरेशः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ढ्यैः"; alternatives "ब्यैः" — at tile resolution the first conjunct looked like ब्यैः; the same word is printed in full as बलाढ्यैः at the end of the next line, which is why I read ढ्यैः.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नप्रदीपे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.

सूर्येंदुभौमार्कजसैंहिकेयैः सर्वैश् चतुर्भिस् त्रिभिरेव लग्नगैः ॥ हन्यात् तदा स्थायिनमाशु यायी द्यूनस्थितैर् यायिनृपं पुरेशः

sūryeṃdubhaumārkajasaiṃhikeyaiḥ sarvaiś caturbhis tribhireva lagnagaiḥ || hanyāt tadā sthāyinamāśu yāyī dyūnasthitair yāyinṛpaṃ pureśaḥ

When the Sun, the Moon, Mars, Saturn and Rāhu (saiṃhikeya) — all of them, or four, or just three — stand in the lagna, the invader quickly kills the one who holds ⟨the city⟩; when they stand in the 7th (dyūna), the lord of the city kills the invading king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्येंदुभौमार्कजसैंहिकेयैःसर्वैश्चतुर्भिस्त्रीभिरेवलग्नगैः ॥ हन्यात्तदा स्थायिनमाशुयायीद्यूनस्थितैर्यायिनृपंपुरेशः

शुक्रेज्यशीतांशुबुधाः सुरेज्यैः सर्वैस् त्रिभिर् द्यूनगतैर् बलाढ्यैः ॥ हन्याद् रणे स्थायिनमाशु यायी सुखास्पदस्थैश् च शुभैः सुसंधिः

śukrejyaśītāṃśubudhāḥ surejyaiḥ sarvais tribhir dyūnagatair balāḍhyaiḥ || hanyād raṇe sthāyinamāśu yāyī sukhāspadasthaiś ca śubhaiḥ susaṃdhiḥ

When Venus, Jupiter, the Moon and Mercury — all ⟨four⟩, or three of them — stand in the 7th (dyūna) full of strength, the invader quickly kills in battle the one who holds ⟨the city⟩. With benefics standing in the seat of ease (sukhāspada, the 4th), there is a good peace.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेज्यशीतांशुबुधाःसुरेज्यैःसर्वैस्त्रिभिर्द्यूनगतैर्बलाढ्यैः ॥ हन्याद्रणेस्थायिनमाशुया यीसुखास्पदस्थैश्शुभैःसुसंधिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सुरेज्यैः, 'by the preceptor of the gods', repeats इज्य, which the same list has already named, and it is an instrumental plural where a single planet is meant; the word is very likely corrupt and I have not rendered it twice. The rule itself is not in doubt: it is verse 45 inverted, benefics in the 7th strengthening the invader as malefics there ruined him.
40.47a reading here is contested

कुजेत्थशाले हिमगौ विलग्ने बंधोऽथ मृत्युर् युधि नागरस्य ॥ भौमेत्थशाले च विधौ कलत्रे वंधं मृतिं वा लभते ऽत्र यायी

kujetthaśāle himagau vilagne baṃdho'tha mṛtyur yudhi nāgarasya || bhaumetthaśāle ca vidhau kalatre vaṃdhaṃ mṛtiṃ vā labhate 'tra yāyī

When the Moon in the lagna is in an itthaśāla with Mars, the townsman ⟨who holds the city⟩ meets capture, or death, in the fight. And when the Moon is in the 7th (kalatra) in an itthaśāla with Mars, it is the invader here who meets capture or death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुजेत्थशालेहिमगौविलग्नेबंधोऽथमृत्युर्युधिनागरस्य ॥ भौमेत्थशालेचविधौकलत्रेवंधंमृतिंवालभते ऽत्रयायी

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽत्रयायी"; alternatives "त्रयायी" — the line opens with a small mark before त्र that I read as an avagraha (the previous line ends वालभते, giving लभतेऽत्र यायी). The press does set avagrahas on this page.
  • About this edition: The second half prints वंधं where the first half prints बंधो; व for ब is the press's own slip and I render both as बंध, 'capture'. The line opens with a small mark before त्र that the plate reader read as an avagraha, giving लभते ऽत्र यायी, and the page does set avagrahas elsewhere; without it the sense is the same.
40.48a reading here is contested

लग्नेशजामित्रपयोश् च मध्ये भवेद् ग्रहो यः स्वगृहोच्चसंस्थः ॥ तद्वर्गमर्त्यां नृपयोश् च संधिर् ज्ञेयो बुधे लेखकपंडिताभ्यां

lagneśajāmitrapayoś ca madhye bhaved graho yaḥ svagṛhoccasaṃsthaḥ || tadvargamartyāṃ nṛpayoś ca saṃdhir jñeyo budhe lekhakapaṃḍitābhyāṃ

Whatever planet stands between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (jāmitra), being in its own house or in exaltation — a peace between the two kings is to be understood as coming through men of that planet's class (varga); and if the planet is Mercury, through a scribe and a paṇḍita.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशजामित्रपयोश्चमध्येभवेद्ग्रहोयःस्वगृहोच्चसंस्थः ॥ तद्वर्गमर्त्यांनृपयोश्चसंधिर्ज्ञेयोबुधेलेखकपंडिताभ्यां

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मर्त्यांनृपयोश्च"; alternatives "मर्त्यान्नृपयोश्च" — the mark over र्त्या may be an anusvāra or the repha.
  • About this edition: The mark over र्त्या may be an anusvāra or a repha, so the word is मर्त्यां or मर्त्यान्; either way it is the men of that planet's class who carry the peace, and the case is loose for the instrumental the sense wants.
40.49a reading here is contested

क्रूरे कलत्रे ह्युदये शुभग्रहो यच्छेद् धनं यायिनृपाय नागरः ॥ विपर्ययाद् यायिनृपः पुरेश्वरं दुर्गाद् विनिष्काश्य ददाति वास्पदम्

krūre kalatre hyudaye śubhagraho yacched dhanaṃ yāyinṛpāya nāgaraḥ || viparyayād yāyinṛpaḥ pureśvaraṃ durgād viniṣkāśya dadāti vāspadam

When a malefic is in the 7th (kalatra) and a benefic planet in the ascendant, the townsman gives up wealth to the invading king. In the reverse case the invading king drives the lord of the city out of his fort and gives him a place ⟨to live⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरेकलत्रेह्युदयेशुभग्रहोयच्छेद्धनंन्यायिनृपायनागरः॥विपर्ययाद्यायि नृपःपुरेश्वरंदुर्गाद्विनिष्काश्यददातिवास्पदम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यच्छेद्धनंन्यायिनृपायनागरः"; alternatives "यच्छेद्धनंयायिनृपायनागरः" — I read both an anusvāra on धनं and a न् before यायि. The word यायिनृप ('the invading king') is printed four other times on this page, and the next line continues विपर्ययाद् यायि|नृपः, so the न् may be an artefact. [2026-10-01: the plate, page_0191 store line 8, read by eye at about 3.6x native, sets धनंयायिनृपाय with no न् between नं and या; the mūla now reads यायिनृपाय.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुर्गाद्विनिष्काश्य"; alternatives "दुर्गादिनिष्काश्य" — the conjunct after दुर्गा could be दि or द्वि; I read द्वि (दुर्गात् + विनिष्काश्य).
  • About this edition: I render यायिनृपाय, 'to the invading king'. The page appears to set न्यायि-, and the plate reader records that यायिनृप is printed four other times on this leaf and that the next line continues विपर्ययाद् यायि|नृपः, so he takes the न् for an artefact and so do I. दुर्गाद् विनिष्काश्य, 'having driven him out of the fort', rests on reading the conjunct as द्वि rather than दि. [2026-10-01: the plate, page_0191 store line 8, read by eye at about 3.6x native, sets धनंयायिनृपाय with no न् between नं and या; the mūla now reads यायिनृपाय.]
40.50a reading here is contested

रवीत्थशाले शशिजे सुगुप्ताश् चरा भवेयुश् च कुजे सराफात् ॥ ग्रहाच् छशांकेन युतश् च तस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश् च भवंति चाराः

ravītthaśāle śaśije suguptāś carā bhaveyuś ca kuje sarāphāt || grahāc chaśāṃkena yutaś ca tasminyeyenyaveṣāś ca bhavaṃti cārāḥ

When Mercury (śaśija) is in an itthaśāla with the Sun, there will be well-hidden (sugupta) spies abroad; so too with Mars, out of a sarāpha ⟨the separating aspect⟩. And ⟨when Mercury is⟩ joined with the Moon away from that planet, then whoever appear there in another man's dress are the spies. [The second half does not divide cleanly as printed; see the note.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रवीत्थशालेशशिजेसुयुक्ताश्चराभवेयुश्चकुजेसराफा त् ॥ ग्रहाच्छशांकेनयुतश्चतस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश्चभवंतिचाराः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश्च"; alternatives "तस्मिन्येयेऽन्यवेषाश्च", "तस्मिन्येयेन्ववेषाश्च" — the run ये-ये-न्य-वे-षा is hard to divide; the akṣaras themselves are legible but I cannot tell whether an avagraha is printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश्च"; alternatives "तस्मिन्येयेऽन्यवेषाश्च", "तस्मिन्येयेन्ववेषाश्च" — the run ये-ये-न्य-वे-षा is hard to divide; the akṣaras themselves are legible but I cannot tell whether an avagraha is printed.
  • About this edition: The plate reader says the run ये-ये-न्य-वे-षा is legible akṣara by akṣara but that he cannot tell whether an avagraha is printed in it, and offers तस्मिन्येयेऽन्यवेषाश्च and तस्मिन्येयेन्ववेषाश्च. I divide तस्मिन् ये ये अन्यवेषाः, 'whoever there are in another's dress', which is the only division that yields words throughout, and I take चाराः in its plain sense of spies, which is what a chapter on two kings at war wants. The syntax of ग्रहाच् छशांकेन युतः is loose as printed and my ⟨away from that planet⟩ renders the ablative without claiming more than it says.

प्रश्ने विलग्ने क्रूरे वा दुर्गभंगो न जायते ॥ विशेषतो भूमिपुत्रे राहौ वा मूर्तिगे सति

praśne vilagne krūre vā durgabhaṃgo na jāyate || viśeṣato bhūmiputre rāhau vā mūrtige sati

In the question ⟨whether a fort will fall⟩, if a malefic is in the rising sign, the breaking of the fort does not come about — and especially so when Mars (bhūmiputra) or Rāhu is in the mūrti (the 1st, the body-house).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रश्नेविलग्नेक्रूरेवादुर्गभंगोनजायते ॥ विशेष तोभूमिपुत्रेराहौवामूर्तिगेसति

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौदुर्गप्रश्नः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ दुर्गप्रश्नः ॥" before this verse; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. दुर्गभंग is the storming or fall of a fort, so "does not come about" means the fort holds.

सप्तमे सिंहिकासूनौ दुर्गं शीघ्रेण लभ्यते ॥ जामित्रोदयगे क्रूरे रिःफगे लग्ननायके

saptame siṃhikāsūnau durgaṃ śīghreṇa labhyate || jāmitrodayage krūre riḥphage lagnanāyake

With Rāhu (siṃhikā-sūnu, the son of Siṃhikā) in the 7th, the fort is taken quickly. ⟨But⟩ with a malefic standing in the jāmitra (7th) or in the rising sign, and the lord of the lagna in the riḥpha (12th) —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सप्तमेसिंहिकासूनौदुर्गंशीघ्रेणलभ्यते ॥ जामित्रोदयगेक्रूरेरिःफगेलग्ननायके

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The sentence is left open at the end of this record: its main clause ("then the fort is not taken") stands in the next record. Nothing has been pulled across.

द्वितीये वाष्टमे षष्ठे तदा दुर्गं न लभ्यते ॥ सक्रूरो लग्नपो वक्री युद्धदः केंद्रसंस्थितः

dvitīye vāṣṭame ṣaṣṭhe tadā durgaṃ na labhyate || sakrūro lagnapo vakrī yuddhadaḥ keṃdrasaṃsthitaḥ

— or ⟨the lord of the lagna is⟩ in the 2nd, in the 8th ⟨or⟩ in the 6th: then the fort is not taken. The lord of the lagna joined with a malefic, retrograde, and standing in a kendra gives battle.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

द्वितीये वाष्टमेषष्ठेतदादुर्गंनलभ्यते ॥ सक्रूरोलग्नपोवक्रीयुद्धदःकेंद्रसंस्थितः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The first half completes the condition begun in the previous record; the link ⟨the lord of the lagna is⟩ is supplied, not printed here.

षष्ठाधिपे द्यूनगते पापे वा युद्धमादिशेत् ॥ पृच्छायां केंद्रगैः क्रूरैः कोटे दुर्गं वधो नृणाम्

ṣaṣṭhādhipe dyūnagate pāpe vā yuddhamādiśet || pṛcchāyāṃ keṃdragaiḥ krūraiḥ koṭe durgaṃ vadho nṛṇām

If the lord of the 6th, or a malefic, has gone to the 7th (dyūna), one should foretell war. ⟨When⟩ in the question malefics stand in the kendras, there is hard straits inside the fort (koṭa) and the slaughter of men.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठाधिपेद्यूनगतेपापेवायुद्धमादिशेत् ॥ पृच्छायांकेंद्रगैः क्रूरैःकोटेदुर्गंवधोनृणाम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: वा is "or": either the lord of the 6th or any malefic in the 7th is enough. In the second half दुर्गं is taken as the neuter noun "hard straits", since कोटे already names the fort; read as the adjective it would say "the fort is hard to take".

भौमाष्टमेशावेकत्र तदातिनिधनं नृणाम् ॥ स्वायपुत्रस्थिते जीवे कोटमध्ये भयं न हि

bhaumāṣṭameśāvekatra tadātinidhanaṃ nṛṇām || svāyaputrasthite jīve koṭamadhye bhayaṃ na hi

Mars and the lord of the 8th together in one place: then there is very great slaughter of men. With Jupiter (jīva) standing in the 2nd (sva), the 11th (āya) or the 5th (putra), there is no fear within the fort.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमाष्टमेशावेकत्रतदातिनिधनंनृणाम् ॥ स्वायपुत्रस्थितेजीवेकोटमध्येभयंनहि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: स्व is read as the 2nd bhāva, the house-name, because the other two members (आय, पुत्र) are bhāva-names; read as "its own sign" it would say Jupiter in svarāśi, the 11th or the 5th.

शनौ भौमे च केंद्रस्थे बहूनां वधवंधनम् ॥ लग्नगतो यदि पापः पापेन युतेक्षितो वा स्यात् ॥ लग्नात् पूर्वापरगौ पापौ युद्धं तदा घोरम्

śanau bhaume ca keṃdrasthe bahūnāṃ vadhavaṃdhanam || lagnagato yadi pāpaḥ pāpena yutekṣito vā syāt || lagnāt pūrvāparagau pāpau yuddhaṃ tadā ghoram

With Saturn and Mars standing in a kendra, there is the killing and the imprisoning of many. If a malefic has gone to the lagna and is joined with or aspected by a malefic; ⟨or if⟩ malefics stand before and behind the lagna ⟨the 12th and the 2nd⟩ — then the war is terrible.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शनौभौमे चकेंद्रस्थेबहूनांवधवंधनम् ॥ लग्नगतोयदिपापःपापेनयुतेक्षितोवास्यात् ॥ लग्नात्पूर्वापरगौपापोयुद्धंतदाघोरम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record runs to three half-lines under one number. पूर्वापरगौ is dual ("the two standing before and behind") but the page prints the singular पापो with it; rendered as a plural, and the printed पापो is a probable misprint for पापौ. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पापौ; this sentence names पापो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

विलग्ने षष्ठपः पापो जन्मराशिनिरीक्षिते ॥ रोगिणस्तस्य मरणं निश्चयेन वदेद्बुधः

vilagne ṣaṣṭhapaḥ pāpo janmarāśinirīkṣite || rogiṇastasya maraṇaṃ niścayena vadedbudhaḥ

⟨When⟩ the lord of the 6th, itself a malefic, is in the rising sign, and the natal rāśi is aspected ⟨by it⟩, the wise man should declare the death of that sick person with certainty.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विलग्नेषष्ठपःपापोजन्मराशिनिरीक्षिते ॥ रोगिणस्तस्यमरणंनिश्चयेनवदेद्बुधः

चतुर्थाष्टमगे चंद्रे पापमध्यगतेपि वा ॥ मृतिः स्याद्बलसंयुक्तसौम्यदृष्ट्या चिरात्सुखं

caturthāṣṭamage caṃdre pāpamadhyagatepi vā || mṛtiḥ syādbalasaṃyuktasaumyadṛṣṭyā cirātsukhaṃ

With the Moon gone to the 4th or the 8th, or standing between malefics, there is death; ⟨but⟩ by the aspect of a benefic possessed of strength, ease after a long time.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चतुर्थाष्टमगेचंद्रेपापमध्यगतेपि वा ॥ मृतिःस्याद्बलसंयुक्तसौम्यदृष्ट्याचिरात्सुखं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The page prints पापमध्यगतेपि without an avagraha; the word is पापमध्यगते ऽपि.

विधौ लग्ने स्मरे भानौ रोगी याति यमालयम् ॥ प्रश्ने क्रूरग्रहे लग्ने रोगवृद्धिश्चिकित्सकात्

vidhau lagne smare bhānau rogī yāti yamālayam || praśne krūragrahe lagne rogavṛddhiścikitsakāt

With the Moon in the lagna and the Sun in the 7th (smara), the sick man goes to Yama's house. In a question with a malefic graha in the lagna, the disease grows worse from the physician ⟨himself⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विधौलग्नेस्मरेभानौरोगीयातियमालयम् ॥ प्रश्नेक्रूरग्रहेलग्नेरोगवृद्धिश्चिकि त्सकात्

40.60a reading here is contested

तथा लग्नगते सौम्ये वैद्योक्तममृतं वचः ॥ लग्ने वैद्यो द्युनं व्याधिः खं रोगी तुर्यमौषधम्

tathā lagnagate saumye vaidyoktamamṛtaṃ vacaḥ || lagne vaidyo dyunaṃ vyādhiḥ khaṃ rogī turyamauṣadham

So too, with a benefic gone to the lagna, the physician's word is nectar. ⟨In such a question⟩ the lagna is the physician, the 7th (dyūna) the disease, the 10th (kha) the patient, and the 4th (turya) the medicine.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तथालग्नगतेसौम्येवैद्योक्तममृतंवचः ॥ लग्नेवैद्योद्युनंव्याधिःखंरोगीतुर्यमौषधम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्युनं"; alternatives "द्यूनं" — the u-stroke under द्य looks short; the word is elsewhere on these two leaves printed द्यून (the 7th house).
  • About this edition: The word for the 7th is printed द्युनं with a short u; the reader records the doubt and the same word is spelt द्यून elsewhere on these leaves. Rendered as the 7th either way.
40.61a reading here is contested

रोगिणो भिषजो मैत्री मैत्री भेषजरोगयोः ॥ व्याधेरुपशमो वाच्यः प्रकोपः शात्रवेतयोः

rogiṇo bhiṣajo maitrī maitrī bheṣajarogayoḥ || vyādherupaśamo vācyaḥ prakopaḥ śātravetayoḥ

⟨When there is⟩ friendship between the patient and the physician, and friendship between the medicine and the disease, one should declare the subsiding of the illness; ⟨and⟩ its flaring up where there is enmity between the two.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रोगिणोभिषजोमैत्रीमैत्रीभेष जरोगयोः ॥ व्याधेरुपशमोवाच्यःप्रकोपःशात्रवेत्रयोः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शात्रवेत्रयोः"; alternatives "शात्रवेवत्रयोः", "शात्रवेत्वयोः" — the akṣaras are legible but I cannot tell where the word breaks; recorded as the continuous string I see. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शात्रवेतयोः; this sentence names शात्रवेत्रयोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle where शात्रवेत्रयोः divides; it is taken as शात्रवे त्रयोः, "in enmity, of the three". त्रयोः is not a regular form of त्रि (the genitive plural is त्रयाणाम्), so the printing is suspect; द्वयोः, "of the two ⟨pairs⟩", would scan equally well. "Friendship" here is the mutual friendship of the grahas signifying each party. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शात्रवेतयोः; this sentence names शात्रवेत्रयोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्ननाथे च सबले केंद्रसंस्थे शुभग्रहे ॥ उच्चगे वा त्रिकोणे वा रोगी जीवति निश्चयम्

lagnanāthe ca sabale keṃdrasaṃsthe śubhagrahe || uccage vā trikoṇe vā rogī jīvati niścayam

With the lord of the lagna strong, and a benefic graha standing in a kendra — or in its exaltation, or in a trikoṇa — the sick man certainly lives.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्ननाथेचसबलेकेंद्रसंस्थेशुभग्रहे ॥ उच्चगेवात्रिकोणेवारोगीजीवतिनिश्च यम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: वा is "or": the kendra, the exaltation and the trikoṇa are three alternatives, not a set of conditions to be met together.
40.63a reading here is contested

एकः शुभो बली लग्ने त्रायते रोगपीडितं ॥ सौम्या धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था गदापहाः

ekaḥ śubho balī lagne trāyate rogapīḍitaṃ || saumyā dharmārilābhasthāstṛtīyasthā gadāpahāḥ

A single strong benefic in the lagna saves the man tormented by disease. Benefics standing in the 9th (dharma), the 6th (ari) and the 11th (lābha), and standing in the third, carry the disease away.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एकःशुभोबलीलग्नेत्रायतेरोगपीडितं ॥ सौम्याधर्मारिलाभस्थास्त्रितीयस्थागदापहाः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रितीयस्था"; alternatives "स्तृतीयस्था" — the vowel under त reads as ्रि to me; ृ (तृतीय, 'third') is the expected word. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था; this sentence names स्त्रितीयस्था, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रितीयस्था"; alternatives "स्तृतीयस्था" — the vowel under त reads as ्रि to me; ृ (तृतीय, 'third') is the expected word. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था; this sentence names स्त्रितीयस्था, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints स्त्रितीयस्था; the word is तृतीयस्था, "standing in the third", and the reader records ्रि where ृ is expected. Rendered as "third"; the Sanskrit is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था; this sentence names स्त्रितीयस्था, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

वन्ह्यंकद्वादशे षष्ठे लग्नात्पापग्रहो यदि ॥ हतो गदैर्जलैश्शस्त्रैस्तस्य दोषः कुलोद्भवः

vanhyaṃkadvādaśe ṣaṣṭhe lagnātpāpagraho yadi || hato gadairjalaiśśastraistasya doṣaḥ kulodbhavaḥ

If from the lagna a malefic graha is in the 3rd (vanhi = 3), the 9th (aṅka = 9), the 12th or the 6th, ⟨the man⟩ is struck down by diseases, by water or by weapons, and the fault upon him arises from his family line (kula).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वन्ह्यंकद्वा दशेषष्ठेलग्नात्पापग्रहोयदि ॥ हतोगदैर्जलैश्शस्त्रैस्तस्यदोषःकुलोद्भवः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: वन्हि and अंक are number-words: वन्हि (the fires) = 3 and अंक (the digits) = 9. The four houses are therefore 3, 9, 12 and 6 — the four cadent (āpoklima) houses from the lagna.
40.65a reading here is contested

प्रेताश्च राहौ पितरः सुरेज्ये चंद्रेंबुदेव्यस्तपनेपि देव्यः ॥ स्वगोत्रदेव्यश्च शनौ बुधे च भूतानि विंद्याद्व्ययरंध्रसंस्थे

pretāśca rāhau pitaraḥ surejye caṃdreṃbudevyastapanepi devyaḥ || svagotradevyaśca śanau budhe ca bhūtāni viṃdyādvyayaraṃdhrasaṃsthe

With Rāhu ⟨the affliction is⟩ from pretas ⟨the departed⟩; with Jupiter (surejya) from the pitṛs ⟨the ancestors⟩; with the Moon from the water-goddesses; with the Sun too from goddesses; with Saturn from the goddesses of one's own gotra; and with Mercury one should know it to be from bhūtas — ⟨reckoned⟩ when that graha stands in the 12th (vyaya) or the 8th (randhra).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रेताश्चराहौपितरःसुरेज्येचंद्रेंबुदेव्यस्तपनेपिदेव्यः ॥ स्वगो त्रदेव्यश्चशनौबुधेचभूतानिविंद्याद्व्ययरंध्रसंस्थे

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विंद्याद्"; alternatives "विद्याद्" — zoomed at 5x: नि and वि each carry an i-hook and a dot sits above, which I read as an anusvāra on वि.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रंध्रसंस्थे"; alternatives "रंभसंस्थे" — the subjoined र of ध्र is faint at this size; at tile resolution the letter looked like भ.
  • About this edition: The reader records doubt at विंद्याद् (alternative विद्याद्, the same sense, "one should know") and at रंध्रसंस्थे (alternative रंभसंस्थे, which would not be a house-name). Rendered on the printed reading; neither doubt changes the rule.
40.66a reading here is contested

शाकिन्य आरे भृगुजेंबुदेव्यो गृह्णंति मर्त्यं विमुखं मुकुंदात् ॥ स्वर्क्षोच्चगे वीर्ययुते च साध्याश्चंद्रे च नीचे विबले न साध्याः

śākinya āre bhṛgujeṃbudevyo gṛhṇaṃti martyaṃ vimukhaṃ mukuṃdāt || svarkṣoccage vīryayute ca sādhyāścaṃdre ca nīce vibale na sādhyāḥ

With Mars it is śākinīs, with Venus (bhṛguja) the water-goddesses, that seize the mortal who is turned away from Mukunda ⟨Viṣṇu⟩. They can be appeased when ⟨the graha⟩ stands in its own sign or its exaltation and is endowed with strength; but with the Moon in debilitation and weak, they cannot be appeased.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शाकिन्यआरेभृगुजेंबुदेव्योगृह्णंतिमर्त्यंविसुखंमुकुंदात् ॥ स्वर्क्षोंच्चगेवीर्ययुतेचसा ध्याश्चंद्रेचनीचेविबलेनसाध्याः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विसुखं"; alternatives "विमुखं" — the middle akṣara is small and could be सु or मु. [2026-10-01: the leaf was opened (master page_0192.png, store line 8, read by eye at about 2.5x and 4.5x native) and the akṣara is मु: it matches three certain मु on p.192 at 0.875–0.882 against 0.67–0.70 for two certain सु. The page sets विमुखं, and the mūla now reads विमुखं.]
  • About this edition: The plate reads विसुखं, "without ease", and the reader marks the middle akṣara as possibly मु. On the alternative विमुखं the line says they seize the man who is TURNED AWAY from Mukunda — which the ablative मुकुंदात् favours, and which is the likelier sense. Rendered on the printed reading. The page also prints स्वर्क्षोंच्चगे with an anusvāra where स्वर्क्षोच्चगे is wanted. [2026-10-01: the leaf was opened (master page_0192.png, store line 8, read by eye at about 4.5x native) and the akṣara is मु, matching three certain मु on p.192 at 0.875–0.882 against 0.67–0.70 for two certain सु. So the plate sets विमुखं, not विसुखं, and the mūla now reads विमुखं. The page does set स्वर्क्षोंच्चगे with the anusvāra; the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षोच्चगे, emended on the lexicon, and the page's form is kept on the ledger.]

केंद्रस्थैर्बलिभिः पापैरसाध्या देवतागणाः ॥ सौम्यग्रहैश्च केंद्रस्थैः साध्या मंत्रस्तवार्चनैः

keṃdrasthairbalibhiḥ pāpairasādhyā devatāgaṇāḥ || saumyagrahaiśca keṃdrasthaiḥ sādhyā maṃtrastavārcanaiḥ

When strong malefics stand in the kendras, the hosts of deities cannot be appeased; when benefic grahas stand in the kendras, they are appeased by mantras, hymns of praise and worship.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

केंद्रस्थैर्बलिभिःपापैरसाध्यादेवतागणाः ॥ सौम्यग्रहैश्चकेंद्रस्थैःसाध्यामंत्रस्तवार्चनैः

40.68a reading here is contested

कंटकाष्टत्रिकोणस्थाः शुभा उपचये शशी ॥ लग्ने च शुभसंदृष्टे रोगी रोगाद्विमुच्यते

kaṃṭakāṣṭatrikoṇasthāḥ śubhā upacaye śaśī || lagne ca śubhasaṃdṛṣṭe rogī rogādvimucyate

Benefics standing in the kendras (kaṇṭaka), in the 8th and in the trikoṇas, the Moon in an upacaya, and the lagna aspected by a benefic — ⟨then⟩ the sick man is freed from his disease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कंटकाष्टत्रिकोणस्थाःशुभाउपचयेशशी ॥ लग्नेचशुभसंदृष्टेरोगीरोगादिमुच्यते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभाउपचयेशशी"; alternatives "शुभाउपचययेशशी" — zoomed at 6x. I count शु भा उ प च ये श शी, but the च and the ye-stroke touch, so an extra य cannot be ruled out.
  • About this edition: The reader could not rule out an extra य in शुभाउपचयेशशी; on either reading the members are the benefics, the Moon in an upacaya, and the aspected lagna. The last word is printed रोगादिमुच्यते; it is read as रोगाद् विमुच्यते, "is freed from the disease", the subscript व having dropped. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads रोगाद्विमुच्यते; this sentence names रोगादिमुच्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.69a reading here is contested

शीर्षोदये सौम्ययुतेक्षितो वा सौम्यैर्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमस्थैः ॥ तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च पापैः सौख्यार्थलाभो नृपसेवकस्य

śīrṣodaye saumyayutekṣito vā saumyairdvitīyāṣṭamasaptamasthaiḥ || tṛtīyalābhārigataiśca pāpaiḥ saukhyārthalābho nṛpasevakasya

⟨With the lagna⟩ in a head-rising sign (śīrṣodaya), or joined with or aspected by benefics; with benefics standing in the 2nd, the 8th and the 7th, and malefics gone to the 3rd, the 11th (lābha) and the 6th (ari) — a king's servant gains ease and wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शीर्षोदयेसौम्ययुतेक्षितोवासौम्यैर्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमस्थैः ॥ ट्टतीयलाभारिगतैश्च पापैःसौख्यार्थलाभोनृपसेवकस्य

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ट्टतीयलाभारिगतैश्च"; alternatives "तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च" — the first akṣara looks like ट्ट on the plate. The sense and the parallel द्वितीय in the same line want तृतीय ('third'), so this is probably a broken ृ, but I have kept the print. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च; this sentence names ट्टतीयलाभारिगतैश्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "त्रैलोक्यप्रकाशे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "त्रैलोक्यप्रकाशे ॥" before this verse; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. The first word of the second half is printed ट्टतीय, a broken तृतीय ("third"), which the parallel द्वितीय in the same line confirms; rendered as "third", the Sanskrit left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च; this sentence names ट्टतीय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.70a reading here is contested

लग्नाद्द्वितीये मदनाष्टमर्क्षे वित्तक्षयं संभ्रममार्तिमृत्युम् ॥ कुर्वंति पापाः क्रमशो नरेंद्रात् भृत्यस्य तस्मात् परिवर्जयेत्तम्

lagnāddvitīye madanāṣṭamarkṣe vittakṣayaṃ saṃbhramamārtimṛtyum || kurvaṃti pāpāḥ kramaśo nareṃdrāt bhṛtyasya tasmāt parivarjayettam

Malefics in the sign 2nd from the lagna, in the 7th (madana) and in the 8th bring about, in that order, loss of wealth, confusion, and distress and death — for a servant, at his king's hands; so let him leave that ⟨master⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाद्द्वितीयेमदनाष्टमेर्क्षेवित्तक्षयंसंभ्रममार्तिमृत्युम् ॥ कुर्वंतिपापाःक्रमशोनरेंद्रात्भृत्यस्यतत्सात्प रिवर्जयेत्तम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्सात्प"; alternatives "तत्स्यात्प", "तत्स्थात्प" — the akṣara after तत् is a broad स with the ा stroke; the sense wants स्या or स्थ. Line-final, and the word finishes on line 2 as रिवर्जयेत्तम्. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्मात्; this sentence names तत्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: Three places against three results: 2nd → loss of wealth, 7th → confusion, 8th → आर्तिमृत्युम्, distress-and-death taken as one item, which is what क्रमशः ("in order") requires. The word before परिवर्जयेत् is printed तत्सात्, which is not a word; the reader offers तत्स्यात् / तत्स्थात्, and तत् स्यात् ("that will be so") is what the line seems to want. Rendered without it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्मात्; this sentence names तत्सात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्नाद्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमर्क्षाः पापाः प्रणाशं नृपभृत्ययोर्द्वयोः ॥ कुर्वंति तेष्वेव गताश्च सौम्याः कुर्युर्धनारोग्यसुखानि चोभयोः

lagnāddvitīyāṣṭamasaptamarkṣāḥ pāpāḥ praṇāśaṃ nṛpabhṛtyayordvayoḥ || kurvaṃti teṣveva gatāśca saumyāḥ kuryurdhanārogyasukhāni cobhayoḥ

Malefics in the 2nd, the 8th and the 7th signs from the lagna bring ruin on both — on the king and on the servant; and benefics gone to those same ⟨signs⟩ give wealth, health and ease to both.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाद्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमर्क्षाःपापाःप्रणाशंनृपभृत्ययोर्द्वयोः ॥ कुर्वंतितेष्वेवगताश्चसौम्याःकुर्युर्धनारोग्यसुखानिचो भयोः

शशांकसौम्यैरुदयास्तभावौ दृष्टौ युतौ वा सबलैर्न पापैः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदास्याद्धृदि पार्थिवस्य स्नेहप्रसादावकृपाप्रतीपात्

śaśāṃkasaumyairudayāstabhāvau dṛṣṭau yutau vā sabalairna pāpaiḥ || praṣṭustadāsyāddhṛdi pārthivasya snehaprasādāvakṛpāpratīpāt

If the bhāva of the lagna (udaya) and the bhāva of the 7th (asta) are aspected by, or joined with, the Moon and strong benefics — and not by malefics — then in the king's heart there will be affection and favour towards the querent, in place of unkindness and hostility.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शशांकसौम्यैरुदयास्तभावौदृष्टौयुतौवासबलैर्नपापैः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदास्याद्धृदिपार्थिवस्यस्नेहप्रसादावकृपाप्रतीपात्

षष्ठेश्वरेण व्ययपेन केंद्रे यदीत्थशालं कुरुते विलग्नपः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदान्यः प्रभुरर्थदः स्यादतः प्रतीपान्न भवेत् परः प्रभुः

ṣaṣṭheśvareṇa vyayapena keṃdre yadītthaśālaṃ kurute vilagnapaḥ || praṣṭustadānyaḥ prabhurarthadaḥ syādataḥ pratīpānna bhavet paraḥ prabhuḥ

If the lord of the lagna, standing in a kendra, makes an itthaśāla with the lord of the 6th or with the lord of the 12th (vyaya), then the querent will have another master, one who gives him wealth; from the contrary of this, there will be no other master.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

षष्ठेश्वरेणव्ययपेनकेंद्रेयदीत्थशालंकुरुतेविलग्नपः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदान्यःप्रभुरर्थदःस्यादतःप्रतीपान्नभ वेतपरःप्रभुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The two lords stand in the instrumental and are alternatives, not a pair to be satisfied together. Near the end the page prints भवेतपरः without the virāma on त; the word is भवेत् परः.

लग्नेश्वरे स्वर्क्षगते स्वतुंगकेंद्रस्थिते शीतकरेत्थशाले ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुते बलान्विते प्रष्टुर्निजस्वाम्यमितार्थलाभः

lagneśvare svarkṣagate svatuṃgakeṃdrasthite śītakaretthaśāle || śubhagrahairdṛṣṭayute balānvite praṣṭurnijasvāmyamitārthalābhaḥ

When the lord of the lagna stands in its own sign, in its own exaltation or in a kendra, is in an itthaśāla with the Moon (śītakara), is aspected by or joined with benefic grahas, and is possessed of strength — the querent gains measureless wealth from his own master.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश्वरेस्वर्क्षगतेस्वतुंगकेंद्रस्थितेशीतकरेत्थशाले ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुतेबलान्वितेप्रष्टुर्निजस्वाम्यमितार्थलाभः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The gain here is from the querent's OWN master (निजस्वामी); the next record gives the contrasting rule for a different master.

जायेश्वरे स्वोच्चनिजर्क्षसंस्थे केंद्रस्थिते शीतकरेत्थशालगे ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुते बलोत्कटैः प्रष्टुस्तदान्यः प्रभुरर्थदो भवेत्

jāyeśvare svoccanijarkṣasaṃsthe keṃdrasthite śītakaretthaśālage || śubhagrahairdṛṣṭayute balotkaṭaiḥ praṣṭustadānyaḥ prabhurarthado bhavet

When the lord of the 7th (jāyā) stands in its own exaltation or its own sign, is placed in a kendra and stands in an itthaśāla with the Moon (śītakara), aspected by or joined with benefic grahas of great strength — then the querent will have another master, one who gives him wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जायेश्वरेस्वोच्चनिजर्क्षसंस्थेकेंद्रस्थितेशीतकरेत्थशालगे ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुतेबलोत्कटैःप्रष्टुस्तदान्यःप्रभुरर्थदोभवेत्

40.76a reading here is contested

इदं गृहं वा शुभमन्यदालयं स्थानं त्विदं वा शुभमन्यदालयं ॥ ममात्र भद्रङ्गमनात्तु तत्र वा पृष्ठोदयेत्थं विधिना विमृश्य

idaṃ gṛhaṃ vā śubhamanyadālayaṃ sthānaṃ tvidaṃ vā śubhamanyadālayaṃ || mamātra bhadraṅgamanāttu tatra vā pṛṣṭhodayetthaṃ vidhinā vimṛśya

"Is this house auspicious, or some other dwelling? Is this the place, or some other dwelling? Is there good for me here, or in going there?" — such a question one should weigh out by the rule, from the rising sign (pṛṣṭhodaya) ⟨of the query⟩, and ⟨then declare the answer⟩. [Our mula now reads पृष्ठोदये, which literally names a sign that rises hind-part first; the sense of the query's rising sign is taken from the context, and the reading is recorded as a doubt.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इदंगृहंवाशुभमन्य दालयंस्थानंत्विदंवाशुभमन्यदालयं ॥ ममात्रभद्रङ्गमनाच्चुतत्रवापृछोदयेत्थंविधिनाविमृश्य

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पृछोदयेत्थं"; alternatives "पृच्छोदयेत्थं" — no subscript च is visible under पृ, but the conjunct is small and the ink is heavy [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 6.5x native, the akṣara after पृ is a full ष्ठ, ष with the ठ loop beneath, not छ and not च्छ. The page sets पृष्ठोदये, and the mūla now reads पृष्ठोदये; what the word means in a query verse is recorded as a doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनाच्चुतत्रवा"; alternatives "मनाक्चुतत्रवा", "मनाच्च उतत्रवा" — the letters after मना are crowded; च्चु read as printed [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 6.5x native, after मना the page sets ा and then the त्त ligature with the u-sign: गमनात्तु, not च्चु. There is no च half-form. The mūla now reads गमनात्तु.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भद्रङ्ग"; alternatives "भद्रं ग" — ङ्ग conjunct with the ् bar; could be an anusvāra plus ग [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 3.1x native, the page sets भद्रङ्ग with the ङ्ग conjunct, as our text has it.]
  • About this edition: The record states the question and says how to approach it; the main verb ("he should declare") is not printed and is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. The reader marks three doubtful spots: पृछोदये for पृच्छोदये, भद्रङ्ग for भद्रं ग, and the crowded च्चु in गमनाच्चु. The sense taken is मम अत्र भद्रं गमनात् च तत्र वा, "good for me here, or from going there"; the doubled च्चु is not accounted for by that reading. [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 6.5x native, the page sets गमनात्तु and पृष्ठोदये, and भद्रङ्ग as the ङ्ग conjunct. Our text now carries all three as the page sets them. गमनात् तु is the ablative with तु that this note's sense already takes, so no doubled च्चु is left to account for; the sense of पृष्ठोदये is recorded as a doubt.]

प्रश्ने चतुर्थाधिपतिस्तत्रस्थे वावलोकिते ॥ अवश्यं वर्तते तत्र धनं चंद्रेऽथवा वदेत्

praśne caturthādhipatistatrasthe vāvalokite || avaśyaṃ vartate tatra dhanaṃ caṃdre'thavā vadet

In the question, if the lord of the 4th stands in that ⟨same 4th⟩ or looks at it, wealth is certainly present there; or one should say the same of the Moon.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रश्नेचतुर्थाधिपतिस्तत्रस्थेवावलोकिते ॥ अवश्यंवर्ततेतत्रधनंचंद्रेऽथवावदेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. The 4th (bandhu/hibuka) is the house of buried or stored wealth, which is what "there" means.

वित्तपे धनगे बंधौ वास्ति तत्र धनं बहु ॥ पापे तुर्यगते द्रव्यं स्थितं तूर्णं न लभ्यते

vittape dhanage baṃdhau vāsti tatra dhanaṃ bahu || pāpe turyagate dravyaṃ sthitaṃ tūrṇaṃ na labhyate

With the lord of wealth (the 2nd) in the 2nd (dhana) or in the 4th (bandhu), there is much wealth there. With a malefic gone to the 4th (turya), the goods that lie ⟨there⟩ are not got quickly.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वित्तपेधनगेबंधौवास्तितत्रधनं बहु ॥ पापेतुर्यगतेद्रव्यंस्थितंतूर्णंनलभ्यते

भौमे सप्ताष्टराशिस्थे धनमन्यत्र नाप्यते ॥ लग्ने तमो रविश्छिद्रे तदा द्रव्यं न लभ्यते ॥ सप्ताष्टदशपातालेशो विधुर्धनदो गुरुः

bhaume saptāṣṭarāśisthe dhanamanyatra nāpyate || lagne tamo raviśchidre tadā dravyaṃ na labhyate || saptāṣṭadaśapātāleśo vidhurdhanado guruḥ

With Mars standing in the 7th or the 8th sign, the wealth is not got anywhere else. ⟨With⟩ Rāhu (tamas) in the lagna and the Sun in the 8th (chidra), then the goods are not got ⟨at all⟩. The lords of the 7th, the 8th, the 10th and the 4th (pātāla), the Moon (vidhu) and Jupiter are the givers of wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भौमेसप्ताष्टराशिस्थेधनमन्यत्रनाप्यते ॥ लग्नेतमोरविच्छिद्रेतदाद्रव्यंनलभ्यते ॥ सप्ता ष्टदशपातालेशोविधुर्धनदोगुरुः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record runs to three half-lines under one number. The compound सप्ताष्टदशपातालेशो carries one -ईशः for all four houses; it is rendered as four lords.

लग्नेश्वरे द्यूनगते विलग्ने जायेश्वरे नष्टधनस्य लाभः ॥ जायेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाले द्यूने विनष्टं धनमेति मर्त्यः

lagneśvare dyūnagate vilagne jāyeśvare naṣṭadhanasya lābhaḥ || jāyeśalagnādhipatītthaśāle dyūne vinaṣṭaṃ dhanameti martyaḥ

With the lord of the lagna gone to the 7th (dyūna) and the lord of the 7th (jāyā) in the rising sign, there is the recovery of lost wealth. When the lord of the 7th and the lord of the lagna are in an itthaśāla in the 7th (dyūna), the man gets back the wealth that was lost.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश्वरेद्यूनगतेविलग्नेजायेश्वरेनष्टधनस्यलाभः ॥ जायेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशालेद्यूनेविनष्टंधनमेतिम र्त्यः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This begins the run on lost and stolen property (naṣṭa-dhana) that carries to the end of the unit.

लग्नेशजायाधिपतीत्थशाले लग्नेश्वरं यच्छति तस्करोऽर्थं ॥ सूर्ये विलग्नेऽस्तमिते शशांके न लभ्यते यद्द्रविणं विनष्टम्

lagneśajāyādhipatītthaśāle lagneśvaraṃ yacchati taskaro'rthaṃ || sūrye vilagne'stamite śaśāṃke na labhyate yaddraviṇaṃ vinaṣṭam

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (jāyā) are in an itthaśāla, the thief hands the goods over to the lord of the lagna ⟨that is, to the querent⟩. With the Sun in the rising sign and the Moon combust, the wealth that was lost is not got back.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशजायाधिपतीत्थशालेलग्नेश्वरंयच्छतितस्करोऽर्थं ॥ सूर्येविलग्नेऽस्तमितेशशांकेनलभ्यतेयद्द्रविणंविनष्टम्

40.82a reading here is contested

कर्मेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाले चौरः स्वमादाय पुरात्पलायते ॥ चंद्रेऽस्तपे चार्ककरप्रविष्टे तल्लभ्यते नष्टधनं सतस्करं

karmeśalagnādhipatītthaśāle cauraḥ svamādāya purātpalāyate || caṃdre'stape cārkakarapraviṣṭe tallabhyate naṣṭadhanaṃ sataskaraṃ

When the lord of the 10th and the lord of the lagna are in an itthaśāla, the thief takes the goods and flees the town. With the Moon and the lord of the 7th (asta) both entered into the Sun's rays, that lost wealth is got back together with the thief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कर्मेशल ग्नाधिपतीत्थशालेचौरःस्वमादायपुरात्पलायते ॥ चंद्रेऽस्तपेचार्ककरप्रविष्टेतलभ्यतेनष्टधनंसतस्करं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रविष्टेतलभ्यते"; alternatives "प्रविष्टेनलभ्यते", "प्रविष्टेतल्लभ्यते" — both the left and the right tile show a plain त before लभ्यते; the sense wants न or तत्. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: re-read on the master (F p.193 l.11, at about 3.6x and 4.3x native): the glyph after त is the stacked ल्ल, a full ल with a second ल-loop hanging below the baseline, not a plain त + ल. The page sets तल्लभ्यते, and the mūla now reads it; it is no longer kept as a single ल.]
  • About this edition: The page prints तलभ्यते. The reader zoomed it and found a single ल preceded by त, not न, and the same spelling on the next leaf; it is the press's way of setting तल्लभ्यते, "that is got". Rendered as "is got back". On the other alternative, नलभ्यते, the line would say the opposite: the wealth is NOT got. [2026-10-01: re-read on the master (F p.193 l.11, at about 3.6x and 4.3x native): the glyph after त is the stacked ल्ल, whose second ल hangs below the baseline; the same ligature on p.194 l.0 (verse 84) measures about 28 px below the baseline. The page sets तल्लभ्यते, and the mūla now reads it. The single-ल reading and the "press's way of setting" explanation are superseded.]

अस्तेश्वरे केंद्रगतेऽस्ति चौरस्तत्रैव वान्यत्र पुराद्विनिर्गतः ॥ धर्मेशदुश्चिक्यपतीत्थशाले जायेश्वरेऽन्यत्र गतः स चौरः

asteśvare keṃdragate'sti caurastatraiva vānyatra purādvinirgataḥ || dharmeśaduścikyapatītthaśāle jāyeśvare'nyatra gataḥ sa cauraḥ

With the lord of the 7th (asta) gone to a kendra, the thief is in that very place; otherwise he has left the town and is elsewhere. When the lord of the 7th (jāyā) is in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 9th (dharma) and the lord of the 3rd (duścikya), that thief has gone elsewhere.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तेश्वरेकेंद्रगतेऽस्तिचौरस्तत्रैव वान्यत्रपुराद्विनिर्गतः ॥ धर्मेशदुश्चिक्यपतीत्थशालेजायेश्वरेऽन्यत्रगतःसचौरः

40.84a reading here is contested

कर्मेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाले तल्लभ्यते राजकुलाच्चचौर्यं ॥ त्रिधर्मपद्यूनपतीत्थशाले त्वन्यप्रदेशाद्गमने तदाप्तिः

karmeśalagnādhipatītthaśāle tallabhyate rājakulāccacauryaṃ || tridharmapadyūnapatītthaśāle tvanyapradeśādgamane tadāptiḥ

When the lord of the 10th and the lord of the lagna are in an itthaśāla, that stolen property is got from the king's household. But when the lords of the 3rd and the 9th are in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 7th (dyūna), it is got from another region, upon going ⟨there⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कर्मेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशालेतलभ्यतेराजकुलाच्चौर्यं॥ त्रिधर्मपद्यूनपतीत्थशालेत्वन्यत्प्रदेशाद्भ्रमनेतदाप्तिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तलभ्यते"; alternatives "तल्लभ्यते", "नलभ्यते" — zoomed (p194_b): a single ल, and the letter before it is त, not न. The same spelling stands on page 193 line 12 (प्रविष्टेतलभ्यते), so it looks like the press's habit for तल्लभ्यते. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: re-read on the master (F p.194 l.0, at about 4.3x and 8.0x native): the page sets the stacked ल्ल, its lower loop measured down to y 373 against y 344–347 for the plain ल of शाले. The mūla now reads तल्लभ्यते. The "press's habit" reading is superseded.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भ्रमने"; alternatives "भ्रमणे" — zoomed (p194_c): the conjunct is द्भ्र and the following nasal is a dental न, not the retroflex ण the word wants. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: the master (F p.194 l.1, about 8.0x native) does set द्भ्रमने with a dental न, as the first reader found. The mūla is now emended to अन्यप्रदेशाद्गमने on the lexicon: भ्रमने breaks ṇatva, and अन्यत्- cannot compound with प्रदेश. The machine reads of the K, Pāṭhaka and Jhā printings give that form, and so does Pāṭhaka's own gloss. The press's reading is kept on the ledger.]
  • About this edition: तलभ्यते again, read as तल्लभ्यते (see verse 82). The page also prints भ्रमने with a dental न where भ्रमणे, "in wandering", wants the retroflex ण; the reader confirmed the dental at magnification. Rendered as "wandering"; the Sanskrit is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the page sets तल्लभ्यते with the stacked ल्ल (F p.194 l.0, read by eye at about 4.3x native), and the mūla now reads it. The page does set भ्रमने with a dental न (l.1, read by eye at about 8.0x native), but the Sanskrit is no longer left as printed: the mūla is emended on the lexicon to अन्यप्रदेशाद्गमने, 'upon going', and the press's अन्यत्प्रदेशाद्भ्रमने is kept on the ledger.]

शुभेत्थशाले हिमगौ विलग्ने खस्थेथवा नष्टधनस्य लाभः ॥ सुस्नेहदृष्ट्या रविणा शुभेन दृष्टे विलग्ने हिमगौ च लाभः

śubhetthaśāle himagau vilagne khasthethavā naṣṭadhanasya lābhaḥ || susnehadṛṣṭyā raviṇā śubhena dṛṣṭe vilagne himagau ca lābhaḥ

When the Moon (himagu, the cold-rayed) is in an itthaśāla with a benefic and stands in the rising sign or in the 10th (kha), there is the recovery of lost wealth. And when the rising sign and the Moon are looked at by the Sun or by a benefic with the affectionate aspect (su-sneha-dṛṣṭi), there is gain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभेत्थशालेहिमगौविलग्नेखस्थेथवानष्टधनस्यलाभः ॥ सुस्नेहदृष्ट्यारविणाशुभेनदृ ष्टेविलग्नेहिमगौचलाभः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The "affectionate aspect" is the friendly aspect of Tājika (the trine and sextile), named here by its quality rather than by its angle.

स्थिरोदये स्थिरांशे वा वर्गोत्तमगतेपि वा ॥ स्थितं तत्रैव तद्द्रव्यं स्वकीयेनैव चोरितम्

sthirodaye sthirāṃśe vā vargottamagatepi vā || sthitaṃ tatraiva taddravyaṃ svakīyenaiva coritam

With a fixed sign rising, or a fixed aṃśa, or ⟨the lagna⟩ gone to a vargottama, that property is still in that very place, and it was stolen by one of ⟨the owner's⟩ own people.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्थिरोदयेस्थिरांशेवावर्गोत्तमगतेपिवा ॥ स्थितंतत्रैवतद्द्रव्यंस्वकीयेनैवचोरितम्

आदिमध्यावसानेषु द्रेष्काणेषु विलग्नतः ॥ द्वारदेशे तथा मध्ये गृहांते च वदेद्धनम्

ādimadhyāvasāneṣu dreṣkāṇeṣu vilagnataḥ || dvāradeśe tathā madhye gṛhāṃte ca vadeddhanam

According as ⟨the rising point falls⟩ in the first, the middle or the last of the drekkāṇas reckoned from the lagna, one should declare the wealth to be at the doorway, in the middle ⟨of the house⟩, or at the back of the house.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आदिमध्यावसानेषुद्रेष्काणेषुविलग्नतः॥ द्वारदेशेतथामध्येगृहांतेचवदेद्धनम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: A drekkāṇa is a third of a sign, 10°. The three drekkāṇas map to the three parts of the house in the same order.

पतितधनस्थप्रश्ने मिथो गृहस्थौ विलग्नसप्तेशौ ॥ यदि मुथशिलं तयोः स्यात्तदाशु तत्रैव वदति धनम्

patitadhanasthapraśne mitho gṛhasthau vilagnasapteśau || yadi muthaśilaṃ tayoḥ syāttadāśu tatraiva vadati dhanam

In a question about where dropped ⟨lost⟩ wealth is: if the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th stand in each other's houses, and a muthaśila is formed between the two, then one declares the wealth to be in that very place, and soon ⟨found⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पतितधनस्थप्रश्नेमिथोगृहस्थौविलग्नसप्तमेशौ ॥ य दिमुथशिलंतयोःस्यात्तदाशुतत्रैववदतिधनम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: मिथो गृहस्थौ is the mutual exchange of houses (parivartana): each lord stands in the other's sign. The muthaśila must hold as well as the exchange — both are required here, not alternatives.
40.89a reading here is contested

नष्टं क्व दिशि प्राप्तं पृच्छायां लग्नगे विधौ प्राच्यां ॥ तत्स्थाने याम्यायामस्ते वारुण्यां वा भुव्युदीच्यां

naṣṭaṃ kva diśi prāptaṃ pṛcchāyāṃ lagnage vidhau prācyāṃ || tatsthāne yāmyāyāmaste vāruṇyāṃ vā bhuvyudīcyāṃ

"In which direction will the lost thing be found?" — in the question, with the Moon in the lagna, in the east; in that place ⟨by the sequence, the 10th⟩, in the south; in the 7th (asta), in the west; or on the earth (bhū, the 4th), in the north.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नष्टंकदिशिप्राप्तंपृच्छायांलग्नगेविधौपाच्यां ॥ तत्स्थानेयाम्यायामस्तेवारुण्यांवाशुन्युदी च्यां

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधौपाच्यां"; alternatives "विधौप्राच्यां" — both the left and the right tile show पा with no repha; the direction list wants प्राच्यां. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: refuted on the master (F p.194 l.4, read by eye at about 2.1x to 3.5x native): the akṣara after विधौ is प्रा, in this fount's form of प्र, a प with a slanting stroke, as in प्रश्नतंत्रे on line 3. The page sets विधौप्राच्यां, and the mūla now reads विधौ प्राच्यां.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाशुन्युदी"; alternatives "वाव्योम्न्युदी", "वाशून्युदी" — zoomed (p194_d): after वा I read a श with a ु hook, then a न with a subscript य and a ु, then दी, which runs into च्यां on line 6. The reading is not settled; the sense wants a word for the tenth place before उदीच्यां. [2026-10-01: refuted on the master (F p.194 ll.4–5, read by eye at about 2.1x to 3.5x native): after वा the page sets भु, which matches stroke for stroke the भु of the press's own in-line gloss भुविचतुर्थे on line 5, and then व्यु; not शु and न्यु, and not व्योम्नि. The mūla now reads वा भुव्युदीच्यां, 'or on the earth (the 4th), in the north'.]
  • About this edition: The run is the four kendras against the four directions, which fixes the second and fourth members. But the page does not print them cleanly: the second is printed तत्स्थाने, "in that place", where the 4th is required, and the fourth word is unsettled on the plate — the reader read वाशुन्यु and offers वाव्योम्नि (व्योमन्, "sky", a name for the 10th), which the sequence needs. The east is printed पाच्यां without the repha, for प्राच्यां. [2026-10-01: the master (F p.194 ll.4–5, read by eye at about 2.1x to 3.5x native) sets प्राच्यां with the repha and वाभुव्युदीच्यां, and glosses the word in line भुविचतुर्थे, 'on the earth, that is the 4th'. The mūla now reads प्राच्यां and भुवि. So the fourth member is settled on the plate: the 4th goes with the north, and वाव्योम्नि is refuted. With the 4th in the north, the second member needs the 10th, not the 4th. The page sets it तत्स्थाने (read at about 2.1x native), our text keeps it, and the split with the later printings' खस्थाने is recorded as a doubt. The page also sets कदिशि (read at about 3.1x native); the mūla is emended on the lexicon to क्व दिशि, and the page's form is kept on the ledger.]

यदि नेंदुः केंद्रे तच्चत्वारिंशांशकैश्च पंचयुतैः । भागे दिक्क्रम उक्तो वह्न्यवनीवायुवारिराशौ वा

yadi neṃduḥ keṃdre taccatvāriṃśāṃśakaiśca paṃcayutaiḥ | bhāge dikkrama ukto vahnyavanīvāyuvārirāśau vā

If the Moon is not in a kendra, then ⟨the direction is taken⟩ by parts of forty increased by five — that is, of 45° each; the order of the directions is stated by that division. Or ⟨it may be taken⟩ from the sign being one of fire, of earth, of air or of water.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिनेंदुःकेंद्रेतच्चत्वारिंशांशकैश्चपंचयुतैः।भागेदिक्क्रमउक्तोवन्ह्यवनीवायुवारिराशौवा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: चत्वारिंश + पंचयुतैः is a number given in words: forty plus five, so 45°. Eight arcs of 45° fill the circle and give the eight directions. वा is "or": the element of the sign is an alternative method, not an added condition.

नष्टवीतवित्तलब्धेः पृच्छायां चौरसप्तमं ततो लाभः ॥ हिबुकं द्रव्यस्थानं लग्नं चंद्रश्च धननाथः

naṣṭavītavittalabdheḥ pṛcchāyāṃ caurasaptamaṃ tato lābhaḥ || hibukaṃ dravyasthānaṃ lagnaṃ caṃdraśca dhananāthaḥ

In a question about recovering wealth lost and gone: the 7th is the thief, and the recovery is read from it. The 4th (hibuka) is the place where the goods are; the lagna, the Moon and the lord of the 2nd ⟨stand for the owner and what is his⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नष्टवीतवित्तलब्धेःपृ च्छायांचौरसप्तमंततोलाभः॥ हिबुकंद्रव्यस्थानंलग्नंचंद्रश्चधननाथः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse assigns the significators and does not say what each yields; the closing phrase "stand for the owner and what is his" is supplied from the assignment, not printed.

लग्नेशोऽस्तेस्तपतिना चेन्मुथशिली ततो लाभः । यद्यष्टेशो लग्ने तदा स्वयं तस्करोऽर्पयति ॥ रविरश्मिगे धनेशे वास्तमिते तस्करस्य लाभः स्यात्

lagneśo'stestapatinā cenmuthaśilī tato lābhaḥ | yadyaṣṭeśo lagne tadā svayaṃ taskaro'rpayati || raviraśmige dhaneśe vāstamite taskarasya lābhaḥ syāt

If the lord of the lagna, in the 7th (asta), is in a muthaśila with the lord of the 7th, the recovery follows from that. And if the lord of the 8th stands in the lagna, then the thief hands it over of his own accord. With the lord of the 2nd gone into the Sun's rays, or combust, the gain falls to the thief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशोऽस्तेस्तपतिनाचेन्मुथशिलीततोलाभः।यद्दृष्टेशोलग्नेतदास्वयं तस्करोऽर्पयति ॥ रविरश्मिगेधनेशेवास्तमितेतस्करस्यलाभःस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record runs to three parts under one number; the page divides the first two with a single daṇḍa. "The gain falls to the thief" is the flat sense of तस्करस्य लाभः स्यात् — the owner does not get the property back.
40.93a reading here is contested

लग्नेशदशमपत्योर्मुथशिलतः प्राप्यते स्ववान्चौरः ॥ लग्नेशदृष्ट्यभावे चौरः सहमात्रयायाति

lagneśadaśamapatyormuthaśilataḥ prāpyate svavāncauraḥ || lagneśadṛṣṭyabhāve cauraḥ sahamātrayāyāti

From a muthaśila between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 10th, the thief is caught together with the goods. Where the lord of the lagna's aspect is absent, the thief goes off with the property.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशदशमपत्योर्मुथशिलतःप्राप्यतेस्ववान्चौरः ॥ लग्नेशदृष्ट्यभावे चौरःसहमात्रयायाति

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्ववान्चौरः"; alternatives "स्वंवानचौरः", "स्ववान्नचौरः" — read as printed from both tiles; the word division is not obvious and the virāma on न् is small
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle the word division at स्ववान्चौरः. Read as स्ववान् चौरः, "the thief possessing the goods", which is what is rendered. On the reader's alternative स्ववान् न चौरः the line says the opposite about half of it — the goods are recovered but the thief is not caught. In the second half सहमात्रया is taken as सह मात्रया, "with the property" (mātrā in the sense of goods); it is not the Tājika term sahama.
40.94a reading here is contested

अस्ताधिपतौ दग्धे रविरश्मिगतेऽथ लभ्यते चौरः ॥ लग्नपकृतेत्थशाले राजभयाद्धनमिदं स्वयं दत्ते

astādhipatau dagdhe raviraśmigate'tha labhyate cauraḥ || lagnapakṛtetthaśāle rājabhayāddhanamidaṃ svayaṃ datte

With the lord of the 7th (asta) burnt, gone into the Sun's rays, the thief is then caught. When the lord of the lagna has formed an itthaśāla ⟨with the lord of the 7th⟩, he gives this wealth back of his own accord, out of fear of the king.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्ताधिपतौदुग्धेरविरश्मिगतेऽथलभ्यतेचौरः॥ लग्ननृपप्रकृतेत्थशालेराजभयाद्धनमिदंस्वयंदत्ते

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुग्धे"; alternatives "दग्धे" — a small stroke under द reads as ु; with रविरश्मिगते following, the sense wants दग्धे. Not zoomed — the four zooms for this page were spent elsewhere. [2026-10-01: read by eye on the master (F p.194 l.8) at about 3.5x native, the 1893 leaf sets दग्धे, with no ु under the द: the rows under it hold no ink. The earlier reader took the द's tail for a ु, and the mūla now reads दग्धे.]
  • About this edition: The page prints दुग्धे; the word is दग्धे, "burnt", which रविरश्मिगते ("gone into the Sun's rays") in the same line confirms. The reader flags the stroke under द and notes the page was not zoomed. Rendered as "burnt". [2026-10-01: read by eye on the master (F p.194 l.8) at about 3.5x native, the 1893 leaf sets दग्धे, with no ु under the द. The earlier reader took the द's tail for a ु, and the mūla now reads दग्धे.]

लग्नास्तपयोर्न स्याद्यदि दृष्टिर्लग्नपस्तथा विकलः ॥ तत्तस्करोस्य हस्ताद्ददाति चौर्यं हि राजकुले

lagnāstapayorna syādyadi dṛṣṭirlagnapastathā vikalaḥ || tattaskarosya hastāddadāti cauryaṃ hi rājakule

If there is no aspect between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (asta), and the lord of the lagna is crippled besides, then the thief does give the stolen goods out of his own hand — but in the king's court.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्ना स्तपयोर्नस्याद्यदिदृष्टिर्लग्नपस्तथाविकलः॥ तत्तस्करोस्यहस्ताद्ददातिचौर्यंहिराजकुले

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: विकल is "crippled, defective" — a graha without strength; rendered flat. हि in the last quarter is read as marking the contrast: the goods come back, but only through the court.

लग्नपमध्यपयोगे राजकुलं प्राप्य लभ्यते चौर्यम् ॥ रंध्रं चौरस्य धनं धनपे तत्राथ सप्तमेनाप्तिः

lagnapamadhyapayoge rājakulaṃ prāpya labhyate cauryam || raṃdhraṃ caurasya dhanaṃ dhanape tatrātha saptamenāptiḥ

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 10th (madhya) are in yoga, the stolen goods are got after reaching the king's court. The 8th (randhra) is the thief's wealth: with the lord of the ⟨owner's⟩ 2nd standing there, or in the 7th, there is no recovery.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपमध्यपयोगेराजकुलंप्राप्यलभ्यतेचौर्यम् ॥ रंध्रंचौरस्यधनंधनपेतत्राथसप्तमेनाप्तिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सप्तमेनाप्तिः is read as सप्तमे न आप्तिः, "in the seventh, no recovery" — the only division the sandhi allows besides सप्तमेन आप्तिः ("recovery through the seventh"), which would reverse the result. The negative is taken because the 8th is the thief's 2nd: the owner's money-lord standing in the thief's house of wealth means the property has become the thief's.

रंध्रपतौ धनपस्य तु मुथशिलयोगे च प्राप्यते वित्तं ॥ रंध्रपतौ दशमपतेर्मुथशिलगे चौरपक्षकृद्भूपः ॥ धनपे विलग्नपे सति दृष्टिविहीने श्रुतिर्भवति नाप्तिः

raṃdhrapatau dhanapasya tu muthaśilayoge ca prāpyate vittaṃ || raṃdhrapatau daśamapatermuthaśilage caurapakṣakṛdbhūpaḥ || dhanape vilagnape sati dṛṣṭivihīne śrutirbhavati nāptiḥ

When the lord of the 8th (randhra) comes into a muthaśila-yoga with the lord of the 2nd, the wealth is got back. When the lord of the 8th goes into a muthaśila with the lord of the 10th, the king takes the thief's side. With the lord of the 2nd and the lord of the lagna both standing without any aspect, there is news ⟨of the goods⟩ and no recovery.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रंध्रपतौधनपस्यतुमुथशिलयोगेचप्राप्यतेवित्तं ॥ रंध्रपतौदशमपतेर्मुथशिलगेचौरपक्षकृद्भूपः ॥ धनपेविलग्नपेसतिदृष्टिविहीनेश्रुतिर्भवतिनाप्तिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record runs to three half-lines under one number. श्रुतिः is "hearing, report": the owner learns where the goods are but does not get them.

चौरज्ञानप्रश्ने लग्नरविशशिदृशा स्वगृहचौरः ॥ अनयोरेकदृशा गृहसमीपवर्ती वसत्येषः

caurajñānapraśne lagnaraviśaśidṛśā svagṛhacauraḥ || anayorekadṛśā gṛhasamīpavartī vasatyeṣaḥ

In a question to identify the thief: by the aspect holding between the lagna, the Sun and the Moon, the thief belongs to the house itself. By the aspect of only one of these two ⟨the Sun and the Moon⟩, he is someone living near the house.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चौरज्ञानप्रश्नेलग्नरविशशिदृशास्वगृहचौरः ॥ अनयोरेकदशागृहसमीपवर्तीवसत्येषः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: अनयोरेकदशा is read as अनयोः एक-दशा, "the condition of one of these two", the two being the Sun and the Moon just named. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads अनयोरेकदृशा; this sentence names अनयोरेकदशा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.99a reading here is contested

लग्नस्थे लग्नपतावस्तपयुक्ते च गृहगतश्चौरः ॥ अस्ताधिपतावंत्ये सहजे वा स्वीयभृत्योऽयम्

lagnasthe lagnapatāvastapayukte ca gṛhagataścauraḥ || astādhipatāvaṃtye sahaje vā svīyabhṛtyo'yam

With the lord of the lagna standing in the lagna and joined with the lord of the 7th (asta), the thief is inside the house. With the lord of the 7th (asta) in the 12th (antya) or in the 3rd (sahaja), this ⟨thief⟩ is one's own servant.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नस्थेलग्नपतावस्तपयुक्तेचगृहगतश्चौरः ॥ अस्ताधिपतावंत्येसहजेवास्वीयभृत्योऽयम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गतश्चौरः"; alternatives "गतश्शौरः" — the conjunct after गत has a half-श joined to a second letter carrying the ौ mātrā; at 4x the second letter is च (the same shape as the free-standing च two akṣaras earlier in युक्तेचगृह), giving the ordinary sandhi गतः+चौरः. Read श्शौ at 1.5x.
  • About this edition: The reader resolved गतश्चौरः at magnification as गतः + चौरः, the ordinary sandhi, against a first reading of गतश्शौरः. Rendered on that resolution.
40.100a reading here is contested

अस्तेशे तुंगस्थे स्वगृहे वा तस्करः प्रसिद्धः स्यात् ॥ लग्नदशमास्तभावाः क्रमेण वीक्ष्याः स्वतुंगभवनादौ

asteśe tuṃgasthe svagṛhe vā taskaraḥ prasiddhaḥ syāt || lagnadaśamāstabhāvāḥ krameṇa vīkṣyāḥ svatuṃgabhavanādau

With the lord of the 7th (asta) standing in its exaltation, or in its own house, the thief will be a man of standing. The lagna, the 10th and the 7th (asta) bhāvas are to be examined in order, ⟨as they fall⟩ in a graha's own exaltation, its own house and so on.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तेशेतुंगस्थेस्वगृहेवातस्करःप्रसि द्धःस्यात् ॥ लग्नदशमास्तभावाःक्रमेणवीक्ष्याःस्वतुंगभवनादौ

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अस्तेशेतुंगस्थे"; alternatives "अस्तेशेंतुंगस्थे" — cannot settle whether a dot stands over शे; the तुं anusvāra immediately after is certain.
  • About this edition: प्रसिद्ध is "well known, of repute" — the thief is not a stranger but a person of some standing. The reader could not settle whether a dot stands over शे in अस्तेशे; on either reading the word is the lord of the 7th.

इत्थं चौरज्ञाने चौरः सूर्ये गृहेश्वरस्य पिता ॥ चंद्रे माता शुक्रे भार्या मंदे सुतो भवेन्नीचे

itthaṃ caurajñāne cauraḥ sūrye gṛheśvarasya pitā || caṃdre mātā śukre bhāryā maṃde suto bhavennīce

Thus, in the discernment of the thief: with the Sun ⟨as the indicator⟩ the thief is the father of the master of the house ⟨our mūla now reads गृहेश्वर, 'master of the house', where it once read ग्रहेश्वर⟩; with the Moon, the mother; with Venus, the wife; with Saturn, a son — ⟨or⟩ a man of low standing (nīca).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इत्थंचौरज्ञानेचौरःसूर्येग्रहेश्वरस्य पिता ॥ चंद्रेमाताशुक्रेभार्यामंदेसुतोभवेन्नीचे

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १ within its section; it is published at position 101.
  • About this edition: Two places where my rendering does not follow the printed word, and neither has been changed in the Sanskrit. (1) ग्रहेश्वरस्य: the run of household relations, and v.102's गृहप्रधान ('head of the house'), require गृहेश्वरस्य, 'of the master of the house'. (2) भवेन्नीचे: नीचे is a locative with nothing to govern it, while every other member of the list (पिता, माता, भार्या, सुतः) is nominative, so I read नीचः, 'a low-born man'. Kept as printed, the word would mean 'when ⟨the graha stands⟩ in its debilitation (nīca)', which leaves the sentence without a predicate. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गृहेश्वरस्य; this sentence names ग्रहेश्वरस्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.102a reading here is contested

जीवे गृहप्रधानं भौमे पुत्रोथवा भ्राता ॥ ज्ञे स्वजनो मित्रं वा ज्ञात्वेत्थं पुण्यसहममावेश्यं

jīve gṛhapradhānaṃ bhaume putrothavā bhrātā || jñe svajano mitraṃ vā jñātvetthaṃ puṇyasahamamāveśyaṃ

With Jupiter, the head of the household; with Mars, a son or a brother; with Mercury, one's own kinsman or a friend. Having discerned ⟨the thief⟩ in this way, the puṇya-sahama (the Tājika lot of merit) is to be brought in ⟨and examined next⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवेगृहप्रधानंभौमेपुत्रोथवाभ्राता ॥ ज्ञेस्वजनोमित्रंवाज्ञात्वेत्थंपुण्यसहममावेश्यं

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुण्यसहममावेश्यं"; alternatives "पुण्यसहममावेंश्यं", "पुण्यसहममावेद्यं" — line-final, up against the right rule. सहम (the Tājika sahama) is certain; the last two akṣaras carry what looks like an anusvāra over वे and I cannot settle श्यं against द्यं. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): वें → वे: above the headline of this word there are exactly two marks: the े tick over the व (x3101-3128) and a clean symmetric diamond (x3177-3187) that stands over the final श्यं; nothing sits over वे but its own े
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २ within its section; it is published at position 102.
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle the last two akṣaras. आवेश्यं as read gives 'is to be brought in'; the alternative आवेद्यं would give 'is to be declared'. The sahama is the next thing the text turns to either way, which v.103's तस्मिन् ('in that') confirms.
40.103a reading here is contested

तस्मिन् क्रूरादृष्टे पुरा न चौरो ऽस्तपे पुरापि स्यात् ॥ अस्तेशान् मूसरिफे भौमे चौरः पुरापि निगृहीतः

tasmin krūrādṛṣṭe purā na cauro 'stape purāpi syāt || asteśān mūsariphe bhaume cauraḥ purāpi nigṛhītaḥ

When that ⟨puṇya-sahama⟩ is not aspected by a malefic, ⟨the man⟩ was no thief before; with the lord of the 7th (astapa) ⟨aspecting it⟩, he may have been one before as well. When Mars is in mūsaripha (the separating aspect) from the lord of the 7th, the thief has been seized before too.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तस्मिन्क्रूरादृष्टेपुरानचौरोऽस्तपेपुरापिस्यात् ॥ अस्तेशान्मूसरिफेभौमेचौरःपुरापिनिगृहीतः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूसरिफे" — not a doubt about the ink — recorded because मूसरिफ (mūsarripha) is a Perso-Arabic Tājika term and a later reader may take it for a misprint. The akṣaras are unambiguous.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३ within its section; it is published at position 103.
  • About this edition: मूसरिफ is the Tājika separating aspect, Perso-Arabic in origin and not a misprint; the plate reader recorded the spelling for that reason.

सप्तेशे रविपुत्रे चंद्रदृशा तस्करो हि पाखंडी ॥ जीवो विलोक्य लोकं भौमे खातेन पालकं भक्त्या

sapteśe raviputre caṃdradṛśā taskaro hi pākhaṃḍī || jīvo vilokya lokaṃ bhaume khātena pālakaṃ bhaktyā

With Saturn (ravi-putra, the Sun's son) as lord of the 7th, and by the Moon's aspect, the thief is a pāṣaṇḍin — a man in the dress of a sect. Jupiter ⟨shows one who⟩ surveys the people ⟨first⟩; with Mars, ⟨he enters⟩ by a breach dug ⟨through the wall⟩, ⟨and wins⟩ the keeper by ⟨a show of⟩ devotion.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सप्तेशेरविपुत्रेचंद्रदृशातस्क रोहिपाखंडी ॥ जीवोविलोक्यलोकंभौमेखातेनपालकंभक्त्या

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४ within its section; it is published at position 104.
  • About this edition: The second half is elliptical as printed: जीवः stands in the nominative beside the locative भौमे and no finite verb is set, so every link in ⟨ ⟩ is supplied and the construction is not certain. खात is the tunnel or breach a house-breaker digs through a wall.
40.105a reading here is contested

प्रतिकुंचिकयापहृतं सिते तिथिर् ज्ञे प्रपंचकरः ॥ चौरस्य वयोज्ञाने सिते युवा ज्ञे शिशुर् गुरौ मध्यः

pratikuṃcikayāpahṛtaṃ site tithir jñe prapaṃcakaraḥ || caurasya vayojñāne site yuvā jñe śiśur gurau madhyaḥ

⟨What was⟩ carried off was taken with a duplicate key (pratikuñcikā). With Venus ⟨the thief is⟩ a guest — atithi; the page prints तिथि, without the initial अ — and with Mercury, a spinner of fraud. In discerning the thief's age: with Venus he is a young man, with Mercury a child, with Jupiter middle-aged.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रतिकुंचिकयापहृतंसितेतिथिर्ज्ञेप्रपंचकरः ॥ चौरस्यवयोज्ञानेसितेयु वाज्ञेशिशुर्गुरौमध्यः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितेतिथिर्ज्ञे"; alternatives "सितेऽतिथिर्ज्ञे", "सितेतिथिर्घे" — read at 5x: सि ते ति थि, then a repha over a ज्ञ-ligature with what may be an anusvāra. No avagraha is printed. The sense wanted by the surrounding list (सिते … ज्ञे प्रपंचकरः) is अतिथि, but nothing in the ink supplies the अ. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): ज्ञें → ज्ञे: two marks stand over the ज्ञ and neither is an anusvāra: a straight diagonal tick (the े, the same glyph as the े of ते three akṣaras earlier) and the repha, a wedge whose leg drops to the headline; the anusvāra of पं four akṣaras later is a symmetric diamond floating clear of the headline
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितेयु" — line-final; joins line 7's वा as सिते युवा, which the following ज्ञे शिशुः confirms.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५ within its section; it is published at position 105.
  • About this edition: The reader read सिते तिथिर्ज्ञे at 5x and found no avagraha and no initial अ. The list wants अतिथि, 'a guest', and that is what I render, saying so in the English. The Sanskrit is left as printed.
40.106a reading here is contested

तरुणो भौमे मंदे वृद्धोर्के स्यादतिस्थविरः ॥ रविनभयोः स्वमंदिरे स्मरभूमिलग्नयोर् मध्यं

taruṇo bhaume maṃde vṛddhorke syādatisthaviraḥ || ravinabhayoḥ svamaṃdire smarabhūmilagnayor madhyaṃ

With Mars ⟨he is⟩ a young man; with Saturn, old; with the Sun he will be extremely aged. When the Sun and the ⟨lord of the⟩ nabha (the 10th, the sky) stand in their own house, ⟨the age is⟩ the mean between what the smara (7th) and the lagna ⟨give⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तरुणोभौमेमंदेवृद्धोर्केस्यादतिस्थविरः ॥ रविनभयोःस्वमंदिरेस्मरभूमिलग्नयोर्मध्यं

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृद्धोर्केस्याद"; alternatives "वृद्धोर्कैस्याद" — repha plus क with either one or two strokes above; ai and e are hard to separate where a repha sits over the same letter. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): र्कै → र्के: the क carries exactly ONE diagonal tick (x1464-1488) plus the repha hook (x1488-1499); ै would need a second tick, and the only other diagonal in the neighbourhood (x1431-1456) is the ो of the preceding धो
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविनभयोः"; alternatives "रविनमयोः" — भ against म.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६ within its section; it is published at position 106.
  • About this edition: The second half sets no verb, so the links in ⟨ ⟩ are supplied and the construction is not certain. नभ is taken as the 10th house (the sky, kha); this chapter uses ख for the 10th at v.142. The reader could not separate भ from म in रविनभयोः; रविनमयोः would leave the word without a sense I can give.
40.107a reading here is contested

चरतिरवौ नवमध्यमवृद्धवयोतीतकाः क्रमशः ॥ नष्टस्थाने प्रश्ने तुर्ये भूम्यग्निवायुजलमध्यात्

caratiravau navamadhyamavṛddhavayotītakāḥ kramaśaḥ || naṣṭasthāne praśne turye bhūmyagnivāyujalamadhyāt

— new, middle, old and past-age, in that order. In a question about the place of a lost thing, ⟨judge⟩ from the 4th (turya), from among earth, fire, air and water —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चरतिरवौनवमध्य मवृद्धवयोतीतकाःक्रमशः ॥ नष्टस्थानेप्रश्नेतुर्येभूम्यग्निवायुजलमध्यात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरतिरवौनवमध्य" — letters certain at 4x (च र ति र वौ न व म ध्य); the WORD DIVISION is not. It may be चरति रवौ or चर तिरवौ. Recorded exactly as set.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७ within its section; it is published at position 107.
  • About this edition: The record's first word चरतिरवौ is left undivided. The reader found its akṣaras certain (च र ति र वौ) and the word division not: it may be चरति रवौ, 'when the Sun moves', or चर तिरवौ. The sentence is left open at the end of this record; its main clause stands in the next. Nothing has been pulled across.
40.108a reading here is contested

यो भवति राशिरस्मात् स्थानं ज्ञेयं गतधनस्य ॥ अथ चतुर्थगृहे तुर्येश्वरोथ यः स्याद् ग्रहस् ततो ज्ञेयम्

yo bhavati rāśirasmāt sthānaṃ jñeyaṃ gatadhanasya || atha caturthagṛhe turyeśvarotha yaḥ syād grahas tato jñeyam

— whichever sign arises from this, that is to be known as the place of the lost wealth. Now the fourth house: the lord of the 4th (turyeśvara), and whatever graha stands ⟨there⟩ — from that it is to be known.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

योभवतिराशिरस्मात्स्थानंज्ञेयंगतधनस्य ॥ अथचतुर्थगृहे तुर्येश्वरोथयःस्याद्ग्रहस्ततोज्ञेयम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अथचतुर्थगृहे"; alternatives "अथचतुर्थेगृहे" — line-final, against the right rule. This अथ… is a topic announcement inside a numbered run, not a chapter heading — the numbering does not restart at it.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८ within its section; it is published at position 108.
  • About this edition: The first half completes the sentence begun in the previous record; the link is supplied and is not printed here. The अथ opening the second half announces a topic inside a numbered run, not a chapter.
40.109a reading here is contested

मंदे मलिनस्थाने चंद्रेंबुनि गीष्पतौ सुरारामे ॥ भौमे वह्निसमीपे रवौ गृहाधीश्वरासनस्थाने

maṃde malinasthāne caṃdreṃbuni gīṣpatau surārāme || bhaume vahnisamīpe ravau gṛhādhīśvarāsanasthāne

With Saturn, in a dirty place; with the Moon, in water; with Jupiter (gīṣpati), in a temple grove (surārāma, the gods' pleasure-garden); with Mars, near fire; with the Sun, in the seat where the master of the house sits.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेमलिनस्थानेचंद्रेंबुनिगीष्पतौसुरारामे ॥ भौमेवह्निसमीपेरवौगृहाधीश्वरासनस्थाने

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रेंबुनिगीष्पतौ"; alternatives "चंद्रेंबुनिर्गीष्पतौ" — at 1.5x a repha seems to stand over गी; at 4x that mark is the ī-mātrā of गी and there is no repha.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९ within its section; it is published at position 109.
40.110a reading here is contested

तल्पे शुक्रे सौम्ये पुस्तकवित्तान्नयानपार्श्वे च ॥ चौरोयमथ न वेति क्रूरेंदोर् मुथशिले च चौरः स्यात्

talpe śukre saumye pustakavittānnayānapārśve ca || cauroyamatha na veti krūreṃdor muthaśile ca cauraḥ syāt

With Venus, on a bed (talpa); with Mercury, beside books, money, food or a vehicle. ⟨In the question⟩ 'is this man a thief or not': when a malefic is in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with the Moon, he is a thief.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त ल्पेशुक्रेसौम्येपुस्तकवित्तान्नयानपार्श्वेच ॥ चौरोयमथनवेतिक्रूरेंदोर्मुथशिलेचचौ रःस्यात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्तान्नयान"; alternatives "वित्तान्न्यान" — settled at 4x: त्ता then न्न (न over न) then या.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्तान्नयान"; alternatives "वित्तान्न्यान" — settled at 4x: त्ता then न्न (न over न) then या.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १० within its section; it is published at position 110.
  • About this edition: तल्पे opens the record with no graha of its own; it belongs to शुक्रे, which follows it, and continues the list of places begun in v.109.
40.111a reading here is contested

सौम्यशशिमुथशिले खलु न भवति चौरः प्रवक्तव्यम् ॥ किमनेन तस्करत्वं कदापि विहितं न वेति पृच्छायाम्

saumyaśaśimuthaśile khalu na bhavati cauraḥ pravaktavyam || kimanena taskaratvaṃ kadāpi vihitaṃ na veti pṛcchāyām

When Mercury and the Moon are in a muthaśila, he is certainly not ⟨a thief⟩: 'no thief' is what is to be declared — in the question 'has this man ever committed a theft or not?'

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सौम्यशशिमुथशिलेखलुनभवतिचौरःप्रवक्तव्यम् ॥ किमनेनतस्करत्वंकदापिविहितंनवेतिपृच्छायाम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिले" — recorded, not doubted: मुथशिल (muthaśila) is the Tājika ithaśāla-type yoga, not a misprint.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ११ within its section; it is published at position 111.
40.112a reading here is contested

लग्नपशशिनोरेकस्मादपि मूसरिफे ऽस्तपे विहितं ॥ चौरः स्त्री पुरुषो वा पृच्छायामस्तपे स्त्रियो राशौ

lagnapaśaśinorekasmādapi mūsariphe 'stape vihitaṃ || cauraḥ strī puruṣo vā pṛcchāyāmastape striyo rāśau

When there is a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) of the lord of the lagna and the Moon — from either one of the two — with the lord of the 7th (astapa), the theft has been committed. ⟨Whether⟩ the thief is a woman or a man: in the question, ⟨if⟩ the lord of the 7th is in a female sign —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नप शशिनोरेकस्मादपिमूसरिफेऽस्तपेविहितं ॥ चौरःस्त्रीपुरुषोवापृच्छायामस्तपेस्त्रियोराशौ

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूसरिफेऽस्तपे"; alternatives "मूसरिफेस्तपे" — an avagraha IS inked here — checked at 4x; it is the only avagraha on the line.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १२ within its section; it is published at position 112.
  • About this edition: The sentence is left open at the end of this record; its conclusion stands in the next. Nothing has been pulled across. The avagraha of मूसरिफेऽस्तपे is inked on the plate and the reader checked it at 4x.
40.113a reading here is contested

स्त्रीखेटे स्त्रीदृष्टे चौरः स्त्री व्यत्ययात् पुरुषः ॥ लग्नेशेन नवमांशतो वयःप्रमाणजातयो ज्ञेयाः ॥

strīkheṭe strīdṛṣṭe cauraḥ strī vyatyayāt puruṣaḥ || lagneśena navamāṃśato vayaḥpramāṇajātayo jñeyāḥ ||

— ⟨or⟩ is a female graha, ⟨or⟩ is aspected by a female ⟨graha⟩, the thief is a woman; by the reverse, a man. From the lord of the lagna and from the navāṃśa, the age, the stature and the caste ⟨of the thief⟩ are to be known.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्रीखेटेस्त्रीदृष्टेचौरःस्त्रीव्यत्ययात्पुरुषः ॥ लग्नेशेननवमांशतोवयःप्रमाणजातयोज्ञेयाः ॥

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रीदृष्टे"; alternatives "स्त्रीदृष्ट्टे" — ष्ट against ष्ट्ट; last line of the page and the ink is slightly heavier here.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १३ within its section; it is published at position 113.
  • About this edition: The first half completes the condition begun in the previous record; the link ⟨or⟩ is supplied and is not printed here.

लग्नेश्वरेणाथ निशाकरेण यदीत्थशालं कुरुते सुतेशः ॥ शुभः शुभैः संयुत ईक्षितः स्यात् ससंततिं प्रष्टुरसौ विदध्यात्

lagneśvareṇātha niśākareṇa yadītthaśālaṃ kurute suteśaḥ || śubhaḥ śubhaiḥ saṃyuta īkṣitaḥ syāt sasaṃtatiṃ praṣṭurasau vidadhyāt

If the lord of the 5th (suteśa) makes an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with the lord of the lagna, or with the Moon (niśākara), and is himself benefic, joined with benefics and aspected ⟨by them⟩, then he will give the querent offspring.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश्वरेणाथनिशा करणयदीत्थशालंकुरुतेसुतेशः ॥ शुभःशुभैःसंयुतईक्षितःस्यात्ससंततिंप्रष्टुरसौविदध्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १४ within its section; it is published at position 114.
  • About this edition: निशाकरण as printed has no ए and so is not an instrumental. निशाकरेण, 'with the Moon', is what the sentence requires beside लग्नेश्वरेण, and that is what I render; the Sanskrit is left as printed. Recorded as a suspected misprint. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads निशाकरेण; this sentence names निशाकरण, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

पुंस्त्रीग्रहाः पुत्रगृहं विलग्नात् पश्यंति यावंति इहातिवीर्याः ॥ तत्संख्यकाः स्युस् तनयाश्च कन्याः शुभेशयोगात् सुतभांशतुल्याः

puṃstrīgrahāḥ putragṛhaṃ vilagnāt paśyaṃti yāvaṃti ihātivīryāḥ || tatsaṃkhyakāḥ syus tanayāśca kanyāḥ śubheśayogāt sutabhāṃśatulyāḥ

As many male and female grahas of great strength as look upon the 5th house (putra-gṛha) from the lagna — that many will be the sons and the daughters. ⟨Or⟩ by conjunction with the lord of a benefic, ⟨their number is⟩ equal to the navāṃśa of the 5th sign.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुंस्त्रीग्रहाःपुत्रगृ हंविलग्नात्पश्यंतियावंतिइहातिवीर्याः ॥ तत्संख्यकाःस्युस्तनयाश्चकन्याःशुभेशयोगात्सुतभांशतुल्याः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १५ within its section; it is published at position 115.
  • About this edition: यावंति is set as a neuter plural beside the masculine ग्रहाः. That male grahas give sons and female grahas daughters is what पुंस्त्रीग्रहाः … तनयाश्च कन्याः implies; the verse does not say it in so many words.
40.116a reading here is contested

लग्नेशपुत्राधिपती परस्परं न पश्यतश् चेदुदयं च पंचमं ॥ पापेत्थशालौ सुतलग्नपौ च प्रष्टुस् तदा संततिनास्तितां वदेत्

lagneśaputrādhipatī parasparaṃ na paśyataś cedudayaṃ ca paṃcamaṃ || pāpetthaśālau sutalagnapau ca praṣṭus tadā saṃtatināstitāṃ vadet

If the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 5th do not look at each other, nor at the rising sign and the 5th, and if the lords of the 5th and of the lagna are in an itthaśāla with a malefic, then one should declare that the querent has no offspring.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशपुत्राधिपतीपरस्परं नपश्यतश्चेदुदयंचपंचमं ॥ पापेत्थशालौसुतलग्नपौचप्रष्टुस्तदासंततिनास्तितांवदेत्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नपश्यतश्चेदुदयंचपंचमं"; alternatives "नपश्यतश्रेदुदयंचपंचमं" — the श्चे conjunct in this fount carries a र-like descender; read as श्चे from the same conjunct checked at 6x on line 11
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापेत्थशालौ"; alternatives "पापेत्थशाले" — the final matra reads ौ; the dual सुतलग्नपौ follows, which fits ौ
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १६ within its section; it is published at position 116.
40.117a reading here is contested

पुत्रालये सिंहवृषालिकन्याः प्रश्नोदयाजन्मभतस् तथेंदोः ॥ अल्पप्रजः संततिपृच्छकः स्यात् पापैः सुतर्क्षे सहितेक्षिते वा

putrālaye siṃhavṛṣālikanyāḥ praśnodayājanmabhatas tatheṃdoḥ || alpaprajaḥ saṃtatipṛcchakaḥ syāt pāpaiḥ sutarkṣe sahitekṣite vā

When the 5th house (putrālaya) — reckoned from the praśna lagna, from the natal sign and likewise from the Moon — is Leo, Taurus, Scorpio or Virgo, the one who asks about offspring will have few children; so too if those 5th signs are joined with, or aspected by, malefics.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पुत्रालयेसिंहवृषालिकन्याःप्रश्नोदयाजन्मभतस्त थेंदोः ॥ अल्पप्रजःसंततिपृच्छकःस्यात्पापैःसुतर्क्षैःसहितेक्षितेवा

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहितेक्षितेवा"; alternatives "सहितेईक्षितेवा" — line 2 sets संयुतईक्षितः with a free ई, so this may be सहिते ईक्षिते वा; the tile seam falls on this word
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १७ within its section; it is published at position 117.
  • About this edition: The reader could not settle सहितेक्षिते against सहिते ईक्षिते; the claim is the same either way — joined with, or aspected by, malefics.

स्वर्क्षस्थितौ रंध्रगतौ यमार्कौ प्रष्टुः स्त्रियं संदिशतश्च वंध्यां ॥ छिद्रस्थितौ चंद्रबुधौ सदोषां वा काकवंध्यां तनयाप्रसूतिम्

svarkṣasthitau raṃdhragatau yamārkau praṣṭuḥ striyaṃ saṃdiśataśca vaṃdhyāṃ || chidrasthitau caṃdrabudhau sadoṣāṃ vā kākavaṃdhyāṃ tanayāprasūtim

Saturn and the Sun (yama and arka), standing in their own signs and gone to the 8th (randhra), declare the querent's wife barren. The Moon and Mercury standing in the 8th (chidra) ⟨declare her⟩ diseased, or a kāka-vandhyā — a woman who bears once only, as a crow does — or ⟨give⟩ the birth of a daughter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वर्क्षस्थितौरंध्रगतौयमार्कौप्रष्टुःस्त्रियंसंदिशतश्चवंध्यां ॥ छिद्रस्थि तौचंद्रबुधौसदोषांवाकाकवंध्यातनयाप्रसूतिम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १८ within its section; it is published at position 118.
40.119a reading here is contested

मृतप्रजा छिद्रगयोः सितेज्ययोर् गर्भस्रवा भूमिसुतेष्टमर्क्षं ॥ छिद्रेश्वरे छिद्रगते ऽतिवीर्ये पुष्पं न विंदत्यबला सुतप्रदम्

mṛtaprajā chidragayoḥ sitejyayor garbhasravā bhūmisuteṣṭamarkṣaṃ || chidreśvare chidragate 'tivīrye puṣpaṃ na viṃdatyabalā sutapradam

With Venus and Jupiter in the 8th, her children die; with Mars in the 8th sign, she miscarries. When the lord of the 8th (chidra) stands in the 8th and is very strong, the woman does not obtain the son-giving flower (puṣpa, the menstrual flow).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मृतप्रजाछिद्रगयोःसितेज्ययोर्गर्भस्रवाभूमिसुतेष्टमर्क्षं ॥ छिद्रेश्वरेछिद्रगतेऽतिवीर्येपुष्पंननविंदत्यबलासुतप्रदम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितेज्ययोर्गर्भस्रवा"; alternatives "सितेज्ययोगर्भर्क्षस्रवा" — zoomed 4x: the repha over ग and the conjunct स्र are both on the plate
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुष्पंननविंदत्यबलासुतप्रदम्"; alternatives "पुष्पंननुविंदत्यबलासुतप्रदम्" — the doubled न is clear; the vowel on the second न is very small
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १९ within its section; it is published at position 119.
  • About this edition: न न as printed is a double negative — 'does not fail to obtain'. The reader's alternative ननु ('surely she obtains') makes the same claim, so the verdict does not turn on the doubt. The strong lord of the 8th standing in the 8th is read here as favourable, against the direction of the rest of the verse.

शुक्रार्कयोरष्टमसंस्थयोर् वा क्रूरैर् धनांत्याष्टमराशिसंस्थैः ॥ जाताः पुरस्तान् म्रियते प्रजा वै प्रष्टुर् न चाग्रे शुभसंततिः स्यात्

śukrārkayoraṣṭamasaṃsthayor vā krūrair dhanāṃtyāṣṭamarāśisaṃsthaiḥ || jātāḥ purastān mriyate prajā vai praṣṭur na cāgre śubhasaṃtatiḥ syāt

When Venus and the Sun are both in the 8th, or when malefics stand in the 2nd, the 12th (antya) and the 8th signs, the children already born die before ⟨the querent's eyes⟩, and no good offspring will come to him hereafter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रार्कियोरष्ट मसंस्थयोर्वाक्रूरैर्धनांत्याष्टमराशिसंस्थैः ॥ जाताःपुरस्तान्म्रियतेप्रजावैप्रष्टुर्नचाग्रेशुभसंततिःस्यात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २० within its section; it is published at position 120.

रिःफेश्वरे केंद्रगते च सौम्यैर् युतेक्षिते जीवति बालकश्च ॥ आपूर्यमाणे शुभयुक्त इंदौ केंद्रे शिशुर् जीवति दीर्घकालं

riḥpheśvare keṃdragate ca saumyair yutekṣite jīvati bālakaśca || āpūryamāṇe śubhayukta iṃdau keṃdre śiśur jīvati dīrghakālaṃ

When the lord of the 12th (riḥpha) is in a kendra and joined with and aspected by benefics, the child lives. And when the Moon is waxing, joined with a benefic and in a kendra, the child lives a long time.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रिःफेश्वरेकेंद्रगतेचसौम्यैर्युते क्षितेजीवतिबालकश्च ॥ आपूर्यमाणेशुभयुक्तइंदौकेंद्रेशिशुर्जीवतिदीर्घकालं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २१ within its section; it is published at position 121.

पंचमेशो ऽथ लग्नेशो विषमर्क्षं गतौ यदा ॥ पुत्रजन्मप्रदौ ज्ञेयौ कन्यानां समराशिगौ

paṃcameśo 'tha lagneśo viṣamarkṣaṃ gatau yadā || putrajanmapradau jñeyau kanyānāṃ samarāśigau

When the lord of the 5th and the lord of the lagna have gone to an odd sign, they are to be known as giving the birth of a son; standing in an even sign, ⟨they give the birth⟩ of daughters.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पंचमेशोऽथलग्नेशोविषमर्क्षंगतौयदा॥ पुत्रजन्मप्रदौज्ञेयौकन्यानांसमराशिगौ

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २२ within its section; it is published at position 122.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label चिंतामणौ ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation.

सुताधिपं नृराशिस्थं पुंराशिस्थोपि लग्नपः ॥ वीक्ष्यते पुत्रदः प्रोक्तो युग्मराशौ च दारिका ॥

sutādhipaṃ nṛrāśisthaṃ puṃrāśisthopi lagnapaḥ || vīkṣyate putradaḥ prokto yugmarāśau ca dārikā ||

When the lord of the lagna, itself standing in a male sign, looks upon the lord of the 5th standing in a male sign, he is declared son-giving; and in an even sign (yugma), a girl ⟨is born⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सुताधिपंनृराशिस्थंपुराशिस्थोपिलग्नपः ॥ वीक्ष्यतेपुत्रदःप्रोक्तोयुग्मराशौचदारिका ॥

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २३ within its section; it is published at position 123.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
  • About this edition: पुराशिस्थ is printed without the anusvāra of पुंराशिस्थ, 'standing in a male sign' — which is what नृराशिस्थ in the same line says — and that is how I render it; the Sanskrit is left as printed. वीक्ष्यते is passive in form but active in sense here, लग्नपः standing in the nominative and सुताधिपं in the accusative. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पुंराशिस्थोपि; this sentence names पुराशिस्थ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.124a reading here is contested

युग्मराशिगते लग्ने यदा तत्र शुभग्रहाः ॥ गर्भेपत्यद्वयं वाच्यं दैवज्ञेन विपश्चिता

yugmarāśigate lagne yadā tatra śubhagrahāḥ || garbhepatyadvayaṃ vācyaṃ daivajñena vipaścitā

When the lagna is in an even sign and benefic grahas stand there, a learned astrologer should declare twin offspring in the womb.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

युग्मराशिगतेलग्नेयदातत्रशुभग्रहाः ॥ गर्भेपत्यद्वयंवाच्यंदैवज्ञेनविपश्चिता

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपश्चिता"; alternatives "विपश्रिता" — zoomed 6x: the conjunct is श्चि, not श्रि
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २४ within its section; it is published at position 124.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
40.125a reading here is contested

विषमोपगतो लग्नाच्छनिः पुत्रसुखप्रदः ॥ समभे योषितां जन्म विशेषो जातकोक्तिवत्

viṣamopagato lagnācchaniḥ putrasukhapradaḥ || samabhe yoṣitāṃ janma viśeṣo jātakoktivat

Saturn, reaching an odd ⟨sign⟩ from the lagna, gives the happiness of sons; in an even sign, the birth of daughters. The particulars are as stated in jātaka, natal astrology.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

वीषमोपगतोलग्नाच्छनिःपुत्रसुखप्रदः ॥ समभेयोषितांजन्मविशेषोजातकोक्तिवत्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीषमोपगतो"; alternatives "विषमोपगतो" — the press sets a long ी on वी; kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विषमोपगतो; this sentence names वीषमोपगतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २५ within its section; it is published at position 125.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
  • About this edition: The press sets a long ी in वीषम- where विषम-, 'odd', is meant; it is kept as printed and rendered as विषम. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विषमोपगतो; this sentence names वीषम, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

कटुको लवणस् तिक्तो मिश्रितो मधुरो रसः ॥ अम्लः कषायः कथिता रव्यादीनां रसा बुधैः

kaṭuko lavaṇas tikto miśrito madhuro rasaḥ || amlaḥ kaṣāyaḥ kathitā ravyādīnāṃ rasā budhaiḥ

Pungent, salty, bitter, mixed, sweet, sour and astringent — these are the tastes (rasa) declared by the wise for the Sun and the rest ⟨in that order⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कटुकोलवणस्तिक्तोमिश्रितोमधुरोरसः ॥ अ म्लःकषायःकथितारव्यादीनांरसाबुधैः

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २६ within its section; it is published at position 126.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 12).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label चिंतामणौ ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. Seven tastes for seven grahas, so the order runs Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn. The verse says क्रमशः nowhere; 'in that order' is supplied from the count.

लग्नं पश्यति यः खेटस् तस्य यः कथितो रसः ॥ भोजने ऽसौ रसो वीर्यक्रमाद् वाच्याः परे रसाः

lagnaṃ paśyati yaḥ kheṭas tasya yaḥ kathito rasaḥ || bhojane 'sau raso vīryakramād vācyāḥ pare rasāḥ

Whichever graha looks upon the lagna — the taste declared for that graha is the taste ⟨of the food⟩ at the meal; the remaining tastes are to be named in the order of ⟨the grahas'⟩ strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नंपश्यतियःखेटस्तस्ययःकथितोरसः ॥ भोजनेऽसौरसोवीर्यक्रमाद्वाच्याःपरेरसाः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २७ within its section; it is published at position 127.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 12).

चंद्रो यस्य मुथशिलस् तस्य विशेषं वदेद् भुक्तौ ॥ लग्ने राहौ मंदे रविदृष्टे भोजनाभावः

caṃdro yasya muthaśilas tasya viśeṣaṃ vaded bhuktau || lagne rāhau maṃde ravidṛṣṭe bhojanābhāvaḥ

Whichever ⟨graha⟩ the Moon is in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with, from that one the particulars of the meal are to be declared. With Rāhu or Saturn in the lagna and the Sun aspecting ⟨it⟩, there is no meal at all.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रोयस्यमुथशिलस्तस्यविशेषंवदेद्भुक्तौ ॥ लग्नेराहौमंदेरविदृष्टेभोजनाभावः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २८ within its section; it is published at position 128.
40.129a reading here is contested

कीदृग् मयाद्यभुक्तं पृच्छायां यदि भवेत् स्थिरं लग्नं ॥ तदुक्तमेकवेलं द्व्यात्मनि वेलद्वयं चरे त्वसकृत्

kīdṛg mayādyabhuktaṃ pṛcchāyāṃ yadi bhavet sthiraṃ lagnaṃ || taduktamekavelaṃ dvyātmani veladvayaṃ care tvasakṛt

⟨In the question⟩ 'what sort of thing have I eaten today?': if in the question the lagna is fixed, one meal-time is declared; in a dvyātman (dual) sign, two meal-times; but in a movable ⟨lagna⟩, more than once.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कीदृग्मयाद्यभुक्तंपृच्छायांयदिभवे तिस्थिरंलग्नं ॥ तदुक्तमेकवेलंह्यात्मनिवेलद्वयंचरेत्वसकृत्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरेत्वसकृत्"; alternatives "चरेतुसकृत्" — reads चरे त्वसकृत् (= चरे तु असकृत्); the virama on त् is small
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २९ within its section; it is published at position 129.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नतंत्र (named प्रश्नतंत्रे on page 197 line 2; ruled for the āryā run २९–३१ only, which the gloss अयमस्यार्थः on page 197 line 5 closes; the upajāti ॥३२॥ after the gloss is ruled mula).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. Two printed words I do not follow, and neither has been changed in the Sanskrit. भवेति has a stray ि where भवेत् ('should be') is required. ह्यात्मनि, which would mean 'indeed in one's own case', is read as द्व्यात्मनि, 'in a dual sign': the three-fold sthira / dvisvabhāva / cara scheme is what the verse is counting, and without it वेलद्वयं ('two meal-times') has no condition attached to it at all. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्व्यात्मनि and भवेत्; this sentence names ह्यात्मनि and भवेति, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
40.130a reading here is contested

चंद्रे लग्नगते स्यात् क्षारं भौमे च कटुकमम्लगुरौ ॥ मधुरं दिनकृति तिक्तं शुक्रे स्निग्धं बुधे च सर्वरसं

caṃdre lagnagate syāt kṣāraṃ bhaume ca kaṭukamamlagurau || madhuraṃ dinakṛti tiktaṃ śukre snigdhaṃ budhe ca sarvarasaṃ

With the Moon in the lagna ⟨the food⟩ is alkaline (kṣāra); with Mars, pungent; sour with Jupiter; sweet with the Sun (dinakṛt, the day-maker); bitter with Venus; and with Mercury, oily and of every taste.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेलग्नगतेस्यात्क्षारंभौमेचकटुकमम्लंगुरौ ॥ मधुरंदिनकृतितिक्तंशुक्रेस्ति ग्धंबुधेचसर्वरसं

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मधुरंदिनकृतितिक्तं"; alternatives "मधुरंदिनकृत्तितिक्तं" — ति or त्ति — the tile seam falls on this word
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३० within its section; it is published at position 130.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नतंत्र (named प्रश्नतंत्रे on page 197 line 2; ruled for the āryā run २९–३१ only, which the gloss अयमस्यार्थः on page 197 line 5 closes; the upajāti ॥३२॥ after the gloss is ruled mula).
  • About this edition: Saturn is not in this list — the verse names six grahas only. स्तिग्धं as printed is not a word; स्निग्धं, 'oily', is what I render, and the Sanskrit is left as printed. The reader also could not settle दिनकृति against दिनकृत्ति; only दिनकृति is a locative, so the claim does not turn on it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्निग्धं; this sentence names स्तिग्धं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.131a reading here is contested

मंदे कषायमशुभान् मूसरिफे शशिनि मुथशिले शुभे ऽरिदृशा ॥ उद्वाहात्प्रियदृष्ट्या प्रायणिकत्वात् समागतं भोज्यम्

maṃde kaṣāyamaśubhān mūsariphe śaśini muthaśile śubhe 'ridṛśā || udvāhātpriyadṛṣṭyā prāyaṇikatvāt samāgataṃ bhojyam

With Saturn, ⟨the taste is⟩ astringent. When the Moon is in a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) from a malefic and in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with a benefic, and by an inimical aspect (ari-dṛś), the food that has come is from a wedding, ⟨come⟩ by the aspect of someone dear (priya-dṛṣṭi), or by reason of a funeral feast (prāyaṇika).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मंदेकषायमशुभान्मूसरिफेशशिनिमुथशिलेशुभेऽरिदृशा ॥ उद्वाहात्त्रियदृष्ट्याप्रायणिकत्वात्समागतंभोज्यम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उद्वाहात्त्रियदृष्ट्या"; alternatives "उद्वाहात्स्त्रियदृष्ट्या" — त्त्रि or स्त्रि — the left limb of the conjunct is thin [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads उद्वाहात्प्रियदृष्ट्या; this sentence names उद्वाहात्त्रियदृष्ट्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३१ within its section; it is published at position 131.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नतंत्र (named प्रश्नतंत्रे on page 197 line 2; ruled for the āryā run २९–३१ only, which the gloss अयमस्यार्थः on page 197 line 5 closes; the upajāti ॥३२॥ after the gloss is ruled mula).
  • About this edition: The conjunct after उद्वाहात् is not resolvable on the plate: the reader offers त्त्रि and स्त्रि. Read as स्त्रि it gives स्त्रिय-दृष्ट्या, 'by a woman's aspect', and that is what I render; read as त्त्रि it yields no word I can construe. The three ablatives and instrumentals of the second half stand in a row with one verb between them, so which of them governs which is not certain. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads उद्वाहात्प्रियदृष्ट्या; this sentence names त्त्रि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.132a reading here is contested

पापे सराफे च शुभेत्थशाले चंद्रे तु भुक्तं शुभमन्नमीशं

pāpe sarāphe ca śubhetthaśāle caṃdre tu bhuktaṃ śubhamannamīśaṃ

When the Moon is in a sarāpha (the separating aspect) from a malefic and in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with a benefic, what has been eaten is good food, fit for a lord (īśa), such as the wealthy enjoy.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पापेसराफेचशुभेत्थशालेचंद्रेतुभुक्तंशुभमन्नमीशं

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभमन्नमीशं"; alternatives "शुभमन्नमिष्टं" — the last conjunct is not resolvable at tile magnification
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभमन्नमीशं"; alternatives "शुभमन्नमिष्टं" — the last conjunct is not resolvable at tile magnification
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३२ within its section; it is published at position 132.
  • About this edition: This record is a single half-line, numbered on its own by the press. The last conjunct is not resolvable at the magnification the reader had: शुभमन्नमीशं or शुभमन्नमिष्टं. I follow इष्टं, 'desired, welcome'; ईशं would have to mean something like 'fit for a lord', and gives no construction with अन्नम्. The Sanskrit is left as printed.

शुभे सराफे त्वशुभेत्थशाले चंद्रे कदन्नं मधु आज्यवर्ज्यं ॥ पापेत्थशाले ऽथ खले सराफे शक्यं न भोक्तुं परतोपि लब्धम्

śubhe sarāphe tvaśubhetthaśāle caṃdre kadannaṃ madhu ājyavarjyaṃ || pāpetthaśāle 'tha khale sarāphe śakyaṃ na bhoktuṃ paratopi labdham

When the Moon is in a sarāpha from a benefic and in an itthaśāla with a malefic, ⟨the food is⟩ bad food, without honey and clarified butter. With an itthaśāla with a malefic, or a sarāpha from a wicked ⟨graha⟩, what is got even from elsewhere cannot be eaten.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभेसराफेत्वशुभेत्थशालेचंद्रेकदन्नंमधुआज्यवर्ज्यं ॥ पापेत्थशालेऽथखलेसराफेशक्यंनभोक्तुंपरतोपिलब्धम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३३ within its section; it is published at position 133.

चंद्रे स्वनाथदृष्टे सुखभोजनमन्यथा कष्टात् ॥ गुरुमुथशिले सगौरवमर्केण मुथशिले ऽतिशुचितीक्ष्णम्

caṃdre svanāthadṛṣṭe sukhabhojanamanyathā kaṣṭāt || gurumuthaśile sagauravamarkeṇa muthaśile 'tiśucitīkṣṇam

When the Moon is aspected by its own lord, the meal is an easy one; otherwise it comes with trouble. In a muthaśila with Jupiter ⟨it is taken⟩ with honour; in a muthaśila with the Sun, ⟨the food is⟩ very clean and sharp.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रेस्वनाथदृष्टेसु खभोजनमन्यथाकष्टात् ॥ गुरुमुथशिलेसगौरवमर्केणमुथशिलेऽतिशुचितीक्ष्णम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३४ within its section; it is published at position 134.

शुक्रे सुस्वादुरसं सहास्यगीतं बुधे जनाकीर्णं ॥ शस्त्रकथाढ्यं शनिना कुस्थानगतं कुजे चोष्णम्

śukre susvādurasaṃ sahāsyagītaṃ budhe janākīrṇaṃ || śastrakathāḍhyaṃ śaninā kusthānagataṃ kuje coṣṇam

With Venus, ⟨the meal is⟩ of fine flavour, with laughter and song; with Mercury, crowded with people; full of talk of weapons; with Saturn, ⟨taken⟩ in a bad place; and with Mars, hot.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुक्रेसुस्वादुरसंसहास्यगीतंबुधेजनाकीर्णं ॥ शस्त्रकथाढ्यंशनिनाकुस्थानगतंकुजेचोष्णम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३५ within its section; it is published at position 135.
  • About this edition: शस्त्रकथाढ्यं ('full of talk of weapons') stands between the Mercury clause and the Saturn clause and names no graha of its own. It suits Mars (kuja), which the record names last, but the verse does not attach it, and I have not attached it either.

यदि वदति भोजनार्थं निमंत्रितो यामि शशिमहीसुतयोः ॥ एकस्थितयोः केंद्रे मुथशिलयोर् वापि पूर्णता भवति

yadi vadati bhojanārthaṃ nimaṃtrito yāmi śaśimahīsutayoḥ || ekasthitayoḥ keṃdre muthaśilayor vāpi pūrṇatā bhavati

If someone says 'I have been invited and am going to a meal': when the Moon and Mars (mahī-suta, the son of the earth) stand together in a kendra, or are in a muthaśila ⟨with each other⟩, the thing comes to fulfilment.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिवदतिभोजनार्थंनिमंत्रितोयामिशशिमहीसुतयोः ॥ एकस्थितयोःकेंद्रेमुथशि लयोर्वापिपूर्णताभवति

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३६ within its section; it is published at position 136.

विधिनानेन शनेः स्यात् कुभोजनं ज्ञसितयोरभीष्टान्नं ॥ जीवस्य तुष्टिजनकं होरेशे तनुखगे स्वयमुपैति

vidhinānena śaneḥ syāt kubhojanaṃ jñasitayorabhīṣṭānnaṃ || jīvasya tuṣṭijanakaṃ horeśe tanukhage svayamupaiti

By this same rule: with Saturn the food is bad; with Mercury and Venus it is the food one wants; with Jupiter it is such as gives contentment. When the lord of the horā is the graha standing in the tanu (the 1st, the body-house), ⟨the food⟩ comes of itself.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विधिनानेनशनेःस्यात्कुभोजनंज्ञसितयोरभीष्टान्नं ॥ जीवस्यतुष्टिजनकंहोरेशेतनुखगेस्वयमुपैति

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३७ within its section; it is published at position 137.

यश् चंद्रेण मुथशिली तस्मिन्नीशे तनोः स्वगृहभोज्यं ॥ वित्तेशे भृत्यगृहे भ्रातॄणां सहजपे तथान्यत्र

yaś caṃdreṇa muthaśilī tasminnīśe tanoḥ svagṛhabhojyaṃ || vitteśe bhṛtyagṛhe bhrātṝṇāṃ sahajape tathānyatra

Whichever ⟨graha⟩ is in a muthaśila with the Moon: if that one is the lord of the tanu (the 1st), the food is from his own house; if the lord of wealth (the 2nd), from a servant's house; if the lord of the sahaja (the 3rd), from his brothers' — and so likewise for the rest.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यश्चंद्रेणमुथशिलीतस्मिन्नीशेतनोःस्वगृहभोज्यं ॥ वित्तेशेभृत्यगृहेभ्रातॄणांसहजपेतथान्यत्र

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३८ within its section; it is published at position 138.

लग्नस्थिते सूर्यसुते ऽथ राहौ सूर्येक्षिते वैरिनिमंत्रितस्य ॥ स्याच्छस्त्रघातः शशिभौमयोश्च लग्नस्थयोः सौरिदृशास्तिघातः

lagnasthite sūryasute 'tha rāhau sūryekṣite vairinimaṃtritasya || syācchastraghātaḥ śaśibhaumayośca lagnasthayoḥ sauridṛśāstighātaḥ

When Saturn (the Sun's son) or Rāhu stands in the lagna and is aspected by the Sun, the man invited by an enemy suffers a wound from a weapon. And when the Moon and Mars are both in the lagna, by Saturn's aspect there is a blow (ghāta, a wound).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नस्थितेसूर्यसुतेऽथराहौसूर्येक्षितेवैरिनिमंत्रितस्य ॥ स्याच्छस्त्रघातःशशिभौमयोश्चलग्नस्थयोःसौरिदृशा स्तिघातः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३९ within its section; it is published at position 139.
  • About this edition: The page prints सौरिदृशास्तिघातः. I read अस्थि-घातः, 'a breaking of bones'; स्ति- as it stands is not a word, and this printing confuses ति with थि and नि elsewhere on the same pages (v.130 स्तिग्धं for स्निग्धं). The Sanskrit is left as printed.
40.140a reading here is contested

जीवे सिते चंद्रगते बलाढ्ये चंद्रे बुधे केंद्रगते शुभान्विते ॥ त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्च पापैः स्यात् प्रेमनिर्वैरकरं सुभोजनम्

jīve site caṃdragate balāḍhye caṃdre budhe keṃdragate śubhānvite || trilābhaṣaṣṭhāspadagaiśca pāpaiḥ syāt premanirvairakaraṃ subhojanam

When Jupiter and Venus stand in ⟨the sign of⟩ the Moon and are strong, when the Moon and Mercury are in a kendra and joined with benefics, and when the malefics are in the 3rd, the 11th (lābha), the 6th and the 10th (āspada), the meal will be a good one, bringing affection and freedom from enmity.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जीवेसितेचंद्रगतेबलाढ्येचंद्रेबुधेकेंद्रगतेशुभान्विते ॥ त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्वपापैःस्यात्तेमनिर्वैरकरंसुभोजनम्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्वपापैः"; alternatives "त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्चपापैः" — श्व or श्च — the same fount ambiguity as श्चे/श्रे on page 196 line 4 [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्च; this sentence names श्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यात्तेमनिर्वैरकरं"; alternatives "स्यात्क्षेमनिर्वैरकरं" — the conjunct after स्यात् may be क्षे; the sense wants क्षेम, but the plate is kept as it prints
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४० within its section; it is published at position 140.
  • About this edition: Two printed words I do not follow, and neither has been changed in the Sanskrit. गैश्व is not a word; the sentence needs गैश्च ('and by ⟨malefics⟩ gone to…'), and the reader recorded the श्व / श्च ambiguity of this fount. स्यात्तेम- is read as स्यात् क्षेम-, 'there will be safety'; the reader said the conjunct after स्यात् may be क्षे and that the sense wants क्षेम. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्च; this sentence names गैश्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

भोज्यं बुभुक्षा भोक्ता च सुखाप्तांगबलक्रमात् ॥ लग्नपो भोज्यदस् तेषां बलेन फलमादिशेत्

bhojyaṃ bubhukṣā bhoktā ca sukhāptāṃgabalakramāt || lagnapo bhojyadas teṣāṃ balena phalamādiśet

The food, the hunger and the eater ⟨are judged⟩ in the order of the strength of sukha (the 4th), āpta, and aṅga (the lagna, the body). The lord of the lagna is the giver of the food; from the strength of these one should declare the result.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भोज्यंबुभुक्षाभोक्ताचसुखाप्तांगबलक्रमात् ॥ लग्नपोभोज्यदस्तेषांबलेनफलमादिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४१ within its section; it is published at position 141.
  • About this edition: सुख is the 4th house and अंग the lagna; आप्त is not a house-name this book uses elsewhere, so the middle term of the three is uncertain. The three are matched in order to भोज्यं, बुभुक्षा and भोक्ता, which is what क्रमात् ('in order') asks for.
40.142a reading here is contested

तुर्येशलाभाधिपतीत्थशाले शुभग्रहेक्षायुति तत्सुभोजनं ॥ इत्थं खलग्नास्तपतीत्थशाले लाभेश्वरे तत्सुखलाभ ऊह्यः

turyeśalābhādhipatītthaśāle śubhagrahekṣāyuti tatsubhojanaṃ || itthaṃ khalagnāstapatītthaśāle lābheśvare tatsukhalābha ūhyaḥ

When the lord of the 4th (turyeśa) and the lord of the 11th (lābha) are in an itthaśāla, joined with or aspected by a benefic graha, that means a good meal. In the same way, when the lords of the 10th (kha), of the lagna and of the 7th (asta) are in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 11th, the gaining of that comfort is to be inferred.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तुर्येंशलाभाधिपतीत्थशालेशुभग्रहेक्षायुतित त्सुभोजनं ॥ इत्थंखलग्नास्तपतीत्थशालेलाभेश्वरेतत्सुखलाभऊह्यः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तुर्येंशलाभाधिपती"; alternatives "तुर्येशलाभाधिपती" — a small anusvāra dot sits over र्ये; it is faint [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तुर्येशलाभाधिपतीत्थशाले; this sentence names तुर्येंशलाभाधिपती, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४२ within its section; it is published at position 142.
  • About this edition: The anusvāra of तुर्येंश is faint on the plate; without it the word is तुर्येश, simply 'the lord of the 4th', and the rule would then be about that lord rather than about the lord of its aṃśa. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तुर्येशलाभाधिपतीत्थशाले; this sentence names तुर्येंश, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.143a reading here is contested

लग्नेर्के नृपतिं वह्निशस्त्रं पश्यति लोहितं ॥ श्वेतं पुष्पं सितं वस्त्रं गंधं नारीं च शीतगौ

lagnerke nṛpatiṃ vahniśastraṃ paśyati lohitaṃ || śvetaṃ puṣpaṃ sitaṃ vastraṃ gaṃdhaṃ nārīṃ ca śītagau

With the Sun in the lagna ⟨the dreamer⟩ sees a king, fire, a weapon and ⟨things⟩ red; with the Moon (śītagu, the cool-rayed), a white flower, a white garment, perfume and a woman.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेर्कंनृपतिर्वह्निशस्त्रंपश्यतिलोहितं ॥ श्वेतंपुष्पंसितंवस्त्रंगंधंनारींचशीतगौ

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नेर्कं"; alternatives "लग्नेर्के" — the mark over र्क could be an anusvāra dot or the tip of the e-stroke [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेर्के; this sentence names लग्नेर्कं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नेर्कं"; alternatives "लग्नेर्के" — the mark over र्क could be an anusvāra dot or the tip of the e-stroke [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेर्के; this sentence names लग्नेर्कं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४३ within its section; it is published at position 143.
  • About this edition: This record opens the section on dreams (svapna). लग्नेर्कं: the reader could not tell an anusvāra from the tip of an e-stroke over र्क, so the word is either लग्नेऽर्कं or लग्ने ऽर्के. I render 'with the Sun in the lagna', which the matching शीतगौ ('with the Moon') in the second half requires. नृपतिर् is set as a nominative among accusatives (वह्निशस्त्रं, लोहितं, नारीं); I render it as one of the things seen, with them. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेर्के and नृपतिं; this sentence names लग्नेर्कं and नृपतिर्, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

रक्तमांसप्रवालं च सुवर्णं धरणीसुते ॥ बुधे खे गमनं जीवे धनं बंधुसमागमं

raktamāṃsapravālaṃ ca suvarṇaṃ dharaṇīsute || budhe khe gamanaṃ jīve dhanaṃ baṃdhusamāgamaṃ

With Mars (dharaṇī-suta, the son of the earth), blood, flesh, coral and gold; with Mercury, travel through the sky; with Jupiter, wealth and the meeting of kinsmen.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रक्तमांसप्रवालंचसुवर्णंधरणीसुते ॥ बुधेखेगमनंजीवेधनंबंधुसमागमं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४४ within its section; it is published at position 144.

जलावगाहनं शुक्रे शनौ तुंगावरोहणम् ॥ लग्नलग्नांशपवशात् स्वप्नो वाच्यो ऽथवा बुधैः

jalāvagāhanaṃ śukre śanau tuṃgāvarohaṇam || lagnalagnāṃśapavaśāt svapno vācyo 'thavā budhaiḥ

With Venus, bathing in water; with Saturn, coming down from a height. Or else the dream is to be declared by the wise according to the lord of the lagna and the lord of the lagna's aṃśa.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जलावगा हनंशुक्रेशनौतुंगावरोहणम् ॥ लग्नलग्नांशपवशात्स्वप्नोवाच्योऽथवाबुधैः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४५ within its section; it is published at position 145.

सर्वोत्तमवलाद् वापि खेटान् बुद्ध्या विचिंतयेत् ॥ वलसाम्ये फलं मिश्रं दुःस्वप्नो निर्वलैः खगैः

sarvottamavalād vāpi kheṭān buddhyā viciṃtayet || valasāmye phalaṃ miśraṃ duḥsvapno nirvalaiḥ khagaiḥ

Or else one should weigh the grahas with judgement, starting from the one strongest of all. When their strengths are equal the result is mixed; when the grahas are without strength, the dream is a bad one.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सर्वोत्तमवलाद्वापिखेटान्बुद्ध्याविचिंतयेत् ॥ वलसाम्येफ लंमिश्रंदुःस्वप्नोनिर्वलैःखगैः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४६ within its section; it is published at position 146.
  • About this edition: This printing writes व for ब — वल for बल, निर्वलैः for निर्बलैः. That is the fount's habit and not a misreading.
40.147a reading here is contested

रविलग्ने शशिदृष्टे रविशशिसमेतविलग्नाद् वा ॥ स्वप्नं दृष्टं प्रवदेत् प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः

ravilagne śaśidṛṣṭe raviśaśisametavilagnād vā || svapnaṃ dṛṣṭaṃ pravadet praṣṭurlagnāṃtarātkālaḥ

When the Sun is in the lagna and aspected by the Moon, or when the lagna is joined by the Sun and the Moon together, one should declare that the querent has seen a dream; the time ⟨of it is reckoned⟩ from the interval of the lagna.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रविलग्नेशशिदृष्टेरविशशिसमेतविलग्नाद्वा ॥ स्वप्नंदृष्टंप्रवदेत्प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विलग्नाद्वा"; alternatives "विलग्नाद्धा" — read at 4x: the conjunct is द्वा, not द्धा; at tile magnification it looked like द्ध
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः"; alternatives "प्रष्टुःप्रज्ञांतरात्कालः", "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञातरात्कालः" — the akṣaras between प्रष्टु and तरात्कालः are crowded and I could not separate them with confidence [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः; this sentence names प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विलग्नाद्वा"; alternatives "विलग्नाद्धा" — read at 4x: the conjunct is द्वा, not द्धा; at tile magnification it looked like द्ध
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः"; alternatives "प्रष्टुःप्रज्ञांतरात्कालः", "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञातरात्कालः" — the akṣaras between प्रष्टु and तरात्कालः are crowded and I could not separate them with confidence [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः; this sentence names प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४७ within its section; it is published at position 147.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: उत्पल (named उत्पलः on page 198 line 5; ruled for ॥४७॥ only. The same āryā stands as Praśna Mārga 31.1, research/translations/prashna-marga/ch31.json n=1, रविलग्ने शशिदृष्टे …; the next line opens a new section, अथाखेटकः).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "उत्पलः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label उत्पलः ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. The last clause is the doubtful one: the reader could not separate the akṣaras between प्रष्टु and तरात्कालः and offers प्रष्टुःप्रज्ञांतरात्कालः ('the time from the querent's own understanding') and प्रष्टुर्ज्ञातरात्कालः as well as the reading printed here. My rendering follows the printed प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः and should be treated as unsettled. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः; this sentence names प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.148a reading here is contested

लग्नेशजामित्रपतीत्थशाले सुस्नेहदृष्ट्या त्वनयोर् द्वयोश्च ॥ आखेटकः स्यात् सफलो ऽरिदृष्ट्या स्यान्निष्फलो वाल्पफलो ऽतिकष्टात्

lagneśajāmitrapatītthaśāle susnehadṛṣṭyā tvanayor dvayośca || ākheṭakaḥ syāt saphalo 'ridṛṣṭyā syānniṣphalo vālpaphalo 'tikaṣṭāt

When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the jāmitra (the 7th) are in an itthaśāla, and by an affectionate aspect of both of these two, the hunt (ākheṭaka) will be fruitful. By an inimical aspect it will be fruitless, or of little fruit and got with great hardship. [Our mūla now reads त्वनयोर्, 'of these two', where two akṣaras were unresolved.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशजामित्रपतीत्थशालेसुस्नेहदृष्ट्यालवनयोर्द्वयोश्च ॥ आखेटकःस्यात्सफलोऽरिदृष्ट्यास्यान्निष्फलोवाल्पफलोऽतिकष्टात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुस्नेहदृष्ट्यालवनयोर्द्वयोश्च"; alternatives "सुस्नेहदृष्ट्याबलयोर्द्वयोश्च", "सुस्नेहदृष्ट्यालग्नयोर्द्वयोश्च" — the two akṣaras after दृष्ट्या are small and touch each other; my 4x crop fell short of them
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४८ within its section; it is published at position 148.
  • About this edition: The two akṣaras after दृष्ट्या are small and touch each other, and the reader's 4x crop fell short of them: लवनयोः as read, with बलयोः ('of the strength of the two') and लग्नयोः offered as alternatives. लवन gives no sense here, so that part of the condition is left unrendered rather than guessed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुस्नेहदृष्ट्या त्वनयोर्; this sentence names लवन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.149a reading here is contested

लग्नेश्वरे द्यूनगते विलग्ने जायेश्वरे स्यान्मृगया प्रभूता ॥ जामित्रनाथे हिबुके नभःस्थे चाखेटकः स्वल्पतरो ऽपि न स्यात्

lagneśvare dyūnagate vilagne jāyeśvare syānmṛgayā prabhūtā || jāmitranāthe hibuke nabhaḥsthe cākheṭakaḥ svalpataro 'pi na syāt

When the lord of the lagna has gone to the 7th (dyūna) and the lord of the 7th (jāyā) is in the lagna, the hunt will be abundant. But when the lord of the jāmitra (the 7th) is in the hibuka (the 4th) or in the 10th (nabhas, the sky), there will be no hunt at all, not even a very small one.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश्वरेद्यूनगतेविलग्नजायेश्वरेस्यान्मृगयाप्रभूता ॥ जामित्रनाथेहिबुकेनभःस्थेचाखेटकःस्वल्पतरोऽपिनस्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूनगते"; alternatives "च्यूनगते" — same disputed conjunct as elsewhere on this page; zoomed to 8x and read द्य
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४९ within its section; it is published at position 149.
40.150a reading here is contested

ज्ञभौमौ सबलौ सिद्धिरस्तांशे मृगया च्युतिः ॥ लग्नद्यूने तत्पती च हेतुस् तैर् जलराशिगैः

jñabhaumau sabalau siddhirastāṃśe mṛgayā cyutiḥ || lagnadyūne tatpatī ca hetus tair jalarāśigaiḥ

Mercury and Mars, both strong, ⟨give⟩ success; in the aṃśa of the 7th (asta) the hunt falls through. The lagna, the 7th (dyūna) and the two lords of these are the ground ⟨of the judgement⟩, together with them when they stand in watery signs.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ज्ञभौमौसव लौसिद्धिरस्तांशेमृगयाच्युतिः ॥ लग्नद्यूनेतत्पतीचहेतुस्तैर्जलराशिगैः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५० within its section; it is published at position 150.
  • About this edition: हेतुः ('the ground, the cause') is left without a complement, and the closing तैर् जलराशिगैः is an instrumental absolute with no verb of its own, so what follows from the watery signs is not stated in this record. I have supplied the link in ⟨ ⟩ and nothing more.
40.151a reading here is contested

जलजं खेटकं ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर् वनसंभवः ॥ क्रूराक्रांतानि यावंति मध्ये भानींदुलग्नयोः

jalajaṃ kheṭakaṃ brūyādanyarkṣair vanasaṃbhavaḥ || krūrākrāṃtāni yāvaṃti madhye bhānīṃdulagnayoḥ

⟨In a question about the hunt:⟩ one should call the quarry water-born ⟨when the planets stand in watery signs⟩, and forest-born by the other signs. However many signs lying between the Moon and the lagna are overrun by malefics —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जलजंखेटकंब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्वनसंभवः ॥ क्रूराक्रांतानियावंतिम ध्येभानींदुलग्नयोः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्वनसंभवः"; alternatives "ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर्वनसंभवः" — the conjunct after ब्रूया reads द्ध to me, but a single द with the next अ absorbed would also fit the ink [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर्; this sentence names द्ध, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५१ within its section; it is published at position 151.
  • About this edition: The plate prints ब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्. धन्यर्क्षैः ('by the wealth-giving signs') sets up no contrast with जलजम्, while the plate reader's own alternative ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैः ('by the OTHER signs') does; I render the alternative and say so, and the word-divided file keeps the printed akṣaras. The topic is the hunt (āheṭaka), carried on from verses 148–150, and verse 150 ends with तैर्जलराशिगैः, 'by them standing in watery signs'. The record does not finish its sentence: its apodosis is verse 152. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर्; this sentence names ब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

तावंतः प्राणिनो वाच्या द्वित्रिघ्नाः स्वांशकादिषु

tāvaṃtaḥ prāṇino vācyā dvitrighnāḥ svāṃśakādiṣu

— so many living creatures are to be declared; and ⟨the number is⟩ multiplied by two or three ⟨when it is taken⟩ in the aṃśas of the planet's own divisions and the rest.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तावंतःप्राणिनोवाच्याद्वित्रिघ्नाःस्वांशकादिषु

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५२ within its section; it is published at position 152.
  • About this edition: The record opens in mid-sentence. What it counts — the signs between the Moon and the lagna that malefics have overrun — stands in verse 151.

क्रूरः खचरो लग्ने विवादपृच्छासु जयति विवादं तम् ॥ सर्वावस्थासु परं नीचेऽस्ते जयति न द्विषतः

krūraḥ khacaro lagne vivādapṛcchāsu jayati vivādaṃ tam || sarvāvasthāsu paraṃ nīce'ste jayati na dviṣataḥ

A malefic planet in the lagna, in questions about a lawsuit: ⟨the querent⟩ wins that suit, in every condition. But when ⟨that malefic stands⟩ in its fall or in the 7th (asta), he does not defeat his adversaries.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रूरःखचरोलग्नेविवादपृच्छा सुजयतिविवादंतम् ॥ सर्वावस्थासुपरंनीचेऽस्तेजयतिनद्विषतः

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५३ within its section; it is published at position 153.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: भुवनदीपक (named भुवनदीपके on page 198 line 9; ruled for the āryā run ५३–५५ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥५६॥, which is ruled mula).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "भुवनदीपके ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: परं is read as the adversative 'but', which makes the second half the exception to the first. Read instead as the adverb 'utterly' with सर्वावस्थासु, the line would say he wins even in fall and in the 7th, and that contradicts its own जयति न ('he does not win').
40.154a reading here is contested

लग्नद्यूने मुक्त्वा परस्परं क्रूरयोर् झकटदृष्टौ ॥ विवदद्वादियुगं तच्छुरिकाभ्यां प्रहरति तदैवम्

lagnadyūne muktvā parasparaṃ krūrayor jhakaṭadṛṣṭau || vivadadvādiyugaṃ tacchurikābhyāṃ praharati tadaivam

⟨When two malefics stand⟩ in the lagna and the 7th (dyūna) and, letting fly at one another, are in a jhakaṭa aspect ⟨the mutually hostile aspect⟩, then the pair of quarrelling litigants strike each other with knives — just so.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नद्यूनेमुक्त्वापरस्परंक्रूरयोर्झकटदृष्टौ ॥ विवदद्वादियुगंतच्छुरि काभ्यांप्रहरतितदेवम्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "झकटदृष्टौ"; alternatives "झकुटदृष्टौ" — the vowel under ट is a thin stroke; I read no mātrā there
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५४ within its section; it is published at position 154.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: भुवनदीपक (named भुवनदीपके on page 198 line 9; ruled for the āryā run ५३–५५ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥५६॥, which is ruled mula).
  • About this edition: मुक्त्वा is an absolutive with no expressed object; I take it of the aspect the two malefics release at each other. Read as 'excepting', the half-line would exclude the lagna and the 7th, and verse 155 puts the same malefic in those same two houses. झकट is nowhere defined in this book; the word is the Prakritic jhagaḍā, 'a quarrel', so I transliterate it and gloss it as the hostile mutual aspect rather than translate it away. The reader could not decide between झकट and झकुट; nothing in the sense turns on it.
40.155a reading here is contested

लग्नद्यूने च यदि क्रूरः खचरो विवादिनोर् न तदा ॥ कलहनिवृत्तिः काले जयति हि बलवान् गतबलं तु

lagnadyūne ca yadi krūraḥ khacaro vivādinor na tadā || kalahanivṛttiḥ kāle jayati hi balavān gatabalaṃ tu

And if a malefic planet ⟨stands⟩ in the lagna and the 7th (dyūna) of the two litigants, then there is no ending of the quarrel; in time the one who has strength wins, and the one whose strength is spent ⟨loses⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नद्यूनेचयदिक्रूरःखचरोविवादिनोर्नतदा ॥ कलहनिवृत्तिःकालेजयतिहिवलवान्गतवलंतु

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५५ within its section; it is published at position 155.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: भुवनदीपक (named भुवनदीपके on page 198 line 9; ruled for the āryā run ५३–५५ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥५६॥, which is ruled mula).
40.156a reading here is contested

लग्नेश सुतदः सौम्याः केंद्रे संधिर्नवान्यथा ॥ लग्नद्यूनेशषष्ठेशारित्वेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः

lagneśa sutadaḥ saumyāḥ keṃdre saṃdhirnavānyathā || lagnadyūneśaṣaṣṭheśāritvepyanyonyavigrahaḥ

⟨When⟩ benefics ⟨stand⟩ in a kendra ⟨with⟩ the lord of the lagna ⟨and⟩ the giver of the 5th (suta), there is a settlement; never otherwise. ⟨When⟩ the lords of the lagna, of the 7th (dyūna) and of the 6th stand in enmity (aritva), there is strife between the two parties. [सुतदः in the first half is not a word I can construe as printed; I render the rest of that half-line and do not emend it.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश सुतदःसौम्याःकेंद्रेसंधिर्नेवान्यथा ॥ लग्नद्यूनेषष्ठेशारिलेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५६ within its section; it is published at position 156.
  • About this edition: Two places defeat me as printed. In the first half the page sets a space after लग्नेश and then सुतदः, which is no word I can construe; लग्नेशसुहृदः ('the friends of the lagna-lord') would fit, but nothing on the plate supports it. संधिर्नेवान्यथा is सन्धिः + नैव + अन्यथा with नैव set as नेव. In the second half, लग्नद्यूनेषष्ठेशारिलेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः, the run रिलेप्य् between षष्ठेशा and अन्योन्यविग्रहः is unintelligible to me; मिले ('when they meet') would give what the line wants. The word-divided file leaves both runs joined and unaltered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नद्यूनेशषष्ठेशारित्वेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः and संधिर्नवान्यथा; this sentence names लग्नद्यूनेषष्ठेशारिलेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः and संधिर्नेवान्यथा, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
40.157a reading here is contested

गृहमागतो न यदसौ किं बद्धः किमथवा हत इति प्रश्ने ॥ मूर्तौ क्रूरो यदि तन्न हतो बद्धोथवा पुरुषः

gṛhamāgato na yadasau kiṃ baddhaḥ kimathavā hata iti praśne || mūrtau krūro yadi tanna hato baddhothavā puruṣaḥ

In the question 'he has not come home — is he imprisoned, or has he been killed?': if a malefic ⟨stands⟩ in the mūrti (the ascendant), then the man is not killed; he is imprisoned instead.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गृहमागतोनयदसौकिंबद्धःकिमथवाहतइतिप्रश्ने ॥ सू तौक्रूरोयदितन्नहतोबद्धोथवापुरुषः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बद्धोथवापुरुषः"; alternatives "बद्धोऽथवापुरुषः" — no avagraha glyph is printed after बद्धो, though sandhi wants one; kept as printed
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५७ within its section; it is published at position 157.
  • About this edition: सूतौ is the locative of सूति, 'birth', that is the ascendant; the same house is called मूर्ति in verse 159 and तनु in verse 160. अथवा here is the contrastive 'or rather', not an additional 'and': the verse denies the killing and asserts the imprisonment. The plate prints बद्धोथवा with no avagraha where sandhi wants बद्धोऽथवा; the reader recorded this and the word-divided file keeps the plate. [2026-10-01: the exemplar's plate sets मूर्तौ, broken across pages 198–199 as मू | र्तौ, read by eye at about 3.7x native against the controls मूर्तौ and चसप्तमे on page 199 line 1. The mūla now reads मूर्तौ, so the word is मूर्ति, the lagna, the name verse 159 uses. The सूतौ this note explains is superseded.]

त्रिकोणचतुरस्रास्तस्थितः पापग्रहो यदि ॥ ग्रहैर् निरीक्षितः पापैर् नूनं बंधनमादिशेत्

trikoṇacaturasrāstasthitaḥ pāpagraho yadi || grahair nirīkṣitaḥ pāpair nūnaṃ baṃdhanamādiśet

If a malefic planet stands in a trikoṇa (a trine), in a caturasra (the 4th or the 8th) or in the 7th (asta), and is aspected by malefic planets, one should declare imprisonment for certain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

त्रिकोणचतुरस्रास्तस्थितःपापग्रहोयदि ॥ ग्रहैर्निरीक्षितःपापेर्नूनंबंधनमादिशेत्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५८ within its section; it is published at position 158.
  • About this edition: The plate prints पापेर्नूनं. पापेः is no form; the instrumental plural पापैः, which निरीक्षितः ('aspected by') requires, is what was meant, and it is what I render. The Sanskrit is unaltered.

सप्तमगोऽष्टमगो वा चेत् क्रूरस् तद्धतोपि वा बद्धः ॥ मूर्तौ च सप्तमे वा यद्वा लग्नेष्टमेपि भवेत् ॥ क्रूरस् तदसौ पुरुषो बद्धश्च हतश्च मुच्यते च परं

saptamago'ṣṭamago vā cet krūras taddhatopi vā baddhaḥ || mūrtau ca saptame vā yadvā lagneṣṭamepi bhavet || krūras tadasau puruṣo baddhaśca hataśca mucyate ca paraṃ

If a malefic is in the 7th or in the 8th, then ⟨the man is⟩ either killed or imprisoned. And if ⟨malefics⟩ stand in the mūrti (the 1st) and the 7th, or else in the lagna and the 8th, then that man is both imprisoned and beaten — and he is released at last.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सप्तम गोऽष्टमगोवाचेत्क्रूरस्तद्धतोपिवाबद्धः ॥ मूर्तौचसप्तमेवायद्वालग्नेष्टमेपिभवेत् ॥ क्रूरस्तदसौपुरुषोबद्धश्चहतश्चमुच्यतेचपरं

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५९ within its section; it is published at position 159.
  • About this edition: Three half-lines under one number. मूर्ति and लग्न name the same house, so the two pairs are 1st-and-7th and 1st-and-8th, and the singular क्रूरः is distributive over each pair. हतः means 'struck' as well as 'killed'; where it stands against बद्धः in the first half-line I render 'killed', and in the third, which ends with मुच्यते ('he is released'), I render 'beaten'.
40.160a reading here is contested

बद्धः सप्ताष्टगे क्रूरे मूर्त्यस्ते चाष्टलग्नगे ॥ बद्धो विमुच्यतेऽत्याशु क्रूरः श्रेयांस् तनौ तदा

baddhaḥ saptāṣṭage krūre mūrtyaste cāṣṭalagnage || baddho vimucyate'tyāśu krūraḥ śreyāṃs tanau tadā

He is bound when a malefic is in the 7th or the 8th, and ⟨when malefics stand⟩ in the mūrti (the 1st) and the 7th (asta), or in the 8th and the lagna. ⟨But⟩ the prisoner is released very quickly, and a malefic in the tanu (the 1st) is then the better thing. [Our mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे, 'standing in the 7th or the 8th'.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बद्धःस साष्टगेक्रूरेमूर्त्यस्तेचाष्टलग्नगे ॥ बद्धोविमुच्यतेऽत्याशुक्रूरःश्रेयांस्तनौतदा

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साष्टगे"; alternatives "प्ताष्टगे" — zoomed to 5x and the first akṣara reads सा; but with line 2 ending बद्धःस that gives बद्धःससाष्टगे, while the sense wants बद्धःसप्ताष्टगे, so a checker should look again [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे; this sentence names साष्टगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साष्टगे"; alternatives "प्ताष्टगे" — zoomed to 5x and the first akṣara reads सा; but with line 2 ending बद्धःस that gives बद्धःससाष्टगे, while the sense wants बद्धःसप्ताष्टगे, so a checker should look again [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे; this sentence names साष्टगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६० within its section; it is published at position 160.
  • About this edition: As printed the line reads बद्धः स साष्टगे क्रूरे, and साष्टगे is no word. The plate reader flagged it himself and asked for a second look: सप्ताष्टगे ('in the 7th or the 8th') is what the sense and the parallel in verse 159 require. I render सप्ताष्टगे and say so; the word-divided file keeps the printed akṣaras. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे; this sentence names साष्टगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.161a reading here is contested

बद्धोऽस्ति तत्किं भवितेति प्रश्ने विमुच्यतेऽसौ खलु मृत्युयोगे ॥ कदा विमुच्येदिति पृच्छमाने शुभं कदा भावि च तैर् मृतिः स्यात्

baddho'sti tatkiṃ bhaviteti praśne vimucyate'sau khalu mṛtyuyoge || kadā vimucyediti pṛcchamāne śubhaṃ kadā bhāvi ca tair mṛtiḥ syāt

In the question 'he is in prison — what will become of him?': he is indeed released when a mṛtyu-yoga ⟨a link with the lord of the 8th⟩ falls. When a man asks 'when will he be released?', ⟨one tells him⟩ when the auspicious ⟨time⟩ is due; and by those same ⟨yogas⟩ death may come.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बद्धोऽस्तितत्किंभवि तेतिप्रश्नेविमुच्यतेऽसौखलुमृत्युयोगे ॥ कदाविमुच्येदितिपृच्छमानेशुभंकदाभाविचतैर्मृतिःस्यात्

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कदाभाविचतैर्मृतिःस्यात्"; alternatives "कदाभाविचेत्तैर्मृतिःस्यात्" — the akṣara between भावि and तैर् is small; I saw no e-stroke on it but it is crowded
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कदाभाविचतैर्मृतिःस्यात्"; alternatives "कदाभाविचेत्तैर्मृतिःस्यात्" — the akṣara between भावि and तैर् is small; I saw no e-stroke on it but it is crowded
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६१ within its section; it is published at position 161.
  • About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नदीपक (named प्रश्नदीपके on page 199 line 3; ruled for the upajāti ॥६१॥ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥६२॥, which is ruled mula).
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नदीपके ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The last quarter is uncertain. The plate reads कदा भावि च तैर्मृतिः स्यात्, which I render; the reader's alternative कदा भावि चेत् तैर्मृतिः स्यात् would make it a condition instead — 'if ⟨he asks⟩ when it will be, death may come of them'. That release and death are named by one and the same yoga is this book's own doctrine: verse 170 states it outright.

मुक्तिप्रश्ने यदा केंद्रे केंद्रेशाः स्युर् न मोक्षदाः ॥ तस्मिन् वर्षेऽथ लग्नेशः पतितः केंद्रगे न च

muktipraśne yadā keṃdre keṃdreśāḥ syur na mokṣadāḥ || tasmin varṣe'tha lagneśaḥ patitaḥ keṃdrage na ca

In a question about release: when the lords of the kendras stand in a kendra, they do not give release in that year. Nor ⟨is there release⟩ when the lord of the lagna is fallen and does not go to a kendra.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मुक्तिप्रश्नेयदाकेंद्रेकेंद्रेशाःस्युर्न मोक्षदाः ॥ तस्मिन्वर्षेऽथलग्नेशःपतितःकेंद्रगेनच

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६२ within its section; it is published at position 162.
  • About this edition: केंद्रगे is a locative where the sense wants the nominative केंद्रगो agreeing with लग्नेशः. I render it as a nominative and have not altered the Sanskrit.
40.163a reading here is contested

संबंधेप्सुः स चेत्क्रूरो मृतीशः स्यात्तदा मृतिः ॥ लग्नेशेस्तमिते ऽम्बुस्थे कुजदृष्टे तदा मृतिः

saṃbaṃdhepsuḥ sa cetkrūro mṛtīśaḥ syāttadā mṛtiḥ || lagneśestamite 'mbusthe kujadṛṣṭe tadā mṛtiḥ

If that malefic which is seeking a connection ⟨that is, applying⟩ is the lord of death (the 8th), then death. When the lord of the lagna is combust, stands in a watery sign, and is aspected by Mars (kuja), then too death.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

संबंधेप्सुःसचेत्क्रूरोमृतीशःस्यात्तदामृतिः ॥ लग्नेशेस्तमितेऽबुस्थेकुजदृष्टेतदामृ तिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽबुस्थे"; alternatives "ऽम्बुस्थे", "ऽब्जस्थे" — I see no anusvāra dot over बु, though अम्बु (a watery sign) is what the sense wants [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ऽम्बुस्थे; this sentence names ऽबुस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६३ within its section; it is published at position 163.
  • About this edition: The plate prints ऽबुस्थे with no anusvāra over बु, and the reader said so and left it. अम्बुस्थे, 'standing in a watery sign', is the sense and is what I render; the reader's other alternative अब्जस्थे would say the same thing by another word. The Sanskrit is unaltered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ऽम्बुस्थे; this sentence names ऽबुस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.164a reading here is contested

चंद्रश्चांबुगपापेन मृत्युनाथेन योगकृत् ॥ तदागुप्त्यां मृतिश्चंद्रः केंद्रे मंदयुगीक्षितः

caṃdraścāṃbugapāpena mṛtyunāthena yogakṛt || tadāguptyāṃ mṛtiścaṃdraḥ keṃdre maṃdayugīkṣitaḥ

And when the Moon, standing in a watery sign, makes a yoga with a malefic that is lord of death (the 8th), then death comes in confinement (gupti). ⟨So too when⟩ the Moon in a kendra is both joined with and aspected by Saturn (manda).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चंद्रश्चांबुगपापेनमृत्युनाथेनयोगकृत् ॥ तदायुस्यांमृतिश्चंद्रःकेंद्रेमंदयुगीक्षितः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रश्चांबुग"; alternatives "चंद्रश्रांबुग" — the conjunct after चंद्र could be श्च or श्र; the lower arm is broken
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६४ within its section; it is published at position 164.
  • About this edition: तदायुस्यां is तदा + आयुस्यां; आयुस्या is an irregular formation on आयुस्, the 8th, and I take it of the period that house governs. मंदयुगीक्षितः compounds युज् and ईक्षित — joined AND aspected, not either one. The reader could not tell whether the conjunct after चंद्र is श्च or श्र; I read श्च, giving चंद्रश्च, 'and the Moon'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तदागुप्त्यां; this sentence names तदायुस्यां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.165a reading here is contested

दीर्घपीडा च भौमेन युग्दृष्टैर् बंधताडने ॥ दृश्यार्धे लग्नपश्चेत्स्याद्व्ययपेनेत्थशालवान्

dīrghapīḍā ca bhaumena yugdṛṣṭair baṃdhatāḍane || dṛśyārdhe lagnapaścetsyādvyayapenetthaśālavān

And ⟨when they are⟩ joined with or aspected by Mars (bhauma), there is long suffering, with bondage and beating. If the lord of the lagna stands in the visible half ⟨of the chart⟩ and is in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with the lord of the 12th (vyaya) —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दीर्घपीडाचभौमेनयुग्दृष्टैर्वंधताडने ॥ दृश्यार्धेलग्नपश्चेत्स्याद्व्ययपेनेत्थशालवान्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्वंधताडने"; alternatives "र्बंधताडने" — the letter after र् has no bottom bar, so I read व; this press writes ब as व elsewhere on these pages
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६५ within its section; it is published at position 165.
  • About this edition: The record does not finish its sentence; the apodosis is the opening of verse 166, 'then the prisoner escapes'. The plate prints वंधताडने for बन्धताडने: this press sets ब as व on these pages, as the reader recorded. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads बंधताडने; this sentence names वंधताडने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

पलायते तदा बद्धो व्ययगे लग्नगेपि वा ॥ तृतीयनवमस्वामी व्ययगो लग्नपेन च

palāyate tadā baddho vyayage lagnagepi vā || tṛtīyanavamasvāmī vyayago lagnapena ca

— then the prisoner escapes; ⟨so too⟩ when ⟨the lord of the lagna⟩ stands in the 12th (vyaya), or in the lagna. And ⟨when⟩ the lord of the 3rd or the 9th, standing in the 12th, ⟨forms a yoga⟩ with the lord of the lagna —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पलायतेतदाबद्धोव्ययगेलग्नगेपिवा ॥ तृतीयनवमस्वामीव्ययगोलग्नपेनच

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६६ within its section; it is published at position 166.

यदीत्थशालयोगेप्सुस् तदापि च पलायते ॥ दृश्यार्धे ह्युपचारेण चंद्रो मुथशिलस् तदा

yadītthaśālayogepsus tadāpi ca palāyate || dṛśyārdhe hyupacāreṇa caṃdro muthaśilas tadā

— if it is seeking an itthaśāla-yoga, then too he escapes. And ⟨so too⟩ when the Moon in the visible half is muthaśila ⟨applying⟩ by upacāra.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदीत्थशालयोगेप्सुस्तदापिचपलायते ॥ दृश्यार्धेह्युपचारेणचंद्रोमुथशिलस्तदा

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६७ within its section; it is published at position 167.
  • About this edition: उपचारेण is 'by way of application', an extension of the strict definition of the aspect. The word may instead be for उपचय (the 3rd, 6th, 10th and 11th), which this literature uses constantly, but the plate prints उपचारेण and that is what I render.

बंधमोक्षस् त्रिधर्मेशः संग्रहः शीघ्रमोक्षकृत् ॥ पतितेंदुस् त्रिधर्मस्थग्रहसंबंधकृत् तदा

baṃdhamokṣas tridharmeśaḥ saṃgrahaḥ śīghramokṣakṛt || patiteṃdus tridharmasthagrahasaṃbaṃdhakṛt tadā

For release from bondage: a saṃgraha ⟨a conjunction⟩ with the lord of the 3rd or the 9th brings release quickly. ⟨So too⟩ when the fallen Moon makes a connection with a planet standing in the 3rd or the 9th.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बंधमोक्षत्रिधर्मेशःसंग्रहःशीघ्रमोक्षकृत् ॥ प तितेंदुस्त्रिधर्मस्थग्रहसंबंधकृत्तदा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६८ within its section; it is published at position 168.

केंद्रस्थत्रिभवेशेन योगेप्सुश्चेत् तदा चिरात् ॥ यावच्छुक्रो बली लग्ने तावत्कर्ता बलाधिकः

keṃdrasthatribhaveśena yogepsuścet tadā cirāt || yāvacchukro balī lagne tāvatkartā balādhikaḥ

If ⟨it⟩ seeks a yoga with the lord of the 3rd standing in a kendra, then ⟨release comes⟩ only after long. As long as Venus is strong in the lagna, so long the doer has the upper hand in strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

केंद्रस्थत्रिभवेशेनयोगेप्सुश्चेत्तदाचिरात् ॥ यावच्छुक्रोवलीलग्नेतावत्कर्तावलाधिकः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६९ within its section; it is published at position 169.
  • About this edition: कर्ता, 'the doer', is left unidentified by the verse; it names whoever is the acting party in the matter asked about.

अस्तंगते तनौ शुक्रे बद्धमोक्षादिसंभवः ॥ म्रियते येन योगेन तेन योगेन मुच्यते

astaṃgate tanau śukre baddhamokṣādisaṃbhavaḥ || mriyate yena yogena tena yogena mucyate

When Venus is combust in the tanu (the 1st), release of the prisoner and the like comes about. By whatever yoga a man dies, by that same yoga he is released.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तंगतेतनौशुक्रेबद्धमोक्षादिसंभवः ॥ म्रियतेयेनयोगेनतेनयोगेनमुच्यते

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७० within its section; it is published at position 170.
40.171a reading here is contested

मेषे तुले च शीघ्रं स्यात्कर्के नक्रे सकष्टता ॥ स्थिरे चिराद् विदेहस्थे मोक्षो मध्यमकालतः

meṣe tule ca śīghraṃ syātkarke nakre sakaṣṭatā || sthire cirād videhasthe mokṣo madhyamakālataḥ

In Aries and Libra it is quick; in Cancer and Capricorn (nakra) it comes with hardship. In a fixed sign, after long; when ⟨the significator⟩ is in a dual sign, release at a middling time.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषेतुलेचशीघ्रंस्यात्कर्केंनक्रेसकष्टता ॥ स्थिरेचि राद्विदेहस्थेमोक्षोमध्यमकालतः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्केंनक्रे"; alternatives "कर्केनक्रे" — a dot sits over के; it may be an anusvāra or a speck of ink [2026-10-01: superseded. The plate, read by eye at about 4.0x native on page_0199.png, shows the dot over के is a set anusvāra, not a speck: 77 dark pixels, against 76 for the anusvāra of शीघ्रं on the same line. So the press sets कर्कें. The mūla now reads कर्के, emended on the lexicon, and the press's कर्कें is kept on the ledger.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७१ within its section; it is published at position 171.
  • About this edition: विदेहस्थे is for द्विदेहस्थे, the dual (common) signs. The list needs them: Aries, Libra, Cancer and Capricorn are the four movable signs, and the second half then names the fixed and the dual. I render 'dual sign' and have not altered the Sanskrit. The reader saw a dot over के in कर्कें which may be an anusvāra or a speck of ink; nothing in the sense turns on it. [2026-10-01: the dot is not a speck. Read by eye at about 4.0x native on page_0199.png, it is a set anusvāra, so the press sets कर्कें. The mūla now reads कर्के, the locative the list needs, emended on the lexicon with the Kalpataru 1889 machine read (tajika-vp1888 page_0234) and the Pāṭhaka commentary lemma (tn-pathak-kuntala page_0386). विदेहस्थे is untouched.]
40.172a reading here is contested

क्षेमायातं वहित्रस्य मज्जनं वपनं जले ॥ पण्यव्यवहृतौ लाभो नापि प्रश्नचतुष्टयं

kṣemāyātaṃ vahitrasya majjanaṃ vapanaṃ jale || paṇyavyavahṛtau lābho nāpi praśnacatuṣṭayaṃ

The safe arrival of a ship; her sinking; sowing in the water; and whether there is profit in trading merchandise or not — ⟨these are⟩ the set of four questions.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्षेमायातंवहित्रस्यमज्जनंवपनंजले ॥ पण्यव्यवहृतौलाभोनापिप्रश्नश्चतु ष्टयं

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वपनं"; alternatives "वहनं" — the middle akṣara is thin; प and ह are close in this face
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वपनं"; alternatives "वहनं" — the middle akṣara is thin; प and ह are close in this face
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७२ within its section; it is published at position 172.
  • About this edition: वपनं, 'sowing', is what the plate prints; the reader flagged that the middle akṣara is thin and that वहनं, 'sailing on the water', would suit a list of ship questions better. I render the printed word. नापि is the 'or not' of the fourth question, not a fifth item in the list.
40.173a reading here is contested

नौर् लाभदा स्यान्मम नेति पृष्टे केंद्रे शुभाश्चेदितरेषु पापाः ॥ बलोज्झिताः क्षेमजयार्थदा नौर् भावीति वाच्यं विदुषा विमृश्य

naur lābhadā syānmama neti pṛṣṭe keṃdre śubhāśceditareṣu pāpāḥ || balojjhitāḥ kṣemajayārthadā naur bhāvīti vācyaṃ viduṣā vimṛśya

When it is asked 'will the ship bring me profit, or not?': if benefics are in the kendras and the malefics in the other houses are stripped of strength, then the learned man, having reflected, is to declare that the ship will bring safety, success and wealth.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नौर्लाभदास्यान्ममनेतिपृष्टेकेंद्रेशुभाश्चेदितरेषुपापाः ॥ वलोज्झिताःक्षेमजयार्थदानौर्भावीतिवाच्यं विदुपाविमृश्य

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विदुपाविमृश्य"; alternatives "विदुःपाविमृश्य", "विदुर्पाविमृश्य" — first word on the leaf, continuing from folio 96; read at 4× as वि-दु-पा-वि-मृ-श्य. I cannot make sense of it and have not emended it.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७३ within its section; it is published at position 173.
  • About this edition: विदुपा, the first word on the leaf, is unintelligible to me as it was to the plate reader, who read it at 4× as वि-दु-पा-वि-मृ-श्य and declined to emend it. विदुषा विमृश्य, 'the learned man having reflected', fits both the metre and the sense; I render the reflection and leave विदुपा unrendered. The Sanskrit is unaltered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विदुषा; this sentence names विदुपा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्नाधिपे वक्रिणि चास्य नाथेव्यावृत्य नौरेति च मार्गतः सा ॥ चेत्सौम्यदृष्टः कुशलेन पापैर् दृष्टस् तदा वस्तु विनेति वाच्यम्

lagnādhipe vakriṇi cāsya nāthevyāvṛtya naureti ca mārgataḥ sā || cetsaumyadṛṣṭaḥ kuśalena pāpair dṛṣṭas tadā vastu vineti vācyam

When the lord of the lagna is retrograde, and its own lord ⟨likewise⟩, the ship turns back and comes ⟨home⟩ by the road ⟨she went⟩. If ⟨that lord⟩ is aspected by benefics, ⟨she comes⟩ safely; if aspected by malefics, then one should declare that she comes without her cargo.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपेवक्रिणिचास्यनाथेन्यावृत्यनौरेतिचमार्गतःसा ॥ चेत्सौम्यदृष्टःकुशलेनपापैर्दृष्टस्तदावस्तुविनेतिवा च्यम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७४ within its section; it is published at position 174.
  • About this edition: अस्य नाथे is 'its lord', that is the dispositor of the lord of the lagna; the verse does not repeat वक्रिणि for it and I supply the repetition. न्यावृत्य is नि + आवृत्य, 'having turned back'. [2026-10-01: superseded for न्यावृत्य. The exemplar's leaf (NSP 1893 p.200), read by eye at about 4.0x native, sets व्यावृत्य, वि + आवृत्य, with this fount's closed half-va loop. न्यावृत्य was a misreading in our vision transcription, and the mūla now reads व्यावृत्य. The sense, 'having turned back', does not move.]

विलग्नरंध्राधिपती स्वगेहे प्रवेक्ष्यतश्चेद् व्यवहारलाभः ॥ यदाष्टमे सौम्यखगा बलाढ्यास् तदा तरी लाभसुखप्रदा स्यात्

vilagnaraṃdhrādhipatī svagehe pravekṣyataśced vyavahāralābhaḥ || yadāṣṭame saumyakhagā balāḍhyās tadā tarī lābhasukhapradā syāt

If the lords of the lagna and of the 8th (randhra) are about to enter their own houses, there is profit in the dealing. When the benefic planets in the 8th are strong, then the boat will bring profit and ease.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विलग्नरंध्राधिपतीस्वगेहेप्रवेश्यतच्चेद्व्यवहारलाभः ॥ यदाष्टमेसौम्यखगावलोक्यास्तदातरीलाभसुखप्रदास्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७५ within its section; it is published at position 175.
  • About this edition: प्रवेश्य is a causative absolutive, 'having caused to enter', which has no agent in this sentence; प्रविश्य, 'having entered', is the sense and is what I render. वलोक्याः is अवलोक्याः, 'to be seen': this press sets ब as व, and the initial अ is absorbed by the preceding खगा. [2026-10-01: superseded. The exemplar's leaf (NSP 1893 p.200), read by eye at about 4.0x and 3.0x native, sets प्रवेक्ष्यतश्चेद् and बलाढ्यास्, with a ब, not a व. प्रवेश्य तच्चेद् and वलोक्यास् were misreadings in our vision transcription, so the remarks on a causative absolutive and on वलोक्याः = अवलोक्याः no longer apply. The mūla now reads प्रवेक्ष्यतश्चेद्, the two lords 'about to enter', and बलाढ्यास्, 'rich in strength'.]

कुशलायातिपृच्छायां मृत्युयोगे समागते ॥ तदा नौरेति शीघ्रेण लाभाद्यं चान्ययोगतः

kuśalāyātipṛcchāyāṃ mṛtyuyoge samāgate || tadā naureti śīghreṇa lābhādyaṃ cānyayogataḥ

In the question about ⟨the ship's⟩ safe arrival: when a mṛtyu-yoga has come about, then the ship arrives quickly; and profit and the rest ⟨is to be judged⟩ from another yoga.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुशलायातिपृच्छायांमृत्युयोगेसमागते ॥ तदानौरेतिशीघ्रेणलाभाद्यंचान्ययोगतः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७६ within its section; it is published at position 176.
  • About this edition: That a mṛtyu-yoga brings the waiting to its end, rather than bringing disaster, is the same doctrine as verses 161 and 170: by the yoga that kills, the matter is also released.

लग्नेशं चंद्रनाथं वा चंद्रं वा मृत्युपो यदि ॥ पश्येत्क्रूरदृशा नावा समं नश्यति नौपतिः

lagneśaṃ caṃdranāthaṃ vā caṃdraṃ vā mṛtyupo yadi || paśyetkrūradṛśā nāvā samaṃ naśyati naupatiḥ

If the lord of death (the 8th) looks with a malefic aspect at the lord of the lagna, or at the lord of the Moon ⟨the Moon's dispositor⟩, or at the Moon itself, the master of the ship perishes along with the ship.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशंचंद्रनाथंवाचंद्रंवामृत्युपोयदि ॥ पश्ये त्क्रूरदृशानावासमंनश्यतिनौपतिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७७ within its section; it is published at position 177.
40.178a reading here is contested

लग्नेशाष्टपतिः स्वस्य गेहं नालोकते यदि ॥ तदा यानस्य वक्तव्यं निश्चितं मज्जनं बुधैः ॥ तावुभौ सप्तमस्थौ चेज्जले वापनिकां वदेत्

lagneśāṣṭapatiḥ svasya gehaṃ nālokate yadi || tadā yānasya vaktavyaṃ niścitaṃ majjanaṃ budhaiḥ || tāvubhau saptamasthau cejjale vāpanikāṃ vadet

If the lords of the lagna and of the 8th do not look at their own house, then the wise are to declare the sinking of the vessel as certain. If those two both stand in the 7th, one should declare the vāpanikā ⟨the sowing⟩ in the water.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशाष्टपतिःस्वस्यगेहंनालोकतेयदि ॥ तदायानस्यवक्तव्यंनिश्चितंमज्जनंबुधैः ॥ ता वुभौसप्तमस्थौचेजलेवापनिकांवदेत्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मज्जनं"; alternatives "मजनं" — read as the ज्ज conjunct at tile scale; the same press sets a single ज in मजनम् across lines 5–6 of this page, so the conjunct is worth re-reading on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेजले"; alternatives "चेज्जले" — a single ज at 4× (zoom tn200_L5start). The press does set the ज्ज conjunct elsewhere — मज्जतीति, line 6 — so this is as printed, not a limit of my reading. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चेज्जले; this sentence names चेजले, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७८ within its section; it is published at position 178.
  • About this edition: Three half-lines under one number. लग्नेशाष्टपतिः is printed as a singular, but तावुभौ ('those two both') in the third half-line shows the dual लग्नेशाष्टपती is meant, and I render the dual. वापनिका is the third of the four questions listed in verse 172, where the plate prints वपनं जले, 'sowing in the water'; the two verses corroborate each other, so I keep 'sowing' in both and do not adopt the reader's alternative वहनं ('sailing') at 172. What the sowing question actually asks is not explained by this book. The plate sets चेजले with a single ज where sandhi wants चेज्जले; the reader checked this at 4× and recorded that the press does set ज्ज elsewhere on the page. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चेज्जले; this sentence names चेजले, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

लग्नचंद्रपती क्रूरदृष्ट्या ऽन्योन्यं यदीक्षितौ ॥ तदा पोतजनानां च मिथः कलहमादिशेत्

lagnacaṃdrapatī krūradṛṣṭyā 'nyonyaṃ yadīkṣitau || tadā potajanānāṃ ca mithaḥ kalahamādiśet

If the lords of the lagna and of the Moon look at each other with a malefic aspect, then one should declare a quarrel among the people of the boat with one another.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नचंद्रपतिक्रूरदृष्ट्याऽन्योन्यंयदीक्षितौ ॥ तदापोतजनानांचमिथःकलहमादिशेत्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७९ within its section; it is published at position 179.
40.180a reading here is contested

लग्नं तु लग्नेश्वरशीतगूदयैः शुभान्वितैः केंद्रगतैस् तु सत्या

lagnaṃ tu lagneśvaraśītagūdayaiḥ śubhānvitaiḥ keṃdragatais tu satyā

But ⟨the report is⟩ true when the lagna, with the lord of the lagna and the cold-rayed one (the Moon) at the rising, are attended by benefics and stand in the kendras.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नंतुलग्नेश्वरशीतगूदयैःशुभान्वितैःकेंद्रगतैस्तुसत्या

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शीतगूदयैः"; alternatives "शीतगुदयैः", "शीतगूदयैः (as two words शीतगू दयैः)" — the ू mātrā is clear at 5× (zoom tn200_L9start); the compound itself is not clear to me.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८० within its section; it is published at position 180.
  • About this edition: One half-line under one number, and it does not finish its sentence: its feminine सत्या agrees with वार्ता ('the report'), which the page first writes in verse 181. I supply 'the report' in ⟨ ⟩. शीतगूदयैः defeated the plate reader, who was sure only of the ū-mātrā; I read शीतगु ('cold-rayed', the Moon) + उदयैः ('risings'), which the following verses about true and false news support, and I say so rather than claim the compound is settled.
40.181a reading here is contested

शुभदृग्योगतः सौम्यां वार्तां सत्यां विनिर्दिशेत् ॥ पातदृग्योगतो दुष्टा वार्ता सत्येति कीर्त्यते

śubhadṛgyogataḥ saumyāṃ vārtāṃ satyāṃ vinirdiśet || pātadṛgyogato duṣṭā vārtā satyeti kīrtyate

From the aspect or conjunction of benefics, one should pronounce the report favourable and true. From the aspect or conjunction of a pāta ⟨a node⟩, the report is bad, and ⟨yet⟩ is said to be true.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभदृग्योगतःसौम्यांवार्तांसत्यांविनिर्दिशेत् ॥ पातदृ ग्योगतोदुष्टावार्तासत्येतिकीर्यते

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पातदृ"; alternatives "पापदृ" — read at 6× (zoom tn200_L8tail) as प-ा-त-दृ. The parallel शुभदृग्योगतः earlier on the same line, and ग्योगतो opening line 9, want पापदृ — but the plate sets त, and I have kept the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कीर्यते"; alternatives "कीर्त्यते" — no त is visible under the repha at tile scale. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कीर्त्यते; this sentence names कीर्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कीर्यते"; alternatives "कीर्त्यते" — no त is visible under the repha at tile scale. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कीर्त्यते; this sentence names कीर्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८१ within its section; it is published at position 181.
  • About this edition: The plate sets पातदृग्योगतो, and the reader read it at 6× as प-ा-त-दृ and kept it. पाप ('malefic') is the parallel the first half-line sets up and is what the reader expected; but पात is itself a Tājika term for the lunar node, so the printed word is renderable and I have rendered it. If पाप is right, the clause simply says 'from the aspect or conjunction of malefics'. कीर्यते is printed without the त of कीर्त्यते, 'is said'; the reader saw no त under the repha. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कीर्त्यते; this sentence names कीर्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.182a reading here is contested

लग्नेश्वरे भाविवक्रे मिथ्या वार्ता भविष्यति

lagneśvare bhāvivakre mithyā vārtā bhaviṣyati

When the lord of the lagna is about to turn retrograde (bhāvi-vakra), the report will prove false.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेश्वरेभाविवेकेमिथ्यावार्ताभविष्यति

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाविवेके"; alternatives "भावविवेके", "भावे विवेके" — as set, without word division. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भाविवक्रे; this sentence names भाविवेके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाविवेके"; alternatives "भावविवेके", "भावे विवेके" — as set, without word division. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भाविवक्रे; this sentence names भाविवेके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८२ within its section; it is published at position 182.
  • About this edition: One half-line under one number. The reader offered भावविवेके and भावे विवेके as the divisions, and wrote that the page sets the run without word division. I render on भावविवेके, the only one of the three that yields a phrase, and I say plainly that the condition the half-line states is not recoverable from it. It stands against verse 181, which gives the marks of a TRUE report. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भाविवक्रे; this sentence names विवेके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.183a reading here is contested

क्रेता लग्नपतिर्ज्ञेयो विक्रेताग्रपतिः स्मृतः ॥ गृह्णाम्यहमिदं वस्तु प्रश्न एवंविधे सति

kretā lagnapatirjñeyo vikretāgrapatiḥ smṛtaḥ || gṛhṇāmyahamidaṃ vastu praśna evaṃvidhe sati

The buyer is to be known as the lord of the lagna; the seller is held to be the lord of the agra. When a question of this kind arises — 'shall I take this thing?' —

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

क्रेतालग्नपतिर्ज्ञेयो विक्रेताग्रपतिःस्मृतः ॥ गृह्णाम्यहमिदंवस्तुप्रश्नएवंविधेसति

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विक्रेताग्रपतिः"; alternatives "विक्रेतास्तपतिः" — second akṣara read as ग्र; the sense (the seller = lord of the seventh) would want अस्तपतिः. Kept as read.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८३ within its section; it is published at position 183.
  • About this edition: विक्रेताग्रपतिः is what the reader read, and he flagged it himself: the doctrine everywhere else in praśna makes the seller the lord of the 7th, so विक्रेतास्तपतिः ('the lord of the asta') is very likely the word. I render the printed अग्र untranslated rather than supply the 7th house on my own authority. The record does not finish its sentence; verse 184 completes it.

बलशालि विलग्नं चेद् गृह्यते तत्क्रयाणकम् ॥ तस्मात्क्रयणकाल्लाभः प्रष्टुर्भवति निश्चितम्

balaśāli vilagnaṃ ced gṛhyate tatkrayāṇakam || tasmātkrayaṇakāllābhaḥ praṣṭurbhavati niścitam

— if the lagna is strong, that article of merchandise is to be bought, and profit from that purchase certainly comes to the querent.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलशालिविलग्नंचेद्गृह्यतेतत्क्रयाणकम् ॥ तस्मात्क्रयणकाल्लाभःप्र ष्टुभवतिनिश्चितम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८४ within its section; it is published at position 184.
  • About this edition: The plate prints प्रष्टुभवति with no repha where प्रष्टुर्भवति ('comes to the querent') is required; the same slip is on the plate again at verse 192, प्रष्टुलाभः for प्रष्टुर्लाभः. I render the genitive and have not altered the Sanskrit. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्भवति; this sentence names प्रष्टुभवति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

विक्रीणाम्यमुकं वस्तु प्रश्न एवंविधे सति ॥ आयस्थाने बलवति विक्रेतव्यं क्रयाणकं

vikrīṇāmyamukaṃ vastu praśna evaṃvidhe sati || āyasthāne balavati vikretavyaṃ krayāṇakaṃ

'Shall I sell such-and-such a thing?' — when a question of this kind arises, and the āya-sthāna (the 11th, the house of gain) is strong, the merchandise should be sold.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

विक्रीणाम्यमुकंवस्तुप्रश्नएवंविधेसति ॥ आयस्थानेबलवतिविक्रेतव्यंक्रयाणकं

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८५ within its section; it is published at position 185.

दिशि कस्यां भवेत्सस्यनिष्पत्तिः क्व च सा नहि ॥ पूर्वं देशस्य भंगो हि क्व दिशि क्व तनेन हि

diśi kasyāṃ bhavetsasyaniṣpattiḥ kva ca sā nahi || pūrvaṃ deśasya bhaṃgo hi kva diśi kva tanena hi

In which direction will the crop come to ripeness, and where will it not? And first: in which direction ⟨falls⟩ the ruin of the country, and in which ⟨…⟩? [The closing words तनेन हि are obscure to me; how to read them is an open doubt on this verse.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिशिकस्यांभवेत्सस्यनिष्पत्तिःक्वचसानहि ॥ पूर्वंदेशस्यभंगोहिक्कदिशिक्कतनेनहि

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८६ within its section; it is published at position 186.
  • About this edition: This record opens the topic of the harvest, which runs to verse 191. क्क is the page's spelling of क्व, 'where'. क्कतनेन would be a derivative of it meaning 'belonging to what place', which is a real but rare formation; I cannot make the clause say anything I would stand behind, so I mark it rather than invent a sense for it. [2026-10-01: superseded for क्क. The plate, read by eye at about 4.75x native on page_0200.png, shows the press sets the same क्व sort here as in क्व च सा नहि; क्क was our transcription's misreading, and the mūla now reads क्व दिशि क्व. The rest of the clause, तनेन हि, is not settled and stands as an open doubt on this verse.]

चतुर्णामपि केंद्राणां मध्ये यत्र शुभग्रहः ॥ तस्यां च सस्यनिष्पत्तिः स्वस्थं चैव भविष्यति

caturṇāmapi keṃdrāṇāṃ madhye yatra śubhagrahaḥ || tasyāṃ ca sasyaniṣpattiḥ svasthaṃ caiva bhaviṣyati

In whichever of the four kendras a benefic planet stands, in that ⟨direction⟩ the crop will ripen, and ⟨the land⟩ will be sound.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चतुर्णामपिकेंद्राणांमध्येयत्रशुभग्रहः ॥ त स्यांचसस्यनिष्पत्तिःस्वस्थंचैवभविष्यति

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८७ within its section; it is published at position 187.

यस्यां दिशि शनिः पापैर् युतो वाप्यवलोकितः ॥ दिशि तस्यां च तत्स्वास्थ्यं दुर्भिक्षं च भविष्यति

yasyāṃ diśi śaniḥ pāpair yuto vāpyavalokitaḥ || diśi tasyāṃ ca tatsvāsthyaṃ durbhikṣaṃ ca bhaviṣyati

In whichever direction Saturn is joined with malefics, or else aspected ⟨by them⟩, in that direction there will be ill-health and famine. [The plate prints तत्स्वास्थ्यं, 'that soundness'; the contrast with verse 187 and the दुर्भिक्षं beside it require तदस्वास्थ्यं, 'ill-health there', and that is what I render.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यस्यांदिशिशनिःपापैर्युतोवाप्यवलोकितः ॥ दिशितस्यांचतत्स्वास्थ्यंदुर्भिक्षंचभविष्यति

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८८ within its section; it is published at position 188.
  • About this edition: As printed the line says soundness AND famine in the same breath, which contradicts itself and contradicts verse 187, where soundness is the benefic's result. The privative अ has been lost in the setting: तत् + अस्वास्थ्यं gives तदस्वास्थ्यं. I render the privative reading and say so; the Sanskrit is unaltered.

दिशि यस्यां रविस् तत्र धान्यनाशो नृपाद् भवेत् ॥ यत्रापि मंगलस् तत्र धान्यनाशोऽग्निभिस् तथा

diśi yasyāṃ ravis tatra dhānyanāśo nṛpād bhavet || yatrāpi maṃgalas tatra dhānyanāśo'gnibhis tathā

In whichever direction the Sun ⟨stands⟩, there the destruction of grain comes from the king. And wherever Mars ⟨stands⟩, there likewise the destruction of grain comes by fires.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

दिशियस्यांरविस्तत्रधान्यनाशोनृपाद्भवेत् ॥ यत्रापिमंगलस्तत्रधान्यनाशोऽग्निभिस्तथा

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८९ within its section; it is published at position 189.

यस्यां दिशि शुभाः खेटाः समस्तबलशालिनः ॥ निष्पन्ना सैव विज्ञेया सस्यस्वास्थ्यं च तत्र हि

yasyāṃ diśi śubhāḥ kheṭāḥ samastabalaśālinaḥ || niṣpannā saiva vijñeyā sasyasvāsthyaṃ ca tatra hi

In whichever direction the benefic planets ⟨stand⟩, possessed of strength of every kind, that very ⟨direction⟩ is to be known as fruitful, and there the crop is sound.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यस्यांदिशिशुभाःखेटाःसमस्तबल शालिनः ॥ निष्पन्नासैवविज्ञेयासस्यस्वास्थ्यंचतत्रहि

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९० within its section; it is published at position 190.

केंद्रेषु सर्वतः पापाः समस्तबलसंयुताः ॥ देशस् तदा विनष्टोऽसौ ज्ञातव्यः शास्त्रकोविदैः

keṃdreṣu sarvataḥ pāpāḥ samastabalasaṃyutāḥ || deśas tadā vinaṣṭo'sau jñātavyaḥ śāstrakovidaiḥ

When malefics, endowed with strength of every kind, ⟨stand⟩ in the kendras on every side, then those skilled in the śāstra are to know that the country is ruined.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

केंद्रेषुसर्वतःपापाःसमस्तबलसंयुताः ॥ देशस्तदाविनष्टोऽसौज्ञातव्यःशास्त्र कोविदैः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९१ within its section; it is published at position 191.

लग्नपो मृत्युपश्चापि मृत्यौ स्यातामुभौ यदि ॥ स्थितौ द्रेष्काण एकस्मिन् प्रष्टुर्लाभस् तदा ध्रुवं

lagnapo mṛtyupaścāpi mṛtyau syātāmubhau yadi || sthitau dreṣkāṇa ekasmin praṣṭurlābhas tadā dhruvaṃ

If the lord of the lagna and the lord of death (the 8th) both stand in the 8th, and stand in one and the same drekkāṇa, then gain to the querent is certain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपोमृत्युपश्चापिमृत्यौस्यातामुभौयदि ॥ स्थितौद्रेष्काणएकस्मिन्प्रष्टु लाभस्तदाध्रुवं

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९२ within its section; it is published at position 192.
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "भुवनदीपके ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The plate prints प्रष्टुलाभः with no repha, as it printed प्रष्टुभवति at verse 184; प्रष्टुर्लाभः, 'gain to the querent', is the reading I render. The Sanskrit is unaltered. This verse opens the run the page labels भुवनदीपके.
40.193a reading here is contested

एवं द्वादशभावेषु द्रेष्काणैरेव केवलम् ॥ बुधो विनिश्चयं ब्रूयाद् योगेष्वन्येषु निस्पृहः

evaṃ dvādaśabhāveṣu dreṣkāṇaireva kevalam || budho viniścayaṃ brūyād yogeṣvanyeṣu nispṛhaḥ

In this way, for all twelve houses, the wise ⟨astrologer⟩ should pronounce his verdict by the drekkāṇas alone, caring nothing for the other yogas.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंद्वादशभावेषुद्रेष्काणैरेवकेवलम् ॥ बुधैविनिश्चयंब्रूयाद्योगेष्वन्येषुनिस्पृहः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधैविनिश्चयं"; alternatives "बुधेविनिश्चयं", "बुधैर्विनिश्चयं" — the mātrā over ध reads ai at tile scale and as a single e-stroke at 3× (zoom tn201_L5); no repha is printed on वि. [2026-10-01: the plate, read by eye at about 4.75x native on page_0201.png beside the णै of द्रेष्काणै on the same line, sets बुधे with one e-stroke and no repha on वि, as the reader's 3× reading said; the mūla now reads बुधो, emended on the grammar with three printings.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९३ within its section; it is published at position 193.
  • About this edition: बुधै is as printed, and the reader could not settle it: बुधैः ('by the wise', instrumental) and बुधे are his alternatives. The verb ब्रूयात् is third singular and निस्पृहः is a nominative singular, so the subject is the single astrologer; on बुधैः the sentence would instead read 'the verdict is to be pronounced by the wise'. The claim is the same either way. [2026-10-01: 'बुधै is as printed' is superseded. Read by eye at about 4.75x native on page_0201.png, the press sets बुधे, which construes with nothing. The mūla now reads बुधो, the nominative singular subject that ब्रूयात् and निस्पृहः need, emended on the grammar with the machine reads of tn-pathak-kuntala page_0392, tn-mahidhara page_0217 and tn-sitaram-jha page_0227.]

प्रश्नकाले सौम्यवर्गे लग्ने यदधिको भवेत् ॥ ग्रहभावानपेक्षेण तदाख्येयं शुभं फलम्

praśnakāle saumyavarge lagne yadadhiko bhavet || grahabhāvānapekṣeṇa tadākhyeyaṃ śubhaṃ phalam

If at the time of the question the lagna is in a benefic varga and ⟨that benefic⟩ is the preponderant one, then a good result is to be declared, without regard to the planets and the houses.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

प्रश्नकालेसौम्यवर्गेलग्नेयदधिको भवेत् ॥ ग्रहभावानपेक्षेणतदाख्येयंशुभंफलम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९४ within its section; it is published at position 194.

लग्नाधिपश्च लाभस्याधीशश्च दायको भवेत् ॥ लग्नाधिपस्य योगो लाभाधीशेन लाभकरः ॥

lagnādhipaśca lābhasyādhīśaśca dāyako bhavet || lagnādhipasya yogo lābhādhīśena lābhakaraḥ ||

The lord of the lagna and the lord of gain (the 11th) are the givers. A yoga of the lord of the lagna with the lord of the 11th brings gain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नाधिपश्चलाभस्याधीशश्चदायकोभवेत् ॥ लग्नाधिपस्ययोगोलाभाधीशेनलाभकरः॥

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९५ within its section; it is published at position 195.

भवति परलाभकरस् तदैव स यदि चंद्रदृग्लाभे ॥ योगाः सर्वेप्यफलाश्चंद्रमृते व्यक्तमेतच्च

bhavati paralābhakaras tadaiva sa yadi caṃdradṛglābhe || yogāḥ sarvepyaphalāścaṃdramṛte vyaktametacca

He becomes a bringer of the highest gain only then, if the Moon has an aspect upon the 11th (lābha). Without the Moon all the yogas are fruitless — and this is plain.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भवतिपरलाभकरस्तदैवसयदिचंद्रदृग्लाभे ॥ योगाःसर्वेप्यफलाश्चंद्रमृतेव्यक्तमेतच्च

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९६ within its section; it is published at position 196.
  • About this edition: चंद्रमृते is चंद्रम् + ऋते, 'apart from the Moon'; it is not a compound of मृत ('dead').
40.197a reading here is contested

कर्माधीशेनैवं कर्माधीशेन च निवृत्त्यधीशेन ॥ मृत्युपतिना च योगे लाभाधीशस्य वक्तव्यम्

karmādhīśenaivaṃ karmādhīśena ca nivṛttyadhīśena || mṛtyupatinā ca yoge lābhādhīśasya vaktavyam

Thus, ⟨in a yoga⟩ with the lord of karma (the 10th), and with the lord of karma, and with the lord of nivṛtti (the 12th, of withdrawal), and with the lord of death (the 8th): when the lord of gain (the 11th) is in such a yoga, ⟨the result⟩ is to be declared. ⟨The lord of karma is named twice; whether the first should be another lord, and whether च stands, is an open doubt on this verse.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कर्माधीशेनननवंकर्माधीशेनचनिवृत्त्यधी शेन ॥ मृत्युपतिनाचयोगेलाभाधीशस्यवक्तव्यम्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्माधीशेनननवं"; alternatives "कर्माधीशेननवं" — three न strokes stand between शे and वं at 3× (zoom tn201_L7); a doubled न in the setting is possible, and I have kept what is printed. [2026-10-01: read again by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F sets two न, कर्माधीशेननवं; the third was the stem of श. The mūla now reads कर्माधीशेनैवं for ननवं, emended on the lexicon with K (1889) p.236, Mahīdhara p.218 and Jhā p.227, whose pages, read by eye on 2026-10-01 at about 2.0x, 1.6x and 2.0x native, set नैवं.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९७ within its section; it is published at position 197.
  • About this edition: The page sets कर्माधीशेन twice, with ननवं between them; the reader counted three न strokes at 3× and kept what is printed. Verse 198 names puṇya (the 9th) beside karma (the 10th), so the first member is very likely पुण्याधीशेन नवमं ('with the lord of merit, the ninth'), and the compositor's eye has jumped. I have NOT rendered that reconstruction: the ⟨…⟩ marks where the text is lost to me, and 'nine' renders the नवं that survives inside ननवं. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F sets two न, not three. The mūla now reads कर्माधीशेनैवं for ननवं, on the lexicon with K p.236, Mahīdhara p.218 and Jhā p.227, which set नैवं (read by eye at about 2.0x, 1.6x and 2.0x native), so no नवं, 'nine', stands in the verse. Whether the first lord is कर्म, as both exemplars set, or Jhā's धर्म, and whether च stands, is an open doubt on this verse.]

तत्तत्स्थानेक्षणतः पुण्यविवृद्धिश्च कर्मवृद्धिश्च ॥ विबुधैस् तदा निवृत्तिर् मृत्युर् भावाः परेप्येवम्

tattatsthānekṣaṇataḥ puṇyavivṛddhiśca karmavṛddhiśca || vibudhais tadā nivṛttir mṛtyur bhāvāḥ parepyevam

By the aspect upon each of those houses in turn: increase of merit, and increase of work. Then the wise ⟨declare⟩ withdrawal, death, and the other bhāvas in the same way.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तत्तत्स्थानेक्षणतःपुण्यविवृद्धिश्चकर्मवृद्धिश्च ॥ विबुधैस्तदानिवृत्तिर्मृत्युर्भावा परेप्येवम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९८ within its section; it is published at position 198.
  • About this edition: The four words पुण्य, कर्म, निवृत्ति and मृत्यु name the 9th, 10th, 12th and 8th, the same four houses verse 197 lists — which is the evidence that 197's doubled कर्माधीशेन conceals पुण्याधीशेन.
40.199a reading here is contested

लग्नेशो यदि षष्ठः स्वयमेत्यरिपुर् भवत्यात्मा ॥ मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ व्ययगोसौ सततं व्ययं कुरुते

lagneśo yadi ṣaṣṭhaḥ svayametyaripur bhavatyātmā || mṛtyukṛdaṣṭamagosau vyayagosau satataṃ vyayaṃ kurute

If the lord of the lagna is ⟨lord of⟩ the 6th, the self comes of its own accord to be its own enemy. Standing in the 8th, he brings death; standing in the 12th (vyaya), he spends without ceasing.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशोयदिपष्ठःस्वयमेत्यरिपुर्भवत्यात्मा ॥ मृत्युक्रूददृष्टमगोसौव्ययगोसौसततंव्ययंकुरुते

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदिपष्ठः"; alternatives "यदिषष्ठः" — read at 3× (zoom tn201_L9) as प, not ष; the sense wants षष्ठः. Plate kept. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F prints षष्ठः, with the ष diagonal inked; प was a misreading in our transcription, and the mūla now reads षष्ठः.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृत्युक्रूददृष्ट"; alternatives "मृत्युक्रूरदृष्ट" — the akṣara after क्रू reads द at tile scale; र would give the expected sense. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F prints मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ: कृ with the ṛ-hook, one द, then ष्ट. क्रूददृष्ट was a misreading in our transcription, and the mūla now reads मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९९ within its section; it is published at position 199.
  • About this edition: Two printed words are wrong and the reader flagged both, keeping the plate each time: पष्ठः stands for षष्ठः ('sixth'), and क्रूद for क्रूर ('malefic'). I render both corrected readings and say so. The third difficulty is मगो, which I have not emended: अष्टमगः would fit the मृत्यु beside it and the व्ययगः that answers it, but nothing on the plate supports the missing syllable. स्वयमेत्य is स्वयम् + एत्य, 'having come of itself'. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F prints षष्ठः and मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ, so पष्ठः, क्रूद and the lost अष्ट- describe our transcription's misreadings, not the press. The mūla now reads मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ: मृत्युकृत्, 'bringer of death', and अष्टमगः, 'standing in the 8th'.]

लग्नस्थचंद्रजं चंद्रः क्रूरो वा यदि पश्यति ॥ धनलाभो भवत्याशु किंत्वनर्थोपि पृच्छतः

lagnasthacaṃdrajaṃ caṃdraḥ krūro vā yadi paśyati || dhanalābho bhavatyāśu kiṃtvanarthopi pṛcchataḥ

If the Moon, or a malefic, aspects Mercury (candraja, the Moon's son) standing in the lagna, gain of wealth comes to the querent quickly — but harm as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नस्थचंद्रजंचंद्रःक्रू रोवायदिपश्यति ॥ धनलाभोभवत्याशुकिंत्वनर्थोपिपृच्छतः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १०० within its section; it is published at position 200.
  • About this edition: वा is 'or', not 'and': either the Moon's aspect or a malefic's is enough. किंतु makes the second clause a qualification of the first, not a second independent result.

Adhyāya 41 · अथसामान्यतोभावविचारः ॥

इंदुः सर्वत्र बीजाभो लग्नं च कुसुमप्रभम् ॥ फलेन सदृशोंशश्च भावः स्वादुसमप्रभः

iṃduḥ sarvatra bījābho lagnaṃ ca kusumaprabham || phalena sadṛśoṃśaśca bhāvaḥ svādusamaprabhaḥ

Everywhere the Moon is like the seed; the lagna is like the flower; the aṃśa (the navāṃśa division) is like the fruit; and the bhāva ⟨is like⟩ the taste.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

इंदुःसर्वत्रबीजाभोलग्नंचकुसुमप्रभ म् ॥ फलेनसदृशोंशश्चभावःस्वादुसमप्रभः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The four terms are set out as a growing plant: seed → flower → fruit → taste. सदृशोंशश्च is printed without an avagraha for सदृशोऽंशश्च (सदृशः + अंशः); the word division is not in doubt.

लग्नपतिर्यदि लग्नं कार्याधीशश्च वीक्षते कार्यं ॥ लग्नाधीशः कार्यं कार्येशः पश्यति विलग्नम्

lagnapatiryadi lagnaṃ kāryādhīśaśca vīkṣate kāryaṃ || lagnādhīśaḥ kāryaṃ kāryeśaḥ paśyati vilagnam

If the lagna-lord ⟨looks upon⟩ the lagna and the lord of the matter (kārya) looks upon the matter ⟨that is one arrangement⟩; ⟨and if⟩ the lagna-lord ⟨looks upon⟩ the matter and the lord of the matter looks upon the lagna ⟨that is another⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नपतिर्यदिलग्नंकार्याधीशश्चवीक्षतेकार्यं ॥ लग्नाधीशःकार्यकार्येशःपश्यतिविलग्नम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The record names the configurations and states no result; the result is given in the record that follows. One verb (वीक्षते / पश्यति) is shared by both halves, so the second aspect in each half is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. कार्य is printed without its anusvāra (कार्यं) in the second half.

लग्नेशः कार्येशं विलोकयेल्लग्नपं च कार्येशः ॥ शीतगुदृष्टौ सत्यां परिपूर्णा कार्यसंसिद्धिः

lagneśaḥ kāryeśaṃ vilokayellagnapaṃ ca kāryeśaḥ || śītagudṛṣṭau satyāṃ paripūrṇā kāryasaṃsiddhiḥ

⟨When⟩ the lagna-lord looks upon the lord of the matter and the lord of the matter ⟨looks upon⟩ the lagna-lord, and when the aspect of the Moon (śītagu, 'the cool-rayed one') is present as well, the accomplishment of the matter is complete.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नेशःकार्येशंविलोकयेल्लग्नपंचकार्येशः ॥ शीतयुग्दृष्टौसत्यांपरिपूर्णाकार्यसंसिद्धिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: विलोकयेल्लग्नपं = विलोकयेत् + लग्नपं, 'should look upon the lagna-lord'; the second verb in the pair is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. शीतयुग्दृष्टौ सत्यां is a locative absolute, 'when the Moon's conjunction-or-aspect exists'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शीतगुदृष्टौ; this sentence names शीतयुग्दृष्टौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
41.4a reading here is contested

कथयंति पादयोगं पश्यति सौम्योनयल्लग्नम् ॥ लग्नाधिपं च पश्यति शुभग्रहश्चार्धयोगोत्र

kathayaṃti pādayogaṃ paśyati saumyonayallagnam || lagnādhipaṃ ca paśyati śubhagrahaścārdhayogotra

They call it a pāda-yoga (a quarter-yoga) ⟨when⟩ a benefic looks upon the lagna; and ⟨when⟩ a benefic graha looks upon the lagna-lord as well, here ⟨there is⟩ an ardha-yoga (a half-yoga).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कथयंतिपादयोगंपश्यतिसौम्योनयल्लग्नम् ॥ ल माधिपंचपश्यतिशुभग्रहश्चार्धयोगोत्र

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौम्योनयल्लग्नम्"; alternatives "सौम्यो नयल्लग्नम्", "सौम्योऽनयल्लग्नम्" — as set; no avagraha is printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रहश्चार्धयोगोत्र"; alternatives "ग्रहश्वार्धयोगोत्र", "ग्रहश्चार्धयोगोऽत्र" — the श्+subscript conjunct is small; this press sets श्च and श्व almost alike (see line 5, where a 4× zoom showed श्व). No avagraha glyph is printed after योगो, so none is recorded.
  • About this edition: Two places are not construable as printed and I have not invented either. (1) सौम्योनयल्लग्नम्: the akṣaras नयल् stand between सौम्यो and लग्नम् and give no word; I render only 'a benefic looks upon the lagna', which is what the rule needs. The plate reader recorded that no avagraha is printed. (2) लमाधिपं is printed where लग्नाधिपं, 'the lagna-lord', is required by the sense; the ग्ना is not on the page. The reader also flagged the श्च/श्व conjunct in ग्रहश्चार्धयोगोत्र; on either reading the sense is 'and a benefic graha', and योगोत्र is योगः + अत्र with no avagraha printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नाधिपं; this sentence names लमाधिपं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

एकः शुभो ग्रहो यदि पश्यति लग्नाधिपे विलोकयति ॥ पादोनयोगमाहुस्तदा बुधाः कार्यसंसिद्धिः

ekaḥ śubho graho yadi paśyati lagnādhipe vilokayati || pādonayogamāhustadā budhāḥ kāryasaṃsiddhiḥ

If one benefic graha looks ⟨upon the lagna⟩ while the lagna-lord too is looking on, then the wise call it a pādona-yoga (a yoga short by a quarter, that is three quarters) — ⟨so far goes⟩ the accomplishment of the matter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एकःशुभोग्रहोयदिपश्यतिलग्नाधिपेविलोकयति ॥ पादोनंयोगमाहुस्तदाबुधाःकार्यसंसि द्धिः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: लग्नाधिपे विलोकयति is a locative absolute, 'the lagna-lord looking on'. The object of the benefic's aspect (the lagna) is not written and is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. पादोन means 'less by a quarter', so three quarters — a weaker result than the परिपूर्णा of record 3 and stronger than the अर्ध of record 4.
41.6a reading here is contested

उदयोपगतं राशिं तञ्च कलीकृत्य लिप्तिका गुणयेत् ॥ छायांगुलैश्च कुर्यात् हत्वा मुनिभिस्ततः शेषः

udayopagataṃ rāśiṃ tañca kalīkṛtya liptikā guṇayet || chāyāṃgulaiśca kuryāt hatvā munibhistataḥ śeṣaḥ

⟨Take⟩ the sign standing at the ascendant, reduce it to kalās (minutes of arc), and multiply the minutes; and one should ⟨multiply⟩ by the aṅgulas of the ⟨gnomon's⟩ shadow. Having divided ⟨the product⟩ by the sages (that is, by seven), the remainder from that ⟨is what is used⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

उदयोपगतंराशिंतत्कलीकृत्यलिप्तिकागुणयेत् ॥ छायांगुलेश्चकुर्यात्फलामुनि भिस्ततःशेषः

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलामुनि"; alternatives "ह्लामुनि" — the letter read as फ has this press's फ shape (a ह-like bowl with a leg); at tile magnification फ and ह are close. A zoom at this spot landed on blank paper and was not repeated. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 5.2x native on page_0202.png, the plate shows ह and the त्व ligature, not फ and ल; the mūla now reads हत्वा मुनिभिस्.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलामुनि"; alternatives "ह्लामुनि" — the letter read as फ has this press's फ shape (a ह-like bowl with a leg); at tile magnification फ and ह are close. A zoom at this spot landed on blank paper and was not repeated. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 5.2x native on page_0202.png, the plate shows ह and the त्व ligature, not फ and ल; the mūla now reads हत्वा मुनिभिस्.]
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "उत्पलः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: This record begins a reckoning that runs on through records 7 to 10. Two words look misprinted and I keep the printed characters: छायांगुलेश्च stands where छायांगुलैश्च (instrumental plural, 'by the shadow-aṅgulas') is required, and फला stands where फलं, 'the product', is required — I read फलामुनिभिः as फलं मुनिभिः, 'the product by the sages (7)', and say so here rather than changing the Sanskrit. मुनि = 7 is the ordinary number-word for the seven ṛṣis. The plate reader's doubt is only whether the letter is फ or ह. The division is supplied in ⟨ ⟩: the verse gives only the divisor and the remainder. [2026-10-01: superseded on both words. Read by eye on page_0202.png, F sets छायांगुलेश्च with one e-stroke over ल (about 3.2x native); the mūla now reads छायांगुलैश्च, the instrumental plural, emended on the lexicon, and the press's ले is kept on the ledger. Where the note reads फलामुनिभिः, the plate shows ह and the त्व ligature (about 5.2x native), so the mūla now reads हत्वा मुनिभिस्.]

ग्रहगुणकारो ज्ञेयो दैवविदा पंच विंशतिः सैका ॥ मनवोंकाष्टौत्रितयं भवाश्च ५।२१।१४।९।८।३।११ सूर्यादितो ज्ञेयाः

grahaguṇakāro jñeyo daivavidā paṃca viṃśatiḥ saikā || manavoṃkāṣṭautritayaṃ bhavāśca 5|21|14|9|8|3|11 sūryādito jñeyāḥ

The astrologer is to know the multipliers of the grahas: five, twenty-one, fourteen, nine, eight, three, eleven — 5, 21, 14, 9, 8, 3, 11 — and they are to be taken beginning from the Sun ⟨so: the Sun 5, the Moon 21, Mars 14, Mercury 9, Jupiter 8, Venus 3, Saturn 11⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ग्रहगुणकारोज्ञेयोदैवविदापंचर्विंशतिःसैका ॥ मनवोंकाष्ठैस्त्रितयंभवाश्च ५।२१।१४।९।८।३।११ सूर्यादितोज्ञेयाः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse gives its numbers as words and then glosses them in figures on the page, so the figures fix the words: पंच = 5, विंशतिः सैका ('twenty with one') = 21, मनवः ('the Manus') = 14, अंक = 9, अष्ट = 8, त्रितयं = 3, भवाः = 11. The assignment to the seven grahas in ⟨ ⟩ is mine, from सूर्यादितो ज्ञेयाः, 'to be known from the Sun onward'; the verse does not name the grahas. पंचर्विंशतिः is printed with a repha that belongs to no preceding letter; the figures show the words are पंच and विंशतिः, two separate numbers. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पंच विंशतिः; this sentence names पंचर्विंशतिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
41.8a reading here is contested

गणयित्वैवं प्राग्वत् हत्वा सौम्यस्य यदि भवेदुदयः ॥ कार्यप्राप्तिः प्रष्टुर्वक्तव्या नेतरैर्ग्रहैर्भवति

gaṇayitvaivaṃ prāgvat hatvā saumyasya yadi bhavedudayaḥ || kāryaprāptiḥ praṣṭurvaktavyā netarairgrahairbhavati

Having reckoned in this way and divided as before, if the rising is that of a benefic, ⟨then⟩ the obtaining of the matter is to be declared to the querent. By the other ⟨malefic⟩ grahas it does not come about.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गणयित्वैवंप्राग्वत्फलवासौम्यस्यभवेदुदयः ॥ कार्यप्राप्तिःप्रष्टुर्वक्तव्यानेतैर्ग्रहैर्भवति

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राग्वत्फल"; alternatives "प्राग्वत्ह्ल" — same फ/ह shape as line 2 [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 5.2x native on page_0202.png, F sets ह and the त्व ligature after प्राग्वत्, not फ and ल. The mūla now reads प्राग्वत् हत्वा.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टुर्"; alternatives "प्रष्ठुर्" — zoomed 5× at page x≈1680-1900, y≈495-585: the subscript under ष is टु, so प्रष्टुर् (of the querent)
  • About this edition: प्राग्वत्फल is printed without the anusvāra of फलं. एतैर्ग्रहैः, 'by these grahas', is set against सौम्यस्य, 'of a benefic', so the grahas denied are the malefics; that identification is supplied in ⟨ ⟩ and is not written in the verse. The plate reader zoomed 5× and confirmed प्रष्टुः, 'of the querent'. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye on page_0202.png, F sets हत्वा after प्राग्वत् (about 5.2x native) and नेतरैर्ग्रहैर् (about 3.3x native); प्राग्वत्फल and एतैर्ग्रहैः, 'by these grahas', came from misreadings in our transcription. The mūla now reads प्राग्वत् हत्वा and नेतरैर्ग्रहैर्, 'not by the other grahas', with यदि added on the metre from Pāṭhaka's printing. प्रष्टुः stands.]

गुणकारैक्यविभक्तः कार्यः सूर्यादिगुणकसंशुद्धः ॥ यस्य न शुध्यति वर्गो विज्ञेयस्तद्दशात् कालः

guṇakāraikyavibhaktaḥ kāryaḥ sūryādiguṇakasaṃśuddhaḥ || yasya na śudhyati vargo vijñeyastaddaśāt kālaḥ

⟨The product⟩ is to be divided by the sum of the multipliers, and is to be cleared by the multipliers taken from the Sun onward. The ⟨graha⟩ whose share does not clear is the one to be known; from his daśā ⟨comes⟩ the time.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

गुणकारैक्यविभक्तःकार्यःसूर्यादिगुण कसंशुद्धः ॥ यस्यनशुध्यतिवर्गोंविज्ञेयस्तद्दशात्कालः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: गुणकारैक्य is the sum of the seven multipliers of record 7; that sum is 71 (5+21+14+9+8+3+11), which I state here rather than in the rendering because the verse gives only the word 'sum'. वर्गों is printed with an anusvāra where वर्गः (or वर्गो) is required; I read it as वर्गो विज्ञेयः. The object of the division, the product of record 6, is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads वर्गो; this sentence names वर्गों, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
41.10a reading here is contested

आरदिवाकरशेषे दिवसाः पक्षाश्च भृगुशशिनोः ॥ गुर्ववशेषे मासा ऋतवः सौम्ये शनैश्चरेब्दाः स्युः

āradivākaraśeṣe divasāḥ pakṣāśca bhṛguśaśinoḥ || gurvavaśeṣe māsā ṛtavaḥ saumye śanaiścarebdāḥ syuḥ

When the remainder ⟨falls⟩ to Mars or the Sun, ⟨the time is counted in⟩ days; and fortnights for Venus and the Moon; when the remainder falls to Jupiter, months; for Mercury, seasons (ṛtus); for Saturn, years.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आरदिवाकरशेषेदिवाकरपक्षाश्वभृगुशशिनोः ॥ गुर्ववशेमासऋतवःसौम्येश नैश्चरेब्दाःस्युः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पक्षाश्व"; alternatives "पक्षाश्च" — zoomed 4× at page x≈2240-2540, y≈605-695: the subscript is a closed व loop, not a च crescent, so the page really prints पक्षाश्व. The sense wants पक्षाश्च, so this looks like a press error; the print is kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पक्षाश्च; this sentence names पक्षाश्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुर्ववशे"; alternatives "गुर्वब्वशे", "गुर्ववर्षे" — the middle akṣara is small and the repha sits tight on it
  • About this edition: Two printed words are wrong and I keep them in the Sanskrit. (1) दिवाकर stands a second time, immediately after आरदिवाकरशेषे, where a word meaning 'days' is required; I take it as the compositor's eye-skip repeating दिवाकर and render 'days', which is what the ascending scale days → fortnights → months → seasons → years requires. (2) पक्षाश्व is printed for पक्षाश्च; the plate reader zoomed 4× and confirmed the closed व loop on the page, and recorded that the sense wants च. गुर्ववशे ('Jupiter being in control') is the reader's reading; the alternatives गुर्वब्वशे and गुर्ववर्षे do not change which graha gives months. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पक्षाश्च; this sentence names पक्षाश्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

आधानेथ प्राप्तौ गमनागमने पराजये विजये ॥ रिपुनाशे वा काले पृच्छायां निश्चितं ब्रूयात्

ādhānetha prāptau gamanāgamane parājaye vijaye || ripunāśe vā kāle pṛcchāyāṃ niścitaṃ brūyāt

In ⟨a question about⟩ conception (ādhāna), or about obtaining ⟨a thing⟩, about going and coming, about defeat, about victory, or about the destruction of an enemy — in a question about the time one should speak with certainty.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आधानेथप्राप्तौगमनागमनेपराजयेविजये ॥ रिपुनाशेवाकालेपृच्छायांनिश्चितंब्रूयात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: आधान in a praśna context is conception; the word can also mean the placing or depositing of a thing, and the verse does not settle which. वा is 'or', and I keep it so: the list is of alternative questions, not of conditions that must all hold.
41.12a reading here is contested

अकचटतपयशवर्गा रविकुजसितसौम्यजीवसौराणाम् ॥ चंद्रस्य च निर्दिष्टास्तैः स्युः प्रथमोद्भवैर्वर्णैः

akacaṭatapayaśavargā ravikujasitasaumyajīvasaurāṇām || caṃdrasya ca nirdiṣṭāstaiḥ syuḥ prathamodbhavairvarṇaiḥ

The vargas beginning with a, ka, ca, ṭa, ta, pa, ya and śa are declared ⟨to belong⟩ to the Sun, Mars, Venus, Mercury, Jupiter and Saturn, and to the Moon. By those ⟨vargas⟩, through the letters that arise first, ⟨the graha is found⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अकचटतपयशवर्गारवि कुजसितसौम्यजीवसौराणाम् ॥ चंद्रस्यचनिर्दिष्टास्तैःस्युःप्रथमोद्वैवर्णैः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रथमोद्वैवर्णैः"; alternatives "प्रथमोद्वेवर्णैः", "प्रथमोऽद्वैवर्णैः" — the ै/े stroke over द्व is thin [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रथमोद्भवैर्वर्णैः; this sentence names प्रथमोद्वैवर्णैः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: A varga here is one of the eight groups into which the Sanskrit alphabet is divided by its first letter. The verse names EIGHT vargas against SEVEN grahas, and as printed it does not say which varga is left over; I list both sides in the order printed and do not guess at the pairing. The closing words प्रथमोद्वैवर्णैः do not construe as printed and are not rendered; the plate reader records only that the ै/े stroke over द्व is thin. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रथमोद्भवैर्वर्णैः; this sentence names प्रथमोद्वैवर्णैः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
41.13a reading here is contested

ज्ञात्वा तस्माल्लग्नं विज्ञाय शुभाशुभं च वदेत् ॥ वर्गादिमध्यमांत्यैर्वर्णैः प्रश्नोद्भवैर् विषमराशिः

jñātvā tasmāllagnaṃ vijñāya śubhāśubhaṃ ca vadet || vargādimadhyamāṃtyairvarṇaiḥ praśnodbhavair viṣamarāśiḥ

Having known that, and having found the lagna from it, one should declare what is auspicious and what is not. By the letters that arise from the question and stand first, middle or last in the varga, the question ⟨falls in⟩ an odd sign …

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ज्ञात्वातत्सालग्नंविज्ञायशुभाशुभंचवदेत् ॥ वर्गादिमध्यमांत्यैर्वं र्णैःप्रश्नोद्वैविषमराशिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्सालग्नं"; alternatives "तत्सल्लग्नं", "तत्स्वलग्नं", "तत्साल्लग्नं" — zoomed 4× at page x≈2080-2380, y≈770-860: the cluster reads त + सा + ल्ग्नं, which is what is recorded; the ल is clear but whether a second ल is doubled is not [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्माल्लग्नं; this sentence names तत्सालग्नं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रश्नोद्वैविषमराशिः"; alternatives "प्रश्नोद्वेविषमराशिः" — the ै/े stroke over द्व is thin, as on line 7 [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रश्नोद्भवैर्; this sentence names द्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The akṣaras द्वै stand between प्रश्नो and विषमराशिः and give no word; I render the rest and do not supply what they might have been. वंर्णैः is printed with an anusvāra on व where वर्णैः, 'by the letters', is required; the printed characters are kept. तत्सालग्नं is the plate reader's reading at 4× zoom; on any of the alternatives offered (तत्सल्लग्नं, तत्स्वलग्नं) the sense is 'the lagna belonging to it'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्माल्लग्नं and वर्गादिमध्यमांत्यैर्वर्णैः; this sentence names तत्सालग्नं and वंर्णैः, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

रात्रौ लग्नं प्रवदेत् पृच्छा युग्मं कुजज्ञजीवानाम् ॥ सितरविजयोश्च नैवं रविशशिनोरेकराशिलात्

rātrau lagnaṃ pravadet pṛcchā yugmaṃ kujajñajīvānām || sitaravijayośca naivaṃ raviśaśinorekarāśilāt

At night one should declare the lagna ⟨so⟩: the question ⟨falls in⟩ an even sign for Mars, Mercury and Jupiter; not so for Venus and Saturn (ravija, 'the Sun's son'); for the Sun and the Moon, from a lagna of the same sign.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

रात्रौलग्नंप्रवदेत्पृच्छायुग्मंकुजज्ञजीवानाम् ॥ सितरविजयोश्चनैवंरविशशिनोरेकराशिलात्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: एकराशिलात् I read as एक-राशि-ल-, taking ल as this book's own shorthand for लग्न (it writes लमाधिपं for लग्नाधिपं at record 4), so 'from a lagna of one and the same sign'. That reading is mine and the ending is unusual; the plate reader recorded no doubt here.

तस्मात् प्राग्वत् प्रवदेत् पृच्छासमये शुभाशुभं सर्वम् ॥ कालस्य च विज्ञानादेतच्चिंत्यं बहुप्रश्ने

tasmāt prāgvat pravadet pṛcchāsamaye śubhāśubhaṃ sarvam || kālasya ca vijñānādetacciṃtyaṃ bahupraśne

From that ⟨lagna⟩, as before, one should declare everything auspicious and inauspicious at the time of the question; and by knowing the time, this is what is to be considered in a question of many ⟨matters at once⟩.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तस्मात्प्राग्व त्प्रवदेत्पृच्छासमयेशुभाशुभंसर्वम् ॥ कालस्यचविज्ञानादेतच्चिंत्यंबहुप्रश्ने

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: बहुप्रश्ने is a question in which several matters are asked at once. तस्मात् refers back to the lagna arrived at in the two records before.

स्वांशे विलग्ने यदि वा त्रिकोणे स्वांशे स्थितः पश्यति धातुचिंतां ॥ परांशकस्थश्च करोति जीवं मूलं परांशोपगतः परांशम्

svāṃśe vilagne yadi vā trikoṇe svāṃśe sthitaḥ paśyati dhātuciṃtāṃ || parāṃśakasthaśca karoti jīvaṃ mūlaṃ parāṃśopagataḥ parāṃśam

If ⟨a graha⟩ standing in its own aṃśa (navāṃśa) — in the lagna, or else in a trine — looks upon its own aṃśa, the thing thought of is a mineral (dhātu). Standing in another's aṃśa it makes it an animal (jīva); and one that has gone into another's aṃśa ⟨and looks upon⟩ another's aṃśa makes it a vegetable (mūla).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्वांशेविलग्नेयदिवात्रिकोणेस्वां शेस्थितःपश्यतिधातुचिंतां ॥ परांशकस्थश्चकरोतिजीवंमूलंपरांशोपगतःपरांशम्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "पृथुयशाः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: धातु / मूल / जीव is the standard three-way answer to a 'what am I thinking of' question: mineral, vegetable, animal. The subject of the verbs is not named in the verse; I supply 'a graha' from what the next records make clear. The second half is elliptical and I render it as it stands: the looking in the third clause is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. The page labels this quotation पृथुयशाः, and our own corpus carries the same verse as Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 1.6, whose Sanskrit is word-for-word the same; I made this rendering from the printed Tājika text and then checked that reading against it.
41.17a reading here is contested

धातुं मूलं जीवमित्योजराशौ युग्मे विंद्यादेतदेव प्रतीपम् ॥ लग्ने योंशस्तत्क्रमाद्ग्राह्यमेवं संक्षेपोयं विस्तरात् तत्प्रभेदः

dhātuṃ mūlaṃ jīvamityojarāśau yugme viṃdyādetadeva pratīpam || lagne yoṃśastatkramādgrāhyamevaṃ saṃkṣepoyaṃ vistarāt tatprabhedaḥ

Mineral, vegetable, animal — so ⟨the order runs⟩ in an odd sign; in an even sign one should find exactly the reverse of this. Whichever aṃśa falls in the lagna, ⟨the answer⟩ is to be taken in that order. This is the matter in brief; its subdivisions ⟨come⟩ from setting it out at length.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

धातुंमूलंजीवमितियोजराशौयुग्मेविंद्यादेतदेवप्रतीपम् ॥ लग्नेयोंशस्तत्क्रमाद्ग्राह्यमेवंसंक्षेपोयंविस्तरात्तत्प्रभेदः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जीवमितियोज"; alternatives "जीवमित्योज" — zoomed 4× at page x≈2090-2470, y≈1015-1110; the crop reached only as far as जीवमि. Sandhi (जीवम् इति ओज-) would give मित्योज, but three separate akṣara bodies are what I read at tile magnification. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads जीवमित्योजराशौ; this sentence names जीवमितियोज, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page prints जीवमितियोज where the sandhi requires जीवमित्योज (जीवम् + इति + ओजराशौ); the plate reader saw three separate akṣara bodies and recorded them, and our own Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 1.7 carries this same verse with मित्योज. Nothing in the rule turns on it. संक्षेपोयं is printed without an avagraha for संक्षेपोऽयं. योंशः is यः + अंशः. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads जीवमित्योजराशौ; this sentence names जीवमितियोज, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

बलिनौ केंद्रोपगतौ रविभौमौ धातुकरौ प्रश्ने । बुधसौरी मूलकरौ शशिगुरुशुक्राः स्मृता जीवाः

balinau keṃdropagatau ravibhaumau dhātukarau praśne | budhasaurī mūlakarau śaśiguruśukrāḥ smṛtā jīvāḥ

The Sun and Mars, strong and placed in a kendra (an angle), make ⟨the thing thought of⟩ a mineral in a question. Mercury and Saturn make it a vegetable; the Moon, Jupiter and Venus are held to be ⟨the indicators of⟩ an animal.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बलिनौकेंद्रोपगतौरविभौमौधातुकरौप्रश्ने । बुधसौरीमूलकरौशशिगुरुशु क्राःस्मृताजीवाः

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "उत्पलः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: This record and the two after it give a second, simpler test for the same question, by graha and by sign instead of by navāṃśa. बलिनौ and केंद्रोपगतौ are both dual and both conditions must hold together for the Sun and Mars. The page labels the quotation उत्पलः. This record closes with a single daṇḍa on the page, not the double one.
41.19a reading here is contested

मेषालिसिंहलग्ने कुजार्कयुक्ते निरीक्ष्यतेप्यथवा ॥ धातोश्चिंतां प्रवदेद्युगघटकन्यागतैर्लग्नैः

meṣālisiṃhalagne kujārkayukte nirīkṣyatepyathavā || dhātościṃtāṃ pravadedyugaghaṭakanyāgatairlagnaiḥ

When the lagna is Aries, Scorpio or Leo and is joined with Mars and the Sun, or else is looked upon ⟨by them⟩, one should declare that the concern (cintā) is about a mineral; and by lagnas falling in Gemini, Aquarius or Virgo …

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषालिसिंहलग्नेकुजार्कयुक्तेनिरीक्ष्यतेप्यथवा ॥ धातोश्रितांप्रवदेद्युग्मघटकन्यागतैर्लग्नैः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धातोश्रितां"; alternatives "धातोःश्रितां" — no visarga dots are printed after धातो; recorded as printed [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 2.7x native on page_0202.png, F sets धातोश्चिंतां: the श्च ligature, with a bindu over चिं. श्रितां was a misreading in our transcription, and K sets the same letters as F (page_0238.jpg, about 2.7x native). The mūla now reads धातोश्चिंतां, 'concern about a mineral'.]
  • About this edition: The rule breaks off here: the second half names the three signs but the verb and the result stand in the next record, which I do not pull words in from. निरीक्ष्यतेप्यथवा is निरीक्ष्यते + अपि + अथवा, so the aspect is an alternative to the conjunction, not an addition to it. धातो is printed with no visarga where धातोः is required; the plate reader recorded that no dots stand on the page. [2026-10-01: the complaint about a missing visarga falls away. The mūla now reads धातोश्चिंतां, as F and K set it (read by eye on 2026-10-01 at about 2.7x native): the visarga of धातोः becomes श् before च by sandhi.]

बुधरविजयुतैर्मूलं वृषतुलहरिमीनचापकर्कटकैः ॥ चंद्रगुरुशुक्रयुक्तैर्दृष्टैर्जीवो विनिर्देश्यः

budharavijayutairmūlaṃ vṛṣatulaharimīnacāpakarkaṭakaiḥ || caṃdraguruśukrayuktairdṛṣṭairjīvo vinirdeśyaḥ

⟨Those lagnas⟩ joined with Mercury and Saturn ⟨give⟩ a vegetable; and with Taurus, Libra, Leo (hari), Pisces, Sagittarius and Cancer, joined with or looked upon by the Moon, Jupiter and Venus, an animal is to be declared.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

बुधरविजयुतैर्मूलंवृषतुल हरिमीनचापकर्कटकैः॥चंद्रगुरुशुक्रयुक्तैर्दृष्टैर्जीवोविनिर्देश्यः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The first three words complete the rule begun in the previous record, whose lagnas (Gemini, Aquarius, Virgo) are the subject; I supply that link in ⟨ ⟩ and take no words from that record. हरि means the lion, that is Leo — but Leo (सिंह) already stands in the mineral list of the previous record, and Capricorn is named nowhere in the three lists. Counting the twelve signs across records 19 and 20 gives Leo twice and Capricorn not at all, so I believe हरि is printed where a word for Capricorn belongs. I have not changed the Sanskrit and I render हरि as Leo.

Adhyāya 42 · बंधेनायंप्रश्नइतिजिज्ञासायांवाज्ञानप्रकाशे ॥

42.1a reading here is contested

लग्नलाभपयोः प्राणितयोर्यद्भावगः शशी ॥ तस्य भावस्य या चिंता प्रष्टुः सा हृदि वर्तते

lagnalābhapayoḥ prāṇitayoryadbhāvagaḥ śaśī || tasya bhāvasya yā ciṃtā praṣṭuḥ sā hṛdi vartate

⟨…⟩ of the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 11th (lābha) ⟨…⟩ whichever bhāva the Moon occupies — whatever thought belongs to that bhāva, that is the thought standing in the querent's heart.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नलाभपयोःप्राणितयोर्यद्द्वावगःशशी॥तस्यभावस्ययाचिंतामप्रष्टुःसाहदिवर्तंते

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नलाभपयोः"; alternatives "लग्नलाभयोः", "लग्नलाभपयोः" — the प between भा and यो is small; it may be a broken piece
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साहदिवर्तंते"; alternatives "साह्यादिवर्तंते", "साहदिवर्तते" — the ह and the following द are tight; the sense would want सा ह्यादि
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "ज्ञानप्रकाशे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The first half-line is corrupt as printed and I do not render it: लग्नलाभपयोः प्राणितयोर्यद्द्वावगः शशी gives no construction, and प्राणितयोः in particular yields no word here. I take यद्द्वावगः as यद्भावगः, 'occupying whichever bhāva', because तस्य भावस्य in the second half must refer back to a bhāva; that is my reading and not the printed text, and द्वाव stands on the page. The plate reader also doubted the प in लग्नलाभपयोः. In the second half: an akṣara म stands between चिंता and प्रष्टुः and does not construe; हदि is printed where हृदि, 'in the heart', is required; and वर्तंते is plural where वर्तते, singular with सा चिंता, is required. The page labels this quotation ज्ञानप्रकाशे. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्राणितयोर्यद्भावगः and वर्तते; this sentence names प्राणितयोर्यद्द्वावगः and वर्तंते, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

एवं बलाधिकाच् चंद्राल्लग्ननाथो यतः स्थितः ॥ दैवज्ञेन विनिर्णेयः प्रश्नसद्भावसंभवः

evaṃ balādhikāc caṃdrāllagnanātho yataḥ sthitaḥ || daivajñena vinirṇeyaḥ praśnasadbhāvasaṃbhavaḥ

In the same way, ⟨when⟩ the lagna-lord is stronger than the Moon, the astrologer must settle the true subject of the question from the place in which that lord stands.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

एवंबलाधिकाचंद्राल्लग्ननाथोयतःस्थितः ॥ देवज्ञेनविनिर्णेयःप्रश्नसद्भावसंभवः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record completes the rule of the one before it: the Moon's bhāva gives the subject of the question, unless the lagna-lord is the stronger, in which case his bhāva does. बलाधिका is printed where बलाधिको (masculine, agreeing with लग्ननाथो) is required; चंद्रात् is the ablative of comparison, 'than the Moon'.

आत्मसमं लग्नगतैस्तृतीयगैर्भ्रातरः सुतं सुतगैः ॥ माता वा भगिनी वा शत्रुगतैः शत्रुभार्या स्यात्

ātmasamaṃ lagnagataistṛtīyagairbhrātaraḥ sutaṃ sutagaiḥ || mātā vā bhaginī vā śatrugataiḥ śatrubhāryā syāt

⟨Grahas⟩ standing in the lagna ⟨show that the question is⟩ about oneself; those in the 3rd, about brothers; those in the 5th (suta), about a son; those in the 6th (śatru), about the mother, or a sister, or the enemy's wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

आत्मसमंलग्नगतैस्तृतीयगैर्भ्रातरःसुतंसुतगैः ॥ मातावाभगिनीवाशत्रुगैःशत्रुभार्यास्यात्

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The page sets the label "पृथुयशाः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
  • About this edition: The verse names only the bhāvas and their fruits; the subject 'grahas' is carried over from the instrumental plurals लग्नगतैः, तृतीयगैः, सुतगैः, शत्रुगैः and is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. वा is 'or': mother, sister and enemy's wife are alternatives read from the 6th, not three things read together. The page labels this quotation पृथुयशाः. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शत्रुगतैः for शत्रुगैः, emended on the metre. Both exemplars set शत्रुगैः (F page_0203 line 4 and K page_0238 line 5, read by eye at about 1.5x native), which leaves the āryā's second half at 26 mātrās, and Pāṭhaka's printing sets शत्रुगतैः in type (page-400 line 3, read by eye at about 2.0x native). The reading from the 6th does not move.]
42.4a reading here is contested

सप्तमसंस्थैर्नवमैर्धर्माश्रिता गुरुर्दशमैः ॥ स्वांशपतिमित्रशत्रुषु तथैव वाच्यं बलयुतेषु

saptamasaṃsthairnavamairdharmāśritā gururdaśamaiḥ || svāṃśapatimitraśatruṣu tathaiva vācyaṃ balayuteṣu

By ⟨grahas⟩ standing in the 7th ⟨the question is about the wife⟩; by those in the 9th, about what rests upon dharma; by the 10th, about the guru (elders, teachers). And just so it is to be declared of the lord of one's own aṃśa, of friends and of enemies, when they are joined with strength.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सप्तमसंस्थैर्नवमैर्धर्माश्रितायुरुदशमैः ॥ स्वांशपतिमित्रशत्रुष्वतथैववाच्यंबलयुतेषु

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्माश्रितायुरुदशमैः"; alternatives "धर्मार्थाश्रितायुर्दशमैः", "धर्मांश्रितायुरुदशमैः" — zoomed 4× at page x≈2740-3090, y≈470-570: I read र्मा · श्रि · ता · यु · रु · द · श · मै, with a hook above र्मा that may be an anusvāra or part of the repha [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye on page_0203.png at about 3.7x and 4.5x native, the hook over र्मा is the repha, with no anusvāra, and a repha stands over द: F sets धर्माश्रितायुरुर्दशमैः. The mūla now reads धर्माश्रिता गुरुर्दशमैः, emended on the lexicon with the K and Jhā machine reads, which give गुरुर्दशमैः.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शत्रुष्व"; alternatives "शत्रुष्ठ" — the subscript under ष is small; व and ठ are close in this type [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 3.7x native on page_0203.png, F sets षु: the small mark under ष is the u-sign, and no व or ठ stands there. The mūla now reads शत्रुषु तथैव.]
  • About this edition: The fruit of the 7th is not written and I supply the wife in ⟨ ⟩ from the standard sense of the house; the verse gives only the house. धर्माश्रितायुरुदशमैः is the plate reader's reading at 4× zoom, with a hook over र्मा that may be an anusvāra; on their alternative धर्मार्थाश्रिता the 9th would give matters of dharma and artha together. An extra अ stands in शत्रुष्वतथैव: divided as शत्रुषु तथैव it means 'and just so for enemies', which is how I render it, but शत्रुषु अतथैव, 'for enemies not so ⟨but the reverse⟩', is an equally possible division and would invert the rule for enemies. [2026-10-01: both points are superseded. Read by eye on page_0203.png, F sets शत्रुषु तथैव with no अ (about 3.7x native), so the division शत्रुषु अतथैव does not arise. F also sets धर्माश्रितायुरुर्दशमैः, with a repha over द and only the repha over र्मा (about 4.5x native). The mūla now reads धर्माश्रिता गुरुर्दशमैः, emended on the lexicon with K and Jhā, so the 10th gives the guru, not āyus.]
42.5a reading here is contested

चरलग्ने चरभागे मध्याद्दृष्टे प्रवासचिंता स्यात् ॥ भ्रष्टः सप्तमभवनात् पुनर्निवृत्तो यदि न वक्री

caralagne carabhāge madhyāddṛṣṭe pravāsaciṃtā syāt || bhraṣṭaḥ saptamabhavanāt punarnivṛtto yadi na vakrī

When the lagna is a movable (cara) sign and its aṃśa part is movable too, and it is looked upon from the mid-heaven (madhya, the 10th), the thought is of going abroad. ⟨A graha⟩ that has slipped away from the 7th house and has turned back again ⟨brings the traveller back⟩ — if it is not retrograde.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चरलग्नेचरभागेमध्याद्दृष्टेप्रवासचिंतास्यात् ॥ भ्रष्टःसप्तमभवनात्पुनर्निवृत्तोयदिनवक्री

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुनर्निवृत्तो"; alternatives "पुनर्निर्वृत्तो", "पुनर्निंवृत्तो" — zoomed 4× at page x≈2770-3100, y≈550-650: a repha sits on नि and there is a separate dot beside it that may be an anusvāra
  • About this edition: The second half is elliptical: it names the condition and not the fruit, and the return of the traveller is supplied in ⟨ ⟩ from भ्रष्टः ... पुनर्निवृत्तः, 'fallen away and come back again'. I render यदि न वक्री as printed, 'if it is not retrograde'; the usual doctrine ties the return to retrogression, so the न may belong with निवृत्तः ('does not return again unless retrograde'). I do not change the Sanskrit and the reader recorded no doubt about the न.
42.6a reading here is contested

अस्ते रविसितवक्रैः परजायां स्वां गुरौ बुधे वेश्याम् ॥ चंद्रे च वयः शशिवत् प्रवदेत् सौरेंऽत्यजादीनां

aste ravisitavakraiḥ parajāyāṃ svāṃ gurau budhe veśyām || caṃdre ca vayaḥ śaśivat pravadet saureṃ'tyajādīnāṃ

⟨A graha⟩ in the 7th (asta): by the Sun, Venus or Mars ⟨the woman asked about is⟩ another man's wife; with Jupiter, one's own; with Mercury, a courtesan. And with the Moon, one should declare the age as the Moon ⟨shows it⟩; with Saturn, ⟨a woman⟩ of the antyaja (lowest-born) castes and the like.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अस्तेरविसितवक्रैःपरजायांस्वांगुरौबुधेवेश्याम् ॥ चंद्रेचववयःशशिवत् प्रवदेत्सौरेंऽत्यजादीनां

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौरेंऽत्यजादीनां"; alternatives "सौरेंत्यजादीनां", "सौरेऽत्यजादीनां" — an avagraha-like stroke does stand between सौरें and त्य, but it is thin; the anusvāra above सौरे is clear
  • About this edition: ववयः is printed with a doubled व; I read it as वयः, 'age', which is what the next record then sets out, and I do not change the Sanskrit. The Moon's own fruit in the list is therefore not recoverable from this record and I leave it marked ⟨…⟩. स्वां is 'one's own ⟨wife⟩', the noun being carried over from परजायां. The plate reader saw a thin avagraha-like stroke in सौरेंऽत्यजादीनां; on any of the readings offered the word is अंत्यज. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads वयः; this sentence names ववयः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

कुमारिकां बालशशी बुधश्च वृद्धां शनिः सूर्य गुरुप्रसूताम् ॥ स्त्रीं कर्कशां भौमसितौ च धत्ते एवं वयः स्यात् पुरुषेषु चैवम्

kumārikāṃ bālaśaśī budhaśca vṛddhāṃ śaniḥ sūrya guruprasūtām || strīṃ karkaśāṃ bhaumasitau ca dhatte evaṃ vayaḥ syāt puruṣeṣu caivam

The young Moon and Mercury ⟨give⟩ a maiden; Saturn an old woman; with the Sun ⟨or⟩ Jupiter, a woman who has borne a child; Mars and Venus bestow a harsh-tongued woman. Such is the age; and among men it is the same.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

कुमारिकांबालशशीबुधश्चवृद्धांशनिःसूर्येगुरुप्रसूताम् ॥ स्त्रींकर्कशांभौमसितौचधत्तेएवंवयःस्यात्पुरुषेषुचैवम्

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse reads an age from the graha in the 7th: maiden, mother, old woman. गुरु is printed with no locative ending where गुरौ is required beside सूर्ये; I take it as a second locative, 'the Sun or Jupiter', and leave the word undivided from प्रसूताम् in the word-division file because गुरुप्रसूता, 'born of a noble family', is a possible compound and I cannot settle it. बालशशी is the Moon young in her cycle, not the Moon in a particular sign. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सूर्य; this sentence names सूर्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

शुभेत्थशाले हिमगौ चतुष्ट्ये सौख्यातिरेकः सविलासहासः ॥ क्रूरेत्थशाले हिमगौ सरोषैः क्रूरान्विते भूत्कलहो नृवध्वोः

śubhetthaśāle himagau catuṣṭye saukhyātirekaḥ savilāsahāsaḥ || krūretthaśāle himagau saroṣaiḥ krūrānvite bhūtkalaho nṛvadhvoḥ

When the Moon (himagu, 'the cool-rayed') stands in a quadrant (catuṣṭaya) and is in an itthaśāla — the applying aspect — with a benefic, happiness is in excess, with dalliance and laughter. When the Moon is in an itthaśāla with a malefic and is joined with angry malefics, there is quarrelling between the man and his wife.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभेत्थशालेहिमगौचतुष्ट्येसौख्यातिरेकःसविलासहासः ॥ क्रूरेत्थशालेहिमगौसरोषैःक्रूरान्वितेभूत्कलहोनृवध्वोः

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: itthaśāla is the Tājika applying aspect, the strongest of the sixteen yogas. The two halves are exactly parallel and turn only on whether the graha the Moon applies to is benefic or malefic. नृवध्वोः is a genitive dual, 'of the man and the wife'.

पीडाथवासीत् सुरते युवत्या रजो यथास्तर्क्षमुपैति तद्वत् ॥ लग्ने सुरेज्ये भृगुजे कलत्रे तुर्ये हिमांशौ सविलासहासौ

pīḍāthavāsīt surate yuvatyā rajo yathāstarkṣamupaiti tadvat || lagne surejye bhṛguje kalatre turye himāṃśau savilāsahāsau

Or there was pain to the young woman in intercourse; and as the monthly flow comes on when ⟨the Moon⟩ reaches the sign of the seventh (asta), so ⟨it is here⟩. Jupiter in the lagna, Venus in the 7th (kalatra), the Moon in the 4th (turya) — the two ⟨of them⟩ are full of dalliance and laughter.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

पीडाथवासीत्सुरतेयुवत्यारजोयथास्तर्क्षमुपैतितद्वत् ॥ लग्नेसुरेज्येभृगुजेकलत्रेतुर्येहिमांशौसविलासहासौ

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: सविलासहासौ is dual and so refers to the couple, not to one person. The subject that reaches the asta-ṛkṣa is not named and I supply the Moon in ⟨ ⟩, since the flow is reckoned from her. अथवा ties this record's first half to the quarrel of the record before: pain in intercourse is the alternative fruit to open quarrelling.
42.10a reading here is contested

शुभग्रहोत्थे च कबूलयोगे युतो रजः पुष्पसुगंधयुक्तम् ॥ स्वर्क्षोच्चगे हर्म्यरतं निगद्यं स्थितेद्विदेहे वनिता स्वकीया

śubhagrahotthe ca kabūlayoge yuto rajaḥ puṣpasugaṃdhayuktam || svarkṣoccage harmyarataṃ nigadyaṃ sthitedvidehe vanitā svakīyā

And when ⟨the Moon⟩ is joined in a kambūla-yoga arising from a benefic graha, the monthly flow is sweet-smelling like flowers. When ⟨the graha⟩ has gone to its own sign or its exaltation, love-making in a fine mansion is to be declared; and when it stands in a dual-bodied ⟨sign⟩ (dvideha), the woman is one's own.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शुभग्रहोत्येचकबूलयो गेयुतोरजःपुष्पसुगंधयुक्तम् ॥ स्वक्षोंच्चगेहर्म्यरतंनिगद्यंस्थितेदिदेहेवनितास्वकीया

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रहोत्येच"; alternatives "ग्रहोत्थेच" — zoomed 5× at page x≈2860-3180, y≈865-965: the cluster after हो reads त्ये to me, but त्थे is close in this type [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads ग्रहोत्थे for ग्रहोत्ये on the lexicon. Read by eye on page_0203.png line 9 at about 4.5x native, the press sets त्ये, as this note read it; उत्य is no word, and every other printing's read gives ग्रहोत्थे.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कबूलयो"; alternatives "कंबूलयो" — same zoom: no anusvāra dot is visible above क, though the Tājika term is कंबूल; the print is kept
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वक्षोंच्चगे"; alternatives "स्वर्क्षोच्चगे", "स्वक्षोच्चगे" — the mark above क्षो may be an anusvāra or a repha belonging to स्वर्क्ष [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षोच्चगे for स्वक्षोंच्चगे on the plate. Read by eye on page_0203.png line 10 at about 3.7x native, the mark over क्षो has the shape of the repha over हर्म्य on the same line, not of the anusvāra over रतं, so the press sets स्वर्क्षो and no anusvāra.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थितेदिदेहे"; alternatives "स्थितेंदिदेहे", "स्थितेंदौदेहे" — an anusvāra over ते would give इंदु-देहे; no dot is clear at tile magnification [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads स्थितेद्विदेहे for स्थितेदिदेहे on the plate. Read by eye on page_0203.png line 10 at about 4.0x native, the press sets द्वि (द with व joined below it), not दि, so the इंदु-देहे alternative falls; द्विदेह is a dual-bodied sign.]
  • About this edition: Four places carry the plate reader's doubt and my rendering follows a reading the page does not print in two of them, so I say which. (1) ग्रहोत्ये: I read the reader's alternative ग्रहोत्थे, 'arising from', which the syntax of कबूलयोगे युतः requires; the page as read gives ोत्ये. (2) कबूल is printed with no anusvāra for the Tājika term कंबूल; I keep the printed spelling in the Sanskrit and gloss the term. (3) स्वक्षों may hide a repha (स्वर्क्ष, 'own sign'), which is how I take it. (4) स्थितेदिदेहे: I read इंदु-देहे, 'in the Moon's body', following the reader's own alternative; the printed दि gives no word. [2026-10-01: items (1), (3) and (4) are settled. (1) The press sets ग्रहोत्ये (read by eye on page_0203.png line 9 at about 4.5x native), and the mūla now reads ग्रहोत्थे on the lexicon. (3) The press sets स्वर्क्षोच्चगे with a repha (line 10, about 3.7x native), and the mūla now reads it. (4) The press sets स्थितेद्विदेहे (line 10, about 4.0x native), and the mūla now reads it, so the reading 'in the Moon's body' falls: द्विदेह is a dual-bodied sign.]
42.11a reading here is contested

चरोदये सारमिते परस्त्रीं केंद्रे शनौ सासुरजो दिवारतिम् ॥ निशोदयेशत्रिखगे च रात्रौ दिवानिशं तद्वलिनोर्द्विखेटयोः

carodaye sāramite parastrīṃ keṃdre śanau sāsurajo divāratim || niśodayeśatrikhage ca rātrau divāniśaṃ tadvalinordvikheṭayoḥ

In a movable ascendant ⟨…⟩ another man's wife; with Saturn in a quadrant ⟨…⟩ love-making by day; ⟨when⟩ the lord of a night-rising ⟨sign stands⟩ in the 3rd or the 10th (kha), ⟨love-making⟩ by night; by day and by night both, ⟨according to⟩ the two strong grahas.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

चरोदयेसारमितेपरस्त्रींकेंद्रेशनौसासुरजोदिवारति म् ॥ निशोद्येशत्रिखगेचरात्रौदिवानिशंतद्वलिनोर्द्विखेटयोः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निशोद्येशत्रिखगे"; alternatives "निशोदयेशत्रिखगे", "निशोद्येशेत्रिखगे" — the द्ये/दये cluster is tight [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads निशोदयेश for निशोद्येश. The plate, read by eye on page_0203.png line 11 at about 3.4x native, sets द and य as two separate full letters.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निशोद्येशत्रिखगे"; alternatives "निशोदयेशत्रिखगे", "निशोद्येशेत्रिखगे" — the द्ये/दये cluster is tight [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads निशोदयेश for निशोद्येश. The plate, read by eye on page_0203.png line 11 at about 3.4x native, sets द and य as two separate full letters.]
  • About this edition: The record is badly corrupt and I render only what construes. सारमिते and सासुरजो give no words and I do not guess at them, so the two conditions they belong to are left marked ⟨…⟩. निशोद्येश I read as निशोदयेशः, 'the lord of the night-rising ⟨ascendant⟩', which is the reader's own first alternative; the printed निशोद्येश gives no word. तद्वलिनोः is printed with व for ब (तद्बलिनोः, 'of those two strong ones'), a slip this press makes often; the sense of the last clause is that when the two grahas are alike in strength the time is both by day and by night. [2026-10-01: the press does not set निशोद्येश. Read by eye on page_0203.png line 11 at about 3.4x native, it sets निशोदयेश, two full letters द and य, so our earlier text had misread it; the mūla now reads निशोदयेश. सारमिते and सासुरजो are not touched by that reading.]

Adhyāya 43 · अथमहर्घचिंता ॥ (closed by इतिश्रीदैवज्ञानंतसुतश्रीदैवज्ञनीलकंठविरचितायांश्रीनीलकंठ्यांप्रश्नतंत्रेतृतीयंसमाप्तम्)

43.1a reading here is contested

मेषे वृषे च मिथुने शुभयुक्तदृष्टे नग्रैष्मिकंतु सुलभं भविता पृथिव्यां ॥ सूर्ये धनुर्मृगघटेषु च सारधान्यं कुर्यात् समर्घमशुभैः सहितोऽसमर्घं

meṣe vṛṣe ca mithune śubhayuktadṛṣṭe nagraiṣmikaṃtu sulabhaṃ bhavitā pṛthivyāṃ || sūrye dhanurmṛgaghaṭeṣu ca sāradhānyaṃ kuryāt samarghamaśubhaiḥ sahito'samarghaṃ

When Aries, Taurus and Gemini are joined with or aspected by a benefic, the summer crop (graiṣmika) will not be easy to get on earth. ⟨When⟩ the Sun ⟨stands⟩ in Sagittarius, Capricorn or Aquarius, he makes the substantial grain (sāra-dhānya) cheap (samargha); joined with malefics, ⟨he makes it⟩ dear. [Our mūla now reads न ग्रैष्मिकं तु … भविता here, so the gap this rendering once left is filled: न is 'not', and ग्रैष्मिक is the summer crop.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषेवृषेचमिथुनेशुभयुक्तदृष्टेनयेग्निमंतुसुलभं भवतिपृथिव्यां ॥ सूर्येंधनुमृगघटेषुचसारधान्यंकुर्यात्समर्घमशुभैःसहितोऽसमर्घं

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नयेग्निमंतु"; alternatives "नयेऽग्निमंतु", "नयेग्निमंतुः" — no avagraha glyph is printed; recorded as set [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads नग्रैष्मिकंतु for नयेग्निमंतु. Re-read by eye on page_0203.png line 11 at about 3.4x native, the leaf sets ग्रै and ष्मि; there is no separate य and no ग्नि.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नयेग्निमंतु"; alternatives "नयेऽग्निमंतु", "नयेग्निमंतुः" — no avagraha glyph is printed; recorded as set [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads नग्रैष्मिकंतु for नयेग्निमंतु. Re-read by eye on page_0203.png line 11 at about 3.4x native, the leaf sets ग्रै and ष्मि; there is no separate य and no ग्नि.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्येंधनु"; alternatives "सूर्येधनु", "सूर्येंधनुर्" — zoomed 5× at page x≈820-1420, y≈330-500: an anusvāra dot IS printed over र्ये as well as the e-stroke, so सूर्यें is recorded as printed. No repha is printed on धनु. [2026-10-01: both claims are superseded. The mūla now reads सूर्ये for सूर्यें on the lexicon: measured on page_0204.png line 0 at about 6.5x native, only two marks stand over र्ये, an e-stroke and one teardrop mark, so the leaf does not show a repha and an anusvāra together. And the mūla now reads धनुर्मृग for धनुमृग on the plate: at the same magnification a hooked mark (70 px, 11x10) stands over मृ; that is the repha, and it was overlooked.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहितोऽसमर्घं" — the avagraha glyph ऽ IS printed here (this press usually omits it); recorded because it is on the page
  • About this edition: The plate was re-read at 8× and 9× for this spot (page 203, line 12, the last words of the leaf, which the reader had already flagged). The ink gives five akṣaras between दृष्टे and सुलभं — न, a letter carrying the e-stroke, a letter carrying the i-mātrā whose subscript this press draws ग्र-fashion, मं with its dot, and तु — so the plate reader's नयेग्निमंतु is what is set. No word of Sanskrit answers to it here, and the metre of this half-line does not scan either (the other three quarters are regular Vasantatilakā, and its second quarter is two syllables light in weight). धनुमृगघटेषु in the second half is printed without the repha; the metre wants धनुर्मृग-, and either way the three signs named are Sagittarius, Capricorn and Aquarius. समर्घ is taken throughout this chapter as "cheap", against महर्घ / असमर्घ "dear" — verses 4 and 5 fix the sense. [2026-10-01: superseded at three places. The mūla now reads नग्रैष्मिकंतु for नयेग्निमंतु: re-read by eye on page_0203.png at about 3.4x native, the leaf sets ग्रै and ष्मि, and the subscript the earlier reading saw is the र of ग्रै; न is the negative particle, 'the summer crop will not be easy to get'. The mūla now reads धनुर्मृग for धनुमृग: measured on page_0204.png at about 6.5x native, a repha stands over मृ. And the mūla now reads भविता for the press's भवति on the metre (the press sets भवति, read by eye at about 4.0x native), with Pāṭhaka's and Jhā's reads carrying भविता, so the half-line scans as Vasantatilakā.]
43.2a reading here is contested

लग्नेबलाढ्ये निजनाथसौम्यैर्युक्तेक्षिते केंद्रगतैः शुभैश्च ॥ सर्वैः समर्घं विबले विलग्ने केंद्रेषु पापैः सकलं समर्घं

lagnebalāḍhye nijanāthasaumyairyuktekṣite keṃdragataiḥ śubhaiśca || sarvaiḥ samarghaṃ vibale vilagne keṃdreṣu pāpaiḥ sakalaṃ samarghaṃ

⟨When⟩ the ascendant is rich in strength, is joined with and aspected by its own lord and by benefics, and benefics stand in the kendras (the 1st, 4th, 7th and 10th) — by all of these together everything is cheap (samargha). ⟨When⟩ the ascendant is weak and malefics stand in the kendras, everything is dear. [At the end of the second half our text reads समर्घं, 'cheap', as the first half does, which would give the weak ascendant with malefics in the kendras the same result as the strong one with benefics. 'Dear' is rendered, the word the opposite condition requires; two later printings give महर्घम् and त्वनर्घम् there. The reading is recorded as a doubt on the verse.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लग्नबलाब्धेनिजनाथसौम्यैर्युक्तेक्षितेकेंद्रगतैःशु भैश्च ॥ सर्वैःसमर्घंविबलेविलग्नेकेंद्रेषुपापैःसकलंसमर्घं

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नबलाब्धे"; alternatives "लग्नबलाढ्ये" — the conjunct after बला is small; this press draws ढ्य and ब्ध alike at tile magnification. Line 4 prints an unambiguous बलाढ्यः, which is what the sense wants here too, but the print is kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेबलाढ्ये; this sentence names लग्नबलाब्धे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विबलेविलग्ने" — zoomed 5× at page x≈820-1420, y≈330-500. At tile magnification this read विवलेविंलये; the zoom shows विबले विलग्ने, with the press's ग्न drawn like ग्र carrying the e-stroke. Recording the zoom reading.
43.3a reading here is contested

राकाकुहूशशिपभास्वदजप्रवेशलग्नेश्वरा शुभखगैर्युतवीक्षिताश्चेत् ॥ तद्वत्सरे जगति सौख्यमलं प्रकुर्युः पापार्दिते गदनरेंद्रभयं प्रजानां

rākākuhūśaśipabhāsvadajapraveśalagneśvarā śubhakhagairyutavīkṣitāścet || tadvatsare jagati saukhyamalaṃ prakuryuḥ pāpārdite gadanareṃdrabhayaṃ prajānāṃ

The full moon (rākā), the new moon (kuhū), the lord of the Moon, and the lord of the ascendant at the Sun's entry into Aries — if these are joined with and aspected by benefic planets, they make ample happiness in the world in that year. When they are afflicted by malefics, disease and fear of the king come upon the people.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

राकाकुहूशशिपभास्वदजप्रवेशलग्नेश्वराशुभखगैर्युतवीक्षिताश्चेत् ॥ तद्वत्स रेजगतिसौख्यमलंप्रकुर्युःपापार्दितेगदनरेंद्रभयंप्रजानां

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीक्षिताश्चेत्"; alternatives "वीक्षिताश्वेत्" — this press sets श्च and श्व almost alike (the same ambiguity page 202 recorded)
  • About this edition: The compound ends in -लग्नेश्वराः, "the lords of the ascendant", in the plural, so rākā and kuhū are most probably the ascendants (or their lords) of the full-moon and new-moon moments rather than the days themselves; the record does not say so, and nothing is supplied. The division लग्नेश्वरा शुभखगैः is certain from the second half: पापार्दिते there makes the first half the benefic case, so the word is शुभखगैः ("by benefic planets") and not लग्नेश्वर + अशुभखगैः ("by malefic planets"), which the same letters would also allow. The reader's ambiguity on वीक्षिताश्चेत् (this press draws श्च and श्व alike) does not touch the sense: चेत् "if" is what the sentence needs.
43.4a reading here is contested

मेषप्रवेशोदयतः स्वरांशः केंद्रेषु पापोडुपतीत्थशाले ॥ पापग्रहैर्दृष्टयुतेऽथ तस्मिन् वर्षे गदार्तिः प्रियमन्नमुर्व्याम्

meṣapraveśodayataḥ svarāṃśaḥ keṃdreṣu pāpoḍupatītthaśāle || pāpagrahairdṛṣṭayute'tha tasmin varṣe gadārtiḥ priyamannamurvyām

Reckoned from the ascendant of ⟨the Sun's⟩ entry into Aries: ⟨if⟩ the svarāṃśa ⟨stands so⟩, malefics are in the kendras, and the Moon (uḍupati) is in an itthaśāla ⟨with one of them⟩, and ⟨these are⟩ aspected by or joined with malefic planets — then in that year there is affliction by disease, and food is dear on earth. [स्वरांशः is left transliterated because it cannot be identified: the word occurs nowhere else in this chapter, and this press draws स्व and ख alike, so खरांश "the hot-rayed one, the Sun" is possible. Our mūla now reads the locative तस्मिन् वर्षे, as verse 5 has it.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

मेषप्रवेशोदयतःस्वरांशःकेंद्रेषुपापोडुपतीत्थशाले ॥ पापग्रहैर्दृष्ट्युतेऽथत स्मिन्वर्षंगदार्तिःप्रियमन्नमुर्व्याम्

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापग्रहैर्दृष्ट्युते"; alternatives "पापग्रहैर्दृष्टयुते" — the subscript under ष्ट is thin; दृष्ट्युत and दृष्टयुत are close here. Line 4 prints दृष्टयुक्तो with a clear य body. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पापग्रहैर्दृष्टयुतेऽथ; this sentence names पापग्रहैर्दृष्ट्युते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्ट्युतेऽथत" — the avagraha glyph ऽ is printed
43.5a reading here is contested

भानोर्मेषः प्रवेशोदयभवनपतिः सद्ग्रहः स्वोच्चसंस्थः स्वर्क्षस्थो वापि केंद्रे शुभगगनचरैर्दृष्टयुक्तो बलाढ्यः ॥ तस्मिन् वर्षे विदध्याज्जगति शुभसुखं भूरिसस्यं सुवृद्धिः क्रूरः क्रूरार्दितो वा दिशति नृपभयं कष्टमन्नं महर्घम्

bhānormeṣaḥ praveśodayabhavanapatiḥ sadgrahaḥ svoccasaṃsthaḥ svarkṣastho vāpi keṃdre śubhagaganacarairdṛṣṭayukto balāḍhyaḥ || tasmin varṣe vidadhyājjagati śubhasukhaṃ bhūrisasyaṃ suvṛddhiḥ krūraḥ krūrārdito vā diśati nṛpabhayaṃ kaṣṭamannaṃ mahargham

⟨If⟩ the lord of the house rising at the Sun's entry into Aries is a benefic, stands in its own exaltation or in its own sign, or stands in a kendra, is aspected by and joined with benefic planets, and is strong — then in that year it brings about good fortune and happiness in the world, abundant crops and great increase. ⟨But if that lord⟩ is a malefic, or is afflicted by malefics, it declares fear from the king, food hard to come by, and high prices (mahargha). [The page sets भानोर्मेषः with a visarga where the sense wants the locative मेषे, "at ⟨the Sun's entry into⟩ Aries"; the rendering follows the locative and the Sanskrit is left as printed.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

भानोर्मेषःप्रवेशोदयभवनपतिःसद्ग्रहःस्वोच्चसंस्थःस्वर्क्षस्थोवापिकेंद्रेशुभगगनचरैर्दृष्टयुक्तोबलाढ्यः ॥ तस्मिन्वर्षेविदध्याजगतिशुभसुखंभूरिसस्यंसुवृद्धिःक्रूरःक्रूरार्दितोवादिशतिनृपभयंकष्टमन्नंमहर्घम्

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भानोर्मेषःप्रवेशोदय"; alternatives "भानोर्मेषेप्रवेशोदय" — two dots are printed after मेष, so a visarga is recorded; the sense would want the locative मेषे. Not zoomed — the zoom budget went to lines 1-2, 9, 10 and 12.
43.6a reading here is contested

जन्मोदयाद्भास्वदजप्रवेशलग्नं हि यद्भावगतं शुभान्वितम् ॥ तद्भाववृद्धिं विदधाति तस्मिन् वर्षे नृणां पापयुतं तदन्यथा

janmodayādbhāsvadajapraveśalagnaṃ hi yadbhāvagataṃ śubhānvitam || tadbhāvavṛddhiṃ vidadhāti tasmin varṣe nṛṇāṃ pāpayutaṃ tadanyathā

In whichever bhāva, counted from the natal ascendant, the ascendant of the Sun's entry into Aries falls — if that ⟨ingress ascendant⟩ is attended by benefics, it produces the increase of that bhāva for men in that year; attended by malefics, the contrary. [Our mūla now reads भास्वदज, यद्भावगतं and तद्भाववृद्धिं, the three forms this rendering follows.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मोदयाद्वास्वदजप्रवेशलग्नंहियद्वावगतंशुभान्वितम् ॥ तद्भावद्वृद्धिंविदधातितस्मिन्वर्षेनृणांपापयुतंतदन्यथा

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मोदयाद्वास्वदज"; alternatives "जन्मोदयाद्भास्वदज" — line 2 prints an unambiguous भास्वदजप्रवेश, which is what the sense wants; here the cluster reads द्वा. The print is kept. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads जन्मोदयाद्भास्वदजप्रवेशलग्नं; this sentence names जन्मोदयाद्वास्वदज, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्भावद्वृद्धिं"; alternatives "तद्भाववृद्धिं" — a subscript stroke sits under the व; it may be a broken ligature [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तद्भाववृद्धिं; this sentence names तद्भावद्वृद्धिं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
43.7a reading here is contested

जन्मोदये देहसुखं धनेऽर्थलाभस्तृतीये च कुटुंबवृद्धिः ॥ तुर्ये सुहृत्सौख्यमथात्मजाप्तिः पुत्रेऽथ षष्ठेऽरिपराजयः स्यात्

janmodaye dehasukhaṃ dhane'rthalābhastṛtīye ca kuṭuṃbavṛddhiḥ || turye suhṛtsaukhyamathātmajāptiḥ putre'tha ṣaṣṭhe'riparājayaḥ syāt

⟨The ingress ascendant falling⟩ in the natal ascendant: comfort of the body. In the 2nd (dhana): gain of wealth. In the 3rd: increase of the household. In the 4th (turya): happiness from friends. Then in the 5th (putra): the getting of children. And then in the 6th: the defeat of enemies.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

जन्मोदयेदेहसुखंधनेऽर्थलाभस्तृतीयेचकुटुंबवृद्धिः ॥ तुर्येसुहृत्सौख्यमथात्मजाप्तिःपुत्रेऽथषष्ठेऽरिपराजयःस्यात्

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनेऽर्थलाभ" — the avagraha glyph ऽ is printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रेऽथषष्ठेऽरि" — both avagraha glyphs ऽ are printed
  • About this edition: The house names are the ones this record uses: धन for the 2nd, तुर्य for the 4th, पुत्र for the 5th. The subject carried over from verse 6 is the ascendant of the Sun's entry into Aries, and the houses are counted from the natal ascendant; verse 8 closes the list by saying so.
43.8a reading here is contested

स्त्रीसौख्याप्तिर्भवति मदने मृत्युरुग्भीश्चरंध्रे धर्मार्थाप्तिस्तपसि दशमे वित्तसौख्यास्पदाप्तिः ॥ लाभे लाभः सुखधनचयो दुःखदारिद्र्यमंत्ये पुंसो मेषं प्रविशति रवौ जन्मलग्नाद्विलग्ने

strīsaukhyāptirbhavati madane mṛtyurugbhīścaraṃdhre dharmārthāptistapasi daśame vittasaukhyāspadāptiḥ || lābhe lābhaḥ sukhadhanacayo duḥkhadāridryamaṃtye puṃso meṣaṃ praviśati ravau janmalagnādvilagne

In the 7th (madana): the winning of a wife and of pleasure. In the 8th (randhra): death, disease and fear. In the 9th (tapas): the gaining of dharma and of wealth. In the 10th: the gaining of wealth, of comfort and of position. In the 11th (lābha): gain — a heap of comfort and wealth. In the 12th (antya): sorrow and poverty. ⟨All this⟩ for a man when the Sun enters Aries, ⟨reckoned⟩ from the natal ascendant to the ⟨ingress⟩ ascendant.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्री सौख्याप्तिर्भवतिमदनेमृत्युरुग्भीश्वरंध्रेधर्मार्थाप्तिस्तपसिदशमेवित्तसौख्यास्पदाप्तिः ॥ लाभेलाभःसुखधनचयोदुःखदारिद्र्यमंत्येपुंसोमेषप्रवि शतिरवौजन्मलग्नाद्रिलग्ने

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृत्युरुग्भीश्वरंध्रे"; alternatives "मृत्युरुग्भीश्चरंध्रे" — the same श्च/श्व ambiguity as line 2; the sense wants श्च रंध्रे [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads मृत्युरुग्भीश्चरंध्रे; this sentence names मृत्युरुग्भीश्वरंध्रे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मलग्नाद्रिलग्ने"; alternatives "जन्मलग्नाद्विलग्ने", "जन्मलग्नाद्वालग्ने" — zoomed 4× at page x≈480-1200, y≈995-1085. The subscript under द् is small and partly filled: a plain slanted stroke reads र, a closed loop reads व. The i-mātrā above it is certain. I could not settle it; neither reading gives an obvious sense. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads जन्मलग्नाद्विलग्ने; this sentence names जन्मलग्नाद्रिलग्ने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मलग्नाद्रिलग्ने"; alternatives "जन्मलग्नाद्विलग्ने", "जन्मलग्नाद्वालग्ने" — zoomed 4× at page x≈480-1200, y≈995-1085. The subscript under द् is small and partly filled: a plain slanted stroke reads र, a closed loop reads व. The i-mātrā above it is certain. I could not settle it; neither reading gives an obvious sense. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads जन्मलग्नाद्विलग्ने; this sentence names जन्मलग्नाद्रिलग्ने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
43.9a reading here is contested

नवपंचमयोर्दृष्टिः पादोना सर्वदृष्टितः सबला ॥ मेलापकदृष्टिरियं प्रत्यक्षस्नेहदृष्टिरिति

navapaṃcamayordṛṣṭiḥ pādonā sarvadṛṣṭitaḥ sabalā || melāpakadṛṣṭiriyaṃ pratyakṣasnehadṛṣṭiriti

The aspect between the 9th and the 5th is short by a quarter ⟨of its full measure⟩; compared with the aspects from every ⟨other⟩ place it is strong. This is the melāpaka (uniting) aspect — that is, the manifest aspect of affection (sneha).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नवपंचमयोर्दृ ष्टिःपादोनासर्वेदृष्टितःसबला ॥ मेलापकदृष्टिरियंप्रत्यक्षस्नेहदृष्टिरिति

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पादोनासर्वेदृष्टितः"; alternatives "पादोनासर्वैर्दृष्टितः" — the e-stroke over र्वे is thin [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सर्वदृष्टितः; this sentence names र्वे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: पादोना is "deficient by a quarter", i.e. three quarters of full strength, not a quarter of it. The reader's alternative सर्वैर्दृष्टितः ("aspected by all") for सर्वे दृष्टितः turns on a thin e-stroke; it would not change the measure, which is what the rule rests on. This verse opens the run of aspect definitions that the page's own connective introduces as "a few of the yogas, itthaśāla and the rest, useful in praśna, set out according to the Tājika doctrine". [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सर्वदृष्टितः; this sentence names सर्वे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
43.10a reading here is contested

तृतीयैकादशयोर्दृष्टौ यो वीक्षते तृतीयदृशा ॥ तद्दृष्टिस्त्र्यंशोना नान्यत्र तु षड्भागदृष्टिश्च

tṛtīyaikādaśayordṛṣṭau yo vīkṣate tṛtīyadṛśā || taddṛṣṭistryaṃśonā nānyatra tu ṣaḍbhāgadṛṣṭiśca

In the aspect of the 3rd and the 11th, ⟨the graha⟩ that looks with the third sight: its aspect is short by a third; and nowhere else ⟨does it fall⟩ — it is the ṣaḍbhāga (sixth-part) aspect. [Our mūla now reads दृष्टौ यो वीक्षते and तृतीयदृशा, as an eye reading of the plate on 2026-10-01 gave them, so the first half construes.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

तृतीयैकादशयोर्दृष्टैयोर्वीक्षतेतृतीयदशा ॥ तद्दृष्टिस्त्र्यंशो नानान्यत्रतुषड्भागदृष्टिश्च

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टैयोर्वीक्षते"; alternatives "दृष्ट्यैयोर्वीक्षते", "दृष्ट्योर्वीक्षते" — zoomed 4× at page x≈2550-3560, y≈1055-1150; the crop reached only as far as वीक्षते, so this cluster was read at tile magnification only [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads दृष्टौ यो वीक्षते for दृष्टैयोर्वीक्षते. Read by eye on the exemplar's plate page_0204.png at about 3.0x native, the press sets ष्ट with the full औ sign, then यो, then वी with no repha.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तृतीयदशा"; alternatives "तृतीयांशा" — zoomed 4×, same crop: the ink reads तृतीयदशा. Line 12 also uses दश-, so the word may belong to the dṛṣṭi count rather than to a fraction. [2026-10-01: the keep is superseded; the mūla now reads तृतीयदृशा for तृतीयदशा, 'with the third sight'. Read by eye on page_0204.png at about 3.0x native (the दृ control at about 3.4x), the first akṣara after तृतीय is the same दृ ligature this page sets in चतुर्थदृष्टिः, not the plain द of पादोना.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्दृष्टिस्त्र्यंशो"; alternatives "तद्दृष्टिरुद्यंशो", "तद्दृष्टिरुद्द्यंशो" — zoomed 4×, same crop, and still not certain. The cluster between दृष्टि and यंशो carries a subscript र. With line 11's नानान्यत्र it gives …त्र्यंशोना नान्यत्र ('deficient by a third, not elsewhere'), which matches the पादोना of this same line; that is why स्त्र्यं is recorded first. At tile magnification it read रुद्यं.
43.11a reading here is contested

अनयोर्दृष्टिर्गुप्तस्नेहा दृष्टिः सर्वत्र कार्यसिद्धिकरी ॥ दशमचतुर्थदृष्टिः पादोना दुर्जनाख्यातुः

anayordṛṣṭirguptasnehā dṛṣṭiḥ sarvatra kāryasiddhikarī || daśamacaturthadṛṣṭiḥ pādonā durjanākhyātuḥ

The aspect of these two ⟨the 3rd and the 11th⟩ is one of hidden affection (gupta-sneha); that aspect everywhere brings the matter to success. The aspect of the 10th and the 4th is short by a quarter, and is called that of an enemy (durjana).

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अनयोर्दृष्टिर्युतस्नेहादृष्टिःसर्वत्रकार्यसिद्धिकरी ॥ दशमचतुर्थदृष्टिःपादोनादुर्जनाख्यातुः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अनयोर्दृष्टिर्युतस्नेहा"; alternatives "अनयोर्दृष्टिर्युक्स्नेहा", "अनयोर्दृष्टिर्युत्स्नेहा" — the virāma/subscript between युत and स्नेहा is faint [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads अनयोर्दृष्टिर्गुप्तस्नेहा; this sentence names अनयोर्दृष्टिर्युतस्नेहा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुर्जनाख्यातुः"; alternatives "दुर्जनाख्यातु", "दुर्जनाख्यातोः" — two dots are printed after तु; recorded as a visarga
  • About this edition: The page sets दुर्जनाख्यातुः with two dots after तु; the visarga is left unrendered because दुर्जनाख्या तु ("but is called durjana") is what the clause holds and a visarga on तु is not a form. The 4th-and-10th aspect is therefore three quarters strong like the 5th-and-9th of verse 9, but hostile where that one is friendly: strength and friendliness are two separate axes in this scheme.
43.12a reading here is contested

यत्रोभयसप्तमके सा सकला प्रत्यक्षदुर्जनादृष्टिः ॥ एकर्क्षस्थितदृष्टिर्मता सकला तिस्रो दशः क्षुताख्याः स्युः ॥ सर्वाश्चैता हि दृशो द्वादशभागांतरे भवेयुश्चेत् ॥ तत्सर्वं विशेषः प्रोक्तो दृष्ट्यनुसारात् फलं चिंत्यं

yatrobhayasaptamake sā sakalā pratyakṣadurjanādṛṣṭiḥ || ekarkṣasthitadṛṣṭirmatā sakalā tisro daśaḥ kṣutākhyāḥ syuḥ || sarvāścaitā hi dṛśo dvādaśabhāgāṃtare bhaveyuścet || tatsarvaṃ viśeṣaḥ prokto dṛṣṭyanusārāt phalaṃ ciṃtyaṃ

Where ⟨two planets stand⟩ in the mutual 7th, that is the full and manifest aspect of an enemy. The aspect of ⟨planets⟩ standing in one sign is likewise considered full. ⟨These⟩ three sights are called kṣuta. And if all these sights fall within a distance of twelve degrees, all that is declared a special case, and the result is to be judged according to the aspect. [Our text reads तिस्रो दशः, where दशः does not construe; our own 2.10 counts these as दृक्त्रितयम्, 'three sights', and that is what is rendered. The reading is recorded as a doubt on the verse.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यत्रोभयसप्तमकेमासकलाप्रत्यक्षदुर्जनादृष्टिः ॥ एकर्क्षस्थितदृष्टिर्मेतासकलातिस्रोदशःक्षुताख्याःस्युः ॥ सर्वाश्चैताहिदशोर्द्वादशभा गांतरेभवेयुश्चेत् ॥ तत्सर्वंविशेषःप्रोक्तोदृष्ट्यनुसारात्फलंचिंत्यं

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यत्रोभयसप्तमकेमासकला"; alternatives "यत्रोभयसप्तमकेसासकला", "यत्रोभयसप्तमगेमासकला" — zoomed 4× at page x≈480-1500, y≈1210-1305: the akṣara after के has a left loop, which this press uses for both म and स. सा सकला would suit the sense ('that one is full').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टिर्मेता"; alternatives "दृष्टिर्नेता" — zoomed 4× at page x≈1540-2400, y≈1210-1305: the letter under the repha has a left loop; म and न are close in this face [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads एकर्क्षस्थितदृष्टिर्मता; this sentence names दृष्टिर्मेता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सकलातिस्रोदशः"; alternatives "सकलास्त्रयोदशः", "सकलातिस्रोदश" — zoomed 4×, same crop. त्रयोदश (thirteen) would suit a list of dṛṣṭis, but तिस्रो is what the ink shows.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षुताख्याः"; alternatives "श्रुताख्याः" — the क्षु/श्रु conjuncts are close at this size
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्ट्यनुसारात्"; alternatives "दृष्टयनुसारात्" — the subscript under ष्ट is thin, the same ambiguity page 204 line 3 records
43.13a reading here is contested

सूर्यः पंचदशांशैरिंदुर्द्वादशभिरवनिजोऽष्टाभिः ॥ सप्तांशैर्बुधशुक्रौ गुरुमंदौ नवभिरीक्षेते

sūryaḥ paṃcadaśāṃśairiṃdurdvādaśabhiravanijo'ṣṭābhiḥ || saptāṃśairbudhaśukrau gurumaṃdau navabhirīkṣete

The Sun ⟨casts its rays⟩ with fifteen degrees, the Moon with twelve, Mars (avanija) with eight; Mercury and Venus with seven degrees, and Jupiter and Saturn look with nine.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

सूर्यःपंचदशांशैरिंदुर्द्वादशभिरवनिजोऽष्टाभिः ॥ सप्तांशैर्बुधशुक्रौ गुरुमंदौनवभिरीक्षते

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवभिरीक्षते"; alternatives "नवभिरिष्यते" — this is the tail of a list of dīptāṃśa values (Sun 15, Moon 12, Mars 8, Mercury and Venus 7, Jupiter and Saturn 9), where इष्यते ('are held to be') fits and ईक्षते does not. Not zoomed; the four zooms for this page went elsewhere. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads नवभिरीक्षेते; this sentence names नवभिरीक्षते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवभिरीक्षते"; alternatives "नवभिरिष्यते" — this is the tail of a list of dīptāṃśa values (Sun 15, Moon 12, Mars 8, Mercury and Venus 7, Jupiter and Saturn 9), where इष्यते ('are held to be') fits and ईक्षते does not. Not zoomed; the four zooms for this page went elsewhere. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads नवभिरीक्षेते; this sentence names नवभिरीक्षते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: This is the table of dīptāṃśas, the orb each graha carries, and the page's own prose line after this verse says as much ("these are the dīptāṃśas, to be reckoned before and after"). The plate reader proposed इष्यते ("are held to be") against the printed ईक्षते; ईक्षते needs no emendation — one verb governs the whole list and says what the orbs are for, that the graha aspects within them. The figures are 15, 12, 8, 7, 7, 9, 9 for the Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Venus, Jupiter and Saturn.
43.14a reading here is contested

यदि शीघ्रस्वल्पांशैः पश्चान्मंदं धनांशमुपगम्य ॥ स्वदीप्तभागमस्मै दत्ते ध्रुवमित्थशालयोगोऽयम्

yadi śīghrasvalpāṃśaiḥ paścānmaṃdaṃ dhanāṃśamupagamya || svadīptabhāgamasmai datte dhruvamitthaśālayogo'yam

If a swift planet, having the fewer degrees, afterwards approaches the slow one in increasing degrees and gives it its own dīpta portion (dīptāṃśa) — that is certainly the itthaśāla yoga. [Our mūla now reads स्वदीप्तभागमस्मै दत्ते, 'gives its own dīpta portion to it', and keeps धनांश, whose ध an eye reading of the plate on 2026-10-01 confirmed.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यदिशीघ्रस्वल्पांशैःपश्चान्मंदंधनांशमुपगम्य ॥ स्वदीप्तभागमस्तेंद त्तेध्रुवमित्थशालयोगोऽयम्

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वदीप्तभागमस्तेंद"; alternatives "खदीप्तभागमस्तेंद" — zoomed 6× at page x≈3090-3620, y≈225-315: the line's last three akṣaras are मस्तें + द, and the anusvāra sits on स्ते. With line 3's त्ते this gives …मस्तेंदत्ते. The word's first akṣara was read at tile magnification only; this press sets स्व and ख alike. [2026-10-01: superseded; the exemplar's plate page_0205.png, read by eye at about 2.7x native, sets स्वदीप्तभागमस्तैर्दत्ते (two strokes of ै on स्त and a repha over the line-final द), not मस्तें, and the mūla now reads स्वदीप्तभागमस्मै दत्ते, emended on the lexicon with Pāṭhaka's mūla and Kuntalā.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनांशमुपगम्य"; alternatives "घनांशमुपगम्य" — ध and घ are close at this size [2026-10-01: settled on the exemplar's plate page_0205.png at about 3.4x native: the press sets ध, matched against the ध of बुध and ध्रुव and the घ of शीघ्र on the same leaf; धनांश is kept.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वदीप्तभागमस्तेंद"; alternatives "खदीप्तभागमस्तेंद" — zoomed 6× at page x≈3090-3620, y≈225-315: the line's last three akṣaras are मस्तें + द, and the anusvāra sits on स्ते. With line 3's त्ते this gives …मस्तेंदत्ते. The word's first akṣara was read at tile magnification only; this press sets स्व and ख alike. [2026-10-01: superseded; the exemplar's plate page_0205.png, read by eye at about 2.7x native, sets स्वदीप्तभागमस्तैर्दत्ते (two strokes of ै on स्त and a repha over the line-final द), not मस्तें, and the mūla now reads स्वदीप्तभागमस्मै दत्ते, emended on the lexicon with Pāṭhaka's mūla and Kuntalā.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनांशमुपगम्य"; alternatives "घनांशमुपगम्य" — ध and घ are close at this size [2026-10-01: settled on the exemplar's plate page_0205.png at about 3.4x native: the press sets ध, matched against the ध of बुध and ध्रुव and the घ of शीघ्र on the same leaf; धनांश is kept.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मित्थशालयोगोऽयम्"; alternatives "मित्यशालयोगोऽयम्" — the थ/य bodies are close here; the same line later prints an unambiguous इत्थशाल, which is why थ is recorded. The avagraha glyph ऽ is printed.
43.15a reading here is contested

लिप्तार्धविलिप्तिकाभ्यां यदि हीनो मंदतोऽप्यतुल्यः स्यात् ॥ तत्पूर्णमित्थशालमुथशिलमपि कथ्यते तज्ज्ञैः

liptārdhaviliptikābhyāṃ yadi hīno maṃdato'pyatulyaḥ syāt || tatpūrṇamitthaśālamuthaśilamapi kathyate tajjñaiḥ

If ⟨the swift planet⟩ falls short of the slow one by half a minute or by ⟨a few⟩ seconds, so as not to be equal ⟨to it⟩, that is the full (pūrṇa) itthaśāla; those who know it call it muthaśila as well.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

लिप्तार्धविलिप्तिकाभ्यांयदिहीनोमंदतोऽप्यतुल्यःस्यात् ॥ तत्पूर्णमित्थशालमुथशिलमपिकथ्यतेतज्ज्ञैः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंदतोऽप्यतुल्यः" — the avagraha glyph ऽ is printed
  • About this edition: लिप्ता is the minute of arc and विलिप्तिका the second, so the measure is half a minute or less. मुथशिल is the Tājika (Arabic) name of the applying aspect that इत्थशाल also names; this record gives the two as one thing, which is why the app may use either word for it.
43.16a reading here is contested

अथ शीघ्रो मंदगतेरपि भागैकं समुत्तरत्यग्रे ॥ तदेसराफसंज्ञो मूसरिफः कथ्यते त्वशुभः

atha śīghro maṃdagaterapi bhāgaikaṃ samuttaratyagre || tadesarāphasaṃjño mūsariphaḥ kathyate tvaśubhaḥ

Now, if the swift planet has passed the slow one by even a single degree, that is named esarāpha; it is also called mūsaripha, and it is inauspicious.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथशीघ्रोमंदगतेरपिभागैकंसमुत्तरलग्ने ॥ तदेसराफसंज्ञोमूसरिफःकथ्यतेत्वशुभः

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समुत्तरलग्ने"; alternatives "समुत्तरेलग्ने", "समुत्तरङ्गे" — the ग्न here is this press's ग्र-shaped ग्न carrying an e-stroke, as confirmed by the zoom on page 204 lines 1-2; the word division is not certain [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads समुत्तरत्यग्रे; this sentence names समुत्तरलग्ने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The page spells the first name एसराफ, not the ईसराफ of this printing's own list of the sixteen yogas; what the verse spells is what is written here. समुत्तरलग्ने is not certainly divided — this press draws its ग्न like ग्र, and the reader records समुत्तरे लग्ने and समुत्तरङ्गे as possible — but the condition does not turn on it: the swift graha having gone one degree past the slow one is the whole of the definition, and it is the separating aspect, the exact opposite of the itthaśāla of verses 14 and 15. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads समुत्तरत्यग्रे; this sentence names समुत्तरलग्ने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
43.17a reading here is contested

यद्युभयदृष्टिरहितो यद्वान्यः शीघ्रगोंऽतरे भूत्वा ॥ पश्चात्तदन्यस्मै ददाति तेजः सनक्तसंज्ञः स्यात्

yadyubhayadṛṣṭirahito yadvānyaḥ śīghragoṃ'tare bhūtvā || paścāttadanyasmai dadāti tejaḥ sanaktasaṃjñaḥ syāt

If ⟨two planets⟩ are without an aspect of each other, or if another, swift-moving, planet comes between them and afterwards gives that light to the other — that is called nakta. [Our mūla now reads सनक्तसंज्ञः, 'that is named nakta', the yoga our own 2.25 defines.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

यद्युभयदृष्टिरहितोयद्वान्यःशीघ्र गोंऽतरेभूत्वा ॥ पश्चात्तदन्यस्मैददातितेजःसनफसंज्ञःस्यात्

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोंऽतरे"; alternatives "गोऽंतरे", "गोऽन्तरे" — both an anusvāra dot AND an avagraha glyph are printed, in that order; recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सनफसंज्ञः"; alternatives "सनकसंज्ञः", "नक्तसंज्ञः" — the yoga described (one planet comes between and then hands the light on) is the one usually called नक्त; the akṣaras read स-न-फ. Not zoomed. Flagged because a Tājika term read wrongly would be repeated as a technical name. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सनक्तसंज्ञः; this sentence names सनफसंज्ञः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोंऽतरे"; alternatives "गोऽंतरे", "गोऽन्तरे" — both an anusvāra dot AND an avagraha glyph are printed, in that order; recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सनफसंज्ञः"; alternatives "सनकसंज्ञः", "नक्तसंज्ञः" — the yoga described (one planet comes between and then hands the light on) is the one usually called नक्त; the akṣaras read स-न-फ. Not zoomed. Flagged because a Tājika term read wrongly would be repeated as a technical name. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सनक्तसंज्ञः; this sentence names सनफसंज्ञः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
43.18a reading here is contested

स्त्रीलाभस्य प्रश्ने कन्यालग्ने बुधः पतिः सिंहे ॥ मीने च तत्पतिर्गुरुस्तत्रानयोर्न त्वस्ति दृष्टिस्तु

strīlābhasya praśne kanyālagne budhaḥ patiḥ siṃhe || mīne ca tatpatirgurustatrānayorna tvasti dṛṣṭistu

In a question about the winning of a woman: the ascendant is Virgo and its lord, Mercury, is in Leo; ⟨the 7th is⟩ Pisces and its lord is Jupiter — and between these two there is no aspect at all.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

स्त्रीलाभस्यप्र श्नेकन्यालग्नेबुधःपतिःसिंहे ॥ मीनेचतत्पतिर्गुरुस्तत्रानयोर्नत्वस्तिदृष्टिस्तु

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रीलाभस्यप्र"; alternatives "स्त्रीलाभस्यत्र" — the cluster is cut by the frame. Line 6 was zoomed 6× at page x≈465-830, y≈548-632 and begins श्ने (a clear न subscript under श), so the pair reads प्र|श्ने ('in the query'). The same प्र/त्र ambiguity appears on page 204 line 5.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रीलाभस्यप्र"; alternatives "स्त्रीलाभस्यत्र" — the cluster is cut by the frame. Line 6 was zoomed 6× at page x≈465-830, y≈548-632 and begins श्ने (a clear न subscript under श), so the pair reads प्र|श्ने ('in the query'). The same प्र/त्र ambiguity appears on page 204 line 5.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्नेकन्यालग्ने" — zoomed 6× at page x≈465-830, y≈548-632: the subscript under श has two humps, so न, not र. Settles line 5's प्र|श्ने.
  • About this edition: This is the first record of a worked example: the page's own prose before it says "'of both' means the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter. An example:", and verse 19 finishes it. The example checks out against verses 9 to 12: Leo and Pisces stand six signs apart one way and eight the other, which is none of the aspects defined — not the 3rd/11th, the 4th/10th, the 5th/9th, the 7th, or one sign.
43.19a reading here is contested

शीघ्रश्चंद्रो द्वाभ्यां दृष्टो बुधात्तन्महो नीत्वा ॥ जीवाय ददौ तद्वत् परहस्ताद्योषितः प्राप्तिः

śīghraścaṃdro dvābhyāṃ dṛṣṭo budhāttanmaho nītvā || jīvāya dadau tadvat parahastādyoṣitaḥ prāptiḥ

The Moon, which is swift, is aspected by both ⟨Mercury and Jupiter⟩; taking that light from Mercury, it gave ⟨it⟩ to Jupiter. Accordingly, the woman is obtained from another's hand.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

शीघ्रश्चंद्रोद्वाभ्यांदृष्टोबुधात्तन्महोनीत्वा ॥ जीवायद दौतद्वत्परहस्ताद्योषितःप्राप्तिः

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्महोनीत्वा"; alternatives "तन्महोनीला" — read त्वा by carrying over the zoom on line 7, where the identical cluster in the identical phrase (तेजोनीत्वा) was confirmed at 5×. At tile magnification alone this reads नीला. This spot itself was NOT zoomed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शीघ्रश्चंद्रो"; alternatives "शीघ्रश्वंद्रो" — the press's श्च/श्व ambiguity
  • About this edition: This closes the worked example of verse 18: the lagna lord and the lord of the matter have no aspect between them, so the Moon carries the light from one to the other, and the reading follows from the transfer — the woman comes through a third party's hand, not directly. महस् is the "light" the transferring graha carries, the same तेजस् as in verses 17 and 20.
43.20a reading here is contested

अथ यदि मंदोंऽतस्थो द्वावप्यपश्यति निजोक्तदीप्तदृशा ॥ तेजो नीत्वा शीघ्राद्ददाति मंदाय तद्यमया

atha yadi maṃdoṃ'tastho dvāvapyapaśyati nijoktadīptadṛśā || tejo nītvā śīghrāddadāti maṃdāya tadyamayā

Now if a slow planet stands between ⟨them⟩ while the two do not aspect ⟨each other⟩, and it is within its own stated dīpta orb — then, carrying the light, it gives it from the swift one to the slow one; and that is ⟨the yoga called⟩ yamayā. [Our text reads द्वावप्यपश्यति, 'not seeing the two', which is what is rendered; one later printing gives द्वावपि पश्यति, 'sees both', which is what our own 2.28 says of the slow planet between, and the metre prefers it. The reading is recorded as a doubt on the verse.]

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अथयदिमंदोंऽतस्थोद्वावप्यपश्यतिनिजोक्तदीप्तदशा ॥ तेजोनीत्वाशीघ्राददातिमंदायतच्चमया

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंदोंऽतस्थो"; alternatives "मंदोऽंतस्थो" — anusvāra then avagraha, both printed, as in line 5's गोंऽतरे
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निजोक्तदीप्तदशा"; alternatives "निजोक्तदीप्तांशा" — lines 2 and 11 both print दीप्तांश-, which is the term in play; here the akṣara reads दशा. Not zoomed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads निजोक्तदीप्तदृशा; this sentence names निजोक्तदीप्तदशा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तेजोनीत्वाशीघ्राददाति" — zoomed 5× at page x≈2400-3000, y≈628-715: the cluster after नी is त with a subscript व and an ā-mātrā, so नीत्वa; and the following word is शीघ्राददाति (two द). At tile magnification these read नीला and शीघ्रादुदाति. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शीघ्राद्ददाति; this sentence names शीघ्राददाति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: मया is most probably यमया, which this printing's own list of the sixteen yogas names: verse 17 gives the case where the graha that comes between is the swifter one, and this verse gives the case where it is the slower, which is exactly the nakta / yamayā pair. The record spells मया and it is written so. The page's prose immediately after this verse glosses मंदाय as मंदगतये, "to the slow-moving one", which is why दत्ते is read as giving the light on to the slower of the two principals.

Use it freely — CC BY 4.0. This Sanskrit transcription and this English translation are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Copy them, print them, build on them; the only condition is attribution to Karma Sakha (karmasakha.com). The underlying work is ancient and in the public domain everywhere.

If you find an error, it is ours and we want it. Every reading on this page is recorded with the evidence behind it, so a disagreement can be argued about concretely rather than asserted.

Readings on this site cite texts at chapter level, with verse numbers only where our research verified the passage in a named edition. How conflicts between texts are resolved is documented on the conventions page.