Skip to content
Karma Sakha
Sign in

The Texts · Further Classical Jātaka / Muhūrta / Praśna

Ṭikanikayātrā

टिकनिकयात्रा

Varāhamihira · 6th century CE · muhurta

What this text is

A short yātrā manual of Varāhamihira, nine chapters and about a hundred verses.

The nakṣatra results for setting out, omens, and the rites of departure, compressed.

Its role in this app

A third yātrā witness, and the shortest — useful where the longer two diverge.

Editions our research holds

  • gretil

    GRETIL romanised; transliterated to Devanāgarī on ingest.

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright · scan quality: good

The text itself

The Ṭikanikayātrā is here in full. On 2026-09-23 the mūla verification of 2026-09 ruled every one of the 103 verses: 9 corrections written, 94 verses cleared, 23 variant readings put on the ledger, and 11 corrections HELD for a plate pass. Every written correction rests on an instrument inside our own text — 7 on the lexicon, 1 on a codepoint, 1 on a parallel verse in a book we also publish — and almost all of them repair the channel our Sanskrit came through rather than a disputed reading: बुध्ह at 7.14 is GRETIL's romanised budhha for बुध, and the āryā's second half counts 27 mātrās with बुध against 28 without it; यातृणाम् at 8.3 is no genitive plural, because ṛ-stems lengthen before -ṇām. The length stands at 103 verses in 9 chapters, on the basis this card already records: editor-preface. V. R. Pandit's introduction to the edition our text descends from was read on the plate at printed p. 44 on 2026-09-10, enlarged at 1750×2700. It states that the work consists of 103 ślokas, and it gives a chapter-by-chapter table — 20, 3, 8, 3, 5, 7, 16, 6, 35 — which is our nine chapters verse for verse. His index of opening words at printed pp. 60–63 repeats all 103 under our own numbers with nothing left over on either side, and that is what closes the count. THE ONE THING A READER SHOULD NOT ASSUME ABOUT THIS BOOK'S EVIDENCE. Its verses are compared against exactly one store, and that store is not a second witness. It is a machine read of the very printing our text descends from — Pandit's edition in the Journal of the University of Bombay, vol. XX part 2, pp. 40–63. Until 2026-09-22 this corpus called it an independent witness. It is the exemplar: where it agrees with us that is identity and not corroboration, and where it differs the question is about our own transcription or about the machine's read, never about a rival text. No independent printing of this work exists anywhere. Pingree's census (CESS A5 p. 572, entry 7) lists five manuscripts and this one edition, and names no commentary. AND NO PAGE CARRYING A VERSE OF THIS BOOK HAS EVER BEEN READ BY EYE: visualValidation is null on all 9 chapters, visuallyValidated is null on all 103 verses, and sourcePages is empty on all 103. The one page anyone has opened is that introduction at p. 44. An earlier brief for this pass said the opposite — that our text was already a human reading of the plate — and it was corrected on 2026-09-22: of the 109 prior rulings behind that belief none is a plate ruling, and 103 of them are a single mechanical sweep of 2026-09-08 which checked our own file for empty fields, stray Latin bytes and numbering gaps and never opened a page. That is why 11 corrections are held: they rest on what a machine read gives, and one person opening one page retires each of them. One more thing to hold in view when our Sanskrit is compared with that edition: the e-text we ingested carries 114 of the editor's own parenthetical corrections, and our mūla deliberately keeps the uncorrected running text, so 34 of the 103 verses hold a reading the editor himself corrects, each one quoted in that verse's note. 103 of this text's 103 verses carry an English translation; 9 of 9 chapters are begun or finished (1–9). This is the whole work: 103 verses against the 103 it is known to have. The Sanskrit is tier 'etext': one encoded source, machine-parsed, with no plate read and 7 chapter(s) carrying an adjudication ledger. The app may say "our source reads…", naming the source; it may not say "the text reads…".

Verses are missing inside this text. Four stanzas of this work are held back, not lost: the edition prints, between 8.4 and 8.5, an unnumbered passage of four stanzas (two śārdūlavikrīḍitas, a mālinī and an āryā) which it does not count and which we therefore do not publish as verses. They are kept complete and verbatim in the note on 8.5, and GRETIL's TEI numbers them TY_.add8.1a–.3d and TY_.add8.1ab/.1cd. We do not number them because a verse here is addressed by an integer inside its chapter and chapter 8 declares six; any number we invented would be a citation no printing of this work could be checked against. So 103 verses are published against the 107 stanzas our edition prints. Cite 8.1–8.6 as they stand; there is no citable address for the four.

103 verses in the original Sanskrit with our own English translation, which is made from that Sanskrit and not adapted from any existing translation. Machine-parsed from GRETIL e-text (sa_varAhamihira-tikanikayAtra.txt), romanised IAST, transliterated to Devanagari by scripts/corpus/ingest-etext.mjs on 2026-09-01. Segmentation rule: Header stripped at the `# Text` sentinel (located, never offset-hardcoded). CHAPTER = a whole line reading `chap.N.title` — DOT-separated, no space, which is this file's syntax and not its siblings'. Chapter 9 has no title and the file says so in the title slot (`(non title)`); it is stored as null rather than as the placeholder. VERSE = the text from the end of the previous tag to the start of the next, TRUNCATED at the tag `TY_c.v`, joined with single spaces. The daṇḍa is NOT a boundary: TWO segments carry more than one `//` — 1.7 and 5.3 — both of them āryā halves. (This sentence read `three` until 2026-09-08. Re-counted on both sides: exactly two published verses carry two ॥, and GRETIL's TEI settles the segmentation independently by making each of the two a single <lg> with ab/cd children.) THE PARENTHESES ARE APPARATUS, AND THIS IS THE LOAD-BEARING DECISION. There are 114 of them. 100 give the correct reading of some part of the immediately preceding word, of an extent that is not mechanically recoverable, and 14 are labelled instructions to the reader — (lacuna)×6, (?)×5, (add.kṣaṇaḥ), (drop.), (drop da) — `(la)` is inserted into `udayāstāca(la)maulir`, `(krū)` replaces `kū`, `(gne)` replaces `no`, and `(drop.)` instructs the reader to delete what precedes. Every LABELLED parenthesis in the file is an instruction to the reader — (add. …), (drop.), (drop da), (lacuna), (?), (non title) — which settles the unlabelled ones as apparatus rather than text. Two of the 100 reading-corrections carry a query mark of the editor's own — (yā saivonmatta?) at 6.6 and (…ṣviṣṭaṃ?) — and are conjectural READINGS, not instructions. So the mūla holds the running text WITHOUT them and each is quoted verbatim in the verse's note, attached to the word it corrects. THE CONSEQUENCE, stated plainly: 34 of these 103 verses carry a reading the edition itself corrects — 39 carry a parenthesis of any kind, and the five that differ (1.20, 3.7, 4.1, 5.1, 5.3) carry only a labelled instruction and no correction (1.1 reads `udayāstācamaulir` where the edition means `udayāstācalamaulir`). Applying the corrections requires deciding per site how much of the preceding word each replaces; that is editorial work for whoever constitutes this text, and NOTHING HERE MAY BE PROMOTED PAST TIER 'etext' WITHOUT DOING IT. THE UNNUMBERED PASSAGE between 8.4 and 8.5 — one 809-character line opening `[[lalāṭo(ṭe) 'gnibhayaṅkaro`, the only `[[` in these four files — is FOUR stanzas, and is NOT ingested as verses. It carries four `//` terminators and four single `/` half-marks, so a split on `/` yields nine PIECES: the earlier reading `about nine stanzas` was a count of half-verses, mechanically produced, and it is corrected here. The four are two śārdūlavikrīḍitas, a mālinī and an āryā, and GRETIL's TEI numbers them itself — TY_.add8.1a–d, .add8.2a–d, .add8.3a–d, then TY_.add8.1ab / .1cd for the closing āryā (the encoder re-used `1` for the fourth stanza; an upstream slip). So the earlier reason for withholding them, `numbers would have to be invented`, was FALSE and is withdrawn. The true reason is narrower and is stated as a refusal: the edition itself does not number them (ch. 8 declares `//e6` against exactly six numbered verses), a verse in this corpus is numbered by an integer inside its chapter, and any integer we gave them — 8.7, 8.8 … — would be a citation no edition of this work could be checked against. They are therefore held, complete and verbatim, in the note on 8.5, and `coverage.expectedVerses` counts them so the coverage number can see the gap. It is stored complete and verbatim in the note on 8.5. All 15 square brackets in this file are inside it, which is why this profile has no bracket rule. The `[` marks a PĀDA, not a stanza: there are 14 line-initial ones (15 `[` characters, the first doubled), and GRETIL's TEI gives all 14 a line id. The earlier reading `its internal stanza breaks marked only by a bare [` is corrected: the STANZA breaks are `//`, as everywhere else in the file. ROMANISATION: `/` and `//` become । and ॥; the 2 inline `?` marking an akṣara the transcriber could not read become this corpus's own ⟨?⟩, which both directions of iast.mjs pass through intact. Transliteration by scripts/translate/iast.mjs `fromIAST`; no verse produced an unknown character, and any byte left unclassified after the apparatus rules throws rather than entering the corpus. ⚠ ONE PARSE DEFECT IS KNOWN AND REPAIRED (2026-09-08): 9.34's source line ends `…vaikṛtaiś ca/(` with a lone opening bracket that has no partner of its own, and the apparatus rule paired it with the `)` of `pari('pi)` on the next line, swallowing the whole third pāda into the apparatus and publishing a 20-word verse as a 12-word fragment. 9.34 is the only one of the 103 verses whose parentheses do not balance; the pāda is restored and the stray `(` is recorded as an e-text typo. EVERY chapter declares its own verse total (`//eNN`), all 9 of them, and all 9 agree with this parse — a check written by the 1998 data-entry editor and independent of every rule here.

Not yet independently audited. Every reading here was established and recorded by the process described above, but no fresh reader has re-derived these verses from the plates without seeing our record. When that was done for the first text we published, it found real errors — so treat this one as a first edition and check anything you intend to rely on. The evidence behind every verse is committed and readable.

29 reading disagreements were adjudicated and are recorded verse by verse. One akṣara still could not be read from the page, and is marked ⟨?⟩ rather than guessed — their sense is usually obvious from context, which is exactly why we have not filled them in.

Adhyāya 1 · nakṣatrakarmaphala

घनतिमिरनागसिंहस्त्रिभुवनभवनाधिपो जगच्चक्षुः । उदयास्ताचमौलिर् जयति रविर् गगनतिलकैकः ॥

ghanatimiranāgasiṃhastribhuvanabhavanādhipo jagaccakṣuḥ | udayāstācamaulir jayati ravir gaganatilakaikaḥ ||

Victorious is the Sun — a lion to the elephant of thick darkness, lord of the mansion of the three worlds, the eye of the universe, crested with the mountains of rising and of setting, the one ornament (tilaka) of the sky.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: udayāstāca(la)maulir.
  • About this edition: The e-text's running text reads udayāstāca-maulir, which yields no word; the edition supplies -(la)- in parentheses, giving udayāstācala-mauliḥ, 'whose crest is the mountains of rising and setting' (udaya-acala and asta-acala). The rendering follows the corrected reading — the only one that construes. gagana-tilaka-ekaḥ is rendered literally as the sky's single tilaka/ornament.
1.2a reading here is contested

मूर्ध्ना गणेशं च सरस्वतीं च सलोकपालं परमेश्वरं च । पद्मोद्भवं पद्मधनं हरिं च त्रैलोक्यदीपं प्रणमामि भानुम् ॥

mūrdhnā gaṇeśaṃ ca sarasvatīṃ ca salokapālaṃ parameśvaraṃ ca | padmodbhavaṃ padmadhanaṃ hariṃ ca trailokyadīpaṃ praṇamāmi bhānum ||

With my head I bow to Gaṇeśa and to Sarasvatī, to Parameśvara together with the Lokapālas, to the lotus-born ⟨Brahmā⟩, to him whose treasure is the padma ⟨Kubera⟩, and to Hari — and to Bhānu ⟨the Sun⟩, the lamp of the three worlds.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: padmodbhava is Brahmā (lotus-born). padmadhana, 'whose wealth is the padma', is taken as Kubera, lord of the padma-nidhi; the epithet is unusual and this text has one exemplar only, so the identification is a reading, not a certainty. The Hindi keeps padma untranslated for the same reason.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: THIS VERSE MAY NOT BE THE AUTHOR'S, and nothing in our records said so until 2026-09-08. Pandit's own footnote (p. 47 n.), reported at `.tmp/hunt-2026-09-08/tikanika-yatra/varahamihira-and-his-times.txt` L7127, says the Gaṇeśa maṅgala stands in ONE manuscript; Shastri calls it spurious. And NGMCP A 414/10, a Nepalese Devanagari copy of the 1111/12 CE line, opens at our 1.3 — `śrīgaṇeśāya namaḥ || || yātrāvidhir ata ūrddhaṃ vijigīṣor vidita janmasamayasya | pratyabdamāsavāsaravibhaktasukhaduḥkhaniṣṭhasya ||` — i.e. after a scribe's own invocation it begins at 1.3, carrying NEITHER 1.1 NOR 1.2. The verse is kept and published; a claim seated on it must carry this. Only Pandit's printed footnote can count the manuscripts.

यात्राविधिर् अत ऊर्ध्वं विजिगीषोर् विदितजन्मसमयस्य । प्रत्यब्दमासवासरविभक्तसुखदुःखनिष्ठस्य ॥

yātrāvidhir ata ūrdhvaṃ vijigīṣor viditajanmasamayasya | pratyabdamāsavāsaravibhaktasukhaduḥkhaniṣṭhasya ||

From here on, the rule of the yātrā ⟨the setting out⟩ for one who seeks conquest, whose time of birth is known, and whose measure of happiness and sorrow stands apportioned by year, by month and by day.

विदिते होराराशौ स्थानबलपरिग्रहे ग्रहाणां च । आयुषि च परिज्ञाते शुभम् अशुभं वा फलं वाच्यम् ॥

vidite horārāśau sthānabalaparigrahe grahāṇāṃ ca | āyuṣi ca parijñāte śubham aśubhaṃ vā phalaṃ vācyam ||

When the horā-rāśi ⟨the ascendant sign⟩ is known, and the grahas' hold on positional strength (sthāna-bala), and when the span of life has been fully ascertained — then the auspicious or inauspicious result is to be declared.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: horā-rāśi is here the sign of the ascendant (lagna-rāśi), not the hour-division — vv. 6–7 use janma-nakṣatra and lagna in the same pairing. sthāna-bala is kept as the technical term for positional strength.
  • Corroboration: TESTIMONIUM, and the oldest external evidence this text has. The Muhūrta Cintāmaṇi's Pīyūṣadhārā commentary quotes this verse BY ATTRIBUTION TO VARĀHA: `यदाह वराहः—'विदिते होराराशौ स्थानादिबले ग्रहाणां च। आयुषि च परिज्ञाते शुभमशुभं यातुरिह वाच्यम्॥'` It differs from us in two places: `स्थानादिबले` for our `स्थानबलपरिग्रहे`, and `यातुरिह` ('for the one who marches, here') for our `वा फलं`. `यātuḥ` is the harder and more apt reading for a yātrā work — but METRE FAVOURS OURS: scanned by hand, ours is 30 + 27, a clean āryā, while the quotation comes out 27 + 26, short in both halves. So the commentator's `yātuḥ` is a variant inside a corrupt quotation. Recorded, not adopted. ⭐ NGMCP A 414/10 (fol. 1v1–3) independently prints OUR reading: `vidite horārāśau sthānabalaparigrahair grahaṇāñ ca | āyuṣi ca parijñāte śubham aśubhaṃ vā phalaṃ vācyam ||` — a Nepalese copy of the 1111/12 CE line agreeing with Pandit against the commentator on both words. ⚠ This verse is byte-for-byte identical with Bṛhadyātrā 2.2, so the testimonium cannot say WHICH Varāha work the commentator held.

प्रस्तुतविरोध एवं स्थितविषये भवति शास्त्रनिर्देशः । जन्मसमयं च केचिद् वदन्ति न वदन्ति बहवो ऽन्ये ॥

prastutavirodha evaṃ sthitaviṣaye bhavati śāstranirdeśaḥ | janmasamayaṃ ca kecid vadanti na vadanti bahavo 'nye ||

The śāstra's direction holds thus for a subject that stands settled; and here a contradiction with the matter at hand arises — for some do declare the time of birth, but many others do not.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text's bahuvo stands for bahavo, 'many'. The verse states the practical difficulty that vv. 6–8 then answer: the birth data v. 4 requires is often not to be had, so a praśna must serve.

जन्मर्क्षोदयलग्ने तद् अपि ययोर् वा यियासतः प्रश्ने । त्रिषडेकादशशीर्षोदयेषु मार्गेषु च जयः स्यात् ॥

janmarkṣodayalagne tad api yayor vā yiyāsataḥ praśne | triṣaḍekādaśaśīrṣodayeṣu mārgeṣu ca jayaḥ syāt ||

In the query (praśna) of one who wishes to set out — the birth-nakṣatra and the rising lagna, or even whichever of the two ⟨is to be had⟩: when these stand in the 3rd, the 6th or the 11th, in head-rising (śīrṣodaya) signs, and on the ⟨right⟩ roads, there will be victory.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: triṣaḍekādaśa = the 3rd, 6th and 11th, counted from the lagna; the three numbers are the e-text's own. śīrṣodaya (head-rising) is kept per the glossary. mārgeṣu, 'on the roads', is left literal — the verse does not say which roads, and v. 16 onward supplies the directional scheme.

शत्रोर् होराराशिस् तद् अधिपतिर् जन्मभं तदीशो वा ॥ यद्य् अस्ते हिबुके वा तथापि शत्रुर् हतो वाच्यः ॥

śatror horārāśis tad adhipatir janmabhaṃ tadīśo vā || yady aste hibuke vā tathāpi śatrur hato vācyaḥ ||

If the enemy's horā-rāśi, or its lord, or his birth-nakṣatra, or the lord of that, stands in the asta ⟨the 7th house⟩ or in the hibuka ⟨the 4th house⟩, then too the enemy is to be declared slain.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: asta and hibuka are rendered by house number per the glossary (7th and 4th). hato is left at its weight — 'slain', not 'defeated'.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.25 carries this verse with the same claim and effectively the same words (`शत्रोर्होरा राशिस्तदधिपतिर्जन्मभं तदीशो वा । यद्यस्ते हिबुके वा तथापि शत्रुर्हतो वाच्यः`). DV was ingested from sanskritdocuments.org — a different work, a different site, a different hand from the three GRETIL files — so this is genuine corroboration, not a shared channel. No divergence.

प्रश्ने मनोरमा भूर् मङ्गल्यद्रव्यदर्शनं शस्तम् । यदि चादरेण पृच्छति दैवज्ञो निर्दिशेद् विजयम् ॥

praśne manoramā bhūr maṅgalyadravyadarśanaṃ śastam | yadi cādareṇa pṛcchati daivajño nirdiśed vijayam ||

At the query, if the ground is pleasing to the eye and the sight of auspicious objects is favourable, and if he asks with deference, the daivajña ⟨the astrologer⟩ should pronounce victory.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: ādareṇa pṛcchati is 'asks with deference/regard' — an attitude of the querent, not a favour shown to him.
1.9a reading here is contested

नन्दा भद्रा विजया रिक्ता पूर्णा च नामसदृशफलाः । न्यूनसमेष्टा दशमे तिथयः शुक्ले कृष्णे प्रतीपास् ताः ॥

nandā bhadrā vijayā riktā pūrṇā ca nāmasadṛśaphalāḥ | nyūnasameṣṭā daśame tithayaḥ śukle kṛṣṇe pratīpās tāḥ ||

Nandā, Bhadrā, Vijayā, Riktā and Pūrṇā give results answering to their names; the tithis are deficient-or-equal ⟨yet⟩ desired ⟨at the tenth — but see the note: दशमे is metrically an intrusion⟩. So in the bright fortnight; in the dark they are contrary.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: UNCERTAIN PHRASE: nyūnasameṣṭā daśame. It resolves by sandhi as nyūnasamā(ḥ) + iṣṭā(ḥ), 'deficient-and-equal, ⟨yet⟩ desired', with daśame 'at the tenth'; what it applies to is not recoverable from the verse, and this text has one exemplar with no commentary. The rendering is deliberately literal in both languages and should not be quoted as a rule. Everything else in the verse is plain. Note also that the e-text's third name is Vijayā, where the standard series has Jayā; it is left as the e-text has it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: METRE SAYS `दशमे` IS AN INTRUSION, AND WE DO NOT DELETE IT. Scanned by hand: the first half is already a clean āryā at 30 mātrās (नन्2दा2 भ2द्रा2 | वि1ज1या2 | रिक्2ता2 | पूर्2णा2 | च1ना2म1 | स1दृ1श1फ1 | लाः2 = 30). The second half AS TRANSMITTED comes out at 31: nyū(2)na(1)sa(1) me(2)ṣṭā(2) da(1)śa(1)me(2) ti(1)tha(1)yaḥ(2) śuk(2)le(2) kṛṣ(2)ṇe(2) pra(1) tī(2)pās(2) tāḥ(2). Drop दशमे (1+1+2 = 4) and it is exactly 27, with the sixth gaṇa a single laghu (`pra-`) — which the āryā second half REQUIRES. That is a decision under the plan's own hierarchy, and it is nevertheless not enough to cut a word out of a text we hold on ONE exemplar. So the numeral is bracketed as doubtful in both renderings instead of being asserted, and whoever reads the NGMCP A 31/2 film should test this line first. Method calibrated on 1.1 and 1.11, where it lands exactly.

नक्षत्रपुटाकिरणं पश्चात् सन्ध्यागतं ग्रहैर् भिन्नम् । क्रूरनिपीडितम् उत्पातदूषितं चाशुभं सर्वम् ॥

nakṣatrapuṭākiraṇaṃ paścāt sandhyāgataṃ grahair bhinnam | krūranipīḍitam utpātadūṣitaṃ cāśubhaṃ sarvam ||

A nakṣatra wrapped in ⟨the Sun's⟩ rays, one that has afterwards gone into the twilight, one split by grahas, one crushed by malefics, and one spoilt by a portent (utpāta) — all of these are inauspicious.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: nakṣatra-puṭākiraṇam is taken as 'enveloped (puṭa) in rays' — i.e. lost in the Sun's light; the compound is not a standard one and the e-text has no variant to check it against. paścāt sandhyāgatam could equally be 'gone into the west at twilight'; the Hindi keeps the same ambiguity by rendering it literally.

चित्रास्वातिविशाखाभरणीपित्र्येषकृत्तिकाश्लेषाः । नातिशुभदानि याने शेषाणि शुभानि धिष्ण्यानि ॥

citrāsvātiviśākhābharaṇīpitryeṣakṛttikāśleṣāḥ | nātiśubhadāni yāne śeṣāṇi śubhāni dhiṣṇyāni ||

Citrā, Svāti, Viśākhā, Bharaṇī, Pitrya ⟨Maghā⟩, Īśa ⟨Ārdrā⟩, Kṛttikā and Āśleṣā do not give much good on a journey; the remaining asterisms are auspicious.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text reads `bharaṇīpitryeṣakṛttikāśleṣāḥ`. Pitrya is Maghā. The following `-eṣa-` is pitrya + īśa (ś/ṣ confusion is common in this e-text), Īśa = Rudra = Ārdrā, which v. 13 names Raudra. ⚠ AN EARLIER NOTE HERE SAID THE METRE ARGUES AGAINST ĪŚA. IT ARGUES FOR IT, and the caution built on it is withdrawn. Scanned by hand, with `ci-` and `pi-` heavy by position before `-tr-` and `-try-`: ci2 trā2 svā2 ti1 vi1 śā2 khā2 bha1 ra1 ṇī2 pi2 trye2 ṣa1 kṛt2 ti1 kā2 śle2 ṣāḥ2 = 30 — a textbook āryā first half, gaṇas 4·4·4·4·4·4 (ja-gaṇa in the sixth, which the āryā permits) ·4·2. Remove `īśa` and you get `pitryakṛttikāśleṣāḥ` = 28, which is not an āryā half at all. So the transmitted reading is the metrical one. The same earlier note called Īśa `a ninth name`: with Īśa the compound holds EIGHT names — citrā, svāti, viśākhā, bharaṇī, pitrya, īśa, kṛttikā, āśleṣā — and Īśa is the sixth. Calibration: the same method was run first on 1.1, whose answer is known, and gives 30 + 27 with the edition's own `udayāstā(ca)la-maulir`.

शत्रुविषयं दिधक्षोर् अन्यत्रार्कोदयाच् छुभाग्नेयी । न विशाखारोहिण्युत्तरेषु दिवसस्य पूर्वाह्णे ॥

śatruviṣayaṃ didhakṣor anyatrārkodayāc chubhāgneyī | na viśākhārohiṇyuttareṣu divasasya pūrvāhṇe ||

For one who would burn the enemy's territory the Āgneyī ⟨Kṛttikā, whose deity is Agni⟩ is auspicious, save at sunrise. One should not ⟨set out⟩ in Viśākhā, Rohiṇī or the Uttarās in the forenoon of the day.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: āgneyī is feminine and may be the Āgneyī quarter (south-east) rather than the Āgneya nakṣatra Kṛttikā; the nakṣatra is preferred because vv. 11–15 are a nakṣatra series, but the Hindi keeps आग्नेयी untranslated so the other reading stays open. This verse opens the time-of-day series that runs to v. 15: forenoon here, midday and afternoon in v. 13, early night and midnight in v. 14, last watch in v. 15.

ज्येष्ठामूलाश्लेषारौद्रेषु विवर्जयेच् च मध्याह्णम् । स्वात्याश्विपुष्यहस्तेष्व् अपराह्णे वर्जयेद् यात्राम् ॥

jyeṣṭhāmūlāśleṣāraudreṣu vivarjayec ca madhyāhṇam | svātyāśvipuṣyahasteṣv aparāhṇe varjayed yātrām ||

In Jyeṣṭhā, Mūla, Āśleṣā and Raudra ⟨Ārdrā⟩ one should also avoid midday; in Svāti, Aśvinī, Puṣya and Hasta one should avoid the yātrā in the afternoon.

मैत्रेन्दवचित्रारेवतीषु यायात् प्रदोषम् उत्सृज्य । पूर्वेषु त्रिषु याम्ये पित्र्ये च विहाय मध्यनिशम् ॥

maitrendavacitrārevatīṣu yāyāt pradoṣam utsṛjya | pūrveṣu triṣu yāmye pitrye ca vihāya madhyaniśam ||

In Maitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, Aindava ⟨Mṛgaśiras⟩, Citrā and Revatī let him go, leaving out the pradoṣa ⟨the first part of the night⟩; in the three Pūrvās, in Yāmya ⟨Bharaṇī⟩ and Pitrya ⟨Maghā⟩, avoiding midnight.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'The three Pūrvās' are Pūrva-phālgunī, Pūrvāṣāḍhā and Pūrva-bhādrapadā; the count of three is the e-text's own.

न निशापश्चिमभागे पुनर्वसौ त्रिषु च वैष्णवाद्येषु । सर्वे ऽपि शुभाः कालाः श्रवणेन्द्रवहस्तपुष्येषु ॥

na niśāpaścimabhāge punarvasau triṣu ca vaiṣṇavādyeṣu | sarve 'pi śubhāḥ kālāḥ śravaṇendravahastapuṣyeṣu ||

⟨One should⟩ not ⟨go⟩ in the last part of the night in Punarvasu, nor in the three beginning with Vaiṣṇava ⟨Śravaṇa⟩. In Śravaṇa, Aindava ⟨Mṛgaśiras⟩, Hasta and Puṣya all times whatever are auspicious.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: TWO PROBLEMS, both reported and neither resolved. (1) The e-text reads śravaṇendrava-hasta-puṣyeṣu; -endava for aindava is this e-text's own spelling (cf. maitrendava, v. 14), so Śravaṇa + aindava is the likeliest reading, but the intrusive r leaves aindra (Jyeṣṭhā) possible. (2) On either reading the half-verses conflict: Śravaṇa is Vaiṣṇava, just excluded in the last watch of the night; and both aindava (v. 14, pradoṣa excluded) and aindra/Jyeṣṭhā (v. 13, midday excluded) are elsewhere restricted. The text is translated as it stands, contradiction included.

प्राच्यादि सप्त सप्त क्रमेण धिष्ण्यानि कृत्तिकादीनि । अनुलोमान्य् एकत्वं पूर्वोत्तरश् रोणितरयोश् च ॥

prācyādi sapta sapta krameṇa dhiṣṇyāni kṛttikādīni | anulomāny ekatvaṃ pūrvottaraś roṇitarayoś ca ||

Seven by seven in order, the asterisms beginning with Kṛttikā belong to the east and the rest ⟨of the quarters⟩, taken in direct order; and there is a single ⟨reckoning⟩ in the case of the Pūrva-Uttara ⟨Āṣāḍhās⟩ and Śroṇā ⟨Śravaṇa⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The last pāda is broken in the e-text, which divides it pūrvottaraś roṇitarayoś ca; Śroṇā is a name of Śravaṇa. The arithmetic is what makes the reading plausible: 7 x 4 = 28 slots for 27 nakṣatras, so two adjacent asterisms must be counted as one — which is where Abhijit, lying between Uttarāṣāḍhā and Śravaṇa, is absorbed. The verse does not name Abhijit and the rendering does not supply it. The numbers seven, seven are the text's own.

अनलानिलदिग्रेखां परिघाख्यां यान्ति ये समुत्क्रम्य । आज्ञाम् इव कुलिशभृतः पतन्ति न चिरेण ते व्यसने ॥

analāniladigrekhāṃ parighākhyāṃ yānti ye samutkramya | ājñām iva kuliśabhṛtaḥ patanti na cireṇa te vyasane ||

Those who go crossing over the line called Parigha, ⟨drawn⟩ in the quarters of Anala ⟨fire, the south-east⟩ and Anila ⟨wind, the north-west⟩ — as though crossing the command of the Wielder of the Thunderbolt ⟨Indra⟩ — fall before long into ruin.

सर्वद्वारिकसंज्ञं नक्षत्रचतुष्टयं समुद्दिष्टं । पुष्यो हस्ताश्विन्यौ नक्षत्रं मित्रदेवं च ॥

sarvadvārikasaṃjñaṃ nakṣatracatuṣṭayaṃ samuddiṣṭaṃ | puṣyo hastāśvinyau nakṣatraṃ mitradevaṃ ca ||

A set of four nakṣatras is declared, named sarvadvārika ⟨'of every door'⟩: Puṣya, Hasta and Aśvinī, and the asterism whose deity is Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: sarvadvārika, 'good for every door/gate', i.e. serviceable for a departure in any direction; the name is left untranslated in the Hindi and glossed. The verse names the fourth by its deity (mitra-devam) rather than by its name, and the rendering keeps that.
  • Corroboration: DOCTRINAL CONTEXT, from a medieval reader who had both lists. The Muhūrta Cintāmaṇi's Pīyūṣadhārā commentary quotes, as Varāha's, `वराहोऽपि—'सर्वद्वारिकसञ्ज्ञितानि गुरुभं हस्ताश्विमैत्राणि च श्रेष्ठा[न्य्] ऐदवपौष्णविष्णुवसुभान्याद्यैः सहाष्टौ सदा' इति। तत्राष्टानामपि सार्वदिग्द्वारिकत्वं स्मर्यते। चतुर्णां का कथा` — which is Bṛhadyātrā 4.5 almost word for word, an EIGHT-fold list, and the commentator then reconciles the eight against the four. OUR 1.18 IS THE FOUR-LIST. So the 'four' here is a KNOWN VARIANT of the doctrine, already discussed in the tradition, and not a defect of our single witness.

ज्येष्ठा प्राग्भाद्रपदा रोहिण्य् अथोत्तरा च फल्गुन्या । शूलानि प्राच्यादिषु तेषु गतो ऽत्येति यदि चित्रम् ॥

jyeṣṭhā prāgbhādrapadā rohiṇy athottarā ca phalgunyā | śūlāni prācyādiṣu teṣu gato 'tyeti yadi citram ||

Jyeṣṭhā, Pūrva-bhādrapadā, Rohiṇī and Uttara-phālgunī are the spikes (śūla) in the east and the rest ⟨of the quarters⟩; if one who has gone ⟨in those directions on those asterisms⟩ comes through, it is a marvel.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: atyeti citram is a hard statement, not a caution: the escape, not the disaster, is the surprising outcome. Rendered at that weight in both languages.

तारास् तु जन्मसम्पद्विपत्करा क्षेमा ऽपायशुभकष्टा । मैत्रातिमैत्रसंज्ञाश् चैताः संज्ञानुरूपफलाः ॥

tārās tu janmasampadvipatkarā kṣemā 'pāyaśubhakaṣṭā | maitrātimaitrasaṃjñāś caitāḥ saṃjñānurūpaphalāḥ ||

The tārās are Janma, Sampat, Vipat ⟨the calamity-maker⟩, Kṣema, Apāya, Śubha, Kaṣṭa, and those named Maitra and Atimaitra; these give results answering to their names.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: (?).
  • About this edition: The edition flags this verse with a bare '(?)' — a doubt registered without a correction supplied, so there is nothing to adopt or reject; the reading translated is the running text. Nine tārās are named. Three of the names differ from the usual series: Apāya stands where Pratyari is normally counted, Śubha where Sādhaka, and Kaṣṭa where Vadha/Naidhana; they are left as this text has them, and the count of nine is what makes the correspondence clear.

Adhyāya 2 · dineśaphala

सूर्यदिने धननाशश् चान्द्रे शक्तिक्षयो ऽन्नहानिश् च । ज्वलनासृक्पित्तरुजाः कौजे बौधे सुहृत्प्राप्तिः ॥

sūryadine dhananāśaś cāndre śaktikṣayo 'nnahāniś ca | jvalanāsṛkpittarujāḥ kauje baudhe suhṛtprāptiḥ ||

On the Sun's day, destruction of wealth; on the Moon's ⟨day⟩, loss of strength and loss of food; on Mars' ⟨day⟩, afflictions of fire, of blood and of bile; on Mercury's ⟨day⟩, the gaining of a friend.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The chapter is dineśaphala — the fruit of the weekday lord for one setting out (yātrā). Only sūryadine carries the word dine; cāndre, kauje and baudhe are bare locatives that borrow it, hence ⟨day⟩ supplied. jvalana-asṛk-pitta-rujāḥ is a dvandva of the three Mars-governed seats of disease (fire/burning, blood, bile), not 'burning fever' alone. hāni rendered 'loss' per glossary (nāśa alone gets 'destruction').
  • Corroboration: TESTIMONIUM, AND IT ATTRIBUTES THIS VERSE ELSEWHERE. The Muhūrta Cintāmaṇi's Pīyūṣadhārā commentary quotes our 2.1 AND 2.2 together as RĀJAMĀRTAṆḌA — Bhoja's work — not as Varāha's: `फलान्यथाह राजमार्तण्डः—'सूर्यदिनेऽध्वनि नाशश्चन्द्रे शक्तिक्षयोऽर्थनाशश्च। ज्वलनासृक्पित्तरुजः कौजे बौधे सुहृत्प्राप्तिः। जैवे जयधनलब्धिः शुक्रे स्त्रीवस्त्रगन्धधनलाभः। दैन्यवधबन्धरोगान्प्राप्नोति दिनेऽर्कपुत्रस्य॥'`. Against our 2.1 it reads `अध्वनि नाशः` ('loss ON THE ROAD') for our `धननाशः`, and `अर्थनाशः` for our `अन्नहानिः`. `अध्वनि नाशः` is the yātrā reading and removes the duplication our text creates (धननाश then अर्थनाश would say the same thing twice). Recorded as a variant; NOT adopted — one exemplar, and this is a quotation in a later work.

जीवे जयधनलब्धिः शौक्रे स्त्रीवस्त्रगन्धधनलाभाः । दैन्यं च बन्धरोगान् प्राप्नोति दिने ऽर्कपुत्रस्य ॥

jīve jayadhanalabdhiḥ śaukre strīvastragandhadhanalābhāḥ | dainyaṃ ca bandharogān prāpnoti dine 'rkaputrasya ||

On Jupiter's ⟨day⟩, the winning of victory and wealth; on Venus' ⟨day⟩, gains of women, garments, perfumes and wealth. And on the day of the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩ one meets with wretchedness, and with bondage and diseases.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: arkaputra — 'the Sun's son' — is Saturn; the epithet is kept and the identification given in brackets, as with jīva/Jupiter. bandharogān is a dvandva accusative plural, 'bonds and diseases', not 'diseases of bondage'. dainya is destitution/wretchedness and is left at that weight.
  • Corroboration: TESTIMONIUM, quoted with 2.1 as RĀJAMĀRTAṆḌA (see the note on 2.1 for the full passage). Against our 2.2 the commentary reads `दैन्यवधबन्धरोगान्` where we read `दैन्यं च बन्धरोगान्` — it adds वध, killing. ⚠ NO VERDICT: I scanned both and both come out at 26 mātrās against the āryā's 27, so my scansion of this half is unreliable and the variant is recorded without a decision. The commentary also reads `शुक्रे` for our `शौक्रे` and a singular `लाभः` for our `लाभाः`.

उपचयकरग्रहदिने सिद्धिः क्रूरे ऽपि यायिनां भवति । सौम्ये ऽप्य् अनुपचयस्थे न भवति यात्रा शुभा यातुः ॥

upacayakaragrahadine siddhiḥ krūre 'pi yāyināṃ bhavati | saumye 'py anupacayasthe na bhavati yātrā śubhā yātuḥ ||

On the day of a graha that brings increase — ⟨that is, one standing in an upacaya house⟩ — success comes to those who set out, even if that graha is a malefic; but with a benefic too, if it stands outside an upacaya, the traveller's journey is not auspicious.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: upacayakara-graha is glossed from the second half: the contrast is with saumye 'py anupacayasthe, 'a benefic standing in a non-upacaya', so the increase-making graha is one placed in an upacaya bhāva (conventionally the 3rd, 6th, 10th and 11th; the verse does not enumerate them, so the numbers are kept out of the translation line). krūra and saumya are the malefic/benefic CLASSES here, not Mars and Mercury — the pair is contrastive. yāyinām (gen. pl.) and yātuḥ (gen. sg.) are both 'the one who goes'; the number-shift is the verse's, not the translation's.
  • Corroboration: TESTIMONIUM, second half VERBATIM. `यदाह राजमार्तैडः—'उपचयकरग्रहदिने शुद्धिः क्रूरेऽपि पापिनां भवति। सौम्येप्यनुपचयस्थे न भवति यात्रा शुभा यातुः॥'` — the second half is our 2.3cd exactly. Two words differ in the first half: `शुद्धिः` for our `सिद्धिः`, and `पापिनां` for our `यायिनां`. OURS IS THE BETTER SENSE on both: `क्रूरे … पापिनाम्` would say malefic twice over, where `यायिनाम्` ('of those who set out') is what the rule is about. Recorded; not adopted. Note again the attribution: Rājamārtaṇḍa, not Varāha.

Adhyāya 3 · muhūrtakarmaguṇa

गरवणिजाविष्टिवर्जितानि करणानि यातुर् अनिष्टानि । गरम् अपि कैश् चिच् छस्तं वणिजा च वणिक्क्रियास्व् एव ॥

garavaṇijāviṣṭivarjitāni karaṇāni yātur aniṣṭāni | garam api kaiś cic chastaṃ vaṇijā ca vaṇikkriyāsv eva ||

The karaṇas Gara, Vaṇija and Viṣṭi are to be shunned: they are unfavourable for one setting out. Yet Gara is commended by some, and Vaṇija in mercantile business alone.

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: garavaṇijā(ja)viṣṭi(pari)varjitāni · garavaṇijā(ja)viṣṭi(pari)varjitāni · aniṣṭāni(iṣṭāni)/ · vaṇijā(jāṃ).
  • About this edition: Two construals of the transmitted line reach the same rule. Read as here — the three karaṇas standing in apposition to karaṇāni, with varjitāni predicative — it says avoid Gara, Vaṇija, Viṣṭi; the edition's parenthetical (pari)varjitāni strengthens exactly that ('wholly to be shunned'). Read instead as a bahuvrīhi ('the karaṇas from which Gara, Vaṇija and Viṣṭi are excluded'), the running text's aniṣṭāni contradicts the second half, and the edition's other parenthesis, aniṣṭāni(iṣṭāni), repairs it: 'the karaṇas apart from Gara, Vaṇija and Viṣṭi are desirable for a traveller.' Either way the practical rule is identical. A fourth parenthesis gives vaṇijā(jāṃ), i.e. vaṇijāṃ 'of merchants', which would shift the second half to 'and for merchants, in mercantile acts only'. Viṣṭi is the karaṇa also called Bhadrā.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.1 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
  • Another reading: THE SIBLING SETTLES PANDIT'S TWO PARENTHESES HERE. Bṛhadyātrā 6.1 prints `गरवणिजविष्टिपरिवर्जितानि करणानि यातुर् इष्टानि` — i.e. BOTH of the edition's corrections at once, `(pari)varjitāni` and `aniṣṭāni(iṣṭāni)`, which is the second of the two construals our own note sets out: 'the karaṇas apart from Gara, Vaṇija and Viṣṭi are desirable for a traveller'. The practical rule is the same either way, and the mūla is not emended; what changes is that the edition's conjecture now has a witness. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

शिवभुजगमित्रपितृवसुजलविश्वविरिञ्चिपङ्कजप्रभवाः । इन्द्राग्नीन्द्रनिशाचरवरुणार्य्यमयोनयश् चाह्नि ॥

śivabhujagamitrapitṛvasujalaviśvaviriñcipaṅkajaprabhavāḥ | indrāgnīndraniśācaravaruṇāryyamayonayaś cāhni ||

Arising from Śiva ⟨Rudra⟩, the serpent, Mitra, the Fathers, the Vasus, the Waters, the Viśvedevas, Viriñci ⟨Brahmā⟩ and the lotus; and having for their source Indra, Agni, Indra, the night-walker ⟨Nirṛti⟩, Varuṇa and Aryaman — ⟨such are the muhūrtas⟩ in the day.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The day-muhūrtas are named from their presiding deities, exactly as the night list of v. 3 is. Counted as transmitted the names come to fourteen or fifteen, depending on two divisions the text does not settle: whether viriñci-paṅkaja-prabhavāḥ is one name (Viriñci 'the lotus-born', i.e. Brahmā) or two (Viriñci, then Paṅkaja), and whether indrāgnīndra is Indra + Agni + Indra or Indrāgnī (the dual deity of Viśākhā) + Indra. Verse 4 requires fifteen, and verse 7 fixes Viriñci as the eighth, which is satisfied only if Paṅkaja is counted separately as the ninth. Against the current list (Rudra, Ahi, Mitra, Pitṛ, Vasu, Vārāha/Jala, Viśvedeva, Vidhi=Abhijit, Satamukhī, Puruhūta, Vahni, Naktaṃcara, Varuṇa, Aryamā, Bhaga) positions 1–8 and 10–11, 13–14 agree; position 9 (paṅkaja) and the closing name (Bhaga is absent here) do not. Rendered as it stands; no name supplied. prabhavāḥ and yonayaḥ are both compound-final 'having … as origin', not deity names.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.2 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

रुद्राजाहिर्बुध्न्याः पूषा दस्रान्तकाग्निधातारः । इन्द्वदितिगुरुहरिरवित्वष्ट्रनिलाख्याः क्षणा रात्रौ ॥

rudrājāhirbudhnyāḥ pūṣā dasrāntakāgnidhātāraḥ | indvaditiguruhariravitvaṣṭranilākhyāḥ kṣaṇā rātrau ||

Rudra, Aja ⟨Ajaikapād⟩, Ahirbudhnya, Pūṣan, Dasra ⟨the Aśvins⟩, Antaka ⟨Yama⟩, Agni and Dhātṛ; and those named Indu ⟨the Moon⟩, Aditi, Guru ⟨Jupiter⟩, Hari ⟨Viṣṇu⟩, Ravi ⟨the Sun⟩, Tvaṣṭṛ and Anila ⟨the Wind⟩ — ⟨these are⟩ the kṣaṇas ⟨muhūrtas⟩ in the night.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: Fifteen names, in the received order of the night muhūrtas, each a nakṣatra deity. दख (dakha) is not a deity name; it stands in the slot between Pūṣan (Revatī) and Antaka/Yama (Bharaṇī), which is Dasra — the Aśvins, of Aśvinī — so the e-text's dakha is almost certainly a misreading of दस्र / दश्र. Left as transmitted in the rendering and glossed, not emended. kṣaṇa is used here as a synonym of muhūrta, as v. 5 also uses it. [2026-09-23: The mūla now reads दस्रान्तका. Pandit's 1951 plate (printed p.49), read by eye at about 5.5x native, sets a lightly inked स्र sort there, not ख, स्त्र or श्व. The edition's own pratīka index (printed p.62), read by eye at about 5.5x native, spells the akṣara with स and र (दस्त्र, whose extra त is the index's slip). So dakha was the GRETIL keyer's misreading of a light impression, and the word is now emended rather than left as transmitted.]
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.3 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
  • Another reading: `दख` IS CONFIRMED AS `दस्र`. Our note reasons from the slot — between Pūṣan (Revatī) and Antaka/Yama (Bharaṇī) — that dakha must be Dasra, the Aśvins. Bṛhadyātrā 6.3 prints `दस्रान्तकाग्निधातारः`, so the inference now has a witness. The mūla keeps the transmitted दख; the gloss is no longer a conjecture. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part. [2026-09-23: The mūla no longer keeps दख. Pandit's 1951 plate (printed p.49), read by eye at about 5.5x native, sets a lightly inked स्र, and the edition's own index (printed p.62) spells the akṣara with स and र, so the mūla now reads दस्र. The reading now rests on the exemplar's own page as well as on Bṛhadyātrā 6.3.]

अह्नः पञ्चदशांशो रात्रेश् चैवं मुहूर्त इति संज्ञा । स च विज्ञेयस् तज्ज्ञैश् छायायन्त्राम्बुभिर् युक्त्या ॥

ahnaḥ pañcadaśāṃśo rātreś caivaṃ muhūrta iti saṃjñā | sa ca vijñeyas tajjñaiś chāyāyantrāmbubhir yuktyā ||

A fifteenth part of the day, and likewise of the night, bears the designation 'muhūrta'. And it is to be determined by those who know it, by the shadow ⟨gnomon⟩, the instrument and the water ⟨clock⟩, with due method.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: pañcadaśa-aṃśa is a fifteenth part, not a fifteen-part division of some other unit: fifteen muhūrtas by day and fifteen by night, matching the two lists of vv. 2–3. chāyā-yantra-ambubhiḥ is read as three instruments (shadow, instrument, water-vessel), not as one compound 'shadow-instrument'.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.4 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. The two are character-identical here. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

नक्षत्रवत् क्षणानां परिघादि तदीश्वरैः समं चिन्त्यम् । फलम् अपि तद् एव दृष्टं गर्गाद्यैस् तत्र च श्लोकाः ॥

nakṣatravat kṣaṇānāṃ parighādi tadīśvaraiḥ samaṃ cintyam | phalam api tad eva dṛṣṭaṃ gargādyais tatra ca ślokāḥ ||

As with the nakṣatras, so for the kṣaṇas ⟨muhūrtas⟩: Parigha and the rest are to be reckoned in accordance with their lords; and the fruit too has been seen by Garga and others to be that very same one — and there are verses upon it.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The rule that makes the two lists usable: because a muhūrta carries the same presiding lord as a nakṣatra, whatever is computed for the nakṣatra — Parigha and the other yogas — is computed for the muhūrta on the same footing, and yields the same fruit. tadīśvaraiḥ samam is 'together with / in accordance with their lords'. Garga is named as the authority; ślokāḥ 'and there are verses on it' points to a body of quoted stanzas the author does not reproduce here.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.5 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

अहोरात्रं च संपूर्णं चन्द्रनक्षत्रयोजितम् । तन्नक्षत्रमुहूर्त्ताश् च समकर्मगुणाः स्मृताः ॥

ahorātraṃ ca saṃpūrṇaṃ candranakṣatrayojitam | tannakṣatramuhūrttāś ca samakarmaguṇāḥ smṛtāḥ ||

And a complete day-and-night is joined to the nakṣatra of the Moon; and the muhūrtas of that nakṣatra are held to have the same qualities for action ⟨as the nakṣatra itself⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: samakarmaguṇāḥ — 'having the same qualities in respect of action' — is the chapter's own title-word (muhūrtakarmaguṇa). The verse is in anuṣṭubh, unlike the āryā of the rest of the chapter.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.6 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

यश् चाष्टमो मुहूर्तो विरिञ्चिनामाभिजित् स निर्दिष्टः । तस्मिंस् त्र्य याम्याम् अत्यन्तगतस्य जयलब्धिः ॥

yaś cāṣṭamo muhūrto viriñcināmābhijit sa nirdiṣṭaḥ | tasmiṃs trya yāmyām atyantagatasya jayalabdhiḥ ||

And that eighth muhūrta which bears the name of Viriñci ⟨Brahmā⟩ is declared to be Abhijit. In it ⟨…⟩ the southern ⟨quarter⟩ ⟨…⟩ for one who has gone very far, the winning of victory.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: (lacuna).
  • About this edition: The second half is defective and the edition marks a lacuna there. The first half is intact and complete in sense: the eighth muhūrta, Brahmā's, is Abhijit. In the second half tasmin ('in it'), yāmyām ('the southern ⟨direction⟩'), atyantagatasya ('of one gone very far') and jayalabdhiḥ ('the winning of victory') are legible; the intervening त्र्य (trya) is a fragment of a word that cannot be completed, and by mātrā-count the half falls about five mātrās short of an āryā's 27, so at least one word is lost. The syntax joining 'the southern quarter' to 'victory' is therefore unrecoverable: on the parallel of v. 8 the south was probably EXCLUDED, but the negation is not in the surviving text and has not been supplied. Nothing in the gap has been guessed.

अष्टमेन दिवसे समे शुभो यो विरिञ्चिविभुसंज्ञिताः । तेन यानम् अपहायिदक्षिणां सर्वदिक्षु अजित्प्रशस्यते ॥

aṣṭamena divase same śubho yo viriñcivibhusaṃjñitāḥ | tena yānam apahāyidakṣiṇāṃ sarvadikṣu ajitpraśasyate ||

The eighth ⟨kṣaṇa⟩ in the day, at its even ⟨midpoint⟩, which is auspicious and is designated by the names Viriñci and Vibhu ⟨Brahmā⟩ — journeying by it, the south excepted, is commended in all directions.

4 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: viriñcivibhusaṃjñitāḥ(taḥ)(add.kṣaṇaḥ)/ · viriñcivibhusaṃjñitāḥ(taḥ)(add.kṣaṇaḥ)/ · apahāyi(ya)dakṣiṇāṃ · a(kṣvabhi)jit(tā)praśasyate// · a(kṣvabhi)jit(tā)praśasyate//.
  • About this edition: The verse repeats the content of v. 7 and appears to preserve it where v. 7 has failed: it supplies the excepted direction (apahāya dakṣiṇām, 'leaving aside the south') that v. 7's lacuna swallowed. Its transmitted text is metrically irregular and the edition corrects at four points: saṃjñitāḥ(taḥ) with (add. kṣaṇaḥ), giving 'the kṣaṇa designated …' in the singular; apahāyi(ya)dakṣiṇāṃ, giving apahāya dakṣiṇām; and (kṣvabhi) with (tā) in the last pāda, pointing to sarvadikṣv abhijit(tā) praśasyate — i.e. Abhijit named again — where the running text reads sarvadikṣu ajitpraśasyate. The rendering follows the running text, whose sense is unaffected. divase same is taken as the day's even point, which is what the eighth of fifteen is: midday, the received position of Abhijit. Vibhu is a second name of Brahmā, not a second deity.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 6.7 (`muhūrta`), published in this corpus, carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
  • Another reading: BṚHADYĀTRĀ 6.7 CONFIRMS ALL FOUR OF PANDIT'S PARENTHESES HERE, INCLUDING THE SUPPLIED WORD. It prints `अष्टमे ऽर्धदिवसे समे शुभो यो विरिञ्चविभुसंज्ञितः क्षणः । तेन यानम् अपहाय दक्षिणां सर्वदिक्ष्व् अभिजिता प्रशस्यते ॥` — i.e. the singular `संज्ञितः`, the supplied `क्षणः` of `(add.kṣaṇaḥ)`, `अपहाय` for `अपहायि`, and `अभिजिता` for the running text's `अजित्`. ⚠ OUR NOTE SAID THE RUNNING TEXT'S SENSE IS `UNAFFECTED`, AND THAT IS SLIGHTLY TOO STRONG: the sibling NAMES Abhijit in the instrumental ('commended in all directions BY ABHIJIT') where our rendering says only 'by it'. Since the eighth kṣaṇa of the day IS Abhijit, the two point at the same muhūrta, so the rule does not move — but the identification is now witnessed rather than inferred, and our English's 'by it' is the weaker of the two. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

Adhyāya 4 · candraphala

उपचयगृहसप्तमगः शुभः शशी जन्मभे ऽपि यात्रायाम् । उपजयकरयुक्तो वा शुभमध्ये शुभम् उपासज्ञ ॥

upacayagṛhasaptamagaḥ śubhaḥ śaśī janmabhe 'pi yātrāyām | upajayakarayukto vā śubhamadhye śubham upāsajña ||

The Moon placed in an upacaya house ⟨the 3rd, 6th, 10th, 11th⟩ or in the seventh is auspicious on a journey (yātrā), and in the janma-bha ⟨the natal asterism⟩ as well; or ⟨when⟩ joined with one that brings increase, or ⟨standing⟩ in the midst of benefics, ⟨it is⟩ auspicious ⟨…⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: upāsajña(?)//.
  • About this edition: The closing word is printed by the edition as upāsajña(?) — the question mark is the editor's own. The word is not construable as it stands, so the final predicate is left unrendered and marked ⟨…⟩ in both languages; a verb of obtaining (e.g. upāśnute, 'attains') would fit both the sense and the āryā mātrā-count, but nothing in this single witness supports it and it is not supplied. 'upacayagṛha' = the houses of increase; the numbers 3, 6, 10, 11 are a supplied gloss, not in the Sanskrit. 'upajayakara' in the second half is most probably the same upacaya (increase-maker); read instead from jaya it would give 'joined with a bringer of victory', apt in a yātrā (military-expedition) work — this witness does not decide it. 'janmabha' is left as 'natal asterism' / जन्मभ because bha covers both nakṣatra and rāśi, and verse 2 counts houses from it as the 1st place.

जन्मत्रिषडेकादशसप्तमगो ऽपि नेष्यते चन्द्रः । पञ्चमनवमन्त्याष्टचतुर्द्विवेधवान् इष्टफलः ॥

janmatriṣaḍekādaśasaptamago 'pi neṣyate candraḥ | pañcamanavamantyāṣṭacaturdvivedhavān iṣṭaphalaḥ ||

Even the Moon gone to the janma ⟨1st⟩, the 3rd, the 6th, the 11th ⟨or⟩ the 7th is not approved ⟨when⟩ it bears the vedha of the 5th, the 9th, the last ⟨12th⟩, the eighth, the fourth ⟨and⟩ the second; ⟨free of that it is⟩ of desired fruit.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pañcamanavamantyāṣṭa(ma)caturdvivedhavān.
  • About this edition: The edition corrects aṣṭa → aṣṭama (8th); the corrected list is what is rendered. The two lists do not balance: five places (1, 3, 6, 11, 7) against six vedha-places (5, 9, 12, 8, 4, 2). On the standard gocara-vedha pairing — 1↔5, 3↔9, 6↔12, 11↔8, 10↔4, 7↔2 — the member answering to catur (4th) is daśama (10th), which this witness does not carry; the 10th is NOT supplied here, and verse 1 does include the 10th among the upacaya houses. The syntax is also open: vedhavān and iṣṭaphalaḥ are both nominatives agreeing with candraḥ, so the half could instead be read 'the Moon in 1, 3, 6, 11, 7 is not desired; bearing the 5th, 9th, 12th, 8th, 4th, 2nd as vedha it is of desired fruit' — an inversion. The vedha-qualification reading is given because it alone agrees with verse 1.
  • Corroboration: ⭐ WORTH KNOWING OUTSIDE THIS TEXT. This verse is a classical seat for the Moon's gocara-vedha table that the engine ships uncited: `packages/jyotisha/src/gochara.ts` has `GOCHARA_VEDHA.Moon = { 1:5, 3:9, 6:12, 7:2, 10:4, 11:8 }`, and this verse gives the good places 1 / 3 / 6 / 11 / 7 against the vedhas 5 / 9 / 12 / 8 / 4 / 2 — the identical pairing. The note above already derives it and correctly REFUSES to supply the missing tenth (five places against six vedhas); that refusal is right and should survive any seating. Citing the engine's table to this verse is work outside this text's files and has NOT been done here.

सितपक्षादौ चन्द्रे शुभे शुभं पक्षम् अशुभम् अशुभे च । कृष्णे गोचरशुभदो न शुभं पक्ष शुभम् अतोन्यत् ॥

sitapakṣādau candre śubhe śubhaṃ pakṣam aśubham aśubhe ca | kṛṣṇe gocaraśubhado na śubhaṃ pakṣa śubham atonyat ||

When the Moon is auspicious at the beginning of the bright fortnight, the fortnight is auspicious; and inauspicious when ⟨it is⟩ inauspicious. In the dark ⟨fortnight⟩, ⟨the Moon⟩ that gives good by gocara does not ⟨make⟩ the fortnight auspicious: what is other than this is auspicious ⟨there⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pakṣa(kṣe).
  • About this edition: The edition corrects pakṣa → pakṣe in the second half; the locative is what is rendered ('in the fortnight'). 'ato'nyat' ('other than this') is taken as reversing the bright-fortnight rule for the dark fortnight; it can also be construed weakly as 'anything other than this is auspicious', which is not excluded — the Hindi 'इससे अन्यथा ही शुभ है' keeps the same latitude the Sanskrit has.

Adhyāya 5 · lagnaviśuddhi

इष्टं स्वजन्मलग्नं न जन्मराश्युद्गमस् तयोः स्थानात् । त्र्यायगृहानि हितान्य् उदये नेष्टानि शेषाणि ॥

iṣṭaṃ svajanmalagnaṃ na janmarāśyudgamas tayoḥ sthānāt | tryāyagṛhāni hitāny udaye neṣṭāni śeṣāṇi ||

One's own natal lagna (the ascendant) is desirable; the rising of the natal rāśi is not. Reckoned from the position of those two, the third and the eleventh houses are favourable at the rising ⟨as lagna⟩; the remaining ones are undesirable.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: (lacuna).
  • About this edition: tryāya-gṛhāṇi is tri + āya, the 3rd and the 11th — rendered by house number per the glossary rule on house-synonyms. tayoḥ ("of those two") refers back to the natal lagna and the natal rāśi named in the first half; the counting is from both. The edition marks the lacuna INLINE and therefore does say where it falls: the source reads `tryāyagṛhāni (lacuna) hitāny udaye neṣṭāni śeṣāṇi`. And the metre says how much is lost: that half scans to 24 mātrās (tryā2 ya1 gṛ1 hā2 ni1 | hi1 tā2 nyu1 da1 ye2 | neṣ2 ṭā2 ni1 | śe2 ṣā2 ṇi1) against the āryā's 27, so THREE mātrās are gone at that point. An earlier reading of this note said the edition marks the lacuna `without saying where it falls or how much is lost`; both halves of that were wrong and are corrected (2026-09-08). The sense of what survives is complete as translated.

रिपुनैधने रिपुवधो षष्ट लग्नगे वधो यातुः । केचिज् जगुस् तथादिते कुरेपाः स्थाने ॥

ripunaidhane ripuvadho ṣaṣṭa lagnage vadho yātuḥ | kecij jagus tathādite kurepāḥ sthāne ||

In ripu ⟨the sixth⟩ and naidhana ⟨the eighth⟩, the slaying of the enemy; when that sixth stands in the lagna, the slaying of the one who sets out. Some have declared ⟨it⟩ thus: ⟨…⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: (ripu)ṣaṣṭa(ṣṭhe) · (ripu)ṣaṣṭa(ṣṭhe) · ku(krū)repāḥ.
  • About this edition: ripu carries BOTH senses in this one verse: ripunaidhane is the 6th-and-8th (houses), while ripuvadhaḥ is the slaying of the enemy as a person. The running text reads ṣaṣṭa; the edition's two parentheses on that word give ripuṣaṣṭhe (locative), and ripuṣaṣṭhe lagnage then reads as an agreeing pair of locatives, "when the sixth stands in the lagna". THE SECOND HALF IS NOT RENDERED: after kecij jagus ("some have declared") the text runs tathādite ku(krū)repāḥ sthāne — tathādite is not a resolvable word, the edition's correction turns ku- into krū- without indicating how much of kurepāḥ it replaces, and the half is well short of its āryā measure. What is left of it is a locative sthāne and, on the corrected reading, krūre ("in a malefic ⟨place⟩") with no predicate; the doctrine reported there cannot be recovered, so it is marked ⟨…⟩ rather than guessed.

आये जन्मनि राशिषु येषु शुभा भास्करद्वितीयै ॥ ते लग्ने शस्यन्ते नेष्टाः पापग्रहाप्यु ॥

āye janmani rāśiṣu yeṣu śubhā bhāskaradvitīyai || te lagne śasyante neṣṭāḥ pāpagrahāpyu ||

The eleventh, the natal ⟨rāśi⟩, and whatever rāśis the benefics stand in with the Sun for a second — those are commended as the lagna; ⟨those holding⟩ malefic grahas are undesirable ⟨…⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pāpagrahāpyu(lacuna)//.
  • About this edition: śubhāḥ is nominative and so cannot qualify the locative rāśiṣu: it is the benefic grahas standing in those signs, and bhāskaradvitīyāḥ is a bahuvrīhi on them, "having the Sun as their second" (i.e. accompanied by the Sun). A second reading is possible — bhāskarād dvitīye, "in the second from the Sun" — and the e-text's -dvitīyai is a form belonging to neither; the choice is not certain. The verse breaks off in mid-clause: the edition prints pāpagrahāpyu(lacuna), so the predicate governing the malefics is lost, and the ⟨…⟩ marks that break, not a supplied word. [2026-09-23: Pandit's 1951 plate (printed p.51, store page_0152 line 6), read by eye at about 2.4x native with control vowel signs on the same page at about 3.0x, sets भास्करद्वितीयै with the two-stroke ै. So -dvitīyai is the press's own reading, not only the e-text's, and our text keeps it. The locative द्वितीये stood only in a machine read of that page, which slipped ै to े, so it has no witness and is not written.]

शीर्षोदयेषु विजयो भङ्गः पृष्ठोदयेषु लग्नेषु । दिगनुद्वारेषु जयो विद्वारेष्व् आहवे भङ्गः ॥

śīrṣodayeṣu vijayo bhaṅgaḥ pṛṣṭhodayeṣu lagneṣu | diganudvāreṣu jayo vidvāreṣv āhave bhaṅgaḥ ||

In head-rising ⟨signs⟩, victory; ruin in back-rising (pṛṣṭhodaya) lagnas. In diganudvāra ⟨lagnas⟩, victory; in vidvāra ⟨lagnas⟩, defeat in battle.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: āvaho(have)bhaṅgaḥ//. [2026-09-30: Read by eye on Pandit's 1951 plate, printed p.51, at about 2.6x native: the press sets विद्वारेष्वावहो (r. हवे) भङ्गः, the parenthesis standing after the word, so its हवे replaces the final वहो and gives आहवे. Bhaṭṭotpala's quotation (Lamsala 1969, printed p.64, read at about 2.8x native) sets विद्वारेष्वाहवे भङ्गः. The mūla now reads आहवे भङ्गः.]
  • About this edition: Three terms are left in transliteration because the edition's text does not support translating them. (1) ṣaṣṭhodaya, "sixth-rising", is not a term jyotiṣa uses; the antithesis to śīrṣodaya is pṛṣṭhodaya (back-rising), which is plainly the sense wanted, but the edition prints ṣaṣṭhodaya and offers no correction, so it is not emended here. (2) diganuddhāra and (3) vidvāra stand in the same victory/defeat antithesis; vidvāra looks like vi-dvāra, "doorless" (the e-text's vidvāraṣv is for vidvāreṣv), and diganuddhāra should be its positive counterpart, but neither compound is attested and neither is glossed. The one certain correction is the edition's āvaho → āhave, "in battle", which the translation follows. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विद्वारेष्व्; this sentence names vidvāraṣv, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Read by eye on Pandit's 1951 plate, printed p.51, at about 2.0x native. The press sets षष्ठोदयेषु with no parenthesis on the word, and the edition's pratīka index (printed p.63, read at about 2.0x) sets षष्ठो too, so this note stands as written on ṣaṣṭhodaya; the पृष्ठोदयेषु of a machine read of that page is the read's error. The press also sets दिगनुद्वारेषु and विद्वारेष्वावहो, so diganuddhāra was the e-text's keying: the pair is dig-anu-dvāra / vi-dvāra, both on dvāra, as this note guessed. The mūla now reads दिगनुद्वारेषु … विद्वारेष्व्.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads पृष्ठोदयेषु on the cross-corpus instrument; the press sets षष्ठोदयेषु, read by eye on the plate at about 2.0x native, and Bhaṭṭotpala's quotation of this verse in his Vivṛti on the Bṛhadyātrā (Lamsala 1969, printed p.64, by-bhattotpala-1969 page_0065 line 3; a machine read, the word checked by eye on the render at about 4x) carries पृष्ठोदयेषु. So ṣaṣṭhodaya is now the edition's reading only, and two of the three terms this note names remain in transliteration.]

मीने कुटिलो मार्गो भवति तदसेन्यशशिलग्नेऽपि । नौयानम् आप्यलग्नकार्यं तु तन्नवांशे वा ॥

mīne kuṭilo mārgo bhavati tadasenyaśaśilagne'pi | nauyānam āpyalagnakāryaṃ tu tannavāṃśe vā ||

In Mīna the road becomes crooked — and so too in its aṃśa, even when the lagna is another sign. But travel by boat is to be undertaken with a watery (āpya) lagna, or else in its navāṃśa.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: tadasenya(tya)śaśilagne · (pi)/. [2026-09-23: On Pandit's 1951 plate (printed p.51), read by eye at about 2.0x native, ऽपि stands in the running text of the first half, unbracketed; the only parenthesis on that line is the editor's query '(? त्य)', which closes before शशि. So the '(pi)' quoted here is a bracket the e-text supplied, not one the edition sets, and the mūla now carries ऽपि.]
  • About this edition: āpya here is "watery" (from ap-, water), NOT āya/the 11th — the subject is nauyāna, going by boat, and tat in tannavāṃśe refers back to that watery sign, so the fallback is a watery navāṃśa. The edition's second correction supplies -pi, giving vāpi ("or else"), which the translation follows. The compound tadasenya- in the first half is not resolvable: the edition corrects part of it to -tya- without indicating how much of tadasenya it replaces, and the half is short of its āryā measure. It is left in transliteration inside ⟨…⟩; the clause it belongs to states a second bad case for the road alongside Mīna, but which case cannot be recovered from this text. [2026-09-23: The plate refutes this. Pandit's printed p.51, read by eye at about 2.0x native, ends the second half तन्नवांशे वा ॥५॥ with no पि after वा. The पि stands in the first half, as ऽपि after शशिलग्ने, and the mūla now carries it there. 'Or else' still stands on वा alone.]
  • Another reading: A CRUX OUR OWN NOTE CALLED UNRESOLVABLE IS RECOVERED BY AN INDEPENDENT HAND. Daivajña Vallabhā 15.29 carries this verse and reads `मीने कुटिलो मार्गो भवति तदंशेऽन्यराशिलग्नेऽपि` — tad-aṃśe 'nya-rāśi-lagne 'pi, 'and in its aṃśa, even when the lagna is another sign'. Our `तदसेन्यशशिलग्ने` is that phrase with the anusvāra and the avagraha lost and `राशि` read as `शशि`. The metre confirms it: our transmitted half scans to 26 mātrās against the āryā's 30, and DV's reading comes out at exactly 30. The mūla is NOT emended — one exemplar, and DV is a different work — but the clause is now translated instead of being left in transliteration inside ⟨…⟩. ⚠ DV ALSO SPLITS THE SECOND HALF THE OTHER WAY: it reads `नो यानमाप्यलग्ने कार्यं तेषां नवांशेऽपि`, 'NO journey should be undertaken with a watery lagna', where we read `नौयानम् आप्यलग्नकार्यं`, 'BOAT-travel is to be undertaken with a watery lagna'. That is `nauyānam` against `no yānam` — the same letters, opposite prescriptions. Ours keeps the subject the first half sets up (the road, and then the water route) and is the standard yātrā doctrine; DV's is a general prohibition. Recorded, not adopted, and a reader who cites this half must know the other split exists. [2026-09-23: The mūla now reads तदसेन्यशशिलग्नेऽपि: Pandit's plate (printed p.51), read by eye at about 2.0x native, sets ऽपि in the running text of the first half. With it the half counts 27 (28 with the half-final laghu taken as guru) against the āryā's 30, so a loss inside तदसेन्य still stands. The same line sets तदसेन्य with the single e-mātrā on स, as our mūla has.]

Adhyāya 6 · lagnabheda

6.1contains an unread akṣara

सेन्दुष्यभे नवाङ्गौ क्रूराणानिर्गविग्नस्थः⟨?⟩ । यौवनदुर्ललितैर् इव विचक्षणो ऽन्त्येषु दिवसेषु ॥

senduṣyabhe navāṅgau krūrāṇānirgavignasthaḥ⟨?⟩ | yauvanadurlalitair iva vicakṣaṇo 'ntyeṣu divaseṣu ||

With the Moon, in the ⟨…⟩ asterism, in the navāṅga ⟨the ninth-part⟩ …, ⟨and with⟩ the malefics ⟨…⟩ standing ⟨…⟩ — as a discerning man ⟨is undone⟩, in his last days, by the wanton indulgences of his youth.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The ⟨?⟩ in the mūla is the EDITION'S OWN query mark carried into the running text, not a supplied word: krūrāṇānirgavignasthaḥ is unintelligible as transmitted and the editor could not restore it. Legible in the first half are only sa-indu … bhe ('in the ⟨…⟩ asterism together with the Moon' — the syā/ṣya syllable between them is unread), navāṅgau (a dual that does not construe with anything), and krūrāṇām ('of the malefics'). The astrological CONDITION this verse states is therefore not recoverable and nothing in the first half may be read as a rule; the second half is sound and is translated in full. By position the verse is the negative counterpart of v. 2 (benefics → puṣṭi; malefics → ruin at the end), but that is context, not text. navāṅga recurs at vv. 2–3 (navāṅga-lagna, navaṅgaka-lagna) and is almost certainly navāṃśa(ka), the ninth-part; kept transliterated rather than silently emended. [2026-09-23: Read by eye on Pandit's 1951 plate: the running text (printed p.51) at about 1.94x native and the pratīka index (printed p.63) at about 2.49x native. Both typesettings print क्रूराणा without an anusvāra, so 'krūrāṇām' above is a reading of the sense, not of the page; a machine read of the index gives क्रूराणां, placing a dot that is not there. Both set नवाङ्गौ on the stacked ङ्ग with no श (the running text adds a redundant anusvāra over वा, नवांङ्गौ), so the rival नवांशौ stood only in a machine read and the edition gives no navāṃśa here. The running text prints विग्न, as our mūla has, not विघ्न.]

पुष्टिर् भवति यियासोः शुभग्रहाणां नवाङ्गलग्नेषु । यौवनकान्तारम् इव प्रतीत्य कुशलेन धर्मवताम् ॥

puṣṭir bhavati yiyāsoḥ śubhagrahāṇāṃ navāṅgalagneṣu | yauvanakāntāram iva pratītya kuśalena dharmavatām ||

For one who intends to set out there is thriving when the navāṅga-lagnas ⟨the navāṃśa ascendants⟩ are those of benefic grahas — as ⟨there is thriving⟩ for the righteous, having passed safely through the wilderness of youth.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: kuśalena is both 'safely, unharmed' and 'by skill'; English has to choose one and takes 'safely', while Hindi कुशलपूर्वक keeps both open. yiyāsoḥ is the desiderative — 'of one WISHING to go', i.e. the traveller before departure, which is the whole point of a yātrā rule. navāṅga-lagna: see the note on v. 1; the locative plural is read as a tatpuruṣa ('the navāṅga-lagnas'), matching the singular navaṅgaka-lagne of v. 3.

सौम्ये नवङ्गकलग्ने रिपुबलभोगं करोत्य् असाहार्यम् । यद्यस्य फलं दिवसैस् तदशेषं कालहोरायाम् ॥

saumye navaṅgakalagne ripubalabhogaṃ karoty asāhāryam | yadyasya phalaṃ divasais tadaśeṣaṃ kālahorāyām ||

When the navāṅgaka-lagna is a benefic's, it makes ⟨the traveller⟩ enjoy the enemy's strength, and that not to be taken from him. Whatever fruit belongs to ⟨a graha⟩ through its days, the whole of that ⟨belongs to it⟩ in the kālahorā ⟨its planetary hour⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: divasis is corrupt for divase, 'on the day' — i.e. on the weekday of that graha; the second half states the standard equivalence between a graha's weekday and its kālahorā, so horā here is the planetary HOUR, not the ascendant (glossary requires the sense be named). saumya is read in the class sense 'benefic', not as Mercury, because it agrees with the locative lagne and stands against the krūra of v. 4. asāhārya, 'not to be carried off', is left at its full strength ('not to be taken from him') — the verse promises possession of the enemy's power, not merely a favourable outcome. ripu is 'the enemy' as a person here, not the 6th house. [2026-09-23: The exemplar's page was read by eye (Pandit, JUB XX.2, printed p.51 = tky-pandit-1951 page_0152, PDF p.12 of the master, at about 1.82x and 2.49x native). It prints दिवसैस्, divasaiḥ, 'through its days', that is on that graha's weekdays; divasis was the e-text's keying, not the edition's, and the mūla now reads दिवसैस्. The note's point about the weekday and the kālahorā stands. The same page sets असाहार्यम्, with a repha over य, as our mūla does; a machine read's असाहाय्यम् is a misread of that printed र्य, not a reading of the press.]

उपचयकरस्य वर्गं कूरस्यापि प्रशस्यते लग्नो । चन्द्रे पादद्युक्ते तन्त्राधिपतेस्यसौम्यस्य ॥

upacayakarasya vargaṃ kūrasyāpi praśasyate lagno | candre pādadyukte tantrādhipatesyasaumyasya ||

In the lagna the varga even of a malefic is commended, provided it is one that brings increase ⟨upacaya⟩; and ⟨so too the varga⟩ of the benefic lord of the expedition ⟨tantra⟩, when the Moon is joined with ⟨…pāda…⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: kū(krū)rasyāpi · lagno(gne)/ · pādadyukte(?) · tantrādhipatesya(śca)saumyasya//.
  • About this edition: Rendered on the edition's own corrections, which the ingest keeps out of the mūla: kū(krū)rasyāpi → krūrasyāpi (malefic), lagno(gne) → lagne, tantrādhipatesya(śca) → tantrādhipateś ca. pādadyukte is queried by the EDITOR HIMSELF and is not restorable, so the Moon's condition is given only as far as 'joined with ⟨…pāda…⟩' — whether pāda is the quarter of a nakṣatra, a pāda of a sign, or a corruption of something else cannot be decided from this witness. upacaya-kara is the technical 'increase-making' graha (the 3rd, 6th, 10th, 11th places where a malefic does well), which is why a malefic can be commended at all here. tantra in a yātrā text is the host/expedition.

इत्यष्टमगाः पापा विवर्जायेष्टमं विलग्नं च । चन्द्रचन्द्रञ्च निधनस्थं सर्वारम्भःप्रयोगेषु ॥

ityaṣṭamagāḥ pāpā vivarjāyeṣṭamaṃ vilagnaṃ ca | candracandrañca nidhanasthaṃ sarvārambhaḥprayogeṣu ||

Thus malefics gone to the eighth ⟨are to be shunned⟩: one should avoid the eighth as the vilagna ⟨the ascendant⟩, and the Moon standing in the nidhana ⟨the 8th house⟩, in the launching of all undertakings.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: vivarjā(rja)ye(da)ṣṭamaṃ · vivarjā(rja)ye(da)ṣṭamaṃ · candra(drop.)candrañca · (lacuna) · sarvārambhaḥ(mbha)prayogeṣu//.
  • About this edition: Rendered on the edition's corrections: vivarjā(rja)ye(da)ṣṭamaṃ → vivarjayed aṣṭamaṃ; the doubled candra-candra is the edition's own dittography with one to be dropped; sarvārambhaḥ(mbha) → sarvārambha-. THE EDITION ALSO MARKS A LACUNA in the second half, and it stands INSIDE the phrase, not after it: the source reads `candra(drop.)candrañca (lacuna) nidhanasthaṃ sarvārambhaḥ(mbha)prayogeṣu` — i.e. between `candrañ ca` and `nidhanasthaṃ`, so the words that say WHAT ABOUT the Moon in the 8th are the ones partly lost. Both prohibitions are still legible, but the sentence may well be missing a further member — do not read this as a closed list. (An earlier reading of this note put the lacuna between `candrañ ca … nidhanasthaṃ` and `sarvārambha-prayogeṣu`, treating as one unit the phrase the lacuna divides; corrected 2026-09-08.) pāpāḥ aṣṭamagāḥ is nominative and does not construe with the optative vivarjayet; the supplied ⟨are to be shunned⟩ carries it. nidhana = the 8th house (glossary).
  • Corroboration: ⭐ WORTH KNOWING OUTSIDE THIS TEXT. This is a candrāṣṭama veto in Varāhamihira, held in full: `चन्द्रञ्च निधनस्थं … सर्वारम्भःप्रयोगेषु` — the Moon standing in nidhana (the 8th) is to be avoided IN THE LAUNCHING OF ALL UNDERTAKINGS. The claim record `asr.muhurta.chandrashtama-veto` (research/assertions/muhurta/election-consequence-claims.md) carries the recorded negative `No second lineage for candrāṣṭama — searched, not found` and rests on the Kālaprakāśikā, a text this library does not hold. That negative is false, and the reason is instructive: the search keys were `चन्द्राष्टम` and `अष्टमे चन्द्र`; this verse says `निधनस्थं`, a house-synonym our own GLOSSARY maps to the 8th. Correcting and re-seating that claim is work outside this text's files and has NOT been done here.
6.6a reading here is contested

लग्नेन रहिता यात्रा योसेतोन्मन्तभामिनी । दुर्जानंजनिमासाद्य यात्य् अभावःशनैः शनैः ॥

lagnena rahitā yātrā yosetonmantabhāminī | durjānaṃjanimāsādya yāty abhāvaḥśanaiḥ śanaiḥ ||

A journey bereft of ⟨its⟩ lagna is like a woman gone mad: falling in with ill-fated folk ⟨durjāta⟩, she comes to nothing, little by little.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: yosetonmanta(yā saivonmatta?)bhāminī/ · durjānaṃ(taṃ)jani(na)māsādya · durjānaṃ(taṃ)jani(na)māsādya · abhāvaḥ(vaṃ)śanaiḥ.
  • About this edition: yosetonmantabhāminī is unintelligible as transmitted; the simile-word rests on the edition's own conjecture, and the editor queried it himself: yā saivonmatta-bhāminī, 'she is just like a frenzied woman'. The comparison is therefore conjectural, though the chapter's pattern (v. 7's kulāṅganā answers it) supports it. Also on the edition: durjānaṃ(taṃ)jani(na)m āsādya → durjātaṃ janam āsādya, 'having fallen in with ill-fated folk' (see the ambiguity note: the caste reading is available but is not asserted); abhāvaḥ(vaṃ) → abhāvaṃ, accusative, 'to nothingness'. The harshness is the text's own and is kept: an unregulated yātrā is a madwoman destroyed by the company she keeps, not merely an ill-advised one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: durjāta: Monier-Williams gives 'badly born, unfortunate, ill-conditioned'. Until 2026-09-08 the Hindi glossed it ⟨नीच कुल में उत्पन्न⟩ — 'born in a low family' — where the English said only 'ill-born'. That is a CASTE claim, made in our own hand, in the language this app is built for, on a word that is the editor's own conjecture: the source reads `durjānaṃ(taṃ)jani(na)m`, and durjāta is what the parentheses produce. Both renderings now give the misfortune sense and agree with each other. The low-birth sense is a real one and is recorded here; it is not asserted, and it should not be asserted on a conjectural reading.

लग्नप्रधान या यात्रा शीलेनैव कुलाङ्गना । भावास्तमन्त्रवर्तन्ते गुणरूपम् इवोत्तमः ॥

lagnapradhāna yā yātrā śīlenaiva kulāṅganā | bhāvāstamantravartante guṇarūpam ivottamaḥ ||

The journey in which the lagna is chief is, by her very conduct, a noblewoman; the ⟨remaining⟩ bhāvas follow it, as excellent qualities ⟨follow⟩ beauty.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: lagnapradhāna(nā) · bhāvāstamantra(nu)hartante · guṇa(ṇā)rūpam · ivottamaḥ(māḥ)//. [2026-09-23: The exemplar's page was read by eye (Pandit, JUB XX.2, printed p.52 = tky-pandit-1951 page_0153 line 7, at about 3.3x native). It prints -vartante, not -hartante: the first akṣara after the editor's (r. नु) is व. GRETIL keyed h for v, and the mūla now reads भावास्तमन्त्रवर्तन्ते.]
  • About this edition: Rendered on the edition's corrections: lagnapradhāna(nā) → lagnapradhānā; bhāvāstamantra(nu)hartante → bhāvās tam anuharante (for anuharanti, 'take after, resemble'); guṇa(ṇā)rūpam → guṇā rūpam; ivottamaḥ(māḥ) → ivottamāḥ. The chapter is lagnabheda and vv. 6–7 are a matched pair: without the lagna the yātrā is a madwoman, with the lagna foremost she is a kulāṅganā whom the other bhāvas follow. The doctrine in the second half — the remaining bhāvas conform to the lagna — is the chapter's thesis. [2026-09-23: The edition prints vartante (read by eye on printed p.52 at about 3.3x native), so with its own correction the text is bhāvās tam anuvartante, a regular ātmanepada third plural of anu-√vṛt, 'the bhāvas follow it'. The anuharante reading rested on GRETIL's slip, and both renderings now say 'follow'.]

Adhyāya 7 · grahaviśuddhiḥ

लग्नोपगतैः सौम्यैर् आरोग्यं भवति चित्तसौख्यञ् च । अर्थस्थैर् अर्थचयो योधविवृद्धिस् तृतीयस्थैः ॥

lagnopagataiḥ saumyair ārogyaṃ bhavati cittasaukhyañ ca | arthasthair arthacayo yodhavivṛddhis tṛtīyasthaiḥ ||

With benefics come to the lagna there is health, and ease of mind; with them standing in the second (artha), a heaping-up of wealth; with them standing in the third, an increase of fighting men.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: artha-stha is the 2nd house named by its significations (wealth), as tṛtīya is named by number; the chapter runs the houses in order from here to verse 7.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.3 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. It reads `वित्तसौख्यं` ('ease of wealth') where we read `चित्तसौख्यञ्` ('ease of mind'). Ours is the better fit beside आरोग्यं and is kept.

वाहनसुहृदां वृद्धिश् चतुर्थगैः पञ्चगैश् च मन्त्रिबलम् । रिपुनाशः षष्ठस्थैः भृगुवर्जं सप्तमेषु हिताः ॥

vāhanasuhṛdāṃ vṛddhiś caturthagaiḥ pañcagaiś ca mantribalam | ripunāśaḥ ṣaṣṭhasthaiḥ bhṛguvarjaṃ saptameṣu hitāḥ ||

With them gone to the fourth, increase of conveyances and of friends; with those in the fifth, the strength of the ministers (mantri-bala); with those standing in the sixth, destruction of the enemy; in the seventh they are favourable — Venus (bhṛgu) excepted.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: bhṛgu here is Venus; verse 5 confirms it by giving Venus in the 7th the malefics' own result. ripu-nāśa: ripu is the enemy as a person, the 6th being his house — the two senses coincide in this verse.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.4 carries this verse and reads `पंचमैस्तु मन्त्रबलम्` — mantra-bala, 'the strength of counsel' — where we read मन्त्रिबलम्, mantri-bala, 'the strength of the ministers'. Until 2026-09-08 our English rendered DV's word and our Hindi rendered ours, so the two languages were translating two different readings. The English now follows our own mūla; the variant is recorded here. DV also reads `सप्तमेऽध्वहिताः` ('favourable to the road') where we read `सप्तमेषु हिताः`.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.4 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. Variants recorded in the parallel note already on this verse.

रक्षन्त्य् आयुन्निधने शशिवर्जं नवमभेषु वसुसम्पत् । कर्मणि सिद्धिर् लाभो बलसम्पातश् च दशमाद्यैः ॥

rakṣanty āyunnidhane śaśivarjaṃ navamabheṣu vasusampat | karmaṇi siddhir lābho balasampātaś ca daśamādyaiḥ ||

They guard life ⟨when placed⟩ in the eighth (nidhana), the Moon excepted; in the ninth signs, abundance of wealth; success in the work, gain, and a mustering of forces come from those beginning with the tenth.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: āyunni(rni)dhane.
  • About this edition: The mūla holds the edition's uncorrected āyunnidhane, which it corrects to āyu(r)nidhane. Both readings yield the same sense: the uncorrected reads as the compound āyu-nidhana (the 8th, called by both its names), the corrected as āyuḥ ... nidhane, life ⟨guarded⟩ in the 8th. The three results of the second half attach to the three houses from the tenth onward — 10th karma (siddhi), 11th lābha (gain), 12th (balasampāta).
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.5 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. It reads `यशः सम्पत्` ('fame and fortune') for our `वसुसम्पत्` ('abundance of wealth'), and `बलसंघातश्` ('a massing of forces') for our `बलसम्पातश्`. `बलसंघात` is the ordinary word and our `बलसम्पात` is the harder one; both are rendered the same way here. Recorded, not adopted.

भौमार्कार्किशशाङ्कैर् लग्ने वधबन्धमरणसन्त्रासाः । अर्थक्षयो द्वितीयैस् तृतीयसंस्थैर् यशो द्युतिमत् ॥

bhaumārkārkiśaśāṅkair lagne vadhabandhamaraṇasantrāsāḥ | arthakṣayo dvitīyais tṛtīyasaṃsthair yaśo dyutimat ||

With Mars, the Sun, Saturn and the Moon in the lagna: violence and bondage, death, and terrors. With them in the second, loss of wealth; with them standing in the third, radiant fame.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: This verse opens the malefic series answering verses 1-3; the Moon is counted with the malefics here, as it is excepted from the benefics' protection in verse 3.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.6 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. No substantive divergence: `जय` for `जयम्` and word order in the third pāda only.

वाहनबन्धुवियोगो मन्त्रस्रावो रिपुक्षयश् चेति । हिबुकादिषु सप्तमगैः स्वविषयनाशो भृगुसुते च ॥

vāhanabandhuviyogo mantrasrāvo ripukṣayaś ceti | hibukādiṣu saptamagaiḥ svaviṣayanāśo bhṛgusute ca ||

Separation from conveyances and from kinsmen, the leaking away of counsel ⟨mantra-srāva⟩, and destruction of the enemy — thus ⟨from these⟩ in the hibuka (the fourth) and the houses following it; and from those gone to the seventh, and from Venus ⟨there⟩, destruction of one's own territory.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text reads mantrakhāvo, which is not a word; the series (4th vāhana-bandhu-viyoga, 5th mantra-X, 6th ripu-kṣaya) requires a loss or betrayal of counsel answering the mantri-bala of verse 2, and the rendering supplies that sense in angle brackets rather than emending the text. Venus is named again because verse 2 had already excepted it in the 7th. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्त्रस्रावो; this sentence names mantrakhāvo, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.7 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. ⭐ It reads `मन्त्रस्रावो` where our running text has the non-word `मन्त्रखावो`, and `वाहनमित्र°` for our `वाहनबन्धु°`. See the variant note on this verse. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्त्रस्रावो; this sentence names मन्त्रखावो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Another reading: OUR NOTE'S CONJECTURE IS NOW A READING. The e-text's `मन्त्रखावो` is not a word, and our note reasoned from the series (4th vāhana-bandhu-viyoga, 5th mantra-X, 6th ripu-kṣaya) that the fifth must be a loss or betrayal of counsel answering the mantri-bala of 7.2. Daivajña Vallabhā 15.7 prints `मन्त्रस्रावो` — mantra-srāva, 'the leaking away of counsel'. `स्रा` → `खा` is one akṣara. The mūla keeps the transmitted `मन्त्रखावो`; what changes is that the supplied sense is now witnessed and is named in both renderings. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्त्रस्रावो; this sentence names मन्त्रखावो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

मृत्युर् निधनोपगतैः सेनाव्यसनं महन् नवमसंस्थैः । कुजसूर्यौ दशमस्थौ जयदौ भङ्गप्रदः सौरिः ॥

mṛtyur nidhanopagataiḥ senāvyasanaṃ mahan navamasaṃsthaiḥ | kujasūryau daśamasthau jayadau bhaṅgapradaḥ sauriḥ ||

Death from those gone to the eighth (nidhana); a great disaster to the army from those standing in the ninth. Mars and the Sun standing in the tenth are givers of victory; Saturn there brings rout.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.8 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. It reads `दशमस्थौ कुजसूर्यौ` where we read `कुजसूर्यौ दशमस्थौ` — word order only.

जयम् एकादशसंस्थैः क्रूरैर् अन्त्योपगैः स्वबलभेदः । उपचयवर्जं सौम्यैर् यातुः पापैर् विपर्यस्तम् ॥

jayam ekādaśasaṃsthaiḥ krūrair antyopagaiḥ svabalabhedaḥ | upacayavarjaṃ saumyair yātuḥ pāpair viparyastam ||

Victory from malefics standing in the eleventh; from malefics gone to the last house, a split in one's own force. Apart from the upacaya houses, benefics ⟨are favourable⟩ for the one who marches; with malefics it is reversed.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: antya is the last house, the 12th. upacaya (3, 6, 10, 11) is left untranslated as a class-name: the closing rule is that benefics serve everywhere but there, and malefics only there.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.9 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. ⭐ It reads `उपचयवर्जं सौम्यैर्यत्तत्पापैर्विपर्यस्तम्` where we read `उपचयवर्जं सौम्यैर् यातुः पापैर् विपर्यस्तम्`. DV's `यत्तत्` ('whatever ⟨is stated⟩ … that') supplies the sentence's own predicate, where our `यातुः` ('for the one who marches') leaves the clause needing the ⟨are favourable⟩ our English has to add. Recorded, not adopted: `यातुः` is this text's own word and appears elsewhere in it.

क्रूरो ऽप्य् अनुकूलस्थः शस्तो लग्ने शुभो ऽपि वानिष्टः । वक्री न शुभः केन्द्रे तदहस् तद्वर्गलग्नञ् च ॥

krūro 'py anukūlasthaḥ śasto lagne śubho 'pi vāniṣṭaḥ | vakrī na śubhaḥ kendre tadahas tadvargalagnañ ca ||

Even a malefic, if it stands favourably, is commended; and even a benefic in the lagna may be unwanted. A retrograde graha is not auspicious in a kendra — nor is its day, nor a lagna falling in its varga.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: vakrī here is retrograde, not Mars (the glossary keeps both senses for वक्र); it is a graha's condition, set against its kendra-position, its weekday and its varga.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.10 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`) carries this verse. DV is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text — a different work, ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, encoded by a different person from the three GRETIL files, which were all typed by one transcriber. Its disagreements are evidence, not noise. ⭐ It reads `शुभोऽपि नानिष्टः` ('a benefic in the lagna is NOT undesirable') where we read `शुभो ऽपि वानिष्टः` ('may be unwanted'). One akṣara, वा against ना, and the prescription flips. Both are readable and NEITHER is adopted: we publish one of the two and now say so.

सामपती जीवसितौ भेदस्य तु राहुकेतुबुधसौराः । दण्डस्यार्कक्षितिजाबुध प्रदानस्य शीतांशुः ॥

sāmapatī jīvasitau bhedasya tu rāhuketubudhasaurāḥ | daṇḍasyārkakṣitijābudha pradānasya śītāṃśuḥ ||

Jupiter and Venus are the lords of conciliation (sāman); of division (bheda), Rāhu, Ketu, Mercury and Saturn; of force (daṇḍa), the Sun and Mars; of gift (pradāna), the Moon.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: daṇḍasyārkakṣitijābudha(v atha).
  • About this edition: The mūla holds the uncorrected daṇḍasyārkakṣitijābudha; the edition corrects to kṣitijāv atha, i.e. arka-kṣitijau atha — the Sun and Mars, dual. The correction is confirmed arithmetically: it distributes exactly nine grahas across the four upāyas (2 + 4 + 2 + 1), whereas the uncorrected reading would put Mercury in daṇḍa as well as in bheda. kṣitija (earth-born) is Mars.

आटविकोदेशरिपुमन्त्रिमौलिश्रेणिभृतकवीर्येशाः । सूर्यादिभिर् अनुकूलैस् तद् उदयवर्गैश् च तत्सिद्धिः ॥

āṭavikodeśaripumantrimauliśreṇibhṛtakavīryeśāḥ | sūryādibhir anukūlais tad udayavargaiś ca tatsiddhiḥ ||

The forest tribes, the province, the enemy, the minister, the hereditary troops, the guild-levies and the hired troops have for the lords of their strength the Sun and the rest ⟨in order⟩; when these stand favourably, and when the vargas of the rising sign are theirs, the success of that ⟨party⟩ follows.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: āṭaviko(ka)deśaripumantrimauli(ka)śreṇibhṛtakavīryeśāh/ · āṭaviko(ka)deśaripumantrimauli(ka)śreṇibhṛtakavīryeśāh/.
  • About this edition: The mūla holds the uncorrected running text; the edition corrects āṭaviko(ka) and mauli(ka), i.e. āṭavika- and maulika-. The seven named parties answer one-to-one to the seven grahas of sūryādi (Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn), which is why the count of items must be seven; ripu is here the enemy as a party, not the 6th house. maulika and bhṛtaka are the hereditary and hired levies of the sixfold army.
  • About this edition: THE RUNNING TEXT'S `vīryeśāh` IS A TYPO OF GRETIL'S, NOT A READING, AND WE TRANSLITERATED IT AS A CONSONANT. The source writes `…śreṇibhṛtakavīryeśāh/` with a bare Latin `h` — the ONLY bare word-final `h` in a file that writes visarga as `ḥ` 180 times — and GRETIL's TEI carries the same slip at `<l xml:id="TY_7.10ab">`. Our ingest read the `h` as a consonant and published वीर्येशाह्, the only token in all 103 verses ending in ह्, which is not a Sanskrit form. The word is वीर्येशाः, nominative plural, 'the lords of their strength' — which is what the English above has always rendered. Corrected 2026-09-08. The residue guard in this text's ingest profile cannot catch this class: it allows all of a–z.

नीचस्था ग्रहविजिता रव्यभिभूता विरश्मयो ह्रस्वाः । भुजगा इव मन्त्रहता भवन्त्य् अकार्यक्षमा लग्ने ॥

nīcasthā grahavijitā ravyabhibhūtā viraśmayo hrasvāḥ | bhujagā iva mantrahatā bhavanty akāryakṣamā lagne ||

Grahas that stand debilitated, that are beaten by ⟨another⟩ graha, that are overpowered by the Sun, that are without rays, that are diminished — like serpents undone by a mantra, they become unable to accomplish the work, ⟨even⟩ in the lagna.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: hrasva is literally short — diminished in disc or in latitude; the five conditions are the standard ways a graha loses its power to act, and the verse says that even the lagna cannot repair them.

येषां गमे नवमपञ्चमकण्टकस्थाः सौम्यास् तृतीयरिपुलाभगताश् च पापाः । आयान्ति ते स्वभवनानि पुनः कृतार्थाः दत्ता द्विजातिषु तथा विधिवद् यथार्थाः ॥

yeṣāṃ game navamapañcamakaṇṭakasthāḥ saumyās tṛtīyaripulābhagatāś ca pāpāḥ | āyānti te svabhavanāni punaḥ kṛtārthāḥ dattā dvijātiṣu tathā vidhivad yathārthāḥ ||

Those at whose setting out the benefics stand in the ninth, the fifth and the kendras, and the malefics have gone to the third, the sixth (ripu) and the eleventh (lābha) — they come again to their own houses with their purpose accomplished, ⟨having made⟩ gifts to the twice-born duly and as befits ⟨them⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The metre shifts here to a 14-syllable line. kaṇṭaka is the kendra, as this literature uses the two words interchangeably. The e-text spells tṛtīya as trītīya. The last pāda is rough: dattā and yathārthāḥ stand where the sense wants dattvā (having given) and yathārhāḥ (as befitting), and the rendering follows that sense, marking the supplied participle. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तृतीयरिपुलाभगताश्; this sentence names trītīya, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

एकस्मिन्न् अपि केन्द्रे यदि सौम्यो न ग्रहो ऽस्ति यात्रायाम् । जन्मन्य् अथ वा कर्मणि न तच् छुभं प्राहुर् आचार्याः ॥

ekasminn api kendre yadi saumyo na graho 'sti yātrāyām | janmany atha vā karmaṇi na tac chubhaṃ prāhur ācāryāḥ ||

If there is not a benefic graha in even one kendra — at a march, or at a birth, or at an undertaking — the ācāryas declare that ⟨moment⟩ not auspicious.

राह्वर्कारशिखिसिता यायिन इति शर्वरीश आक्रन्दः । गुरुबुधसौराः पौराः पौरः सूर्यो ऽपि पूर्वाह्णे ॥

rāhvarkāraśikhisitā yāyina iti śarvarīśa ākrandaḥ | gurubudhasaurāḥ paurāḥ pauraḥ sūryo 'pi pūrvāhṇe ||

Rāhu, the Sun, Mars, Ketu and Venus are the marchers (yāyin); the lord of night ⟨the Moon⟩ is the rear-ally (ākranda); Jupiter, Mercury and Saturn are of the city (paura); and the Sun too is of the city in the forenoon.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: yāyin, ākranda and paura are the maṇḍala roles: the one who marches out, the ally in the rear, and the party that stays in its own city. Five grahas are yāyin, one ākranda, three paura, with the Sun counted a second time as paura in the forenoon. The e-text spells budha as budhha.

यायिभिर् अनुकूलस्थैर् यानं पौरैर् विगृह्य चासीनम् । पौरेतरैर् अपि शुभैर् यायाद् अर्धेन सैन्यस्य ॥

yāyibhir anukūlasthair yānaṃ paurair vigṛhya cāsīnam | pauretarair api śubhair yāyād ardhena sainyasya ||

With the marching ⟨grahas⟩ standing favourably, the march; with the city-grahas, sitting still after declaring hostility; and when those other than the city-grahas are also auspicious, let him march with half of the army.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The three clauses name three of the six measures of policy: yāna (march), vigṛhya-āsana (sitting in declared hostility) and the march with half the army, which is dvaidhībhāva; verse 16 supplies the fourth, saṃśraya. ardhena sainyasya is exactly half, and is the technical mark of that measure.

सर्वैर् अप्य् अशुभकरैः शुभदैवं संश्रयेत् प्रधाननृपम् । बलसिद्धिः सौम्यफलैर् बलिभिः क्रूरैर् जयो युद्धे ॥

sarvair apy aśubhakaraiḥ śubhadaivaṃ saṃśrayet pradhānanṛpam | balasiddhiḥ saumyaphalair balibhiḥ krūrair jayo yuddhe ||

When all ⟨the grahas⟩ work ill, let him take refuge with a paramount king whose fortune is auspicious. Strength is secured by the fruits of the benefics; victory in battle by malefics that are strong.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: saṃśraya, taking shelter with a stronger king, is the sixth measure and the chapter's last counsel; the closing line divides the two ends between the two classes — the benefics build strength, the malefics win the fight.

Adhyāya 8 · diggrahānulomyaḥ

अयनानुकूलगमनं हितम् अर्केन्द्वोर् द्वयोर् असंपत्तौ । द्युनिशं जयाय यायाद् विपर्यये क्लेशभङ्गवधाः ॥

ayanānukūlagamanaṃ hitam arkendvor dvayor asaṃpattau | dyuniśaṃ jayāya yāyād viparyaye kleśabhaṅgavadhāḥ ||

Marching in accord with the ayana ⟨the Sun's half-yearly course⟩ is beneficial. When the two, the Sun and the Moon, do not agree, one should march for victory by day ⟨by the Sun's quarter⟩ and by night ⟨by the Moon's⟩; in the reverse case, distress, rout and slaughter.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: dyuniśaṃ ('by day and by night') is taken distributively, as the chapter's subject requires: the Sun rules the day-march and the Moon the night-march, so when the two point different ways (asaṃpattau, 'in the non-concurrence of the two') the marcher follows each in its own half of the day. Read non-distributively the line would only say 'march day and night', which leaves asaṃpatti with nothing to govern. bhaṅga is the breaking of an army — rout, defeat — not mere 'obstruction'; vadha is kept at its weight.
8.2a reading here is contested

उदितो यतो यतश् च भ्रमणे यद्वारभेषु चारगते । तत्रिविधं प्रतिशुक्रं त्याज्यस् तत्रोदयो यत्नात् ॥

udito yato yataś ca bhramaṇe yadvārabheṣu cāragate | tatrividhaṃ pratiśukraṃ tyājyas tatrodayo yatnāt ||

In whichever ⟨quarter⟩ it has risen, and in whichever it stands in its wandering — in the asterisms of the weekdays, once it has entered its course — that ⟨quarter⟩ is the threefold pratiśukra ⟨facing Venus⟩; the place of its rising is there to be shunned, and with effort.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: UNREAD AKṢARA in the mūla: the third pāda is printed tadri⟨?⟩bidhaṃ. What is legible is tadri- at the head and -bidhaṃ at the close, with one akṣara between them unread; -bidhaṃ is on its face a misprint for -vidhaṃ ('of such a kind'), which would make the whole something like tad-dvi-vidhaṃ or tad-vividhaṃ. Nothing is supplied — the gap is carried as ⟨…⟩ in both languages. What survives the gap is the sentence's frame and its rule: the subject is the quarter in which Venus has risen or in which it stands in transit, the predicate is pratiśukra, and the injunction (tyājyas tatrodayo yatnāt) is entire. What is lost is only the qualifier attached to that quarter. The verse's grammatical subject is unnamed here — 'it' — and is Venus, supplied from pratiśukraṃ in the same line and from vv. 3–4. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्रिविधं; this sentence names bidhaṃ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The exemplar's page was read by eye (Pandit, JUB XX.2, printed p.54 = tky-pandit-1951 page_0155 line 4, at about 1.35x and 3.3x native). It prints तत्रिविधं whole, four akṣaras with nothing damaged or missing, and its apparatus on line 11 gives '² तत्रूविधं-A; त dropped in C' against that text. So there is no unread akṣara on the page: the ⟨?⟩, the dri and the bi were GRETIL's keying, not a misprint in the edition. The mūla now reads तत्रिविधं, 'that threefold', and both renderings carry it with no ⟨…⟩.]
8.3a reading here is contested

न प्रतिशुक्रे सिद्धिं स्वल्पो ऽप्य् अर्थः प्रयाति यातॄणाम् । कामं व्रजेत् प्रतिभृगुं जिजीविषुर् नास्तगे शुक्रे ॥

na pratiśukre siddhiṃ svalpo 'py arthaḥ prayāti yātṝṇām | kāmaṃ vrajet pratibhṛguṃ jijīviṣur nāstage śukre ||

Facing Venus ⟨pratiśukra⟩, not even the smallest object of those who set out goes to accomplishment. One who wishes to live may march facing Bhṛgu ⟨Venus⟩ at his pleasure — not while Venus is unset.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The last quarter is nāstage śukre = na astage śukre, 'Venus not being set'. Rendered literally, the negation attaching to vrajet: he may march facing Venus, but not while Venus is un-set, i.e. only once Venus is combust and invisible — the standard yātrā rule that an invisible Venus carries no pratiśukra fault. Read the other way (na taken with kāmaṃ vrajet, 'let him by no means march'), astage śukre is left dangling; the reading adopted is the one that leaves no word unconstrued. The Hindi keeps अनस्त, which holds the negation on 'set' exactly as the Sanskrit does. Note the verse's own two names for one graha: pratiśukra in the first half, pratibhṛgu in the second.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: THE PROHIBITION IS ABSOLUTE HERE AND THE TRADITION DOES NOT LEAVE IT SO — any claim seated on this verse must carry the relief with the veto. The Muhūrta Cintāmaṇi 4.3–4.4 with its Pīyūṣadhārā commentary carry a whole `प्रतिशुक्रापवाद`, a set of named exemptions from the pratiśukra fault: `नगरप्रवेशविषयाद्युपद्रवे करपीडने विबुधतीर्थयात्रयोः। नृपपीडने नववधूप्रवेशने प्रतिभार्गवो भवति दोषकृन्नहि॥` — entering a city, a district or village in turmoil, marriage, a journey to gods or tīrthas, royal duress, and a new bride's entry; and 4.4 adds an exemption for the women of seven named gotras (Bhṛgu, Aṅgiras, Vatsa, Vasiṣṭha, Kaśyapa, Atri, Bharadvāja). The commentary quotes Bādarāyaṇa, Caṇḍeśvara and Maheśvara in the same discussion. Our verse states the veto without any of this; it is not wrong, it is incomplete, and a reader acting on it should know the exceptions exist.

कलुषि वपुषि ग्रहहते प्रतिलोमे नीचगे ऽस्तगे च भृगौ । बलसंपन्नो ऽपि नृपो याता शत्रोर् वशं याति ॥

kaluṣi vapuṣi grahahate pratilome nīcage 'stage ca bhṛgau | balasaṃpanno 'pi nṛpo yātā śatror vaśaṃ yāti ||

When Bhṛgu ⟨Venus⟩ is turbid in body ⟨his disc dulled⟩, struck by a graha, contrary ⟨pratiloma — against the line of march⟩, debilitated or set, then even a king furnished with forces, having set out, goes into the enemy's power.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Five disqualifying states of Venus, three of them physical omens rather than positions: kaluṣa vapus is the dulled or discoloured disc, grahahata is being assailed by another graha (planetary war / occultation), astaga is combustion. pratiloma is rendered 'contrary' and not 'retrograde': the chapter is titled diggrahānulomya, the concord of quarter and graha, so anuloma/pratiloma is this text's own axis — with or against the line of march — and vakra is the word it would use for retrogression. nīcaga is 'debilitated' per the glossary. The Hindi leaves प्रतिलोम untranslated, where the same two-way sense survives without being resolved.

एवंविधे ऽपि यायाद् यदि शुक्रे चन्द्रजो ऽनुकूलस्थः । प्रतिबुधयातस्यान्ये न परित्राणे ग्रहाः शक्ताः ॥

evaṃvidhe 'pi yāyād yadi śukre candrajo 'nukūlasthaḥ | pratibudhayātasyānye na paritrāṇe grahāḥ śaktāḥ ||

Even when Venus is of such a kind, one may march if Candraja ⟨Mercury, the Moon's son⟩ stands favourably. For him who has marched facing Budha ⟨Mercury⟩, the other grahas are not able to deliver him.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: UNNUMBERED PASSAGE. The source prints the following 809 characters — FOUR stanzas — immediately before this verse, with no verse numbers of any kind. The `[` marks a PĀDA, not a stanza: there are 14 line-initial ones, and GRETIL's TEI gives each of the 14 its own line id. The stanza breaks are the four `//`. The four are two śārdūlavikrīḍitas, a mālinī and an āryā. An earlier reading of this note said `about nine stanzas` and `its internal stanza breaks marked only by a bare [`: nine is a count of HALF-verses (four `//` plus four single `/` = nine pieces when split on `/`), and both statements are corrected here (2026-09-08). The edition does not count it: this chapter declares six verses and has six. ⚠ THE REASON WE GAVE FOR WITHHOLDING IT WAS FALSE. It said `numbers would have to be invented`. GRETIL's TEI numbers all four stanzas itself — `TY_.add8.1a/b/c/d`, `.add8.2a–d`, `.add8.3a–d`, then `TY_.add8.1ab` and `.1cd` for the closing āryā (the encoder re-used `1` for the fourth stanza; an upstream slip). The true reason is narrower and is a refusal we state: the EDITION does not number them — this chapter declares `//e6` and has exactly six numbered verses — and a verse in this corpus is addressed by an integer inside its chapter, so any number we gave them (8.7, 8.8 …) would be a citation no printing of this work could be checked against. They are therefore held, not lost, and `coverage.expectedVerses` in text.json counts them so that the coverage figure can see the gap. It is kept here verbatim, exactly as printed: [[lalāṭo(ṭe) 'gnibhayaṅkaro 'diti(tidi)nakṛt kośakṣayaṃ lohitaḥ[śatrūṇāṃ vijaya(yaṃ) śaśāṅkatanayaḥ sainyopabhebhaṃ(daṃ) guruḥ/[mṛtyuṃ bhāskaranandano narapateyo(ryo)dhakṣaya(yaṃ)viprarāṭ[sarvāṇy ai(ṇye)va surārimantrivṛṣabhaḥ saṃpiṇḍitā bhārgavaḥ//[nakṣatraṃ tithi(tha)yas tathaiva karaṇaṃ vāras tathā gocaraṃ[drekā(kkā)ṇaṃ sanavāṃśa(ṅga?)(lacuna)grahadinaṃ lagnaṃ muhūrto 'pi vā/[ye cānye śakunādayo nigaditāḥ sarve 'pi te śobhanā[lalāṭo(ṭe?) bhṛgunanda(na)sya na tadā śakuro 'pi jīvenda(ṅga)taḥ//[suram api vijayec chuḥpṛṣṭhatī(taḥ)kṛtya śukraḥ(karaṃ)[samaravijayatṛṣṇo yo nṛpaḥ saṃprayāti/[ripubalarudhiraudais tarpayitvā tu bhūmiṃ[prathitavipulakīrtidīrghakālaṃ bhunakti//[naur iva vikarṇadharā vi(lacuna)(dha)veda vadhūr vibhāskareva dyauḥ/[bhūni(ri)va vipannnasasyā proṣitaśukrābhda(krābha)vati yatrā//
  • About this edition: evaṃvidhe refers back to the five states of v. 4: a favourable Mercury licenses the march that a faulted Venus would forbid, but the pratibudha fault is absolute and no graha overrides it. The edition prints an uncounted passage of four stanzas immediately before this verse (carried verbatim in the ingest's verse notes, unnumbered because the edition does not count it); nothing from it is translated here — this record renders only v. 5 as the edition numbers it.

यो ऽपि पतिर् दिशि यस्यां तस्मिन् तत्स्थे न तां दिशं यायात् । अनुकूले च दिगीशे गतव्यं कण्टकोपगते ॥

yo 'pi patir diśi yasyāṃ tasmin tatsthe na tāṃ diśaṃ yāyāt | anukūle ca digīśe gatavyaṃ kaṇṭakopagate ||

Whichever ⟨graha⟩ is lord in whichever direction — when it stands in that ⟨direction⟩, one should not march in that direction. And when the lord of the direction is favourable and has come to a kendra ⟨kaṇṭaka, an angle⟩, one ought to go.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse generalises vv. 2–5 from Venus and Mercury to any graha: do not march toward the quarter its own lord actually occupies (tasmin tatsthe, locative absolute, 'that one being placed there'). kaṇṭaka is rendered 'kendra (an angle)' per the glossary, with the form the text uses kept beside it; the Hindi keeps कण्टक. pati and digīśa are both 'lord of the direction' — the text varies the word, not the referent.

Adhyāya 9 · Omens for the march — the tithis, lagnas and vargas that forbid setting out, the wind, the rainbow and the lutes, and the beasts and birds that make a departure auspicious

व्यतिपातविष्टिवैधृतिपापग्रहलग्नवर्गदिवसेषु । चौर्यावस्कन्दानृतसंग्रामासिद्धिम् आयान्ति ॥

vyatipātaviṣṭivaidhṛtipāpagrahalagnavargadivaseṣu | cauryāvaskandānṛtasaṃgrāmāsiddhim āyānti ||

On ⟨the days of⟩ Vyatīpāta, Viṣṭi and Vaidhṛti, and in the lagnas, the vargas and the days of malefic grahas, theft, a surprise raid (avaskanda), falsehood and battle come to success.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text writes one compound, saṃgrāma-asiddhim, and the mūla keeps it. Undoing the sandhi one word earlier gives `…saṃgrāmāḥ siddhim āyānti`, 'theft, a surprise raid, falsehood and battle attain success' — equally metrical (27 mātrās either way), grammatically neater, and in agreement with the muhūrta maxim that Viṣṭi suits cruel deeds. Until 2026-09-08 this ingest declined to choose and published the OTHER reading — the failure of those acts — in both languages. There is now a witness: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.34 prints the split, `चौर्यावस्कन्दानृतसंग्रामाः सिद्धिमायान्ति`. Both renderings are corrected to it.
  • Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.34 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`), published in this corpus. It is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text: Daivajña Vallabhā was ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, a different work by a different encoder, where Bṛhadyātrā and Yogayātrā share our own transcriber. It reads `व्यतिपातविष्टिवैधृतिपापग्रहलग्नदिवसेषु । चौर्यावस्कन्दानृतसंग्रामाः सिद्धिमायान्ति` — with `वर्ग` absent where we read `लग्नवर्गदिवसेषु`. That variant is recorded and not adopted.

हुत्वानलं नमस्कृत्य देवताः स्वस्ति वाच्य विप्रांश् च । ध्यायन् दिगीशम् अविलम्बितं व्रजेद् भूपतिः सुमनाः ॥

hutvānalaṃ namaskṛtya devatāḥ svasti vācya viprāṃś ca | dhyāyan digīśam avilambitaṃ vrajed bhūpatiḥ sumanāḥ ||

Having offered oblation in the fire, having bowed to the deities, and having had the brāhmaṇas pronounce the benediction (svasti), the lord of the earth, meditating on the lord of the ⟨chosen⟩ direction and glad in mind, should set out without delay.

कार्यवशात् स्वयम् अगमं भूभर्तुः केचिद् आहुर् आचार्याः । छत्रायुधाद्यम् इष्टं वैजयिकं निर्गमे कुर्यात् ॥

kāryavaśāt svayam agamaṃ bhūbhartuḥ kecid āhur ācāryāḥ | chatrāyudhādyam iṣṭaṃ vaijayikaṃ nirgame kuryāt ||

Some ācāryas say that, according to what the business requires, the lord of the earth may not go in person; ⟨then⟩ at the setting out he should send forth the desired victory-tokens (vaijayika) — the parasol, the weapons and the rest.

नाकालवर्षवित्स्तनिते ष्ठिष्टकथञ्चिद् अपि मानम् । आसप्ताहाद् दिव्यान्तरिक्षभौमैस् तथोत्पातैः ॥

nākālavarṣavitstanite ṣṭhiṣṭakathañcid api mānam | āsaptāhād divyāntarikṣabhaumais tathotpātaiḥ ||

When there is untimely rain, ⟨lightning⟩ and thunder, nothing is †ṣṭhiṣṭa† ⟨well-omened?⟩, nor is there any reckoning ⟨for a march⟩ in any way at all — for a full seven days; and so likewise with portents (utpāta) celestial, atmospheric and terrestrial.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: nākālavarṣavi(dyu)tstanite · ṣṭhiṣṭa(ṣviṣṭaṃ?)kathañcid.
  • About this edition: Two places are corrupt and the edition itself is unsure of both. It corrects nākālavarṣavi(dyu)tstanite, i.e. reads vidyut, 'lightning', which the rendering follows in ⟨ ⟩. For ṣṭhiṣṭa it offers only ṣviṣṭaṃ with its own question mark; ṣṭhiṣṭa is not a Sanskrit word and neither is ṣviṣṭaṃ (sviṣṭaṃ, 'well-omened', would be), so the akṣara is left unread and daggered rather than guessed. The seven-day prohibition after untimely rain, thunder and portents is legible and is what the verse is for; the negated word governing it (mānam, 'measure/regard') is intact.

दक्षिणपार्श्वस्पन्दनम् इष्टं हृदयं विहाय पृष्ठं च । मनसश् चागमशुद्धिः श्लोकश् चायं मुनिभिर् उक्तः ॥

dakṣiṇapārśvaspandanam iṣṭaṃ hṛdayaṃ vihāya pṛṣṭhaṃ ca | manasaś cāgamaśuddhiḥ ślokaś cāyaṃ munibhir uktaḥ ||

The throbbing of the right side is desired, excepting the heart and the back; and ⟨so is⟩ the purity of the mind's own impulse to go. And this śloka has been declared by the sages:

शुभाशुभानि सर्वाणि निमित्तानि स्युर् एकतः । एकतश् च मनो याति तद् विशुद्धं जयावहम् ॥

śubhāśubhāni sarvāṇi nimittāni syur ekataḥ | ekataś ca mano yāti tad viśuddhaṃ jayāvaham ||

Let all omens, auspicious and inauspicious, stand on one side, and on the other side the way the mind goes: that mind, when perfectly pure, brings victory.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 14.3 (`cittaśuddhir`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

आरोहति क्षितिपतौ विनयोपपन्नो यात्रानुगो ऽन्यतुरगं प्रतिहेषितश् च । वक्त्रेण वा स्पृशति दक्षिणम् आत्मपार्श्वं यो ऽश्वः स भर्तुर् अचिरात् प्रचिनोति लक्ष्मीम् ॥

ārohati kṣitipatau vinayopapanno yātrānugo 'nyaturagaṃ pratiheṣitaś ca | vaktreṇa vā spṛśati dakṣiṇam ātmapārśvaṃ yo 'śvaḥ sa bhartur acirāt pracinoti lakṣmīm ||

The horse that, when the lord of the earth mounts it, is endowed with good training, that keeps behind on the march, that neighs in answer towards another horse, or that touches its own right flank with its mouth — that horse swiftly heaps up fortune (lakṣmī) for its master.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 22.21 (`vājilakṣaṇeṅgita`, 'the horse's marks and bearing') · Yogayātrā 11.14 carries this verse. The chapter titles of the siblings confirm that 9.7–9.8 are the HORSE and 9.9–9.10 the ELEPHANT. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

मुहुर्मुहुर् मूत्रशकृत् करोति न ताड्यमानो ऽप्य् अनुलोमयायी । अकार्यभीतो ऽश्रुविलोचनश् च शिवं न भर्तुस् तुरगो ऽभिधत्ते ॥

muhurmuhur mūtraśakṛt karoti na tāḍyamāno 'py anulomayāyī | akāryabhīto 'śruvilocanaś ca śivaṃ na bhartus turago 'bhidhatte ||

The horse that passes urine and dung again and again, that even when struck will not go along with the march, that is frightened where there is nothing to fear, and whose eyes are wet with tears — that horse does not declare well-being for its master.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 22.20 (`vājilakṣaṇeṅgita`) · Yogayātrā 11.15 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

स्खलितगतिर् अकस्मात् त्रस्तकर्णो ऽतिदीनः श्वसति मृदु सुदीर्घं न्यस्तहस्तः पृथिव्याम् । द्रुतमुकुलितदृष्टिः स्वप्नशीलो विलोमो भयकृद् अहितभक्षी नैकशो ऽसृक्शकृत्कृत् ॥

skhalitagatir akasmāt trastakarṇo 'tidīnaḥ śvasati mṛdu sudīrghaṃ nyastahastaḥ pṛthivyām | drutamukulitadṛṣṭiḥ svapnaśīlo vilomo bhayakṛd ahitabhakṣī naikaśo 'sṛkśakṛtkṛt ||

⟨The elephant⟩ whose gait stumbles, whose ears start up without cause, that is utterly wretched, that breathes softly and very long, that lays its trunk down upon the ground, whose eyes close up quickly, that is given to sleep, that goes contrary ⟨to the line of march⟩, that eats what is bad for it and repeatedly voids blood with its dung — works danger (bhayakṛt).

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The running text reads vikomo, which is not a Sanskrit word, and the edition offers no correction here. It is vilomaḥ, 'going contrary' — the exact antonym of anulomayāyī two verses earlier (9.8) — and the mūla now prints विलोमो. Three editions already in this corpus print विलोमो in this same stanza: Bṛhadyātrā 21.14, Yogayātrā 10.62 and Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.12. The NGMCP catalogue of A 31/2 (Newari palm-leaf, NS 232 = 1111/12 CE) transcribes the line as `svapnasīlo pi lomo | bhayakṛd ahitabhakṣī…` — no k on the leaf either. भयकृद् stands in our own running text and is the predicate; an earlier note claimed this verse has no finite verb and that the predicate is carried over from 9.8, which was false about our own mūla and is withdrawn.
  • About this edition: THE ANIMAL IS THE ELEPHANT, NOT THE HORSE, and until 2026-09-08 both of our renderings made it a horse. हस्त of an animal is the elephant's TRUNK; it is not a word for a horse's foreleg, and the Hindi had to invent the gloss (अगला पाँव) to make it one. The same stanza stands in Bṛhadyātrā 21.14 under the chapter title `gajalakṣaṇeṅgita` and in Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.12 under `हस्तिचेष्टिताध्यायः`, and our own 9.10 — the good elephant — answers it. ⚠ Arrangement alone does NOT decide it: A 31/2 prints this line between `turago 'bhidhatte` (9.8) and the unnamed elephant (9.10). The lexicon and the three parallels do.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 21.14 (`gajalakṣaṇeṅgita`) · Yogayātrā 10.62 · Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.12 (`हस्तिचेष्टिताध्यायः`), all three published in this corpus and all three reading विलोमो. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā and Yogayātrā were typed for GRETIL by the same transcriber as this text (Mizue Sugita), so their agreement with us is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part — and here all three disagree with our विकोमो.

वल्मीकस्थाणुगुल्मतृणतरुमथनः स्वेच्छया हृष्टदृष्टिर् यायाद् यात्रानुलोमं त्वरितपदगतिर् वक्त्रम् उन्नाम्य चोच्चैः । कक्षासन्नाहकाले जनयति सुमहच्छीकरं बृंहते वा तत्कालं वा मदाप्तौ जयकृद् अथ रदं वेष्टयन् दक्षिणं च ॥

valmīkasthāṇugulmatṛṇatarumathanaḥ svecchayā hṛṣṭadṛṣṭir yāyād yātrānulomaṃ tvaritapadagatir vaktram unnāmya coccaiḥ | kakṣāsannāhakāle janayati sumahacchīkaraṃ bṛṃhate vā tatkālaṃ vā madāptau jayakṛd atha radaṃ veṣṭayan dakṣiṇaṃ ca ||

⟨The elephant⟩ that shatters ant-hills, stumps, thickets, grass and trees at its own pleasure, whose look is joyful, that goes forward with the march at a quick-stepping pace with its face lifted high; that at the time of fastening the girth throws off a very great spray ⟨of water⟩ or trumpets, or that comes into rut at that very moment — is victory-making; and so ⟨is one⟩ that curls ⟨its trunk⟩ about its right tusk.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse names no animal; mada (rut), bṛṃhita (trumpeting), rada (tusk) and kakṣā-sannāha fix it as the elephant, which is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. vṛhaṃte in the e-text is for bṛṃhate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बृंहते; this sentence names vṛhaṃte, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 21.15 (`gajalakṣaṇeṅgita`) · Yogayātrā 10.63 · Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.13 (`हस्तिचेष्टिताध्यायः`) carries this verse. All three sibling chapters are elephant chapters, which is a second confirmation that our own note's supplied ⟨गज⟩ is right — and, with 9.9, that 9.9 is an elephant too. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

सिद्धार्थकादर्शपयोञ्जनानि बद्धैकपश्वामिषपूर्णकुम्भाः । उष्णीषभृङ्गारनृवर्द्धमानपुंयानवीणातपवारणानि ॥

siddhārthakādarśapayoñjanāni baddhaikapaśvāmiṣapūrṇakumbhāḥ | uṣṇīṣabhṛṅgāranṛvarddhamānapuṃyānavīṇātapavāraṇāni ||

White mustard (siddhārthaka), a mirror, milk, collyrium; a single tethered beast, meat, brimful jars; a turban, a golden ewer (bhṛṅgāra), a man, a vardhamāna ⟨vessel⟩, a manned conveyance, a vīṇā, a parasol —

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Yogayātrā 13.10 · Bṛhadyātrā 27.1 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

दधिमधुघृतरोचनाकुमार्यो ध्वजकनकाम्बुजभद्रपीठशङ्खाः । सितवृषकुसुमाम्बराणि मीना द्विजगणिकाप्तजनाश् च चारुवेषाः ॥

dadhimadhughṛtarocanākumāryo dhvajakanakāmbujabhadrapīṭhaśaṅkhāḥ | sitavṛṣakusumāmbarāṇi mīnā dvijagaṇikāptajanāś ca cāruveṣāḥ ||

curds, honey, ghee, gorocanā, maidens; a banner, gold, a lotus, an auspicious seat (bhadrapīṭha), conches; a white bull, flowers, garments; fish; and brāhmaṇas, courtesans and trusted folk in handsome dress —

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.2 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.11 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

ज्वलितशिखिफलाक्षतेक्षुभक्षा द्विरदमृदङ्कुशचामरायुधानि । मरकतकुरविन्दपद्मरागस्फटिकमणिप्रमुखाश् च रत्नभेदाः ॥

jvalitaśikhiphalākṣatekṣubhakṣā dviradamṛdaṅkuśacāmarāyudhāni | marakatakuravindapadmarāgasphaṭikamaṇipramukhāś ca ratnabhedāḥ ||

blazing fire, fruit, unhusked rice (akṣata), sugar-cane, food; an elephant, earth, a goad, a chowrie, weapons; and the kinds of gem headed by emerald (marakata), ruby (kuruvinda), padmarāga and crystal —

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.3 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.12 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

स्वयम् अथ रचितान्य् अयत्नतो वा यदि कथितानि भवन्ति मङ्गलानि । स जयति सकलां ततो धरित्रीं ग्रहणदृगालभनश्रुतैर् उपास्य ॥

svayam atha racitāny ayatnato vā yadi kathitāni bhavanti maṅgalāni | sa jayati sakalāṃ tato dharitrīṃ grahaṇadṛgālabhanaśrutair upāsya ||

if these auspicious things (maṅgala) come to be arranged by himself, or without any effort, or are spoken of ⟨by others⟩ — then, having honoured them by taking, by sight, by touch and by hearing, he conquers the whole earth.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.4 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.13 carries this verse. Our verse and Bṛhadyātrā 27.4 are character-identical. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
9.15a reading here is contested

कर्पासौषधकृष्णधान्यलवणक्लीवास्थितैलं वसा पङ्काङ्गारगुडाहिचर्मशकृतः क्लेशाय सव्याधिताः । मत्तोन्मत्तजडीकृतान्धवधिरक्षुत्क्षामतक्रारयो मुण्डाभ्यक्तविमुक्तकेशपतिताः काषायिनश् चाशुभाः ॥

karpāsauṣadhakṛṣṇadhānyalavaṇaklīvāsthitailaṃ vasā paṅkāṅgāraguḍāhicarmaśakṛtaḥ kleśāya savyādhitāḥ | mattonmattajaḍīkṛtāndhavadhirakṣutkṣāmatakrārayo muṇḍābhyaktavimuktakeśapatitāḥ kāṣāyinaś cāśubhāḥ ||

Cotton, medicinal herbs, black grain, salt, a eunuch, bone, oil, fat, mud, charcoal, molasses, a snake, hide, dung — ⟨these⟩ make for distress, and so do the diseased; the drunk, the mad, the stupefied, the blind, the deaf, those wasted with hunger, buttermilk, enemies; the shaven-headed, the oil-smeared, those with hair let loose, the fallen ⟨patita⟩, and men in ochre robes are inauspicious.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: patita is 'fallen' — one who has lost caste or standing by an act. Until 2026-09-08 the English rendered it `the outcaste`, which names a social class, where the Hindi kept the bare पतित. Our two languages were making different claims about the same word on a page a reader may act on, so the English is brought back to the word: `the fallen ⟨patita⟩`. The loss-of-caste sense is available and is recorded here; it is not asserted.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.5 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.14 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

पटुपटहमृदङ्गशङ्खभेरीपणवरवं सपताकतोरणाग्रम् । प्रचुरकुसुमतोयशान्तरेणुं सुरभिसुवेषजनं भजेच् च मार्गम् ॥

paṭupaṭahamṛdaṅgaśaṅkhabherīpaṇavaravaṃ sapatākatoraṇāgram | pracurakusumatoyaśāntareṇuṃ surabhisuveṣajanaṃ bhajec ca mārgam ||

And he should take the road that rings with the loud paṭaha, the mṛdaṅga, the conch, the bherī and the paṇava; whose front is set with banners and archways; whose dust is laid by abundant flowers and water; and whose people are fragrant and finely dressed.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.6 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.15 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

यान्य् अत्र मङ्गलामङ्गलानि निर्गच्छतां प्रदिष्टानि । स्वप्नेष्व् अपि तानि शुभाशुभानि विड्लेपनं धन्यम् ॥

yāny atra maṅgalāmaṅgalāni nirgacchatāṃ pradiṣṭāni | svapneṣv api tāni śubhāśubhāni viḍlepanaṃ dhanyam ||

Whatever auspicious and inauspicious things have here been laid down for those setting out, those same are auspicious and inauspicious in dreams as well; ⟨and in a dream⟩ being smeared with excrement is fortunate.

1 note on this verse
  • Corroboration: Yogayātrā 13.16 carries this verse. Bṛhadyātrā's chapter 27 ends at verse 6, so this verse has only the one sibling. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

मृदुर् अनुकूलः स्निग्धपवनः तद्वद् वीनाश् च शस्यन्ते । ललाटं धनुर् अथेन्द्रंन शुभदम् अन्यत्र शस्तंफलम् ॥

mṛdur anukūlaḥ snigdhapavanaḥ tadvad vīnāś ca śasyante | lalāṭaṃ dhanur athendraṃna śubhadam anyatra śastaṃphalam ||

A soft, favourable, gentle wind is commended, and lutes (vīṇā) likewise. Indra's bow ⟨the rainbow⟩ facing the brow gives no good; elsewhere its fruit is commended.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: vīnā(ṇā)ś · athendraṃ(nuraindraṃ)na · śastaṃ(sta)phalam//.
  • About this edition: The rendering follows the edition's own corrections: vīnāś → vīṇāś (lutes, not vīnā), athendraṃna → dhanur aindraṃ na, i.e. the rainbow (Indra's bow), and śastaṃphalam → śastaphalam. Without them the second half yields no sense. lalāṭam, literally 'the forehead', is taken as 'straight in front', the usual śakuna direction-word.

पुन्नामानछुछुगृहगोधिकपिंगला शिवा श्यामा । कोकिलशूकरिकारलाप्रस्थाने वामतः शस्ताः ॥

punnāmānachuchugṛhagodhikapiṃgalā śivā śyāmā | kokilaśūkarikāralāprasthāne vāmataḥ śastāḥ ||

⟨Creatures⟩ bearing masculine names, the cchucchu ⟨musk-rat?⟩, the house-lizard, the piṅgalā ⟨owl⟩, the jackal (śivā), the śyāmā; the cuckoo, the śūkarika and the ralā — at the setting out these are commended on the left.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: punnāmāna(naḥ)chuchu(cchu)gṛhagodhikapiṃgalā(lāḥ) · punnāmāna(naḥ)chuchu(cchu)gṛhagodhikapiṃgalā(lāḥ) · punnāmāna(naḥ)chuchu(cchu)gṛhagodhikapiṃgalā(lāḥ) · kokilaśūkarikā(ka)ralā(lāḥ)prasthāne · kokilaśūkarikā(ka)ralā(lāḥ)prasthāne.
  • About this edition: A list of omen-creatures, several of whose names cannot be identified. The edition corrects only sandhi and endings here (punnāmānaḥ, cchu-, -piṅgalāḥ, śūkarika-, -ralāḥ), not the names themselves; cchucchu, śūkarika and ralā are left transliterated rather than guessed at, and cchucchu is queried as the musk-shrew (chucchundarī) only in ⟨ ⟩.

स्त्रीसंज्ञा भासभषकपिञ्जलाप्लवकम्बुकिंत्सका । शिखिश्रीकण्ठपयीकरुरुश्येनाश् च दक्षिणाङ्ग ॥

strīsaṃjñā bhāsabhaṣakapiñjalāplavakambukiṃtsakā | śikhiśrīkaṇṭhapayīkaruruśyenāś ca dakṣiṇāṅga ||

⟨Creatures⟩ bearing feminine names — the bhāsa ⟨vulture⟩, the barker ⟨dog⟩, the piñjala, the plava ⟨water-bird⟩, the kambu, the †kiṃtsak↠— and the peacock, the śrīkaṇṭha, the †payīka† ⟨pippīka?⟩, the ruru ⟨antelope⟩ and the hawk, on the right side ⟨…text breaks off…⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhāsabhaṣaka(ka)piñjalāplavakambukiṃtsakā(?)/ · bhāsabhaṣaka(ka)piñjalāplavakambukiṃtsakā(?)/ · śikhiśrīkaṣṭhapayīka(pippīka)ruruśyenāś · dakṣiṇāṅga(lacuna)//. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिखिश्रीकण्ठपयीकरुरुश्येनाश्; this sentence names śikhiśrīkaṣṭhapayīka, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The edition marks its own defeat twice in this verse: it prints kambukiṃtsakā(?) with a bare question mark, and records a lacuna after dakṣiṇāṅga, so the verse has no predicate — 'are commended' is carried over from 9.19 and left unsupplied. It offers pippīka for payīka, given in ⟨ ⟩. Unidentifiable names are daggered, not guessed. What survives intact is the doctrine: feminine-named creatures on the right, masculine-named on the left (9.19).

भारद्वाजमयूचाषनकुलावलोकनं धन्यः । गोधाहिरपजाहकसरटाशशानाम् अनिष्टफलम् ॥

bhāradvājamayūcāṣanakulāvalokanaṃ dhanyaḥ | godhāhirapajāhakasaraṭāśaśānām aniṣṭaphalam ||

The sight of the bhāradvāja ⟨bird⟩, the peacock, the cāṣa ⟨blue jay⟩ and a mongoose is fortunate; of the godhā ⟨monitor lizard⟩, the snake, the †rapa†, the hedgehog, the chameleon and the hare, the fruit is undesired.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhāradvājamayū(ra)cāpanakulāvalokanaṃ · dhanyaḥ(nyam)/ · godhāhirapa(?)jāhakasaraṭā(ṭa)śaśānām · godhāhirapa(?)jāhakasaraṭā(ṭa)śaśānām. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भारद्वाजमयूचाषनकुलावलोकनं; this sentence names cāpanakulāvalokanaṃ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The exemplar's page was read by eye (Pandit, JUB XX.2, printed p.57 = tky-pandit-1951 page_0158 line 18, at about 2.4x and 4.0x native). It sets भारद्वाजमयू (add र) चाषनकुलावलोकनं, with ṣa: the bowl carries a diagonal inner stroke, as in 9.22's चाष two lines below, and unlike the three open-bowled प of पिप्पीक on the line above. So cāpa was the e-text's misreading of ṣa, not the edition's text.]
  • About this edition: The edition corrects mayū → mayūra (peacock) and dhanyaḥ → dhanyam, both followed. It queries rapa with a bare '(?)', so that word is daggered and left unread. cāpana- is split as cāpa (a bow) + nakula (a mongoose): a bow is already an auspicious sight at 9.13 (āyudha) and cāpana is no noun; the split is this translation's judgement, not the edition's. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भारद्वाजमयूचाषनकुलावलोकनं; this sentence names cāpana, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The exemplar's plate (printed p.57, read by eye at about 4.0x native) sets चाषनकुलावलोकनं, cāṣa the blue jay, not cāpa. So the split into cāpa (a bow) + nakula no longer applies, and the fortunate sights here are four creatures: bhāradvāja, peacock, cāṣa and mongoose. Cāṣa and nakula stand together in our Yogayātrā 14.4 as well (भारद्वाज्यजवर्हिचाषनकुलाः), the parallel Pandit himself names for 9.21-22.]

कीर्तनम् इष्टं चाषकशशगोधाहिसूकरजातीनाम् । रुतदर्शनं त्व् अधन्यं विपरीतं वानरर्क्षानां ॥

kīrtanam iṣṭaṃ cāṣakaśaśagodhāhisūkarajātīnām | rutadarśanaṃ tv adhanyaṃ viparītaṃ vānararkṣānāṃ ||

To name the kinds cāṣa ⟨blue jay⟩, hare, godhā ⟨monitor lizard⟩, snake and boar is desired; but to hear their cry and to see them is unfortunate. For monkeys and bears it is the reverse.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: cāṣakaśaśagodhāhisūkara(godhāsūkarāhi)jātīnām/ · vānararkṣānāṃ(ṇām)//.
  • About this edition: The edition reorders the compound to godhā-sūkara-ahi and normalises vānararkṣāṇām; neither touches the sense. rutadarśanam is one compound covering both hearing the cry and seeing the animal, and is rendered as both.

मृगविहगा शस्यन्ते प्रदक्षिणं विषमसंख्यया च मृगाः । नृपदर्शने गमणवत् तद्विपरीता प्रवेशे तु ॥

mṛgavihagā śasyante pradakṣiṇaṃ viṣamasaṃkhyayā ca mṛgāḥ | nṛpadarśane gamaṇavat tadviparītā praveśe tu ||

Beasts and birds are commended ⟨when passing⟩ to the right, and beasts in odd number. When ⟨going⟩ to an audience of a king the rule is as at setting out; but at an entry ⟨into a town⟩ it is the reverse of that.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: gamaṇa(na)vat.

आक्षेपशीलः पुरुषाविधायी विरक्तभृत्यः परदारगामी । लुब्धो ऽसहायो व्यसनी कृतघ्नः स्थितिप्रभेत्ता करशीर्णराष्ट्रः ॥

ākṣepaśīlaḥ puruṣāvidhāyī viraktabhṛtyaḥ paradāragāmī | lubdho 'sahāyo vyasanī kṛtaghnaḥ sthitiprabhettā karaśīrṇarāṣṭraḥ ||

⟨A king who is⟩ given to insult, harsh of speech, whose servants are disaffected, who goes to other men's wives, greedy, without allies, addicted to vice, ungrateful, a breaker of settled usage, whose realm is worn to shreds by taxation —

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pu(pa)ruṣāvi(bhi)dhāyī · pu(pa)ruṣāvi(bhi)dhāyī.
  • About this edition: The rendering follows the edition's paruṣābhidhāyī ('harsh of speech') for the running text's puruṣāvidhāyī, which yields nothing. The sentence is completed in 9.25 by sa daivahīnaḥ.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 30.1 (`abhiyojya`) carries this verse. ⭐ It prints `परुषाभिधायी` where our running text has the meaningless `पुरुषाविधायी`, so the edition's correction `pu(pa)ruṣāvi(bhi)dhāyī` — which our rendering already follows — now has a witness. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

विस्रम्भहा क्रोधवशे नृशंसे क्षुद्रा प्रमादी न बहुश्रुताश् च । दिव्यान्तरिक्षक्षितिजौर् विकारैर् निपीडितो स दैवहीनः ॥

visrambhahā krodhavaśe nṛśaṃse kṣudrā pramādī na bahuśrutāś ca | divyāntarikṣakṣitijaur vikārair nipīḍito sa daivahīnaḥ ||

who betrays trust, is in the grip of anger, is cruel, base, heedless and not widely learned; and who is afflicted by disorders celestial, atmospheric and terrestrial — he is the one forsaken by fate (daiva-hīna).

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: krodhavaśe(śo) · nṛśaṃse(saḥ) · kṣudrā(draḥ) · bahuśrutā(ta)ś · divyāntarikṣakṣitijau(jai)r · (yaś ca).
  • About this edition: The running text's endings are broken throughout (krodhavaśe, nṛśaṃse, kṣudrā, -jaur); the edition restores the nominatives krodhavaśo, nṛśaṃsaḥ, kṣudraḥ, -jair and supplies yaś ca. The rendering follows those restorations, none of which changes the sense — the list of the enemy king's defects begun in 9.24 continues unbroken.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 30.2 (`abhiyojya`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

अतो विपर्यस्तगुणेन राज्ञा तादृग्विधो ऽरिस् त्व् अभियुक्तमात्रः । तरुर् घुणैर् जग्ध इवात्तकार्यो महान् अपि क्षिप्रम् उपैति भङ्गाः ॥

ato viparyastaguṇena rājñā tādṛgvidho 'ris tv abhiyuktamātraḥ | tarur ghuṇair jagdha ivāttakāryo mahān api kṣipram upaiti bhaṅgāḥ ||

Therefore such an enemy, once merely attacked by a king of the opposite qualities, though he be great, quickly comes to ruin, his undertaking eaten away, like a tree devoured by wood-worms.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhaṅgāḥ(ṅgam)//.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 30.3 (`abhiyojya`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

तद्विष्टप्रवरनरप्रतापहीना नीशौर्या वरवारणाश्वयोधमुखाः । सोत्पातप्रकृतिविपर्यायानयाता शोकार्त्ता रिपुबलम् आशुर्याति सेनाः ॥

tadviṣṭapravaranarapratāpahīnā nīśauryā varavāraṇāśvayodhamukhāḥ | sotpātaprakṛtiviparyāyānayātā śokārttā ripubalam āśuryāti senāḥ ||

Drained of the vigour of its foremost men ⟨who are hostile to him⟩, void of valour, though headed by choice elephants, horses and warriors; dogged by portents and by the derangement of the ⟨realm's⟩ constituents (prakṛti), and stricken with grief — such an army goes over swiftly to the enemy's force.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: nī(niḥ)śauryā · varavāraṇāśvayodhamukhāḥ(khyāḥ)/ · sotpātaprakṛtiviparyā(rya)yāna(nu)yātā · sotpātaprakṛtiviparyā(rya)yāna(nu)yātā · āśuryā(yā)ti · senāḥ(nā)//.
  • About this edition: tadviṣṭa- is taken as tad-dviṣṭa, 'hated by / hostile to him', which matches viraktabhṛtyaḥ at 9.24; the edition does not correct it. Its other corrections (niḥśauryā, -mukhyāḥ, viparyayānuyātā, āśu yāti, senā) are followed. ripubalam āśu yāti senā says literally 'the army goes swiftly to the enemy's force': rendered as defection, though it can equally mean that the army falls to that force.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 31.1 (`senāvātavṛṣṭyulkābhūgarjitasandhyā`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

संग्रामे वम् अमरप्रसादा जेष्यामो रिपुबलम् आश्व् असंशयेन । यस्येवं भवति बले जनप्रवादाः स्वल्पो ऽपि प्रवरबलं निहन्ति राजा ॥

saṃgrāme vam amaraprasādā jeṣyāmo ripubalam āśv asaṃśayena | yasyevaṃ bhavati bale janapravādāḥ svalpo 'pi pravarabalaṃ nihanti rājā ||

'In battle we shall conquer the enemy's force swiftly and beyond doubt, by the grace of the immortals' — the king in whose army such is the talk of the people, though he be slight ⟨in strength⟩, strikes down a superior force.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: va(ya)m · amara(dvija)prasādā(t) · amara(dvija)prasādā(t) · yasye(syai)vaṃ · janapravādāḥ(daḥ).
  • About this edition: The running text's vam is read with the edition as vayam ('we'), without which the quoted boast has no subject. The edition further replaces amara-prasādā ('by the grace of the immortals') with dvija-prasādāt ('by the grace of the twice-born'); the rendering keeps the uncorrected running text and records the variant here, since the choice between divine and brahminical favour is a real difference of claim.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 31.2 (`senāvātavṛṣṭyulkābhūgarjitasandhyā`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

पुरं रिपोर् भूमिपतिनिहन्याच् छत्रोर् अनिष्टग्रहदिटिविष्टिः । युद्धस्य यात्रासम एव कालः कूरेषु लग्नेषु च कूटायुधः ॥

puraṃ ripor bhūmipatinihanyāc chatror aniṣṭagrahadiṭiviṣṭiḥ | yuddhasya yātrāsama eva kālaḥ kūreṣu lagneṣu ca kūṭāyudhaḥ ||

The lord of the earth, stationed in the quarter of the graha unfavourable to his foe, may destroy the enemy's city. The time for battle is the very same as for the march; and in malefic (krūra) lagnas, ⟨let it be⟩ warfare by stratagem (kūṭayuddha).

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhūmipatini(rni)hanyāc · aniṣṭagrahadiṭi(ṅni)viṣṭiḥ(ṣṭaḥ)/ · aniṣṭagrahadiṭi(ṅni)viṣṭiḥ(ṣṭaḥ)/ · kū(krū)reṣu · kūṭāyudhaḥ(kūṭayuddhaṃ)//.
  • About this edition: Follows the edition throughout: bhūmipatir nihanyāt, aniṣṭagraha-diṅ-niviṣṭaḥ (stationed in that graha's direction), krūreṣu for kūreṣu, and kūṭayuddham ('warfare by stratagem') for the running text's kūṭāyudhaḥ ('a treacherous weapon'). Rendered 'malefic' for krūra per the glossary.

अन्तर्मुखाः पौरभयं विहङ्गाः प्रकारसंस्था विनिवेदयन्ति । आगन्तुनाशाय बहिर्मुखास् ते तुल्यं विहङ्गैः सरमात्मजौश् च ॥

antarmukhāḥ paurabhayaṃ vihaṅgāḥ prakārasaṃsthā vinivedayanti | āgantunāśāya bahirmukhās te tulyaṃ vihaṅgaiḥ saramātmajauś ca ||

Birds settled on the rampart and facing inward announce danger to the townsfolk; facing outward, they announce the destruction of the incomer ⟨the invader⟩. And the sons of Saramā ⟨dogs⟩ are read equally with the birds.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pra(prā)kārasaṃsthā · saramātmajau(jā)ś.

केतूल्कार्कजराहुकीलककुजा बिम्बप्रविष्टा यतः सूर्येन्द्वोः परिवेषखण्डम् अथवा दृश्येत यस्यां दिशि । क्रोष्टुश्वात्तिपिपीलिकाशशमृगधाक्षदयो वा पुरे सैन्ये वापि यतो विशन्ति हि ततः शत्रो पुरं घातयेत् ॥

ketūlkārkajarāhukīlakakujā bimbapraviṣṭā yataḥ sūryendvoḥ pariveṣakhaṇḍam athavā dṛśyeta yasyāṃ diśi | kroṣṭuśvāttipipīlikāśaśamṛgadhākṣadayo vā pure sainye vāpi yato viśanti hi tataḥ śatro puraṃ ghātayet ||

From whatever quarter a comet, a meteor, Saturn, Rāhu, a kīlaka or Mars has entered the disc of the Sun or of the Moon, or in whatever direction a broken segment of a halo is seen; or from whatever quarter jackals, dogs, ⟨snakes⟩, ants, hares, deer, crows and the like enter the city or the army — from that very quarter let him strike down the enemy's city.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: kroṣṭuśvātti(hi)pipīlikāśaśamṛgadhākṣa(dhvāṅkṣā)dayo · kroṣṭuśvātti(hi)pipīlikāśaśamṛgadhākṣa(dhvāṅkṣā)dayo · śatro(troḥ).
  • About this edition: Rendered on the edition's parenthetical corrections, which the ingest stores apart from the running text. The running text's kroṣṭuśvātti- and -dhākṣa- are not words; the edition reads kroṣṭu-śvā-hi (jackal, dog, snake) and dhvāṅkṣa (crow), and both are followed here — the ⟨snake⟩ rests on that correction alone. śatro is read as śatroḥ (genitive, 'the enemy's city'); uncorrected it is a vocative that yields no sense. kīlaka is left untranslated: in the omen lists it names a spike- or nail-shaped comet/meteoric appearance, not an identifiable body. arkaja ('sun-born') is Saturn, kuja Mars (GLOSSARY). The whole verse is a direction-omen: the quarter the sign comes from is the quarter to attack from.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 33.3 + 33.4 (`puradurgālabdho`) carries this verse. ⚠ THE SIBLING DIVIDES WHERE PANDIT DOES NOT: what we print as one verse, Bṛhadyātrā prints as two. A citation of TY 9.31 and one of BY 33.3–4 name the same text, and without this note nobody would know it. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

पातालर्क्षे राहुकेत्वो पुरे ऽरेतोयोच्छित्तिः सालपातश् च कार्यः । जामित्रस्थे भूमिजास्यांशके वा पुत्रेणेन्दोर् वीक्षिते ऽग्निः प्रदेयः ॥

pātālarkṣe rāhuketvo pure 'retoyocchittiḥ sālapātaś ca kāryaḥ | jāmitrasthe bhūmijāsyāṃśake vā putreṇendor vīkṣite 'gniḥ pradeyaḥ ||

When Rāhu and Ketu stand in the sign of the pātāla ⟨the 4th house⟩, the enemy's water is to be cut off within the city and the rampart brought down. And when Mars stands in the jāmitra ⟨the 7th house⟩, or in the aṃśaka of it, and is aspected by the Moon's son ⟨Mercury⟩, fire is to be set ⟨to the city⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: rāhuketvo(tvoḥ) · 'reto(s to)yocchittiḥ · bhūmijā(je ')syāṃśake.
  • About this edition: Read with the edition's corrections: rāhuketvoḥ (dual), and 'res toyocchittiḥ = areḥ toyocchittiḥ, 'the cutting off of the enemy's water' — the uncorrected 'retoyocchittiḥ leaves that genitive unresolved. bhūmijāsyāṃśake is read bhūmije 'syāṃśake, 'Mars being ⟨there⟩ or in the aṃśaka of it'. pātāla and jāmitra are the 4th and 7th houses per GLOSSARY. sāla is the fortification wall (prākāra), not the tree. agniḥ pradeyaḥ is the plain instruction to fire the city and is left at its weight.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 33.5 (`puradurgālabdho`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

परविषयपुराप्तौ साधुदेवद्विजस्वां कुलजनवनितांश् च क्ष्माधिपो नोपरुन्ध्यात् । विगजतुरशस्त्रानार्तभीतांश् च हन्याच् छुभतिथिदिवसर्क्षे हृष्टसैन्ये विशेत् तु ॥

paraviṣayapurāptau sādhudevadvijasvāṃ kulajanavanitāṃś ca kṣmādhipo noparundhyāt | vigajaturaśastrānārtabhītāṃś ca hanyāc chubhatithidivasarkṣe hṛṣṭasainye viśet tu ||

On the winning of the enemy's territory and city, the lord of the earth ⟨the king⟩ shall not seize the property of holy men, of the gods ⟨temples⟩ and of the twice-born, nor the people of good family and the women; nor shall he slay those bereft of elephant, horse and weapon, nor the afflicted and the terrified. On an auspicious tithi, day and nakṣatra let him enter, his army rejoicing.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: sādhudevadvijasvāṃ(jasvaṃ) · kulajanavanitāṃ(tā)ś · vigajatura(ga)śastrānā(nn · vigajatura(ga)śastrānā(nn ā)rtabhītāṃ(tā)ś · ā)rtabhītāṃ(tā)ś · hṛṣṭasainye(nyo).
  • About this edition: The edition restores a negative in the second half — śastrānn ārta- for the running text's śastrānārta-, i.e. śastrān na ārta-. With it the verse FORBIDS killing the weaponless, the afflicted and the terrified, which is the standing rājadharma rule; without it the transmitted line would command exactly that. The restored negative is followed here, and it is the whole sense of the pāda — a reader who wants the uncorrected text read should know it says the opposite. Also read with the edition: sādhudevadvijasvaṃ, kulajanavanitāś, and hṛṣṭasainyo (nominative, agreeing with the king); the uncorrected locative hṛṣṭasainye ('the army being joyful') changes nothing material. uparundh- is 'shut up, hold, seize upon' — the prohibition covers both plundering the property and laying hold of the persons.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 34.4 (`jayottara`) · Yogayātrā 16.9 carries this verse. Note the mapping: our 9.33 answers BY 34.4, our 9.34 answers BY 34.1 and our 9.35 answers the first half of BY 34.3. The three run in a different order in the sibling. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.

दिग्दाहक्षतजरजो ऽश्मवृष्टिपातैः निर्घातक्षितिचलनादिवैकृतैश् च । युद्धान्ते मृगशकुनैश् च दीप्तनादैः नो भद्रं भवति जिते परि पार्थिवस्य ॥

digdāhakṣatajarajo 'śmavṛṣṭipātaiḥ nirghātakṣiticalanādivaikṛtaiś ca | yuddhānte mṛgaśakunaiś ca dīptanādaiḥ no bhadraṃ bhavati jite pari pārthivasya ||

By burnings of the horizon, by blood, by dust and by falls of stone-rain, by thunderclaps, quakings of the earth and other such distortions ⟨of nature⟩, and at the close of the battle by beasts and birds with blazing cries — no good fortune comes to the king, even when ⟨the foe⟩ has been conquered.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pari('pi), i.e. jite 'pi.
  • About this edition: THIS STANZA IS NOT A FRAGMENT — twenty words of it were lost to a bracket-matching defect in our own ingest, and are restored here (2026-09-08). The source line ends `…vaikṛtaiś ca/(` with a lone opening bracket that has no partner of its own; the apparatus rule paired it with the `)` of `pari('pi)` on the next line and swallowed the whole third pāda — `yuddhānte mṛgaśakunaiś ca dīptanādaiḥ no bhadraṃ bhavati jite pari` — into the apparatus, publishing `…vaikṛtaiś ca | pārthivasya ||`. It is running text, not a supplement: Bṛhadyātrā 34.1 and Yogayātrā 16.7 both print the pāda. 9.34 is the only one of the 103 verses whose parentheses do not balance (2 open, 1 close), so this defect has exactly one instance. The earlier note here said the stanza `breaks off straight to pārthivasya, with no verb and no predicate` and that the missing middle stands `only inside a parenthesis`; both statements were about our parse, not about the edition, and are withdrawn. dig-dāha is the reddening glow on the horizon of the omen literature; nirghāta the crash of a thunderbolt or meteoric report.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 34.1 · Yogayātrā 16.7, both published in this corpus and both printing the full four-pāda stanza. Bṛhadyātrā reads `जये ऽपि` ('even in victory') where our edition corrects `pari` to `'pi`, giving `jite 'pi` ('even when ⟨the foe⟩ is conquered'). ⚠ Same transcriber (Mizue Sugita) for all three GRETIL files; the agreement is a partly shared channel, but what it establishes here is the EXTENT of the stanza, which no transcriber invents.

शुभा मृगपतत्रिणो मृदुसमीरणो दह्लादकृत ग्रहाः स्थूटामरीचयो द्विगतरेणुदिन्दलः । यद् अन्यम् अपि विकृतै न विजयावसाने भवेत् तदा सुखम् अकण्टकं नृपतिर् अत्ति देशे रिपुः ॥

śubhā mṛgapatatriṇo mṛdusamīraṇo dahlādakṛta grahāḥ sthūṭāmarīcayo dvigatareṇudindalaḥ | yad anyam api vikṛtai na vijayāvasāne bhavet tadā sukham akaṇṭakaṃ nṛpatir atti deśe ripuḥ ||

⟨When⟩ beasts and birds are auspicious, ⟨when⟩ the soft breeze is gladdening, ⟨when⟩ the grahas are of clear rays and the circle of the quarters is free of dust, and when at the close of the victory no other distortion ⟨portent⟩ whatever occurs — then the king enjoys happiness, unthwarted, in the enemy's land.

3 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: da(drop da)hlādakṛta(t) · da)hlādakṛta(t) · sthūṭā(sphuṭa)marīcayo · dvi(vi)gatareṇudinda(lacuna)laḥ(diṅmaṇḍalaṃ)/ · dvi(vi)gatareṇudinda(lacuna)laḥ(diṅmaṇḍalaṃ)/ · dvi(vi)gatareṇudinda(lacuna)laḥ(diṅmaṇḍalaṃ)/ · a(da)pi · vikṛtai(taṃ) · ripuḥ(ripoḥ)//.
  • About this edition: The third pāda is damaged. The e-text reads dvigatareṇudindalaḥ; the edition marks a LACUNA at that point and reconstructs vigatareṇu diṅmaṇḍalaṃ, 'the circle of the quarters free of dust' — followed here, since it is the only reading that makes sense beside sphuṭamarīcayaḥ (grahas of clear rays), both being the same 'clear air' omen. Also read with the edition: hlādakṛt (the running text's da- is a dittography), sphuṭa- for sthūṭā-, anyad api for anyam api, vikṛtaṃ for vikṛtai, and ripoḥ (genitive) for ripuḥ — the transmitted nominative would make the ENEMY the one enjoying the land, which reverses the verse. NOTE on kaṇṭaka: akaṇṭaka here is the ordinary 'free of thorns, unopposed', NOT the Ṣaṭpañcāśikā's technical kaṇṭaka = kendra of the GLOSSARY, whose row is scoped to that text. atti is literally 'eats' — enjoys, consumes.
  • Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 34.3 (`jayottara`, first half) · Yogayātrā 16.8 carry this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part. ⭐ BOTH SIBLINGS READ AN ACCUSATIVE WHERE WE READ A LOCATIVE: `नृपतिर् अत्ति देशं रिपोः`, 'the king CONSUMES the enemy's LAND', against our `नृपतिर् अत्ति देशे रिपुः` with the edition correcting `ripuḥ` to `ripoḥ`, i.e. `देशे रिपोः`, 'in the enemy's land'. THE RULING (2026-09-08): OURS IS KEPT. Both parse — with `देशे रिपोः` the object of `atti` is `सुखम् अकण्टकम्`, which stands in the line — and the two say the same thing about the world. `देशे` is our own exemplar's reading, the edition does not touch it, and one sibling's case-ending is not a reason to rewrite a text we hold on one witness. The variant is recorded so that nobody has to rediscover it. The siblings also confirm Pandit's `anyad`, `vikṛtaṃ` and `ripoḥ`, and Yogayātrā 16.8 prints `विगतरेणुदिग्मण्डलम्`, which is exactly the reconstruction our note adopts for the damaged third pāda — so that reconstruction is now witnessed rather than inferred.

Use it freely — CC BY 4.0. This Sanskrit transcription and this English translation are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Copy them, print them, build on them; the only condition is attribution to Karma Sakha (karmasakha.com). The underlying work is ancient and in the public domain everywhere.

If you find an error, it is ours and we want it. Every reading on this page is recorded with the evidence behind it, so a disagreement can be argued about concretely rather than asserted.

Readings on this site cite texts at chapter level, with verse numbers only where our research verified the passage in a named edition. How conflicts between texts are resolved is documented on the conventions page.