व्यतिपातविष्टिवैधृतिपापग्रहलग्नवर्गदिवसेषु । चौर्यावस्कन्दानृतसंग्रामासिद्धिम् आयान्ति ॥
vyatipātaviṣṭivaidhṛtipāpagrahalagnavargadivaseṣu | cauryāvaskandānṛtasaṃgrāmāsiddhim āyānti ||
On ⟨the days of⟩ Vyatīpāta, Viṣṭi and Vaidhṛti, and in the lagnas, the vargas and the days of malefic grahas, theft, a surprise raid (avaskanda), falsehood and battle come to success.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The e-text writes one compound, saṃgrāma-asiddhim, and the mūla keeps it. Undoing the sandhi one word earlier gives `…saṃgrāmāḥ siddhim āyānti`, 'theft, a surprise raid, falsehood and battle attain success' — equally metrical (27 mātrās either way), grammatically neater, and in agreement with the muhūrta maxim that Viṣṭi suits cruel deeds. Until 2026-09-08 this ingest declined to choose and published the OTHER reading — the failure of those acts — in both languages. There is now a witness: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.34 prints the split, `चौर्यावस्कन्दानृतसंग्रामाः सिद्धिमायान्ति`. Both renderings are corrected to it.
- Corroboration: Daivajña Vallabhā 15.34 (`लग्नचिन्ताध्यायः`), published in this corpus. It is our only INDEPENDENT digital hand for this text: Daivajña Vallabhā was ingested from sanskritdocuments.org, a different work by a different encoder, where Bṛhadyātrā and Yogayātrā share our own transcriber. It reads `व्यतिपातविष्टिवैधृतिपापग्रहलग्नदिवसेषु । चौर्यावस्कन्दानृतसंग्रामाः सिद्धिमायान्ति` — with `वर्ग` absent where we read `लग्नवर्गदिवसेषु`. That variant is recorded and not adopted.
हुत्वानलं नमस्कृत्य देवताः स्वस्ति वाच्य विप्रांश् च । ध्यायन् दिगीशम् अविलम्बितं व्रजेद् भूपतिः सुमनाः ॥
hutvānalaṃ namaskṛtya devatāḥ svasti vācya viprāṃś ca | dhyāyan digīśam avilambitaṃ vrajed bhūpatiḥ sumanāḥ ||
Having offered oblation in the fire, having bowed to the deities, and having had the brāhmaṇas pronounce the benediction (svasti), the lord of the earth, meditating on the lord of the ⟨chosen⟩ direction and glad in mind, should set out without delay.
कार्यवशात् स्वयम् अगमं भूभर्तुः केचिद् आहुर् आचार्याः । छत्रायुधाद्यम् इष्टं वैजयिकं निर्गमे कुर्यात् ॥
kāryavaśāt svayam agamaṃ bhūbhartuḥ kecid āhur ācāryāḥ | chatrāyudhādyam iṣṭaṃ vaijayikaṃ nirgame kuryāt ||
Some ācāryas say that, according to what the business requires, the lord of the earth may not go in person; ⟨then⟩ at the setting out he should send forth the desired victory-tokens (vaijayika) — the parasol, the weapons and the rest.
नाकालवर्षवित्स्तनिते ष्ठिष्टकथञ्चिद् अपि मानम् । आसप्ताहाद् दिव्यान्तरिक्षभौमैस् तथोत्पातैः ॥
nākālavarṣavitstanite ṣṭhiṣṭakathañcid api mānam | āsaptāhād divyāntarikṣabhaumais tathotpātaiḥ ||
When there is untimely rain, ⟨lightning⟩ and thunder, nothing is †ṣṭhiṣṭa† ⟨well-omened?⟩, nor is there any reckoning ⟨for a march⟩ in any way at all — for a full seven days; and so likewise with portents (utpāta) celestial, atmospheric and terrestrial.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: nākālavarṣavi(dyu)tstanite · ṣṭhiṣṭa(ṣviṣṭaṃ?)kathañcid.
- About this edition: Two places are corrupt and the edition itself is unsure of both. It corrects nākālavarṣavi(dyu)tstanite, i.e. reads vidyut, 'lightning', which the rendering follows in ⟨ ⟩. For ṣṭhiṣṭa it offers only ṣviṣṭaṃ with its own question mark; ṣṭhiṣṭa is not a Sanskrit word and neither is ṣviṣṭaṃ (sviṣṭaṃ, 'well-omened', would be), so the akṣara is left unread and daggered rather than guessed. The seven-day prohibition after untimely rain, thunder and portents is legible and is what the verse is for; the negated word governing it (mānam, 'measure/regard') is intact.
दक्षिणपार्श्वस्पन्दनम् इष्टं हृदयं विहाय पृष्ठं च । मनसश् चागमशुद्धिः श्लोकश् चायं मुनिभिर् उक्तः ॥
dakṣiṇapārśvaspandanam iṣṭaṃ hṛdayaṃ vihāya pṛṣṭhaṃ ca | manasaś cāgamaśuddhiḥ ślokaś cāyaṃ munibhir uktaḥ ||
The throbbing of the right side is desired, excepting the heart and the back; and ⟨so is⟩ the purity of the mind's own impulse to go. And this śloka has been declared by the sages:
शुभाशुभानि सर्वाणि निमित्तानि स्युर् एकतः । एकतश् च मनो याति तद् विशुद्धं जयावहम् ॥
śubhāśubhāni sarvāṇi nimittāni syur ekataḥ | ekataś ca mano yāti tad viśuddhaṃ jayāvaham ||
Let all omens, auspicious and inauspicious, stand on one side, and on the other side the way the mind goes: that mind, when perfectly pure, brings victory.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 14.3 (`cittaśuddhir`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
आरोहति क्षितिपतौ विनयोपपन्नो यात्रानुगो ऽन्यतुरगं प्रतिहेषितश् च । वक्त्रेण वा स्पृशति दक्षिणम् आत्मपार्श्वं यो ऽश्वः स भर्तुर् अचिरात् प्रचिनोति लक्ष्मीम् ॥
ārohati kṣitipatau vinayopapanno yātrānugo 'nyaturagaṃ pratiheṣitaś ca | vaktreṇa vā spṛśati dakṣiṇam ātmapārśvaṃ yo 'śvaḥ sa bhartur acirāt pracinoti lakṣmīm ||
The horse that, when the lord of the earth mounts it, is endowed with good training, that keeps behind on the march, that neighs in answer towards another horse, or that touches its own right flank with its mouth — that horse swiftly heaps up fortune (lakṣmī) for its master.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 22.21 (`vājilakṣaṇeṅgita`, 'the horse's marks and bearing') · Yogayātrā 11.14 carries this verse. The chapter titles of the siblings confirm that 9.7–9.8 are the HORSE and 9.9–9.10 the ELEPHANT. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
मुहुर्मुहुर् मूत्रशकृत् करोति न ताड्यमानो ऽप्य् अनुलोमयायी । अकार्यभीतो ऽश्रुविलोचनश् च शिवं न भर्तुस् तुरगो ऽभिधत्ते ॥
muhurmuhur mūtraśakṛt karoti na tāḍyamāno 'py anulomayāyī | akāryabhīto 'śruvilocanaś ca śivaṃ na bhartus turago 'bhidhatte ||
The horse that passes urine and dung again and again, that even when struck will not go along with the march, that is frightened where there is nothing to fear, and whose eyes are wet with tears — that horse does not declare well-being for its master.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 22.20 (`vājilakṣaṇeṅgita`) · Yogayātrā 11.15 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
स्खलितगतिर् अकस्मात् त्रस्तकर्णो ऽतिदीनः श्वसति मृदु सुदीर्घं न्यस्तहस्तः पृथिव्याम् । द्रुतमुकुलितदृष्टिः स्वप्नशीलो विलोमो भयकृद् अहितभक्षी नैकशो ऽसृक्शकृत्कृत् ॥
skhalitagatir akasmāt trastakarṇo 'tidīnaḥ śvasati mṛdu sudīrghaṃ nyastahastaḥ pṛthivyām | drutamukulitadṛṣṭiḥ svapnaśīlo vilomo bhayakṛd ahitabhakṣī naikaśo 'sṛkśakṛtkṛt ||
⟨The elephant⟩ whose gait stumbles, whose ears start up without cause, that is utterly wretched, that breathes softly and very long, that lays its trunk down upon the ground, whose eyes close up quickly, that is given to sleep, that goes contrary ⟨to the line of march⟩, that eats what is bad for it and repeatedly voids blood with its dung — works danger (bhayakṛt).
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The running text reads vikomo, which is not a Sanskrit word, and the edition offers no correction here. It is vilomaḥ, 'going contrary' — the exact antonym of anulomayāyī two verses earlier (9.8) — and the mūla now prints विलोमो. Three editions already in this corpus print विलोमो in this same stanza: Bṛhadyātrā 21.14, Yogayātrā 10.62 and Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.12. The NGMCP catalogue of A 31/2 (Newari palm-leaf, NS 232 = 1111/12 CE) transcribes the line as `svapnasīlo pi lomo | bhayakṛd ahitabhakṣī…` — no k on the leaf either. भयकृद् stands in our own running text and is the predicate; an earlier note claimed this verse has no finite verb and that the predicate is carried over from 9.8, which was false about our own mūla and is withdrawn.
- About this edition: THE ANIMAL IS THE ELEPHANT, NOT THE HORSE, and until 2026-09-08 both of our renderings made it a horse. हस्त of an animal is the elephant's TRUNK; it is not a word for a horse's foreleg, and the Hindi had to invent the gloss (अगला पाँव) to make it one. The same stanza stands in Bṛhadyātrā 21.14 under the chapter title `gajalakṣaṇeṅgita` and in Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.12 under `हस्तिचेष्टिताध्यायः`, and our own 9.10 — the good elephant — answers it. ⚠ Arrangement alone does NOT decide it: A 31/2 prints this line between `turago 'bhidhatte` (9.8) and the unnamed elephant (9.10). The lexicon and the three parallels do.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 21.14 (`gajalakṣaṇeṅgita`) · Yogayātrā 10.62 · Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.12 (`हस्तिचेष्टिताध्यायः`), all three published in this corpus and all three reading विलोमो. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā and Yogayātrā were typed for GRETIL by the same transcriber as this text (Mizue Sugita), so their agreement with us is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. Their DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part — and here all three disagree with our विकोमो.
वल्मीकस्थाणुगुल्मतृणतरुमथनः स्वेच्छया हृष्टदृष्टिर् यायाद् यात्रानुलोमं त्वरितपदगतिर् वक्त्रम् उन्नाम्य चोच्चैः । कक्षासन्नाहकाले जनयति सुमहच्छीकरं बृंहते वा तत्कालं वा मदाप्तौ जयकृद् अथ रदं वेष्टयन् दक्षिणं च ॥
valmīkasthāṇugulmatṛṇatarumathanaḥ svecchayā hṛṣṭadṛṣṭir yāyād yātrānulomaṃ tvaritapadagatir vaktram unnāmya coccaiḥ | kakṣāsannāhakāle janayati sumahacchīkaraṃ bṛṃhate vā tatkālaṃ vā madāptau jayakṛd atha radaṃ veṣṭayan dakṣiṇaṃ ca ||
⟨The elephant⟩ that shatters ant-hills, stumps, thickets, grass and trees at its own pleasure, whose look is joyful, that goes forward with the march at a quick-stepping pace with its face lifted high; that at the time of fastening the girth throws off a very great spray ⟨of water⟩ or trumpets, or that comes into rut at that very moment — is victory-making; and so ⟨is one⟩ that curls ⟨its trunk⟩ about its right tusk.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The verse names no animal; mada (rut), bṛṃhita (trumpeting), rada (tusk) and kakṣā-sannāha fix it as the elephant, which is supplied in ⟨ ⟩. vṛhaṃte in the e-text is for bṛṃhate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बृंहते; this sentence names vṛhaṃte, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 21.15 (`gajalakṣaṇeṅgita`) · Yogayātrā 10.63 · Bṛhat Saṃhitā 93.13 (`हस्तिचेष्टिताध्यायः`) carries this verse. All three sibling chapters are elephant chapters, which is a second confirmation that our own note's supplied ⟨गज⟩ is right — and, with 9.9, that 9.9 is an elephant too. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
सिद्धार्थकादर्शपयोञ्जनानि बद्धैकपश्वामिषपूर्णकुम्भाः । उष्णीषभृङ्गारनृवर्द्धमानपुंयानवीणातपवारणानि ॥
siddhārthakādarśapayoñjanāni baddhaikapaśvāmiṣapūrṇakumbhāḥ | uṣṇīṣabhṛṅgāranṛvarddhamānapuṃyānavīṇātapavāraṇāni ||
White mustard (siddhārthaka), a mirror, milk, collyrium; a single tethered beast, meat, brimful jars; a turban, a golden ewer (bhṛṅgāra), a man, a vardhamāna ⟨vessel⟩, a manned conveyance, a vīṇā, a parasol —
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Yogayātrā 13.10 · Bṛhadyātrā 27.1 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
दधिमधुघृतरोचनाकुमार्यो ध्वजकनकाम्बुजभद्रपीठशङ्खाः । सितवृषकुसुमाम्बराणि मीना द्विजगणिकाप्तजनाश् च चारुवेषाः ॥
dadhimadhughṛtarocanākumāryo dhvajakanakāmbujabhadrapīṭhaśaṅkhāḥ | sitavṛṣakusumāmbarāṇi mīnā dvijagaṇikāptajanāś ca cāruveṣāḥ ||
curds, honey, ghee, gorocanā, maidens; a banner, gold, a lotus, an auspicious seat (bhadrapīṭha), conches; a white bull, flowers, garments; fish; and brāhmaṇas, courtesans and trusted folk in handsome dress —
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.2 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.11 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
ज्वलितशिखिफलाक्षतेक्षुभक्षा द्विरदमृदङ्कुशचामरायुधानि । मरकतकुरविन्दपद्मरागस्फटिकमणिप्रमुखाश् च रत्नभेदाः ॥
jvalitaśikhiphalākṣatekṣubhakṣā dviradamṛdaṅkuśacāmarāyudhāni | marakatakuravindapadmarāgasphaṭikamaṇipramukhāś ca ratnabhedāḥ ||
blazing fire, fruit, unhusked rice (akṣata), sugar-cane, food; an elephant, earth, a goad, a chowrie, weapons; and the kinds of gem headed by emerald (marakata), ruby (kuruvinda), padmarāga and crystal —
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.3 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.12 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
स्वयम् अथ रचितान्य् अयत्नतो वा यदि कथितानि भवन्ति मङ्गलानि । स जयति सकलां ततो धरित्रीं ग्रहणदृगालभनश्रुतैर् उपास्य ॥
svayam atha racitāny ayatnato vā yadi kathitāni bhavanti maṅgalāni | sa jayati sakalāṃ tato dharitrīṃ grahaṇadṛgālabhanaśrutair upāsya ||
if these auspicious things (maṅgala) come to be arranged by himself, or without any effort, or are spoken of ⟨by others⟩ — then, having honoured them by taking, by sight, by touch and by hearing, he conquers the whole earth.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.4 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.13 carries this verse. Our verse and Bṛhadyātrā 27.4 are character-identical. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
9.15a reading here is contested कर्पासौषधकृष्णधान्यलवणक्लीवास्थितैलं वसा पङ्काङ्गारगुडाहिचर्मशकृतः क्लेशाय सव्याधिताः । मत्तोन्मत्तजडीकृतान्धवधिरक्षुत्क्षामतक्रारयो मुण्डाभ्यक्तविमुक्तकेशपतिताः काषायिनश् चाशुभाः ॥
karpāsauṣadhakṛṣṇadhānyalavaṇaklīvāsthitailaṃ vasā paṅkāṅgāraguḍāhicarmaśakṛtaḥ kleśāya savyādhitāḥ | mattonmattajaḍīkṛtāndhavadhirakṣutkṣāmatakrārayo muṇḍābhyaktavimuktakeśapatitāḥ kāṣāyinaś cāśubhāḥ ||
Cotton, medicinal herbs, black grain, salt, a eunuch, bone, oil, fat, mud, charcoal, molasses, a snake, hide, dung — ⟨these⟩ make for distress, and so do the diseased; the drunk, the mad, the stupefied, the blind, the deaf, those wasted with hunger, buttermilk, enemies; the shaven-headed, the oil-smeared, those with hair let loose, the fallen ⟨patita⟩, and men in ochre robes are inauspicious.
2 notes on this verse
- Where the Sanskrit is open: patita is 'fallen' — one who has lost caste or standing by an act. Until 2026-09-08 the English rendered it `the outcaste`, which names a social class, where the Hindi kept the bare पतित. Our two languages were making different claims about the same word on a page a reader may act on, so the English is brought back to the word: `the fallen ⟨patita⟩`. The loss-of-caste sense is available and is recorded here; it is not asserted.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.5 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.14 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
पटुपटहमृदङ्गशङ्खभेरीपणवरवं सपताकतोरणाग्रम् । प्रचुरकुसुमतोयशान्तरेणुं सुरभिसुवेषजनं भजेच् च मार्गम् ॥
paṭupaṭahamṛdaṅgaśaṅkhabherīpaṇavaravaṃ sapatākatoraṇāgram | pracurakusumatoyaśāntareṇuṃ surabhisuveṣajanaṃ bhajec ca mārgam ||
And he should take the road that rings with the loud paṭaha, the mṛdaṅga, the conch, the bherī and the paṇava; whose front is set with banners and archways; whose dust is laid by abundant flowers and water; and whose people are fragrant and finely dressed.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 27.6 (`maṅgalāmaṅgala`) · Yogayātrā 13.15 carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
यान्य् अत्र मङ्गलामङ्गलानि निर्गच्छतां प्रदिष्टानि । स्वप्नेष्व् अपि तानि शुभाशुभानि विड्लेपनं धन्यम् ॥
yāny atra maṅgalāmaṅgalāni nirgacchatāṃ pradiṣṭāni | svapneṣv api tāni śubhāśubhāni viḍlepanaṃ dhanyam ||
Whatever auspicious and inauspicious things have here been laid down for those setting out, those same are auspicious and inauspicious in dreams as well; ⟨and in a dream⟩ being smeared with excrement is fortunate.
1 note on this verse
- Corroboration: Yogayātrā 13.16 carries this verse. Bṛhadyātrā's chapter 27 ends at verse 6, so this verse has only the one sibling. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
मृदुर् अनुकूलः स्निग्धपवनः तद्वद् वीनाश् च शस्यन्ते । ललाटं धनुर् अथेन्द्रंन शुभदम् अन्यत्र शस्तंफलम् ॥
mṛdur anukūlaḥ snigdhapavanaḥ tadvad vīnāś ca śasyante | lalāṭaṃ dhanur athendraṃna śubhadam anyatra śastaṃphalam ||
A soft, favourable, gentle wind is commended, and lutes (vīṇā) likewise. Indra's bow ⟨the rainbow⟩ facing the brow gives no good; elsewhere its fruit is commended.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: vīnā(ṇā)ś · athendraṃ(nuraindraṃ)na · śastaṃ(sta)phalam//.
- About this edition: The rendering follows the edition's own corrections: vīnāś → vīṇāś (lutes, not vīnā), athendraṃna → dhanur aindraṃ na, i.e. the rainbow (Indra's bow), and śastaṃphalam → śastaphalam. Without them the second half yields no sense. lalāṭam, literally 'the forehead', is taken as 'straight in front', the usual śakuna direction-word.
पुन्नामानछुछुगृहगोधिकपिंगला शिवा श्यामा । कोकिलशूकरिकारलाप्रस्थाने वामतः शस्ताः ॥
punnāmānachuchugṛhagodhikapiṃgalā śivā śyāmā | kokilaśūkarikāralāprasthāne vāmataḥ śastāḥ ||
⟨Creatures⟩ bearing masculine names, the cchucchu ⟨musk-rat?⟩, the house-lizard, the piṅgalā ⟨owl⟩, the jackal (śivā), the śyāmā; the cuckoo, the śūkarika and the ralā — at the setting out these are commended on the left.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: punnāmāna(naḥ)chuchu(cchu)gṛhagodhikapiṃgalā(lāḥ) · punnāmāna(naḥ)chuchu(cchu)gṛhagodhikapiṃgalā(lāḥ) · punnāmāna(naḥ)chuchu(cchu)gṛhagodhikapiṃgalā(lāḥ) · kokilaśūkarikā(ka)ralā(lāḥ)prasthāne · kokilaśūkarikā(ka)ralā(lāḥ)prasthāne.
- About this edition: A list of omen-creatures, several of whose names cannot be identified. The edition corrects only sandhi and endings here (punnāmānaḥ, cchu-, -piṅgalāḥ, śūkarika-, -ralāḥ), not the names themselves; cchucchu, śūkarika and ralā are left transliterated rather than guessed at, and cchucchu is queried as the musk-shrew (chucchundarī) only in ⟨ ⟩.
स्त्रीसंज्ञा भासभषकपिञ्जलाप्लवकम्बुकिंत्सका । शिखिश्रीकण्ठपयीकरुरुश्येनाश् च दक्षिणाङ्ग ॥
strīsaṃjñā bhāsabhaṣakapiñjalāplavakambukiṃtsakā | śikhiśrīkaṇṭhapayīkaruruśyenāś ca dakṣiṇāṅga ||
⟨Creatures⟩ bearing feminine names — the bhāsa ⟨vulture⟩, the barker ⟨dog⟩, the piñjala, the plava ⟨water-bird⟩, the kambu, the †kiṃtsak↠— and the peacock, the śrīkaṇṭha, the †payīka† ⟨pippīka?⟩, the ruru ⟨antelope⟩ and the hawk, on the right side ⟨…text breaks off…⟩
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhāsabhaṣaka(ka)piñjalāplavakambukiṃtsakā(?)/ · bhāsabhaṣaka(ka)piñjalāplavakambukiṃtsakā(?)/ · śikhiśrīkaṣṭhapayīka(pippīka)ruruśyenāś · dakṣiṇāṅga(lacuna)//. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिखिश्रीकण्ठपयीकरुरुश्येनाश्; this sentence names śikhiśrīkaṣṭhapayīka, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
- About this edition: The edition marks its own defeat twice in this verse: it prints kambukiṃtsakā(?) with a bare question mark, and records a lacuna after dakṣiṇāṅga, so the verse has no predicate — 'are commended' is carried over from 9.19 and left unsupplied. It offers pippīka for payīka, given in ⟨ ⟩. Unidentifiable names are daggered, not guessed. What survives intact is the doctrine: feminine-named creatures on the right, masculine-named on the left (9.19).
भारद्वाजमयूचाषनकुलावलोकनं धन्यः । गोधाहिरपजाहकसरटाशशानाम् अनिष्टफलम् ॥
bhāradvājamayūcāṣanakulāvalokanaṃ dhanyaḥ | godhāhirapajāhakasaraṭāśaśānām aniṣṭaphalam ||
The sight of the bhāradvāja ⟨bird⟩, the peacock, the cāṣa ⟨blue jay⟩ and a mongoose is fortunate; of the godhā ⟨monitor lizard⟩, the snake, the †rapa†, the hedgehog, the chameleon and the hare, the fruit is undesired.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhāradvājamayū(ra)cāpanakulāvalokanaṃ · dhanyaḥ(nyam)/ · godhāhirapa(?)jāhakasaraṭā(ṭa)śaśānām · godhāhirapa(?)jāhakasaraṭā(ṭa)śaśānām. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भारद्वाजमयूचाषनकुलावलोकनं; this sentence names cāpanakulāvalokanaṃ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The exemplar's page was read by eye (Pandit, JUB XX.2, printed p.57 = tky-pandit-1951 page_0158 line 18, at about 2.4x and 4.0x native). It sets भारद्वाजमयू (add र) चाषनकुलावलोकनं, with ṣa: the bowl carries a diagonal inner stroke, as in 9.22's चाष two lines below, and unlike the three open-bowled प of पिप्पीक on the line above. So cāpa was the e-text's misreading of ṣa, not the edition's text.]
- About this edition: The edition corrects mayū → mayūra (peacock) and dhanyaḥ → dhanyam, both followed. It queries rapa with a bare '(?)', so that word is daggered and left unread. cāpana- is split as cāpa (a bow) + nakula (a mongoose): a bow is already an auspicious sight at 9.13 (āyudha) and cāpana is no noun; the split is this translation's judgement, not the edition's. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भारद्वाजमयूचाषनकुलावलोकनं; this sentence names cāpana, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The exemplar's plate (printed p.57, read by eye at about 4.0x native) sets चाषनकुलावलोकनं, cāṣa the blue jay, not cāpa. So the split into cāpa (a bow) + nakula no longer applies, and the fortunate sights here are four creatures: bhāradvāja, peacock, cāṣa and mongoose. Cāṣa and nakula stand together in our Yogayātrā 14.4 as well (भारद्वाज्यजवर्हिचाषनकुलाः), the parallel Pandit himself names for 9.21-22.]
कीर्तनम् इष्टं चाषकशशगोधाहिसूकरजातीनाम् । रुतदर्शनं त्व् अधन्यं विपरीतं वानरर्क्षानां ॥
kīrtanam iṣṭaṃ cāṣakaśaśagodhāhisūkarajātīnām | rutadarśanaṃ tv adhanyaṃ viparītaṃ vānararkṣānāṃ ||
To name the kinds cāṣa ⟨blue jay⟩, hare, godhā ⟨monitor lizard⟩, snake and boar is desired; but to hear their cry and to see them is unfortunate. For monkeys and bears it is the reverse.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: cāṣakaśaśagodhāhisūkara(godhāsūkarāhi)jātīnām/ · vānararkṣānāṃ(ṇām)//.
- About this edition: The edition reorders the compound to godhā-sūkara-ahi and normalises vānararkṣāṇām; neither touches the sense. rutadarśanam is one compound covering both hearing the cry and seeing the animal, and is rendered as both.
मृगविहगा शस्यन्ते प्रदक्षिणं विषमसंख्यया च मृगाः । नृपदर्शने गमणवत् तद्विपरीता प्रवेशे तु ॥
mṛgavihagā śasyante pradakṣiṇaṃ viṣamasaṃkhyayā ca mṛgāḥ | nṛpadarśane gamaṇavat tadviparītā praveśe tu ||
Beasts and birds are commended ⟨when passing⟩ to the right, and beasts in odd number. When ⟨going⟩ to an audience of a king the rule is as at setting out; but at an entry ⟨into a town⟩ it is the reverse of that.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: gamaṇa(na)vat.
आक्षेपशीलः पुरुषाविधायी विरक्तभृत्यः परदारगामी । लुब्धो ऽसहायो व्यसनी कृतघ्नः स्थितिप्रभेत्ता करशीर्णराष्ट्रः ॥
ākṣepaśīlaḥ puruṣāvidhāyī viraktabhṛtyaḥ paradāragāmī | lubdho 'sahāyo vyasanī kṛtaghnaḥ sthitiprabhettā karaśīrṇarāṣṭraḥ ||
⟨A king who is⟩ given to insult, harsh of speech, whose servants are disaffected, who goes to other men's wives, greedy, without allies, addicted to vice, ungrateful, a breaker of settled usage, whose realm is worn to shreds by taxation —
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pu(pa)ruṣāvi(bhi)dhāyī · pu(pa)ruṣāvi(bhi)dhāyī.
- About this edition: The rendering follows the edition's paruṣābhidhāyī ('harsh of speech') for the running text's puruṣāvidhāyī, which yields nothing. The sentence is completed in 9.25 by sa daivahīnaḥ.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 30.1 (`abhiyojya`) carries this verse. ⭐ It prints `परुषाभिधायी` where our running text has the meaningless `पुरुषाविधायी`, so the edition's correction `pu(pa)ruṣāvi(bhi)dhāyī` — which our rendering already follows — now has a witness. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
विस्रम्भहा क्रोधवशे नृशंसे क्षुद्रा प्रमादी न बहुश्रुताश् च । दिव्यान्तरिक्षक्षितिजौर् विकारैर् निपीडितो स दैवहीनः ॥
visrambhahā krodhavaśe nṛśaṃse kṣudrā pramādī na bahuśrutāś ca | divyāntarikṣakṣitijaur vikārair nipīḍito sa daivahīnaḥ ||
who betrays trust, is in the grip of anger, is cruel, base, heedless and not widely learned; and who is afflicted by disorders celestial, atmospheric and terrestrial — he is the one forsaken by fate (daiva-hīna).
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: krodhavaśe(śo) · nṛśaṃse(saḥ) · kṣudrā(draḥ) · bahuśrutā(ta)ś · divyāntarikṣakṣitijau(jai)r · (yaś ca).
- About this edition: The running text's endings are broken throughout (krodhavaśe, nṛśaṃse, kṣudrā, -jaur); the edition restores the nominatives krodhavaśo, nṛśaṃsaḥ, kṣudraḥ, -jair and supplies yaś ca. The rendering follows those restorations, none of which changes the sense — the list of the enemy king's defects begun in 9.24 continues unbroken.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 30.2 (`abhiyojya`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
अतो विपर्यस्तगुणेन राज्ञा तादृग्विधो ऽरिस् त्व् अभियुक्तमात्रः । तरुर् घुणैर् जग्ध इवात्तकार्यो महान् अपि क्षिप्रम् उपैति भङ्गाः ॥
ato viparyastaguṇena rājñā tādṛgvidho 'ris tv abhiyuktamātraḥ | tarur ghuṇair jagdha ivāttakāryo mahān api kṣipram upaiti bhaṅgāḥ ||
Therefore such an enemy, once merely attacked by a king of the opposite qualities, though he be great, quickly comes to ruin, his undertaking eaten away, like a tree devoured by wood-worms.
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhaṅgāḥ(ṅgam)//.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 30.3 (`abhiyojya`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
तद्विष्टप्रवरनरप्रतापहीना नीशौर्या वरवारणाश्वयोधमुखाः । सोत्पातप्रकृतिविपर्यायानयाता शोकार्त्ता रिपुबलम् आशुर्याति सेनाः ॥
tadviṣṭapravaranarapratāpahīnā nīśauryā varavāraṇāśvayodhamukhāḥ | sotpātaprakṛtiviparyāyānayātā śokārttā ripubalam āśuryāti senāḥ ||
Drained of the vigour of its foremost men ⟨who are hostile to him⟩, void of valour, though headed by choice elephants, horses and warriors; dogged by portents and by the derangement of the ⟨realm's⟩ constituents (prakṛti), and stricken with grief — such an army goes over swiftly to the enemy's force.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: nī(niḥ)śauryā · varavāraṇāśvayodhamukhāḥ(khyāḥ)/ · sotpātaprakṛtiviparyā(rya)yāna(nu)yātā · sotpātaprakṛtiviparyā(rya)yāna(nu)yātā · āśuryā(yā)ti · senāḥ(nā)//.
- About this edition: tadviṣṭa- is taken as tad-dviṣṭa, 'hated by / hostile to him', which matches viraktabhṛtyaḥ at 9.24; the edition does not correct it. Its other corrections (niḥśauryā, -mukhyāḥ, viparyayānuyātā, āśu yāti, senā) are followed. ripubalam āśu yāti senā says literally 'the army goes swiftly to the enemy's force': rendered as defection, though it can equally mean that the army falls to that force.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 31.1 (`senāvātavṛṣṭyulkābhūgarjitasandhyā`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
संग्रामे वम् अमरप्रसादा जेष्यामो रिपुबलम् आश्व् असंशयेन । यस्येवं भवति बले जनप्रवादाः स्वल्पो ऽपि प्रवरबलं निहन्ति राजा ॥
saṃgrāme vam amaraprasādā jeṣyāmo ripubalam āśv asaṃśayena | yasyevaṃ bhavati bale janapravādāḥ svalpo 'pi pravarabalaṃ nihanti rājā ||
'In battle we shall conquer the enemy's force swiftly and beyond doubt, by the grace of the immortals' — the king in whose army such is the talk of the people, though he be slight ⟨in strength⟩, strikes down a superior force.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: va(ya)m · amara(dvija)prasādā(t) · amara(dvija)prasādā(t) · yasye(syai)vaṃ · janapravādāḥ(daḥ).
- About this edition: The running text's vam is read with the edition as vayam ('we'), without which the quoted boast has no subject. The edition further replaces amara-prasādā ('by the grace of the immortals') with dvija-prasādāt ('by the grace of the twice-born'); the rendering keeps the uncorrected running text and records the variant here, since the choice between divine and brahminical favour is a real difference of claim.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 31.2 (`senāvātavṛṣṭyulkābhūgarjitasandhyā`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
पुरं रिपोर् भूमिपतिनिहन्याच् छत्रोर् अनिष्टग्रहदिटिविष्टिः । युद्धस्य यात्रासम एव कालः कूरेषु लग्नेषु च कूटायुधः ॥
puraṃ ripor bhūmipatinihanyāc chatror aniṣṭagrahadiṭiviṣṭiḥ | yuddhasya yātrāsama eva kālaḥ kūreṣu lagneṣu ca kūṭāyudhaḥ ||
The lord of the earth, stationed in the quarter of the graha unfavourable to his foe, may destroy the enemy's city. The time for battle is the very same as for the march; and in malefic (krūra) lagnas, ⟨let it be⟩ warfare by stratagem (kūṭayuddha).
2 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: bhūmipatini(rni)hanyāc · aniṣṭagrahadiṭi(ṅni)viṣṭiḥ(ṣṭaḥ)/ · aniṣṭagrahadiṭi(ṅni)viṣṭiḥ(ṣṭaḥ)/ · kū(krū)reṣu · kūṭāyudhaḥ(kūṭayuddhaṃ)//.
- About this edition: Follows the edition throughout: bhūmipatir nihanyāt, aniṣṭagraha-diṅ-niviṣṭaḥ (stationed in that graha's direction), krūreṣu for kūreṣu, and kūṭayuddham ('warfare by stratagem') for the running text's kūṭāyudhaḥ ('a treacherous weapon'). Rendered 'malefic' for krūra per the glossary.
अन्तर्मुखाः पौरभयं विहङ्गाः प्रकारसंस्था विनिवेदयन्ति । आगन्तुनाशाय बहिर्मुखास् ते तुल्यं विहङ्गैः सरमात्मजौश् च ॥
antarmukhāḥ paurabhayaṃ vihaṅgāḥ prakārasaṃsthā vinivedayanti | āgantunāśāya bahirmukhās te tulyaṃ vihaṅgaiḥ saramātmajauś ca ||
Birds settled on the rampart and facing inward announce danger to the townsfolk; facing outward, they announce the destruction of the incomer ⟨the invader⟩. And the sons of Saramā ⟨dogs⟩ are read equally with the birds.
1 note on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pra(prā)kārasaṃsthā · saramātmajau(jā)ś.
केतूल्कार्कजराहुकीलककुजा बिम्बप्रविष्टा यतः सूर्येन्द्वोः परिवेषखण्डम् अथवा दृश्येत यस्यां दिशि । क्रोष्टुश्वात्तिपिपीलिकाशशमृगधाक्षदयो वा पुरे सैन्ये वापि यतो विशन्ति हि ततः शत्रो पुरं घातयेत् ॥
ketūlkārkajarāhukīlakakujā bimbapraviṣṭā yataḥ sūryendvoḥ pariveṣakhaṇḍam athavā dṛśyeta yasyāṃ diśi | kroṣṭuśvāttipipīlikāśaśamṛgadhākṣadayo vā pure sainye vāpi yato viśanti hi tataḥ śatro puraṃ ghātayet ||
From whatever quarter a comet, a meteor, Saturn, Rāhu, a kīlaka or Mars has entered the disc of the Sun or of the Moon, or in whatever direction a broken segment of a halo is seen; or from whatever quarter jackals, dogs, ⟨snakes⟩, ants, hares, deer, crows and the like enter the city or the army — from that very quarter let him strike down the enemy's city.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: kroṣṭuśvātti(hi)pipīlikāśaśamṛgadhākṣa(dhvāṅkṣā)dayo · kroṣṭuśvātti(hi)pipīlikāśaśamṛgadhākṣa(dhvāṅkṣā)dayo · śatro(troḥ).
- About this edition: Rendered on the edition's parenthetical corrections, which the ingest stores apart from the running text. The running text's kroṣṭuśvātti- and -dhākṣa- are not words; the edition reads kroṣṭu-śvā-hi (jackal, dog, snake) and dhvāṅkṣa (crow), and both are followed here — the ⟨snake⟩ rests on that correction alone. śatro is read as śatroḥ (genitive, 'the enemy's city'); uncorrected it is a vocative that yields no sense. kīlaka is left untranslated: in the omen lists it names a spike- or nail-shaped comet/meteoric appearance, not an identifiable body. arkaja ('sun-born') is Saturn, kuja Mars (GLOSSARY). The whole verse is a direction-omen: the quarter the sign comes from is the quarter to attack from.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 33.3 + 33.4 (`puradurgālabdho`) carries this verse. ⚠ THE SIBLING DIVIDES WHERE PANDIT DOES NOT: what we print as one verse, Bṛhadyātrā prints as two. A citation of TY 9.31 and one of BY 33.3–4 name the same text, and without this note nobody would know it. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
पातालर्क्षे राहुकेत्वो पुरे ऽरेतोयोच्छित्तिः सालपातश् च कार्यः । जामित्रस्थे भूमिजास्यांशके वा पुत्रेणेन्दोर् वीक्षिते ऽग्निः प्रदेयः ॥
pātālarkṣe rāhuketvo pure 'retoyocchittiḥ sālapātaś ca kāryaḥ | jāmitrasthe bhūmijāsyāṃśake vā putreṇendor vīkṣite 'gniḥ pradeyaḥ ||
When Rāhu and Ketu stand in the sign of the pātāla ⟨the 4th house⟩, the enemy's water is to be cut off within the city and the rampart brought down. And when Mars stands in the jāmitra ⟨the 7th house⟩, or in the aṃśaka of it, and is aspected by the Moon's son ⟨Mercury⟩, fire is to be set ⟨to the city⟩.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: rāhuketvo(tvoḥ) · 'reto(s to)yocchittiḥ · bhūmijā(je ')syāṃśake.
- About this edition: Read with the edition's corrections: rāhuketvoḥ (dual), and 'res toyocchittiḥ = areḥ toyocchittiḥ, 'the cutting off of the enemy's water' — the uncorrected 'retoyocchittiḥ leaves that genitive unresolved. bhūmijāsyāṃśake is read bhūmije 'syāṃśake, 'Mars being ⟨there⟩ or in the aṃśaka of it'. pātāla and jāmitra are the 4th and 7th houses per GLOSSARY. sāla is the fortification wall (prākāra), not the tree. agniḥ pradeyaḥ is the plain instruction to fire the city and is left at its weight.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 33.5 (`puradurgālabdho`) carries this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
परविषयपुराप्तौ साधुदेवद्विजस्वां कुलजनवनितांश् च क्ष्माधिपो नोपरुन्ध्यात् । विगजतुरशस्त्रानार्तभीतांश् च हन्याच् छुभतिथिदिवसर्क्षे हृष्टसैन्ये विशेत् तु ॥
paraviṣayapurāptau sādhudevadvijasvāṃ kulajanavanitāṃś ca kṣmādhipo noparundhyāt | vigajaturaśastrānārtabhītāṃś ca hanyāc chubhatithidivasarkṣe hṛṣṭasainye viśet tu ||
On the winning of the enemy's territory and city, the lord of the earth ⟨the king⟩ shall not seize the property of holy men, of the gods ⟨temples⟩ and of the twice-born, nor the people of good family and the women; nor shall he slay those bereft of elephant, horse and weapon, nor the afflicted and the terrified. On an auspicious tithi, day and nakṣatra let him enter, his army rejoicing.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: sādhudevadvijasvāṃ(jasvaṃ) · kulajanavanitāṃ(tā)ś · vigajatura(ga)śastrānā(nn · vigajatura(ga)śastrānā(nn ā)rtabhītāṃ(tā)ś · ā)rtabhītāṃ(tā)ś · hṛṣṭasainye(nyo).
- About this edition: The edition restores a negative in the second half — śastrānn ārta- for the running text's śastrānārta-, i.e. śastrān na ārta-. With it the verse FORBIDS killing the weaponless, the afflicted and the terrified, which is the standing rājadharma rule; without it the transmitted line would command exactly that. The restored negative is followed here, and it is the whole sense of the pāda — a reader who wants the uncorrected text read should know it says the opposite. Also read with the edition: sādhudevadvijasvaṃ, kulajanavanitāś, and hṛṣṭasainyo (nominative, agreeing with the king); the uncorrected locative hṛṣṭasainye ('the army being joyful') changes nothing material. uparundh- is 'shut up, hold, seize upon' — the prohibition covers both plundering the property and laying hold of the persons.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 34.4 (`jayottara`) · Yogayātrā 16.9 carries this verse. Note the mapping: our 9.33 answers BY 34.4, our 9.34 answers BY 34.1 and our 9.35 answers the first half of BY 34.3. The three run in a different order in the sibling. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part.
दिग्दाहक्षतजरजो ऽश्मवृष्टिपातैः निर्घातक्षितिचलनादिवैकृतैश् च । युद्धान्ते मृगशकुनैश् च दीप्तनादैः नो भद्रं भवति जिते परि पार्थिवस्य ॥
digdāhakṣatajarajo 'śmavṛṣṭipātaiḥ nirghātakṣiticalanādivaikṛtaiś ca | yuddhānte mṛgaśakunaiś ca dīptanādaiḥ no bhadraṃ bhavati jite pari pārthivasya ||
By burnings of the horizon, by blood, by dust and by falls of stone-rain, by thunderclaps, quakings of the earth and other such distortions ⟨of nature⟩, and at the close of the battle by beasts and birds with blazing cries — no good fortune comes to the king, even when ⟨the foe⟩ has been conquered.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: pari('pi), i.e. jite 'pi.
- About this edition: THIS STANZA IS NOT A FRAGMENT — twenty words of it were lost to a bracket-matching defect in our own ingest, and are restored here (2026-09-08). The source line ends `…vaikṛtaiś ca/(` with a lone opening bracket that has no partner of its own; the apparatus rule paired it with the `)` of `pari('pi)` on the next line and swallowed the whole third pāda — `yuddhānte mṛgaśakunaiś ca dīptanādaiḥ no bhadraṃ bhavati jite pari` — into the apparatus, publishing `…vaikṛtaiś ca | pārthivasya ||`. It is running text, not a supplement: Bṛhadyātrā 34.1 and Yogayātrā 16.7 both print the pāda. 9.34 is the only one of the 103 verses whose parentheses do not balance (2 open, 1 close), so this defect has exactly one instance. The earlier note here said the stanza `breaks off straight to pārthivasya, with no verb and no predicate` and that the missing middle stands `only inside a parenthesis`; both statements were about our parse, not about the edition, and are withdrawn. dig-dāha is the reddening glow on the horizon of the omen literature; nirghāta the crash of a thunderbolt or meteoric report.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 34.1 · Yogayātrā 16.7, both published in this corpus and both printing the full four-pāda stanza. Bṛhadyātrā reads `जये ऽपि` ('even in victory') where our edition corrects `pari` to `'pi`, giving `jite 'pi` ('even when ⟨the foe⟩ is conquered'). ⚠ Same transcriber (Mizue Sugita) for all three GRETIL files; the agreement is a partly shared channel, but what it establishes here is the EXTENT of the stanza, which no transcriber invents.
शुभा मृगपतत्रिणो मृदुसमीरणो दह्लादकृत ग्रहाः स्थूटामरीचयो द्विगतरेणुदिन्दलः । यद् अन्यम् अपि विकृतै न विजयावसाने भवेत् तदा सुखम् अकण्टकं नृपतिर् अत्ति देशे रिपुः ॥
śubhā mṛgapatatriṇo mṛdusamīraṇo dahlādakṛta grahāḥ sthūṭāmarīcayo dvigatareṇudindalaḥ | yad anyam api vikṛtai na vijayāvasāne bhavet tadā sukham akaṇṭakaṃ nṛpatir atti deśe ripuḥ ||
⟨When⟩ beasts and birds are auspicious, ⟨when⟩ the soft breeze is gladdening, ⟨when⟩ the grahas are of clear rays and the circle of the quarters is free of dust, and when at the close of the victory no other distortion ⟨portent⟩ whatever occurs — then the king enjoys happiness, unthwarted, in the enemy's land.
3 notes on this verse
- About this edition: The edition corrects itself in parentheses; the mūla above holds the UNCORRECTED running text and the corrections are quoted here verbatim with the word each attaches to — the parenthesis gives the reading that should stand in place of some part of what precedes it, and how much it replaces is an editorial decision this ingest does not make: da(drop da)hlādakṛta(t) · da)hlādakṛta(t) · sthūṭā(sphuṭa)marīcayo · dvi(vi)gatareṇudinda(lacuna)laḥ(diṅmaṇḍalaṃ)/ · dvi(vi)gatareṇudinda(lacuna)laḥ(diṅmaṇḍalaṃ)/ · dvi(vi)gatareṇudinda(lacuna)laḥ(diṅmaṇḍalaṃ)/ · a(da)pi · vikṛtai(taṃ) · ripuḥ(ripoḥ)//.
- About this edition: The third pāda is damaged. The e-text reads dvigatareṇudindalaḥ; the edition marks a LACUNA at that point and reconstructs vigatareṇu diṅmaṇḍalaṃ, 'the circle of the quarters free of dust' — followed here, since it is the only reading that makes sense beside sphuṭamarīcayaḥ (grahas of clear rays), both being the same 'clear air' omen. Also read with the edition: hlādakṛt (the running text's da- is a dittography), sphuṭa- for sthūṭā-, anyad api for anyam api, vikṛtaṃ for vikṛtai, and ripoḥ (genitive) for ripuḥ — the transmitted nominative would make the ENEMY the one enjoying the land, which reverses the verse. NOTE on kaṇṭaka: akaṇṭaka here is the ordinary 'free of thorns, unopposed', NOT the Ṣaṭpañcāśikā's technical kaṇṭaka = kendra of the GLOSSARY, whose row is scoped to that text. atti is literally 'eats' — enjoys, consumes.
- Corroboration: Bṛhadyātrā 34.3 (`jayottara`, first half) · Yogayātrā 16.8 carry this verse. ⚠ Bṛhadyātrā, Yogayātrā and this text were all typed for GRETIL by ONE transcriber (Mizue Sugita, 1997–98), so agreement between them is a partly shared channel; Bṛhat Saṃhitā is a separate line. The DISAGREEMENTS are the useful part. ⭐ BOTH SIBLINGS READ AN ACCUSATIVE WHERE WE READ A LOCATIVE: `नृपतिर् अत्ति देशं रिपोः`, 'the king CONSUMES the enemy's LAND', against our `नृपतिर् अत्ति देशे रिपुः` with the edition correcting `ripuḥ` to `ripoḥ`, i.e. `देशे रिपोः`, 'in the enemy's land'. THE RULING (2026-09-08): OURS IS KEPT. Both parse — with `देशे रिपोः` the object of `atti` is `सुखम् अकण्टकम्`, which stands in the line — and the two say the same thing about the world. `देशे` is our own exemplar's reading, the edition does not touch it, and one sibling's case-ending is not a reason to rewrite a text we hold on one witness. The variant is recorded so that nobody has to rediscover it. The siblings also confirm Pandit's `anyad`, `vikṛtaṃ` and `ripoḥ`, and Yogayātrā 16.8 prints `विगतरेणुदिग्मण्डलम्`, which is exactly the reconstruction our note adopts for the damaged third pāda — so that reconstruction is now witnessed rather than inferred.