40.1a reading here is contested आगमने पृच्छायां लग्नेशे लग्नमध्यसंस्थेन ॥ कृतमुथशिले समेति हि सुखमस्ततुरीयगे कष्टात्
āgamane pṛcchāyāṃ lagneśe lagnamadhyasaṃsthena || kṛtamuthaśile sameti hi sukhamastaturīyage kaṣṭāt
In a question about ⟨a traveller's⟩ coming home: when the lord of the lagna forms a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with a planet standing in the middle of the lagna, he does come, and in comfort; ⟨when that planet stands⟩ in the 7th (asta) or the 4th (turīya), he comes with hardship. [Our mūla now reads सुखमस्ततुरीयगे: the त of अस्त is restored, so the pair of houses stands in the text.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
आगमनेपृच्छायांलग्नेशेलग्नमध्यसंस्थेन ॥ कृतमुथशिलेसमेतिहिसुखमस्तुरीयगेकष्टात्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुखमस्तुरीयगे"; alternatives "सुखमस्ततुरीयगे" — no word break is printed; the reading of the join is uncertain [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुखमस्ततुरीयगे; this sentence names सुखमस्तुरीयगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "समरसिंहे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The second half is one mātrā short as printed. An āryā's second half runs to 27 mātrās; सुखमस्तुरीयगे counts 26, and the plate reader's own alternative सुखमस्ततुरीयगे counts exactly 27. The sense wants the same thing, because अस्तुरीय is no word while अस्त (the 7th) and तुरीय (the 4th) are a standing pair of houses. The first half counts a regular 30, so the metre is otherwise sound. I have not altered the Sanskrit: the word-divided file keeps the printed akṣaras. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुखमस्ततुरीयगे; this sentence names सुखमस्तुरीयगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
स्थानाच् चलितः प्रश्ने लग्नपतौ सहजनवमगृहसंस्थे ॥ लग्नस्थेन मुथशिले पंथानं वहति पथिकोऽयं
sthānāc calitaḥ praśne lagnapatau sahajanavamagṛhasaṃsthe || lagnasthena muthaśile paṃthānaṃ vahati pathiko'yaṃ
In a question ⟨asked⟩ about a man who has set out from his place: when the lord of the lagna stands in the 3rd (sahaja) or the 9th house, and a muthaśila is formed with a planet standing in the lagna, this traveller is on the road ⟨and travelling still⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
स्थानाच्चलितःप्रश्नेलग्न पतौसहजनवमगृहसंस्थे ॥ लग्नस्थेनमुथशिलेपंथानंवहतिपथिकोऽयं
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
40.3a reading here is contested रंध्रेथ धने तस्मिन्नाकाशस्थेन मुथशिलेप्येवं ॥ केंद्रस्थिते त्थशाले लग्नेक्षणवर्ज्यमेति न कदापि
raṃdhretha dhane tasminnākāśasthena muthaśilepyevaṃ || keṃdrasthite tthaśāle lagnekṣaṇavarjyameti na kadāpi
⟨So too⟩ when that ⟨lord of the lagna⟩ is in the 8th (randhra) or in the 2nd (dhana) and the muthaśila is with a planet standing in the ākāśa (the 10th): the same ⟨result⟩. When the itthaśāla is with a planet standing in a kendra but there is no aspect on the lagna, he never comes at all.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रंध्रेथधनेतस्मिन्नाकाशस्थेनमुथशिलेप्येवं ॥ केंद्रस्थिते त्थशालेलग्नेक्षणवर्ज्यमेतिनकदापि
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रंध्रेथधने"; alternatives "रंध्रेऽथधने" — no avagraha printed, though one IS printed on the same line in पथिकोऽयं
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलेप्येवं"; alternatives "मुथशिलेऽप्येवं" — no avagraha printed
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
- About this edition: The press sets रंध्रेथ and मुथशिलेप्येवं without an avagraha; I read रंध्रे ऽथ and मुथशिले ऽप्येवं, the ordinary elision of an initial अ, which changes no sense. The word-divided file keeps the akṣaras as printed. The last quarter reads लग्नेक्षणवर्ज्यम् एति न कदापि, where -वर्ज्यम् is a neuter agreeing with nothing in the sentence; I take it adverbially of the itthaśāla, 'devoid of an aspect on the lagna'. ईक्षण could instead be read with लग्ने, giving 'no aspect while in the lagna'; the printing does not settle it.
40.4a reading here is contested लग्नाधिपतौ वक्रे लग्नं पश्यत्यमुत्र चंद्रे वा ॥ वक्रगमूथशिले सति समेति पथिकः सुखं शीघ्रं
lagnādhipatau vakre lagnaṃ paśyatyamutra caṃdre vā || vakragamūthaśile sati sameti pathikaḥ sukhaṃ śīghraṃ
When the lord of the lagna is retrograde and aspects the lagna from where it stands — or when the Moon ⟨is so placed⟩ — and a mūthaśila is made with that retrograde planet, the traveller comes home in comfort and quickly.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाधिपतौवक्रेलग्नंपश्यत्यमुत्रचंद्रेवा ॥ वक्रगमूथशिलेसतिसमेतिपथिकःसुखंशीघ्रं
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूथशिले"; alternatives "मुथशिले" — 5x zoom: म carries a ू (long u) here, against मुथशिल- everywhere else on these two pages. Kept as printed.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
- About this edition: The page prints मूथशिले with a long ū here, against मुथशिल- everywhere else on these two leaves; the plate reader checked it at 5× and kept it, and I render it as the same term. अमुत्र, 'yonder', I take of the retrograde planet's own place, hence 'from where it stands'.
40.5a reading here is contested अंत्यस्थितलग्नपतौ शशिना कृतमुथशिले द्रुतमुपैति ॥ लग्नाद् वापि चतुर्थाच् छुभाद् द्वितीयतृतीयगा वापि
aṃtyasthitalagnapatau śaśinā kṛtamuthaśile drutamupaiti || lagnād vāpi caturthāc chubhād dvitīyatṛtīyagā vāpi
When the lord of the lagna stands in the 12th (antya) and a muthaśila is made with the Moon, he arrives swiftly. Or again ⟨he arrives swiftly when the Moon stands⟩ in the 2nd or the 3rd from the lagna, or from the 4th, or from a benefic.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अंत्य स्थितलग्नपतौशशिनाकृतमुथशिलेद्दुतमुपैति ॥ लग्नाद्वापिचतुर्थांच्छुभाद्द्वितीयतृतीयगावापि
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिलेद्दुतमुपैति"; alternatives "मुथशिलेद्रुतमुपैति" — the same conjunct as line 1; read as द्दु from the ink [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्रुतमुपैति; this sentence names द्दु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8).
- About this edition: द्दुतम् as printed is not a word; द्रुतम्, 'swiftly', is meant, and the plate reader records the same conjunct at the same spot in the line above. I render द्रुतम् and leave the printed akṣaras in the word-divided file. चतुर्थांच् carries an anusvāra for which the sandhi has no room — चतुर्थात् + शुभात् gives चतुर्थाच् छुभात् — and I read it without. The second half names the places but neither the planet nor the result; both are carried over from the first half and are marked as supplied. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चतुर्थाच्; this sentence names चतुर्थांच्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.6a reading here is contested कथयंति नष्टलाभं प्रवासिनश् चागमं त्वरितम् ॥ ग्रहः षष्ठेऽथ जामित्रे वाक्पतिः कंटके स्थितः ॥ पथिकागमनं ब्रूते सिते ज्ञे वा त्रिकोणगे
kathayaṃti naṣṭalābhaṃ pravāsinaś cāgamaṃ tvaritam || grahaḥ ṣaṣṭhe'tha jāmitre vākpatiḥ kaṃṭake sthitaḥ || pathikāgamanaṃ brūte site jñe vā trikoṇage
⟨They⟩ declare the recovery of what was lost, and the swift arrival of the man who is abroad. — A planet in the 6th, or in the 7th (jāmitra), ⟨and⟩ Jupiter (vākpati) standing in a kendra (kaṇṭaka): ⟨this⟩ declares the traveller's arrival; or Venus, or Mercury, standing in a trine.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कथयंतिनष्टलाभंप्रवासिनश्चागमं त्वरितम् ॥ ग्रहःषष्ठेऽथजामित्रेवाक्पतिःकंटकेस्थितः ॥ पथिकागमनंब्रूतेसितेज्ञेवात्रिकोणगे
4 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: समरसिंह (named ताजिकेसमरसिंहे on page 188 line 8); चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: The label "चिंतामणौ ॥" stands INSIDE this verse's span, after "…कथयंतिनष्टलाभंप्रवासिनश्चागमं त्वरितम् ॥". The words before the label may close the quotation before it rather than open this verse; the page does not say.
- About this edition: The page sets the label चिंतामणौ ॥, 'in the Cintāmaṇi', INSIDE this record, after कथयंति नष्टलाभं प्रवासिनश्चागमं त्वरितम् ॥. So the first half-line probably closes the quotation that runs through verses 1–5 rather than opening this one; its subject stands in a verse the page has already numbered, and I supply it as 'they'. The page marks where a quotation opens and never where it closes. ब्रूते is singular while two conditions precede it, so the verse is loose about whether the planet in the 6th or 7th and Jupiter in a kendra are one condition or two.
40.7a reading here is contested षष्ठोदये पापदृष्टे शुभदृग्वर्जिते बुधः ॥ लग्नात् षष्ठे यदा पापा यातुश् च निधनं वदेत्
ṣaṣṭhodaye pāpadṛṣṭe śubhadṛgvarjite budhaḥ || lagnāt ṣaṣṭhe yadā pāpā yātuś ca nidhanaṃ vadet
When the 6th and the ascendant (udaya) are aspected by malefics and have no benefic's aspect at all, and when malefics stand in the 6th from the lagna, the wise man should declare the traveller's death.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
षष्ठोदयेपापदृष्टेशुभदृ ग्वर्जितेबुधः ॥ लग्नात्षष्ठेयदापापायातुश्चनिधनंवदेत्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्वर्जितेबुधः"; alternatives "वर्जितेबुधः", "ग्रवर्जितेबुधः" — the first akṣara of the page carries a subscript and continues a word broken at the previous page; it reads ग्व
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: बुधः here is 'the wise man', the subject of वदेत् in the second half, and not the planet Mercury: the verse gives a planet no verb, and the same idiom stands in verse 12 (वदेत् सुधीः). The first akṣara of the page, ग्व, continues शुभदृग्वर्जिते, a word broken across the page turn; the plate reader's alternatives वर्जिते and ग्रवर्जिते would leave that compound without its दृग्.
यदा क्रूरास् तृतीयस्था देशाद्देशांतरं गतः ॥ चौरेणैव हृतस्वश् च पथिकः केंद्रगा यदि
yadā krūrās tṛtīyasthā deśāddeśāṃtaraṃ gataḥ || caureṇaiva hṛtasvaś ca pathikaḥ keṃdragā yadi
When malefics stand in the 3rd, ⟨the man⟩ has gone from one country to another; and if they stand in a kendra, the traveller has had his goods carried off by a thief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यदाक्रूरास्तृतीयस्थादेशादेशांतरंगतः ॥ चौरेणैवहृतस्वश्चपथिकःकेंद्रगायदि
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
40.9a reading here is contested पापैः षष्ठत्रिलाभस्थैः कंटकस्थैः शुभग्रहैः ॥ प्रवासी सुखमायाति दूरस्थोपि सुनिश्चितम्
pāpaiḥ ṣaṣṭhatrilābhasthaiḥ kaṃṭakasthaiḥ śubhagrahaiḥ || pravāsī sukhamāyāti dūrasthopi suniścitam
With malefics standing in the 6th, the 3rd and the 11th (lābha), and with benefic planets standing in the kendras, the man abroad comes home in comfort, far off though he is — and this is quite certain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पापैःषष्ठत्रिलाभस्थैःकंटकस्थैःशुभग्रहैः ॥ प्रवासीसुखमायातिदूरस्थोपिसुनिश्चितम्
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दूरस्थोपि"; alternatives "दूरस्थोऽपि" — no avagraha glyph is printed here; kept as set
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
चतुरस्रे त्रिकोणे वा पापगेहस्थितः शनिः ॥ पापदृष्टश् च नियतं बंधनं यातुरादिशेत्
caturasre trikoṇe vā pāpagehasthitaḥ śaniḥ || pāpadṛṣṭaś ca niyataṃ baṃdhanaṃ yāturādiśet
When Saturn stands in a caturasra or in a trine, ⟨or⟩ in the sign of a malefic, and is aspected by a malefic, one should declare imprisonment for the traveller, and declare it as certain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चतुरस्रेत्रिकोणेवापापगेहस्थितःश निः ॥ पापदृष्टश्चनियतंबंधनंयातुरादिशेत्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: चतुरस्र, 'the square', names the 4th house, and in much of this literature the 8th along with it; the verse does not say which, so I have not chosen for it. पापगेह is 'the house of a malefic', that is a sign owned by Mars or Saturn, and not a house of the chart.
40.11a reading here is contested शुभयुक्ते स्थिरे लग्ने स्थिरो बंधश् चरेऽन्यथा ॥ द्वितनौ सौम्यसंयुक्ते बंधमोक्षौ क्रमेण तु
śubhayukte sthire lagne sthiro baṃdhaś care'nyathā || dvitanau saumyasaṃyukte baṃdhamokṣau krameṇa tu
When the lagna is a fixed sign joined with a benefic, the confinement lasts; in a movable ⟨sign⟩ it is otherwise. In a dual-bodied ⟨sign⟩ (dvitanu) joined with a benefic, confinement and release come in that order.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुभयुक्तेस्थिरेलग्नेस्थिरोबंधश्चरेऽन्यथा ॥ द्वितनौसौम्यसंयुक्तेबंधमोक्षौक्रमेणतु
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरेऽन्यथा"; alternatives "चरेन्यथा" — an avagraha glyph IS set here, unlike दूरस्थोपि on line 2; small but present
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
40.12a reading here is contested पापास् त्रिकोणजामित्रे विलग्ने षष्ठकोदये ॥ शत्रुभिर् वीक्ष्यमाणाश् च यातुः कष्टं वदेत् सुधीः
pāpās trikoṇajāmitre vilagne ṣaṣṭhakodaye || śatrubhir vīkṣyamāṇāś ca yātuḥ kaṣṭaṃ vadet sudhīḥ
Malefics standing in a trine, in the 7th (jāmitra), in the lagna ⟨and⟩ in the 6th from the ascendant, and aspected by planets that are their enemies — the wise man should declare hardship for the traveller.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पापास्त्रिकोणजामित्रविलग्नेषष्ठकोदये ॥ शत्रुभिर्वीक्ष्यमाणाश्चयातुःकष्टंवदेत्सुधीः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठकोदये"; alternatives "षष्ठगोदये" — the को akṣara is small and its left hook could be ग
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: The compound names विलग्न and उदय one after the other and both are the ascendant. I read षष्ठक-उदये as 'the 6th from the ascendant', which is how verse 7 writes the same count (लग्नात् षष्ठे); taken as a flat list the two members merely repeat one another. The plate reader could not rule out षष्ठगोदये against षष्ठकोदये, and that reading gives the same house. [2026-10-01: read on the plate (NSP 1893 page_0189, line 3, by eye at about 3.5x native), the page sets जामित्रेविलग्ने with the e-mātrā on त्र. The mūla now reads जामित्रे विलग्ने. षष्ठकोदये was not re-read on that crop.]
मार्गस्थानगतैः सौम्यैर् मार्गं तस्य शुभं वदेत् ॥ क्रूरैर् दुःखं विलग्नस्थैः पापैः क्लेशमवाप्नुयात्
mārgasthānagataiḥ saumyair mārgaṃ tasya śubhaṃ vadet || krūrair duḥkhaṃ vilagnasthaiḥ pāpaiḥ kleśamavāpnuyāt
With benefics gone to the house of the road (mārga-sthāna), one should declare his journey auspicious; with malefics, suffering; and with malefics standing in the lagna, he meets with distress.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मार्गस्थानगतैःसौम्यैर्मार्गंतस्यशुभंवदेत् ॥ क्रूरैर्दुःखंविलग्नस्थैःपापैःक्लेशमवाप्नुयात्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
चरलग्ने चरांशे वा चतुर्थे चंद्रमाः स्थितः ॥ प्रवासी सुखमायाति कृतकार्यश् च वेश्मनि
caralagne carāṃśe vā caturthe caṃdramāḥ sthitaḥ || pravāsī sukhamāyāti kṛtakāryaś ca veśmani
When the Moon stands in a movable lagna, or in a movable aṃśa, or in the 4th, the man abroad comes home in comfort, and with his business done.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चरलग्नेचरांशेवाचतुर्थेचंद्रमाःस्थितः ॥ प्रवासीसुखमायातिकृतकार्यश्चवेश्मनि
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
कंटकैः सौम्यसंयुक्तैः पापग्रहविवर्जितैः ॥ प्रवासी सुखमायाति निधनस्थे सुधाकरे
kaṃṭakaiḥ saumyasaṃyuktaiḥ pāpagrahavivarjitaiḥ || pravāsī sukhamāyāti nidhanasthe sudhākare
When the kendras (kaṇṭaka) are occupied by benefics and free of malefic planets, the man abroad comes home in comfort — even with the Moon standing in the 8th (nidhana).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कंटकैःसौम्यसंयुक्तैःपापग्रहविवर्जितैः ॥ प्रवासीसुखमायातिनिधनस्थेसुधाकरे
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
गमागमौ तु न स्यातां योगे दुरुधराकृते ॥ शुभैः शुभकृतो रोधः पापैस् तस्करतो भयम्
gamāgamau tu na syātāṃ yoge durudharākṛte || śubhaiḥ śubhakṛto rodhaḥ pāpais taskarato bhayam
Neither going nor coming takes place when a durudharā yoga has been formed ⟨by planets standing in the 2nd and the 12th from the Moon⟩. If benefics form it, the detention is one made by something good; if malefics, ⟨there is⟩ danger from a thief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
गमागमौतुनस्यातांयोगेदुरुधराकृते ॥ शुभैःशुभ कृतोरोधःपापैस्तस्करतोभयम्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: durudharā is the yoga of planets standing in the 2nd and the 12th from the Moon. The verse names it and does not define it, so the definition is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. शुभकृतो रोधः says who makes the detention, not what it is.
गमागमौ हि न स्यातां स्थिरराशौ विलग्नगे ॥ न रोगोपशमो नाशो द्रव्याणां न पराभवः
gamāgamau hi na syātāṃ sthirarāśau vilagnage || na rogopaśamo nāśo dravyāṇāṃ na parābhavaḥ
Neither going nor coming takes place when a fixed sign is the lagna: no easing of illness, no loss of goods, and no defeat.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
गमागमौहिनस्यातांस्थिरराशौविलग्नगे ॥ नरोगोपशमोनाशोद्रव्याणांनपराभवः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
विपरीतं चरे वाच्यं फलं मिश्रं द्विमूर्तिषु ॥ स्थिरवत् प्रथमे खंडे परार्धे चरराशिवत्
viparītaṃ care vācyaṃ phalaṃ miśraṃ dvimūrtiṣu || sthiravat prathame khaṃḍe parārdhe cararāśivat
In a movable ⟨sign⟩ the opposite is to be declared. In dual-bodied (dvimūrti) signs the result is mixed: as with a fixed sign in the first half ⟨of the sign⟩, and as with a movable sign in the latter half.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
वि परीतंचरेवाच्यंफलंमिश्रंद्विमूर्तिषु ॥ स्थिरवत्प्रथमेखंडेपरार्धेचरराशिवत्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
प्रवासी शीघ्रमायाति गुरुशुक्रौ त्रिवित्तगौ ॥ चतुर्थस्थानगावेतौ शीघ्रमायाति कार्यकृत्
pravāsī śīghramāyāti guruśukrau trivittagau || caturthasthānagāvetau śīghramāyāti kāryakṛt
The man abroad comes home quickly ⟨when⟩ Jupiter and Venus stand in the 3rd and the 2nd (vitta); and when these two stand in the 4th house, he comes home quickly with his work done.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
प्रवासीशीघ्रमायातिगुरुशुक्रौत्रिवित्तगौ ॥ चतुर्थ स्थानगावेतौशीघ्रमायातिकार्यकृत्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
इंदुः सप्तमगो लग्नात् पथिकं वक्ति मार्गगम् ॥ मार्गाधिपश् च राश्यर्धात्परभागे व्यवस्थितः
iṃduḥ saptamago lagnāt pathikaṃ vakti mārgagam || mārgādhipaś ca rāśyardhātparabhāge vyavasthitaḥ
The Moon in the 7th from the lagna declares the traveller to be on the road; so does the lord of the road, when it stands in the part that lies beyond the half of its sign ⟨past 15°⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
इंदुःसप्तमगोलग्नात्पथिकंवक्तिमार्गगम् ॥ मार्गाधिपश्चराश्यर्धांतपरभागेव्यवस्थितः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
40.21a reading here is contested शुक्रार्कजीवसौम्यानामेकोपि स्याद् धरायगः ॥ तदाशु गमनं ब्रूयात् प्रष्टुर् न गमनं व्यये
śukrārkajīvasaumyānāmekopi syād dharāyagaḥ || tadāśu gamanaṃ brūyāt praṣṭur na gamanaṃ vyaye
If even one of Venus, the Sun, Jupiter and Mercury should stand in the 4th or the 11th (dharā-āya), then one should declare a swift going; for the querent there is no going when ⟨that planet stands⟩ in the 12th (vyaya).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुक्रार्कजीवसौम्यानामेकोपिस्याद्धरायगः ॥ तदाशुगमनंब्रूयात्प्रष्टुर्नगमनंव्यये
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्धरायगः"; alternatives "स्याच्छरायगः", "स्याद्धोरायगः" — the conjunct after स्या is inked heavily and could be द्ध or च्छ; no reading here is certain and the word does not resolve for me
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: The plate reader records that this word does not resolve for him either, and offers स्याच्छरायगः and स्याद्धोरायगः beside the printed स्याद्धरायगः. स्याद् is certain, the optative of अस्. What follows names a position, because the second half sets it against व्यये, 'in the 12th'. If the ending -आयगः is आय-गः, 'standing in the 11th', the rule would oppose the 11th (āya) to the 12th (vyaya), which is the pair this literature usually opposes — but that is a conjecture and I have not rendered it as the text. The metre decides nothing: द्ध and च्छ both leave the syllable light, and the pāda is a regular pathyā either way.
लग्नाद् यावतिथे स्थाने बली खेटो व्यवस्थितः ॥ ब्रूयात् तावतिथे मासे पथिकस्य निवर्तनम्
lagnād yāvatithe sthāne balī kheṭo vyavasthitaḥ || brūyāt tāvatithe māse pathikasya nivartanam
In whatever house counted from the lagna a strong planet (kheṭa) stands, in that same month one should declare the traveller's return.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाद्यावतिथेस्थानेबलीखेटोव्यवस्थितः ॥ ब्रूयात्तावतिथेमासेपथिकस्यनिवर्तनम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
एवं कालं चरांशस्थे द्विगुणं च स्थिरांशके ॥ द्विस्वभावांशगे खेटे त्रिगुणं चिंतयेत् सुधीः
evaṃ kālaṃ carāṃśasthe dviguṇaṃ ca sthirāṃśake || dvisvabhāvāṃśage kheṭe triguṇaṃ ciṃtayet sudhīḥ
The time is reckoned thus when ⟨the planet⟩ stands in a movable aṃśa; twofold in a fixed aṃśa; and when the planet is in a dual-natured aṃśa, the wise man should reckon it threefold.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
एवंकालंचरांशस्थेद्विगुणंचस्थिरांशके ॥ द्विस्वभावांशगेखेटेत्रिगुणंचिंतयेत्सुधीः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
यातुर्विलग्नाज्जामित्रभवनाधिपतिर् यदा ॥ करोति वक्रमावृत्तेः कालं तु ब्रुवते परे
yāturvilagnājjāmitrabhavanādhipatir yadā || karoti vakramāvṛtteḥ kālaṃ tu bruvate pare
When the lord of the house that stands 7th (jāmitra) from the traveller's lagna turns retrograde — that, others say, is the time of his return.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यातुर्विलग्नाजामित्रभवनाधिपतिर्यदा ॥ करोतिवक्रमावृत्तेःकालंतुब्रुवतेपरे
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
चतुर्थे दशमे वापि यदि सौम्यग्रहो भवेत् ॥ तदा न गमनं क्रूरैस् तत्रस्थैर् गमनं भवेत्
caturthe daśame vāpi yadi saumyagraho bhavet || tadā na gamanaṃ krūrais tatrasthair gamanaṃ bhavet
If a benefic planet is in the 4th or in the 10th, then there is no going; with malefics standing there, going does take place.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चतुर्थेदशमेवापियदिसौम्यग्रहोभवेत् ॥ तदा नगमनंक्रूरैस्तत्रस्थैर्गमनंभवेत्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
लग्नाद् वा लग्ननाथाद् वा यत्संख्याः क्रूरखेचराः ॥ नवमे द्वादशे वापि तत्संख्याः स्युरुपद्रवाः
lagnād vā lagnanāthād vā yatsaṃkhyāḥ krūrakhecarāḥ || navame dvādaśe vāpi tatsaṃkhyāḥ syurupadravāḥ
However many malefic planets stand in the 9th or the 12th — counted from the lagna, or from the lord of the lagna — that many are the calamities ⟨on the journey⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाद्वालग्ननाथाद्वायत्संख्याःक्रूरखेचराः ॥ नवमेद्वादशेवापितत्संख्याःस्युरुपद्रवाः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
लग्नाद् वा लग्ननाथाद् वा यावंतः सौम्यखेचराः ॥ मार्गे तत्रोदया वाच्याः स्थाने स्थाने विचक्षणैः
lagnād vā lagnanāthād vā yāvaṃtaḥ saumyakhecarāḥ || mārge tatrodayā vācyāḥ sthāne sthāne vicakṣaṇaiḥ
However many benefic planets ⟨stand in those houses⟩, counted from the lagna or from the lord of the lagna, that many risings ⟨of fortune⟩ on the road are to be declared by the discerning, at one place after another.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाद्वालग्ननाथाद्वायावंतःसौम्यखेचराः ॥ मार्गेतत्रोदयावाच्याःस्थानेस्थानेविचक्षणैः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
- About this edition: उदय is literally a 'rising'. In a question about a journey it is the favourable turn — a gain, an advancement — and स्थाने स्थाने distributes one such turn to each stage of the road.
क्रूरयुक्तेक्षितो मंदः शुभदृग्योगवर्जितः ॥ धर्मस्थस् तनुते व्याधिं प्रोषितस्याष्टगो मृतिम्
krūrayuktekṣito maṃdaḥ śubhadṛgyogavarjitaḥ || dharmasthas tanute vyādhiṃ proṣitasyāṣṭago mṛtim
Saturn joined with malefics and aspected by them, and without any benefic's aspect or conjunction, standing in the 9th (dharma), stretches out illness for the man who is abroad; standing in the 8th, death.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
क्रूरयुक्तेक्षितोमंदःशुभदृग्योगवर्जितः ॥ धर्मस्थस्तनुतेव्याधिंप्रोषितस्याष्टगोमृतिम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 188 line 12; the run of anuṣṭubh verses ६–२८ follows with no new rubric, and the metre changes to āryā at ॥२९॥).
जामित्रस्य शुभोत्थे याता नायाति दुरुधरायोगे ॥ मित्रस्वामिनिषेधात् पापोत्थे शत्रुरुक्चौरात्
jāmitrasya śubhotthe yātā nāyāti durudharāyoge || mitrasvāminiṣedhāt pāpotthe śatrurukcaurāt
When a durudharā yoga of the 7th (jāmitra) is formed by benefics, the man who went does not come — because a friend or his master forbids it. When it is formed by malefics, ⟨he is stopped⟩ by an enemy, by illness, or by a thief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जामित्रस्यशुभोत्थेयातानायातिदुरुधरायोगे ॥ मित्रस्वामिनिषेधात्पापोत्थेशत्रु रुक्चौरात्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This repeats verse 16 with the causes named: durudharā (planets in the 2nd and the 12th from a point) stops both going and coming, benefics detaining a man well and malefics ill. Here the yoga is reckoned on the 7th rather than on the Moon, which is what जामित्रस्य states.
चंद्रार्कयोश् छिद्रगयोर् यमेन संदृष्टयोः स्यात् परशस्त्रभीतिः ॥ रंध्रे सिते ज्ञे च सुखाप्तिरारे मंदे भयं पापयुगीक्षितेऽध्वनि
caṃdrārkayoś chidragayor yamena saṃdṛṣṭayoḥ syāt paraśastrabhītiḥ || raṃdhre site jñe ca sukhāptirāre maṃde bhayaṃ pāpayugīkṣite'dhvani
When the Moon and the Sun stand in the 8th (chidra) and are aspected by Saturn (yama), there is fear of another man's weapon. With Venus and Mercury in the 8th (randhra) there is a gain of comfort; with Mars ⟨or⟩ Saturn there, joined with malefics and aspected by them, there is danger on the road.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चंद्रार्कयोश्छिद्रगयोर्यमेनसंदृष्टयोःस्यात्परशस्त्रभीतिः ॥ रंध्रेसितेज्ञेचसुखाप्तिरारेमंदेभयंपापयुगीक्षितेऽध्वनि
40.31a reading here is contested अथ दूरस्थो जीवति मृतोथवेत्थं यदा प्रश्नः
atha dūrastho jīvati mṛtothavetthaṃ yadā praśnaḥ
Now, ⟨the case⟩ when the question is put thus: "is the man who is far away alive, or dead?"
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अथदूरस्थोजीवतिमृतोथवेत्थंयदाप्रश्नः
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृतोथवेत्थं"; alternatives "मृतोऽथवेत्थं" — no avagraha glyph is set here, although the SAME line prints ऽ twice, in शीतकरेऽथषष्ठे and तुर्येऽष्टमे
- About this edition: One half-line, which the page numbers on its own. It opens the topic that verses 32 to 36 answer; it states no rule itself. The press sets मृतोथवेत्थं without an avagraha, though it prints ऽ twice on the same line; I read मृतो ऽथवेत्थं.
लग्नेश्वरे शीतकरेऽथ षष्ठे तुर्येऽष्टमे वाप्यतिनीचगे वा ॥ अस्तंगते छिद्रपतीत्थशालयुक्ते शुभैर् दूरगतो मृतः स्यात्
lagneśvare śītakare'tha ṣaṣṭhe turye'ṣṭame vāpyatinīcage vā || astaṃgate chidrapatītthaśālayukte śubhair dūragato mṛtaḥ syāt
When the lord of the lagna, or the Moon (śītakara), is in the 6th, the 4th (turya) or the 8th, or has gone very deep into its fall (atinīca), or is combust, and is joined in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 8th (chidra), ⟨and is unaspected⟩ by benefics — the man far away must be dead.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश्वरेशीतकरेऽथषष्ठेतुर्येऽष्टमेवाप्यतिनीचगेवा ॥ अस्तंगतेछिद्रपतीत्थ शालयुक्तेशुभैर्दूरगतोमृतःस्यात्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: शुभैः stands in this record with no participle of its own. Verses 33 and 35 both spell the same condition out as सौम्यैरदृष्टे, 'unaspected by benefics', and I supply the negative from them, marking it as supplied. Read without the negative the instrumental would say 'joined with benefics', which would contradict the death this verse declares.
भूमेरधःस्थेन च वक्रगेण यदीत्थशालं कुरुते शशांकः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टे मरणं प्रकुर्याद् दूरस्थितस्यापि विदेशगस्य
bhūmeradhaḥsthena ca vakrageṇa yadītthaśālaṃ kurute śaśāṃkaḥ || saumyairadṛṣṭe maraṇaṃ prakuryād dūrasthitasyāpi videśagasya
If the Moon forms an itthaśāla with a planet that stands below the earth ⟨in the houses under the horizon⟩ and is retrograde (vakra), and is unaspected by benefics, it brings about death even for a man who stands far off, gone to a foreign country.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
भूमेरधःस्थेनवचक्रगेणयदीत्थशालंकुरुतेशशांकः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टेमरणंप्रकुर्याद्दूरस्थितस्यापि विदेशगस्य
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The akṣaras भूमेरधःस्थेनवचक्रगेण divide two ways and only one gives words: भूमेरधःस्थे नवचक्रगेण, which I follow. The other, भूमेरधःस्थेन वचक्रगेण, leaves वचक्र, which is no word. नवचक्र I take as the navāṃśa circle; the verse does not gloss it, and this chapter uses no other 'ninefold' figure. [2026-10-01: superseded. The 1893 leaf does set स्थेनवचक्रगेण (PDF p.190, read by eye at about 4.5x native), but every other printing reads वक्र as their machine reads give them, and two set भूमेरधःस्थेन च वक्रगेण; the mūla now reads that on the lexicon, taking the 1893 to have transposed व and च.]
40.34a reading here is contested सौम्यैः षष्ठांत्यरंध्रस्थैर् विबलैश् च शुभेक्षितैः ॥ पापयुक्तौ शशांकार्कौ तदा दूरस्थितो मृतः
saumyaiḥ ṣaṣṭhāṃtyaraṃdhrasthair vibalaiś ca śubhekṣitaiḥ || pāpayuktau śaśāṃkārkau tadā dūrasthito mṛtaḥ
With benefics standing in the 6th, the 12th (antya) and the 8th (randhra), weak and aspected by benefics, and with the Moon and the Sun joined by malefics — then the man far away is dead.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सौम्यैःषष्ठांत्यरंध्रस्थैर्विंबलैश्चशुभेक्षितैः ॥ पापयुक्तौशशांकार्कौतदादूरस्थितोमृतः
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थैर्विंबलैश्च"; alternatives "स्थैर्विबलैश्च", "स्थैर्बिंबलैश्च" — zoomed 5×: a clear anusvāra dot stands over वि under the repha. Kept as printed; the sense would want विबलैः, 'weak'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विबलैश्; this sentence names विंबलैश्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The page prints विंबलैः with a clear anusvāra, which the plate reader checked at 5× and kept. The word the sense needs is विबलैः, 'weak', and I render it so; I have not altered the Sanskrit. शुभेक्षितैः as printed says 'aspected by benefics', and I render it flat even though it sits oddly in a list of afflictions; the expected अशुभेक्षितैः would show as चाशुभ- after च, and the page sets च शुभ-.
पृष्ठोदये पापयुते त्रिकोणकेंद्राष्टषष्ठोपगतैश् च पापैः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टैः परदेशसंस्थो मृतो गदार्तो नवमे च सूर्ये
pṛṣṭhodaye pāpayute trikoṇakeṃdrāṣṭaṣaṣṭhopagataiś ca pāpaiḥ || saumyairadṛṣṭaiḥ paradeśasaṃstho mṛto gadārto navame ca sūrye
When a back-rising (pṛṣṭhodaya) sign ⟨rises⟩ joined with a malefic, and malefics have gone to the trines, the kendras, the 8th and the 6th, unaspected by benefics, the man living in a foreign country is dead — or, with the Sun in the 9th, stricken with disease.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पृष्ठोदयेपापयुतेत्रि कोणकेंद्राष्टषष्ठोपगतैश्चपापैः ॥ सौम्यैरदृष्टैःपरदेशसंस्थोमृतोगदार्तोनवमेचसूर्ये
तुर्योपरिस्थेन खगेन चंद्रमा यदीत्थशालं कुरुते शुभेक्षितः ॥ सौम्यैर् युतो वा परदेशसंस्थितः सुखी च जीवेत् पथि सौख्यमेति
turyoparisthena khagena caṃdramā yadītthaśālaṃ kurute śubhekṣitaḥ || saumyair yuto vā paradeśasaṃsthitaḥ sukhī ca jīvet pathi saukhyameti
If the Moon, aspected by benefics or joined with benefics, forms an itthaśāla with a planet standing above the 4th (turya-upari), the man settled in a foreign country lives, and lives happily, and meets with ease on the road.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तुर्येपरिस्थेनखगेनचंद्रमायदीत्थशालंकुरुते शुभेक्षितः ॥ सौम्यैर्युतोवापरदेशसंस्थितःसुखीचजीवेत्पथिसौख्यमेति
मार्गान् निवर्तते शत्रुः पापैः शत्रुग्रहाश्रितैः ॥ चतुर्थगैरपि प्राप्तः शत्रुर् भग्नो निवर्तते
mārgān nivartate śatruḥ pāpaiḥ śatrugrahāśritaiḥ || caturthagairapi prāptaḥ śatrur bhagno nivartate
The enemy turns back from the road when malefics have attached themselves to the enemy's planet; and with malefics in the 4th as well, the enemy who has already arrived is broken and turns back.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मा र्गान्निवर्ततेशत्रुःपापैःशत्रुग्रहाश्रितैः ॥ चतुर्थगैरपिप्राप्तःशत्रुर्भग्नोनिवर्तते
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).
झषालिकुंभकर्कटा रसातले यदा स्थिताः ॥ रिपोः पराजयस् तदा चतुष्पदैः पलायनम्
jhaṣālikuṃbhakarkaṭā rasātale yadā sthitāḥ || ripoḥ parājayas tadā catuṣpadaiḥ palāyanam
When ⟨planets⟩ stand in Pisces (jhaṣa), Scorpio (ali), Aquarius (kumbha) or Cancer (karkaṭa) in the rasātala ⟨the nether quarter of the chart, below the earth⟩, then the enemy is defeated, and the flight is on four-footed beasts.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
झषालिकुंभकर्कटारसातलेयदास्थिताः ॥ रिपोःपराजय स्तदाचतुष्पदैःपलायनम्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).
- About this edition: रसातल is the nether world, and in a chart the quarter below the earth, whose centre is the 4th (pātāla); the verse names the region and not a single house. The four signs it lists are the watery ones. चतुष्पदैः पलायनम् is flight by means of four-footed beasts, that is on horseback, not flight of the beasts themselves.
मेषधनुःसिंहवृषा यद्युदयस्था भवंति हिबुके वा ॥ शत्रुर् निवर्तते तदा ग्रहसहिता वा वियुक्ता वा
meṣadhanuḥsiṃhavṛṣā yadyudayasthā bhavaṃti hibuke vā || śatrur nivartate tadā grahasahitā vā viyuktā vā
If Aries, Sagittarius, Leo or Taurus stand in the ascendant, or in the 4th (hibuka), then the enemy turns back — whether those signs hold a planet or are empty of one.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मेषधनुःसिंहवृषायद्युदयस्थाभवंतिहिबुकेवा ॥ शत्रुर्निवर्ततेतदाग्रहसहितावावियुक्तावा
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).
नागच्छति परचक्रं यदार्कचंद्रौ चतुर्थभवनस्थौ ॥ गुरुबुधशुक्रा हिबुके यदा तदा शीघ्रमायाति
nāgacchati paracakraṃ yadārkacaṃdrau caturthabhavanasthau || gurubudhaśukrā hibuke yadā tadā śīghramāyāti
The enemy's army (paracakra) does not come when the Sun and the Moon stand in the 4th house; and when Jupiter, Mercury and Venus are in the 4th (hibuka), then it comes quickly.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
नागच्छतिपरचक्रंयदार्कचंद्रौचतुर्थभवनस्थौ ॥ गुरुबुधशुक्राहिबुकेयदातदाशीघ्रमायाति
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json).
40.41a reading here is contested स्थिरोदये जीवशनैश्चरे स्थिते गमागमौ नैव वदेत् तु पृच्छतः ॥ त्रिपंचषष्ठा रिपुसंगमाय पापाश् चतुर्था विनिवर्तनाय
sthirodaye jīvaśanaiścare sthite gamāgamau naiva vadet tu pṛcchataḥ || tripaṃcaṣaṣṭhā ripusaṃgamāya pāpāś caturthā vinivartanāya
When a fixed sign rises and Jupiter and Saturn stand ⟨in it⟩, one should declare neither a going nor a coming for the querent. Malefics in the 3rd, the 5th and the 6th make for an encounter with the enemy; malefics in the 4th, for turning back.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
स्थिरोदयेजीवशनैश्चरेस्थितेगमागमौ नैववदेत्तुपृच्छतः ॥ त्रिपंचषष्ठारिपुसंगमायपापाश्चतुर्थाविनिवर्तनाय
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापाश्चतुर्थाविनिवर्तनाय"; alternatives "पापाश्चतुर्थांविनिवर्तनाय", "पापाश्चतुर्थेविनिवर्तनाय" — a small hook sits over र्था; I read it as the repha of र्थ, but it could be an anusvāra. The ā-stroke after थ is clear, so I did not read र्थे.
- About this edition: Part of this verse stands in lines the reader marked as a quotation (षट्पंचाशिका (named षट्पंचाशिकायाम् on page 190 line 9; verses ३७–४० are Ṣaṭpañcāśikā 2.3, 2.4, 2.12, 2.11 in research/translations/shatpanchashika/ch02.json)); the rest stands in lines marked as the work's own. The printing numbers it in this text's own count.
- About this edition: The plate reader could not decide whether the mark over र्था is a repha or an anusvāra. I read पापाश् चतुर्था, a nominative plural agreeing with पापाः, 'malefics in the 4th'; his alternative चतुर्थां and चतुर्थे would name the same house.
40.42a reading here is contested दशमोदयसप्तमगाः सौम्या नगराधिपस्य विजयकराः ॥ आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताः प्रभंगदौ विजयदा नवमे
daśamodayasaptamagāḥ saumyā nagarādhipasya vijayakarāḥ || ārārkijñagurusitāḥ prabhaṃgadau vijayadā navame
Benefics gone to the 10th, the ascendant and the 7th bring victory to the lord of the city. In the 9th, Mars and Saturn are the two that bring ruin, and Mercury, Jupiter and Venus the givers of victory.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
दशमोदयसप्तमगाःसौम्यानगराधिपस्यविजयकराः ॥ आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताःप्रभंगदौविजयदानवमे
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताःप्रभंगदौविजयदानवमे"; alternatives "आरार्किप्रभंगदौज्ञगुरुसिताविजयदानवमे" — the gloss that follows on this same line (भौमशनी भंगदौ, बुधगुरुशुक्रा विजयदा) pairs the words in the opposite order from the one I read off the plate; the word order and the division here should be re-read at higher magnification.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आरार्किज्ञगुरुसिताःप्रभंगदौविजयदानवमे"; alternatives "आरार्किप्रभंगदौज्ञगुरुसिताविजयदानवमे" — the gloss that follows on this same line (भौमशनी भंगदौ, बुधगुरुशुक्रा विजयदा) pairs the words in the opposite order from the one I read off the plate; the word order and the division here should be re-read at higher magnification.
- About this edition: The plate reader marked the word order here as doubtful, because the gloss printed on the same line (भौमशनी भंगदौ, बुधगुरुशुक्रा विजयदा) seemed to him to pair the words the other way about. It does not: the verse names five planets and then two predicates, प्रभंगदौ in the DUAL and विजयदा in the plural, so the dual can only take the first two names, Mars and Saturn, and the plural the remaining three. The gloss and the plate agree, and the grammar settles it without a re-read.
40.43a reading here is contested उदयर्क्षाच् चंद्रर्क्षं भवति च यावद् दिनैश् च तावद्भिः ॥ आगमनं स्याच् छत्रोर् यदि न हि मध्ये ग्रहः कश्चित्
udayarkṣāc caṃdrarkṣaṃ bhavati ca yāvad dinaiś ca tāvadbhiḥ || āgamanaṃ syāc chatror yadi na hi madhye grahaḥ kaścit
In as many days as the Moon's sign stands from the rising sign, the enemy's arrival takes place — if there is no planet at all in between.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
उदयक्षांचंद्रर्क्षंभवतिचयावद्दि नेश्चतावद्भिः ॥ आगमनंस्याच्छत्रोर्यदिनहिमध्येग्रहःकश्चित्
5 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उदयक्षांचंद्रर्क्षं"; alternatives "उदयर्क्षांचंद्रर्क्षं", "उदयर्क्षाच्चंद्रर्क्षं" — I could not see a repha over उदय-क्ष at tile resolution; it may be there.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उदयक्षांचंद्रर्क्षं"; alternatives "उदयर्क्षांचंद्रर्क्षं", "उदयर्क्षाच्चंद्रर्क्षं" — I could not see a repha over उदय-क्ष at tile resolution; it may be there.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तावद्भिः"; alternatives "तावद्धिः" — zoomed at 9x: the subjoined letter has a left loop and a right stem, which I read as भ; ध cannot be ruled out.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तावद्भिः"; alternatives "तावद्धिः" — zoomed at 9x: the subjoined letter has a left loop and a right stem, which I read as भ; ध cannot be ruled out.
- About this edition: Two words are doubtful and neither changes the rule. उदयक्षां as printed is no word; the plate reader could not see a repha at tile resolution and offers उदयर्क्षां and उदयर्क्षाच्, and the ablative उदयर्क्षात्, 'from the rising sign', is what the sentence needs. दिनेश् likewise is no form; दिनैश् च, 'and by days', is, and the ए for ऐ is a single stroke. I render both corrected readings and leave the printed akṣaras in the word-divided file. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads उदयर्क्षाच् and दिनैश्; this sentence names उदयक्षां and दिनेश्, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
40.44a reading here is contested दैत्येज्यवाचस्पतिसोमपुत्रैरेकर्क्षगैर् लग्नगतैर् बलाढ्यैः ॥ द्वाभ्यामथेज्ये भृगुजेऽथ लग्ने हन्याद् रणे यायिनृपं पुरेशः
daityejyavācaspatisomaputrairekarkṣagair lagnagatair balāḍhyaiḥ || dvābhyāmathejye bhṛguje'tha lagne hanyād raṇe yāyinṛpaṃ pureśaḥ
When Venus (daityejya), Jupiter (vācaspati) and Mercury (somaputra) stand in one sign, in the lagna, and full of strength — or two of them, or Jupiter, or Venus, in the lagna — the lord of the city kills the invading king in battle.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
दैत्येज्यवाचस्पतिसोमपुत्रैरेकर्क्षगैर्लग्नगतैर्बला ढ्यैः ॥ द्वाभ्यामथेज्येभृगुजेऽथलग्नेहन्याद्रणेयायिनृपंपुरेशः
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ढ्यैः"; alternatives "ब्यैः" — at tile resolution the first conjunct looked like ब्यैः; the same word is printed in full as बलाढ्यैः at the end of the next line, which is why I read ढ्यैः.
- About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नप्रदीपे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
सूर्येंदुभौमार्कजसैंहिकेयैः सर्वैश् चतुर्भिस् त्रिभिरेव लग्नगैः ॥ हन्यात् तदा स्थायिनमाशु यायी द्यूनस्थितैर् यायिनृपं पुरेशः
sūryeṃdubhaumārkajasaiṃhikeyaiḥ sarvaiś caturbhis tribhireva lagnagaiḥ || hanyāt tadā sthāyinamāśu yāyī dyūnasthitair yāyinṛpaṃ pureśaḥ
When the Sun, the Moon, Mars, Saturn and Rāhu (saiṃhikeya) — all of them, or four, or just three — stand in the lagna, the invader quickly kills the one who holds ⟨the city⟩; when they stand in the 7th (dyūna), the lord of the city kills the invading king.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सूर्येंदुभौमार्कजसैंहिकेयैःसर्वैश्चतुर्भिस्त्रीभिरेवलग्नगैः ॥ हन्यात्तदा स्थायिनमाशुयायीद्यूनस्थितैर्यायिनृपंपुरेशः
शुक्रेज्यशीतांशुबुधाः सुरेज्यैः सर्वैस् त्रिभिर् द्यूनगतैर् बलाढ्यैः ॥ हन्याद् रणे स्थायिनमाशु यायी सुखास्पदस्थैश् च शुभैः सुसंधिः
śukrejyaśītāṃśubudhāḥ surejyaiḥ sarvais tribhir dyūnagatair balāḍhyaiḥ || hanyād raṇe sthāyinamāśu yāyī sukhāspadasthaiś ca śubhaiḥ susaṃdhiḥ
When Venus, Jupiter, the Moon and Mercury — all ⟨four⟩, or three of them — stand in the 7th (dyūna) full of strength, the invader quickly kills in battle the one who holds ⟨the city⟩. With benefics standing in the seat of ease (sukhāspada, the 4th), there is a good peace.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुक्रेज्यशीतांशुबुधाःसुरेज्यैःसर्वैस्त्रिभिर्द्यूनगतैर्बलाढ्यैः ॥ हन्याद्रणेस्थायिनमाशुया यीसुखास्पदस्थैश्शुभैःसुसंधिः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: सुरेज्यैः, 'by the preceptor of the gods', repeats इज्य, which the same list has already named, and it is an instrumental plural where a single planet is meant; the word is very likely corrupt and I have not rendered it twice. The rule itself is not in doubt: it is verse 45 inverted, benefics in the 7th strengthening the invader as malefics there ruined him.
40.47a reading here is contested कुजेत्थशाले हिमगौ विलग्ने बंधोऽथ मृत्युर् युधि नागरस्य ॥ भौमेत्थशाले च विधौ कलत्रे वंधं मृतिं वा लभते ऽत्र यायी
kujetthaśāle himagau vilagne baṃdho'tha mṛtyur yudhi nāgarasya || bhaumetthaśāle ca vidhau kalatre vaṃdhaṃ mṛtiṃ vā labhate 'tra yāyī
When the Moon in the lagna is in an itthaśāla with Mars, the townsman ⟨who holds the city⟩ meets capture, or death, in the fight. And when the Moon is in the 7th (kalatra) in an itthaśāla with Mars, it is the invader here who meets capture or death.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कुजेत्थशालेहिमगौविलग्नेबंधोऽथमृत्युर्युधिनागरस्य ॥ भौमेत्थशालेचविधौकलत्रेवंधंमृतिंवालभते ऽत्रयायी
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽत्रयायी"; alternatives "त्रयायी" — the line opens with a small mark before त्र that I read as an avagraha (the previous line ends वालभते, giving लभतेऽत्र यायी). The press does set avagrahas on this page.
- About this edition: The second half prints वंधं where the first half prints बंधो; व for ब is the press's own slip and I render both as बंध, 'capture'. The line opens with a small mark before त्र that the plate reader read as an avagraha, giving लभते ऽत्र यायी, and the page does set avagrahas elsewhere; without it the sense is the same.
40.48a reading here is contested लग्नेशजामित्रपयोश् च मध्ये भवेद् ग्रहो यः स्वगृहोच्चसंस्थः ॥ तद्वर्गमर्त्यां नृपयोश् च संधिर् ज्ञेयो बुधे लेखकपंडिताभ्यां
lagneśajāmitrapayoś ca madhye bhaved graho yaḥ svagṛhoccasaṃsthaḥ || tadvargamartyāṃ nṛpayoś ca saṃdhir jñeyo budhe lekhakapaṃḍitābhyāṃ
Whatever planet stands between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (jāmitra), being in its own house or in exaltation — a peace between the two kings is to be understood as coming through men of that planet's class (varga); and if the planet is Mercury, through a scribe and a paṇḍita.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशजामित्रपयोश्चमध्येभवेद्ग्रहोयःस्वगृहोच्चसंस्थः ॥ तद्वर्गमर्त्यांनृपयोश्चसंधिर्ज्ञेयोबुधेलेखकपंडिताभ्यां
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मर्त्यांनृपयोश्च"; alternatives "मर्त्यान्नृपयोश्च" — the mark over र्त्या may be an anusvāra or the repha.
- About this edition: The mark over र्त्या may be an anusvāra or a repha, so the word is मर्त्यां or मर्त्यान्; either way it is the men of that planet's class who carry the peace, and the case is loose for the instrumental the sense wants.
40.49a reading here is contested क्रूरे कलत्रे ह्युदये शुभग्रहो यच्छेद् धनं यायिनृपाय नागरः ॥ विपर्ययाद् यायिनृपः पुरेश्वरं दुर्गाद् विनिष्काश्य ददाति वास्पदम्
krūre kalatre hyudaye śubhagraho yacched dhanaṃ yāyinṛpāya nāgaraḥ || viparyayād yāyinṛpaḥ pureśvaraṃ durgād viniṣkāśya dadāti vāspadam
When a malefic is in the 7th (kalatra) and a benefic planet in the ascendant, the townsman gives up wealth to the invading king. In the reverse case the invading king drives the lord of the city out of his fort and gives him a place ⟨to live⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
क्रूरेकलत्रेह्युदयेशुभग्रहोयच्छेद्धनंन्यायिनृपायनागरः॥विपर्ययाद्यायि नृपःपुरेश्वरंदुर्गाद्विनिष्काश्यददातिवास्पदम्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यच्छेद्धनंन्यायिनृपायनागरः"; alternatives "यच्छेद्धनंयायिनृपायनागरः" — I read both an anusvāra on धनं and a न् before यायि. The word यायिनृप ('the invading king') is printed four other times on this page, and the next line continues विपर्ययाद् यायि|नृपः, so the न् may be an artefact. [2026-10-01: the plate, page_0191 store line 8, read by eye at about 3.6x native, sets धनंयायिनृपाय with no न् between नं and या; the mūla now reads यायिनृपाय.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुर्गाद्विनिष्काश्य"; alternatives "दुर्गादिनिष्काश्य" — the conjunct after दुर्गा could be दि or द्वि; I read द्वि (दुर्गात् + विनिष्काश्य).
- About this edition: I render यायिनृपाय, 'to the invading king'. The page appears to set न्यायि-, and the plate reader records that यायिनृप is printed four other times on this leaf and that the next line continues विपर्ययाद् यायि|नृपः, so he takes the न् for an artefact and so do I. दुर्गाद् विनिष्काश्य, 'having driven him out of the fort', rests on reading the conjunct as द्वि rather than दि. [2026-10-01: the plate, page_0191 store line 8, read by eye at about 3.6x native, sets धनंयायिनृपाय with no न् between नं and या; the mūla now reads यायिनृपाय.]
40.50a reading here is contested रवीत्थशाले शशिजे सुगुप्ताश् चरा भवेयुश् च कुजे सराफात् ॥ ग्रहाच् छशांकेन युतश् च तस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश् च भवंति चाराः
ravītthaśāle śaśije suguptāś carā bhaveyuś ca kuje sarāphāt || grahāc chaśāṃkena yutaś ca tasminyeyenyaveṣāś ca bhavaṃti cārāḥ
When Mercury (śaśija) is in an itthaśāla with the Sun, there will be well-hidden (sugupta) spies abroad; so too with Mars, out of a sarāpha ⟨the separating aspect⟩. And ⟨when Mercury is⟩ joined with the Moon away from that planet, then whoever appear there in another man's dress are the spies. [The second half does not divide cleanly as printed; see the note.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रवीत्थशालेशशिजेसुयुक्ताश्चराभवेयुश्चकुजेसराफा त् ॥ ग्रहाच्छशांकेनयुतश्चतस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश्चभवंतिचाराः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश्च"; alternatives "तस्मिन्येयेऽन्यवेषाश्च", "तस्मिन्येयेन्ववेषाश्च" — the run ये-ये-न्य-वे-षा is hard to divide; the akṣaras themselves are legible but I cannot tell whether an avagraha is printed.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तस्मिन्येयेन्यवेषाश्च"; alternatives "तस्मिन्येयेऽन्यवेषाश्च", "तस्मिन्येयेन्ववेषाश्च" — the run ये-ये-न्य-वे-षा is hard to divide; the akṣaras themselves are legible but I cannot tell whether an avagraha is printed.
- About this edition: The plate reader says the run ये-ये-न्य-वे-षा is legible akṣara by akṣara but that he cannot tell whether an avagraha is printed in it, and offers तस्मिन्येयेऽन्यवेषाश्च and तस्मिन्येयेन्ववेषाश्च. I divide तस्मिन् ये ये अन्यवेषाः, 'whoever there are in another's dress', which is the only division that yields words throughout, and I take चाराः in its plain sense of spies, which is what a chapter on two kings at war wants. The syntax of ग्रहाच् छशांकेन युतः is loose as printed and my ⟨away from that planet⟩ renders the ablative without claiming more than it says.
प्रश्ने विलग्ने क्रूरे वा दुर्गभंगो न जायते ॥ विशेषतो भूमिपुत्रे राहौ वा मूर्तिगे सति
praśne vilagne krūre vā durgabhaṃgo na jāyate || viśeṣato bhūmiputre rāhau vā mūrtige sati
In the question ⟨whether a fort will fall⟩, if a malefic is in the rising sign, the breaking of the fort does not come about — and especially so when Mars (bhūmiputra) or Rāhu is in the mūrti (the 1st, the body-house).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
प्रश्नेविलग्नेक्रूरेवादुर्गभंगोनजायते ॥ विशेष तोभूमिपुत्रेराहौवामूर्तिगेसति
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौदुर्गप्रश्नः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ दुर्गप्रश्नः ॥" before this verse; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. दुर्गभंग is the storming or fall of a fort, so "does not come about" means the fort holds.
सप्तमे सिंहिकासूनौ दुर्गं शीघ्रेण लभ्यते ॥ जामित्रोदयगे क्रूरे रिःफगे लग्ननायके
saptame siṃhikāsūnau durgaṃ śīghreṇa labhyate || jāmitrodayage krūre riḥphage lagnanāyake
With Rāhu (siṃhikā-sūnu, the son of Siṃhikā) in the 7th, the fort is taken quickly. ⟨But⟩ with a malefic standing in the jāmitra (7th) or in the rising sign, and the lord of the lagna in the riḥpha (12th) —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सप्तमेसिंहिकासूनौदुर्गंशीघ्रेणलभ्यते ॥ जामित्रोदयगेक्रूरेरिःफगेलग्ननायके
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The sentence is left open at the end of this record: its main clause ("then the fort is not taken") stands in the next record. Nothing has been pulled across.
द्वितीये वाष्टमे षष्ठे तदा दुर्गं न लभ्यते ॥ सक्रूरो लग्नपो वक्री युद्धदः केंद्रसंस्थितः
dvitīye vāṣṭame ṣaṣṭhe tadā durgaṃ na labhyate || sakrūro lagnapo vakrī yuddhadaḥ keṃdrasaṃsthitaḥ
— or ⟨the lord of the lagna is⟩ in the 2nd, in the 8th ⟨or⟩ in the 6th: then the fort is not taken. The lord of the lagna joined with a malefic, retrograde, and standing in a kendra gives battle.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
द्वितीये वाष्टमेषष्ठेतदादुर्गंनलभ्यते ॥ सक्रूरोलग्नपोवक्रीयुद्धदःकेंद्रसंस्थितः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The first half completes the condition begun in the previous record; the link ⟨the lord of the lagna is⟩ is supplied, not printed here.
षष्ठाधिपे द्यूनगते पापे वा युद्धमादिशेत् ॥ पृच्छायां केंद्रगैः क्रूरैः कोटे दुर्गं वधो नृणाम्
ṣaṣṭhādhipe dyūnagate pāpe vā yuddhamādiśet || pṛcchāyāṃ keṃdragaiḥ krūraiḥ koṭe durgaṃ vadho nṛṇām
If the lord of the 6th, or a malefic, has gone to the 7th (dyūna), one should foretell war. ⟨When⟩ in the question malefics stand in the kendras, there is hard straits inside the fort (koṭa) and the slaughter of men.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
षष्ठाधिपेद्यूनगतेपापेवायुद्धमादिशेत् ॥ पृच्छायांकेंद्रगैः क्रूरैःकोटेदुर्गंवधोनृणाम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: वा is "or": either the lord of the 6th or any malefic in the 7th is enough. In the second half दुर्गं is taken as the neuter noun "hard straits", since कोटे already names the fort; read as the adjective it would say "the fort is hard to take".
भौमाष्टमेशावेकत्र तदातिनिधनं नृणाम् ॥ स्वायपुत्रस्थिते जीवे कोटमध्ये भयं न हि
bhaumāṣṭameśāvekatra tadātinidhanaṃ nṛṇām || svāyaputrasthite jīve koṭamadhye bhayaṃ na hi
Mars and the lord of the 8th together in one place: then there is very great slaughter of men. With Jupiter (jīva) standing in the 2nd (sva), the 11th (āya) or the 5th (putra), there is no fear within the fort.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
भौमाष्टमेशावेकत्रतदातिनिधनंनृणाम् ॥ स्वायपुत्रस्थितेजीवेकोटमध्येभयंनहि
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: स्व is read as the 2nd bhāva, the house-name, because the other two members (आय, पुत्र) are bhāva-names; read as "its own sign" it would say Jupiter in svarāśi, the 11th or the 5th.
शनौ भौमे च केंद्रस्थे बहूनां वधवंधनम् ॥ लग्नगतो यदि पापः पापेन युतेक्षितो वा स्यात् ॥ लग्नात् पूर्वापरगौ पापौ युद्धं तदा घोरम्
śanau bhaume ca keṃdrasthe bahūnāṃ vadhavaṃdhanam || lagnagato yadi pāpaḥ pāpena yutekṣito vā syāt || lagnāt pūrvāparagau pāpau yuddhaṃ tadā ghoram
With Saturn and Mars standing in a kendra, there is the killing and the imprisoning of many. If a malefic has gone to the lagna and is joined with or aspected by a malefic; ⟨or if⟩ malefics stand before and behind the lagna ⟨the 12th and the 2nd⟩ — then the war is terrible.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शनौभौमे चकेंद्रस्थेबहूनांवधवंधनम् ॥ लग्नगतोयदिपापःपापेनयुतेक्षितोवास्यात् ॥ लग्नात्पूर्वापरगौपापोयुद्धंतदाघोरम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This record runs to three half-lines under one number. पूर्वापरगौ is dual ("the two standing before and behind") but the page prints the singular पापो with it; rendered as a plural, and the printed पापो is a probable misprint for पापौ. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पापौ; this sentence names पापो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
विलग्ने षष्ठपः पापो जन्मराशिनिरीक्षिते ॥ रोगिणस्तस्य मरणं निश्चयेन वदेद्बुधः
vilagne ṣaṣṭhapaḥ pāpo janmarāśinirīkṣite || rogiṇastasya maraṇaṃ niścayena vadedbudhaḥ
⟨When⟩ the lord of the 6th, itself a malefic, is in the rising sign, and the natal rāśi is aspected ⟨by it⟩, the wise man should declare the death of that sick person with certainty.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
विलग्नेषष्ठपःपापोजन्मराशिनिरीक्षिते ॥ रोगिणस्तस्यमरणंनिश्चयेनवदेद्बुधः
चतुर्थाष्टमगे चंद्रे पापमध्यगतेपि वा ॥ मृतिः स्याद्बलसंयुक्तसौम्यदृष्ट्या चिरात्सुखं
caturthāṣṭamage caṃdre pāpamadhyagatepi vā || mṛtiḥ syādbalasaṃyuktasaumyadṛṣṭyā cirātsukhaṃ
With the Moon gone to the 4th or the 8th, or standing between malefics, there is death; ⟨but⟩ by the aspect of a benefic possessed of strength, ease after a long time.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चतुर्थाष्टमगेचंद्रेपापमध्यगतेपि वा ॥ मृतिःस्याद्बलसंयुक्तसौम्यदृष्ट्याचिरात्सुखं
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The page prints पापमध्यगतेपि without an avagraha; the word is पापमध्यगते ऽपि.
विधौ लग्ने स्मरे भानौ रोगी याति यमालयम् ॥ प्रश्ने क्रूरग्रहे लग्ने रोगवृद्धिश्चिकित्सकात्
vidhau lagne smare bhānau rogī yāti yamālayam || praśne krūragrahe lagne rogavṛddhiścikitsakāt
With the Moon in the lagna and the Sun in the 7th (smara), the sick man goes to Yama's house. In a question with a malefic graha in the lagna, the disease grows worse from the physician ⟨himself⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
विधौलग्नेस्मरेभानौरोगीयातियमालयम् ॥ प्रश्नेक्रूरग्रहेलग्नेरोगवृद्धिश्चिकि त्सकात्
40.60a reading here is contested तथा लग्नगते सौम्ये वैद्योक्तममृतं वचः ॥ लग्ने वैद्यो द्युनं व्याधिः खं रोगी तुर्यमौषधम्
tathā lagnagate saumye vaidyoktamamṛtaṃ vacaḥ || lagne vaidyo dyunaṃ vyādhiḥ khaṃ rogī turyamauṣadham
So too, with a benefic gone to the lagna, the physician's word is nectar. ⟨In such a question⟩ the lagna is the physician, the 7th (dyūna) the disease, the 10th (kha) the patient, and the 4th (turya) the medicine.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तथालग्नगतेसौम्येवैद्योक्तममृतंवचः ॥ लग्नेवैद्योद्युनंव्याधिःखंरोगीतुर्यमौषधम्
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्युनं"; alternatives "द्यूनं" — the u-stroke under द्य looks short; the word is elsewhere on these two leaves printed द्यून (the 7th house).
- About this edition: The word for the 7th is printed द्युनं with a short u; the reader records the doubt and the same word is spelt द्यून elsewhere on these leaves. Rendered as the 7th either way.
40.61a reading here is contested रोगिणो भिषजो मैत्री मैत्री भेषजरोगयोः ॥ व्याधेरुपशमो वाच्यः प्रकोपः शात्रवेतयोः
rogiṇo bhiṣajo maitrī maitrī bheṣajarogayoḥ || vyādherupaśamo vācyaḥ prakopaḥ śātravetayoḥ
⟨When there is⟩ friendship between the patient and the physician, and friendship between the medicine and the disease, one should declare the subsiding of the illness; ⟨and⟩ its flaring up where there is enmity between the two.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रोगिणोभिषजोमैत्रीमैत्रीभेष जरोगयोः ॥ व्याधेरुपशमोवाच्यःप्रकोपःशात्रवेत्रयोः
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शात्रवेत्रयोः"; alternatives "शात्रवेवत्रयोः", "शात्रवेत्वयोः" — the akṣaras are legible but I cannot tell where the word breaks; recorded as the continuous string I see. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शात्रवेतयोः; this sentence names शात्रवेत्रयोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The reader could not settle where शात्रवेत्रयोः divides; it is taken as शात्रवे त्रयोः, "in enmity, of the three". त्रयोः is not a regular form of त्रि (the genitive plural is त्रयाणाम्), so the printing is suspect; द्वयोः, "of the two ⟨pairs⟩", would scan equally well. "Friendship" here is the mutual friendship of the grahas signifying each party. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads शात्रवेतयोः; this sentence names शात्रवेत्रयोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
लग्ननाथे च सबले केंद्रसंस्थे शुभग्रहे ॥ उच्चगे वा त्रिकोणे वा रोगी जीवति निश्चयम्
lagnanāthe ca sabale keṃdrasaṃsthe śubhagrahe || uccage vā trikoṇe vā rogī jīvati niścayam
With the lord of the lagna strong, and a benefic graha standing in a kendra — or in its exaltation, or in a trikoṇa — the sick man certainly lives.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्ननाथेचसबलेकेंद्रसंस्थेशुभग्रहे ॥ उच्चगेवात्रिकोणेवारोगीजीवतिनिश्च यम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: वा is "or": the kendra, the exaltation and the trikoṇa are three alternatives, not a set of conditions to be met together.
40.63a reading here is contested एकः शुभो बली लग्ने त्रायते रोगपीडितं ॥ सौम्या धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था गदापहाः
ekaḥ śubho balī lagne trāyate rogapīḍitaṃ || saumyā dharmārilābhasthāstṛtīyasthā gadāpahāḥ
A single strong benefic in the lagna saves the man tormented by disease. Benefics standing in the 9th (dharma), the 6th (ari) and the 11th (lābha), and standing in the third, carry the disease away.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
एकःशुभोबलीलग्नेत्रायतेरोगपीडितं ॥ सौम्याधर्मारिलाभस्थास्त्रितीयस्थागदापहाः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रितीयस्था"; alternatives "स्तृतीयस्था" — the vowel under त reads as ्रि to me; ृ (तृतीय, 'third') is the expected word. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था; this sentence names स्त्रितीयस्था, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रितीयस्था"; alternatives "स्तृतीयस्था" — the vowel under त reads as ्रि to me; ृ (तृतीय, 'third') is the expected word. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था; this sentence names स्त्रितीयस्था, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The page prints स्त्रितीयस्था; the word is तृतीयस्था, "standing in the third", and the reader records ्रि where ृ is expected. Rendered as "third"; the Sanskrit is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads धर्मारिलाभस्थास्तृतीयस्था; this sentence names स्त्रितीयस्था, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
वन्ह्यंकद्वादशे षष्ठे लग्नात्पापग्रहो यदि ॥ हतो गदैर्जलैश्शस्त्रैस्तस्य दोषः कुलोद्भवः
vanhyaṃkadvādaśe ṣaṣṭhe lagnātpāpagraho yadi || hato gadairjalaiśśastraistasya doṣaḥ kulodbhavaḥ
If from the lagna a malefic graha is in the 3rd (vanhi = 3), the 9th (aṅka = 9), the 12th or the 6th, ⟨the man⟩ is struck down by diseases, by water or by weapons, and the fault upon him arises from his family line (kula).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
वन्ह्यंकद्वा दशेषष्ठेलग्नात्पापग्रहोयदि ॥ हतोगदैर्जलैश्शस्त्रैस्तस्यदोषःकुलोद्भवः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: वन्हि and अंक are number-words: वन्हि (the fires) = 3 and अंक (the digits) = 9. The four houses are therefore 3, 9, 12 and 6 — the four cadent (āpoklima) houses from the lagna.
40.65a reading here is contested प्रेताश्च राहौ पितरः सुरेज्ये चंद्रेंबुदेव्यस्तपनेपि देव्यः ॥ स्वगोत्रदेव्यश्च शनौ बुधे च भूतानि विंद्याद्व्ययरंध्रसंस्थे
pretāśca rāhau pitaraḥ surejye caṃdreṃbudevyastapanepi devyaḥ || svagotradevyaśca śanau budhe ca bhūtāni viṃdyādvyayaraṃdhrasaṃsthe
With Rāhu ⟨the affliction is⟩ from pretas ⟨the departed⟩; with Jupiter (surejya) from the pitṛs ⟨the ancestors⟩; with the Moon from the water-goddesses; with the Sun too from goddesses; with Saturn from the goddesses of one's own gotra; and with Mercury one should know it to be from bhūtas — ⟨reckoned⟩ when that graha stands in the 12th (vyaya) or the 8th (randhra).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
प्रेताश्चराहौपितरःसुरेज्येचंद्रेंबुदेव्यस्तपनेपिदेव्यः ॥ स्वगो त्रदेव्यश्चशनौबुधेचभूतानिविंद्याद्व्ययरंध्रसंस्थे
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विंद्याद्"; alternatives "विद्याद्" — zoomed at 5x: नि and वि each carry an i-hook and a dot sits above, which I read as an anusvāra on वि.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रंध्रसंस्थे"; alternatives "रंभसंस्थे" — the subjoined र of ध्र is faint at this size; at tile resolution the letter looked like भ.
- About this edition: The reader records doubt at विंद्याद् (alternative विद्याद्, the same sense, "one should know") and at रंध्रसंस्थे (alternative रंभसंस्थे, which would not be a house-name). Rendered on the printed reading; neither doubt changes the rule.
40.66a reading here is contested शाकिन्य आरे भृगुजेंबुदेव्यो गृह्णंति मर्त्यं विमुखं मुकुंदात् ॥ स्वर्क्षोच्चगे वीर्ययुते च साध्याश्चंद्रे च नीचे विबले न साध्याः
śākinya āre bhṛgujeṃbudevyo gṛhṇaṃti martyaṃ vimukhaṃ mukuṃdāt || svarkṣoccage vīryayute ca sādhyāścaṃdre ca nīce vibale na sādhyāḥ
With Mars it is śākinīs, with Venus (bhṛguja) the water-goddesses, that seize the mortal who is turned away from Mukunda ⟨Viṣṇu⟩. They can be appeased when ⟨the graha⟩ stands in its own sign or its exaltation and is endowed with strength; but with the Moon in debilitation and weak, they cannot be appeased.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शाकिन्यआरेभृगुजेंबुदेव्योगृह्णंतिमर्त्यंविसुखंमुकुंदात् ॥ स्वर्क्षोंच्चगेवीर्ययुतेचसा ध्याश्चंद्रेचनीचेविबलेनसाध्याः
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विसुखं"; alternatives "विमुखं" — the middle akṣara is small and could be सु or मु. [2026-10-01: the leaf was opened (master page_0192.png, store line 8, read by eye at about 2.5x and 4.5x native) and the akṣara is मु: it matches three certain मु on p.192 at 0.875–0.882 against 0.67–0.70 for two certain सु. The page sets विमुखं, and the mūla now reads विमुखं.]
- About this edition: The plate reads विसुखं, "without ease", and the reader marks the middle akṣara as possibly मु. On the alternative विमुखं the line says they seize the man who is TURNED AWAY from Mukunda — which the ablative मुकुंदात् favours, and which is the likelier sense. Rendered on the printed reading. The page also prints स्वर्क्षोंच्चगे with an anusvāra where स्वर्क्षोच्चगे is wanted. [2026-10-01: the leaf was opened (master page_0192.png, store line 8, read by eye at about 4.5x native) and the akṣara is मु, matching three certain मु on p.192 at 0.875–0.882 against 0.67–0.70 for two certain सु. So the plate sets विमुखं, not विसुखं, and the mūla now reads विमुखं. The page does set स्वर्क्षोंच्चगे with the anusvāra; the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षोच्चगे, emended on the lexicon, and the page's form is kept on the ledger.]
केंद्रस्थैर्बलिभिः पापैरसाध्या देवतागणाः ॥ सौम्यग्रहैश्च केंद्रस्थैः साध्या मंत्रस्तवार्चनैः
keṃdrasthairbalibhiḥ pāpairasādhyā devatāgaṇāḥ || saumyagrahaiśca keṃdrasthaiḥ sādhyā maṃtrastavārcanaiḥ
When strong malefics stand in the kendras, the hosts of deities cannot be appeased; when benefic grahas stand in the kendras, they are appeased by mantras, hymns of praise and worship.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
केंद्रस्थैर्बलिभिःपापैरसाध्यादेवतागणाः ॥ सौम्यग्रहैश्चकेंद्रस्थैःसाध्यामंत्रस्तवार्चनैः
40.68a reading here is contested कंटकाष्टत्रिकोणस्थाः शुभा उपचये शशी ॥ लग्ने च शुभसंदृष्टे रोगी रोगाद्विमुच्यते
kaṃṭakāṣṭatrikoṇasthāḥ śubhā upacaye śaśī || lagne ca śubhasaṃdṛṣṭe rogī rogādvimucyate
Benefics standing in the kendras (kaṇṭaka), in the 8th and in the trikoṇas, the Moon in an upacaya, and the lagna aspected by a benefic — ⟨then⟩ the sick man is freed from his disease.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कंटकाष्टत्रिकोणस्थाःशुभाउपचयेशशी ॥ लग्नेचशुभसंदृष्टेरोगीरोगादिमुच्यते
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभाउपचयेशशी"; alternatives "शुभाउपचययेशशी" — zoomed at 6x. I count शु भा उ प च ये श शी, but the च and the ye-stroke touch, so an extra य cannot be ruled out.
- About this edition: The reader could not rule out an extra य in शुभाउपचयेशशी; on either reading the members are the benefics, the Moon in an upacaya, and the aspected lagna. The last word is printed रोगादिमुच्यते; it is read as रोगाद् विमुच्यते, "is freed from the disease", the subscript व having dropped. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads रोगाद्विमुच्यते; this sentence names रोगादिमुच्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.69a reading here is contested शीर्षोदये सौम्ययुतेक्षितो वा सौम्यैर्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमस्थैः ॥ तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च पापैः सौख्यार्थलाभो नृपसेवकस्य
śīrṣodaye saumyayutekṣito vā saumyairdvitīyāṣṭamasaptamasthaiḥ || tṛtīyalābhārigataiśca pāpaiḥ saukhyārthalābho nṛpasevakasya
⟨With the lagna⟩ in a head-rising sign (śīrṣodaya), or joined with or aspected by benefics; with benefics standing in the 2nd, the 8th and the 7th, and malefics gone to the 3rd, the 11th (lābha) and the 6th (ari) — a king's servant gains ease and wealth.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शीर्षोदयेसौम्ययुतेक्षितोवासौम्यैर्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमस्थैः ॥ ट्टतीयलाभारिगतैश्च पापैःसौख्यार्थलाभोनृपसेवकस्य
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ट्टतीयलाभारिगतैश्च"; alternatives "तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च" — the first akṣara looks like ट्ट on the plate. The sense and the parallel द्वितीय in the same line want तृतीय ('third'), so this is probably a broken ृ, but I have kept the print. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च; this sentence names ट्टतीयलाभारिगतैश्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The page sets the label "त्रैलोक्यप्रकाशे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label "त्रैलोक्यप्रकाशे ॥" before this verse; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. The first word of the second half is printed ट्टतीय, a broken तृतीय ("third"), which the parallel द्वितीय in the same line confirms; rendered as "third", the Sanskrit left as printed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तृतीयलाभारिगतैश्च; this sentence names ट्टतीय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.70a reading here is contested लग्नाद्द्वितीये मदनाष्टमर्क्षे वित्तक्षयं संभ्रममार्तिमृत्युम् ॥ कुर्वंति पापाः क्रमशो नरेंद्रात् भृत्यस्य तस्मात् परिवर्जयेत्तम्
lagnāddvitīye madanāṣṭamarkṣe vittakṣayaṃ saṃbhramamārtimṛtyum || kurvaṃti pāpāḥ kramaśo nareṃdrāt bhṛtyasya tasmāt parivarjayettam
Malefics in the sign 2nd from the lagna, in the 7th (madana) and in the 8th bring about, in that order, loss of wealth, confusion, and distress and death — for a servant, at his king's hands; so let him leave that ⟨master⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाद्द्वितीयेमदनाष्टमेर्क्षेवित्तक्षयंसंभ्रममार्तिमृत्युम् ॥ कुर्वंतिपापाःक्रमशोनरेंद्रात्भृत्यस्यतत्सात्प रिवर्जयेत्तम्
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्सात्प"; alternatives "तत्स्यात्प", "तत्स्थात्प" — the akṣara after तत् is a broad स with the ा stroke; the sense wants स्या or स्थ. Line-final, and the word finishes on line 2 as रिवर्जयेत्तम्. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्मात्; this sentence names तत्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: Three places against three results: 2nd → loss of wealth, 7th → confusion, 8th → आर्तिमृत्युम्, distress-and-death taken as one item, which is what क्रमशः ("in order") requires. The word before परिवर्जयेत् is printed तत्सात्, which is not a word; the reader offers तत्स्यात् / तत्स्थात्, and तत् स्यात् ("that will be so") is what the line seems to want. Rendered without it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तस्मात्; this sentence names तत्सात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
लग्नाद्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमर्क्षाः पापाः प्रणाशं नृपभृत्ययोर्द्वयोः ॥ कुर्वंति तेष्वेव गताश्च सौम्याः कुर्युर्धनारोग्यसुखानि चोभयोः
lagnāddvitīyāṣṭamasaptamarkṣāḥ pāpāḥ praṇāśaṃ nṛpabhṛtyayordvayoḥ || kurvaṃti teṣveva gatāśca saumyāḥ kuryurdhanārogyasukhāni cobhayoḥ
Malefics in the 2nd, the 8th and the 7th signs from the lagna bring ruin on both — on the king and on the servant; and benefics gone to those same ⟨signs⟩ give wealth, health and ease to both.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाद्द्वितीयाष्टमसप्तमर्क्षाःपापाःप्रणाशंनृपभृत्ययोर्द्वयोः ॥ कुर्वंतितेष्वेवगताश्चसौम्याःकुर्युर्धनारोग्यसुखानिचो भयोः
शशांकसौम्यैरुदयास्तभावौ दृष्टौ युतौ वा सबलैर्न पापैः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदास्याद्धृदि पार्थिवस्य स्नेहप्रसादावकृपाप्रतीपात्
śaśāṃkasaumyairudayāstabhāvau dṛṣṭau yutau vā sabalairna pāpaiḥ || praṣṭustadāsyāddhṛdi pārthivasya snehaprasādāvakṛpāpratīpāt
If the bhāva of the lagna (udaya) and the bhāva of the 7th (asta) are aspected by, or joined with, the Moon and strong benefics — and not by malefics — then in the king's heart there will be affection and favour towards the querent, in place of unkindness and hostility.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शशांकसौम्यैरुदयास्तभावौदृष्टौयुतौवासबलैर्नपापैः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदास्याद्धृदिपार्थिवस्यस्नेहप्रसादावकृपाप्रतीपात्
षष्ठेश्वरेण व्ययपेन केंद्रे यदीत्थशालं कुरुते विलग्नपः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदान्यः प्रभुरर्थदः स्यादतः प्रतीपान्न भवेत् परः प्रभुः
ṣaṣṭheśvareṇa vyayapena keṃdre yadītthaśālaṃ kurute vilagnapaḥ || praṣṭustadānyaḥ prabhurarthadaḥ syādataḥ pratīpānna bhavet paraḥ prabhuḥ
If the lord of the lagna, standing in a kendra, makes an itthaśāla with the lord of the 6th or with the lord of the 12th (vyaya), then the querent will have another master, one who gives him wealth; from the contrary of this, there will be no other master.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
षष्ठेश्वरेणव्ययपेनकेंद्रेयदीत्थशालंकुरुतेविलग्नपः ॥ प्रष्टुस्तदान्यःप्रभुरर्थदःस्यादतःप्रतीपान्नभ वेतपरःप्रभुः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The two lords stand in the instrumental and are alternatives, not a pair to be satisfied together. Near the end the page prints भवेतपरः without the virāma on त; the word is भवेत् परः.
लग्नेश्वरे स्वर्क्षगते स्वतुंगकेंद्रस्थिते शीतकरेत्थशाले ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुते बलान्विते प्रष्टुर्निजस्वाम्यमितार्थलाभः
lagneśvare svarkṣagate svatuṃgakeṃdrasthite śītakaretthaśāle || śubhagrahairdṛṣṭayute balānvite praṣṭurnijasvāmyamitārthalābhaḥ
When the lord of the lagna stands in its own sign, in its own exaltation or in a kendra, is in an itthaśāla with the Moon (śītakara), is aspected by or joined with benefic grahas, and is possessed of strength — the querent gains measureless wealth from his own master.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश्वरेस्वर्क्षगतेस्वतुंगकेंद्रस्थितेशीतकरेत्थशाले ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुतेबलान्वितेप्रष्टुर्निजस्वाम्यमितार्थलाभः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The gain here is from the querent's OWN master (निजस्वामी); the next record gives the contrasting rule for a different master.
जायेश्वरे स्वोच्चनिजर्क्षसंस्थे केंद्रस्थिते शीतकरेत्थशालगे ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुते बलोत्कटैः प्रष्टुस्तदान्यः प्रभुरर्थदो भवेत्
jāyeśvare svoccanijarkṣasaṃsthe keṃdrasthite śītakaretthaśālage || śubhagrahairdṛṣṭayute balotkaṭaiḥ praṣṭustadānyaḥ prabhurarthado bhavet
When the lord of the 7th (jāyā) stands in its own exaltation or its own sign, is placed in a kendra and stands in an itthaśāla with the Moon (śītakara), aspected by or joined with benefic grahas of great strength — then the querent will have another master, one who gives him wealth.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जायेश्वरेस्वोच्चनिजर्क्षसंस्थेकेंद्रस्थितेशीतकरेत्थशालगे ॥ शुभग्रहैर्दृष्टयुतेबलोत्कटैःप्रष्टुस्तदान्यःप्रभुरर्थदोभवेत्
40.76a reading here is contested इदं गृहं वा शुभमन्यदालयं स्थानं त्विदं वा शुभमन्यदालयं ॥ ममात्र भद्रङ्गमनात्तु तत्र वा पृष्ठोदयेत्थं विधिना विमृश्य
idaṃ gṛhaṃ vā śubhamanyadālayaṃ sthānaṃ tvidaṃ vā śubhamanyadālayaṃ || mamātra bhadraṅgamanāttu tatra vā pṛṣṭhodayetthaṃ vidhinā vimṛśya
"Is this house auspicious, or some other dwelling? Is this the place, or some other dwelling? Is there good for me here, or in going there?" — such a question one should weigh out by the rule, from the rising sign (pṛṣṭhodaya) ⟨of the query⟩, and ⟨then declare the answer⟩. [Our mula now reads पृष्ठोदये, which literally names a sign that rises hind-part first; the sense of the query's rising sign is taken from the context, and the reading is recorded as a doubt.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
इदंगृहंवाशुभमन्य दालयंस्थानंत्विदंवाशुभमन्यदालयं ॥ ममात्रभद्रङ्गमनाच्चुतत्रवापृछोदयेत्थंविधिनाविमृश्य
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पृछोदयेत्थं"; alternatives "पृच्छोदयेत्थं" — no subscript च is visible under पृ, but the conjunct is small and the ink is heavy [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 6.5x native, the akṣara after पृ is a full ष्ठ, ष with the ठ loop beneath, not छ and not च्छ. The page sets पृष्ठोदये, and the mūla now reads पृष्ठोदये; what the word means in a query verse is recorded as a doubt on this verse.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनाच्चुतत्रवा"; alternatives "मनाक्चुतत्रवा", "मनाच्च उतत्रवा" — the letters after मना are crowded; च्चु read as printed [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 6.5x native, after मना the page sets ा and then the त्त ligature with the u-sign: गमनात्तु, not च्चु. There is no च half-form. The mūla now reads गमनात्तु.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भद्रङ्ग"; alternatives "भद्रं ग" — ङ्ग conjunct with the ् bar; could be an anusvāra plus ग [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 3.1x native, the page sets भद्रङ्ग with the ङ्ग conjunct, as our text has it.]
- About this edition: The record states the question and says how to approach it; the main verb ("he should declare") is not printed and is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. The reader marks three doubtful spots: पृछोदये for पृच्छोदये, भद्रङ्ग for भद्रं ग, and the crowded च्चु in गमनाच्चु. The sense taken is मम अत्र भद्रं गमनात् च तत्र वा, "good for me here, or from going there"; the doubled च्चु is not accounted for by that reading. [2026-10-01: read by eye on PDF p.193 at about 6.5x native, the page sets गमनात्तु and पृष्ठोदये, and भद्रङ्ग as the ङ्ग conjunct. Our text now carries all three as the page sets them. गमनात् तु is the ablative with तु that this note's sense already takes, so no doubled च्चु is left to account for; the sense of पृष्ठोदये is recorded as a doubt.]
प्रश्ने चतुर्थाधिपतिस्तत्रस्थे वावलोकिते ॥ अवश्यं वर्तते तत्र धनं चंद्रेऽथवा वदेत्
praśne caturthādhipatistatrasthe vāvalokite || avaśyaṃ vartate tatra dhanaṃ caṃdre'thavā vadet
In the question, if the lord of the 4th stands in that ⟨same 4th⟩ or looks at it, wealth is certainly present there; or one should say the same of the Moon.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
प्रश्नेचतुर्थाधिपतिस्तत्रस्थेवावलोकिते ॥ अवश्यंवर्ततेतत्रधनंचंद्रेऽथवावदेत्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. The 4th (bandhu/hibuka) is the house of buried or stored wealth, which is what "there" means.
वित्तपे धनगे बंधौ वास्ति तत्र धनं बहु ॥ पापे तुर्यगते द्रव्यं स्थितं तूर्णं न लभ्यते
vittape dhanage baṃdhau vāsti tatra dhanaṃ bahu || pāpe turyagate dravyaṃ sthitaṃ tūrṇaṃ na labhyate
With the lord of wealth (the 2nd) in the 2nd (dhana) or in the 4th (bandhu), there is much wealth there. With a malefic gone to the 4th (turya), the goods that lie ⟨there⟩ are not got quickly.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
वित्तपेधनगेबंधौवास्तितत्रधनं बहु ॥ पापेतुर्यगतेद्रव्यंस्थितंतूर्णंनलभ्यते
भौमे सप्ताष्टराशिस्थे धनमन्यत्र नाप्यते ॥ लग्ने तमो रविश्छिद्रे तदा द्रव्यं न लभ्यते ॥ सप्ताष्टदशपातालेशो विधुर्धनदो गुरुः
bhaume saptāṣṭarāśisthe dhanamanyatra nāpyate || lagne tamo raviśchidre tadā dravyaṃ na labhyate || saptāṣṭadaśapātāleśo vidhurdhanado guruḥ
With Mars standing in the 7th or the 8th sign, the wealth is not got anywhere else. ⟨With⟩ Rāhu (tamas) in the lagna and the Sun in the 8th (chidra), then the goods are not got ⟨at all⟩. The lords of the 7th, the 8th, the 10th and the 4th (pātāla), the Moon (vidhu) and Jupiter are the givers of wealth.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
भौमेसप्ताष्टराशिस्थेधनमन्यत्रनाप्यते ॥ लग्नेतमोरविच्छिद्रेतदाद्रव्यंनलभ्यते ॥ सप्ता ष्टदशपातालेशोविधुर्धनदोगुरुः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This record runs to three half-lines under one number. The compound सप्ताष्टदशपातालेशो carries one -ईशः for all four houses; it is rendered as four lords.
लग्नेश्वरे द्यूनगते विलग्ने जायेश्वरे नष्टधनस्य लाभः ॥ जायेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाले द्यूने विनष्टं धनमेति मर्त्यः
lagneśvare dyūnagate vilagne jāyeśvare naṣṭadhanasya lābhaḥ || jāyeśalagnādhipatītthaśāle dyūne vinaṣṭaṃ dhanameti martyaḥ
With the lord of the lagna gone to the 7th (dyūna) and the lord of the 7th (jāyā) in the rising sign, there is the recovery of lost wealth. When the lord of the 7th and the lord of the lagna are in an itthaśāla in the 7th (dyūna), the man gets back the wealth that was lost.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश्वरेद्यूनगतेविलग्नेजायेश्वरेनष्टधनस्यलाभः ॥ जायेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशालेद्यूनेविनष्टंधनमेतिम र्त्यः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This begins the run on lost and stolen property (naṣṭa-dhana) that carries to the end of the unit.
लग्नेशजायाधिपतीत्थशाले लग्नेश्वरं यच्छति तस्करोऽर्थं ॥ सूर्ये विलग्नेऽस्तमिते शशांके न लभ्यते यद्द्रविणं विनष्टम्
lagneśajāyādhipatītthaśāle lagneśvaraṃ yacchati taskaro'rthaṃ || sūrye vilagne'stamite śaśāṃke na labhyate yaddraviṇaṃ vinaṣṭam
When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (jāyā) are in an itthaśāla, the thief hands the goods over to the lord of the lagna ⟨that is, to the querent⟩. With the Sun in the rising sign and the Moon combust, the wealth that was lost is not got back.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशजायाधिपतीत्थशालेलग्नेश्वरंयच्छतितस्करोऽर्थं ॥ सूर्येविलग्नेऽस्तमितेशशांकेनलभ्यतेयद्द्रविणंविनष्टम्
40.82a reading here is contested कर्मेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाले चौरः स्वमादाय पुरात्पलायते ॥ चंद्रेऽस्तपे चार्ककरप्रविष्टे तल्लभ्यते नष्टधनं सतस्करं
karmeśalagnādhipatītthaśāle cauraḥ svamādāya purātpalāyate || caṃdre'stape cārkakarapraviṣṭe tallabhyate naṣṭadhanaṃ sataskaraṃ
When the lord of the 10th and the lord of the lagna are in an itthaśāla, the thief takes the goods and flees the town. With the Moon and the lord of the 7th (asta) both entered into the Sun's rays, that lost wealth is got back together with the thief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कर्मेशल ग्नाधिपतीत्थशालेचौरःस्वमादायपुरात्पलायते ॥ चंद्रेऽस्तपेचार्ककरप्रविष्टेतलभ्यतेनष्टधनंसतस्करं
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रविष्टेतलभ्यते"; alternatives "प्रविष्टेनलभ्यते", "प्रविष्टेतल्लभ्यते" — both the left and the right tile show a plain त before लभ्यते; the sense wants न or तत्. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: re-read on the master (F p.193 l.11, at about 3.6x and 4.3x native): the glyph after त is the stacked ल्ल, a full ल with a second ल-loop hanging below the baseline, not a plain त + ल. The page sets तल्लभ्यते, and the mūla now reads it; it is no longer kept as a single ल.]
- About this edition: The page prints तलभ्यते. The reader zoomed it and found a single ल preceded by त, not न, and the same spelling on the next leaf; it is the press's way of setting तल्लभ्यते, "that is got". Rendered as "is got back". On the other alternative, नलभ्यते, the line would say the opposite: the wealth is NOT got. [2026-10-01: re-read on the master (F p.193 l.11, at about 3.6x and 4.3x native): the glyph after त is the stacked ल्ल, whose second ल hangs below the baseline; the same ligature on p.194 l.0 (verse 84) measures about 28 px below the baseline. The page sets तल्लभ्यते, and the mūla now reads it. The single-ल reading and the "press's way of setting" explanation are superseded.]
अस्तेश्वरे केंद्रगतेऽस्ति चौरस्तत्रैव वान्यत्र पुराद्विनिर्गतः ॥ धर्मेशदुश्चिक्यपतीत्थशाले जायेश्वरेऽन्यत्र गतः स चौरः
asteśvare keṃdragate'sti caurastatraiva vānyatra purādvinirgataḥ || dharmeśaduścikyapatītthaśāle jāyeśvare'nyatra gataḥ sa cauraḥ
With the lord of the 7th (asta) gone to a kendra, the thief is in that very place; otherwise he has left the town and is elsewhere. When the lord of the 7th (jāyā) is in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 9th (dharma) and the lord of the 3rd (duścikya), that thief has gone elsewhere.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अस्तेश्वरेकेंद्रगतेऽस्तिचौरस्तत्रैव वान्यत्रपुराद्विनिर्गतः ॥ धर्मेशदुश्चिक्यपतीत्थशालेजायेश्वरेऽन्यत्रगतःसचौरः
40.84a reading here is contested कर्मेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशाले तल्लभ्यते राजकुलाच्चचौर्यं ॥ त्रिधर्मपद्यूनपतीत्थशाले त्वन्यप्रदेशाद्गमने तदाप्तिः
karmeśalagnādhipatītthaśāle tallabhyate rājakulāccacauryaṃ || tridharmapadyūnapatītthaśāle tvanyapradeśādgamane tadāptiḥ
When the lord of the 10th and the lord of the lagna are in an itthaśāla, that stolen property is got from the king's household. But when the lords of the 3rd and the 9th are in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 7th (dyūna), it is got from another region, upon going ⟨there⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कर्मेशलग्नाधिपतीत्थशालेतलभ्यतेराजकुलाच्चौर्यं॥ त्रिधर्मपद्यूनपतीत्थशालेत्वन्यत्प्रदेशाद्भ्रमनेतदाप्तिः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तलभ्यते"; alternatives "तल्लभ्यते", "नलभ्यते" — zoomed (p194_b): a single ल, and the letter before it is त, not न. The same spelling stands on page 193 line 12 (प्रविष्टेतलभ्यते), so it looks like the press's habit for तल्लभ्यते. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: re-read on the master (F p.194 l.0, at about 4.3x and 8.0x native): the page sets the stacked ल्ल, its lower loop measured down to y 373 against y 344–347 for the plain ल of शाले. The mūla now reads तल्लभ्यते. The "press's habit" reading is superseded.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भ्रमने"; alternatives "भ्रमणे" — zoomed (p194_c): the conjunct is द्भ्र and the following nasal is a dental न, not the retroflex ण the word wants. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: the master (F p.194 l.1, about 8.0x native) does set द्भ्रमने with a dental न, as the first reader found. The mūla is now emended to अन्यप्रदेशाद्गमने on the lexicon: भ्रमने breaks ṇatva, and अन्यत्- cannot compound with प्रदेश. The machine reads of the K, Pāṭhaka and Jhā printings give that form, and so does Pāṭhaka's own gloss. The press's reading is kept on the ledger.]
- About this edition: तलभ्यते again, read as तल्लभ्यते (see verse 82). The page also prints भ्रमने with a dental न where भ्रमणे, "in wandering", wants the retroflex ण; the reader confirmed the dental at magnification. Rendered as "wandering"; the Sanskrit is left as printed. [2026-10-01: the page sets तल्लभ्यते with the stacked ल्ल (F p.194 l.0, read by eye at about 4.3x native), and the mūla now reads it. The page does set भ्रमने with a dental न (l.1, read by eye at about 8.0x native), but the Sanskrit is no longer left as printed: the mūla is emended on the lexicon to अन्यप्रदेशाद्गमने, 'upon going', and the press's अन्यत्प्रदेशाद्भ्रमने is kept on the ledger.]
शुभेत्थशाले हिमगौ विलग्ने खस्थेथवा नष्टधनस्य लाभः ॥ सुस्नेहदृष्ट्या रविणा शुभेन दृष्टे विलग्ने हिमगौ च लाभः
śubhetthaśāle himagau vilagne khasthethavā naṣṭadhanasya lābhaḥ || susnehadṛṣṭyā raviṇā śubhena dṛṣṭe vilagne himagau ca lābhaḥ
When the Moon (himagu, the cold-rayed) is in an itthaśāla with a benefic and stands in the rising sign or in the 10th (kha), there is the recovery of lost wealth. And when the rising sign and the Moon are looked at by the Sun or by a benefic with the affectionate aspect (su-sneha-dṛṣṭi), there is gain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुभेत्थशालेहिमगौविलग्नेखस्थेथवानष्टधनस्यलाभः ॥ सुस्नेहदृष्ट्यारविणाशुभेनदृ ष्टेविलग्नेहिमगौचलाभः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The "affectionate aspect" is the friendly aspect of Tājika (the trine and sextile), named here by its quality rather than by its angle.
स्थिरोदये स्थिरांशे वा वर्गोत्तमगतेपि वा ॥ स्थितं तत्रैव तद्द्रव्यं स्वकीयेनैव चोरितम्
sthirodaye sthirāṃśe vā vargottamagatepi vā || sthitaṃ tatraiva taddravyaṃ svakīyenaiva coritam
With a fixed sign rising, or a fixed aṃśa, or ⟨the lagna⟩ gone to a vargottama, that property is still in that very place, and it was stolen by one of ⟨the owner's⟩ own people.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
स्थिरोदयेस्थिरांशेवावर्गोत्तमगतेपिवा ॥ स्थितंतत्रैवतद्द्रव्यंस्वकीयेनैवचोरितम्
आदिमध्यावसानेषु द्रेष्काणेषु विलग्नतः ॥ द्वारदेशे तथा मध्ये गृहांते च वदेद्धनम्
ādimadhyāvasāneṣu dreṣkāṇeṣu vilagnataḥ || dvāradeśe tathā madhye gṛhāṃte ca vadeddhanam
According as ⟨the rising point falls⟩ in the first, the middle or the last of the drekkāṇas reckoned from the lagna, one should declare the wealth to be at the doorway, in the middle ⟨of the house⟩, or at the back of the house.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
आदिमध्यावसानेषुद्रेष्काणेषुविलग्नतः॥ द्वारदेशेतथामध्येगृहांतेचवदेद्धनम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: A drekkāṇa is a third of a sign, 10°. The three drekkāṇas map to the three parts of the house in the same order.
पतितधनस्थप्रश्ने मिथो गृहस्थौ विलग्नसप्तेशौ ॥ यदि मुथशिलं तयोः स्यात्तदाशु तत्रैव वदति धनम्
patitadhanasthapraśne mitho gṛhasthau vilagnasapteśau || yadi muthaśilaṃ tayoḥ syāttadāśu tatraiva vadati dhanam
In a question about where dropped ⟨lost⟩ wealth is: if the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th stand in each other's houses, and a muthaśila is formed between the two, then one declares the wealth to be in that very place, and soon ⟨found⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पतितधनस्थप्रश्नेमिथोगृहस्थौविलग्नसप्तमेशौ ॥ य दिमुथशिलंतयोःस्यात्तदाशुतत्रैववदतिधनम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: मिथो गृहस्थौ is the mutual exchange of houses (parivartana): each lord stands in the other's sign. The muthaśila must hold as well as the exchange — both are required here, not alternatives.
40.89a reading here is contested नष्टं क्व दिशि प्राप्तं पृच्छायां लग्नगे विधौ प्राच्यां ॥ तत्स्थाने याम्यायामस्ते वारुण्यां वा भुव्युदीच्यां
naṣṭaṃ kva diśi prāptaṃ pṛcchāyāṃ lagnage vidhau prācyāṃ || tatsthāne yāmyāyāmaste vāruṇyāṃ vā bhuvyudīcyāṃ
"In which direction will the lost thing be found?" — in the question, with the Moon in the lagna, in the east; in that place ⟨by the sequence, the 10th⟩, in the south; in the 7th (asta), in the west; or on the earth (bhū, the 4th), in the north.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
नष्टंकदिशिप्राप्तंपृच्छायांलग्नगेविधौपाच्यां ॥ तत्स्थानेयाम्यायामस्तेवारुण्यांवाशुन्युदी च्यां
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधौपाच्यां"; alternatives "विधौप्राच्यां" — both the left and the right tile show पा with no repha; the direction list wants प्राच्यां. Kept as printed. [2026-10-01: refuted on the master (F p.194 l.4, read by eye at about 2.1x to 3.5x native): the akṣara after विधौ is प्रा, in this fount's form of प्र, a प with a slanting stroke, as in प्रश्नतंत्रे on line 3. The page sets विधौप्राच्यां, and the mūla now reads विधौ प्राच्यां.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाशुन्युदी"; alternatives "वाव्योम्न्युदी", "वाशून्युदी" — zoomed (p194_d): after वा I read a श with a ु hook, then a न with a subscript य and a ु, then दी, which runs into च्यां on line 6. The reading is not settled; the sense wants a word for the tenth place before उदीच्यां. [2026-10-01: refuted on the master (F p.194 ll.4–5, read by eye at about 2.1x to 3.5x native): after वा the page sets भु, which matches stroke for stroke the भु of the press's own in-line gloss भुविचतुर्थे on line 5, and then व्यु; not शु and न्यु, and not व्योम्नि. The mūla now reads वा भुव्युदीच्यां, 'or on the earth (the 4th), in the north'.]
- About this edition: The run is the four kendras against the four directions, which fixes the second and fourth members. But the page does not print them cleanly: the second is printed तत्स्थाने, "in that place", where the 4th is required, and the fourth word is unsettled on the plate — the reader read वाशुन्यु and offers वाव्योम्नि (व्योमन्, "sky", a name for the 10th), which the sequence needs. The east is printed पाच्यां without the repha, for प्राच्यां. [2026-10-01: the master (F p.194 ll.4–5, read by eye at about 2.1x to 3.5x native) sets प्राच्यां with the repha and वाभुव्युदीच्यां, and glosses the word in line भुविचतुर्थे, 'on the earth, that is the 4th'. The mūla now reads प्राच्यां and भुवि. So the fourth member is settled on the plate: the 4th goes with the north, and वाव्योम्नि is refuted. With the 4th in the north, the second member needs the 10th, not the 4th. The page sets it तत्स्थाने (read at about 2.1x native), our text keeps it, and the split with the later printings' खस्थाने is recorded as a doubt. The page also sets कदिशि (read at about 3.1x native); the mūla is emended on the lexicon to क्व दिशि, and the page's form is kept on the ledger.]
यदि नेंदुः केंद्रे तच्चत्वारिंशांशकैश्च पंचयुतैः । भागे दिक्क्रम उक्तो वह्न्यवनीवायुवारिराशौ वा
yadi neṃduḥ keṃdre taccatvāriṃśāṃśakaiśca paṃcayutaiḥ | bhāge dikkrama ukto vahnyavanīvāyuvārirāśau vā
If the Moon is not in a kendra, then ⟨the direction is taken⟩ by parts of forty increased by five — that is, of 45° each; the order of the directions is stated by that division. Or ⟨it may be taken⟩ from the sign being one of fire, of earth, of air or of water.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यदिनेंदुःकेंद्रेतच्चत्वारिंशांशकैश्चपंचयुतैः।भागेदिक्क्रमउक्तोवन्ह्यवनीवायुवारिराशौवा
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: चत्वारिंश + पंचयुतैः is a number given in words: forty plus five, so 45°. Eight arcs of 45° fill the circle and give the eight directions. वा is "or": the element of the sign is an alternative method, not an added condition.
नष्टवीतवित्तलब्धेः पृच्छायां चौरसप्तमं ततो लाभः ॥ हिबुकं द्रव्यस्थानं लग्नं चंद्रश्च धननाथः
naṣṭavītavittalabdheḥ pṛcchāyāṃ caurasaptamaṃ tato lābhaḥ || hibukaṃ dravyasthānaṃ lagnaṃ caṃdraśca dhananāthaḥ
In a question about recovering wealth lost and gone: the 7th is the thief, and the recovery is read from it. The 4th (hibuka) is the place where the goods are; the lagna, the Moon and the lord of the 2nd ⟨stand for the owner and what is his⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
नष्टवीतवित्तलब्धेःपृ च्छायांचौरसप्तमंततोलाभः॥ हिबुकंद्रव्यस्थानंलग्नंचंद्रश्चधननाथः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The verse assigns the significators and does not say what each yields; the closing phrase "stand for the owner and what is his" is supplied from the assignment, not printed.
लग्नेशोऽस्तेस्तपतिना चेन्मुथशिली ततो लाभः । यद्यष्टेशो लग्ने तदा स्वयं तस्करोऽर्पयति ॥ रविरश्मिगे धनेशे वास्तमिते तस्करस्य लाभः स्यात्
lagneśo'stestapatinā cenmuthaśilī tato lābhaḥ | yadyaṣṭeśo lagne tadā svayaṃ taskaro'rpayati || raviraśmige dhaneśe vāstamite taskarasya lābhaḥ syāt
If the lord of the lagna, in the 7th (asta), is in a muthaśila with the lord of the 7th, the recovery follows from that. And if the lord of the 8th stands in the lagna, then the thief hands it over of his own accord. With the lord of the 2nd gone into the Sun's rays, or combust, the gain falls to the thief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशोऽस्तेस्तपतिनाचेन्मुथशिलीततोलाभः।यद्दृष्टेशोलग्नेतदास्वयं तस्करोऽर्पयति ॥ रविरश्मिगेधनेशेवास्तमितेतस्करस्यलाभःस्यात्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This record runs to three parts under one number; the page divides the first two with a single daṇḍa. "The gain falls to the thief" is the flat sense of तस्करस्य लाभः स्यात् — the owner does not get the property back.
40.93a reading here is contested लग्नेशदशमपत्योर्मुथशिलतः प्राप्यते स्ववान्चौरः ॥ लग्नेशदृष्ट्यभावे चौरः सहमात्रयायाति
lagneśadaśamapatyormuthaśilataḥ prāpyate svavāncauraḥ || lagneśadṛṣṭyabhāve cauraḥ sahamātrayāyāti
From a muthaśila between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 10th, the thief is caught together with the goods. Where the lord of the lagna's aspect is absent, the thief goes off with the property.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशदशमपत्योर्मुथशिलतःप्राप्यतेस्ववान्चौरः ॥ लग्नेशदृष्ट्यभावे चौरःसहमात्रयायाति
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्ववान्चौरः"; alternatives "स्वंवानचौरः", "स्ववान्नचौरः" — read as printed from both tiles; the word division is not obvious and the virāma on न् is small
- About this edition: The reader could not settle the word division at स्ववान्चौरः. Read as स्ववान् चौरः, "the thief possessing the goods", which is what is rendered. On the reader's alternative स्ववान् न चौरः the line says the opposite about half of it — the goods are recovered but the thief is not caught. In the second half सहमात्रया is taken as सह मात्रया, "with the property" (mātrā in the sense of goods); it is not the Tājika term sahama.
40.94a reading here is contested अस्ताधिपतौ दग्धे रविरश्मिगतेऽथ लभ्यते चौरः ॥ लग्नपकृतेत्थशाले राजभयाद्धनमिदं स्वयं दत्ते
astādhipatau dagdhe raviraśmigate'tha labhyate cauraḥ || lagnapakṛtetthaśāle rājabhayāddhanamidaṃ svayaṃ datte
With the lord of the 7th (asta) burnt, gone into the Sun's rays, the thief is then caught. When the lord of the lagna has formed an itthaśāla ⟨with the lord of the 7th⟩, he gives this wealth back of his own accord, out of fear of the king.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अस्ताधिपतौदुग्धेरविरश्मिगतेऽथलभ्यतेचौरः॥ लग्ननृपप्रकृतेत्थशालेराजभयाद्धनमिदंस्वयंदत्ते
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुग्धे"; alternatives "दग्धे" — a small stroke under द reads as ु; with रविरश्मिगते following, the sense wants दग्धे. Not zoomed — the four zooms for this page were spent elsewhere. [2026-10-01: read by eye on the master (F p.194 l.8) at about 3.5x native, the 1893 leaf sets दग्धे, with no ु under the द: the rows under it hold no ink. The earlier reader took the द's tail for a ु, and the mūla now reads दग्धे.]
- About this edition: The page prints दुग्धे; the word is दग्धे, "burnt", which रविरश्मिगते ("gone into the Sun's rays") in the same line confirms. The reader flags the stroke under द and notes the page was not zoomed. Rendered as "burnt". [2026-10-01: read by eye on the master (F p.194 l.8) at about 3.5x native, the 1893 leaf sets दग्धे, with no ु under the द. The earlier reader took the द's tail for a ु, and the mūla now reads दग्धे.]
लग्नास्तपयोर्न स्याद्यदि दृष्टिर्लग्नपस्तथा विकलः ॥ तत्तस्करोस्य हस्ताद्ददाति चौर्यं हि राजकुले
lagnāstapayorna syādyadi dṛṣṭirlagnapastathā vikalaḥ || tattaskarosya hastāddadāti cauryaṃ hi rājakule
If there is no aspect between the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 7th (asta), and the lord of the lagna is crippled besides, then the thief does give the stolen goods out of his own hand — but in the king's court.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्ना स्तपयोर्नस्याद्यदिदृष्टिर्लग्नपस्तथाविकलः॥ तत्तस्करोस्यहस्ताद्ददातिचौर्यंहिराजकुले
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: विकल is "crippled, defective" — a graha without strength; rendered flat. हि in the last quarter is read as marking the contrast: the goods come back, but only through the court.
लग्नपमध्यपयोगे राजकुलं प्राप्य लभ्यते चौर्यम् ॥ रंध्रं चौरस्य धनं धनपे तत्राथ सप्तमेनाप्तिः
lagnapamadhyapayoge rājakulaṃ prāpya labhyate cauryam || raṃdhraṃ caurasya dhanaṃ dhanape tatrātha saptamenāptiḥ
When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 10th (madhya) are in yoga, the stolen goods are got after reaching the king's court. The 8th (randhra) is the thief's wealth: with the lord of the ⟨owner's⟩ 2nd standing there, or in the 7th, there is no recovery.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नपमध्यपयोगेराजकुलंप्राप्यलभ्यतेचौर्यम् ॥ रंध्रंचौरस्यधनंधनपेतत्राथसप्तमेनाप्तिः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: सप्तमेनाप्तिः is read as सप्तमे न आप्तिः, "in the seventh, no recovery" — the only division the sandhi allows besides सप्तमेन आप्तिः ("recovery through the seventh"), which would reverse the result. The negative is taken because the 8th is the thief's 2nd: the owner's money-lord standing in the thief's house of wealth means the property has become the thief's.
रंध्रपतौ धनपस्य तु मुथशिलयोगे च प्राप्यते वित्तं ॥ रंध्रपतौ दशमपतेर्मुथशिलगे चौरपक्षकृद्भूपः ॥ धनपे विलग्नपे सति दृष्टिविहीने श्रुतिर्भवति नाप्तिः
raṃdhrapatau dhanapasya tu muthaśilayoge ca prāpyate vittaṃ || raṃdhrapatau daśamapatermuthaśilage caurapakṣakṛdbhūpaḥ || dhanape vilagnape sati dṛṣṭivihīne śrutirbhavati nāptiḥ
When the lord of the 8th (randhra) comes into a muthaśila-yoga with the lord of the 2nd, the wealth is got back. When the lord of the 8th goes into a muthaśila with the lord of the 10th, the king takes the thief's side. With the lord of the 2nd and the lord of the lagna both standing without any aspect, there is news ⟨of the goods⟩ and no recovery.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रंध्रपतौधनपस्यतुमुथशिलयोगेचप्राप्यतेवित्तं ॥ रंध्रपतौदशमपतेर्मुथशिलगेचौरपक्षकृद्भूपः ॥ धनपेविलग्नपेसतिदृष्टिविहीनेश्रुतिर्भवतिनाप्तिः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: This record runs to three half-lines under one number. श्रुतिः is "hearing, report": the owner learns where the goods are but does not get them.
चौरज्ञानप्रश्ने लग्नरविशशिदृशा स्वगृहचौरः ॥ अनयोरेकदृशा गृहसमीपवर्ती वसत्येषः
caurajñānapraśne lagnaraviśaśidṛśā svagṛhacauraḥ || anayorekadṛśā gṛhasamīpavartī vasatyeṣaḥ
In a question to identify the thief: by the aspect holding between the lagna, the Sun and the Moon, the thief belongs to the house itself. By the aspect of only one of these two ⟨the Sun and the Moon⟩, he is someone living near the house.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चौरज्ञानप्रश्नेलग्नरविशशिदृशास्वगृहचौरः ॥ अनयोरेकदशागृहसमीपवर्तीवसत्येषः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: अनयोरेकदशा is read as अनयोः एक-दशा, "the condition of one of these two", the two being the Sun and the Moon just named. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads अनयोरेकदृशा; this sentence names अनयोरेकदशा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.99a reading here is contested लग्नस्थे लग्नपतावस्तपयुक्ते च गृहगतश्चौरः ॥ अस्ताधिपतावंत्ये सहजे वा स्वीयभृत्योऽयम्
lagnasthe lagnapatāvastapayukte ca gṛhagataścauraḥ || astādhipatāvaṃtye sahaje vā svīyabhṛtyo'yam
With the lord of the lagna standing in the lagna and joined with the lord of the 7th (asta), the thief is inside the house. With the lord of the 7th (asta) in the 12th (antya) or in the 3rd (sahaja), this ⟨thief⟩ is one's own servant.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नस्थेलग्नपतावस्तपयुक्तेचगृहगतश्चौरः ॥ अस्ताधिपतावंत्येसहजेवास्वीयभृत्योऽयम्
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गतश्चौरः"; alternatives "गतश्शौरः" — the conjunct after गत has a half-श joined to a second letter carrying the ौ mātrā; at 4x the second letter is च (the same shape as the free-standing च two akṣaras earlier in युक्तेचगृह), giving the ordinary sandhi गतः+चौरः. Read श्शौ at 1.5x.
- About this edition: The reader resolved गतश्चौरः at magnification as गतः + चौरः, the ordinary sandhi, against a first reading of गतश्शौरः. Rendered on that resolution.
40.100a reading here is contested अस्तेशे तुंगस्थे स्वगृहे वा तस्करः प्रसिद्धः स्यात् ॥ लग्नदशमास्तभावाः क्रमेण वीक्ष्याः स्वतुंगभवनादौ
asteśe tuṃgasthe svagṛhe vā taskaraḥ prasiddhaḥ syāt || lagnadaśamāstabhāvāḥ krameṇa vīkṣyāḥ svatuṃgabhavanādau
With the lord of the 7th (asta) standing in its exaltation, or in its own house, the thief will be a man of standing. The lagna, the 10th and the 7th (asta) bhāvas are to be examined in order, ⟨as they fall⟩ in a graha's own exaltation, its own house and so on.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अस्तेशेतुंगस्थेस्वगृहेवातस्करःप्रसि द्धःस्यात् ॥ लग्नदशमास्तभावाःक्रमेणवीक्ष्याःस्वतुंगभवनादौ
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अस्तेशेतुंगस्थे"; alternatives "अस्तेशेंतुंगस्थे" — cannot settle whether a dot stands over शे; the तुं anusvāra immediately after is certain.
- About this edition: प्रसिद्ध is "well known, of repute" — the thief is not a stranger but a person of some standing. The reader could not settle whether a dot stands over शे in अस्तेशे; on either reading the word is the lord of the 7th.
इत्थं चौरज्ञाने चौरः सूर्ये गृहेश्वरस्य पिता ॥ चंद्रे माता शुक्रे भार्या मंदे सुतो भवेन्नीचे
itthaṃ caurajñāne cauraḥ sūrye gṛheśvarasya pitā || caṃdre mātā śukre bhāryā maṃde suto bhavennīce
Thus, in the discernment of the thief: with the Sun ⟨as the indicator⟩ the thief is the father of the master of the house ⟨our mūla now reads गृहेश्वर, 'master of the house', where it once read ग्रहेश्वर⟩; with the Moon, the mother; with Venus, the wife; with Saturn, a son — ⟨or⟩ a man of low standing (nīca).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
इत्थंचौरज्ञानेचौरःसूर्येग्रहेश्वरस्य पिता ॥ चंद्रेमाताशुक्रेभार्यामंदेसुतोभवेन्नीचे
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १ within its section; it is published at position 101.
- About this edition: Two places where my rendering does not follow the printed word, and neither has been changed in the Sanskrit. (1) ग्रहेश्वरस्य: the run of household relations, and v.102's गृहप्रधान ('head of the house'), require गृहेश्वरस्य, 'of the master of the house'. (2) भवेन्नीचे: नीचे is a locative with nothing to govern it, while every other member of the list (पिता, माता, भार्या, सुतः) is nominative, so I read नीचः, 'a low-born man'. Kept as printed, the word would mean 'when ⟨the graha stands⟩ in its debilitation (nīca)', which leaves the sentence without a predicate. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads गृहेश्वरस्य; this sentence names ग्रहेश्वरस्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.102a reading here is contested जीवे गृहप्रधानं भौमे पुत्रोथवा भ्राता ॥ ज्ञे स्वजनो मित्रं वा ज्ञात्वेत्थं पुण्यसहममावेश्यं
jīve gṛhapradhānaṃ bhaume putrothavā bhrātā || jñe svajano mitraṃ vā jñātvetthaṃ puṇyasahamamāveśyaṃ
With Jupiter, the head of the household; with Mars, a son or a brother; with Mercury, one's own kinsman or a friend. Having discerned ⟨the thief⟩ in this way, the puṇya-sahama (the Tājika lot of merit) is to be brought in ⟨and examined next⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जीवेगृहप्रधानंभौमेपुत्रोथवाभ्राता ॥ ज्ञेस्वजनोमित्रंवाज्ञात्वेत्थंपुण्यसहममावेश्यं
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुण्यसहममावेश्यं"; alternatives "पुण्यसहममावेंश्यं", "पुण्यसहममावेद्यं" — line-final, up against the right rule. सहम (the Tājika sahama) is certain; the last two akṣaras carry what looks like an anusvāra over वे and I cannot settle श्यं against द्यं. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): वें → वे: above the headline of this word there are exactly two marks: the े tick over the व (x3101-3128) and a clean symmetric diamond (x3177-3187) that stands over the final श्यं; nothing sits over वे but its own े
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २ within its section; it is published at position 102.
- About this edition: The reader could not settle the last two akṣaras. आवेश्यं as read gives 'is to be brought in'; the alternative आवेद्यं would give 'is to be declared'. The sahama is the next thing the text turns to either way, which v.103's तस्मिन् ('in that') confirms.
40.103a reading here is contested तस्मिन् क्रूरादृष्टे पुरा न चौरो ऽस्तपे पुरापि स्यात् ॥ अस्तेशान् मूसरिफे भौमे चौरः पुरापि निगृहीतः
tasmin krūrādṛṣṭe purā na cauro 'stape purāpi syāt || asteśān mūsariphe bhaume cauraḥ purāpi nigṛhītaḥ
When that ⟨puṇya-sahama⟩ is not aspected by a malefic, ⟨the man⟩ was no thief before; with the lord of the 7th (astapa) ⟨aspecting it⟩, he may have been one before as well. When Mars is in mūsaripha (the separating aspect) from the lord of the 7th, the thief has been seized before too.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तस्मिन्क्रूरादृष्टेपुरानचौरोऽस्तपेपुरापिस्यात् ॥ अस्तेशान्मूसरिफेभौमेचौरःपुरापिनिगृहीतः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूसरिफे" — not a doubt about the ink — recorded because मूसरिफ (mūsarripha) is a Perso-Arabic Tājika term and a later reader may take it for a misprint. The akṣaras are unambiguous.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३ within its section; it is published at position 103.
- About this edition: मूसरिफ is the Tājika separating aspect, Perso-Arabic in origin and not a misprint; the plate reader recorded the spelling for that reason.
सप्तेशे रविपुत्रे चंद्रदृशा तस्करो हि पाखंडी ॥ जीवो विलोक्य लोकं भौमे खातेन पालकं भक्त्या
sapteśe raviputre caṃdradṛśā taskaro hi pākhaṃḍī || jīvo vilokya lokaṃ bhaume khātena pālakaṃ bhaktyā
With Saturn (ravi-putra, the Sun's son) as lord of the 7th, and by the Moon's aspect, the thief is a pāṣaṇḍin — a man in the dress of a sect. Jupiter ⟨shows one who⟩ surveys the people ⟨first⟩; with Mars, ⟨he enters⟩ by a breach dug ⟨through the wall⟩, ⟨and wins⟩ the keeper by ⟨a show of⟩ devotion.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सप्तेशेरविपुत्रेचंद्रदृशातस्क रोहिपाखंडी ॥ जीवोविलोक्यलोकंभौमेखातेनपालकंभक्त्या
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४ within its section; it is published at position 104.
- About this edition: The second half is elliptical as printed: जीवः stands in the nominative beside the locative भौमे and no finite verb is set, so every link in ⟨ ⟩ is supplied and the construction is not certain. खात is the tunnel or breach a house-breaker digs through a wall.
40.105a reading here is contested प्रतिकुंचिकयापहृतं सिते तिथिर् ज्ञे प्रपंचकरः ॥ चौरस्य वयोज्ञाने सिते युवा ज्ञे शिशुर् गुरौ मध्यः
pratikuṃcikayāpahṛtaṃ site tithir jñe prapaṃcakaraḥ || caurasya vayojñāne site yuvā jñe śiśur gurau madhyaḥ
⟨What was⟩ carried off was taken with a duplicate key (pratikuñcikā). With Venus ⟨the thief is⟩ a guest — atithi; the page prints तिथि, without the initial अ — and with Mercury, a spinner of fraud. In discerning the thief's age: with Venus he is a young man, with Mercury a child, with Jupiter middle-aged.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
प्रतिकुंचिकयापहृतंसितेतिथिर्ज्ञेप्रपंचकरः ॥ चौरस्यवयोज्ञानेसितेयु वाज्ञेशिशुर्गुरौमध्यः
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितेतिथिर्ज्ञे"; alternatives "सितेऽतिथिर्ज्ञे", "सितेतिथिर्घे" — read at 5x: सि ते ति थि, then a repha over a ज्ञ-ligature with what may be an anusvāra. No avagraha is printed. The sense wanted by the surrounding list (सिते … ज्ञे प्रपंचकरः) is अतिथि, but nothing in the ink supplies the अ. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): ज्ञें → ज्ञे: two marks stand over the ज्ञ and neither is an anusvāra: a straight diagonal tick (the े, the same glyph as the े of ते three akṣaras earlier) and the repha, a wedge whose leg drops to the headline; the anusvāra of पं four akṣaras later is a symmetric diamond floating clear of the headline
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितेयु" — line-final; joins line 7's वा as सिते युवा, which the following ज्ञे शिशुः confirms.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५ within its section; it is published at position 105.
- About this edition: The reader read सिते तिथिर्ज्ञे at 5x and found no avagraha and no initial अ. The list wants अतिथि, 'a guest', and that is what I render, saying so in the English. The Sanskrit is left as printed.
40.106a reading here is contested तरुणो भौमे मंदे वृद्धोर्के स्यादतिस्थविरः ॥ रविनभयोः स्वमंदिरे स्मरभूमिलग्नयोर् मध्यं
taruṇo bhaume maṃde vṛddhorke syādatisthaviraḥ || ravinabhayoḥ svamaṃdire smarabhūmilagnayor madhyaṃ
With Mars ⟨he is⟩ a young man; with Saturn, old; with the Sun he will be extremely aged. When the Sun and the ⟨lord of the⟩ nabha (the 10th, the sky) stand in their own house, ⟨the age is⟩ the mean between what the smara (7th) and the lagna ⟨give⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तरुणोभौमेमंदेवृद्धोर्केस्यादतिस्थविरः ॥ रविनभयोःस्वमंदिरेस्मरभूमिलग्नयोर्मध्यं
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृद्धोर्केस्याद"; alternatives "वृद्धोर्कैस्याद" — repha plus क with either one or two strokes above; ai and e are hard to separate where a repha sits over the same letter. | ink ruling 2026-09-11 (second reading): र्कै → र्के: the क carries exactly ONE diagonal tick (x1464-1488) plus the repha hook (x1488-1499); ै would need a second tick, and the only other diagonal in the neighbourhood (x1431-1456) is the ो of the preceding धो
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविनभयोः"; alternatives "रविनमयोः" — भ against म.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६ within its section; it is published at position 106.
- About this edition: The second half sets no verb, so the links in ⟨ ⟩ are supplied and the construction is not certain. नभ is taken as the 10th house (the sky, kha); this chapter uses ख for the 10th at v.142. The reader could not separate भ from म in रविनभयोः; रविनमयोः would leave the word without a sense I can give.
40.107a reading here is contested चरतिरवौ नवमध्यमवृद्धवयोतीतकाः क्रमशः ॥ नष्टस्थाने प्रश्ने तुर्ये भूम्यग्निवायुजलमध्यात्
caratiravau navamadhyamavṛddhavayotītakāḥ kramaśaḥ || naṣṭasthāne praśne turye bhūmyagnivāyujalamadhyāt
— new, middle, old and past-age, in that order. In a question about the place of a lost thing, ⟨judge⟩ from the 4th (turya), from among earth, fire, air and water —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चरतिरवौनवमध्य मवृद्धवयोतीतकाःक्रमशः ॥ नष्टस्थानेप्रश्नेतुर्येभूम्यग्निवायुजलमध्यात्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरतिरवौनवमध्य" — letters certain at 4x (च र ति र वौ न व म ध्य); the WORD DIVISION is not. It may be चरति रवौ or चर तिरवौ. Recorded exactly as set.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७ within its section; it is published at position 107.
- About this edition: The record's first word चरतिरवौ is left undivided. The reader found its akṣaras certain (च र ति र वौ) and the word division not: it may be चरति रवौ, 'when the Sun moves', or चर तिरवौ. The sentence is left open at the end of this record; its main clause stands in the next. Nothing has been pulled across.
40.108a reading here is contested यो भवति राशिरस्मात् स्थानं ज्ञेयं गतधनस्य ॥ अथ चतुर्थगृहे तुर्येश्वरोथ यः स्याद् ग्रहस् ततो ज्ञेयम्
yo bhavati rāśirasmāt sthānaṃ jñeyaṃ gatadhanasya || atha caturthagṛhe turyeśvarotha yaḥ syād grahas tato jñeyam
— whichever sign arises from this, that is to be known as the place of the lost wealth. Now the fourth house: the lord of the 4th (turyeśvara), and whatever graha stands ⟨there⟩ — from that it is to be known.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
योभवतिराशिरस्मात्स्थानंज्ञेयंगतधनस्य ॥ अथचतुर्थगृहे तुर्येश्वरोथयःस्याद्ग्रहस्ततोज्ञेयम्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अथचतुर्थगृहे"; alternatives "अथचतुर्थेगृहे" — line-final, against the right rule. This अथ… is a topic announcement inside a numbered run, not a chapter heading — the numbering does not restart at it.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८ within its section; it is published at position 108.
- About this edition: The first half completes the sentence begun in the previous record; the link is supplied and is not printed here. The अथ opening the second half announces a topic inside a numbered run, not a chapter.
40.109a reading here is contested मंदे मलिनस्थाने चंद्रेंबुनि गीष्पतौ सुरारामे ॥ भौमे वह्निसमीपे रवौ गृहाधीश्वरासनस्थाने
maṃde malinasthāne caṃdreṃbuni gīṣpatau surārāme || bhaume vahnisamīpe ravau gṛhādhīśvarāsanasthāne
With Saturn, in a dirty place; with the Moon, in water; with Jupiter (gīṣpati), in a temple grove (surārāma, the gods' pleasure-garden); with Mars, near fire; with the Sun, in the seat where the master of the house sits.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मंदेमलिनस्थानेचंद्रेंबुनिगीष्पतौसुरारामे ॥ भौमेवह्निसमीपेरवौगृहाधीश्वरासनस्थाने
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रेंबुनिगीष्पतौ"; alternatives "चंद्रेंबुनिर्गीष्पतौ" — at 1.5x a repha seems to stand over गी; at 4x that mark is the ī-mātrā of गी and there is no repha.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९ within its section; it is published at position 109.
40.110a reading here is contested तल्पे शुक्रे सौम्ये पुस्तकवित्तान्नयानपार्श्वे च ॥ चौरोयमथ न वेति क्रूरेंदोर् मुथशिले च चौरः स्यात्
talpe śukre saumye pustakavittānnayānapārśve ca || cauroyamatha na veti krūreṃdor muthaśile ca cauraḥ syāt
With Venus, on a bed (talpa); with Mercury, beside books, money, food or a vehicle. ⟨In the question⟩ 'is this man a thief or not': when a malefic is in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with the Moon, he is a thief.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
त ल्पेशुक्रेसौम्येपुस्तकवित्तान्नयानपार्श्वेच ॥ चौरोयमथनवेतिक्रूरेंदोर्मुथशिलेचचौ रःस्यात्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्तान्नयान"; alternatives "वित्तान्न्यान" — settled at 4x: त्ता then न्न (न over न) then या.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्तान्नयान"; alternatives "वित्तान्न्यान" — settled at 4x: त्ता then न्न (न over न) then या.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १० within its section; it is published at position 110.
- About this edition: तल्पे opens the record with no graha of its own; it belongs to शुक्रे, which follows it, and continues the list of places begun in v.109.
40.111a reading here is contested सौम्यशशिमुथशिले खलु न भवति चौरः प्रवक्तव्यम् ॥ किमनेन तस्करत्वं कदापि विहितं न वेति पृच्छायाम्
saumyaśaśimuthaśile khalu na bhavati cauraḥ pravaktavyam || kimanena taskaratvaṃ kadāpi vihitaṃ na veti pṛcchāyām
When Mercury and the Moon are in a muthaśila, he is certainly not ⟨a thief⟩: 'no thief' is what is to be declared — in the question 'has this man ever committed a theft or not?'
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सौम्यशशिमुथशिलेखलुनभवतिचौरःप्रवक्तव्यम् ॥ किमनेनतस्करत्वंकदापिविहितंनवेतिपृच्छायाम्
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुथशिले" — recorded, not doubted: मुथशिल (muthaśila) is the Tājika ithaśāla-type yoga, not a misprint.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ११ within its section; it is published at position 111.
40.112a reading here is contested लग्नपशशिनोरेकस्मादपि मूसरिफे ऽस्तपे विहितं ॥ चौरः स्त्री पुरुषो वा पृच्छायामस्तपे स्त्रियो राशौ
lagnapaśaśinorekasmādapi mūsariphe 'stape vihitaṃ || cauraḥ strī puruṣo vā pṛcchāyāmastape striyo rāśau
When there is a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) of the lord of the lagna and the Moon — from either one of the two — with the lord of the 7th (astapa), the theft has been committed. ⟨Whether⟩ the thief is a woman or a man: in the question, ⟨if⟩ the lord of the 7th is in a female sign —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नप शशिनोरेकस्मादपिमूसरिफेऽस्तपेविहितं ॥ चौरःस्त्रीपुरुषोवापृच्छायामस्तपेस्त्रियोराशौ
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूसरिफेऽस्तपे"; alternatives "मूसरिफेस्तपे" — an avagraha IS inked here — checked at 4x; it is the only avagraha on the line.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १२ within its section; it is published at position 112.
- About this edition: The sentence is left open at the end of this record; its conclusion stands in the next. Nothing has been pulled across. The avagraha of मूसरिफेऽस्तपे is inked on the plate and the reader checked it at 4x.
40.113a reading here is contested स्त्रीखेटे स्त्रीदृष्टे चौरः स्त्री व्यत्ययात् पुरुषः ॥ लग्नेशेन नवमांशतो वयःप्रमाणजातयो ज्ञेयाः ॥
strīkheṭe strīdṛṣṭe cauraḥ strī vyatyayāt puruṣaḥ || lagneśena navamāṃśato vayaḥpramāṇajātayo jñeyāḥ ||
— ⟨or⟩ is a female graha, ⟨or⟩ is aspected by a female ⟨graha⟩, the thief is a woman; by the reverse, a man. From the lord of the lagna and from the navāṃśa, the age, the stature and the caste ⟨of the thief⟩ are to be known.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
स्त्रीखेटेस्त्रीदृष्टेचौरःस्त्रीव्यत्ययात्पुरुषः ॥ लग्नेशेननवमांशतोवयःप्रमाणजातयोज्ञेयाः ॥
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रीदृष्टे"; alternatives "स्त्रीदृष्ट्टे" — ष्ट against ष्ट्ट; last line of the page and the ink is slightly heavier here.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १३ within its section; it is published at position 113.
- About this edition: The first half completes the condition begun in the previous record; the link ⟨or⟩ is supplied and is not printed here.
लग्नेश्वरेणाथ निशाकरेण यदीत्थशालं कुरुते सुतेशः ॥ शुभः शुभैः संयुत ईक्षितः स्यात् ससंततिं प्रष्टुरसौ विदध्यात्
lagneśvareṇātha niśākareṇa yadītthaśālaṃ kurute suteśaḥ || śubhaḥ śubhaiḥ saṃyuta īkṣitaḥ syāt sasaṃtatiṃ praṣṭurasau vidadhyāt
If the lord of the 5th (suteśa) makes an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with the lord of the lagna, or with the Moon (niśākara), and is himself benefic, joined with benefics and aspected ⟨by them⟩, then he will give the querent offspring.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश्वरेणाथनिशा करणयदीत्थशालंकुरुतेसुतेशः ॥ शुभःशुभैःसंयुतईक्षितःस्यात्ससंततिंप्रष्टुरसौविदध्यात्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १४ within its section; it is published at position 114.
- About this edition: निशाकरण as printed has no ए and so is not an instrumental. निशाकरेण, 'with the Moon', is what the sentence requires beside लग्नेश्वरेण, and that is what I render; the Sanskrit is left as printed. Recorded as a suspected misprint. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads निशाकरेण; this sentence names निशाकरण, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
पुंस्त्रीग्रहाः पुत्रगृहं विलग्नात् पश्यंति यावंति इहातिवीर्याः ॥ तत्संख्यकाः स्युस् तनयाश्च कन्याः शुभेशयोगात् सुतभांशतुल्याः
puṃstrīgrahāḥ putragṛhaṃ vilagnāt paśyaṃti yāvaṃti ihātivīryāḥ || tatsaṃkhyakāḥ syus tanayāśca kanyāḥ śubheśayogāt sutabhāṃśatulyāḥ
As many male and female grahas of great strength as look upon the 5th house (putra-gṛha) from the lagna — that many will be the sons and the daughters. ⟨Or⟩ by conjunction with the lord of a benefic, ⟨their number is⟩ equal to the navāṃśa of the 5th sign.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पुंस्त्रीग्रहाःपुत्रगृ हंविलग्नात्पश्यंतियावंतिइहातिवीर्याः ॥ तत्संख्यकाःस्युस्तनयाश्चकन्याःशुभेशयोगात्सुतभांशतुल्याः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १५ within its section; it is published at position 115.
- About this edition: यावंति is set as a neuter plural beside the masculine ग्रहाः. That male grahas give sons and female grahas daughters is what पुंस्त्रीग्रहाः … तनयाश्च कन्याः implies; the verse does not say it in so many words.
40.116a reading here is contested लग्नेशपुत्राधिपती परस्परं न पश्यतश् चेदुदयं च पंचमं ॥ पापेत्थशालौ सुतलग्नपौ च प्रष्टुस् तदा संततिनास्तितां वदेत्
lagneśaputrādhipatī parasparaṃ na paśyataś cedudayaṃ ca paṃcamaṃ || pāpetthaśālau sutalagnapau ca praṣṭus tadā saṃtatināstitāṃ vadet
If the lord of the lagna and the lord of the 5th do not look at each other, nor at the rising sign and the 5th, and if the lords of the 5th and of the lagna are in an itthaśāla with a malefic, then one should declare that the querent has no offspring.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशपुत्राधिपतीपरस्परं नपश्यतश्चेदुदयंचपंचमं ॥ पापेत्थशालौसुतलग्नपौचप्रष्टुस्तदासंततिनास्तितांवदेत्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नपश्यतश्चेदुदयंचपंचमं"; alternatives "नपश्यतश्रेदुदयंचपंचमं" — the श्चे conjunct in this fount carries a र-like descender; read as श्चे from the same conjunct checked at 6x on line 11
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापेत्थशालौ"; alternatives "पापेत्थशाले" — the final matra reads ौ; the dual सुतलग्नपौ follows, which fits ौ
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १६ within its section; it is published at position 116.
40.117a reading here is contested पुत्रालये सिंहवृषालिकन्याः प्रश्नोदयाजन्मभतस् तथेंदोः ॥ अल्पप्रजः संततिपृच्छकः स्यात् पापैः सुतर्क्षे सहितेक्षिते वा
putrālaye siṃhavṛṣālikanyāḥ praśnodayājanmabhatas tatheṃdoḥ || alpaprajaḥ saṃtatipṛcchakaḥ syāt pāpaiḥ sutarkṣe sahitekṣite vā
When the 5th house (putrālaya) — reckoned from the praśna lagna, from the natal sign and likewise from the Moon — is Leo, Taurus, Scorpio or Virgo, the one who asks about offspring will have few children; so too if those 5th signs are joined with, or aspected by, malefics.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पुत्रालयेसिंहवृषालिकन्याःप्रश्नोदयाजन्मभतस्त थेंदोः ॥ अल्पप्रजःसंततिपृच्छकःस्यात्पापैःसुतर्क्षैःसहितेक्षितेवा
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहितेक्षितेवा"; alternatives "सहितेईक्षितेवा" — line 2 sets संयुतईक्षितः with a free ई, so this may be सहिते ईक्षिते वा; the tile seam falls on this word
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १७ within its section; it is published at position 117.
- About this edition: The reader could not settle सहितेक्षिते against सहिते ईक्षिते; the claim is the same either way — joined with, or aspected by, malefics.
स्वर्क्षस्थितौ रंध्रगतौ यमार्कौ प्रष्टुः स्त्रियं संदिशतश्च वंध्यां ॥ छिद्रस्थितौ चंद्रबुधौ सदोषां वा काकवंध्यां तनयाप्रसूतिम्
svarkṣasthitau raṃdhragatau yamārkau praṣṭuḥ striyaṃ saṃdiśataśca vaṃdhyāṃ || chidrasthitau caṃdrabudhau sadoṣāṃ vā kākavaṃdhyāṃ tanayāprasūtim
Saturn and the Sun (yama and arka), standing in their own signs and gone to the 8th (randhra), declare the querent's wife barren. The Moon and Mercury standing in the 8th (chidra) ⟨declare her⟩ diseased, or a kāka-vandhyā — a woman who bears once only, as a crow does — or ⟨give⟩ the birth of a daughter.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
स्वर्क्षस्थितौरंध्रगतौयमार्कौप्रष्टुःस्त्रियंसंदिशतश्चवंध्यां ॥ छिद्रस्थि तौचंद्रबुधौसदोषांवाकाकवंध्यातनयाप्रसूतिम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १८ within its section; it is published at position 118.
40.119a reading here is contested मृतप्रजा छिद्रगयोः सितेज्ययोर् गर्भस्रवा भूमिसुतेष्टमर्क्षं ॥ छिद्रेश्वरे छिद्रगते ऽतिवीर्ये पुष्पं न विंदत्यबला सुतप्रदम्
mṛtaprajā chidragayoḥ sitejyayor garbhasravā bhūmisuteṣṭamarkṣaṃ || chidreśvare chidragate 'tivīrye puṣpaṃ na viṃdatyabalā sutapradam
With Venus and Jupiter in the 8th, her children die; with Mars in the 8th sign, she miscarries. When the lord of the 8th (chidra) stands in the 8th and is very strong, the woman does not obtain the son-giving flower (puṣpa, the menstrual flow).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मृतप्रजाछिद्रगयोःसितेज्ययोर्गर्भस्रवाभूमिसुतेष्टमर्क्षं ॥ छिद्रेश्वरेछिद्रगतेऽतिवीर्येपुष्पंननविंदत्यबलासुतप्रदम्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितेज्ययोर्गर्भस्रवा"; alternatives "सितेज्ययोगर्भर्क्षस्रवा" — zoomed 4x: the repha over ग and the conjunct स्र are both on the plate
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुष्पंननविंदत्यबलासुतप्रदम्"; alternatives "पुष्पंननुविंदत्यबलासुतप्रदम्" — the doubled न is clear; the vowel on the second न is very small
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १९ within its section; it is published at position 119.
- About this edition: न न as printed is a double negative — 'does not fail to obtain'. The reader's alternative ननु ('surely she obtains') makes the same claim, so the verdict does not turn on the doubt. The strong lord of the 8th standing in the 8th is read here as favourable, against the direction of the rest of the verse.
शुक्रार्कयोरष्टमसंस्थयोर् वा क्रूरैर् धनांत्याष्टमराशिसंस्थैः ॥ जाताः पुरस्तान् म्रियते प्रजा वै प्रष्टुर् न चाग्रे शुभसंततिः स्यात्
śukrārkayoraṣṭamasaṃsthayor vā krūrair dhanāṃtyāṣṭamarāśisaṃsthaiḥ || jātāḥ purastān mriyate prajā vai praṣṭur na cāgre śubhasaṃtatiḥ syāt
When Venus and the Sun are both in the 8th, or when malefics stand in the 2nd, the 12th (antya) and the 8th signs, the children already born die before ⟨the querent's eyes⟩, and no good offspring will come to him hereafter.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुक्रार्कियोरष्ट मसंस्थयोर्वाक्रूरैर्धनांत्याष्टमराशिसंस्थैः ॥ जाताःपुरस्तान्म्रियतेप्रजावैप्रष्टुर्नचाग्रेशुभसंततिःस्यात्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २० within its section; it is published at position 120.
रिःफेश्वरे केंद्रगते च सौम्यैर् युतेक्षिते जीवति बालकश्च ॥ आपूर्यमाणे शुभयुक्त इंदौ केंद्रे शिशुर् जीवति दीर्घकालं
riḥpheśvare keṃdragate ca saumyair yutekṣite jīvati bālakaśca || āpūryamāṇe śubhayukta iṃdau keṃdre śiśur jīvati dīrghakālaṃ
When the lord of the 12th (riḥpha) is in a kendra and joined with and aspected by benefics, the child lives. And when the Moon is waxing, joined with a benefic and in a kendra, the child lives a long time.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रिःफेश्वरेकेंद्रगतेचसौम्यैर्युते क्षितेजीवतिबालकश्च ॥ आपूर्यमाणेशुभयुक्तइंदौकेंद्रेशिशुर्जीवतिदीर्घकालं
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २१ within its section; it is published at position 121.
पंचमेशो ऽथ लग्नेशो विषमर्क्षं गतौ यदा ॥ पुत्रजन्मप्रदौ ज्ञेयौ कन्यानां समराशिगौ
paṃcameśo 'tha lagneśo viṣamarkṣaṃ gatau yadā || putrajanmapradau jñeyau kanyānāṃ samarāśigau
When the lord of the 5th and the lord of the lagna have gone to an odd sign, they are to be known as giving the birth of a son; standing in an even sign, ⟨they give the birth⟩ of daughters.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पंचमेशोऽथलग्नेशोविषमर्क्षंगतौयदा॥ पुत्रजन्मप्रदौज्ञेयौकन्यानांसमराशिगौ
4 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २२ within its section; it is published at position 122.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label चिंतामणौ ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation.
सुताधिपं नृराशिस्थं पुंराशिस्थोपि लग्नपः ॥ वीक्ष्यते पुत्रदः प्रोक्तो युग्मराशौ च दारिका ॥
sutādhipaṃ nṛrāśisthaṃ puṃrāśisthopi lagnapaḥ || vīkṣyate putradaḥ prokto yugmarāśau ca dārikā ||
When the lord of the lagna, itself standing in a male sign, looks upon the lord of the 5th standing in a male sign, he is declared son-giving; and in an even sign (yugma), a girl ⟨is born⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सुताधिपंनृराशिस्थंपुराशिस्थोपिलग्नपः ॥ वीक्ष्यतेपुत्रदःप्रोक्तोयुग्मराशौचदारिका ॥
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २३ within its section; it is published at position 123.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
- About this edition: पुराशिस्थ is printed without the anusvāra of पुंराशिस्थ, 'standing in a male sign' — which is what नृराशिस्थ in the same line says — and that is how I render it; the Sanskrit is left as printed. वीक्ष्यते is passive in form but active in sense here, लग्नपः standing in the nominative and सुताधिपं in the accusative. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads पुंराशिस्थोपि; this sentence names पुराशिस्थ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.124a reading here is contested युग्मराशिगते लग्ने यदा तत्र शुभग्रहाः ॥ गर्भेपत्यद्वयं वाच्यं दैवज्ञेन विपश्चिता
yugmarāśigate lagne yadā tatra śubhagrahāḥ || garbhepatyadvayaṃ vācyaṃ daivajñena vipaścitā
When the lagna is in an even sign and benefic grahas stand there, a learned astrologer should declare twin offspring in the womb.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
युग्मराशिगतेलग्नेयदातत्रशुभग्रहाः ॥ गर्भेपत्यद्वयंवाच्यंदैवज्ञेनविपश्चिता
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपश्चिता"; alternatives "विपश्रिता" — zoomed 6x: the conjunct is श्चि, not श्रि
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २४ within its section; it is published at position 124.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
40.125a reading here is contested विषमोपगतो लग्नाच्छनिः पुत्रसुखप्रदः ॥ समभे योषितां जन्म विशेषो जातकोक्तिवत्
viṣamopagato lagnācchaniḥ putrasukhapradaḥ || samabhe yoṣitāṃ janma viśeṣo jātakoktivat
Saturn, reaching an odd ⟨sign⟩ from the lagna, gives the happiness of sons; in an even sign, the birth of daughters. The particulars are as stated in jātaka, natal astrology.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
वीषमोपगतोलग्नाच्छनिःपुत्रसुखप्रदः ॥ समभेयोषितांजन्मविशेषोजातकोक्तिवत्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीषमोपगतो"; alternatives "विषमोपगतो" — the press sets a long ी on वी; kept as printed [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विषमोपगतो; this sentence names वीषमोपगतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २५ within its section; it is published at position 125.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 9).
- About this edition: The press sets a long ी in वीषम- where विषम-, 'odd', is meant; it is kept as printed and rendered as विषम. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विषमोपगतो; this sentence names वीषम, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
कटुको लवणस् तिक्तो मिश्रितो मधुरो रसः ॥ अम्लः कषायः कथिता रव्यादीनां रसा बुधैः
kaṭuko lavaṇas tikto miśrito madhuro rasaḥ || amlaḥ kaṣāyaḥ kathitā ravyādīnāṃ rasā budhaiḥ
Pungent, salty, bitter, mixed, sweet, sour and astringent — these are the tastes (rasa) declared by the wise for the Sun and the rest ⟨in that order⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कटुकोलवणस्तिक्तोमिश्रितोमधुरोरसः ॥ अ म्लःकषायःकथितारव्यादीनांरसाबुधैः
4 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २६ within its section; it is published at position 126.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 12).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "चिंतामणौ ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label चिंतामणौ ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. Seven tastes for seven grahas, so the order runs Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn. The verse says क्रमशः nowhere; 'in that order' is supplied from the count.
लग्नं पश्यति यः खेटस् तस्य यः कथितो रसः ॥ भोजने ऽसौ रसो वीर्यक्रमाद् वाच्याः परे रसाः
lagnaṃ paśyati yaḥ kheṭas tasya yaḥ kathito rasaḥ || bhojane 'sau raso vīryakramād vācyāḥ pare rasāḥ
Whichever graha looks upon the lagna — the taste declared for that graha is the taste ⟨of the food⟩ at the meal; the remaining tastes are to be named in the order of ⟨the grahas'⟩ strength.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नंपश्यतियःखेटस्तस्ययःकथितोरसः ॥ भोजनेऽसौरसोवीर्यक्रमाद्वाच्याःपरेरसाः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २७ within its section; it is published at position 127.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: चिंतामणि (named चिंतामणौ on page 196 line 12).
चंद्रो यस्य मुथशिलस् तस्य विशेषं वदेद् भुक्तौ ॥ लग्ने राहौ मंदे रविदृष्टे भोजनाभावः
caṃdro yasya muthaśilas tasya viśeṣaṃ vaded bhuktau || lagne rāhau maṃde ravidṛṣṭe bhojanābhāvaḥ
Whichever ⟨graha⟩ the Moon is in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with, from that one the particulars of the meal are to be declared. With Rāhu or Saturn in the lagna and the Sun aspecting ⟨it⟩, there is no meal at all.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चंद्रोयस्यमुथशिलस्तस्यविशेषंवदेद्भुक्तौ ॥ लग्नेराहौमंदेरविदृष्टेभोजनाभावः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २८ within its section; it is published at position 128.
40.129a reading here is contested कीदृग् मयाद्यभुक्तं पृच्छायां यदि भवेत् स्थिरं लग्नं ॥ तदुक्तमेकवेलं द्व्यात्मनि वेलद्वयं चरे त्वसकृत्
kīdṛg mayādyabhuktaṃ pṛcchāyāṃ yadi bhavet sthiraṃ lagnaṃ || taduktamekavelaṃ dvyātmani veladvayaṃ care tvasakṛt
⟨In the question⟩ 'what sort of thing have I eaten today?': if in the question the lagna is fixed, one meal-time is declared; in a dvyātman (dual) sign, two meal-times; but in a movable ⟨lagna⟩, more than once.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कीदृग्मयाद्यभुक्तंपृच्छायांयदिभवे तिस्थिरंलग्नं ॥ तदुक्तमेकवेलंह्यात्मनिवेलद्वयंचरेत्वसकृत्
5 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरेत्वसकृत्"; alternatives "चरेतुसकृत्" — reads चरे त्वसकृत् (= चरे तु असकृत्); the virama on त् is small
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse २९ within its section; it is published at position 129.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नतंत्र (named प्रश्नतंत्रे on page 197 line 2; ruled for the āryā run २९–३१ only, which the gloss अयमस्यार्थः on page 197 line 5 closes; the upajāti ॥३२॥ after the gloss is ruled mula).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label प्रश्नतंत्रे ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. Two printed words I do not follow, and neither has been changed in the Sanskrit. भवेति has a stray ि where भवेत् ('should be') is required. ह्यात्मनि, which would mean 'indeed in one's own case', is read as द्व्यात्मनि, 'in a dual sign': the three-fold sthira / dvisvabhāva / cara scheme is what the verse is counting, and without it वेलद्वयं ('two meal-times') has no condition attached to it at all. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads द्व्यात्मनि and भवेत्; this sentence names ह्यात्मनि and भवेति, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
40.130a reading here is contested चंद्रे लग्नगते स्यात् क्षारं भौमे च कटुकमम्लगुरौ ॥ मधुरं दिनकृति तिक्तं शुक्रे स्निग्धं बुधे च सर्वरसं
caṃdre lagnagate syāt kṣāraṃ bhaume ca kaṭukamamlagurau || madhuraṃ dinakṛti tiktaṃ śukre snigdhaṃ budhe ca sarvarasaṃ
With the Moon in the lagna ⟨the food⟩ is alkaline (kṣāra); with Mars, pungent; sour with Jupiter; sweet with the Sun (dinakṛt, the day-maker); bitter with Venus; and with Mercury, oily and of every taste.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चंद्रेलग्नगतेस्यात्क्षारंभौमेचकटुकमम्लंगुरौ ॥ मधुरंदिनकृतितिक्तंशुक्रेस्ति ग्धंबुधेचसर्वरसं
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मधुरंदिनकृतितिक्तं"; alternatives "मधुरंदिनकृत्तितिक्तं" — ति or त्ति — the tile seam falls on this word
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३० within its section; it is published at position 130.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नतंत्र (named प्रश्नतंत्रे on page 197 line 2; ruled for the āryā run २९–३१ only, which the gloss अयमस्यार्थः on page 197 line 5 closes; the upajāti ॥३२॥ after the gloss is ruled mula).
- About this edition: Saturn is not in this list — the verse names six grahas only. स्तिग्धं as printed is not a word; स्निग्धं, 'oily', is what I render, and the Sanskrit is left as printed. The reader also could not settle दिनकृति against दिनकृत्ति; only दिनकृति is a locative, so the claim does not turn on it. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads स्निग्धं; this sentence names स्तिग्धं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.131a reading here is contested मंदे कषायमशुभान् मूसरिफे शशिनि मुथशिले शुभे ऽरिदृशा ॥ उद्वाहात्प्रियदृष्ट्या प्रायणिकत्वात् समागतं भोज्यम्
maṃde kaṣāyamaśubhān mūsariphe śaśini muthaśile śubhe 'ridṛśā || udvāhātpriyadṛṣṭyā prāyaṇikatvāt samāgataṃ bhojyam
With Saturn, ⟨the taste is⟩ astringent. When the Moon is in a mūsaripha (the separating aspect) from a malefic and in a muthaśila (the applying aspect) with a benefic, and by an inimical aspect (ari-dṛś), the food that has come is from a wedding, ⟨come⟩ by the aspect of someone dear (priya-dṛṣṭi), or by reason of a funeral feast (prāyaṇika).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मंदेकषायमशुभान्मूसरिफेशशिनिमुथशिलेशुभेऽरिदृशा ॥ उद्वाहात्त्रियदृष्ट्याप्रायणिकत्वात्समागतंभोज्यम्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उद्वाहात्त्रियदृष्ट्या"; alternatives "उद्वाहात्स्त्रियदृष्ट्या" — त्त्रि or स्त्रि — the left limb of the conjunct is thin [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads उद्वाहात्प्रियदृष्ट्या; this sentence names उद्वाहात्त्रियदृष्ट्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३१ within its section; it is published at position 131.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नतंत्र (named प्रश्नतंत्रे on page 197 line 2; ruled for the āryā run २९–३१ only, which the gloss अयमस्यार्थः on page 197 line 5 closes; the upajāti ॥३२॥ after the gloss is ruled mula).
- About this edition: The conjunct after उद्वाहात् is not resolvable on the plate: the reader offers त्त्रि and स्त्रि. Read as स्त्रि it gives स्त्रिय-दृष्ट्या, 'by a woman's aspect', and that is what I render; read as त्त्रि it yields no word I can construe. The three ablatives and instrumentals of the second half stand in a row with one verb between them, so which of them governs which is not certain. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads उद्वाहात्प्रियदृष्ट्या; this sentence names त्त्रि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.132a reading here is contested पापे सराफे च शुभेत्थशाले चंद्रे तु भुक्तं शुभमन्नमीशं
pāpe sarāphe ca śubhetthaśāle caṃdre tu bhuktaṃ śubhamannamīśaṃ
When the Moon is in a sarāpha (the separating aspect) from a malefic and in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with a benefic, what has been eaten is good food, fit for a lord (īśa), such as the wealthy enjoy.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पापेसराफेचशुभेत्थशालेचंद्रेतुभुक्तंशुभमन्नमीशं
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभमन्नमीशं"; alternatives "शुभमन्नमिष्टं" — the last conjunct is not resolvable at tile magnification
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभमन्नमीशं"; alternatives "शुभमन्नमिष्टं" — the last conjunct is not resolvable at tile magnification
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३२ within its section; it is published at position 132.
- About this edition: This record is a single half-line, numbered on its own by the press. The last conjunct is not resolvable at the magnification the reader had: शुभमन्नमीशं or शुभमन्नमिष्टं. I follow इष्टं, 'desired, welcome'; ईशं would have to mean something like 'fit for a lord', and gives no construction with अन्नम्. The Sanskrit is left as printed.
शुभे सराफे त्वशुभेत्थशाले चंद्रे कदन्नं मधु आज्यवर्ज्यं ॥ पापेत्थशाले ऽथ खले सराफे शक्यं न भोक्तुं परतोपि लब्धम्
śubhe sarāphe tvaśubhetthaśāle caṃdre kadannaṃ madhu ājyavarjyaṃ || pāpetthaśāle 'tha khale sarāphe śakyaṃ na bhoktuṃ paratopi labdham
When the Moon is in a sarāpha from a benefic and in an itthaśāla with a malefic, ⟨the food is⟩ bad food, without honey and clarified butter. With an itthaśāla with a malefic, or a sarāpha from a wicked ⟨graha⟩, what is got even from elsewhere cannot be eaten.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुभेसराफेत्वशुभेत्थशालेचंद्रेकदन्नंमधुआज्यवर्ज्यं ॥ पापेत्थशालेऽथखलेसराफेशक्यंनभोक्तुंपरतोपिलब्धम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३३ within its section; it is published at position 133.
चंद्रे स्वनाथदृष्टे सुखभोजनमन्यथा कष्टात् ॥ गुरुमुथशिले सगौरवमर्केण मुथशिले ऽतिशुचितीक्ष्णम्
caṃdre svanāthadṛṣṭe sukhabhojanamanyathā kaṣṭāt || gurumuthaśile sagauravamarkeṇa muthaśile 'tiśucitīkṣṇam
When the Moon is aspected by its own lord, the meal is an easy one; otherwise it comes with trouble. In a muthaśila with Jupiter ⟨it is taken⟩ with honour; in a muthaśila with the Sun, ⟨the food is⟩ very clean and sharp.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चंद्रेस्वनाथदृष्टेसु खभोजनमन्यथाकष्टात् ॥ गुरुमुथशिलेसगौरवमर्केणमुथशिलेऽतिशुचितीक्ष्णम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३४ within its section; it is published at position 134.
शुक्रे सुस्वादुरसं सहास्यगीतं बुधे जनाकीर्णं ॥ शस्त्रकथाढ्यं शनिना कुस्थानगतं कुजे चोष्णम्
śukre susvādurasaṃ sahāsyagītaṃ budhe janākīrṇaṃ || śastrakathāḍhyaṃ śaninā kusthānagataṃ kuje coṣṇam
With Venus, ⟨the meal is⟩ of fine flavour, with laughter and song; with Mercury, crowded with people; full of talk of weapons; with Saturn, ⟨taken⟩ in a bad place; and with Mars, hot.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुक्रेसुस्वादुरसंसहास्यगीतंबुधेजनाकीर्णं ॥ शस्त्रकथाढ्यंशनिनाकुस्थानगतंकुजेचोष्णम्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३५ within its section; it is published at position 135.
- About this edition: शस्त्रकथाढ्यं ('full of talk of weapons') stands between the Mercury clause and the Saturn clause and names no graha of its own. It suits Mars (kuja), which the record names last, but the verse does not attach it, and I have not attached it either.
यदि वदति भोजनार्थं निमंत्रितो यामि शशिमहीसुतयोः ॥ एकस्थितयोः केंद्रे मुथशिलयोर् वापि पूर्णता भवति
yadi vadati bhojanārthaṃ nimaṃtrito yāmi śaśimahīsutayoḥ || ekasthitayoḥ keṃdre muthaśilayor vāpi pūrṇatā bhavati
If someone says 'I have been invited and am going to a meal': when the Moon and Mars (mahī-suta, the son of the earth) stand together in a kendra, or are in a muthaśila ⟨with each other⟩, the thing comes to fulfilment.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यदिवदतिभोजनार्थंनिमंत्रितोयामिशशिमहीसुतयोः ॥ एकस्थितयोःकेंद्रेमुथशि लयोर्वापिपूर्णताभवति
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३६ within its section; it is published at position 136.
विधिनानेन शनेः स्यात् कुभोजनं ज्ञसितयोरभीष्टान्नं ॥ जीवस्य तुष्टिजनकं होरेशे तनुखगे स्वयमुपैति
vidhinānena śaneḥ syāt kubhojanaṃ jñasitayorabhīṣṭānnaṃ || jīvasya tuṣṭijanakaṃ horeśe tanukhage svayamupaiti
By this same rule: with Saturn the food is bad; with Mercury and Venus it is the food one wants; with Jupiter it is such as gives contentment. When the lord of the horā is the graha standing in the tanu (the 1st, the body-house), ⟨the food⟩ comes of itself.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
विधिनानेनशनेःस्यात्कुभोजनंज्ञसितयोरभीष्टान्नं ॥ जीवस्यतुष्टिजनकंहोरेशेतनुखगेस्वयमुपैति
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३७ within its section; it is published at position 137.
यश् चंद्रेण मुथशिली तस्मिन्नीशे तनोः स्वगृहभोज्यं ॥ वित्तेशे भृत्यगृहे भ्रातॄणां सहजपे तथान्यत्र
yaś caṃdreṇa muthaśilī tasminnīśe tanoḥ svagṛhabhojyaṃ || vitteśe bhṛtyagṛhe bhrātṝṇāṃ sahajape tathānyatra
Whichever ⟨graha⟩ is in a muthaśila with the Moon: if that one is the lord of the tanu (the 1st), the food is from his own house; if the lord of wealth (the 2nd), from a servant's house; if the lord of the sahaja (the 3rd), from his brothers' — and so likewise for the rest.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यश्चंद्रेणमुथशिलीतस्मिन्नीशेतनोःस्वगृहभोज्यं ॥ वित्तेशेभृत्यगृहेभ्रातॄणांसहजपेतथान्यत्र
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३८ within its section; it is published at position 138.
लग्नस्थिते सूर्यसुते ऽथ राहौ सूर्येक्षिते वैरिनिमंत्रितस्य ॥ स्याच्छस्त्रघातः शशिभौमयोश्च लग्नस्थयोः सौरिदृशास्तिघातः
lagnasthite sūryasute 'tha rāhau sūryekṣite vairinimaṃtritasya || syācchastraghātaḥ śaśibhaumayośca lagnasthayoḥ sauridṛśāstighātaḥ
When Saturn (the Sun's son) or Rāhu stands in the lagna and is aspected by the Sun, the man invited by an enemy suffers a wound from a weapon. And when the Moon and Mars are both in the lagna, by Saturn's aspect there is a blow (ghāta, a wound).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नस्थितेसूर्यसुतेऽथराहौसूर्येक्षितेवैरिनिमंत्रितस्य ॥ स्याच्छस्त्रघातःशशिभौमयोश्चलग्नस्थयोःसौरिदृशा स्तिघातः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ३९ within its section; it is published at position 139.
- About this edition: The page prints सौरिदृशास्तिघातः. I read अस्थि-घातः, 'a breaking of bones'; स्ति- as it stands is not a word, and this printing confuses ति with थि and नि elsewhere on the same pages (v.130 स्तिग्धं for स्निग्धं). The Sanskrit is left as printed.
40.140a reading here is contested जीवे सिते चंद्रगते बलाढ्ये चंद्रे बुधे केंद्रगते शुभान्विते ॥ त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्च पापैः स्यात् प्रेमनिर्वैरकरं सुभोजनम्
jīve site caṃdragate balāḍhye caṃdre budhe keṃdragate śubhānvite || trilābhaṣaṣṭhāspadagaiśca pāpaiḥ syāt premanirvairakaraṃ subhojanam
When Jupiter and Venus stand in ⟨the sign of⟩ the Moon and are strong, when the Moon and Mercury are in a kendra and joined with benefics, and when the malefics are in the 3rd, the 11th (lābha), the 6th and the 10th (āspada), the meal will be a good one, bringing affection and freedom from enmity.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जीवेसितेचंद्रगतेबलाढ्येचंद्रेबुधेकेंद्रगतेशुभान्विते ॥ त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्वपापैःस्यात्तेमनिर्वैरकरंसुभोजनम्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्वपापैः"; alternatives "त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्चपापैः" — श्व or श्च — the same fount ambiguity as श्चे/श्रे on page 196 line 4 [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्च; this sentence names श्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यात्तेमनिर्वैरकरं"; alternatives "स्यात्क्षेमनिर्वैरकरं" — the conjunct after स्यात् may be क्षे; the sense wants क्षेम, but the plate is kept as it prints
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४० within its section; it is published at position 140.
- About this edition: Two printed words I do not follow, and neither has been changed in the Sanskrit. गैश्व is not a word; the sentence needs गैश्च ('and by ⟨malefics⟩ gone to…'), and the reader recorded the श्व / श्च ambiguity of this fount. स्यात्तेम- is read as स्यात् क्षेम-, 'there will be safety'; the reader said the conjunct after स्यात् may be क्षे and that the sense wants क्षेम. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads त्रिलाभषष्ठास्पदगैश्च; this sentence names गैश्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
भोज्यं बुभुक्षा भोक्ता च सुखाप्तांगबलक्रमात् ॥ लग्नपो भोज्यदस् तेषां बलेन फलमादिशेत्
bhojyaṃ bubhukṣā bhoktā ca sukhāptāṃgabalakramāt || lagnapo bhojyadas teṣāṃ balena phalamādiśet
The food, the hunger and the eater ⟨are judged⟩ in the order of the strength of sukha (the 4th), āpta, and aṅga (the lagna, the body). The lord of the lagna is the giver of the food; from the strength of these one should declare the result.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
भोज्यंबुभुक्षाभोक्ताचसुखाप्तांगबलक्रमात् ॥ लग्नपोभोज्यदस्तेषांबलेनफलमादिशेत्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४१ within its section; it is published at position 141.
- About this edition: सुख is the 4th house and अंग the lagna; आप्त is not a house-name this book uses elsewhere, so the middle term of the three is uncertain. The three are matched in order to भोज्यं, बुभुक्षा and भोक्ता, which is what क्रमात् ('in order') asks for.
40.142a reading here is contested तुर्येशलाभाधिपतीत्थशाले शुभग्रहेक्षायुति तत्सुभोजनं ॥ इत्थं खलग्नास्तपतीत्थशाले लाभेश्वरे तत्सुखलाभ ऊह्यः
turyeśalābhādhipatītthaśāle śubhagrahekṣāyuti tatsubhojanaṃ || itthaṃ khalagnāstapatītthaśāle lābheśvare tatsukhalābha ūhyaḥ
When the lord of the 4th (turyeśa) and the lord of the 11th (lābha) are in an itthaśāla, joined with or aspected by a benefic graha, that means a good meal. In the same way, when the lords of the 10th (kha), of the lagna and of the 7th (asta) are in an itthaśāla with the lord of the 11th, the gaining of that comfort is to be inferred.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तुर्येंशलाभाधिपतीत्थशालेशुभग्रहेक्षायुतित त्सुभोजनं ॥ इत्थंखलग्नास्तपतीत्थशालेलाभेश्वरेतत्सुखलाभऊह्यः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तुर्येंशलाभाधिपती"; alternatives "तुर्येशलाभाधिपती" — a small anusvāra dot sits over र्ये; it is faint [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तुर्येशलाभाधिपतीत्थशाले; this sentence names तुर्येंशलाभाधिपती, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४२ within its section; it is published at position 142.
- About this edition: The anusvāra of तुर्येंश is faint on the plate; without it the word is तुर्येश, simply 'the lord of the 4th', and the rule would then be about that lord rather than about the lord of its aṃśa. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तुर्येशलाभाधिपतीत्थशाले; this sentence names तुर्येंश, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.143a reading here is contested लग्नेर्के नृपतिं वह्निशस्त्रं पश्यति लोहितं ॥ श्वेतं पुष्पं सितं वस्त्रं गंधं नारीं च शीतगौ
lagnerke nṛpatiṃ vahniśastraṃ paśyati lohitaṃ || śvetaṃ puṣpaṃ sitaṃ vastraṃ gaṃdhaṃ nārīṃ ca śītagau
With the Sun in the lagna ⟨the dreamer⟩ sees a king, fire, a weapon and ⟨things⟩ red; with the Moon (śītagu, the cool-rayed), a white flower, a white garment, perfume and a woman.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेर्कंनृपतिर्वह्निशस्त्रंपश्यतिलोहितं ॥ श्वेतंपुष्पंसितंवस्त्रंगंधंनारींचशीतगौ
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नेर्कं"; alternatives "लग्नेर्के" — the mark over र्क could be an anusvāra dot or the tip of the e-stroke [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेर्के; this sentence names लग्नेर्कं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नेर्कं"; alternatives "लग्नेर्के" — the mark over र्क could be an anusvāra dot or the tip of the e-stroke [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेर्के; this sentence names लग्नेर्कं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४३ within its section; it is published at position 143.
- About this edition: This record opens the section on dreams (svapna). लग्नेर्कं: the reader could not tell an anusvāra from the tip of an e-stroke over र्क, so the word is either लग्नेऽर्कं or लग्ने ऽर्के. I render 'with the Sun in the lagna', which the matching शीतगौ ('with the Moon') in the second half requires. नृपतिर् is set as a nominative among accusatives (वह्निशस्त्रं, लोहितं, नारीं); I render it as one of the things seen, with them. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नेर्के and नृपतिं; this sentence names लग्नेर्कं and नृपतिर्, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
रक्तमांसप्रवालं च सुवर्णं धरणीसुते ॥ बुधे खे गमनं जीवे धनं बंधुसमागमं
raktamāṃsapravālaṃ ca suvarṇaṃ dharaṇīsute || budhe khe gamanaṃ jīve dhanaṃ baṃdhusamāgamaṃ
With Mars (dharaṇī-suta, the son of the earth), blood, flesh, coral and gold; with Mercury, travel through the sky; with Jupiter, wealth and the meeting of kinsmen.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रक्तमांसप्रवालंचसुवर्णंधरणीसुते ॥ बुधेखेगमनंजीवेधनंबंधुसमागमं
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४४ within its section; it is published at position 144.
जलावगाहनं शुक्रे शनौ तुंगावरोहणम् ॥ लग्नलग्नांशपवशात् स्वप्नो वाच्यो ऽथवा बुधैः
jalāvagāhanaṃ śukre śanau tuṃgāvarohaṇam || lagnalagnāṃśapavaśāt svapno vācyo 'thavā budhaiḥ
With Venus, bathing in water; with Saturn, coming down from a height. Or else the dream is to be declared by the wise according to the lord of the lagna and the lord of the lagna's aṃśa.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जलावगा हनंशुक्रेशनौतुंगावरोहणम् ॥ लग्नलग्नांशपवशात्स्वप्नोवाच्योऽथवाबुधैः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४५ within its section; it is published at position 145.
सर्वोत्तमवलाद् वापि खेटान् बुद्ध्या विचिंतयेत् ॥ वलसाम्ये फलं मिश्रं दुःस्वप्नो निर्वलैः खगैः
sarvottamavalād vāpi kheṭān buddhyā viciṃtayet || valasāmye phalaṃ miśraṃ duḥsvapno nirvalaiḥ khagaiḥ
Or else one should weigh the grahas with judgement, starting from the one strongest of all. When their strengths are equal the result is mixed; when the grahas are without strength, the dream is a bad one.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सर्वोत्तमवलाद्वापिखेटान्बुद्ध्याविचिंतयेत् ॥ वलसाम्येफ लंमिश्रंदुःस्वप्नोनिर्वलैःखगैः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४६ within its section; it is published at position 146.
- About this edition: This printing writes व for ब — वल for बल, निर्वलैः for निर्बलैः. That is the fount's habit and not a misreading.
40.147a reading here is contested रविलग्ने शशिदृष्टे रविशशिसमेतविलग्नाद् वा ॥ स्वप्नं दृष्टं प्रवदेत् प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः
ravilagne śaśidṛṣṭe raviśaśisametavilagnād vā || svapnaṃ dṛṣṭaṃ pravadet praṣṭurlagnāṃtarātkālaḥ
When the Sun is in the lagna and aspected by the Moon, or when the lagna is joined by the Sun and the Moon together, one should declare that the querent has seen a dream; the time ⟨of it is reckoned⟩ from the interval of the lagna.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
रविलग्नेशशिदृष्टेरविशशिसमेतविलग्नाद्वा ॥ स्वप्नंदृष्टंप्रवदेत्प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः
8 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विलग्नाद्वा"; alternatives "विलग्नाद्धा" — read at 4x: the conjunct is द्वा, not द्धा; at tile magnification it looked like द्ध
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः"; alternatives "प्रष्टुःप्रज्ञांतरात्कालः", "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञातरात्कालः" — the akṣaras between प्रष्टु and तरात्कालः are crowded and I could not separate them with confidence [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः; this sentence names प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विलग्नाद्वा"; alternatives "विलग्नाद्धा" — read at 4x: the conjunct is द्वा, not द्धा; at tile magnification it looked like द्ध
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः"; alternatives "प्रष्टुःप्रज्ञांतरात्कालः", "प्रष्टुर्ज्ञातरात्कालः" — the akṣaras between प्रष्टु and तरात्कालः are crowded and I could not separate them with confidence [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः; this sentence names प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४७ within its section; it is published at position 147.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: उत्पल (named उत्पलः on page 198 line 5; ruled for ॥४७॥ only. The same āryā stands as Praśna Mārga 31.1, research/translations/prashna-marga/ch31.json n=1, रविलग्ने शशिदृष्टे …; the next line opens a new section, अथाखेटकः).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "उत्पलः ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The page sets the label उत्पलः ॥ before this verse, naming the work it quotes from; the attribution is not rendered into the translation. The last clause is the doubtful one: the reader could not separate the akṣaras between प्रष्टु and तरात्कालः and offers प्रष्टुःप्रज्ञांतरात्कालः ('the time from the querent's own understanding') and प्रष्टुर्ज्ञातरात्कालः as well as the reading printed here. My rendering follows the printed प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः and should be treated as unsettled. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्लग्नांतरात्कालः; this sentence names प्रष्टुर्ज्ञांतरात्कालः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.148a reading here is contested लग्नेशजामित्रपतीत्थशाले सुस्नेहदृष्ट्या त्वनयोर् द्वयोश्च ॥ आखेटकः स्यात् सफलो ऽरिदृष्ट्या स्यान्निष्फलो वाल्पफलो ऽतिकष्टात्
lagneśajāmitrapatītthaśāle susnehadṛṣṭyā tvanayor dvayośca || ākheṭakaḥ syāt saphalo 'ridṛṣṭyā syānniṣphalo vālpaphalo 'tikaṣṭāt
When the lord of the lagna and the lord of the jāmitra (the 7th) are in an itthaśāla, and by an affectionate aspect of both of these two, the hunt (ākheṭaka) will be fruitful. By an inimical aspect it will be fruitless, or of little fruit and got with great hardship. [Our mūla now reads त्वनयोर्, 'of these two', where two akṣaras were unresolved.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशजामित्रपतीत्थशालेसुस्नेहदृष्ट्यालवनयोर्द्वयोश्च ॥ आखेटकःस्यात्सफलोऽरिदृष्ट्यास्यान्निष्फलोवाल्पफलोऽतिकष्टात्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुस्नेहदृष्ट्यालवनयोर्द्वयोश्च"; alternatives "सुस्नेहदृष्ट्याबलयोर्द्वयोश्च", "सुस्नेहदृष्ट्यालग्नयोर्द्वयोश्च" — the two akṣaras after दृष्ट्या are small and touch each other; my 4x crop fell short of them
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४८ within its section; it is published at position 148.
- About this edition: The two akṣaras after दृष्ट्या are small and touch each other, and the reader's 4x crop fell short of them: लवनयोः as read, with बलयोः ('of the strength of the two') and लग्नयोः offered as alternatives. लवन gives no sense here, so that part of the condition is left unrendered rather than guessed. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुस्नेहदृष्ट्या त्वनयोर्; this sentence names लवन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.149a reading here is contested लग्नेश्वरे द्यूनगते विलग्ने जायेश्वरे स्यान्मृगया प्रभूता ॥ जामित्रनाथे हिबुके नभःस्थे चाखेटकः स्वल्पतरो ऽपि न स्यात्
lagneśvare dyūnagate vilagne jāyeśvare syānmṛgayā prabhūtā || jāmitranāthe hibuke nabhaḥsthe cākheṭakaḥ svalpataro 'pi na syāt
When the lord of the lagna has gone to the 7th (dyūna) and the lord of the 7th (jāyā) is in the lagna, the hunt will be abundant. But when the lord of the jāmitra (the 7th) is in the hibuka (the 4th) or in the 10th (nabhas, the sky), there will be no hunt at all, not even a very small one.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश्वरेद्यूनगतेविलग्नजायेश्वरेस्यान्मृगयाप्रभूता ॥ जामित्रनाथेहिबुकेनभःस्थेचाखेटकःस्वल्पतरोऽपिनस्यात्
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूनगते"; alternatives "च्यूनगते" — same disputed conjunct as elsewhere on this page; zoomed to 8x and read द्य
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ४९ within its section; it is published at position 149.
40.150a reading here is contested ज्ञभौमौ सबलौ सिद्धिरस्तांशे मृगया च्युतिः ॥ लग्नद्यूने तत्पती च हेतुस् तैर् जलराशिगैः
jñabhaumau sabalau siddhirastāṃśe mṛgayā cyutiḥ || lagnadyūne tatpatī ca hetus tair jalarāśigaiḥ
Mercury and Mars, both strong, ⟨give⟩ success; in the aṃśa of the 7th (asta) the hunt falls through. The lagna, the 7th (dyūna) and the two lords of these are the ground ⟨of the judgement⟩, together with them when they stand in watery signs.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
ज्ञभौमौसव लौसिद्धिरस्तांशेमृगयाच्युतिः ॥ लग्नद्यूनेतत्पतीचहेतुस्तैर्जलराशिगैः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५० within its section; it is published at position 150.
- About this edition: हेतुः ('the ground, the cause') is left without a complement, and the closing तैर् जलराशिगैः is an instrumental absolute with no verb of its own, so what follows from the watery signs is not stated in this record. I have supplied the link in ⟨ ⟩ and nothing more.
40.151a reading here is contested जलजं खेटकं ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर् वनसंभवः ॥ क्रूराक्रांतानि यावंति मध्ये भानींदुलग्नयोः
jalajaṃ kheṭakaṃ brūyādanyarkṣair vanasaṃbhavaḥ || krūrākrāṃtāni yāvaṃti madhye bhānīṃdulagnayoḥ
⟨In a question about the hunt:⟩ one should call the quarry water-born ⟨when the planets stand in watery signs⟩, and forest-born by the other signs. However many signs lying between the Moon and the lagna are overrun by malefics —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
जलजंखेटकंब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्वनसंभवः ॥ क्रूराक्रांतानियावंतिम ध्येभानींदुलग्नयोः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्वनसंभवः"; alternatives "ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर्वनसंभवः" — the conjunct after ब्रूया reads द्ध to me, but a single द with the next अ absorbed would also fit the ink [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर्; this sentence names द्ध, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५१ within its section; it is published at position 151.
- About this edition: The plate prints ब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्. धन्यर्क्षैः ('by the wealth-giving signs') sets up no contrast with जलजम्, while the plate reader's own alternative ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैः ('by the OTHER signs') does; I render the alternative and say so, and the word-divided file keeps the printed akṣaras. The topic is the hunt (āheṭaka), carried on from verses 148–150, and verse 150 ends with तैर्जलराशिगैः, 'by them standing in watery signs'. The record does not finish its sentence: its apodosis is verse 152. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ब्रूयादन्यर्क्षैर्; this sentence names ब्रूयाद्धन्यर्क्षैर्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
तावंतः प्राणिनो वाच्या द्वित्रिघ्नाः स्वांशकादिषु
tāvaṃtaḥ prāṇino vācyā dvitrighnāḥ svāṃśakādiṣu
— so many living creatures are to be declared; and ⟨the number is⟩ multiplied by two or three ⟨when it is taken⟩ in the aṃśas of the planet's own divisions and the rest.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तावंतःप्राणिनोवाच्याद्वित्रिघ्नाःस्वांशकादिषु
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५२ within its section; it is published at position 152.
- About this edition: The record opens in mid-sentence. What it counts — the signs between the Moon and the lagna that malefics have overrun — stands in verse 151.
क्रूरः खचरो लग्ने विवादपृच्छासु जयति विवादं तम् ॥ सर्वावस्थासु परं नीचेऽस्ते जयति न द्विषतः
krūraḥ khacaro lagne vivādapṛcchāsu jayati vivādaṃ tam || sarvāvasthāsu paraṃ nīce'ste jayati na dviṣataḥ
A malefic planet in the lagna, in questions about a lawsuit: ⟨the querent⟩ wins that suit, in every condition. But when ⟨that malefic stands⟩ in its fall or in the 7th (asta), he does not defeat his adversaries.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
क्रूरःखचरोलग्नेविवादपृच्छा सुजयतिविवादंतम् ॥ सर्वावस्थासुपरंनीचेऽस्तेजयतिनद्विषतः
4 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५३ within its section; it is published at position 153.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: भुवनदीपक (named भुवनदीपके on page 198 line 9; ruled for the āryā run ५३–५५ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥५६॥, which is ruled mula).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "भुवनदीपके ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: परं is read as the adversative 'but', which makes the second half the exception to the first. Read instead as the adverb 'utterly' with सर्वावस्थासु, the line would say he wins even in fall and in the 7th, and that contradicts its own जयति न ('he does not win').
40.154a reading here is contested लग्नद्यूने मुक्त्वा परस्परं क्रूरयोर् झकटदृष्टौ ॥ विवदद्वादियुगं तच्छुरिकाभ्यां प्रहरति तदैवम्
lagnadyūne muktvā parasparaṃ krūrayor jhakaṭadṛṣṭau || vivadadvādiyugaṃ tacchurikābhyāṃ praharati tadaivam
⟨When two malefics stand⟩ in the lagna and the 7th (dyūna) and, letting fly at one another, are in a jhakaṭa aspect ⟨the mutually hostile aspect⟩, then the pair of quarrelling litigants strike each other with knives — just so.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नद्यूनेमुक्त्वापरस्परंक्रूरयोर्झकटदृष्टौ ॥ विवदद्वादियुगंतच्छुरि काभ्यांप्रहरतितदेवम्
5 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "झकटदृष्टौ"; alternatives "झकुटदृष्टौ" — the vowel under ट is a thin stroke; I read no mātrā there
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५४ within its section; it is published at position 154.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: भुवनदीपक (named भुवनदीपके on page 198 line 9; ruled for the āryā run ५३–५५ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥५६॥, which is ruled mula).
- About this edition: मुक्त्वा is an absolutive with no expressed object; I take it of the aspect the two malefics release at each other. Read as 'excepting', the half-line would exclude the lagna and the 7th, and verse 155 puts the same malefic in those same two houses. झकट is nowhere defined in this book; the word is the Prakritic jhagaḍā, 'a quarrel', so I transliterate it and gloss it as the hostile mutual aspect rather than translate it away. The reader could not decide between झकट and झकुट; nothing in the sense turns on it.
40.155a reading here is contested लग्नद्यूने च यदि क्रूरः खचरो विवादिनोर् न तदा ॥ कलहनिवृत्तिः काले जयति हि बलवान् गतबलं तु
lagnadyūne ca yadi krūraḥ khacaro vivādinor na tadā || kalahanivṛttiḥ kāle jayati hi balavān gatabalaṃ tu
And if a malefic planet ⟨stands⟩ in the lagna and the 7th (dyūna) of the two litigants, then there is no ending of the quarrel; in time the one who has strength wins, and the one whose strength is spent ⟨loses⟩.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नद्यूनेचयदिक्रूरःखचरोविवादिनोर्नतदा ॥ कलहनिवृत्तिःकालेजयतिहिवलवान्गतवलंतु
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५५ within its section; it is published at position 155.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: भुवनदीपक (named भुवनदीपके on page 198 line 9; ruled for the āryā run ५३–५५ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥५६॥, which is ruled mula).
40.156a reading here is contested लग्नेश सुतदः सौम्याः केंद्रे संधिर्नवान्यथा ॥ लग्नद्यूनेशषष्ठेशारित्वेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः
lagneśa sutadaḥ saumyāḥ keṃdre saṃdhirnavānyathā || lagnadyūneśaṣaṣṭheśāritvepyanyonyavigrahaḥ
⟨When⟩ benefics ⟨stand⟩ in a kendra ⟨with⟩ the lord of the lagna ⟨and⟩ the giver of the 5th (suta), there is a settlement; never otherwise. ⟨When⟩ the lords of the lagna, of the 7th (dyūna) and of the 6th stand in enmity (aritva), there is strife between the two parties. [सुतदः in the first half is not a word I can construe as printed; I render the rest of that half-line and do not emend it.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश सुतदःसौम्याःकेंद्रेसंधिर्नेवान्यथा ॥ लग्नद्यूनेषष्ठेशारिलेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यूने"; alternatives "च्यूने" — the conjunct after लग्न was zoomed to 8x: the ligature is the curl+य form, read द्य, but its left element is close to the च् half-form printed in च्युतिः on the same line
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५६ within its section; it is published at position 156.
- About this edition: Two places defeat me as printed. In the first half the page sets a space after लग्नेश and then सुतदः, which is no word I can construe; लग्नेशसुहृदः ('the friends of the lagna-lord') would fit, but nothing on the plate supports it. संधिर्नेवान्यथा is सन्धिः + नैव + अन्यथा with नैव set as नेव. In the second half, लग्नद्यूनेषष्ठेशारिलेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः, the run रिलेप्य् between षष्ठेशा and अन्योन्यविग्रहः is unintelligible to me; मिले ('when they meet') would give what the line wants. The word-divided file leaves both runs joined and unaltered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads लग्नद्यूनेशषष्ठेशारित्वेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः and संधिर्नवान्यथा; this sentence names लग्नद्यूनेषष्ठेशारिलेप्यन्योन्यविग्रहः and संधिर्नेवान्यथा, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
40.157a reading here is contested गृहमागतो न यदसौ किं बद्धः किमथवा हत इति प्रश्ने ॥ मूर्तौ क्रूरो यदि तन्न हतो बद्धोथवा पुरुषः
gṛhamāgato na yadasau kiṃ baddhaḥ kimathavā hata iti praśne || mūrtau krūro yadi tanna hato baddhothavā puruṣaḥ
In the question 'he has not come home — is he imprisoned, or has he been killed?': if a malefic ⟨stands⟩ in the mūrti (the ascendant), then the man is not killed; he is imprisoned instead.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
गृहमागतोनयदसौकिंबद्धःकिमथवाहतइतिप्रश्ने ॥ सू तौक्रूरोयदितन्नहतोबद्धोथवापुरुषः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बद्धोथवापुरुषः"; alternatives "बद्धोऽथवापुरुषः" — no avagraha glyph is printed after बद्धो, though sandhi wants one; kept as printed
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५७ within its section; it is published at position 157.
- About this edition: सूतौ is the locative of सूति, 'birth', that is the ascendant; the same house is called मूर्ति in verse 159 and तनु in verse 160. अथवा here is the contrastive 'or rather', not an additional 'and': the verse denies the killing and asserts the imprisonment. The plate prints बद्धोथवा with no avagraha where sandhi wants बद्धोऽथवा; the reader recorded this and the word-divided file keeps the plate. [2026-10-01: the exemplar's plate sets मूर्तौ, broken across pages 198–199 as मू | र्तौ, read by eye at about 3.7x native against the controls मूर्तौ and चसप्तमे on page 199 line 1. The mūla now reads मूर्तौ, so the word is मूर्ति, the lagna, the name verse 159 uses. The सूतौ this note explains is superseded.]
त्रिकोणचतुरस्रास्तस्थितः पापग्रहो यदि ॥ ग्रहैर् निरीक्षितः पापैर् नूनं बंधनमादिशेत्
trikoṇacaturasrāstasthitaḥ pāpagraho yadi || grahair nirīkṣitaḥ pāpair nūnaṃ baṃdhanamādiśet
If a malefic planet stands in a trikoṇa (a trine), in a caturasra (the 4th or the 8th) or in the 7th (asta), and is aspected by malefic planets, one should declare imprisonment for certain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
त्रिकोणचतुरस्रास्तस्थितःपापग्रहोयदि ॥ ग्रहैर्निरीक्षितःपापेर्नूनंबंधनमादिशेत्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५८ within its section; it is published at position 158.
- About this edition: The plate prints पापेर्नूनं. पापेः is no form; the instrumental plural पापैः, which निरीक्षितः ('aspected by') requires, is what was meant, and it is what I render. The Sanskrit is unaltered.
सप्तमगोऽष्टमगो वा चेत् क्रूरस् तद्धतोपि वा बद्धः ॥ मूर्तौ च सप्तमे वा यद्वा लग्नेष्टमेपि भवेत् ॥ क्रूरस् तदसौ पुरुषो बद्धश्च हतश्च मुच्यते च परं
saptamago'ṣṭamago vā cet krūras taddhatopi vā baddhaḥ || mūrtau ca saptame vā yadvā lagneṣṭamepi bhavet || krūras tadasau puruṣo baddhaśca hataśca mucyate ca paraṃ
If a malefic is in the 7th or in the 8th, then ⟨the man is⟩ either killed or imprisoned. And if ⟨malefics⟩ stand in the mūrti (the 1st) and the 7th, or else in the lagna and the 8th, then that man is both imprisoned and beaten — and he is released at last.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
सप्तम गोऽष्टमगोवाचेत्क्रूरस्तद्धतोपिवाबद्धः ॥ मूर्तौचसप्तमेवायद्वालग्नेष्टमेपिभवेत् ॥ क्रूरस्तदसौपुरुषोबद्धश्चहतश्चमुच्यतेचपरं
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ५९ within its section; it is published at position 159.
- About this edition: Three half-lines under one number. मूर्ति and लग्न name the same house, so the two pairs are 1st-and-7th and 1st-and-8th, and the singular क्रूरः is distributive over each pair. हतः means 'struck' as well as 'killed'; where it stands against बद्धः in the first half-line I render 'killed', and in the third, which ends with मुच्यते ('he is released'), I render 'beaten'.
40.160a reading here is contested बद्धः सप्ताष्टगे क्रूरे मूर्त्यस्ते चाष्टलग्नगे ॥ बद्धो विमुच्यतेऽत्याशु क्रूरः श्रेयांस् तनौ तदा
baddhaḥ saptāṣṭage krūre mūrtyaste cāṣṭalagnage || baddho vimucyate'tyāśu krūraḥ śreyāṃs tanau tadā
He is bound when a malefic is in the 7th or the 8th, and ⟨when malefics stand⟩ in the mūrti (the 1st) and the 7th (asta), or in the 8th and the lagna. ⟨But⟩ the prisoner is released very quickly, and a malefic in the tanu (the 1st) is then the better thing. [Our mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे, 'standing in the 7th or the 8th'.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
बद्धःस साष्टगेक्रूरेमूर्त्यस्तेचाष्टलग्नगे ॥ बद्धोविमुच्यतेऽत्याशुक्रूरःश्रेयांस्तनौतदा
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साष्टगे"; alternatives "प्ताष्टगे" — zoomed to 5x and the first akṣara reads सा; but with line 2 ending बद्धःस that gives बद्धःससाष्टगे, while the sense wants बद्धःसप्ताष्टगे, so a checker should look again [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे; this sentence names साष्टगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साष्टगे"; alternatives "प्ताष्टगे" — zoomed to 5x and the first akṣara reads सा; but with line 2 ending बद्धःस that gives बद्धःससाष्टगे, while the sense wants बद्धःसप्ताष्टगे, so a checker should look again [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे; this sentence names साष्टगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६० within its section; it is published at position 160.
- About this edition: As printed the line reads बद्धः स साष्टगे क्रूरे, and साष्टगे is no word. The plate reader flagged it himself and asked for a second look: सप्ताष्टगे ('in the 7th or the 8th') is what the sense and the parallel in verse 159 require. I render सप्ताष्टगे and say so; the word-divided file keeps the printed akṣaras. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सप्ताष्टगे; this sentence names साष्टगे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.161a reading here is contested बद्धोऽस्ति तत्किं भवितेति प्रश्ने विमुच्यतेऽसौ खलु मृत्युयोगे ॥ कदा विमुच्येदिति पृच्छमाने शुभं कदा भावि च तैर् मृतिः स्यात्
baddho'sti tatkiṃ bhaviteti praśne vimucyate'sau khalu mṛtyuyoge || kadā vimucyediti pṛcchamāne śubhaṃ kadā bhāvi ca tair mṛtiḥ syāt
In the question 'he is in prison — what will become of him?': he is indeed released when a mṛtyu-yoga ⟨a link with the lord of the 8th⟩ falls. When a man asks 'when will he be released?', ⟨one tells him⟩ when the auspicious ⟨time⟩ is due; and by those same ⟨yogas⟩ death may come.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
बद्धोऽस्तितत्किंभवि तेतिप्रश्नेविमुच्यतेऽसौखलुमृत्युयोगे ॥ कदाविमुच्येदितिपृच्छमानेशुभंकदाभाविचतैर्मृतिःस्यात्
6 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कदाभाविचतैर्मृतिःस्यात्"; alternatives "कदाभाविचेत्तैर्मृतिःस्यात्" — the akṣara between भावि and तैर् is small; I saw no e-stroke on it but it is crowded
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कदाभाविचतैर्मृतिःस्यात्"; alternatives "कदाभाविचेत्तैर्मृतिःस्यात्" — the akṣara between भावि and तैर् is small; I saw no e-stroke on it but it is crowded
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६१ within its section; it is published at position 161.
- About this edition: The page quotes this verse from another work and numbers it in this text's own count, so it is published as part of the text as printed. The reader's identification of the source: प्रश्नदीपक (named प्रश्नदीपके on page 199 line 3; ruled for the upajāti ॥६१॥ only; the metre changes to anuṣṭubh at ॥६२॥, which is ruled mula).
- About this edition: The page sets the label "प्रश्नदीपके ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The last quarter is uncertain. The plate reads कदा भावि च तैर्मृतिः स्यात्, which I render; the reader's alternative कदा भावि चेत् तैर्मृतिः स्यात् would make it a condition instead — 'if ⟨he asks⟩ when it will be, death may come of them'. That release and death are named by one and the same yoga is this book's own doctrine: verse 170 states it outright.
मुक्तिप्रश्ने यदा केंद्रे केंद्रेशाः स्युर् न मोक्षदाः ॥ तस्मिन् वर्षेऽथ लग्नेशः पतितः केंद्रगे न च
muktipraśne yadā keṃdre keṃdreśāḥ syur na mokṣadāḥ || tasmin varṣe'tha lagneśaḥ patitaḥ keṃdrage na ca
In a question about release: when the lords of the kendras stand in a kendra, they do not give release in that year. Nor ⟨is there release⟩ when the lord of the lagna is fallen and does not go to a kendra.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मुक्तिप्रश्नेयदाकेंद्रेकेंद्रेशाःस्युर्न मोक्षदाः ॥ तस्मिन्वर्षेऽथलग्नेशःपतितःकेंद्रगेनच
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६२ within its section; it is published at position 162.
- About this edition: केंद्रगे is a locative where the sense wants the nominative केंद्रगो agreeing with लग्नेशः. I render it as a nominative and have not altered the Sanskrit.
40.163a reading here is contested संबंधेप्सुः स चेत्क्रूरो मृतीशः स्यात्तदा मृतिः ॥ लग्नेशेस्तमिते ऽम्बुस्थे कुजदृष्टे तदा मृतिः
saṃbaṃdhepsuḥ sa cetkrūro mṛtīśaḥ syāttadā mṛtiḥ || lagneśestamite 'mbusthe kujadṛṣṭe tadā mṛtiḥ
If that malefic which is seeking a connection ⟨that is, applying⟩ is the lord of death (the 8th), then death. When the lord of the lagna is combust, stands in a watery sign, and is aspected by Mars (kuja), then too death.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
संबंधेप्सुःसचेत्क्रूरोमृतीशःस्यात्तदामृतिः ॥ लग्नेशेस्तमितेऽबुस्थेकुजदृष्टेतदामृ तिः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽबुस्थे"; alternatives "ऽम्बुस्थे", "ऽब्जस्थे" — I see no anusvāra dot over बु, though अम्बु (a watery sign) is what the sense wants [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ऽम्बुस्थे; this sentence names ऽबुस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६३ within its section; it is published at position 163.
- About this edition: The plate prints ऽबुस्थे with no anusvāra over बु, and the reader said so and left it. अम्बुस्थे, 'standing in a watery sign', is the sense and is what I render; the reader's other alternative अब्जस्थे would say the same thing by another word. The Sanskrit is unaltered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads ऽम्बुस्थे; this sentence names ऽबुस्थे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.164a reading here is contested चंद्रश्चांबुगपापेन मृत्युनाथेन योगकृत् ॥ तदागुप्त्यां मृतिश्चंद्रः केंद्रे मंदयुगीक्षितः
caṃdraścāṃbugapāpena mṛtyunāthena yogakṛt || tadāguptyāṃ mṛtiścaṃdraḥ keṃdre maṃdayugīkṣitaḥ
And when the Moon, standing in a watery sign, makes a yoga with a malefic that is lord of death (the 8th), then death comes in confinement (gupti). ⟨So too when⟩ the Moon in a kendra is both joined with and aspected by Saturn (manda).
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चंद्रश्चांबुगपापेनमृत्युनाथेनयोगकृत् ॥ तदायुस्यांमृतिश्चंद्रःकेंद्रेमंदयुगीक्षितः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चंद्रश्चांबुग"; alternatives "चंद्रश्रांबुग" — the conjunct after चंद्र could be श्च or श्र; the lower arm is broken
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६४ within its section; it is published at position 164.
- About this edition: तदायुस्यां is तदा + आयुस्यां; आयुस्या is an irregular formation on आयुस्, the 8th, and I take it of the period that house governs. मंदयुगीक्षितः compounds युज् and ईक्षित — joined AND aspected, not either one. The reader could not tell whether the conjunct after चंद्र is श्च or श्र; I read श्च, giving चंद्रश्च, 'and the Moon'. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads तदागुप्त्यां; this sentence names तदायुस्यां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.165a reading here is contested दीर्घपीडा च भौमेन युग्दृष्टैर् बंधताडने ॥ दृश्यार्धे लग्नपश्चेत्स्याद्व्ययपेनेत्थशालवान्
dīrghapīḍā ca bhaumena yugdṛṣṭair baṃdhatāḍane || dṛśyārdhe lagnapaścetsyādvyayapenetthaśālavān
And ⟨when they are⟩ joined with or aspected by Mars (bhauma), there is long suffering, with bondage and beating. If the lord of the lagna stands in the visible half ⟨of the chart⟩ and is in an itthaśāla (the applying aspect) with the lord of the 12th (vyaya) —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
दीर्घपीडाचभौमेनयुग्दृष्टैर्वंधताडने ॥ दृश्यार्धेलग्नपश्चेत्स्याद्व्ययपेनेत्थशालवान्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्वंधताडने"; alternatives "र्बंधताडने" — the letter after र् has no bottom bar, so I read व; this press writes ब as व elsewhere on these pages
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६५ within its section; it is published at position 165.
- About this edition: The record does not finish its sentence; the apodosis is the opening of verse 166, 'then the prisoner escapes'. The plate prints वंधताडने for बन्धताडने: this press sets ब as व on these pages, as the reader recorded. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads बंधताडने; this sentence names वंधताडने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
पलायते तदा बद्धो व्ययगे लग्नगेपि वा ॥ तृतीयनवमस्वामी व्ययगो लग्नपेन च
palāyate tadā baddho vyayage lagnagepi vā || tṛtīyanavamasvāmī vyayago lagnapena ca
— then the prisoner escapes; ⟨so too⟩ when ⟨the lord of the lagna⟩ stands in the 12th (vyaya), or in the lagna. And ⟨when⟩ the lord of the 3rd or the 9th, standing in the 12th, ⟨forms a yoga⟩ with the lord of the lagna —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
पलायतेतदाबद्धोव्ययगेलग्नगेपिवा ॥ तृतीयनवमस्वामीव्ययगोलग्नपेनच
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६६ within its section; it is published at position 166.
यदीत्थशालयोगेप्सुस् तदापि च पलायते ॥ दृश्यार्धे ह्युपचारेण चंद्रो मुथशिलस् तदा
yadītthaśālayogepsus tadāpi ca palāyate || dṛśyārdhe hyupacāreṇa caṃdro muthaśilas tadā
— if it is seeking an itthaśāla-yoga, then too he escapes. And ⟨so too⟩ when the Moon in the visible half is muthaśila ⟨applying⟩ by upacāra.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यदीत्थशालयोगेप्सुस्तदापिचपलायते ॥ दृश्यार्धेह्युपचारेणचंद्रोमुथशिलस्तदा
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६७ within its section; it is published at position 167.
- About this edition: उपचारेण is 'by way of application', an extension of the strict definition of the aspect. The word may instead be for उपचय (the 3rd, 6th, 10th and 11th), which this literature uses constantly, but the plate prints उपचारेण and that is what I render.
बंधमोक्षस् त्रिधर्मेशः संग्रहः शीघ्रमोक्षकृत् ॥ पतितेंदुस् त्रिधर्मस्थग्रहसंबंधकृत् तदा
baṃdhamokṣas tridharmeśaḥ saṃgrahaḥ śīghramokṣakṛt || patiteṃdus tridharmasthagrahasaṃbaṃdhakṛt tadā
For release from bondage: a saṃgraha ⟨a conjunction⟩ with the lord of the 3rd or the 9th brings release quickly. ⟨So too⟩ when the fallen Moon makes a connection with a planet standing in the 3rd or the 9th.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
बंधमोक्षत्रिधर्मेशःसंग्रहःशीघ्रमोक्षकृत् ॥ प तितेंदुस्त्रिधर्मस्थग्रहसंबंधकृत्तदा
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६८ within its section; it is published at position 168.
केंद्रस्थत्रिभवेशेन योगेप्सुश्चेत् तदा चिरात् ॥ यावच्छुक्रो बली लग्ने तावत्कर्ता बलाधिकः
keṃdrasthatribhaveśena yogepsuścet tadā cirāt || yāvacchukro balī lagne tāvatkartā balādhikaḥ
If ⟨it⟩ seeks a yoga with the lord of the 3rd standing in a kendra, then ⟨release comes⟩ only after long. As long as Venus is strong in the lagna, so long the doer has the upper hand in strength.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
केंद्रस्थत्रिभवेशेनयोगेप्सुश्चेत्तदाचिरात् ॥ यावच्छुक्रोवलीलग्नेतावत्कर्तावलाधिकः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ६९ within its section; it is published at position 169.
- About this edition: कर्ता, 'the doer', is left unidentified by the verse; it names whoever is the acting party in the matter asked about.
अस्तंगते तनौ शुक्रे बद्धमोक्षादिसंभवः ॥ म्रियते येन योगेन तेन योगेन मुच्यते
astaṃgate tanau śukre baddhamokṣādisaṃbhavaḥ || mriyate yena yogena tena yogena mucyate
When Venus is combust in the tanu (the 1st), release of the prisoner and the like comes about. By whatever yoga a man dies, by that same yoga he is released.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
अस्तंगतेतनौशुक्रेबद्धमोक्षादिसंभवः ॥ म्रियतेयेनयोगेनतेनयोगेनमुच्यते
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७० within its section; it is published at position 170.
40.171a reading here is contested मेषे तुले च शीघ्रं स्यात्कर्के नक्रे सकष्टता ॥ स्थिरे चिराद् विदेहस्थे मोक्षो मध्यमकालतः
meṣe tule ca śīghraṃ syātkarke nakre sakaṣṭatā || sthire cirād videhasthe mokṣo madhyamakālataḥ
In Aries and Libra it is quick; in Cancer and Capricorn (nakra) it comes with hardship. In a fixed sign, after long; when ⟨the significator⟩ is in a dual sign, release at a middling time.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
मेषेतुलेचशीघ्रंस्यात्कर्केंनक्रेसकष्टता ॥ स्थिरेचि राद्विदेहस्थेमोक्षोमध्यमकालतः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्केंनक्रे"; alternatives "कर्केनक्रे" — a dot sits over के; it may be an anusvāra or a speck of ink [2026-10-01: superseded. The plate, read by eye at about 4.0x native on page_0199.png, shows the dot over के is a set anusvāra, not a speck: 77 dark pixels, against 76 for the anusvāra of शीघ्रं on the same line. So the press sets कर्कें. The mūla now reads कर्के, emended on the lexicon, and the press's कर्कें is kept on the ledger.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७१ within its section; it is published at position 171.
- About this edition: विदेहस्थे is for द्विदेहस्थे, the dual (common) signs. The list needs them: Aries, Libra, Cancer and Capricorn are the four movable signs, and the second half then names the fixed and the dual. I render 'dual sign' and have not altered the Sanskrit. The reader saw a dot over के in कर्कें which may be an anusvāra or a speck of ink; nothing in the sense turns on it. [2026-10-01: the dot is not a speck. Read by eye at about 4.0x native on page_0199.png, it is a set anusvāra, so the press sets कर्कें. The mūla now reads कर्के, the locative the list needs, emended on the lexicon with the Kalpataru 1889 machine read (tajika-vp1888 page_0234) and the Pāṭhaka commentary lemma (tn-pathak-kuntala page_0386). विदेहस्थे is untouched.]
40.172a reading here is contested क्षेमायातं वहित्रस्य मज्जनं वपनं जले ॥ पण्यव्यवहृतौ लाभो नापि प्रश्नचतुष्टयं
kṣemāyātaṃ vahitrasya majjanaṃ vapanaṃ jale || paṇyavyavahṛtau lābho nāpi praśnacatuṣṭayaṃ
The safe arrival of a ship; her sinking; sowing in the water; and whether there is profit in trading merchandise or not — ⟨these are⟩ the set of four questions.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
क्षेमायातंवहित्रस्यमज्जनंवपनंजले ॥ पण्यव्यवहृतौलाभोनापिप्रश्नश्चतु ष्टयं
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वपनं"; alternatives "वहनं" — the middle akṣara is thin; प and ह are close in this face
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वपनं"; alternatives "वहनं" — the middle akṣara is thin; प and ह are close in this face
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७२ within its section; it is published at position 172.
- About this edition: वपनं, 'sowing', is what the plate prints; the reader flagged that the middle akṣara is thin and that वहनं, 'sailing on the water', would suit a list of ship questions better. I render the printed word. नापि is the 'or not' of the fourth question, not a fifth item in the list.
40.173a reading here is contested नौर् लाभदा स्यान्मम नेति पृष्टे केंद्रे शुभाश्चेदितरेषु पापाः ॥ बलोज्झिताः क्षेमजयार्थदा नौर् भावीति वाच्यं विदुषा विमृश्य
naur lābhadā syānmama neti pṛṣṭe keṃdre śubhāśceditareṣu pāpāḥ || balojjhitāḥ kṣemajayārthadā naur bhāvīti vācyaṃ viduṣā vimṛśya
When it is asked 'will the ship bring me profit, or not?': if benefics are in the kendras and the malefics in the other houses are stripped of strength, then the learned man, having reflected, is to declare that the ship will bring safety, success and wealth.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
नौर्लाभदास्यान्ममनेतिपृष्टेकेंद्रेशुभाश्चेदितरेषुपापाः ॥ वलोज्झिताःक्षेमजयार्थदानौर्भावीतिवाच्यं विदुपाविमृश्य
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विदुपाविमृश्य"; alternatives "विदुःपाविमृश्य", "विदुर्पाविमृश्य" — first word on the leaf, continuing from folio 96; read at 4× as वि-दु-पा-वि-मृ-श्य. I cannot make sense of it and have not emended it.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७३ within its section; it is published at position 173.
- About this edition: विदुपा, the first word on the leaf, is unintelligible to me as it was to the plate reader, who read it at 4× as वि-दु-पा-वि-मृ-श्य and declined to emend it. विदुषा विमृश्य, 'the learned man having reflected', fits both the metre and the sense; I render the reflection and leave विदुपा unrendered. The Sanskrit is unaltered. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads विदुषा; this sentence names विदुपा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
लग्नाधिपे वक्रिणि चास्य नाथेव्यावृत्य नौरेति च मार्गतः सा ॥ चेत्सौम्यदृष्टः कुशलेन पापैर् दृष्टस् तदा वस्तु विनेति वाच्यम्
lagnādhipe vakriṇi cāsya nāthevyāvṛtya naureti ca mārgataḥ sā || cetsaumyadṛṣṭaḥ kuśalena pāpair dṛṣṭas tadā vastu vineti vācyam
When the lord of the lagna is retrograde, and its own lord ⟨likewise⟩, the ship turns back and comes ⟨home⟩ by the road ⟨she went⟩. If ⟨that lord⟩ is aspected by benefics, ⟨she comes⟩ safely; if aspected by malefics, then one should declare that she comes without her cargo.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाधिपेवक्रिणिचास्यनाथेन्यावृत्यनौरेतिचमार्गतःसा ॥ चेत्सौम्यदृष्टःकुशलेनपापैर्दृष्टस्तदावस्तुविनेतिवा च्यम्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७४ within its section; it is published at position 174.
- About this edition: अस्य नाथे is 'its lord', that is the dispositor of the lord of the lagna; the verse does not repeat वक्रिणि for it and I supply the repetition. न्यावृत्य is नि + आवृत्य, 'having turned back'. [2026-10-01: superseded for न्यावृत्य. The exemplar's leaf (NSP 1893 p.200), read by eye at about 4.0x native, sets व्यावृत्य, वि + आवृत्य, with this fount's closed half-va loop. न्यावृत्य was a misreading in our vision transcription, and the mūla now reads व्यावृत्य. The sense, 'having turned back', does not move.]
विलग्नरंध्राधिपती स्वगेहे प्रवेक्ष्यतश्चेद् व्यवहारलाभः ॥ यदाष्टमे सौम्यखगा बलाढ्यास् तदा तरी लाभसुखप्रदा स्यात्
vilagnaraṃdhrādhipatī svagehe pravekṣyataśced vyavahāralābhaḥ || yadāṣṭame saumyakhagā balāḍhyās tadā tarī lābhasukhapradā syāt
If the lords of the lagna and of the 8th (randhra) are about to enter their own houses, there is profit in the dealing. When the benefic planets in the 8th are strong, then the boat will bring profit and ease.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
विलग्नरंध्राधिपतीस्वगेहेप्रवेश्यतच्चेद्व्यवहारलाभः ॥ यदाष्टमेसौम्यखगावलोक्यास्तदातरीलाभसुखप्रदास्यात्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७५ within its section; it is published at position 175.
- About this edition: प्रवेश्य is a causative absolutive, 'having caused to enter', which has no agent in this sentence; प्रविश्य, 'having entered', is the sense and is what I render. वलोक्याः is अवलोक्याः, 'to be seen': this press sets ब as व, and the initial अ is absorbed by the preceding खगा. [2026-10-01: superseded. The exemplar's leaf (NSP 1893 p.200), read by eye at about 4.0x and 3.0x native, sets प्रवेक्ष्यतश्चेद् and बलाढ्यास्, with a ब, not a व. प्रवेश्य तच्चेद् and वलोक्यास् were misreadings in our vision transcription, so the remarks on a causative absolutive and on वलोक्याः = अवलोक्याः no longer apply. The mūla now reads प्रवेक्ष्यतश्चेद्, the two lords 'about to enter', and बलाढ्यास्, 'rich in strength'.]
कुशलायातिपृच्छायां मृत्युयोगे समागते ॥ तदा नौरेति शीघ्रेण लाभाद्यं चान्ययोगतः
kuśalāyātipṛcchāyāṃ mṛtyuyoge samāgate || tadā naureti śīghreṇa lābhādyaṃ cānyayogataḥ
In the question about ⟨the ship's⟩ safe arrival: when a mṛtyu-yoga has come about, then the ship arrives quickly; and profit and the rest ⟨is to be judged⟩ from another yoga.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कुशलायातिपृच्छायांमृत्युयोगेसमागते ॥ तदानौरेतिशीघ्रेणलाभाद्यंचान्ययोगतः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७६ within its section; it is published at position 176.
- About this edition: That a mṛtyu-yoga brings the waiting to its end, rather than bringing disaster, is the same doctrine as verses 161 and 170: by the yoga that kills, the matter is also released.
लग्नेशं चंद्रनाथं वा चंद्रं वा मृत्युपो यदि ॥ पश्येत्क्रूरदृशा नावा समं नश्यति नौपतिः
lagneśaṃ caṃdranāthaṃ vā caṃdraṃ vā mṛtyupo yadi || paśyetkrūradṛśā nāvā samaṃ naśyati naupatiḥ
If the lord of death (the 8th) looks with a malefic aspect at the lord of the lagna, or at the lord of the Moon ⟨the Moon's dispositor⟩, or at the Moon itself, the master of the ship perishes along with the ship.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशंचंद्रनाथंवाचंद्रंवामृत्युपोयदि ॥ पश्ये त्क्रूरदृशानावासमंनश्यतिनौपतिः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७७ within its section; it is published at position 177.
40.178a reading here is contested लग्नेशाष्टपतिः स्वस्य गेहं नालोकते यदि ॥ तदा यानस्य वक्तव्यं निश्चितं मज्जनं बुधैः ॥ तावुभौ सप्तमस्थौ चेज्जले वापनिकां वदेत्
lagneśāṣṭapatiḥ svasya gehaṃ nālokate yadi || tadā yānasya vaktavyaṃ niścitaṃ majjanaṃ budhaiḥ || tāvubhau saptamasthau cejjale vāpanikāṃ vadet
If the lords of the lagna and of the 8th do not look at their own house, then the wise are to declare the sinking of the vessel as certain. If those two both stand in the 7th, one should declare the vāpanikā ⟨the sowing⟩ in the water.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशाष्टपतिःस्वस्यगेहंनालोकतेयदि ॥ तदायानस्यवक्तव्यंनिश्चितंमज्जनंबुधैः ॥ ता वुभौसप्तमस्थौचेजलेवापनिकांवदेत्
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मज्जनं"; alternatives "मजनं" — read as the ज्ज conjunct at tile scale; the same press sets a single ज in मजनम् across lines 5–6 of this page, so the conjunct is worth re-reading on the plate.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेजले"; alternatives "चेज्जले" — a single ज at 4× (zoom tn200_L5start). The press does set the ज्ज conjunct elsewhere — मज्जतीति, line 6 — so this is as printed, not a limit of my reading. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चेज्जले; this sentence names चेजले, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७८ within its section; it is published at position 178.
- About this edition: Three half-lines under one number. लग्नेशाष्टपतिः is printed as a singular, but तावुभौ ('those two both') in the third half-line shows the dual लग्नेशाष्टपती is meant, and I render the dual. वापनिका is the third of the four questions listed in verse 172, where the plate prints वपनं जले, 'sowing in the water'; the two verses corroborate each other, so I keep 'sowing' in both and do not adopt the reader's alternative वहनं ('sailing') at 172. What the sowing question actually asks is not explained by this book. The plate sets चेजले with a single ज where sandhi wants चेज्जले; the reader checked this at 4× and recorded that the press does set ज्ज elsewhere on the page. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads चेज्जले; this sentence names चेजले, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
लग्नचंद्रपती क्रूरदृष्ट्या ऽन्योन्यं यदीक्षितौ ॥ तदा पोतजनानां च मिथः कलहमादिशेत्
lagnacaṃdrapatī krūradṛṣṭyā 'nyonyaṃ yadīkṣitau || tadā potajanānāṃ ca mithaḥ kalahamādiśet
If the lords of the lagna and of the Moon look at each other with a malefic aspect, then one should declare a quarrel among the people of the boat with one another.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नचंद्रपतिक्रूरदृष्ट्याऽन्योन्यंयदीक्षितौ ॥ तदापोतजनानांचमिथःकलहमादिशेत्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ७९ within its section; it is published at position 179.
40.180a reading here is contested लग्नं तु लग्नेश्वरशीतगूदयैः शुभान्वितैः केंद्रगतैस् तु सत्या
lagnaṃ tu lagneśvaraśītagūdayaiḥ śubhānvitaiḥ keṃdragatais tu satyā
But ⟨the report is⟩ true when the lagna, with the lord of the lagna and the cold-rayed one (the Moon) at the rising, are attended by benefics and stand in the kendras.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नंतुलग्नेश्वरशीतगूदयैःशुभान्वितैःकेंद्रगतैस्तुसत्या
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शीतगूदयैः"; alternatives "शीतगुदयैः", "शीतगूदयैः (as two words शीतगू दयैः)" — the ू mātrā is clear at 5× (zoom tn200_L9start); the compound itself is not clear to me.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८० within its section; it is published at position 180.
- About this edition: One half-line under one number, and it does not finish its sentence: its feminine सत्या agrees with वार्ता ('the report'), which the page first writes in verse 181. I supply 'the report' in ⟨ ⟩. शीतगूदयैः defeated the plate reader, who was sure only of the ū-mātrā; I read शीतगु ('cold-rayed', the Moon) + उदयैः ('risings'), which the following verses about true and false news support, and I say so rather than claim the compound is settled.
40.181a reading here is contested शुभदृग्योगतः सौम्यां वार्तां सत्यां विनिर्दिशेत् ॥ पातदृग्योगतो दुष्टा वार्ता सत्येति कीर्त्यते
śubhadṛgyogataḥ saumyāṃ vārtāṃ satyāṃ vinirdiśet || pātadṛgyogato duṣṭā vārtā satyeti kīrtyate
From the aspect or conjunction of benefics, one should pronounce the report favourable and true. From the aspect or conjunction of a pāta ⟨a node⟩, the report is bad, and ⟨yet⟩ is said to be true.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
शुभदृग्योगतःसौम्यांवार्तांसत्यांविनिर्दिशेत् ॥ पातदृ ग्योगतोदुष्टावार्तासत्येतिकीर्यते
5 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पातदृ"; alternatives "पापदृ" — read at 6× (zoom tn200_L8tail) as प-ा-त-दृ. The parallel शुभदृग्योगतः earlier on the same line, and ग्योगतो opening line 9, want पापदृ — but the plate sets त, and I have kept the plate.
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कीर्यते"; alternatives "कीर्त्यते" — no त is visible under the repha at tile scale. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कीर्त्यते; this sentence names कीर्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कीर्यते"; alternatives "कीर्त्यते" — no त is visible under the repha at tile scale. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कीर्त्यते; this sentence names कीर्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८१ within its section; it is published at position 181.
- About this edition: The plate sets पातदृग्योगतो, and the reader read it at 6× as प-ा-त-दृ and kept it. पाप ('malefic') is the parallel the first half-line sets up and is what the reader expected; but पात is itself a Tājika term for the lunar node, so the printed word is renderable and I have rendered it. If पाप is right, the clause simply says 'from the aspect or conjunction of malefics'. कीर्यते is printed without the त of कीर्त्यते, 'is said'; the reader saw no त under the repha. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads कीर्त्यते; this sentence names कीर्यते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.182a reading here is contested लग्नेश्वरे भाविवक्रे मिथ्या वार्ता भविष्यति
lagneśvare bhāvivakre mithyā vārtā bhaviṣyati
When the lord of the lagna is about to turn retrograde (bhāvi-vakra), the report will prove false.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेश्वरेभाविवेकेमिथ्यावार्ताभविष्यति
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाविवेके"; alternatives "भावविवेके", "भावे विवेके" — as set, without word division. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भाविवक्रे; this sentence names भाविवेके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाविवेके"; alternatives "भावविवेके", "भावे विवेके" — as set, without word division. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भाविवक्रे; this sentence names भाविवेके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८२ within its section; it is published at position 182.
- About this edition: One half-line under one number. The reader offered भावविवेके and भावे विवेके as the divisions, and wrote that the page sets the run without word division. I render on भावविवेके, the only one of the three that yields a phrase, and I say plainly that the condition the half-line states is not recoverable from it. It stands against verse 181, which gives the marks of a TRUE report. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads भाविवक्रे; this sentence names विवेके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
40.183a reading here is contested क्रेता लग्नपतिर्ज्ञेयो विक्रेताग्रपतिः स्मृतः ॥ गृह्णाम्यहमिदं वस्तु प्रश्न एवंविधे सति
kretā lagnapatirjñeyo vikretāgrapatiḥ smṛtaḥ || gṛhṇāmyahamidaṃ vastu praśna evaṃvidhe sati
The buyer is to be known as the lord of the lagna; the seller is held to be the lord of the agra. When a question of this kind arises — 'shall I take this thing?' —
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
क्रेतालग्नपतिर्ज्ञेयो विक्रेताग्रपतिःस्मृतः ॥ गृह्णाम्यहमिदंवस्तुप्रश्नएवंविधेसति
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विक्रेताग्रपतिः"; alternatives "विक्रेतास्तपतिः" — second akṣara read as ग्र; the sense (the seller = lord of the seventh) would want अस्तपतिः. Kept as read.
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८३ within its section; it is published at position 183.
- About this edition: विक्रेताग्रपतिः is what the reader read, and he flagged it himself: the doctrine everywhere else in praśna makes the seller the lord of the 7th, so विक्रेतास्तपतिः ('the lord of the asta') is very likely the word. I render the printed अग्र untranslated rather than supply the 7th house on my own authority. The record does not finish its sentence; verse 184 completes it.
बलशालि विलग्नं चेद् गृह्यते तत्क्रयाणकम् ॥ तस्मात्क्रयणकाल्लाभः प्रष्टुर्भवति निश्चितम्
balaśāli vilagnaṃ ced gṛhyate tatkrayāṇakam || tasmātkrayaṇakāllābhaḥ praṣṭurbhavati niścitam
— if the lagna is strong, that article of merchandise is to be bought, and profit from that purchase certainly comes to the querent.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
बलशालिविलग्नंचेद्गृह्यतेतत्क्रयाणकम् ॥ तस्मात्क्रयणकाल्लाभःप्र ष्टुभवतिनिश्चितम्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८४ within its section; it is published at position 184.
- About this edition: The plate prints प्रष्टुभवति with no repha where प्रष्टुर्भवति ('comes to the querent') is required; the same slip is on the plate again at verse 192, प्रष्टुलाभः for प्रष्टुर्लाभः. I render the genitive and have not altered the Sanskrit. [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads प्रष्टुर्भवति; this sentence names प्रष्टुभवति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
विक्रीणाम्यमुकं वस्तु प्रश्न एवंविधे सति ॥ आयस्थाने बलवति विक्रेतव्यं क्रयाणकं
vikrīṇāmyamukaṃ vastu praśna evaṃvidhe sati || āyasthāne balavati vikretavyaṃ krayāṇakaṃ
'Shall I sell such-and-such a thing?' — when a question of this kind arises, and the āya-sthāna (the 11th, the house of gain) is strong, the merchandise should be sold.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
विक्रीणाम्यमुकंवस्तुप्रश्नएवंविधेसति ॥ आयस्थानेबलवतिविक्रेतव्यंक्रयाणकं
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८५ within its section; it is published at position 185.
दिशि कस्यां भवेत्सस्यनिष्पत्तिः क्व च सा नहि ॥ पूर्वं देशस्य भंगो हि क्व दिशि क्व तनेन हि
diśi kasyāṃ bhavetsasyaniṣpattiḥ kva ca sā nahi || pūrvaṃ deśasya bhaṃgo hi kva diśi kva tanena hi
In which direction will the crop come to ripeness, and where will it not? And first: in which direction ⟨falls⟩ the ruin of the country, and in which ⟨…⟩? [The closing words तनेन हि are obscure to me; how to read them is an open doubt on this verse.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
दिशिकस्यांभवेत्सस्यनिष्पत्तिःक्वचसानहि ॥ पूर्वंदेशस्यभंगोहिक्कदिशिक्कतनेनहि
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८६ within its section; it is published at position 186.
- About this edition: This record opens the topic of the harvest, which runs to verse 191. क्क is the page's spelling of क्व, 'where'. क्कतनेन would be a derivative of it meaning 'belonging to what place', which is a real but rare formation; I cannot make the clause say anything I would stand behind, so I mark it rather than invent a sense for it. [2026-10-01: superseded for क्क. The plate, read by eye at about 4.75x native on page_0200.png, shows the press sets the same क्व sort here as in क्व च सा नहि; क्क was our transcription's misreading, and the mūla now reads क्व दिशि क्व. The rest of the clause, तनेन हि, is not settled and stands as an open doubt on this verse.]
चतुर्णामपि केंद्राणां मध्ये यत्र शुभग्रहः ॥ तस्यां च सस्यनिष्पत्तिः स्वस्थं चैव भविष्यति
caturṇāmapi keṃdrāṇāṃ madhye yatra śubhagrahaḥ || tasyāṃ ca sasyaniṣpattiḥ svasthaṃ caiva bhaviṣyati
In whichever of the four kendras a benefic planet stands, in that ⟨direction⟩ the crop will ripen, and ⟨the land⟩ will be sound.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
चतुर्णामपिकेंद्राणांमध्येयत्रशुभग्रहः ॥ त स्यांचसस्यनिष्पत्तिःस्वस्थंचैवभविष्यति
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८७ within its section; it is published at position 187.
यस्यां दिशि शनिः पापैर् युतो वाप्यवलोकितः ॥ दिशि तस्यां च तत्स्वास्थ्यं दुर्भिक्षं च भविष्यति
yasyāṃ diśi śaniḥ pāpair yuto vāpyavalokitaḥ || diśi tasyāṃ ca tatsvāsthyaṃ durbhikṣaṃ ca bhaviṣyati
In whichever direction Saturn is joined with malefics, or else aspected ⟨by them⟩, in that direction there will be ill-health and famine. [The plate prints तत्स्वास्थ्यं, 'that soundness'; the contrast with verse 187 and the दुर्भिक्षं beside it require तदस्वास्थ्यं, 'ill-health there', and that is what I render.]
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यस्यांदिशिशनिःपापैर्युतोवाप्यवलोकितः ॥ दिशितस्यांचतत्स्वास्थ्यंदुर्भिक्षंचभविष्यति
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८८ within its section; it is published at position 188.
- About this edition: As printed the line says soundness AND famine in the same breath, which contradicts itself and contradicts verse 187, where soundness is the benefic's result. The privative अ has been lost in the setting: तत् + अस्वास्थ्यं gives तदस्वास्थ्यं. I render the privative reading and say so; the Sanskrit is unaltered.
दिशि यस्यां रविस् तत्र धान्यनाशो नृपाद् भवेत् ॥ यत्रापि मंगलस् तत्र धान्यनाशोऽग्निभिस् तथा
diśi yasyāṃ ravis tatra dhānyanāśo nṛpād bhavet || yatrāpi maṃgalas tatra dhānyanāśo'gnibhis tathā
In whichever direction the Sun ⟨stands⟩, there the destruction of grain comes from the king. And wherever Mars ⟨stands⟩, there likewise the destruction of grain comes by fires.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
दिशियस्यांरविस्तत्रधान्यनाशोनृपाद्भवेत् ॥ यत्रापिमंगलस्तत्रधान्यनाशोऽग्निभिस्तथा
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ८९ within its section; it is published at position 189.
यस्यां दिशि शुभाः खेटाः समस्तबलशालिनः ॥ निष्पन्ना सैव विज्ञेया सस्यस्वास्थ्यं च तत्र हि
yasyāṃ diśi śubhāḥ kheṭāḥ samastabalaśālinaḥ || niṣpannā saiva vijñeyā sasyasvāsthyaṃ ca tatra hi
In whichever direction the benefic planets ⟨stand⟩, possessed of strength of every kind, that very ⟨direction⟩ is to be known as fruitful, and there the crop is sound.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
यस्यांदिशिशुभाःखेटाःसमस्तबल शालिनः ॥ निष्पन्नासैवविज्ञेयासस्यस्वास्थ्यंचतत्रहि
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९० within its section; it is published at position 190.
केंद्रेषु सर्वतः पापाः समस्तबलसंयुताः ॥ देशस् तदा विनष्टोऽसौ ज्ञातव्यः शास्त्रकोविदैः
keṃdreṣu sarvataḥ pāpāḥ samastabalasaṃyutāḥ || deśas tadā vinaṣṭo'sau jñātavyaḥ śāstrakovidaiḥ
When malefics, endowed with strength of every kind, ⟨stand⟩ in the kendras on every side, then those skilled in the śāstra are to know that the country is ruined.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
केंद्रेषुसर्वतःपापाःसमस्तबलसंयुताः ॥ देशस्तदाविनष्टोऽसौज्ञातव्यःशास्त्र कोविदैः
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९१ within its section; it is published at position 191.
लग्नपो मृत्युपश्चापि मृत्यौ स्यातामुभौ यदि ॥ स्थितौ द्रेष्काण एकस्मिन् प्रष्टुर्लाभस् तदा ध्रुवं
lagnapo mṛtyupaścāpi mṛtyau syātāmubhau yadi || sthitau dreṣkāṇa ekasmin praṣṭurlābhas tadā dhruvaṃ
If the lord of the lagna and the lord of death (the 8th) both stand in the 8th, and stand in one and the same drekkāṇa, then gain to the querent is certain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नपोमृत्युपश्चापिमृत्यौस्यातामुभौयदि ॥ स्थितौद्रेष्काणएकस्मिन्प्रष्टु लाभस्तदाध्रुवं
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९२ within its section; it is published at position 192.
- About this edition: The page sets the label "भुवनदीपके ॥" before this verse, naming the work it quotes from. The page marks where a quotation begins, never where it ends.
- About this edition: The plate prints प्रष्टुलाभः with no repha, as it printed प्रष्टुभवति at verse 184; प्रष्टुर्लाभः, 'gain to the querent', is the reading I render. The Sanskrit is unaltered. This verse opens the run the page labels भुवनदीपके.
40.193a reading here is contested एवं द्वादशभावेषु द्रेष्काणैरेव केवलम् ॥ बुधो विनिश्चयं ब्रूयाद् योगेष्वन्येषु निस्पृहः
evaṃ dvādaśabhāveṣu dreṣkāṇaireva kevalam || budho viniścayaṃ brūyād yogeṣvanyeṣu nispṛhaḥ
In this way, for all twelve houses, the wise ⟨astrologer⟩ should pronounce his verdict by the drekkāṇas alone, caring nothing for the other yogas.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
एवंद्वादशभावेषुद्रेष्काणैरेवकेवलम् ॥ बुधैविनिश्चयंब्रूयाद्योगेष्वन्येषुनिस्पृहः
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधैविनिश्चयं"; alternatives "बुधेविनिश्चयं", "बुधैर्विनिश्चयं" — the mātrā over ध reads ai at tile scale and as a single e-stroke at 3× (zoom tn201_L5); no repha is printed on वि. [2026-10-01: the plate, read by eye at about 4.75x native on page_0201.png beside the णै of द्रेष्काणै on the same line, sets बुधे with one e-stroke and no repha on वि, as the reader's 3× reading said; the mūla now reads बुधो, emended on the grammar with three printings.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९३ within its section; it is published at position 193.
- About this edition: बुधै is as printed, and the reader could not settle it: बुधैः ('by the wise', instrumental) and बुधे are his alternatives. The verb ब्रूयात् is third singular and निस्पृहः is a nominative singular, so the subject is the single astrologer; on बुधैः the sentence would instead read 'the verdict is to be pronounced by the wise'. The claim is the same either way. [2026-10-01: 'बुधै is as printed' is superseded. Read by eye at about 4.75x native on page_0201.png, the press sets बुधे, which construes with nothing. The mūla now reads बुधो, the nominative singular subject that ब्रूयात् and निस्पृहः need, emended on the grammar with the machine reads of tn-pathak-kuntala page_0392, tn-mahidhara page_0217 and tn-sitaram-jha page_0227.]
प्रश्नकाले सौम्यवर्गे लग्ने यदधिको भवेत् ॥ ग्रहभावानपेक्षेण तदाख्येयं शुभं फलम्
praśnakāle saumyavarge lagne yadadhiko bhavet || grahabhāvānapekṣeṇa tadākhyeyaṃ śubhaṃ phalam
If at the time of the question the lagna is in a benefic varga and ⟨that benefic⟩ is the preponderant one, then a good result is to be declared, without regard to the planets and the houses.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
प्रश्नकालेसौम्यवर्गेलग्नेयदधिको भवेत् ॥ ग्रहभावानपेक्षेणतदाख्येयंशुभंफलम्
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९४ within its section; it is published at position 194.
लग्नाधिपश्च लाभस्याधीशश्च दायको भवेत् ॥ लग्नाधिपस्य योगो लाभाधीशेन लाभकरः ॥
lagnādhipaśca lābhasyādhīśaśca dāyako bhavet || lagnādhipasya yogo lābhādhīśena lābhakaraḥ ||
The lord of the lagna and the lord of gain (the 11th) are the givers. A yoga of the lord of the lagna with the lord of the 11th brings gain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नाधिपश्चलाभस्याधीशश्चदायकोभवेत् ॥ लग्नाधिपस्ययोगोलाभाधीशेनलाभकरः॥
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९५ within its section; it is published at position 195.
भवति परलाभकरस् तदैव स यदि चंद्रदृग्लाभे ॥ योगाः सर्वेप्यफलाश्चंद्रमृते व्यक्तमेतच्च
bhavati paralābhakaras tadaiva sa yadi caṃdradṛglābhe || yogāḥ sarvepyaphalāścaṃdramṛte vyaktametacca
He becomes a bringer of the highest gain only then, if the Moon has an aspect upon the 11th (lābha). Without the Moon all the yogas are fruitless — and this is plain.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
भवतिपरलाभकरस्तदैवसयदिचंद्रदृग्लाभे ॥ योगाःसर्वेप्यफलाश्चंद्रमृतेव्यक्तमेतच्च
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९६ within its section; it is published at position 196.
- About this edition: चंद्रमृते is चंद्रम् + ऋते, 'apart from the Moon'; it is not a compound of मृत ('dead').
40.197a reading here is contested कर्माधीशेनैवं कर्माधीशेन च निवृत्त्यधीशेन ॥ मृत्युपतिना च योगे लाभाधीशस्य वक्तव्यम्
karmādhīśenaivaṃ karmādhīśena ca nivṛttyadhīśena || mṛtyupatinā ca yoge lābhādhīśasya vaktavyam
Thus, ⟨in a yoga⟩ with the lord of karma (the 10th), and with the lord of karma, and with the lord of nivṛtti (the 12th, of withdrawal), and with the lord of death (the 8th): when the lord of gain (the 11th) is in such a yoga, ⟨the result⟩ is to be declared. ⟨The lord of karma is named twice; whether the first should be another lord, and whether च stands, is an open doubt on this verse.⟩
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
कर्माधीशेनननवंकर्माधीशेनचनिवृत्त्यधी शेन ॥ मृत्युपतिनाचयोगेलाभाधीशस्यवक्तव्यम्
3 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्माधीशेनननवं"; alternatives "कर्माधीशेननवं" — three न strokes stand between शे and वं at 3× (zoom tn201_L7); a doubled न in the setting is possible, and I have kept what is printed. [2026-10-01: read again by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F sets two न, कर्माधीशेननवं; the third was the stem of श. The mūla now reads कर्माधीशेनैवं for ननवं, emended on the lexicon with K (1889) p.236, Mahīdhara p.218 and Jhā p.227, whose pages, read by eye on 2026-10-01 at about 2.0x, 1.6x and 2.0x native, set नैवं.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९७ within its section; it is published at position 197.
- About this edition: The page sets कर्माधीशेन twice, with ननवं between them; the reader counted three न strokes at 3× and kept what is printed. Verse 198 names puṇya (the 9th) beside karma (the 10th), so the first member is very likely पुण्याधीशेन नवमं ('with the lord of merit, the ninth'), and the compositor's eye has jumped. I have NOT rendered that reconstruction: the ⟨…⟩ marks where the text is lost to me, and 'nine' renders the नवं that survives inside ननवं. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F sets two न, not three. The mūla now reads कर्माधीशेनैवं for ननवं, on the lexicon with K p.236, Mahīdhara p.218 and Jhā p.227, which set नैवं (read by eye at about 2.0x, 1.6x and 2.0x native), so no नवं, 'nine', stands in the verse. Whether the first lord is कर्म, as both exemplars set, or Jhā's धर्म, and whether च stands, is an open doubt on this verse.]
तत्तत्स्थानेक्षणतः पुण्यविवृद्धिश्च कर्मवृद्धिश्च ॥ विबुधैस् तदा निवृत्तिर् मृत्युर् भावाः परेप्येवम्
tattatsthānekṣaṇataḥ puṇyavivṛddhiśca karmavṛddhiśca || vibudhais tadā nivṛttir mṛtyur bhāvāḥ parepyevam
By the aspect upon each of those houses in turn: increase of merit, and increase of work. Then the wise ⟨declare⟩ withdrawal, death, and the other bhāvas in the same way.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
तत्तत्स्थानेक्षणतःपुण्यविवृद्धिश्चकर्मवृद्धिश्च ॥ विबुधैस्तदानिवृत्तिर्मृत्युर्भावा परेप्येवम्
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९८ within its section; it is published at position 198.
- About this edition: The four words पुण्य, कर्म, निवृत्ति and मृत्यु name the 9th, 10th, 12th and 8th, the same four houses verse 197 lists — which is the evidence that 197's doubled कर्माधीशेन conceals पुण्याधीशेन.
40.199a reading here is contested लग्नेशो यदि षष्ठः स्वयमेत्यरिपुर् भवत्यात्मा ॥ मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ व्ययगोसौ सततं व्ययं कुरुते
lagneśo yadi ṣaṣṭhaḥ svayametyaripur bhavatyātmā || mṛtyukṛdaṣṭamagosau vyayagosau satataṃ vyayaṃ kurute
If the lord of the lagna is ⟨lord of⟩ the 6th, the self comes of its own accord to be its own enemy. Standing in the 8th, he brings death; standing in the 12th (vyaya), he spends without ceasing.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नेशोयदिपष्ठःस्वयमेत्यरिपुर्भवत्यात्मा ॥ मृत्युक्रूददृष्टमगोसौव्ययगोसौसततंव्ययंकुरुते
4 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदिपष्ठः"; alternatives "यदिषष्ठः" — read at 3× (zoom tn201_L9) as प, not ष; the sense wants षष्ठः. Plate kept. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F prints षष्ठः, with the ष diagonal inked; प was a misreading in our transcription, and the mūla now reads षष्ठः.]
- Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृत्युक्रूददृष्ट"; alternatives "मृत्युक्रूरदृष्ट" — the akṣara after क्रू reads द at tile scale; र would give the expected sense. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F prints मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ: कृ with the ṛ-hook, one द, then ष्ट. क्रूददृष्ट was a misreading in our transcription, and the mūla now reads मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ.]
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse ९९ within its section; it is published at position 199.
- About this edition: Two printed words are wrong and the reader flagged both, keeping the plate each time: पष्ठः stands for षष्ठः ('sixth'), and क्रूद for क्रूर ('malefic'). I render both corrected readings and say so. The third difficulty is मगो, which I have not emended: अष्टमगः would fit the मृत्यु beside it and the व्ययगः that answers it, but nothing on the plate supports the missing syllable. स्वयमेत्य is स्वयम् + एत्य, 'having come of itself'. [2026-10-01: superseded. Read by eye at about 4.1x native on page_0201.png, F prints षष्ठः and मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ, so पष्ठः, क्रूद and the lost अष्ट- describe our transcription's misreadings, not the press. The mūla now reads मृत्युकृदष्टमगोसौ: मृत्युकृत्, 'bringer of death', and अष्टमगः, 'standing in the 8th'.]
लग्नस्थचंद्रजं चंद्रः क्रूरो वा यदि पश्यति ॥ धनलाभो भवत्याशु किंत्वनर्थोपि पृच्छतः
lagnasthacaṃdrajaṃ caṃdraḥ krūro vā yadi paśyati || dhanalābho bhavatyāśu kiṃtvanarthopi pṛcchataḥ
If the Moon, or a malefic, aspects Mercury (candraja, the Moon's son) standing in the lagna, gain of wealth comes to the querent quickly — but harm as well.
What the printed page actually sets, here
The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.
लग्नस्थचंद्रजंचंद्रःक्रू रोवायदिपश्यति ॥ धनलाभोभवत्याशुकिंत्वनर्थोपिपृच्छतः
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The printing numbers this verse १०० within its section; it is published at position 200.
- About this edition: वा is 'or', not 'and': either the Moon's aspect or a malefic's is enough. किंतु makes the second clause a qualification of the first, not a second independent result.