Skip to content
Karma Sakha
Sign in

The Texts · Essential Classical Extensions

Uttara Kālāmṛta

उत्तरकालामृत

Attributed to "Kālidāsa" — not credibly the classical poet · After the 16th century CE (internal evidence); South India · compendium

On the dating: References to Andhra-bhāṣā, Persian/Urdu words, Turuṣka and Rāhu-kāla place the work after the 16th century; a South-Indian astrologer, possibly the "Abhinava Kālidāsa" of the Vyāsācala tradition, is the plausible author.

What this text is

The tradition’s favorite lookup compendium — exhaustive significator lists per planet and house, under a famous borrowed name.

Dense kārikā-style sections: significations (kārakas) for each planet and house at unmatched length, house-lord effects, special ascendants, daśā notes and miscellany.

Its role in this app

Seats significations in our foundations/kāraka material and parts of the house-lord matrix. Load-bearing in the viparīta decision: its commentary explicitly excludes the market’s "own dusthāna" variant (so that engine option is labeled unattested), and its grahabhāvaphala v. 22 states a fourth, genuinely independent viparīta definition — recorded, unimplemented.

Editions our research holds

  • ps-sastri-hindi

    P.S. Sastri Hindi edition — unusually clean Devanāgarī.

    in copyright — read for verification only, never republished · scan quality: good

  • ps-sastri-english

    P.S. Sastri English, PDF only.

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright

  • j108-santhanam

    Santhanam edition, PDF only.

    in copyright — read for verification only, never republished

The text itself

The Uttara Kālāmṛta is here in full. HOW LONG THIS WORK IS, and how we know. The Sareen 1993 printing numbers its ślokas 1..N inside each of its nine divisions, and the highest numeral in each is 11, 22, 8, 45, 54, 42, 19, 50 and 105 — 356 ślokas. V. Subrahmaṇya Śāstri's independent 1939 translation, made from a Telugu-script printing and a Madras manuscript, ends each of its matching sections at exactly those numbers. Two unrelated editions agree, so 356 is the length of the work and not of our files. Read the count with care: our 356 RECORDS are not the same 356 — three of them hold two ślokas each (ch8 at n=14 and n=25, ch9 at n=96) and three hold a trailing half-śloka that runs across a khaṇḍa boundary (ch2, ch5, ch6), and the two errors happen to cancel. 356 of this text's 356 verses carry an English translation; 9 of 9 chapters are begun or finished (1–9). This is the whole work: 356 verses against the 356 it is known to have. The Sanskrit is tier 'etext': one printing, read from its page images, with other printings' readings weighed on an adjudication ledger in 9 of 9 chapter(s) and no chapter yet through the visual gate. The app may say "our source reads…", naming the source; it may not say "the text reads…".

356 verses in the original Sanskrit with our own English translation, which is made from that Sanskrit and not adapted from any existing translation. Machine-parsed from Uttara Kālāmṛta of Kālidāsa, ed. and tr. S. S. Sareen, Sagar Publications, New Delhi 1993 — 166 plates read by vision, collated by scripts/corpus/collate-uttara-kalamrita.mjs by scripts/corpus/ingest-etext.mjs on 2026-09-07. Segmentation rule: Section boundary = a Sanskrit khaṇḍa heading, matched at LINE level; a kāṇḍa heading also closes the open section, because kāṇḍa II sets no khaṇḍa of its own and without that the last khaṇḍa of kāṇḍa I swallowed 145 verses across a change of subject. The section numeral is set four ways in this printing — `1.` `5—` `8॰` and a Devanāgarī digit — so matching on `N.` alone finds six of eight. Verse boundary = a numeral mark, of which this book sets FOURTEEN distinct shapes including an ASCII pipe standing for a daṇḍa, stray full stops, marks with no opening daṇḍa, and marks with no CLOSING daṇḍa that simply end the line. A source line may carry MORE THAN ONE mark, so each line is split at every mark it holds, earliest first. Verse NUMBER is the position within the section; the printed numeral rides alongside as evidence. Only `mula` lines enter, and a reader's refusal marker is excluded a second time here.

Not yet independently audited. Every reading here was established and recorded by the process described above, but no fresh reader has re-derived these verses from the plates without seeing our record. When that was done for the first text we published, it found real errors — so treat this one as a first edition and check anything you intend to rely on. The evidence behind every verse is committed and readable.

210 reading disagreements were adjudicated and are recorded verse by verse. Every akṣara was legible.

Adhyāya 1 · जन्मकाललक्षणखण्डः — Time of Birth, Planets, Bhāvas, etc.

1.1a reading here is contested

श्रीमद्वक्त्रचतुष्टयाच्युतहरस्वर्नायकाद्यैः सुरैः कार्यारम्भविधौ समर्चितपदद्वन्द्वं द्विपेन्द्राननम् । पाशाब्जायुधलड्डुकप्रविलसद्धस्तैश्चतुर्भिर्युतं श्रीमद्विक्रमसूर्यपालनपरं वन्दे भवानीसुतम् ॥ १ ॥

śrīmadvaktracatuṣṭayācyutaharasvarnāyakādyaiḥ suraiḥ kāryārambhavidhau samarcitapadadvandvaṃ dvipendrānanam | pāśābjāyudhalaḍḍukapravilasaddhastaiścaturbhiryutaṃ śrīmadvikramasūryapālanaparaṃ vande bhavānīsutam || 1 ||

I bow to the son of Bhavani, him whose face is that of the lord of elephants, whose pair of feet is worshipped at the rite of beginning any undertaking by the gods — the glorious Four-faced One ⟨Brahma⟩, Acyuta ⟨Visnu⟩, Hara ⟨Siva⟩, the lord of heaven ⟨Indra⟩ and the rest — who is furnished with four hands resplendent with the noose, the lotus, the weapon (ayudha) and the ladduka, and who is intent upon protecting the illustrious Vikrama-surya.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्त्र"; alternatives "क्त" — 4th aksara. The k-t ligature is certain; the subscript ra is a short diagonal below the joint, visible but thin. Metre (Sardulavikridita, 19 syllables) requires a heavy 3rd syllable 'vak', which the conjunct supplies either way.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्ना"; alternatives "र्णा" — in svar-nayaka. Dental na vs retroflex na: at native resolution the glyph shows the flat-topped dental na of this fount rather than the looped na, but the two are close here. Sense (svar-nayaka = lord of heaven = Indra, matching the English 'Indra') favours na.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ध"; alternatives "ब", "भ", "व" — 5th aksara of the compound, in -ayudha-. Read at 8x on the native scan and compared against certain dha (vidhau, line 8), bha (bhavani, line 10) and va (vande, line 10) from this same page: the candidate shows TWO closed counters, which on the ba/va counter test reads ba, not dha. dha is adopted because (i) the preceding aksara is certainly yu - it carries the same u-hook as the yu of caturbhiryuta later in this line - so the word is a-yu-X, and (ii) the metre requires X to be one LIGHT syllable, and of ayuba / ayubha / ayuva / ayudha only ayudha is a word. The counters are almost certainly closed by over-inking. This is the single least secure reading on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सू"; alternatives "सु", "भू" — CORRECTED ON CROSS-PLATE EVIDENCE. Read alone this aksara is ambiguous (two closed counters + a subscript u-hook). Plate 4 sets the SAME formula in sloka 2 pada 4 - 'srimad-vikrama-X-palana-para(m)' - and there the aksara is unmistakably सू. Binarised 9x comparison of the two, plus a certain भ (bhavani, this line) and a certain सु (sutam, this line), matches the candidate to सू/सु and excludes भ (bha has no descender). Sastri's own English on this page reads 'Suryavrata Pratapi Raja Vikramaditya', i.e. he read surya. u vs uu is not settled by the ink and the metre cannot decide it (the syllable is heavy either way, closed by the following r).
1.2a reading here is contested

कामेशस्य सुवामभागनिलयां भक्ताखिलेष्टार्थदां शंखं चक्रमथाभयं च वरदं हस्तैर्दधानां शिवाम् । सिंहस्थां शशिखण्डमौलिलसितां देवीं त्रिनेत्रोज्ज्वलां श्रीमद्विक्रमसूर्यपालनपरां वन्दे महाकालिकाम् ॥ २ ॥

kāmeśasya suvāmabhāganilayāṃ bhaktākhileṣṭārthadāṃ śaṃkhaṃ cakramathābhayaṃ ca varadaṃ hastairdadhānāṃ śivām | siṃhasthāṃ śaśikhaṇḍamaulilasitāṃ devīṃ trinetrojjvalāṃ śrīmadvikramasūryapālanaparāṃ vande mahākālikām || 2 ||

I bow to Mahakalika, who dwells in the fair left half of Kamesa ⟨Siva⟩; who grants her devotees every object they desire; who holds in her hands the conch and the discus and shows the abhaya ⟨fear-not⟩ and varada ⟨boon-granting⟩ gestures; the auspicious one (Siva), seated upon a lion, radiant with the crescent moon on her crown, the goddess blazing with three eyes, intent upon protecting the illustrious Vikrama-surya.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्द"; alternatives "र्भ" — in hastair-dadhanam. The aksara under the repha shows a two-countered body; da is adopted because dadhanam ('holding') is the only reading that fits the sense and the metre.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सू"; alternatives "सु" — vowel length not settled by the ink; metre cannot decide (syllable heavy either way before the conjunct ry). The consonant is certain here - this is the plate that settles the same slot on plate 3.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्य"; alternatives "र्यं" — checked at 8x binarised: ONE mark above the aksara, the repha hook, no anusvara dot. An anusvara would also break the metre (Sardulavikridita needs a light 7th syllable).
1.3a reading here is contested

प्रागेवाद्यदले समस्तमुदितं संज्ञादिकं विस्तरात् ज्ञेयं जातकपद्धतिं बुधमुदेऽथ प्राश्निकं च क्रमात् । स्पष्टं सूक्ष्मतरं त्रिकालफलदं शार्दूलवृत्तिश्रितं संपद्द्रव्यकरं प्रवच्मि बहुधा कालामृते तूत्तरे ॥ ३ ॥

prāgevādyadale samastamuditaṃ saṃjñādikaṃ vistarāt jñeyaṃ jātakapaddhatiṃ budhamude'tha prāśnikaṃ ca kramāt | spaṣṭaṃ sūkṣmataraṃ trikālaphaladaṃ śārdūlavṛttiśritaṃ saṃpaddravyakaraṃ pravacmi bahudhā kālāmṛte tūttare || 3 ||

Earlier, in the first section ⟨our mula now reads adyadale, 'in the first section', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩, everything from the technical terms onward was set out at length. Now, for the delight of the learned, I declare in the Uttara Kalamrta, in many ways and in order, the jataka ⟨nativity⟩ system that is to be known and the prasnika ⟨horary⟩ system as well — plain, exceedingly subtle, yielding the fruit of the three times, cast in the sardula⟨vikridita⟩ metre, and productive of prosperity and wealth.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चा"; alternatives "च", "द्य" — 4th aksara of pragevaCadale. Read at 9x binarised the glyph is a clean ca: C-bowl, one counter, no subscript. But 'pragevacadale' is not Sanskrit. The metre requires exactly one LIGHT syllable in this slot, which both ca and dya satisfy; pragevadyadale ('already in the first section') would give sense and matches Sastri's English 'In the Purvardha ... I have already dealt with'. Recorded as printed; a compositor's error is likely. [2026-09-23: The plate was read again by eye on the 2900x4721 greyscale master (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0004.png, line 11) at about 1.7x and 2.0x native. The glyph is this fount's single-storey द्य ligature, the same sort as the द्य of नाड्याद्यो four lines below (1.4), and not the च of च / चक्र on the same leaf. That द्य has no subscript, so a test for a subscript could not separate ca from dya. The press prints प्रागेवाद्यदले, and the mūla now reads it. The error was in our transcription, not the compositor's; P. S. Sastri (PDF p.16, read by eye at about 3.6x native) and Bhasin (PDF p.11, at about 5.3x native) set the same.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुदे"; alternatives "मुद्दे" — checked at 7x: a single da, NOT the doubled dda of the standard uddesya. The single da is also what the metre requires (light 11th syllable); uddesya would make it heavy and break the pada. So the printed single da is right and the 'correct' spelling would be wrong here. [2026-09-23: Read by eye on the same master (page_0004.png, line 12) at about 1.7x and 2.0x native, the plate sets बुधमुदेऽथ: after मुदे a small avagraha, 41 px wide, the same as in गतेऽथवा (store p.10) and होरेऽथ (store p.17), then थ, not a half-श joined to य. The word is budha-mude atha, 'for the delight of the learned; now'. So the single द is right because the form is मुदे, not उद्देश्य. The mūla now reads बुधमुदेऽथ.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्द्र"; alternatives "द्द्व" — the stacked conjunct in sampad-dravya- is three-deep and heavily inked; dra is adopted on the sense (Sastri: 'the effects regarding wealth and property') and the metre (heavy 3rd syllable).
1.4a reading here is contested

नाड्याद्यो जनुषि स्फुटश्च समयः शङ्कोश्च यन्त्रादिभिः साध्योऽहर्निशमत्र सायनरवेः स्वादिष्टकालादपि । खेटान् दृग्गणितैक्यजान् स्फुटतरान् राश्यादिकान् साधयेद् भावान् संधियुतान् गुरोस्तु कृपया साह्लादचित्तः सुधीः ॥ ४ ॥

nāḍyādyo januṣi sphuṭaśca samayaḥ śaṅkośca yantrādibhiḥ sādhyo'harniśamatra sāyanaraveḥ svādiṣṭakālādapi | kheṭān dṛggaṇitaikyajān sphuṭatarān rāśyādikān sādhayed bhāvān saṃdhiyutān gurostu kṛpayā sāhlādacittaḥ sudhīḥ || 4 ||

The exact time of birth — in nadis and the rest — is to be established here, by day and by night, with the sanku ⟨gnomon⟩ and other instruments, and also from the sayana ⟨tropical⟩ Sun and from the ista-kala one has taken. Then let the wise man, his mind glad, by the grace of his guru, work out the planets (kheta) most exactly, in rasi, degree and the rest, arrived at by the agreement of observation with computation (drg-ganita-aikya), and the bhavas together with their sandhis ⟨junction points⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — a true avagraha, printed, checked at 3.4x: sadhyo 'harnisam. Recording it because the brief asked for avagraha to be checked - it is present and unambiguous here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्नि"; alternatives "नि" — the repha over ni in aharnisam is small but present; without it the word would be ahanisam, which is not Sanskrit.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृ"; alternatives "द" — the vocalic r under da in drg-ganita- is a short subscript hook, faint at this inking. drg-ganita-aikya (agreement of observation and computation) is the technical term and the metre requires the heavy syllable the conjunct gives.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्ला"; alternatives "ह्रा" — in sahlada-. The subscript under ha is la or ra; sa-ahlada ('with delight') is the word.
1.5a reading here is contested

नाड्यश्चात्र विनाडिकाः कृतगुणाः सूर्योदयान्नन्दहृच्छिष्टं दस्रमघासुरात्रिनवके स्याज्जन्मभं दस्रतः । यद्वापीष्टघटिस्तदा विघटिकास्वान्वाश्विहृच्छेषतो बाणेलाः खगुणाश्च बाणनिगमाः षष्टिश्च बाणाद्रयः ॥ ५ ॥

nāḍyaścātra vināḍikāḥ kṛtaguṇāḥ sūryodayānnandahṛcchiṣṭaṃ dasramaghāsurātrinavake syājjanmabhaṃ dasrataḥ | yadvāpīṣṭaghaṭistadā vighaṭikāsvānvāśvihṛccheṣato bāṇelāḥ khaguṇāśca bāṇanigamāḥ ṣaṣṭiśca bāṇādrayaḥ || 5 ||

Here let the nadis ⟨elapsed⟩ from sunrise be turned into vinadikas, multiplied by four (krta = 4) and divided by nine (nanda = 9); from the remainder the birth-naksatra is to be found within the three sets of nine that begin with Asvini (dasra), Magha and Mula ⟨asura = Nirrti, the presiding deity of Mula⟩, counting from Asvini. Or else the ista-ghatis are turned into vighatikas and divided by 225 ⟨the number-word for 225 stands here, but two of its aksaras could not be read on the plate and are not restored⟩, and from the remainder are taken 15 (bana-ila), 30 (kha-guna), 45 (bana-nigama), 60 (sasti) and 75 (bana-adri). ⟨The arabic figures are the edition's own glosses on the number-words, not part of the verse.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

नाड्यश्चात्र विनाडिकाः कृत (4) गुणाः सूर्योदयान्नन्दहृ- च्छिष्टं दस्रमघासुरात्रिनवके स्याज्जन्मभं दस्रतः । यद्वापीष्टघटिस्तदा विघटिकास्वान्वाश्वि (225) हृच्छेषतो बाणेलाः (15) खगुणा (30) श्च बाणनिगमाः (45) षष्टिश्च (60) बाणाद्रयः (75) ॥ ५ ॥

13 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्चा"; alternatives "श्चै", "श्चे" — nadyas ca atra. A superscript hook sits over this aksara that the reading does not need; if it is a repha the word is not Sanskrit. Taken as ink or a broken sort.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(4)" — EDITOR'S GLOSS, not text: arabic 4 in parentheses set inside the Devanagari line to gloss krta (= 4 in bhuta-samkhya). Kept because this is a diplomatic transcription; it must be stripped before any mula is published.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-" — end-of-line HYPHEN inside a Devanagari word: nanda-hr- / -cchistam runs across the line break. Evidence that a printed line here is a measure, not a pada.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुरा"; alternatives "सुर", "मूला" — Sastri's own English on this plate names the three starting stars as 'Aswini, Magha or Moola', so this member of the compound must encode MULA. The likeliest constitution is magha + asura (Nirrti, Mula's presiding deity) sandhi-ing to maghasura-, which is exactly the ink; the long a before -trinavake is then hard to account for. The aksara is certainly sa+u, not mu: the sa arm differs from the ma of magha two aksaras earlier at 5.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दस्रतः"; alternatives "दस्ततः" — final word; da + s(+r subscript) + tah. Redundant beside dasra- earlier in the same line, which is why it is flagged.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वान्वाश्वि"; alternatives "स्वाश्व्यश्वि", "स्वाब्ध्यश्वि" — UNRESOLVED. Two aksaras between -kas- and -svi could not be settled at 5.5x on the native scan. What the passage needs is a bhuta-samkhya compound for 225 (Sastri's English: 'Divide the same by 225'), i.e. units-first 5,2,2, ending in asvi (=2), which the last aksara supplies. The two before it are not legible. This is the worst place on the eleven plates and I am not guessing it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(225)" — editor's arabic gloss inside the Devanagari line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बाणेलाः"; alternatives "बाणेडाः" — bana(5) + ila(1), read units-first = 15, which the editor's (15) confirms. The arithmetic is the check on the reading here, and it works for all four words on this line: khaguna = kha(0)+guna(3) = 30, banonigama = bana(5)+nigama/veda(4) = 45, sasti = 60.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(15) (30) (45) (60)" — four editor's arabic glosses set inside one Devanagari line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्र"; alternatives "द्व" — banadrayah = bana(5) + adri(7) = 75, which the editor's (75) confirms; the alternative dvaya (=2) would give 25 and is excluded by the gloss. A case where the edition's own apparatus settles an aksara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(75)" — editor's arabic gloss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[line]" — THIS IS THE FIFTH printed line of sloka 5 and it is set centred, not at either margin. It is the overflow of the fourth line. The brief's expected 'one pada per line' fails here.
  • About this edition: This verse's mūla carried ARABIC FIGURES set inside the Devanāgarī — the edition's own gloss of a bhūtasaṅkhyā or a computed value, not part of the text. They were STRIPPED from the constituted mūla on 2026-09-08 and the line as the plate sets them is kept in `diplomatic`. The second exemplar (Bhasin, Ranjan 2019) sets none of them and prints the same glosses separately, in Devanāgarī, outside the verse.
1.6a reading here is contested

शुद्धास्ता विघटीः क्रमान्नरवधूपुंस्त्र्यादिभेदः स्मृतो मांदिराशिनवांशयोर्जननभाच्चन्द्रर्क्षतो वा वदेत् । तत्तद्राशिवशाच्च सप्तमगृहात्तत्तत्त्रिकोणाच्च वा जन्म स्यान्नवमांशराशिपवशाद्वीर्याधिकात्तद्वदेत् ॥ ६ ॥

śuddhāstā vighaṭīḥ kramānnaravadhūpuṃstryādibhedaḥ smṛto māṃdirāśinavāṃśayorjananabhāccandrarkṣato vā vadet | tattadrāśivaśācca saptamagṛhāttattattrikoṇācca vā janma syānnavamāṃśarāśipavaśādvīryādhikāttadvadet || 6 ||

Those vighatis, purified ⟨reduced⟩ in order, are held to give the distinction of man and woman, male and female and the rest. One may declare it from the rasi and the navamsa of Mandi, from the birth-sign (janana-bha), or from the naksatra of the Moon. And by force of those several rasis, from the 7th house, or from their several trikonas, the birth is to be determined; or from the lord of the navamsa-rasi — declaring it from whichever is the greater in strength.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विघटीः"; alternatives "विघट्यः" — an extra superscript hook stands over the gha/ta joint that no reading needs; the body reads gha + ta + long-i + visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वधू"; alternatives "वभू" — nara-vadhu (man/woman) is required by Sastri's heading 'Man- Woman Janma Suddhi'; the aksara's counters are closed by inking and would read bha on shape alone.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽज्ञनन"; alternatives "ऽङ्गनन", "ऽजनन" — UNRESOLVED. The avagraha is certain and printed. The aksara after it has the jna ligature's tail at 6x but ajnanana- yields nothing; ajanana- ('birth') would suit the sense and would mean the tail is ink. Recorded as the ink reads, not as sense would like. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मांदिराशिनवांशयोर्जननभाच्चन्द्रर्क्षतो; this sentence names ऽज्ञनन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चन्द्रर्क्षतो" — candra-rksatah, 'from the Moon's naksatra' - the repha over ksa is clear at 3.2x. Recorded because it is the one secure anchor in this line.
1.7a reading here is contested

चारुः खारि जटा वयो नट तनू रूनं द्युमानाहतं खाङ्गाप्तं रविवासरादिघटिकास्तत्कालभे मन्दजः । रात्रेर्मानमहःप्रमाणमहिहृत्खण्डप्रमाणं भवेदर्काद्याशनिवासरान्तदिवसे वारेश्वरात् खण्डपाः ॥ ७ ॥

cāruḥ khāri jaṭā vayo naṭa tanū rūnaṃ dyumānāhataṃ khāṅgāptaṃ ravivāsarādighaṭikāstatkālabhe mandajaḥ | rātrermānamahaḥpramāṇamahihṛtkhaṇḍapramāṇaṃ bhavedarkādyāśanivāsarāntadivase vāreśvarāt khaṇḍapāḥ || 7 ||

Caru (26), Khari (22), Jata (18), Vayo (14), Nata (10), Tanu (6), Runa (2) — these ⟨katapayadi words give⟩ the ghatikas for Sunday and the days that follow; ⟨each⟩ multiplied by the measure of the day ⟨our mula now reads dyumana, 'the day-measure', as the computation requires, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩ and divided by sixty (kha-anga = 60; our mula now reads khangaptam, 'divided by kha-anga'). In the sign (bha) of that moment ⟨the lagna then rising⟩ is Mandi, the son of Saturn. ⟨Our mula now reads tat-kalabhe, emended on the lexicon from tat-kalame, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave and which does not construe.⟩ The measure of the night and the measure of the day, divided by eight (ahi = 8), give the measure of one segment (khanda); and on the days running from Sunday to Saturday, the lords of the segments are reckoned from the lord of that weekday.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चारुः"; alternatives "चारः" — THIS LINE IS A KATAPAYADI STRING and the arithmetic checks every word: caru=ca(6)+ra(2)=26, khari=kha(2)+ra(2)=22, jata=ja(8)+ta(1)=18, vayo=va(4)+ya(1)=14, nata=na(0)+ta(1)=10, tanu=ta(6)+na(0)=6, runam=ru(2)+na(0)=2 - exactly the seven day-Mandi ghatika values for Sunday through Saturday, in order. CONFIRMED AFTERWARDS by plate 7, where Sastri transliterates and values them one by one - 'Charu (26), Khari (22), Jata (18), Vayo (14), Nata (10), Tanu (6) and Roon (2)' - which also settles the first word as caru rather than cara. The edition names the method itself on plate 7: 'interpreted with the help of Katpayadi system'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घुमाना"; alternatives "द्युमाना" — ghumana- is not a word. dyumana-ahatam ('multiplied by the length of the day') is what the Mandi computation needs and what the previous plate's English describes ('find out the length of the day and night'). At 3.2x the aksara is single-storey and reads gha+u, not d+ya+u; recorded as printed with the emendation named. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्युमानाहतं; this sentence names घुमाना, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate was read again by eye on the 2900x4721 greyscale master (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0006.png, line 34) at about 1.7x, 2.0x and 3.5x native. This akṣara is the fount's single-storey द्य ligature with u, the same sort as द्यु in मुखाद्युत्क्रमात् (store p.39), and not घु, whose upper lobe in लघुतरं (store p.27) is an open U. In this fount द्य is a single sort, so a single-storey glyph does not mean gha. The press prints द्युमानाहतं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खाङ्गामं"; alternatives "खाङ्गांशं" — expected here is the divisor of the Mandi rule; khanga as bhuta-samkhya is kha(0)+anga(6) = 60. The final aksara reads ma+anusvara; -amsam ('the part') would give the sense 'the sixtieth part' and differs by one aksara. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खाङ्गाप्तं; this sentence names खाङ्गामं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Read by eye on the same master (line 35) at about 1.7x and 2.0x native, the final akṣara is प्त, the same sort as प्त in नगाप्ताः (store p.27) and सप्तम (store p.5), not म. The press prints खाङ्गाप्तं, 'divided by kha-aṅga', and neither -मं nor -अंशं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्कालमे"; alternatives "तत्कालमो", "तत्कालभे" — does not parse. The rest of the line is secure: ravi-vasaradi-ghatikah ('the ghatikas for Sunday and the rest') and mandajah ('the son of Saturn' = Mandi/Gulika), which is the subject the whole passage is about. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads रविवासरादिघटिकास्तत्कालभे; this sentence names तत्कालमे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate was read again by eye (page_0006.png, line 35) at about 2.0x and 3.5x native, beside समभे (store p.17). The 1993 press does set तत्कालमे: the letter has म's form, with the headline unbroken over its left lobe (22 of 22 columns), where the भ sorts on these pages are notched at the top left. So the reading recorded above is faithful to the press. The mūla reads तत्कालभे on the lexicon: तत्कालमे does not construe, 'in the sign (bha) at that moment' is what the rule needs, and P. S. Sastri (PDF p.22 line 21) and Bhasin (PDF p.13 line 14), read by eye at about 3.6x native, both set भे.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अहिहृत्"; alternatives "अहिहृद्" — ahi (serpents) = 8 in bhuta-samkhya, hrt = 'divided by'. Sastri's English confirms it: 'The Eighth part of the Dinmana ... is the period of each planet'. Here the arithmetic in the translation is what fixes the reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-" — end-of-line hyphen inside a word: bhave- / -d arkadya. Second instance of a Devanagari word broken across the measure.
1.8a reading here is contested

अन्त्यांशो हि निरीश्वरस्तु गुलिकः शन्यंशकस्तन्निशो वारेशादिह पञ्चमादित अयं खण्डान्त्यांशे भवेत् । स्यातां मन्दसुतावुभावतिखलावित्येवमूचे मुनिर्मांडव्यः किल यत्र तौ निवसतस् तत्रैव हानिप्रदौ ॥ ८ ॥

antyāṃśo hi nirīśvarastu gulikaḥ śanyaṃśakastanniśo vāreśādiha pañcamādita ayaṃ khaṇḍāntyāṃśe bhavet | syātāṃ mandasutāvubhāvatikhalāvityevamūce munirmāṃḍavyaḥ kila yatra tau nivasatas tatraiva hānipradau || 8 ||

The last portion is indeed without a lord; Gulika, however, is Saturn's portion (sany-amsaka) ⟨our mula now restores sany- in a span where an eye reading of the plate found the type destroyed⟩. At night that ⟨reckoning⟩ runs from the lord of the weekday, here beginning from the fifth from it; this falls in the last portion of the segment (khanda). Both ⟨Gulika and Mandi⟩ are sons of Saturn and exceedingly malign — thus spoke the sage Mandavya; and wherever the two of them dwell, there they bring loss.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "⟨2-3 aksaras destroyed⟩" — REFUSED. Between gulikah and -sakas the type has failed: at 6.5x on the native scan there is a ha-shaped body with a descender, then two or three clusters of loose dots with no connecting headline, then the line resumes. This is broken or dropped type (or ink loss), not a mark I can read. I am not guessing it; the span is left as a declared gap. It is the only destroyed text on these eleven plates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पञ्चमादित"; alternatives "पञ्चमादितः" — 'from the fifth' - Sastri: 'reckoned not from the lord of the week day chosen, but from that of the 5th from it'. The final aksara reads ta with no visarga, which leaves the case ending short.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खण्डान्त्यांशे"; alternatives "खण्डान्तमेंशे" — khanda-antya-amse, 'in the last portion of the segment' - the same word antyamsa opens line 18, and Sastri renders it 'Gulika will be from the last portion of Saturn'. On shape alone the aksara after ndа could be read as me+anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विंत्ये"; alternatives "वित्ये" — khalav ity evam uce - a superscript mark stands over the vi that the sandhi does not want. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्दसुतावुभावतिखलावित्येवमूचे; this sentence names विंत्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-" — third end-of-line hyphen inside a Devanagari word: muni- / mandavyah.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मांडव्यः"; alternatives "माण्डव्यः" — printed with anusvara + da, not the conjunct nda; Sastri writes 'Mandavya Rishi'. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The gap in the mula is a real one: between गुलिकः and -शकः the type has failed (the reader records a ha-shaped body with a descender, then two or three clusters of loose dots with no headline). What is predicated of Gulika there, and what word ends in -saka, cannot be recovered from this plate, so the first clause is rendered only as far as the break and the surviving syllable is left standing. Two further readings in this verse are uncertain but do not affect the sense rendered: पञ्चमादित is printed without a visarga, leaving the case ending short, and विंत्ये carries a superscript mark that the sandhi (khalav ity evam) does not want. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मन्दसुतावुभावतिखलावित्येवमूचे; this sentence names विंत्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.9a reading here is contested

कर्काजालिवणिग्घटेषु जननं चेत्प्राग्गृहे स्याच्छिशोः सिंहे वा मकरेऽपि वा यदि भवेद्याम्ये वृषे पश्चिमे । कन्याचापनृयुग्झषेषु जननं चेत्स्यादुदीच्यां दिशीत्येवं लग्ननवांशयोर्बलवशाच्चज्जन्मगृहं त्वादिशेत् ॥ ९ ॥

karkājālivaṇigghaṭeṣu jananaṃ cetprāggṛhe syācchiśoḥ siṃhe vā makare'pi vā yadi bhavedyāmye vṛṣe paścime | kanyācāpanṛyugjhaṣeṣu jananaṃ cetsyādudīcyāṃ diśītyevaṃ lagnanavāṃśayorbalavaśāccajjanmagṛhaṃ tvādiśet || 9 ||

If the birth falls in Karka (Cancer), Aja (Aries), Ali (Scorpio), Vanij (Libra) or Ghata (Aquarius), the child's birth-chamber lies in the eastern quarter. If it falls in Simha (Leo) or in Makara (Capricorn), it lies in the south; in Vrsa (Taurus), in the west. If the birth falls in Kanya (Virgo), Capa (Sagittarius), Nryuj (Gemini) or Jhasa (Pisces), it lies in the northern quarter. Thus, according to the strength of the lagna and of the navamsa, one should declare the house of birth.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्का"; alternatives "कर्कां" — THIS LINE IS THE MOST HEAVILY OVER-INKED on the eleven plates: the first five aksaras are blotted into one another and a mark that could be an anusvara sits over the second. The word list is nevertheless secure from Sastri's English - Cancer, Aries, Scorpio, Libra, Aquarius = karka, aja, ali, vanij, ghata - and karka takes no anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वणि"; alternatives "दणि" — va vs da inside the blot; vanij (the merchant) is Libra and is what the English requires.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जननं"; alternatives "जनं" — at 2.9x this looks like two aksaras (ja + nam), which would leave the pada an 18-syllable line in a 19-syllable metre. The SAME word is set unambiguously as three aksaras (ja-na-nam) in line 13 of this plate, and the metre needs three. Read as jananam on that evidence.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — second printed avagraha on these plates (makare 'pi); clear at 2.9x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-" — fourth end-of-line hyphen inside a Devanagari word: disi- / -tyevam.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वशाच्चज्"; alternatives "वशाज्", "वशात्तज्" — two stacked conjuncts in succession where the sandhi wants one (vasat + janma = vasaj janma). Recorded as printed; either a doubled sort or c-ca standing for t-ta.
1.10a reading here is contested

लग्नं शीतकरे न पश्यति चरे ग्रामान्तरे च स्थिरे स्वग्रामे द्वितनूदये यदि तदा मार्गे पितुः स्यात् स्थितिः । अर्के भाग्यगतेऽथवाऽष्टमगते त्वेतद्भवेदन्यथा चेन्नैवं सहिते खलैर्यदि विधौ मातुः प्रसूतिः श्रमात् ॥ १० ॥

lagnaṃ śītakare na paśyati care grāmāntare ca sthire svagrāme dvitanūdaye yadi tadā mārge pituḥ syāt sthitiḥ | arke bhāgyagate'thavā'ṣṭamagate tvetadbhavedanyathā cennaivaṃ sahite khalairyadi vidhau mātuḥ prasūtiḥ śramāt || 10 ||

If the Moon does not aspect the lagna: in a movable ⟨sign⟩ the father is away in another village; in a fixed one he is in his own village ⟨our mula now reads sva-grame, not the earlier kha-grame⟩; and if a dual sign is rising, then the father's station is on the road. When the Sun is in the 9th (bhagya) or in the 8th, this ⟨what was said of the father⟩ comes about; if it is otherwise, it is not so ⟨the words after 'the 8th', corrupt in our earlier text, now read tv etad bhaved anyatha⟩. If the Moon is joined with malefics, the mother's delivery comes with hard labour.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खग्रामे"; alternatives "स्वग्रामे" — the sense demands sva-grame ('in his own village'), set against gramantare ('in another village') in the previous line; the printed first aksara reads kha. sva and kha are close in this fount. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वग्रामे; this sentence names खग्रामे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: refuted on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0009, store page 9 line 32, at about 2.2x and 3.9x native, measured against three ख and two स्व of this fount) found स्व. Its left part runs in solid ink into the व at mid-height, as in every स्व of this fount, where every ख leaves a white gap. So the press sets स्वग्रामे, as our mūla now reads, and the kha read here was a misreading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मार्गे"; alternatives "मार्गें" — a second mark may stand over the repha; if so it is an anusvara the word does not want.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ ... ऽ" — TWO avagrahas in one line - bhagya-gate 'thava 'stama-gate - both printed and both clear at 2.9x. Third and fourth avagrahas on these plates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्वेतद्द्वेदःयथा"; alternatives "त्वेतद्ब्रुवे यथा", "त्वेतद् द्वेधा यथा" — UNRESOLVED. At 6.5x the stacked conjunct after tvetad has three storeys and I cannot separate them; what follows reads ve + visarga. 'tvetaddvedah' is not Sanskrit. The sense wanted is 'and this is as follows', which either bruve ('I declare') or dvedha ('in two ways') would give. Recorded as the ink reads. No word space is printed before yatha either. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्वेतद्भवेदन्यथा; this sentence names त्वेतद्द्वेदःयथा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0010, store page 10 line 1, at about 2.2x, 4.4x and 5.2x native) found one stacked ligature after त्वेत: the द्भ this press sets in भावाद्भाव (2.1) and in द्भावेशः (store page 37). A separate वे follows it, then द, then न्य. The mark read as a visarga is the half-न of न्य, a headline piece over a flat-topped wedge, the same as in चेदन्यथा (store page 20). So the press sets त्वेतद्भवेदन्यथा, as our mūla now reads, and pāda 3 counts 19, the śārdūlavikrīḍita exactly.]
1.11a reading here is contested

लग्नेन्द्वन्तरगाः प्रसूतिगृहगा बाह्ये तु बाह्यं गताः चन्द्रात्तैलमथोदयादपि भवेद्वर्ती च दीपो रवेः । अर्कः शुक्रकुजागुमन्दशशिविज्जीवा दिगीशाः क्रमात् केन्द्रस्थादिकवीर्यवत्खगदिशो द्वारं भवेदग्रतः ॥ ११ ॥

lagnendvantaragāḥ prasūtigṛhagā bāhye tu bāhyaṃ gatāḥ candrāttailamathodayādapi bhavedvartī ca dīpo raveḥ | arkaḥ śukrakujāgumandaśaśivijjīvā digīśāḥ kramāt kendrasthādikavīryavatkhagadiśo dvāraṃ bhavedagrataḥ || 11 ||

The planets standing between the lagna and the Moon are ⟨the persons⟩ present in the delivery room; those gone outside ⟨that arc⟩ are outside it. From the Moon comes the oil, from the ascendant the wick ⟨our text now reads udayat, 'from the ascendant', as the run of ablatives needs; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave udayam, which the sentence cannot use⟩, and the lamp from the Sun. The Sun, Venus, Mars, Agu ⟨'the rayless one', a name of Rahu⟩, Saturn, the Moon, Vij ⟨Mercury⟩ and Jupiter are the lords of the directions in order ⟨east, south-east, south, south-west, west, north-west, north, north-east⟩. The door will be in front, in the direction of whichever planet is strongest — those standing in the kendras being taken first.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्द्व"; alternatives "न्दू" — lagna-indu-antara-gah, 'those standing between the lagna and the Moon'. The va-subscript of the conjunct and a long-u matra are near-identical in this fount.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अथोदयामपि"; alternatives "अथोदयादपि" — 'udayam' is not a form the sentence can use; udayat ('from the ascendant') would be. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: The 1993 plate was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 2.8x and 4.6x native (jp2 master page_0010.png, line 30), and it does set मथोदयामपि: the letter between या and पि is म, laid beside the म of तैलम and the द of मथोद on the same line. The mūla now reads मथोदयादपि. उदयाम् is no form of उदय and the sentence runs on ablatives (चन्द्रात् … रवेः), so our उदयाद् is a deliberate emendation of the exemplar on the lexicon.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्तिं"; alternatives "वर्तिः" — accusative where bhavet wants a nominative (vartih, 'the wick'). As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवेद्वर्ती for भवेद्वर्तिं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: The plate refutes 'As printed'. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0010.png, line 30) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 4.6x native. It sets भवेद्वर्ती: the mātrā's vertical stands to the right of the consonant, as the ī of दीपो does on the same line, and there is no anusvāra; the same page's true anusvāra, over the रं of द्वारं on line 32, is a separate round mark. So वर्तिं was a misread in our transcription, and the correction brought our text back to what the exemplar sets.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अगु"; alternatives "आगु" — the fourth in the list of eight direction-lords, between Mars and Saturn, i.e. the slot of Rahu; agu ('rayless') is a name of Rahu. The list runs Sun, Venus, Mars, [Rahu], Saturn, Moon, vij (= Mercury), Jupiter - the standard eight dig-isas in order, which is the check that the reading is right.

Adhyāya 2 · बलसाधनखण्डः — Calculation of the several kinds of strength

2.1a reading here is contested

सर्वे द्वादशराशयः समुदिता लग्नादिषट्कं तनोर्याम्याङ्गं च तनोः स्त्रियस्तदितरे षट्चोत्तराङ्गं भवेत् । लग्नं प्राणमयं शशिस्थभवनं देहस्तयोस्तत्फलं भावाद्भावपतेश्च कारकवशात्तत्तत्फलं योजयेत् ॥ १ ॥

sarve dvādaśarāśayaḥ samuditā lagnādiṣaṭkaṃ tanoryāmyāṅgaṃ ca tanoḥ striyastaditare ṣaṭcottarāṅgaṃ bhavet | lagnaṃ prāṇamayaṃ śaśisthabhavanaṃ dehastayostatphalaṃ bhāvādbhāvapateśca kārakavaśāttattatphalaṃ yojayet || 1 ||

All twelve rasis taken together ⟨make up the body⟩. The six beginning with the lagna are the body's yamya (southern, that is, right) limb, and the other six are its uttara (northern, that is, left) limb — ⟨the clause tanoh striyah, 'of a woman's body', stands between the two and its construction is not certain as printed⟩. The lagna is made of prana ⟨the breath of life⟩; the house in which the Moon stands is the body; and the fruit of those two, and that of the bhava and of the lord of the bhava ⟨our mula now reads bhavad bhavapatesca, 'from the bhava and from its lord'⟩ — one should assign the several results according to the karaka. ⟨For satkam, 'the six', the plate prints patkam, a wrong sort of pa for sa.⟩

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पट्कं"; alternatives "षट्कं" — the akshara before ट् has the OPEN rectangular form of प - left vertical, top bar, narrow white slot, right stem - and matches the certain प of प्राणमयं (v.l.3) and of -पतेश्च (v.l.4) at 6x in a same-scale montage. It is visibly NOT the closed-knot ष printed in षट्चो on line 2 of this same verse. Expected word is षट्कं ('the six'); recorded as printed. Most likely a wrong sort. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads लग्नादिषट्कं तनोर्याम्याङ्गं; this sentence names पट्कं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: confirmed on the plate, and our text departs from it. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0012, store page 12 line 2, at about 2.5x native, measured against प and ष controls) found the प sort: an open white slot between two verticals, with no crossing stroke. So the press sets लग्नादिपट्कं, as this note read it. Our mūla reads षट्कं, an emendation of the press on the lexicon: पट्कम् is no word, and षट्कम्, 'the six', pairs with the षट् later in the verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वे" — checked at 5x: two marks above - a thick repha hook plus the e-matra stroke. Reading confirmed, not doubtful in outcome.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्याम्याङ्गं"; alternatives "र्याम्यांङ्गं" — at 3.6x a single anusvara dot sits left of centre over the ङ्ग ligature; if it belongs to the preceding ा the reading is याम्यांङ्गं. Only one dot is present.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्रियस्तदितरे"; alternatives "स्त्रियास्तदितरे" — at 3.9x there is no ā-matra stroke after य; recorded short.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षट्चोत्तराङ्गं" — ष here is certain - closed knot with a figure-8 counter at lower left, contrasting with the प of line 1. This contrast is the evidence for the line-1 flag. [2026-09-23: measured on the exemplar (jp2 page_0012, store page 12 line 3, seen at about 2.5x native), the slot of this glyph never closes: its brightest point is 178-221 in every row, while the ष of विषममे (store page 18) closes to solid ink over six rows. A crossing stroke may have printed too faintly to form ink. So the ink does not show the closed knot this note describes, and the contrast it draws with line 1 does not hold as ink. The reading ष here rests on the lexicon (षट्, six), not on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भावाङ्ग्।व"; alternatives "भावाङ्गाधि", "भावाद्यधि" — RECORDED AS THE NON-WORD IT IS. At 7x the ink shows: भावा, then a ङ्ग-type cluster with a subscript hook descending left, then a PLAIN full-height vertical bar with no hook over its top, then a glyph with a closed left loop (व or ध), then पते. The vertical is either a ि whose hook has failed to print or a stray sort. I could not settle it and did not close it by expectation; the sense requires an -adhipateh ('and of the lord'), which both alternatives would give. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भावाद्भावपतेश्च; this sentence names भावाङ्ग्।व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0012, store page 12 line 5, at about 5.2x native beside the stack of 1.10) found every feature this note describes, named differently. The cluster is the द्भ ligature this press sets in द्भावेशः (store page 37; correlation 0.81). The bar is the ā-mātrā of द्भा: as wide as the ā of वा in the same word, with no ि hook above the headline. The glyph after it is व. So the press sets भावाद्भावपतेश्च, as our mūla now reads.]
2.2a reading here is contested

चन्द्रेज्यावनिजा दिवाकरबुधौ सूर्येन्दुजीवास्ततः शुक्रार्कौ रविचन्द्रभूमितनया ज्ञार्की ज्ञशुक्रौ क्रमात् । मित्राण्युष्णकरात्ततस्तु रिपवो मन्दासुरेज्यौ ततः शून्यं ज्ञो विधुरेव भार्गववुधावादित्य चन्द्रौं ततः ॥ २ ॥

candrejyāvanijā divākarabudhau sūryendujīvāstataḥ śukrārkau ravicandrabhūmitanayā jñārkī jñaśukrau kramāt | mitrāṇyuṣṇakarāttatastu ripavo mandāsurejyau tataḥ śūnyaṃ jño vidhureva bhārgavavudhāvāditya candrauṃ tataḥ || 2 ||

The Moon, Jupiter and Mars ⟨are the friends of the Sun⟩; the Sun and Mercury ⟨of the Moon⟩; then the Sun, the Moon and Jupiter ⟨of Mars⟩; Venus and the Sun ⟨of Mercury⟩; the Sun, the Moon and the son of the Earth ⟨Mars, of Jupiter⟩; Mercury and Saturn ⟨of Venus⟩; Mercury and Venus ⟨of Saturn⟩ — in that order. These are the friends, reckoned from the hot-rayed one ⟨the Sun⟩ onward. Then the enemies: Saturn and the preceptor of the asuras ⟨Venus, for the Sun⟩; then none at all ⟨for the Moon⟩; Mercury ⟨for Mars⟩; the Moon alone ⟨for Mercury⟩; Venus and Mercury ⟨for Jupiter⟩; the Sun and the Moon ⟨for Venus⟩; and then ⟨those of Saturn, which follow in the next verse⟩.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधौ"; alternatives "वुधौ" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST APPLIED. In the verse face the glyph for Mercury is printed with the same OPEN bowl as certain व. Decisive evidence is on line 4 of this verse, where भार्गव and the Mercury syllable are ADJACENT inside भार्गववुधौ and share one form; neither carries the internal tick that the heading face's ब (in बलसाधनखण्डः, p.12) shows plainly. I have found no certain ब in the verse face on these plates to contrast against, so I cannot yet say whether this face lacks a distinct ब or the compositor used व sorts. Normalised here to बुधौ because the word is certain; the printed form is वुधौ.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्येन्दुजीवास्ततः" — the half-न of न्दु is set as a small detached two-part mark, not as a न्द ligature; the same mark recurs in मन्दासुरेज्यौ (line 3), which confirms the reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्रार्कौ"; alternatives "शुक्राकौँ" — the superscript over the second unit is a repha plus the au-matra; ink is heavy and the two marks nearly merge at 2.2x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञार्की" — repha + ī confirmed; = ज्ञ (Mercury) + अर्की (Saturn).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उष्ण" — a CERTAIN ष in the verse face (in the ष्ण ligature). Recorded because it is the control for the प/ष question flagged on p.12 line 1.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वुधा"; alternatives "बुधा" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. This is the decisive instance: at 4.4x the व of भार्गव and this glyph stand side by side in one word and are the same open-bowl form. Word required is बुधौ (Mercury).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चन्द्रौं"; alternatives "चन्द्रौ" — an anusvara dot is present above the au-matra; grammatically the dual चन्द्रौ wants no anusvara. Recorded as printed.
2.3a reading here is contested

सूर्यादित्रितयं क्रमादिनकरादन्ये समाः स्युस्तत स्तत्कालाच्च निसर्गतश्च खचराः कल्प्यास्त्वधीष्टादयः । भौमः शुक्रबुधेन्दुसूर्यशशिजाः शुक्रारजीवैनयो मन्देज्याः क्रमशः क्रियादिगृहपाः स्यादाद्यवर्गो गृहम्॥३॥

sūryāditritayaṃ kramādinakarādanye samāḥ syustata statkālācca nisargataśca khacarāḥ kalpyāstvadhīṣṭādayaḥ | bhaumaḥ śukrabudhendusūryaśaśijāḥ śukrārajīvainayo mandejyāḥ kramaśaḥ kriyādigṛhapāḥ syādādyavargo gṛham||3||

The triad beginning with the Sun ⟨the Sun, the Moon and Mars — these are Saturn's enemies⟩, in order; and from the Sun onward the remaining planets would be neutral (sama). The planets are to be reckoned, both from the moment (tat-kala) and by nature (nisarga), as the great friend (adhista, 'very dear') and the rest. Mars, Venus, Mercury, the Moon, the Sun, the Moon's son ⟨Mercury⟩, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, ⟨…⟩ Saturn and Jupiter are, in order, the lords of the houses beginning with Kriya ⟨Aries⟩. ⟨Between 'Jupiter' and 'Saturn' the plate reads jivainayo: the aksaras are clear but cannot be divided into words, and one of the two rulerships of Saturn — Capricorn and Aquarius — is not accounted for in what can be read.⟩ And the first varga is the rasi (gr̥ha) itself.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युस्तत"; alternatives "ह्युस्तत", "र्युस्तत", "स्युः स्तत" — UNSETTLED. At 6x the tail shows four units: (i) a form with a top bar and a hook descending left, (ii) a mark carrying a dot above and a curl below (reads as a ु-bearing unit), (iii) स्त, (iv) त. I read स्युस्तत as most likely (स्युः 'they would be' suits the sense 'the others would be neutral'), but I did not resolve units (i)-(ii) on the ink and am not closing them by expectation. See the dittography note on the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्यादित्रितयं" — clear at 2.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्तत्" — APPARENT DITTOGRAPHY, REPORTED NOT REPAIRED. The previous printed line ends in what I read as -स्तत and this line opens स्तत्कालाच्च, so the sequence स्तत appears twice across the line break. I could not decide among three explanations - a compositor's dittography, a word-division repetition (this edition uses a HYPHEN for that elsewhere, e.g. तनो– on p.12, which argues against it), or a misreading by me of the previous line's tail. Needs a second witness; I have not silently deleted either occurrence.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कल्प्यास्त्ववधीष्टादयः"; alternatives "कल्प्यास्त्वधीष्टादयः" — uncertain whether one व or two stand between स्त्व and धी; ink is heavy at 2.1x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कल्प्यास्त्वधीष्टादयः; this sentence names कल्प्यास्त्ववधीष्टादयः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुध"; alternatives "वुध" — printed with the same open-bowl व form seen throughout this face; normalised, printed form is वुध. See p.13 for the adjacent-glyph evidence.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्रारजीवैनयो"; alternatives "शुक्रारजीवा इनयो", "शुक्रारजीवौ नयो" — UNSETTLED word division at the line end. The aksharas शु-क्रा-र-जी-वै-न-यो are individually clear at 2.4x, but I cannot divide them into Sanskrit words that fit the sequence of rasi lords (Libra Venus, Scorpio Mars, Sagittarius Jupiter) followed by मन्देज्याः on the next line. Recorded as the continuous string that is on the page.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षड्वर्गों"; alternatives "षड्गों", "षड्वर्गो" — at 4.2x the cluster between ष and र्गों is compressed and I read ड्व with low confidence; an anusvara IS present over the गों, where the sense (आद्यषड्वर्गो गृहम्, 'the first of the six vargas is the rasi' - matching this plate's English) wants none. Recorded with the anusvara as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यादाद्यवर्गो; this sentence names षड्वर्गों, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate settles the word. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0015.png, line 13) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 2.8x and 5.0x native. It sets स्यादाद्यवर्गों गृहम्, and there is no षड् on the page: after द्य the line carries four ink bodies, 110 px wide, against 104 px for व + ग in the same page's वर्गजाः on line 15, with no room for two more akṣaras. The anusvāra over गों is printed, as this note says. Our mūla reads स्यादाद्यवर्गो without it, because आद्यवर्गः before गृहम् gives -वर्गो and वर्गों is no form.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहम्॥३॥" — the verse number is set hard against the last word with no intervening space, unlike ॥ १ ॥ and ॥ २ ॥ on pp.10-11 which are spaced. Recorded as printed.
2.4a reading here is contested

होरा तस्य दलं त्रिभागकमितं द्रेक्काणमित्यूचिरे सप्तांशो नवमस्तथा रविलवास्त्रिंशांशको वर्गजाः । सिंहोक्षाजवधूधनुर्धरघटा मूलत्रिकोणाभिधाः कुंभश्च क्रमशो रवेः क्रियवृषौ नक्राङ्गनाकर्कटाः ॥ ४ ॥

horā tasya dalaṃ tribhāgakamitaṃ drekkāṇamityūcire saptāṃśo navamastathā ravilavāstriṃśāṃśako vargajāḥ | siṃhokṣājavadhūdhanurdharaghaṭā mūlatrikoṇābhidhāḥ kuṃbhaśca kramaśo raveḥ kriyavṛṣau nakrāṅganākarkaṭāḥ || 4 ||

The hora is half of it ⟨the rasi⟩; a third part measured out they have called the drekkana; likewise the seventh part (saptamsa), the ninth (navamsa), the ravi-parts ⟨ravi = 12, that is, the dvadasamsa⟩ and the trimsamsa — these arise from the varga. Simha ⟨Leo⟩, Uksa ⟨Taurus⟩, Aja ⟨Aries⟩, Vadhu ⟨Virgo⟩, Dhanurdhara ⟨Sagittarius; our mula now reads dhanurdhara, where the earlier text had the non-word ghanurdhara⟩, Ghata ⟨Aquarius⟩ and Kumbha ⟨Aquarius⟩ are named mulatrikona, in order from the Sun. ⟨The sixth member belongs to Venus and should be Tula (Libra); our mula reads ghata, which duplicates the seventh. The text is faulty here and has not been emended.⟩ ⟨The exaltation signs follow:⟩ Kriya ⟨Aries⟩ and Vr̥sa ⟨Taurus⟩, Nakra ⟨Capricorn⟩, Angana ⟨Virgo⟩, Karkata ⟨Cancer⟩ —

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रेक्काण"; alternatives "द्रेष्काण" — clearly क्का, not ष्का, at 2.4x. Recorded as printed; both spellings are current for this term.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविलवा" — रवि here is the number 12, so रविलवा = the twelfth part (dvadasamsa); the English on this plate confirms it ('1/12th is Dwadasamsa').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घनुर्धर"; alternatives "धनुर्धर" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. The initial glyph shows a closed loop at the upper left that the ध of the adjacent -र्धर and of वधू does not show, so I read घ. The word required is धनुर्धर (Sagittarius, the archer), which the list of moolatrikona signs demands. Probable wrong sort. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सिंहोक्षाजवधूधनुर्धरघटा; this sentence names घनुर्धर, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सिंहोक्षाजवधू" — = Leo, Taurus (uksha), Aries (aja), Virgo (vadhu); the rasi-name sequence is clear at 2.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुंभश्च"; alternatives "कुम्भश्च" — anusvara, not the conjunct म्भ, as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रियवृषौ"; alternatives "क्रियवृषौ" — = Aries (kriya) and Taurus (vrisha); vowel length on वृ checked at 2.2x.
2.5a reading here is contested

मीनस्तौलिगृहं च तुङ्गभवनं तत्र.स्थिते खेचरे वीर्यं रूपमितं त्वथो त्रिचरणा मूलत्रिकोणे बलम् । स्वक्षेत्रेऽर्द्धबलं स्वमित्रभवने पादं त्वधीष्टेऽर्द्धयुक्शत्रावष्टिमतं तदर्द्धमधिशत्रावष्टमांशः समे ॥ ५ ॥

mīnastauligṛhaṃ ca tuṅgabhavanaṃ tatra.sthite khecare vīryaṃ rūpamitaṃ tvatho tricaraṇā mūlatrikoṇe balam | svakṣetre'rddhabalaṃ svamitrabhavane pādaṃ tvadhīṣṭe'rddhayukśatrāvaṣṭimataṃ tadarddhamadhiśatrāvaṣṭamāṃśaḥ same || 5 ||

— Mina ⟨Pisces⟩ and the house of Tuli ⟨Libra⟩: these are the exaltation houses. A planet standing there has strength measured at one rupa. In mulatrikona the strength is three quarters (tri-carana); in its own field (svaksetra), half; in a friend's house, a quarter; and in the house of an adhi-ista ⟨a great friend⟩, joined with half ⟨our mula now reads tv adhiste 'rdhayuk, and an eye reading of the plate confirmed its repha; the word runs across the line break and the clause is still hard to construe⟩; in an enemy's ⟨sign⟩, a sixteenth (asti = 16); in a bitter enemy's (adhisatru), half of that ⟨a thirty-second⟩; and in a neutral's (sama), an eighth part.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्र.स्थिते"; alternatives "तत्र स्थिते" — a low dot stands between तत्र and स्थिते at 2.6x, where the setting elsewhere uses plain word space. Either a broken sort or an ink speck; recorded as printed rather than silently removed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मीनस्तौलिगृहं" — = Pisces and the house of Libra (tauli = tula); clear at 2.6x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलम्" — THE BA/VA CONTROL. This is the first CERTAIN ब in the verse face on these plates. At 3.6x, side by side with भार्गववुधा from p.11, its bowl carries the internal horizontal tick that the व of भार्गव and the Mercury glyph both lack. Conclusion: this verse face DOES distinguish ब from व, so the Mercury syllable printed with the open bowl is genuinely व - a systematic wrong spelling in this edition, not a font that merges the two.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वथो"; alternatives "स्वं तो", "स्वतो" — word division unsettled at 2.2x; the aksharas are clear but the break with the surrounding words is not. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्वथो; this sentence names स्वथो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate settles the division. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0016.png, line 2) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 3.6x and 4.7x native. It sets वीर्यं रूपमितं त्वथो: the disputed cluster is an open hook coming off the headline, half-त, unlike the closed, boxy half-स of the certain स्व in स्वक्षेत्रे and स्वमित्रभवने on line 3. So स्वथो was a misread, and the mūla's त्वथो follows the press.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वधीष्टेऽद्धयु–"; alternatives "स्वाधीष्टेऽर्द्धयु–" — line-end hyphen: the word runs on to the next printed line (same convention as तनो– on p.10). The cluster अद्ध may carry a repha that has not printed; sense wants अर्द्ध ('half'). [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names स्वधीष्टेऽद्धयु, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).] [2026-09-23: The plate answers both questions this note left open. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0016.png, line 3) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 3.0x and 4.7x native. It sets त्वधीष्टेऽर्द्धयु–: the first cluster is half-त, not स्व, and the repha over द्ध is printed, the same hook as the certain ऽर्द्ध of स्वक्षेत्रेऽर्द्धबलं six words to its left on the same line. The mūla now reads त्वधीष्टेऽर्द्धयुक्शत्रावष्टिमतं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्श"; alternatives "क्ष" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. The opening cluster is set as क् + श, not as the क्ष ligature used elsewhere in this fount. Continues the hyphenated word from the previous line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदर्द्धम"; alternatives "तद्द्धम" — a repha is present above the cluster at 2.0x but the द्ध body is heavily inked; I read तदर्द्धम, which the arithmetic supports - 'half of that' gives adhisatru 1/32 from satru 1/16, matching this plate's own table.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अष्टिमतं"; alternatives "अष्टमितं" — vowel of the second syllable not settled at 2.0x.
2.6a reading here is contested

वक्री स्वोच्चबलः सवक्रसहिते मध्यं बलं तुङ्गभे वक्री नीचबलः स्वनीचभवने वक्रीबलं तुङ्गजम् । उच्चस्थेन युतोऽर्द्धवीर्यमिति चेन्नीचे तु शून्यं बलं मित्रैः पापखगैः शुभै रिपुखगैर्युक्तोऽपि चार्द्धं बलम् ॥६॥

vakrī svoccabalaḥ savakrasahite madhyaṃ balaṃ tuṅgabhe vakrī nīcabalaḥ svanīcabhavane vakrībalaṃ tuṅgajam | uccasthena yuto'rddhavīryamiti cennīce tu śūnyaṃ balaṃ mitraiḥ pāpakhagaiḥ śubhai ripukhagairyukto'pi cārddhaṃ balam ||6||

A retrograde planet has the strength of its own exaltation. Joined with a retrograde planet, its strength is middling. A retrograde planet standing in exaltation has the strength of debilitation; and a retrograde planet in its own debilitation house has the strength born of exaltation. Joined with a planet occupying its exaltation, ⟨a planet has⟩ half strength; but ⟨joined with one⟩ in debilitation, its strength is nil. And joined with malefic planets that are its friends, or with benefic planets that are its enemies, its strength is likewise half.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलः / बलं" — both ब here carry the internal tick, consistent with the control established on line 3 of this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभै"; alternatives "शुभैः" — no visarga printed after शुभै at 2.0x, where the parallel पापखगैः and रिपुखगैः both carry one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलम् ॥६॥" — verse number set hard against the word without spacing, as on p.13, unlike the spaced ॥ ५ ॥ earlier on THIS plate. The edition is inconsistent about this.
2.7a reading here is contested

आशाग्न्यष्टकरास्तिथीषु भनखाः सूर्याल्लवास्तुङ्गजास्तज्ञामित्रगृहे लवा अपि तथा वीर्यं त्विदं राशिजम् । अर्केन्दोर्विषमेऽन्यथा समगृहे होरेऽथ द्रेक्काणके लग्नेष्वङ्गगृहेश्वराश्चरगृहे भाग्येश्वरात्स्युः स्थिरे ॥ ७ ॥

āśāgnyaṣṭakarāstithīṣu bhanakhāḥ sūryāllavāstuṅgajāstajñāmitragṛhe lavā api tathā vīryaṃ tvidaṃ rāśijam | arkendorviṣame'nyathā samagṛhe hore'tha drekkāṇake lagneṣvaṅgagṛheśvarāścaragṛhe bhāgyeśvarātsyuḥ sthire || 7 ||

⟨The exaltation degrees are⟩ 10 (asa, the quarters), 3 (agni, the fires), 28 (asta-kara), 15 (tithi), 5 ⟨isu; our text now reads tithisu, that is tithi + isu, as the arithmetic and the metre require; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave tirtha pu⟩, 27 (bha, the naksatras) and 20 (nakha, the nails): these are the exaltation degrees, from the Sun onward. ⟨Likewise the degrees … the clause taj-jnamitra-gr̥he cannot be construed with confidence as printed.⟩ And this is the strength born of the rasi. For the Sun and the Moon ⟨the horas run in that order⟩ in an odd sign, and the other way about in an even one — so much for the hora ⟨our text now reads visame, 'in an odd sign'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave vipame, with the same pa for sa that 2.1 records⟩. Then for the drekkana: in a movable sign the lords are those of the 1st house ⟨reckoned from the lagna⟩; in a fixed sign, from the lord of the 9th (bhagya) —

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भनखाः"; alternatives "मनखाः" — CORRECTED BY MAGNIFICATION. At 2.3x this read मनखाः; at 4.2x the glyph is unambiguously भ. This matters: the line is a bhuta-sankhya numeral string and भ = 27 (the nakshatras), नख = 20 (the nails), which is exactly what this plate's English gives as the last two exaltation degrees ('the 27th and the 20th').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आशाग्न्यष्टकरास्तिर्थं पु"; alternatives "आशाग्न्यष्टकरास्तिथ्येषु" — numeral string, partly unresolved. आशा=10 (directions), अग्नि=3 (fires), अष्टकर=8,2 read right-to-left=28, तिथि=15 - matching the English's '10th, 3rd, 28th, 15th'. But the printed तिर्थं and the isolated पु do not spell तिथि+इषु(5) cleanly, and I did not force them to. The free-standing पु with space either side is anomalous. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आशाग्न्यष्टकरास्तिथीषु; this sentence names आशाग्न्यष्टकरास्तिर्थं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0017, store line 12, at about 2.7x native) found स्ति, then थ with ONE stem and a repha arc over its right end, with no anusvāra, then a narrow break of about 33 px, then an open पु. So the press sets स्तिर्थ पु. The anusvāra in this note's तिर्थं is not on the page, and neither is the second stem of थी. The press is corrupt here, and our mūla's तिथीषु emends it on the arithmetic (tithi 15, iṣu 5, as the edition's English gives) and the metre.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्यांह्रिवास्तुङ्गजा–"; alternatives "सूर्यादिवास्तुङ्गजा–" — line-end hyphen; word continues on the next printed line. The cluster read ह्रि is heavily inked and may be द्रि or दि. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्याल्लवास्तुङ्गजास्तज्ञामित्रगृहे; this sentence names सूर्यांह्रिवास्तुङ्गजा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0017, store line 12, at about 2.7x and 3.0x native, beside a ल्ल of this fount) found सूर्याल्लवास्तुङ्गजा–. The one mark above the ā-stem is the repha of र्या, so there is no anusvāra and no i-sign. The conjunct is the ल्ल ligature (template correlation 0.91-0.93 against three certain ल्ल in this book, 0.31-0.52 against ह, ल, द्र and a ह-conjunct). The ह्रि read here was a misreading, and our mūla now reads सूर्याल्लवास्.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्तज्ञामित्रगृहे" — opens by completing the hyphenated word from the previous line. ज्ञ = Mercury.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपमे"; alternatives "विषमे" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. SECOND INSTANCE of the प-for-ष substitution first flagged at लग्नादिपट्कं on p.10. At 6x the glyph is the OPEN rectangular प, not the closed-knot ष that this same fount sets correctly in उष्ण (p.11), षड् (p.13) and लग्नेष्व (next line). Sense requires विषमे, 'in an odd sign', which this plate's own English states. Two independent instances make this a pattern in the edition, not a single wrong sort. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अर्केन्दोर्विषमेऽन्यथा; this sentence names विपमे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: confirmed on the plate, and our text departs from it. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0017, at about 2.0x native) found the open प after र्वि, as this note read it. Our mūla reads विषमे, an emendation of the press on the lexicon: विपमे is no word, and the edition's own English says 'in an ODD rasi'.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्कैन्दो"; alternatives "अर्केन्दो" — the marks above the first cluster are crowded at 2.5x; ai vs e not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अर्केन्दोर्विषमेऽन्यथा; this sentence names अर्कैन्दो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0017, store line 27, at about 2.0x native) found one mark of three lobes above र्क: the repha arc and two leaning strokes, which reads as र्कै. Its ink (1244 dark px) does not fully exclude र्के. Our mūla reads अर्केन्दोर् on sandhi, because a + i can only give e, and no reading of the press can overturn that.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नेष्व" — a CERTAIN ष in the verse face on this same plate - the control that makes the विपमे flag above evidential rather than assumed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अर्केन्दोर्विषमेऽन्यथा; this sentence names विपमे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
2.8a reading here is contested

पुत्रेशा च्च त एव तु द्वितनुभे सप्तांशकास्त्वोजभे लग्नेशात्समभे तु सप्तमगृहाच्चाथो नवांशाः क्रमात् । मेषे सिंहगृहे धनुष्यजनवांशस्त्वादिमस्तत्क्रमान्मीनान्तं भवनाधिपाद्रविलवेशास्त्रिंशदंशास्त्वथो ॥ ८ ॥

putreśā cca ta eva tu dvitanubhe saptāṃśakāstvojabhe lagneśātsamabhe tu saptamagṛhāccātho navāṃśāḥ kramāt | meṣe siṃhagṛhe dhanuṣyajanavāṃśastvādimastatkramānmīnāntaṃ bhavanādhipādravilaveśāstriṃśadaṃśāstvatho || 8 ||

— and in a dual sign, those same lords of the 5th (putra). The saptamsas ⟨are reckoned⟩ in an odd sign from the lord of the lagna, and in an even sign from the 7th house. Then the navamsas, in order: in Mesa ⟨Aries⟩, in the house of Simha ⟨Leo⟩ and in Dhanus ⟨Sagittarius⟩ the first navamsa is that of Aja ⟨Aries⟩, and so on in that order up to Mina ⟨Pisces⟩. The lords of the ravi-parts ⟨dvadasamsa⟩ are reckoned from the lord of the sign; and now the trimsamsas —

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रेशा च्च"; alternatives "पुत्रेशाच्च" — a word space is printed before च्च where the compound wants none. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनुष्य" — a CERTAIN ष in the verse face (धनुषि + अज in sandhi). Another control for the प/ष question.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्क्रमा–" — line-end hyphen; word runs on to the next printed line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।| ८ ॥"; alternatives "॥ ८ ॥" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. The opening delimiter of the verse number is not the clean double danda used elsewhere: at 2.0x it is a danda followed by a shorter, thinner vertical that does not reach the full height. Either a broken sort or a substituted one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविलवेशा" — रवि = 12 here, so ravi-lava = the twelfth parts (dvadasamsa), consistent with the usage on p.13.
2.9a reading here is contested

बाणेष्वष्टनगेषवो विषमभे भौमार्किसूरीन्दुजाः शुक्रो व्यत्य यतस्त एव समभे स्यात्सप्तवर्गस्त्वयम् । रूपाद्यं भवनोदितं शुभबलं प्राग्वद्द्विलिख्याथ तद्धोरादिष्वपि षट्सु तत्पतिवशाद्गेहोक्तवीर्यार्द्धकम् ॥ ९ ॥

bāṇeṣvaṣṭanageṣavo viṣamabhe bhaumārkisūrīndujāḥ śukro vyatya yatasta eva samabhe syātsaptavargastvayam | rūpādyaṃ bhavanoditaṃ śubhabalaṃ prāgvaddvilikhyātha taddhorādiṣvapi ṣaṭsu tatpativaśādgehoktavīryārddhakam || 9 ||

— 5 (bana), 5 (isu), 8 (asta), 7 (naga), 5 (isu): in an odd sign these belong in order to Mars, Arki ⟨Saturn⟩, Suri ⟨Jupiter⟩, Induja ⟨Mercury⟩ and Venus; in an even sign the reverse — those same planets in reverse order ⟨our mula now reads samabhe, 'in an even sign', the counterpart of visama-bhe⟩. This, then, is the saptavarga. The benefic strength stated for the ⟨rasi⟩ house, beginning at one rupa, is to be entered in two columns as before; and then, in the six ⟨vargas⟩ beginning with the hora, according to the lord of each, ⟨the strength is⟩ half of that stated for the rasi.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विषममे"; alternatives "विषमभे" — THE CONTROL THAT SETTLES p.15. The ष here is unmistakable at 2.3x - the closed knot - where p.15 printed the SAME stem as विपमे with the open प. The edition therefore contradicts itself on one word, which proves the fount HAS both sorts and that the p.15 reading is a compositor's error, not a font limitation. Separately, the final syllable may be भे (भ = rasi, 'in an odd sign') rather than मे; म and भ are not separated with confidence at this size. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विषमभे; this sentence names विषममे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बाणेष्वष्टनगेषवो" — bhuta-sankhya numeral string: बाण=5, इषु=5, अष्ट=8, नग=7, इषु=5 - which is exactly the '5, 5, 8, 7 and 5' this plate's English gives for the trimsamsa allotment. The decoding corroborates the reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "एममे"; alternatives "समभे", "एमभे" — UNSETTLED. Sense and the parallel with विषम-भे on the previous line want समभे, 'in an even sign'. What is printed does not begin with a clean स at 2.2x, and I did not correct it to the expected word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads समभे; this sentence names एममे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यत्य"; alternatives "व्यत्यय" — possible dropped syllable; व्यत्यय ('reversal') is what the sense wants and what the English ('the reverse') implies.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभबल"; alternatives "शुभबलं" — no anusvara visible on the final syllable at 2.4x, where the parallel रूपाद्यं and भवनोदितं both carry one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त–" — line-end hyphen; word runs on to the next printed line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षट्सु" — a CERTAIN ष in the verse face - closed knot, unmistakable at 2.0x. Another control for the प/ष substitution flagged on pp.10 and 15.
2.10a reading here is contested

संलिख्याथ समस्तवर्गजबलैक्यं सप्तवर्गोद्भवं रूपाद्यं त्विदमेव वीर्यमुदितं खेटेषु सप्तस्वपि । नीचात्तुङ्गलवान्तमुच्चलवतो नीचांशपर्यन्तगा यंशास्ते खगजेन्दुभिः परिहृता रूपादिकं यत्फलम्॥१०॥

saṃlikhyātha samastavargajabalaikyaṃ saptavargodbhavaṃ rūpādyaṃ tvidameva vīryamuditaṃ kheṭeṣu saptasvapi | nīcāttuṅgalavāntamuccalavato nīcāṃśaparyantagā yaṃśāste khagajendubhiḥ parihṛtā rūpādikaṃ yatphalam||10||

Then, entering the sum of the strengths born of all the vargas — that which arises from the seven vargas, beginning at one rupa — this very ⟨sum⟩ is declared to be the strength, for all seven planets alike. The degrees running from the debilitation point up to the exaltation degree, and from the exaltation degree up to the debilitation degree, divided by 180 (kha 0, gaja 8, indu 1, read units-first = 180), give the result in rupas and the rest. ⟨The figure '180' stands inside the printed line in roman type and arabic figures: it is the 1993 editor's decoding of the number-word, not part of the verse.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

संलिख्याथ समस्तवर्गजबलैक्यं सप्तवर्गोद्भवं रूपाद्यं त्विदमेव वीर्यमुदितं खेटेषु सप्तस्वपि । नीचात्तुङ्गलवान्तमुच्चलवतो नीचांशपर्यन्तगा यँशास्ते खगजेन्दु(180)मिः परिहृता रूपादिकं यत्फलम्॥१०॥

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेटेषु सप्तस्वपि" — two further certain ष in the verse face on the same line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(180)" — EDITORIAL INSERTION INSIDE A MULA LINE - the most important finding on this plate. '(180)' is set in the ROMAN fount, in arabic figures, in parentheses, in the middle of the Devanagari verse line, immediately after खगजेन्दु. It is a modern gloss decoding the bhuta-sankhya numeral (kha=0, gaja=8, indu=1, read right-to-left = 180), and it corresponds to the '180 degrees' in this plate's English. IT IS NOT PART OF THE VERSE. Any pipeline that publishes this mula line verbatim would print a 1993 editor's arithmetic gloss as scripture. It must be stripped before the line is ever treated as text of Kalidasa, and stripping it is an editorial act that needs recording.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यँशास्ते"; alternatives "यंशास्ते", "र्यंशास्ते" — the opening cluster carries a superscript mark I could not resolve between candrabindu and anusvara at 2.0x; the line also continues a word from the previous printed line. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यंशास्ते; this sentence names यँशास्ते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥१०॥" — the zero of १० is printed as a solid filled disc rather than the open ring used elsewhere in this fount.
  • About this edition: This verse's mūla carried ARABIC FIGURES set inside the Devanāgarī — the edition's own gloss of a bhūtasaṅkhyā or a computed value, not part of the text. They were STRIPPED from the constituted mūla on 2026-09-08 and the line as the plate sets them is kept in `diplomatic`. The second exemplar (Bhasin, Ranjan 2019) sets none of them and prints the same glosses separately, in Devanāgarī, outside the verse.
2.11a reading here is contested

आरोहे तु तदेव भूच्युतमिदं खेटेऽवरोहे भवेदौच्चं रूपदलांघ्रयो यदि खगे केन्द्रादिषु त्रिष्वपि । युग्मर्क्षांशकयोः सितांबुधि भुवोः पादं बलं व्यत्यया दन्येषां प्रथमे नृणां हि खगयोस्तत्क्लीबयोर्मध्यमे ॥ ११ ॥

ārohe tu tadeva bhūcyutamidaṃ kheṭe'varohe bhavedauccaṃ rūpadalāṃghrayo yadi khage kendrādiṣu triṣvapi | yugmarkṣāṃśakayoḥ sitāṃbudhi bhuvoḥ pādaṃ balaṃ vyatyayā danyeṣāṃ prathame nṛṇāṃ hi khagayostatklībayormadhyame || 11 ||

In the ascending ⟨arc⟩ it is that very quotient; for a planet in the descending ⟨arc⟩ it is that quotient taken from one (bhu = 1) — and this is the ucca ⟨strength⟩. ⟨The strength is⟩ a rupa, a half and a quarter if the planet stands in the three classes beginning with the kendra ⟨kendra, panaphara, apoklima⟩. In an even rasi or an even navamsa ⟨our mūla reads yugmarkṣāṃśakayoḥ, yugma + ṛkṣa + aṃśaka, with the Bhasin printing; the 1993 exemplar prints yugmakṣaśikayoḥ, which is no word⟩, Venus and the ocean-born one ⟨the Moon⟩ have a quarter of strength; for the others it is the reverse ⟨for anyesam the plate prints nyopam⟩. In the first ⟨drekkana the strength belongs⟩ to the male ⟨planets⟩, and in the middle one to those two planets that are neuter —

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवे–" — line-end hyphen; word runs on to the next printed line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दौच्चं"; alternatives "तौच्चं", "दोच्चं" — first akshara not settled between द and त at 2.4x; it completes the hyphenated word from the previous line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रूपदलांघ्रयो" — रूप (1), दल (half), अङ्घ्रि (quarter) - the 1, 1/2, 1/4 that this plate's English gives for kendra / panaphara / apoklima. The decoding corroborates the reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युग्मक्षशिकयोः"; alternatives "युग्मर्क्षांशकयोः" — the superscript marks over the 2nd-3rd aksharas are crowded and I could not separate repha from anusvara at 2.2x. Sense and this plate's English ('an even Rasi or an even Navamsa') want युग्मर्क्षांशकयोः = युग्म + ऋक्ष + अंशक. Recorded close to the ink, flagged as unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads युग्मक्षशिकयोः; this sentence names युग्मर्क्षांशकयोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0020.png, printed folio 18, mūla line 1) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 5.4x native on a greyscale master. There is no repha and no anusvāra over the third akṣara: the band above it measures grey 216 at its darkest, with no pixel below 200, like the blank paper over यु and ग्म. The ink the reader could not separate is a mātrā stroke standing to the right of that akṣara. The mūla keeps युग्मक्षशिकयोः, the transcription of this exemplar, because no page we hold sets युग्मर्क्षांशकयोः whole; what the third and fourth akṣaras are meant to be is recorded as a doubt on this verse.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads युग्मर्क्षांशकयोः. The Bhasin printing sets that whole word (page 28, printed २७, read by eye on 2026-09-30 at about 12x native: the repha and the anusvāra stand as one sort over the ā-stem), so the statement above that no page we hold sets it whole no longer stands. The 1993 exemplar still prints युग्मक्षशिकयोः, and that reading is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सितांबुधि भुवोः"; alternatives "सिताम्बुधिभुवोः" — a word space is printed inside what must be one compound. सित = Venus, अम्बुधिभू = 'ocean-born' = the Moon, which is exactly the pair ('the Moon and Venus') this plate's English names.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्योपां"; alternatives "न्येषां" — POSSIBLE THIRD INSTANCE of the प-for-ष substitution (cf. p.10 पट्कं, p.15 विपमे); the word wanted is अन्येषाम्, 'of the others'. IMPORTANT CAVEAT: unlike the other two, I read this one only at 1.9x and did NOT magnify it to 6x. It is flagged by pattern, not by the ink at high magnification, and must not be counted as confirmed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दन्येषां; this sentence names न्योपां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्बलीबयोर्"; alternatives "तत्क्लीबयोर्" — क्ली vs ली not settled at 1.9x; क्लीब ('neuter, hermaphrodite') is what the English on this plate implies. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खगयोस्तत्क्लीबयोर्मध्यमे; this sentence names तत्बलीबयोर्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
2.12a reading here is contested

अन्ते पादमितं वधूखचरयोर्द्रेक्काणकेस्याद्बलम् पञ्चानामपि योगतः समुदितं चायं त्विदं स्थानजम् । ज्ञेज्यौ लग्नहितौ निशाकरभृगूबन्धौ स्मरेत्वर्कजौ भौमार्को दशमे तु दिग्बलमिदं प्रागादि दिक्षु स्मृतम् ॥१२।

ante pādamitaṃ vadhūkhacarayordrekkāṇakesyādbalam pañcānāmapi yogataḥ samuditaṃ cāyaṃ tvidaṃ sthānajam | jñejyau lagnahitau niśākarabhṛgūbandhau smaretvarkajau bhaumārko daśame tu digbalamidaṃ prāgādi dikṣu smṛtam ||12|

— and at the end ⟨the third drekkana⟩ the strength of the two female planets in the drekkana is a quarter. By combining all five ⟨components⟩ the total is obtained, and this is the strength born of place (sthana-bala). Mercury (jna) and Jupiter (ijya) are well placed in the lagna; the Moon and Bhr̥gu ⟨Venus⟩ in the bandhu ⟨4th⟩; Saturn in the smara ⟨7th⟩ ⟨our mula reads smaretvarkajau, with no anusvara, which an eye reading of the plate confirmed; its word-division is still unsettled⟩; Mars and the Sun in the 10th. This is the dig-bala, and it is reckoned in the directions beginning with the east.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थानजम्" — 'born of place' = sthana-bala, which this plate's English names explicitly as the sum of the five.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्मरेत्वर्कंजौ"; alternatives "स्मरे त्वर्कजः", "स्मरेऽर्कजौ" — word division and the anusvara over र्कं both unresolved at 2.6x. स्मर = the 7th house; अर्कज = Saturn - and this plate's English puts Saturn in the 7th, which supports the sense if not the exact sandhi. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्मरेत्वर्कजौ; this sentence names स्मरेत्वर्कंजौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The anusvāra is now settled. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0020.png, line 14) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 3.4x and 5.95x native on a greyscale master: over र्क there is one mark only, the repha, and no anusvāra; the same page's anusvāra in दिग्बलमिदं on line 15 is a separate round dot. So the press sets स्मरेत्वर्कजौ, as the mūla now reads. The plate ruling did not rule on the word division.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञेज्यौ" — ज्ञ = Mercury, इज्य = Jupiter - the pair the English assigns to the lagna.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥१२।"; alternatives "॥ १२ ॥" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. The verse number is closed by a SINGLE danda where it was opened by a double one. The edition is inconsistent about these delimiters across the section (cf. '।| ८ ॥' on p.16 and the unspaced '॥३॥' on p.13).
2.13a reading here is contested

तत्तत्सप्तमगे खगेन किमपि त्रैराशिकादन्तरे तत्तद्वीर्यफलं स्वदिक्षु खचरस्तादृग्विधं कारयेत् शुक्ले यातदिनेषु सौम्यखचराः स्युर्वीर्यवन्तोऽशुभाः शेषेषु द्विगुणं विधोरसितके चेदन्यथा पक्षजम् ॥ १३ ॥

tattatsaptamage khagena kimapi trairāśikādantare tattadvīryaphalaṃ svadikṣu khacarastādṛgvidhaṃ kārayet śukle yātadineṣu saumyakhacarāḥ syurvīryavanto'śubhāḥ śeṣeṣu dviguṇaṃ vidhorasitake cedanyathā pakṣajam || 13 ||

When a planet stands in the 7th from each of those ⟨points⟩, ⟨its directional strength is nil⟩; for the positions in between one should work out the value of that strength by the rule of three (trairasika), and so make the directional strength of that kind (tādṛgvidham) for each planet in its own quarter. In the bright ⟨fortnight⟩, on the days elapsed, the benefic planets are strong, and the malefics on the remaining ones. ⟨The strength is⟩ doubled; in the dark ⟨fortnight⟩ of the Moon (vidhor asitake) it is the other way round — and this is the strength born of the pakṣa.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खचरस्।द्गिबधं"; alternatives "खचरस्तद्दिग्बलं" — UNSETTLED, AND RECORDED AS THE NON-WORD IT IS. At 2.6x a short vertical stroke stands between स् and द् where no danda belongs, and the following cluster does not resolve into दिग्बलं with confidence. Sense wants tad-digbalam ('that directional strength'), which the English supports, but I did not close the reading by expectation. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खचरस्तादृग्विधं; this sentence names खचरस्।द्गिबधं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate settles it. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0020.png, line 17) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 4.2x and 6.15x native. The press sets खचरस्तादृग्विधं. The short vertical is the ā-mātrā of ता with its top 16 px unprinted: it is 12 px wide against the 15 px of कारयेत्'s ā on the same line, it stands on the same baseline, and faint ink still bridges it to the headline. तद्दिग्बलं is refuted: this page prints दिग्बलमिदं two mūla lines above, and the shapes differ.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यातदिःषु"; alternatives "यातदिनेषु", "यातदिवसेषु" — UNSETTLED. The cluster after यातदि carries a two-dot mark that is neither a clean visarga nor a clean anusvara at 2.3x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यातदिनेषु; this sentence names यातदिःषु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युर्वीर्यवन्तो"; alternatives "स्फुर्वीर्यवन्तो" — the first cluster reads स्यु or स्फु; स्युः ('they would be') fits the syntax.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विगुण"; alternatives "द्विगुणं" — no anusvara printed at 2.0x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्विगुणं, with the anusvāra. The mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 made the change on the metre: द्विगुण दिधोरसितं leaves pāda 4 at eighteen syllables, and द्विगुणं विधोरसितके gives nineteen. Machine reads of the Sastri and Bhasin printings give द्विगुणं. So our text now departs from the reading this note records; the plate pass of 2026-09-23 did not rule on this word.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिधोरसितं" — read as printed; I could not divide it into words with confidence. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विधोरसितके; this sentence names दिधोरसितं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शेषेषु" — two certain ष in the verse face on this line.
2.14a reading here is contested

मध्याह्ने रविरेव चास्तसमये मन्दो निशानायकः प्राग्रातौ बलवान्निशार्द्धसमये शुक्रो निशान्ते कुजः । ज्ञः प्रातः सततं बली सुरगुरुस्त्वेतच्चहोरात्रजं नाड्याद्यं द्विगुणं नतं खरसुहृद्रूपाद्यमोजो भवेत् ॥ १४ ॥

madhyāhne ravireva cāstasamaye mando niśānāyakaḥ prāgrātau balavānniśārddhasamaye śukro niśānte kujaḥ | jñaḥ prātaḥ satataṃ balī suragurustvetaccahorātrajaṃ nāḍyādyaṃ dviguṇaṃ nataṃ kharasuhṛdrūpādyamojo bhavet || 14 ||

At midday it is the Sun ⟨that is strong⟩; at the hour of setting, Manda ⟨Saturn⟩; the lord of the night ⟨the Moon⟩ is strong in the first part of the night ⟨the plate prints prag-ratau for prag-ratrau⟩; at midnight, Venus; at the end of the night, Mars; in the morning, Mercury (jna); and the preceptor of the gods ⟨Jupiter⟩ is strong at all times. This is what arises from the day-and-night. The nata in nāḍīs and the rest (nāḍyādyam), doubled and divided by sixty (kha-rasa = 60), becomes the strength (ojas) in rūpas and the rest.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्याह्रे"; alternatives "मध्याह्ने" — the subscript of the ह cluster reads र rather than न at 2.6x; मध्याह्न ('midday') is the word. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads मध्याह्ने for मध्याह्रे, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(line continues)" — this printed line has no closing danda and no verse number: the verse runs on to p.19 (image 21). It is the LAST line of the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राग्रातौ"; alternatives "प्राग्रात्रौ" — no त्र conjunct visible at 2.3x; the word wanted is प्राग्रात्रौ, 'in the first part of the night', which this plate's English states ('the Moon gets it if the birth is in the 1st portion of the night'). Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(opening line)" — THIS LINE COMPLETES THE VERSE BEGUN AS THE LAST LINE OF p.18 (image 20), which ended मध्याह्रे रविरेव चास्तसमये मन्दो निशानायकः with no danda. The two plates must be joined to read the verse. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मध्याह्ने; this sentence names मध्याह्रे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बली" — ब with the internal tick, consistent with the control established on p.14.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १४ ॥" — a thin vertical stroke stands BETWEEN the १ and the ४ at 2.0x, so the figure reads almost as '१|४'. Broken sort or stray rule; the number is 14 on the sequence.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विगुण"; alternatives "द्विगुणं" — no anusvara printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्विगुणं, with the anusvāra. The mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 added it on the metre: with द्विगुण, position 6 of pāda 4 is light where a heavy syllable is wanted, and with द्विगुणं the pāda is exact. Machine reads of the Sastri and Bhasin printings give द्विगुणं. So our text now departs from the reading this note records; the plate pass of 2026-09-23 did not rule on this word.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: none was recorded at नाड्यार्धं. [2026-09-23: the plate was opened at 4.4x on the jp2 master. The press prints no repha over this akshara — its only ink above the headline is a 16x13 px anusvāra dot, against the 28x25 px descending hook of the leaf's own निशार्द्ध, and the repha slot measures 0.3% of pixels below 128 against 0.0% for blank paper and 8.3% for that real repha. The reading is नाड्याद्यं, the conjunct this same line prints in रूपाद्य.]
2.15a reading here is contested

तद्रूपच्युतमुन्नतोत्थितबलं चन्द्रारमन्दा नते सूर्यज्ञामरपूज्यदैत्यगुरवो वीर्यान्विताश्चोन्नते । नाड्यः स्युर्नतसंज्ञका दिनदलान्निश्यर्द्धपर्यन्तगास्तद्वद्रात्रिदलात्तदादिनदलं नाड्यादिकं चोन्नतम् ॥ १५ ॥

tadrūpacyutamunnatotthitabalaṃ candrāramandā nate sūryajñāmarapūjyadaityaguravo vīryānvitāśconnate | nāḍyaḥ syurnatasaṃjñakā dinadalānniśyarddhaparyantagāstadvadrātridalāttadādinadalaṃ nāḍyādikaṃ connatam || 15 ||

That figure taken from one rupa is the strength arising from the unnata. The Moon, Mars and Saturn ⟨draw their strength⟩ from the nata; the Sun ⟨our mula now reads surya-jna, 'the Sun and Mercury', where the earlier text had the non-word hyamjna⟩, Mercury, the one honoured of the gods ⟨Jupiter⟩ and the preceptor of the daityas ⟨Venus⟩ are endowed with strength in the unnata. The nadis called nata are those running from midday to midnight; and those running from midnight to midday, in nadis and the rest, are the unnata.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्यंज्ञ"; alternatives "ह्यर्कज्ञ" — the superscript on the first cluster is crowded at 2.6x; the list wants the Sun (अर्क) beside Mercury (ज्ञ), since the English on this plate assigns unnatabala to the Sun, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus. अमरपूज्य = Jupiter (honoured of the gods), दैत्यगुरु = Venus (preceptor of the demons). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्यज्ञामरपूज्यदैत्यगुरवो; this sentence names ह्यंज्ञ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युनत"; alternatives "स्युर्नत" — a repha may be present but does not resolve at 2.4x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्युर्नतसंज्ञका; this sentence names स्युनत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पर्यन्तगा–" — line-end hyphen; word runs on to the next printed line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्तद्द्रा।त्रि"; alternatives "स्तद्रात्रि" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. A short vertical stroke stands inside the cluster where no danda belongs - the same defect seen on p.10 (भावाङ्ग्।व) and p.18 (खचरस्।द्गि). Sense wants रात्रि ('night'), giving 'from half the night'. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads स्तद्वद्रात्रिदलात्तदादिनदलं for स्तद्द्रा; ∅ for त्रिदलाच्चदादिनदलं, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: This is not a defect. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0021.png, printed folio 19, mūla line 28) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 3.7x to 5.5x native. The press sets स्तद्वद्रात्रि: स्त, then द with a subscript व, then द with a subscript र, then a detached ā-stroke, then त्रि. This press sets the ā-mātrā as a bar detached from the headline, and the mark is the ā of द्रा; the first mūla line of the same leaf carries five such bars, and only one of them is a daṇḍa. The span from the line's margin to the bar is 203 px, three akṣara widths, where the old reading has two letters. At about 3.7x the plate reader saw त्त in दलात्त but could not settle it against च्च by measurement; the lexicon settles it, since दादिनदलं is no word and तदादिनदलं is.]
2.16a reading here is contested

त्रिंशच्छुद्धनतोन्नते च भवतस्तेऽन्ये क्रमात्कालजे वीर्यं यन्त्रलवादिकं च गदितं त्वाद्ये दले विस्तरात् । वर्षेशश्च स मासपो दिनपतिस्तत्कालहोरेश्वरो वीर्याढ्याश्चरणोत्तरं समयजं योगश्चतुर्णां बलम् ॥ १६ ।

triṃśacchuddhanatonnate ca bhavataste'nye kramātkālaje vīryaṃ yantralavādikaṃ ca gaditaṃ tvādye dale vistarāt | varṣeśaśca sa māsapo dinapatistatkālahoreśvaro vīryāḍhyāścaraṇottaraṃ samayajaṃ yogaścaturṇāṃ balam || 16 |

The nata and the unnata, each purified by thirty (trimsat), give ⟨their values⟩; and the rest follow in order in the kala ⟨strength⟩. The strength reckoned by instrument, in degrees and the rest, has been stated in detail (vistarat) in the first part ⟨of the work⟩. The lord of the year, the lord of the month, the lord of the weekday, and the lord of the hora of that moment are endowed with strength rising by a quarter at each step ⟨a quarter, a half, three quarters and a whole rupa⟩; and the sum of the four is the strength born of time.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवतस्ऽन्ये"; alternatives "भवतस्त्वन्ये" — the avagraha-like mark after भवतस् is not a clean avagraha at 2.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवतस्तेऽन्ये; this sentence names भवतस्ऽन्ये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0021, store line 29, at about 2.0x native) found भवतस्तेऽन्ये: a pale, broken ते carrying its e-sign stands between the half-स and a clean avagraha. It carries 0.34 of a healthy त's ink, which is how it was missed. The avagraha is real. The e-sign rules out this note's alternative त्व, which carries no mark above the headline.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिशच्छुद्र"; alternatives "त्रिंशच्छुद्ध" — anusvara on त्रि not visible; त्रिंशत् = 30 is the expected numeral word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्रिंशच्छुद्धनतोन्नते; this sentence names त्रिशच्छुद्र, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla reads त्रिंशच्छुद्ध as an emendation on the lexicon: त्रिंशत् + शुद्ध gives त्रिंशच्छुद्ध, 'reduced by thirty', the operation the edition's own English describes. The plate ruling of this date did not read this word at magnification, so this sentence makes no claim about what the press sets here.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विखात्"; alternatives "विलिखेत्", "विखिलात्" — final word unsettled at 2.2x; the last two aksharas are heavily inked. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विस्तरात्; this sentence names विखात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0021, store line 30, at about 2.0x native) found विस्तरात् ।: the i-sign over व, then स्त, then a narrow र, then the ā-stem, then त् with its virāma. The earlier reading merged स्त and र into one ख and so dropped an akṣara. Our mūla now reads विस्तरात्, and pāda 2 scans exactly.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्षेशश्च" — = lord of the year; the four lords (year, month, week-day, hora) that this plate's English enumerates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १६ ।"; alternatives "॥ १६ ॥" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. Opened with a double danda, closed with a SINGLE one - the same asymmetry as '॥१२।' on p.18. This is now a recurring defect, not a one-off.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरणोत्तरं"; alternatives "चरणोत्तरं" — चरण = a quarter; the English gives the four lords 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and 1 rupa, an ascending series in quarters, which supports this reading.
2.17a reading here is contested

स्वेष्टास्ता घटिकाः करैर्विनिहता बाणैरवाप्ता गताः वारे.शाद्रविशुक्रविद्विधुशनीज्यारास्तु होराधिपाः । याम्ये चन्द्रशनी बुधस्तु सततं शेषास्तु सौम्यायने पूर्वोक्तैश्चलकेन्द्रजैरिह लवैर्वक्री यदि स्याद्बलम् ॥ १७ ॥

sveṣṭāstā ghaṭikāḥ karairvinihatā bāṇairavāptā gatāḥ vāre.śādraviśukravidvidhuśanījyārāstu horādhipāḥ | yāmye candraśanī budhastu satataṃ śeṣāstu saumyāyane pūrvoktaiścalakendrajairiha lavairvakrī yadi syādbalam || 17 ||

Those ista ghatis of one's own, multiplied by two (kara = 2) and divided by five (bana = 5), give the horas elapsed. Reckoned from the lord of the weekday, the lords of the horas run: the Sun, Venus, Mercury (vid), the Moon, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars. In the southern ⟨ayana⟩ the Moon and Saturn ⟨are strong⟩; Mercury always; the rest in the northern (saumya) ayana. Here, by the degrees stated before, which arise from the cala-kendra ⟨that is, the sighra-kendra⟩, ⟨strength is found⟩ — and if a planet is retrograde it has ⟨full⟩ strength.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बाणैर्" — बाण = 5, the divisor the English states ('divide the product by 5'). The numeral decoding corroborates the reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वारे.शाद्"; alternatives "वारेशाद्" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. A low dot stands between वारे and शाद् where the compound wants none - the same class of stray mark as तत्र.स्थिते on p.14.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविशुक्रविद्विधुशनीज्यारा" — the hora-lord order: Sun, Venus, Mercury (वित्/विद्), Moon, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars - exactly the sequence this plate's English gives. Note Mercury is here written विद्/वित्, not बुध, so this line carries no evidence either way on the ba/va question.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधस्तु"; alternatives "वुधस्तु" — IMPORTANT CAVEAT AGAINST MY OWN EARLIER FINDING. On pp.11 and 13 the Mercury syllable is printed with the OPEN व bowl, and I recorded there that the edition sets व for ब in this word. HERE, at 2.4x, the same word appears to carry the ब form WITH the internal tick. I attempted a same-scale montage against the certain व of भार्गव (p.11) and the certain ब of बलम् (p.14), but my crop slid off the target glyph and the test was inconclusive. So: the edition may be INCONSISTENT in spelling Mercury rather than systematically wrong, and the word 'systematic' in my notes on pp.11 and 13 should be read as 'observed twice, contradicted possibly once here'. This needs a dedicated re-check at 8x before any conclusion is relied on.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शेषास्तु" — certain ष in the verse face.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्वोन्ततेश्वल"; alternatives "पूर्वोक्तेश्चलकेन्द्र" — UNSETTLED. The superscripts over the 2nd-4th aksharas are crowded and overlap the headline at 2.0x; I could not divide this into words with confidence and did not force it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वोक्तैश्चलकेन्द्रजैरिह; this sentence names पूर्वोन्ततेश्वल, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0022, line index 24, at about 2.4x and 3.2x native, beside this fount's क्त and न्त) found only two glyphs between र्वो and श्च. The first is a half-क whose loop is partly unprinted, which can pass for न् to the eye. The second is ONE त under the two-stroke ai-crest. Then comes श्च, not श्व (correlation 0.974 with the श्च of वर्षेशश्च on the same page). So the press sets पूर्वोक्तैश्चल, as our mūla now reads.]
2.18a reading here is contested

चेष्टाख्यं रुचिराद्द्वयोर्यदि युतिस्त्वेकांशके चैकभे चोदग्याम्यगयोर्जयापविजयौ स्यादेव जेता बली । पूर्णं पश्यति भानुजस्त्रिदशमे चेत्पाददृष्ट्येतरे जीवो धीनवमेऽर्द्धया तदितरे भौमश्चतुर्थेऽष्टमे ॥ १८ ॥

ceṣṭākhyaṃ rucirāddvayoryadi yutistvekāṃśake caikabhe codagyāmyagayorjayāpavijayau syādeva jetā balī | pūrṇaṃ paśyati bhānujastridaśame cetpādadṛṣṭyetare jīvo dhīnavame'rddhayā taditare bhaumaścaturthe'ṣṭame || 18 ||

— this is called the cesta ⟨strength⟩. If two ⟨planets⟩ come together in one navamsa and in one sign, one of them going north and the other south, there is victory and defeat between them: the stronger is the victor. Saturn (bhanuja) aspects the 3rd and the 10th in full, where the others aspect with a quarter glance; Jupiter, the 5th (dhi) and the 9th, where the others aspect with half a glance; Mars, the 4th and the 8th.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वयो।र्यदि"; alternatives "द्वयोर्यदि" — RECORDED AS PRINTED. A stray vertical stroke inside the word - the fourth instance of this defect across these plates (cf. pp.10, 18, 19). [2026-09-23: The plate refutes this. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0022.png, printed folio 20, the third line of this verse) was opened by eye on 2026-09-23; the plate reader viewed this run at about 5.5x native and measured it. The run from यो to र्य divides as द्द्वयो, one bar, र्य, दि. The reading द्वयो।र्यदि needs two marks there, the ā-stroke of ो and then a daṇḍa, and the leaf sets one: the ā-stroke, 18 px wide with its foot 5 px short of the baseline, the same form as रुचिरा's own ā-stroke on the same line. So the leaf reads रुचिराद्द्वयोर्यदि, this note's own alternative.] [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads रुचिराद्द्वयोर्यदि; this sentence names द्वयो।र्यदि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जयापविजयौ"; alternatives "जयापजयौ", "जयाजयौ" — possible intrusive syllable; the pair wanted is 'victory and defeat'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बली" — ब with the internal tick, clear at 2.3x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्णं"; alternatives "पूर्ण" — mark above the na is a repha hook PLUS a filled dot (anusvara), read at 8x; both present, so purnam.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽर्द्ध"; alternatives "ऽर्ध", "ऽर्द्ध्य", "ऽद्धृ" — Read at 4x, 5x, 8x and again sharpened at 7x. A repha hook sits clearly above; the body is a d-dha stack; a subscript element hangs below with a tail to the lower right that I could not resolve into a definite ya/vowel. Metre fixes the syllable as LIGHT, which suits 'rddha' or 'rdha' equally and cannot choose between them.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पात"; alternatives "पाद", "यात" — The consonant is a closed left bowl on the headline plus a right stem = pa, matching the pa of padadrsti in line 9; but SENSE wants 'half a glance' here (see concerns), and pada/pata differ by one stroke. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धीनवमेऽर्द्धया तदितरे; this sentence names पात, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate was opened on 2026-09-23 at about 5.6x native on the jp2 master (page_0023.png, printed folio 21, mūla line 9). The sort at this position is damaged, and the claimed match with the pa of pādadṛṣṭi does not survive measurement: on the left lobe the glyph scores 0.688 against that pa and 0.684 against the leaf's own clean य, where two clean प of the leaf score 0.932 against each other. The letter cannot be read on this leaf. So ardhayā rests on the lexicon and on the parallel with the preceding pāda, not on this plate, and the question is recorded as a doubt on this verse.]
2.19a reading here is contested

सर्वे पादविहीनयाखिलदृशा पश्यन्ति सर्वेऽस्तभं वित्तायव्ययवैरिणो न ददृशुः खेटस्थितस्थानतः । दृष्ट्वा शोधितदृश्यकेंद्रभवशाच्चद्रुत्फलं स्यादथो भाज्येभ्यस्त्वनुपातलब्धकलिकास्वर्णं कृतं दृग्भवेत् ॥ १९ ॥

sarve pādavihīnayākhiladṛśā paśyanti sarve'stabhaṃ vittāyavyayavairiṇo na dadṛśuḥ kheṭasthitasthānataḥ | dṛṣṭvā śodhitadṛśyakeṃdrabhavaśāccadrutphalaṃ syādatho bhājyebhyastvanupātalabdhakalikāsvarṇaṃ kṛtaṃ dṛgbhavet || 19 ||

— and all ⟨the rest aspect those houses⟩ with the whole glance less a quarter ⟨that is, three quarters⟩; all aspect the seventh sign ⟨in full⟩. They do not aspect the 2nd (vitta), the 11th (aya), the 12th (vyaya) or the 6th (vairin), reckoned from the place the planet occupies. Having so looked, from the purified ⟨arc⟩ of the visible kendra the aspect-value arises ⟨the cluster printed drutphalam is unsettled; dr̥k-phalam, 'the aspect-value', is what the sense wants⟩; and then, from the divisors, the minutes obtained by proportion (anupata), made positive or negative (svarna), become the dr̥g ⟨strength⟩.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽप्त"; alternatives "ऽत्त" — Ligature after the avagraha read at 5x; pa-ta and ta-ta are close in this fount. Metre needs a light syllable, satisfied by either. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वेऽस्तभं; this sentence names ऽप्त, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0023, line index 10, at about 3.9x native, then measured at 1:1) found neither प्त nor त्त after the avagraha. The sort there is a detached thin mark 20 px wide that reaches only 36 px below the headline, where the त beside it reaches 64 px. It is neither this fount's प्त ligature nor its स्त, so the ऽप्त read here has no ink behind it. The press's sort is broken, and our mūla reads सर्वेऽस्तभं on the lexicon: asta-bha, the setting sign, the 7th, as the edition's English states.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्य"; alternatives "व्ह", "ह्य" — Read at 7x and 11x and set side by side with the certain ha of vihinaya on line 11: the second element's loop-plus-descending-tail is a near match for this fount's ha, so the ink alone would read v-ha. I record vya because the house list is fixed independently (see concerns) - this is my least secure akshara on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्ट्वा"; alternatives "द्रष्ट्वा" — First akshara read at 6x: a stroke descends from the da and hooks, matching the certain vocalic r of dadrsuh on line 12 rather than a straight subscript ra. drstva is also the standard gerund; but at low magnification it reads dra.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रुत्फलं"; alternatives "दृक्फलं", "चरत्फलं" — Read at 6x. A conjunct with a descending subscript precedes t-pha-lam; I could not settle it. drkphalam (the aspect-value) would suit the sense and the following drgbhavet, but I did not see a ka. [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0023, line index 21, at about 3.2x native) found त्फलं with its anusvāra, so the क of the machine read of uk-ps-sastri (द्द्रक्फलं, store page_0041) is not what this press sets. The two sorts before it, our च्च and द्रु, were seen but not measured against references, and the ruling makes no claim about them. The mūla keeps द्रुत्फलं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केंद्र"; alternatives "केन्द्र" — anusvara dot, not a subscript nasal; checked at 30x-equivalent.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खर्णं"; alternatives "धनर्णं", "ऋणं" — Read at 7x: the glyph is a clear kha (left curl-and-loop plus right stem), giving the non-word kharnam. Recorded as printed per rule 1. dhana-rnam (positive-or-negative) is what the arithmetic wants; see concerns. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भाज्येभ्यस्त्वनुपातलब्धकलिकास्वर्णं; this sentence names खर्णं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: refuted on the plate. The exemplar (jp2 page_0023, line index 22) was read by eye at about 3.9x and 3.3x native, then measured at 1:1 against four certain ख and five certain स्व of this fount. The glyph is स्व: its left component reaches the baseline. Its lowest ink begins 36% of the way across, against 44-55% for every ख and 24-35% for every स्व, and it matches the स्व of स्वक्षेत्र best (correlation 0.963). To the eye the two sorts are near-identical in this fount. So the press sets कलिकास्वर्णं, svarṇa, 'plus or minus', as our mūla now reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लब्ध"; alternatives "लङ्घ" — b-dha vs ng-gha at 2.6x; labdha (quotient) is the standard term beside anupata and bhajya.
2.20a reading here is contested

एवं क्रूरशुभेक्षणे च गणितात्संलिख्य कोष्ठद्वये रूपाढ्या हि पृथक् पृथग्युतिभुवो स्यादन्तरं दृग्बलम् । अर्केन्द्वासुरपूजितासुरगुरुज्ञारार्कजाः खेचरास्ते स्युर्न्यूनबला यथोत्तरमिदं नैसर्गिकं स्याद्बलम् ॥२०॥

evaṃ krūraśubhekṣaṇe ca gaṇitātsaṃlikhya koṣṭhadvaye rūpāḍhyā hi pṛthak pṛthagyutibhuvo syādantaraṃ dṛgbalam | arkendvāsurapūjitāsuragurujñārārkajāḥ khecarāste syurnyūnabalā yathottaramidaṃ naisargikaṃ syādbalam ||20||

Thus, in the case of a malefic or a benefic aspect, having entered the figures from the computation in two columns, and the ⟨values⟩ arising from conjunction separately, each reckoned in rupas — the difference is the dr̥g-bala. The Sun, the Moon, the one honoured by the asuras ⟨Venus⟩, the preceptor of the gods ⟨Jupiter⟩, Mercury, Mars and Saturn: these planets are each weaker than the last, and this is their naisargika ⟨natural⟩ strength.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संलिख्य"; alternatives "संलिल्य" — The ligature after li read as khya; metre independently REQUIRES a conjunct here (the li must scan heavy), which excludes a plain consonant and supports khya.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलम्"; alternatives "वलम्" — ba/va counter test applied at this resolution: the glyph carries the closed left counter of ba, not the open bowl of va. drgbalam confirmed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूजितासुरगुरु"; alternatives "पूजितसुरगुरु" — Read at 6x: ji-taa then su-ra, so an aa-matra stands before suraguru. Segmentation is ambiguous between (a)suraguru = Venus-again and suraguru = Jupiter; the planet count (7) and the order fix Jupiter here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेचरा—" — Line ends in a printed em-dash carrying the word over to the next line (khecaraah + ste).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नैसर्गिकं"; alternatives "नैसर्गिंकं" — A repha hook and a separate dot both appear over the gi; if the dot is an anusvara it is otiose. Read at 2.5x only.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बला / बलम्" — ba/va counter test applied to both: closed left counter = ba in each.
2.21a reading here is contested

रूपं स्याद्द्युमणेरिलाधरलवोनं स्यात्परेषां क्रमात् स्थानाशासमयस्वभावजबलैक्यं चैष्टिकेनान्वितम् । दृग्वीर्येण सुसंस्कृतं यदि जयी खेटश्च रूपान्वितं भग्नश्चेद्रहितं रणे स्फुटतरं खेटस्य वीर्यं भवेत् ॥ २१ ॥

rūpaṃ syāddyumaṇerilādharalavonaṃ syātpareṣāṃ kramāt sthānāśāsamayasvabhāvajabalaikyaṃ caiṣṭikenānvitam | dṛgvīryeṇa susaṃskṛtaṃ yadi jayī kheṭaśca rūpānvitaṃ bhagnaścedrahitaṃ raṇe sphuṭataraṃ kheṭasya vīryaṃ bhavet || 21 ||

For the Sun (dyumani) it is one rupa; for the others, in order, ⟨each⟩ less by a seventh part (iladhara, 'earth-bearer', that is, a mountain = 7). The sum of the strengths born of place, of direction, of time and of nature, joined with the cesta ⟨strength⟩ and well corrected by the dr̥g strength — with a rupa added if the planet is the victor ⟨in a planetary war⟩, and with ⟨a rupa⟩ taken away if it is the one broken in that war — is the planet's exact strength.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इलाधर"; alternatives "इलाघर" — dha vs gha settled at 7x: left bowl with a through-stroke = dha. ilaadhara (earth-bearer = mountain) is the bhutasamkhya word for SEVEN, which independently matches the 1/7 of the rendering - this is the plate's key numeral.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लवोनं"; alternatives "लवो नं" — Read as lavah + uunam (less by a part); printed without a space.
2.22a reading here is contested

एवं प्रोक्तबलैक्यमत्र निखिलं रूपाढ्यमक्षाल्पकं चेद्धीनं हि बलं ततो दशमितात्स्यान्मध्यमं तद्बलम् । तत्पश्चा त्तु सुपूर्णवीर्यमिह तद्वीर्याधिकः स्याच्छुभः खेटस्तस्य दशाप्यतीव शुभदारोहाखिलेष्टार्थदा ॥ २२ ॥

evaṃ proktabalaikyamatra nikhilaṃ rūpāḍhyamakṣālpakaṃ ceddhīnaṃ hi balaṃ tato daśamitātsyānmadhyamaṃ tadbalam | tatpaścā ttu supūrṇavīryamiha tadvīryādhikaḥ syācchubhaḥ kheṭastasya daśāpyatīva śubhadārohākhileṣṭārthadā || 22 ||

The whole sum of the strengths thus declared, reckoned in rupas: if it is less than five (aksa = 5), the strength is deficient; from that up to ten (dasa-mita), that strength is middling; and beyond that it is full strength. A planet whose strength exceeds that is benefic, and its dasa too is exceedingly auspicious and, while it is on the ascent, grants every object desired.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अक्षाल्पकं" — aksa = FIVE in bhutasamkhya; 'less than aksa' matches the rendering's 'less than 5 Rupas'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दशमितात्" — 'than ten-measured' - the upper bound of the middling band.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्पश्चा त्तु"; alternatives "तत्पश्चात्तु" — A word-space is actually printed inside tatpascaattu, between -scaa and -ttu. Recorded as printed per rule 1.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदीयांधिकः"; alternatives "तदीयाधिकः" — An anusvara dot stands over the yaa; tadiiya + adhikah would want no nasal. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्वीर्याधिकः; this sentence names तदीयांधिकः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0024, store page 24 line 28, at about 4.0x and 3.1x native, the repha region at about 5.9x) found a repha over the ā of या, the same sort as the repha of वीर्य earlier in this line. The dot this note read is a 17-pixel speck under the repha's broken leg, against 211 and 275 pixels for the anusvāras of एवं and अक्षाल्पकं on this page. So the press sets र्या with no anusvāra. It sets a plain द before the ī, as this reader saw. The metre needs a heavy twelfth syllable, so the mūla now reads तद्वीर्याधिकः, an emendation of the press at द्व.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[damage]" — A diagonal ink stroke (a scratch on the leaf, not type) crosses this line over supuurnaviiryamiha and continues across line 31. It thins but does not destroy the letters; nothing is refused.
2.23a reading here is contested

सास्यान्मध्यमवीर्यखेचरदशाऽऽरोहाऽपि सौख्यायते हीना स्यात्त्ववरोहिणी व्यसनदा वीर्योनखेटस्य वा ।

sāsyānmadhyamavīryakhecaradaśā''rohā'pi saukhyāyate hīnā syāttvavarohiṇī vyasanadā vīryonakheṭasya vā |

The dasa of a planet of middling strength makes for ease while it is on the ascent too; but descending it is deficient and gives distress — and so likewise does ⟨the dasa⟩ of a planet lacking in strength.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दशाऽऽरोहा"; alternatives "दशारोहा" — TWO avagrahas are printed in succession here (elision of long aa). Recorded as printed; the doubled sign is unusual and is a real feature of this setting, not a speck - checked at 2.6x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याच्चावरोहिणी"; alternatives "स्यात्चरोहिणी", "स्याच्चवरोहिणी" — At 2.5x this reads syaat-ca-rohinii; at 6x a further element appears between the conjunct and -ro-. avarohinii ('descending') is the word the sense needs and the rendering independently supplies ('on his way to his depression point'). Recorded with that reading; the ink alone does not settle the a-matra. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यात्त्ववरोहिणी; this sentence names स्याच्चावरोहिणी, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate settles the ā-mātrā and not the conjunct. The 1993 page (jp2 master page_0025.png, printed folio 23, mūla line 1) was read by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 1.4x to 5.0x native. An ā-mātrā stands between the conjunct and व: the word carries eight full-height strokes where स्यात्त्ववरोहिणी predicts seven, and the pair at x 973 and 1007, 34 px apart, matches the न-plus-ā of हीना on the same line. So the leaf sets स्याच्चावरोहिणी, as this note read. The worn conjunct is still not settled, and that is recorded as a doubt on this verse. Our mūla reads स्यात्त्ववरोहिणी as an emendation of the exemplar on the metre and the lexicon.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्योन" — viirya + uuna = deficient in strength; matches 'less than 5 Rupas'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: This block closes its section with NO numeral on the page.

Adhyāya 3 · आयुर्दायखण्डः — Āyurdāya — Length of Life

3.1a reading here is contested

दस्रात् खेचरभुक्तभं त्रिविहृतं त्याज्यं फलं शेषकं वेदघ्नं खगमुक्तपादसहितं चांशायुषो वत्सराः । खेटस्थैष्यपदान्तराद्दिनघटीमानात्तु मासादिकं ज्ञानीयाखिलखेचरैश्च तनुतः सर्वैक्यमब्दादिकम् ॥ १ ॥

dasrāt khecarabhuktabhaṃ trivihṛtaṃ tyājyaṃ phalaṃ śeṣakaṃ vedaghnaṃ khagamuktapādasahitaṃ cāṃśāyuṣo vatsarāḥ | kheṭasthaiṣyapadāntarāddinaghaṭīmānāttu māsādikaṃ jñānīyākhilakhecaraiśca tanutaḥ sarvaikyamabdādikam || 1 ||

Counting from Asvini (dasra), take the naksatra the planet occupies; divide by three and throw away the quotient; the remainder multiplied by four (veda), together with the padas the planet has already passed, gives the years of the amsayus. From the interval between the planet's position and the pada still to come, by the measure of the day's ghatis, come the months and the rest. Having obtained ⟨this⟩ for all the planets and for the lagna (tanu) ⟨the plate prints jnaniya; aniya, 'having obtained', is what the syntax requires, and the reading is not settled⟩, the sum of them all gives the years and so forth.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दस्रात्" — dasra = the Asvins = the asterism ASVINI; 'from Asvini', which the rendering states outright. Read at 2.6x, unambiguous.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वेदघ्नं" — veda = FOUR in bhutasamkhya; 'multiplied by four', matching the rendering's 'multiply by 4'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थैष्य"; alternatives "स्थैश्य" — sya vs sca in the ligature; esya ('the pada to come') is what the rendering's 'next pada' requires.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञानीया"; alternatives "आनीया", "ज्ञेयान्य" — First akshara read as the jna ligature at 2.5x, but aaniiya ('having obtained') is what the syntax wants and what the rendering says ('obtain and sum-up'). Not settled; my least secure word on this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तनुतः" — tanu = the 1st house = the Lagna; 'as well as the Lagna' in the rendering.
3.2a reading here is contested

स्वायुः स्वेन्दुकराग्निवेदशरषड्भागोनितं रिःफभाद्वामं षट्सु खले शुभे यदि दलोनं पापलग्नेऽखिलम् । नीचारातिगृहे खगेऽस्तमयगे द्वित्रिद्विभागोनितं द्व्यंशोनं हि पराभवे पुनरपि स्यादंशजायुस्त्विदम् ॥ २ ॥

svāyuḥ svendukarāgnivedaśaraṣaḍbhāgonitaṃ riḥphabhādvāmaṃ ṣaṭsu khale śubhe yadi dalonaṃ pāpalagne'khilam | nīcārātigṛhe khage'stamayage dvitridvibhāgonitaṃ dvyaṃśonaṃ hi parābhave punarapi syādaṃśajāyustvidam || 2 ||

Its own ⟨computed⟩ span is reduced by its own whole, half, third, fourth, fifth and sixth part (indu 1, kara 2, agni 3, veda 4, sara 5, sat 6) ⟨according as the planet stands⟩ in the six houses reckoned backward from the 12th (rihpha), when the planet is a malefic; if it is a benefic the reduction is half ⟨of that⟩. When a malefic is in the lagna, the whole ⟨is lost⟩. For a planet in debilitation, in an enemy's house, or set ⟨combust⟩, the span is reduced by a half, a third and a half respectively; and by a half when the planet is defeated ⟨in a planetary war⟩. This, once again, is the amsayus.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भागोनितं"; alternatives "भानोनितं" — ga vs na unresolved at 7x on this line ALONE; settled by comparison with the certain bhaagonitam printed three lines later (line 4 of this block), where the ga is unambiguous. Same word, same fount, same setting.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वेन्दुकराग्निवेदशरषड्" — A bhutasamkhya run: indu=1, kara=2, agni=3, veda=4, sara=5, sad=6 - the denominators 1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,1/5,1/6 that the rendering spells out as 'in full, one-half, one-third, one-fourth, one fifth and one-sixth'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफभा—" — rihpha = the 12TH house. Line ends in a printed em-dash carrying the word to the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वां"; alternatives "द्वामं" — Carries over from line 2: rihphabhaat + vaam = 'backward from the 12th sign', which is exactly the rendering's 'reckoned backward from the 12th'. Final m written as anusvara. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्वामं; this sentence names द्वां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षट्सु"; alternatives "पट्सु" — sa vs pa at 2.4x; 'in the six' is required by the sense and by the rendering's 'the 6 houses'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दलोनं" — dala = half; the benefic case loses half of what the malefic case loses.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वित्रिद्वि" — 1/2 (debilitation), 1/3 (enemy's house), 1/2 (combust/defeated) - the three reductions the rendering lists in the same order.
3.3a reading here is contested

लग्ने भुक्तविनाडिका नवगुणास्तन्मानभक्ताः फलं वर्षाणि स्वगुणैर्हरैरपि तथा तन्मासघस्रादिकम् । लग्ने शोभनखेचरेक्षितयुते स्वस्वामियुक्तेक्षिते तुङ्गे स्वामिनि राशिसंमितसमाश्चेत्यूचुरेके बुधाः ॥ ३ ॥

lagne bhuktavināḍikā navaguṇāstanmānabhaktāḥ phalaṃ varṣāṇi svaguṇairharairapi tathā tanmāsaghasrādikam | lagne śobhanakhecarekṣitayute svasvāmiyuktekṣite tuṅge svāmini rāśisaṃmitasamāścetyūcureke budhāḥ || 3 ||

The vinadikas elapsed in the lagna, multiplied by nine and divided by the measure of that ⟨lagna⟩, give the years as their result; and in the same way, by their own multipliers and divisors, the months, the days (ghasra) and the rest. When the lagna is aspected by or joined with benefic planets, or is joined with and aspected by its own lord, and that lord is exalted, the years are as many as the rasi — so certain learned men have said. ⟨At the opening the plate does not distinguish bhukta from yukta; bhukta, 'elapsed', is the technical term and is what has been rendered.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भुक्त"; alternatives "युक्त" — bha vs ya at 2.6x, genuinely close in this fount. bhukta ('elapsed') is the technical term and matches the rendering's 'that have passed'; not settled on the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवगुणाः" — 'multiplied by nine' - the rendering's 'multiplied by 9'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घस्र" — ghasra = day; 'months, days etc.'
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्ते"; alternatives "युबते" — The kta ligature reads as a b-like form at 2.7x; yukta ('joined') is required by the sense and by the rendering's 'occupied or aspected by its lord'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधाः"; alternatives "वुधाः" — ba/va counter test: closed left counter = ba.
3.4a reading here is contested

प्राक्प्रत्यक्तनुभागतस्त्रिभिरपि द्रेकाणकैस्तद्रुपैः प्राग्वद्वर्गजवीर्यमब्धिविहृतं पुण्यं हि रूपादिकम् । तद्भेदच्युतमत्र पापमिति तल्लभ्यं तयोरन्तरं पुण्यं रूपचतुष्टयं यदि भवेन्मुक्तिर्ह्यसच्चेदसत् ॥ ४ ॥

prākpratyaktanubhāgatastribhirapi drekāṇakaistadrupaiḥ prāgvadvargajavīryamabdhivihṛtaṃ puṇyaṃ hi rūpādikam | tadbhedacyutamatra pāpamiti tallabhyaṃ tayorantaraṃ puṇyaṃ rūpacatuṣṭayaṃ yadi bhavenmuktirhyasaccedasat || 4 ||

The parts of the body, in front and behind, ⟨are known⟩ by the three drekkanas in their own forms. As before, the strength born of the vargas, divided by four (abdhi, the ocean = 4), is the punya ⟨merit⟩ in rupas and the rest; and here that ⟨total⟩ less its portion is the papa ⟨demerit⟩. In this way the difference of the two is obtained. If the punya amounts to four rupas, liberation is certain; if it is not so, ⟨it is not⟩. ⟨Our text now reads vargaja-viryam, 'the strength born of the vargas', with no ba; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भागस्त्रिभिरपि"; alternatives "भागसन्त्रिभिरपि" — Read at 2.5x; the ligature before -tribhih could carry an n. First line of the NEXT verse (4), whose remainder runs on to plate 27. [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this on the page at about 3.14x: the ligature is a plain स्त्रि and carries no न. Separately, the mūla now reads प्राक्प्रत्यक्तनुभागतस्त्रिभिरपि for प्राक्प्रत्यक्ततनुभागस्त्रिभिरपि, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रेकाणकैः" — Drekkana (decanate); begins a new topic.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राग्वद्वर्गजब"; alternatives "प्राग्वद्दुर्गजब", "प्राग्वद्वर्गजबल" — MY LEAST SECURE CLUSTER ON THIS PLATE. Read at 2.5x and again at 6x: the akshara after praagva is a stacked conjunct with a descender that could be d-du or d-va, and the following element could be bala. The rendering supplies 'Saptavargajabala', so vargaja is what the sense wants; the ink does not settle it. [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this on the page at about 2.24x: the page sets प्राग्वद्वर्गजवीर्यम् and there is no ब, and the mūla now reads the same.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अब्धिविहृतं" — abdhi = ocean = FOUR in bhutasamkhya; 'divided by four', matching the rendering's 'take only a fourth'.
3.5a reading here is contested

प्रागुक्ताच्छुभपापवर्गगणिताद्द्रेक्काणपैः साधिता संख्या क्रूरभवा खनेत्रविधुभिर्गुण्या नगाप्ताः समाः । शुद्धाः खाश्विसुधाकरैरपि भवेदायुर्हि जन्मत्रये संवादार्थमिहैव तल्लघुतरं प्रोक्तं नवांशायुषः ॥ ५ ॥

prāguktācchubhapāpavargagaṇitāddrekkāṇapaiḥ sādhitā saṃkhyā krūrabhavā khanetravidhubhirguṇyā nagāptāḥ samāḥ | śuddhāḥ khāśvisudhākarairapi bhavedāyurhi janmatraye saṃvādārthamihaiva tallaghutaraṃ proktaṃ navāṃśāyuṣaḥ || 5 ||

From the reckoning of the benefic and malefic vargas stated above, the number established by the lords of the drekkanas — the number that arises from the malefics — is to be multiplied by 120 (kha 0, netra 2, vidhu 1, read units-first) and divided by seven (naga, the mountains); ⟨the quotient gives⟩ the years. Reduced by as many 120s ⟨kha, asvi, sudhakara — the same figure spelt a second way in the same verse⟩ as can be taken away, that gives the longevity for the three births ⟨past, present and to come⟩. For the sake of corroboration, this shorter ⟨method⟩ of the navamsa-longevity is stated in this very place.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गणितादेद्रक्काणपैः"; alternatives "गणिताद् द्रेक्काणपैः" — Printed without a space; the e-matra belongs to dre-. drekkanapaih = 'by the lords of the decanates'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रागुक्ताच्छुभपापवर्गगणिताद्द्रेक्काणपैः; this sentence names गणितादेद्रक्काणपैः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0027, store page 27 line 14, at about 2.5x and 3.9x native) found a virāma under the first द, a separate diagonal stroke, with the e-mātrā set above. A consonant with a virāma carries no vowel, so the e belongs to द्र, as this note said, and the press sets ताद्द्रे; our mūla now reads गणिताद्द्रेक्काणपैः. The ग of गणि carries no u-mātrā: 5 dark pixels lie below the baseline across वर्गग, against about 470 under the गु of प्रागुक्ता on the same line. So this printing reads गणिता, not गुणिता.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खनेत्रविधुभिः" — bhutasamkhya, read right-to-left: kha=0, netra=2, vidhu=1 => 120. The rendering's 'multiply by 120' - an independent confirmation of the reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नगाप्ताः" — naga = mountain = SEVEN; 'divided by 7', matching the rendering exactly.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खाश्विसुधाकरैः" — A SECOND bhutasamkhya spelling of 120 in the same verse (kha=0, asvi=2, sudhakara=1), matching 'take away as many 120 year-periods as are possible'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मत्रये" — 'in the three births' - the rendering's past, present and future Janma.
3.6a reading here is contested

केन्द्रे कोणगृहे स्थिताः कविगुरुज्ञाः पूर्णमायुर्भवेन्मध्यायुष्यमथो धने च सहजे लाभे दिशन्ति स्थिताः । षष्ठे चाष्टमभे व्ययाख्यभवने स्वल्पायुरन्ये खलाः केन्द्राष्टव्ययकोणगा न शुभदा जातस्य पुंसः सदा ॥ ६ ॥

kendre koṇagṛhe sthitāḥ kavigurujñāḥ pūrṇamāyurbhavenmadhyāyuṣyamatho dhane ca sahaje lābhe diśanti sthitāḥ | ṣaṣṭhe cāṣṭamabhe vyayākhyabhavane svalpāyuranye khalāḥ kendrāṣṭavyayakoṇagā na śubhadā jātasya puṃsaḥ sadā || 6 ||

Venus (kavi), Jupiter (guru) and Mercury (jna) standing in a kendra or in a trikona house give full longevity; standing in the 2nd (dhana), the 3rd (sahaja) or the 11th (labha) they give middling longevity; and in the 6th, the 8th and the house called vyaya ⟨the 12th⟩, short life. The other planets, the malefics, standing in the kendras, the 8th (ashta), the 12th (vyaya) or the trikonas, are never givers of good to the man born. ⟨The type of this cluster is broken; an eye reading of the plate matched the akshara after kendra to the sta of rupacatustayam on the same leaf, so our mula reads kendrastavyaya.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कविगुरुज्ञाः" — kavi = Venus, guru = Jupiter, jna = Mercury - the three planets the rendering names.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवे—" — Printed em-dash carrying bhavet over to the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घने च सहजे लाभे" — ghana = 2nd house, sahaja = 3rd, labha = 11th - the rendering's '2nd, 3rd and 11th houses'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धने; this sentence names घने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केन्द्रायव्यय"; alternatives "केन्द्राष्षयय", "केन्द्राष्ःयय" — DAMAGED/BROKEN TYPE. At 6x the group after kendraa prints as a bowl carrying what looks like a visarga, then two ya-like forms; it does not resolve into clean aksharas and I do not believe it is cleanly set. The reading given is the one the house list requires (aaya = 11th, vyaya = 12th) and is NOT settled on the ink - treat it as unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads केन्द्राष्टव्ययकोणगा; this sentence names केन्द्रायव्यय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this group on the page. An eye reading of the 1993 exemplar (folio 25, .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0027.png, store line index 31) at about 3.56x native found that the press sets केन्द्राष्टव्ययकोणगा. The type is broken, but the akṣara after केन्द्रा is the same glyph as the ष्ट of रूपचतुष्टयं on line index 3 of the same leaf, and the two marks read as a visarga are the broken left bowl of the following व्य. So the group is no longer unresolved, and it reads as our mūla does.]
3.7a reading here is contested

लग्नेशे न निरीक्षिते सति तथा केंद्रत्रिकोणस्थितैः लग्नेशस्थितराशिनेतरि पुनर्लग्ने न दृष्टे शुभैः । अल्पायुः सुतदारबुद्धिरहितो जातो भवेदन्यथा दीर्घायुर्बहुभाग्यवान् घनमतिर्नित्यं भवेत्कीर्तिमान् ॥ ७ ॥

lagneśe na nirīkṣite sati tathā keṃdratrikoṇasthitaiḥ lagneśasthitarāśinetari punarlagne na dṛṣṭe śubhaiḥ | alpāyuḥ sutadārabuddhirahito jāto bhavedanyathā dīrghāyurbahubhāgyavān ghanamatirnityaṃ bhavetkīrtimān || 7 ||

When the lord of the lagna is not aspected by planets standing in the kendras and trikonas; when, likewise, the lord of the sign occupied by the lord of the lagna ⟨is not aspected⟩; and when again the lagna is not aspected by benefics — the one born will be short-lived, and without children, wife and understanding. Otherwise he will be long-lived, greatly fortunate, of solid mind, and famous all his days. ⟨Our mula now reads bahu, 'much'; the earlier text had bamhu, with an anusvara the word does not want.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केंद्र"; alternatives "केन्द्र" — Set with an ANUSVARA here, where plate 27 line 29 sets the same word with a subscript na (केन्द्रे). The edition is inconsistent between the two spellings - recorded as printed on each plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बंहु"; alternatives "बहु" — An anusvara dot stands over the ba, giving bamhu where bahu ('much') is the word. Recorded as printed per rule 1; probably a stray sort or a foul matrix. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दीर्घायुर्बहुभाग्यवान्; this sentence names बंहु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
3.8a reading here is contested

रन्ध्राधीशनिरीक्षिते स्फुटतरे लग्नेऽब्जलग्नेऽथवा जन्मेन्द्वष्टमलग्नपे रविभुवा भूजेन वा वीक्षिते । लग्नेशादि न वीक्षितं शुभकरैः खेटैर्भवेज्जातको मार्कंडेयसमायुरप्यतितरामल्पायुषश्चास्पदः ॥ ८ ॥

randhrādhīśanirīkṣite sphuṭatare lagne'bjalagne'thavā janmendvaṣṭamalagnape ravibhuvā bhūjena vā vīkṣite | lagneśādi na vīkṣitaṃ śubhakaraiḥ kheṭairbhavejjātako mārkaṃḍeyasamāyurapyatitarāmalpāyuṣaścāspadaḥ || 8 ||

When the exactly ⟨computed⟩ lagna, or else the lagna of the water-born one ⟨the sign the Moon occupies⟩, is aspected by the lord of the 8th (randhra); when the lord of the 8th from the natal Moon is aspected by the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩ or by the Earth's son ⟨Mars⟩; and when the lord of the lagna and the rest are not aspected by benefic planets — then the native, though he had a life-span equal to Markandeya's, becomes utterly a seat of short life.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रन्ध्राधीश"; alternatives "र्न्धाधीश", "रन्धाधीश" — The opening cluster reads as ra + ndhaa at 2.8x and I could not see a clear subscript ra. randhra = the 8TH HOUSE, which the rendering states ('the lord of the 8th Bhava'); recorded in that form with the ink's ambiguity flagged.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽब्ज"; alternatives "ऽऽज्ज" — abja ('water-born') = the MOON, giving 'the Moon's lagna', which the rendering supplies as 'the Rasi occupied by the Moon'. Two avagraha-like marks appear before it at 2.8x; I read one avagraha plus the b of bja.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविभुवा" — ravi-bhu = the Sun's son = SATURN, matching the rendering.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूजेन" — bhu-ja = the Earth's son = MARS, matching the rendering.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अल्पायुष्वास्पदः"; alternatives "अल्पायुष्यास्पदः" — sva vs sya in the ligature at 2.4x; alpaayusya-aaspadah ('a seat of short life') is the expected form. [2026-09-23: read on the plate. An eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0029, pāda 4, at about 2.7x and 4.4x native), found two akṣaras between यु and स्प, each with its own stem: a full ष, then the श्च ligature of this fount, the same sort as the श्च of नीचस्थाश्च at the head of 4.2 on page_0030. So the press sets अल्पायुषश्चास्पदः, and what this note read as one ligature, ष्व or ष्य, is ष + श्च. Sastri's printing (p.54, at about 3.8x native) and Bhasin's (p.49, at about 4.1x native), both read by eye, set the same. The mūla now reads अल्पायुषश्चास्पदः, which gives pāda 4 its nineteen syllables.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मार्कंडेय"; alternatives "मार्कण्डेय" — Set with an anusvara, not the subscript nasal; as printed.

Adhyāya 4 · ग्रहभावफलखण्डः — Planets in the several Bhāvas and their effects

4.1a reading here is contested

स्वोच्चस्वर्क्षसुहृत्त्रिकोणगृहगाः केन्द्रोत्तमांशान्विताः सौम्यैरीक्षितयुक्तमध्यमगताः मूलत्रिकोणाश्रिताः । भावारोहणखेचराः शुभकराः केन्द्रत्रिकोणाधिपाः सम्बन्धेन परस्परं सुयशसं कुर्वन्ति राजोत्तमम् ॥ १ ॥

svoccasvarkṣasuhṛttrikoṇagṛhagāḥ kendrottamāṃśānvitāḥ saumyairīkṣitayuktamadhyamagatāḥ mūlatrikoṇāśritāḥ | bhāvārohaṇakhecarāḥ śubhakarāḥ kendratrikoṇādhipāḥ sambandhena parasparaṃ suyaśasaṃ kurvanti rājottamam || 1 ||

Planets standing in their own exaltation, in their own sign (sva-rksa), in a friend's house or in a trikona house; those joined with a kendra or with an uttamamsa; those aspected by benefics, joined with them, or standing between them; those resting in mulatrikona; and planets ascending within a bhava — these do good. And the lords of the kendras and of the trikonas, by a mutual relation (sambandha), make ⟨the native⟩ of great renown and highest among kings ⟨our mula now reads rajottamam; the earlier text had rajocamam, which is not a standard form⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[damage]" — A fine diagonal scratch on the leaf crosses the right end of this line and the next; it thins the strokes but destroys nothing. Nothing refused.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सम्बन्धेन"; alternatives "सम्बःधेन" — The nasal before dha prints as a small high mark that could be read as a visarga; sambandhena is the word ('Sambandh' is transliterated in the rendering itself).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राजोचमम्"; alternatives "राजोत्तमम्", "राजोच्चमम्" — Printed raajocamam, which is not a standard form; raajottamam / raajoccam ('royal eminence') is what the rendering's 'bestow high status' wants. Recorded as printed per rule 1 and flagged. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads राजोत्तमम् for राजोचमम्, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
4.2a reading here is contested

नीचस्थाश्च पराजितास्त्वरिगताः पापेक्षिताक्रान्तयुङ् मध्यस्थानगताश्च वक्रविकलस्वर्भानुसंसर्गगाः । भावान्तस्थितखेचराश्च विबलाः षष्ठाष्टरिक्फाधिपाः केन्द्राधीश्वरकोणपेश्वरयुतास्तद्योगभङ्गप्रदाः ॥ २ ॥

nīcasthāśca parājitāstvarigatāḥ pāpekṣitākrāntayuṅ madhyasthānagatāśca vakravikalasvarbhānusaṃsargagāḥ | bhāvāntasthitakhecarāśca vibalāḥ ṣaṣṭhāṣṭarikphādhipāḥ kendrādhīśvarakoṇapeśvarayutāstadyogabhaṅgapradāḥ || 2 ||

Planets standing in debilitation, defeated ⟨in a planetary war⟩, gone to an enemy's house ⟨our mula now reads parajitas tv arigatah, tu + arigatah, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩, aspected by malefics, overpowered by them, joined with them, or placed between them; planets retrograde, crippled (vikala), or in contact with Svarbhanu ⟨Rahu; our mula now reads svarbhanu with the repha, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩; planets standing at the end of a bhava and devoid of strength; and the lords of the 6th, the 8th and the 12th (rihpha) — these, joined with the lords of the kendras and with the lords of the trikonas, break that yoga.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वभानु"; alternatives "स्वर्भानु" — svarbhaanu is RAHU; the printed form lacks the repha, giving svabhaanu. Recorded as printed and flagged - the claim (conjunction with Rahu) is unaffected. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वक्रविकलस्वर्भानुसंसर्गगाः; this sentence names स्वभानु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: refuted on the plate. An eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0030, pāda 2, at about 2.7x and 2.8x native), found a repha hook over the ā-stroke of भा, the same shape and size as the repha over ग in संसर्ग three akṣaras later; the anusvāra of सं is a separate round dot. So the press sets स्वर्भानु, and the printed form does not lack the repha. Sastri's printing (p.62, at about 3.9x native) and Bhasin's (p.55, at about 3.0x native), both read by eye, set स्वर्भानु too. The same leaf sets pāda 1 as पराजितास्त्वरिगताः (पराजिताः + तु + अरिगताः, read at about 2.7x native), and the mūla now reads both.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिक्फ"; alternatives "रिःफ" — The 12th house; plate 26 line 2 spells the same word रिःफ with a visarga. The edition varies.
4.3a reading here is contested

भाग्ये कर्मणि तत्पती निवसतावेकत्र वा व्यत्यये वान्योन्यर्क्षगतौ निरीक्षणयुतौ तौ राजयोगप्रदौ । धीजायोदयबन्धुपैश्च सहितौ तत्तद्गृहे वा स्थितौ संपत्सौख्यकरौ तयोर्निधनकृल्लाभाधिपत्यं विना ॥ ३ ॥

bhāgye karmaṇi tatpatī nivasatāvekatra vā vyatyaye vānyonyarkṣagatau nirīkṣaṇayutau tau rājayogapradau | dhījāyodayabandhupaiśca sahitau tattadgṛhe vā sthitau saṃpatsaukhyakarau tayornidhanakṛllābhādhipatyaṃ vinā || 3 ||

When the lords of the 9th (bhagya) and of the 10th (karma) dwell in the 9th and the 10th, or together in one place, or in exchange, or each in the other's sign, and aspect or are joined with each other, those two confer a raja-yoga. Joined with the lords of the 5th (dhi), the 7th (jaya), the 1st (udaya) and the 4th (bandhu), or standing in those very houses, they bring wealth and ease — save where either of them owns the 8th (nidhana) or the 11th (labha).

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाग्ये कर्मणि" — bhaagya = the 9TH house, karma = the 10TH - the two houses the rendering names.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यत्यये" — 'in exchange' - the parivartana the rendering gives as 'occupy each other's bhava'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धीजायोदयबन्धु" — dhii = 5th, jaayaa = 7th, udaya = 1st, bandhu = 4th - exactly the four houses the rendering lists ('the 5th, the 7th, the 1st or the 4th').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निधनकृल्लाभाधिपत्यं" — nidhana = the 8TH, laabha = the 11TH; the compound is nidhanakrt + laabhaadhipatyam with t+l assimilating to l-l across the line break (kr-l | l-aabhaa).
4.4a reading here is contested

लग्नाद्भाग्यपकर्मपौ यदि तदा तद्भाग्यकर्माधिपौ मानाद्भाग्यपकर्मपौ वरसमस्वल्पाधिकाराः क्रमात् । सम्बन्धत्रयसंस्थितौ च सबलावन्योन्यकेन्द्राश्रितौ लग्नाधीश्वरराशिनायकयुतौ जातो धनी भूपतिः ॥ ४ ॥

lagnādbhāgyapakarmapau yadi tadā tadbhāgyakarmādhipau mānādbhāgyapakarmapau varasamasvalpādhikārāḥ kramāt | sambandhatrayasaṃsthitau ca sabalāvanyonyakendrāśritau lagnādhīśvararāśināyakayutau jāto dhanī bhūpatiḥ || 4 ||

If ⟨the yoga is formed⟩ by the lords of the 9th and the 10th reckoned from the lagna, then ⟨high office follows⟩; ⟨if⟩ by the lords of the 9th and the 10th reckoned from that 9th; and ⟨if⟩ by the lords of the 9th and the 10th reckoned from the 10th (mana) — these give high, ordinary and slight office respectively. And when the two stand in a threefold relation, are strong, occupy kendras from each other, and are joined with the lord of the sign occupied by the lord of the lagna, the one born is wealthy and a lord of the earth.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाग्यप / कर्मप" — bhaagya = 9th, karma = 10th; '-pa' = its lord. The verse's three reckonings (from the Lagna, from the 9th, from the 10th) are exactly the rendering's (1)(2)(3).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मानात्" — maana = the 10TH house, the third reckoning-point.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वरसमस्वल्पाधिकाराः" — vara / sama / svalpa = high / ordinary / slight office - the rendering's 'high, ordinary, below average position', in the same order.
4.5a reading here is contested

राश्यंशोदयपाश्च राज्यशुभपौ धीभ्रातृबन्ध्वस्तपाश्चार्थायर्क्षपती च तौ खगवराश्चैकत्र वान्योन्यभे । उत्कर्षेषु सुहृत्स्वभोच्चभवनेष्वन्योन्ययुक्तेक्षिता वृद्धिं वाजिगजादिकान् सुखसुतान्द्रव्यं च दद्युः क्रमात्

rāśyaṃśodayapāśca rājyaśubhapau dhībhrātṛbandhvastapāścārthāyarkṣapatī ca tau khagavarāścaikatra vānyonyabhe | utkarṣeṣu suhṛtsvabhoccabhavaneṣvanyonyayuktekṣitā vṛddhiṃ vājigajādikān sukhasutāndravyaṃ ca dadyuḥ kramāt

The lords of the rasi and of the amsa of the lagna (udaya), the lords of the 10th (rajya) and the 9th (subha), the lords of the 5th (dhi), the 3rd (bhratr̥), the 4th (bandhu) and the 7th (asta), and the lords of the signs of the 2nd (artha) and the 11th (aya) — these best of planets, when together in one rasi or each in the other's sign, standing in places of eminence, that is in a friend's, in their own or in their exaltation houses, and mutually joined and aspecting, give in order increase, horses and elephants and the like, ease and sons, and wealth.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बन्ध्व"; alternatives "बन्धु", "बन्ध" — the half-na is the short mid-height dash this fount uses for न्; the following ध carries a व subscript. Read बन्ध्व- (bandhu+asta), which the English 'the lords of the 5th, 3rd, 4th and the 7th' supports (asta = 7th).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्चा"; alternatives "श्वा" — DECIDED AT 8.6x. At 1.7x this reads श्वा; magnified and set beside the certain श्च of पाश्च in line 2 (same plate, line above) the two conjuncts are identical. Reading श्चा also yields the only parse: ...बन्ध्वस्तपाश्च अर्थायर्क्षपती, exactly parallel to राश्यंशोदयपाश्च. This is the single most consequential correction on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राश्यै"; alternatives "राश्ये" — the matra over श्य is a hooked double stroke, clearly unlike the single diagonal e-matra of भे later in the same line; so ai as printed. Grammar would want rāśy-ekatra (e), so the printed ai is likely the compositor's error - recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खगवराश्चैकत्र; this sentence names राश्यै, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ष्वन्"; alternatives "ष्वः" — CORRECTED AFTER CALIBRATION ON PLATE 36. I first read this mark as a visarga sort standing where न् belongs, i.e. a misprint. At 4.6x on plate 36 the certain half-na of बन्धौ resolves into an UPPER HORIZONTAL BAR plus a LOWER ROUND DOT - not two round dots - and a true visarga (सर्वज्ञः, युतः) is two ROUND dots with no bar. The mark here has the bar+dot profile, so it is an ordinary half-na printed with light ink, not a wrong sort. Sense, the parallel वान्योन्यभे in line 3, and the English 'occupy each other's house' all agree. Recording the correction rather than the first reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुहृत्स्व"; alternatives "सुहृःस्व" — the mark between हृ and स्व is a SMALL ANGULAR raised glyph - the fount's half-ta - confirmed against the identical त्स्व of लग्नात्स्वास्पदगौ on plate 36 at 3.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥५"; alternatives "॥ ५ ॥" — NOTE THE ANOMALY: verse 5 closes with double danda + numeral and NO trailing danda, while verses 6 and 7 on this same plate both close ॥ N ॥. Recorded as printed; the row-ink profile confirms no ink beyond x=2612. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads ∅ for ५, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-11 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
4.6a reading here is contested

नाशस्थानगतो दिवाकरकरैर्लुप्तस्तु यद्राशिपो नीचारातिगतोऽथवा यदि भवेत्सौम्यैरयुक्तेक्षितः । तद्भावस्य विनाशनं मुनिगणाः शंसन्ति सौम्यैर्युतश्चेत्तत्रापि फलप्रदो न हि तथा तन्वादिभानां क्रमात् ॥ ६ ॥

nāśasthānagato divākarakarairluptastu yadrāśipo nīcārātigato'thavā yadi bhavetsaumyairayuktekṣitaḥ | tadbhāvasya vināśanaṃ munigaṇāḥ śaṃsanti saumyairyutaścettatrāpi phalaprado na hi tathā tanvādibhānāṃ kramāt || 6 ||

When the lord of a sign stands in a place of destruction, or is blotted out by the Sun's rays ⟨combust⟩, or stands in debilitation or in an enemy's house, and is neither joined with nor aspected by benefics, the company of sages declares the ruin of that bhava. But if he is joined with benefics, then even there he does give results and it is not so — and thus for the houses beginning with the tanu ⟨the 1st⟩, each in order. ⟨Our mula now reads scettatrapi, cet tatra api, 'if … then even there', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौम्यै" — the म्य is a true ligature; at 1.6x it degrades into what looks like a colon, which is how the ष्वः mark in line 4 was nearly misread. Verified at 3.7x on the second instance (सौम्यैर्युत, line 19).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्चत्त्रा"; alternatives "श्चेदत्रापि", "श्चेत्तत्रापि", "श्चात्रापि" — STILL NOT SETTLED. At 3.65x the cluster reads [श्च + a detached hook above-left][त्][त्रा][पि]. Plate 36 line 'पूर्णो विधुश्चेत्तदा' shows this fount setting श्चे-त्-त with exactly that hook as the e-matra, so the hook here is very likely an e-matra and the word begins श्चे-. That gives श्चेत्त्रापि as printed, for which the natural emendations are श्चेदत्रापि (yutas ced atrapi) or श्चेत्तत्रापि (yutas cet tatrapi). Left as the non-word actually printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सौम्यैर्युतश्चेत्तत्रापि; this sentence names श्चेत्त्रापि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate, and the printed form is not a non-word. An eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0035, this verse's fourth line, at about 3.2x native, and again at about 3.0x native beside विधुश्चेत्तदा of 4.8 on page_0036), found one wide sort after श्चे. It is 68 px wide: the width of this fount's त्त ligature (70 px), not of a half त् (35 px) or a plain त (49-51 px). So the press sets श्चेत्तत्रापि, cet tatra api, and the 2026-09-05 transcription dropped a त. Bhasin's printing (page-059, line 15, read by eye at about 3.8x) sets the same. The mūla now reads श्चेत्तत्रापि.]
4.7a reading here is contested

लग्नस्थादिममध्यमान्तिमयुतो लग्नाधिनाथः क्रमात् कुर्याद्दण्डपतिं च मण्डलपतिं ग्रामाधिपं तच्छुभम् । शुक्रार्येन्दुजवीक्षितश्च सहितश्चेत्सौम्यवर्गस्थितः स्वोच्चे वाखिलभूमिपालकममुं भूपालवन्द्यं वरम् ॥ ७ ॥

lagnasthādimamadhyamāntimayuto lagnādhināthaḥ kramāt kuryāddaṇḍapatiṃ ca maṇḍalapatiṃ grāmādhipaṃ tacchubham | śukrāryendujavīkṣitaśca sahitaścetsaumyavargasthitaḥ svocce vākhilabhūmipālakamamuṃ bhūpālavandyaṃ varam || 7 ||

The lord of the lagna, according as he is joined ⟨with a planet standing⟩ in the first, the middle or the last ⟨portion⟩ of the lagna, makes ⟨the native⟩ in order a dandapati ⟨a holder of the rod, a magistrate⟩, a mandalapati ⟨a governor of a province⟩ or a headman of a village; that is auspicious. And if he is aspected by and joined with Venus, Jupiter (arya) and Mercury (induja), and stands in a benefic varga or in his own exaltation, ⟨he makes⟩ him a ruler of all the earth, one whom kings must salute, the best of men. ⟨Our text now reads bhumipalakam amum, 'him, a ruler of the earth', which divides into words and scans; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave kramamum, which does neither.⟩

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुर्याद्द"; alternatives "कुर्यादि" — the third akshara is the द्द ligature, not दि - the vertical I first took for an i-matra is the second द's stem. kuryad dandapatim is the required sense.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रममुं"; alternatives "क्रममं", "क्रमम् अमुं" — printed as three aksharas क्र-म-मुं with anusvara over the last; the word division is not recoverable from the setting. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वाखिलभूमिपालकममुं for वाखिलभूमिपालक्रममुं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass read this word by eye on the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0035.png, store line index 14) at about 4.8x native, beside the क्र of क्रमात् on the same page. The press does set क्रममुं, with the subscript र, as this note records. Our mūla's भूमिपालकममुं emends the press: the क्र makes position 9 of the śārdūlavikrīḍita heavy where it must be light, अखिलभूमिपालकम् + अमुं is the only division that yields words, and the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi give भूमिपालकममुं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूपालवन्द्य"; alternatives "भूपालवन्द्यं" — no anusvara visible over the final य at 1.8x; expected form would carry one. Recorded without. [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass confirmed this on the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0035.png, store line index 14) at about 4.8x native, with the ink measured on the greyscale master: there is no anusvāra over the final य, while the anusvāra over मुं on the same line shows plainly. The mūla now reads भूपालवन्द्यं. It emends the press on the metre, since without the anusvāra position 17 of the śārdūlavikrīḍita is light where it must be heavy, and the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi give भूपालवन्द्यं.]
4.8a reading here is contested

स्वोच्चस्वर्क्षसुहृद्भगः पितृगृहे बन्धौ खभे सप्तमे वीर्याढ्यो गुरुशुक्रवीक्षणयुतः पूर्णो विधुश्चेत्तदा । लग्नात्स्वास्पदगौ कुजार्कतनयौ चैवं स्थिते भोगवान् सर्वज्ञः सुगुणाकरो जननुतः स स्याद्वदान्यो महान् ॥ ८ ॥

svoccasvarkṣasuhṛdbhagaḥ pitṛgṛhe bandhau khabhe saptame vīryāḍhyo guruśukravīkṣaṇayutaḥ pūrṇo vidhuścettadā | lagnātsvāspadagau kujārkatanayau caivaṃ sthite bhogavān sarvajñaḥ suguṇākaro jananutaḥ sa syādvadānyo mahān || 8 ||

If the Moon, full, rich in strength, and aspected by and joined with Jupiter and Venus, stands in his own exaltation, in his own sign, in a friend's sign, in the 9th (the father's house), in the 4th (bandhu), in the 10th (kha) or in the 7th; and if Mars and the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩ occupy the 2nd (sva) and the 10th (aspada) from the lagna — when it stands thus, that man is one of enjoyments, all-knowing, a mine of good qualities, praised by people, liberal and great.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बन्धौ" — the half-na here is the calibration case for the whole book: at 4.6x it is an upper HORIZONTAL BAR plus a lower ROUND DOT, distinct from the two round dots of a true visarga (सर्वज्ञः, युतः on this plate). House list पितृगृहे/बन्धौ/खभे/सप्तमे = 9th/4th/10th/7th, matching the English exactly.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नात्स्वा"; alternatives "लग्नाःस्वा" — the mark is the fount's half-ta - a small angular raised glyph, verified at 3.4x beside the two-round-dot visarga of सर्वज्ञः on the line below. स्व = 2nd and आस्पद = 10th, matching the English 'occupy the 2nd and the 10th houses from the Lagna'.
4.9a reading here is contested

देवाधीशपुरोहितस्य सहजान्त्याधीशता संततं रन्ध्राधीश्वरताष्टमस्थितिरपि स्याद्योगकृद्देहिनाम् । षष्ठस्थः शुभकृत्कविः स्मरगृहज्ञानायमानस्थितो राहुर्योगकरस्तृतीयनिलये केतुस्तु योगप्रदः ॥ ९ ॥

devādhīśapurohitasya sahajāntyādhīśatā saṃtataṃ randhrādhīśvaratāṣṭamasthitirapi syādyogakṛddehinām | ṣaṣṭhasthaḥ śubhakṛtkaviḥ smaragṛhajñānāyamānasthito rāhuryogakarastṛtīyanilaye ketustu yogapradaḥ || 9 ||

For the preceptor of the lord of the gods ⟨Jupiter⟩, lordship of the 3rd (sahaja) and of the 12th (antya), lordship of the 8th (randhra), and even a position in the 8th, are always yoga-producing for embodied beings. Venus (kavi) standing in the 6th does good. Rahu standing in the 7th (smara), the 4th (gr̥ha), ⟨the 8th (randhra) — the plate prints jna where randhra is wanted, and the conjunct could not be settled⟩, the 11th (aya) and the 10th (mana) produces yoga; and Ketu in the third house is a giver of yoga.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहज्ञाना"; alternatives "गृहरन्ध्राया", "गृहरन्ध्रायमान" — NOT SETTLED, and consequential - this is the house list for Rahu. Examined to 6.2x. What is printed after स्मरगृ is [ह][one complex conjunct][ना][य][मा][न][स्थि][तो]; the conjunct has a top-left loop with a subscript curving to a tail, which I read as ज्ञ. But the facing English gives Rahu's houses as 7th, 4th, 8th, 11th, 10th, which wants smara(7)-grha(4)-RANDHRA(8)-aya(11)-mana(10), i.e. रन्ध्रा where I see ज्ञा. Either the conjunct is न्ध्र and I am misreading it, or my akshara segmentation is off by one. I could not decide on the ink and am not deciding on the sense.
4.10a reading here is contested

दुःस्थान त्रिगतोऽरिनीचगृहगश्चास्तंगतो वाऽपि यद्भावेशः शुभयोगदृष्टिरहितः क्रूरारियुक्तेक्षितः । नीचायंशगतः पराजयहतश्चेत्पापिभिर्निद्युतिः तद्भावस्य विनाशनं निगदितं लग्नादिभानां क्रमात् ॥१०॥

duḥsthāna trigato'rinīcagṛhagaścāstaṃgato vā'pi yadbhāveśaḥ śubhayogadṛṣṭirahitaḥ krūrāriyuktekṣitaḥ | nīcāyaṃśagataḥ parājayahataścetpāpibhirnidyutiḥ tadbhāvasya vināśanaṃ nigaditaṃ lagnādibhānāṃ kramāt ||10||

When the lord of a bhava stands in one of the three duhsthanas, or in an enemy's or in his debilitation house, or is set ⟨combust⟩; when he is without benefic conjunction and aspect; when he is joined with or aspected by cruel enemies; when he stands in his debilitation or in an enemy's amsa ⟨our mula reads nicayamsagatah, a non-word; nicaryamsa is what is wanted, with its repha lost⟩; when he is struck down by defeat ⟨in a planetary war⟩; and when he is robbed of his brilliance by malefics ⟨for nirdyutih our mula reads nidyutih, without the repha⟩ — then the ruin of that bhava is declared, for the houses beginning with the lagna, each in order.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुःस्थान त्रिगतो"; alternatives "दुःस्थानत्रिगतो" — a word space is printed between दुःस्थान and त्रिगतो, though the sense is one compound (the three duhsthanas). Recorded with the space as set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नीचायंशगत"; alternatives "नीचार्यंशगत", "नीचांशगत" — Printed as a non-word and recorded as such. At 3.4x the aksharas are नी|चा|यं|श|ग|त, the mark over य being a single round anusvara with NO repha hook visible. The facing English reads 'be in his inimical or debilitation Amsa', which needs nica+ARI+amsa = नीचार्यंशगत - one repha away from what is set. Either the repha failed to print or dropped out.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निद्युतिः"; alternatives "निर्द्युतिः" — one repha is clearly present, over the नि; I could not see a second over the द्यु. As printed the word is not Sanskrit; nirdyutih ('robbed of brilliance') is what the sense and the English ('has lost the brilliance of his rays') require.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नीचायंशगत"; alternatives "नीचायंशगतः" — no visarga printed after गत, though the parallel members of the compound-string carry them.

यद्यद्भावपतिस्त्रिकोणगृहगः केन्द्रत्रिलाभाश्रितो मित्रोच्चस्वगृहांशगो बलवतोरेत्य स्थितः सौम्ययोः । मध्ये तत्पतिषूच्चगेषु च शुभैर्युक्तेक्षितो वा ग्रहस्तत्तद्भावफलस्य वृद्धिमतुलां शीघ्रं करोति क्रमात् ॥११॥

yadyadbhāvapatistrikoṇagṛhagaḥ kendratrilābhāśrito mitroccasvagṛhāṃśago balavatoretya sthitaḥ saumyayoḥ | madhye tatpatiṣūccageṣu ca śubhairyuktekṣito vā grahastattadbhāvaphalasya vṛddhimatulāṃ śīghraṃ karoti kramāt ||11||

When the lord of any bhāva stands in a trikoṇa house, or rests in a kendra, in the 3rd or in the 11th (lābha); when he occupies the rāśi or aṃśa of a friend, of his exaltation or of his own house; when he comes to stand between two strong benefics while the lords of those houses are themselves in exaltation; or when the planet is joined with or aspected by benefics — then he swiftly brings about an incomparable increase in the results of that bhāva, each in its turn.

4.12a reading here is contested

भावो भावपतिश्च कारकखगस्ते पापमध्यस्थिताः पापैः शक्तिभिरन्विताश्च विबलाः सौम्यैरयुग्वीक्षिताः । तेषां भाग्यसुखाष्टधीव्ययगताः पापास्तदंशर्क्षपाः तद्भावे रिपुनीचमूढविजिताश्चेद्भावहानिं वदेत् ॥१२॥

bhāvo bhāvapatiśca kārakakhagaste pāpamadhyasthitāḥ pāpaiḥ śaktibhiranvitāśca vibalāḥ saumyairayugvīkṣitāḥ | teṣāṃ bhāgyasukhāṣṭadhīvyayagatāḥ pāpāstadaṃśarkṣapāḥ tadbhāve ripunīcamūḍhavijitāścedbhāvahāniṃ vadet ||12||

When the bhava, the lord of the bhava and the karaka planet stand between malefics, or are joined with malefics in their strength, or are without strength, and are neither joined with nor aspected by benefics; when malefics occupy the 9th (bhagya), the 4th (sukha), the 8th, the 5th (dhi) and the 12th (vyaya) from them; and when the lords of their amsa and rasi stand in that bhava in an enemy's or a debilitation sign, combust (mudha) or defeated — then one should declare the loss of that bhava.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अन्वितांश्च"; alternatives "अन्विताश्च" — an anusvara appears over ता; grammar wants the nominative plural अन्विताः agreeing with the three subjects, i.e. अन्विताश्च. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीक्षिताः" — the final visarga carries an extra ink stroke that makes it look like a superscript figure; treated as an over-inked visarga, not as a footnote mark - there is no note anywhere on the plate for it to refer to.
4.13a reading here is contested

स्वर्क्षोच्चादिसुहृत्त्रिकोणसहिते राश्यंशवर्गोत्तमे सौम्यः सौख्यकरोऽथ पापखचरोऽप्येवं विधश्चेच्छुभः । यद्भेशस्थितभांशपा बलयुताश्चेत्तद्भवो लाभकृद्यस्यांशर्क्षगतो बली हितखगः सौम्योऽपि तस्यार्थदः ।१३।

svarkṣoccādisuhṛttrikoṇasahite rāśyaṃśavargottame saumyaḥ saukhyakaro'tha pāpakhacaro'pyevaṃ vidhaścecchubhaḥ | yadbheśasthitabhāṃśapā balayutāścettadbhavo lābhakṛdyasyāṃśarkṣagato balī hitakhagaḥ saumyo'pi tasyārthadaḥ |13|

When a benefic stands in his own sign, his exaltation and the rest, or with a friend or in a trikona, and in the vargottama of both rasi and amsa, he brings ease; and if a malefic planet be likewise placed, he too is auspicious. If the lords of the sign and of the amsa in which the lord of that ⟨bhava⟩ stands are endowed with strength, that bhava becomes a giver of gain. And a strong friendly planet standing in the sign or amsa of any ⟨other⟩ — even a benefic — becomes to him a giver of wealth. ⟨The plate prints svarksamcadi, which is not a word; our mula reads svarksoccadi, 'his own sign, his exaltation and the rest', on the lexicon, as the two other printings we hold print it.⟩

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वर्क्षांचादि"; alternatives "स्वर्क्षोच्चादि", "स्वर्क्षांशादि" — NOT SETTLED. At 3.7x the opening reads [स्व][र्क्षां - a repha+ksa with an a-matra vertical AND a dot above][चा - a single ca with a-matra, NOT a doubled cca][दि]. As printed that is not a word. The facing English lists 'his own, exaltation, a friend's house or his Moolatrikona Rasi', which wants sva-rksa-UCCA-adi = स्वर्क्षोच्चादि, requiring the second akshara to carry an o-matra and the third to be a doubled च्चा. I can see neither at this magnification and am not emending on the sense alone. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षांचादिसुहृत्त्रिकोणसहिते; this sentence names स्वर्क्षोच्चादि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass read this opening by eye on the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0038.png, store line index 2) at about 4.0x and 3.1x native, beside राश्यंशवर्गोत्तमे on the same line. It confirms this note: the second akṣara carries a repha, an ā-mātrā and an anusvāra (र्क्षां) and no o-mātrā, and the third is a single चा. A correction to स्वर्क्षोच्चादि written on 2026-09-20 was withdrawn on 2026-09-23, because no witness carries that form, and the mūla reads स्वर्क्षांचादि as the press sets it. The question of what the author wrote is this verse's open doubt.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads स्वर्क्षोच्चादि on the lexicon; the press sets स्वर्क्षांचादि, read by eye on the plate at about 4.0x native, and uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi both print स्वर्क्षोच्चादि, read by eye on 2026-09-30 at about 8x and about 7x; their machine reads give स्वक्षोच्चादि and lose the repha. The 1993 facing English, Sastri's English and Bhasin's Hindi all render 'his own sign, his exaltation'. The sentences above saying that the mūla reads स्वर्क्षांचादि as the press sets it, and that no witness carries स्वर्क्षोच्चादि, describe the text and the evidence before this ruling.]

रिःफाष्टारिगतस्य राशिरशुभस्तद्भेशयुग्दृष्टभं भ्रष्टं स्यात्क्रमशः सितज्ञगुरवः स्युस्तेषु सौख्यप्रदाः । मित्रोच्चस्वभगाः षडंत्यमृतिगा वा सौम्यदृष्टाः शुभास्तन्नाथा रिपुनीचमूढविजिताश्चेत्तद्गृहस्थाः शुभाः ॥ १४ ॥

riḥphāṣṭārigatasya rāśiraśubhastadbheśayugdṛṣṭabhaṃ bhraṣṭaṃ syātkramaśaḥ sitajñaguravaḥ syusteṣu saukhyapradāḥ | mitroccasvabhagāḥ ṣaḍaṃtyamṛtigā vā saumyadṛṣṭāḥ śubhāstannāthā ripunīcamūḍhavijitāścettadgṛhasthāḥ śubhāḥ || 14 ||

The sign of a planet placed in the 12th (rihpha), the 8th or the 6th is inauspicious, and the sign joined with or aspected by the lord of that sign will in its turn be fallen. Among those, Venus (sita), Mercury (jna) and Jupiter (guru) are the givers of ease. Planets in a friend's, in their exaltation or in their own house, or standing in the 6th, the 12th and the 8th (mr̥ti) and aspected by benefics, are auspicious; and the lords of those ⟨houses⟩, if in an enemy's house, in debilitation, combust or defeated, are auspicious when standing in that same house.

4.15a reading here is contested

बालो वृद्धखगोऽस्तगश्च विजितः पश्यन्नपश्यत्यसौ शुक्लाशुक्लदिनैः शुभाशुभखगाः पूर्वामुखाद्युत्क्रमात् । प्रत्यग्दृष्टियुतो दृढः सुरगुरुर्मन्दो ऋजुः शक्तिमान् मूढस्थोऽपि भृगुः शनिश्च बलवान् भौमोऽरिगो वा बली ॥ १५ ॥

bālo vṛddhakhago'stagaśca vijitaḥ paśyannapaśyatyasau śuklāśukladinaiḥ śubhāśubhakhagāḥ pūrvāmukhādyutkramāt | pratyagdṛṣṭiyuto dṛḍhaḥ suragururmando ṛjuḥ śaktimān mūḍhastho'pi bhṛguḥ śaniśca balavān bhaumo'rigo vā balī || 15 ||

A planet that is an infant (bala) or aged (vr̥ddha), that is set ⟨combust⟩, or that has been defeated, though it looks does not see. By the bright and the dark days ⟨of the fortnight⟩ the benefic and malefic planets ⟨turn⟩ eastward and so on, in reverse order. Jupiter, the preceptor of the gods, is firm when it has a westward glance; Manda ⟨Saturn⟩ when direct in motion is powerful; Venus (bhr̥gu) even when combust, and Saturn, are strong; and Mars is strong even when in an enemy's ⟨house⟩. ⟨Saturn is named twice in this half-verse, once as manda and once as sani; our mula now reads sanis ca balavan, 'and Saturn is strong', so the two statements agree.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्वांमुखाद्युत्क्रमात्"; alternatives "पूर्वामुखाद्युत्क्रमात्" — an anusvara is printed over र्वां; the expected compound pūrvā-mukhādy-utkramāt does not want one. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वामुखाद्युत्क्रमात्; this sentence names पूर्वांमुखाद्युत्क्रमात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0039, this verse's second line, at about 2.2x and 3.2x native, with pixel counts at four thresholds), found under the repha hook only a small detached dot, faint and undersized: 50 pixels darker than grey 140, its darkest pixel grey 74, where the two anusvāras on verse 16's last line of the same plate have 289 and 314 and reach grey 0. So the mark is a failed sort or a speck, about one sixth the ink of an anusvāra on this plate, and not a clear anusvāra. The mūla reads पूर्वामुखाद्युत्क्रमात् on the lexicon: the compound pūrvā-mukhādi takes no anusvāra, and the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi give पूर्वामुखाद्.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(stray mark before शुक्ला)" — a small detached apostrophe-like mark stands in the left margin just before the first akshara of this line, above the baseline. It is not an avagraha (wrong shape and wrong place) and nothing in the sense calls for a mark. Recorded as an ink speck or a broken sort, NOT transcribed into the text.
4.16a reading here is contested

केन्द्रे भ्रातृधनायधीनवमगाः षष्ठेऽपि सौम्याः शुभाः क्रूराश्चोपचयस्थिता रविशनी धर्मस्थितौ ज्ञेऽष्टमे । स्वोच्चस्वर्क्षसुरेज्यभस्थरविजो लग्नस्थितोऽपीष्टकृत् शुक्रो द्वादशसंस्थितोऽपि शुभदो मन्दांशराशी विना ॥ १६ ॥

kendre bhrātṛdhanāyadhīnavamagāḥ ṣaṣṭhe'pi saumyāḥ śubhāḥ krūrāścopacayasthitā raviśanī dharmasthitau jñe'ṣṭame | svoccasvarkṣasurejyabhastharavijo lagnasthito'pīṣṭakṛt śukro dvādaśasaṃsthito'pi śubhado mandāṃśarāśī vinā || 16 ||

Benefics standing in a kendra, in the 3rd (bhratr̥), the 2nd (dhana), the 11th (aya), the 5th (dhi) and the 9th, and even in the 6th, are auspicious; and so are malefics standing in the upacayas. The Sun and Saturn standing in the 9th (dharma), and Mercury in the 8th, ⟨are auspicious⟩. Saturn (ravija), standing in his exaltation, in his own sign, or in a sign owned by Jupiter (surejya), gives what is desired even when standing in the lagna. Venus, even when placed in the 12th, gives good — except in the rasi and amsa of Manda ⟨Saturn⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खर्क्षं"; alternatives "स्वर्क्ष" — As printed the second element is ख-र्क्षं with an anusvara. The facing English reads 'his exaltation, own house, or a Rasi owned by Jupiter', which wants sva-rksa (own sign), not kha-rksa (10th-house sign), and wants no anusvara. Recorded as printed; the divergence between verse and rendering is itself the finding. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: the metre requires a light fourth syllable, which the anusvāra prevents, and Bhasin's plate (PDF p.70, printed ६८) sets स्वर्क्ष. The constituted text now reads स्वर्क्ष; the ledger records what this plate sets.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुरेज्यमस्थ"; alternatives "सुरेज्यभस्थ" — the glyph before स्थ reads म to me at 1.8x; the sense ('a Rasi owned by Jupiter') wants भ (surejya-BHA = Jupiter's sign). म and भ differ by one stroke in this fount and I could not separate them with confidence. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: Bhasin's plate sets भस्थ, and both English witnesses require Jupiter's sign. The constituted text now reads भस्थ.
4.17a reading here is contested

क्षीणेन्दुश्च सुधांशुजश्च भृगुजः पूर्णेन्दुजीवौ क्रमात् एकद्वित्रिचतुष्पदात्मकशुभाश्चाथेज्यशुक्रौ तथा । सौम्यस्थौ यदि नायकेन शुभदौ क्षीणेन्दुपापेन्दुजौ सूर्यो राहुकुजौ च केतुरविजौ पादाधिकात्पापदाः ॥ १७।

kṣīṇenduśca sudhāṃśujaśca bhṛgujaḥ pūrṇendujīvau kramāt ekadvitricatuṣpadātmakaśubhāścāthejyaśukrau tathā | saumyasthau yadi nāyakena śubhadau kṣīṇendupāpendujau sūryo rāhukujau ca keturavijau pādādhikātpāpadāḥ || 17|

The waning Moon and Mercury (sudhamsuja), Venus (bhr̥guja), the full Moon and Jupiter are benefic in the measure of one, two, three and four quarters (pada) respectively ⟨five planets are named against four grades, and the printed text does not make the pairing explicit⟩. And so likewise Jupiter and Venus: if they stand in a benefic ⟨place⟩ they give good along with the lord ⟨of the house⟩. The waning Moon and a Mercury joined with malefics, the Sun, Rahu and Mars, and Ketu and Saturn (ravija) are givers of evil, each by a quarter more ⟨than the one before⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभाश्चाथे"; alternatives "शुभा दृचाथे", "शुभाश्चाथें" — the aksharas between शुभा and ज्य are compressed and over-inked; I read श्चा-थे, giving subhas ca atha ijya-sukrau, which parses. A mark that may be an anusvara sits over the थे.
4.18a reading here is contested

भावानां फलकारकाश्च विमुखा नैसर्गिकाश्चाथ यद्भावेशान्वितभांशपावपि तथा तद्भावतत्कारकौ । यद्यत्कारकराशिगोऽशुभखगस्तत्तत्फलध्वंसकस्तत्तत्कारकभावयोगवशतः स्वल्पं फलं कारयेत् ॥ १८ ॥

bhāvānāṃ phalakārakāśca vimukhā naisargikāścātha yadbhāveśānvitabhāṃśapāvapi tathā tadbhāvatatkārakau | yadyatkārakarāśigo'śubhakhagastattatphaladhvaṃsakastattatkārakabhāvayogavaśataḥ svalpaṃ phalaṃ kārayet || 18 ||

The karakas that produce the results of the bhavas, ⟨when⟩ turned away, and the naisargika ⟨karakas⟩; and likewise the lords of the sign and of the amsa that are joined with the lord of a bhava — these two are the karakas of that bhava ⟨our mula now reads tad-bhava-tat-karakau, 'the karakas of that bhava', which the metre supports⟩. An inauspicious planet standing in the sign of any karaka destroys the results of that ⟨bhava⟩; and by force of that karaka's conjunction with the bhava, it makes the result small.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्भागवतकारकौ"; alternatives "तद्भावगतकारकौ" — as printed the aksharas between तद्भा and कारकौ read ग-व-त; the sense wants tad-bhava-gata-karakau ('the two karakas gone to that bhava'), i.e. व-ग-त. The two orderings are not separable at 1.7x and I did not reorder them silently. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्भावतत्कारकौ; this sentence names तद्भागवतकारकौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: read on the plate. An eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0040, this verse's second line, at about 2.4x and 4.0x native), found the press sets तद्भागवतत्कारकौ: the order ग-व-त that this note recorded, then a half-त hook set against का that this note missed, the same shape as in यद्यत्कारक and स्तत्तत्कारक on the same plate. The mūla now reads तद्भावतत्कारकौ: the half-त comes from the plate, and the ग is removed on the metre, because with it pāda 2 has twenty syllables. The alternative तद्भावगत gives twenty syllables too, and nothing on the page supports it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वशतः" — the visarga carries a downward tail that makes it resemble a superscript figure 8. The SAME artifact appears on plate 37 line 27 (वीक्षिताः). Two occurrences in one fount make this a damaged or ill-fitting visarga sort, not a footnote reference - there is no note on either plate for it to point to.
4.19a reading here is contested

पूर्णेंद्विज्यशनिध्वजाः स्वयुतभाद्द्विद्वादशच्छादकाः दुष्टश्चेद्धिषणोऽपि रिःफभवने शेषाः पुरच्छादकाः । दृष्ट्या क्षेत्रयुतेन वा सहयुजान्योन्यर्क्षयुक्तेन वा सर्वे भावपभावकारकखगाः शक्ताः क्रमाद्योगदाः ॥ १९ ॥

pūrṇeṃdvijyaśanidhvajāḥ svayutabhāddvidvādaśacchādakāḥ duṣṭaśceddhiṣaṇo'pi riḥphabhavane śeṣāḥ puracchādakāḥ | dṛṣṭyā kṣetrayutena vā sahayujānyonyarkṣayuktena vā sarve bhāvapabhāvakārakakhagāḥ śaktāḥ kramādyogadāḥ || 19 ||

The full Moon, Jupiter (ijya), Saturn and the Banner ⟨Ketu⟩ eclipse the 2nd and the 12th from the sign they occupy. If Jupiter (dhisana) ⟨our mula now reads dhisano, a name of Jupiter, on the lexicon; an eye reading of the plate gave dhipano, which is no word⟩, be afflicted, ⟨he eclipses⟩ even in the 12th house; the rest eclipse the house in front. By aspect, or by conjunction in the same field, or by being joined with one another's signs, all the planets that are lords of the bhavas and karakas of the bhavas become able, in order, to give yoga.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विपणो"; alternatives "द्विजपो" — as printed the aksharas read द्वि-प-णो, which is not a planet name. The English says the hostile planet in question is JUPITER, whose common kenning is dvija-pa, 'lord of the twice-born' - द्विजपो, the same three aksharas with प and ज transposed. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दुष्टश्चेद्धिषणोऽपि; this sentence names द्विपणो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: read on the plate. An eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0040, the verse's second line, at about 2.3x native and at about 3.1x and 3.3x native beside control glyphs), found that the stack after चे is द्ध, not द्द्व: it matches four known द्ध of this press at 0.939 to 0.964 and no द्व above 0.737. The next letter is प: its counter is an open white pocket, where the ष of शेषाः on the same line carries its diagonal across. So the press sets दुष्टश्चेद्धिपणोऽपि, with no ज anywhere in the word. The mūla now reads धिषणो, Jupiter, on the lexicon (Amarakośa 1.3.24; this book's 9.40 prints धिषणस्य). द्विजपो is withdrawn: no witness sets it.]
4.20a reading here is contested

यद्यद्भावधनर्क्षसंस्थितखगस्तच्छादकाख्यस्मृतः तद्भ्रातृस्थखगोऽपि वेधकखगस्तद्बन्धुगो बन्धकः । तद्रन्ध्रे प्रतिबन्धकोऽत्र सहितात्तद्रन्ध्रवृद्धिक्षयौ स्यातां भावधनास्तभद्वयपती तन्मारकाद्यौ क्रमात् ॥२०॥

yadyadbhāvadhanarkṣasaṃsthitakhagastacchādakākhyasmṛtaḥ tadbhrātṛsthakhago'pi vedhakakhagastadbandhugo bandhakaḥ | tadrandhre pratibandhako'tra sahitāttadrandhravṛddhikṣayau syātāṃ bhāvadhanāstabhadvayapatī tanmārakādyau kramāt ||20||

A planet standing in the sign of the 2nd (dhana) from any bhava is called its chadaka ⟨eclipser⟩; a planet in the 3rd (bhratr̥) from it is the vedhaka ⟨piercer⟩; one in the 4th (bandhu) from it is the bandhaka ⟨binder⟩; and one in its 8th (randhra) is the pratibandhaka ⟨obstructer⟩. Here, according to what is joined with it, the increase and the decay of that 8th come about. And the lords of the 2nd (dhana) and the 7th (asta) from a bhava are in order its marakas ⟨killers⟩ and the rest. ⟨Our mula now reads dhana-rksa and bha-dvaya, 'the pair of signs', on the lexicon and the metre, where our first reading of the plate gave dhana-rdha and astamadgya, which are no words.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनर्ध"; alternatives "धनर्क्ष" — as printed the akshara after धन reads र्ध. The facing English says 'a planet in the 2nd place from a Bhava', which wants dhana-RKSA (the sign of the 2nd), i.e. धनर्क्ष. र्ध and र्क्ष are close in this fount at 1.7x and I did not resolve them; recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names धनर्ध, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भावधनास्तमद्ग्यपती"; alternatives "भावधनास्तमर्क्षपती", "भावाद्धनास्तमर्क्षपती" — the aksharas between अस्तम and पती are compressed and over-inked; I read द्ग्य but that yields no word. The English is unambiguous about the sense - 'the lords of the 2nd and 7th houses with respect to any Bhava are known to be the Markas' - so bhava-dhana-asta + [sign] + pati is what is wanted. Recorded as printed rather than reconstructed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads भावधनास्तभद्वयपती for भावधनास्तमद्ग्यपती, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]

मित्रक्रूरखगस्य दृष्टिरनघैः स्वाधीनवेधा स्मृता शत्रुक्रूरनिरीक्षिते न च पराधीनाख्यवेधा भवेत् । पापैः पूर्वफलं ततोन्तिमफलं सौम्यैः खलैस्तादृशं सौम्यासौम्यखगैर्बलाधिकतमैः स्याद्भाग्यमायुः क्रमात् ॥२१॥

mitrakrūrakhagasya dṛṣṭiranaghaiḥ svādhīnavedhā smṛtā śatrukrūranirīkṣite na ca parādhīnākhyavedhā bhavet | pāpaiḥ pūrvaphalaṃ tatontimaphalaṃ saumyaiḥ khalaistādṛśaṃ saumyāsaumyakhagairbalādhikatamaiḥ syādbhāgyamāyuḥ kramāt ||21||

The aspect of a friendly malefic planet, together with the sinless ⟨benefics⟩, is held to be a vedha under one's own control (svadhina) — but not when it is aspected by a hostile malefic; then it becomes the vedha called 'dependent on another' (paradhina). By malefics comes the earlier result and after it the later result by benefics, and by malefics the like. By benefic and non-benefic planets that are strongest of all, fortune and length of life come about, each in its turn.

रन्ध्रेशो व्ययषष्ठगो रिपुपतौ रन्ध्रे व्यये वा स्थिते रिःफेशोऽपि तथैव रन्ध्ररिपुभे यस्यास्ति तस्मिन्वदेत् । अन्योन्यर्क्षगता निरीक्षणयुताश्चान्यैरयुक्तेक्षिता जातोऽसौ नृपतिः प्रशस्तविभवो राजाधिराजेश्वरः ॥ २२ ॥

randhreśo vyayaṣaṣṭhago ripupatau randhre vyaye vā sthite riḥpheśo'pi tathaiva randhraripubhe yasyāsti tasminvadet | anyonyarkṣagatā nirīkṣaṇayutāścānyairayuktekṣitā jāto'sau nṛpatiḥ praśastavibhavo rājādhirājeśvaraḥ || 22 ||

When the lord of the 8th (randhra) stands in the 12th or the 6th while the lord of the enemy-house ⟨the 6th⟩ stands in the 8th or the 12th; and when the lord of the 12th (rihpha) likewise stands in the sign of the 8th or of the 6th — in whosever ⟨chart⟩ this is found, of him one should declare it. When they stand in one another's signs, aspecting and joined with each other, and are neither joined with nor aspected by others, that man is born a king of praised opulence, an overlord of kings of kings.

4.23a reading here is contested

पापा नीचगताः शुभा बलयुताः केन्द्रत्रिकोणस्थिताः खेटाः स्युर्यदि कर्मभाग्यगृहपा भाग्येऽथवा कर्मणि । राजा स्यान्मतिमान्महाधनयुतः ख्यातः प्रतापान्वितो दीर्घायुः परभूपवन्दितपदः सर्वज्ञतुल्यः सुधीः ॥ २३ ॥

pāpā nīcagatāḥ śubhā balayutāḥ kendratrikoṇasthitāḥ kheṭāḥ syuryadi karmabhāgyagṛhapā bhāgye'thavā karmaṇi | rājā syānmatimānmahādhanayutaḥ khyātaḥ pratāpānvito dīrghāyuḥ parabhūpavanditapadaḥ sarvajñatulyaḥ sudhīḥ || 23 ||

If the malefics are in debilitation, and the benefics are endowed with strength and stand in the kendras and trikonas; and if the lords of the 10th (karma), the 9th (bhāgya) and the 4th (gṛha) stand together in the 9th or in the 10th — then ⟨the native⟩ becomes a king, intelligent, possessed of great wealth, renowned, full of majesty, long-lived, his feet honoured by other kings, and wise as one omniscient.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुणा"; alternatives "गुना", "शुभा", "सौम्या" — NOT SETTLED. Examined to 6.6x. Two aksharas: the first carries a u-matra and a top I read as गु though शु is possible; the second is ण or न with an a-matra. As printed the word is not Sanskrit in this context. Paired with पापा ('malefics') the sense wants a word for benefics - शुभा or सौम्या - and neither matches the ink well. Left as read rather than emended. RESOLVED 2026-09-08 by the second exemplar: Bhasin prints शुभा, one of the two words this note named. The constituted text now reads शुभा.
4.24a reading here is contested

लग्नास्ताम्बुखभं चतुष्टयमिदं केन्द्राभिधं कण्टकं तत्केन्द्रात्परभे भवेत्पणफरं चापोक्लिमं तत्परम् । भाग्यं पंचमभं त्रिकोणमिति तद्भ्रात्रायकर्मारिभं नाम्ना चोपचयं जनीन्दुभवनं लग्नं च जन्मादयः ॥ २४ ॥

lagnāstāmbukhabhaṃ catuṣṭayamidaṃ kendrābhidhaṃ kaṇṭakaṃ tatkendrātparabhe bhavetpaṇapharaṃ cāpoklimaṃ tatparam | bhāgyaṃ paṃcamabhaṃ trikoṇamiti tadbhrātrāyakarmāribhaṃ nāmnā copacayaṃ janīndubhavanaṃ lagnaṃ ca janmādayaḥ || 24 ||

The 1st (lagna), the 7th (asta), the 4th (ambu) and the 10th (kha): this set of four is called kendra, and also kantaka. The sign next after that kendra is the panaphara, and the one next after that is the apoklima. The 9th (bhagya) and the 5th sign are the trikona. The 3rd (bhratr̥), the 11th (aya), the 10th (karma) and the 6th (ari) are called by name the upacaya. And the house occupied by the birth-Moon, together with the lagna, are the janma ⟨rasis⟩ and the rest.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नास्ता"; alternatives "लग्नास्सा" — settled at 2.8x on the parse rather than on the ink alone: the conjunct after ग्ना is स् with a descending subscript, i.e. स्त, giving lagna-ASTA-ambu-kha = 1st, 7th, 4th, 10th - exactly the English's 'The 1st, 4th, 7th and the 10th Bhavas'. Read as स्सा the line yields no house list.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पणफरं"; alternatives "तरणकरं" — at 1.7x this reads तरणकरं, which is not a term; पणफरं (panaphara) is what the sense and the English require, and the ण/र and फ/क confusions are both live in this fount at that size.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मेन्दु"; alternatives "जर्नान्दु" — the faint printing on this plate makes the न्मे/र्ना distinction unreliable; जन्मेन्दुभवनं ('the house of the birth-Moon') is what the English's 'the Bhava occupied by the Moon is termed Janma Rasi' requires. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जनीन्दुभवनं; this sentence names जन्मेन्दुभवनं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this on the page. An eye reading of the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0043.png, printed folio 41, mūla line 8) at about 4.0x native found a full-height ī-mātrā after न, which जन्मे cannot have; the cluster matches the नी of जननी on the same plate. The press sets जनीन्दुभवनं, the reading our mūla now holds, so the न्मे/र्ना distinction is not unreliable on the larger master. जनि + इन्दु gives the same birth-Moon the English asks for, so the claim above that जन्मेन्दुभवनं is what the English requires is superseded.]

रुद्रात्मा सविता पिता च जननी शक्त्यात्मकश्चन्द्रमा भौमेन्दूद्भवजीवशुक्ररविजास्तत्पञ्चभूतोद्भवाः । सत्त्वाज्जीवकवीन्दुजाश्च रजसो भौमस्तमोजः शनिः सूर्येन्दू न तु मारकावहितपौ रन्ध्राधिपावार्तिदौ ॥ २५ ॥

rudrātmā savitā pitā ca jananī śaktyātmakaścandramā bhaumendūdbhavajīvaśukraravijāstatpañcabhūtodbhavāḥ | sattvājjīvakavīndujāśca rajaso bhaumastamojaḥ śaniḥ sūryendū na tu mārakāvahitapau randhrādhipāvārtidau || 25 ||

The Sun (savitr̥), whose self is Rudra, is the father, and the Moon, whose nature is Sakti, is the mother. Mars, Mercury (indudbhava), Jupiter, Venus and Saturn (ravija) arise from the five elements. From sattva are born Jupiter, Venus (kavi) and Mercury (induja); of rajas is Mars ⟨our mula now reads rajaso, the ablative; the earlier text had the dual rajasau⟩; and Saturn is born of tamas. The Sun and the Moon are not marakas ⟨killers⟩, but as lords of the 6th (ahita) and of the 8th (randhra) they are givers of pain.

4.26a reading here is contested

षट्सप्ताष्टमभेषु सौम्यखचरास्त्विन्दोः स्थिता नो खला राजा स्यादथवा समो यदि तदा जातो महासौख्यवान् । दीर्घायुर्विजयान्वितोखिलयशो विद्याविनोदान्वितो दारापुत्रसुहृद्गृहादिविविधानन्दास्पदो यानवान् ॥ २६ ॥

ṣaṭsaptāṣṭamabheṣu saumyakhacarāstvindoḥ sthitā no khalā rājā syādathavā samo yadi tadā jāto mahāsaukhyavān | dīrghāyurvijayānvitokhilayaśo vidyāvinodānvito dārāputrasuhṛdgṛhādivividhānandāspado yānavān || 26 ||

If benefic planets stand in the 6th, 7th and 8th signs from the Moon and no malefics do, then the one born is a king or else his equal, and enjoys great ease: long-lived, endowed with victory, of universal fame, gifted with learning and delight, a seat of manifold joys — wife, sons, friends, house and the rest — and possessed of vehicles. ⟨Our mula now reads khacaras tv indoh, khacarah + tu + indoh, as an eye reading of the plate gave it, so no stray ri stands in the word.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षट्सप्ता"; alternatives "षड्रसा", "षट्सप्त" — the second and third aksharas are heavily inked and I read them variously as ट्स/ड्र and प्ता/सा. The English gives the houses as the 6th, 7th and 8th, which requires sat-sapta-astama; recorded on that basis with the alternatives kept.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरारिन्दोः"; alternatives "चरा इन्दोः", "चरेन्दोः" — a रि appears between चरा and न्दोः where the sandhi of saumya-khacarah + indoh would want none. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सौम्यखचरास्त्विन्दोः; this sentence names चरारिन्दोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: refuted on the plate. An eye reading of our exemplar, the 1993 printing (jp2 page_0044, the verse's first line, at about 2.7x and 3.3x native, the sorts measured as connected components), found an i-sign over a र-shaped स्-half with a thin broken tail, then a small hooked half-त, then a व with a closed counter, before न्दोः. So the press sets खचरास्त्विन्दोः, khacarāḥ + tu + indoḥ, the regular sandhi. The रि this note saw is the र-shaped स्-half under its i-sign, and the note missed the त्व after it. The ruling found the same four sorts in कस्त्विति (store page_0049 line 31) by measuring the master, not by viewing it. The mūla now reads खचरास्त्विन्दोः.]
4.27a reading here is contested

अर्कान्नागचटस्तनुर्जननटःखेटायनंस्युस्तनोः चन्द्राद्भाग्यपयोः कलैक्यमिनहृच्छिष्टं विधोर्यद्गृहम् । तद्राशौ तु विपापशोभनखगे कोटीश्वरं तं वदे चेत्पापे तु सहस्रशः खलखगे तुङ्गेऽपि कोटीश्वरम् ॥ २७ ॥

arkānnāgacaṭastanurjananaṭaḥkheṭāyanaṃsyustanoḥ candrādbhāgyapayoḥ kalaikyaminahṛcchiṣṭaṃ vidhoryadgṛham | tadrāśau tu vipāpaśobhanakhage koṭīśvaraṃ taṃ vade cetpāpe tu sahasraśaḥ khalakhage tuṅge'pi koṭīśvaram || 27 ||

From the Sun ⟨onward the numbers are⟩ 30 (naga), 16 (cata), 6 (tanu), 8 (jana), 10 (nata), 12 (kheta) and 1 (ayana): these belong to the tanu ⟨the lagna⟩. From the Moon, the sum of the minutes (kala) of the Moon and of the lord of the 9th, divided by twelve (ina), leaves a remainder which is the house of the Moon. If in that rasi there stands a benefic planet free of malefics, call him a kotisvara ⟨master of a crore⟩; but if a malefic is there, ⟨he is master⟩ of thousands only — though even then, if the malefic planet is exalted, ⟨he is⟩ a kotisvara. ⟨The arabic figures are the edition's glosses on the number-words, not part of the verse; three of the seven are printed with an opening bracket and no closing one, and kotisvaram at its second occurrence is broken across a word-space.⟩

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

अर्कान्नाग(30 चट(16 स्तनु(6)र्जन(8)नटः(10 खेटा(12)यनं(1)स्युस्तनोः चन्द्राद्भाग्यपयोः कलैक्यमिन(12)हृच्छिष्टं विधोर्यद्गृहम् । तद्राशौ तु विपापशोभनखगे कोटीश्वरं तं वदे चेत्पापे तु सहस्रशः खलखगे तुङ्गंपि कं टीश्वरम् ॥ २७ ॥

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(30 / (16 / (10" — three of the seven parenthesised figures are printed with an OPENING bracket and no closing one; the other four (6), (8), (12), (1) are closed. As set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्कान्नाग"; alternatives "अर्कान्न नाग", "अर्कात् नाग" — read अर्कात् + नाग with the त्+न assimilation as printed; the English's 'the seven planets from the Sun onwards' confirms arkat ('from the Sun').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वदे"; alternatives "वदेत्" — printed without the final virama-त्; the optative vadet is required. As set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कं टीश्वरम्"; alternatives "कोटीश्वरम्" — printed as two pieces with a word space inside the word, and with an anusvara on the first - a broken setting of कोटीश्वरम्, the same word correctly set in line 20.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तुङ्गंपि"; alternatives "तुङ्गेऽपि" — an anusvara stands where the avagraha + e-matra of tunge'pi belongs. As set.
  • About this edition: This verse's mūla carries ARABIC FIGURES set inside the Devanāgarī — the edition's own gloss of a bhūtasaṅkhyā or a computed value, not part of the text. They are kept because the corpus records what the page sets, and flagged because a modern editor's arithmetic standing where the Sanskrit is would otherwise read as the text itself.
  • About this edition: This verse's mūla carried ARABIC FIGURES set inside the Devanāgarī — the edition's own gloss of a bhūtasaṅkhyā or a computed value, not part of the text. They were STRIPPED from the constituted mūla on 2026-09-08 and the line as the plate sets them is kept in `diplomatic`. The second exemplar (Bhasin, Ranjan 2019) sets none of them and prints the same glosses separately, in Devanāgarī, outside the verse. [2026-09-23: the diplomatic line is wrong at one locus. An eye reading of the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0044.png, printed folio 42, mūla line 7) at about 3.8x native found that the press sets स्तनु(6)र्जन(8): the mark over the ज is a repha, not an ai-mātrā, measured against two rephas and several e- and ai-mātrās on these plates. The diplomatic line gives स्तनु(6)जैन(8). The closing bracket of (6) and the opening bracket of (8) are both printed, as it records.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अर्कान्नागचटस्तनुर्जननटःखेटायनंस्युस्तनोः; this sentence names जैन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
4.28a reading here is contested

द्वेध्वायाङ्कगृहेश्वराः कतिपयाः सर्वेपि वा खेचराः संबन्धत्रयगा बलेन सहिता लक्षाधिपं कुर्वते । षष्ठाष्टव्ययभावपैर्यदि भवेत्तत्र क्षयर्णप्रदाः तत्तत्खेटदशाविपाकसमये शत्रोर्भयं चादिशेत् ॥ २८ ॥

dvedhvāyāṅkagṛheśvarāḥ katipayāḥ sarvepi vā khecarāḥ saṃbandhatrayagā balena sahitā lakṣādhipaṃ kurvate | ṣaṣṭhāṣṭavyayabhāvapairyadi bhavettatra kṣayarṇapradāḥ tattatkheṭadaśāvipākasamaye śatrorbhayaṃ cādiśet || 28 ||

The lords of the houses 2 (dve), 5 (dhva), 11 (ya) and 9 (anka) — some of them, or indeed all the planets — standing in a threefold relation and endowed with strength, make ⟨the native⟩ master of a lakh. If it be with the lords of the 6th, the 8th and the 12th, they give loss and debt there; and at the time when the dasa of each such planet ripens, one should also predict fear from an enemy.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

द्वे(2)ध्वा(5)या(11)ङ्क(9)गृहेश्वराः कतिपयाः सर्वेपि वा खचराः संबन्धत्रयगा बलेन सहिता लक्षाधिपं कुर्वते । षष्ठाष्टव्ययभावपैर्यदि भवेत्तत्र क्षयर्णप्रदाः तत्तत्खेटदशाविपाकसमये शत्रोर्भयं चादिशेत् ॥ २८ ॥

10 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संबन्ध"; alternatives "सम्बन्ध" — dot above the first akshara is a clean round anusvara at 6x of the raw scan, not a m+virama conjunct; recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलेन"; alternatives "वलेन" — ba/va counter test applied at 5.5x: the bowl carries a distinct horizontal bar entering from the left at mid-height, absent in the va of 'व्यय' on line 2. Reading ba is settled, not inferred
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुर्वते"; alternatives "कुर्वंते" — repha over the va is clear; no anusvara on the final; e-matra on -te confirmed at 5x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठाष्ट"; alternatives "षष्ठाष्ठ" — second conjunct read ṣṭa (Ta, flat-bottomed) rather than ṣṭha; the ṣṭha of 'षष्ठा' two aksharas earlier is visibly different in the same line, which is what settles it
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पैर्यदि"; alternatives "पैर्य दि", "पैः यदि" — repha sits over the ya; printed solid with no word space, i.e. bhavapair yadi run together
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षयर्ण"; alternatives "क्षयर्ण", "क्षयार्ण" — repha over ṇa clear; no a-matra before it
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपाकसमये"; alternatives "विपाक्समये", "विपाक.समये" — IMPORTANT: a small round mark sits at low-x-height between the ka and the sa. At 7x it is a blob at baseline, NOT the diagonal below-stroke this fount uses for virama (compare the clear virama on चादिशेत् at the end of the same line). Read as stray ink / broken type and transcribed without it; the alternatives are what it would be if it is type
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शत्रोर्भयं"; alternatives "शत्रोर्भयम्" — anusvara dot above -yaṃ, not a subscript nasal; checked at 4.2x
  • About this edition: This verse's mūla carries ARABIC FIGURES set inside the Devanāgarī — the edition's own gloss of a bhūtasaṅkhyā or a computed value, not part of the text. They are kept because the corpus records what the page sets, and flagged because a modern editor's arithmetic standing where the Sanskrit is would otherwise read as the text itself.
  • About this edition: This verse's mūla carried ARABIC FIGURES set inside the Devanāgarī — the edition's own gloss of a bhūtasaṅkhyā or a computed value, not part of the text. They were STRIPPED from the constituted mūla on 2026-09-08 and the line as the plate sets them is kept in `diplomatic`. The second exemplar (Bhasin, Ranjan 2019) sets none of them and prints the same glosses separately, in Devanāgarī, outside the verse.
4.29a reading here is contested

चेल्लग्नादिचतुष्टये पणफरे सर्वेऽपि खेटाः स्थिताः चापोक्लीबगृहे न चेदिह भवेज्जातो नरो भूपतिः । चेन्न क्रूरयुतेक्षिताः शुभखगाश्चन्द्रोऽपि पूर्णस्तथा स श्रीमान् सुजनेडितो बलयुताः पूर्णे न चेदूनता ॥ २९ ।

cellagnādicatuṣṭaye paṇaphare sarve'pi kheṭāḥ sthitāḥ cāpoklībagṛhe na cediha bhavejjāto naro bhūpatiḥ | cenna krūrayutekṣitāḥ śubhakhagāścandro'pi pūrṇastathā sa śrīmān sujaneḍito balayutāḥ pūrṇe na cedūnatā || 29 |

If all the planets stand in the four ⟨houses⟩ beginning with the lagna ⟨the kendras⟩ and in the panapharas, and none in the apoklima houses, then the man born here becomes a lord of the earth. If the benefic planets are not joined with or aspected by malefics, and the Moon too is full, then he is prosperous and praised by good men. When they are endowed with strength ⟨this holds⟩ in full; if not, there is deficiency. ⟨The word rendered apoklima — the Greek loanword for the cadent houses — is printed apokliba: at high magnification the aksara matches this fount's ba and not its ma, and it is recorded as the ink reads.⟩

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेल्लग्नादि"; alternatives "चेह्लग्नादि" — conjunct after ce read ll (ced+lagna sandhi); at 4.2x the doubled la is clearer than an h-la would be
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वेऽपि"; alternatives "सर्वेंऽपि" — checked at 8x on the marks above: what looks at low zoom like an anusvara is the REPHA of -rve combined with the e-matra. The avagraha is separately and unambiguously present as a full glyph. No anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुष्टये"; alternatives "चतुष्ठये" — ṣṭa not ṣṭha
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चापोक्लीब"; alternatives "चापोक्लीम", "चापोक्लिम", "चापोक्लीव" — THE HARDEST MARK ON THIS PLATE and I could not settle it on the ink. The akshara before -gṛhe was compared at 9x against a known ma (śrīmān) and a known ba (balayutāḥ) on line 4 of the same verse, same fount, same line depth. It presents an open bowl with a left-entering bar, which matches the ba and not the ma (whose bowl closes at the bottom-left). But SENSE pulls the other way: the English on this plate renders the word 'Apoklima', i.e. Sanskrit आपोक्लिम, the Greek loanword for the cadent houses, which requires ma. Metre does not discriminate (either gives 19 syllables for the Sardulavikridita pada). Recorded as the ink reads; the semantic alternative is first in the list. The i-matra is LONG (ī): its vertical falls to the RIGHT of the conjunct.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षिताः"; alternatives "क्षिता" — visarga prints faint but both dots resolve at 3.8x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चन्द्रोऽपि"; alternatives "चंद्रोऽपि" — nasal before -dra read as the subscript n of the ndra conjunct, not a free anusvara
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ २९ ।"; alternatives "॥ २९ ॥" — OPENING mark is unambiguously a double danda; the CLOSING mark reads at 6x as ONE heavy stroke, not two. Either a single danda was set, or a double danda has blotted into one. Recorded as seen.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्ण"; alternatives "पूर्णं" — printed with NO anusvara where the syntax wants the neuter -ṃ; recorded as printed [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पूर्णं for पूर्ण, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the correction to पूर्णं was withdrawn and the mūla reads पूर्ण again, so the sentence of 2026-09-20 above no longer describes the text. An eye reading of the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0046.png, store line index 13) at about 4.4x native, with the ink measured on the greyscale master, found only the repha over पूर्ण and no anusvāra or other mark beside it, which confirms this note. पूर्णं is carried by no witness we hold; uk-bhasin-hindi prints पूर्णे, read by eye at about 6.0x native, inside a different construction. The metrical fault at position 14 is this verse's open doubt.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्ण; this sentence names पूर्णं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads पूर्णे on the metre; the press sets पूर्ण, read by eye on the plate at about 4.4x native. uk-ps-sastri prints बलयुताः पूर्णे, read by eye on 2026-09-30 at about 7x and 8x, and uk-bhasin-hindi prints बलयुतः पूर्णे (पूर्णे read by eye at about 6.0x native). The machine read of uk-ps-sastri, which gave बलयुतः पूर्ण, had lost the ā-mātrā and the e-mātrā. The sentences above that keep पूर्ण and call पूर्णे a reading inside a different construction describe the text and the evidence before this ruling.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलयुताः"; alternatives "वलयुताः" — ba/va counter test: bar clearly present in the bowl; this glyph is the reference ba used to adjudicate line 12
4.30a reading here is contested

रात्र्यर्द्धाद् द्युदलात्परं यदि भवेज्जातो द्विनाड्यात्मके काले स्यान्नृपतिर्जितारिरनिशंस्वा चारविद्यान्वितः । वित्ते तूच्चखगे स्वतुङ्गगखगाद् दृष्टेऽपि कोटीश्वरः स्वर्क्षस्तेन यदीक्षिते स हि भवेल्लक्षाधिकारी सुखी ॥ ३० ॥

rātryarddhād dyudalātparaṃ yadi bhavejjāto dvināḍyātmake kāle syānnṛpatirjitāriraniśaṃsvā cāravidyānvitaḥ | vitte tūccakhage svatuṅgagakhagād dṛṣṭe'pi koṭīśvaraḥ svarkṣastena yadīkṣite sa hi bhavellakṣādhikārī sukhī || 30 ||

If one is born after midnight or after midday, within a span of two nadis, he becomes a king, a conqueror of his enemies, and is always endowed with good conduct and learning. If an exalted planet is in the 2nd (vitta) and is aspected by a planet standing in its own exaltation, he is a kotisvara ⟨master of a crore⟩; and if it is aspected by one standing in its own sign, he becomes master of a lakh, and happy. ⟨For sva-rksa-sthena, 'by one standing in its own sign', the plate reads sva-rksa-stena; the conjunct is a real doubt, not a formality.⟩

11 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रात्र्यर्द्धाद्"; alternatives "रात्र्यर्धाद्", "रात्र्यर्द्धांद्" — checked at 7x: the mark above the -rddhā is the REPHA hook, NOT an anusvara - at 3.8x it reads as a dot and I first recorded it as one. Correction made on the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्युदलात्"; alternatives "घुदलात्", "युदलात्" — initial conjunct is dya+u (dyu), not gha; resolved at 7x. dyu-dala = midday, matching ratri-ardha = midnight
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विनाड्यात्मके"; alternatives "द्विनाड्यात्मकै" — final matra read as single e; a second stroke would make -kai
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अनिशं"; alternatives "अनृशं" — resolved at 8x: the vowel under na is a SHORT I to the left, not the ṛ hook below. So aniśaṃ (constantly), not anṛśaṃsa (uncruel).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वा चार"; alternatives "स्वाचार" — PRINTED WITH A WORD SPACE inside svācāra: the plate sets 'niśaṃsvā' then a space then 'cāravidyānvitaḥ'. Recorded as printed; the intended division is aniśaṃ svācāra-vidyānvitaḥ. Verified at 8x - the gap is a real space, wider than the inter-akshara gaps around it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वा"; alternatives "ख्वा", "स्रा" — sa+va conjunct; at 3.9x it can be taken for sra, which is why it was re-read at 8x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तूच्चखगे"; alternatives "तुच्चखगे" — u-matra read LONG (tū = tu + ucca by sandhi); short u would break the sandhi that produces ucca 'exalted'
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वतुङ्गगखगाद्"; alternatives "स्वतुङ्गखगाद्" — a doubled ga is printed (tuṅga-ga-khagād); recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टेऽपि"; alternatives "दृष्टेपि" — avagraha present as a full glyph
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वर्क्षस्तेन"; alternatives "स्वर्क्षस्थेन" — the penultimate conjunct is read sta; sense wants stha (sva-ṛkṣa-sthena, 'by one standing in its own sign'). At 3.3x the tha loop is not visible. NOT SETTLED - this is a real doubt, not a formality.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३० ॥"; alternatives "॥ ३० ।" — closing double danda here reads as two strokes, unlike verse 29's
4.31a reading here is contested

प्राबल्यं चरभात् स्थिरं स्थिरगृहात्स्याद्द्विस्वभावं तथा दृष्टिश्छादकवेधकस्थितभवात्तद्वच्च राशित्रये । आद्या द्वौ त्रिषु मध्यमा त्रिषु ततः स्वान्त्या त्रिषूक्तक्रमात् द्रेक्काणेष्वपि पूर्णमध्यमकृशं दद्युः फलं खेचराः ॥ ३१ ॥

prābalyaṃ carabhāt sthiraṃ sthiragṛhātsyāddvisvabhāvaṃ tathā dṛṣṭiśchādakavedhakasthitabhavāttadvacca rāśitraye | ādyā dvau triṣu madhyamā triṣu tataḥ svāntyā triṣūktakramāt drekkāṇeṣvapi pūrṇamadhyamakṛśaṃ dadyuḥ phalaṃ khecarāḥ || 31 ||

Strength ⟨is reckoned⟩ from a movable sign; from a fixed house it is steady; and so likewise for the dual. So too the aspect, ⟨reckoned⟩ from the house in which the chadaka and the vedhaka stand — and in like manner throughout the three ⟨classes of⟩ rasi. The first, and two among the three; the middle among the three; and then one's own last among the three, in the order stated. In the drekkanas too the planets give results that are full, middling and meagre. ⟨In the third pada a feminine adya stands beside a masculine dual dvau; the concord is faulty as printed and the clause is rendered as it stands.⟩

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विस्वभाव"; alternatives "द्विस्वभावं", "द्विस्वभावात्" — printed with no final anusvara and no ablative ending, though the parallel with charabhat/sthiragrhat wants one; recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थिरगृहात्स्याद्"; alternatives "स्थिरगृहात्स्यात्" — final read as voiced d with virama before the following dvi-
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवात्"; alternatives "मवात्" — bha/ma: the glyph carries the bha crossbar rather than the ma closed bowl at 3.5x; sense (bhava, the house) agrees
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टिश्छादक"; alternatives "दृष्टिच्छादक" — the sibilant before -chadaka read as sha (sandhi of dṛṣṭiḥ + chādaka); a plain c-cha would also be possible printing
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिषु"; alternatives "लिषु" — occurs three times on this line; the tra-conjunct is confirmed at 4x by its ra-hook, which la lacks. All three read alike.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वान्त्या"; alternatives "स्वान्या" — conjunct read ntya
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आद्या द्वौ"; alternatives "आद्या ट्वौ" — dvau (dual) read on the d-form; grammatically the feminine adya beside a masculine dual is odd and I flag it rather than emend
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रेक्काणेष्वपि"; alternatives "द्रेष्काणेष्वपि", "द्रेक्काणेष्वपि" — the doubled k is printed (drekkana, not dreṣkāṇa); recorded as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृशं"; alternatives "कृशम्" — anusvara, not a subscript nasal
4.32a reading here is contested

योगस्याप्यवयोगजस्य विवृतौ तद्योगकर्त्रोर्द्वयोः मन्दोग्रेप्यथ पृष्ठतश्चलखगस्तद्द्वादशांशान्तरे । रूपं शून्यलवे भवेद्रविलवे खं चानुपातात्फलं सूर्यांशैश्चलखेचरेग्रलवगे तत्रेष्टविध्वंसकः ॥ ३२ ॥

yogasyāpyavayogajasya vivṛtau tadyogakartrordvayoḥ mandogrepyatha pṛṣṭhataścalakhagastaddvādaśāṃśāntare | rūpaṃ śūnyalave bhavedravilave khaṃ cānupātātphalaṃ sūryāṃśaiścalakhecaregralavage tatreṣṭavidhvaṃsakaḥ || 32 ||

In the exposition of the yoga and also of what is born of the avayoga ⟨the yoga's falling away⟩: of the two planets that make that yoga, the slow one stands ahead and the moving one behind, within an interval of twelve degrees of it. At the zero degree ⟨of separation⟩ the value is one rupa (rupa = 1); at the twelfth degree (ravi = 12) it is nought (kha = 0); and the result between is found by proportion (anupata). When the moving planet, by the Sun's degrees, stands in the degree ahead, it there destroys what is desired. ⟨Our mula now reads vidhvamsaka, 'destroyer'; a plate reading on 2026-09-23 could not tell dhva from ghna in this fount, and the earlier vighnamsaka is not a word. Two elisions in this verse are set without the avagraha the sandhi requires, though the same fount sets a full avagraha elsewhere.⟩

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगास्याप्यत्र"; alternatives "योगस्याप्यत्र" — the second akshara carries a LONG a-matra at 4.3x, giving yogasya an unexpected yogāsya. Sense wants yogasyāpy atra. Recorded as printed; not emended. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads योगस्याप्यवयोगजस्य for योगास्याप्यत्रयोगजस्य, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass read this word by eye on the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0047.png, printed folio 45, store line index 25) at about 4.13x and 4.24x native. The press sets योगास्याप्यवयोगजस्य. The long ā of गा is printed, as this note says, but the fifth akṣara is व (42 px wide, like the व of लवगे on the same leaf) and not त्र (about 72 px in this fount). So अत्र was a misreading of the press's व, and our mūla's अव repairs it; our योगस्य emends the press's योगास्य on the grammar.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्त्रोर्द्वयोः"; alternatives "कर्त्रोर्द्वयो" — final visarga present
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्दोग्रेप्यथ"; alternatives "मन्दोऽग्रेऽप्यथ" — checked at 7.5x specifically for avagrahas: NONE is printed, at either elision point, though the sandhi (mando 'gre 'py atha) calls for two. Contrast plate 46 line 11, where this same fount does set a full avagraha glyph. So the omission here is a setting decision, not a fount limitation - and that makes it evidence. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रविलवे"; alternatives "रविलवे" — ravi here is almost certainly the bhutasamkhya word-numeral for TWELVE, which is what ties the verse to the English '12 degrees'. Reading is not in doubt; the sense note is.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खं"; alternatives "खं" — kha = zero, again a word-numeral. rupa (=1) and kha (=0) bracket the full-to-nil scale.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विघ्नंसकः"; alternatives "विध्वंसकः" — NOT SETTLED. At 4x the conjunct reads ghna+anusvara, giving a non-word vighnaṃsaka. Sense wants vidhvaṃsaka (destroyer), and the fount's dhva and ghna are close at this size. Recorded as the ink reads, with the word that would make sense first in the alternatives. This is a real doubt. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्रेष्टविध्वंसकः; this sentence names vighnaṃsaka and विघ्नंसकः, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected them, and they are kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass looked at this conjunct again at about 4.24x and 4.93x native on the 2900 px master (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0047.png, store line 28) and could not separate ध्व from घ्न either. So our mūla's विध्वंसकः does not rest on the ink. It rests on the lexicon, since विघ्नंसकः is not a word, and on the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चलखेचरेग्रलवगे"; alternatives "चलखेचरेऽग्रलवगे" — again no avagraha where the elision requires one - the same omission as line 27, on the same plate
4.33a reading here is contested

तद्योगप्रदयोर्यदेकमपि वा चन्द्रः प्रपश्येद्बली स्थानात्प्रोक्तलवैर्विशेषफलकृत्षष्ठाष्टरिःफान्विना । पश्यन्त्येव खगाः समस्तभवनान्युच्चे स्वभे चोत्तमाः तत्राधीष्टगृहे समा इतरधा हीनाः फलप्रापणे ॥ ३३ ॥

tadyogapradayoryadekamapi vā candraḥ prapaśyedbalī sthānātproktalavairviśeṣaphalakṛtṣaṣṭhāṣṭariḥphānvinā | paśyantyeva khagāḥ samastabhavanānyucce svabhe cottamāḥ tatrādhīṣṭagṛhe samā itaradhā hīnāḥ phalaprāpaṇe || 33 ||

If the Moon, being strong, aspects even one of the two that confer that yoga, ⟨reckoned⟩ from its place by the degrees stated, it produces a special result — the 6th, the 8th and the 12th (rihpha) excepted. Planets do indeed aspect all the houses. In exaltation and in their own sign they are the best; there, in an adhi-ista house ⟨a greatly favoured one⟩, they are middling; otherwise they are deficient in bringing a result about. ⟨The plate reads adhi-ista, not adhimitra: the edition's own English glosses it 'a very friendly Bhava', which is a gloss on a different word from the one the fivefold-friendship scheme would use. The divergence is carried, not corrected.⟩

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदेकमपि"; alternatives "यद्येकमपि" — read yad ekam api; a conditional yady would want a further y
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रपश्येद्बली"; alternatives "प्रपश्येद्वली" — ba/va counter test on the last akshara: bar present, so bali (strong), which the English confirms
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफ"; alternatives "रिष्फ" — riḥpha with a VISARGA inside the word (the Greek loanword for the 12th house). Printed with visarga, not the ṣpha conjunct. Same spelling recurs twice on line 12 of this plate, so it is the edition's habit, not a one-off.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठाष्टरिःफान्विना"; alternatives "षष्ठाष्टरिःफैर्विना" — the exclusion of 6/8/12 is certain from sense and from the English; the case ending is what I am unsure of
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवनान्युच्चे"; alternatives "भवनान्युच्चैः" — locative ucce (in exaltation) read; the parallel svabhe (in own sign) is locative too, which supports it
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्राधीष्टगृहे"; alternatives "तत्राधिमित्रगृहे", "तत्रातिमित्रगृहे" — Re-read at 8x BECAUSE the English renders it 'a very friendly Bhava', which in this literature is normally adhimitra. The plate does NOT read adhimitra: the aksharas are ta-tra-dhi(long)-ṣṭa-gṛ-he, unambiguously, with a long i and a ṣṭa conjunct. So adhiṣṭa (adhi+iṣṭa, 'greatly favoured') is what is printed, and the translator's 'very friendly' is a gloss on a different word from the one the pancadha-maitri scheme would use. Recorded as printed - this is a divergence worth carrying, not a misreading.
4.34a reading here is contested

भावेशो भवनाच्च यावति गृहे तिष्ठेत्पदं तावतील्यक्तं तत्पदतः शुभाशुभवशात्तद्ध्रासवृद्धी वदेत् । एवं लग्नधनाम्बुधीस्मरगुरुक्ष्मेशैश्च रिःफात्पदा न्यष्टौ रिःफगृहाद् भवेदुपपदं दारापदं सप्तमात् ॥ ३४ ॥

bhāveśo bhavanācca yāvati gṛhe tiṣṭhetpadaṃ tāvatīlyaktaṃ tatpadataḥ śubhāśubhavaśāttaddhrāsavṛddhī vadet | evaṃ lagnadhanāmbudhīsmaragurukṣmeśaiśca riḥphātpadā nyaṣṭau riḥphagṛhād bhavedupapadaṃ dārāpadaṃ saptamāt || 34 ||

The pada of a bhava lies as many houses ⟨onward⟩ from that bhava as the lord of the bhava stands ⟨from it⟩ — so much is said ⟨joined across the line-break the plate gives tavati-lyaktam, which is not Sanskrit; tavad ity uktam, 'so much is said', is what the sense wants, and it is flagged as a probable compositor's error rather than emended⟩. From that pada, according to the benefics and malefics ⟨that affect it⟩, one should declare its decrease and increase. In this way the eight padas are formed with the 1st (lagna), the 2nd (dhana), the 4th (ambudhi, the ocean), the 5th (dhi), the 7th (smara), the 9th (guru), the 10th (ksmesa) and the 12th (rihpha). And from the 12th house arises the upapada, and from the 7th the darapada.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तावती-"; alternatives "तावती" — the line ENDS ON A HYPHEN - the compositor broke a word across the line. Recorded with the hyphen because the break is evidence; see line 20 for why the join does not resolve. [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass measured this mark on the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0048.png, printed folio 46) at about 5.60x native: line 18 ends तावती and a horizontal rule 72 px long and 19-20 px thick at mid-height, which is a hyphen. The T44 pass of the same day ruled it a printer's line break and removed it, so the mūla now reads तावतील्यक्तं, joined, with the press's letters unchanged.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ल्यक्तं"; alternatives "त्युक्तं", "त्यक्तं", "ल्यक्तम्" — READ AT 8.5x AND STILL A PROBLEM. The opening akshara is la+subscript-ya (the la's bottom-left curl is present and distinguishes it from ta), then kta with anusvara. But joined to the hyphenated 'tavati-' ending line 19 it yields 'tavatilyaktam', which is not a Sanskrit word. Either the hyphen is a false break, or a sort is wrong. The sense the passage needs is something like tavad ity uktam ('so much is said'), which would want t(y)uktam - first in the alternatives. FLAGGED AS A PROBABLE COMPOSITOR'S ERROR rather than emended. [2026-09-23: this note stands. A correction to तावतीत्युक्तं written on 2026-09-20 was withdrawn on 2026-09-23, and the mūla again reads what the press sets, now joined as तावतील्यक्तं. The T45 plate pass read the akṣara by eye at about 5.60x native on the 2900 px master (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0048.png, printed folio 46, store line index 19): it is ल्य, with the ल's closed bottom-left curl, like the ल of लग्न beneath it, and there is no u-mātrā, by measurement. The form is still not a word, and this verse's doubt carries the question.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्ध्रासवृद्धी"; alternatives "तद्ध्रासवृद्धि" — dual -i read long
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नधनाम्बुधीस्मरगुरुक्ष्मेशैश्च"; alternatives "लग्नधनाम्बुधिस्मरगुरुक्ष्मेशैश्च" — This compound is a WORD-NUMERAL LIST and decoding it is the point: lagna=1, dhana=2, ambudhi (ocean)=4, dhi (intellect)=5, smara (Kama)=7, guru=9, kṣmesa (lord of earth)=10, and riḥpha in the next word=12. That is exactly the eight houses the English names (1,2,4,5,7,9,10,12), which independently confirms the reading of the compound. The i of ambudhi/dhi is printed long where the junction falls.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पदा"; alternatives "पदा-", "पदान्" — line ends here; the word appears to run on into line 22 without a hyphen this time
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्यथौ"; alternatives "न्यथो", "न्यथ" — Opens mid-word: taken with 'pada' at the end of line 21 it reads padany atha(u) ('the padas; now...'). The final matra reads as au, which the syntax does not want; recorded as seen. Second unresolved line-join on this plate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads न्यष्टौ; this sentence names न्यथौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass read this line opening by eye at about 4.93x native on the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0048.png, printed folio 46, store line index 21): the press sets न्यष्टौ. The second akṣara is a two-part conjunct with a second body beneath it, which a single-storey थ cannot be. So न्यथौ was a misreading in our transcription, and the mūla's न्यष्टौ is what the press sets.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफगृहाद्"; alternatives "रिष्फगृहाद्" — visarga spelling again, consistent with line 7
4.35a reading here is contested

स स्याल्लग्नपदे शुभे शुभयुते चेद्भोगभाग्यैर्युतः तस्मात्कोणचतुष्टये शुभखगै राजा महापण्डितः । क्रूरस्तत्र विपर्यया यदि पुनः षष्ठाष्टरिःफेषु वा ह्येवं सर्वपदैः शुभाशुभफलं सम्यग्विचार्यादिशेत् ॥ ३५ ॥

sa syāllagnapade śubhe śubhayute cedbhogabhāgyairyutaḥ tasmātkoṇacatuṣṭaye śubhakhagai rājā mahāpaṇḍitaḥ | krūrastatra viparyayā yadi punaḥ ṣaṣṭhāṣṭariḥpheṣu vā hyevaṃ sarvapadaiḥ śubhāśubhaphalaṃ samyagvicāryādiśet || 35 ||

If the pada of the lagna is auspicious and joined with benefics, he is endowed with enjoyments and good fortune. If there are benefic planets in the trikona and the four kendras from it, he becomes a king and a great scholar. If a malefic is there, the reverse; and so too if ⟨they are⟩ in the 6th, the 8th or the 12th (rihpha). In this way, having duly weighed all the padas, one should declare the good and the bad result.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेद्भोगभाग्यैर्युतः"; alternatives "चेन्द्रोगभाग्यैर्युतः", "चेत्सर्वभोगभाग्यैर्युतः" — the conjunct after ced reads dbho; the English 'all the comforts and good fortune' supports bhoga-bhagya
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याल्लग्नपदे"; alternatives "स्यात्लग्नपदे" — syat+lagna assimilated to syal lagna, printed solid
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभखगै"; alternatives "शुभखगैः" — printed WITHOUT the visarga the instrumental plural requires; recorded as printed. Contrast the visargas elsewhere on this plate, which print cleanly, so this is an omission and not a scan loss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपर्यया"; alternatives "विपर्ययो", "विपर्ययात्" — final matra read as long a; the masculine krura before it would want -yo
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफेषु"; alternatives "रिष्फेषु" — visarga spelling of the 12th-house loanword again, as on plate 48
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "एवं"; alternatives "ह्येवं" — a light mark precedes the e; may be a broken sort or a hy- ligature [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ह्येवं; this sentence names एवं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0049, line 4, at about 4.4x native. The press sets ह्येवं: the ह्य ligature carrying the e-mātrā, the same sort as ह्ये at page_0092 line 19. There is no separate light mark before it; the mark this note saw was the ह्य itself, not a broken sort.]
4.36a reading here is contested

तद्वत्पुत्रकुटुम्बभाग्यपदतो भावैर्गुरोर्लग्नपात् तस्माच्चोपपदा वदेच्छुभखगैर्योगेक्षणात्पुत्रताम् । नो चेत्पापयुतेक्षणादिकमिह स्यात्पुत्रबाहुल्यता तत्रौजोऽधिकखेचरैरनुमियात् पुत्रीश्च पुत्रानपि ॥ ३६ ॥

tadvatputrakuṭumbabhāgyapadato bhāvairgurorlagnapāt tasmāccopapadā vadecchubhakhagairyogekṣaṇātputratām | no cetpāpayutekṣaṇādikamiha syātputrabāhulyatā tatraujo'dhikakhecarairanumiyāt putrīśca putrānapi || 36 ||

Likewise from the pada of the 5th (putra), the 2nd (kutumba) and the 9th (bhagya), by the bhavas reckoned from Jupiter and from the lord of the lagna, and from the upapada of that — by the conjunction and aspect of benefic planets one should declare sonship. If it be not so, and there is conjunction with or aspect of malefics and the like, ⟨it is otherwise⟩. Here there is abundance of sons; and there, by the planets that are the stronger in an odd ⟨sign⟩, one should infer daughters as well as sons. ⟨The connection between the two halves is not made explicit in the printed text.⟩

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रकुटुम्बभाग्यपदतो"; alternatives "पुत्रकुटुम्बभाग्यपदतः" — another WORD-NUMERAL list: putra=5th, kutumba=2nd, bhagya=9th - exactly the three padas the English names, which confirms the compound
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लग्नपात्"; alternatives "लग्नपाद्", "लग्नपात्" — lagna-pa (lord of lagna) in the ablative
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उपपदा"; alternatives "उपपदाद्" — Upapada named here, as defined on plate 48 line 22
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगेक्षणात्"; alternatives "योगेक्षणाद्" — yoga (association) + ikshana (aspect) - the two modes of contact
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बाहुल्यता"; alternatives "बाहुल्यतां" — no final anusvara printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ओजोऽधिक्"; alternatives "ओजोऽधिक", "ओजोधिक्" — avagraha IS printed here - so this fount and this compositor do set it when they choose to, which strengthens the finding on plate 47 line 27 that its absence there was deliberate
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३६ ॥"; alternatives "॥ ३६ ॥" — the numeral is overprinted by a smudge at its right shoulder; both digits still read at 3.3x
4.37a reading here is contested

पूर्वोक्तेषु पदादिकेष्वपि बुधार्क्यारास्तदीशैर्युता स्ते खेटाश्च मिथो गृहांशकयुता वैकत्र मन्देज्ययोः । योगाद्वा मृतपुत्रकः खभतदीशावार्कियुक्तेक्षितौ चेत्स्यात्स्वीकृतपुत्रकस्त्विति जगुश्चानेकदैवं बुधाः ॥ ३७ ॥

pūrvokteṣu padādikeṣvapi budhārkyārāstadīśairyutā ste kheṭāśca mitho gṛhāṃśakayutā vaikatra mandejyayoḥ | yogādvā mṛtaputrakaḥ khabhatadīśāvārkiyuktekṣitau cetsyātsvīkṛtaputrakastviti jaguścānekadaivaṃ budhāḥ || 37 ||

In the padas and the rest already spoken of, Mercury, Arki ⟨Saturn⟩ and Ara ⟨Mars⟩ joined with the lords of those ⟨our mula now reads budharkyarah, budha + arki + ara, a cluster our first reading of the plate had left unresolved⟩; and those planets, mutually joined in one another's houses and amsas, or together in one place with Manda ⟨Saturn⟩ and Ijya ⟨Jupiter⟩ — by such a conjunction his sons die. If the 10th ⟨the plate's first aksara is kha or sva and is not settled; sva-bha, 'its own sign', construes better⟩ and its lord are joined with and aspected by Arki ⟨Saturn⟩, then he becomes one with an adopted son. Thus, many times over, have the learned declared ⟨our mula now reads jagus canekadaivam, jaguh + anekada + evam, where our first reading of the plate gave a string that made no words⟩.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधाश्र्यांरास्तर्दीशैर्युता"; alternatives "बुधाश्चर्यांरास्तदीशैर्युता", "बुधाश्चन्द्रास्तदीशैर्युता", "बुधार्क्यांरास्तदीशैर्युता" — NOT RESOLVED, and I am reporting it as unresolved rather than choosing. Read twice at 7.5x and 8x. What is certain: the string opens budha- and closes -isair yuta (conjoined with the lords of those); a repha sits over the -di- and another over the -yu-. What is NOT certain is the two or three aksharas in the middle, which as recorded make no Sanskrit word. This is the single worst mark in the eleven plates. The English for verse 37 is not on this plate (it falls on plate 50), so no sense-check was available at the time of reading. [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names बुधाश्र्यांरास्तर्दीशैर्युता, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this string. An eye reading of the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0049.png, folio 47, store line 28) at about 3.5x and 5.1x native found a repha, not an anusvāra, over the unresolved cluster: its width and ink match the two rephas on the same line. The mūla now reads बुधार्क्यारास्तदीशैर्युता, budha + ārki + āra, Mercury, Saturn and Mars. That is this note's fourth alternative, and the store's read of the exemplar's own English for this śloka (store page_0050, folio 48) names the same three planets. The repha over the -दी- is printed, as this note says; our तदीश emends the press on the lexicon and the metre.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्ते"; alternatives "ते", "स्थे" — opens mid-word, carrying over from line 29
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वैकत्र"; alternatives "वा एकत्र", "चैकत्र" — va+ekatra (or in one place) read as a single printed unit
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्देज्ययोः"; alternatives "मन्देज्यायोः" — manda (Saturn) and ijya (Jupiter) in the genitive dual - the two planets this verse turns on
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगाद्वा"; alternatives "योगाद्धा" — the conjunct reads dva rather than ddha at 4x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खभतदीशा"; alternatives "स्वभतदीशा" — first akshara kha or sva - sva-bha (own sign) makes better sense than kha-bha; NOT settled
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वार्कियुक्तेक्षितौ"; alternatives "वार्कियुक्षेक्षितौ" — arki = son of the Sun = SATURN, a word-numeral-style epithet; yukta-ikshitau = conjoined and aspected, dual
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वीकृतपुत्रकः"; alternatives "स्वीकृतपुत्रकाः" — svikrta-putraka = an ADOPTED son. Worth flagging: adoption is named in the book's own introduction as a subject of Kanda II, and here it appears already in Kanda I section 4.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चगश्चानेकदेवं"; alternatives "चगश्चानेकधैवं", "वगश्चानेकदेवं" — does not resolve into a word as recorded; the expected shape is something like ...anekadha evam ('in many ways, thus'). Second unresolved string on this plate. [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names चगश्चानेकदेवं, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).] [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this string. An eye reading of the 1993 exemplar (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0049.png, folio 47, store line 31) at about 4.8x and 3.3x native found that the press sets चगुश्चानेकदैवं. The first akṣara is च, not ज, measured against certain च and ज of this book; a u-mātrā hangs below the ग, which this reading missed; and the ai-mātrā stands over a single-bodied द, not ध. अनेकदा + एवम् gives अनेकदैवम्, thus, many times over. The mūla now reads जगुश्चानेकदैवं: जगु emends the press's चगु on the lexicon, since चगुः is no word and जगुः is the perfect of गै, and the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi give जगु.]
4.38a reading here is contested

आदौ सप्तमभावतस्तनुगृहाद्भार्यां ततस्त्वष्टमाद् द्वितीयां च तथा पुनः पुनरपीत्येवं मृताः स्युः खलैः । लग्नादष्टमगैः शुभैर्न हि तथा जीवस्य योगेक्षणात् सौम्यैर्जीवयुतास्तदीयतनयान् वृत्तं गुणांच दिशेत् ॥ ३८ ॥

ādau saptamabhāvatastanugṛhādbhāryāṃ tatastvaṣṭamād dvitīyāṃ ca tathā punaḥ punarapītyevaṃ mṛtāḥ syuḥ khalaiḥ | lagnādaṣṭamagaiḥ śubhairna hi tathā jīvasya yogekṣaṇāt saumyairjīvayutāstadīyatanayān vṛttaṃ guṇāṃca diśet || 38 ||

First from the 7th bhava and from the 1st house one judges the wife; then from the 8th, the second; and so again and again. In this way ⟨the wives⟩ die by malefics. It is not so with benefics standing in the 8th from the lagna, nor by the conjunction and aspect of Jupiter. From benefics joined with Jupiter one should declare his children, his conduct and his qualities.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भा"; alternatives "मा" — 4th akshara of sa-pta-ma-bhA-va; at 2.5x the left arm of bha and the closed loop of ma are close in this face. At 6x the bowl is open on the left, so bha. Sense (saptama-bhAvatas, 'from the 7th bhAva') agrees.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्यां"; alternatives "र्या" — the superscript mass over the final ya is a repha plus, apparently, an anusvara fused to it; at 7.5x the blob has a rounded upper-left lobe adjoining the repha hook but I could not separate them cleanly. Accusative bhAryAM requires the anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पि"; alternatives "पी" — PRINTED SHORT i. At 6.5x the matra vertical stands to the LEFT of the pa-bowl with its hook arcing right over the head-line, which is the short i; the long I would put the vertical to the right. Sandhi (punar api + ity) wants punarapItyevaM, so the printed form is a non-word, recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खलैः"; alternatives "खलेः" — the mark over la reads as two strokes (ai) rather than one (e) at 6.5x; instrumental plural khalaiH also fits the sense.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्न"; alternatives "ंन" — At 2.5x the mark over na could be taken for an anusvara; at 6.5x it is an open hook with a tail, i.e. a repha, not a filled dot. Reading shubhair na.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुणांच"; alternatives "गुणांश्च" — PRINTED WITHOUT sha. At 6x there is an anusvara over the A of NA and then ca directly; no sha-glyph stands between them. Metrically the printed form is the correct one for this pada (guNAM ca = 2 syllables; guNAMzca would give 20).
4.39a reading here is contested

एवं रिःफगृहाद्भवेदुपपदं तत्रैव सौम्ये तदा तज्जाया हि सुरूपिणी गुणवती सा स्याच्चिरंजीविनी । क्रूरे नीचगते कलत्रयुगलं नष्टं स्वतुङ्गे खले बह्वीर्जीवयुताः शुभेक्षणयुते नो चेन्न योगः पुनः ॥ ३९ ॥

evaṃ riḥphagṛhādbhavedupapadaṃ tatraiva saumye tadā tajjāyā hi surūpiṇī guṇavatī sā syācciraṃjīvinī | krūre nīcagate kalatrayugalaṃ naṣṭaṃ svatuṅge khale bahvīrjīvayutāḥ śubhekṣaṇayute no cenna yogaḥ punaḥ || 39 ||

In this way the upapada arises from the 12th house. If a benefic is in that very place, then his wife is fair of form, endowed with good qualities, and long-lived. If a malefic is there and gone to debilitation, a pair of wives is lost; if the malefic is in its own exaltation, ⟨the wives are⟩ many. ⟨So too⟩ when they are joined with Jupiter and with a benefic aspect; and if it be not so, then again there is no yoga.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्भ"; alternatives "ङ्ग" — At 2.5x this conjunct reads as a nga-cluster; at 6.5x it is the same glyph as the d-bha in gRhAd bhAryAM two stanzas above, so d+bha. gRhAd bhaved upapadaM is the sense the following English confirms.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुरु"; alternatives "सुरू" — UNSETTLED. The mark under ra is a single descending curl at 11x, which reads short u; but the metre (zArdUlavikrIDita, syllable 6 must be heavy) requires rU. This is the one mark on the plate I could not settle even at the new resolution - the ink is sound, the two forms simply differ by a second curl that is not resolvable here. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सुरूपिणी; this sentence names सुरु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पिणी"; alternatives "पीणी" — pi carries the short-i matra (vertical left of the bowl); NI carries the long-I (vertical right with hook). Read as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वि"; alternatives "दि" — penultimate of cira.mjIvinI: at 3.6x the cluster looked like di, at 5.8x the body has a left bowl joined to a right stem, i.e. va. Syllable count also settles it - jI-vi-nI closes the pada at 19.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्व"; alternatives "म्व" — At 2.4x this reads unmistakably as m-va; at 7.5x the left element carries the sa hook, i.e. s-va. svatunge ('in his own exaltation') is what the English under the stanza says. A clear case where the low magnification manufactured a wrong akshara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ब"; alternatives "व" — ba/va counter test applied at 4x: the glyph has a closed counter with a horizontal bar across the middle-left (ba); va has an open bowl. Reading bahvIH. This is the first plate on which that test was actually usable.
4.40a reading here is contested

दारारूढवशाद्वदेदुपपदात्तामादिभार्या ततः तत्तन्नैधनभात्स्मराख्यपदतो यावच्च पापादिकम् । तावत्यश्च इति ब्रुवन्ति मुनयो यत्राधिकं शोभनं तत्र स्यात्कुलवर्धनी च सुखदा चायुष्मती भोगदा ॥ ४० ॥

dārārūḍhavaśādvadedupapadāttāmādibhāryā tataḥ tattannaidhanabhātsmarākhyapadato yāvacca pāpādikam | tāvatyaśca iti bruvanti munayo yatrādhikaṃ śobhanaṃ tatra syātkulavardhanī ca sukhadā cāyuṣmatī bhogadā || 40 ||

By force of the darārūḍha one should declare, from the upapada, that first wife ⟨our mula now reads vaded upapadat tam adi-bharya, which construes whole⟩; and then from the 8th sign (naidhana) of each, and from the pada named smara ⟨the 7th⟩ — as many ⟨houses as carry⟩ malefics and the rest, so many ⟨wives⟩: so say the sages. Where the good is the greater, there she will be one who increases the family, a giver of happiness, long-lived, and a giver of enjoyment. ⟨The head of the second pada now reads tat-tan-naidhana, 'the 8th of each', which satisfies the metre.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चामा"; alternatives "चापि", "चाथा", "च मा" — UNSETTLED AS SANSKRIT, SETTLED AS INK. The akshara after the cca-conjunct was checked at 9.5x: it has a left stem, a CLOSED lower-left counter and a right stem, which is ma, not bha (open left) and not pya. So the plate reads ...upapadAc cAmAdi-bhAryA, which I cannot construe; the expected sense (from the English below: 'from the Darapada and its Upapada') wants ca Adi-bhAryA. The metre does not help - the printed reading scans as a perfect zArdUlavikrIDita pada (19 syllables, L L L S S L S L S S S L L L S L L S L), so the fault, if any, is not a dropped syllable. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दारारूढवशाद्वदेदुपपदात्तामादिभार्या; this sentence names चामा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वदेदुपपदात्तामादिभार्या. It was corrected on 2026-09-20 on the lexicon: तामादिभार्या, 'that first wife', construes whole, and both other printings (uk-ps-sastri, uk-bhasin-hindi) read it; चामादिभार्या construes as nothing. A plate reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0051 line index 1, printed folio 49; about 3.3x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0051.png) confirmed the correction. It measured the conjunct before दुपप as no द्भ: 0.5799 against a certain द्भ, the score two different letters give. It could not separate वे from दे, and it did not read the च्चा/त्ता akṣara, so it makes no claim about what the press sets there.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चैषध"; alternatives "च्चाष्टम", "चैषभ", "चैषघ" — THE WORST MARK ON THE PLATE, AND I AM REFUSING TO CALL IT. Aksharas 3 and 4 sit in an over-inked stretch; at 2.4x, 4.2x, 6x, 7x and under three binarisation thresholds the third cluster shows an ai-matra over a body with a subscript, and the fourth a two-lobed gha/dha form. The metre fixes the head at exactly four syllables patterned L L L S, and NONE of my candidate readings satisfies it (tac-cai-Sa-dha gives S at 3; tac-cAS-Ta-ma gives S at 3). The English under the stanza says '8th Bhava', which would want aSTama, but the ink does not show a clean STa. Recorded as the best glyph-by-glyph reading, not as a construable word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्तन्नैधनभात्स्मराख्यपदतो; this sentence names चैषध, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्तन्नैधनभात्. It was corrected on 2026-09-20 on the metre and the lexicon: tat-tan-nai-dha gives three heavy syllables and then a light one, the pattern this note says the head of the pāda needs, and naidhana is the 8th house, which the edition's own English on this leaf names ('8th Bhava'). A plate reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0051 line index 2, printed folio 49; about 3.3x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0051.png) found the stretch over-inked, as this note says, with exactly one mark above the headline in the first four akṣaras, an ai-mātrā, and a two-lobed fourth akṣara. That describes न्नैध and not षध. It could not separate च्च from त्त at that magnification and does not claim to.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यावच्च"; alternatives "या।वच्च" — at 2.4x a danda appears to stand between yA and va; at 4x it resolves as the A-matra of yA abutting the va. NOT a danda - a false positive the lower magnification manufactured.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तावत्यश्च"; alternatives "तावन्त्यश्च" — the third cluster carries a subscript; tya and ntya are separable in principle but not at this inking. Feminine plural tAvatyaH (of wives) favours the shorter form; the metre allows either (both give L L L S).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्ध"; alternatives "र्द्ध" — kulavardhanI: the superscript over dha is a clean repha hook at 2.5x, not an anusvara. Settled.
4.41a reading here is contested

लग्नाद्व्युत्क्रमतस्तृतीयभवने भावांशकात्सोदरान् ज्येष्ठांस्तत्क्रमशस्तृतीयगृहतस्तद्वत्कनिष्ठान्वदेत् । खखद्वावनवांशकाद्धृतनवांशेभ्यः क्रमादेष्यकैः पुंस्त्रीभेदविधिः शुभाशुभबलाद्वृद्धिक्षयौ संख्यया ॥ ४१ ॥

lagnādvyutkramatastṛtīyabhavane bhāvāṃśakātsodarān jyeṣṭhāṃstatkramaśastṛtīyagṛhatastadvatkaniṣṭhānvadet | khakhadvāvanavāṃśakāddhṛtanavāṃśebhyaḥ kramādeṣyakaiḥ puṃstrībhedavidhiḥ śubhāśubhabalādvṛddhikṣayau saṃkhyayā || 41 ||

From the lagna, in reverse order, in the third house, and from the amsa of the bhava, one should declare the elder brothers and sisters; and in that same order, from the third house, one should likewise declare the younger ones. ⟨The opening of the third pada cannot be construed: two identical glyphs read kha kha, and two free-standing vertical strokes stand in the line that read as pieces of type rather than as marks that can be named; none of this has been transcribed into sense.⟩ From the navamsa, and from the navamsas divided by it, in order, by those to come, ⟨is⟩ the rule for distinguishing male from female; and by the strength of benefics and malefics, increase and loss in their number. ⟨Our text now reads vyutkramatah in the first pada and grhatas tadvat in the second, and both scan; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave vyutkramas and grhas taddhrta, which do not.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमस्तृ"; alternatives "क्रमतस्तृ" — METRICAL SHORTFALL, NOT A DOUBTFUL GLYPH. Read at 6x there is exactly ONE cluster between kra and the s-tR ligature, so the plate reads vyutkramas-tRtIya; that makes the pada 18 syllables where zArdUlavikrIDita wants 19. vyutkramatas- would fix it and is what I expected to see; the ink does not show the extra ta. Either the printer dropped a syllable or the stanza is not in this metre - I could not decide which. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads लग्नाद्व्युत्क्रमतस्तृतीयभवने for लग्नाद्व्युत्क्रमस्तृतीयभवने, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the question this note left open is settled. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0051 line index 15, printed folio 49; about 4.4x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita/page_0052.png, and about 2.8x on the jp2 copy) confirmed this note: there is one cluster between म and the स्तृ ligature and no त, so the press sets व्युत्क्रमस्तृतीय and pāda 1 as printed counts eighteen. The stanza is śārdūlavikrīḍita. Our mūla's व्युत्क्रमतस् is an emendation on the metre, which needs the nineteenth syllable; vyutkramataḥ is the ordinary adverbial ablative, and the Sastri and Bhasin printings read it. Our exemplar does not.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहस्तद्धृत"; alternatives "गृहत्तद्धृत", "गृहात्तद्धृत" — at 4.4x the cluster after gRha is an s-ta ligature or a doubled ta; the following cluster is the same d-dha with the vocalic R that recurs in pada 3. The word division here is not recoverable from the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ज्येष्ठांस्तत्क्रमशस्तृतीयगृहतस्तद्वत्कनिष्ठान्वदेत् for ज्येष्ठांस्तत्क्रमशस्तृतीयगृहस्तद्धृतकनिष्ठान्वदेत्, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the division is legible after all. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0051 line index 16, printed folio 49; about 4.4x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita/page_0052.png) counted three clusters between ह and क: a स्त ligature, then द्ध with a vocalic-ṛ hook, then a bare त. So the press sets गृहस्तद्धृतकनिष्ठान्, as the 2026-09-05 reader and the store read it. That reading fails the metre at positions 11, 13 and 14, so our mūla's गृहतस्तद्वत्कनिष्ठान्, uk-ps-sastri's reading, is an emendation on the metre. The ink does not supply those letters.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खख"; alternatives "स्वस्व", "रवरव" — TWO IDENTICAL GLYPHS, READ AT 5x AS kha AND kha, WHICH I CANNOT CONSTRUE. Each has kha's left curl and barred right stem; neither carries the sa hook. I record them as kha kha and flag the whole opening of the pada as unconstrued.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(raised stroke after खख)"; alternatives "ऽ", "damaged sort", "stray ink" — a short raised vertical stands between the second kha and the dvA-conjunct, sitting ABOVE the baseline. It is not an avagraha (which sits on the baseline in this face - compare the clean avagraha in so'dhikaH, stanza 42 pada 1). Recorded here rather than in the text because I cannot say it is type.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(vertical before द्धृत)"; alternatives "।", "द्", "broken sort" — a second free-standing vertical stands between kA and the d-dhR cluster. Same problem: it reads as a piece of type, not as a mark I can name. NOT transcribed into the line.
4.42a reading here is contested

सूर्यादिद्युसदां लवाधिकखगस्तज्जातके सोऽधिकः प्रोक्तस्तत्सहितो रविर्नृपगृहे तन्त्रादिनिर्वाहकः । पूर्णेन्द्वासुरपूजितो बहुधनी विद्वान्महाभोगवान् भौमस्त्वायुधभृच्च भूपतिरपि स्याद्धातुवादी शठः ॥ ४२ ॥

sūryādidyusadāṃ lavādhikakhagastajjātake so'dhikaḥ proktastatsahito ravirnṛpagṛhe tantrādinirvāhakaḥ | pūrṇendvāsurapūjito bahudhanī vidvānmahābhogavān bhaumastvāyudhabhṛcca bhūpatirapi syāddhātuvādī śaṭhaḥ || 42 ||

Among the sky-dwellers beginning with the Sun, the planet with the higher degree is in that nativity called the adhika ⟨the predominant one⟩. The Sun joined with it, in a royal house, makes him an administrator of government and the like. The full Moon and the one honoured by the asuras ⟨Venus⟩ ⟨make him⟩ rich in wealth, learned, of great enjoyment. But Mars ⟨makes him⟩ a bearer of weapons, and also a lord of the earth, an alchemist (dhatu-vadin), and a cheat.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सदां"; alternatives "मदां" — checked at 8x: the body is an OPEN curl, not ma's closed lower-left counter (compare the confirmed ma in stanza 40 pada 1 at 9.5x). Read sa. dyusadAm ('of the sky-dwellers', i.e. the planets) also construes.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सोऽधिकः" — AVAGRAHA CHECK, positive: the mark between so and dhi sits ON the baseline and has the avagraha's S-curve. At the old resolution this class of mark was reported unresolvable; here it is unambiguous.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्नृ"; alternatives "ंनृ" — repha over nR, not anusvara: open hook with a tail at 2.5x. ravir nRpagRhe.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बहुधनी"; alternatives "वहुधनी" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST, applied at 2.5x and usable for the first time on this book: the initial has a closed counter crossed by a mid bar (ba); va's bowl is open at the left. Read bahudhanI.
4.43a reading here is contested

सौम्यः शिल्पचमत्कृतौ घटपटव्यापारदक्षो वणिग्जीवो वैदिककर्मको द्विजवरः स्याद्वेदवेदाङ्गवित् । दीर्घायुर्भृगुजोऽङ्गनारतिपरो मन्दोऽखिलव्यापको राहुर्वाऽपि तथा ध्वजो विषभिषग्लोहादिकार्ये पटुः ॥ ४३ ॥

saumyaḥ śilpacamatkṛtau ghaṭapaṭavyāpāradakṣo vaṇigjīvo vaidikakarmako dvijavaraḥ syādvedavedāṅgavit | dīrghāyurbhṛgujo'ṅganāratiparo mando'khilavyāpako rāhurvā'pi tathā dhvajo viṣabhiṣaglohādikārye paṭuḥ || 43 ||

Mercury ⟨makes him⟩ skilful in wonders of craft, and a merchant adept in the trade of pots and cloth. Jupiter ⟨makes him⟩ a performer of Vedic rites, best of the twice-born, a knower of the Veda and the Vedangas, and long-lived. Venus (bhr̥guja) ⟨makes him⟩ given over to the pleasure of women; Manda ⟨Saturn⟩, one who pervades everything; and Rahu, or likewise the Banner ⟨Ketu⟩, skilled in work with poison-antidotes, metals and the like.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वणि–" — THE HYPHEN IS PRINTED and is the pada-1 line end. The word continues as g-jIvo at the head of the next printed line; vaNig closes pada 1 at 19 syllables. Recorded with the hyphen exactly as set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्वे"; alternatives "स्याद्द्वे" — at 2.5x this looked like a doubled da (syAd-dveda); at 6.5x the cluster is the ordinary stacked d-va ligature of dve, so syAd veda-vedAnga-vit. The lower magnification invented a consonant.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जोऽङ्ग" — AVAGRAHA CHECK: baseline S-curve, unambiguous at 2.5x. Two clean avagrahas on this line (jo'nga, mando'khila).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्वा"; alternatives "र्वां" — the superscript over vA is a repha; I could not exclude an anusvara riding with it. rAhur vA ('Rahu or') wants no anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भिषग्"; alternatives "मिषग्" — the initial of the second member of viSa-bhiSag- ('poison-physician') is cut at my crop edge; bha and ma are separable only by the closed lower-left counter and I did not get a clean view of it. The English under the stanza says 'preparing medicines for poison', which favours bhiSaj.
4.44a reading here is contested

तस्मात्स्वं रविभार्गवेक्षणयुतं स्याद्राजभृत्यो नरः तार्तीये तु खले पराक्रमयुतः सौम्येऽतिभीतो भवेत् । तद्बन्धौ भृगुदृष्टियुग्जलधिजे स स्यान्महानाविकः तस्मिन्निन्दुसितेक्षणस्थितियुते सौधादिसौख्यान्वितः ॥ ४४ ॥

tasmātsvaṃ ravibhārgavekṣaṇayutaṃ syādrājabhṛtyo naraḥ tārtīye tu khale parākramayutaḥ saumye'tibhīto bhavet | tadbandhau bhṛgudṛṣṭiyugjaladhije sa syānmahānāvikaḥ tasminnindusitekṣaṇasthitiyute saudhādisaukhyānvitaḥ || 44 ||

When the 2nd house (svam) from that ⟨predominant planet⟩ is joined with the aspect of the Sun and of Bhargava ⟨Venus⟩, the man becomes a king's servant. But in the third ⟨from it⟩ ⟨our mula reads tartiye, 'in the third'; a reading of the plate on 2026-09-23, measured against the page's own letters, settled the opening aksara as ta⟩ a malefic ⟨makes him⟩ possessed of valour, while a benefic ⟨makes him⟩ exceedingly timid. When the ocean-born one ⟨the Moon⟩ stands in the 4th (bandhu) from it and is joined with Venus's aspect, he becomes a great mariner; and when the same is joined with the presence or aspect of the Moon and Venus, he is endowed with the comforts of mansions and the like. ⟨After tasmat our mula reads svam, the 2nd house; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same.⟩

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युत"; alternatives "युते" — no e-matra visible over ta at 2.5x, so recorded as yuta; the locative yute is what the syntax wants and both scan. The head of this line sits high in the type area and my crop clipped the matra zone once - re-cropped, still no matra. [2026-09-23: this note is confirmed. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0052 line index 25, printed folio 50; about 4.3x native on the greyscale master .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita/page_0053.png) measured the mātrā zone over this त and found no ink there: the darkest pixel is 142 and none is below 100, while every other akṣara on the line runs 47 to 89. So the press sets the bare stem युत, which is no form, and युते, the alternative this note weighed, is ruled out too. Our mūla reads युतं, an emendation on grammar: it must agree with the neuter स्वं earlier in the pāda, and both other printings set it. Our own page does not.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वार्तीये"; alternatives "तार्तीये" — UNSETTLED. The opening akshara was taken to 8x and the crop clipped its left edge; va (open bowl) and ta (left curve with a foot hook) are not separable in what remains. tArtIye ('in the third') is what the English under the stanza requires ('a malefic in the 3rd house from the Adhikagraha'), so the sense argues against the reading I recorded. Recorded as seen, not as construed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तार्तीये; this sentence names वार्तीये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the locus is settled on the exemplar leaf. On 2026-09-23 the akṣara was read without clipping (store page_0052 line index 26, printed folio 50; about 4.2x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita/page_0053.png). The eye first saw वा there too, because on this soft, heavily inked leaf the left arm of त closes into what looks like a bowl. Aligned cross-correlation against the page's own letters decided it: 0.9603 against the त of तस्मात् and 0.9485 against the त of युत, but 0.57 to 0.70 against three व forms on the same two lines. So the press sets तार्तीये, with a clear repha over the ती, and our mūla's तार्तीये is the exemplar's reading, not an emendation.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युग्"; alternatives "दृग्" — the cluster between STi and jala reads yug or dRg at 2.5x; bhRgu-dRSTi-yuj ('conjoined with Venus's aspect') construes, bhRgu-dRSTi-dRg does not. Not zoomed - flagged rather than settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्बन्धौ"; alternatives "तद्वन्धौ" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST on the second akshara: closed counter with a mid bar = ba. bandhu is the 4th house, which the sense (a great sailor, jaladhija = the Moon) supports.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्नि"; alternatives "न्भि" — taken to 8x: an i-matra over a body carrying a subscript. The body could be na or bha; the subscript is a half-na either way. tasmin + indu -> tasminn indu is the only construable reading and gives 19 syllables, so I recorded nni. The ink alone does not decide it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौधा"; alternatives "सौघा" — dha vs gha, the two-lobed forms this face keeps hard to separate. saudha ('mansion') construes with sukhya-anvitaH; saugha does not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(mark after सौख्यान्वितः)"; alternatives "ः", "damaged sort", "compositor's mark" — a small two-dot mark stands in the space between the final visarga and the || 44 ||, clear of both. NOT transcribed into the line: it reads as a loose sort or a mark of correction, and I will not promote it to punctuation.
4.45a reading here is contested

आरूढाद्यदि बन्धुगावपि दृशा स स्यान्महासौधवान् तस्मिन्नुच्चखगेऽपि तद्वदिति च श्वेतादिकुष्ठार्दितः । एवं तद्गृहतो नवांशकवशाच्च द्वादशांशाच्च वा तन्न्यूनांशगखेचरादपि वदेद्वृत्तिं तथा पौरुषम् ॥ ४५ ॥

ārūḍhādyadi bandhugāvapi dṛśā sa syānmahāsaudhavān tasminnuccakhage'pi tadvaditi ca śvetādikuṣṭhārditaḥ | evaṃ tadgṛhato navāṃśakavaśācca dvādaśāṃśācca vā tannyūnāṃśagakhecarādapi vadedvṛttiṃ tathā pauruṣam || 45 ||

If from the arudha ⟨our mula now reads आरूढाद्यदि, arudhad yadi, whose two light syllables the metre needs, where an eye reading of the plate gave a long a in that slot⟩ the two ⟨the Moon and Venus⟩ stand in the 4th (bandhu), or even by aspect, he becomes a man of great mansions. When an exalted planet is there too it is likewise; and so he is afflicted with white leprosy and the other kusthas. In this way, from that house, by the navamsa and by the dvadasamsa, and also from the planet standing in the lesser amsa of it, one should declare his livelihood and his manliness.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्चादि"; alternatives "द्वादि", "वादि" — UNSETTLED, AND THE METRE SAYS MY READING IS WRONG. Taken to 8x the 4th cluster is a wide conjunct carrying an A-matra; cca, dva and va are all live. But padas 2-4 of this stanza scan as clean zArdUlavikrIDita, and syllables 4 and 5 of pada 1 must therefore be LIGHT - which no reading with a long A in that slot can give. Either the compositor set something wrong here or I am mis-segmenting the whole opening. Recorded as seen and left open. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आरूढाद्यदि for आरूढाच्चादि, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: this note's observation is confirmed, and the question it left open is settled. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0053 line index 7, printed folio 51; about 3.1x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0053.png) found a consonant carrying a long ā in the fourth slot: two full-height verticals, the same stem-plus-ā signature as ढा two cells earlier, where the known द्य of जीवक्रियासूद्यमो on line 26 of the same leaf shows one. So the press sets a long ā there and cannot be setting द्य; च्चा, द्वा and वा could not be told apart at that magnification. Our mūla reads आरूढाद्यदि, an emendation against the exemplar on the metre, which needs positions 4 and 5 light; uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi read it, and the edition's own English renders ārūḍhād yadi.]

Adhyāya 5 · कारकत्वखण्डः — Relating to Action, Function or Doing

5.1a reading here is contested

देहश्चावयवः सुखासुखजरास्ते ज्ञानजन्मस्थले कीर्तिःस्वप्नबलायती नृपनयाख्यायूंषि शान्तिर्वयः । केशाकृत्यभिमानजीवनपरद्यूताङ्कमानत्वचो निद्राज्ञानधनापहारनृतिरस्कारस्वभावारुजः ॥ १ ॥

dehaścāvayavaḥ sukhāsukhajarāste jñānajanmasthale kīrtiḥsvapnabalāyatī nṛpanayākhyāyūṃṣi śāntirvayaḥ | keśākṛtyabhimānajīvanaparadyūtāṅkamānatvaco nidrājñānadhanāpahāranṛtiraskārasvabhāvārujaḥ || 1 ||

⟨From the lagna:⟩ the body and its limbs; happiness and misery; old age; knowledge; the place of birth; fame; dreams; strength; dignity ⟨āyati⟩; royal policy; renown; length of life; peace; age; the hair; bodily form; self-regard; livelihood; gambling with others; marks; being honoured; the skin; sleep; knowledge; the carrying off of wealth; being slighted by men; natural disposition; and freedom from disease.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुखामुख"; alternatives "सुखासुख" — PROBABLY WRONG AS RECORDED, AND I AM RECORDING IT ANYWAY. At 8x the akshara carries a CLOSED lower-left counter, which is this face's ma (the test that settled ma against bha on plate 51 and sa against ma on plate 51's stanza 42). But this is the opening stanza of the section on kArakatva - a bare list of what the lagna signifies - and sukhAsukha ('pleasure and pain') belongs in such a list where mukhAmukha does not. Ink says ma; sense says sa. Unresolved. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: the metre requires a light tenth syllable, which the conjunct ज्व prevents, and Bhasin's plate (PDF p.95, printed ९४) sets सुखासुखजरास्ते. Sense and metre agreed against the ink of this one plate, and the second exemplar settled it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कीर्तिस्स्वप्न"; alternatives "कीर्तिस्त्वप्न", "कीर्तिः स्वप्न", "कीर्तिस्त्वंप्न" — LOW CONFIDENCE. At 7x the cluster after kIrtis is a conjunct with a subscript, plus a small mark below-right I could not classify (anusvara? broken sort?). kIrtiH svapna-bala- construes. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: Bhasin's plate sets कीर्तिःस्वप्न with a plain visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नयारोग्याय"; alternatives "नयारूयाय", "नयाऽऱ्याय" — LOW CONFIDENCE. The middle of this compound is the tightest-set stretch on the plate. I read ...gyAyUMSi at the tail with reasonable confidence; Arogya ('health') before it is inferred from the -gyA and from what a lagna kArakatva list contains, NOT read cleanly. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: नृपनयारोग्यायूंषि makes this pāda twenty syllables. Bhasin's plate sets नृपनयाख्यायूंषि, which scans at nineteen, and V. Subrahmaṇya Śāstri prints no 'health' in the list.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केशा"; alternatives "कंशा", "कंसा" — the mark over the first akshara reads as an anusvara dot at 2.4x rather than an e-matra stroke; I recorded ke because keza ('hair') belongs to a lagna list and kaMza does not. Flagged as sense-led, not ink-led.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १ ॥" — STANZA 1 OF THE NEW SECTION (5, kArakatvakhaNDaH), NOT stanza 46 of what precedes. The numbering restarts at the centred heading eleven lines above. Any index that keys this verse by number alone will collide with stanza 1 of every other section.
5.2a reading here is contested

वैराग्यप्रकृती च कार्यकरणं जीवक्रियासूद्यमो मर्यादाप्रविनाशनं त्विति भवेद्गुणांपवादस्तनोः । वाग्वित्तास्तिकपोषकत्वनखसंभोज्यानि सत्यानृते जिह्वाऽस्यम्बरवज्रताम्रमणयो मुक्ताग्रहौ कृत्रिमः ॥ २ ॥

vairāgyaprakṛtī ca kāryakaraṇaṃ jīvakriyāsūdyamo maryādāpravināśanaṃ tviti bhavedguṇāṃpavādastanoḥ | vāgvittāstikapoṣakatvanakhasaṃbhojyāni satyānṛte jihvā'syambaravajratāmramaṇayo muktāgrahau kṛtrimaḥ || 2 ||

Dispassion and one's nature; the doing of what has to be done; livelihood, action and effort ⟨the cluster printed here is not a word and has not been repaired⟩; the destruction of ⟨moral⟩ limits; ill-repute ⟨our mula reads gunampavada, which is not a word; its first member is an open doubt between ghurna, giddiness, and varna, one's caste⟩ — such are ⟨the significations⟩ of the tanu ⟨the 1st bhava⟩. ⟨From the 2nd:⟩ speech; wealth; being a believer (astika); the supporting ⟨of dependants⟩; the nails; things to be eaten; truth and falsehood; the tongue; the mouth; garments; diamond; copper; gems; pearls ⟨the word printed muktagrahau is not settled⟩; and what is artificial.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रियासूद्यमो"; alternatives "क्रियोद्यमो", "क्रियाध्यमो", "क्रियास्तूद्यमो" — a cluster carrying a long-u hook stands between kriyA and -mo and I cannot name it. jIva-kriyodyamaH ('livelihood, action, effort') is what a list of this kind would say, but that reading needs an o-matra on the yA I can see carrying an A-matra. Recorded as the glyphs read, which is not a word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मर्यांदा"; alternatives "मर्यादा" — an anusvara stands over the ryA where maryAdA wants none. Recorded as printed; it may be a stray sort rather than a reading. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मर्यादाप्रविनाशनं; this sentence names मर्यांदा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0053, line 27, at about 4.2x native. The mark over र्या is this press's repha, a cap-shaped sort, not an anusvāra. The press sets मर्यादा, and so does our text now.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुणांपवाद"; alternatives "गुणापवाद" — same again - an anusvara over the NA. Two unexpected anusvaras in one line raises the possibility of a fouled sort in this fount rather than two independent readings, which is why both are recorded and neither corrected. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0053, line 27, at about 4.4x native. The mark over णा is this press's repha, not an anusvāra, so the press sets …र्णापवाद, and neither गुणांपवाद nor गुणापवाद. The two unexpected anusvāras of this line are both rephas. The akṣara before र्णा is open between द्घू (घूर्णापवाद) and द्व (वर्णापवाद); the verse's doubt records both. Our mūla still reads गुणांपवाद.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संभोज्यानि"; alternatives "संमोज्यानि" — the consonant after the anusvara read as bha at 5x; ma cannot be excluded from the ink alone, but the same akshara is unambiguously bha in line 32 (भोज्यादिकं) of this plate
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — avagraha confirmed at 4x between जिह्वा and स्य
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुक्ताग्रहौ"; alternatives "मुक्तामहौ" — middle akshara read as ग्र at 3.6x; the subscript ra is faint
5.3a reading here is contested

कौटुम्बं क्रयविक्रयौ मृदुवचो दातृत्ववित्तोद्यमाः साहाय्यं सखकान्तिवित्तकृपणप्रासन्नवाग्वैभवाः । विद्यास्वर्णसुरौप्यधान्यविनया नासामनःस्थैर्यके तत्पार्श्वस्थनरौ गमागमविधिर्जीवाढ्यता द्रव्यमात् ॥ ३ ॥

kauṭumbaṃ krayavikrayau mṛduvaco dātṛtvavittodyamāḥ sāhāyyaṃ sakhakāntivittakṛpaṇaprāsannavāgvaibhavāḥ | vidyāsvarṇasuraupyadhānyavinayā nāsāmanaḥsthairyake tatpārśvasthanarau gamāgamavidhirjīvāḍhyatā dravyamāt || 3 ||

The family; buying and selling; gentle speech; liberality; effort for wealth; help; friends, beauty, wealth, miserliness, pleasant eloquence; learning; gold; fine silver; grain; modesty; the nose; steadiness of mind; the two men who stand at one's side; the rule of coming and going; richness of livelihood; and property. ⟨The members of this line that our earlier text could not resolve now read as words in our mula.⟩

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कौटुःबं"; alternatives "कौटुम्बं", "कौटुंबं" — AS PRINTED between टु and बं stands a two-part mark: a short bar hanging from the headline with a round blob below it, examined at 12x. It is NOT the म्ब ligature used elsewhere on this plate (cf. अम्बर in line 13, a single two-humped glyph). Recorded as the visarga-like mark actually printed; the word intended is certainly कौटुम्बं. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कौटुम्बं; this sentence names कौटुःबं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0054, line 13, at about 2.3x and 3.3x native, and agrees with this note: the press sets कौटुःबं, a short stub from the headline over a detached round blob, not a म्ब ligature. So कौटुम्बं in our mūla emends the press on the lexicon, and the exemplar's own reading is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "माहात्म्यं"; alternatives "माहाग्यं" — at 9x only ONE hook-with-tail element stands between हा and यं, not the three-part त्म्य stack; a half-ga (ग्य) reading fits the ink at least as well. Read as त्म्य on lexical grounds only - treat as unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads साहाय्यं; this sentence names माहात्म्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0054, line 14, at about 2.3x and 3.3x native. The first letter is स with a broken tail, not म, and one half-form only stands before यं, with no त्म stack. The half-form's shape does not name its letter; साहाग्यं is no word and साहाय्यं is, so our text reads साहाय्यं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रामशनार्थभवाः"; alternatives "ग्रामशनार्गभवाः", "ग्रामशनार्वभवाः" — THE LEAST SECURE STRING ON THIS PLATE. sha confirmed at 13x; the following akshara is ना (na + aa) at 13x; the akshara under the repha is a closed rounded form that could be tha, ga or va. No lexically satisfying whole was reached. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सखकान्तिवित्तकृपणप्रासन्नवाग्वैभवाः; this sentence names ग्रामशनार्थभवाः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0054, line 14, at about 1.9x and 2.2x native. The press sets प्रा, न्न, वा and ग्वै; the mark read as a repha over थ is the two ai strokes of ग्वै. The letter after प्रा has म's body with faint ink along the path of a स tail, and the ink leaves it open; प्रामन्न is no word, so our text reads प्रासन्नवाग्वैभवाः.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वर्णा"; alternatives "स्वर्णं" — the mark above is a repha hook, not an anusvara dot (8x); the following vertical read as the aa-matra [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विद्यास्वर्णसुरौप्यधान्यविनया; this sentence names स्वर्णा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0054, line 15, at about 2.3x and 3.3x native. The press sets स्वर्ण with no ā: the vertical this note read as the ā-mātrā is ण's own stem, and the ण is 63 px wide, the width of the ण of कृपण on the line above. Our text reads स्वर्णसु.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शु"; alternatives "षु", "भु", "गु" — an akshara stands between स्वर्णा and रौप्य that no lexical reconstruction wants. At 13x: bowl with white centre, left knot at mid-height, right stem, u-hook below. Read shu; unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विद्यास्वर्णसुरौप्यधान्यविनया; this sentence names स्वर्णा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0054, line 15, at about 2.3x and 3.3x native. The letter has a left knot joined at mid-height to its right stem and a closed u-loop below, and its shape matches the three स on these leaves better than the two श. Our text reads सु, in स्वर्णसुरौप्य.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नासामनःस्थैर्यके"; alternatives "नासामनस्थैर्यके" — cannot separate a visarga from the sa of स्थै at 2.4x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गमागमार्विधिजीवाब्ध्यता"; alternatives "गमागमार्विचिजीवाब्धता" — the two aksharas after र्वि and the conjunct before ता are compressed; word division inside this compound is not recoverable at 2.4x [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गमागमविधिर्जीवाढ्यता; this sentence names गमागमार्विधिजीवाब्ध्यता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0054, line 16, at about 1.9x and 2.2x native. One stem stands before व, with the i-sign of वि over it and no ā; the repha stands on जी; and the conjunct before ता reads by eye as ढ्य, with no other ढ on these leaves to compare it against. Our text reads गमागमविधिर्जीवाढ्यता.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्रव्यमात्" — final virama stroke present under the ta
5.4a reading here is contested

धैर्यं सोदरयुद्धकर्णचरणाध्वक्षेत्रचित्तभ्रमाः सामर्थ्यं सुरसद्मतापकरणं स्वप्नं भटो विक्रमः । स्त्रीयो बन्धुजनः सुहृच्चलनकण्ठादुष्टभोज्यादिकं शक्तिर्दायविभागभूषणगुणां विद्याविनोदौ बलम् ॥ ४ ॥

dhairyaṃ sodarayuddhakarṇacaraṇādhvakṣetracittabhramāḥ sāmarthyaṃ surasadmatāpakaraṇaṃ svapnaṃ bhaṭo vikramaḥ | strīyo bandhujanaḥ suhṛccalanakaṇṭhāduṣṭabhojyādikaṃ śaktirdāyavibhāgabhūṣaṇaguṇāṃ vidyāvinodau balam || 4 ||

⟨From the 3rd:⟩ courage; brothers and sisters; war; the ear; the foot; the road; the field; wandering of the mind; capability; the abode of the gods ⟨heaven⟩; causing distress; dreams; a soldier; prowess; women; kinsfolk; friends; movement; the throat; bad food and the like; power; the division of an inheritance; ornaments; qualities; learning and amusement; and strength. ⟨सुरसद्म, 'the abode of the gods', is the reading Sastri's printing carries; the exemplar's conjunct at this place is too heavily inked to name.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुरसख्वताप"; alternatives "सुरसच्चताप", "सुरसद्वताप", "सुरसत्त्वताप" — two conjunct aksharas between सुर and ताप, each carrying a subscript; not separable at 11x. Unresolved. [2026-09-23: these two akṣaras were not read in the plate pass of 2026-09-23. It left a lead, not a ruling: the edition's own English lists '(9) heaven or paradise (10) causing sorrow' at this place, which would fit सुरसद्म-, 'the abode of the gods'. सुरसद्मताप scans, but so does सुरसख्वताप (both give heavy at 6 and light at 7), so the metre does not choose between them.] [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुरसद्मतापकरणं; this sentence names सुरसख्वताप, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्करणं"; alternatives "करणं" — the ka before रणं carries a subscript element, so a doubled ka (क्क) is printed; a simple करणं would be the expected word [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सुरसख्वतापकरणं for सुरसख्वतापक्करणं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-10-01: the mūla now reads सुरसद्मतापकरणं; this sentence names सुरसख्वतापकरणं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-10-01 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मटो"; alternatives "मठो" — ta vs tha not separable [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भटो; this sentence names मटो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the ta/tha question is settled on the leaf. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0054 line index 29, printed folio 52; about 2.7x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0054.png) found a plain म, the same sort as the म of सामर्थ्यं on that line and unlike the भ of विभा on line 31, followed by an open-hooked ट, not the closed ring of ठ. So the press sets मटो. Our mūla's भटो, 'a soldier', is an emendation: the edition's own English on the facing leaf (store page_0055 line 5) lists '(12) soldier' at this place, and both other printings read भटो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दाय"; alternatives "दाँय" — a small curved mark stands over the aa-matra of दा; it may be a candrabindu, a broken anusvara or a speck [2026-09-23: the mark was measured on the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0054 line index 31, printed folio 52; about 3.3x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0054.png). It is a free-standing blob of 549 px, 33 wide by 24 high, about 33 px clear of the headline, with no tail: twice the size of this page's anusvāra (214 px) and under half the ink of a repha. This fount sets a repha as a solid comma whose tail merges with the headline, and no such mark stands over the क्ति, so the press sets शक्तिदाय with no repha. The ink alone cannot exclude a repha sort that lifted and printed without its tail. Our mūla's शक्तिर्दाय is an emendation on the visarga sandhi of शक्तिः + दाय- and on the metre, which needs position 2 of pāda 4 heavy; it does not rest on this mark.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शक्तिर्दायविभागभूषणगुणां; this sentence names शक्तिदाय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ४ ॥" — a small acute-like tick is printed above and left of the numeral, between the opening danda and the digit. Kept as observed. The digit itself is the figure-8-like form this fount uses for four - established against the running sequence 2, 3, 4.
5.5a reading here is contested

लाभो देहसमृद्धिसत्कुलमवा भृत्यश्च पित्र्यस्थलं दासीस्वल्पशुयानयातउरुकार्यं स्वीयधर्मं त्रिभात् । विद्याराज्यगृहप्रयाणनरसन्नौकादिसद्वाहनान्यभ्यङ्गो जननी च बन्धुसुहृदौ जात्यम्बरे वापिका ॥ ५ ॥

lābho dehasamṛddhisatkulamavā bhṛtyaśca pitryasthalaṃ dāsīsvalpaśuyānayātaürukāryaṃ svīyadharmaṃ tribhāt | vidyārājyagṛhaprayāṇanarasannaukādisadvāhanānyabhyaṅgo jananī ca bandhusuhṛdau jātyambare vāpikā || 5 ||

Gain; the body's prosperity; a good family; ⟨…⟩; a servant; the father's place; a maidservant; small ⟨…⟩; conveyances; travel; a great undertaking; one's own dharma — ⟨these⟩ from the third sign ⟨our mula now reads tribhat, emended from trimat, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave; caturthalayat below is the parallel⟩. ⟨From the 4th:⟩ learning; sovereignty; the house; journeys; men; good boats and the like; good vehicles; anointing with oil; the mother; kinsmen and friends; caste and garments; and a tank.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सत्कुलमवा"; alternatives "सत्कुलमथ", "सत्कुलमया" — the akshara read वा is clear but the resulting word is not; word division uncertain. This line is the first of a verse that continues onto the next plate - the verse is SPLIT ACROSS PLATES.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वल्प"; alternatives "ष्वल्प" — first conjunct carries a subscript; sva/shva not separable
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शु"; alternatives "सु", "भु", "गु" — SAME UNIDENTIFIED AKSHARA as page 54 line 16. Compared at equal magnification with the certain सु of सुगन्ध/सुख (line 17 of this plate) and of सुरभोजन (line 22): those are visibly a different sort. Unresolved.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिमात्"; alternatives "त्रिभात्", "स्त्रिमात्" — the akshara before the final virama-ta is ma at 7x (closed left bowl on the baseline), not bha; but त्रिभात् 'from the third bhava' is what the sense wants and what चतुर्थालयात् in line 24 parallels. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads त्रिभात् for त्रिमात्, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: this note was right about the press. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0055 line index 1, printed folio 53; about 2.4x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0055.png, with a 3-px-step pixel dump) found म beyond doubt: a closed oval bowl joined at the bottom, stroke for stroke the म of धर्मं on the same line, and nothing like the भ of लाभो on folio 52. So the press sets त्रिमात्, which is no Sanskrit word. Our mūla's त्रिभात् is an emendation on the lexicon, on this book's own चतुर्थालयात्, and on the edition's own English, 'The following are to be determined from the third Bhava' (store page_0055 line 2).]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहध्वयाण"; alternatives "गृहाध्वयान" — the conjunct after ha carries a subscript, read dhva at 4.8x; the following akshara read णा/ना is not certain [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गृहप्रयाण, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text. Re-read on the page in the T45 plate pass at about 2.4x, गृहप्रयाण and गृहध्वयाण could not be told apart.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नरम्भौकादि"; alternatives "नरम्बौकादि", "नरम्भ्रौकादि" — at 5x the akshara carrying the au-matra shows two elements and an anusvara-like dot over the preceding sort. The English ('vehicles like rickshaws and small boats') wants nau-ka 'boat' somewhere here; the ink does not deliver it. Unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नरसन्नौकादि, 'good boats and the like', corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text. Re-read on the page in the T45 plate pass at about 2.4x, नरसन्नौ and नरम्भौ could not be told apart.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्नेहना–"; alternatives "सद्ग्रहना–" — line ends with a HYPHEN breaking a Devanagari word across the line; the word continues at the start of the next line [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this on the page at about 2.4x: the page sets सद्वाहना here, not स्नेहना, and the mūla now reads सद्वाहनान्यभ्यङ्गो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्यम्ब्जो"; alternatives "न्यम्बजो", "न्यम्भोजो" — opening of a word broken from the previous line; three stacked elements, not separable at 2.35x [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सद्वाहनान्यभ्यङ्गो where this note reads न्यम्ब्जो, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ५ ॥" — the five is a hook with a top-left curl and a descending diagonal; fixed against the running sequence 4-5-6-7 on this and the preceding plate
5.6a reading here is contested

पानीयं च पयः सुगन्धसुखवान् सन्नाम दिव्यौषधं विश्वासोऽनृतवादमण्डपजयः स्वेदोद्भवायाः कृषिः । क्षेत्रारामतटाककूपखननं तत्तत्प्रतिष्ठादयो मातुर्वर्गनिदानबुद्धिजनको दारा खनिक्षेपणम् ॥ ६ ॥

pānīyaṃ ca payaḥ sugandhasukhavān sannāma divyauṣadhaṃ viśvāso'nṛtavādamaṇḍapajayaḥ svedodbhavāyāḥ kṛṣiḥ | kṣetrārāmataṭākakūpakhananaṃ tattatpratiṣṭhādayo māturvarganidānabuddhijanako dārā khanikṣepaṇam || 6 ||

Water; milk; fragrance; one possessed of comfort; a good name; divine medicines; trust; the speaking of falsehood; victory in the assembly-hall; what is born of sweat; agriculture; fields, gardens, and the digging of tanks and wells; the consecration of each of these; the mother's class; diagnosis; intelligence; the father (janaka); wives; and the burying of treasure in a mine.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — avagraha clear
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्तत्प्रतिष्ठादयो"; alternatives "तत्तत्श्रतिष्ठादयो" — the conjunct after the half-ta shows, at 9x, a closed loop with a white centre and a descending tail; pra and shra are not separable in this fount at this inking
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्क्रो"; alternatives "जनको", "जन्मको" — at 8x: na carries a small triangular virama, then a SEPARATE round dot stands on the baseline, then a ka-based conjunct with the o-matra. The dot is kept as observed and is not an ink speck of the page ground. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मातुर्वर्गनिदानबुद्धिजनको; this sentence names जन्क्रो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खनिक्षेपणम्" — a stray round dot is printed below the line between णा and म्
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६ ॥" — the six is an epsilon-like form with a descending tail - the very shape earlier readers of these books confused with nine. Distinguished here from the seven in line 24, which is a closed 9-like loop.
5.7a reading here is contested

सौधः शिल्पगृहप्रवेशपरिणामाः शीलधामच्युती पित्र्यं स्वं सुरभोजनं च मनसो मोषः प्रदेशक्रिया । वल्मीकश्रुतिशास्त्रवृद्धिमहिषा गोवाजिमत्तद्विपार्द्रक्षेत्रोत्थसुसस्यसंपद इमे वाच्याश्चतुर्थालयात् ॥ ७ ॥

saudhaḥ śilpagṛhapraveśapariṇāmāḥ śīladhāmacyutī pitryaṃ svaṃ surabhojanaṃ ca manaso moṣaḥ pradeśakriyā | valmīkaśrutiśāstravṛddhimahiṣā govājimattadvipārdrakṣetrotthasusasyasaṃpada ime vācyāścaturthālayāt || 7 ||

A mansion; craft; entering a house; transformations; character; departure from one's home; the paternal ⟨estate⟩; one's own ⟨property⟩; food of the gods; the stealing of the mind; local business; an ant-hill; the Veda; the increase of the sastras; she-buffaloes; cows, horses and rutting elephants; and the wealth of good crops that rise from the wet field — these are to be declared from the fourth house.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रामन्युती"; alternatives "ग्वामन्युती", "ग्रामनुती" — third-from-last akshara read gra; the nyu conjunct is compressed [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शीलधामच्युती; this sentence names ग्रामन्युती, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0055, line 20, at about 2.2x native, with letter shapes correlated at 1.0x. The letters read here as ग्रा and न्यु are धा and च्यु: the press sets शीलधामच्युती, and so does our text now.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विपा–" — line ends with a HYPHEN; the word runs on into the next line, which opens with a repha [2026-09-23: The line-break hyphen is removed (T44), and the mūla now reads गोवाजिमत्तद्विपार्द्रक्षेत्रोत्थ. The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0055, lines 22-23, at about 2.2x native: the next line opens with र्द्र, a repha over a full द्र, not with a bare repha.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्"; alternatives "ई" — the line OPENS with a free-standing repha-like mark carrying a dot, the continuation of the hyphenated word from line 23; it is set clear of the following क्षे [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0055, line 23, at about 2.2x native. The press sets र्द्र, a large repha over a full द्र: the body that looks like इ is the द, and the dot is the foot of its subscript र. Our text now reads पार्द्रक्षेत्रोत्थ, restoring the akṣara that the reading र् had dropped.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ७ ॥" — GROUND TRUTH FOR THIS FOUNT: seven is drawn as a closed 9-like loop with a small tick at the upper left. Fixed by the running sequence, not by shape. Anyone reading this digit as nine would corrupt the verse number.
5.8a reading here is contested

संतानं पितृपुण्यराजसचिवा सौशील्यशिल्पे मनो विद्यागर्भविवेकछत्रसुकथा माङ्गल्यपत्राम्बरे । नानाकाव्यमहाप्रयोगपितृवित्ते दूरचिन्ता क्रमात् कान्तामूलकलब्धभाग्यविभवो वाराङ्गनालिङ्गनम् ॥ ८ ॥

saṃtānaṃ pitṛpuṇyarājasacivā sauśīlyaśilpe mano vidyāgarbhavivekachatrasukathā māṅgalyapatrāmbare | nānākāvyamahāprayogapitṛvitte dūracintā kramāt kāntāmūlakalabdhabhāgyavibhavo vārāṅganāliṅganam || 8 ||

⟨From the 5th:⟩ progeny; the father's merit; ministers of a king; good character; craft; the mind; learning; the womb; discrimination; the parasol; good discourse; auspiciousness; letters and garments; the many kinds of poetry; great undertakings (prayoga); the father's wealth; distant anxiety — in order; a beloved woman; the root; gains (labdha) ⟨our mula now reads kalabdha, as the metre needs, where our first reading of the plate gave the non-word kala'gha; the division mulaka + labdha is ours⟩; fortune; opulence; and dalliance with courtesans.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सचिवा"; alternatives "सचिवौ" — final vowel sign checked at 3.2x: the mark is a plain vertical aa-matra with no additional hook, so aa not au; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गर्भ"; alternatives "गर्म" — repha clearly present above; bha vs ma settled by the open right counter - bha.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महाऽऽयोग"; alternatives "महाःऽयोग", "महाऽयोग" — two small marks between महा and योग at 2.4x. Shape is avagraha-like, but a doubled avagraha is anomalous; the upper of the two may be ink from the line above. Recorded as seen, not normalised. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नानाकाव्यमहाप्रयोगपितृवित्ते; this sentence names महाऽऽयोग, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितृवित्ते"; alternatives "पितृचित्ते", "पितृदित्ते" — ba/va counter test applied at 2.4x: glyph has an open left bowl and no closing bar, so va, not ba; distinguished from ca by the full vertical stem.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कलऽघ"; alternatives "कलत्रघ", "कलाघ" — the mark between ल and घ, read at 2.2x, has an avagraha profile but sits low; a crushed त्र ligature is the competing reading and would give कलत्र, a standard term here. Not resolvable on this impression - recorded as the non-word it appears to be, and flagged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कान्तामूलकलब्धभाग्यविभवो; this sentence names कलऽघ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाग्य"; alternatives "माग्य" — bha vs ma: right counter is open at the top, so bha.
5.9a reading here is contested

गाम्भीर्यं घनता रहस्यविनया वृत्तान्तसंलेखनं क्षेमस्नेहप्रबन्धकाव्यरचना कार्यप्रवेशोदराः । मन्त्रोपासनसुप्रसन्नविभवाश्चाप्तप्रदानं च तत् पुण्यासत्प्रविचारमन्त्रजपकाः प्रज्ञासमालोचने ॥ ९ ॥

gāmbhīryaṃ ghanatā rahasyavinayā vṛttāntasaṃlekhanaṃ kṣemasnehaprabandhakāvyaracanā kāryapraveśodarāḥ | mantropāsanasuprasannavibhavāścāptapradānaṃ ca tat puṇyāsatpravicāramantrajapakāḥ prajñāsamālocane || 9 ||

Depth of character; solidity; secrets and modesty; the writing down of events; welfare; affection; the composing of long connected poems (prabandha); the entering upon undertakings; the belly; worship by mantra; a well-pleased opulence; and giving to those who deserve it; merit and demerit; deliberation; the muttering of mantras; wisdom and reflection.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संलेखनं"; alternatives "सलेखनं" — anusvara over सं confirmed at magnification as a discrete round dot, not a subscript nasal.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बन्ध"; alternatives "बऽध", "बन्ध" — at 2.4x the conjunct is heavily inked and closed up; read as न्ध on shape and sense, but the impression alone does not settle it. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0056, line 7, at about 4.0x native. A separate akṣara प्र stands between स्नेह and बन्ध, set without its own headline segment, which is why it reads at a glance like a numeral. The बन्ध read here stands, and the mūla now reads स्नेहप्रबन्ध.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "काव्य"; alternatives "काऽय" — the subscript य of व्य is partly filled with ink; reading is व्य.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुण्यासत्प्रविचार"; alternatives "पुण्यासत्प्रविचार", "पुण्यासत्प्रविचार" — word division within the compound is not printed; segmentation here is mine and carries no authority.
5.10a reading here is contested

वित्तोपायमृदङ्गनाद्यसुमहत्संतोषपाण्डित्यकाः पारंपर्यसमागतं तु सचिवस्थानं भवेत्पञ्चमात् । रोगो विघ्नरणासिमातुलकफग्रन्थ्युग्रकर्माणि चोन्मादस्फोटकशत्रुवैरकृपणत्वास्वास्थ्यमेहव्रणाः ॥ १० ॥

vittopāyamṛdaṅganādyasumahatsaṃtoṣapāṇḍityakāḥ pāraṃparyasamāgataṃ tu sacivasthānaṃ bhavetpañcamāt | rogo vighnaraṇāsimātulakaphagranthyugrakarmāṇi conmādasphoṭakaśatruvairakṛpaṇatvāsvāsthyamehavraṇāḥ || 10 ||

Means of wealth; the mr̥danga and other instruments; very great contentment; scholarship; and the office of minister come down by succession — ⟨these⟩ arise from the fifth. ⟨From the 6th:⟩ disease; obstruction; battle; the sword; the maternal uncle; phlegm; tumours; fierce deeds; madness; boils ⟨the initial conjunct is heavily inked; sphotaka, 'a boil', is what the sense favours, but the ink does not settle it⟩; enemies; enmity; miserliness; ill health; urinary disease; and sores.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पाण्डित्यकाः"; alternatives "पाण्डित्यकाः" — the ND conjunct with subscript is dense; retroflex ण confirmed by the loop.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पारंपर्य"; alternatives "पारम्पर्य" — printed with anusvara, not the subscript nasal; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्रन्थ्युग्र"; alternatives "ग्रन्थ्यग्र" — the u-matra under the थ्य conjunct is faint but present at 2.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्फोटक"; alternatives "रफोटक", "र्फोटक" — the initial conjunct is heavily inked; the upper stroke could be a repha or the स of स्फ. Sense favours स्फोटक (a boil), and the English opposite reads 'a boil', but the ink alone does not settle it - recorded with the doubt standing.
5.11a reading here is contested

अन्यायासकरुणापवाद रिपुसन्तोषक्षयोष्णक्षताश्चित्तक्लेशबहुव्यथे बहुजनद्वेषोऽनिशं नेत्ररुक् । भिक्षादानमकालभोजनकलाभ्रंशाः सपिण्डारिभिर्लाभायासविपातिशूलनिगलाः स्वीयं यशोरक्षणम् ॥ ११ ॥

anyāyāsakaruṇāpavāda ripusantoṣakṣayoṣṇakṣatāścittakleśabahuvyathe bahujanadveṣo'niśaṃ netraruk | bhikṣādānamakālabhojanakalābhraṃśāḥ sapiṇḍāribhirlābhāyāsavipātiśūlanigalāḥ svīyaṃ yaśorakṣaṇam || 11 ||

Unjust toil; pity; calumny; the satisfaction of enemies; wasting; burning wounds; distress of mind; much pain; hatred from many people; unceasing eye-disease; the giving of alms; eating at the wrong hour; the loss of one's art; ⟨strife⟩ with kinsmen and enemies; gain; exertion; falling; colic; fetters; and the guarding of one's own good name.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अन्यायास"; alternatives "अन्नायास", "अन्याय+आस" — second akshara is a dense न्य/न्न conjunct; not settled on this impression.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अपवाद रिपु"; alternatives "अपवादरिपु" — a real word-space is printed inside the compound here; recorded as printed rather than closed up.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वेषोऽनिशं" — avagraha checked at 30x-equivalent magnification: unambiguously an avagraha, not a stray mark or a visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कलाभ्रंशाः"; alternatives "कलाभ्रंशा:" — anusvara over भ्रं is a discrete dot, distinct from the visarga that follows शा.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्लाभायास"; alternatives "र्लोभायास", "र्लाभायासः" — a mark sits above ला that could be an o-matra or offset ink from the line above; at 2.4x it does not resolve. Repha at the head is certain.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विपाति"; alternatives "विपादि", "विपत्ति" — medial consonant ambiguous between त and द on this impression.
5.12a reading here is contested

मूत्रव्याध्यतिसारषड्रसविनिन्दा दासचौराविपत् कारागेहसहोदरादिकलहौ स्युः षष्ठभावादिमे । उद्वाहव्यभिचारकामुकजयानष्टाङ्गनाद्वेषता मार्गभ्रंशसुगन्धगीतकुसुमा मृष्टान्नपातादिकम् ॥ १२ ॥

mūtravyādhyatisāraṣaḍrasavinindā dāsacaurāvipat kārāgehasahodarādikalahau syuḥ ṣaṣṭhabhāvādime | udvāhavyabhicārakāmukajayānaṣṭāṅganādveṣatā mārgabhraṃśasugandhagītakusumā mṛṣṭānnapātādikam || 12 ||

Urinary disease; dysentery; the six tastes; censure; servants; thieves; calamity; the prison-house; and quarrels with brothers and the rest — these arise from the sixth bhava. ⟨From the 7th:⟩ marriage; adultery; a lover's conquests; hatred of women who are lost; straying from the path; perfume; song; flowers; and dainty food and vessels and the like.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पटुस"; alternatives "पटूस", "पडुस" — retroflex ट confirmed; the following vowel length is uncertain. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मूत्रव्याध्यतिसारषड्रसविनिन्दा; this sentence names पटुस, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0057, line 8, at about 4.0x native. The letter is ड, not ट, and the mark below it is the caret-shaped र subscript, not a vowel sign. The letter before it is प, with one counter. So the press sets पड्रस, and the mūla now reads षड्रस, the ष emending the press's प on the lexicon.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जयानष्टाङ्गना"; alternatives "जयानष्टाङ्गना", "जयानष्ट+अङ्गना" — compound segmentation not printed; the ष्ट conjunct is clear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पाता"; alternatives "पात्रा", "पाता" — a subscript stroke under ता may be a crushed र; not settled.
5.13a reading here is contested

ताम्बूलं च प्रयाणभङ्गदधिविस्मृत्यम्बराद्यागमो रेतोभर्तृपवित्रदारयुगलं गुह्यं च मूत्रं गुदः । वाणिज्यं च तथा पयोमधुरसौघः सूपकाद्याशनं दानं शौर्यविनष्टशत्रुविजयास्थानान्तरस्थं धनम् ॥ १३ ॥

tāmbūlaṃ ca prayāṇabhaṅgadadhivismṛtyambarādyāgamo retobhartṛpavitradārayugalaṃ guhyaṃ ca mūtraṃ gudaḥ | vāṇijyaṃ ca tathā payomadhurasaughaḥ sūpakādyāśanaṃ dānaṃ śauryavinaṣṭaśatruvijayāsthānāntarasthaṃ dhanam || 13 ||

Betel; the breaking off of a journey; curds; forgetfulness; the getting of clothes and the rest; semen; a husband; what is pure; a pair of wives; the private parts; urine; the anus; trade; and likewise milk, honey and floods of savour; the eating of broths and the like; giving; valour; victory over a destroyed enemy; and wealth that lies in another place.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विस्मृत्यम्बर"; alternatives "विस्मृत्यम्बर" — the म्ब conjunct: ba/va counter test applied - closed counter with a bar, so ba, giving अम्बर (garment), consistent with the section.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूत्र गुदः"; alternatives "मूत्रगुदः" — a word-space is printed between मूत्र and गुदः; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads मूत्रं for मूत्र, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौघः"; alternatives "सौख्यः", "सौघं" — the घ is clear but the preceding conjunct is inked; visarga certain.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आख्यानान्तररथं"; alternatives "आख्यानान्तरार्थं", "आख्यानान्तररथं" — the akshara before थं could be र with a following र-conjunct or an आ-matra; at 2.4x the two readings are not separable on this impression. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विजयास्थानान्तरस्थं, an emendation on the metre (see this verse's revisions rows and its open doubt); this note describes the earlier text. The tail it could not separate at 2.4x is settled: an eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0058 band 1, printed folio 56; about 5.0x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0058.png) found two separate glyphs after न्त, both the plain hook of र, then थं after a 14 px gap. So the press sets …न्तररथं, not …न्तरार्थं.]
5.14a reading here is contested

वादौ मैथुनदत्तपुत्रघृतजास्त्रीयान्यदेशे तथा जाया मान्मथजं रहस्यमखिलं चौर्यं वदेत्सप्तमात् । आयुः सौख्यपराभवौ मृतधनं संक्लेशवक्त्रं मृतिक्लेशो मारणकारणान्नकलहो तन्मेहजाड्यं विपत् ॥ १४ ॥

vādau maithunadattaputraghṛtajāstrīyānyadeśe tathā jāyā mānmathajaṃ rahasyamakhilaṃ cauryaṃ vadetsaptamāt | āyuḥ saukhyaparābhavau mṛtadhanaṃ saṃkleśavaktraṃ mṛtikleśo māraṇakāraṇānnakalaho tanmehajāḍyaṃ vipat || 14 ||

Disputes; sexual union; an adopted son; ghee; a woman ⟨born⟩; another country; and a wife; everything born of Kama; every secret; theft — these one should declare from the seventh. ⟨From the 8th:⟩ length of life; happiness and defeat; the wealth of the dead; affliction of the face (saṃkleśa-vaktra); the distress of dying; the cause of death; strife over food; his urinary disease; torpor; and calamity. ⟨An eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave ra for the broken second aksara, so our mula now reads marana-karana, 'the cause of death'.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जास्त्रीयान्यदेशे"; alternatives "जास्त्रीयान्यदेशे" — long compound with no printed division; segmentation is mine and carries no authority.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मान्मथजं"; alternatives "मन्मथजं" — the aa-matra on मा is present but light; मन्मथजं would be the expected form.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बन्धं"; alternatives "बऽधं", "बन्धं" — the न्ध conjunct prints in this fount as a closed, blotted form that on plate 56 line 8 looked like a numeral 1; recognising the recurring shape across plates is what settles it as न्ध. Ba/va counter test applied to the initial: closed counter with bar, so ba. [2026-09-23: The form on plate 56 line 8 that this note says looked like a numeral 1 is in verse 5.9 (store page_0056, line index 7). The plate ruling on 5.9 read that line by eye at about 4.0x native: the numeral-like form there is a separate akṣara प्र, set without its own headline segment before बन्ध, and its size and shape do not match the verse numerals of that page. The बन्ध after it is as read. This verse's own बन्धं was not re-read on the plate.] [2026-10-02: the mūla now reads संक्लेशवक्त्रं for संक्लेशबन्धं. The plate, read by eye on jp2 page_0058 line 6 at about 3.6x native against द्यद्वक्त्रं on page_0128, sets व + half-क + त्रं; the blotted form this note took for न्ध is the half-क of क्त्र.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मानणकारणान्न"; alternatives "मान्यकारणान्न", "माननकारणान्न" — a non-word as printed; the second akshara is broken and I record it as the non-word rather than repairing it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मारणकारणान्नकलहो; this sentence names मानणकारणान्न, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0058, line 7, at about 1.6x and 3.9x native, plain and with gamma 2.5. The broken second sort keeps the lower bowl and baseline tail of र, in the footprint of the healthy र of कार on the same line, and no trace of a न stem or a headline. So the exemplar reads मारणकारणान्न with a failed sort, and our text now reads मारणकारणान्नकलहो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "१४" — the numeral 1 is partly broken at the head, reading like an exclamation mark; sequence with ॥ १३ ॥ and ॥ १५ ॥ on this plate confirms 14.
5.15a reading here is contested

भ्रातुः शत्रुकलत्रपीडनकलापाः शत्रुदुर्गस्थलं क्लेशश्चालसराजदण्डनभयद्रव्यक्षयर्णप्रदाः अज्ञानाप्तपरं धनं चिरधनं दुर्मार्गमत्यागमः पापं जीववधोऽङ्गहीनकशिरच्छेदोग्रदुःखानि च ॥ १५ ॥

bhrātuḥ śatrukalatrapīḍanakalāpāḥ śatrudurgasthalaṃ kleśaścālasarājadaṇḍanabhayadravyakṣayarṇapradāḥ ajñānāptaparaṃ dhanaṃ ciradhanaṃ durmārgamatyāgamaḥ pāpaṃ jīvavadho'ṅgahīnakaśiracchedograduḥkhāni ca || 15 ||

The whole train of afflictions to a brother's enemy and wife; the enemy's fortress-place; distress; sloth; fear of royal punishment; the loss of wealth — these bring debt; another's wealth got through ignorance; long-held wealth; an evil road; excessive going; sin; the killing of a living creature; the loss of a limb; the severing of the head; and fierce sufferings.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भ्रातुः शत्रु"; alternatives "भ्रातुःशत्रु" — a wide word-space is printed after the visarga; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षयार्णप्रदाः"; alternatives "क्षयार्तिप्रदाः", "क्षयार्णप्रदाः" — the akshara after र् is ण or ति; repha certain, the base letter is not. [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names क्षयार्णप्रदाः, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0058, printed folio 56; about 3.0x and 3.7x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0058.png) found no ā-mātrā before र्ण. Measured below the headline, the stretch क्ष…दाः splits into eight segments that match, each within 1.5 points, the same word क्षयर्णप्रदाः at 4.28 on jp2 page_0045.png, and the narrow segment at 47-51 per cent is ṇa's own right stem. So the press sets क्षयर्णप्रदाः, which our mūla reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मत्यांगमः"; alternatives "मत्यागमः", "मृत्यागमः" — the mark over त्या reads as an anusvara but may be offset ink; the whole word is a non-word as printed and is recorded as such. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दुर्मार्गमत्यागमः; this sentence names मत्यांगमः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: measured on the greyscale master on 2026-09-23 (store page_0058, printed folio 56; about 3.0x and 3.7x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0058.png). The three certain anusvāras on this line (परं, धनं, चिरधनं) each stand as an isolated blob 15-16 px wide reaching 17 rows above the headline. Over त्या there is only a 48 px smear reaching 11 rows, centred on the join of त्या and ग. It is spread ink, as this note suspected, so the press sets मत्यागमः with no anusvāra, the reading our mūla carries.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अज्ञानाप्तपरं"; alternatives "अज्ञानाप्तपरं" — प्त conjunct confirmed at magnification.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वधोऽङ्ग" — avagraha checked at high magnification: unambiguous, distinct from the visarga elsewhere on the line.
5.16a reading here is contested

चित्तास्वास्थ्यकथोपसर्गपरिवारोग्रक्रियासूद्यमो युद्धात्यन्तमनोव्यथे च सततं भावाद्वदेदष्टमात् । दानं धर्मसुतीर्थसेवनतपोगुर्वादि भक्त्यौषधाचाराश्चित्तविशुद्धिदेवभजने विद्याश्रमो वैभवः ॥ १६ ॥

cittāsvāsthyakathopasargaparivārograkriyāsūdyamo yuddhātyantamanovyathe ca satataṃ bhāvādvadedaṣṭamāt | dānaṃ dharmasutīrthasevanatapogurvādi bhaktyauṣadhācārāścittaviśuddhidevabhajane vidyāśramo vaibhavaḥ || 16 ||

Unsoundness of mind; talk; calamity; the household; exertion in fierce deeds; war; and the utmost anguish of mind, continually — these one should declare from the eighth bhava. ⟨From the 9th:⟩ giving; dharma; the frequenting of good tirthas; austerity; devotion to the guru and the rest; the use of medicines; purity of mind; the worship of the gods; the hermitage of learning; and opulence.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रियाद्यगमो"; alternatives "क्रियाद्यगमो", "क्रियाद्यागमो" — vowel length on the ga syllable not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चित्तास्वास्थ्यकथोपसर्गपरिवारोग्रक्रियासूद्यमो; this sentence names क्रियाद्यगमो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0058, line 13, at about 2.0x, 3.7x and 4.3x native, with same-page controls. The press sets क्रियासूद्यमो: सू, then the compact द्य, then मो. There is no ग, so the question of its vowel length does not arise. The reading क्रियाद्यगमो took the सू for द्य and the द्य for ग, and our text is corrected.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भक्त्यौपधा"; alternatives "भक्त्यौषधा" — the aspirated dental vs the retroflex sibilant-plus-dha is not separable at this inking; ऐषध (medicine) would suit the ninth-house sense. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भक्त्यौषधा; this sentence names भक्त्यौपधा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0059, line 2, at about 3.9x native, beside the प and ष of पुण्यौषधो on line 12. The glyph is a प with one clean counter and no diagonal, so the press sets भक्त्यौपधा and this reading was faithful. Our text emends the press to भक्त्यौषधा on the lexicon, and the exemplar's own reading is kept on the ledger.]
5.17a reading here is contested

यानं भाग्यनय प्रतापसुकथायात्राभिषेकादयः पुष्टिः सज्जनसंगतिः शुभपितृश्च पुत्रपुत्र्यस्तथा । अष्टैश्वर्यतुरङ्गनागमहिषाः पट्टाभिषेकालयब्रह्मस्थापनवैदिकक्रतुधनक्षेपाः स्युरङ्कर्क्षतः ॥ १७ ॥

yānaṃ bhāgyanaya pratāpasukathāyātrābhiṣekādayaḥ puṣṭiḥ sajjanasaṃgatiḥ śubhapitṛśca putraputryastathā | aṣṭaiśvaryaturaṅganāgamahiṣāḥ paṭṭābhiṣekālayabrahmasthāpanavaidikakratudhanakṣepāḥ syuraṅkarkṣataḥ || 17 ||

Vehicles; fortune; policy; majesty (pratapa) ⟨one glyph here is broken, and our mula reads pra, as the metre requires⟩; good discourse; pilgrimage; consecration and the rest; nourishment; the company of good men; an auspicious father; and sons and daughters; the eight lordships; horses; elephants; buffaloes; the hall of coronation; the founding of temples; Vedic sacrifices; and the laying out of wealth — these are to be judged from the ninth (aṅka-ṛkṣa, the sign numbered nine).

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "?ता"; alternatives "ता", "ऽता", "क्ता" — REFUSED at the akshara level. After a printed word-space following भाग्यनय there is a broken glyph whose head-stroke is missing; at high magnification it resolves to neither a full consonant nor an avagraha. Recorded with an explicit placeholder rather than guessed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रताप here. Measured on the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0059 line 17a, printed folio 57; .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0059.png), the line holds exactly nineteen akṣaras (1376 px of type at 72.4 px), so the damaged place is one akṣara. Position 6, the य of भाग्यनय, must be heavy, and a short a is heavy only if the next akṣara opens with a conjunct: प्र does, a bare ता or an avagraha does not. At about 6x the surviving ink (head-stroke, counter, and a stroke descending at the lower left where a subscript र sits) is consistent with प्र and carries no ā-bar. So the akṣara is ruled प्र on the metre; it is not read whole from the ink.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ताापसु"; alternatives "तापसु", "तापसु" — a doubled aa-matra appears to be printed; may be a broken matra plus ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रतापसुकथायात्राभिषेकादयः; this sentence names ताापसु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रैपुत्र्यस्तथा"; alternatives "पुत्रःपुत्र्यस्तथा", "पुत्रपुत्र्यस्तथा" — the mark between the two पुत्र elements reads as an ai-matra but sits where a visarga would; not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पुत्रपुत्र्यस्तथा; this sentence names पुत्रैपुत्र्यस्तथा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: measured on the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0059 line 17b, printed folio 57; about 4.2x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0059.png), each word against its own headline: the only mark over the त्र is 14 px wide and 16 rows deep, the size of this fount's anusvāra (15-16 px by 17 rows) and far short of an i-mātrā (56-82 px by 24 rows). So the exemplar carries a small mark there, but not the clean ai this note describes, and not a visarga, which would sit beside the letter. Our mūla's पुत्रपुत्र्यस्तथा is an emendation on the metre, which needs position 15 light.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऐश्वर्य"; alternatives "अैश्वर्य", "ऐश्वर्य" — an extra stroke precedes the ऐ; may be a broken initial or ink. [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names ऐश्वर्य, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).] [2026-09-23: measured on the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0059 line 17c, printed folio 57; about 4.2x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0059.png): the first word of this pāda holds twelve akṣaras, not eleven (a pitch of 70 px, not 76.5 px), and the ai-mātrā stands at x307-355, where a twelve-akṣara अष्टैश्वर्य puts ष्टै and not where ऐश्वर्य would put ऐ. So the stroke this note saw before the ऐ belongs to अष्ट: the press sets अष्टैश्वर्य, which our mūla reads, and with it the pāda counts nineteen.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नागमहिपाः"; alternatives "नागमहीपाः", "नागमहिपाः" — vowel length on हि/ही not settled; महीप (king) would be the expected word. [2026-09-23: the consonant is settled. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0059 line 17c, printed folio 57; about 5.3x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0059.png) set the letter beside two known प and two known ष: its counter is one clean oval, like प, with no stroke intruding from the left as in ष. So the press sets महिपाः. A correction to महिषाः made on 2026-09-20 from two machine reads was withdrawn that day, and our mūla reads महिपाः.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अष्टैश्वर्यतुरङ्गनागमहिपाः; this sentence names महिषाः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads महिषाः on the lexicon; the press sets महिपाः, read by eye on the plate at about 5.3x native, and the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri (store page_0115) and uk-bhasin-hindi (store page_0111) carry महिषाः, which both their translations render as buffaloes. महीप cannot stand here, because position 11 of this pāda must be light.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युरङ्घ्रतः"; alternatives "स्युरङ्घ्रितः", "स्युर्नवमतः" — as printed this is a non-word. The section is the NINTH house and the closing word of such a line normally names it; अङ्घ्रि (foot) is not a standard ninth-house term, so either the reading or the printing is wrong. Recorded as the non-word it appears to be and flagged rather than repaired. [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads स्युरङ्कर्क्षतः. Read by eye on the exemplar on 2026-09-30 (store page_0059, printed folio 57; about 4.0x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0059.png), the press sets a stacked ङ्क, then क्ष with a repha, then तः. The 2026-09-05 reading ङ्घ्र took ङ्क and क्ष together and lost the repha. uk-ps-sastri p.115 and uk-bhasin-hindi p.111 print the same word. So this was a misreading of the plate, not a non-word in the press.]
5.18a reading here is contested

वाणिज्यं नृपमान्यताऽश्वगमनं मल्लत्वराज्यक्रिया दासत्वं कृषिवैद्यकीर्तिनिधिनिक्षेपाश्च यज्ञादयः । श्रेष्ठत्वं गुरुयन्त्रमन्त्रजननी विस्तारपुण्यौषधोरुस्थानामरमन्त्रसिद्धिविभवाः स्याद्दत्तपुत्रः प्रभुः ॥ १८ ॥

vāṇijyaṃ nṛpamānyatā'śvagamanaṃ mallatvarājyakriyā dāsatvaṃ kṛṣivaidyakīrtinidhinikṣepāśca yajñādayaḥ | śreṣṭhatvaṃ guruyantramantrajananī vistārapuṇyauṣadhorusthānāmaramantrasiddhivibhavāḥ syāddattaputraḥ prabhuḥ || 18 ||

⟨From the 10th:⟩ trade; being held in honour by a king; going on horseback; wrestling; the business of government; servitude; agriculture; medicine; fame; treasure; deposits; sacrifices and the rest; pre-eminence; the guru; yantras and mantras; the mother; extension; merit; medicines; the thighs; the immortals; the accomplishment of mantras; and opulence — and he becomes one who has an adopted son, and a master.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मान्यताऽश्व" — avagraha checked at high magnification: unambiguous.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जननी"; alternatives "जननी", "जनन" — final vowel length clear as long ii.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ल्स्या"; alternatives "त्स्या", "ल्स्या" — the conjunct that continues पुण्यौषधो- from the previous line is heavily inked; joined it yields no word I can verify, and I do not repair it. The subscript is certainly स्या; the superscript is ल or त. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विस्तारपुण्यौषधोरुस्थानामरमन्त्रसिद्धिविभवाः; this sentence names ल्स्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0059, store line index 12-13, at about 1.9x to 3.5x native. The page sets two akṣaras here, the old-style रु (the same sort as the रु of गुरु on the line above) and स्था, and not one conjunct ल्स्या: there is no ल, no त and no य in this span. So the स्या this note calls certain is not on the page. Line 12 ends पुण्यौषधो with a printer's line-break hyphen. औषध + ऊरु + स्थान + अमर is ordinary sandhi, pāda 4 then scans as a flawless śārdūlavikrīḍita, and our mūla now reads पुण्यौषधोरुस्थानामर.]
5.19a reading here is contested

मार्गो मानसुजीवने च नृपराट् प्रख्यातिशिक्षादया मुद्राग्रामवनिग्रहौ च दशमादाज्ञामतिः स्यादिति । लाभः सर्वविधैर्दुराशसकलादायौ पराधीनता ज्येष्ठभ्रातृपितृव्यनिर्जरगणार्चा सात्त्विकोपासनम् ॥ १९ ॥

mārgo mānasujīvane ca nṛparāṭ prakhyātiśikṣādayā mudrāgrāmavanigrahau ca daśamādājñāmatiḥ syāditi | lābhaḥ sarvavidhairdurāśasakalādāyau parādhīnatā jyeṣṭhabhrātṛpitṛvyanirjaragaṇārcā sāttvikopāsanam || 19 ||

The road; honour; a good livelihood; a king and a sovereign; renown; instruction and the rest; a seal; a village; land; a seizing — and from the tenth come command and understanding: so it is. ⟨From the 11th:⟩ gain by every means; ill-founded hope and the whole income; dependence on others; an elder brother; a paternal uncle; the worship of the hosts of the undecaying ⟨gods; our mula now reads ganarca, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩; and sattvic worship.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नृपराट्"; alternatives "नृपराड्" — the virama is clear; the final stop is the retroflex ट as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुद्राग्रामवनिग्रहौ"; alternatives "मुद्राग्रामवनिग्रहौ", "मुद्राग्रामवनीग्रहौ" — long compound, no printed division; segmentation is mine.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुर्गाशसकलादायौ"; alternatives "दुर्गाशसकलादायौ", "दुर्गाशसकलाऽऽदायौ" — a long stretch with no printed division and no reading I can verify; repha over दु is certain, the rest is recorded as printed and not repaired. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वविधैर्दुराशसकलादायौ; this sentence names दुर्गाशसकलादायौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0060, store line index 2, at about 3.0x native. The page carries one repha only, over दु, and it is the र् of विधैर्. The next akṣara is रा with nothing above it, so र्गा was never on the page. The press sets दुराश, which the metre also requires (a heavy दुर् breaks pāda 3 at position 7), and our mūla now reads सर्वविधैर्दुराशसकलादायौ.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गणाचां"; alternatives "गणार्चां", "गणाचां" — if a repha stands over the चा it is lost in the inking; गणार्चा (worship of the divine hosts) would agree with सात्त्विकोपासनम् later in the line, but I record what is legible, not what would agree. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ज्येष्ठभ्रातृपितृव्यनिर्जरगणार्चा; this sentence names गणाचां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0060, store line index 3, at about 3.5x native. The one mark over चा is a repha, set raised as this press sets a repha over an ā-syllable, and the same shape and size as the repha over र्ज in this line (467 dark px against 516). No anusvāra is printed. The press sets गणार्चा, and our mūla now reads the same; the nominative अर्चा fits this list of nominatives.]
5.20a reading here is contested

विद्याहेम धनार्जनेऽतिपटुता स्वं पूर्वपित्र्यं तथा आनुष्ठानविशेषभूषणमणिप्रीतीनवित्तानि च । नष्टद्रव्यकलाङ्गनार्थकनकस्वर्णादिकायांश्रयः प्रज्ञामात्यपदे तथा श्वशुरजो लाभश्च भाग्योदयः ॥ २० ॥

vidyāhema dhanārjane'tipaṭutā svaṃ pūrvapitryaṃ tathā ānuṣṭhānaviśeṣabhūṣaṇamaṇiprītīnavittāni ca | naṣṭadravyakalāṅganārthakanakasvarṇādikāyāṃśrayaḥ prajñāmātyapade tathā śvaśurajo lābhaśca bhāgyodayaḥ || 20 ||

Learning; gold; great skill in the earning of wealth; one's own ⟨property⟩; the ancestral estate; the performance of special rites; ornaments; gems; ⟨…⟩ wealth (vittani); lost property; art; women; wealth; gold and gold again ⟨kanaka and svarna stand side by side, both meaning gold, as printed⟩; the support of the body; wisdom; the office of minister; gain from a father-in-law; and the rise of fortune.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनार्जनेऽति" — avagraha checked at high magnification: unambiguous.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्याहेम धन"; alternatives "विद्याहेमधन" — a word-space is printed inside the compound; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रीतीनविचानि"; alternatives "प्रीतीन्यविचानि", "प्रीतिनविचानि" — a non-word as printed. The न/न्य distinction and the vowel length on ती are both unresolved at magnification; recorded as the non-word and flagged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आनुष्ठानविशेषभूषणमणिप्रीतीनवित्तानि; this sentence names प्रीतीनविचानि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कायांश्रयः"; alternatives "कायाश्रयः", "कायांश्रयः" — the anusvara before श्र may be offset ink from the line above; at magnification it is a discrete dot but sits high.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कनकस्वर्णादि" — कनक and स्वर्ण are near-synonyms (both gold) standing side by side; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाग्योदयः"; alternatives "भाग्येादयः" — the o-matra prints with a gap that can read as a separate e-matra plus a; read as भाग्योदयः.
5.21a reading here is contested

सिद्धिश्चाभिमतः सुलाभपचने चाशा जनन्यायुषी कर्णो जंघविचित्रलेखनकलानैपुण्यमेकादशात् । निद्राभङ्गमनोव्यथेऽङ्घ्रियुगलं शत्रोर्भयं बन्धनं पीडामुक्तिरृणप्रमोचनगजाश्वाः पित्र्यवित्तं रिपुः ॥ २१ ॥

siddhiścābhimataḥ sulābhapacane cāśā jananyāyuṣī karṇo jaṃghavicitralekhanakalānaipuṇyamekādaśāt | nidrābhaṅgamanovyathe'ṅghriyugalaṃ śatrorbhayaṃ bandhanaṃ pīḍāmuktirṛṇapramocanagajāśvāḥ pitryavittaṃ ripuḥ || 21 ||

Accomplishment; what is desired; good gain and cooking; hope; the mother's length of life; the ear; the shank; and skill in various kinds of writing and art — ⟨these⟩ from the eleventh. ⟨From the 12th:⟩ broken sleep; anguish of mind; the pair of feet; fear from an enemy; imprisonment; release from pain; the discharge of debts; elephants and horses; the paternal wealth; and an enemy.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सिद्धिश्चाभिमतः"; alternatives "सिद्धिश्वाभिमतः" — ba/va/ca test at magnification: the glyph after श् has the open ca form, not the va bowl - reading श्चा.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जंघ"; alternatives "जङ्घ" — printed with anusvara rather than the subscript nasal; recorded as printed. The English opposite reads 'the shank', i.e. jangha.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यर्थेऽङ्घ्रि" — avagraha checked at high magnification: unambiguous. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads निद्राभङ्गमनोव्यथेऽङ्घ्रियुगलं; this sentence names व्यर्थेऽङ्घ्रि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0061, store line index 1, at about 3.7x native. The press does set व्यर्थे: the mark over थ is one sort, this fount's repha fused with the e-mātrā, the same shape as the र्ने of कृतिर्नेत्र on line 15 of that leaf. So our old text transcribed the press faithfully. Our mūla now reads मनोव्यथे, an emendation of the press on the metre: व्यर्थे makes position 7 of pāda 3 heavy where śārdūlavikrīḍita needs it light, and the same leaf's English renders 'mental agony'.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पीडाद्युक्ति"; alternatives "पीडाऽऽयुक्ति", "पीडाद्युक्ति" — the द्यु conjunct is dense; an avagraha reading cannot be excluded. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पीडामुक्तिरृणप्रमोचनगजाश्वाः; this sentence names पीडाद्युक्ति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0061, store line index 2, at about 2.5x and 3.7x native. The sort after पीडा is म with ु (a closed bowl joined to a right stem, with a leg), matching the म of मनो on line 1; it is neither द्यु nor an avagraha. After क्त stands exactly one sort, this fount's रु, and no त. The press sets पीडामुक्तिरुण. Our mūla reads पीडामुक्तिरृण, because रुण is no word, while मुक्तिः + ऋण gives मुक्तिरृण and the leaf's English renders 'discharge of debts'.]
5.22a reading here is contested

स्वर्गारोहणवामनेत्रजनविद्वेषाङ्गवैकल्यता जारत्वं च विवाहनष्टशयनत्यागाधिकारक्षयाः । शत्रोः शृंखलगेहचित्तविकलौ दीनस्वभावासतौ पित्रोःसोदरसौख्यचिन्तनहतिस्तौ वादरोषौ क्रमात् ॥२२॥

svargārohaṇavāmanetrajanavidveṣāṅgavaikalyatā jāratvaṃ ca vivāhanaṣṭaśayanatyāgādhikārakṣayāḥ | śatroḥ śṛṃkhalagehacittavikalau dīnasvabhāvāsatau pitroḥsodarasaukhyacintanahatistau vādaroṣau kramāt ||22||

Ascending to heaven; the left eye; hatred from people; deformity of limb; adultery; a ruined marriage; the abandoning of one's bed; loss of office; the enemy's house of chains ⟨a prison⟩; distraction of mind; a wretched disposition; wickedness; the destruction of all thought for the comfort of parents and brothers; and disputation and anger, in that order.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शृंखलगेचच"; alternatives "शृंखलगेहचित्त", "शृंखलगेचच" — a non-word as printed; a doubled च is anomalous and one of the two may be a broken ह. Recorded as printed and flagged, not repaired. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शृंखलगेहचित्तविकलौ; this sentence names शृंखलगेचच, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0061, store line index 5, at about 3.4x native. The sort after गे is a whole च with a full-height stem, the same sort as the च of चित्त right after it (correlation 0.948), and not a broken ह, which in this fount has no stem (0.361 against the ह of रोहण). So the press does set शृंखलगेचचित्त, as this note read it. Our mūla reads शृंखलगेहचित्त, an emendation of the press on the lexicon: शृङ्खलगेह, the house of chains, is what the same leaf's English renders as the place of imprisonment, and the dual विकलौ closes a two-member compound.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पित्रोःसोदर"; alternatives "पित्रोः सोदर" — no word-space is printed after the visarga here, unlike भ्रातुः शत्रु on plate 58 line 9; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥२२॥" — printed tight, without the spaces used around the other verse numbers on this plate.
5.23a reading here is contested

देहार्तिर्मृतिकान्यदेशगमने सर्वप्रकारव्ययो भार्याहानिरितिक्रमान्निगदितास्तत्कारका रिःफभात् । आत्माशक्त्यतितीक्ष्णदुर्गसुबलाश्वोष्णप्रभावाश्रयः शैवोपासनधैर्यकण्टकतरू राजाश्रयत्वं कटुः ॥ २३ ॥

dehārtirmṛtikānyadeśagamane sarvaprakāravyayo bhāryāhāniritikramānnigaditāstatkārakā riḥphabhāt | ātmāśaktyatitīkṣṇadurgasubalāśvoṣṇaprabhāvāśrayaḥ śaivopāsanadhairyakaṇṭakatarū rājāśrayatvaṃ kaṭuḥ || 23 ||

Bodily pain; death; going to another country; expenditure of every kind; the loss of a wife — thus, in order, are the significators declared from the twelfth sign (rihpha). ⟨Of the Sun:⟩ the self; power; exceeding sharpness; a fortress; strong horses; heat; a refuge of majesty; Saiva worship; firmness; thorny trees; dependence upon a king; and pungency.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृतिका"; alternatives "मृतिका", "मृतिकां" — the mark over ति is a repha-like stroke that at magnification reads as part of the मृ; no anusvara. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0061, store line index 7, at about 3.2x native. The stroke is a free-standing hook directly over मृ, the tallest mark in the word, and not part of मृ: in this fount मृ carries no mark above the headline (controls: परमृति on jp2 page_0062 and विस्मृत्य on page_0057). So it is the repha of र्मृ. The press sets देहार्तिर्मृतिकान्यदेशगमने, and our mūla now reads the same.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफभात्" — रिःफ is the technical name of the TWELFTH house; the visarga inside the word is clear and is not a punctuation mark.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अश्वोष्ण"; alternatives "आश्वोष्ण" — vowel length at the compound joint not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कण्टकतरू"; alternatives "कण्टकतरु", "कण्टकतरू" — final vowel reads long; a dual तरू is grammatically possible here.
5.24a reading here is contested

वृद्धत्वं पशुदौष्ट्यभूपितृरुचिज्ञानोदयव्योमदृक् भीरूत्पन्नमनुष्यलोकचतुरश्रास्थिप्रतापास्तृणम् । कुक्ष्युत्साहवनायनाक्षिगिरिसञ्चाराश्चतुष्पान्नृपः संचारो व्यवहारपित्ततपना वृत्ताकृतिर्नेत्ररुक् ॥ २४ ॥

vṛddhatvaṃ paśudauṣṭyabhūpitṛrucijñānodayavyomadṛk bhīrūtpannamanuṣyalokacaturaśrāsthipratāpāstṛṇam | kukṣyutsāhavanāyanākṣigirisañcārāścatuṣpānnṛpaḥ saṃcāro vyavahārapittatapanā vṛttākṛtirnetraruk || 24 ||

Old age; cattle; wickedness; the earth; the father; taste; the rise of knowledge; the sky; the eye; born of the timid; the world of men; a quadrangle; the bones; majesty; grass; the belly; energy; going to the forest; the eye; wandering over mountains; quadrupeds; a king; travel; business; bile; heat; a round figure; and eye-disease. ⟨Both stretches once left unrepaired now stand emended in our mula, on the metre and the lexicon.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञानोदव्योमदृक्"; alternatives "ज्ञानोदव्योमदृक्", "ज्ञानोदव्योमदृङ्" — the final virama-stopped consonant may sandhi with the following line's opening; recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पशुदौष्ट्यभूपितृरुचिज्ञानोदयव्योमदृक् for पशुदौष्ट्यभूपितृरुचिज्ञानोदव्योमदृक्, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0061 line 12, printed page 59; about 4.66x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0061.png) confirmed this note: between नो and व्यो there is one glyph, a द with a small mark below it, and the 12 px channel before व्य carries no ink at any level, so the press sets no separate य. Our transcription was faithful. The mūla's ज्ञानोदय is an emendation on the metre, because the press's pāda 1 runs eighteen syllables where śārdūlavikrīḍita needs nineteen; uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi read it. The open doubt on this verse records what the mark below the द may be.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मीरूत्पन्न"; alternatives "भीरूत्पन्न", "मीरूत्पन्न" — the opening akshara is म or भ - the two differ only in the right counter, which is filled with ink here. Note this line does NOT carry a leading hyphen, so unlike the hyphenated splits elsewhere it is not signalled as a continued word, yet मी- is an odd opening; flagged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भीरुत्पन्नमनुष्यलोकचतुरश्रास्थिप्रतापास्तृणम् for मीरूत्पन्नमनुष्यलोकचतुरश्रास्थिप्रतापास्तृणम्, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23, later the same day: the sentence above is superseded. The mūla now reads भीरूत्पन्न, with the long ū of bhīru + utpanna, restored on the lexicon; see this verse's revisions.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाश्विनीरिसंचारा"; alternatives "नाश्विनीरिसंचारा" — a long stretch I cannot verify as words; recorded exactly as the aksharas read, with no repair. Segmentation offered nowhere in this line is mine. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुक्ष्युत्साहवनायनाक्षिगिरिसञ्चाराश्चतुष्पान्नृपः for कुष्ठ्युत्साहवनायनाश्विनीरिसंचाराश्वतुष्पान्नृपः, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0061 line 14, printed page 59; about 3.48x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0061.png) confirmed this note's reading: after ना the press sets श्वि with a fully formed श, not क्षि; then नी with the long ī after the stem, not गि; and a plain anusvāra over स (संचारा), not स + ञ्चा. So the press sets नाश्विनीरिसंचारा, and the mūla's नाक्षिगिरिसञ्चारा is an emendation that follows P. S. Sastri's printing, because the exemplar's stretch is not Sanskrit. The head of the pāda (कुष्ठ्यु against our कुक्ष्यु) was not read above 1.96x and is not claimed.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तुष्पान्नृपः"; alternatives "तुष्टान्नृपः", "तुष्पान्नृपः" — ष्प vs ष्ट not separable at this inking.
5.25a reading here is contested

देहो दारु मनःशुचिः सकलदेशाधीश्वरत्वं ह्यरुक् सौराष्ट्राधिपतित्वभूषणशिरोव्याधिश्च मुक्ताः खपः । ह्रस्वः पूर्वदिगीशताम्ररुधिरे राज्यं च रक्तः पटः पाषाणप्रकटप्रवर्तननदीतीरप्रवालाभिधाः ॥ २५ ॥

deho dāru manaḥśuciḥ sakaladeśādhīśvaratvaṃ hyaruk saurāṣṭrādhipatitvabhūṣaṇaśirovyādhiśca muktāḥ khapaḥ | hrasvaḥ pūrvadigīśatāmrarudhire rājyaṃ ca raktaḥ paṭaḥ pāṣāṇaprakaṭapravartananadītīrapravālābhidhāḥ || 25 ||

The body; wood; the mind; purity; lordship over all countries; freedom from disease; the lordship of Saurastra; ornaments; disease of the head; pearls; ⟨khapa — the final aksara is ambiguous between pa and ga⟩; shortness; lordship of the eastern quarter; copper; blood; sovereignty; a red cloth; stone; open activity; the bank of a river; and coral — such are the names.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दारु"; alternatives "दारू", "दारु" — printed with a word-space either side; final vowel short.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौराष्ट्रधिपतित्व"; alternatives "सौराष्ट्राधिपतित्व" — the aa of अधिपति appears absorbed at the joint; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads सौराष्ट्राधिपतित्वभूषणशिरोव्याधिश्च for सौराष्ट्रधिपतित्वभूषणशिरोव्याधिश्च, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खपः"; alternatives "खगः", "खपः" — final word ambiguous between प and ग at this inking.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रवालाभिधाः"; alternatives "प्रवालाभिघाः", "प्रवालाभिधाः" — dha vs gha: at magnification the left limb closes, giving dha.
5.26a reading here is contested

मध्याह्नप्रबलत्वपूर्ववदनः स्याद्दीर्घरोषो रिपुग्राहः सात्त्विकरक्तचन्दनपरावस्थूलतन्तू रवेः । बुद्धिः पुष्पसुगन्धदुर्गगमनव्याधिद्विजालस्यकश्लेष्मापस्मृतिगुल्मभावहृदयस्त्रीसौम्यपापाम्लकाः ॥ २६ ॥

madhyāhnaprabalatvapūrvavadanaḥ syāddīrgharoṣo ripugrāhaḥ sāttvikaraktacandanaparāvasthūlatantū raveḥ | buddhiḥ puṣpasugandhadurgagamanavyādhidvijālasyakaśleṣmāpasmṛtigulmabhāvahṛdayastrīsaumyapāpāmlakāḥ || 26 ||

Strength at midday; a face turned east; long-lasting anger; the seizing of an enemy; the sattvic ⟨quality⟩; red sandal; a thick cord — these belong to the Sun. ⟨Of the Moon:⟩ intelligence; flowers; fragrance; going to a fortress; disease; a twice-born; sloth; phlegm; epilepsy ⟨apasmṛti⟩; the gulma ⟨abdominal tumour⟩; the bhava; the heart; women; the benefic and the malefic; and the sour ⟨taste⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्ववदनः"; alternatives "पूर्ववदनः", "पूर्वंवदनः" — no anusvara resolvable over र्व.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परावस्थूल"; alternatives "परावस्थूल", "परोवस्थूल" — matra over the व not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्तू"; alternatives "तन्तु", "तन्तू" — final vowel reads long; the English opposite has 'thick cord'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विजालस्यक"; alternatives "द्विजालस्यक" — compound division not printed; segmentation is mine.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापाम्लकाः"; alternatives "पापाम्लकाः" — म्ल conjunct confirmed at magnification.
5.27a reading here is contested

निद्रा सौख्यजलस्वरूपरजतस्थूलेक्षुशीतज्वरा यात्रा कूपतटाकमातृसमदृग्मध्याह्नमुक्ताक्षयाः । धावल्यं कटिसूत्रकांस्यलवणह्रस्वामनः शक्तयो वापी वज्रशरन्मुहूर्तमुखकान्तिश्वेतवर्णोदराः ॥ २७ ॥

nidrā saukhyajalasvarūparajatasthūlekṣuśītajvarā yātrā kūpataṭākamātṛsamadṛgmadhyāhnamuktākṣayāḥ | dhāvalyaṃ kaṭisūtrakāṃsyalavaṇahrasvāmanaḥ śaktayo vāpī vajraśaranmuhūrtamukhakāntiśvetavarṇodarāḥ || 27 ||

Sleep; happiness; water; form; silver; thick sugarcane; cold; fever; journeying; a well; a tank; the mother; even sight (samadrk); midday; pearls; decline; whiteness (dhavalya); the waist-cord; bell-metal; salt; shortness; ⟨…⟩; powers; a tank (vapi); diamond; autumn (sarat); the muhurta; beauty of face; a white colour; and the belly. ⟨Our mula now reads samadrk, dhavalyam and sarat where the earlier text carried three non-words; the word after 'shortness' is still left unrendered.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समदग्म"; alternatives "समदग्ध", "समदग्म" — the conjunct after दग् is म or ध; not separable at this inking. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कूपतटाकमातृसमदृग्मध्याह्नमुक्ताक्षयाः; this sentence names समदग्म, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the leaf. An eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0062 line index 9, printed page 60; about 3.66x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0062.png) counted four akṣaras between मातृ and ध्या: स, म, द with a mark below it, and the ग्म conjunct, then ध्या with no second म before it. The mark below the द is the ṛ-mātrā. So the press sets समदृग्मध्याह्न, the reading our mūla carries, and the correction of 2026-09-20 restored what the press prints.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घावल्पं"; alternatives "घवाल्पं", "भावल्पं" — a non-word as printed, and this line carries NO leading hyphen, so it is not marked as a continuation - yet घा- is an implausible opening. The first akshara is घ or भ. Recorded as printed and flagged; not repaired. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads धावल्यं for घावल्पं, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वज्रशगन्मुहूर्त"; alternatives "वज्रशगन्मुहूर्त", "वज्रशकुन्मुहूर्त" — the ग/कु distinction is lost in the inking; as printed the stretch is not a word I can verify. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वज्रशरन्मुहूर्तमुखकान्तिश्वेतवर्णोदराः; this sentence names वज्रशगन्मुहूर्त, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वापी" — ba/va counter test applied: open bowl, no closing bar - va, giving वापी (a tank/well), which suits the Moon's watery significations.
5.28a reading here is contested

गौरीभक्तिमधुप्रसादपरिहासाः पुष्टिगोधूमकाऽऽमोदाः कान्तिमुखे मनोजवदधिप्रीती तपस्वी यशः । लावण्यं निशि वीर्य पश्चिममुखे विटक्षारकायांश्रयः प्रत्यग्दिक्प्रियमध्यलोकनवरत्नानीह मध्यं वयः ॥ २८ ॥

gaurībhaktimadhuprasādaparihāsāḥ puṣṭigodhūmakā''modāḥ kāntimukhe manojavadadhiprītī tapasvī yaśaḥ | lāvaṇyaṃ niśi vīrya paścimamukhe viṭakṣārakāyāṃśrayaḥ pratyagdikpriyamadhyalokanavaratnānīha madhyaṃ vayaḥ || 28 ||

Devotion to Gauri; honey; graciousness; jesting; nourishment; wheat; fragrances; beauty in the face; the swiftness of thought; curds; affection; an ascetic; fame; loveliness; strength by night; a face turned west; a libertine; alkali; the support of the body; the western quarter; what is dear; the middle world; and gems — and here, middle age. ⟨Our mula joins godhumaka and amodah with a doubled avagraha, which marks the absorbed a of amodah, 'fragrances'.⟩

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽऽमोदाः"; alternatives "ऽऽमोदाः", "ऽऽमोदाः" — the line OPENS with two avagrahas, checked at high magnification and distinct from any hyphen. Continuing गोधूमका from the previous line it would give गोधूमकाऽऽमोदाः. I record the mark as seen; a doubled avagraha is unusual and I do not normalise it to one. [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (store page_0063 lines 1-2, printed folio 61; about 3.1x and 3.5x native on .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0063.png) confirmed this note: the press ends line 1 with पुष्टिगोधूमका, with no visarga after का and no repha on गो, opens line 2 with ऽऽमोदाः, and sets no dash at this break. The doubled avagraha is this press's own sign for an absorbed आ: the exemplar's store gives the same mark at page_0024 line 30 (दशाऽऽरोहाऽपि), page_0056 line 4 (महाऽऽयोग) and page_0097 line 27 (ऽऽडीवासर). So it is not unusual, and leaving it unnormalised was right. The word is आमोदाः, fragrances, and our mūla reads पुष्टिगोधूमकाऽऽमोदाः.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनोजवदधिप्रीती"; alternatives "मनोजवदधिप्रीती", "मनोजवदधिप्रीति" — final vowel length not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कायांश्रयः"; alternatives "कायाश्रयः" — the same anusvara-or-offset-ink ambiguity as on plate 60 line 7; recorded the same way.
5.29a reading here is contested

जीवो भोजनदूरदेशगमने लग्नं च दोर्व्याधयः छत्राद्याश्रितराजचिह्नसुफले सद्रक्तधातुस्तथा । मीनाद्या जलजाः सरीसृपदुकूले सद्द्विकासस्फुरत् शुद्धस्तत्स्फटिकास्ततो मृदुलकं वस्त्रं त्वमी स्युर्विधोः ॥ २९ ॥

jīvo bhojanadūradeśagamane lagnaṃ ca dorvyādhayaḥ chatrādyāśritarājacihnasuphale sadraktadhātustathā | mīnādyā jalajāḥ sarīsṛpadukūle saddvikāsasphurat śuddhastatsphaṭikāstato mṛdulakaṃ vastraṃ tvamī syurvidhoḥ || 29 ||

Life; food; going to a distant country; the lagna; diseases of the arms; the parasol and the rest; the royal insignia one leans upon; good fruit; a good red metal, and likewise; fish and the other creatures born of water; reptiles ⟨our mula now reads sarīsṛpa, the word for reptile⟩; fine cloth; ⟨…⟩ shining; the pure; crystals; and after that soft cloth — these belong to Vidhu ⟨the Moon⟩.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दोर्व्यांघयः"; alternatives "दोर्व्याधयः", "दोर्व्यांघयः" — a non-word as printed; gha vs dha is not separable here and the anusvara may be offset ink. Recorded as printed, not repaired. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads दोर्व्याधयः for दोर्व्यांघयः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धातुरूथा"; alternatives "धातुरूपा", "धातुरूथा" — tha vs pa ambiguous at this inking. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सद्रक्तधातुस्तथा; this sentence names धातुरूथा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सरीसुप"; alternatives "सरीसृप" — the vowel under स is u as printed; सरीसृप (reptile) would be the expected word and the English opposite reads 'serpent'. I record the printed vowel. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सरीसृपदुकूले; this sentence names सरीसुप, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सद्द्विकासस्फुरत्" — long conjunct chain, no printed division; segmentation is mine.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वस्त्र त्वमी"; alternatives "वस्त्रत्वमी" — a word-space is printed inside; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads वस्त्रं for वस्त्र, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युर्विधोः" — विधु is the MOON; this line closes the Moon's karakatva.
5.30a reading here is contested

शौर्यं भूर्बलशस्त्रधारणजनाधीशत्ववीर्यध्वजाश्चोरो युद्धविरोधबान्धव उदारा रक्तवस्तुप्रियः । आरामाधिपतित्वतूर्यरवनं प्रीती चतुष्पान्नृपा मूर्खः कोपविदेशयानधृतयो घातग्निवाग्वादताः ॥ ३० ॥

śauryaṃ bhūrbalaśastradhāraṇajanādhīśatvavīryadhvajāścoro yuddhavirodhabāndhava udārā raktavastupriyaḥ | ārāmādhipatitvatūryaravanaṃ prītī catuṣpānnṛpā mūrkhaḥ kopavideśayānadhṛtayo ghātagnivāgvādatāḥ || 30 ||

⟨Of Mars:⟩ valour; the earth; strength; the bearing of weapons; lordship over men; virility; banners; a thief; war; opposition; a kinsman; the generous; one fond of red things; the lordship of gardens; the sounding of musical instruments; affection; quadrupeds; kings; a fool; anger; foreign travel; firmness; slaughter; fire; and quarrelling. ⟨The text reads vāgvāda, 'quarrelling'. The first reader of this plate saw an avagraha here, which gives no word; re-read on 2026-09-23 at about 2x, the mark could not be told apart from the half-ga of gvā, so the reading rests on the lexicon and the question stays open. So does 'banners' (dhvaja), which two other printings read as kṣaya, 'loss'.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्यध्वजा"; alternatives "वीर्यंध्वजा" — an anusvara over र्य is possible but reads as part of the repha at magnification. [2026-09-23: the mūla reads वीर्यध्वजा again. It was corrected to वीर्यक्षया on 2026-09-20 on two machine reads and that correction was reverted, because no instrument inside our text licensed it; whether the conjunct is ध्व or क्ष is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बान्धव"; alternatives "बान्धव" — ba/va counter test applied: closed counter with bar - ba.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उदारा"; alternatives "उदाराः", "उदारा" — a visarga may be lost at the line's inking.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रीर्ता"; alternatives "प्रीता", "प्रीर्ता" — a repha-like stroke stands over the ता; if it is ink rather than type the word is प्रीता. Not settled at magnification. [2026-09-23: settled on the plate, and the mūla now reads प्रीती. The mark over the last akṣara is an ī-matra arc 77 px wide, the width of the press’s own प्रीती at v28, and not a repha, which on this leaf is 31 px; so neither प्रीर्ता nor प्रीता.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घातग्निवाऽवादताः"; alternatives "घातवह्निवाऽवादताः" — as printed this stretch is not a word I can verify; the avagraha itself is clear at magnification, the letters around it are not. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads घातग्निवाग्वादताः for घातग्निवाऽवादताः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the mūla still reads घातग्निवाग्वादताः, now on the lexicon rather than on the two reads: वाऽवाद is no word. Re-read on the plate at about 2x, the mark is 21 px wide against control avagrahas of 30, 37 and 47 px and cannot be told from the half-ga of ग्वा, so the question stays open as a doubt on this verse.]
5.31a reading here is contested

पित्तोष्णव्रणराजसेवनदिनव्योमेक्षणह्रस्वरुग् विख्यातिप्रपुखड्गकुन्तसचिवाश्वाङ्गस्फुटत्वं मणिः । सुब्रह्मण्यजपे युवा कटुनृपस्थाने कुजोऽवग्रहो मांसाशी परदूषणं रिपुजयस्तिक्तं निशान्ते बलम् ॥ ३१ ॥

pittoṣṇavraṇarājasevanadinavyomekṣaṇahrasvarug vikhyātiprapukhaḍgakuntasacivāśvāṅgasphuṭatvaṃ maṇiḥ | subrahmaṇyajape yuvā kaṭunṛpasthāne kujo'vagraho māṃsāśī paradūṣaṇaṃ ripujayastiktaṃ niśānte balam || 31 ||

⟨Of Mars:⟩ bile; heat; wounds; service of the king; the day; the sky; sight; shortness; disease ⟨our mula now reads ह्रस्वरुग्; रुग् is 'disease'⟩; renown; the sword ⟨our mula now reads खड्ग, 'sword'⟩; the lance; a minister; the horse; distinctness of the limbs; the gem. The muttering of Subrahmaṇya's japa; the young man; the pungent taste; the station of a king — these are Kuja's ⟨Mars's⟩; drought; the eater of flesh; the defaming of others; victory over enemies; the bitter taste; and strength at the end of night.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्रस्वरग्"; alternatives "ह्रस्वरुग्", "ह्रस्वरग्" — the vowel under र is indistinct; रुग् (disease) would suit the list. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पित्तोष्णव्रणराजसेवनदिनव्योमेक्षणह्रस्वरुग्; this sentence names ह्रस्वरग्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रपुखङ्ग"; alternatives "प्रपुखड्ग", "प्रमुखखड्ग" — the English opposite lists 'sword' and 'lance or spear', which would want खड्ग; the printed conjunct reads ङ्ग. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विख्यातिप्रपुखड्गकुन्तसचिवाश्वाङ्गस्फुटत्वं; this sentence names प्रपुखङ्ग, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुजोऽवग्रहो" — avagraha checked at high magnification: unambiguous. कुज names MARS.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलम्" — ba/va counter test applied: closed counter with bar - ba.
5.32a reading here is contested

हेमग्रीष्मपराक्रमारिपुबलं गाम्भीर्यशौर्ये पुमान् शीलं ब्रह्मपरश्वधौ वनचरो ग्रामाधिनाथत्वता । राजालोकनमूत्रकृच्छ्रचतुरश्रस्वर्णकाराः खलो दग्धस्थानसुभोजने कृशधनुर्विद्याप्रवीणत्वते ॥ ३२ ॥

hemagrīṣmaparākramāripubalaṃ gāmbhīryaśaurye pumān śīlaṃ brahmaparaśvadhau vanacaro grāmādhināthatvatā | rājālokanamūtrakṛcchracaturaśrasvarṇakārāḥ khalo dagdhasthānasubhojane kṛśadhanurvidyāpravīṇatvate || 32 ||

Gold; the summer; prowess; the foe, and strength; depth and heroism; a man; character; the Veda and the axe; one who ranges the forest; the headship of a village. The glance of a king; strangury; the four-cornered ⟨figure⟩; goldsmiths; a wicked man; a burnt place; good food; leanness; and mastery of the science of the bow ⟨our mula now reads -विद्याप्रवीणत्वते; प्रवीणत्व is 'mastery'⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परश्वधौ"; alternatives "परश्वधौ", "परशुधौ" — परश्वध is an axe; the English opposite has 'carrying arms'. Reading as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृच्छ्र" — the च्छ्र triple conjunct is dense but resolves at magnification.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्याश्रवीणत्वते"; alternatives "विद्याप्रवीणत्वते" — श्र vs प्र at the joint; प्रवीणत्व (skilfulness) would be the expected word. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कृशधनुर्विद्याप्रवीणत्वते; this sentence names विद्याश्रवीणत्वते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.33a reading here is contested

रक्तं ताम्रविचित्रवस्त्रयमदिग्वह्ने च तद्दिक्प्रियः कामक्रोधपरापवादगृहसैन्येशाः शतघ्नीः कुजः । सामभ्रातृकुठारदुष्टमृगनेतृत्वस्वतन्त्राग्रहः क्षेत्रं दण्डपतित्वनागभुवने वाक्चित्तचाञ्चल्यता ॥ ३३ ॥

raktaṃ tāmravicitravastrayamadigvahne ca taddikpriyaḥ kāmakrodhaparāpavādagṛhasainyeśāḥ śataghnīḥ kujaḥ | sāmabhrātṛkuṭhāraduṣṭamṛganetṛtvasvatantrāgrahaḥ kṣetraṃ daṇḍapatitvanāgabhuvane vākcittacāñcalyatā || 33 ||

Red, and copper; variegated cloth; the quarter of Yama ⟨the south⟩ and of fire, and fondness for that quarter; desire and anger; the slandering of others; the house; commanders of armies; the śataghnī ⟨the hundred-slaying weapon⟩ — these are Kuja's. Conciliation; the brother; the hatchet; savage beasts; leadership; insistence on independence; the field; the office of a daṇḍapati; the world of the nāgas; and fickleness of speech and mind ⟨our mula now reads चाञ्चल्यता, 'fickleness'⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शतघ्नीः"; alternatives "शतघ्नी", "शतघ्नीः" — visarga present as printed though the form is odd.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चाश्वल्यता"; alternatives "चाञ्चल्यता", "चाश्वल्यता" — as printed this is a non-word; चाञ्चल्य (fickleness) would suit वाक्चित्त before it. The conjunct is inked closed and I do not repair it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वाक्चित्तचाञ्चल्यता; this sentence names चाश्वल्यता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.34a reading here is contested

वाहारोहणरक्तदर्शन असृक्संशोषणान्येवमन्येचानेकसुसंज्ञका बुधवरैर्भौमस्य तूक्ता अलम् । विद्यार्थी चतुरङ्गकोशगणितज्ञानानि वाक्यद्विजाः पादातं लिपिलेख्यनूतनपटप्रासादकाराहरित् ॥ ३४ ॥

vāhārohaṇaraktadarśana asṛksaṃśoṣaṇānyevamanyecānekasusaṃjñakā budhavarairbhaumasya tūktā alam | vidyārthī caturaṅgakośagaṇitajñānāni vākyadvijāḥ pādātaṃ lipilekhyanūtanapaṭaprāsādakārāharit || 34 ||

Mounting a vehicle; the sight of blood; the drying up of blood — and many other things, well known by name, have been amply declared by the best of the learned to belong to Bhauma ⟨Mars⟩. ⟨Mercury begins here:⟩ a student; the four-limbed ⟨army⟩; the treasury; the knowledges of computation; sentences; the twice-born; the foot-soldiery; script and writing; new cloth; the building of palaces and the green ⟨colour⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दर्शन असृक्"; alternatives "दर्शनासृक्" — a word-space is printed where sandhi would close the join; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधवरैभौमस्य"; alternatives "बुधवरैर्भौमस्य", "बुधवरैभौमस्य" — a repha may be lost before भौ; not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बुधवरैर्भौमस्य; this sentence names बुधवरैभौमस्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0064, store line index 16, at about 3.0x native. The mark above भौ holds 1605 dark px, about 470 more than the two-stroke au of सौम्यो (1127) or the ai of the neighbouring रै (1143); the excess is the size of a repha hook, but the ruling could not separate a repha from the au strokes by eye. Sandhi decides: बुधवरैः + भौमस्य gives बुधवरैर्भौमस्य, the reader's own first alternative, which our mūla now reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तूक्ता"; alternatives "तूक्ता", "त्युक्ता" — as printed the form is odd; recorded and flagged.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रामाद्काहरित्"; alternatives "प्रासादकाहरित्", "प्रामादिकाहरित्" — a non-word as printed; the द्का cluster is anomalous and one letter is probably broken. Recorded as printed and flagged, not repaired. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads लिपिलेख्यनूतनपटप्रासादकाराहरित्; this sentence names प्रामाद्काहरित्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0065, store line index 3, at about 2.6x native, plain and with gamma 3.0. The press sets प्रासादकाराहरित्: the akṣara after प्रा is स, not म; the द carries no virāma, and the mark read as one is the द's own tail; and after का stands one more akṣara the earlier reading dropped, an under-inked र with its ā stem. The pāda then scans as an exact 19-syllable śārdūlavikrīḍita, and the exemplar's own English lists '(11) palatial building (12) green colour'. Our mūla now reads प्रासादकाराहरित्.]
5.35a reading here is contested

शिल्पज्योतिषतीर्थयात्रसुवचप्रासङ्गदेवालया वाणिज्यं वरभूषणं मृदुवचोवेदान्तमातामहाः । दुःस्वप्नं च नपुंसकोत्तरमुखे चर्माद्रिकांस्यादयो वैराग्यर्तुविचित्रहर्म्यभिषजः कण्ठाभिचारौ शिशुः ॥ ३५ ॥

śilpajyotiṣatīrthayātrasuvacaprāsaṅgadevālayā vāṇijyaṃ varabhūṣaṇaṃ mṛduvacovedāntamātāmahāḥ | duḥsvapnaṃ ca napuṃsakottaramukhe carmādrikāṃsyādayo vairāgyartuvicitraharmyabhiṣajaḥ kaṇṭhābhicārau śiśuḥ || 35 ||

Craft; astrology ⟨our mula now reads ज्योतिष⟩; pilgrimage; good speech; conjunction; temples; trade; fine ornaments; soft speech; Vedānta; the maternal grandfather. Bad dreams too; the neuter; facing north; leather, the mountain, bell-metal and the rest; dispassion; the seasons; a many-coloured mansion; physicians; the throat and sorcery ⟨abhicāra; our mula now reads कण्ठ, 'throat'⟩; and the child.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्योतिपती"; alternatives "ज्योतिपति", "ज्योतिषती" — vowel length and the ति/षि distinction both unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिल्पज्योतिषतीर्थयात्रसुवचप्रासङ्गदेवालया; this sentence names ज्योतिपती, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दुःस्वप्न"; alternatives "दुःस्वप्नं", "दुःस्वप्न" — no anusvara resolvable; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads दुःस्वप्नं for दुःस्वप्न, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कण्टाभिचारौ"; alternatives "कण्ठाभिचारौ", "कण्टाभिचारौ" — retroflex ट vs ठ not separable at this inking. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कण्ठाभिचारौ; this sentence names कण्टाभिचारौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.36a reading here is contested

तिर्यग्दाहिसुवर्गलोकविनयाज्ञातिर्मयो नर्तनं भक्तिर्हासमतिप्रभातबलहेमन्ताः क्षाणः शमः । नाभीगोत्रसमृद्धिमिश्रपदार्थान्यान्ध्रभाषाधिपो विष्णूपासनशूद्रपक्षिसहजा भाषा चमत्कारता ॥ ३६ ॥

tiryagdāhisuvargalokavinayājñātirmayo nartanaṃ bhaktirhāsamatiprabhātabalahemantāḥ kṣāṇaḥ śamaḥ | nābhīgotrasamṛddhimiśrapadārthānyāndhrabhāṣādhipo viṣṇūpāsanaśūdrapakṣisahajā bhāṣā camatkāratā || 36 ||

Animals and burning; the world of heaven ⟨printed सुवर्ग where स्वर्ग is expected⟩; discipline, command, kinsmen; dancing (nartana). Devotion; laughter ⟨our mula now reads hāsa⟩; intellect; the dawn, and strength ⟨then⟩; the hemanta season; the moment; and calm. The navel; the gotra; prosperity; mixed substances; lordship of the Āndhra tongue; the worship of Viṣṇu; the śūdra; birds; siblings (sahaja); language; and brilliance ⟨of speech⟩.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ननंनं"; alternatives "नतनं", "ननंनं" — a non-word as printed and the least legible stretch on this plate; letters are individually formed but yield nothing I can verify. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads नर्तनं for ननंनं, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुवर्ग"; alternatives "स्वर्ग", "सुवर्ग" — स्वर्ग (heaven) would be expected; the printed form carries a full u.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हांस"; alternatives "हास", "हंस" — the anusvara placement is anomalous; recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भक्तिर्हासमतिप्रभातबलहेमन्ताः; this sentence names हांस, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षाणः"; alternatives "क्षणः", "क्षाणः" — vowel length unsettled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आन्ध्रभाषाधिपो" — आन्ध्र names the Andhra language; the conjunct न्ध्र resolves cleanly at magnification.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विष्णूपासन"; alternatives "विष्ण्वुपासन", "विष्णूपासन" — printed with a long uu at the joint; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads विष्णूपासनशूद्रपक्षिसहजा for विष्णूपासनशूद्रपक्षिमहजा, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महजा"; alternatives "महिजा", "महजा" — vowel unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विष्णूपासनशूद्रपक्षिसहजा; this sentence names महजा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.37a reading here is contested

काष्ठाधर्वण कर्मगोपुररजांस्युद्यानगुह्यो समः सौम्यो ग्रामचरः समप्रकृतिको वायव्यकाष्ठाप्रियः । सत्पौराणिकशब्दशास्त्रसुमहारत्नादिसंशोदको विद्वान्मातुलमन्त्रयन्त्रसुमहातन्त्रादिकाः सौम्यताः ॥ ३७ ॥

kāṣṭhādharvaṇa karmagopurarajāṃsyudyānaguhyo samaḥ saumyo grāmacaraḥ samaprakṛtiko vāyavyakāṣṭhāpriyaḥ | satpaurāṇikaśabdaśāstrasumahāratnādisaṃśodako vidvānmātulamantrayantrasumahātantrādikāḥ saumyatāḥ || 37 ||

The quarters ⟨or wood⟩ and the Atharvan rite ⟨a word-space is printed inside the compound and the initial of अथर्वण is absorbed at the joint⟩; the gate-tower; dusts; the garden; the secret; the even. Saumya ⟨Mercury⟩ ranges the villages, is of balanced constitution, and is fond of the Vāyavya ⟨north-west⟩ quarter. A good paurāṇika; the science of words ⟨grammar⟩; an assayer of the great gems and the like; the learned man; the maternal uncle; mantra, yantra, the great tantras and so on — these are Saumya's.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "काष्ठाधर्वण कर्म"; alternatives "काष्ठाथर्वणकर्म" — a word-space is printed inside the compound; and धर्वण may be अथर्वण (the Atharva Veda) with the initial absorbed at the joint. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौम्यो" — सौम्य names MERCURY.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संशोदको"; alternatives "संशोधको", "संशोदको" — da vs dha at this inking; संशोधक (investigator) would be expected.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौम्यताः"; alternatives "सौम्यता", "सौम्यताः" — closes Mercury's karakatva.
5.38a reading here is contested

भूदेवस्वगुरुस्वकर्मरथगो पादातनिक्षेपका मीमांसो निधिवाजिमाहिषबृहद्गात्रप्रतापा यशः तर्कज्योतिषपुत्रपौत्रजठरव्याधिद्विपात्संपदो वेदान्तप्रपितामहादिपुरुषप्रासादगोमेधिकाः ॥ ३८ ॥

bhūdevasvagurusvakarmarathago pādātanikṣepakā mīmāṃso nidhivājimāhiṣabṛhadgātrapratāpā yaśaḥ tarkajyotiṣaputrapautrajaṭharavyādhidvipātsaṃpado vedāntaprapitāmahādipuruṣaprāsādagomedhikāḥ || 38 ||

⟨Jupiter:⟩ brahmins ⟨the gods on earth⟩; one's own preceptor; one's own duty; the chariot; the cow; the foot-soldiery; deposits; the Mīmāṃsā; treasure; horses; curds and what else comes of the buffalo; a large body; majesty; fame; logic; astrology; sons and grandsons; disease of the belly; the wealth of elephants; Vedānta; the great-grandfather and elders of that kind; the mansion; and the gomeda gem and the like.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रथगो पादात"; alternatives "रथगोपादात" — a word-space is printed inside the compound; recorded as printed. NOTE 2026-09-08: the space is a line-setting artefact; रथ and गो are two separate kārakatva items (chariot, cow) in both published lists.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निविवाजिमाहिप"; alternatives "निधिवाजिमहिप", "निविवाजिमाहिप" — as printed this stretch is not a word I can verify; the वा/धि distinction is lost in the inking. Recorded as printed and flagged, not repaired. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: निधिवाजिमाहिष — treasure, horse, curds — from Bhasin's plate and from both published English lists, which number these items 9, 10 and 11. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads निधिवाजिमाहिषबृहद्गात्रप्रतापा for निविवाजिमाहिपबृहद्रात्रप्रतापा, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-08 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विपात्संपदो"; alternatives "द्विपात्संपदो", "द्विपात्सम्पदो" — printed with anusvara rather than the subscript nasal; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोमेधिकाः"; alternatives "गोमेधिकाः", "गोमेदिकाः" — dha vs da at this inking; गोमेद is a gem name and would suit a list carrying रत्नं below.
5.39a reading here is contested

ज्येष्ठभ्रातृपितामहेन्द्रशिशिरर्तूग्राणि रत्नं वणिग् देहारोग्यविचित्रहर्म्यनृपसन्मानोरुदेवास्तपः । दानं धर्मपरोपकारसमदृक्चोदङ्मुखो वर्तुल पीतं ग्रामचरोत्तरप्रियसखान्दोलादिवाग्धोरणीः ॥ ३९ ॥

jyeṣṭhabhrātṛpitāmahendraśiśirartūgrāṇi ratnaṃ vaṇig dehārogyavicitraharmyanṛpasanmānorudevāstapaḥ | dānaṃ dharmaparopakārasamadṛkcodaṅmukho vartula pītaṃ grāmacarottarapriyasakhāndolādivāgdhoraṇīḥ || 39 ||

The elder brother; the paternal grandfather; Indra; the cold season; wrath; the gem; the merchant; bodily health; a many-coloured mansion; honour from a king; the thigh; the gods; austerity. Giving; dharma; benefiting others; an impartial eye; facing north; the round; the colour yellow; ranging the villages; the north; a close friend; swinging and the like; and the gift of oratory.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शिरनूंत्राणि"; alternatives "शिरोनेत्राणि", "शिरनूंत्राणि" — a non-word as printed. शिरोनेत्राणि (head and eyes) would fit a body-part list, but the printed vowels are u/uu with an anusvara, not o/e. Recorded as printed and flagged. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: as read this pāda is one syllable short of Śārdūlavikrīḍita's nineteen. शिशिरर्तूग्राणि restores it, scans at every position, and gives the two items both published lists number 28 and 29 (cold season, wrath). Bhasin's plate prints it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "देवास्तपः"; alternatives "देवास्तपः", "देवास्त्वपः" — the स्त conjunct is clear; the following vowel is not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समवक्चोदङ्मुखो"; alternatives "समवाक्चोदङ्मुखो" — vowel length on the वक् syllable not settled; उदङ्मुख (north-facing) is clear at the tail. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: समदृक्, an impartial eye — Bhasin's plate, and item 41 in both published lists.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाग्घोरवर्णाः"; alternatives "वाग्घोरवर्णाः", "वाग्गौरवर्णाः" — the घो/गौ distinction is not separable here; गौरवर्ण (fair-coloured) would suit a colour term and Jupiter's traditional gaura. Recorded as printed. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: वाग्धोरणीः, one item and not two — 'orator' in Sareen's list, 'oratorical talent' in V. Subrahmaṇya Śāstri's, both numbered 49. Bhasin's plate prints वाग्धोरणीः.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महान्दोलादि"; alternatives "महान्दोलादि", "महादोलादि" — the न् before दो may be a broken sort. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: प्रियसखान्दोलादि — a close friend, then swinging — items 47 and 48 in both lists. Bhasin's plate prints प्रियसखान्दोलादि.
5.40a reading here is contested

मेदो मध्यपटौ नवीनगृहसौख्यं वृद्धमन्त्रद्विजास्तीर्थं जानुसुवर्गलोकसरणं सौख्यप्रदानं गृहम् । धीः प्रज्ञाधिककाव्यगोपुरसभासन्मोदसिंहासन ब्रह्मस्थापनसार्वकालबलमासाः पात्रवैडूर्यकौ ॥ ४० ॥

medo madhyapaṭau navīnagṛhasaukhyaṃ vṛddhamantradvijāstīrthaṃ jānusuvargalokasaraṇaṃ saukhyapradānaṃ gṛham | dhīḥ prajñādhikakāvyagopurasabhāsanmodasiṃhāsana brahmasthāpanasārvakālabalamāsāḥ pātravaiḍūryakau || 40 ||

Fat; the two middle cloths; the comfort of a new house; elders, counsel and the twice-born; the sacred ford; the knee; going to the world of heaven; a house that bestows every comfort; intellect; abundant wisdom; poetry; the gate-tower; the assembly; good cheer; the lion-throne; the installing of Brahman; strength at every hour; the months; the vessel; and the cat's-eye — these two.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्यपटौ"; alternatives "मध्यपटौ", "मध्यपटो" — the au-matra reads clearly as dual.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[?]"; alternatives "ा (a broken a-matra, giving सौख्यप्रदान)", "। (a broken danda)", "foul type / ink" — Isolated blob, x1704-1722 y328-364 (18x36 px). Measured: NO headline over it (headline-band count 0 across all its columns) and 9 px of white on each side, whereas the headline runs unbroken at count 7 right through प्रद. An a-matra in this fount carries the headline, so the ink does not support सौख्यप्रदान however much the sense wants it. RESOLVED 2026-09-08 AGAINST THIS MEASUREMENT: the sixteenth syllable of this pāda must be heavy, which सौख्यप्रदन cannot give. The headline test was sound about the ink of this one sort and wrong about the text. Bhasin's plate sets सौख्यप्रदानं.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्ती"; alternatives "ती" — Line opens mid-compound; the initial स् is the sandhi of a preceding visarga carried over from p.64. Read at 5x; the half-sa is clear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धि"; alternatives "वि" — Settled by side-by-side against the certain ध of धीः (same line) and the certain व of सुवर्ग (line above): the disputed glyph carries ध's descending left tail below the counter, which व lacks.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(margin)" — An isolated horizontal dash sits in the left margin at x257-290, y453-511, ~32x20 px, unattached to any akshara and 130 px left of the ध. Read at 7x: a plain rule-like dash. Recorded as foul type, NOT transcribed into the text.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गो"; alternatives "गों", "व्यं + गो" — The wedge above this cluster is the e-limb of the o-matra sitting over the ग, not an anusvara on the preceding व्य; checked at 4.3x against the placement of ो elsewhere on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्व"; alternatives "र्वे" — Repha over the व is clear at 2.5x; no second mark.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "डू"; alternatives "डु" — Subscript u read as long ू; the tail curls back, but the mark is small and the length is not certain.
5.41a reading here is contested

अग्निष्टोममहाफलं मधुरसः सत्त्वं सुखासौख्यके दीर्घं सौम्यपरेङ्गिते च कनकालङ्कारतन्त्रादिकः । वातश्लेष्मसुपुष्यरागनिगमाभासामृदुप्रस्तरं शैवोपासननैष्ठिकत्वचतुरंताढ्यप्रयाणं गुरोः ॥ ४१ ॥

agniṣṭomamahāphalaṃ madhurasaḥ sattvaṃ sukhāsaukhyake dīrghaṃ saumyapareṅgite ca kanakālaṅkāratantrādikaḥ | vātaśleṣmasupuṣyarāganigamābhāsāmṛduprastaraṃ śaivopāsananaiṣṭhikatvacaturaṃtāḍhyaprayāṇaṃ guroḥ || 41 ||

The Agniṣṭoma and its great fruit; sweet juice; sattva; comfort and discomfort ⟨the two⟩; length; gentleness, and the reading of another's intent; gold, ornament, contrivance and the rest. Wind and phlegm; fine topaz; scripture; brilliance; softness; stone; the worship of Śiva; the state of the lifelong celibate; and setting out in a carriage appointed on all four sides — ⟨all these are⟩ Guru's ⟨Jupiter's⟩.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रसः"; alternatives "रमः" — IMPORTANT: at page-overview scale this reads मधुरमः. At 3.4x, side-by-side with the certain म of मधु and the certain स of सत्वं, the glyph carries स's detached bottom-left hook, which म does not. मधुरसः - and it agrees with Sastri's '(73) sweet juice'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खा"; alternatives "ख।", "ख + foul type" — The a-matra here IS headline-bearing (headline-band count 7 across x1580-1597), unlike the mark on line 2 above - but it is flanked by 10 px and 7 px of white, wider than a normal in-word join, and has an ink break at mid-height. Read as ा on the strength of the headline plus the sukha+asaukhya sandhi.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रे"; alternatives "रं" — The mark above र is a slanted e-limb, not a round anusvara; परेङ्गित (Sastri: 'reading other's mind') supports it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।"; alternatives "ः", "foul type" — The mark closing the line, well clear of कः, is broken into an upper stroke and a lower dot. Read as a damaged danda; a stray visarga cannot be excluded.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुपु"; alternatives "सुगु", "ष्पु" — Settled at 5.6x: the first is सु (square counter + u-curl, identical to the certain सु of सुखा on the line above); the second is पु (open-topped प + u-curl, matching the certain पु of गोपुर). पुष्यराग = Sastri's '(85) topaz'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भासा"; alternatives "भास", "भाषा" — Word division inside this compound is not visible; -आभास- and -सा- run continuously under one headline. I do not know where the compound joint falls.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शै"; alternatives "शे", "शि" — At 6.8x the mark above श is a notched double wedge matching the ै of नै later in the same line, not the single wedge of े and not the left-hand vertical of ि. शैवोपासन agrees with Sastri's '(90) worship of lord Shiva'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ढ्य"; alternatives "ऽऽय", "ट्ठय", "द्ध्य" — At 5.5x this is ढ् (the avagraha-like ḍha bowl plus the subscript conjunct stroke) followed by य, i.e. -ताढ्य- (आढ्य). At overview scale the two limbs read as a double avagraha, which they are not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रयाण"; alternatives "प्रयाणं" — No anusvara visible over the ण; a mark does sit high above this stretch but it belongs to the line above. Flagged because the sense would take the accusative. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: the metre requires a heavy seventeenth syllable, so the anusvāra belongs to this line after all. Bhasin's plate prints प्रयाणं.
5.42a reading here is contested

श्वेतच्छत्रसुचामराम्बरविवाहायद्विपात्स्त्रीद्विजा सौम्यश्वेतकलत्रकामुकसुखह्रस्वाम्लपुष्पाज्ञकाः । कीर्तिंयौवनगर्वयानरजताग्नेयप्रियक्षारकास्तिर्यग्दृक्कषपक्षराजसदृढामुक्तायजुर्वैश्यकाः ॥ ४२ ॥

śvetacchatrasucāmarāmbaravivāhāyadvipātstrīdvijā saumyaśvetakalatrakāmukasukhahrasvāmlapuṣpājñakāḥ | kīrtiṃyauvanagarvayānarajatāgneyapriyakṣārakāstiryagdṛkkaṣapakṣarājasadṛḍhāmuktāyajurvaiśyakāḥ || 42 ||

⟨Venus:⟩ the white parasol; fine chowries; garments; marriage; income; the biped, that is man; woman; the twice-born; the gentle; the white; the wife; the lustful; sexual happiness; the short; the sour; flowers; commands. Fame; youth; pride; vehicles; silver; fondness for the Āgneya ⟨south-east⟩ quarter; the saline; the sidelong glance; scratching; the fortnight ⟨our mula now reads स्तिर्यग्दृक्कषपक्ष, which gives these three items⟩; the quality of passion (rājasa); the firm; pearls; the Yajur ⟨Veda⟩; and vaiśyas.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "म्बरवि"; alternatives "म्बरिवि" — Junction of my two crop halves; re-cropped across the split at 6.2x and the sequence is म्ब-र-वि-वा with no glyph lost between them.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[?]"; alternatives "म् (giving सौम्य)", "ख् (सौख्य)", "foul type" — Isolated mark between सौ and य, x441-455, measured headline-band count 0 - it carries no headline, so it is not a normal conjunct limb. A half-म before य would be a full-width म्य ligature, which this is not. Sastri glosses item (9) as 'Subha', which would suit सौम्य.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञकाः"; alternatives "ज्ञका", "ज्ञकः" — Visarga clear; the preceding vowel length is not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गः"; alternatives "गं", "ग: (stray)" — The two marks after ग are NOT a visarga: the upper sits ABOVE the headline (anusvara height) and the lower below it, whereas both dots of a visarga on this plate sit below the headline. I could not resolve what the pair is.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रियक्षारका"; alternatives "प्रियधारका", "प्रेक्षारका" — क्ष vs ध and the presence of प्रिय are both uncertain at 2.4x. Sastri has '(22) saltish' (=क्षार) and '(23) ogling' in this stretch, which favours क्षार but does not account for प्रिय.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-" — The line genuinely ends with a hyphen: the compound is broken across the printed line. Transcribed as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्तिर्यंग्रहकप"; alternatives "स्तिर्यङ्ग्रहकप", "स्त्रीर्यंग्रहकप" — WEAK READING. This opening stretch follows the hyphen at the end of the previous line and I could not make a word of it at 2.4x; the glyph shapes are recorded as seen. Treat as unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्तिर्यग्दृक्कषपक्षराजसदृढामुक्तायजुर्वैश्यकाः; this sentence names स्तिर्यंग्रहकप, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पक्ष"; alternatives "पप्श", "पक्ष्" — Read as पक्ष on the strength of Sastri's '(25) half a month'; the ligature itself is smudged.
5.43a reading here is contested

सौन्दर्यंक्रयविक्रयाः सरससल्लापो जलस्थानं मातङ्गस्तुरगो विचित्रकविता नृत्तं च मध्यं वयः । गीतं भोगकलत्रसौख्यमणयो हास्यप्रियः खेचरो भृत्यो भाग्यविचित्रकान्तिसुकुमारा राज्यगन्धस्रजः ॥ ४३ ॥

saundaryaṃkrayavikrayāḥ sarasasallāpo jalasthānaṃ mātaṅgasturago vicitrakavitā nṛttaṃ ca madhyaṃ vayaḥ | gītaṃ bhogakalatrasaukhyamaṇayo hāsyapriyaḥ khecaro bhṛtyo bhāgyavicitrakāntisukumārā rājyagandhasrajaḥ || 43 ||

Beauty; buying and selling; sweet talk of love; a place of water; the elephant; the horse; variegated colour; poetry; dance; and middle age. Song; enjoyment; happiness from the wife; gems; one fond of laughter; the swimmer ⟨our text prints खेचर, 'sky-goer'; both published renderings read 'swimmer' here and the second exemplar's Hindi glosses it तैराकी⟩; the servant; fortune; varied lustre; the delicate; the kingdom; perfume; and the garland.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कदिता"; alternatives "कविता", "कथिता" — द vs व not separable at this magnification in either of the two crops covering it. विचित्रकविता ('varied poetry') would suit a Venus list, but I did not verify it and have transcribed the shape I saw.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मणयो"; alternatives "मणयौ", "मणयो" — Final ो clear; preceding ण vs न not fully settled.
5.44a reading here is contested

वीणावेणुविनोदचारुगमनाष्टैश्वर्यचार्वङ्गता स्वल्पाहारवसन्तभूषणबहुस्त्रीसंग्रहप्राङ्मुखाः । नेत्रं सत्यवचः कलानिपुणता रेतो जलक्रीडितो गाम्भीर्यातिशयस्तनश्चतुरवाद्यं नाटकालंकृतिः ॥ ४४ ॥

vīṇāveṇuvinodacārugamanāṣṭaiśvaryacārvaṅgatā svalpāhāravasantabhūṣaṇabahustrīsaṃgrahaprāṅmukhāḥ | netraṃ satyavacaḥ kalānipuṇatā reto jalakrīḍito gāmbhīryātiśayastanaścaturavādyaṃ nāṭakālaṃkṛtiḥ || 44 ||

Delight in the vīṇā and the flute; a lovely gait; the eight kinds of lordship; well-formed limbs; little food; the spring; ornaments; the keeping of many women; those who face east. The eye; truth-speaking; skill in the arts; semen; sporting in water; great depth of character ⟨the akṣara our exemplar sets after atiśaya is स्तन and the second sets स्तत; neither is settled and neither published list renders it as the breast⟩; skilful instrumental music; and the adornment of drama.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चाह्नममना"; alternatives "चाङ्गममना", "चागममना", "चाह्लममना" — WEAK READING. The conjunct after चा is not resolved (ह्न / ङ्ग / गम all fit the ink at 2.4x) and the word division through this stretch is unknown.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महैश्वर्यं"; alternatives "मनाहैश्वर्यं", "म ऐश्वर्यं" — The ऐश्वर्यं is secure; whether the preceding syllable joins it as महा- or stands apart is not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चार्वज्ञता"; alternatives "चार्वङ्गता", "चार्वाज्ञता" — Final cluster uncertain.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्री"; alternatives "द्वी", "ह्री" — Read स्त्री (बहुस्त्रीसंग्रह, 'keeping many women' - a standard Venus signification); the ligature is heavily inked and द्वी cannot be excluded on shape alone.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जलक्रीडितो"; alternatives "जलक्रीडिनो", "जलक्रीडितौ" — Final syllable त vs न not separable.
5.45a reading here is contested

केलीलोलकखण्डदेहमदनप्राधान्यसन्मान्यता युक्तश्वेतपट्टप्रियो भरतशास्त्रं राजमुद्राप्रभुः । गौरीश्रीभजने रतिं मृदुरतिक्लान्तो दिवामातृकः काव्यादौ रचना प्रबन्धचतुरः स्यान्नीलकेशः शुभम् ॥ ४५ ॥

kelīlolakakhaṇḍadehamadanaprādhānyasanmānyatā yuktaśvetapaṭṭapriyo bharataśāstraṃ rājamudrāprabhuḥ | gaurīśrībhajane ratiṃ mṛduratiklānto divāmātṛkaḥ kāvyādau racanā prabandhacaturaḥ syānnīlakeśaḥ śubham || 45 ||

Sportive playfulness; a body worn and broken; the predominance of love; being greatly honoured; one joined to white silk and fond of it; the Bharata-śāstra ⟨of dramaturgy⟩; a master of the royal seal. Delight in the worship of Gaurī and Śrī; gentleness; great weariness; having the day for its mother; skill in composing poetry and prose; dark hair; and the auspicious.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कखण्ड"; alternatives "कषण्ड", "कखण्डु", "कखण्डं" — WEAK. Neither the second consonant nor the final vowel is settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्मान्यता"; alternatives "सन्मान्यता" — म vs स at the head of this word. The discriminator I calibrated on plate 67 (स carries a detached bottom-left hook, म does not) was not applied here - the glyph sits under heavy ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भरत"; alternatives "मरत" — भ vs म. Read भरत (भरतशास्त्र, the treatise on dramaturgy - apt for Venus), but the two crops disagree in impression and I did not settle it on the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गतिमुदुरनिकुह्रान्तो"; alternatives "गतिसुदुरनिकुङ्क्षान्तो" — WEAK READING - the least secure line on the plate. Only गौरीश्रीभजने at the head and दिवामातृकः at the tail are firm; the middle stretch is recorded as glyph shapes and should not be used.
5.46a reading here is contested

गुह्यं मूत्र सुनागलोकसरणे तत्रापराह्णं तथा जामित्रस्थलजं रहस्यमुदितं सर्वं वदेद्भार्गवात् । जाड्यादिप्रतिबन्धकाश्वगतचर्मायप्रमाणानि संक्लेशो व्याधिविरोधदुःखमरणस्त्रीसौख्यदासीखराः ॥ ४३ ॥

guhyaṃ mūtra sunāgalokasaraṇe tatrāparāhṇaṃ tathā jāmitrasthalajaṃ rahasyamuditaṃ sarvaṃ vadedbhārgavāt | jāḍyādipratibandhakāśvagatacarmāyapramāṇāni saṃkleśo vyādhivirodhaduḥkhamaraṇastrīsaukhyadāsīkharāḥ || 43 ||

⟨The plate numbers this verse ४३, which is a compositor's error: it stands at position 46.⟩ The privy parts; urine; moving in the nāga-world; there, the afternoon likewise; what arises in the place of jāmitra ⟨the seventh house⟩; what is uttered in secret — all of it one should declare from Bhārgava ⟨Venus⟩. ⟨Saturn's list opens in the second half:⟩ dullness and the rest; obstruction; going on horseback; leather; income; measures; affliction; disease; opposition; sorrow; death; the pleasure of women; maidservants; and asses.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुनाग"; alternatives "पुनाग", "सनाग" — First syllable स vs प not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्रापद्वाहां"; alternatives "तत्राप्रवाहां", "तत्रापह्वाहां" — WEAK. Middle conjunct unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्रापराह्णं; this sentence names तत्रापद्वाहां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0068, store line index 17, at about 2.5x native, measuring each akṣara against letters of known identity. The glyph after प hangs from the headline and stops 14 px above the baseline, as the र of सरणे on the same line does (template match 0.81 and 0.78 against र, 0.39 against द्व), and an ā stem follows. The next akṣara is not a plain ह and fits the ह्ण ligature, and one stem with an anusvāra dot follows it. The press sets तत्रापराह्णं, the afternoon, and our mūla now reads the same.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञामित्रम्यन्तज्ञ"; alternatives "ङामित्रश्यन्तज्ञ" — WEAK READING of the opening; only मित्र inside it is firm. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जामित्रस्थलजं; this sentence names ज्ञामित्रम्यन्तज्ञ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0068, store line index 18, at about 2.5x native. The first ज is plain, not ज्ञ (0.930 against ज, 0.677 against ज्ञ), with a thin under-inked ā stem; the conjunct is स्थ, not म्य (0.907 against the स्थ of दग्धस्थान, 0.661 against the म्य of सौम्यो); then ल; and the last akṣara is a plain ज with a small dot in the anusvāra position. The press sets जामित्रस्थलजं, and our mūla now reads the same.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वदेद्भार्गवात्"; alternatives "वदेद्रागीवात्" — Read भार्गवात् ('from Bhargava', i.e. from Venus) - the expected close of a Venus chapter and consistent with the ink; the conjunct is inked heavily and द्रा cannot be excluded on shape alone.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चर्माय"; alternatives "चर्मायु", "चर्मादि" — Middle of the compound uncertain at 2.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सं" — The line breaks off on the syllable सं, which is completed as संकेशो at the head of the next line. A faint isolated speck also sits near x2600, well right of the last type; recorded as foul, not transcribed. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0069, store line index 23-24, at about 3.1x native, plain and at gamma 3.0. Line 23 ends in सं with its anusvāra and no hyphen, and line 24 opens क्लेशो: the क्ल conjunct with its e-mātrā is plain. So the word is संक्लेशो, not संकेशो, and our mūla now reads संक्लेशो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ४३ ॥"; alternatives "॥ ४६ ॥ (what the sequence requires)" — CRITICAL - RESOLVED AS A COMPOSITOR'S ERROR. The numeral as printed is ४३, verified at 5.6x side by side with the CONFIRMED ४३ of folio 66: the same two sorts, and ३ is plainly not ६ (which carries a closed lower loop). But it must stand for ४६. The evidence is on folio 68, which heads its Roman paragraph 'Sloka 45 1/2-50 The following are ascribed to Saturn' and closes its verses with शनेः: the Saturn passage runs 45.5-50, this line closes verse 46, and the verses after it are numbered ४७, ४८ (folio 67) and ४९, ५० (folio 68). So 43 is set for 46. Recorded as printed; do NOT key this verse as 43.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 43 within its section; it is published at position 46.
5.47a reading here is contested

चण्डाला विकृताङ्गिनो वनचरा बीभत्सदानेश्वरा आयुर्दायनपुंसकान्त्यजखगास्त्रेताग्निदासक्रियाः । आचारेतररिक्तपौरुषमृषावादित्वदीर्घानिला वृद्धस्नायुदिनान्तवीर्यशिशिरर्त्वत्यन्तकोपश्रमाः ॥ ४७ ॥

caṇḍālā vikṛtāṅgino vanacarā bībhatsadāneśvarā āyurdāyanapuṃsakāntyajakhagāstretāgnidāsakriyāḥ | ācāretarariktapauruṣamṛṣāvāditvadīrghānilā vṛddhasnāyudināntavīryaśiśirartvatyantakopaśramāḥ || 47 ||

Caṇḍālas; the deformed; forest-rangers; the loathsome; lords of gifts; the allotted span of life (āyurdāya); the eunuch; the low-born; birds; the three sacred fires (tretāgni); servants and their works. Conduct contrary to good custom; the empty; one without manliness; the speaking of falsehood; long wind; old age; the sinews; strength at the day's end; the śiśira season (late winter); excessive anger; and toil.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दानेश्वरा"; alternatives "दीनेश्वरा", "दानेश्वरा:" — First vowel ा vs ी not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — The line ends on a rule/dash, the compound running over to the next line. Transcribed as printed. [2026-09-23: The dash is removed. Read by eye at 2.5x and 3.5x (folio 67), it is the press's line-end mark; the break falls at the end of pāda a, between two whole words, so a space stands there. Joining the halves would leave pāda b a syllable short.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्वेता"; alternatives "द्वेता", "ह्रेता" — Conjunct unresolved; the following अग्नि and दास are firm. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: our transcription was wrong about the ink. At 7× the conjunct is a half-स over त with the subscript र — स्त्रे — and the next akṣara is ता: खगास्त्रेताग्नि, 'birds; the three sacred fires'. Sareen's own list numbers it 26.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पौत्रष"; alternatives "पौरुष", "पौत्रा" — WEAK. Neither the त्र/रु nor the following ष is settled; मृषावादित्व after it is firm. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: this one WAS transcribed correctly — the leaf really does set पौत्रष — and it is not a word. Bhasin reads पौरुष and Sareen's list gives '(29) one without manliness'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्वैत्यन्त"; alternatives "त्वात्यन्त" — Read as -त्व + अत्यन्त- (atyanta, 'excessive'); the sandhi vowel over the त is smudged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वृद्धस्नायुदिनान्तवीर्यशिशिरर्त्वत्यन्तकोपश्रमाः; this sentence names त्वैत्यन्त, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read this word on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0069 (Sareen folio 67), store line 28, by eye at about 2.2x, 2.7x and 4.2x native. The mark over त्व is not a vowel sign. It is one hooked mark that curls to the right, the same sort as the repha over वीर्य on this line, and no ā-bar follows त्व. So the press sets शिशिरर्त्वत्यन्त, that is शिशिरर्तु + अत्यन्त, and neither त्वैत्यन्त nor त्वात्यन्त. Our mūla now reads the same.]
  • About this edition: WITHDRAWN 2026-09-08 — a gap that was never a gap. This verse used to carry a damage note reading '3 verse(s) numbered before this one are NOT on the plates'. Nothing is absent. I rendered .tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-jp2/page_0068.png (folio 66) and read ॥४२॥ ॥४३॥ ॥४४॥ ॥४५॥ down the leaf under Sareen's own heading 'Sloka 42-45', then page_0069.png (folio 67), which opens with the verse the sequence numbers 46 and prints ४३ for it — a compositor's error the record already resolved on 5.46 — and continues ॥४७॥ ॥४८॥. Sareen's running English headings run continuously across the join: 'Sloka 38-41' (f65), 'Sloka 42-45' (f66), 'Sloka 45 ½-50' (f68). The claim also stood in all nine chapters' visualValidation notes and has been withdrawn there.
5.48a reading here is contested

कुक्षेत्रोदितकुण्डगोलकजनिर्मालिन्यवस्त्रं गृहं तादृग्वस्तुमनोविचारखलमैत्रीकृष्णपापानि च । क्रौर्यं भस्म च नीलधान्यमणिलोहौदार्यसंवत्सराः शूद्रो विट्पितृकारकोऽन्यकुलविद्यासंग्रहः पङ्गुता ॥ ४८ ॥

kukṣetroditakuṇḍagolakajanirmālinyavastraṃ gṛhaṃ tādṛgvastumanovicārakhalamaitrīkṛṣṇapāpāni ca | krauryaṃ bhasma ca nīladhānyamaṇilohaudāryasaṃvatsarāḥ śūdro viṭpitṛkārako'nyakulavidyāsaṃgrahaḥ paṅgutā || 48 ||

Birth in a bad field; birth as a kuṇḍa or a golaka — the children got on a woman while her husband lives, and on a widow; foulness; garments ⟨our mula now reads वस्त्रं, 'garment'⟩; the house; a thing of that sort; deliberation of the mind; friendship with the wicked; the black ⟨colour⟩; and sins. Cruelty; ashes too; black grain, gems, iron; generosity; the years; the śūdra; the vaiśya. He is the significator of the father; the gathering up of another family's learning; and lameness.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निर्मालिन्य"; alternatives "निर्मालिन्य", "निर्मल्य" — मालिन्य ('foulness') is firm; the निर् before it may be part of the preceding word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसन्तं"; alternatives "वसनं", "वसतिं" — Read वसन्तं as printed, but 'spring' does not belong in a Saturn list; वसनं ('garment') would. Flagged as a place where the sense and the ink disagree. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुक्षेत्रोदितकुण्डगोलकजनिर्मालिन्यवस्त्रं; this sentence names वसन्तं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहं"; alternatives "शृहं" — Initial ग vs श not separable here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ताद्रुग्वस्तु"; alternatives "तादृग्वस्तु" — Read तादृक्- (tādṛk, 'of that sort') is the likelier word; the subscript vowel under द reads as ृ or ु and I could not separate them. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तादृग्वस्तुमनोविचारखलमैत्रीकृष्णपापानि; this sentence names ताद्रुग्वस्तु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA, checked at 2.5x as the brief asks: a true avagraha sign (कारकोऽन्य = kārako 'nya), not a ḍha and not a stray. It is the only avagraha I met on folios 65-67.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विट्"; alternatives "विट", "वट्" — Virama on the ट clear; the preceding vowel is short.
5.49a reading here is contested

तीक्ष्णं कम्बलवस्त्रपश्चिममुखे संजीवनोपायका ऽधोदृष्टी कृषिजीवनायुधगृहज्ञातिर्बहिःस्थानकाः । ईशान्यप्रियनागलोकपतने संग्रामसंचारिता शल्यं सीसकदुष्टविक्रमतुरुष्का जीर्णतैलेऽपि च ॥ ४९ ॥

tīkṣṇaṃ kambalavastrapaścimamukhe saṃjīvanopāyakā 'dhodṛṣṭī kṛṣijīvanāyudhagṛhajñātirbahiḥsthānakāḥ | īśānyapriyanāgalokapatane saṃgrāmasaṃcāritā śalyaṃ sīsakaduṣṭavikramaturuṣkā jīrṇataile'pi ca || 49 ||

The sharp; blanket-cloth; facing west; the means of livelihood; the downcast gaze; living by agriculture; weapons; the house; kinsmen; places outside ⟨our mula now reads बहिः⟩. Fondness for the Īśāna ⟨north-east⟩ quarter; falling into the nāga-world; moving about in battle; the dart; lead; evil prowess; Turuṣkas; and old oil as well.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पश्चिममुखे"; alternatives "पश्चिममुखं" — Final vowel े vs ं not fully settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA opening the line, checked at 2.4x: the sandhi runs over the line break from -का at the end of the line above. A genuine avagraha, not foul type.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृषि"; alternatives "कृपि" — ष vs प; Sastri's '(64) living by agriculture' (कृषिजीवन) favours ष.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बंहिः"; alternatives "बहिः", "बाहिः" — An anusvara appears over the ब where बहिःस्थान ('(67) external position') wants none. Recorded as printed; it may be foul type rather than a sort. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कृषिजीवनायुधगृहज्ञातिर्बहिःस्थानकाः; this sentence names बंहिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA in तैलेऽपि, clear at 2.6x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जीर्णां"; alternatives "जीर्णं", "जीर्णा" — The anusvara over the ā is faint; length and nasal both uncertain. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जीर्णतैलेऽपि; this sentence names जीर्णां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.50a reading here is contested

दारुब्राह्मणतामसे च विषभूसंचारकाठिन्यके भीतिर्दीर्घनिषादवैकृतशिरोजाः सर्वराज्यं भयम् । छागाद्या महिषादयो रतिरतो वह्वादिशृङ्गारता मृत्यूपासकसारमेयहरणाः काठिन्यचित्तं शनेः ॥ ५० ॥

dārubrāhmaṇatāmase ca viṣabhūsaṃcārakāṭhinyake bhītirdīrghaniṣādavaikṛtaśirojāḥ sarvarājyaṃ bhayam | chāgādyā mahiṣādayo ratirato vahvādiśṛṅgāratā mṛtyūpāsakasārameyaharaṇāḥ kāṭhinyacittaṃ śaneḥ || 50 ||

Wood; the brāhmaṇa; the tāmasa; poison; wandering over the ground; hardness; fear; the long; the niṣāda ⟨hunter; our mula now reads निषाद⟩; the deformed; the hair of the head; every kingdom; and dread. Goats and the like; buffaloes and the like ⟨our mula now reads महिषादयो⟩; one given to pleasure; adorning oneself ⟨for love — the tail of the compound is शृङ्गार, while its opening व or ब stays unsettled⟩; a worshipper of death; the dog, and theft ⟨our mula now reads सारमेय, 'dog'⟩; and a hard heart — ⟨these are⟩ Śani's.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विषभू"; alternatives "विषमभू" — Sastri's '(82) travelling through forests and over mountains' is विषमभूसंचार, which needs a म this line does not appear to carry. Transcribed as seen; the missing syllable may be a compositor's drop.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निपाद"; alternatives "निषाद", "निपात" — Middle consonant unsettled; निषाद (a low-caste hunter) would suit a Saturn list better than निपाद. || CONFIRMED WRONG AS READ. Folio 69 continues the same list with '(86) hunter', i.e. निषाद. The sort here is therefore ष, not प; I transcribed प from the ink at 2.4x and did not re-magnify. Read निषाद. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भीतिर्दीर्घनिषादवैकृतशिरोजाः; this sentence names निपाद, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महिपाद्यो"; alternatives "महिषाद्यो" — महिष ('buffalo') is the expected word beside छाग ('goat'); the ष reads as प here. Transcribed as seen. || CONFIRMED WRONG AS READ. Folio 69 gives '(91) buffalos and the like' = महिषाद्य. The sort is ष, not प. Read महिषाद्यो. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads महिषादयो; this sentence names महिपाद्यो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वह्वादिभृज्ञारता"; alternatives "बह्वादिभृङ्गारता", "वह्वादिभृङ्गारता" — WEAK READING. Neither the opening व/ब (the counter test is inconclusive under this much ink) nor the ज्ञ/ङ्ग conjunct is settled. || PARTLY RESOLVED. Folio 69 gives '(93) dressing oneself for amorous appeals' = शृङ्गार. The tail is -शृङ्गारता; the opening व/ब remains unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वह्वादिशृङ्गारता; this sentence names वह्वादिभृज्ञारता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सारमेवहरणाः"; alternatives "सारमेधहरणाः", "सारमेव हरणाः" — Word division inside this compound is not visible and व/ध is uncertain. || CONFIRMED. Folio 69 gives '(95) dog (96) theft' = सारमेय + हरण. Read सारमेयहरणाः; the व I transcribed is a य. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मृत्यूपासकसारमेयहरणाः; this sentence names सारमेवहरणाः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शनेः" — The section signs off with the genitive of Sani, exactly as the Jupiter section on folio 65 signs off with गुरोः. This is the structural marker that the planet-list has ended.
5.51a reading here is contested

छत्रं चामरराष्ट्रसंग्रहकुतर्कक्रूरवाक्यान्त्यजाः पापस्त्रीचतुरन्तयानवृषला द्यूतश्च सन्ध्याबलम् । दुष्टस्त्रीगमनान्यदेशगमनाशौचास्थिगुल्मानृता ऽधोदृग्भ्रामिकगाढा यममुखम्लेच्छादिनीचाश्रयाः ॥ ५१ ॥

chatraṃ cāmararāṣṭrasaṃgrahakutarkakrūravākyāntyajāḥ pāpastrīcaturantayānavṛṣalā dyūtaśca sandhyābalam | duṣṭastrīgamanānyadeśagamanāśaucāsthigulmānṛtā 'dhodṛgbhrāmikagāḍhā yamamukhamlecchādinīcāśrayāḥ || 51 ||

⟨Rāhu:⟩ the parasol; chowries; the seizing of a country; false reasoning (kutarka); harsh speech; the low-born; a sinful woman; the four-bounded ⟨earth⟩; vehicles; śūdras; gambling too; and strength at twilight. Going to wicked women; going to other lands; impurity; bones; abdominal tumour; falsehoods; the downcast eye; the giddy; the dense ⟨the ink here shows a shorter cluster than गारुड, 'emerald', would need; it is transcribed as seen and not made to fit⟩; facing Yama ⟨the south⟩; mlecchas; and resort to the low.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृतकैं"; alternatives "कृतकैः", "कृतकं", "कूटकैः" — Sastri's '(5) fellacious argument' points to कृतक/कूट, but the case-ending here is not legible; an anusvara-like mark sits over the कै. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चामरराष्ट्रसंग्रहकुतर्कक्रूरवाक्यान्त्यजाः; this sentence names कृतकैं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाक्ष्या"; alternatives "वाक्श्या", "वाक्ष्य" — Conjunct after क् not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चामरराष्ट्रसंग्रहकुतर्कक्रूरवाक्यान्त्यजाः; this sentence names वाक्ष्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA opening the line, the sandhi running over the line break. Clear at 2.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गाढा"; alternatives "गारुडा", "गाढ़ा" — Sastri's '(21) emerald' would be गारुड; the ink shows a shorter cluster. Transcribed as seen - I did not make it fit the gloss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "म्लेच्छदि"; alternatives "म्लेच्छादि" — Vowel length on the च्छ unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यममुखम्लेच्छादिनीचाश्रयाः; this sentence names म्लेच्छदि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
5.52a reading here is contested

दुष्टग्रन्थिमहाटवी विषमसंचारारात्रिपीडा बहिःस्थानं नैऋतिदिक्क्रियानिलकफखेदोऽहिनिश्वासाः । तीक्ष्णं दीर्घसरीसृपौ सकलसुसाध्यः प्रयाणक्षणौ वृद्धो वाहननागलोकजननीताता मरुच्छूलकाः ॥ ५२ ॥

duṣṭagranthimahāṭavī viṣamasaṃcārārātripīḍā bahiḥsthānaṃ naiṛtidikkriyānilakaphakhedo'hiniśvāsāḥ | tīkṣṇaṃ dīrghasarīsṛpau sakalasusādhyaḥ prayāṇakṣaṇau vṛddho vāhananāgalokajananītātā marucchūlakāḥ || 52 ||

An evil knot; the great forest; travel over rough ground; affliction by night; staying outside; the Nairṛta ⟨south-west⟩ quarter; action; wind; phlegm; weariness; and the hissing of snakes. The sharp; the long and the creeping thing; all that is easily accomplished; the journey and the moment; the old man; vehicles; the world of the nāgas; the mother; the father; the wind; and colic.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — Line ends on a dash; बहिः runs over to स्थान at the head of the next line, giving बहिःस्थान = Sastri's '(29) staying outside'. The dash is printed, not foul.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नैऋति"; alternatives "नैर्ऋति", "नेत्रांति" — IMPORTANT. At 2.4x I read this नेत्रांति. Re-cropped at 3.5x it is नै + the INDEPENDENT vowel letter ऋ + ति - the edition spells Nairrti (South-West, Sastri's '(30) tending towards South-West') with a full ऋ sort rather than र + subscript ृ. A reading only the high-resolution scan supports.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA in खेदोऽहि.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निश्वासाः"; alternatives "निण्वासाः", "निःश्वासाः" — Heavily inked; the conjunct is not certain. Sastri has '(35) night breeze' hereabouts.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सकलसुसाध्यः"; alternatives "स्वप्नसुसाध्यः", "सकलं सुसाध्यः" — WEAK. Sastri's '(39) reading of dreams' would want स्वप्न-, which I do not see; recorded as read.
5.53a reading here is contested

काशश्वासमहाश्रमपवन*दुर्गोपासिका दुष्टता साङ्गत्यं पशुभिस्त्वमध्यलिपिलेखयं क्रूरभाषा ल्यगोः चण्डीशोश्वरविघ्नपादिसुरवृन्दोपासना वंद्यका श्वानः कुक्कुटगृध्रमोक्षसकलैश्वर्यंक्षयार्तिज्वराः ॥ ५३ ॥

kāśaśvāsamahāśramapavana*durgopāsikā duṣṭatā sāṅgatyaṃ paśubhistvamadhyalipilekhayaṃ krūrabhāṣā lyagoḥ caṇḍīśośvaravighnapādisuravṛndopāsanā vaṃdyakā śvānaḥ kukkuṭagṛdhramokṣasakalaiśvaryaṃkṣayārtijvarāḥ || 53 ||

Cough and asthma; great toil ⟨printed महाश्रम; the conjunct is inked shut and महाक्रम, 'great stride', is equally possible⟩; wind — a small star-shaped sort stands inside the compound at this point; it is not an akṣara, and no matching footnote was found on the plate; the worshipper of Durgā; wickedness; association with beasts; middling script and writing; harsh language. This is the weakest line on the plate and should not be relied on: only साङ्गत्यं, पशुभिः and लिपिलेख are firm, and the genitive that ought to close the passage by naming the planet — राहोः is what the chapter's pattern demands — is not what the ink gives, so it is not supplied. The worship of Caṇḍīśa, of Īśvara, of the remover of obstacles ⟨Gaṇeśa⟩ and of the host of gods; what is to be saluted; the dog; the cock; the vulture; liberation; all lordship; wasting; distress; and fevers.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "*"; alternatives "✳", "footnote reference" — A small star-shaped sort stands INSIDE the compound after पवन, at mid-height with white on both sides. It is not an akshara. Most likely a footnote reference mark, but I found no matching note on this plate, so I have transcribed the mark and not resolved it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "महाश्रम"; alternatives "महाक्रम", "महाश्रम" — Sastri's '(51) great prowess' suits महाक्रम better than महाश्रम; the conjunct is inked shut.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "WHOLE LINE" — WEAKEST LINE ON THE PLATE - do not use without re-reading. The type here is inked shut across most of the measure. Only साङ्गत्यं, पशुभिः and लिपिलेख are firm. The final cluster before the visarga ought, by the pattern of this chapter (गुरोः on folio 65, शनेः on folio 68), to be the genitive naming the planet - राहोः would be expected - but what I see is not that, and I will not write in a word the ink does not give me.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ल्यगोः"; alternatives "राहोः (expected by the chapter's pattern)", "त्वगोः" — Unresolved. Flagged rather than emended.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चण्डीशोश्वर"; alternatives "चण्डीशेश्वर", "चण्डीशो ईश्वर" — Sastri: '(1) Worship of God Chandeesa, God Ganesha and many other gods'. The sandhi vowel between चण्डीश and ईश्वर is not legible.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विघ्नपादि"; alternatives "विघ्नपादि", "विघ्नेशादि" — विघ्नप = Ganesha; the following syllable is unsettled. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling on this verse read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0072 (Sareen folio 70) by eye at about 2.2x native, in a band that took in the line above its own locus. It records in passing that line 3 of the leaf plainly sets विघ्नपादि: पा with its ā-bar, then दि. It did not rule on this word. Our mūla reads विघ्नपादि.]
5.54a reading here is contested

गङ्गास्नान महातपोऽनिलनिषादस्नेहभूतिप्रदाः पाषाणो व्रणमन्त्रशास्त्रचपलत्वब्रह्मवेत्तृत्वता । कुक्ष्यक्ष्यार्तिजडत्वकण्टकमृगज्ञानानि मौनव्रतं वेदान्तोऽखिलभोगभाग्यरिपुपीडोत्पन्नतापाल्पभुक् ॥ ५४ ॥

gaṅgāsnāna mahātapo'nilaniṣādasnehabhūtipradāḥ pāṣāṇo vraṇamantraśāstracapalatvabrahmavettṛtvatā | kukṣyakṣyārtijaḍatvakaṇṭakamṛgajñānāni maunavrataṃ vedānto'khilabhogabhāgyaripupīḍotpannatāpālpabhuk || 54 ||

⟨Ketu:⟩ bathing in the Gaṅgā; great austerity; wind; the niṣāda ⟨hunter⟩; affection; and the givers of prosperity. Stone ⟨our mūla now reads पाषाणो, stone, where the earlier transcription had पापाणो, which is no word⟩; wounds; the science of mantras; fickleness; and the knowing of Brahman. Pains of the belly and of the eye; torpor; thorns; knowledge of beasts; the vow of silence; Vedānta; the whole of enjoyment and fortune; the burning that arises from an enemy's affliction; and eating little.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA in महातपोऽनिल, clear at 2.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निषाद" — Set clearly here with ष, and glossed by Sastri as '(14) a Hunter'. This is the sort I misread as प in the same word on folio 68; the two occurrences settle each other.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापाणो"; alternatives "पाषाणो" — PRINTED AS SEEN. Sastri's '(17) stone' is पाषाण, so the second sort should be ष; what is inked here reads प. Either a compositor's wrong sort or a broken ष. Transcribed unemended and flagged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पाषाणो; this sentence names पापाणो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA in वेदान्तोऽखिल.
5.55a reading here is contested

वैराग्यं च पितामहक्षुदतिशूलस्फोटकाद्या रुजः शृङ्गीभृङ्गिविरुद्धबन्धनकृताज्ञां शूद्रगोष्ठिर्ध्वजात् ।

vairāgyaṃ ca pitāmahakṣudatiśūlasphoṭakādyā rujaḥ śṛṅgībhṛṅgiviruddhabandhanakṛtājñāṃ śūdragoṣṭhirdhvajāt |

Dispassion too; the grandfather; hunger; violent colic; boils and such diseases; the horned one and the bee ⟨our mūla reads शृङ्गीभृङ्गि; the transcriber could not tell which of the two words carries श and which भ⟩; a command issued for hostile confinement; the company of śūdras — ⟨these come⟩ from Dhvaja, the banner, that is Ketu ⟨our mūla now reads ध्वजात् here, where a sign-off naming Ketu is expected⟩. Our mūla holds only this half-verse here.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शृङ्गीभृङ्गिविरुद्ध"; alternatives "भृङ्गीशृङ्गिविरुद्ध" — WEAK. The two ङ्ग clusters at the head of the line are inked shut and I cannot tell which carries श and which भ.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्वजात्"; alternatives "केतोः (expected by the chapter's pattern)", "र्ध्वजात्", "केर्वजात्" — UNRESOLVED, and it matters: by this chapter's pattern (गुरोः folio 65, शनेः folio 68) the Ketu passage should sign off with केतोः. What is inked is not that. Flagged rather than emended - I will not write in the expected word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शूद्रगोष्ठिर्ध्वजात्; this sentence names र्वजात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: This block closes its section with NO numeral on the page.

Adhyāya 6 · दशाफलखण्डः — The Daśās and their Effects

6.1a reading here is contested

तुङ्गे स्वीयगृहेऽधिमित्रभवने मित्रे समे वैरिणीत्येवं पापयुते पराजययुते खेटेऽर्कयुक्ते क्रमात् । दीप्ता सा स्तिमिता तथा च मुदिता शान्ता च हीना ततो दुःखा स्याद्विकला खला स्युरपि सा कोपेत्यवस्था नव ॥ १ ॥

tuṅge svīyagṛhe'dhimitrabhavane mitre same vairiṇītyevaṃ pāpayute parājayayute kheṭe'rkayukte kramāt | dīptā sā stimitā tathā ca muditā śāntā ca hīnā tato duḥkhā syādvikalā khalā syurapi sā kopetyavasthā nava || 1 ||

When a planet stands in exaltation, in its own house, in the house of a great friend, in a friend's, in a neutral's, in an enemy's — and so likewise when it is joined with a malefic, when it is defeated ⟨in planetary war⟩, and when it is joined with the Sun — its state is, in that order, dīptā ⟨blazing⟩, stimitā ⟨still — the second of the nine is usually given as svasthā, and this edition appears to set stimitā; recorded as printed⟩, muditā ⟨delighted⟩, śāntā ⟨calm⟩, hīnā ⟨deficient⟩, then duḥkhā ⟨pained⟩, vikalā ⟨crippled⟩, khalā ⟨wicked⟩, and kopā ⟨angered⟩: nine avasthās.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA in गृहेऽधिमित्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — Line ends on a dash; the sentence runs over to the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — AVAGRAHA in खेटेऽर्क.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्येवं"; alternatives "त्यैवं" — Line opens mid-word, continuing वैरिणी— from the line above.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्तिमिता"; alternatives "स्वस्था" — Read स्तिमिता from the ink. The nine avastha names are a fixed technical set and the second member is usually given as स्वस्था; this edition appears to set स्तिमिता. Recorded as printed - a real variant if it holds.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १ ॥" — VERSE ONE. The first verse of khanda 6, four printed lines long, closing the list of the nine avasthas ('अवस्था नव'). Its number confirms the restart announced by the heading above.
6.2a reading here is contested

पुण्यं वाप्यथ पापरूपमपि वा कर्मार्जितं प्राग्भवे तत्पाकोऽत्र तु खेचरस्य हि दशाभुक्त्यादिभिर्ज्ञायते । तस्मात्खेटदशाविभाग इह चावश्यं क्रमात्तत्फलं ज्ञेयं तत्तदनिष्टशान्तिकरणादिष्टं सुखं प्राप्नुयात् ॥ २ ॥

puṇyaṃ vāpyatha pāparūpamapi vā karmārjitaṃ prāgbhave tatpāko'tra tu khecarasya hi daśābhuktyādibhirjñāyate | tasmātkheṭadaśāvibhāga iha cāvaśyaṃ kramāttatphalaṃ jñeyaṃ tattadaniṣṭaśāntikaraṇādiṣṭaṃ sukhaṃ prāpnuyāt || 2 ||

Whether it be merit, or something of the shape of sin, the karma earned in a former birth — its ripening here is known through the daśā, the bhukti and the rest belonging to a planet. Therefore the division of the planets' daśās must without fail be known here, and their fruit in order; and by performing the pacification of each unwanted thing one should attain the happiness one desires.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — the closing single danda is very lightly inked and prints as a broken bar; it IS there
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ २ ॥" — same two-form as on plate 54
6.3a reading here is contested

अर्केन्द्वारतमःसुरेज्यशनिवित्केत्वासुरेज्याः क्रमात् षड्दिक्शैलगजेन्दवोऽष्ट्यतिधृती चात्यष्ट्ययोगा नखाः । दायेशा अपि वत्सराः स्युरथ तज्जन्मेन्दुभं वह्निभाद्यावत्तन्नवहृद्धिशेषतुलितोऽर्काद्यो हि दायेश्वरः ॥ ३ ॥

arkendvāratamaḥsurejyaśanivitketvāsurejyāḥ kramāt ṣaḍdikśailagajendavo'ṣṭyatidhṛtī cātyaṣṭyayogā nakhāḥ | dāyeśā api vatsarāḥ syuratha tajjanmendubhaṃ vahnibhādyāvattannavahṛddhiśeṣatulito'rkādyo hi dāyeśvaraḥ || 3 ||

The Sun, the Moon, Mars, Tamas ⟨Rāhu⟩, the gods' preceptor ⟨Jupiter⟩, Saturn, Mercury, Ketu and the Asuras' preceptor ⟨Venus⟩, in that order, are the lords of the daśā; and their years are six, the directions ⟨ten⟩, the mountains ⟨seven⟩, elephant-and-moon ⟨eighteen⟩, aṣṭi ⟨sixteen⟩, atidhṛti ⟨nineteen⟩, atyaṣṭi ⟨seventeen⟩, ⟨the word standing for Ketu's seven yields no number-word: our mūla reads योगा⟩, and the nails ⟨twenty⟩. Then, counting the Moon's birth-star from Kṛttikā ⟨the fire-star⟩ up to that star, dividing by nine and weighing the remainder, the lord of the daśā is the planet reckoned from the Sun onwards.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्केत्वा"; alternatives "वित्केतुःवा" — at 7x the string is वि + a त्के conjunct + a comma-like half-consonant mark + वा. The mark is this fount's reduced half-consonant, not a visarga - see the note on वत्सराः in line 17.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शैल"; alternatives "क्षेल", "शेल" — the conjunct after दि is compressed; read क् + शै
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चात्यष्ट्ययोगा"; alternatives "चात्यष्टियोगा", "चात्यष्ट्यगा" — the syllable read यो is clear, but no number-word for 7 is recoverable from it; the English gives 7 in this slot
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वत्सराः"; alternatives "वःसराः" — the त् of त्स prints as a two-part mark (round blob over a comma) that reads as a visarga at low magnification; resolved at 10x on the identical word in line 17
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वह्निभा–" — line ends with a HYPHEN; the word continues on the next line
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्कादिचो"; alternatives "अर्कादिको" — the akshara before हि reads as ca (open left hook + right stem), not ka; the sense wants अर्कादिको 'beginning with the Sun', which the English confirms ('counted from the Sun onwards'). Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवहृद्धिशेष"; alternatives "नवहृद्भिशेष" — the conjunct after हृ is doubled-d or d+bh; not separable at 2.35x
6.4a reading here is contested

जन्मर्क्षागमनाडिका विघटिकास्तत्तद्दशाताडिता नाड्यः षष्टिहता युता विघटिकास्तच्छेद्यराशिर्भवेत् । आद्यन्तस्थितनाडिका विघटिकाभिर्भाजिता वत्सराः शेषं द्वादशभिर्दिनैः खरुतुभिर्निघ्नाच्च मासादिकम् ॥ ४ ॥

janmarkṣāgamanāḍikā vighaṭikāstattaddaśātāḍitā nāḍyaḥ ṣaṣṭihatā yutā vighaṭikāstacchedyarāśirbhavet | ādyantasthitanāḍikā vighaṭikābhirbhājitā vatsarāḥ śeṣaṃ dvādaśabhirdinaiḥ kharutubhirnighnācca māsādikam || 4 ||

The nāḍikās and vighaṭikās of the birth-star still to pass, multiplied by the daśā ⟨years⟩ of that lord; the nāḍīs multiplied by sixty and the vighaṭikās added — that becomes the quantity to be divided. The nāḍikās and vighaṭikās standing from the star's beginning to its end, divided into it, give the years ⟨still to pass⟩; and the remainder, multiplied by twelve and by kha-ṛtu, gives the months and the rest. ⟨kha-ṛtu is a bhūtasaṅkhyā — kha 0, ṛtu 6 — read leftward as sixty. Sareen and V. Subrahmaṇya Śāstri both say the second multiplier is thirty, and the Tamil printing sets 12-30-60. The number this compound encodes is not settled.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मर्क्षांगम"; alternatives "जन्मक्षांगम", "जन्मर्क्षागम" — the mark above the क्षा is a single hook that could be a repha or a candrabindu; janma-rksha-agamana is what the sense wants RESOLVED 2026-09-08: the second exemplar sets आगम, which is what this note said the sense wanted.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वत्सराः"; alternatives "वःसराः" — EXAMINED AT 10x AND SETTLED HERE: between व and स stands a two-part mark - a round blob above a curved comma - which is this fount's reduced half-ta of the त्स conjunct, NOT a visarga. It recurs in lines 2 and 4 of this plate and, in a different two-part form, in कौटुःबं on plate 54. A parser demanding clean visargas or clean conjuncts will mis-segment every one of them.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खरतुमिर्निशाच्च"; alternatives "खर्तुभिर्निशाच्च", "खरुतुभिर्निघ्नाच्च" — THE LEAST SECURE STRING ON THIS PLATE. At 7x: kha, then a looped sort with a descending tail that is neither a plain ra nor a clean vocalic r, then तु, then a म-based sort with the i-matra (bha not excluded), then र्नि, then a शा-like sort (घ्ना not excluded), then च्च. The English wants the numbers 12 and 30 in this clause and only द्वादश is legible. RESOLVED 2026-09-08 in favour of this note's own second-listed alternative: खरुतुभिर्निघ्नाच्च is what Bhasin prints and the only one of the three that scans (the thirteenth syllable must be heavy). The NUMBER the compound encodes is still open — kha 0 + ṛtu 6 read leftward gives sixty, both English witnesses say thirty, and the Tamil printing sets 12-30-60.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ४ ॥" — the four is the figure-8-like form; confirmed against the running sequence 3-4-5 on this plate
6.5a reading here is contested

तत्तत्खेटदशाद्दशा विनिहता मासाः पुरोक्तस्ततस्त्वन्त्याङ्कस्त्रिगुणो दिनानि सततं त्वेवं हि चान्तर्दशाः । तद्भुक्तिस्तु दिनीकृता करहृता तत्तद्दशाताडिता नाड्याद्या विदशा वियद्रसहृता चेत्सा दिनाद्या भवेत् ॥ ५ ॥

tattatkheṭadaśāddaśā vinihatā māsāḥ puroktastatastvantyāṅkastriguṇo dināni satataṃ tvevaṃ hi cāntardaśāḥ | tadbhuktistu dinīkṛtā karahṛtā tattaddaśātāḍitā nāḍyādyā vidaśā viyadrasahṛtā cetsā dinādyā bhavet || 5 ||

The daśā of each planet multiplied by ⟨the other's⟩ daśā gives months, as was said before; then the last figure trebled gives the days — thus always are the antardaśās. That bhukti, turned into days, divided by the hands ⟨two⟩ and multiplied by the respective daśā, gives the vidaśā in nāḍīs and the rest; and if it be divided by sky-and-flavours ⟨sixty⟩ it comes out in days and the rest.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुरोक्तस्तत–"; alternatives "पुरोङ्क्स्तत–" — the conjunct after रो carries a subscript; line ends with a HYPHEN and the word runs on
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्त्वन्त्याङ्कस्त्रिगुणो" — AN INK BLOT sits above and between the ङ्क and the following स्त्रि, obscuring the top of both aksharas. The baseline forms are legible; the marks above them in that span are NOT, and no anusvara or repha can be asserted or denied there.
6.6a reading here is contested

तद्वत्सूक्ष्मदशादयोऽपि गदिताश्चैको विशेषोऽस्ति तद् घस्राद्या घटिकादिरूपमिह चाधोऽधो व्रजन्ति क्रमात् । सूर्योत्कृष्टदशा करोति सुतधीप्रज्ञादिकारोच्छ्रयज्ञानार्थागमकीर्तिपौरुषसुखप्राप्तीश्वरानुग्रहान् ॥ ६ ॥

tadvatsūkṣmadaśādayo'pi gaditāścaiko viśeṣo'sti tad ghasrādyā ghaṭikādirūpamiha cādho'dho vrajanti kramāt | sūryotkṛṣṭadaśā karoti sutadhīprajñādikārocchrayajñānārthāgamakīrtipauruṣasukhaprāptīśvarānugrahān || 6 ||

Likewise the sūkṣma-daśās and those below them have also been stated; there is just one difference, that here what begins as days takes the form of ghaṭikās and so on, descending step by step ⟨our mūla now reads तद्वत्, 'likewise', the word the sense wants; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave तद्वात्, which is no Sanskrit form⟩. — The Sun's excellent daśā produces sons, understanding, wisdom and the like, the raising up of one's work, knowledge, the coming of wealth, fame, manliness, the attainment of happiness, and the favour of the ruler.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्वात्"; alternatives "तद्वत्" — an aa-matra is printed on the द्वा; तद्वत् 'likewise' is what the sense wants. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्वत्सूक्ष्मदशादयोऽपि; this sentence names तद्वात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 29 of the exemplar's jp2 master page_0074 (folio 72) by eye at about 3.0x native, beside the same press's तद्वत्पुत्र on folio 47. The ā is on the page: a free-standing full-height bar after द्व, with no curl to its left, so it is not the stem of a full त. The press sets तद्वात् here, as this note says. Our mūla now emends the press to तद्वत् on the lexicon: तद्वात् is no Sanskrit form, and the same press sets तद्वत् on folios 47 and 125.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कारोच्छ्रय–"; alternatives "कारोच्छ्य–" — line ends with a HYPHEN; the word runs on
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६ ॥" — the epsilon-with-tail six, matching plate 55; a small stray mark stands to the right of the closing danda
6.7a reading here is contested

भानोः पापदशातिकष्टविबलोद्योगार्थहान्यामयारातिक्षोभमहीशकोपजनकारिष्टादिबाधोदयान् चन्द्रोत्कृष्टदशा करोति जननीश्रेयस्तटाकादिकः क्षेत्रारामगृहापसद्द्विजवरश्रीशोभनान्दोलिकान् ॥ ७ ॥

bhānoḥ pāpadaśātikaṣṭavibalodyogārthahānyāmayārātikṣobhamahīśakopajanakāriṣṭādibādhodayān candrotkṛṣṭadaśā karoti jananīśreyastaṭākādikaḥ kṣetrārāmagṛhāpasaddvijavaraśrīśobhanāndolikān || 7 ||

From the Sun's evil daśā come extreme distress, want of strength, ⟨fruitless⟩ exertion, loss of wealth, disease, agitation from enemies, the anger of the king, and the rising of affliction and other trouble to the father ⟨janaka⟩. — The Moon's excellent daśā produces the welfare of the mother, tanks and the like, fields, groves, houses, ⟨the akṣara printed between गृहा and सद् is compressed and is not resolved⟩ excellent brahmins, prosperity, splendour, and palanquins.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गार्थैहान्यामया–"; alternatives "गार्थहान्यामया–" — an e-matra appears over the र्थ; अर्थहानि 'loss of wealth' is what the sense wants. Line ends with a HYPHEN.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षोभममहीश"; alternatives "क्षोभं महीश" — two ma-aksharas stand in succession with no anusvara visible between them
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चन्द्रोत्कृष्ट"; alternatives "चन्द्रोःकृष्ट" — the half-ta of त्कृ is the two-part reduced mark described on plate 74; it reads as a visarga below 4x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहापसद्द्विजवर"; alternatives "गृहाप्तसद्द्विजवर" — the akshara between गृहा and सद् is compressed; the English has 'houses, the blessings of good Brahmins' with nothing answering to apasad
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ७ ॥" — the closed 9-like seven, identical to plate 55
6.8a reading here is contested

इन्दोः पापदशान्नहीनकृपणानन्दार्थनाशामय प्रज्ञाहीनजुगुप्समातृहरणक्रोधादिशीतज्वरान् । भौमोत्कृष्टदशा करोति वसुधाप्राप्तीष्टवस्त्वागमप्रज्ञास्वच्छमनःपराक्रमधनारातिक्षयांश्चानुजान् ॥ ८ ॥

indoḥ pāpadaśānnahīnakṛpaṇānandārthanāśāmaya prajñāhīnajugupsamātṛharaṇakrodhādiśītajvarān | bhaumotkṛṣṭadaśā karoti vasudhāprāptīṣṭavastvāgamaprajñāsvacchamanaḥparākramadhanārātikṣayāṃścānujān || 8 ||

From the Moon's evil daśā come want of food, meanness, the destruction of joy and of wealth, disease, lack of wisdom, disgust, the loss of the mother, anger and the like, and cold fevers. — Mars's excellent daśā produces the gaining of land, the coming of the things one wants, wisdom, a clear mind, prowess, wealth, the wasting away of enemies, and younger brothers.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आनन्दार्थनाश"; alternatives "आनन्दार्थैनाश", "आनन्दार्थंनाश" — an extra mark stands over the र्थ - an e-matra or an anusvara; not separable
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वस्त्वागम–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८ ॥" — GROUND TRUTH: eight in this fount is an ANGULAR '<'-like stroke, nothing like the figure-8 form that stands for FOUR (plates 54, 74). The two are easily transposed by a reader who assumes the arabic shapes; fixed here by the running sequence 7-8-9 on this plate.
6.9a reading here is contested

पापाङ्गारदशानुजातिकलहं क्षेत्राग्निबाधाव्रणाक्षिक्षीणादिमहीशपीडसुजनक्रोधासिवेधामयाम् । सौम्योत्कृष्टदशा करोति वसनानन्तार्थधान्योच्छ्रयश्रेयः सौख्यगृहस्वबन्धुविजयप्राप्तीष्टवस्त्वागमान् ॥ ९ ॥

pāpāṅgāradaśānujātikalahaṃ kṣetrāgnibādhāvraṇākṣikṣīṇādimahīśapīḍasujanakrodhāsivedhāmayām | saumyotkṛṣṭadaśā karoti vasanānantārthadhānyocchrayaśreyaḥ saukhyagṛhasvabandhuvijayaprāptīṣṭavastvāgamān || 9 ||

Mars's evil daśā brings quarrel with younger brothers and with kinsmen, trouble from fields and from fire, wounds, the wasting of the eyes and so on, affliction from the king, the anger of good men, piercing by the sword, and disease. — Mercury's excellent daśā produces clothes, endless wealth, grain, high standing, welfare, comfort, a house, one's own kinsmen, victory, gain, and the coming of the things one wants.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्रणा–" — line ends with a HYPHEN; the word continues as अक्षिक्षीण on the next line
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसनान्ता"; alternatives "वमनानन्ता" — at 5.5x the second akshara is sa, not ma, and carries a small subscript dot that may be a speck; the sequence va-sa-naa-ntaa is what the ink gives
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्थंधान्य"; alternatives "र्थधान्य" — an anusvara-like dot stands over the र्थ
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उच्छ्रय–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राप्तीष्टवस्त्वागमान्"; alternatives "प्राप्तीष्टस्त्वागमान्" — at 8x one narrow akshara stands between ष्ट and त्वा; read as va on the strength of the identical string इष्टवस्त्वागम printed at line 20 of this same plate
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ९ ॥" — GROUND TRUTH: nine is a small closed loop set high with a short tail dropping to the right - visibly smaller than the SEVEN of line 8 and quite unlike the epsilon-form SIX of plate 55. All three were checked against the running sequence on this plate and its neighbours.
6.10a reading here is contested

बोध्या पापदशा विदेशगमनक्रोधस्वबन्धुक्षयप्रज्ञाहीनवणिग्जनार्तिकलहक्षेत्रार्थनाशापदः । जीवोत्कृष्टदशा करोति विपुलग्रामाधिकारात्मजश्रीसौभाग्यगुणाकराश्रितजनाश्वान्दोलिकावैभवान् ॥ १० ॥

bodhyā pāpadaśā videśagamanakrodhasvabandhukṣayaprajñāhīnavaṇigjanārtikalahakṣetrārthanāśāpadaḥ | jīvotkṛṣṭadaśā karoti vipulagrāmādhikārātmajaśrīsaubhāgyaguṇākarāśritajanāśvāndolikāvaibhavān || 10 ||

⟨Mercury's⟩ evil daśā is to be understood as bringing going abroad, anger, the wasting of one's own kinsmen, want of wisdom, distress and quarrel from tradesmen and from people, loss of field and of wealth, and calamity. — Jupiter's excellent daśā produces authority over a wide village, sons, prosperity, good fortune, a mine of virtues, dependants, horses, palanquins, and grandeur.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षय–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षेत्रार्थनाशापदः"; alternatives "क्षेत्रार्थंनाशापदः" — a mark stands over the र्थ - anusvara or a speck
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आत्मज–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जनाश्वाःदोलिका"; alternatives "जनाश्वान्दोलिका" — EXAMINED AT 9x: the mark between श्वा and दो is TWO CLEAN ROUND DOTS at mid-height - a genuine visarga, and demonstrably NOT the blob-over-comma reduced half-consonant this fount uses for त् (compare वत्सराः, plate 74 line 17). So a visarga IS printed where आन्दोलिका wants a न्. Recorded as printed; the two mark-types are separable at 9x and must not be conflated. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads जनाश्वान्दोलिकावैभवान् for जनाश्वाःदोलिकावैभवान्, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-08 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १० ॥" — TWO-DIGIT verse number: a Devanagari one (loop with a long descending tail) followed by a small ring for zero. The one is easily confused with the NINE of plate 76 line 33, which is a smaller loop with a shorter tail; only the running sequence separates them.
6.11a reading here is contested

जैव्या पापदशा महीसुरभयाधिव्याधिधैर्यच्युता धान्यानर्थमहीसुरार्तिजनकक्रोधाशनार्तिक्षयान् । शौक्री श्रेष्ठदशा करोति सुखसौभाग्योच्छ्रयान्दोलिकाष्टैश्वर्यायतधर्मबुद्धिकनकारामाश्वगीतोत्सवान् ॥ ११ ॥

jaivyā pāpadaśā mahīsurabhayādhivyādhidhairyacyutā dhānyānarthamahīsurārtijanakakrodhāśanārtikṣayān | śaukrī śreṣṭhadaśā karoti sukhasaubhāgyocchrayāndolikāṣṭaiśvaryāyatadharmabuddhikanakārāmāśvagītotsavān || 11 ||

Jupiter's evil daśā brings fear from brahmins ⟨both exemplars print महीसुर, 'earth-god', that is a brahmin; both published translations read a king here — see the divergence note⟩, disorder of mind and body, the collapse of steadfastness, loss of grain, misfortune, distress from brahmins, the anger of the father ⟨janaka⟩, want of food, affliction, and wasting. — Venus's finest daśā produces comfort, good fortune, high standing ⟨उच्छ्रय: the ink failed over this run on the plate. It is restored from the metre, from the parallel plates and from the second exemplar — not read⟩, palanquins, the eight lordships ⟨aṣṭaiśvarya⟩, dharma made wide, intelligence, gold, groves, horses, and festivals of song.

What the printed page actually sets, here

The Sanskrit above is what our source reads — one encoded source, machine-parsed. This printed page sets it differently. Because only one source stands behind this verse, that difference has not been adjudicated: both readings are shown and neither has been weighed against the other.

ज्ञेन्या पापदशा महीसुरभयाधिव्याधिधैर्यच्युता धान्यानर्थंमहीसुरार्तिजनक्रोधाशनार्तिक्षयान् । शौक्री श्रेष्ठदशा करोति सुखसौभाग्यं [ILLEGIBLE:2-3]यान्दोलिका– ऐश्वर्यायतधर्मबुद्धिकनकारामाश्वगीतोःसवान् ॥ ११ ॥

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञेन्या"; alternatives "ज्ञेया", "चिन्त्या" — two aksharas plus a superscript mark; the parallel line 2 of this plate opens बोध्या, a gerundive, so ज्ञेया would fit, but a न् is visible in the second akshara [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जैव्या; this sentence names ज्ञेन्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Refuted on the page. The plate ruling read line 13 of the exemplar's jp2 master page_0077 (folio 75) by eye at about 2.6x, 3.5x and 3.6x native. The first consonant is ज, not ज्ञ; a small mark under the foot of its stem is probably what was taken for the tail of ज्ञ. The vowel sign is ै, not े. The loop of the second akṣara has a white counter, like the व्या of व्याधि on the same line, so it is this fount's half-व and not a न्. The press sets जैव्या, and so does our mūla now. The verse's doubt records the rival जैवी.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धान्यानर्थं"; alternatives "धान्यानर्थ" — anusvara over the र्थ as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[ILLEGIBLE:2-3]" — REFUSED, NOT GUESSED. On plate 77, line at y 3238-3379, a run of roughly two to three aksharas between x 1582 and x 1803 did not take ink: at 6x only disconnected fragments survive - a hook, a pair of dots, a partial subscript - with no headline continuity. The parallel lines on plates 75 and 76 both end their first hemistich with उच्छ्रय, which is what the sense wants here, but that is inference from other plates and NOT what this plate carries. Nothing is asserted for this run.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुखसौभाग्यं"; alternatives "सुखसौमाग्यं" — the bha is lightly inked; the final anusvara sits on a partially printed akshara at the edge of the damaged run
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यान्दोलिका–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गीतोःसवान्"; alternatives "गीतोत्सवान्" — the त् of त्स is the blob-over-comma reduced mark, not a visarga; the intended word is गीतोत्सवान्
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ११ ॥" — two ones; the second is heavily inked and its loop is filled solid
  • Where we differ: WITNESS DIVERGENCE, recorded and NOT acted on. Both exemplars print महीसुरभया at the head of this verse — महीसुर, 'earth-god', is a brahmin — and महीसुर is printed again eleven syllables later in महीसुरार्ति. Both published translations render the FIRST of the two as a king: V. Subrahmaṇya Śāstri 1939 (Sloka 9½–10½) 'royal displeasure', and Bhasin's Hindi 'राज्य की ओर से कष्ट, भय'. महीश्वर, 'lord of the earth', would scan here exactly as महीसुर does — ma(L) hī(G) śva(L) ra(L) bha(L) yā(G) — so the metre cannot separate them, and महीश, the shorter king-word, cannot be right because it leaves the pāda a syllable short. Our English stays literal to what both printings set. To settle it, read folio 75 (plate page_0077, line 14) at magnification and decide between सु and श्व in the third akṣara of the compound. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read this line of jp2 page_0077 (folio 75) by eye at about 2.2x native. The third akṣara of the compound is plainly सु, with the u-hook below. The press sets महीसुरभया, and श्व is not on the page. The two published translations' king is theirs, not the printing's.]
6.12a reading here is contested

शौक्री पापदशा कलत्रभयकृन्नीचार्थहानिप्रदात्यन्तस्तेयमहाप्रदोषविपुलस्त्रीवर्गरोगोद्भवान् । मन्दोत्कृष्टदशा करोति विभवप्रज्ञादियज्ञादिकक्षेत्रग्रामपुराधिनायकबहुव्यापारदक्षोत्सुकान् ॥ १२ ॥

śaukrī pāpadaśā kalatrabhayakṛnnīcārthahānipradātyantasteyamahāpradoṣavipulastrīvargarogodbhavān | mandotkṛṣṭadaśā karoti vibhavaprajñādiyajñādikakṣetragrāmapurādhināyakabahuvyāpāradakṣotsukān || 12 ||

Venus's evil daśā causes fear on the wife's account, baseness, loss of wealth, extreme theft, grave offences, and the outbreak of disease from a large company of women. — Saturn's excellent daśā produces wealth, wisdom and the like, sacrifices and the like, headship of fields, villages and towns, and a man skilful and eager in many undertakings.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्लन्नीच"; alternatives "क्लिन्नीच", "कृन्नीच" — the conjunct after भय carries a subscript and is not resolvable at 2.35x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रदा–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।"; alternatives "!" — the closing danda has a mark at its foot, giving it the appearance of an exclamation point; kept as observed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रज्ञा"; alternatives "प्रज्ञा (settled)" — the pa-ra conjunct is faint at 1.6x; at 5x the ra-subscript stroke below प is unambiguous. Settled as प्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-" — the line ends with a printed hyphen marking a word broken across lines. Contrast line 22, which breaks a word with NO hyphen - this edition is not consistent about it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बहु"; alternatives "वहु" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST APPLIED and usable at this resolution: at 5x the left bowl is closed by a horizontal bar (ब); the va of व्यापार two glyphs later shows the same bowl OPEN. Settled as ब.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्या"; alternatives "ब्या" — the half-va is set as a SMALL RAISED व before य rather than as a subscript - a font habit of this edition, easy to mistake for a visarga or an anusvara at low magnification. Open bowl confirms व not ब.
6.13a reading here is contested

मान्दी पापविषप्रयोगधनहृद्देहाद्यनर्थोदयान् राजक्रोधविरुद्धकार्यविकलान् रोगादिबाधोदयान् । राहूत्कृष्टदशा करोति सकलश्रेयोमहद्राज्यकृद्धर्मार्थागमपुण्यतीर्थचलनज्ञानप्रभावोदयान् ॥ १३ ॥

māndī pāpaviṣaprayogadhanahṛddehādyanarthodayān rājakrodhaviruddhakāryavikalān rogādibādhodayān | rāhūtkṛṣṭadaśā karoti sakalaśreyomahadrājyakṛddharmārthāgamapuṇyatīrthacalanajñānaprabhāvodayān || 13 ||

Saturn's evil ⟨daśā gives⟩ the administering of poison, ⟨loss of⟩ wealth, ⟨affliction of⟩ heart and body and the rest, and the rise of ruin ⟨our mūla now reads देहाद्यनर्थोदयान्, that is देहादि, 'the body and the rest', + अनर्थोदय; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the द्य ligature where the older transcription had घ⟩; the anger of the king; works crippled by opposition; and the rise of trouble from disease and the like. — Rāhu's excellent daśā produces all welfare, a great kingdom, dharma, the coming of wealth, travel to holy fords, and the rise of knowledge and of influence ⟨our mūla now reads महद्राज्यकृद्धर्म-, that is राज्यकृत्, 'making a kingdom', + धर्म, so no word for intelligence stands here; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave कृ where the older transcription had बु⟩.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घनर्थो"; alternatives "घानर्थो", "घ्नानर्थो" — UNSETTLED AND SUBSTANTIVE. घ and न are two full glyphs on the baseline at 7x - there is no virama and no conjunct, so the print is घ + न, not घ्न. But देह-आघ + अनर्थोदयान् requires आघानर्थो, and घ्न + अनर्थ requires a conjunct. As printed the string घनर्थ is not a Sanskrit word. Recorded as printed per rule 1; the exemplar is very likely defective here. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पापविषप्रयोगधनहृद्देहाद्यनर्थोदयान्; this sentence names घनर्थो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 7 of the exemplar's jp2 master page_0078 (folio 76) by eye at about 2.1x and 2.7x native, beside controls. The sort after हा is one ligature, द्य, 61 px wide, and a separate न follows. It is the same sort as the द्य of नेत्रद्यूनगतौ on the next folio, not the घ of घनता (normalised correlation 0.834 against 0.539). So the press sets देहाद्यनर्थोदयान्, देहादि + अनर्थोदयान्, and the exemplar is not defective here. The misreading was our transcription's, and the mūla is corrected.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हृद्दे"; alternatives "हृद्दे (settled)" — the e-matra sits above the द्द ligature and reads at 7x as a slanted stroke on the headline; the descender belongs to the ligature, not to a separate vowel.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कार्य" — repha above य confirmed at 3.5x - a hooked flag, distinct from the plain dot of an anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राहू"; alternatives "राहु" — the subscript under ह is a doubled curl (long ū) rather than the single hook seen in बहु on line 7; compared side by side at 9x the two are distinct. Read राहू, but the mark is small and this is the least certain vowel length on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बु" — the line ENDS here mid-word with NO hyphen, though line 6 hyphenated an identical kind of break. The word continues as द्ध... on line 21. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 19 of jp2 page_0078 (folio 76) by eye at about 2.1x native and mapped the glyph at 3 px steps. The last akṣara has a central stem, a loop on each side and the ṛ-hook under the stem, so it is कृ, not बु. The line does end with no hyphen, as this note says. The press sets महद्राज्यकृ|द्धर्मार्थागम, राज्यकृत् + धर्म, and the mūla is corrected.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्मा"; alternatives "मां" — ZOOMED TO 8x specifically for this. The mark above म is a REPHA (a hook that curls back on itself), not an anusvara (a plain filled dot). Same mark above थ. At 3.5x both read as dots and the line would be mis-transcribed मांथांगम; at 8x they are unmistakably rephas, giving र्मार्थागम.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्ध"; alternatives "द्धि" — joined to line 20's बु this gives बुद्धर्मार्थागम, which is not well-formed; बुद्धिधर्मार्थागम (intelligence + dharma + artha + acquisition) is what the sense and the English require. No ि-matra is visible before the ligature at 8x, so I record द्ध as printed. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling found that the akṣara before this ligature is कृ, not बु (jp2 page_0078 line 19, read by eye at about 2.1x native). Line 20 opens द्धर्मार्थागम, so the press sets महद्राज्यकृद्धर्मार्थागम, महद्राज्यकृत् + धर्मार्थागम, 'bestowing a great kingdom'. No बुद्धि is needed, and the mūla is corrected.]
6.14a reading here is contested

राहोः पापदशाऽहिभीतिविषजः सर्वाङ्गरोगार्तिकृच्छस्त्राग्न्यन्त्यविरोधवृक्षतपनारातिप्रपीडादयान् । केतूत्कृष्टदशा करोति विजयक्रूरक्रियार्थागमम्लेच्छक्ष्मापतिलब्धभाग्यकवनप्रारंभशत्रुक्षयान् ॥ १४ ॥

rāhoḥ pāpadaśā'hibhītiviṣajaḥ sarvāṅgarogārtikṛcchastrāgnyantyavirodhavṛkṣatapanārātiprapīḍādayān | ketūtkṛṣṭadaśā karoti vijayakrūrakriyārthāgamamlecchakṣmāpatilabdhabhāgyakavanaprāraṃbhaśatrukṣayān || 14 ||

From Rāhu's evil daśā ⟨our mūla now reads पापदशा, 'evil daśā'; the earlier transcription's पापशा had lost the द and was no word⟩ come fear of snakes, ills born of poison, pain from disease in every limb, weapons, fire, opposition from the low-born, trees, the sun's burning, and grievous affliction from enemies. — Ketu's excellent daśā produces victory, cruel acts, the coming of wealth, fortune obtained from a mleccha king, the beginning of ⟨कवन: our mūla reads this word, but its sense in this place is not determinable⟩, and the destruction of enemies.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापशा"; alternatives "पापदशा" — SUBSTANTIVE. At 9x there are exactly THREE glyphs between the word space and the avagraha: पा, प, शा. There is no द. The parallel line 8 reads मान्दी पाप... and the sense wants पापदशा (malefic Dasa); as printed पापशा is not a word. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पापदशाऽहिभीतिविषजः for पापशाऽहिभीतिविषजः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽहि"; alternatives "ऽद्वि" — settled at 9x: the glyph after the avagraha is ि + ह, giving हि, not द्वि. अहिभीति (fear of snakes) is confirmed by the facing English claim about reptiles.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृ-" — hyphenated break; resolves with line 23 as आर्तिकृत् + शस्त्र → आर्तिकृच्छस्त्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्छस्त्रा"; alternatives "च्छत्रा" — at 9x the second glyph carries a स above the त्र, so स्त्रा not त्रा. This matters: छत्र is a parasol, शस्त्र a weapon, and the facing English claim says missiles. Settled as च्छस्त्रा.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केतू"; alternatives "केतु" — doubled subscript curl (ū), matching राहू on plate 78 line 20 and contrasting with the single hook of बहु; read as long.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्था"; alternatives "थां" — repha above थ, not anusvara - the mark is a returning hook. Contrast प्रारंभ on line 3 of this plate, where a true anusvara prints as a plain filled dot. Both appear on this plate, which is what makes the discrimination checkable.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लब्ध"; alternatives "लव्ध" — ba/va counter test: the bowl is closed by a bar, so ब.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रारंभ"; alternatives "प्रारम्भ" — anusvara printed, not a subscript nasal; the dot is round, filled, and sits clear of the headline.
6.15a reading here is contested

केतोः पापदशाऽतिकष्टविफलानर्थक्रियोद्योगहृच्छूलास्थिज्वरकम्पनद्विजजनद्वेषातिमूर्खक्रिया । लग्नात्कोणगतौ च वित्तमदनस्थानेश्वराभ्यां तमः खेटौ संयुतवीक्षितौ निजदशाकाले हि मृत्युप्रदौ ॥ १५ ॥

ketoḥ pāpadaśā'tikaṣṭaviphalānarthakriyodyogahṛcchūlāsthijvarakampanadvijajanadveṣātimūrkhakriyā | lagnātkoṇagatau ca vittamadanasthāneśvarābhyāṃ tamaḥ kheṭau saṃyutavīkṣitau nijadaśākāle hi mṛtyupradau || 15 ||

From Ketu's evil daśā: extreme distress; fruitless and harmful action and effort; colic at the heart; ⟨disease of⟩ the bones; fever; trembling; hatred from brahmins and from people; and exceedingly stupid conduct. — And when the two planets of darkness ⟨Rāhu and Ketu⟩ stand in a trine from the lagna and are joined with or aspected by the lords of the place of wealth ⟨the 2nd⟩ and the place of desire ⟨the 7th⟩, then in the time of their own daśā they are givers of death.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पापदशा" — IMPORTANT CONTROL. Exactly parallel in position and construction to plate 78 line 22 ('राहोः पापशा...'), and here the द IS present and unambiguous at 3.5x. This is direct evidence from the same edition, two plates apart, that plate 78's पापशा is a defective printing with a dropped द - not a variant reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽति"; alternatives "ऽन्ति" — at 8x the glyph after the avagraha is a plain ति with no न् above or before it. Read पापदशा + अतिकष्ट.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ानर्थ" — a second control: अनर्थ is printed here in full with its आ, which sharpens the flag on plate 78 line 8 where the same element appears as bare न.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्छूला"; alternatives "च्छुला" — resolves with line 4's हृ- as हृच्छूल (heart-pain, हृद् + शूल). The subscript is the doubled ū curl.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूर्ख"; alternatives "मूखं" — repha above ख confirmed at 3.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तमः" — visarga clear and round - useful as the plate's reference specimen of a well-inked visarga when judging line 18.
6.16a reading here is contested

नेत्रद्यूनगतौ त्रिकोणपतियुग्दृष्टौ धनायुष्प्रदौ तद्भावेश्वरयुक्तपापखचरो मृत्युं विधत्ते नृणाम् । स्यातां केतुविधुन्तुदौ द्वितनुभे केन्द्रत्रिकोणेश्वरेर्युक्तौ वा तदधीश्वरौ यदि तयोः पाकेऽर्धराज्यप्रदौ ॥१६॥

netradyūnagatau trikoṇapatiyugdṛṣṭau dhanāyuṣpradau tadbhāveśvarayuktapāpakhacaro mṛtyuṃ vidhatte nṛṇām | syātāṃ ketuvidhuntudau dvitanubhe kendratrikoṇeśvareryuktau vā tadadhīśvarau yadi tayoḥ pāke'rdharājyapradau ||16||

Standing in the 2nd ⟨netra⟩ or the 7th ⟨dyūna⟩, joined with or aspected by the lord of a trine, the two are givers of wealth and of long life; while a malefic planet joined with the lord of that bhāva dispenses death to men ⟨our mūla now reads विधत्ते, 'brings about', the verb the sentence needs; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave विवत्ते, which is no Sanskrit word⟩. And if Ketu and Vidhuntuda ⟨Rāhu, 'the tormentor of the moon'⟩ stand in the two dual-bodied signs joined with the lords of a kendra and a trikoṇa, or are themselves the lords of these, then in their ripening they give half a kingdom.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्यून"; alternatives "घ्न" — CORRECTED AT 8x. At overview scale this reads as घ्न; magnified, the glyph is द with a य subscript and a doubled ū below, i.e. द्यू, followed by a separate न. द्यून is the standard name of the 7th house, and the facing English claim says 'the 7th or the 2nd house' - so the low-resolution reading घ्न would have been a substantive error.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनायुप्रदौ"; alternatives "धनायुःप्रदौ" — NO VISARGA IS PRINTED between यु and प्र. Checked at 9x against the plate's own reference visargas (तमः line 16, केतोः line 4, तयोः line 20), which are large, round and unmistakable; nothing of that size or shape is present here. Recorded without it per rule 1, though धनायुःप्रदौ is what an edited text would carry. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धनायुष्प्रदौ; this sentence names धनायुप्रदौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 17 of the exemplar's jp2 master page_0079 (folio 77) by eye at about 2.0x and 4.3x native. No visarga is printed, as this note says, but a separate half-consonant sort stands between यु and प्र. It is the half ग् this line also sets in युग्दृष्टौ; this fount's visarga is two free round dots, and its ष् has a left stroke and a loop at lower right. So the press sets धनायुग्प्रदौ, a wrong sort, and our transcription had left the sort out. The mūla now reads धनायुष्प्रदौ on the lexicon: the stem आयुस् takes ष् before प in a compound.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विवत्ते"; alternatives "विदत्ते", "विवृत्ते", "विवते" — UNSETTLED - the plate's least secure word. At 10x there are three glyphs: वि, then a letter whose left element is an OPEN bowl (व, not द, by the counter test), then त with a subscript and an e-matra. As printed विवत्ते is not a Sanskrit word; विदत्ते ('dispenses', with the facing English 'will cause death') fits the sense, but that requires द and the counter says व. Left as printed; a second exemplar is needed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विधत्ते; this sentence names विवत्ते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this word on line 18 of jp2 page_0079 (folio 77) by eye at about 2.7x and 4.3x native, beside the ध of धना on the line above. The second sort has an unbroken headline and a closed loop on a right-hand stem, the same sort as the व of वि beside it; this fount's ध has a detached top-left tick. So the press sets विवत्ते, as recorded here. The mūla now emends the press to विधत्ते on the lexicon: विवत्ते is no Sanskrit form, and मृत्युं विधत्ते is the idiom the sentence needs.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधुन्तुदौ" — विधुन्तुद (moon-tormentor) is a name of Rahu; so the dual pairs Ketu with Rahu, consistent with the surrounding matter.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वितनुभे"; alternatives "द्वितनुभे (as printed)" — read glyph by glyph as द्वि-त-नु-भे; recorded as printed without expansion.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥१६॥" — set tight, with no spaces inside the dandas, unlike '॥ १४ ॥' and '॥ १५ ॥' on this same plate. A typesetting inconsistency, not a reading problem.
6.17a reading here is contested

तावेव व्ययशत्रुरन्ध्रसदनाधीशैश्च युक्तेक्षितौ नृणामल्पफलप्रदौ च जननीं तद्वर्गसंहारकौ । तावेव स्थिरचञ्चलर्क्षसहितौ केन्द्रत्रिकोणाधिपैर्युक्तावप्युभयोश्च यः शुभगृहे स स्यान्महाभाग्यदः ॥१७॥

tāveva vyayaśatrurandhrasadanādhīśaiśca yuktekṣitau nṛṇāmalpaphalapradau ca jananīṃ tadvargasaṃhārakau | tāveva sthiracañcalarkṣasahitau kendratrikoṇādhipairyuktāvapyubhayośca yaḥ śubhagṛhe sa syānmahābhāgyadaḥ ||17||

Those same two, joined with or aspected by the lords of the houses of loss ⟨12th⟩, of enemies ⟨6th⟩ and of the aperture ⟨8th⟩, give men little fruit, and are destroyers of the mother and of those of her group ⟨our mūla now reads जननीं, 'the mother', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩. And those same two, set in a fixed or a movable sign and joined with the lords of a kendra and a trikoṇa — whichever of the two is in an auspicious house, he becomes a giver of great fortune.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जननां"; alternatives "जनानां" — as printed the genitive plural is short by one syllable (जनानां expected). Two न glyphs are present, not three; recorded as printed and flagged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जननीं; this sentence names जननां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 31 of the exemplar's jp2 master page_0079 (folio 77) by eye at about 3.8x native, beside the नीं of नन्दिनीं (page_0120) and the जननी of page_0076. Two न glyphs stand, as this note says, but the third akṣara is नीं. The ī-curl stands detached over the second न because its thin right leg did not print, and the round dot over the right half of the bar is the anusvāra. The press sets जननीं, 'the mother', and the mūla is corrected.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संहारकौ"; alternatives "सम्हारकौ" — anusvara dot, clear and round. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read this word on line 31 of jp2 page_0079 (folio 77) by eye at about 3.8x native. The press sets कौ with the two-stroke ौ, the same sort as प्रदौ on this line, not ो. The machine reads of Sastri's and Bhasin's printings both give संहारको; our mūla keeps संहारकौ.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चञ्चल"; alternatives "चचल", "चच्चल" — CORRECTED AT 8x. At 3x the third glyph reads as a doubled च; magnified it is the ñ-c conjunct ञ्च. चञ्चल (movable) is confirmed by the facing English claim, 'a fixed or a movable Rasi'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्क्ष"; alternatives "क्षं" — repha above क्ष - hooked, not a dot. ऋक्ष (sign) after sandhi.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥१७॥" — tight setting again, no spaces inside the dandas - as at ॥१६॥ on plate 79 but unlike ॥ १८ ॥ two blocks below on this same plate. Purely typographic.
6.18a reading here is contested

पापर्क्षस्थतमोग्रहौ विफलदौ केचिज्जगुः सौख्यदौ तौ द्वौ पापगृहस्थितौ शुभयुतौ स्यातां महामारकौ । रिःफाष्टारिगृहस्थितौ तदधिपैर्युक्तेक्षितौ हिंसकौ स्यातां मारकसंयुतौ तदधिपैस्तावेव मृत्युप्रदौ ॥ १८ ॥

pāparkṣasthatamograhau viphaladau kecijjaguḥ saukhyadau tau dvau pāpagṛhasthitau śubhayutau syātāṃ mahāmārakau | riḥphāṣṭārigṛhasthitau tadadhipairyuktekṣitau hiṃsakau syātāṃ mārakasaṃyutau tadadhipaistāveva mṛtyupradau || 18 ||

Some have declared that the two planets of darkness, standing in a malefic's sign, give no fruit, and ⟨others⟩ that they give comfort — the line is a report of what authorities say, not the author's own assertion. Those two, standing in a malefic's house and joined with a benefic, become great mārakas. Standing in the 12th ⟨riḥpha⟩, the 8th or the 6th ⟨ari⟩ and joined with or aspected by the lords of those houses, they become injurers; and joined with a māraka and with the lords of those houses, they are themselves the givers of death.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केचिज्जगुः" — 'some have said' - the verse itself reports a divergence of authorities, which the facing English renders as 'some Astrologers opine'. Worth noting for the claim library: this line is a doxographic report, not the author's own assertion.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रिःफाष्टारि" — house-name shorthand, not ordinary words: रिःफ = 12th, अष्ट = 8th, अरि = 6th. The facing English claim names exactly '6th, 8th or the 12th', which corroborates the reading of all three.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हिंसकौ"; alternatives "हिन्सकौ" — anusvara dot, not a subscript nasal; the dot is round and sits clear above the headline.
6.19a reading here is contested

तद्भावेषु च केन्द्रकोणपतिभिर्युक्तौ क्वचित्सौख्यदौ चेद्व्याधिव्रणदुःखखड्गसलिलाच्चोद्बन्धनान्मृत्युदौ । भ्रातृप्राप्तिचतुष्टयेषु बलिभिर्योगग्रहैरन्वितौ संपत्सौख्यसुतार्थराज्यकरिणौ यानोत्कटानिच्छतः ॥१९॥

tadbhāveṣu ca kendrakoṇapatibhiryuktau kvacitsaukhyadau cedvyādhivraṇaduḥkhakhaḍgasalilāccodbandhanānmṛtyudau | bhrātṛprāpticatuṣṭayeṣu balibhiryogagrahairanvitau saṃpatsaukhyasutārtharājyakariṇau yānotkaṭānicchataḥ ||19||

And in those bhāvas, joined with the lords of a kendra and a trine, they are in some cases givers of comfort; but if ⟨otherwise⟩ they give death from disease, wounds, sorrow, the sword, water, and hanging ⟨udbandhana⟩. In the 3rd ⟨bhrātṛ⟩, the 11th ⟨prāpti, gain⟩ and the four kendras, accompanied by strong yoga-giving planets, the two are makers of a kingdom together with wealth, comfort, sons and riches, for one who longs for towering conveyances.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्वचित्"; alternatives "कःचित्", "कचित्" — the mark between क and चित् is the edition's SMALL RAISED व (half-va), not a visarga: it has an open bowl and no second dot. Compare the identical form in बहुव्यापार, plate 78 line 7. Read क्वचित् ('in some cases'), which also matches the hedged facing English.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्चो"; alternatives "च्छो" — UNSETTLED. At 10x the glyph is a च carrying a subscript that is either a second च or a छ; the two are barely separable in this fount at this inking. Ablative सलिलात् + च would give च्च.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्धृ"; alternatives "द्ध्रु", "द्ध" — UNSETTLED, and the plate's least secure cluster. A द्ध ligature carrying a subscript curl that could be ृ or a ra-subscript with u. The likely words behind it are उद्धृत or उद्धत, but I cannot choose on the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चेद्व्याधिव्रणदुःखखड्गसलिलाच्चोद्बन्धनान्मृत्युदौ; this sentence names द्धृ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घनान्"; alternatives "घनात्", "घ्नान्" — reads as घ + ना + न् with a visible virama; an ablative घनात् would be expected after सलिलात्. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चेद्व्याधिव्रणदुःखखड्गसलिलाच्चोद्बन्धनान्मृत्युदौ; this sentence names घनान्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शाम्भि"; alternatives "श्राम्भि", "पाम्भि", "शाम्बि", "शात्रि" — UNSETTLED, and the worst-conditioned word on this plate. Zoomed to 11x. Glyph 3 is a consonant + ा whose body I cannot decide between श and प; glyph 4 carries a ि-matra over a body that could be म्भ, म्ब or ष्ठ. I can fix neither on the ink. What the sense demands is a house-list: भ्रातृ (3rd) + चतुष्टय (the kendra quartet 1/4/7/10) already accounts for the facing English '1st, 3rd, 4th, 7th or the 10th', leaving this middle element unexplained by the translation as well. Recorded as my best glyph-level reading and flagged, NOT emended. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भ्रातृप्राप्तिचतुष्टयेषु; this sentence names शाम्भि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलिभिः"; alternatives "वलिभिः" — ba/va counter test: closed bowl with bar, so ब. A large round ink blot sits on the baseline immediately before this word - it is a scan/ink defect with no stroke structure, not a punctuation mark.
6.20a reading here is contested

तावेव स्मरराशिपेन यदि वा वित्ताधिपेनाश्रितौ ताभ्यां दृक्पथगौ तदा धनहरौ स्यातां महामारकौ तुङ्गं तद्वृषभश्च वृश्चिक इति स्याद्राहुकेत्वोर्गृहौ कुंभोऽलीमिथुनाङ्गने तु भवतो मूलत्रिकोणाभिधं ॥ २० ॥

tāveva smararāśipena yadi vā vittādhipenāśritau tābhyāṃ dṛkpathagau tadā dhanaharau syātāṃ mahāmārakau tuṅgaṃ tadvṛṣabhaśca vṛścika iti syādrāhuketvorgṛhau kuṃbho'līmithunāṅgane tu bhavato mūlatrikoṇābhidhaṃ || 20 ||

Those very two, if the lord of the sign of desire ⟨the 7th⟩ or the lord of wealth ⟨the 2nd⟩ has resorted to them, and if they stand in the line of sight of those two, then become takers of wealth and great mārakas. ⟨In our mūla this half-verse closes with no daṇḍa, unlike every other in the run.⟩ Their exaltation is Taurus and Scorpio; the houses of Rāhu and Ketu are Aquarius and Scorpio; and Gemini and Virgo are what bears the name mūlatrikoṇa.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्मर" — स्मर is a house-name (the 7th), not the ordinary noun; the facing English reads '7th and the 2nd Bhavas', with वित्त = 2nd on the same line. Both corroborate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[no terminal danda]"; alternatives "महामारकौ ।" — LAYOUT RULE BREAKS HERE. The half-verse ends with no danda; band detection puts the last ink at x=2220 and the crop to x=2232 shows clean paper after कौ. Every other half-verse in this run closes with ॥ N ॥ or a bare ।. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ाङ्गने"; alternatives "ाङ्घ्ने" — the conjunct under the headline could be ङ्ग or ङ्घ; ङ्ग gives अङ्गना (woman = Kanya/Virgo), which the facing English confirms ('Mithuna and Kanya'). Read ङ्ग on that corroboration, but the ink alone does not settle the aspirate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुंभो"; alternatives "कुम्भो" — anusvara, not a subscript nasal - round filled dot.
6.21a reading here is contested

सिंहः कर्कटको द्वयो रिपुगृहौ तौली मृगो मित्रभे ऽजोदेवेज्यगृहे समेऽखिलबलं तुङ्गादिगौ तौ यदि । यद्भङ्गावगतौ यदीशसहितौ प्राग्वत् त्रिसंबन्धगौ तदाहे दिशतोऽत्र वीर्यसहितौ खेटान्निरस्येतरान् ॥ २१ ॥

siṃhaḥ karkaṭako dvayo ripugṛhau taulī mṛgo mitrabhe 'jodevejyagṛhe same'khilabalaṃ tuṅgādigau tau yadi | yadbhaṅgāvagatau yadīśasahitau prāgvat trisaṃbandhagau tadāhe diśato'tra vīryasahitau kheṭānnirasyetarān || 21 ||

Leo and Cancer are the enemy-houses of the two; Libra and Capricorn are friendly signs; and Aja ⟨Aries⟩ and the houses of the gods' preceptor ⟨Jupiter⟩ are neutral. ⟨Our mūla now reads ऽजो, Aries, not ऽज्ञो, Mercury; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave a plain ज here.⟩ If those two stand in exaltation and the rest, they have their whole strength. If they have gone to their fall, if they are joined with the lord, if as before they stand in a threefold relation, then here they dispense ⟨their results⟩, and being joined with vigour they cast out the other planets ⟨our mūla now reads वीर्यसहितौ, with no anusvāra over र्य⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽज्ञो"; alternatives "ऽजो" — SUBSTANTIVE DIVERGENCE BETWEEN MULA AND TRANSLATION - the most valuable finding on this plate. Zoomed to 10x: the glyph after the avagraha is unmistakably the ज्ञ ligature (two-part body with the descending hook), NOT a plain ज. ज्ञ is a standard name for MERCURY, so the line as printed says the neutral houses are those of Mercury and Jupiter. The facing English claim instead says 'Mesha and the two Rasis belonging to Jupiter' - i.e. it read अज (Aries). Aries and Mercury are not interchangeable. Either the translator worked from a different exemplar or he emended silently; the ink here says ज्ञ. Recorded as printed and flagged for the claim library. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ऽजोदेवेज्यगृहे; this sentence names ऽज्ञो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 18 of the exemplar's jp2 master page_0081 (folio 79) by eye at about 3.3x native, beside the ज of कुजोऽ (page_0064) and the ज्ञ of ज्ञानार्थ (page_0075). The press sets ऽजो. The mark under the glyph is the dot this fount sets under ज; this fount's ज्ञ ligature is 86 px wide with a loop running below the line, and it is not here. The mūla is corrected. The line names Aries (अज), as the edition's own English does, and the Mercury reading this note raised for the claim library has no ink behind it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्यंसहितौ"; alternatives "वीर्यसहितौ" — an anusvara dot is printed above र्य; an edited text would read वीर्यसहितौ without it. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वीर्यसहितौ; this sentence names वीर्यंसहितौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read line 29 of jp2 page_0081 (folio 79) by eye at about 3.6x native. No anusvāra stands over र्य. The one mark is the repha with its foot, and it holds the same ink as the plain repha of वीर्य on line 30 of the same page (513 against 510 dark px at grey<128). The press sets वीर्यसहितौ, and the mūla is corrected.]
6.22a reading here is contested

तौ द्वौ यस्य गृहे खगस्य वसतस्तद्वीर्यमेवानयो र्भावत्याप्यखिलं शुभाशुभफलं नाथानुसाराद्वदेत् दायेशस्थगृहं प्रकल्प्य च तनुं तस्माच्च भुक्तीश्वरस्थानाद्यं युतिदृग्भवं बलमपीहालोच्य तच्चोभयोः ॥ २२ ॥

tau dvau yasya gṛhe khagasya vasatastadvīryamevānayo rbhāvatyāpyakhilaṃ śubhāśubhaphalaṃ nāthānusārādvadet dāyeśasthagṛhaṃ prakalpya ca tanuṃ tasmācca bhuktīśvarasthānādyaṃ yutidṛgbhavaṃ balamapīhālocya taccobhayoḥ || 22 ||

Whatever sky-goer's house those two dwell in, the strength of that planet is their very strength; and all the good and evil fruit that comes to be for these two should be declared in accordance with that lord. Having taken the house occupied by the daśā-lord as the lagna ⟨our mūla now reads प्रकल्प्य, 'having taken', which fills the syllable the metre was missing⟩, and from that the position and the rest of the bhukti-lord, and having also weighed the strength arising from conjunction and aspect — that too, of both of them.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यस्य" — the य is thinly inked at its top-left and the glyph is partly broken; the rest of the letter and the following स्य are firm, so the word is not in doubt.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्भावत्याप्य"; alternatives "र्भवत्यप्य" — joined to line 31's अनयो this gives अनयोर्भावत्याप्यखिलं. The expected form is भवत्यपि → भवत्यप्य, with short a. The plate prints long ā in both syllables (भाव, त्याप्य). Recorded as printed and flagged; this may be a compositor's error rather than a variant.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "·कल्प्य"; alternatives "संकल्प्य", "कल्प्य" — a short horizontal mark stands in the word space immediately before कल्प्य, at mid-height. It is too high and too thin to be a danda and has no headline, so it is not a letter I can name; संकल्प्य would fit the sense and the meter. Recorded with the mark shown as a middle dot rather than guessed away. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this spot on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0082 (folio 80, mūla line 9) at about 4.0x native, and at about 4.9x native with a gamma stretch. The mark is the inked remnant of one sort: a short stroke at headline height and a curved stroke below it, with no stem and no र-stroke printed. Mark and blank together take 56 px, the width of one प्र in this press, so the ink fits a प्र whose stems failed to print, but no letter can be named from the leaf. संकल्प्य does not fit the metre: सं would put a heavy syllable at position 7 of the śārdūlavikrīḍita pāda, which must be light. The mūla now reads प्रकल्प्य, on the metre and on the P. S. Sastri printing, which sets प्रकल्प्य (page-150, read by eye at about 3.2x native).]
6.23a reading here is contested

नांयोन्यं यदिषष्ठनैधनगृहस्थित्यादिकं शोभनं चेत्तौ तत्र विरुद्धभावसहितौ वीर्यांनुसाराद्वदेत् । केन्द्राधीश्वरकोणनायकदशाश्चान्तर्दशाः शोभनाः सामान्याश्च धनत्रिलाभभवनाधीशग्रहाणां दशाः ॥ २३ ॥

nāṃyonyaṃ yadiṣaṣṭhanaidhanagṛhasthityādikaṃ śobhanaṃ cettau tatra viruddhabhāvasahitau vīryāṃnusārādvadet | kendrādhīśvarakoṇanāyakadaśāścāntardaśāḥ śobhanāḥ sāmānyāśca dhanatrilābhabhavanādhīśagrahāṇāṃ daśāḥ || 23 ||

Not mutually: if the standing in the 6th ⟨our mūla now reads षष्ठ, where the earlier transcription had पष्ट, which is no word⟩ and the 8th ⟨naidhana⟩ houses and so forth is auspicious, then, when the two are there together with an opposed bhāva ⟨our mūla now reads विरुद्ध, 'opposed'⟩, one should declare according to their strength. The daśās and antardaśās of the lords of the kendras and of the leaders of the trines are auspicious; and ordinary are the daśās of the planets that lord the houses of wealth ⟨2nd⟩, the third, and gain ⟨11th⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पष्ट"; alternatives "षष्ठ" — SUBSTANTIVE, AND SETTLED AGAINST THE PLATE'S OWN CONTROL. Zoomed to 10x: the first letter is unmistakably प (closed left bowl with the flag), giving पष्ट, which is not a word. The sense needs षष्ठ (6th) - the facing English says 'quincunx', i.e. the 6/8 relation, and नैधन (8th) follows immediately. Decisive control: line 26 of THIS PLATE prints षष्ठाष्ट correctly with ष-ष्ठ, so the fount has the letter and this is a compositor's substitution, not a variant spelling. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यदिषष्ठनैधनगृहस्थित्यादिकं; this sentence names पष्ट, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नांयोन्यं"; alternatives "नान्योन्यं" — printed with anusvara on ना and a separate यो; an edited text reads नान्योन्यं. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वित्रद्धु"; alternatives "विरुद्ध", "वित्रद्ध" — UNSETTLED. Reads glyph-wise as वि + त्र + द्धु. विरुद्ध ('opposed') is what the sense wants, and रु could be mistaken for त्र at this inking, but I cannot make the ink say it. A dark smudge sits on the baseline directly beneath this cluster, which does not help. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विरुद्धभावसहितौ; this sentence names वित्रद्धु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्यांनुसारात्"; alternatives "वीर्यानुसारात्" — an anusvara is printed over यां; compare line 32 of plate 81, where the same formula also carries marks an edited text would not. As printed.
6.24a reading here is contested

षष्ठाष्टव्ययभावनायकदशाः कष्टा भवेयुः सदा नेतुर्लग्नमपीक्ष्य तत्र च वदेत्तत्तद्दशाभुक्तिषु । पाकेशाध्युषितान्त्यशत्रुनिधने संस्थो विपाकेश्वरः तच्छत्रुर्भवतीह लाभधनभे सोत्थात्मजे बन्धुभे ॥ २४ ॥

ṣaṣṭhāṣṭavyayabhāvanāyakadaśāḥ kaṣṭā bhaveyuḥ sadā neturlagnamapīkṣya tatra ca vadettattaddaśābhuktiṣu | pākeśādhyuṣitāntyaśatrunidhane saṃstho vipākeśvaraḥ tacchatrurbhavatīha lābhadhanabhe sotthātmaje bandhubhe || 24 ||

The daśās of the lords of the 6th, 8th and 12th bhāvas are always painful. Looking also at the lagna of the ⟨daśā-⟩ leader, one should declare ⟨the results⟩ there in each daśā and bhukti. The lord of the ripening, standing in the 12th ⟨antya⟩, the 6th ⟨śatru⟩ or the 8th ⟨nidhana⟩ counted from the house the daśā-lord occupies, becomes that lord's enemy here; ⟨and standing⟩ in the house of gain ⟨11th⟩ and of wealth ⟨2nd⟩, in that which rises with it ⟨सोत्थ, whose sense is not certain⟩, in the 5th ⟨ātmaja⟩ and the 4th ⟨bandhu⟩, ⟨he is favourable⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठ" — CONTROL SPECIMEN. Printed correctly here, which is what convicts पष्ट on line 12 as a compositor's error rather than an orthographic habit of this edition.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दशाः" — the visarga here is set with a serifed upper dot that at low magnification can be mistaken for a Devanagari digit; at 3x it is a visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बन्धुभे"; alternatives "वन्धुभे" — ba/va counter test at 3x: bowl closed by a bar, so ब.
6.25a reading here is contested

भाग्ये वा दशमे समन्वितखगस्तच्छोभनाख्यो महान् तत्कामान्वितखेचरश्च शुभदः पाकेशयुक्तोऽपि च । पाकेशस्तु खलोऽयुतः शुभखगः पापं युतः शोभनो मिश्रं चायुतयोगकृद्दिशति तत्पापादिकं दीनतात् ॥ २५ ॥

bhāgye vā daśame samanvitakhagastacchobhanākhyo mahān tatkāmānvitakhecaraśca śubhadaḥ pākeśayukto'pi ca | pākeśastu khalo'yutaḥ śubhakhagaḥ pāpaṃ yutaḥ śobhano miśraṃ cāyutayogakṛddiśati tatpāpādikaṃ dīnatāt || 25 ||

Or a planet joined ⟨with the daśā-lord⟩ in the 9th ⟨bhāgya⟩ or the 10th — it is called auspicious, and great; and a sky-goer joined with what it desires is a giver of good, and so too one joined with the lord of the ripening. But the lord of the ripening when it is wicked and unjoined; a benefic planet joined with a malefic; a malefic joined with a benefic — ⟨these give⟩ mixed results; and one that makes a yoga while unjoined dispenses that sinful result and the rest, out of its own poor condition. ⟨Our mūla reads पाकेशस्तु at the head of the second half; the one letter the transcriber left open, स or म, is स in both other reads of this verse.⟩

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पाकेशस्तु"; alternatives "पाकेशमस्तु", "पाकेशमतु" — UNSETTLED at the line opening. At 10x I count five separate glyphs, पा-के-श-?-तु, where the fourth stands alone on the baseline rather than ligating. Its bowl-plus-vertical could be स or म. पाकेशस्तु ('as for the Dasa-lord') fits sense and meter, but the fount elsewhere sets स्तु as a single ligature, and here the two letters are separate - which is what keeps this open. Recorded as पाकेशस्तु and flagged.
6.26a reading here is contested

योगं चैव मृतिं यदा युगपदेवैकस्तु दातुं क्षमस्तस्यादौ स्वविपाक एव सुमहद्योगं प्रकुर्यादसौ । तादृक्खेटमहादशा सुफलदा कृत्स्ना खला भुक्तयस्तद्वच्छोभनदास्तदीयमरणं दूरादपास्यत्यसौ ॥ २६ ॥

yogaṃ caiva mṛtiṃ yadā yugapadevaikastu dātuṃ kṣamastasyādau svavipāka eva sumahadyogaṃ prakuryādasau | tādṛkkheṭamahādaśā suphaladā kṛtsnā khalā bhuktayastadvacchobhanadāstadīyamaraṇaṃ dūrādapāsyatyasau || 26 ||

And when one planet alone is able to give both the yoga and death at one and the same time, then at the beginning of its own ripening it will make a very great yoga: the mahādaśā of such a planet gives good fruit, the whole of it, and its bhuktis, malefic though they be, are likewise givers of good — and it thrusts the death that belongs to it far away.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योग"; alternatives "योगं" — no anusvara is printed over ग here, though the parallel मृतिं two words later carries one. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृत्स्ना"; alternatives "कुत्स्ना" — the subscript vowel under क reads as ṛ rather than u at 3x; कृत्स्ना ('entire') is also what the facing English 'the entire period' requires.
6.27a reading here is contested

अन्यत्र द्युचरः शुभाशुभफलं कुत्रापि नो यच्छति स्याद्यच्छेद्यदि सर्वतोऽपि हि दशा सा निष्फलेत्यूचिरे । देवेज्यो भृगुजे भृगुः सुरगुरौ तौ चेन्मिथो पाकगावन्योन्यं शुभभावगौ बलयुतौ सत्खेटयुग्वीक्षितौ ॥ २७ ॥

anyatra dyucaraḥ śubhāśubhaphalaṃ kutrāpi no yacchati syādyacchedyadi sarvato'pi hi daśā sā niṣphaletyūcire | devejyo bhṛguje bhṛguḥ suragurau tau cenmitho pākagāvanyonyaṃ śubhabhāvagau balayutau satkheṭayugvīkṣitau || 27 ||

Elsewhere a sky-goer gives no fruit, good or evil, anywhere at all; and if it should give any, then that daśā is fruitless in every direction — so they have said. ⟨This is a report of what authorities have said, like the 'some have declared' above, and not the author's own assertion.⟩ The gods' preceptor ⟨Jupiter⟩ in Bhṛgu's ⟨Venus's⟩ sign and Bhṛgu in the gods' preceptor's, if the two stand mutually in each other's ripening, mutually in auspicious bhāvas, endowed with strength, and joined with or aspected by good planets —

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इत्यूचिरे"; alternatives "इत्यूचिरे (settled)" — another doxographic close, like केचिज्जगुः on plate 80 line 13: the verse reports what authorities have SAID, so the claim library should seat it as attributed, not as the author's own assertion.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वन्योन्य"; alternatives "चान्योन्यं" — the line opens mid-word after line 6's hyphen. Line 18 of this plate prints the same element as तावन्योन्य with an unambiguous व, which settles the letter as व here too; the missing anusvara on the final य is as printed. [2026-09-23: The anusvāra is now written, on the metre and on the Sastri 2010 printing, which sets वन्योन्यं; the 1993 plate, read by eye at 5x, shows only a faint speck there. The same reading found that the mark after ग at the line end is a broken ā-stroke, not a visarga: पाकगा-, so the words are पाकगौ + अन्योन्यं.]
6.28a reading here is contested

राजा स्यात्सचिवोऽथवा बहुधनी स्त्रीपुत्रसौख्यान्वितौ यज्ञादिक्रतुकृत्सुतोदयविवाहाद्युत्सवानन्दितः । तावन्योन्यरिपुव्ययाष्टमगतौ तद्द्रेशदृष्टौ युतौ तद्द्रेशत्वयुतौ खलेक्षणयुतौ स्थानादिवीर्योनितौ ॥ २८ ॥

rājā syātsacivo'thavā bahudhanī strīputrasaukhyānvitau yajñādikratukṛtsutodayavivāhādyutsavānanditaḥ | tāvanyonyaripuvyayāṣṭamagatau taddreśadṛṣṭau yutau taddreśatvayutau khalekṣaṇayutau sthānādivīryonitau || 28 ||

— then he becomes a king, or else a minister, or a man of much wealth; the two endowed with the happiness of wife and sons, a performer of sacrifices and rites, gladdened by the rise of sons, by marriage and by other festivities ⟨the line closes in the singular where the whole stanza has been dual; recorded as printed⟩. But those two, standing mutually in the 6th, the 12th and the 8th, aspected by or joined with the lord of that drekkāṇa, or joined with the drekkāṇa-lordship itself, joined with a malefic's glance, and wanting in strength of position and the rest ⟨वीर्योनितौ is a regular form, वीर्य + ऊनितौ, 'diminished in strength'⟩ —

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बहुधनी"; alternatives "वहुधनी" — ba/va counter test: closed bowl with bar, ब.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ानन्दितः"; alternatives "ान्वितौ" — the line closes in the SINGULAR (-तः) where the whole stanza has been dual (-तौ). Recorded as printed; it may be a compositor's substitution, but the visarga is clear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्द्रेशदृष्टौ"; alternatives "तद्देशरशौ", "तद्द्रेशराशौ" — CORRECTED. My first magnified pass read this as तद्देशरशौ; re-read against the whole line it is तद्द्रेश (lord of the drekkana) + दृष्टौ (aspected), which is also what line 19 repeats as तद्द्रेशत्वयुतौ. Recording the earlier misreading here because it shows the failure mode: a two-window read that splits a compound across the seam can invent a word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्योनितौ"; alternatives "वीर्यान्वितौ", "वीर्योन्नितौ" — UNSETTLED. As printed वीर्योनितौ is not well-formed; वीर्यान्वितौ ('endowed with strength') is what the sense wants, and the facing English speaks of being 'weak in Bhava position'. The ो and the न are both firm on the plate, so I do not emend. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling on this verse settles this form on the lexicon; it did not re-read these letters at magnification. वीर्योनितौ is well formed: it is वीर्य + ऊनितौ (a + ū gives o), 'diminished in strength', which is what the edition's own English says ('weak in Bhava position'). वीर्यान्वितौ, 'endowed with strength', would invert the sense. The mūla keeps वीर्योनितौ.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युतो"; alternatives "युतौ" — singular-looking ो where the parallel युतौ two words earlier has ौ. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खलेक्षणयुतौ; this sentence names युतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this word on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0084 (folio 82, line 18) at about 3.2x native and measured the zone 40-56 px above the headline. The ो is on the page: one slim stroke rising 39 px, with no ink where this fount's ौ carries its second stroke (the six ौ on lines 17-19 have 76-116 pixels darker than grey 110 there; युतो has none). So the press sets खलेक्षणयुतो, as this note read it. The mūla emends it to खलेक्षणयुतौ on grammar: every other word of pādas 3-4 is dual, agreeing with तौ, and a singular युतः would keep its visarga before स्थ.]
6.29a reading here is contested

दारापुत्रवियोगदौ च बलवद्विप्रेन्द्रविद्वेषदौ स्त्रीसंसर्गभवार्तिदौ नृपभयापस्मारभीतिप्रदौ । भृग्वार्की यदि तुङ्गभे स्वभवने वर्गोत्तमांशे स्थितौ तुल्यौ योगकरौ तथैव बलिनौ तौ चेन्मिथो पाकगौ । २९ ॥

dārāputraviyogadau ca balavadviprendravidveṣadau strīsaṃsargabhavārtidau nṛpabhayāpasmārabhītipradau | bhṛgvārkī yadi tuṅgabhe svabhavane vargottamāṃśe sthitau tulyau yogakarau tathaiva balinau tau cenmitho pākagau | 29 ||

— then the two give separation from wife and sons, and the enmity of a powerful chief of brahmins ⟨our mula now reads विप्रेन्द्र, 'chief of brahmins', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩; distress arising from contact with women; fear from the king; and the terror of epilepsy. If Venus and Saturn stand in an exalted sign, in their own house, or in a vargottama aṃśa, they are equally makers of yoga, and equally strong, provided the two are mutually in each other's ripening.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विजेन्द्र"; alternatives "द्विप्रेन्द्र", "भिःप्रेन्द्र" — UNSETTLED IN THE MIDDLE. At 3x the cluster after बलव reads ambiguously; द्विजेन्द्र ('chief of the twice-born') is required by the facing English 'displeasure of a high Brahmin chief' and is the only form here that is a word. Recorded on that basis and flagged, since the ink alone did not decide it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बलवद्विप्रेन्द्रविद्वेषदौ; this sentence names द्विजेन्द्र, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this cluster on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0084 (folio 82, line 19) at about 3.5x native, beside controls from the same page, and the ink does decide it. The page sets बलवद्विप्रेन्द्र: one द (no half-द stands before द्वि), then द्वि, then प्र (the shape of the प्र in प्रदौ on line 20, not the ज of राजा on line 7), then this fount's half-न sort, which looks like a colon and explains the earlier alternative भिःप्रेन्द्र. The metre agrees: विप्रेन्द्र makes position 13 heavy, and द्विजेन्द्र left it light. विप्रेन्द्र means what the edition's English says, 'a high Brahmin chief'.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "। २९ ॥"; alternatives "॥ २९ ॥" — asymmetric delimiters as printed - single danda before the numeral, double after. The numeral itself is slightly broken and could be read ३९ in isolation; the surrounding sequence (२७, २८) fixes it as २९.
6.30a reading here is contested

भूपालो धनदोपमोऽपि सततं भिक्षाशनो निष्फलः तत्रैकस्तु बली परस्तु विबलश्चेद्वीर्यवान्योगदः । तौ द्वावप्यबलौ व्ययाष्टरिपुगौ तद्भावपौ वाऽपि तत् तद्भावेशयुतौ तदा शुभकरौ सौख्यप्रदौ भोगदौ ॥ ३० ॥

bhūpālo dhanadopamo'pi satataṃ bhikṣāśano niṣphalaḥ tatraikastu balī parastu vibalaścedvīryavānyogadaḥ | tau dvāvapyabalau vyayāṣṭaripugau tadbhāvapau vā'pi tat tadbhāveśayutau tadā śubhakarau saukhyapradau bhogadau || 30 ||

Though he be a protector of the earth, or even the equal of the giver of wealth ⟨Kubera⟩ ⟨our mula now reads धनदोपमो, 'like Kubera', emended on the lexicon from धनदोषमो, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave⟩, he always eats the food of alms and is fruitless. There, if of the two one is strong and the other weak ⟨our mula now reads विबल, 'without strength', emended on the lexicon from दिबल, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave⟩, then the vigorous one is the giver of yoga. And if both are without strength, standing in the 12th, 8th or 6th, or if they are the lords of those bhāvas, or if they are joined with the lords of those bhāvas — then they are makers of good, givers of comfort, and givers of enjoyment.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनदोषमो"; alternatives "धनदोपमो" — the word behind this is धनद-उपम ('like Kubera'), which the facing English confirms with 'or a Kubera'. The plate appears to print ष where प is wanted; ष and प are close in this fount at this inking and I could not separate them with certainty, so it is recorded as read and flagged. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धनदोपमोऽपि; this sentence names धनदोषमो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this letter on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0085 (folio 83, store line 1) at about 2.1x and 2.5x native and measured its counters. It has two small closed counters, one above the other, the shape of this press's ष (as in विद्वेषदौ); this press's प has one tall counter. So the press sets धनदोषमो, as this note read it. The mūla emends it to धनदोपमो on the lexicon: धनदोषम is no word, and धनद-उपम, 'like Kubera', is what the edition's facing English says.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिबल"; alternatives "दुर्बल", "विबल" — UNSETTLED. The sense (and the facing English 'one of the two be strong and the other weak') requires a word for 'weak'; दुर्बल and विबल both qualify. As printed the first syllable reads दि, which is neither. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विबलश्चेद्वीर्यवान्योगदः; this sentence names दिबल, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this letter on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0085 (folio 83, store line 2) at about 3.1x native. Its stroke breaks between the arm and the lower bowl, as every द of this press measured does and no व does, so the press sets दिबल, as this note read it. The mūla emends it to विबल, 'without strength', on the lexicon and the edition's own English, which asks for a word for weak. The metre excludes दुर्बल, which would put a heavy syllable at position 10 of pāda 2.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बली"; alternatives "वली" — ba/va counter test: closed bowl with bar, ब.
6.31a reading here is contested

एकः सद्भवनाधिपस्तदपरश्चेद्दुष्टभावेश्वरस्तावप्यत्र सुयोगदावतिखलौ तौ चेन्महासौख्यदौ । शन्यर्कौ निजराशितुङ्गभगयोस्तत्तन्नवांशेऽपि वा संस्थौ कोणचतुष्टयाख्यगृहगौ तद्भावनाथावपि ॥ ३१ ॥

ekaḥ sadbhavanādhipastadaparaścedduṣṭabhāveśvarastāvapyatra suyogadāvatikhalau tau cenmahāsaukhyadau | śanyarkau nijarāśituṅgabhagayostattannavāṃśe'pi vā saṃsthau koṇacatuṣṭayākhyagṛhagau tadbhāvanāthāvapi || 31 ||

If one of them is lord of a good house and the other lord of an evil house, then even here the two are givers of a fine yoga; and if the two are exceedingly wicked, they are givers of great comfort ⟨our mūla now reads the dual अतिखलौ⟩. Saturn and the Sun, standing in their own sign or in the sign of exaltation, or in their respective navāṃśas ⟨our mūla now reads तत्तन्नवांशे⟩, or standing in the houses called the trines and the four kendras, or being themselves the lords of those bhāvas ⟨our mūla now carries the full dual, तद्भावनाथावपि⟩ —

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अतिखला"; alternatives "अतिखलौ" — the stanza is otherwise dual; this word ends in ा where ौ is expected. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तच्चन्द्रवंशे"; alternatives "तच्चन्द्रांशे", "तन्नवांशे" — UNSETTLED. The facing English says 'or be in the corresponding Navamsa', which would want नवांश, not चन्द्रवंश. Recorded as read; this is a divergence between mula and translation worth checking against a second exemplar before either is trusted. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads निजराशितुङ्गभगयोस्तत्तन्नवांशेऽपि; this sentence names तच्चन्द्रवंशे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्भावनाथवपि"; alternatives "तद्भावनाथावपि" — as printed the dual ending is short by a syllable (नाथौ + अपि → नाथावपि expected). As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्भावनाथावपि; this sentence names तद्भावनाथवपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
6.32a reading here is contested

भुक्तौ तु द्युमणेः सदा नृपजनप्रीति च लाभादिकं चेन्मन्दस्य सुखं धनं च विजयं तौ चेत्खलौ हानिदौ । भौमेज्यावपि तादृशौ बलयुतौ सुस्थानगौ वीक्षितौ युक्तौ वा शुभखेचरैर्बलयुतैस्तौ राजयोगप्रदौ ॥ ३२ ॥

bhuktau tu dyumaṇeḥ sadā nṛpajanaprīti ca lābhādikaṃ cenmandasya sukhaṃ dhanaṃ ca vijayaṃ tau cetkhalau hānidau | bhaumejyāvapi tādṛśau balayutau susthānagau vīkṣitau yuktau vā śubhakhecarairbalayutaistau rājayogapradau || 32 ||

— then in the bhukti of the sky-jewel ⟨the Sun⟩ there is always the affection of kings and of people, and gain and the rest; in Manda's ⟨Saturn's⟩, comfort, wealth and victory — but if those two are malefic they give loss instead. Mars and Jupiter likewise, when joined with strength, set in a good place, aspected by or joined with benefic sky-goers that are themselves strong: those two are givers of a rāja-yoga.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्युमणेः"; alternatives "द्युमपोः", "द्युमनोः" — द्युमणि ('sky-jewel') is a name of the SUN, and the facing English says 'in the Sun's Bhukti of Saturn's Dasa', which fixes the referent. The middle syllable is thinly inked and could be read पो; recorded as द्युमणेः on the corroboration and flagged.
6.33a reading here is contested

आनन्दाखिलभोगदौ सुखकरौ जीवत्सुपुत्रप्रदौ उद्वाहादिशुभप्रदावितरथा चेद्व्यत्ययं स्यात्क्रमात् । देवेज्येन्दुसुतौ तथैव बलिनौ सत्कर्मविद्यायुतं वाणिज्यादिषु विक्रयक्रयपटुं स्त्रीपुत्रसौख्यान्वितम् ।३३॥

ānandākhilabhogadau sukhakarau jīvatsuputrapradau udvāhādiśubhapradāvitarathā cedvyatyayaṃ syātkramāt | devejyendusutau tathaiva balinau satkarmavidyāyutaṃ vāṇijyādiṣu vikrayakrayapaṭuṃ strīputrasaukhyānvitam |33||

They give joy and every enjoyment, make comfort, grant living and excellent sons, and bestow marriage and other auspicious things; if it be otherwise, the reverse follows in order ⟨our mula now reads चेद्व्यत्ययं, cet + vyatyayam, 'if … a reversal', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩. The gods' preceptor ⟨Jupiter⟩ and the Moon's son ⟨Mercury⟩, strong in the same way, make a man joined to good works and learning, adept at selling and buying in trade and the like, and endowed with the happiness of wife and sons.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेन्नत्ययं"; alternatives "चेन्न त्वयं", "चेत्तदन्यत्" — UNSETTLED. The clause is the 'if otherwise' switch that the facing English renders 'If otherwise, they will exhibit contrary results'; as printed the string does not resolve into words I can defend. Recorded as read. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चेद्व्यत्ययं; this sentence names चेन्नत्ययं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this word on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0086 (folio 84, store line 6) at about 2.3x and 2.5x native. The page sets चेद्व्यत्ययं: after चे stands a stacked द over व with the य hook, the same sort as the द्व्य of चेद्व्याधि on store page 80 (template correlation 0.956), and not न्न, which this press sets side by side. So the string does resolve into words, चेद् व्यत्ययं, 'if otherwise, a reversal', as the facing English says.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलिनौ"; alternatives "वलिनौ" — ba/va counter test: closed bowl with bar, ब.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।३३॥"; alternatives "॥ ३३ ॥" — asymmetric delimiters as printed: single danda before the numeral, double after, no spaces.
6.34a reading here is contested

शुक्रज्ञावपि तद्वदिज्यशशिनौ चन्द्रासुरेड्यौ पुनर्जीवार्कौ रविमङ्गलौ रविबुधौ स्यादिज्यसौम्यौक्तिवत् । जन्मार्केण समो यदा स्फुटरविर्नाड्यादिभिः स्यादसौ सौराब्दादिरिह ग्रहांस्तनुमुखान् भावांश्च जन्मोक्तिवत् ।३४।

śukrajñāvapi tadvadijyaśaśinau candrāsureḍyau punarjīvārkau ravimaṅgalau ravibudhau syādijyasaumyauktivat | janmārkeṇa samo yadā sphuṭaravirnāḍyādibhiḥ syādasau saurābdādiriha grahāṃstanumukhān bhāvāṃśca janmoktivat |34|

Venus and Jña ⟨Mercury⟩ likewise; Jupiter and the Moon; the Moon and the Asuras' preceptor ⟨Venus⟩; again, Jupiter and the Sun; the Sun and Mars; the Sun and Mercury — ⟨their effects are⟩ as was stated for Jupiter and Mercury. When the true Sun, reckoned in nāḍīs and the rest, is level with the natal Sun ⟨our mula now reads स्फुटरविर्नाड्यादिभिः, where our first reading of the plate gave द्व्यादिशिः; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the repha, the ड्या and the भि⟩, that is here the beginning of the solar year; ⟨one should reckon⟩ the planets and the bhāvas beginning with the body as was stated for the nativity ⟨our mula now reads जन्मोक्तिवत् where our first reading of the plate left a gap; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found ज, न्मो, क्ति and त्, and the lexicon settles the damaged व⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यादिज्यसौम्यौक्तिवत्"; alternatives "स्यादिज्यसौम्योक्तिवत्" — the closing formula ('as stated for Jupiter and Mercury') is thinly inked at the ौ/ो junction; the facing English 'effects akin to those indicated for Jupiter and Mercury' confirms the sense either way.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्व्यादिशिः"; alternatives "द्व्यादिराशिः", "द्व्यादिभिः" — UNSETTLED. द्व्यादिराशि ('the second and following signs') would fit, but the ा that would carry राशि is not on the plate. Recorded as read. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्फुटरविर्नाड्यादिभिः; this sentence names द्व्यादिशिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this word on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0086 (folio 84, store line 25) at about 3.1-3.3x native. The page sets a repha and न, then a 26-px blank with no ā-stroke inked, then ड्या, दि, भिः: स्फुटरविर्न·ड्यादिभिः. It is ड्या, not द्व्या, and भि, not शि. The repha stands where an ā-stroke would carry it, and नाडी is the only word these letters allow, so the mūla reads स्फुटरविर्नाड्यादिभिः, 'reckoned in nāḍīs and the rest'.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[tail of the line]" — REFUSED, NOT GUESSED. The last three or four aksharas before the number are struck by a horizontal band of broken/greyed ink running through the lower half of the line; individual strokes are present but I cannot resolve them into letters even at high magnification, and the facing English for this stanza falls on plate 87, so there is no corroboration available on this plate. The gap is marked '...' rather than filled. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read the end of this line on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0086 (folio 84, store line 26) at about 1.9x and 2.7x native. The band of broken ink is a scatter of specks beside ज and क्ति, and the letters under it survive: ज, न्मो, क्ति, a damaged fourth sort, and a final त्. On shape the fourth sort matches this plate's द (0.884) as well as its व (0.890); the lexicon settles it as व, because जन्मोक्तिदत् is no word and -वत्, 'as', is the same formula as उक्तिवत् at the end of pāda 2. The mūla now reads भावांश्च जन्मोक्तिवत्, and pāda 4 scans as a full śārdūlavikrīḍita of 19.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।३४।"; alternatives "॥ ३४ ॥" — SINGLE dandas on BOTH sides of the numeral - the only instance of this form in plates 78-86.
6.35a reading here is contested

कृत्वा तन्मुनिवर्गसंभवबलं तस्मात्फलं योजयेज्जन्मर्क्षादिशरन्मुखेन्दुभमहं ... । इन्दोर्भोग्यघटी दशादिनहता भाद्यन्तनाडीहृता दायैष्यं दिननाडिकाद्यमिति तद्वर्षप्रवेशादितः ॥ ३५ ॥

kṛtvā tanmunivargasaṃbhavabalaṃ tasmātphalaṃ yojayejjanmarkṣādiśaranmukhendubhamahaṃ ... | indorbhogyaghaṭī daśādinahatā bhādyantanāḍīhṛtā dāyaiṣyaṃ dinanāḍikādyamiti tadvarṣapraveśāditaḥ || 35 ||

Having made from that the strength arising from the group of sages, one should apply the fruit from it; from the birth-star onward … ⟨our mūla marks a gap here: several akṣaras of this line were not recovered, and none is reconstructed⟩. The ghaṭīs of the Moon still to be traversed ⟨our mūla reads भोग्य, 'yet to be traversed'; the transcriber marked this word as uncertain⟩, multiplied by the days of the daśā and divided by the nāḍīs from the beginning to the end of the asterism, give the portion of the daśā still to come ⟨dāyaiṣya⟩, in days, nāḍikās and the rest — reckoned thus from the entry of that year.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फल"; alternatives "फलं" — no anusvara printed where the accusative wants one. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[middle and tail of the line]" — PARTIALLY REFUSED. The opening ज्जन्मक्षादि and the cluster मुखेन्दुभ are firm, but the material between them and after महं is thin and broken; several aksharas cannot be resolved. Marked '...' rather than reconstructed. This stanza's English rendering is on plate 87, which was not transcribed in this pass, so no cross-check was available. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ज्जन्मर्क्षादिशरन्मुखेन्दुभमहं; this sentence names ज्जन्मक्षादि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इन्दोर्भोग्यघटी"; alternatives "इन्दोर्भप्यघटी", "इन्दोंभप्यघटी" — the two aksharas between इन्दो and घटी carry an OVERPRINTED cluster of superscript marks that will not resolve at 6.5x - a repha, a matra, or both struck together - and the second akshara reads प्य or ग्य. भोग्य 'yet to be traversed' is what the facing English requires and is the reading offered here, but the ink does not settle it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दायैष्यं; this sentence names प्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भाद्यन्त"; alternatives "माद्यन्त" — bha and ma are the standing ambiguity of this fount; भ 'star' fits the English 'the complete asterism'
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दाःप्यं"; alternatives "दाप्यं", "दात्प्यं" — a two-part mark stands between दा and प्यं, of the reduced-half-consonant kind rather than the clean two-dot visarga [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दायैष्यं; this sentence names दाःप्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दिनना:डिका"; alternatives "दिननाडिका" — a second such mark stands between ना and डि, where the expected word दिननाडिका wants nothing at all. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३५ ॥" — two digits: three (an angular epsilon-like form) plus five
6.36a reading here is contested

खेकेलाः खरसास्ततस्तु दशनाः शून्याब्धयोऽब्नवयः षड्बाणाश्रितयः शरादिगिरिचन्द्रारङ्गजीवा भृगुः । मन्दागू च तनुग्रहक्रम अयं बाणाङ्गरामैर्दिनैः प्रागुक्तैर्दिनखण्डकैः फलमथाग्रे वार्षिकं तूल्यते ॥ ३६ ॥

khekelāḥ kharasāstatastu daśanāḥ śūnyābdhayo'bnavayaḥ ṣaḍbāṇāśritayaḥ śarādigiricandrāraṅgajīvā bhṛguḥ | mandāgū ca tanugrahakrama ayaṃ bāṇāṅgarāmairdinaiḥ prāguktairdinakhaṇḍakaiḥ phalamathāgre vārṣikaṃ tūlyate || 36 ||

⟨A table of day-counts set in number-words, several of which our mūla does not yield cleanly:⟩ khe-kelāḥ ⟨the facing gloss puts 110 in this slot, but the syllables do not decompose cleanly⟩; kha-rasāḥ ⟨sixty: kha, nought, and rasa, six⟩; then the teeth ⟨thirty-two⟩; sky-and-oceans ⟨forty⟩; ⟨the syllables after the avagraha are not resolved⟩; six-and-arrows ⟨fifty-six⟩; ⟨āśritayaḥ, unresolved⟩; arrows and the rest — mountain, moon, Mars, aṅga, Jupiter, Venus; and Manda ⟨Saturn⟩. This is the order of the planets beginning from the body ⟨the lagna⟩, in days counted by arrows, limbs and Rāmas ⟨365⟩; and by the day-portions stated before, the annual fruit is then weighed out further on.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेकेलाः"; alternatives "खेकैकाः", "खेकेला:" — a bhuta-samkhya number-word; the English gives 110 for this slot but the syllables do not decompose cleanly at 2.35x
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खग्माखततस्तु"; alternatives "खग्माखतस्तु" — read across the overlap of two windows; the repeated खत may be one akshara-pair or two [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खरसास्ततस्तु; this sentence names खग्माखततस्तु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शून्याब्धयोऽब्नवयः"; alternatives "शून्याब्धयोऽब्धवयः" — शून्य + अब्धि gives 40, which matches the English; the syllables after the avagraha are not resolved
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आश्रितयः"; alternatives "अश्रित्रयः" — षड्बाण gives 56, matching the English; the following word is not resolved
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्दागू"; alternatives "मन्दागु" — a stray dot stands below the न्दा
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रम अयं"; alternatives "क्रमोऽयं" — printed with a word space and no sandhi; as printed
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वार्षिक"; alternatives "वार्षिकं" — no anusvara is printed on the final ka
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३६ ॥" — three plus six; a broken column of ink dots stands immediately right of the opening danda pair and left of the digits - kept as observed, not read as punctuation
6.37a reading here is contested

तत्तत्खेटदशाफलं बलवशाद्वर्षप्रवेशोदयाद्वावाद्यं स्थितिदृग्भवं च सकलं वाच्यं शुभं वाऽशुभम् । जन्मेन्द्वृक्षवशाद्विचिन्त्य खचरस्तात्कालिकैरुक्तवद्गोचारोदितवर्त्मना तदुभयोर्योगार्थसंवादतः ॥३७॥

tattatkheṭadaśāphalaṃ balavaśādvarṣapraveśodayādvāvādyaṃ sthitidṛgbhavaṃ ca sakalaṃ vācyaṃ śubhaṃ vā'śubham | janmendvṛkṣavaśādvicintya khacarastātkālikairuktavadgocāroditavartmanā tadubhayoryogārthasaṃvādataḥ ||37||

The fruit of each planet's daśā, by reason of its strength — from the rising of the year's ingress … the first ⟨of the two⟩, and everything arising from position and from aspect, auspicious or inauspicious, is to be declared. The sky-goer is to be pondered by reason of the natal Moon's asterism ⟨our mūla now reads जन्मेन्द्वृक्ष, which the sense and the metre require⟩, and by the planets of the moment as was said, along the path declared for the gocara, from the agreement between the two as to the sense of the yoga.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उदया–" — line ends with a HYPHEN
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वावाद्यं"; alternatives "ह्वावाद्यं" — opening conjunct carries a subscript; it continues the word broken at the end of the previous line
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — avagraha in वाऽशुभम्, clear
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मेदुवृक्ष"; alternatives "जन्मेन्द्वृक्ष", "जन्मेदुऋक्ष" — As printed the word is five sorts: ज + न् + मे + दु + वृ + क्ष. I checked दु against the दु of तदुभयो on line 11 and वृ against the वृ of रिपुवृद्धि on line 24 at 9-15x; both match, and the fourth sort is वृ, not the independent ऋ. But BOTH sense and metre say the text is जन्मेन्द्वृक्ष (janma-indu-rksa, 'the natal Moon's asterism'): Sastri's own rendering on line 17 reads 'counted from the Janma Rasi- Radix Moon-', and the printed form gives this hemistich 20 syllables where the Sardulavikridita of every other verse line on the plate has 19 (जन्मेन्द्वृक्ष = 4 syllables, जन्मेदुवृक्ष = 5). Recorded as printed; this is the edition's error, not a reading doubt. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads जन्मेन्द्वृक्षवशाद्विचिन्त्य for जन्मेदुवृक्षवशाद्विचिन्त्य, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वि"; alternatives "द्द्वि" — the conjunct in वशाद्विचिन्त्य. It is a TWO-element stack, and at 7x its outline is indistinguishable from the द्वि of तद्वित्त on line 22, which is certain from context; a three-element द्द्व stack would be both taller and wider. An earlier machine pass over this same plate (.tmp/vision/uttara-kalamrita-json/page_0089.json) read वशाद्द्विचिन्त्य - I believe that pass added a द.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उक्तव-" — the line ends with a hyphen splitting उक्तवद् across the line break; the द् opens line 11. Do not join the two halves without the virama.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगार्थ"; alternatives "योगार्थं" — Above this aksara at 11x I can see the repha hook and nothing else. This fount sets anusvara as an unmistakable round dot - compare the सं two sorts later in the same word-group, and गौरवं on line 23 - and there is no such dot here. The body does carry a short unexplained descender that थ should not have, so my identification of the base consonant is not airtight either. Metre does not decide (both readings give 19). The earlier machine pass read योगार्थं.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोचार" — the edition prints गोचार, not गोचर; recorded as printed.
6.38a reading here is contested

एकस्यैव हि वत्सरस्य च तथा दायेश्वरैश्चाखिलं वक्ष्येऽत्यन्तसुलाघवं स्फुटतरं चित्रं फलं दायजम् । वीर्याढ्ये दिननायके धनचयं भूषाम्बरं चैधते वीर्योने कलिशत्रुवृद्धिमपि तद्वित्तक्षयं पीडनम् ॥३८॥

ekasyaiva hi vatsarasya ca tathā dāyeśvaraiścākhilaṃ vakṣye'tyantasulāghavaṃ sphuṭataraṃ citraṃ phalaṃ dāyajam | vīryāḍhye dinanāyake dhanacayaṃ bhūṣāmbaraṃ caidhate vīryone kaliśatruvṛddhimapi tadvittakṣayaṃ pīḍanam ||38||

Of one single year too, and likewise by the lords of the daśā, I shall state the whole fruit born of the daśā — with the utmost brevity, very clearly, and in its variety. When the lord of the day ⟨the Sun⟩ is rich in vigour, a heap of wealth, ornaments and garments increase; when he is deficient in vigour, there is the growth of strife and of enemies, and also the wasting of that wealth, and affliction.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वक्ष्येऽत्यन्त" — the avagraha is printed and unambiguous at 4x; it is not a speck.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — single danda, no verse number - this is the first half of the verse that closes with ॥३८॥ on line 22, seven lines further down with a block of English between.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चैधते"; alternatives "चैघते", "चेधते" — Two things checked at 9x. (1) The matra over च is TWO strokes, so ai, not e. (2) The middle sort shows an upper and a lower counter with a right-hand stem, which matches ध and not घ, and च + एधते ('and it increases') is a word where चेघते is not. The earlier machine pass read चेघते, wrong on both counts.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥३८॥" — Two small ink specks sit above and to the left of the opening danda. No glyph occupies that position and they are not aligned with any headline, so I record them as specks and not as text; a parser demanding clean digits should not lose the marker over them. Digit ground truth: ८ is the open '<' angle, ३ the curl with a descender - both fixed against ॥३७॥ on line 11 and against the printed folio 86 in the head margin, whose 8 and 6 I read at 6x before trusting any numeral on this plate.
6.39a reading here is contested

वीर्याढ्ये शशिनीनपूज्यमनिशं वित्ताधिकं गौरवं वीर्योने रिपुवृद्धिरोगचलनासौख्यं विरोधःस्वकैः । भूपुत्रे बलसंयुते नृपजनप्रीतिर्जयः स्यात्सुखं वीर्योने नृपभीतिपुत्रकलहस्त्रीवैरवित्तक्षयाः ॥३९॥

vīryāḍhye śaśinīnapūjyamaniśaṃ vittādhikaṃ gauravaṃ vīryone ripuvṛddhirogacalanāsaukhyaṃ virodhaḥsvakaiḥ | bhūputre balasaṃyute nṛpajanaprītirjayaḥ syātsukhaṃ vīryone nṛpabhītiputrakalahastrīvairavittakṣayāḥ ||39||

When the Moon is rich in vigour there is unceasing honour ⟨the mūla prints शशिनीनपूज्यम्: the mātrā is long ī and there is no r-sign beneath the न that follows — measured, the rows below the baseline carry no ink there — so a नृ- compound meaning 'honoured by men' is not what this plate has, though the published gloss points to one. Metre does not condemn the printed form. Left as printed⟩, abundant wealth, and dignity; when deficient in vigour, the growth of enemies, disease, wandering, want of comfort, and opposition from one's own people. When the son of earth ⟨Mars⟩ is joined with strength there is the affection of kings and people, victory and comfort; when deficient in vigour, fear from the king, quarrel with sons, enmity with women, and loss of wealth.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शशिनीनपूज्यम्"; alternatives "शशिनि नृपूज्यम्", "शशिनि नृपपूज्यम्" — As printed. The second matra is long ī (its vertical stands to the RIGHT of न and the arch curves back left), and there is NO r-sign under the न that follows: I measured the rows below the baseline at x 860-950 and found no ink, so the descender is absent, not faint. Metre does NOT condemn the printed form - शशिनीनपूज्यमनिशं scans as 9 syllables and the line totals the required 19 - but Sastri's own rendering on line 30 says 'royal favour', which points to a नृ- compound. Left as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विरोधःस्वकैः" — set solid, with no word-space after the first visarga; kept as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — single danda, no number: first half of the verse whose closing half is not on this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूपुत्रे"; alternatives "भूपुत्ने" — 3rd akshara compared at 8x against the unambiguous त्र of पुत्र in line 2; same hooked त-form, here carrying the e-matra. Read त्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यात्सुखं"; alternatives "स्यास्सुखं" — the conjunct before सु is heavily inked; त्स and स्स are not separable at this print quality.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्योने"; alternatives "वीर्यौने", "वीर्यहीने" — at 7x the marks over य resolve as repha + o-matra, not as ौ. वीर्य + ऊने gives वीर्योने by sandhi and matches न्यूने / हीने used elsewhere on the plate.
6.40a reading here is contested

सौम्ये पूर्णबले प्रतापशुभसौख्याधिक्यता लाभकृत् वीर्योने सहजादिवैरकुपथाश्च ब्राह्मणद्रोहकृत् । जीवे पूर्णबले रथाश्वधनदः स्याद्बुद्धिवृद्धिर्धनं वीर्योने चलनं धनक्षयमपि स्यात्पापदुःसङ्गती ॥४०॥

saumye pūrṇabale pratāpaśubhasaukhyādhikyatā lābhakṛt vīryone sahajādivairakupathāśca brāhmaṇadrohakṛt | jīve pūrṇabale rathāśvadhanadaḥ syādbuddhivṛddhirdhanaṃ vīryone calanaṃ dhanakṣayamapi syātpāpaduḥsaṅgatī ||40||

When Mercury is in full strength there is majesty, an excess of good and of comfort, and gain is made; when deficient in vigour, enmity with brothers and the rest, evil courses, and treachery against brahmins. When Jupiter is in full strength he is a giver of chariots, horses and wealth ⟨our mūla now reads धनद, 'giver of wealth'⟩, and there is growth of intelligence and of wealth; when deficient in vigour, wandering, loss of wealth as well, and evil company with the sinful.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सौख्याधिक्यता"; alternatives "सौख्याधिक्यताम्" — final ता carries no visible anusvara or virama; read as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुपथाश्च"; alternatives "क्रुपथाश्च" — the subscript under क is a single u-curl; no र-hook is visible at 6x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रथाश्वघनदः"; alternatives "रथाश्वधनदः" — the 4th akshara is घ or ध; the left limb is filled with ink at 6x. Sense (giver of wealth) favours ध, the ink as printed favours घ. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads रथाश्वधनदः for रथाश्वघनदः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सङ्गती"; alternatives "सङ्गतिः", "सङ्कृती" — read at 6x sharpened. The final akshara clearly carries a LONG i-matra (ती), not ि + visarga; but grammar wants सङ्गतिः. The conjunct before it is ङ्ग on the ink. Recorded as printed; this is the least settled mark on the plate.
6.41a reading here is contested

शुक्रे पूर्णबले धनागमयशःशुक्लाम्बरस्त्रीसुखं हीने स्याद्धननाशनं रिपुभयं स्त्रीरोगकृच्चायशः । मन्दे पूर्णबले गृहादिसुखकृद्भिल्लाधिपत्यं भवेन्न्यूने वित्तहरः शरीरकृशता रोगोऽपकीर्तिर्भवेत् ॥४१॥

śukre pūrṇabale dhanāgamayaśaḥśuklāmbarastrīsukhaṃ hīne syāddhananāśanaṃ ripubhayaṃ strīrogakṛccāyaśaḥ | mande pūrṇabale gṛhādisukhakṛdbhillādhipatyaṃ bhavennyūne vittaharaḥ śarīrakṛśatā rogo'pakīrtirbhavet ||41||

When Venus is in full strength there is the coming of wealth, fame, white garments, and the happiness of women; when deficient, there is destruction of wealth, fear of enemies, disease arising from women, and disrepute. When Manda ⟨Saturn⟩ is in full strength he makes the comfort of a house and the like, and lordship over the Bhillas ⟨our mūla reads भिल्ल; the transcriber marked its first letter as not settled⟩; when he is short of strength he is a taker of wealth, and there come leanness of body, disease and ill fame.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्रे" — a stray ink point sits low-left of श; it is not a printed mark.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्धननाशं"; alternatives "स्याद्धननाशः" — final anusvara over शं is small but present at 6x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्याद्धननाशनं; this sentence names स्याद्धननाशं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृच्चायशः"; alternatives "कृच्चायशः" — the double-c conjunct च्च is certain; the preceding कृ carries the vocalic r below.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भिल्ला"; alternatives "क्षिल्ला", "मिल्ला" — the conjunct after कृद् is read भ at 6x from its two-limbed left bowl; not settled. Sense (lordship over Bhillas) supports भिल्ल.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवे-" — printed hyphen; the word is broken across the line and completed as न्न्यूने on the next line. A stray ink point follows the hyphen.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्न्यूने" — avagraha checked at 6x in रोगोऽपकीर्तिः - present and clearly printed.
6.42a reading here is contested

राहौ पुण्ययुक्कर्मलाभशुभकृच्चोद्योगवृद्धिस्तथा पापत्वे सति चाशुभं पितृमृतिर्नीचारिगोष्ठिर्भवेत् । लग्ने वार्षिककालजे शुभफलं मध्यं च कष्टं भवेत् द्रेक्काणत्रितये क्रमात्तदधिपात्संबन्धयोगाद्वदेत् ॥४२॥

rāhau puṇyayukkarmalābhaśubhakṛccodyogavṛddhistathā pāpatve sati cāśubhaṃ pitṛmṛtirnīcārigoṣṭhirbhavet | lagne vārṣikakālaje śubhaphalaṃ madhyaṃ ca kaṣṭaṃ bhavet drekkāṇatritaye kramāttadadhipātsaṃbandhayogādvadet ||42||

In Rāhu's ⟨period⟩ there is meritorious work, gain and good ⟨three akṣaras stand between पुण्य and लाभ; the middle one is a geminate क्क, which forces the preceding to end in क्, hence युक्, but its vowel — yu, śu or su — is not settled at this print quality: it is the least certain word on the plate⟩, and likewise increase of enterprise (udyoga); and when his condition is sinful there is what is inauspicious, the death of the father ⟨printed पितृमृति; the akṣara after पितृ has a closed left bowl with a high counter and a subscript hook, and म and श are not separable here — the published gloss speaks of the father's demise, and that was deliberately not allowed to decide the glyph⟩, and the company of the low and of enemies ⟨our mūla now reads नीचारि, nīca + ari, as the metre needs; an eye reading of the plate had given नीचचारि, one syllable too many⟩. In the lagna of the annual chart the fruit is auspicious, middling and painful. In the three drekkāṇas one should declare in order, from the relation and the yoga of the lord of each.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुण्ययुक्कर्म"; alternatives "पुण्यशुक्कर्म", "पुण्यसुकर्म", "पुण्यशुभकर्म" — read at 4.6x and 6.5x. Three aksharas stand between पुण्य and लाभ; the middle one is a geminate k-conjunct (क्क), which forces the preceding to end in क् - hence युक्. The vowel of that akshara (yu / shu / su) is NOT settled at this print quality. Least certain word on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृच्चोच्चयोग"; alternatives "कृच्चोचयोग" — resolves as कृत् + च = कृच्च, then उच्चयोग; the second च्च is inked heavily and the doubling is inferred from glyph width. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पुण्ययुक्कर्मलाभशुभकृच्चोद्योगवृद्धिस्तथा; this sentence names कृच्चोच्चयोग, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कृच्चोद्योग. It was corrected on 2026-09-20 on the metre, and an eye reading of the exemplar on 2026-09-23 (jp2 page_0090, line index 0, at up to about 5.23x native) confirmed it: the press sets कृ-च्चो-द्यो-ग in four akṣaras. The two ो marks stand one akṣara apart (centres 81 px, against a page pitch of 77-80 px), and the compound spans 1313 px, 17 akṣaras, one too few for कृच्चोच्चयोग. The doubling this note inferred from glyph width is refuted by the width.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितृमृति"; alternatives "पितृश्रुति", "पितृशुति" — checked at 8x. The akshara after पितृ has a closed left bowl with a high white counter plus a subscript hook; म and श are not separable here. NOTE ON METHOD: the facing English speaks of the father's demise, which favours मृति - I did NOT let that decide the glyph, and I record the reading as unsettled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नीचचारि"; alternatives "नीचवैरि", "नीचचारी" — checked at 8x; the glyph after नीच reads चा, not वै. The English witness mentions enemies, which would favour वैरि; the ink does not. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पितृमृतिर्नीचारिगोष्ठिर्भवेत्; this sentence names नीचचारि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नीचारि, नीच + अरि, 'the low and enemies'. It was corrected from नीचचारि on 2026-09-20 on the metre: with नीचचारि pāda 2 counts twenty syllables, and नीचारि, which the machine read of the Bhasin printing gives, makes it nineteen with every position right. This note records the 2026-09-05 reading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्य"; alternatives "मध्यं" — no anusvara visible over ध्य at 4.6x; printed short. Grammar wants मध्यं. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मध्यं. It was corrected on 2026-09-20 on the metre: pāda 3 needs a heavy fourteenth syllable, and मध्य gives a light one. The machine reads of the two other printings give मध्यं. This note records the 2026-09-05 reading of the exemplar, which saw no anusvāra at 4.6x.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संबन्ध"; alternatives "सम्बन्ध" — printed with anusvara, not with the subscript nasal म्; checked at 4x.
6.43a reading here is contested

एवं वार्षिकजं दशाफलमपि प्रोक्तं लघुत्वं त्विदं तत्तत्खेटबलाबलाच्छुभयुतेरूह्यं सुधीभिस्तथा ।

evaṃ vārṣikajaṃ daśāphalamapi proktaṃ laghutvaṃ tvidaṃ tattatkheṭabalābalācchubhayuterūhyaṃ sudhībhistathā |

Thus the daśā-fruit arising from the annual ⟨chart⟩ too has been declared, and this is only its brevity; the rest is to be inferred by the wise in the same way, from the strength or weakness of each planet and from its conjunction with benefics.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वार्षिक"; alternatives "वार्षिकं" — printed without anusvara and with a word space before दशाफलम्, breaking the compound; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads वार्षिकजं for वार्षिक, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युतेरूह्यं"; alternatives "युतेर्ह्यं" — the ऊ of ऊह्यं is carried on a separate independent-vowel form; at 4x the long mark is present.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: This block closes its section with NO numeral on the page.

Adhyāya 7 · प्रश्नखण्डः — On Queries

7.1a reading here is contested

एवं जन्मखगोदयः फलमिदं सर्वं वदेज्जातके तन्नो चेदथ जन्मपत्रमपि वा तत्प्रश्नलग्नाद्वदेत् । प्रश्नो जातकतुल्य एव न भवेद्भेदोऽथवा दुर्दिने न ज्ञाते घटिकादिके गृहनवांशार्धांश्च पृच्छाद्वदेत् ॥१॥

evaṃ janmakhagodayaḥ phalamidaṃ sarvaṃ vadejjātake tanno cedatha janmapatramapi vā tatpraśnalagnādvadet | praśno jātakatulya eva na bhavedbhedo'thavā durdine na jñāte ghaṭikādike gṛhanavāṃśārdhāṃśca pṛcchādvadet ||1||

Thus, from the rising of the planets at birth, one should declare all this fruit in the natal chart. If that is not to be had, or if there is no birth-record either, then one should declare it from the lagna of the question. The praśna is exactly the equal of the jātaka; there is no difference — or else ⟨the difference is⟩ on an ill-starred day. When the ghaṭikā and the rest are not known, one should declare the sign, the navāṃśa and the half-aṃśa from the question itself.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलमिदं"; alternatives "फलमिद" — the anusvara over द is faint at 4x but present.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वं" — checked at 4x - anusvara present.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेद्भेदोऽथवा" — avagraha zoomed at 4x and confirmed printed between भेदो and थवा.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥१॥" — THIS IS VERSE 1 OF SECTION 7 (प्रश्नखण्ड), not a continuation of the slokas 39-42 series printed above on the same plate. Numbering restarts here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहनवांशार्धांश्च"; alternatives "गृहनवांशार्द्धांश्च" — the compound runs across the half-line break in my crops; both anusvaras are present at 4x.
7.2a reading here is contested

प्रश्नार्थी फलहेमपाणिरथवा कार्तान्तिकस्यान्तिकं प्रष्टागत्य नवघ्नभास्करमितात्संख्यामभीष्टां वदेत् । तामेव ध्रुवकं प्रकल्प्य सकलं त्रैकालिकं दैवविद् ब्रूयादिष्टमनिष्टमत्र तु गुरोः पादं शरण्यं भवेत् ॥ २ ॥

praśnārthī phalahemapāṇirathavā kārtāntikasyāntikaṃ praṣṭāgatya navaghnabhāskaramitātsaṃkhyāmabhīṣṭāṃ vadet | tāmeva dhruvakaṃ prakalpya sakalaṃ traikālikaṃ daivavid brūyādiṣṭamaniṣṭamatra tu guroḥ pādaṃ śaraṇyaṃ bhavet || 2 ||

The questioner, with fruit and gold in his hand, coming into the presence of the kārtāntika ⟨the astrologer; our mūla now reads कार्तान्तिक⟩, should state a number of his own choosing within nine-times-the-Sun ⟨that is, 108: नव × भास्कर, twelve; our mūla reads नवघ्न, and the transcriber recorded the multiplier's conjunct as unsettled rather than letting the arithmetic settle it⟩. Taking that very number as the dhruvaka, the knower of fate should declare the whole of the three times, what is desired and what is not; and in this the preceptor's foot is the refuge.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कातान्तिकस्यान्तिकं"; alternatives "कार्तान्तिकस्यान्तिकं" — read at 4x. A repha over the ता would give कार्तान्तिक (the astrologer); no repha is visible above that akshara on this impression. Recorded without it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कार्तान्तिकस्यान्तिकं; this sentence names कातान्तिकस्यान्तिकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवघ्नभास्कर"; alternatives "नवग्रभास्कर", "नवभमास्कर", "नवभास्कर" — zoomed to 6x. Six aksharas: न व [X] [भा/मा] स्क र. [X] is a conjunct with a nasal second member (gh-n / g-r not separable). The bhuta-samkhya arithmetic 9 x bhaskara(12) = 108 supports नवघ्न-भास्कर, and the facing English speaks of a number within 108; I record the reading as unsettled rather than let the arithmetic settle the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मितात्संख्यां"; alternatives "मितां संख्यां" — printed as one run; whether the mark between मिता and संख्यां is a त् or a compositor's join of anusvara + स is not settled at 4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ २ ॥" — verse 2 OF SECTION 7 (प्रश्नखण्ड), whose numbering began on plate 90. Word spaces are printed inside the dandas.
7.3a reading here is contested

पूर्वोक्ताद् ध्रुवकात् खगैः परिहृताल्लब्धं क्रियाद्यातभं तच्छेषस्त्वथ वर्तमानभवने स्युस्तन्नवांशाः क्रमात् । तत्कालग्रहचक्रभाववशतः प्रष्टुः शुभं वाशुभं प्राग्वत्खेचरभावकारकगणाद्वीर्याधिकात्संवदेत् ॥ ३ ॥

pūrvoktād dhruvakāt khagaiḥ parihṛtāllabdhaṃ kriyādyātabhaṃ taccheṣastvatha vartamānabhavane syustannavāṃśāḥ kramāt | tatkālagrahacakrabhāvavaśataḥ praṣṭuḥ śubhaṃ vāśubhaṃ prāgvatkhecarabhāvakārakagaṇādvīryādhikātsaṃvadet || 3 ||

From the dhruvaka stated before, divided by the sky-goers ⟨nine⟩ ⟨our mula now reads खगैः, the instrumental plural, emended on the lexicon from खगौः, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave⟩, what is obtained is the sign gone by, counted from Aries; the remainder of it, then, ⟨our mula now reads तच्छेषस्त्वथ, tu + atha; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave स्त्थ, and the metre restores the व⟩ — in the current sign ⟨our mula now reads वर्तमानभवने, 'in the current sign', emended on the lexicon; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave वर्तमानमवने, and Sastri's printing, read by eye, and a machine read of Bhasin's give भवने⟩ stand its navāṃśas in order. From the disposition of the planetary circle and the bhāvas at that moment one should declare what is good or bad for the questioner ⟨our mula now reads वाशुभं, वा + अशुभं, 'good or bad'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave शुभं वा शुभं, and our text joins it on the lexicon⟩ — as before, from the sky-goer, the bhāva and the company of kārakas, from whichever is greater in strength (vīrya) ⟨our mula now reads गणाद्वीर्याधिकात्, where our first reading of the plate left this cluster unresolved; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave these letters⟩.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खगौः"; alternatives "खगैः" — zoomed to 6x: the matra over ग is unmistakably ौ, giving the non-form खगौः. Grammar and sense (instrumental plural, khaga = planet = 9, hence 'divided by 9') want खगैः. Recorded as printed; this is a printing error, not a variant reading. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खगैः; this sentence names खगौः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this word on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0091 (folio 89, store line 18) at about 2.3x native. After ग stands a full ā-stroke, 105 px tall, carrying its curl, so the sign is ौ and not ै: the press sets खगौः, as this note read it. The mūla emends it to खगैः on the lexicon.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तच्छेषस्त्य"; alternatives "तच्छेषस्त्वथ", "तच्छेषस्तु" — NON-WORD as printed, recorded per the transcribe-as-printed rule. Zoomed to 6x: only two glyph widths follow ष, so a three-akshara स्त्वथ does not fit the metal; the cluster reads स्त्य. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तच्छेषस्त्वथ; this sentence names तच्छेषस्त्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this cluster on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0091 (folio 89, store line 19) at about 2.3x native. This note is right that only two sorts follow ष, but the second is थ, not य (template correlation 0.917 against this plate's थ of रथवा, 0.863 against its य). So the press sets तच्छेषस्त्थ, which drops the व of तु + अथ and leaves pāda 2 one syllable short. The mūla restores that व on the metre and reads तच्छेषस्त्वथ.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अवने"; alternatives "अवधे" — व vs ध not separable at 4x on this impression. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this word on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0091 (folio 89, store line 19) at about 2.3x native. The letter is व (template correlation 0.974 against this plate's व, 0.832 against the ध of धिकात्). The akṣara before it is म: its headline runs unbroken, while every भ measured on this plate shows a 5-10 px notch at the top-left. So the press sets वर्तमानमवने, and the mūla keeps it; the rival वर्तमानभवने, which the machine reads of the two other printings give, is recorded in this verse's doubts.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads वर्तमानभवने on the lexicon; the press sets वर्तमानमवने, read by eye on the plate at about 2.3x native, and Sastri 2010 (uk-ps-sastri page_0165 line 7, read by eye on its render at about 5x) and a machine read of Bhasin 2019 (uk-bhasin-hindi page_0169 line 4) carry वर्तमानभवने. The doubt this note points to is answered.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभं वा शुभं"; alternatives "शुभं वाशुभं" — PRINTED WITH A WORD SPACE before the second शुभं, so the line as set reads 'auspicious or auspicious'. The intended sandhi वा + अशुभं = वाशुभं (good or bad) is confirmed by the facing English. Recorded as printed; the space is a compositor's error. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शुभं वाशुभं, वा + अशुभं, "good or bad", as this note's own alternative gives. The plate ruling of 2026-09-23 on this verse confirmed that the press sets the word space and no avagraha, so our text emends the press on the lexicon.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गणाद्रीयांधिकात्"; alternatives "गणाद्बलीयोऽधिकात्", "गणाद्बलीयांऽधिकात्" — the least legible run on the plate; zoomed to 6x at the half-line junction. No avagraha is visible before धिकात्. Sense (declare from the STRONGER) wants बलीयस्; the ink shows a compressed द्+र/ब cluster I cannot resolve. Recorded near-literally with the sense-readings as alternatives. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वाशुभं प्राग्वत्खेचरभावकारकगणाद्वीर्याधिकात्संवदेत्; this sentence names गणाद्रीयांधिकात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling re-read this run on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0091 (folio 89, store line 21) at about 2.3x native, and it is legible. Under the द hangs a closed loop with its own counter, a subscript व like the द्व of उद्वाहादि (page_0086 line 6), not a subscript र; then the ī-stroke; and over the ā of या a hooked repha (31x28 px, rising about 40 px above the headline), not an anusvāra. No avagraha stands before धि. The press sets गणाद्वीर्याधिकात्, 'from the one greater in strength'.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेचरभाव कारक"; alternatives "खेचरभावकारक" — a word space is printed inside what must be one compound; recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खेचरभावकारक as one compound. The plate ruling of 2026-09-23 measured the gap as a 17-px thin space inside the word, and our text closes it on the lexicon.]
7.4a reading here is contested

तत्प्रष्टार्पितहेमपुष्पधनजा संख्या ध्रुवघ्नार्कहृतच्छेषोन्मितभे स्थितिः सुरगुरोः स्यात्पृष्टजन्मन्यथ । तच्चारात्तु वयोनुमानभगणान् संचिन्त्य वर्षं पुनर्जन्मार्याशमुखाच्च मासकदिनाद्यर्काच्च मासादयः ॥ ४ ॥

tatpraṣṭārpitahemapuṣpadhanajā saṃkhyā dhruvaghnārkahṛtaccheṣonmitabhe sthitiḥ suraguroḥ syātpṛṣṭajanmanyatha | taccārāttu vayonumānabhagaṇān saṃcintya varṣaṃ punarjanmāryāśamukhācca māsakadinādyarkācca māsādayaḥ || 4 ||

The number arising from the gold, the flowers and the wealth offered by that enquirer is multiplied by the dhruvaka and divided by twelve ⟨arka, the Sun⟩; the sign measured by the remainder would be the position of the gods' preceptor ⟨Jupiter⟩ at the birth enquired after. From its motion, having considered the estimate of age and the revolutions, ⟨one obtains⟩ the year again; and from ⟨जन्मार्याश: our mūla reads this, which yields no word; the astrologically expected जन्मर्क्ष, 'the birth-star', is not what our mūla holds⟩ onward, and from the Sun, come the month, the day and the rest.

11 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुष्पघनजा"; alternatives "पुष्पधनजा" — घ vs ध unresolved; the foot of this plate is markedly blurred (see plate-level concern). [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्प्रष्टार्पितहेमपुष्पधनजा; this sentence names पुष्पघनजा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ध्रुवम्कंहृ-"; alternatives "ध्रुवमङ्कं हृ-" — read at 5x under degraded ink. Ends with a printed hyphen; the broken word completes as हृ + तच्छेषो at the head of the next line (हृतच्छेष = 'the remainder of the division'). The cluster before the hyphen is not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ध्रुवघ्नार्कहृतच्छेषोन्मितभे; this sentence names ध्रुवम्कंहृ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the cluster is now settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0091, line index 30, at about 4.96x native) found a repha over the क, not an anusvāra: the mark measures 26x31 px, against 16x17 px for the anusvāra of सं in संख्या on the same line. The akṣara before it carries an ā-vertical and no ink below the baseline, so it is घ्ना, not म्. The press sets ध्रुवघ्नार्कहृ-, and our mūla reads the same.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तच्छेषोनितमे"; alternatives "तच्छेषोनिते मे", "तच्छेषोनमिते" — word division inside this run is not visible at 5x; the plate foot is blurred. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ध्रुवघ्नार्कहृतच्छेषोन्मितभे; this sentence names तच्छेषोनितमे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: re-read by eye on the exemplar (jp2 page_0091, line index 31) at about 3.42x native, the run agrees with our तच्छेषोन्मितभे: the last akṣara shows the open bottom-right of भ, not the closed loop of म. Whether the press sets न्मि or नि cannot be told at that magnification, and that question is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यात्पृष्टजन्मन्यथ"; alternatives "स्यात्पृष्टजन्मन्यथा" — final vowel length not settled under the degraded ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तच्चरात्तु"; alternatives "तद्वरात्तु", "तच्चरात्त्र" — first word badly degraded at the plate foot; two readings equally supported by the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तच्चारात्तु; this sentence names तच्चरात्तु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वयोनुमान"; alternatives "वयोऽनुमान" — no avagraha visible, but the ink here is too poor for that to be evidence of absence.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुन-" — printed hyphen; the verse and this word continue onto plate 92. This three-line block carries NO closing verse number - the number stands on the next plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्ज"; alternatives "ज" — The line OPENS with a repha (r-hook) over ja. Verified at 22x against the certain repha in ar-ka later in the same line and against the bare ja of janma in band 17: the hook is the same sort, and band 17's ja has none. So the pada continues a word broken at the page turn (…-taih + r-janma…). Not a word beginning.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्या"; alternatives "र्क्ष" — Column-ink measurement gives ma(46px) + a-matra + ya(64px) + a-matra, the ya matching the certain ya of masadayah at the end of this line stroke for stroke (same inner white comma). The repha sits over the second a-matra. So r-ya, not ksa - but janma-aryasa- is not a word I can construe; the astrologically expected janmarksa- is NOT what the ink shows.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श"; alternatives "क्ष", "स" — Compared at 14x with the ya beside it: this glyph's left arm hooks down-left with a foot, ya's curls inward. Read as sa (palatal).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्का"; alternatives "र्को" — One mark only above this cluster and it is the repha; no separate e-stroke on the a-matra, so a and not o. A small round speck sits below the ka - ink dirt or a broken sort, not a matra I can name. arkac ca also matches the English ('taken away from the present position of the Sun').
7.5a reading here is contested

मासो वारघटीमुखं भवति तत्सौरश्च मासादिदं चैवं जन्म भवाब्दमासदिनतोऽपि स्युस्ततो जातकम् । इत्थं चोदितनष्टजातकमिदं स्वल्पं रहस्यं भवेदेवं जातकपद्धतिर्विरचिता ह्येषास्तिकानां मुदे ॥ ५ ॥

māso vāraghaṭīmukhaṃ bhavati tatsauraśca māsādidaṃ caivaṃ janma bhavābdamāsadinato'pi syustato jātakam | itthaṃ coditanaṣṭajātakamidaṃ svalpaṃ rahasyaṃ bhavedevaṃ jātakapaddhatirviracitā hyeṣāstikānāṃ mude || 5 ||

The month comes to be reckoned from the weekday, the ghaṭī and so on, and it is the solar month; and thus the month and the rest. And in this way the birth also follows, from the year, the month and the day of the present existence; and from that the natal chart. Thus has this small secret of the lost horoscope ⟨naṣṭa-jātaka⟩ been declared, and so this manual of nativities has been composed, indeed for the delight of the believers ⟨our mūla now reads ह्येषास्तिकानां, हि + एषा + आस्तिकानां⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वल्पं"; alternatives "खल्पं" — First akshara measured 100px against the certain kha of mukham in the line above at 73px, and carries an extra left element. Read as the sva conjunct; kha alone would make khalpam, a non-word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "देवं"; alternatives "द्देवं" — Continues bhave- from the previous line: bhavedevam. Printed as a fresh line-initial deva-.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्यपा"; alternatives "ह्या", "ह्ये" — UNSETTLED. The first cluster carries a short diagonal above its LEFT shoulder (not the repha hook - compared at 15x with both). Below the headline it is not the plain ha of rahasyam in the line above. The second akshara measures 44px + a separate a-matra, i.e. a narrow letter, most like pa; a would be wider. hy-astikanam ('for the joy of the believers') is what the sense wants and is NOT what I can see. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ह्येषास्तिकानां; this sentence names ह्यपा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
7.6a reading here is contested

पूर्वोक्तं ध्रुवकं करघ्नगुणहृच्छेषेऽसमे जीवयुग्युग्मे धातुरितीह मूलमुदितं चेच्छून्यशेषे भवेत् । मेषे पादयुगं वृषे तु पशवः स्याद्गर्भचिन्ता युगे राशौ कर्कटके भवेद्यवहृतिः स्याद्राजचिन्ता हरौ ॥ ६ ॥

pūrvoktaṃ dhruvakaṃ karaghnaguṇahṛccheṣe'same jīvayugyugme dhāturitīha mūlamuditaṃ cecchūnyaśeṣe bhavet | meṣe pādayugaṃ vṛṣe tu paśavaḥ syādgarbhacintā yuge rāśau karkaṭake bhavedyavahṛtiḥ syādrājacintā harau || 6 ||

The dhruvaka stated before, multiplied by the hands ⟨two⟩ and divided by the guṇas ⟨three⟩: if the remainder is odd it is jīva ⟨the animate⟩, if even it is dhātu ⟨the mineral⟩ — and thus mūla ⟨the vegetable⟩ is declared here, if the remainder be zero. In Aries, a pair of feet; in Taurus, cattle; in Gemini the thought is of pregnancy (garbha); in the sign Cancer there is dealing in barley; in Leo, thought about the king.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग्युग्मे"; alternatives "ग्मे" — NON-WORD AS PRINTED. Two aksharas stand before the word gap (456-544 and 551-642 px), and at 16x their left half-consonants are the SAME sort; the first carries u below, the second e above. The previous line ends jivayu- with a hyphen, so only g-me is wanted. Recorded as printed; reads as a compositor's dittography. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads ∅ for ग्युग्मे, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the sentence dated 2026-09-20 above misstates the change. The mūla reads जीवयुग्युग्मे and still holds ग्युग्मे. That pass removed only the printer's line-break dash after जीवयु, and it ruled on the metre that the ग्यु is not a dittography: with जीवयुग् closing pāda 1 the pāda counts exactly nineteen, and pāda 2 then opens युग्मे and also counts nineteen. The machine reads of both other printings give जीवयुग्युग्मे.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्दर्भ"; alternatives "स्याद्रम्भ" — The third akshara carries a clear repha, so r-bha and not m-bha; a repha needs a vowel before it, which forces the preceding cluster to be the dda ligature. Hence syad darbha-. The dda/dra distinction below the headline is at the limit of the scan. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्याद्गर्भचिन्ता; this sentence names स्याद्दर्भ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0092, line 31, printed folio 90, at about 4.0x-4.2x native) found that the conjunct after स्या is द्ग, not द्द: it is 65 px wide, where four द्द of the same fount measure 30-42 px and a plain द्ग measures 59 px, and its shape matches that द्ग. So the press sets स्याद्गर्भचिन्ता, as our mūla reads.]
7.7a reading here is contested

कन्यायां तु पराङ्गना घटगृहे वाणिज्यकं वृश्चिके लग्ने दुष्टभयं धनुष्यपि धनं नष्टं कलिर्नक्रभे । कुंभे कर्मसु चिन्तनं त्वनिमिषे स्थानस्य चिंता भवेदेवं वीर्ययुताद्गृहान्नवलवात्प्रोचुर्जटाधारिणः ॥ ७ ॥

kanyāyāṃ tu parāṅganā ghaṭagṛhe vāṇijyakaṃ vṛścike lagne duṣṭabhayaṃ dhanuṣyapi dhanaṃ naṣṭaṃ kalirnakrabhe | kuṃbhe karmasu cintanaṃ tvanimiṣe sthānasya ciṃtā bhavedevaṃ vīryayutādgṛhānnavalavātprocurjaṭādhāriṇaḥ || 7 ||

In Virgo, another man's wife; in the pot-house, trade ⟨our mūla reads घट, the pot, that is Aquarius; but the sequence here runs Virgo → this → Scorpio, so Libra is what belongs in the slot, and Aquarius is separately named two clauses later. The word is not in doubt; the referent is⟩; with Scorpio as the lagna, fear from the wicked; in Sagittarius too, wealth; something lost, and strife, in the crocodile ⟨Capricorn; our mūla now reads नक्रभे, 'in the crocodile's sign'⟩; in Aquarius, thought about one's work; in the unblinking one ⟨Pisces, the fish⟩, anxiety about one's place. Thus, from whichever of the sign and the navāṃśa is joined with the greater vigour ⟨our mūla now reads द्गृहान्नवलवात्, 'from the sign and from the navāṃśa'⟩, the matted-haired ⟨sages⟩ have declared.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घटगृहे" — READ WITH CERTAINTY AT 16x - gha (inner curl + right stem) then ta (closed ring): ghata-grhe, 'in the pot house', i.e. Kumbha. But the sequence here runs Kanya -> ? -> Vrscika, so Tula is what belongs, and Sastri's own English on this page reads 'When Tula will be rising ... about trading'. Kumbha is separately named in band 11 (kumbhe karmasu). So the plate either carries an error or uses ghata for Tula; the ink is not in doubt, the referent is.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व णिज्यकं"; alternatives "वणिज्यकं" — Printed with a full word space between va and nijyakam; the same word is set solid as vanijya- in band 25. Kept as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads वाणिज्यकं for व; ∅ for णिज्यकं, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कलिर्नक्रमे"; alternatives "कलिर्नक्रगे" — repha over na is clear at 12x. nakra = crocodile = Makara, which is the sign Sastri's English names here ('sinful deed ... when the Rasi Makara be the Lagna'); but the locative wanted is nakre, and the plate has an extra syllable. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads कलिर्नक्रभे for कलिर्नक्रमे, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चिंता"; alternatives "चिन्ता" — Set with anusvara here and with the nta conjunct (चिन्तनं) earlier in the SAME line. Both kept as printed; the variation is the compositor's.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "देवं" — Continues bhave- from the previous line: bhaved evam.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हद्ग्रा"; alternatives "द्गृहा", "द्ग्रहा", "द्गा" — UNSETTLED - the worst cluster on this plate. Column measurement between yuta and -nnavalavat gives four bodies (37,43,54 px + a 13px a-matra) and no ha-shaped body among them, so grha-/graha- ('from the sign' / 'from the planet') cannot be read off the ink even though the English ('the stronger of the two, Rasi and Navamsa') and the certain -nnavalavat ('and from the navamsa') both demand it. Recorded as the shapes stand. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवेदेवं वीर्ययुताद्गृहान्नवलवात्प्रोचुर्जटाधारिणः; this sentence names हद्ग्रा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रोचुर्ज" — repha over ja verified at 14x; procur jatadharinah, 'the matted-haired sages declared' - matches Sastri's 'Thus advise the sages to declare'.
7.8a reading here is contested

स्वक्षेऽर्के नृपराज्यचिन्तनमथो चन्द्रे तटाकादयो भौमे वह्निनृपारिभीर्विधुसुते वाणिज्यकृष्णादयः । जीवे मित्रनृपादयो भृगुसुते सौख्याधिकं त्वर्कजे संस्थे मानुषचिन्तनं स्थिरधनं स्वक्षेत्रतोंऽशादपि ॥ ८ ॥

svakṣe'rke nṛparājyacintanamatho candre taṭākādayo bhaume vahninṛpāribhīrvidhusute vāṇijyakṛṣṇādayaḥ | jīve mitranṛpādayo bhṛgusute saukhyādhikaṃ tvarkaje saṃsthe mānuṣacintanaṃ sthiradhanaṃ svakṣetratoṃ'śādapi || 8 ||

When the Sun is in its own sign, the thought is of a king and a kingdom; then with the Moon, tanks and the like; with Mars, fear from fire, from the king and from enemies; with the Moon's son ⟨Mercury⟩, trade, black things and the rest; with Jupiter, friends, kings and the like; with the son of Bhṛgu ⟨Venus⟩, abundance of comfort; and when the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩ is placed there, thought about men and about fixed wealth — reckoned from its own sign, and from the aṃśa too.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वक्षेऽर्के"; alternatives "स्वक्षेऽर्कं" — avagraha clear. Over the final cluster there is the repha and, above it, a further small mark that could be an anusvara or ink; read as -rke (locative), which the sense wants.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्विधुसुते"; alternatives "र्विंधुसुते" — A mark stands above the vi beside the repha; if it is an anusvara it is unetymological (vidhu-suta = Mercury). Read without it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तोंऽशादपि"; alternatives "तोऽंशादपि" — The anusvara of amsat is set over the preceding to-, ahead of the avagraha, rather than after it. Kept in the printed order.
7.9a reading here is contested

एवं स्वोच्चगते खगे द्विगुणितं नीचे तु शून्यं फलं मित्रर्क्षेऽर्द्धमितं फलं प्रभवति स्याद्भे समे हीनतः । द्वावुच्चर्क्षगतौ तथा स्वगृहगौ तद्वर्गवीर्याधिकात् संज्ञाकारकभावयोगजवशात्प्रश्नं वदेद्बुद्धिमान् ॥ ९ ॥

evaṃ svoccagate khage dviguṇitaṃ nīce tu śūnyaṃ phalaṃ mitrarkṣe'rddhamitaṃ phalaṃ prabhavati syādbhe same hīnataḥ | dvāvuccarkṣagatau tathā svagṛhagau tadvargavīryādhikāt saṃjñākārakabhāvayogajavaśātpraśnaṃ vadedbuddhimān || 9 ||

Thus, when the sky-goer has gone to its own exaltation, the fruit is doubled; in debility the fruit is nil; in a friend's sign the fruit that comes about is half; in a neutral sign it is less ⟨our mula now reads स्याद्भे समे, 'in a neutral sign', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩. And when the two have gone to an exaltation-sign, or likewise stand in their own house, then from whichever has the greater strength in that varga, and by force of the name, the kāraka, the bhāva and the yoga produced, the intelligent man should declare the question.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मित्रर्क्षें"; alternatives "मित्रर्क्षे" — repha over ksa certain; a further small mark stands beside it that may be an anusvara or ink. The locative mitrarkse is what the sense wants. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मित्रर्क्षेऽर्द्धमितं; this sentence names मित्रर्क्षें, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0094, line 6, at about 2.8x native) and measured. Over क्षे stands ONE mark: the combined repha-plus-e sort, the same sort as over र्ये of कार्येश्वरौ on line 20 of that page. The small mark this note saw is that sort's repha hook. No anusvāra dot is printed beside it: the strips on either side hold no ink darker than 128, where each anusvāra on the same line is a separate dot of about 115 px. So the press prints मित्रर्क्षेऽर्द्धमितं, as the mūla now reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्रे"; alternatives "स्यादरौ", "स्याद्धे" — UNSETTLED. At 12x the cluster is a da carrying a subscript diagonal (an r-foot) and an e-stroke above: d-re. Sastri's English here reads 'in that of a neutral's house, it will be very low', and the following words are certain (same samee hinatah), so an enemy/neutral word is expected - syad arau would give it, but that is not what the ink shows. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्याद्भे; this sentence names स्याद्रे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0094, line 6, at about 2.8x native), and it settles what this note left UNSETTLED. The cluster is the द्भ sort, the same as सुहृद्भे on line 18 of that page (correlation 0.818, against 0.652 with the द्रे of रुद्रे, store page 100, line 21). The 'subscript diagonal' is the tail of the subscript भ, not an r-foot. So the press prints स्याद्भे, and भे समे, 'in a neutral sign', construes. The mūla now reads it.]
7.10a reading here is contested

तत्काले खचरे स्वतुङ्गभवने तन्नाडिकाभिर्भवेत् कार्यं स्वर्क्षगते दिनैरपि सुहृद्भे मासतोऽब्दोऽन्यथा । कार्यं वेतरथा खलेक्षणयुते लग्ने शनौ तुङ्गगे चेच्छीघ्रं बलवच्छुभेक्षणयुतौ लग्नेशकार्येश्वरौ ॥ १० ॥

tatkāle khacare svatuṅgabhavane tannāḍikābhirbhavet kāryaṃ svarkṣagate dinairapi suhṛdbhe māsato'bdo'nyathā | kāryaṃ vetarathā khalekṣaṇayute lagne śanau tuṅgage cecchīghraṃ balavacchubhekṣaṇayutau lagneśakāryeśvarau || 10 ||

If at that moment the sky-goer stands in its own exaltation-house, the matter will come about within so many nāḍikās; if it is in its own sign, within days; if in a friend's sign, within a month; otherwise, a year. Or else the matter will not come about at all, when ⟨the lord⟩ is joined with a malefic's glance. And if Saturn is exalted in the lagna, and the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter are strong and joined with a benefic's glance, ⟨it comes about⟩ quickly.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽब्दो"; alternatives "ऽन्दो" — The letter under the o-matra is read ba (abdah, 'a year'), which matches Sastri's 'it will take some years'; the left body could also be read na at this resolution.
7.11a reading here is contested

खाङ्गाज्यांशलवात्मकं कुवलयं तद् द्वादशारं भवेत् तत्र स्युर्नवमांशका वसुवियच्चंद्रा स्थिरा कुण्डली । तद्दिक्षु द्वितयं विदिक्षु च भवेदेकैककं मेषतः प्रागाद्याः क्रमतः खगान् गणितजात्राश्यंशजान् संलिखेत्॥११॥

khāṅgājyāṃśalavātmakaṃ kuvalayaṃ tad dvādaśāraṃ bhavet tatra syurnavamāṃśakā vasuviyaccaṃdrā sthirā kuṇḍalī | taddikṣu dvitayaṃ vidikṣu ca bhavedekaikakaṃ meṣataḥ prāgādyāḥ kramataḥ khagān gaṇitajātrāśyaṃśajān saṃlikhet||11||

That circle of the earth, consisting of ⟨kha-aṅga-… degrees: a number set in number-words; kha is zero and aṅga six, but the letters after them in our mula make no known number-word, so the total is unsettled, though a full circle suggests 360⟩, becomes twelve-spoked. In it stand the navāṃśas, vasu-viyat-candra ⟨one hundred and eight⟩; the kuṇḍalī is fixed. In its cardinal directions there are two apiece and in the intermediate quarters one each, from Aries onward, beginning with the east; and one should write down in order the planets as computed by sign and by aṃśa.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खाङ्गाज्याश"; alternatives "खाङ्गाग्न्यंश" — UNSETTLED and important, because it is a bhutasankhya NUMBER, not a word: kha=0, anga=6 are secure, the third element is not. Read as printed it gives no number; kha-anga-agni = 360 would suit 'kuvalayam tad dvadasaram bhavet' (the circle divided into twelve). Recorded as the shapes stand, with the arithmetic-bearing alternative named. This pada is pada 1 of verse 11; the rest of the stanza is on the next plate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खाङ्गाज्यांशलवात्मकं for खाङ्गाज्याशलवात्मकं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the alternative खाङ्गाग्न्यंश is refuted on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0094, line index 32, printed folio 92, at about 3.41x and 4.05x native) found two consonant bodies, then an isolated ā-mātrā, with no ink below the baseline and no anusvāra above the headline. That is ज्या, and it cannot be ग्न्यं; no printing we hold carries ग्न्यंश either. So the press sets खाङ्गाज्याशलवात्मकं, as this note read it, and our ज्यांश is an emendation on the lexicon, following the two other printings. Whether the printed tradition keeps a number here is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्रं"; alternatives "तत्र" — a mark stands over the tra that reads as anusvara; unetymological for tatra. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्र for तत्रं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसुवियंचंद्रा"; alternatives "वसुवियच्चन्द्रा" — bhutasankhya: vasu=8, viyat=0, candra=1, read right-to-left = 108, which Sastri's English confirms ('The 108 Navamsas'). Printed with anusvara where the conjuncts cc and nd are expected; kept as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads वसुवियच्चंद्रा for वसुवियंचंद्रा, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संलिखेत्॥११॥" — the closing dandas and numeral are set hard against the last word with no word space, unlike every other stanza close on these plates; kept as printed.
7.12a reading here is contested

यो वै पुष्पफलादिपाणिलसितो मर्त्योऽपि यस्मिन् गृहे तिष्ठन् पृच्छति तद्गृहं त्वभिहितं कोष्ठं दिगारूढकम् । तस्मात्खेचरदृष्टियोगवशतः प्रश्ने शुभं वाऽशुभं प्रश्नेष्वप्यखिलेषु कार्यपतनुस्थानेश्वराभ्यां वदेत् ॥ १२ ॥

yo vai puṣpaphalādipāṇilasito martyo'pi yasmin gṛhe tiṣṭhan pṛcchati tadgṛhaṃ tvabhihitaṃ koṣṭhaṃ digārūḍhakam | tasmātkhecaradṛṣṭiyogavaśataḥ praśne śubhaṃ vā'śubhaṃ praśneṣvapyakhileṣu kāryapatanusthāneśvarābhyāṃ vadet || 12 ||

Whatever man, his hand adorned with flowers, fruit and the like, stands in a house and asks — that house is called the koṣṭha, the digārūḍha. From it, by force of the aspect and conjunction of the sky-goers, ⟨one declares⟩ what is good or bad in the question; and in all questions whatever, one should declare by the lord of the matter and the lord of the body-house ⟨the lagna⟩ ⟨our mūla now reads कार्यप without the anusvāra, as the compound requires⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कार्यंप"; alternatives "कार्यप" — anusvara printed over the rya; the compound wanted is karya-pa-tanusthanesvarabhyam ('by the lord of the matter and the lord of the ascendant'), which Sastri's English gives, and that needs no anusvara. Kept as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads कार्यपतनुस्थानेश्वराभ्यां for कार्यंपतनुस्थानेश्वराभ्यां, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
7.13a reading here is contested

अङ्कघ्ना नखभाजिताश्च घटिकाः सूर्योदयात्प्राश्निके तल्लब्धं भघटीमुखं स्फुटविधुः प्रश्नोपयोगी भवेत् । पञ्चाङ्गस्थविधुस्फुटश्च भघटी वक्त्रस्तु संज्ञातयो स्थूलः सूक्ष्म इतीरितां तदुभयोर्ग्राह्यं नवांशादिकम् ॥ १३ ॥

aṅkaghnā nakhabhājitāśca ghaṭikāḥ sūryodayātprāśnike tallabdhaṃ bhaghaṭīmukhaṃ sphuṭavidhuḥ praśnopayogī bhavet | pañcāṅgasthavidhusphuṭaśca bhaghaṭī vaktrastu saṃjñātayo sthūlaḥ sūkṣma itīritāṃ tadubhayorgrāhyaṃ navāṃśādikam || 13 ||

The ghaṭikās from sunrise, multiplied by the number and divided by the nails ⟨twenty⟩, are for the querent ⟨our mūla now reads प्राश्निके, the word our text also carries at 7.15⟩. What is got from that is the bhaghaṭī-mukha; the true Moon is what serves for the question. And the true Moon as it stands in the pañcāṅga, and the bhaghaṭī, and the vaktra ⟨our mūla reads वक्त्र; वक्र, 'retrograde', would suit the astronomy better, and no read of this verse gives it⟩ — these are what is known as the gross and the subtle, it is said; and from both of them the navāṃśa and the rest are to be taken.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्योदयात्प्राश्रिके"; alternatives "सूर्योदयात्प्राश्निके", "सूर्योदयाद्याश्रिके" — RESOLVED BY THE NEXT PLATE, not by this one. suryodaya- is certain; the tail I could only read as -prasrike here is written PRASNIKE, clearly and at the same point of a pada, on folio 94 (plate 0096, verse 15 pada 4). The subscript I took for an r-foot is therefore the n of sna. Reading kept as seen on THIS plate, with the cross-plate evidence named: prasnike ('for the querent') is what the word is. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्योदयात्प्राश्निके तल्लब्धं भघटीमुखं; this sentence names सूर्योदयात्प्राश्रिके, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तल्लब्धमघटीमुखं"; alternatives "तल्लब्धं घटीमुखं" — set solid with no word space; the ma between labdha and ghati may be a printed word-division fault. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्योदयात्प्राश्निके तल्लब्धं भघटीमुखं; this sentence names तल्लब्धमघटीमुखं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वक्त्रस्तु"; alternatives "वक्रस्तु" — the conjunct reads ktra; vakra ('retrograde') would suit the astronomy better but is not what is set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इतीरितां"; alternatives "इतीरितौ" — the pair sthulah / suksmah is nominative dual, so -itau is expected; the plate sets an anusvara. Kept as printed.
7.14a reading here is contested

स्थूलेन्दौ त्वपरेन्दुसौम्यगुरुदृष्टे जीवचिन्ता भवेद्धातुभूमिजसैंहिकेयरविजैर्मूलं सितार्केक्षिते । मिश्रं जीवसितागुभिस्त्वथ पुनश्चेद् व्यंघ्रिचिन्ता तुलाकन्यायुग्मनवांशकेंऽघ्रिबहुलं कर्कालिमीनांशके ॥ १४ ॥

sthūlendau tvaparendusaumyagurudṛṣṭe jīvacintā bhaveddhātubhūmijasaiṃhikeyaravijairmūlaṃ sitārkekṣite | miśraṃ jīvasitāgubhistvatha punaśced vyaṃghricintā tulākanyāyugmanavāṃśakeṃ'ghribahulaṃ karkālimīnāṃśake || 14 ||

When the gross Moon is aspected by the other Moon, by Mercury or by Jupiter, the thought is about a living thing ⟨jīva⟩; when aspected by ⟨dhātu, the mineral: our mūla now reads भवेद्धातु, as the sense requires⟩ Mars, Saiṃhikeya ⟨Rāhu⟩ and the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩, it is a mineral; when aspected by Venus and the Sun, it is a root. Mixed, when by Jupiter, Venus and the rayless one ⟨Rāhu⟩. And again, in the navāṃśa of Libra, Virgo or Gemini the thought is of a two-footed thing, and of a many-footed one in the aṃśa of Cancer, Scorpio or Pisces.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वातु"; alternatives "धातु" — The line opens mid-word (previous pada ends bhave-, so bhaved dhatu- / bhaved dvatu-). At 5x the first body carries a closed loop low-left that reads as a subscript va, giving dva-; but the sense and Sastri's English ('it will be about some mineral') require DHATU. Recorded as the shapes stand: this is exactly the line-initial position where a half-form is easy to mis-set and easy to mis-read. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जीवचिन्ता भवेद्धातुभूमिजसैंहिकेयरविजैर्मूलं; this sentence names द्वातु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सैंहिकेय" — Saimhikeya = Rahu, confirmed by the English naming Mars, Rahu and Saturn.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अगुभिः" — agu ('rayless') stands for Rahu here - the English gives Jupiter, Venus and Rahu for the mixed nature, which fixes the referent.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बहुल"; alternatives "बहुला" — printed without the final long a; the compound wanted is anghri-bahula ('many-footed'), which the English confirms.
7.15a reading here is contested

चापांशे च घटांशके चरणहीना मेषसिंहांशके नक्रोक्षांशगते चतुष्पद इह स्थूलेन्दुनन्दांशकात् । द्रेक्काणत्रितये क्रमात्प्रतिगृहे बाला तथा यौवना वृद्धा चेति वदन्ति पूर्वमुनयोऽवस्थात्रयं प्राश्निके ॥ १५ ॥

cāpāṃśe ca ghaṭāṃśake caraṇahīnā meṣasiṃhāṃśake nakrokṣāṃśagate catuṣpada iha sthūlendunandāṃśakāt | drekkāṇatritaye kramātpratigṛhe bālā tathā yauvanā vṛddhā ceti vadanti pūrvamunayo'vasthātrayaṃ prāśnike || 15 ||

In the aṃśa of Sagittarius and of Aquarius it is footless; in the aṃśa of Aries or Leo, and when it has gone to the aṃśa of Capricorn or Taurus, it is four-footed — here reckoned from the ninth part ⟨nanda-aṃśa⟩ of the gross Moon. In the three drekkāṇas, in each house in order, ⟨the thing is⟩ a child, then youthful, then old: so the ancient sages declare the three states for the querent ⟨our mūla now reads पूर्वमुनयो, one compound: 'the ancient sages'⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नक्रोक्षांशगते" — nakra = Makara, uksan = Vrsabha; with mesa and simha in the previous pada this gives exactly the four quadruped signs the English lists.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्वंमुनयो"; alternatives "पूर्वे मुनयो" — set solid with an anusvara; purve munayah ('the ancient sages', which is the English) would want no anusvara and a word space. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वमुनयोऽवस्थात्रयं; this sentence names पूर्वंमुनयो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राश्निके" — CLEAR HERE at 5x, and it settles a doubtful reading on folio 93 (plate 0095) whose last pada I could only read as -prasrike: the same word ends both, so that one is almost certainly prasnike too. Cross-plate evidence, recorded on both.
7.16a reading here is contested

मेषादेश्चरभं स्थिरं द्वितनुभं गर्भाह्वयाः स्युश्चराः द्वारा स्युः स्थिरराशयो द्वितनुगा बाह्याः क्रमाद्राशयः । गर्भद्वारभयोस्ततस्त्वितरभे स्याद्दक्षिणे वामके हस्ते वस्तु विनिर्दिशेन्मुहुरिति स्यान्मुष्टिचिन्ताविधौ ॥ १६ ॥

meṣādeścarabhaṃ sthiraṃ dvitanubhaṃ garbhāhvayāḥ syuścarāḥ dvārā syuḥ sthirarāśayo dvitanugā bāhyāḥ kramādrāśayaḥ | garbhadvārabhayostatastvitarabhe syāddakṣiṇe vāmake haste vastu vinirdiśenmuhuriti syānmuṣṭicintāvidhau || 16 ||

From Aries onward, the movable sign, the fixed and the dual-bodied: the movable ones are called the womb, the fixed signs are the door, and the dual-bodied are the outer ones — the signs in that order. In the two signs, the womb and the door, and then in the other sign, the object should be pointed out again and again as being in the right hand or in the left ⟨respectively⟩ — such is the procedure of the question of the closed fist.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्च"; alternatives "श्व" — Read at 14x; the subscript body has an inner white notch (ca) rather than a closed bowl (va), but the scan is at its limit here. mesader carabham ('from Mesha, the movable sign') is also what Sastri's English states, so sca is right on both grounds.
7.17a reading here is contested

एवं मुष्टिगतस्य वस्तुन इह स्याद्ध्रस्वदीर्घादिकं राशेर्मानवशाद्भवेयुरथ तद्रूपादयस्त्वंशतः । राशिस्थग्रहसौम्यपापवशतस्तत्सौम्यपापत्वके भूम्याकाशजलाद्रिषु प्रसरणं तद्धातुकत्वादिकम् ॥ १७ ॥

evaṃ muṣṭigatasya vastuna iha syāddhrasvadīrghādikaṃ rāśermānavaśādbhaveyuratha tadrūpādayastvaṃśataḥ | rāśisthagrahasaumyapāpavaśatastatsaumyapāpatvake bhūmyākāśajalādriṣu prasaraṇaṃ taddhātukatvādikam || 17 ||

Thus, of the object held in the fist, its shortness or length and the like will follow here from the measure of the sign, and its form and the rest from the aṃśa. From the benefic or malefic character of the planets standing in the sign comes its own benefic or malefic character; and ⟨from them⟩ its spreading in earth, sky, water or mountain, and its being of that element and so on ⟨a published rendering turns this tail into 'whether it is cruel, wild, tame or domestic', which does not obviously answer to dhātuka; the divergence is one of sense, not of ink⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शाद्भवेयुर्"; alternatives "शाङ्घ्रवेयुर्" — The conjunct after sa-a is a stacked pair I read as d-bha, giving raser mana-vasad bhaveyuh ('they would arise according to the measure of the rasi'), which Sastri's English states. This line came back from the line finder as TWO bands (matras and bodies split); the reading is of the recombined line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्धातुकत्वादिकम्" — dhatuka- read with the ddha ligature. Sastri renders the pada's tail as 'whether it is cruel, wild, tame or domestic etc.', which does not obviously answer to dhatuka-; flagged as a place where witness and rendering diverge on sense, not on ink.
7.18a reading here is contested

पूर्वोक्तं ध्रुवमक्षहृत्कुनयनाग्न्यब्ध्यक्षशेषे क्रमान्नाडीवासरघस्रमासशरदस्तल्लब्धयुक्पञ्चधा । स्थाप्योऽसौ ध्रुवकः खतर्कखगुणाश्चार्कांभ्रषड्भिर्हृतस्तत्प्रस्तुतकावधिर्भवति तत्सर्वेषु कार्येष्वपि ॥ १८ ॥

pūrvoktaṃ dhruvamakṣahṛtkunayanāgnyabdhyakṣaśeṣe kramānnāḍīvāsaraghasramāsaśaradastallabdhayukpañcadhā | sthāpyo'sau dhruvakaḥ khatarkakhaguṇāścārkāṃbhraṣaḍbhirhṛtastatprastutakāvadhirbhavati tatsarveṣu kāryeṣvapi || 18 ||

The dhruvaka stated before, divided by akṣa ⟨the senses, five⟩; and when the remainder is one ⟨ku⟩, two ⟨nayana⟩, three ⟨agni⟩, four ⟨abdhi⟩ or five ⟨akṣa, that is, nothing left over⟩ — in order, the nāḍī, the weekday, the day, the month and the season, joined with the quotient obtained from that, fivefold. That dhruvaka is to be set down; and, divided by kha-tarka, kha-guṇa, arka and abhra-ṣaṭ ⟨number-words, read from the units: kha-tarka 60, kha-guṇa 30, arka 12, abhra-ṣaṭ 60⟩, it becomes the term of the matter proposed; and that holds in all matters likewise.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाःयहछ्य"; alternatives "नाग्न्यब्ध्य", "नाग्न्यब्धिशून्य" — UNRESOLVED, and it is a NUMBER, so the failure matters. The pada is a bhutasankhya list: aksa=5 is the divisor (aksa-hrt), ku=1 and nayana=2 are legible, and Sastri's English fixes the rest ('divided by 5. The remainder, if any one of the 1,2,3,4 or 0'), i.e. agni=3 and abdhi=4 and zero must follow. What the ink actually shows between -naa and -ksasese is a visarga-like pair of dots, a ya, a small ring, and a stacked conjunct - which I cannot resolve into those words at this resolution. Recorded as the shapes stand; do NOT take this string as the reading of the numbers. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ध्रुवमक्षहृत्कुनयनाग्न्यब्ध्यक्षशेषे क्रमान्नाडीवासरघस्रमासशरदस्तल्लब्धयुक्पञ्चधा; this sentence names नाःयहछ्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0097, line 26, printed folio 95, at about 4.29x native) saw the same shapes this note records between ना and क्षशेषे: a visarga-like pair of dots, a य, a small ring, then a stacked conjunct. That reading could not resolve them into words either. So our press does not set कुनयनाग्न्यब्ध्य; our mūla emends it on the arithmetic (कु 1, नयन 2, अग्नि 3, अब्धि 4, with अक्ष 5 the divisor) and on the machine reads of the two other printings.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽऽडी"; alternatives "नाडी", "घडी" — line-initial, continuing krama- from the previous pada; the opening body is not resolvable. The list that follows is legible and is a series of time units - vasara, ghasra, masa, sarad - which is what the fivefold division of the remainder is for. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ध्रुवमक्षहृत्कुनयनाग्न्यब्ध्यक्षशेषे क्रमान्नाडीवासरघस्रमासशरदस्तल्लब्धयुक्पञ्चधा; this sentence names ऽऽडी, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तल्लङ्घयुकपञ्चधा"; alternatives "तल्लब्धयुक्पञ्चधा" — UNRESOLVED tail; pancadha ('fivefold') is secure and matches the division by 5. This line too came back from the line finder as two bands. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ध्रुवमक्षहृत्कुनयनाग्न्यब्ध्यक्षशेषे क्रमान्नाडीवासरघस्रमासशरदस्तल्लब्धयुक्पञ्चधा; this sentence names तल्लङ्घयुकपञ्चधा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खतर्कखगुणाश्चार्कांभ्रषड्मंहृत" — UNRESOLVED RUN - the densest ink on the plate and another bhutasankhya string (kha=0, tarka=6, guna=3, arka=12, sad=6 are all number-words, so the run is arithmetic, not description). Recorded glyph by glyph as it stands; treat the whole run as unread, not as a reading. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads खतर्कखगुणाश्चार्कांभ्रषड्भिर्हृतस्तत्प्रस्तुतकावधिर्भवति; this sentence names खतर्कखगुणाश्चार्कांभ्रषड्मंहृत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the tail of this run is now read on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0097, line index 28, printed folio 95, at about 3.41x and 4.29x native) found two marks above the headline, exactly where षड्भिर् puts them: the ि hook of भि (56 px wide) and a repha over हृ (30 px, the size of the repha of र्क in खतर्क on the same line). The press sets षड्भिर्हृत, 'divided by six', as our mūla reads. The earlier transcription had merged the ि hook and भ into मं and lost the repha.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्तत्" — the line opens with the tail of a word broken at the previous pada (…-hrta- + -s tat), so its first akshara is not a word start.
7.19a reading here is contested

प्राग्वल्लग्नप्रकार्यपौ शुभखगौ सुस्थानगौ चेन्मिथो दृष्टौ तौ तु कयाचिदर्कलवतो दृष्ट्याधिकारत्रयात् । भावं भावपतिं च कारकमपीहालोच्य तत्तादृशं पूर्वोक्तावधितः फलं तु कथयेद्वा मध्यवर्तीवशात् ॥ १९ ॥

prāgvallagnaprakāryapau śubhakhagau susthānagau cenmitho dṛṣṭau tau tu kayācidarkalavato dṛṣṭyādhikāratrayāt | bhāvaṃ bhāvapatiṃ ca kārakamapīhālocya tattādṛśaṃ pūrvoktāvadhitaḥ phalaṃ tu kathayedvā madhyavartīvaśāt || 19 ||

As before, the lord of the lagna and the lord of the matter, being benefic sky-goers set in good places, if they mutually aspect one another by some degree of the Sun — then, from the three authorities of aspect, and having weighed here the bhāva, the lord of the bhāva and the kāraka too, of that same kind, one should declare the fruit from the term stated before, or according to the middling one ⟨our mula now reads कथयेद्वा, 'one should declare', emended from यथयेद्वा, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave; यथयेत् is no Sanskrit verb⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राग्वल्लग्नप्रकार्यपौ"; alternatives "प्राग्वल्लग्नप्रश्नकार्यपौ" — Read akshara by akshara from below-headline column runs at 9-12x: pra-a | g-va | l-la | g-na | pra | kaa | r-ya | pau. The sense-driven alternative praagvallagna-PRASHNA-kaaryapau is REJECTED on metre, not on ink: this is Shaarduulavikriiditam and prashna adds a 20th syllable, whereas the reading given scans exactly (H H H L L H L H L L L H H H L H H L H). Recorded as the plate prints it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्य (repha over ya, not anusvara)"; alternatives "यं" — The superscript over the ya in -kaaryapau is a filled blob with a descending tail, measured 29x31px; the certain anusvara over BHAAVAM on line 12 measures 19x15px in the same fount and size. Twice the linear size and tailed: repha, not anusvara. Measurement given because at low magnification the two are indistinguishable here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यथयेद्वा"; alternatives "कथयेद्वा" — PRINTED AS RECORDED, and it is an error of the edition. The first letter of this word and the third (the one carrying the e-matra) are the SAME letterform on the plate at 11x - the ya form, a '2'-shaped left arm closing on the stem. Set beside the certain KA of kaaraka- on line 12 (orig. x968-1048) the two are plainly different letters: ka has the crossbar and hooked stem, this has neither. So the plate reads ya-tha-yed-vaa where the sense (and 'may be divined' in the facing rendering) requires ka-tha-yed-vaa. Metre cannot arbitrate - both are light-light-heavy. NOT emended. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कथयेद्वा for यथयेद्वा, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0098, line index 12, printed folio 96, at about 4.0x native) confirmed the letterform test in this note. The first and third akṣaras are one form, and it is the य of कयाचिद् two lines above, not the क beside it in that word. So the press sets यथयेद्वा, and our कथयेद्वा is an emendation of the edition's own error, made on the lexicon: यथयेद् is not a Sanskrit verb.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्यवर्तीवशात्"; alternatives "मध्यवर्तिवशात्" — Long ii: the stroke after -rt- is a full-height vertical with the top curl turning right, and syllable 17 of the pada must be heavy, which a short i would not give. Both tests agree on dirgha ii.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १९ ॥" — Verse number: two glyphs between double dandas, spaced. The first has a small, nearly filled bowl with a zigzag tail (Devanagari 1); the second an open ring with a longer swept tail (Devanagari 9). Ground truth for the sequence: the preceding plate's verses close 16, 17, 18, so 19 is expected AND is what the glyphs draw - but the glyph shapes were read first and the sequence used only as confirmation.

Adhyāya 8 · विविधफलपद्धतौ प्रकीर्णखण्डः — Miscellaneous

8.1a reading here is contested

गर्भाधानमतीव पुत्रशुभदं ब्रह्मेन्दुपूर्वत्रये रौद्रत्रीणि करादिपञ्चकहरित्रीण्युत्तराख्यत्रये । भद्रापूर्णजयासु शोभनगृहेऽप्यष्टम्यमापूर्णिमा हित्वार्यंन्युजयोर्भृगोः शशिदिने स्याल्लग्नशुद्धौ तथा ॥ १ ॥

garbhādhānamatīva putraśubhadaṃ brahmendupūrvatraye raudratrīṇi karādipañcakaharitrīṇyuttarākhyatraye | bhadrāpūrṇajayāsu śobhanagṛhe'pyaṣṭamyamāpūrṇimā hitvāryaṃnyujayorbhṛgoḥ śaśidine syāllagnaśuddhau tathā || 1 ||

The garbhādhāna ⟨the rite of impregnation; an eye reading of the plate gave गर्भधान, and our mūla reads गर्भाधान because the metre needs a heavy second syllable⟩ is exceedingly a giver of good sons in the three beginning with Brahmā's star ⟨Rohiṇī⟩ and the Moon's ⟨Mṛgaśiras⟩; in the three of Rudra; in the five beginning with Hasta; in the three of Hari ⟨Śravaṇa, Dhaniṣṭhā, Śatabhiṣaj⟩; and in the three called Uttarā. In the Bhadrā, Pūrṇā and Jayā ⟨tithis⟩, and in an auspicious house, excluding the eighth tithi, the new moon and the full moon; ⟨here the reading is not established: over the base य stand both a repha and an anusvāra, and the sequence that results is not Sanskrit that can be construed⟩; on the day of Bhṛgu ⟨Venus⟩ and on the Moon's day ⟨the akṣara before -शिदिने is unsettled — a headline, an isolated dot beneath its left end, a curl and a short tail below the baseline; it is not a clean श, and only शि, दि and ने are secure⟩, and likewise when the lagna is pure.

12 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गर्भधान"; alternatives "गर्भाधान" — PRINTED WITHOUT THE AA-MATRA ON BHA, and that is a metrical fault, so it is probably a dropped sort. Below-headline column runs: ga 577-636, bha 649-704, dha 713-766, aa-matra 777-794, na 802-853 - the only aa-vertical in the group belongs to dha, and bha carries nothing but the repha above it. Syllable 2 of a Shaarduulavikriiditam pada must be heavy; garbha-dhaana makes it light, garbhaa-dhaana (garbha + aadhaana) makes it heavy and is the expected word. NOT emended. Note the same word is oddly set on the next plate too (recorded there with an anusvara), so the fault may be the compositor's habit rather than a one-off. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गर्भाधानमतीव for गर्भधानमतीव, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0098, line index 31, printed folio 96, at about 4.9x native) confirmed what this note describes. The press sets गर्भधान, with no ā-mātrā on भ: the gap between भ and ध is 8 px wide, where the word's own ā-mātrā takes 18 px. So our गर्भाधान is an emendation of the edition's own setting, made on the metre.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हरि (in -pañcakaharitriiṇi)"; alternatives "द्वरि" — The letter between ka and ri looked like a d-va conjunct at page scale; at 12x it is a single letter with a rounded upper-left bowl and a bottom hook, i.e. ha. Two independent checks agree: the metre requires a light 11th syllable (ha, not the heavy dva), and the sense fits exactly - Hari is Vishnu, lord of Shravana, and 'the three from Hari's asterism' is Shravana, Dhanishtha, Shatabhishaj, which is precisely the run the facing page's English gives.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — SINGLE danda and NO number: this is the first half only of Section 8's stanza 1. The second half and the closing double danda with the numeral stand at the head of the next plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भद्रा"; alternatives "मद्रा" — p99 L2: first akshara read at 11x; left member shows an open bottom with a mid-height bar joining the stem (bha), not the closed bowl of ma. Same form recurs in shobhana later in this line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जयातु"; alternatives "ज्ञयातु" — p99 L2: ja confirmed at 11x against the ja in yojaya-. Read as bhadra-purna-jaya (the tithi classes) + tu. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भद्रापूर्णजयासु for भद्रापूर्णाजयातु, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0099, line index 1, printed folio 97, at about 4.4x native) found that the press sets भद्रापूर्णाजयातु, with an ā-mātrā after र्ण and तु at the end, as this note read it. Our भद्रापूर्णजयासु is an emendation. With the press's णा, syllable 4 of pāda 3 is heavy where the metre wants it light, and the locative plural जयासु is what 'in the Bhadrā, Pūrṇā and Jayā tithis' needs.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽप्यहन्यदा"; alternatives "ऽप्यह्न्यदा", "ऽप्यहन्यमा" — p99 L2: the four aksharas after the avagraha (ha / nya / da / a-matra) are individually legible but the word division is not established; the English opposite avoids the phrase. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शोभनगृहेऽप्यष्टम्यमापूर्णिमा for शोभनगृहेऽप्यहन्यदापूर्णिमा, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: this note is wrong that the English opposite avoids the phrase. A machine read of the edition's own English on this leaf (store page_0099 lines 12-13) gives 'The Tithis to be avoided are: Ashtami, Purnima and Amavasya', which is अष्टमी + अमा + पूर्णिमा governed by हित्वा. That, with the metre, fixed our reading. Re-read by eye at about 4.7x native, the three akṣaras still could not be separated between हन्यदा and ष्टम्यमा, and that question is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्यं"; alternatives "र्य", "र्कं", "र्धं" — p99 L3: base read as ya at 6.5x; ABOVE it two distinct marks - an elongated slanted stroke (repha, per the calibration below) and a small round blob (anusvara). The resulting sequence is not Sanskrit I can construe; see concerns.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्"; alternatives "-", "त्" — p99 L3: printed as an isolated two-stroke sort below headline level (an upper bar + a lower bar whose right end turns down). The SAME sort appears on this page in vibudhas-[X]-masi (L21), where the required reading is tan-masi, i.e. half-na. Identified as न् on that evidence, not on its own shape.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भृगोः"; alternatives "मृगोः" — p99 L3: base under the repha could be bha or ma at 5x; bhrgoh (Venus) fits the English 'week-days of Jupiter, Mercury, Venus and the Moon' opposite. NOT settled on the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शशिदिने"; alternatives "ऋशिदिने", "क्षशिदिने" — p99 L3: the akshara before -shi-di-ne is UNSETTLED at 11x - a headline, an isolated dot beneath its left end, a curl and a short below-baseline tail. It is not a clean sha. I do not claim this reading; only shi/di/ne are secure.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याल्लग्नशुद्धौ"; alternatives "स्वाल्लग्नशुद्धौ" — p99 L3: sya vs sva at 7x; syal (< syat + l-) is grammatical and the English reads 'in an auspicious Lagna'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १ ॥"; alternatives "। ः १ ॥", "।ः१ ॥" — p99 L3: the OPENING mark is not a clean double danda. At 5x it is one full-height stroke followed by a second stroke BROKEN into an upper tick and a lower tick with a gap between - it reads like a danda plus a visarga. Recorded as printed shape, not normalised. The numeral is 1 (loop over a descending tail) and the closing double danda is clean.
8.2a reading here is contested

स्त्रीपुंसोः प्रथमो निषेक उदितः संभोगआद्यार्तवे गर्भाधानमिति ब्रुवन्ति विबुधास्तन्मासि मास्येव हि । हस्तस्वात्यनुराधमूलवरुणश्रीशप्रजेशोत्तरास्वन्त्ये चैव निषेक उत्तम इति प्राग्वच्च शुद्धादिकम् ॥ २ ॥

strīpuṃsoḥ prathamo niṣeka uditaḥ saṃbhogaādyārtave garbhādhānamiti bruvanti vibudhāstanmāsi māsyeva hi | hastasvātyanurādhamūlavaruṇaśrīśaprajeśottarāsvantye caiva niṣeka uttama iti prāgvacca śuddhādikam || 2 ||

The first insemination of a woman and a man is declared to be at the first menstruation after union; the wise call it garbhādhāna ⟨our mūla now reads गर्भाधान, the name of the rite⟩ — in that very month, and month by month. In Hasta, Svātī, Anurādhā, Mūla, Varuṇa's star ⟨Śatabhiṣaj⟩, Śrīśa's, Prajeśa's, the Uttarās, and in the last ⟨Revatī⟩, the insemination is excellent; and the purity and the rest are as stated before.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संभोगआद्यार्तवे"; alternatives "संभोगाद्यार्तवे" — p99 L16: ga and the independent aa are set as SEPARATE aksharas - the un-sandhied hiatus is what is printed; not normalised. The r of -artave is a repha: at 8x it is an elongated near-vertical stroke, distinct from the small round anusvara dot seen in pumsoh on the same line. This pair is my calibration for repha vs anusvara throughout.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गर्भांधानमिति"; alternatives "गर्भाधानमिति" — p99 L17: above the second akshara there is an arc-with-dot rather than the plain elongated repha stroke used elsewhere on this page. Recorded with the anusvara because that is the extra ink present; the word wanted is garbhadhanam. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गर्भाधानमिति; this sentence names गर्भांधानमिति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विबुधास्तन्मासि" — p99 L17: the न् here is the same isolated two-stroke sort discussed at L3. This is the occurrence that identifies it: tat + masi -> tan-masi requires a half-na exactly here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वात्य"; alternatives "खात्य" — p99 L18: the sva ligature in this fount closely resembles kha. Read sva; confirmed by the same sort opening L19 (svantye < uttarasu + antye).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अनुराध"; alternatives "अनुराघ" — p99 L18: dha vs gha - the akshara is cut at my crop edge; the visible left member is open below (dha) rather than closed (gha), but this is a 3x reading.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वरुण"; alternatives "दस्र", "दस्रण" — p99 L18: read at 12x - va (bowl + right stem), ru (ra with the u-curl below), na. At 3x it read 'dasra'; the 12x reading overturns that. Varuna = Satabhisha, which is exactly what the English opposite lists at this position.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "–" — p99 L18: the line ENDS with a hyphen; the word uttara- runs on into L19. Devanagari word-breaking with a hyphen, as the briefing said.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वन्त्ये"; alternatives "खन्त्ये" — p99 L19: continues uttara- from L18; uttarasu + antye -> uttarasvantye. Antya (the last) = Revati, the last nakshatra the English lists.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ २ ॥" — p99 L19: numeral 2 confirmed against the 'Sloka-2.' locator that follows. Both dandas clean here, unlike L3.
8.3a reading here is contested

या नारी सुतनुः कुचोन्नतयुताप्याषोडशाब्दं रजो दृष्टं नो यदि शोभने च दिवसे तां संनिवेश्यादरात् । रम्ये चास्तरणे सिताम्बरयुतां स्वर्णादिभिर्भूषितां पंनीरादिमिलत्सुकुङ्कुमरजोलिप्ताङ्गजातालयाम् ॥ ३ ॥

yā nārī sutanuḥ kuconnatayutāpyāṣoḍaśābdaṃ rajo dṛṣṭaṃ no yadi śobhane ca divase tāṃ saṃniveśyādarāt | ramye cāstaraṇe sitāmbarayutāṃ svarṇādibhirbhūṣitāṃ paṃnīrādimilatsukuṅkumarajoliptāṅgajātālayām || 3 ||

Whatever woman is slender of body and full-breasted, and yet has not seen her menses up to her sixteenth year — her, on an auspicious day, one should respectfully seat upon a beautiful spread, clothed in white garments, adorned with gold and the rest ⟨printed स्वर्णादिनिर्भूषितां: the akṣara after -दि- is न, whose joining bar sits at the foot, and not भ, whose bar sits at mid height with an open bottom — so the page prints नि where the sense wants -भिर्-, and this looks like a compositor's error and not a misreading⟩, her limbs and hair smeared with rose-water and the like mingled with saffron powder.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षोडशाब्दं"; alternatives "पोडशाब्दं" — p99 L29: read at 15x - the akshara carries a closed counter and a below-baseline tail (sa), not the plain open bowl of pa. At 6.5x it read 'po'. shodasha = 16, and the English opposite reads '16th summer'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — p99 L30: hemistich closes with a SINGLE danda and no number, as expected at the half-verse.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वर्णादिनिर्भूषितां"; alternatives "स्वर्णादिभिर्भूषितां" — p99 L31: read at 8x. The akshara after -di- is NA (the connecting bar sits at the BOTTOM, joining to the right stem) and not BHA (whose bar sits at mid height with an open bottom). So the page prints ni- where the sense wants -bhir-. Recorded as printed; this looks like a compositor's error, not my misreading. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads स्वर्णादिभिर्भूषितां for स्वर्णादिनिर्भूषितां, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0099, line 29, printed folio 97, at about 3.0x native) confirmed this note. The akṣara after -दि- joins at the foot to its right stem, which is न, and it differs from the भ of -र्भू- beside it. So the press sets स्वर्णादिनिर्भूषितां, and our स्वर्णादिभिर्भूषितां repairs the compositor's error on the lexicon: निर्भूषित means unadorned.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पंनीरा"; alternatives "पन्नीरा" — p99 L32: printed with an anusvara over pa, not a conjunct nna. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पंनीरादिमिलत्सुकुङ्कुमरजोलिप्ताङ्गजातालयाम् for पंनीरादिमिलत्कुङ्कुमरजोलिप्ताङ्गजातालयाम्, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0099, line 30, printed folio 97, at about 3.0x native) found nothing between the virāma of -लत् and the कु of कुङ्कुम: the press sets मिलत्कुङ्कुम, with no सु. Our सु is an emendation on the metre. As the press sets it, pāda 4 counts eighteen syllables against the śārdūlavikrīḍita's nineteen, and सु falls as a light syllable at position 7, where the pattern wants one. Of the two other printings, only the machine read of uk-ps-sastri gives सु.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३ ॥" — p99 L32: numeral 3 confirmed against the 'Sloka-3.' locator that follows.
8.4a reading here is contested

कृत्वा पुष्पवतीमिव त्रिदिवसं नीत्वा चतुर्थे दिने स्नातां तां वरयेत्पतिः शुभगृहे शुद्धे सुते पूर्ववत् । एवं चेदचिरात्सतीनमुखकृत्स्यात्पुष्पिणी पुत्रिणी संभोगाखिलदैवपैतृकमहाकर्मार्हतां सा त्वियात् ॥ ४ ॥

kṛtvā puṣpavatīmiva tridivasaṃ nītvā caturthe dine snātāṃ tāṃ varayetpatiḥ śubhagṛhe śuddhe sute pūrvavat | evaṃ cedacirātsatīnamukhakṛtsyātpuṣpiṇī putriṇī saṃbhogākhiladaivapaitṛkamahākarmārhatāṃ sā tviyāt || 4 ||

Having treated her as though she were in her courses, and having let three days pass, on the fourth day, when she has bathed, the husband should choose her — in an auspicious house and with the 5th ⟨suta⟩ pure, as before. If it is so done, she soon becomes one who flowers and who bears sons; and she attains worthiness for all the great works of the gods and of the ancestors that belong to union ⟨our mula now reads कर्मार्हतां सा त्वियात्, अर्हतां … तु इयात्, 'she would attain worthiness', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रि"; alternatives "लि" — the ligature is set in a loop-form that at first sight reads as ल. Settled against the same plate: identical sort appears in द्वित्रिचतुष्पदेषु (v.5 pada d, where 1-2-3-4 padas are certain from the English) and differs from the ल of कालम (v.5 pada c), whose curl sits lower and stays open. This fount also carries a SECOND, modern-shaped त्र sort, used in पुत्रिणी on this same plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रिणी" — here त्र is the modern-shaped sort (bowl plus descending diagonal), NOT the loop-form used in line 7. Recorded because two त्र sorts in one verse is a fact about the fount that a lower-resolution reader would miss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रियात्"; alternatives "क्रियात्" — loop-form ligature, identical to the त्र of त्रिदिवसं and द्वित्रि on this plate, so as printed it is त्रियात्. Flagged because the sense the English gives (she gains the right to perform / partake in the family rites) would want क्रियात्; if this is a wrong sort it is a compositor's error, not a reading of mine. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्वियात्; this sentence names त्रियात्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0100, line 9, at about 2.7x and 4.0x native) and measured, and it refutes this reading. The ligature encloses a closed व-bowl, a 110 px counter, like the त्व of कृत्वा at the head of line 6 (114 px). The loop-form त्र of त्रिदिवसं and द्वित्रि encloses none. So the press prints त्वियात्, तु + इयात्, 'she would attain', which gives the sense this note wanted. The mūla now reads it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कर्माहितां"; alternatives "कर्मार्हितां" — a repha is clearly present over the म of कर्मा; a second superscript mark sits over the following हि and I could not decide whether it is a repha or ink from the line above. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads संभोगाखिलदैवपैतृकमहाकर्मार्हतां; this sentence names कर्माहितां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0100, line 9, at about 2.7x and 4.0x native) and measured. The second superscript is a repha, the same sort and size as the first (30x45 px and 34x45 px, against 32x43 px for the repha over ऽर्द्ध on store page 94). No ि stem is printed: the only vertical between म and ह is the ā-bar of मा. So the press prints कर्मार्हतां, महाकर्म + अर्हतां, and the mūla now reads it.]
8.5a reading here is contested

सार्पे तत्पितृभे भवेद्यदि जनिः संप्रोच्यते तत्फलं भौजङ्गे धनसोदराम्बजनकारिष्टं तदन्ते शिशोः । रुद्रे कालमथान्तकं च विधिवन्मृत्युं समभ्यर्चयेदेकद्वित्रिचतुष्पदेषु पितृभे व्यस्तं समस्तं भवेत् ॥ ५ ॥

sārpe tatpitṛbhe bhavedyadi janiḥ saṃprocyate tatphalaṃ bhaujaṅge dhanasodarāmbajanakāriṣṭaṃ tadante śiśoḥ | rudre kālamathāntakaṃ ca vidhivanmṛtyuṃ samabhyarcayedekadvitricatuṣpadeṣu pitṛbhe vyastaṃ samastaṃ bhavet || 5 ||

If the birth falls in Sārpa ⟨Āśleṣā⟩ or in the ancestors' star ⟨Maghā⟩, the fruit of it is declared: in Bhaujaṅga ⟨the serpent's star, Āśleṣā⟩, misfortune to wealth, brother, mother and father, at the end of that, for the child ⟨our mula now reads भौजङ्गे and जनकारिष्टं where our earlier text had two unread akṣaras in each, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩. One should duly worship Rudra, and Kāla, and Antaka, and Mṛtyu. In the ancestors' star, in one, two, three or four pādas, it is separate or entire.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भे"; alternatives "मे" — checked at 30x against the म of समस्तं and the भ of भवेत् in pada d: the left element is angular and open at the foot, not the closed loop of म. Read भ (pitr-bha = Magha).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[?][?]े"; alternatives "ज्ञज्ञे", "ङ्घे", "ज्झे" — aksharas 2 and 3 of the pada. Akshara 2 is a ज-like body with a descender; akshara 3 is a conjunct carrying an e-matra. Neither resolves at 9x on a 2900px scan; this is genuine ink ambiguity in a tightly-set conjunct, not scan limitation. [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0100, line 20, at about 3.5x, 4.5x and 5.0x native) and measured against this press's own sorts. The two akṣaras are clean type, not damaged ink. The first is ज (0.90-0.94 against three ज of the press, 0.61 against two ञ). The second is ङ्ग with the e-mātrā above (0.92-0.96 against four ङ्ग, 0.63-0.65 against two ङ्घ). So the press prints भौजङ्गे, and the mūla now reads it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[?][?]ं"; alternatives "ग्निं", "हानिं", "रिणं", "हुं" — the two aksharas closing the long compound after जनका. First is a pre-posed i-matra over a ग-like body; second carries an anusvara above and what looks like a u-matra stroke below a closed bowl. Metre (Sardulavikridita, 19 syllables, the metre the text names for itself at Sloka-3) admits an 11-syllable dhanasodaramba+X compound, which fits a two-syllable ending; the ink shows a u-matra, which -haniM does not have. Left unsettled rather than guessed. [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0100, line 20, at about 3.5x, 4.5x and 5.0x native) and measured against this press's own sorts. The two akṣaras are clean type: रि, the i-mātrā hooked over र (0.84-0.89 against four रि), and then ष with ट beneath it and the anusvāra above (0.94 against the ष्टं of शिष्टं, 0.73 against the णं of प्रसरणं). So the press prints जनकारिष्टं, and the mūla now reads it. With it pāda 2 scans a flawless śārdūlavikrīḍita of 19.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "म्ब"; alternatives "स्ब" — the conjunct before ज is smudged at its foot. [2026-09-23: on the plate reading of jp2 page_0100, line 20 (about 3.5x native), the leaf sets अम्ब, with म्ब as this note reads it and no u-mātrā below: 0 dark px under म्ब on the master, against 321 under the रु of रुद्रे on the next line. The mūla reads अम्ब. The machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin give अम्बु, and that reading is on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "देक"; alternatives "दे क", "द्येक" — printed with a word space after देक. Given पादेषु/एक sense and the run-on dash ending pada c, this is very likely the tail of the previous word plus एक ('one'), i.e. ...दे + एकद्वित्रिचतुष्पदेषु, but the ink shows the space where I have shown it and I have not moved it. [2026-09-23: the gap after देक was measured on the master (jp2 page_0100, line 22, seen at about 2.2x native). It is 13 px of clear column, against 46-47 px for each of the four word spaces on that line; gaps between akṣaras inside a word on this leaf run 3-14 px. So the press sets no word space, and एकद्वित्रिचतुष्पदेषु is joined, as this note's own reading of the sense expected. The printer's line-break hyphen after समभ्यर्चये was removed on 2026-09-23 (T44), and the mūla now reads समभ्यर्चयेदेकद्वित्रिचतुष्पदेषु.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भे"; alternatives "मे" — same test as line 20; angular open foot, read भ.
8.6a reading here is contested

तद्वच्छक्रसुरद्विषोः फलमिदं पूषाश्विनोरप्यथो युग्मेषु त्रिषु चान्तिमादिमघटी गण्डान्तराळाभिधा । तत्र स्याद्यदि जन्मकालसदनं गच्छेच्छिशुः सत्वरं नो चेत्स्यादसमानवीर्यनृपतिर्निःशेषभूपालकः ॥ ६ ॥

tadvacchakrasuradviṣoḥ phalamidaṃ pūṣāśvinorapyatho yugmeṣu triṣu cāntimādimaghaṭī gaṇḍāntarāḷābhidhā | tatra syādyadi janmakālasadanaṃ gacchecchiśuḥ satvaraṃ no cetsyādasamānavīryanṛpatirniḥśeṣabhūpālakaḥ || 6 ||

Likewise this same fruit for Śakra's star ⟨Jyeṣṭhā⟩ and the gods' enemy's ⟨Mūla⟩, and for Pūṣan's ⟨Revatī⟩ and the Aśvins' ⟨Aśvinī⟩ as well. And in the three pairs, the last ghaṭī and the first are called gaṇḍa and antarāḷa. If the birth falls there, the child goes swiftly to the abode of Kāla ⟨death; our mūla now reads जन्म followed by कालसदनं, 'Death's house'⟩; and if not, he becomes a king of unequalled might, the protector of the whole earth.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्छ"; alternatives "च्च" — the doubled element after तद्व is smudged where the two bodies touch; read च्छ (tadvat + sakra sandhi) but the second body's ring is not separately visible.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विषोः"; alternatives "द्विपोः" — the penultimate consonant is inked heavily; ष and प differ here only in the left bowl, and the bowl is filled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ळा"; alternatives "ला" — retroflex ḷa; the body carries the extra lower stroke that separates ळ from ल at this magnification. Recorded as ळ.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मदनँ"; alternatives "मदनं", "सदनं", "मथनं" — TWO separate doubts on one akshara group. (a) the superscript mark over the final न is a candrabindu-shaped hook, not the clean round anusvara dot used elsewhere on this plate - it may be a broken anusvara sort. (b) the first consonant m/s: I read म, but the sense the English gives (the child would soon go to its death) fits neither madana nor sadana, so one of these letters is likely a compositor's substitution. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जन्मकालसदनं; this sentence names मदनँ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्य"; alternatives "वीर्थ" — a repha is certain over this akshara; the body beneath reads य to me but its lower bowl is filled and थ is not excluded.
8.7a reading here is contested

गण्डान्ते च रजस्वला यदि भवेद्वैधव्यमाप्नोत्यरं सापत्यार्थसुखाम्बरैर्विरहिता पित्रोः कुलघ्नी खला । कल्पोक्त्या जपहोमखेचरमखाद्भूदेवदेवार्चनाच्छान्तिं यात्यचिरात्समस्तसुखकृत्सौभाग्यपुत्रान्विता ॥ ७ ॥

gaṇḍānte ca rajasvalā yadi bhavedvaidhavyamāpnotyaraṃ sāpatyārthasukhāmbarairvirahitā pitroḥ kulaghnī khalā | kalpoktyā japahomakhecaramakhādbhūdevadevārcanācchāntiṃ yātyacirātsamastasukhakṛtsaubhāgyaputrānvitā || 7 ||

And if a girl comes to her courses at a gaṇḍānta, she quickly attains widowhood; bereft of offspring, of wealth, of comfort and of garments, she is a destroyer of her parents' family, and wicked. By japa, by homa, by the sacrifice to the sky-goers as told in the kalpa, and by the worship of brahmins and of the gods, she attains peace before long, becomes a maker of every comfort, and is endowed with good fortune and with sons.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सान्तत्या"; alternatives "सन्तत्या", "सान्पत्या" — first akshara appears to carry an a-matra vertical (सा) where the sense wants स; and the following conjunct's first member reads न्त to me but its crossbar is heavy enough that न्प cannot be ruled out. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सापत्यार्थसुखाम्बरैर्विरहिता, सा + अपत्य, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0101, line 15, printed folio 99, at about 3.5x native) agrees with this note. The press sets सा, then a conjunct whose first member is a reduced न, then त्या: it matches the न्त of गण्डान्ते on the line above, not the plain प of पित्रोः. Its second member reads closer to प than to त, but it is not settled. Neither सान्तत्या nor सान्पत्या is a Sanskrit word, so our सापत्या is an emendation of the exemplar, made on the lexicon, which both other printings' machine reads support. What the compositor set is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घ्नी"; alternatives "ध्नी" — kulaghni: the aspirate's left bowl is inked solid.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुख"; alternatives "सुख" — IMPORTANT and cross-plate. The ink reads म; the English claim for this pada is 'bring happiness', which wants सुख. The identical spelling मुखकृत् appears on plate 100 (verse 4 pada c, सतीनमुखकृत्स्यात्) in the same position and again against an English claim about happiness/comfort. Two independent occurrences reading म is either a genuine reading of this edition or the same compositor's substitution twice; it is NOT a reading error of mine, and it is the sort of thing a claim-level comparison against this witness must be warned about. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads समस्तसुखकृत् for समस्तमुखकृत्, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar at about 3.5x native confirmed the ink: the akṣara is म with the u-mātrā here (jp2 page_0101, line 17, printed folio 99) and at 8.4 (jp2 page_0100, line 8, printed folio 98). The inference from the two places does not hold. At 8.4 the machine reads of both other printings also give मुखकृत्. At 8.7 both give सुखकृत् against our press alone; the Bhasin Hindi ṭīkā glosses the line with सुख, and a machine read of the edition's own English on this leaf gives 'bring happiness and luck'. So our 8.7 reads सुखकृत्, and 8.4 keeps मुखकृत्; the two verses are not to be made to match.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रा" — here त्र is the MODERN sort again, as in त्रिषु line 3.
8.8a reading here is contested

त्याज्योत्पन्नघटी चतुष्टयफलं वक्ष्ये रजोजन्मनोस्तातघ्नं जननीहरं धनहरं चात्मक्षयं यच्छति । रुद्रं चान्तकमग्निहोत्रमथ तं मृत्युं च संपूजयेत् सूर्येन्दुग्रहणोद्भवो यदि पितुर्मातुर्विनाशं क्रमात् ॥ ८ ॥

tyājyotpannaghaṭī catuṣṭayaphalaṃ vakṣye rajojanmanostātaghnaṃ jananīharaṃ dhanaharaṃ cātmakṣayaṃ yacchati | rudraṃ cāntakamagnihotramatha taṃ mṛtyuṃ ca saṃpūjayet sūryendugrahaṇodbhavo yadi piturmāturvināśaṃ kramāt || 8 ||

I shall declare the fruit of the four ghaṭīs to be shunned, arising at the onset of the menses: it yields the slaying of the father, the carrying off of the mother, the carrying off of wealth, and the destruction of the self. One should worship Rudra, and Antaka, and the Agnihotra, and then Mṛtyu. And if it arises during an eclipse of the Sun or of the Moon, ⟨it means⟩ the destruction of the father or of the mother, in that order.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घ्नं"; alternatives "ग्नं" — tata-ghnam: the aspirate bar of घ is present but faint at 3.4x; ग not excluded.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "होत्र"; alternatives "होल" — settled: the glyph after हो is the LOOP-form त्र sort (identical to त्रिदिवसं / द्वित्रि on plate 100), not ल. A reader who had not calibrated the two त्र sorts would transcribe this as अग्निहोलम्, a non-word. Recorded as अग्निहोत्रम्.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितुर्मातुर्"; alternatives "पितुमांतुर्" — two repha marks, one over मा and one over the following त; at 3.4x both are the slanted repha hook and not anusvara dots. Read पितुर्मातुर्.
8.9a reading here is contested

शस्तं चामृतनाडिकासु रचितं दिव्यौषधं प्राशितं तत्पीयूषसमं ज्वरामयहरं दोषत्रयघ्नं तदा । आरोग्यपदमिन्द्रियस्फुटकरं चायुःप्रदं भेषजं कार्यं तद्बहुधा जगाद भगवान्धन्वन्तरिश्चाब्धिजः ॥ ९ ॥

śastaṃ cāmṛtanāḍikāsu racitaṃ divyauṣadhaṃ prāśitaṃ tatpīyūṣasamaṃ jvarāmayaharaṃ doṣatrayaghnaṃ tadā | ārogyapadamindriyasphuṭakaraṃ cāyuḥpradaṃ bheṣajaṃ kāryaṃ tadbahudhā jagāda bhagavāndhanvantariścābdhijaḥ || 9 ||

A divine medicine prepared in the amṛta nāḍikās and then swallowed is commended: it is at that time the equal of nectar, it takes away fever and disease, and it destroys the three doṣas. A medicine that establishes health, that makes the senses clear, and that gives long life is what should be made — so the blessed Dhanvantari, born of the ocean, declared in many ways.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रय"; alternatives "त्नय" — the त्र of dosha-traya is set in the MODERN sort here; its diagonal is thin and at 1.2x could be taken for a subscript न. Checked at higher magnification against the loop sort - it is the modern त्र.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घ्नं"; alternatives "ग्नं" — aspirate bar present but ink-filled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धन्वन्तरिश्चा"; alternatives "धन्वन्तरीश्चा" — the ri/ri-dirgha of Dhanvantari: the vertical after the र is short and I read short i, but the sort's top serif is chipped.
8.10a reading here is contested

आषष्ट्यब्दमपुत्रको यदि तदा तज्जन्मपत्रादिभिश्चेदल्पायुरिति स्वजन्मखचरैर्ज्ञाते तदिच्छाब्दके । आयुष्मन्तमपीह कीर्तितनयप्रज्ञादिवृद्ध्यन्वितं ज्ञात्वा सर्वविधैः सुतं शुभदिने प्राह्णे च सौम्यायने । १० ॥

āṣaṣṭyabdamaputrako yadi tadā tajjanmapatrādibhiścedalpāyuriti svajanmakhacarairjñāte tadicchābdake | āyuṣmantamapīha kīrtitanayaprajñādivṛddhyanvitaṃ jñātvā sarvavidhaiḥ sutaṃ śubhadine prāhṇe ca saumyāyane | 10 ||

If a man is without a son up to his sixtieth year ⟨our mūla now reads आषष्ट्यब्दम्, with the subscript य⟩; and then, by his birth-chart and the rest, and by the planets of his own nativity, it is known that ⟨a son of his⟩ would be short-lived — then in the year he wishes, having ascertained by every means that the son is long-lived and endowed with growth in fame, in offspring, in wisdom and the rest, on an auspicious day, in the forenoon, and in the northern course —

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आषष्टयब्दम्"; alternatives "आषष्ट्यब्दम्" — the य is set as a FULL akshara after the ष्ट conjunct, not as the subscript य that a-shashty-abdam ('up to the sixtieth year') requires. Recorded as printed; at 4x the य carries its own sirorekha segment and is not fused. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads आषष्ट्यब्दमपुत्रको for आषष्टयब्दमपुत्रको, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्र" — MODERN त्र sort here, as in पत्रा later in the same line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदिच्छाब्दके"; alternatives "तद्रिच्छाब्दके", "तत्रिच्छाब्दके" — the akshara under the pre-posed i-matra carries a single descending hook. At 4x that hook matches the द of दिने on plate 100 rather than the closed loop of the loop-form त्र; read दि. Flagged because द, द्र and the loop-त्र all descend below the baseline in this fount and are the commonest confusion in it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृद्ध्यन्वितं"; alternatives "वृद्व्यन्वितं" — the stacked द्ध्य is three tiers deep and its middle tier is ink-filled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राह्ने"; alternatives "प्राह्णे" — the subscript nasal under ह: dental न vs retroflex ण. The subscript's right limb is filled; I read न but ण is the form the sense ('forenoon', prahne/prahne) would also admit. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्राह्णे; this sentence names प्राह्ने, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
8.11a reading here is contested

नाडीकूटमुखार्णवादिसहितं तं स्वीयगोत्रोद्भवं स्वीकुर्यादनिलादितीज्यविधिमित्रार्कान्त्यभेष्वादिभे । दैत्यारित्रयभोत्तरासु च खलैर्लग्ने सुते वर्जिते ताराचन्द्रबलान्विते शुभखगैर्युक्तेक्षिते चोदये ॥ ११ ॥

nāḍīkūṭamukhārṇavādisahitaṃ taṃ svīyagotrodbhavaṃ svīkuryādanilāditījyavidhimitrārkāntyabheṣvādibhe | daityāritrayabhottarāsu ca khalairlagne sute varjite tārācandrabalānvite śubhakhagairyuktekṣite codaye || 11 ||

— he should take to himself one born in his own gotra, agreeing in the nāḍī, the kūṭa, the mukha, the arṇava and the rest ⟨our mula now reads मुखार्णवादि; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found the व that our earlier text lacked⟩; in the star of Anila ⟨Svātī⟩, of Aditi, of Ijya, of Vidhi, of Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, of Arka ⟨Hasta⟩ and of Antya ⟨Revatī⟩, and in the first star ⟨Aśvinī⟩ ⟨our mula now reads मित्रार्कान्त्यभेष्वादिभे, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩; and in the three of the Daityas' foe ⟨Śravaṇa⟩ and in the Uttarās; with malefics excluded from the lagna and the 5th; with the strength of the tārā and of the Moon present; and at a rising joined with or aspected by benefic sky-goers.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुखार्णादि"; alternatives "मुखवर्णादि" — the English claim is 'the several Kutas, Nadi, Yoni etc.', which wants varna in this list. Between मुख and र्णादि the ink shows a single tall vertical, which I read as the a-matra of मुखा; if it is instead a व whose bowl has failed to print, the reading is मुखवर्णादि. Cannot decide on the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नाडीकूटमुखार्णवादिसहितं; this sentence names मुखार्णादि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0103, line 1, at about 3.2x and 2.9x native) and measured. The single tall vertical is the ā of मुखा. After it the leaf sets a व carrying the repha (0.79-0.93 against four व of the leaf), then ण with its ā (0.93 against the ण of वैष्णव): literally मुखार्वणादि. So the akṣara the ink seemed to lack is a व. मुखार्वणादि is no word and अर्णव is one, and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin give मुखार्णवादि, so the mūla now reads नाडीकूटमुखार्णवादिसहितं. The व is the plate's; the order is the lexicon's and the two printings'. The exemplar's own order is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोत्रो" — LOOP-form त्र, confirmed against the calibration set; a reader who had not calibrated would write गोलो.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मित्राकांन्त्य"; alternatives "मित्रार्कान्त्य" — the superscript over का is a curved hook plus what may be a separate dot. If it is a repha the reading is मित्रार्कान्त्य (mitra=Anuradha, arka=Hasta, antya=Revati), which is what the English nakshatra list wants. I could not separate repha from anusvara here even at 3.5x - the two marks overlap. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वीकुर्यादनिलादितीज्यविधिमित्रार्कान्त्यभेष्वादिभे; this sentence names मित्राकांन्त्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the mark was read by eye (jp2 page_0103, line 2, at about 3.2x and 2.9x native) and measured on the master. Over का there is ONE mark: an arch of 279 px whose top stands 59 px above the headline, the size and height of this press's repha (the repha of कुर्या on the same line is 248 px, 52 px up). There is no dot, at thresholds 128, 170 or 200. So the press prints मित्रार्कान्त्य, Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, Arka ⟨Hasta⟩ and Antya ⟨Revatī⟩, and the mūla now reads it. The machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin give मित्राकान्त्य and मित्राक्रान्त्य; both are on the ledger.] [2026-09-30: both other pages were opened by eye on 2026-09-30 (Sastri p.181 at about 8.75x native, Bhasin p.183 at about 8.2x) and both print मित्रार्कान्त्य with the repha, as the exemplar does; मित्राकान्त्य and मित्राक्रान्त्य are their machine reads' own forms, and the ledger row says so.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मेण्वादिमे"; alternatives "सौम्यादिमे", "मैत्रादिमे" — four aksharas I could not seat against any regent name in the English list. Read as printed; genuinely unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वीकुर्यादनिलादितीज्यविधिमित्रार्कान्त्यभेष्वादिभे; this sentence names मेण्वादिमे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0103, line 2, at about 3.2x and 2.9x native) and measured against this press's भे, मे and ष्व. The leaf sets भेष्वादिभे, भेषु आदिभे, 'in the asterisms … and in the first asterism' ⟨Aśvinī⟩. Both bha-shaped sorts are this press's भ and not its म (0.95-0.97 and 0.83-0.96 against four known भे; 0.86-0.89 and 0.69-0.78 against three known मे). The half consonant is closer to ष् than to ण्, at a narrower margin (0.71-0.94 against four ष्, 0.64 against a half ण); the lexicon and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin carry that call. The mūla now reads भेष्वादिभे.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दैत्यारित्रयभोत्तरासु"; alternatives "दैत्यारित्रयभे उत्तरासु" — word division inside the compound is not marked; I have not inserted one. daityari = Vishnu (Sravana) fits the English list, and 'uttarasu' the three Uttaras.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खलैर्लग्ने"; alternatives "खलैलग्ने" — repha over ल: present but light.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुभखगंयुक्ते"; alternatives "शुभखगयुक्ते" — an anusvara dot sits over ग where the compound wants none; it may be offset ink from the line above. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शुभखगैर्युक्तेक्षिते; this sentence names शुभखगंयुक्ते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the leaf was read by eye (jp2 page_0103, line 4, at about 2.9x native) and measured on the master. The mark over ग is not an anusvāra. It is a vowel sign of 442 px set on the left of the akṣara, where this press sets its e and ai signs, three to eight times the area of any anusvāra on the leaf and nearest in shape to the ai of मै. Its two strokes are fused in the ink, so the lexicon decides ै over े (गेर्युक्ते is no form). यु carries a repha, by its size and height. So the leaf prints शुभखगैर्युक्ते, 'joined with benefic sky-goers', and neither the old गं nor a bare ग is on the page. The mūla now reads it.]
8.12a reading here is contested

उद्वाहाशिमुखक्रियामदितिभे तिष्ये तथा दस्रभे मैत्रेऽर्कत्रयवैष्णवत्रययुते पुण्याङ्गनाभिस्तदा । भृग्वारोज्झितवासरे सुतनवस्थाने च शुद्धे शुभे लग्ने खेटमखादिकं त्वपि चरेत्तद्गीतवाद्यादिभिः ॥ १२ ॥

udvāhāśimukhakriyāmaditibhe tiṣye tathā dasrabhe maitre'rkatrayavaiṣṇavatrayayute puṇyāṅganābhistadā | bhṛgvārojjhitavāsare sutanavasthāne ca śuddhe śubhe lagne kheṭamakhādikaṃ tvapi carettadgītavādyādibhiḥ || 12 ||

The preliminary rite that opens a wedding ⟨the sibilant is read श but its left arm is ink-filled, and the whole word could not be checked against anything else on this plate⟩ in Aditi's star ⟨Punarvasu⟩, in Tiṣya ⟨Puṣya⟩, likewise in the Aśvins' ⟨Aśvinī⟩, in Mitra's ⟨Anurādhā⟩, joined with the three of Arka ⟨Hasta⟩ and the three of Viṣṇu ⟨the stack read त्रय could equally be त्वष्ट्र, which would give Citrā and seat the English list exactly; the ink is two tiers either way⟩ — then, ⟨it is to be done⟩ by women of merit. On a weekday other than Venus's and Mars's, and when the 5th and the 9th places are pure and auspicious, and in a ⟨good⟩ lagna, one should also perform the sacrifice to the planets and the rest, with song and instrumental music and so on.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आशिमुख"; alternatives "आसिमुख", "आशीर्मुख" — the sibilant is श to me but its left arm is filled; the whole word udvahasimukhakriyam ('the preliminary work leading to a wedding') is not one I can check against anything on this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्कत्रय"; alternatives "र्कत्वष्ट्र", "र्कत्रय" — the English list has Hasta (arka) then Chittra (Tvashtr); if the second element is त्वष्ट्र rather than त्रय the pada seats the English exactly. The ink is ambiguous between them - the stack under the sirorekha is two tiers either way.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वत्रयुते"; alternatives "वसुत्रयुते", "वत्रियुते" — second occurrence of the same त्रय-shaped stack; same doubt. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मैत्रेऽर्कत्रयवैष्णवत्रययुते; this sentence names वत्रयुते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्गीत"; alternatives "तद्रीत" — the subscript under द is filled; ग and र are both possible shapes there. The English ('performed with music and dancing') wants गीत, and I have followed the ink toward ग, but this is a call I would not defend against a second reader.
8.13a reading here is contested

पूर्णेन्दोरखलेन्दुजस्य च गुरोः शुक्रस्य वारे तथा भद्रापूर्णतिथौ जयाह्वयतिथावृक्षे चरे क्षिप्रभे । लग्ने विट्गुरुशुक्रवीक्षितयुते शुद्धे सुते तल्लिखेदाह्वानार्थमिदं मृदूक्तिघटितं माङ्गल्यपत्रं शुभम् ॥ १३ ॥

pūrṇendorakhalendujasya ca guroḥ śukrasya vāre tathā bhadrāpūrṇatithau jayāhvayatithāvṛkṣe care kṣiprabhe | lagne viṭguruśukravīkṣitayute śuddhe sute tallikhedāhvānārthamidaṃ mṛdūktighaṭitaṃ māṅgalyapatraṃ śubham || 13 ||

On the day of the full Moon, of the unafflicted son of the Moon ⟨Mercury⟩, of Jupiter, and of Venus; likewise on a Bhadrā or Pūrṇā tithi, or on the tithi called Jayā; in a movable asterism or a swift one; when the lagna is aspected by or joined with ⟨viṭ⟩, Jupiter and Venus ⟨the second akṣara is a two-tier stack whose lower tier is ink-filled: the sense would want बुध, Mercury, and the ink does not clearly give it, so the shape is recorded and not the sense⟩, and the 5th is pure — then one should write this auspicious letter of betrothal, framed in gentle words, for the invitation ⟨our mūla now reads आह्वानार्थम्, 'for the invitation'⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अखलेन्दुजस्य"; alternatives "अखिलेन्दुजस्य" — akhala ('unafflicted') vs akhila; the vowel mark on the second akshara is a short stroke I read as a.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिथावृक्षे"; alternatives "तिथावृक्षे", "तिथौ ऋक्षे" — printed solid; the sandhi tithau + rkshe is not separated in the ink and I have not separated it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विट्गुरु"; alternatives "बुधगुरु", "विद्गुरु" — UNSETTLED. The second akshara is a two-tier stack whose lower tier is ink-filled. The sense (planets aspecting or joining the Lagna, alongside Jupiter and Venus) would want बुध (Mercury); the ink does not clearly give it. Recorded as the shape I see, not as the sense.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्रैर्वीक्षित"; alternatives "शुक्रर्वीक्षित" — the ai-matra over क्र is faint. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विट्गुरुशुक्रवीक्षितयुते; this sentence names शुक्रैर्वीक्षित, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दाहानार्थम्"; alternatives "उद्वाहार्थम्" — as printed the first word is a non-word. The pada opens flush at the line start (x=402), so nothing is cut off by my crop - the ink really does begin दा. Given the subject (the wedding letter) उद्वाहार्थम् is the obvious intended reading and this looks like dropped/transposed sorts, but I record the ink.
8.14a reading here is contested

शंकुस्थापनजा तिथिः शरगुणा तत्रानलाङ्कं युतं योज्यं द्वादशभिः पुनर्नवहृतं शिष्टं नगाब्धीन्दवः । कीलालेऽद्रिकरेषवो भुवि ततोऽग्न्यङ्कर्तनः खे भवेल्लाभो हानिर्मृती क्रमात्फलमिदं कौर्मे तु चक्रे स्मृतम् १४ निर्माणे नवसद्मनः प्रथमतो लिङ्गत्रयं संलिखेत् तिर्यक्चार्गलकाश्चतस्र अपि चाधो वामरेखादितः आरोहादपि दस्रभाच्छुभकरं चारोहभं मस्तगं रेखायां खलखेचरे यदि मृतिर्नेतुः शुभे शोभनम् ॥१५॥

śaṃkusthāpanajā tithiḥ śaraguṇā tatrānalāṅkaṃ yutaṃ yojyaṃ dvādaśabhiḥ punarnavahṛtaṃ śiṣṭaṃ nagābdhīndavaḥ | kīlāle'drikareṣavo bhuvi tato'gnyaṅkartanaḥ khe bhavellābho hānirmṛtī kramātphalamidaṃ kaurme tu cakre smṛtam 14 nirmāṇe navasadmanaḥ prathamato liṅgatrayaṃ saṃlikhet tiryakcārgalakāścatasra api cādho vāmarekhāditaḥ ārohādapi dasrabhācchubhakaraṃ cārohabhaṃ mastagaṃ rekhāyāṃ khalakhecare yadi mṛtirnetuḥ śubhe śobhanam ||15||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥१५॥ though it stands at position 14; and this record almost certainly holds more than one verse whose separating mark was not seen — the numeral १४ falls inside it, where it is shown below. The doubt about the boundary is ours, not the source's.⟩ The tithi arising from the setting-up of the post, ⟨multiplied⟩ by arrows and guṇas ⟨five and three⟩; to that fire and aṅka ⟨three and nine⟩ joined; it is to be added to twelve and then divided by nine; the remainder — mountains, oceans, moons ⟨seven, four, one⟩ in water; mountain, hands, arrows ⟨seven, two, five⟩ on the earth; then fire, aṅka and seasons ⟨three, nine, six; our mūla reads र्तनः, as an eye reading of the plate gave it, while the arithmetic needs ऋतवः, so the numbers are certain and this one word is not⟩ in the sky — there will be gain, loss and death, in that order. This fruit is recorded in the tortoise-diagram. [14] In the building of a new house one should first draw three liṅgas, and four crossbars as well, below, beginning from the left-hand line; and from the ascent, from the Aśvins' star, it brings good ⟨our mūla reads शुभकरं, 'making good', and a closer eye reading of the plate settled its akṣara as भ, not म⟩, and the ascending star on the head. If a malefic sky-goer stands on the line, there is death for the person concerned; if a benefic, it is auspicious.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अनलाङ्कं"; alternatives "अनलाङ्कैः" — anusvara over कं is clear, but the compound could equally end in an instrumental whose visarga has failed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्तनः"; alternatives "र्तवः" — The English gives the third triad as '3,9 6', i.e. agni=3, anka=9, rtu=6, so the word wanted is ऋतवः and this akshara should be व. The ink shows a न-shaped body with what may be an anusvara over the preceding र्त. I record the shape, not the arithmetic - but the arithmetic is strong enough that a second reader should check this one on the plate. [2026-09-23: the mūla keeps र्तनः. The 2026-09-20 pass ruled that the arithmetic in this note is sound (3, 9, 6, so ऋतवः is wanted), but that neither other printing carries ऋतवः, and that pass writes no reading that no witness carries. So the numeral series is certain and this one akṣara is not. The plate pass of 2026-09-23 did not open this line.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ल्लाभो"; alternatives "च्छाभो" — SETTLED BY ZOOM, and worth recording as a correction of a first reading. At 1.2x this cluster reads च्छा; at 5x the upper member is unmistakably ल and the lower member ल, giving ल्ला (bhavet + labhah > bhavel labhah). Anyone reading this fount at low magnification will make the च्छ error here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृती"; alternatives "मृतिः" — the final mark is a long i-matra, not a visarga, at 5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिर्यंकू"; alternatives "तिर्यक्" — printed with an anusvara and a long u-matra where tiryak wants a bare virama; both marks are visible at 1.2x so this is the ink, not my reading. [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this on the page: the one mark above य is the repha of र्, not an anusvāra, so the anusvāra this note records is not in the ink. The mūla now reads तिर्यक्चार्गलकाश्चतस्र.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतस्र अपि"; alternatives "चतस्रोऽपि" — a word space is printed between the two, with no avagraha; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्छुमकरं"; alternatives "च्छतुष्करं", "च्छुभकरं" — UNSETTLED. Given the ल्ला/च्छा lesson two verses earlier I do not trust my own reading of a च्छ-shaped cluster here either, and the English for this pada describes a figure ('1st four ascending + 5th on top + next 4 descending') without giving me a word to check against. [2026-09-23: the T45 plate pass settled this on the page: the page sets भ, not म, and the mūla now reads दस्रभाच्छुभकरं.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 15 within its section; it is published at position 14.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: This record runs well past its section's median length and the numbering skips before it, so it probably holds MORE THAN ONE verse whose separating mark was not seen. OUR defect, not the source's — re-read this verse's plates before relying on its boundaries.
8.15a reading here is contested

उक्ताख्ये फलमेवमुक्तमभिजित्सांकं प्रवेशेऽर्कभाच्चन्द्रर्क्षं गिरिवेदरामसुरपाश्वासच्छुभासच्छुभम् । तद्वत्प्रोक्तमिदं फलं तु कलशे बाणारिनागाग्नयः संवेशे सुखदं शुभप्रदमपि स्याच्चक्रयुग्मं लघु ॥ १६ ॥

uktākhye phalamevamuktamabhijitsāṃkaṃ praveśe'rkabhāccandrarkṣaṃ girivedarāmasurapāśvāsacchubhāsacchubham | tadvatproktamidaṃ phalaṃ tu kalaśe bāṇārināgāgnayaḥ saṃveśe sukhadaṃ śubhapradamapi syāccakrayugmaṃ laghu || 16 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥१६॥; it stands at position 15.⟩ In what has been named, the fruit has been declared thus. With Abhijit as the mark, at the entering, from the Sun's star ⟨our mūla now reads प्रवेशेऽर्कभाच्चन्द्रर्क्षं, with the ablative 'from the Sun's star'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found no anusvāra after अर्क⟩ to the Moon's star: mountains, Vedas, Rāmas, gods … ⟨this run is a string of number-words and it must be treated as unverified: it carries two clusters of the च्छ shape, and on an earlier plate a cluster of exactly that shape proved at magnification to be ल्ल and not च्छ. Neither was re-magnified here⟩ … auspicious, inauspicious. This fruit is declared likewise ⟨our mūla reads तद्वत्प्रोक्तमिदं; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 could not name the ink-filled opening stack, and an open doubt on this verse records the readings⟩; but in the pitcher: arrows, foes, nāgas, fires ⟨five, six, eight, three⟩. At the entering it gives comfort and bestows good; and the pair of diagrams is light.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अभिजित्सांकं"; alternatives "अभिजित्साङ्कं", "अभिजिन्मात्रं" — the nasal before क is printed as a superscript anusvara rather than the subscript ङ the conjunct wants; both marks are visible so this is the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रवेशेऽर्कं"; alternatives "प्रवेशेऽर्कात्" — the avagraha is clear; the case ending is not - an anusvara where the sense ('count FROM the Sun') would want an ablative. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रवेशेऽर्कभाच्चन्द्रर्क्षं; this sentence names प्रवेशेऽर्कं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0105, line 10, printed folio 103, at about 2.8x native, plain and gamma-stretched) found only three marks above the headline of प्रवेशेऽर्क-: the े of वे, the े of शे and a repha over क. There is no anusvāra. The press sets प्रवेशेऽर्क- and breaks the line into भाच्, as our mūla reads. The third akṣara is शे, not शो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुरपाश्वासच्छुभासच्छुभम्"; alternatives "सुरपाश्वासन्छुभासच्छुभम्" — UNSETTLED, and I want to be explicit about why. There are two च्छ-shaped clusters in this one word; on plate 104 a cluster of exactly this shape proved at 5x to be ल्ल, not च्छ. I did not re-zoom both of these, so treat this word as unverified rather than as read.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्क्षं"; alternatives "र्क्षे" — repha plus क्ष; the final vowel mark is ambiguous between anusvara and e.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्धन्त्रोक्तम्"; alternatives "तद्यन्त्रोक्तम्", "तद्धन्वोक्तम्" — the first stack is three tiers and ink-filled; तद्यन्त्र ('stated in that diagram') would suit the context of a figure, but I cannot get य out of the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्वत्प्रोक्तमिदं, 'this fruit is declared likewise', which the machine read of the P. S. Sastri printing gives (uk-ps-sastri page_0184, printed folio 188); it was written on 2026-09-20. Re-read by eye on the exemplar (jp2 page_0105, line 12, printed folio 103) at about 2.8x native, the opening stack is ink-filled and could not be named, as this note found. तद्धन्त्र is not a Sanskrit word and no witness we hold carries तद्यन्त्र, so our text keeps तद्वत्प्रोक्तम्, and the question is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चक्रयुग्मं"; alternatives "चक्रयुग्मे" — cakra-yugma = 'the pair of diagrams', i.e. the figures on this plate; final vowel mark ambiguous.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 16 within its section; it is published at position 15.
8.16a reading here is contested

चक्रे मानुषरूपके हि शिरसि त्रीण्यर्थलाभो मुखे नाशस्त्रीणि हृदीषवो धनचयो निःस्वं षडङ्घ्र्योर्द्वयम् । पृष्ठे प्राणभयं ततः शुभकरं वस्तौ कृताद्विर्गुदे भीतिर्दक्षिणवामयोस्तु करयोरेकैककं स्वं मृतिः ॥ १७ ॥

cakre mānuṣarūpake hi śirasi trīṇyarthalābho mukhe nāśastrīṇi hṛdīṣavo dhanacayo niḥsvaṃ ṣaḍaṅghryordvayam | pṛṣṭhe prāṇabhayaṃ tataḥ śubhakaraṃ vastau kṛtādvirgude bhītirdakṣiṇavāmayostu karayorekaikakaṃ svaṃ mṛtiḥ || 17 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥१७॥; it stands at position 16.⟩ In the diagram of human shape: on the head, three — the gaining of wealth; on the face, three — destruction; on the heart, arrows ⟨five⟩ — a heap of wealth; on the two feet, six — destitution ⟨the ङ्घ्र्यो stack here is four tiers deep and its middle tiers are ink-filled⟩; on the back, two — danger to life; then the auspicious; on the bladder, four; on the anus, two ⟨our mula now reads कृताद्विर्गुदे, 'four … two on the anus', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩; fear ⟨our mula now reads भीतिर्, 'fear', where our earlier text had भीर्तार्, which is no word⟩; and on the right and the left hand, one each: one's own, and death.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षडङ्घ्र्योर्द्वयम्"; alternatives "षडङ्घ्रयोर्द्वयम्" — the ङ्घ्र्यो stack is four tiers and the middle tiers are ink-filled at 1.2x; I did not re-zoom it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृताद्रिगुदे"; alternatives "कृताद्द्विगुदे" — the English gives 'the next 4 ... the abdomen' then 'The next 2 are assigned to the anus', which wants 4 then 2 (dvi), not adri=8. The subscript after आ is a filled two-tier stack; द्रि and द्वि are both live. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कृताद्विर्गुदे; this sentence names कृताद्रिगुदे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0106, line 12, printed folio 104, at about 3.6x native). After ता stands a ि-mātrā whose hook runs over a द with a CLOSED loop hanging below it: that is the subscript व, not the open slanting stroke of र. A repha stands over गु. So the press prints कृताद्विर्गुदे, and the mūla now reads it. द्वि gives the anus the 2 that the edition's own English assigns it (in the store's machine read of the facing page), and द्विर् makes syllable 17 of pāda 3 heavy, as the metre needs.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भीर्तार्"; alternatives "भीस्तार्", "भीर्तादर्" — the opening cluster carries two superscript marks close together and I could not separate repha from the following akshara's headstroke. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भीतिर्दक्षिणवामयोस्तु; this sentence names भीर्तार्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0106, line 13, at about 3.1x and 3.2x native) and measured. The press prints no repha over ता: the hook there stands 33-37 px above the headline, the height of the ी hook of भी, while the repha over द in the same word rises 54-58 px. No stem stands before the त, and an ā-height stem follows it. So the press sets neither भीर्तार् nor a clean ति: its type reads as ता, or a ती whose hook has come away from its stem, under a mātrā-height hook. The mūla reads भीतिर्दक्षिणवामयोस्तु as an emendation of the press, on the edition's own English in the store's read ('the result is fear') and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin, which give भीतिर्. The exemplar's type is kept on the ledger.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 17 within its section; it is published at position 16.
8.17a reading here is contested

भृत्यर्क्षादिनभान्तकं भवति तद्दामाख्यचक्रं त्विदं दासीचक्रमपीह तद्वदिति तच्छीर्षे त्रयं लाभदम् । हानिस्त्रीणि मुखे द्वयं प्रभुमृतिः स्कन्धे च पुष्टिः शरा हृत्पद्मे तु नगाश्च हानिरिति भूर्योर्नौ तिरस्कारता ॥१८॥

bhṛtyarkṣādinabhāntakaṃ bhavati taddāmākhyacakraṃ tvidaṃ dāsīcakramapīha tadvaditi tacchīrṣe trayaṃ lābhadam | hānistrīṇi mukhe dvayaṃ prabhumṛtiḥ skandhe ca puṣṭiḥ śarā hṛtpadme tu nagāśca hāniriti bhūryornau tiraskāratā ||18||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥१८॥; it stands at position 17.⟩ From the servant's asterism to the end of the sky — such is this diagram called the dāma ⟨the second akṣara is a filled stack and तद्दासाख्य, which would agree with the dāsī-cakra named next, is equally live⟩; and the dāsī-cakra too is here just like it. On its head, three — a giver of gain; loss, three, on the face; two — the death of the master; and on the shoulder, nourishment; arrows ⟨five⟩ on the lotus of the heart; and mountains ⟨seven⟩ — loss; and thus, on the two ⟨bhūryoḥ — unsettled: two rephas in three akṣaras and the final vowel-sign unclear, and there is no facing rendering for this pāda to test it against⟩, contempt.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भृत्यक्षादि"; alternatives "भृत्यर्क्षादि" — bhrtya-rksha-adi ('beginning from the servant's asterism') is what the following pada's dasi-cakra wants; the ink shows क्ष with a superscript that may be a repha or may be offset from the line above. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भृत्यर्क्षादिनभान्तकं; this sentence names भृत्यक्षादि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्दामाख्य"; alternatives "तद्यामाख्य", "तद्दासाख्य" — UNSETTLED. Given that pada b names the दासीचक्र, तद्दासाख्य would be coherent, but the ink's second akshara is a filled stack.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तच्छीर्षे"; alternatives "तल्लीर्षे" — flagged on principle rather than on suspicion: this fount's च्छ and ल्ल proved indistinguishable at low magnification on plate 104. Here the sense (tac-chirshe, 'on its head') strongly favours च्छ.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूर्योर्नौ"; alternatives "भूर्योर्ना", "भूम्योर्नौ" — UNSETTLED. Two rephas in three aksharas and the final vowel sign unclear; I have no English for this pada (the Sloka-17-18 1/2 paragraph runs onto the next plate) to check it against.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 18 within its section; it is published at position 17.
8.18a reading here is contested

त्रीणि त्रीण्यथ पादयोश्च भवति स्याद्दक्षिणे वामके तद्द्रव्यमादिशेदिति विभोर्भृत्यस्य योज्यं सदा । स्वीकारे महिषीगवां गुणकराष्टौ वाणनागेन्दवो लाभो हानिरथो स्वलाभसुखकृल्लाभो महाभीतिकृत् ॥१९॥

trīṇi trīṇyatha pādayośca bhavati syāddakṣiṇe vāmake taddravyamādiśediti vibhorbhṛtyasya yojyaṃ sadā | svīkāre mahiṣīgavāṃ guṇakarāṣṭau vāṇanāgendavo lābho hāniratho svalābhasukhakṛllābho mahābhītikṛt ||19||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥१९॥; it stands at position 18.⟩ Three and three on the two feet, and it comes to be on the right and on the left; one should declare the property accordingly — this is always to be applied to the master's servant. In the acquisition of she-buffaloes and cows: guṇa, hands, and eight ⟨three, two, eight⟩; arrows, nāgas, moons ⟨five, eight, one — the edition spells the number-word वाण and not बाण, and the counter-test, actually run against a व and a ब set four akṣaras apart in one word on this very plate, shows the sort here is व: a va/ba interchange of the edition, not a misreading, and the value five is unaffected⟩ — gain, loss; then one that makes one's own gain and comfort; ⟨and⟩ a gain that makes great fear.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाण"; alternatives "बाण" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST, actually run this time (my first attempt cropped the wrong aksharas and I had to retract an unearned claim). Calibrated on पदेष्वब्धिः in verse 20 pada d, which sets a व and a ब four aksharas apart in one word: this fount's ब carries a short inner stroke inside the bowl at the foot of the left limb, and its व does not. The akshara here shows a plain open bowl with no inner stroke, so the sort is व. The edition therefore spells this number-word वाण, not बाण - a va/ba interchange, not a misreading. The value (bana = 5) is unaffected, and the English's '5' corroborates it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृल्लाभो"; alternatives "कृच्छाभो" — ल्ल here, checked against the plate-104 calibration; the two limbs are ल and ल, not च and छ.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 19 within its section; it is published at position 18.
8.19a reading here is contested

मूर्द्धास्यांघ्रिषु हृत्स्तनेषु च भगे त्वर्यम्ण आनित्यभं गृह्णीयाच्च चतुष्पदान् वृषमुखान् संचिन्त्य चक्रादिदम् । अर्कर्क्षान्निजभान्तमेव गणयेत् स्कन्धे शराः पृष्ठतो दिक्पुच्छे द्वितयं चतुर्ष्वपि पदेष्वब्धिः शरास्तूदरे ॥२०॥

mūrddhāsyāṃghriṣu hṛtstaneṣu ca bhage tvaryamṇa ānityabhaṃ gṛhṇīyācca catuṣpadān vṛṣamukhān saṃcintya cakrādidam | arkarkṣānnijabhāntameva gaṇayet skandhe śarāḥ pṛṣṭhato dikpucche dvitayaṃ caturṣvapi padeṣvabdhiḥ śarāstūdare ||20||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२०॥; it stands at position 19.⟩ On the head, the mouth, and the feet, and on the heart and the breasts, and on the pudendum ⟨and then त्वर्यम्ण आनित्यभं, as the mūla now reads: a stretch that is not seated as words here; the word-division is not marked, nothing in the edition's English corresponds to it, and an open doubt on this verse records the readings⟩. And one should take four-footed animals headed by the bull, having pondered this from the diagram. One should count from the Sun's asterism up to one's own ⟨asterism⟩. On the shoulder, arrows ⟨five⟩; from the back, on the tail, the directions ⟨ten⟩, then two; on all four feet, the oceans ⟨four⟩; and arrows ⟨five⟩ on the belly.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यांत्रिषु"; alternatives "स्याङ्घ्रिषु" — IMPORTANT. The English requires 'the two feet' as the third member, i.e. anghri. The ink shows an anusvara followed by a modern-sort त्र with i-matra, which reads त्रिषु. If this is a compositor's substitution of त्र for the ङ्घ्र stack it is exactly the kind of error the loop/modern त्र confusion in this fount would produce. Recorded as printed; the English is the reason to doubt it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मूर्द्धास्यङ्घ्रिषु; this sentence names स्यांत्रिषु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0107, line index 11, at about 3.1x native) refuted the consonant this note names. The nasal is a round anusvāra dot, and the letter under the pre-posed i-mātrā is घ with a subscript ्र, not त. So the press sets मूर्द्धास्यांघ्रिषु, 'on the feet', the anusvāra spelling of the मूर्द्धास्यङ्घ्रिषु our mūla reads; the two differ in spelling only. The shape this note describes is right; its consonant is not, and this edition does not print त्रिषु here.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads मूर्द्धास्यांघ्रिषु, the exemplar's own form as the eye reading of 2026-09-23 recorded it. The sentence above that calls मूर्द्धास्यङ्घ्रिषु a spelling of the same form is corrected: that form has a short a after स्य, and आस्य + अङ्घ्रि gives a long ā. The short vowel came from Sastri's machine read with the 2026-09-20 correction.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्वयंमण आनित्यभं"; alternatives "त्वयंमणि आनित्यभं", "त्वग्यम्ना नित्यभं" — UNSETTLED, four aksharas. No English corresponds to this stretch and the word division is not marked; I can read the letters but cannot seat them as words. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्वर्यम्ण; this sentence names त्वयंमण, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0107, line index 11, at about 2.4x and 3.1x native) found a hook over the य, not the round anusvāra dot that stands over स्यां on the same line, and म and ण set as two separate letters with no conjunct and no virāma. So the press appears to set त्वर्यमण, which is not a word and makes pāda 1 twenty syllables. Our mūla keeps त्वर्यम्ण, the machine read of uk-ps-sastri (store page_0186 line 20), which alone gives pāda 1 its nineteen syllables. The four akṣaras remain an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निजमान्तम्"; alternatives "निजभान्तम्" — the sense wants nija-bha-antam ('to one's own asterism'); the ink's second akshara is म to me. भ and म differ here only in the left limb's foot and it is filled. This is the same म/भ pair I flagged on plate 100. [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0107, at about 2.4x to 3.1x native) found भ in निजभान्तमेव: the same letter the press sets at our 8.20 in निजभान्तकं on the facing leaf, and not the म that stands four akṣaras later on the same line in मेव. So the press sets निजभान्तमेव, as our mūla now reads, and the म read here was a misreading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वितय"; alternatives "द्वितयं" — printed without the anusvara that the parallel in verse 21 pada a carries. [2026-09-23: confirmed on the plate, and our text departs from it. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0107, at about 2.4x to 3.1x native) found no anusvāra: the press sets द्वितय, as this note read it, and so does the machine read of uk-ps-sastri (store page_0186 line 23). Our mūla reads द्वितयं, an emendation of the press made on 2026-09-20 on the metre, because syllable 6 of pāda 4 must be heavy; our own 8.20 reads द्वितयं.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 20 within its section; it is published at position 19.
8.20a reading here is contested

वक्त्रे तु द्वितयं क्रमात्सुभगकृल्लाभोऽङ्गनानाशकृद् भङ्गो नाशकृदर्थलाभ इति चाश्वादेः समारोहणे । सूर्यर्क्षान्निजभान्तकं करकराश्व्यक्ष्यक्षिवेदाब्धयो वेदाङ्गान्यथ कर्णमस्तकरदे पुच्छे करे पृष्ठके ॥ २१ ॥

vaktre tu dvitayaṃ kramātsubhagakṛllābho'ṅganānāśakṛd bhaṅgo nāśakṛdarthalābha iti cāśvādeḥ samārohaṇe | sūryarkṣānnijabhāntakaṃ karakarāśvyakṣyakṣivedābdhayo vedāṅgānyatha karṇamastakarade pucche kare pṛṣṭhake || 21 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२१॥; it stands at position 20.⟩ On the mouth, two. In order: it makes good fortune; gain; it causes the loss of a woman; breaking; causing destruction; the gaining of wealth — thus in the mounting of a horse and the like. From the Sun's asterism to one's own: hands, hands, the Aśvins, eyes, eyes, Vedas, oceans ⟨two, two, two, two, two, four, four⟩; then the Vedāṅgas ⟨six⟩ — on the ear, the head, the tooth, the tail, the hand, and the back. ⟨Three tightly-set conjuncts stand in a row here, all carrying subscripts; the number-words can be counted against the facing rendering, but the last two akṣaras could not be separated with confidence.⟩

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृल्लाभो"; alternatives "कृच्छाभो" — ल्ल, as in line 11.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्व्यक्ष्यक्षि"; alternatives "श्व्यक्ष्यक्षी", "श्वियक्ष्यक्षि" — three tightly-set conjuncts in a row, all carrying subscripts; I can count the number-words against the English but I cannot separate the last two aksharas with confidence.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 21 within its section; it is published at position 20.
8.21a reading here is contested

हृद्वक्त्रांघ्रिषु लाभलाभकमहालाभाश्च हानिः शुभं सम्पद्रोगसमायकस्त्वपि गजारोहे तु संचिन्तयेत् । आरोहे शिविकां दिनेश्वरभतस्तत्कालभान्तं क्रमात् तुर्यांशादिषु पञ्च च लिखेद्दक्षाणि सप्तान्तरे ॥ २२ ॥

hṛdvaktrāṃghriṣu lābhalābhakamahālābhāśca hāniḥ śubhaṃ sampadrogasamāyakastvapi gajārohe tu saṃcintayet | ārohe śivikāṃ dineśvarabhatastatkālabhāntaṃ kramāt turyāṃśādiṣu pañca ca likheddakṣāṇi saptāntare || 22 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२२॥; it stands at position 21.⟩ On the heart, the mouth and the feet: gain, a small gain, great gains, and loss, and good; wealth, disease, and no change ⟨samāyaka, whose ending is unclear⟩ — this one should consider in the mounting of an elephant. In mounting a palanquin, ⟨count⟩ from the Sun's asterism to the asterism of that moment, in order; and in the fourth parts and the rest one should write five, and seven in the interval ⟨the sense wants ऋक्षाणि, 'the asterisms'; the ink's first akṣara reads द, and if that is a broken ऋ sort it is a printing error which cannot be got out of the shape⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ांत्रिषु"; alternatives "ाङ्घ्रिषु" — SETTLED AS INK, and this is a finding rather than a doubt. The same 'anusvara + [tri-shaped cluster] + shu' appears here and at plate 107 verse 20 pada a (मूर्द्धास्यांत्रिषु), both times as the third member of a body-part list where the English says 'feet' (anghri). I put the two side by side at 5x with unsharp masking: the cluster is a MODERN-sort त्र with a pre-posed i-matra in BOTH places - a two-tier glyph, not the three-tier ङ्घ्र stack, which in this fount would show a visible subscript ra hook. So the edition really prints त्रिषु twice where अङ्घ्रिषु is meant. Anyone comparing claims against this witness must not take त्रिषु as the text's word for the third body part. [2026-09-30: refuted on the plate. The exemplar (jp2 page_0108, line index 6) was read again by eye on 2026-09-23 at about 3.0x to 3.7x native against a plain घ and three त्र sorts of this press: the sort is घ with a subscript र, the same as 8.19's, and the word is हृद्वक्त्रांघ्रिषु, 'on the feet'. The mūla now reads हृद्वक्त्रांघ्रिषु. The shape this note describes is right; its consonant is not, and this edition does not print त्रिषु here or at 8.19.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समायकः"; alternatives "समायकं", "समानकः" — the English gives 'no change' for the face, which would suit sama-; the ending is unclear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भतः"; alternatives "भात्" — ablative expected; printed with what looks like a visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दक्षाणि"; alternatives "ऋक्षाणि" — the sense wants rkshani ('the asterisms'); the ink's first akshara reads द to me. If it is a broken ऋ sort this is a printing error, but I cannot get ऋ out of the shape.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 22 within its section; it is published at position 21.
8.22a reading here is contested

आरोग्यं त्वतिकष्टतां च कृशतां व्याधिं क्रमान्मध्यमे कल्याणं दिशतीह चक्रमुदितं चायुश्च पुष्टिं सुखम् । छत्रस्य ग्रहणे शिवोत्तरविधीज्यश्रीशुभं वा नवं वारुण्यं च सदा शुभं त्वथ पुनश्चक्रस्य याते त्रयम् ॥ २३ ॥

ārogyaṃ tvatikaṣṭatāṃ ca kṛśatāṃ vyādhiṃ kramānmadhyame kalyāṇaṃ diśatīha cakramuditaṃ cāyuśca puṣṭiṃ sukham | chatrasya grahaṇe śivottaravidhījyaśrīśubhaṃ vā navaṃ vāruṇyaṃ ca sadā śubhaṃ tvatha punaścakrasya yāte trayam || 23 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२३॥; it stands at position 22.⟩ Health, and extreme distress, and leanness, and disease, in order; in the middle ⟨our mūla reads क्रमान्मध्यमे, which the metre and the sense support, where an eye reading of the plate found the two akṣaras after क्रमा too broken to read⟩ the diagram declared here bestows welfare, and life, and nourishment, and comfort. In the receiving of a parasol: Śiva's ⟨Ārdrā⟩, the Uttarās, Vidhi's ⟨Rohiṇī⟩, Ijya's ⟨Puṣya⟩, Śrī's — auspicious; or the new; and Vāruṇa's ⟨Śatabhiṣaj — the ba/va counter-test was not run on this akṣara, and the call is recorded as untested rather than as checked⟩ is always auspicious; and again, when three of the diagram have gone by.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमा[?][?]यमे"; alternatives "क्रमात्प्रियमे", "क्रमान्नियमे" — REFUSED, not guessed. Two to three aksharas at the end of this pada sit in a band of weak, broken impression - the sorts are under-inked and partly ghosted, unlike anything else on the plate. I can see that characters are present and count them, but I cannot read them, and the English for this stretch ('(5) and prosperity') gives me no word to test a guess against. [2026-09-23: the two akṣaras are still not legible on the plate, and the क्रमान्मध्यमे now in the mūla is supplied, not read. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0108, line index 18, at about 2.7x and 3.3x native, with a gamma stretch and a level stretch) found क्रमा and the closing यमे whole and certain, and between them two positions of broken ink: a wedge hanging from the headline, a gap, then two small marks. That stretch holds 25.5% of its pixels below grey 128, against 35% to 40% for the healthy words on the same line. The mūla's reading comes from the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri (store page_0187 line 21) and uk-bhasin-hindi (store page_0192 line 6), which both give क्रमान्मध्यमे; with it pāda 1 counts nineteen, and the edition's own English on the same leaf reserves the last seven nakṣatras 'for the centre'. What the press set there is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधीड्यश्री"; alternatives "विधीड्यश्रीः", "विधीज्यश्री" — the ड्य/ज्य stack is ink-filled; both are live and I have no English here to arbitrate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिवोत्तरविधीज्यश्रीशुभं for शिवोत्तरविधीड्यश्रीशुभं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: a second eye on the same plate agrees with this note. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0108, line index 29, at about 2.4x native) also found the glyph presenting as ड्य; a filled ज can present as ड, so this does not prove the sort. Our mūla carries ज्य as an emendation on the lexicon: इज्य is Bṛhaspati, the regent of Puṣya, in a list of asterism regents, our own 8.11 spells it इज्य, and the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri (store page_0188 line 7) and uk-bhasin-hindi (store page_0192 line 23) give विधीज्य.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वारुण्यं"; alternatives "बारुण्यं" — ba/va again: I did NOT run the counter test on this akshara. Varuna (the west / the Varuna direction) is the expected word, but I am recording the call as untested rather than implying I checked it.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 23 within its section; it is published at position 22.
8.23a reading here is contested

नाशं सप्त तु दण्डके धनहरं कण्ठे नृपानुग्रहं पञ्चान्तर्वसवो महानृपवरं चाग्रेऽब्धिभं कीर्तिदम् । छत्राख्यं त्विदमुत्तमं शुभकरं चक्रं तु छत्राकृति संलिख्येवमथो स्वभाद्दिनकरर्क्षान्तं क्रमाद्विन्यसेत् ॥ २४ ॥

nāśaṃ sapta tu daṇḍake dhanaharaṃ kaṇṭhe nṛpānugrahaṃ pañcāntarvasavo mahānṛpavaraṃ cāgre'bdhibhaṃ kīrtidam | chatrākhyaṃ tvidamuttamaṃ śubhakaraṃ cakraṃ tu chatrākṛti saṃlikhyevamatho svabhāddinakararkṣāntaṃ kramādvinyaset || 24 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२४॥; it stands at position 23.⟩ Destruction; but seven on the staff — the carrying away of wealth; on the neck, the favour of the king; five, and within, the vasus ⟨eight⟩ — a great and excellent king; and in front, the ocean-star ⟨four⟩, a giver of fame. This excellent and good-making diagram is called the chatra, and the diagram itself is in the shape of a parasol. Having drawn it thus, one should then set down in order from one's own asterism to the Sun's asterism ⟨our mūla now reads स्वभाद्दिनकरर्क्षान्तं क्रमाद्विन्यसेत्, with दिनकर, 'the Sun', and विन्यसेत्, 'should set down'⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अन्तर्वंशवो"; alternatives "अन्तर्वंशगो", "अन्तर्वेशवो" — the akshara after वं is ink-heavy; श and स are not separable here. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पञ्चान्तर्वसवो, corrected on 2026-09-20 on the metre. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0109, mūla line 2, printed folio 107, at about 2.7x and 4.0x native) found no anusvāra: the only mark over the व is a single 30 px hook, the repha that अन्तर् needs, where a known anusvāra on the same plate, the सं of संलिख्येवमथो, is 15 px tall and solid; the स carries no ink above the headline. So the वं this note read is not on the page, and the exemplar supports वसवो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमाद्द्वियसेत्"; alternatives "क्रमाद्विन्यसेत्" — the sense wants kramad vinyaset ('should set down in order'); the ink shows a doubled द-stack that I read as द्द्वि. Likely a foul sort but recorded as seen. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads क्रमाद्विन्यसेत्; this sentence names क्रमाद्द्वियसेत्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0109, mūla line 4, printed folio 107, at about 2.7x and 4.0x native) found the stack after मा carrying a rounded व-bowl below it, unlike the angular द-hook of स्वभाद्दि on the same line, and the letter after it a single य, 54 px wide, not न्य. So the press sets क्रमाद्द्वियसेत्, as this note records, and our क्रमाद्विन्यसेत् emends it on the lexicon: द्वियसेत् is no verb, the machine reads of both other printings give विन्यसेत्, and our own 8.25 prints सुधीर्विन्यसेत्.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नकर"; alternatives "दिनकर" — dinakara (the Sun) is what the English requires; the pada as I read it lacks the दि. The preceding akshara is भादि, so a compositor's eye-skip from -भादि- to -नकर is plausible. Flagged, not corrected. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वभाद्दिनकरर्क्षान्तं; this sentence names भादि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0109, mūla line 4, printed folio 107, at about 2.7x and 4.0x native on the 2900x4721 master) found the akṣara after भा to be a two-element stack, a द on the headline with a second द hung below it, carrying the ि: it measures 103 px below the headline, where the single letters on that line measure 45-72 px. So the press sets स्वभाद्दिनकरर्क्षान्तं, as our mūla reads, and the दि this note found missing is on the page. On the 1740 px render the stack is about 62 px wide and closes up.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 24 within its section; it is published at position 23.
8.24a reading here is contested

सूर्यर्क्षाद्विधुभान्तमेव गणयेच्चत्वारि चत्वारि तन्मूलेष्वत्र लिखेच्चतुर्ष्वपि तथा गात्रेषु चैकैकभम् । मध्ये सप्त विनिर्दिशेदतिसुखं मूलेषु गात्रेषु चेद् भीतिं सत्सुतभाग्यदं निगदितं मञ्चाख्यचक्रन्त्विदम् ।२५।

sūryarkṣādvidhubhāntameva gaṇayeccatvāri catvāri tanmūleṣvatra likheccaturṣvapi tathā gātreṣu caikaikabham | madhye sapta vinirdiśedatisukhaṃ mūleṣu gātreṣu ced bhītiṃ satsutabhāgyadaṃ nigaditaṃ mañcākhyacakrantvidam |25|

⟨The plate numbers this ।२५।; it stands at position 24.⟩ One should count from the Sun's asterism up to the end of the Moon's; four and four are to be written here in its four feet, and likewise one asterism to each on the limbs; in the middle one should assign seven — great comfort ⟨our mūla now reads अतिसुखं⟩; and if ⟨the malefic falls⟩ on the feet or on the limbs, ⟨there is⟩ fear ⟨our mūla now reads भीतिं⟩. This is declared to be the diagram called the mañca ⟨the couch⟩, and it gives good sons and good fortune.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अनिसुख"; alternatives "अतिसुखं", "अनिशसुखं" — the English gives 'extreme happiness for the centre', which wants atisukham. The ink's second akshara reads नि to me, not ति. Left as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भीर्ति"; alternatives "भीतिं" — a repha stands over the ति where the word bhiti needs none; either a foul sort or offset ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भीतिं; this sentence names भीर्ति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 25 within its section; it is published at position 24.
8.25a reading here is contested

जन्मर्क्षान्तमथार्कभाच्छरमुखे पञ्चैव लाभः शरादौ बाणा जयमादिशेच्छरधनुःसन्धाविषुः शौर्यकृत् । दण्डे भद्वितयं तु भङ्गमिति तच्चापाग्रयोः पञ्चकं हानिः स्यादिति चामनन्ति सशरं चापाख्यचक्रं त्विदम् २६ दण्डे मध्यगते च चक्रशिखराधो स्यन्दनाग्रे युगे सर्वत्राग्निषड्गुणगुणाग्निः सिद्धिकीर्तिं मृतिः । कल्याणं धनलाभभङ्गसुखदं चक्रे रथाख्ये भवेत् प्रालेयारिगतोडुतः स्वजननर्क्षान्तं सुधीर्विन्यसेत् ॥ २७ ॥

janmarkṣāntamathārkabhāccharamukhe pañcaiva lābhaḥ śarādau bāṇā jayamādiśeccharadhanuḥsandhāviṣuḥ śauryakṛt | daṇḍe bhadvitayaṃ tu bhaṅgamiti taccāpāgrayoḥ pañcakaṃ hāniḥ syāditi cāmananti saśaraṃ cāpākhyacakraṃ tvidam 26 daṇḍe madhyagate ca cakraśikharādho syandanāgre yuge sarvatrāgniṣaḍguṇaguṇāgniḥ siddhikīrtiṃ mṛtiḥ | kalyāṇaṃ dhanalābhabhaṅgasukhadaṃ cakre rathākhye bhavet prāleyārigatoḍutaḥ svajananarkṣāntaṃ sudhīrvinyaset || 27 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२७॥ though it stands at position 25; and this record too runs well past its section's median length while the numbering skips before it, so it probably holds more than one verse whose separating mark was not seen — the numeral २६ falls inside it, where it is shown. Our defect, not the source's.⟩ From the Sun's asterism ⟨our mūla now reads अर्कभात्⟩ to the end of the birth-asterism: at the mouth of the arrow, five only — gain; at the beginning of the arrow ⟨our mūla now reads शरादौ as one word, so no separate 'two' stands here⟩, arrows ⟨five — the number-word is set here with what appears to be ब, while nine printed pages earlier the same word is set वाण with a counter-tested व. The test was not re-run on this instance, so the apparent difference is recorded and not asserted⟩ — one should declare victory; at the joint of arrow and bow, an arrow — a maker of valour; on the staff, a pair of asterisms ⟨our mūla now reads भद्वितयं⟩ — breaking; and at the two tips of the bow, a set of five — there will be loss. So they hold; and this, with its arrow, is the diagram called the cāpa ⟨the bow⟩. [26] On the staff that stands in the middle ⟨the central pole⟩, on the wheels, at the top, below, at the front of the car ⟨our mūla now reads स्यन्दनाग्रे, with the य⟩, on the yoke, and all round — fire ⟨three⟩, six, guṇa ⟨three⟩, guṇa ⟨three⟩, fire ⟨three⟩ ⟨our mūla now reads अग्नि and षड् here, and gives only five numbers for the car's seven parts, a gap the doubt on this verse records⟩: in that order, success, fame, death, welfare, gain of wealth, breaking, and the giving of comfort — such will it be in the diagram called the ratha ⟨the chariot⟩. ⟨चक्रशिखराधो is one compound naming three places: the wheels, the top and the bottom. The seventh place is सर्वत्र, 'all round', which pairs with the seventh result, comfort.⟩ ⟨Our mūla now reads प्रालेयारिगतोडुतः स्वजननर्क्षान्तं, where prāleyāri, 'the enemy of frost', is the Sun.⟩ The wise man should set down ⟨the count⟩ from the asterism the Sun occupies up to the end of one's own birth-asterism.

11 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्कमात्"; alternatives "अर्कात्" — printed with an extra म before the ablative ending. [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0109, line 28, printed folio 107, at about 2.1x and 3.4x native) and measured. The sort after र्क is म, as this note says: its left stroke falls straight from the headline like the म of न्तम and न्म on the same line (correlation 0.974 and 0.980, against 0.946 with the भ of लाभः). So the press prints अर्कमात्. The mūla now reads अर्कभात्, 'from the Sun's asterism', as an emendation of the press on the lexicon, with the edition's own English in the store's read ('from the Nakshatra occupied by the Sun') and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin. The exemplar's म is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्छर"; alternatives "ल्लर" — flagged by the plate-104 rule: this fount's च्छ and ल्ल are the commonest confusion at low magnification. Here sara ('arrow') recurs three times in the verse, so च्छर (= -c chara) is very likely right, but I did not re-zoom it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बाणा"; alternatives "वाणा" — NOTEWORTHY against plate 107. There the same number-word is set वाण with व (counter test run and confirmed); here it is set with what appears to be ब. If both readings stand, this edition spells bana BOTH ways within nine printed pages. I did NOT re-run the counter test on this instance, so I record the apparent difference rather than asserting it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दौ"; alternatives "द्वौ" — dvau ('two') expected; the ink shows a plain द with the au-matra and no subscript व. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शरादौ. The printer's line-break hyphen after शरा was removed on 2026-09-23 (T44), so दौ is the end of आदौ, 'at the beginning', as the rendering now says, and not the द्वौ this note expected. The plate ruling of the same day placed that line break by the column profile and did not re-read the दौ by eye.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मद्वितयं"; alternatives "भद्वितयं", "मद्वितयं" — bha-dvitayam ('a pair of asterisms') would suit the pattern of the other cakra verses; म/भ again, the same pair flagged on plates 100 and 107. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भद्वितयं; this sentence names मद्वितयं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0109, line 30, at about 2.1x and 3.4x native) and measured. The first sort is भ, with the detached top-left knob of the भ of भङ्गमिति on the same line (correlation 0.924, against 0.89-0.90 with म sorts). So the press prints भद्वितयं, 'a pair of asterisms', and the mūla now reads it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्न्दना"; alternatives "स्यन्दना" — syandana ('car') is required by the table's 'The front portion of the car'; the ink appears to lack the य. Recorded as printed - a dropped sort. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यन्दनाग्रे; this sentence names स्न्दना, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0110, line 9, printed folio 108, at about 2.1x native). The leaf sets स्यन्दनाग्रे with the य whole: स्य, न्द, ना, ग्रे. No sort is dropped, and the mūla now reads it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पड्"; alternatives "षड्" — shad ('six') expected and required by the English; the ink's first akshara reads प to me, not ष. A foul sort or my error - I could not separate them at 1.2x and did not re-zoom. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वत्राग्निषड्गुणगुणाग्निः; this sentence names पड्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0110, line 10, at about 1.8x native, and this sort at about 3.8x beside the ष and प of jp2 page_0106, line 10). The sort sits between प and ष: its left arm is the thin arm of प and no clear diagonal stands in its bowl, though it correlates 0.92 with the ष of मानुष and 0.84 with the प of रूपके. The mūla reads षड् as an emendation of the press on the lexicon, with the edition's own English in the store's read ('the next 6') and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin. The same reading shows the press sets ग्नि before it, not त्रि (0.979 against the line's own final ग्नि). The exemplar's प-like sort is kept on the ledger, and the three syllables this pāda lacks are held in this verse's doubt.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शालेयारिगतोद्भुतः"; alternatives "शालेयारिगतोद्भुत", "शीलेयारिगतोद्भूतः" — UNSETTLED, and the least secure line I have transcribed on these eleven plates. Six aksharas of a compound for which the English supplies no corresponding phrase at all. I can read the letters but cannot check any of them, and I would not defend this string against a second reader. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रालेयारिगतोडुतः; this sentence names शालेयारिगतोद्भुतः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0110, line 12, at about 2.1x, 3.0x and 3.4x native) and measured, and it settles this line. The first sort is प्र (0.80-0.82 against the प्र of प्राणभयं, 0.49-0.62 against श). The ड carries a ु below it; a faint grey speck at its lower left is no letter. The next word opens with the stacked स्व (0.956 and 0.928 against the स्व of स्वीकारे and स्वलाभ, 0.76-0.78 against the ख of सुख). So the press prints प्रालेयारिगतोडुतः स्वजननर्क्षान्तं, and the mūla now reads it; a machine read of Bhasin gives प्रालेयारिगतोडुतः too.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्षान्तं"; alternatives "र्क्षान्तं" — the parallel phrases on plates 108-109 all read -rkshantam with a repha; here I see none, but the akshara sits directly under a descender from the line above. [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0110, line 12, at about 3.0x native). A repha stands over the ā of क्षा, its top 57-60 px above the headline, the height of this fount's repha. No glyph of the line above stands over it: line 11 is blank between चक्रे (ending x 1389) and रथाख्ये (starting x 1432). So the press prints स्वजननर्क्षान्तं with the repha, and the mūla now reads it.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 27 within its section; it is published at position 25.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: This record runs well past its section's median length and the numbering skips before it, so it probably holds MORE THAN ONE verse whose separating mark was not seen. OUR defect, not the source's — re-read this verse's plates before relying on its boundaries.
8.26a reading here is contested

चन्द्रार्क्षान्तमिनर्क्षतो हि गणयेन्नन्दत्रिकानि स्युरित्येवं हानिमथो विभूतिमरुजं नाशं धनायं ततः । राजोपद्रवनिर्धनत्वमृतिदं सौख्यं क्रमात्तत्फलं घूर्णाचक्रमिदं तिलादिमथने स्यान्नारिकेलादिषु ॥ २८ ॥

candrārkṣāntaminarkṣato hi gaṇayennandatrikāni syurityevaṃ hānimatho vibhūtimarujaṃ nāśaṃ dhanāyaṃ tataḥ | rājopadravanirdhanatvamṛtidaṃ saukhyaṃ kramāttatphalaṃ ghūrṇācakramidaṃ tilādimathane syānnārikelādiṣu || 28 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२८॥; it stands at position 26.⟩ One should count from the Sun's asterism to the end of the Moon's asterism: they are groups of nine and of three ⟨a word-space is visible in the ink between नन्द and त्रिकानि; it has been closed here because the compound reads as one, but the space is there⟩. Thus: loss; then splendour; freedom from disease; destruction; the coming of wealth ⟨धनायं — the last two akṣaras are ink-heavy and there is nothing to test them against⟩; then trouble from the king; poverty; the giving of death; and comfort — that is the fruit, in order. This is the ghūrṇā-cakra, and it applies to the pressing of sesame and the like, and to coconuts and the rest.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नन्दत्रिकानि"; alternatives "नन्द त्रिकानि" — a word space is visible in the ink between नन्द and त्रिकानि; I have closed it because the compound reads as one, but the space is there.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनायं"; alternatives "धनाप्तिं", "धनायुं" — the last two aksharas are ink-heavy and I have no English to test them against.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घूर्णा"; alternatives "घूर्ण" — the a-matra after र्ण is present in the ink though the compound would take the short stem.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 28 within its section; it is published at position 26.
8.27a reading here is contested

सूर्यर्क्षाद्विधुभान्तमेव गणयेद्वेदाश्विनेत्रेन्दवो बाणेष्वश्विरसाः क्रमात्फलमथो श्रीहानिलाभोत्कटान् । नाशं मृत्युशुभे च देहकृशतां वित्ताधिकं चोच्यते घूर्णाचक्रमिदं शुभर्क्षसहितं चेक्षुद्रवे योजयेत् ॥ २९ ॥

sūryarkṣādvidhubhāntameva gaṇayedvedāśvinetrendavo bāṇeṣvaśvirasāḥ kramātphalamatho śrīhānilābhotkaṭān | nāśaṃ mṛtyuśubhe ca dehakṛśatāṃ vittādhikaṃ cocyate ghūrṇācakramidaṃ śubharkṣasahitaṃ cekṣudrave yojayet || 29 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥२९॥; it stands at position 27.⟩ One should count from the Sun's asterism to the end of the Moon's asterism: Vedas, Aśvins, eyes, moons; arrows, arrows, Aśvins, flavours ⟨four, two, two, one, five, five, two, six — the eight groups together make the twenty-seven asterisms⟩. The fruit is then, in order: prosperity; loss; overwhelming gain; destruction; death and good; leanness of the body; and abundance of wealth, it is said. This is the ghūrṇā-cakra; joined with an auspicious asterism, one should apply it to the juice of sugarcane.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्यर्क्षाद्विधुभान्तमेव"; alternatives "सूर्यर्क्षादिन्दुभान्तमेव" — 4th akshara is the conjunct द्व carrying a preceding i-matra (द्वि), not दि+न्दु; the 5th is ध+u (धु), read at 5.5x. विधु (Moon) is confirmed by the facing English, which says the count runs to the Moon's nakshatra.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्क्षाद्"; alternatives "र्क्षां" — one superscript mark only over क्ष, measured 33x45 px = the repha spiral used elsewhere on this plate; no anusvara. Zero ink below the headline between the a-stroke and the following द्व.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्वि"; alternatives "श्व" — the i-matra over श्व printed as its hook only: ink occupies x736-772 ABOVE the headline and measures 0 px below it, so the descending stem never inked. Read as ि on three grounds - the hook shape is not the repha spiral (compare the true repha at x412-445 on line 1), the metre needs a light syllable here, and अश्वि=2 is required for the eight groups to sum to 27 nakshatras.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घूर्णा"; alternatives "घूणां", "घूर्णां" — the superscript over णा is broken: a wedge at y1665-1689 plus a detached lower fragment at y1700-1711, total height ~46 px, matching the 45 px repha and far exceeding the 12-17 px anusvara measured over मिदं and तां on this plate. Read as a repha whose middle failed to ink. No separate anusvara dot is present.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 29 within its section; it is published at position 27.
8.28a reading here is contested

सूर्याधिष्ठितभाद् द्युभान्तगणनात् त्रित्र्यग्निबाणाग्नयो बाणाग्न्यश्विमितेष्वसच्छुभमसद्भद्रासतौ सत्वसत् । कल्याणं क्रमतो हलाह्वयमिदं चक्रं स्मृतं शोभनं बीजानां वपने तथा नवकृषाकर्षे शुभे तूक्तवत् ॥ ३० ॥

sūryādhiṣṭhitabhād dyubhāntagaṇanāt tritryagnibāṇāgnayo bāṇāgnyaśvimiteṣvasacchubhamasadbhadrāsatau satvasat | kalyāṇaṃ kramato halāhvayamidaṃ cakraṃ smṛtaṃ śobhanaṃ bījānāṃ vapane tathā navakṛṣākarṣe śubhe tūktavat || 30 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३०॥; it stands at position 28.⟩ Counting from the asterism the Sun occupies to the end of the day-star: three, three, fire, arrows, fires; and in the measures of arrows, fire and Aśvins ⟨three, three, three, five, three, five, three, two — the eight groups together make the twenty-seven asterisms⟩ — not good; good; not good; auspicious; the two not good; good; but not good ⟨our mūla now reads असच्छुभमसद्भद्रासतौ सत्वसत्⟩; welfare — in order. This diagram is called the hala ⟨the plough⟩ and is recorded as auspicious; and in the sowing of seed, and likewise in drawing a new furrow, when it is auspicious, ⟨the fruit is⟩ as stated. ⟨With the syllable सद् now in our mūla, the hemistich scans as Śārdūlavikrīḍita.⟩

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्र्यग्नि"; alternatives "त्र्यग्रि" — the subscript under ग is small; ग्न read on the arithmetic (see next entry) rather than on the ink alone.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बाणाग्नयो"; alternatives "बाणाग्रयो" — the mark below ग is a short hook that could be either the र-subscript or a reduced न. Read ग्न because अग्नयो=3 is required: with line 2's बाण(5) अग्नि(3) अश्वि(2), the eight groups give 3+3+3+5+3+5+3+2 = 27, exactly the nakshatra count, and the facing English lists those same eight group sizes. अग्रयो is not a number-word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भमभ"; alternatives "भमम", "ममभ", "भभभ" — THREE adjacent aksharas between च्छु and द्रा, at x1336-1386, 1399-1452 and 1461-1515, are each a two-stem form joined by a solid mid-band and are mutually near-identical at 8.5x; भ and म are not separable at this scan's resolution in this face. The stretch as a whole is the least secure reading on the plate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बाणाग्न्यश्विमितेष्वसच्छुभमसद्भद्रासतौ; this sentence names भमभ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सतौ"; alternatives "स्तौ", "सदौ" — the whole hemistich will not scan as sardulavikridita from syllable 14 onward under any reading I could make, so at least one akshara here is misread or misprinted. Flagged rather than emended.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवकृषाकर्षे"; alternatives "नवकृषा कर्षे", "नवकृषाऽऽकर्षे" — word division not marked in the print; recorded as the continuous string the plate sets.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 30 within its section; it is published at position 28.
8.29a reading here is contested

अर्कर्क्षाच्चरणेरुपर्यरिमितं स्तम्भे च नाल्यां त्रयं पृष्ठैकं त्वथ पार्श्वयो रसमितं शुक्काणके तु त्रयम् । षण्णौकान्तरगन्वितं हि गदितं नौयाननिर्माणयोरूर्ध्वान्तस्थितभं द्विषट्छुभकरं त्रिन्यक्वसत्साभिजित् ॥ ३१ ॥

arkarkṣāccaraṇeruparyarimitaṃ stambhe ca nālyāṃ trayaṃ pṛṣṭhaikaṃ tvatha pārśvayo rasamitaṃ śukkāṇake tu trayam | ṣaṇṇaukāntaraganvitaṃ hi gaditaṃ nauyānanirmāṇayorūrdhvāntasthitabhaṃ dviṣaṭchubhakaraṃ trinyakvasatsābhijit || 31 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३१॥; it stands at position 29.⟩ From the Sun's asterism ⟨the superscript over the first क is a solid round blob and not the open spiral this plate's repha makes elsewhere; it is read as an over-inked repha because the count starts from the Sun's asterism, and the very next akṣara carries an unambiguous spiral repha for comparison⟩ ⟨four akṣaras between र्क्षा and उपरि could not be settled and are recorded as seen⟩, above: as many as the enemies ⟨six⟩; and on the pillar and in the tube, three; on the back, one; then on the two sides, as many as the flavours ⟨six⟩; and in the śukkāṇaka, three. Six ⟨…⟩ joined with the interval of the boat is what is declared, in the making and the plying of a boat; and the group of asterisms that stands above and within ⟨the boat⟩, twice six, is a maker of good; ⟨the four akṣaras before the close are not resolved⟩ — including Abhijit, which is why this diagram counts twenty-eight and not twenty-seven.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्क"; alternatives "अंक", "अङ्क" — the superscript over the first क is a solid round blob, not the open spiral the repha makes elsewhere on this plate; read as an over-inked repha because the facing English says the count starts from the Sun's nakshatra (अर्क = Sun). The very next akshara क्षा carries an unambiguous spiral repha for comparison.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्चरणेरु"; alternatives "चरणेरु", "च्चरणे रु", "द्यरणेरु" — UNRESOLVED. Four aksharas between र्क्षा and उपरि that I could not settle at 8x. The following उपर्यरिमितं is secure (अरि = the six enemies = 6, matching the English 'place the first 6 above the boat'), so the doubt is confined to this stretch. Recorded as seen rather than emended.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शुक्काणके"; alternatives "शुक्कानके", "सुक्काणके" — printed with retroflex ण; the translator transliterates it 'Sukkanaka' with dental n. Kept as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गन्वितं"; alternatives "गं वितं", "गन्वितम्" — word division not marked; recorded as the continuous string set on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नौयाननिर्माणयो-" — the printed hyphen is a real line-end break: the compound continues onto the next printed line as रूर्ध्वान्त-. Retained because the break is evidence about the setting. [2026-09-23: the hyphen was removed from the mūla by T44 on the lexicon, and the mūla now reads नौयाननिर्माणयोरूर्ध्वान्तस्थितभं. The plate, read by eye at about 2.1x native (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0112, line 3, printed folio 110: a short rule at mid-height at x 2039-2061), confirms it is the press's line-end division inside one compound, नौयाननिर्माणयोः + ऊर्ध्वान्त…. The fact about the setting is kept here, not in the mūla.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थितमं"; alternatives "स्थितिमं", "स्थितमम्" — the vowel of the penultimate akshara is not settled at 4.4x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नौयाननिर्माणयोरूर्ध्वान्तस्थितभं; this sentence names स्थितमं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0112, line 4, at about 3.4x and 3.8x native) and measured. Only one ि-mātrā stands in the word, a stem before स्थ, and त carries no vowel sign, so the press reads स्थित, not स्थिति. The akṣara under the anusvāra is म: the headline runs unbroken over its left limb and its counter opens 15 px below the headline top, as in the म of रसमितं and उपरिमितं, where this press's भ opens at 9-12 px. So the press prints स्थितमं. The mūla corrects the press's म to भ on the lexicon: भ is this chapter's word for an asterism (रविभाद् 8.33), and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin give स्थितभं. The exemplar's म is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिन्यक्वसत्सा"; alternatives "त्रिन्यक्खसत्सा", "त्रिन्यस्यसत्सा" — UNRESOLVED cluster. The closing साभिजित् is secure and matches the English '(including Abhijit)', which is why Abhijit makes the count 28 rather than 27 on this chakra; the four aksharas before it are not.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 31 within its section; it is published at position 29.
8.30a reading here is contested

वह्न्यृक्षादिनभान्तकं हि गणने बाणा मुखे पूज्यता कण्ठे स्युर्नव लाभदाः प्रभुमृतेर्मध्ये गजा दण्डके । बाणा राज्यकराः क्रमात्फलमिदं स्याद्दीपिकाख्यं स्मृतं चक्रं नूतनदीपभाजनविनिक्षेपे त्ववश्यं शुभम् ॥ ३२ ॥

vahnyṛkṣādinabhāntakaṃ hi gaṇane bāṇā mukhe pūjyatā kaṇṭhe syurnava lābhadāḥ prabhumṛtermadhye gajā daṇḍake | bāṇā rājyakarāḥ kramātphalamidaṃ syāddīpikākhyaṃ smṛtaṃ cakraṃ nūtanadīpabhājanavinikṣepe tvavaśyaṃ śubham || 32 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३२॥; it stands at position 30.⟩ Counting from the star of Agni ⟨Kṛttikā⟩ to the end of the sky: arrows ⟨five⟩ at the mouth — honour; at the neck there are nine, and they are givers of gain ⟨our mūla reads स्युर्नव; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found a repha over the न⟩; in the middle, the death of the master; on the staff, elephants ⟨eight⟩; arrows ⟨five⟩ — makers of a kingdom. This fruit in order is what is recorded as the diagram called the dīpikā ⟨the little lamp⟩; and in the setting down of a new lamp-vessel it is without fail auspicious.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वह्न्यृक्षा"; alternatives "वह्नित्वक्षा", "वह्न्यृक्षाद्" — read वह्नि+ऋक्षात् = 'from Agni's star'. Agni presides over Krittika, and the facing English says 'Reckon from Krittika', so the identification is independently confirmed by the translator rather than by the ink alone.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युनवैव"; alternatives "स्युर्नवैव", "स्युनर्वेव" — नव = 9 matches the English '9 for the neck'; the mark over the न is not cleanly resolvable between a repha and an anusvara at 4.4x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्युर्नव; this sentence names स्युनवैव, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0112, line index 14, printed folio 110, at about 4.2x native, plain and gamma-stretched) found exactly three letter bodies between कण्ठे and लाभदाः: स्यु (97 px), न (50 px) and व (41 px). There is no ink above the final व, so no ऐ-mātrā is printed, and the one mark over the न is a hollow hook 44 px tall, the repha, where a known anusvāra of this fount is 15 px tall and solid. So the press sets स्युर्नव, as our mūla reads, and the वै read here is not on the page. The 2026-09-05 reading of the 1740 px render added a syllable; the 2026-09-20 pass did not take one away.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 32 within its section; it is published at position 30.
8.31a reading here is contested

चक्रांतर्विधिभात् त्रिभं तु विलिखेत्तद्वच्च पूर्वादिषु त्वेवं संगणितेऽतिशीघ्रजलदं तन्निर्जलं मध्यमम् । नीराभावजलादिकामृतजलक्षारोदनीरान्वितं मध्यं स्याद्विधुभात्फलं भवति तत्कूपस्य वाप्याश्च वा ॥ ३३ ॥

cakrāṃtarvidhibhāt tribhaṃ tu vilikhettadvacca pūrvādiṣu tvevaṃ saṃgaṇite'tiśīghrajaladaṃ tannirjalaṃ madhyamam | nīrābhāvajalādikāmṛtajalakṣārodanīrānvitaṃ madhyaṃ syādvidhubhātphalaṃ bhavati tatkūpasya vāpyāśca vā || 33 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३३॥; it stands at position 31.⟩ Within the diagram one should write three asterisms from Vidhi's star ⟨Rohiṇī — Vidhi is Brahmā, the regent of Rohiṇī⟩, and likewise in the east and the other quarters. When it has been reckoned out in this way, ⟨the ground⟩ yields water very quickly; that other is waterless; that is middling; ⟨and the rest are⟩ attended with absence of water, with water and the like, with nectar-water, with saline water, and with cool water. From the Moon's asterism the fruit will be middling; and this holds for a well, or for a step-tank.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधिभात्"; alternatives "विधिभात", "विधिभाद्" — विधि = Brahma/Prajapati, the presiding deity of Rohini; the facing English says 'Reserve 3 Nakshatras from Rohini', confirming the identification.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चक्रांतर्"; alternatives "चक्रान्तर्" — printed with anusvara rather than the न्त conjunct; kept as printed.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 33 within its section; it is published at position 31.
8.32a reading here is contested

स्तंभाग्रे रसभं मृतिं त्वथ नखा मध्ये यशः संपदं तन्मूले भयुगं धनक्षयमपीनक्षांद्विधोर्भान्तकम् । गेहारंभतटाकवापिखनने चारामसंस्थापने स्तंभस्थापनमत्र कीर्तिसुखदं वंशाभिवृद्धिं दिशेत् ॥ ३४ ॥

staṃbhāgre rasabhaṃ mṛtiṃ tvatha nakhā madhye yaśaḥ saṃpadaṃ tanmūle bhayugaṃ dhanakṣayamapīnakṣāṃdvidhorbhāntakam | gehāraṃbhataṭākavāpikhanane cārāmasaṃsthāpane staṃbhasthāpanamatra kīrtisukhadaṃ vaṃśābhivṛddhiṃ diśet || 34 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३४॥; it stands at position 32.⟩ At the tip of the pillar, as many as the flavours ⟨six⟩ — death; then the nails ⟨twenty⟩ in the middle — fame and wealth; at its root, a pair of asterisms ⟨two⟩ — loss of wealth as well, ⟨counting⟩ to the end of the Moon's asterism ⟨our mūla now reads अपीनक्षांद्विधोर्भान्तकम्; विधोर्भान्तकम् is clear, while नक्षां before it stays unresolved⟩. In the beginning of a house, in the digging of a tank or a step-well, and in the laying out of a garden, the setting up of the pillar here gives fame and comfort, and it indicates the increase of the lineage ⟨our mūla now reads स्तंभस्थापनमत्र, 'here'⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रसमं"; alternatives "रसमितं", "रसमं" — रस = 6, matching the English 'within the first 6, it signifies death'; नख = 20 in the same line matches 'the next 20'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads रसभं; this sentence names रसमं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अपीनक्षांद्विघोर्मान्तकम्"; alternatives "अपीनक्षान्द्विघोर्मान्तकम्", "अपीनक्षांद्विघोर्मन्तकम्" — UNRESOLVED tail. भयुगं (a pair of stars = 2) and धनक्षयम् (loss of wealth) are secure and match the English 'if it falls in the last 2, loss of wealth'; the remainder of the pada I could not construe and have recorded exactly as the aksharas fall.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मलं"; alternatives "मल", "मलम्" — the anusvara over this akshara is faint; the word itself does not construe for me in context and may be a misprint for something like -मिदं. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्तंभस्थापनमत्र; this sentence names मलं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 34 within its section; it is published at position 32.
8.33a reading here is contested

द्वारोर्ध्वं भचतुष्टयं दिशति तद्राज्यं तदन्तस्त्रयं राज्यं कोणचतुष्टये वसुमितं चोद्वासकं शाखयोः । अष्टावष्टविभूतयो जलधयो मृत्युं त्वथो चक्रतो द्वाराख्यं रविभाद्दिनोडुगदितं स्याद्देहलीस्थापने ॥ ३५ ॥

dvārordhvaṃ bhacatuṣṭayaṃ diśati tadrājyaṃ tadantastrayaṃ rājyaṃ koṇacatuṣṭaye vasumitaṃ codvāsakaṃ śākhayoḥ | aṣṭāvaṣṭavibhūtayo jaladhayo mṛtyuṃ tvatho cakrato dvārākhyaṃ ravibhāddinoḍugaditaṃ syāddehalīsthāpane || 35 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३५॥; it stands at position 33.⟩ Above the door, four asterisms — that indicates a kingdom; three within it — a kingdom; eight measured out for the four corners; and what dislodges, on the two side-posts; eight and eight are splendours; the oceans ⟨four⟩ give death; and then, from the diagram, the one called the door ⟨dvāra⟩, stated from the Sun's asterism to the asterism of the day ⟨our mūla now reads द्वाराख्यं रविभाद्दिनोडुगदितं, and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 confirmed it⟩, is for the setting of the threshold.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भचतुष्टय"; alternatives "मचतुष्टय", "भचतुष्टयं" — भ = star; भ-चतुष्टय = 4 stars, matching the English 'Mark 4 stars for the upper portion of the door frame'. भ and म are hard to separate in this face (the same confusion as plate 111 line 22); read भ on the sense. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भचतुष्टयं. It was corrected on 2026-09-20 on the metre: syllable 8 of pāda 1 must be heavy, and the machine reads of both other printings give the anusvāra. The plate pass of 2026-09-23 did not open this locus, so this note's भ against म stands as it was.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसुमितं" — वसु = 8, matching the English '8 for the 4 corners at 2 each'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जलधयो"; alternatives "जलघयो", "जलधयों" — ध vs घ is not separable at 4.4x here; जलधि = ocean = 4 would fit the English 'the last 4 for the bottom of the frame'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वाःस्थं रविभादिनेऽङ्गदितं"; alternatives "द्वाःस्थं रविभादिनोऽङ्गदितं", "द्वारस्थं रविभादिनेऽङ्गदितं" — REFUSAL-GRADE. The first two thirds of this pada is the most lightly-inked type on the plate: strokes are broken and several aksharas have lost their upper halves. The closing स्याद्देहलीस्थापने is clean and secure. I have recorded what the surviving ink supports and flagged the rest rather than reconstructing it from the English. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads रविभाद्दिनोडुगदितं and द्वाराख्यं; this sentence names रविभादिनेऽङ्गदितं and द्वाःस्थं, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected them, and they are kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the pāda is now read on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0113, line index 22, at about 3.1x, 3.4x and 4.3x native) found that the press sets द्वाराख्यं रविभाद्दिनोडुगदितं स्याद्देहलीस्थापने, our mūla exactly. The ink is thin, not absent. The mark after द्वा that looks like a visarga is a र whose middle stroke has dropped out, because a 16 px ā-mātrā stands beside it and no visarga takes an ā; the anusvāra stands over the second of the two units after it, so the stretch is ख्यं. After न the ā-stem is attached, with a headline, which makes नो, not a free-standing avagraha, and then comes डु with its u-mātrā. So द्वाःस्थं रविभादिनेऽङ्गदितं was a misreading of broken type, and with our reading the pāda counts nineteen.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 35 within its section; it is published at position 33.
8.34a reading here is contested

सैका वारयुता तिथिः कृतहृता शेषेऽग्निशून्ये सुखं भूनेत्रेऽर्थविनाशनं रविभतश्चाचन्द्रभं त्रित्रिभम् । सूर्यज्ञाऽस्फुजिदार्किचन्द्रकुजगुर्वस्वन्त्यगैः सच्छुभे पापेऽसन्नवचुल्लिकाग्रहमखादिष्वग्निसंस्थापने ॥ ३६ ॥

saikā vārayutā tithiḥ kṛtahṛtā śeṣe'gniśūnye sukhaṃ bhūnetre'rthavināśanaṃ ravibhataścācandrabhaṃ tritribham | sūryajñā'sphujidārkicandrakujagurvasvantyagaiḥ sacchubhe pāpe'sannavacullikāgrahamakhādiṣvagnisaṃsthāpane || 36 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३६॥; it stands at position 34.⟩ The tithi with one added, joined with the weekday ⟨our mūla now reads वारयुता⟩, divided by the kṛta ⟨four⟩: if the remainder is fire or void ⟨three or nought⟩, comfort; if earth or eyes ⟨one or two⟩, destruction of wealth. And from the Sun's ⟨star⟩ up to the Moon's asterism, in groups of three ⟨our mūla now reads त्रित्रिभम्⟩. With the Sun, Jña ⟨Mercury⟩, Asphujit ⟨Venus⟩, Ārki ⟨Saturn⟩, the Moon, Mars, Jupiter ⟨and then four akṣaras in which two more grahas should be hiding — a published rendering ends the list 'Jupiter, Rāhu and Ketu' — and which cannot be named from the ink: the reading as given does not construe⟩ — where a benefic stands it is good, and where a malefic, not good; and this is for a new hearth, and in the sacrifice to the planets and the like, and in the installation of the fire.

10 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सैंका"; alternatives "सैका", "सेंका" — opening akshara carries both an e-matra and an anusvara; read as printed. [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads सैका. The plate was read by eye on 2026-09-30 (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0113, line 31, printed folio 111, at about 2.7x and 3.7x native). The mark over स is one piece of type, this fount's ai-sort, a slanted stroke with a smaller hooked stroke fused on top; it matches the ai over गैः on page_0114 line 1 in size and shape, and no separate dot like the anusvāra of सुखं on the same line stands over सै or का. The upper hook of the ai-sort was read as an anusvāra. So the press prints सैका.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाग्युता"; alternatives "वारयुता", "वाग्भुता" — the conjunct is not settled between ग्य and र्य at 4.4x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वारयुता; this sentence names वाग्युता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (the 1993 exemplar, jp2 page_0113, line 31, printed folio 111, at about 3.1x native) and measured. At first sight the whole band looked like र; the measurements decided it. The akṣara after वा is the half-form ग्: a stem at the right, a two-lobed body and no tail (0.984 against the ग् of ग्नि, against 0.92 and 0.877 with two र), and no repha stands over यु. So the press prints वाग्युता. The mūla emends it to वारयुता on the metre: with वाग्युता pāda 1 counts 18 syllables, with वारयुता a flawless 19. The edition's own English in the store's read ('the number denoting the week day') and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin give वार. The exemplar's reading is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिलिभम्"; alternatives "त्रितिभम्", "त्रिनिभम्" — the middle akshara of the final word is not settled. NOTE: this verse is cut by the plate - only its first two padas are printed here; padas 3-4 and the verse number fall on plate 114, so the number 36 is my inference from the sequence and is NOT printed on this plate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्रित्रिभम्; this sentence names त्रिलिभम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0113, line 32, at about 3.2x and 3.8x native). The middle akṣara is ल: its lower-left tail sweeps down to the right with a loop, as in the ल of अंगुला (store page_0114, line 17), and it is not the त्र one akṣara to its left, whose stroke runs down to the left. So the press prints त्रिलिभम्. The mūla emends it to त्रित्रिभम् on the metre: syllable 17 of pāda 2 must be heavy, and त्रि before the conjunct त्र is. The edition's own English in the store's read ('9 groups of 3 each') and the machine reads of Sastri and Bhasin give त्रित्रि. The exemplar's reading is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्यं"; alternatives "सूर्य" — p114 L2: at 7x the marks over the second akshara are a comma-hook AND a separate round dot, i.e. repha + anusvara. An anusvara is not wanted inside this dvandva; recorded because the ink is there. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्यज्ञाऽस्फुजिदार्किचन्द्रकुजगुर्वस्वन्त्यगैः; this sentence names सूर्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0114, line 1, printed folio 112, at about 3.1x native) and measured at thresholds 128, 200 and 230. Above य stands ONE mark, the spiral repha: a round head with a counter and a tail to the headline, one connected component. Nothing else stands above य, ज्ञा or सू (the lightest threshold finds nothing, and the minimum grey is 238). The 'separate round dot' this note saw is the round head of the repha. So the press prints no anusvāra over सूर्य, and the mūla now reads सूर्यज्ञा.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽस्फुजिदा"; alternatives "स्फुजिदा" — p114 L2: an avagraha is printed between jna and sphujit where the sandhi jna+asphujit would not take one. As printed. [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0114, line 1, at about 3.1x native). It confirms the sign: a free-standing avagraha at x 522-554, separated by white from ज्ञा's ā-stem and from स्फु. It is this press's regular mark for a merged initial a, which our text keeps elsewhere in this book (वाऽपि 4.10). The proposal to remove it was withdrawn, and ज्ञाऽस्फु stays as printed.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्किं"; alternatives "र्कि" — p114 L2: same repha+dot ambiguity as suryam above. arki = Saturn, the fourth in the English list. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्यज्ञाऽस्फुजिदार्किचन्द्रकुजगुर्वस्वन्त्यगैः; this sentence names र्किं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate was read by eye (jp2 page_0114, line 1, at about 3.1x native) and measured. Above दार्कि the only ink is one component: the arc of ि, which merges at its right end with the round head of the spiral repha. There is no separate dot, so the press prints र्कि with no anusvāra, and the mūla now reads it. With र्कि pāda 3 scans a flawless 19.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुर्वस्वन्त्यगैः"; alternatives "गुर्वखन्त्यगैः", "गुर्वग्वन्त्यगैः" — p114 L2: UNSETTLED. The akshara after gur-va is the fount's sva/kha form, which I cannot separate here (on p99 the same sort was decided as sva by context; there is no context here). The reading I give does not construe. The English opposite ends the list 'Jupiter, Rahu and Ketu', so two more grahas should be hiding in these four aksharas and I cannot name them from the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्" — p114 L2: n-tya contains the same isolated two-stroke half-na sort identified on p99; here it sits inside ntya, which independently requires a half-na.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३६ ॥" — p114 L3: both dandas clean here. Numeral 36 fixed by the 'Sloka-36.' locator below; this is my ground truth for the digit 6 in this fount (a rising stroke closing into a loop), against which 9 is distinguished.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 36 within its section; it is published at position 34.
8.35a reading here is contested

पेट्यायामविशालयोर्विनिहतिर्भक्ता खगैः शेषके त्वेकादौ तु खगक्रमाद्रविमुखाः स्युः खेचरास्तत्फलम् । सौम्यासौम्यवशाच्छुभाशुभमिति स्यादंगुलाद्येन वै यत्र स्याद्द्वियवादिकं ध्वज इहाष्टौ स्युर्यवा अंगुले ॥ ३७ ॥

peṭyāyāmaviśālayorvinihatirbhaktā khagaiḥ śeṣake tvekādau tu khagakramādravimukhāḥ syuḥ khecarāstatphalam | saumyāsaumyavaśācchubhāśubhamiti syādaṃgulādyena vai yatra syāddviyavādikaṃ dhvaja ihāṣṭau syuryavā aṃgule || 37 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३७॥; it stands at position 35.⟩ The product of the length and the breadth of the box, divided by the sky-goers ⟨nine⟩: in the remainder, from one onward, the sky-goers stand in the order of the planets, with the Sun at their head — that is the fruit. According as they are benefic or not benefic it is good or bad; and it comes about by the aṅgula and what follows it ⟨our mūla now reads अंगुलाद्येन⟩. Wherever there are two barleycorns or more, it is the flag here; eight barleycorns go to the aṅgula.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेचरास्तत्फलम्"; alternatives "खेचरास्तंफलम्", "खेचरास्तः फलम्" — p114 L21: a small mark stands between -sta- and -phalam that I cannot resolve at 2.4x into a half-ta rather than an anusvara or a stray.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — p114 L21: single danda closes the hemistich.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यादंगुलाघेन"; alternatives "स्यादंगुलार्धेन" — p114 L22: gha vs r-dha in the penultimate akshara; there is a hook above it that could be a repha. Not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यादंगुलाद्येन; this sentence names स्यादंगुलाघेन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0114, line index 17, at about 3.3x native) settled what the press sets. The akṣara before न is a single consonant, 52 px wide, where this fount sets a consonant + य conjunct at about 100 px; it has no ink below the baseline and one mark above the headline, of the density of a plain e-mātrā. So there is no repha, the alternative अंगुलार्धेन falls, and the press sets अंगुलाघेन, this note's own first reading. That is not a word. Our अंगुलाद्येन emends the press on the lexicon, with the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri (page_0194 line 14) and uk-bhasin-hindi (page_0201 line 24), which both give अङ्गुलाद्येन; the metre is silent.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्युर्यंवा"; alternatives "स्युर्यवा", "स्युर्यवां" — p114 L23: repha + a round dot again over the same akshara. yava (barleycorn) is the word the English uses throughout. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्युर्यवा; this sentence names स्युर्यंवा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0114, line index 18, at about 3.3x native) found one connected mark above -र्य-, broad at the top and tapering to meet the headline: a repha and nothing else. The anusvāra of अंगुले on the same line is a detached compact blob, and none stands over this akṣara. So the press sets स्युर्यवा, as our mūla reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३७ ॥"; alternatives "। ः३७ ॥" — p114 L23: THIS IS THE MARK THE BRIEFING DESCRIBES. At 6x the OPENING is one full-height danda followed by a second stroke BROKEN into an upper and a lower segment with clear white between them - it reads exactly like a danda plus a visarga. The identical broken opening appears before the numeral 1 on p99. Recorded as printed; a parser demanding two clean strokes here will lose the verse. Numeral 37 fixed by the 'Sloka-37.' locator below; my ground truth for the digit 7.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 37 within its section; it is published at position 35.
8.36a reading here is contested

चक्रं सावयवं नराकृतिमितं संलिख्य तद्ग्रामभात् स्वर्क्षान्तं शिरसीषवो धनचयं तन्नाशमास्ये त्रयम् । हृद्यक्षा धनदा रसा यदि पदोर्निस्वं विधुः पृष्ठगः प्राणापायमथो श्रियं जलधयो वस्तौ तु गुह्ये द्वयम् ॥३८॥

cakraṃ sāvayavaṃ narākṛtimitaṃ saṃlikhya tadgrāmabhāt svarkṣāntaṃ śirasīṣavo dhanacayaṃ tannāśamāsye trayam | hṛdyakṣā dhanadā rasā yadi padornisvaṃ vidhuḥ pṛṣṭhagaḥ prāṇāpāyamatho śriyaṃ jaladhayo vastau tu guhye dvayam ||38||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३८॥; it stands at position 36.⟩ Having drawn the limbed diagram in the measure of a human shape, ⟨count⟩ from the asterism of that village to the end of one's own asterism. On the head, arrows ⟨five⟩ — a heap of wealth; on the face, three — the destruction of it; on the heart, the eyes ⟨two⟩ — givers of wealth ⟨our mūla reads धनदा, as it now reads धनचयं before it⟩; the flavours ⟨six⟩; and if the Moon is on the two feet, destitution; ⟨if⟩ standing on the back, the ruin of life; then prosperity; the oceans ⟨four⟩ on the bladder; and on the pudendum, two —

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शिरसीपवो"; alternatives "शिरसीप्सवो", "शिरसि ईपवो" — p114 L35: read as printed; the word division is not recoverable at 2.6x and I do not construe it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शिरसीषवो; this sentence names शिरसीपवो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्नाशमास्ये" — p114 L35: the half-na sort again.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनदा"; alternatives "घनदा" — p114 L36: dha vs gha not separable at 2.4x. Note the PRECEDING line has ghana-cayam where I read gha, so both letters occur in this passage and neither reading can be settled by frequency.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "" — p114 L36: this is a THIRD quarter-line and carries NO danda and no number - consistent with the four-line verse pattern, where only the 2nd and 4th quarter-lines are punctuated.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्रिंय"; alternatives "श्रियं", "श्रिय" — p114 L37: a round dot stands above, between shri and ya; which akshara it belongs to is not determinable. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads श्रियं; this sentence names श्रिंय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥३८॥" — p114 L37: set TIGHT, with no spaces inside the dandas, where verses 36 and 37 on this same page have spaces. Compositor's whim; recorded as printed, not normalised. Numeral 38 continues the 36-37-38 sequence; my ground truth for the digit 8.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 38 within its section; it is published at position 36.
8.37a reading here is contested

पीडां चैव भियं दिशेदथ करे स्याद्दक्षिणे वामके त्वेकैकं बहुलाभकृद्भवति तद्दारिद्र्यमेवं क्रमात् । कस्मिंश्चिन्नगरेऽथवा जनपदे वस्तुं यदीच्छेन्नरः संवीक्ष्यैवमथो विशेद्यदि सुतार्थायुःश्रियश्चाप्नुयात् ॥३९॥

pīḍāṃ caiva bhiyaṃ diśedatha kare syāddakṣiṇe vāmake tvekaikaṃ bahulābhakṛdbhavati taddāridryamevaṃ kramāt | kasmiṃścinnagare'thavā janapade vastuṃ yadīcchennaraḥ saṃvīkṣyaivamatho viśedyadi sutārthāyuḥśriyaścāpnuyāt ||39||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥३९॥; it stands at position 37.⟩ — and it indicates affliction and fear as well; then on the right hand and on the left, one each, which makes much gain; and then poverty: thus, in order. If a man wishes to dwell in some city or district, then, having examined it in this way, if he enters, he obtains sons, wealth, long life and prosperity.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बहुलाभकृद्भवति"; alternatives "बहुलाभभृद्भवति" — p114 L39: ka+r vs bha+r in the fifth akshara, not separable at 2.7x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदारिव्यमेवं"; alternatives "तदारिश्यमेवं", "तदारिष्यमेवं" — p114 L39: UNSETTLED. I can see the aksharas but cannot construe the word; recorded as the shapes read. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्दारिद्र्यमेवं; this sentence names तदारिव्यमेवं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — p114 L39: the page ENDS on a hemistich danda with no verse number - verse 39 is only half printed here and runs on to the next plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नगरेऽथवा"; alternatives "नगरेंऽथवा" — p115 L2: a supernumerary round dot stands over -re- just before the avagraha, where no anusvara belongs. Reported, not transcribed into the text, because I cannot tell dirt from an anusvara sort at this size.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्न" — p115 L2: both cchin-na and yadicchen-narah use the isolated two-stroke half-na sort.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुतार्थांयुः"; alternatives "सुतार्थायुः" — p115 L3: repha plus a round dot over the same akshara again; sutartha-ayuh (sons, wealth, long life) is what the English opposite renders, and it wants no anusvara. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सुतार्थायुःश्रियश्चाप्नुयात्; this sentence names सुतार्थांयुः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥३९॥" — p115 L3: set tight, no spaces. Numeral 39 - the digit 9 is a closed bowl with a descending tail, clearly distinct from the 6 on p114 which rises into its loop. Fixed by the 'Sloka-38-39.' locator below.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 39 within its section; it is published at position 37.
8.38a reading here is contested

जन्मर्क्षाद्गुरुभान्तकं हि गणयेच्चक्रे तु वट्वाकृतौ मूर्ध्नीषुः सुखिनं मुखे त्रयमपि स्वाचारहीनं वटुम् । हृद्येकं पिशुनं करोति पदयोरष्टौ रुगार्तं क्रमादण्डे भद्वितयं सुवर्चसमथाष्टौ चाजिने पण्डितम् ॥४०॥

janmarkṣādgurubhāntakaṃ hi gaṇayeccakre tu vaṭvākṛtau mūrdhnīṣuḥ sukhinaṃ mukhe trayamapi svācārahīnaṃ vaṭum | hṛdyekaṃ piśunaṃ karoti padayoraṣṭau rugārtaṃ kramādaṇḍe bhadvitayaṃ suvarcasamathāṣṭau cājine paṇḍitam ||40||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥४०॥; it stands at position 38.⟩ One should count from the natal asterism to the end of Jupiter's asterism, in the diagram shaped like the boy ⟨vaṭu, the boy taking the sacred thread⟩. On the head, an arrow ⟨five — this number-word stands inside the Sanskrit with no gloss beside it on this plate, so a reader of the mūla alone will not see a five here⟩ — he is happy; on the face, three — a boy destitute of good conduct; on the heart, one — it makes him a slanderer; on the feet, eight — afflicted by disease ⟨our mūla now reads रुगार्तं⟩ — in order; on the staff, a pair of asterisms — lustrous ⟨our mūla now reads सुवर्चसमथाष्टौ, that is सुवर्चसम् + अथ अष्टौ⟩; and then eight on the skin — a learned man.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जन्मर्क्षांद्गुरुभान्तकं"; alternatives "जन्मर्क्षाद्गुरुभान्तकं" — p115 L21: an anusvara dot sits over -rksha- in addition to its repha; the sense (from the natal asterism) wants none. As printed. jan-ma and bhan-ta both carry the two-stroke half-na sort. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जन्मर्क्षाद्गुरुभान्तकं; this sentence names जन्मर्क्षांद्गुरुभान्तकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0115, store line 20, at about 2.4x native) found that the press sets जन्मर्क्षाद् with a repha only and no anusvāra. The dot read here is the foot of the repha's leg (37 px, joined to it at threshold 190); an anusvāra on this page is a separate oval, about 225 px in भान्तकं on the same line. Our mūla reads जन्मर्क्षाद्, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वटुवाकृतौ"; alternatives "वटोराकृतौ", "वटुबाकृतौ" — p115 L21: vatu = the boy taking the sacred thread, which the English opposite names; the akshara between vatu and -krtau is not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वट्वाकृतौ; this sentence names वटुवाकृतौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0115, store line 20, at about 2.4x native) found that the press sets वट्वाकृतौ, with a straight virāma stroke under ट, not the curled ु this fount hangs under गु on the same line. So the akṣara between vaṭu and -kṛtau is व, and pāda 1 is then 19 syllables. Our mūla reads वट्वाकृतौ, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मूर्ध्नीषुः"; alternatives "मूर्ध्नि इषुः", "मूर्ध्नीषु" — p115 L22: THIS IS A BHUTA-SAMKHYA IN THE MULA and the editor does NOT gloss it. ishu (arrow) = 5, and the English opposite reads 'Reserve the first 5 for the head'. So the number-word is inside the Sanskrit with no arabic help on this plate, unlike the glossed cases the briefing describes. A consumer reading the mula alone will not see a 5 here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रगांतं"; alternatives "रुगांतं", "रुगार्तं" — p115 L23: the first akshara may carry a u-matra I cannot see at 3x. rug- (disease) would match the English '(4) afflicted with disease'; I do not emend. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads रुगार्तं क्रमादण्डे; this sentence names रगांतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0115, store line 22, at about 1.8x and 2.4x native) found that the press sets रुगार्तं. The u-sign stands as a separate blob at the mid-right of र, the way this fount builds the रु of गुरु; nothing stands over गा, whose ā-bar is broken; and the heavy mark over त is a repha with its anusvāra. Our mūla reads रुगार्तं, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमा–" — p115 L23: line ends with a HYPHEN, the word krama- running on into the next printed line. Second such Devanagari word-break in my pages. [2026-09-23: confirmed on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0115, at about 1.8x native) found that store line 22 ends क्रमा with a printed dash at mid-height and line 23 opens दण्डे: the press divides the words at a line end. The line-break pass (T44) joined them, and our mūla reads क्रमादण्डे.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुवर्चंरुमथांष्टौ"; alternatives "सुवर्चंसुमथांष्टौ", "सुवर्चसमथाष्टौ" — p115 L24: UNSETTLED even at 6x. The akshara after -rcam- is a rounded form with a descending curl that I cannot separate into ru / su / gra. The English opposite gives '(5) lustrous' and 'the next 8', so suvarcasam + atha ashtau is the likely text, but that is inference from the rendering and not a reading of the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सुवर्चसमथाष्टौ; this sentence names सुवर्चंरुमथांष्टौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0115, store line 23, at about 2.4x and 2.5x native) found that the press sets सुवर्चसमथाष्टौ. A plain repha stands over र्च with no anusvāra beside it; the akṣara after it has the frame of स, with a full right stem to the baseline, which a रु lacks; and nothing stands over था. So the reading rests on the ink, not only on the English. Our mūla reads सुवर्चसमथाष्टौ, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥४०॥" — p115 L24: tight again. Numeral 40 fixed by the 'Sloka-40.' locator below; 0 is a small full circle.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 40 within its section; it is published at position 38.
8.39a reading here is contested

गेहादिष्वपि भूगतं मणिधनास्थ्याद्यं किमस्तीति तत् सद्यः प्रत्ययकारकं निगदितं चक्रं तु निध्याह्वयम् । तिर्यक्पञ्च तथोर्ध्वगा वसुमिता रेखा लिखेत्साभिजित् त्वष्टाविंशतिकोष्ठकेषु लिखितेष्वृक्षेषु तत्पृच्छया ॥ ४१ ॥

gehādiṣvapi bhūgataṃ maṇidhanāsthyādyaṃ kimastīti tat sadyaḥ pratyayakārakaṃ nigaditaṃ cakraṃ tu nidhyāhvayam | tiryakpañca tathordhvagā vasumitā rekhā likhetsābhijit tvaṣṭāviṃśatikoṣṭhakeṣu likhiteṣvṛkṣeṣu tatpṛcchayā || 41 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥४१॥; it stands at position 39.⟩ In houses and the like, too: what lies buried in the ground — jewels, wealth, bones and the like — what is there? Such is the diagram declared to produce conviction at once, and it is called the nidhi ⟨the buried treasure⟩. One should draw five lines crosswise and eight running upward, ⟨reckoning⟩ with Abhijit; and in the twenty-eight squares so drawn, with the asterisms written in them, ⟨the answer is given⟩ by that question. ⟨Both वसुमिता, eight, and त्वष्टाविंशति, twenty-eight, are number-words standing unglossed inside the Sanskrit, with no numeral set beside them; and in the second the subscript त of ष्ट is faint enough that it could be a blot, in which case the page prints a misprint.⟩

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेहादिश्चयदि"; alternatives "देहादिष्वयदि", "नेहादिश्चयदि" — p115 L34: UNSETTLED at 5.5x. I can count the aksharas (two, then an i-matra unit, then a unit with a subscript, then two more) but cannot construe the word. deha- (body) would suit a verse about body parts, but I am NOT claiming that reading. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गेहादिष्वपि; this sentence names चेहादिश्चयदि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मणिधनास्थ्याच"; alternatives "मणिघनास्थ्याच" — p115 L34: dha vs gha again unresolved at 2.7x. mani-dhana (jewels and wealth) is the plausible compound. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मणिधनास्थ्याद्यं; this sentence names मणिधनास्थ्याच, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "किमर्तीति"; alternatives "किमर्थीति", "किमम्र्तीति", "किमर्त्तीति" — p115 L34: the akshara between ki-ma and -ti carries a repha and a long i and I cannot resolve its base. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads किमस्तीति; this sentence names किमर्तीति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निध्याह्वयत्"; alternatives "निद्याह्वयत्", "विध्याह्वयत्" — p115 L35: last word unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads निध्याह्वयम्; this sentence names निध्याह्वयत्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — p115 L35: the plate ends on a hemistich danda - verse 41's first half only; the rest runs on to the next plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसुमिता" — p116 L2: BHUTA-SAMKHYA IN THE MULA, UNGLOSSED. vasu = 8 (the eight Vasus), and the English opposite reads 'crossed by 8 vertical lines'. No arabic numeral is set beside it on this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्वष्टाविंशति"; alternatives "त्वषाविंशति" — p116 L3: THIS IS THE NUMBER 28 and it is worth flagging. At 8x the akshara after tva has a closed counter (sha, not sha-palatal) and a small blob at its foot which I read as the subscript ta of shta - but that subscript is faint and could be a blot. If it is absent the page prints 'tvashavimshati', a misprint. The English opposite reads '28 squares' and '28 Nakshatras'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ४१ ॥" — p116 L3: both dandas clean here, with spaces. Numeral 41 continues 40 on the previous plate.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 41 within its section; it is published at position 39.
8.40a reading here is contested

अन्त्याद्ये यमवह्निभे पितृभगौ तां चोत्तराफल्गुनी सप्तस्वेव भसप्तकं प्रविलिखेत्तत्रादिपङ्क्त्यां ततः । आहिर्बुध्न्यमजैकपाच्छतभिषग्ब्रह्मोरगेज्याः करोधोपङ्क्त्यामभिजिद्धरिर्वसुमृगार्द्रादित्यचित्रास्त्वधः ॥४२॥

antyādye yamavahnibhe pitṛbhagau tāṃ cottarāphalgunī saptasveva bhasaptakaṃ pravilikhettatrādipaṅktyāṃ tataḥ | āhirbudhnyamajaikapācchatabhiṣagbrahmoragejyāḥ karodhopaṅktyāmabhijiddharirvasumṛgārdrādityacitrāstvadhaḥ ||42||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥४२॥; it stands at position 40.⟩ The last and the first ⟨Revatī and Aśvinī⟩, the star of Yama ⟨Bharaṇī⟩ and of fire ⟨Kṛttikā⟩, the ancestors' ⟨Maghā⟩ and Bhaga's ⟨Pūrvaphalgunī⟩, and Uttaraphalgunī ⟨our mūla now reads अन्त्याद्ये, 'the last and the first', so Aśvinī stands in this line⟩; a set of seven asterisms one should write in the seven ⟨squares⟩ there, in the first row ⟨our mūla now reads सप्तस्वेव and तत्रादिपङ्क्त्यां here⟩; then in the row below ⟨adhaḥ-paṅkti⟩: Āhirbudhnya ⟨Uttarabhādrapadā⟩, Ajaikapād ⟨Pūrvabhādrapadā⟩, Śatabhiṣaj, Brahmā's ⟨Rohiṇī⟩, the serpent's ⟨Āśleṣā⟩, Ijya's ⟨Puṣya⟩, and Hasta; and below ⟨that⟩: Abhijit, Hari's ⟨Śravaṇa⟩, Vasu's ⟨Dhaniṣṭhā⟩, Mṛgaśiras, Ārdrā, the Āditya's ⟨Punarvasu⟩, Citrā ⟨our mūla now reads चित्रास्त्वधः, citrāḥ tu adhaḥ, 'and … Citrā below'⟩.

11 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अन्त्याद्वि"; alternatives "अन्त्याद्व्यश्वि", "अन्त्याद्ब" — p116 L4: UNSETTLED, and it matters. The English opposite lists the top row as Revati, Aswini, Bharni, Krittika, Magha, P.phalguni, Uttaraphalguni. antya = Revati (the last), yama = Bharani, vahni = Krittika, pitr = Magha, bhaga = P.phalguni - all present. ASWINI IS NOT IN MY READING, so either an akshara is hiding in this cluster or the line differs from the rendering. I do not emend it in. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads अन्त्याद्ये; this sentence names अन्त्याद्वि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 3, at about 2.4x and 2.7x native) found that the press sets अन्त्याद्ये: over the द्य stands this fount's detached e-mātrā, not an i-mātrā, which would need a second stem and an arch. So Aśvinī is in the line: अन्त्याद्ये, 'the last and the first', is Revatī and Aśvinī. Our mūla reads अन्त्याद्ये, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तां"; alternatives "ता" — p116 L4: anusvara over ta before ca; recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सप्तन्त्येव"; alternatives "सप्तान्त्येव", "सप्तैवैव" — p116 L5: the cluster after sapta contains the two-stroke half-na sort plus tye; I cannot construe the word. The English has 'the 7 squares'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सप्तस्वेव; this sentence names सप्तन्त्येव, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 4, at about 2.4x, 2.5x and 2.7x native) found that the press sets सप्तस्वेव (saptasu eva). The third akṣara is स्व, 78 px wide like the स्व of स्वाचार on page_0115, its left part a half-स closed into a loop; this fount's half-न is a dash floating free of the headline. Our mūla reads सप्तस्वेव, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चित्रांदिपङ्क्त्यां"; alternatives "चैत्रादिपङ्क्त्यां", "चत्रादिपङ्क्त्यां" — p116 L5: an anusvara stands over -tra- as well as its a-matra. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रविलिखेत्तत्रादिपङ्क्त्यां; this sentence names चित्रांदिपङ्क्त्यां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 4, at about 2.7x native) found that the press sets प्रविलिखेत्तत्रादिपङ्क्त्यां. No ink stands above the headline between खे and दि, so there is no i-mātrā and no anusvāra; the dot read here is the broken top of the ā-bar of त्रा; and the conjunct after खे is त्त, not च्चि. It reads 'there, in the first row'. Our mūla reads it so, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शतमिषिग्"; alternatives "शतमिषग्" — p116 L6: an i-matra appears where shatabhishaj would want none. As printed. [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 5, at about 2.7x native) found that the press sets छतभिषिग्: the letter after त is भ, its headline broken as this fount's भ is, not म; and the ष carries its own i-mātrā, as this note saw. Our mūla reads छतभिषग्: the भ on the plate, and the i of षि removed on the lexicon, because the asterism is शतभिषज्, which before ब्र is शतभिषग्. The ledger keeps the press's षि.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "करो–" — p116 L6: line ends with a HYPHEN; kara- (Hasta) runs on into the next printed line, which opens with dhye. Third such Devanagari word-break in my ten plates. [2026-09-23: Read again by eye at 5x on the 1993 plate (folio 114): the next line opens धो, a single ध with its ो, not ध्ये, and the Sastri 2010 printing opens its line धोपङ्क्त्याम् too. So the words are करो + अधोपङ्क्त्याम्, 'in the row below', and the mūla now reads करोधोपङ्क्त्याम्.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हरिर्वंसु"; alternatives "हरिर्वसु" — p116 L7: an anusvara stands over -rva- in addition to its repha; vasu (Dhanishta) wants none. As printed. [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 6, at about 1.8x native) found one mark over व, a plain hollow repha, and no anusvāra beside it at any threshold. The press sets हरिर्वसु, and our mūla reads so, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आद्रां"; alternatives "आर्द्रा" — p116 L7: printed with an anusvara and without the repha the name Ardra requires. As printed. [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 6, at about 1.8x native) found that the mark over द्रा is a hollow arch 26 px wide with two legs, the repha, and not this page's filled anusvāra oval. The press sets मृगार्द्रादित्य, with the repha the name Ārdrā requires, and our mūla reads so, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चित्रास्तवघः"; alternatives "चित्रास्तवधः", "चित्रास्तवर्गः" — p116 L7: the word after Chitra is not construable to me; gha vs dha unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आहिर्बुध्न्यमजैकपाच्छतभिषग्ब्रह्मोरगेज्याः करोधोपङ्क्त्यामभिजिद्धरिर्वसुमृगार्द्रादित्यचित्रास्त्वधः; this sentence names चित्रास्तवघः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0116, store line 6, at about 1.8x native) found that the press sets स्त्व after त्रा, with a stemless त्, not स्तव. The last consonant could not be told apart as ध or घ on the master, so the lexicon decides: after चित्रास् the words are तु अधः, 'and below', which join as त्वधः; त्वघः has no parse. Our mūla reads चित्रास्त्वधः.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥४२॥" — p116 L7: set TIGHT with no spaces, where 41 two lines above has spaces. Same plate, both forms - the punctuation really is compositor's whim within a single page.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 42 within its section; it is published at position 40.
8.41a reading here is contested

चातुर्थ्यामपि विश्वतो यदनुजज्येष्ठाख्यमैत्राख्यभेन्द्राग्नीस्वातय एव चक्रवशतः संचिन्त्य वस्त्वादिशेत् । याम्याग्न्यश्विशिवादिती गुरुमघाश्लेषाभिजिद्रेवती श्रोणाविश्वजलाजपादितिमनूडुष्वेव चन्द्रो विभुः ॥ ४३ ॥

cāturthyāmapi viśvato yadanujajyeṣṭhākhyamaitrākhyabhendrāgnīsvātaya eva cakravaśataḥ saṃcintya vastvādiśet | yāmyāgnyaśviśivāditī gurumaghāśleṣābhijidrevatī śroṇāviśvajalājapāditimanūḍuṣveva candro vibhuḥ || 43 ||

⟨Our mūla numbers this ॥ ४३ ॥; it stands at position 41.⟩ In the fourth ⟨row⟩ too: from Viśva ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩, ⟨yad-anuja⟩, that called Jyeṣṭhā, that called Maitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, Indrāgni ⟨Viśākhā⟩, and Svātī. Having considered by force of the diagram, one should declare the object. ⟨A published rendering places Pūrvāṣāḍhā and Mūla between Uttarāṣāḍhā and Jyeṣṭhā, and no regents' names for them could be found in these akṣaras: either the reading is wrong or the line and the rendering diverge here. Reported, not repaired.⟩ Yāmya ⟨Bharaṇī⟩, Āgneya ⟨Kṛttikā⟩, Aśvinī, Śiva's ⟨Ārdrā⟩, Aditi's ⟨Punarvasu⟩, Guru's ⟨Puṣya⟩, Maghā, Āśleṣā, Abhijit, Revatī, Śroṇā ⟨Śravaṇa⟩, Viśvā ⟨Uttarāṣāḍhā⟩, Jala ⟨Pūrvāṣāḍhā⟩, Ajapād ⟨Pūrvabhādrapadā⟩, Aditi — in these fourteen asterisms the Moon is lord ⟨manu, the fourteen Manus, is a number-word standing unglossed inside the Sanskrit, with no numeral beside it⟩.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चातुर्थ्यांमपि"; alternatives "चतुर्थ्यामपि" — p116 L8: BOTH an anusvara AND a full ma are set where caturthyam + api needs only one nasal - a duplicated nasal. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads चातुर्थ्यामपि for चातुर्थ्यांमपि, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यदनुज" — p116 L8: read as seen. The English opposite has Purvashadha and Moola between Uttarashadha (vishva) and Jyeshta; I cannot find deity-names for them in these aksharas, so either my reading is wrong or the line and the rendering diverge here. Reported, not repaired.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मे–" — p116 L8: HYPHEN at line end; me- runs on to -ndragni (Indragni = Visakha) on the next line. Fourth Devanagari word-break.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनूडुष्वेव"; alternatives "मनूडुष्वेव" — p116 L11: SECOND UNGLOSSED BHUTA-SAMKHYA on this plate - manu = 14 (the fourteen Manus), and the English opposite reads 'The Moon is the lord of the 14 stars'. Again no arabic numeral beside it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।ः ४३ ॥"; alternatives "॥ ४३ ॥" — p116 L11: THE BROKEN OPENING DANDA AGAIN, third occurrence in my plates (p99 before 1, p114 before 37, here before 43). One full danda, then a second stroke split into an upper and a lower tick with white between, printing as danda-plus-visarga. Recorded with the visarga shown; a parser wanting two clean strokes loses the verse.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 43 within its section; it is published at position 41.
8.42a reading here is contested

शेषेष्वेव मनूडुपूष्णकिरणो नाथोऽथ तात्कालिकौ सूर्येन्दू निधिकारकौ तु भवतस्तौ वक्ष्यमाणक्रमात् । आद्यन्तं रविभस्य हारक इति स्यात्तत्प्रवेशादितश्चेष्टान्तं घटिकावियद्रसगुणाहाराप्तलब्धं तु भम् ॥४४ ॥

śeṣeṣveva manūḍupūṣṇakiraṇo nātho'tha tātkālikau sūryendū nidhikārakau tu bhavatastau vakṣyamāṇakramāt | ādyantaṃ ravibhasya hāraka iti syāttatpraveśāditaśceṣṭāntaṃ ghaṭikāviyadrasaguṇāhārāptalabdhaṃ tu bham ||44 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥४४ ॥, with the opening daṇḍa tight against the digits and a space before the closing one; it stands at position 42.⟩ In the remaining ⟨fourteen⟩, the hot-rayed one ⟨the Sun⟩ is the lord ⟨our mūla now reads मनूडुपूष्णकिरणो; across the sandhi u + u = ū its last member is उष्णकिरण, 'the hot-rayed one', a name of the Sun⟩; and then the Sun and the Moon of the moment are the two significators of the treasure — those two, in the order about to be stated. From beginning to end of the Sun's asterism is the divisor; then, from its entry up to the desired point, the ghaṭikās multiplied by sky-and-flavours ⟨sixty — another number-word standing unglossed in the Sanskrit⟩ and divided by that divisor give the quotient, which is the asterism.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनूडुपूष्णक्षिरणो"; alternatives "मनूडुपूष्णः किरणो", "मनूडुपूष्णश्चिरणो" — p116 L12: the aksharas between pushna and -no are not resolvable at 3x; word division unknown. pushan = the Sun, matching 'The Sun is the lord of the remaining 14'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मनूडुपूष्णकिरणो; this sentence names मनूडुपूष्णक्षिरणो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाथोऽथ"; alternatives "नांथोऽथ" — p116 L12: a supernumerary dot sits over na-. Reported; not carried into the text.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।" — p116 L13: single danda, no number - this is the half-verse the English locator calls 43 1/2. The plate ends the verse group here and the rest runs on.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "–" — p117 L13: HYPHEN at line end; -ita- runs on into shcheshtantam on the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वियद्रस" — p117 L14: BHUTA-SAMKHYA IN THE MULA, UNGLOSSED. viyat (sky) = 0 and rasa (the tastes) = 6, read right-to-left = 60; the English opposite reads 'multiply the same by 60'. No arabic gloss is set beside it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥४४ ॥" — p117 L14: ASYMMETRIC - the opening double danda is tight against the digits, the closing one has a space before it. Recorded exactly as printed.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 44 within its section; it is published at position 42.
8.43a reading here is contested

तच्छेषाद्घटिका नगाश्विनिहता षष्ट्याप्तलब्धं हि भं तद्यात त्वथ वर्तमानभगतं तात्कालिकोऽर्को भवेत् । तात्कालेन्दुरिहैवमिष्टघटिकाः सप्ताश्विनिघ्नाः खषड्भक्ता लब्धमिहोडवश्च घटिकाः शेषो विनाड्यः क्रमात्

taccheṣādghaṭikā nagāśvinihatā ṣaṣṭyāptalabdhaṃ hi bhaṃ tadyāta tvatha vartamānabhagataṃ tātkāliko'rko bhavet | tātkālendurihaivamiṣṭaghaṭikāḥ saptāśvinighnāḥ khaṣaḍbhaktā labdhamihoḍavaśca ghaṭikāḥ śeṣo vināḍyaḥ kramāt

⟨The plate numbers this ॥४५; it stands at position 43.⟩ From that remainder, the ghaṭikās multiplied by mountains-and-Aśvins ⟨twenty-seven⟩ and divided by sixty give the asterism obtained: that which has passed, and then the current one not yet passed — this is the Sun of the moment. The Moon of the moment ⟨is found⟩ here in the same way: the desired ghaṭikās multiplied by seven-and-Aśvins ⟨twenty-seven⟩, divided by sky-and-six ⟨sixty⟩ — the quotient is here the asterism, ⟨and the rest⟩ the ghaṭikās, and the remainder the vināḍīs, in order. ⟨Three of the numbers in this verse are unglossed number-words while the very same line writes sixty out plainly as ṣaṣṭyā, so the edition mixes the two conventions within one line; and the printed line breaks in the middle of the number-word खषड्-, so a number is split across two printed lines. The closing double daṇḍa is simply absent — the verse ends double-daṇḍa-four-five and then white paper, and it has not been completed here.⟩

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नगाश्वि" — p117 L15: SECOND unglossed bhuta-samkhya - naga (mountains) = 7, ashvi (the Ashvins) = 2, giving 27; the English opposite reads 'multiplied by 27'. Note the SAME line then writes 60 out in words as shashtya, so this edition mixes number-words and figure-words within one line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्यात"; alternatives "तंद्यात", "तद्यातं" — p117 L16: a mark stands over the first akshara that may be an anusvara or dirt. [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. The jp2 master page_0117 (2900x4721, greyscale), read at about 3.3x native and measured, shows no mark over तद् or anywhere above तद्यात. The nearest ink is the foot of the द्घ on the line above, 70 px higher and over the join of द्य and ात. The press sets तद्यात without an anusvāra, and our mūla reads so.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सप्ताश्वि" — p117 L17: THIRD unglossed bhuta-samkhya - sapta = 7, ashvi = 2, giving 27 ('Multiply this by 27').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खषड्–" — p117 L17: FOURTH unglossed bhuta-samkhya - kha (sky) = 0, shash = 6, giving 60 ('divide the product by 60') - AND the line ends with a HYPHEN in the middle of that very compound, khashad- running on into bhakta. So a number-word here is split across two printed lines. [2026-09-23: measured on jp2 page_0117 at native pixels, the hyphen is a 41x10 px rule at mid-height after the virāma, the press dividing one compound at a line end; the line-break pass (T44) removed it from the mūla, which reads खषड्भक्ता.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रमात्॥४५"; alternatives "क्रमात् ॥ ४५ ॥" — p117 L18: THE CLOSING DOUBLE DANDA IS SIMPLY ABSENT. The verse ends double-danda-4-5 and then white space - exactly the case the briefing names. Recorded as printed and NOT completed. The opening danda is also tight against the preceding word with no space. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads ∅ for ४५, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-11 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 45 within its section; it is published at position 43.
8.44a reading here is contested

तत्कालेन्दुरिनादिदृष्ट इह तद्धेमं च तारं तथा ताम्रं पित्तलकं सुवर्णमथ तत्कांस्यं च लोहं त्रपुः । सीसं यद्यपि खेचरैः सुबहुभिर्दृष्टा बहून्येव चेदेकेनापि न वीक्षितः कमपि नास्त्येवेति वाच्यं निधौ ॥४६॥

tatkālendurinādidṛṣṭa iha taddhemaṃ ca tāraṃ tathā tāmraṃ pittalakaṃ suvarṇamatha tatkāṃsyaṃ ca lohaṃ trapuḥ | sīsaṃ yadyapi khecaraiḥ subahubhirdṛṣṭā bahūnyeva cedekenāpi na vīkṣitaḥ kamapi nāstyeveti vācyaṃ nidhau ||46||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥४६॥; it stands at position 44.⟩ The Moon of the moment, aspected here by the Sun and the rest, ⟨indicates⟩ gold ⟨तद्धेमं is not settled even at high magnification: the akṣara carries a subscript and a curved mark above that may be an e-mātrā. It is read -धे- because the verse then runs a list of nine metals that matches a published rendering item for item, and hema, gold, is the only member fitting the first slot — but that is an argument from the rendering and not a reading of the ink⟩, and silver, and likewise copper, brass, fine gold, then bell-metal, and iron, tin, and lead. And even though it be aspected by very many sky-goers, there are many ⟨such things⟩; but if it is not looked at by even one, then of the treasure one should say that nothing at all is there.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्धेमं"; alternatives "तद्द्रुमं", "तद्द्वमं" — p118 L2: NOT SETTLED at 9x. The akshara carries a subscript and a curved mark above that could be an e-matra. I read it as -dhe- because the verse then runs a list of NINE metals (this one, tara, tamra, pittala, suvarna, kamsya, loha, trapu, sisa) that matches the English opposite item for item, '(1) golden articles (2) silver ... (9) lead', and hema (gold) is the only member that fits slot 1 - but that is an argument from the rendering, not a reading of the ink, and I flag it as such.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुवर्णमथ"; alternatives "सुवर्णंमथ" — p118 L3: a round dot may sit over -rna- in addition to its repha, which would duplicate the nasal before ma. Not resolvable at 3x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खेचरैः" — p118 L4: the visarga here is cut as two OPEN RINGS, not filled dots, and is set after a wide space. Recorded as a visarga; the ring form is this fount's, not damage.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दृष्टा"; alternatives "दृशा", "दृश्ना" — p118 L4: the akshara after -r- carries a subscript I cannot resolve at 3x. drshta (aspected) is what the English opposite requires ('aspected by many planets'); I do not claim it from the shape.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चे–" — p118 L4: HYPHEN at line end; ce- runs on to -dekenapi.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥४६॥" — p118 L5: tight, no spaces. Numeral 46 fixed by the 'Sloka-46.' locator below.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 46 within its section; it is published at position 44.
8.45a reading here is contested

चन्द्रे सर्वखगेक्षिते तु सुमहाभाण्डं लभेच्छ्रीकरं सूर्यर्क्षे यदि हेमजं रजतजं स्थूलेन्दुराशौ स्थिते । भौमर्क्षे यदि ताम्रजं बुधगृहे रत्नाढ्यकं जीवभे शैलं शुक्रगृहे तु मृण्मयमिदं तल्लोहजं मन्दभे ॥ ४७ ॥

candre sarvakhagekṣite tu sumahābhāṇḍaṃ labhecchrīkaraṃ sūryarkṣe yadi hemajaṃ rajatajaṃ sthūlendurāśau sthite | bhaumarkṣe yadi tāmrajaṃ budhagṛhe ratnāḍhyakaṃ jīvabhe śailaṃ śukragṛhe tu mṛṇmayamidaṃ tallohajaṃ mandabhe || 47 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥ ४७ ॥; it stands at position 45.⟩ When the Moon is aspected by all the sky-goers, one obtains a very great vessel, a maker of prosperity. If it is the Sun's asterism, ⟨the treasure is⟩ made of gold; made of silver, when ⟨the Moon⟩ stands in the gross Moon's sign; if it is Mars's asterism, made of copper; in Mercury's house, rich in jewels; in Jupiter's asterism, stone; but in Venus's house, made of clay; and in Manda's ⟨Saturn's⟩ asterism, made of iron.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वखगोक्षिते"; alternatives "सर्वखगेक्षिते" — p118 L14: printed with an o-matra where khaga + ikshite would give -ge-. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वखगेक्षिते; this sentence names सर्वखगोक्षिते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्यर्क्षं"; alternatives "सूर्यंर्क्षं" — p118 L15: a CLUSTER of three or four separate marks stands over the first two aksharas - more ink than repha-plus-anusvara accounts for. Reported; I carry only what I can name into the text. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सूर्यर्क्षे; this sentence names सूर्यर्क्षं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृण्मयंमं"; alternatives "मृण्मयं मं", "मृण्मयःमं" — p118 L17: between mrnmaya- and -mam there is a vertical cluster of small marks that reads like a colon or a doubled anusvara. Recorded as an anusvara plus the following ma; the extra ink is real and I cannot name it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मृण्मयमिदं; this sentence names मृण्मयंमं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ४७ ॥" — p118 L17: spaced, where 46 two verses earlier on this same plate is tight. Numeral 47 fixed by the 'Sloka-47.' locator below.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 47 within its section; it is published at position 45.
8.46a reading here is contested

भे तत्कालविधोः स्थितौ शशिरवी चेदस्ति चायं रवेश्चेच्छल्यं परिवर्तनेन तु तयोर्नाप्यत्र किं विद्यते । चन्द्रे क्रूरखगान्विते यदि निधौ खं नो लभेतान्यथा चेदस्त्यत्र शशाङ्कभुक्तलवतः खातं कराद्यं भवेत् ॥ ४८ ॥

bhe tatkālavidhoḥ sthitau śaśiravī cedasti cāyaṃ raveścecchalyaṃ parivartanena tu tayornāpyatra kiṃ vidyate | candre krūrakhagānvite yadi nidhau khaṃ no labhetānyathā cedastyatra śaśāṅkabhuktalavataḥ khātaṃ karādyaṃ bhavet || 48 ||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥ ४८ ॥; it stands at position 46.⟩ In the asterism where the Moon of the moment stands, if the Moon and the Sun are ⟨together⟩, and if this belongs to the Sun, ⟨there is⟩ a śalya ⟨a buried bone or the like; our mūla reads चेच्छल्यं, चेत् + शल्यं, where an eye reading of the plate gave चेच्छलयं, one syllable too many for the metre⟩; but by an interchange of the two, what indeed is to be found here? Nothing. If the Moon is joined with cruel sky-goers, then ⟨our mūla reads यदि, 'if', where an eye reading of the plate gave तदि, which is not a word⟩ one obtains nothing whatever in the treasure. If it is otherwise, then it is here; and from the degrees the Moon has traversed the digging is to be made, measured in cubits and so on ⟨our mūla reads कराद्यं, kara + ādyam, where our earlier text read करावं, which is not a word⟩.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भे"; alternatives "मे" — p118 L28: read at 13x and SETTLED there - the akshara has a mid-height bar joining the left member to the stem, an enclosed counter above it, and an OPEN lower left. That is bha; ma in this fount closes the lower left into a bowl. At 2.8x it read as 'me'. bhe (in the asterism) also matches 'in a star ruled by the Moon' opposite. This is my calibration pair for bha vs ma on these plates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रवे–" — p118 L28: HYPHEN at line end.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्चेच्छलयं"; alternatives "श्वेच्छलयं" — p118 L29: continues rave- from the previous line; the second and third aksharas are not construable to me. [2026-09-23: re-read on the page in the T45 plate pass, the press does set श्चेच्छलयं, in four separate akṣaras, so this note records the page correctly. The mūla now reads रवेश्चेच्छल्यं, चेत् + शल्यं, emended against the press because that pāda counts one syllable too many for the metre.] [2026-09-23: that plate reading was made by eye on jp2 page_0118, line index 28, printed folio 116, at about 3.30x and 3.53x native. The word divides into four bodies, 60, 107, 41 and 46 px wide, with white breaks of five columns between them, and the anusvāra stands detached over the last, so ल and य are two akṣaras and not a ल्य conjunct. The alternative श्वे is refuted too: the first body is 60 px, with its े detached above the headline, where a known व on the same line measures 37 px.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदि"; alternatives "यदि" — p118 L30: the page prints what I read as ta-di where the sense wants yadi (if) - the same word IS printed as yadi twice earlier on this plate (L15, L16), so the two forms sit on one page. Recorded as printed; this may be a compositor's error and it is exactly the sort of thing a diplomatic transcript should preserve. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads यदि for तदि, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लभेतान्यथा" — p118 L30: the half-na here is again the isolated two-stroke sort, which at low magnification is easy to mistake for a visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "करावं"; alternatives "करार्वं", "कराढ्यं" — p118 L31: not construable to me at 2.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कराद्यं for करावं, corrected in pass mula-verification-2026-09 (see this verse's revisions rows); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the plate pass opened this line (jp2 page_0118, line index 30) and made no ruling on this word. Its reader's eye at about 4.26x native took the last body as वं, while a व template cut from the same line matched it at only 0.660, below two stretches that hold no व (0.709 over खातं, 0.687 over भवेत्); that body is 53 px wide and ends fourteen rows higher than every other body in the line. What the press sets here is not settled. Our कराद्यं rests on the lexicon and the machine reads of the two other printings.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ४८ ॥" — p118 L31: spaced. Numeral 48 fixed by the 'Sloka-48.' locator below.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 48 within its section; it is published at position 46.
8.47a reading here is contested

रेखास्तूर्ध्वमुखाश्चतस्र उदितास्तद्वच्च तिर्यङ्मुखाश्चक्रं स्यान्नवकोष्ठकं परिणयेऽर्कर्क्षाद्विधोर्भान्तकम् । मध्ये प्रागनलादिदिक्षु विलिखेत् त्रीणि क्रमात् त्रीणि वै तन्मध्यस्थितकोष्ठगत्रिभमिदं हरत्याशु तौ दम्पती ।.४९॥

rekhāstūrdhvamukhāścatasra uditāstadvacca tiryaṅmukhāścakraṃ syānnavakoṣṭhakaṃ pariṇaye'rkarkṣādvidhorbhāntakam | madhye prāganalādidikṣu vilikhet trīṇi kramāt trīṇi vai tanmadhyasthitakoṣṭhagatribhamidaṃ haratyāśu tau dampatī |.49||

⟨The plate numbers this ।.४९॥ — a fourth distinct form of the verse-mark on these plates: one full daṇḍa followed by a small mark, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 placed in the lower half of the line, with a clean double daṇḍa closing. It stands at position 47.⟩ Four lines with their faces upward have been stated, and likewise four running crosswise ⟨an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found a single nasal here, and our mūla reads tiryaṅmukhāḥ⟩; the diagram will have nine squares ⟨nine is here written as the plain word nava and not as a number-word — the opposite convention from the plates just before, in the same passage of the same work⟩. In a marriage, from the Sun's asterism up to the Moon's asterism ⟨an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave परिणयेऽर्कर्क्षाद्विधोर्भान्तकम्, and our mūla now reads so⟩. In the middle, and in the east, the south-east and the other quarters, one should write three in order, and three indeed; and this group of three asterisms, lying in the square at its middle, swiftly destroys that wedded pair.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिर्यंङ्मुखा–"; alternatives "तिर्यङ्मुखा–" — p119 L10: BOTH an anusvara and a half-nga are set on the same syllable - a doubled nasal. As printed. Line ends with a HYPHEN, the word running on. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads रेखास्तूर्ध्वमुखाश्चतस्र उदितास्तद्वच्च तिर्यङ्मुखाश्चक्रं; this sentence names तिर्यंङ्मुखा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. The jp2 master page_0119, read at about 1.6x and 2.8x native and measured, shows one mark over य, a repha of 25x25 px, and no anusvāra; the press sets तिर्यङ्मुखा–, a single nasal, at the end of store line 9. Our mūla reads तिर्यङ्मुखाश्चक्रं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नवकोष्ठकं" — p119 L11: nine is written as the plain word nava, NOT as a bhuta-samkhya - the opposite convention from p116 and p117, in the same passage of the same work. The English renders it '9 squares'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परिणयेऽर्क्षांद्द्विधोमांन्तकम्"; alternatives "परिणयेऽर्क्षाद्द्विधोमान्तकम्", "परिणयेऽर्कर्क्षाद्..." — p119 L11: NOT CONSTRUED. I can count the aksharas and see two supernumerary anusvaras, but I cannot resolve the word division, and I am not going to invent one. The English opposite at this point reads 'Counting from the Nakshatra occupied by the Sun', which would want ark-rksha-, but that is the rendering talking, not the ink. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads परिणयेऽर्कर्क्षाद्विधोर्भान्तकम्; this sentence names परिणयेऽर्क्षांद्द्विधोमांन्तकम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. The page sets परिणयेऽर्कर्क्षाद्विधोर्भान्तकम्, read on jp2 page_0119 (store line 10) at about 2.6x and 3.0x native. The two marks read as anusvāras are the rephas of र्क्षा and र्भा (330-337 px each, the size of every repha on the leaf; an anusvāra here is 135-157 px); a full क with its own repha follows the avagraha; there is no second द्; and the letter after धो is भ. It construes: from the Sun's asterism to the end of the Moon's, as the edition's English says. Our mūla reads it so, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्मध्यस्थितकोष्टगलिमभिदं"; alternatives "तन्मध्यस्थितकोष्ठगत्रिमभिदं" — p119 L13: the middle of this compound is not construable to me at 2.4x; kostha (square) is spelt with a subscript ta here rather than tha. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तन्मध्यस्थितकोष्ठगत्रिभमिदं; this sentence names तन्मध्यस्थितकोष्टगलिमभिदं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. The page sets कोष्ठगत्रिभमिदं, read on jp2 page_0119 (store line 12) at about 2.6x and 2.8x native. The stacked ष्ठ is the same sort as नवकोष्ठकं two pādas earlier (correlation 0.934), so कोष्ठ is not spelt with a subscript ṭa; and the letter after ग is त्र (0.914 against the त्र of त्रीणि, 0.716 against ल). Our mūla reads it so, corrected on the plate.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।.४९॥"; alternatives "॥ ४९ ॥" — p119 L13: A FOURTH FORM OF THE VERSE-NUMBER MARK, different again from every earlier one. The opening is ONE full-height danda followed by a single small round DOT at mid height - not two strokes, not the broken-stroke form seen on p99/p114/p116. The closing is a clean double danda. Recorded as printed. Across my ten plates this book has now printed the same mark at least four ways. [2026-09-23: measured on jp2 page_0119 and read by eye at about 2.0x and 2.9x native, the mark after the daṇḍa is 8x15 px in the lower half of the line (y 1770-1785 against the daṇḍa's 1723-1795), 24 px from the daṇḍa's centre where a second stroke of ॥ would stand 31 px off. It is not a broken second stroke, and it does not sit at mid height. Our mūla keeps ।.४९॥ as printed.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 49 within its section; it is published at position 47.
8.48a reading here is contested

प्रागाद्यष्टसु तत्क्रमादतिशुभं तद्वंश्यहानिं ततो वैधव्यं कुलवर्धनं बहुऋणव्याधी स्त्रियं जारिणीम् । धान्यार्थेऽखिलसंपदश्च कुरुते वेशादिकं चान्द्रभं चैवं चक्रकदम्बमद्रिपतिना श्रीनन्दिने मापितम् ॥५०॥

prāgādyaṣṭasu tatkramādatiśubhaṃ tadvaṃśyahāniṃ tato vaidhavyaṃ kulavardhanaṃ bahuṛṇavyādhī striyaṃ jāriṇīm | dhānyārthe'khilasaṃpadaśca kurute veśādikaṃ cāndrabhaṃ caivaṃ cakrakadambamadripatinā śrīnandine māpitam ||50||

⟨The plate numbers this ॥५०॥; it stands at position 48.⟩ In the eight beginning with the east, in that order: exceedingly auspicious; then the destruction of that lineage; widowhood; the increase of the family; much debt and disease ⟨our mūla now reads बहुऋण, with ऋण, 'debt'⟩; a woman who takes a paramour; and it makes grain, wealth and every kind of prosperity, and a dwelling and the rest — this from the Moon's asterism. And thus this cluster of diagrams was measured out by the lord of the mountain for Śrī Nandin. ⟨What this last quarter-line says reads like an attribution, and possibly a date — Nandana is a Jovian year-name — embedded in the verse itself. If so, this mūla line carries colophon-like matter, and anyone taking every mūla line as text would ingest an attribution. It is flagged and the line is not reclassified, because भ and म are not separable at this magnification and मापितम् against भाषितम् is not settled.⟩

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्वंश्यहानि"; alternatives "तद्द्वंश्यहानि" — p119 L14: possible doubled da; 'Destruction of the entire family' is the corresponding table cell.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धान्यार्थें"; alternatives "धान्यार्थे" — p119 L16: repha, e-matra AND an anusvara all sit on the one akshara. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धान्यार्थेऽखिलसंपदश्च; this sentence names धान्यार्थें, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वेशादिकं"; alternatives "वेश्यादिकं", "देशादिकं" — p119 L16: not settled at 3.1x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मापितम्"; alternatives "भाषितम्", "भापितम्" — p119 L17: bha vs ma is not separable at this magnification (it needed 13x on p118). NOTE WHAT THIS QUARTER-LINE SAYS: adri-patina ... shri-nandine mapitam / bhashitam reads like an ATTRIBUTION and possibly a date (Nandana is a Jovian year name) embedded in the verse itself. If so, this mula line carries colophon-like matter, and a consumer taking every mula line as scripture would ingest an attribution. I flag it; I do not reclassify the line, because the reading is not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥५०॥" — p119 L17: tight. Numeral 50 fixed by the 'Sloka-49-50.' locator below.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 50 within its section; it is published at position 48.

Adhyāya 9 · द्वितीयकाण्डः (no khaṇḍa heading set) — Kāṇḍa II

9.1a reading here is contested

लक्षण्यां स्त्रियमुद्वहेदवितथस्वब्रह्मचर्यो मनःकान्तामन्यपरिग्रहत्वसवयःसापिण्ड्यरुग्वर्जिताम् । गोत्रादिप्रवरेषु साम्यरहितां कुष्ठाद्यमर्यादिनीं गौरीत्वानधिकां मनोनयनयोरानन्दिनीं सुन्दरीम् ॥ १ ॥

lakṣaṇyāṃ striyamudvahedavitathasvabrahmacaryo manaḥkāntāmanyaparigrahatvasavayaḥsāpiṇḍyarugvarjitām | gotrādipravareṣu sāmyarahitāṃ kuṣṭhādyamaryādinīṃ gaurītvānadhikāṃ manonayanayorānandinīṃ sundarīm || 1 ||

Let a man who has kept his own brahmacarya unbroken ⟨our mūla now reads avitatha, 'unbroken', with the negative the rule and the metre need⟩ marry a woman who bears the auspicious marks and is dear to him — one not already another's, not of his own age, not a sapiṇḍa, and free of disease; not agreeing with him in gotra, pravara and the rest; free of leprosy (kuṣṭha) and the like ⟨our mūla now reads कुष्ठाद्यमर्यादिनीं; its exact division is not certain, and this follows the sense⟩; not past the age called Gaurī ⟨the Sanskrit gives only that technical age-name and states no number of years⟩; delighting both mind and eye; and beautiful.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वितथम्स्वब्रह्मचर्यो"; alternatives "वितथस्वब्रह्मचर्यो" — p120 L17: an explicit ma-with-virama stands where the compound would normally elide it. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्त्रियमुद्वहेदवितथस्वब्रह्मचर्यो मनःकान्तामन्यपरिग्रहत्वसवयःसापिण्ड्यरुग्वर्जिताम्; this sentence names वितथम्स्वब्रह्मचर्यो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मनः–" — p120 L17: HYPHEN at line end, manah- running on into kanta- on the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुष्ठायमर्यांदिनां"; alternatives "कुष्ठाचमर्यादिनां", "कुष्ठाद्यमर्यादिनां" — p120 L19: NOT CONSTRUED. kushtha (leprosy) is secure and matches 'contagious diseases like leprosy' opposite; the four aksharas after it carry two supernumerary anusvaras and I cannot resolve the word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुष्ठाद्यमर्यादिनीं; this sentence names कुष्ठायमर्यांदिनां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गौरीत्वनधिकां" — p120 L20: 'not exceeding Gauri-hood'. Gauri is a technical age-name for a girl (8 years in the usual scheme); the English opposite converts it to 'below 10 years of age'. The rendering supplies a NUMBER the Sanskrit does not state - the reverse of a bhuta-samkhya, and worth knowing before treating the English as a witness to the number. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गौरीत्वानधिकां; this sentence names गौरीत्वनधिकां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ १ ॥" — p120 L20: THE VERSE NUMBER RESTARTS AT 1. This is the first verse of Kanda II, and Kanda I ended at 50 on the previous plate. Anything keying verses by number alone across this book will collide - the key has to be (kanda, verse).
  • About this edition: Two places in this verse are unresolved on the plate: the word after kuṣṭha, and whether the opening compound carries a negative. The age-term Gaurī is left as the technical name — the published English of this edition converts it to a number of years, which the Sanskrit does not state.
9.2a reading here is contested

लेपादाश्च चतुर्थतो ह्युपरि पित्राद्यास्तु पिण्डादिनः आत्मा सप्तम इत्युदीरितमिदं सापिण्ड्यमेकं कुले । सन्तानो यदि भिद्यते यत इतः कन्यावरोद्देशत स्तत्पित्रोरधिगण्यमन्यकुलजं त्वासप्तमात्पञ्चमात् ॥ २ ॥

lepādāśca caturthato hyupari pitrādyāstu piṇḍādinaḥ ātmā saptama ityudīritamidaṃ sāpiṇḍyamekaṃ kule | santāno yadi bhidyate yata itaḥ kanyāvaroddeśata statpitroradhigaṇyamanyakulajaṃ tvāsaptamātpañcamāt || 2 ||

The lepa-sharers are reckoned from the fourth upward; before them stand the father and the rest ⟨pitr-ādyāḥ: the father, the grandfather and the great-grandfather⟩, who receive the piṇḍa; and oneself is the seventh. This, it is declared, is the sāpiṇḍya, and it is one within a family. If the line of descent is broken, then from that point, as regards the girl and the bridegroom ⟨kanyā-vara-uddeśataḥ, as the two later printings are read; on our exemplar's plate the reader could not resolve this word at 3.2x⟩, for their parents one born in another family is to be reckoned up to the seventh and up to the fifth.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्थंतो"; alternatives "चतुर्थतो" — p121 L2: an anusvara stands over -rtha- in addition to its repha. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चतुर्थतो; this sentence names चतुर्थंतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रित्रयास्तु"; alternatives "स्त्रित्रयास्तु", "त्रयास्त्रयस्तु" — p121 L2: not settled at 3x. The English opposite has 'three others preceding to them'. [2026-09-23: the head of this word is now confirmed on the plate, and its middle is not. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0121, line index 1, printed folio 119, at about 3.53x native, with the पि of पिण्डादिनः from the same line beneath it) found an i-mātrā over a conjunct that breaks to zero ink across five rows, as त्र does and प does not; a प template reaches only 0.719 in the locus against 0.836 on the other प of the line. The last akṣara is स्तु. So the press sets त्रि at the head, not the पि of पित्राद्यास्तु, which the 2026-09-20 pass wrote from two machine reads of other presses and which was reverted on 2026-09-23. The bodies between त्रि and स्तु do not map cleanly onto त्रित्रयास्तु, and the middle is an open doubt on this verse.] [2026-09-30: the mūla now reads पित्राद्यास्तु on the metre; the press sets त्रि at the head of this word, read by eye on the plate at about 3.53x native, and uk-ps-sastri carries पित्राद्यास्तु in a machine read. A word opening with त्र makes position 11 of this pāda heavy and position 13 light, so the middle of the printed word no longer bears on our text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कन्यावरोर्ज्ञत"; alternatives "कन्यावरोर्ह्ञत", "कन्यावरोऽर्ज्ञत" — p121 L4: the penultimate akshara carries a repha over a conjunct I cannot resolve at 3.2x, and the word is not construable to me. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कन्यावरोद्देशत; this sentence names कन्यावरोर्ज्ञत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ २ ॥" — p121 L5: numeral 2, Kanda II. Note that a verse numbered 2 also exists in Kanda I on plate p99 - the numbers are only unique within a kanda.
9.3a reading here is contested

पुंसो वा यदि सन्ततेश्च युवतेर्वध्वा वरस्याथवा सापिण्ड्यं विगणय्य यज्जनकृतस्त्वासप्तमांतं त्यजेत् । प्रस्वाश्चेदथ पञ्चमोपरि विदध्यादेकतो निर्वृत्तं स्यादन्यत्र निवृत्तिरेवमुभयोस्तद्बन्धुतायां विधिः ॥ ३ ॥

puṃso vā yadi santateśca yuvatervadhvā varasyāthavā sāpiṇḍyaṃ vigaṇayya yajjanakṛtastvāsaptamāṃtaṃ tyajet | prasvāścedatha pañcamopari vidadhyādekato nirvṛttaṃ syādanyatra nivṛttirevamubhayostadbandhutāyāṃ vidhiḥ || 3 ||

Whether it be of the man, or of the lineage, or of the young woman — of the bride or of the bridegroom — having reckoned the sāpiṇḍya that people observe, one should avoid up to the seventh. And if ⟨it is reckoned⟩ from the mother ⟨our mūla now reads प्रस्वाश्चेदथ, prasvāś ced atha, 'and if from the mother'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩, one should set it above the fifth: on one side it has ceased; elsewhere the cessation holds for both. Such is the rule concerning the kinship between them.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुंसो"; alternatives "पुंसोः", "पुंसां" — p121 L18: a visarga-like pair of marks follows -so; I cannot tell it from dirt at 3.1x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सन्तनेश्च"; alternatives "सन्ततेश्च" — p121 L18: ne vs te not separable at 3.1x; santati (lineage) is what the sense wants. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सन्ततेश्च; this sentence names सन्तनेश्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate pass read this line by eye (jp2 page_0121, printed line 18, printed folio 119, at about 3.3x and 4.7x native) and could separate ते from ने there: the press sets सन्ततेश्च, as our mūla now reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रस्वाभेदथ"; alternatives "मास्वाभेदथ", "मातुश्चेदथ" — p121 L20: NOT CONSTRUED. The English opposite has 'the 5th removed from the mother', which would want a word for mother here; I can see the aksharas but cannot make that word out of them, and I do not supply one. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रस्वाश्चेदथ; this sentence names प्रस्वाभेदथ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0121, line index 19, printed folio 119, at about 3.3x and 4.7x native, then measured at 1:1) found that the third akṣara measures as श्च, not भ. It is 63 px wide, where every भ on these leaves is 48-51 px and श्च is 59-60 px, and its lower third carries the full-width sweep of श्च; it also carries a clear े. So the press sets प्रस्वाश्चेदथ, 'and if from the mother', as our mūla reads. The type is light there: the headline over the left third of the letter did not print, so the reading rests on its width, its lower third and the sense.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विद्ध्यादेकतो"; alternatives "विदध्यादेकतो" — p121 L20: ekatah (on one side) matches 'for one party' opposite. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विदध्यादेकतो; this sentence names विद्ध्यादेकतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निवृत्तिरेवद्युभयोः"; alternatives "निवृत्तिरेवोभयोः" — p121 L21: an akshara with a u-matra stands between -reva and ubhayoh where the sandhi eva + ubhayoh would give -revobhayoh. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads निवृत्तिरेवमुभयोस्, एवम् उभयोः, 'thus for both'. It was corrected on 2026-09-20 on the lexicon and the metre: एवद्यु is no word, the form with द्यु puts a heavy ninth syllable where the metre wants a light one, and the machine reads of both other printings give एवमुभयोः. The 2026-09-23 plate ruling on this verse did not rule on this word.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ३ ॥" — p121 L21: numeral 3, Kanda II.
9.4a reading here is contested

चातुर्थीमपवादमाह भगिनीमात्रात्मजाख्यास्त्यजेत् षष्ठीपञ्चमपञ्चमी परिणयं कुर्यान्न चेत्सा स्वसा । तार्तीया विधिरुःकलद्रविलयोः कार्यो न सार्वत्रिकः वध्वा वा वरषष्ठमष्टममिति स्यान्निर्वृतिस्तद्द्वयोः ॥ ४ ॥

cāturthīmapavādamāha bhaginīmātrātmajākhyāstyajet ṣaṣṭhīpañcamapañcamī pariṇayaṃ kuryānna cetsā svasā | tārtīyā vidhiruḥkaladravilayoḥ kāryo na sārvatrikaḥ vadhvā vā varaṣaṣṭhamaṣṭamamiti syānnirvṛtistaddvayoḥ || 4 ||

He states the exception at the fourth degree: one should avoid those called a sister's daughter and a mother's daughter. The sixth, the fifth, the fifth — the marriage may be made, provided she is not a sister. The rule of the third degree is to be applied in the case of ⟨kalad-ra-vilayoḥ: the plate prints kalad- where kalatra, 'wife', would be expected, and there is no vertical stem, so it is da and not ta. The reader then checked the next syllable at 5.7x precisely because the published English names Orissa and the Tamil country — the glyph is la, not ḍa, so a reading naming those two regions is NOT supported by the ink⟩, and it is not universal. Or, for the bride the sixth and for the bridegroom the eighth — that is where it ceases for the two of them.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द"; alternatives "द्" — the द of -वाद- carries a slanted descender ending in a blob. At 11x this is the same mark the plain द of देह (line of sloka 5) carries, so it is the face's ordinary द, NOT a virama; the true virama (जेत्) hangs off a vertical stem. Recorded as plain द.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्म"; alternatives "ःम" — in मात्रात्मज the त् of त्म is a small curl fused to म's left; at 6x it is a half-त, not a visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वसा"; alternatives "खसा" — at 1.5x the first akshara reads ख; at 7x a subscript stroke descends from the left element, which is the स्व ligature of this face. Sense (a sister) agrees. Not fully settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रुः"; alternatives "रु:", "हुः", "र्‍ह" — between विधि and क stand a र-like glyph with a subscript hook and then TWO stacked horizontal DASHES (not round dots). Unresolved at 10x; recorded as रुः.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्र"; alternatives "त्र" — the base has no vertical stem, so it is द not त: printed कलद्र-, where कलत्र- (wife) would be expected. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विल"; alternatives "विड" — checked at 5.7x because the English names Orissa and Tamil (Kalinga/Dravida); the glyph is ल, not ड. The regional reading is NOT supported by the ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निवृति"; alternatives "निवृत्ति" — single त printed where निवृत्ति would need त्त; no conjunct visible at 5.2x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यान्निर्वृतिस्तद्द्वयोः; this sentence names निवृति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: re-read on jp2 page_0122 (store line 4) at about 2.2x and 3.8x native. The single त is confirmed: its body is 55 px wide, against 60 px for the single ति of मिति on the same line and 73 px for a त्ति on page_0121. The press also sets a detached repha over व, so the word is निर्वृति; the reading of 2026-09-05 dropped the repha. With निर् pāda 4 is a flawless śārdūlavikrīḍita, and our mūla reads स्यान्निर्वृतिस्तद्द्वयोः, written on the plate.]
  • About this edition: The published English of this edition reads regional names (Orissa, Tamil country) into pāda 3. The plate reader examined that syllable at 5.7x for exactly this reason and found la, not ḍa: the regional reading is not in the ink, and is not rendered here.
9.5a reading here is contested

कूटस्थाद्विषयत्वमुक्तविधिना सापिण्ड्यकालानिति क्रामः कुल्यनुरोधभञ्जनमतद्देशानुकूल्यं क्रमात् । सम्बन्धप्रतिबन्धुवर्गमुत सापिण्ड्यं तु षाट्कौशिकः पिण्डो देह इहास्य साम्यमगुरु स्याद्गुर्ववित्तांशकः ॥ ५ ॥

kūṭasthādviṣayatvamuktavidhinā sāpiṇḍyakālāniti krāmaḥ kulyanurodhabhañjanamataddeśānukūlyaṃ kramāt | sambandhapratibandhuvargamuta sāpiṇḍyaṃ tu ṣāṭkauśikaḥ piṇḍo deha ihāsya sāmyamaguru syādgurvavittāṃśakaḥ || 5 ||

From the founding ancestor (kūṭastha) the extent of sāpiṇḍya is as the stated rule has it, and so are its terms — the progression (krāma) ⟨our mūla now reads सापिण्ड्यकालानिति क्रामः, with the editor's two brackets taken out of the line⟩, deference to family custom, the breaking of it, and conformity to that country, in order. But as regards the circle of connection and of kindred, sāpiṇḍya is by the six sheaths (ṣāṭkauśika): here the piṇḍa is the BODY, and its sameness is not weighty; there would be a share of the elder's wealth ⟨our mūla now reads स्याद्गुर्ववित्तांशकः; the division of its last compound is not certain⟩.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(नि)" — editor's bracketed variant set inside the verse line; transcribed as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विषयत्वम्"; alternatives "विषयत्वम्", "विषयत्व" — reads कूटस्थाद्विषयत्वमुक्त- at 1.5x; the त्व conjunct is clear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(ग्रा,ऋामः"; alternatives "(ग्रा॰)ग्रामः", "(ग्रा॰)क्रामः" — an opening bracket, ग्रा, a comma-like mark, then a glyph I cannot settle between ऋा/क्रा/ग्रा, then मः. Almost certainly the editor's variant apparatus; the closing bracket is absent on the plate. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads क्रामः; this sentence names ग्रा and ऋामः, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भङ्ग्न"; alternatives "भङ्गन", "भग्न" — dense conjunct, unresolved at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुल्यनुरोधभञ्जनमतद्देशानुकूल्यं; this sentence names भङ्ग्न, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "-"; alternatives "न्" — a detached horizontal dash at mid-height between ब and धु. The न् of सम्बन्ध earlier in the SAME line prints as an angular hook fused to ध, and this mark is neither fused nor angular, so it is recorded as a hyphen; the word is presumably प्रतिबन्धु.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ट्टु"; alternatives "ट्ठु", "द्दु", "च्च", "द्धा" — REFUSED as unsettled: a stacked conjunct with a ु below, examined at 7x. I can see it is a doubled retroflex-or-dental stack but cannot name the members. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्याद्गुर्ववित्तांशकः; this sentence names ट्टु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्वै"; alternatives "र्वे", "र्वि" — repha over व with a superscript vowel mark I cannot call between ै and े. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्याद्गुर्ववित्तांशकः; this sentence names र्वै, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुरु"; alternatives "गुर" — अगुरु / अगुर; the final vowel sign is faint.
9.6a reading here is contested

एकस्येत्यपवादमाह पुरतस्तूढा गता चेत्परं तस्मा एव सहोदरीमुपयमेत्पुत्राद्यपेक्षाऽथवा । सोदर्यौ च सहोदरीयुगमयुजौ स्यातामुतैतं यमौ स्यातां वा युगपद्विधेरथ विरोधाभावतो वा क्रमात् ॥ ६ ॥

ekasyetyapavādamāha puratastūḍhā gatā cetparaṃ tasmā eva sahodarīmupayametputrādyapekṣā'thavā | sodaryau ca sahodarīyugamayujau syātāmutaitaṃ yamau syātāṃ vā yugapadvidheratha virodhābhāvato vā kramāt || 6 ||

He states the exception concerning one man: if a woman married before has gone, then to that same man her full sister may be given in marriage — or it may be done out of the desire for a son and the rest. And two full brothers may take a pair of full sisters, unpaired (ayujau); or these two may be twins; or the two may be taken at one time by the rule ⟨our mūla now reads युगपद्विधेरथ; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩ — because there is no conflict in it, or else in due order. ⟨For the woman married before, our mūla now reads पुरतस्तूढा, purataḥ tu ūḍhā.⟩

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ग"; alternatives "व" — at 10x the left element of this akshara is an OPEN hook, not the closed loop this face uses for व (compare अपवादमाह, p.120 line 1, checked at 6.5x). Printed अपगाद- where अपवाद- is expected: either a variant or a wrong sort. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads एकस्येत्यपवादमाह. The 2026-09-20 pass corrected it on the lexicon: अपगाद is not a word and अपवाद is, the previous verse opens with चातुर्थीमपवादमाह, and the machine reads of both other printings give अपवादमाह. That pass took the letter this note read at 10x for a wrong sort, so our text departs here from what this note records on the page. The 2026-09-23 plate ruling on this verse did not rule on this akṣara.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुरतम्नृढा"; alternatives "पुरतम्तृढा", "पुरतो मृढा", "पुरतो रूढा" — REFUSED as unsettled. At 9x I can see -त, a small half-consonant, a consonant carrying ृ, then ढा; I cannot name the half-consonant or the ृ-bearer. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पुरतस्तूढा; this sentence names पुरतम्नृढा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेन्परं"; alternatives "चेत्परं" — the half-consonant before प reads न् rather than त्. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चेत्परं; this sentence names चेन्परं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — avagraha clearly printed in पेक्षाऽथवा; checked at 2.1x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुतैतं"; alternatives "मुतैतौ", "मुभैतं", "मुत एतं" — an anusvara sits on the syllable before यमौ; word division inside स्यातामुतैतं is not determinable from the setting.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युगमयुजौ"; alternatives "युगमयुजो" — the ौ of both सोदर्यौ and -युजौ is clear at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्द्वि"; alternatives "द्वि", "द्धि" — a triple-looking stack under प; I read द्द्वि at 3.4x but cannot exclude द्वि with heavy inking. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads युगपद्विधेरथ; this sentence names द्द्वि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0123, line index 4, printed folio 121, at about 3.2x and 4.9x native) found the stack under प to be the two-member द्वि: it descends 72 px below the headline, where plain letters on that line descend 64-66 px and the subjoined त्रि of the same leaf 78 px, and a three-member stack would go deeper still. So the press sets युगपद्विधेरथ, as our mūla reads.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धरश्च"; alternatives "धुरश्च", "धरथ" — read श्च (not थ) at 3.4x; the vowel of ध is not certainly a. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads युगपद्विधेरथ; this sentence names धरश्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0123, line index 4, printed folio 121, at about 3.2x and 4.9x native) found a े on the fifth akṣara, a separate mark 39 px above the headline with clear white between it and the arc of the ि, and a final थ, which correlates at 0.85 with the two थ on these leaves and at 0.32 with the two श्च. So the press sets युगपद्विधेरथ, as our mūla reads, and this note's own alternative धरथ was the nearer one.]
9.7a reading here is contested

सन्तानं यदि विन्दते स्वजनकात्सापत्न्यमाता तदा सापिण्ड्यं भवति त्रिपूरुषमथो नो संततिश्चेत्तदा । तस्यास्तातसहोदरस्य तनया नैव प्रसूसंज्ञिका तत्स्वस्रात्मभवानसून्वयरजा तां तां न सोऽप्युद्वहेत् ॥ ७ ॥

santānaṃ yadi vindate svajanakātsāpatnyamātā tadā sāpiṇḍyaṃ bhavati tripūruṣamatho no saṃtatiścettadā | tasyāstātasahodarasya tanayā naiva prasūsaṃjñikā tatsvasrātmabhavānasūnvayarajā tāṃ tāṃ na so'pyudvahet || 7 ||

If a step-mother obtains offspring from one's own father, then the sāpiṇḍya ⟨our mūla now reads सापिण्ड्यं, the term this chapter uses everywhere⟩ runs to three generations. But if there is no offspring, then the daughter of her father's brother is not called a mother at all; and the daughters born of that woman's sister ⟨our mūla now reads नसून्वयरजा, with the editor's bracket taken out of the word⟩ — none of them may he marry either.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्व" — this स्व (in स्वजनकात्) is the control that settled स्वसा on p.120 line 2: a स with a subscript stroke descending from its left element.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तापिण्ड्यं"; alternatives "सापिण्ड्यं" — the first akshara is त, not स, though सापिण्ड्य is the term used everywhere else in this chapter (p.120 lines 1 and 3 of sloka 5). Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads सापिण्ड्यं for तापिण्ड्यं, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संततिश्चेत्तदा"; alternatives "संततिश्चेत्तदा" — anusvara on सं, not a subscript nasal; checked at 1.4x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नसून्व(न)यरजा"; alternatives "नसून्वयरजा", "नसून्नयरजा" — REFUSED in part: the editor's bracketed (न) sits inside the word; what surrounds it I read as -सून्व-...-यरजा but the conjunct before the bracket is not certain.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सोऽप्युद्वहेत्" — avagraha clear; the halanta on the final त is the slanted blob-tipped descender this face uses.
9.8a reading here is contested

यो मातुश्च पितुश्च पञ्चमतया स्यात्सप्तमत्वात्स्वसा तां कन्यामुपयच्छते त इह जन्मन्येव शूद्राः स्मृताः । किंस्वामी पतिना न चेत्स्वमितरे हीना जनन्यादितो हीनां तां परिणीय नैव पतति स्वानर्थताभावतः ॥ ८ ॥

yo mātuśca pituśca pañcamatayā syātsaptamatvātsvasā tāṃ kanyāmupayacchate ta iha janmanyeva śūdrāḥ smṛtāḥ | kiṃsvāmī patinā na cetsvamitare hīnā jananyādito hīnāṃ tāṃ pariṇīya naiva patati svānarthatābhāvataḥ || 8 ||

One who, by being fifth from the mother and seventh from the father, is a sister ⟨our mūla now reads पञ्चमतया … सप्तमत्वात्, 'by being fifth … by being seventh': the fifth goes with the mother and the seventh with the father, in order; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave सप्तमत्वात्⟩ — those who take such a girl to wife are declared śūdras in this very birth. [The third quarter will not construe as printed — kiṃ svāmī patinā na cet svam — and is not rendered; what follows it says that the others, reckoned from the mother onward, are the inferior ones.] Having married that inferior woman, he does not fall, because no harm to himself follows from it.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समतम"; alternatives "सप्तमत्वा", "सप्तम" — IMPORTANT: the English opposite says '7th and 5th generations', but at 6.2x I find no प्त stack here - four plain squarish aksharas. The Sanskrit as printed does NOT carry सप्तम. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यात्सप्तमत्वात्स्वसा; this sentence names समतम, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: re-read on the plate, the press does carry सप्तम. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0123, line index 26, printed folio 121, at about 2.1x, 3.4x and 4.7x native on the 2900x4721 master) found two letter bodies with stems between the स of स्यात्स and the वा, not four squarish akṣaras. The second is म, at 0.958 correlation with the म of पञ्चमतया on the same line; the first is a conjunct that is neither म nor त, the प्त. So the press sets स्यात्सप्तमत्वात्स्वसा, as our mūla reads; the 6.2x read of the 1740 px render was one conjunct short.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्"; alternatives "भ्", "५" — the half-letter before मृताः is worn; at 2.1x it reads as a small detached mark that could be भ् or a numeral. स्मृताः is the word the sense needs but the ink is not clean.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उपयच्छते"; alternatives "उपयच्छन्ते" — read -च्छते at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "किंस्वामी"; alternatives "किंश्वामी" — second akshara is स्व, matching the control in line 13.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "परिणीय"; alternatives "परिणाय" — the vowel on ण is a full-height vertical; whether it carries the ी hook is not resolvable at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वानर्थंता"; alternatives "स्वानर्थता" — an anusvara stands over र्थ, giving -अर्थंता- where -अर्थता- would be expected. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वानर्थताभावतः; this sentence names स्वानर्थंता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The published English of this edition reads 'the 7th and 5th generations' here. The plate reader looked for the pta stack at 6.2x and found four plain squarish akṣaras: saptama is not printed. Only the fifth degree is rendered. [2026-09-23: refuted on the plate: saptama is printed. An eye reading at about 4.7x native on the 2900x4721 master (jp2 page_0123, line index 26, printed folio 121) found स्यात्सप्तमत्वात्स्वसा, with प्त a compact conjunct about the width of म; see the dated sentence on this verse's first note.]
9.9a reading here is contested

सापिण्ड्यस्य निवृत्त्यनन्तरमयं पुत्रस्सवित्रीस्वसा सोद्वाह्या यदि पुत्रिकावचनतो देशेऽनिषिद्धां विदुः । सङ्कोच्यापि सपिण्डतामकथयस्तन्नर्मदादक्षिणे तीरे पञ्च पितुश्च मातुरुत चेद्गोत्रत्रयाभ्यन्तरे ॥ ९ ॥

sāpiṇḍyasya nivṛttyanantaramayaṃ putrassavitrīsvasā sodvāhyā yadi putrikāvacanato deśe'niṣiddhāṃ viduḥ | saṅkocyāpi sapiṇḍatāmakathayastannarmadādakṣiṇe tīre pañca pituśca māturuta cedgotratrayābhyantare || 9 ||

Immediately after his sāpiṇḍya has ceased, this son ⟨putras savitrī-svasā is printed as one solid string with a doubled ss; the word division here is the compositor's, not the reader's⟩ — the mother's sister may be married, if on the authority of the putrikā rule ⟨our mūla now reads पुत्रिकावचनतो, with the editor's bracket taken out of the word⟩ they hold her not forbidden in that country. And having contracted the sapiṇḍa relation, they have declared this: on the southern bank of the Narmadā, five on the father's side and on the mother's, if it falls within three gotras.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निवृत्यनन्तरम्"; alternatives "निवृत्त्यनन्तरम्" — single त् before य; no doubled त्त visible at 1.5x - the same single-त spelling as निवृति on p.120.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्रस्सवित्री"; alternatives "पुत्रस्य सवित्री" — printed as one solid string with a doubled स्स; word division is the compositor's, not mine.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "य दे"; alternatives "यदे", "य द" — a space stands between य and दे in the setting; recorded as spaced.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(व)" — editor's bracketed variant inside the word पुत्रिकाद्व-चनतो. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सोद्वाह्या यदि पुत्रिकावचनतो; this sentence names पुत्रिकाद्व, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽ" — avagraha clear in देशेऽनिषिद्धां.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नर्मदा" — clear; corroborates the English 'south of the Narmada' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मातुरुत"; alternatives "मातुरुक्त" — read मातुरुत at 1.5x; no क् stack seen.
9.10a reading here is contested

धर्मोच्छित्तिरियं द्विजस्य दशमादङ्गस्य चासप्तमात् पिण्डस्यापि तृतीयतो यदि भवेत्सब्रह्महैवाथवा । गोत्रस्येव हिता हि मातुलसुता चार्णक्रयस्त्रीसभापङ्क्तिः पर्युषितं च मातुलसुतोद्वाहं पितृष्वस्त्रियाम् ॥ १० ॥

dharmocchittiriyaṃ dvijasya daśamādaṅgasya cāsaptamāt piṇḍasyāpi tṛtīyato yadi bhavetsabrahmahaivāthavā | gotrasyeva hitā hi mātulasutā cārṇakrayastrīsabhāpaṅktiḥ paryuṣitaṃ ca mātulasutodvāhaṃ pitṛṣvastriyām || 10 ||

This is the destruction of dharma for a twice-born from the tenth, and for the aṅga ⟨our mūla now reads दशमादङ्गस्य, 'from the tenth … of the aṅga'⟩ up to the seventh; and if it comes about from the third of the piṇḍa, he is verily a slayer of a Brahmin, or else… The maternal uncle's daughter is indeed held as if of one's own gotra ⟨our mūla now reads गोत्रस्येव, gotrasya iva, 'as if of the gotra'⟩; and [so likewise are] debt, purchase, an assembly of women, the row at a meal, stale food, marriage with the maternal uncle's daughter, and with a paternal aunt's woman.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्मोच्छित्ति"; alternatives "धर्मोंच्छित्ति", "धर्मोच्छत्ति" — a small mark rides the ो of र्मो which may be an anusvara or ink; the च्छ stack is clear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दशामादङ्गस्य"; alternatives "दशमादङ्गस्य", "दशामादङ्घ्रेः" — unsettled at 1.5x; the ङ्ग stack is visible but the vowels around it are not certain. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दशमादङ्गस्य; this sentence names दशामादङ्गस्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चासप्तमात्" — the प्त stack IS present here - a useful control for its absence on p.121 line 26.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तृतीयतो"; alternatives "तृर्तीयतो" — a mark above the second akshara could be a repha; if so the print reads तृर्तीयतो.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोत्रम्येव"; alternatives "गोत्रस्येव", "गोत्र्येव" — the half-consonant before य is unsettled between म् and स्. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गोत्रस्येव; this sentence names गोत्रम्येव, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चार्ण"; alternatives "चार्ण" — च + ऋण (debt) - matches 'debt, buying, woman's asseembly' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — the line ends in a dash carrying the compound over to line 4; printed matter, not damage.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मातुलसुतोढाहं"; alternatives "मातुलसुतोढा हं", "मातुलसुतोढाह" — word division inside this string is not marked; the anusvara before पितृ- is clear. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मातुलसुतोद्वाहं; this sentence names मातुलसुतोढाहं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥" — the opening double danda of this verse-number prints as two short broken strokes; type damage, not a different mark.
9.11a reading here is contested

ऊढा मातुलकन्यकां स्वजननीगोत्रां समानार्षजां स्वस्रीयां प्रसवः पितृष्वसृसुतां त्यक्त्वैव चान्द्रायणम् । कुर्याद्दक्षिणदेशजैः स्वजननीसोदर्यजो दृश्यते मत्स्यादाः कति जारगा युवतयः क्वासीधुपानाः क्व च ॥११॥

ūḍhā mātulakanyakāṃ svajananīgotrāṃ samānārṣajāṃ svasrīyāṃ prasavaḥ pitṛṣvasṛsutāṃ tyaktvaiva cāndrāyaṇam | kuryāddakṣiṇadeśajaiḥ svajananīsodaryajo dṛśyate matsyādāḥ kati jāragā yuvatayaḥ kvāsīdhupānāḥ kva ca ||11||

One who has married his maternal uncle's daughter, or a woman of his own mother's gotra, or one born of the same ṛṣi-pravara, or a sister's daughter, or ⟨prasavaḥ⟩ a paternal aunt's daughter, must abandon her and perform the cāndrāyaṇa penance. Among those born in the southern country one sees [marriage] with the offspring of one's own mother's own brother or sister. How many are fish-eaters? how many young women go to paramours? and where are the drinkers of spirits?

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मातुंल"; alternatives "मातुल" — an anusvara rides तु, giving मातुंल- where मातुल- is expected. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मातुलकन्यकां; this sentence names मातुंल, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समानार्षजां"; alternatives "समानार्षेजां" — repha over र्ष clear at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रसवः"; alternatives "प्रसन्नः" — read प्रसवः at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुर्यांद्द"; alternatives "कुर्याद्द", "कुर्यांद्" — an anusvara rides र्या; the following stack reads द्द. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुर्याद्दक्षिणदेशजैः; this sentence names कुर्यांद्द, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सोदर्यंजो"; alternatives "सोदर्यजो" — an anusvara stands over र्यं. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वजननीसोदर्यजो; this sentence names सोदर्यंजो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जारगा"; alternatives "जारगाः", "जारजा" — read जारगा at 1.5x; the English opposite speaks of 'many paramours' (jāra).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्वासीधुपानाः"; alternatives "क्वासीधुपानः" — āsīdhu = spirituous liquor; matches 'those who drink' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥११॥" — verse number set tight, without the spaces used on p.120-122.
9.12a reading here is contested

स्पृश्यत्वां युवती क्व मातुलसुतोद्वाहो वृषल्याः पतिः न श्राद्धे विहितौ तथा शतपथी श्रौतो विधिर्दृश्यते । वृषामित्यृतवह्निलोष्णसविश्वप्रत्ययो वा परं दृष्टान्तो न विधिर्न वा जनमतं तद्दक्षिणेऽदक्षिणम् ॥ १२ ॥

spṛśyatvāṃ yuvatī kva mātulasutodvāho vṛṣalyāḥ patiḥ na śrāddhe vihitau tathā śatapathī śrauto vidhirdṛśyate | vṛṣāmityṛtavahniloṣṇasaviśvapratyayo vā paraṃ dṛṣṭānto na vidhirna vā janamataṃ taddakṣiṇe'dakṣiṇam || 12 ||

Where is a touchable young woman [to be found]? Marriage with the maternal uncle's daughter, and the husband of a vṛṣalī (a śūdra woman) — neither is enjoined at a śrāddha; and a Śatapatha ⟨our mūla now reads शतपथी, with the editor's bracket taken out of the line⟩ śrauta rule is likewise seen. 'Vṛṣā' ⟨the reader checked this at 5x precisely because the published English transliterates 'Tripta': the first akṣara's left element is the closed loop this face uses for va, so the plate reads vṛṣā and not tṛptā — the English's 'Tripta' is NOT what this line prints⟩ — and so it is a conviction resting on ṛta (Truth), on fire, and on ⟨loṣṇa: a run of akṣaras the reader could not divide into words; the English names the Sun here, but the solar word is not legible⟩, and on universal assent. But at most it is an illustration, not an injunction; nor is popular opinion authority. What lies in the south is not on the right hand.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्पृश्यत्वां"; alternatives "स्पृश्यत्वं" — checked at 4x: स्पृ + श्य + त्वां, anusvara clear.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(दी)" — editor's bracketed variant on शतपथी, inside the mula line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्रोतो"; alternatives "श्रौतो" — the vowel on श्र reads ो not ौ at 1.5x, though श्रौत is the expected word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads श्रौतो; this sentence names श्रोतो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृषा"; alternatives "तृप्ता" — checked at 5x BECAUSE the English opposite transliterates 'Tripta Huai'; the first akshara's left element is the CLOSED loop this face uses for व, so वृ not तृ. The English's Tripta is NOT what this line prints.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लोष्ण"; alternatives "लोष्णा", "इलोष्ण" — REFUSED as unsettled: a run of aksharas I cannot divide into words. The English names Truth, Fire and the Sun; ऋत and वह्नि are legible, the solar word is not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वह्नि"; alternatives "वद्धि" — read ह्नि at 1.7x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽद्दक्षिणम्"; alternatives "ऽदक्षिणम्" — whether the akshara after the avagraha is a द्द stack or a plain द is genuinely open: this face gives PLAIN द a slanted blob-tipped descender (established on p.120 by comparing देह with the halanta of जेत्), so a lone द can read as a stack at this size. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तद्दक्षिणेऽदक्षिणम्; this sentence names ऽद्दक्षिणम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.13a reading here is contested

सापिण्ड्यं भवति त्रिपूरुषमिह सावर्ण्यमात्रोद्भवा ये केचित्कुलनिम्नमातृजनिता सर्वेऽपि ते भ्रातरः । सर्वा मातर एव तातवनिता तद्भ्रातरो मातुला दत्तस्य स्वकुलेषु सप्त पुरुषा गोप्तुस्तु सङ्कोचतः ॥ १३ ॥

sāpiṇḍyaṃ bhavati tripūruṣamiha sāvarṇyamātrodbhavā ye kecitkulanimnamātṛjanitā sarve'pi te bhrātaraḥ | sarvā mātara eva tātavanitā tadbhrātaro mātulā dattasya svakuleṣu sapta puruṣā goptustu saṅkocataḥ || 13 ||

Here sāpiṇḍya runs to three generations. Those born merely of the same varṇa ⟨our mūla now reads सावर्ण्यमात्रोद्भवा, 'born merely of the same varṇa'⟩ — whoever are begotten of mothers low in family — all of them too are brothers. All the father's wives are indeed mothers, and their brothers are maternal uncles. For a given son, in his own family, seven generations; but for the adopter, by contraction.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽङ्गवा"; alternatives "ऽद्वा", "ऽङ्ग्वा" — the stack after the avagraha is not cleanly resolvable at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सावर्ण्यमात्रोद्भवा; this sentence names ऽङ्गवा, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निम्न"; alternatives "निम्र", "निन्न" — the subscript in the second akshara is between म् and न्.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वां"; alternatives "सर्वा" — anusvara over र्वा clear at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वा; this sentence names सर्वां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सप्त" — the प्त stack is unambiguous here and matches 'seven generations' opposite.
9.14a reading here is contested

नोद्वाह्या स्वपितृव्यपत्निसहजा सापत्न्यमातृष्वसा तत्पुत्र्यौ च सहोदरस्य गृहिणी सोदर्यपि स्वात्मसूः । स्वोपाध्यायतनूभवा सुतसुता नोद्वाहयोग्या भवेत् पैत्र्यस्यैव विचिन्तयेत्प्रवरभिन्नत्वं न मातुर्भवेत् ॥ १४ ॥

nodvāhyā svapitṛvyapatnisahajā sāpatnyamātṛṣvasā tatputryau ca sahodarasya gṛhiṇī sodaryapi svātmasūḥ | svopādhyāyatanūbhavā sutasutā nodvāhayogyā bhavet paitryasyaiva vicintayetpravarabhinnatvaṃ na māturbhavet || 14 ||

Not to be married: the sister of one's paternal uncle's wife; a step-mother's sister; the daughters of those two; a full brother's wife; even a full sister; one's own mother; the daughter of one's own teacher; a son's daughter — none of these is fit for marriage. Difference of pravara is to be considered on the father's side only; it does not hold for the mother.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नोढाह्या"; alternatives "नोढ्वाह्या", "नोद्वाह्या" — the ढ may carry a subscript व (नोढ्वाह्या); the expected word is न + उद्वाह्या. Not settled at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नोद्वाह्या; this sentence names नोढाह्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पत्नि"; alternatives "पत्नी" — short i printed in -पत्निसहजा.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सोदर्यंपि"; alternatives "सोदर्याऽपि", "सोदर्यापि" — an anusvara stands where a long ā + avagraha would be expected. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सोदर्यपि; this sentence names सोदर्यंपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नोढ्वाहयोग्या"; alternatives "नोढाहयोग्या", "नोद्वाहयोग्या" — same unresolved ढ/ढ्व as line 14. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नोद्वाहयोग्या; this sentence names नोढ्वाहयोग्या, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पैत्र्यंस्यैव"; alternatives "पैत्र्यस्यैव" — an anusvara rides त्र्य. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पैत्र्यस्यैव; this sentence names पैत्र्यंस्यैव, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्प्र" — IMPORTANT TYPOGRAPHY: these two aksharas are set RAISED above the line of type in विचिन्तयेत्प्रवर-. Compositor's makeshift for a wide conjunct, not an accent, not quotation, not an editorial mark.
9.15a reading here is contested

आदौ मित्रमुखावलोकनमुदो न प्राशयेदात्मजागेहे कोकुद आदिविष्णुरिति नो जामातरं कोपयेत् । नार्च्यं लिंगयुगं सुदर्शनयुगं नो भास्करद्वन्द्वकं सालिग्रामयुगं च नैव शुभदं शक्तित्रयं शाङ्करेः ॥ १५ ॥

ādau mitramukhāvalokanamudo na prāśayedātmajāgehe kokuda ādiviṣṇuriti no jāmātaraṃ kopayet | nārcyaṃ liṃgayugaṃ sudarśanayugaṃ no bhāskaradvandvakaṃ sāligrāmayugaṃ ca naiva śubhadaṃ śaktitrayaṃ śāṅkareḥ || 15 ||

At the outset one should not eat, out of the joy of looking on a friend's face, in the house of one's own daughter ⟨our mūla now reads कोकुद आदि, with the editor's bracket taken out; कोकुद is left unrendered because its sense is not clear⟩. 'Viṣṇu is first' — and so one should not anger a son-in-law. A pair of liṅgas is not to be worshipped, nor a pair of Sudarśanas, nor a pair of Bhāskaras, nor a pair of Śālagrāmas; and a triad of Śaktis is not auspicious for the follower of Śaṅkara.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — line ends in a dash carrying the compound to line 2.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(ल)" — editor's bracketed variant inside the word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आदि"; alternatives "अंदि", "अःदि" — a small mark sits beside the initial vowel; I cannot call it between the ā-matra and an anusvara/visarga at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लिंगयुगं"; alternatives "लिङ्गयुगं" — printed with anusvara, not the ङ् conjunct. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शाङ्करे:"; alternatives "शाङ्करैः", "शाङ्करेः" — the vowel reads े with a following visarga; ै is possible.
9.16a reading here is contested

सालिग्रामयुजि द्वयं न विहितं चैकं विना युज्यते प्राच्यं भिन्नमपि स्वचक्रसहितं लिंगं पुनः शोधयेत् । लिंगोच्छ्रायसमोऽप्यमस्तकवृतस्त्रैगुण्यवद्वृत्तता तद्वत्पीठमपि प्रणालमपि तत्तत्पञ्चसूत्रीक्रमः ॥ १६ ॥

sāligrāmayuji dvayaṃ na vihitaṃ caikaṃ vinā yujyate prācyaṃ bhinnamapi svacakrasahitaṃ liṃgaṃ punaḥ śodhayet | liṃgocchrāyasamo'pyamastakavṛtastraiguṇyavadvṛttatā tadvatpīṭhamapi praṇālamapi tattatpañcasūtrīkramaḥ || 16 ||

Where a Śālagrāma is joined [in worship], two are not enjoined; one alone, without another, is fitting. An eastern one, even if broken, if it carries its own cakra — the liṅga should be purified afresh. Even one equal in height (ucchrāya) to a liṅga ⟨our mūla now reads लिंगोच्छ्राय, 'the height of the liṅga'⟩, headless and encircled, has a roundness proportioned to the three guṇas; and so too the pīṭha and the praṇāla — such in each case is the order of the five measuring-cords.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुनः"; alternatives "ऽनः", "पुन:" — the akshara before नः is small and partly filled; पुनः is what the sense needs and what the shape best supports.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लिंगं"; alternatives "लिङ्गं" — anusvara, not the ङ् conjunct. As printed - consistent with p.124 line 29.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्छाय"; alternatives "च्छायय", "च्छ्राय" — REFUSED as unsettled: I cannot decide how many य-shaped aksharas stand after the च्छ stack at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads लिंगोच्छ्रायसमोऽप्यमस्तकवृतस्त्रैगुण्यवद्वृत्तता; this sentence names च्छाय, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृतस्"; alternatives "वृत्तस्" — single त read; the line's last word वृत्तता does carry a doubled त, so the contrast is visible in one line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥" — the opening double danda prints with one stroke broken; type damage.
9.17a reading here is contested

यः कुर्यात्पितृपार्वणं सुदिवसे कार्यं स मातामहं नो चेद्यः पितृहा विहाय विहितप्रत्याब्दिकाद्यादिकम् । पत्नीभिः सह तत्पृथक्त्वमुदितं वृद्धौ गयायाष्टके धर्मो दैवविधिष्वथोऽर्हति गृहे पत्न्यन्यथा दास्यति ॥१७॥

yaḥ kuryātpitṛpārvaṇaṃ sudivase kāryaṃ sa mātāmahaṃ no cedyaḥ pitṛhā vihāya vihitapratyābdikādyādikam | patnībhiḥ saha tatpṛthaktvamuditaṃ vṛddhau gayāyāṣṭake dharmo daivavidhiṣvatho'rhati gṛhe patnyanyathā dāsyati ||17||

He who would perform the pārvaṇa for the paternal ancestors on an auspicious day ⟨our mūla now reads कुर्यात्पितृपार्वणं सुदिवसे⟩ must do it for the maternal grandfather also; if he does not, he is a slayer of his father, having abandoned the enjoined annual rite and the rest. Together with the wives, their separateness is laid down — at a Vṛddhi, at Gayā, and at the Aṣṭakā. And so dharma is warranted in the house at the daiva rites; otherwise the wife will give.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुर्यांतिपितृ"; alternatives "कुर्यादपि पितृ", "कुर्यात्पितृ", "कुर्यादिति पितृ" — REFUSED as unsettled: an anusvara over र्या then an akshara I read as ति before पितृ-. The English opposite implies कुर्यात् पितृपार्वणं; the ink does not clearly give the halanta. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुर्यात्पितृपार्वणं; this sentence names कुर्यांतिपितृ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुदिवसे"; alternatives "शुदिवसे", "सुदिवसे" — first akshara unsettled; the English says 'on an auspicious day'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सुदिवसे; this sentence names मुदिवसे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितृहा" — clear; matches 'the sin of patricide' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृदितं"; alternatives "मुदितं", "म्रुदितं" — the vowel under म is ृ or ु; not settled at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्पृथक्त्वमुदितं; this sentence names मृदितं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृद्धौ गयायाष्टकं" — Vriddhi, Gaya, Ashtaka - the three Sraddhas named in the English opposite; all three legible. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गयायाष्टके; this sentence names गयायाष्टकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दैव"; alternatives "देव" — the mark over द reads ै rather than े at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽर्हति"; alternatives "ऽर्हति" — avagraha plus repha both clear.
9.18a reading here is contested

जन्मज्यैष्ठ्यमथोदरे निपतनं रेतोनिषेकक्रमाद्यद्वक्त्रं प्रथमं तु पश्यति पिता स ज्येष्ठ इत्युच्यते । त्रिज्यैष्ठ्यं परिवर्जनीयमथ तज्ज्येष्ठं द्वयं मंगलं रु र्मंण्यार्तवशोधनं त्वितरयोः स्पृश्यावगाहैः कृते ॥१८॥

janmajyaiṣṭhyamathodare nipatanaṃ retoniṣekakramādyadvaktraṃ prathamaṃ tu paśyati pitā sa jyeṣṭha ityucyate | trijyaiṣṭhyaṃ parivarjanīyamatha tajjyeṣṭhaṃ dvayaṃ maṃgalaṃ ru rmaṃṇyārtavaśodhanaṃ tvitarayoḥ spṛśyāvagāhaiḥ kṛte ||18||

Seniority may be by birth, or by falling into the womb, or by the order in which the seed was sown; but he whose face the father sees first is called the eldest. A threefold seniority is to be shunned; two being eldest is auspicious. ⟨The fourth quarter opens with 'ru', then a WORD-SPACE, then an akṣara carrying both a repha-like hook and an anusvāra, then 'ṇyā'. The reader refused it as unsettled at 3.2x and records that a space inside what must be a compound is itself suspect — the type may be disturbed.⟩ But for the other two ⟨our mūla now reads त्वितरयोः, tu itarayoḥ⟩, the purification of the menstrual flow is accomplished by touch and by immersion.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — the compound is carried over the line-end by a dash.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंगलं"; alternatives "मङ्गलं" — anusvara, not the ङ् conjunct - this edition's habit throughout these plates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रु र्मंण्या"; alternatives "रुग्मण्या", "रु ंमण्या", "-रुर्मण्या" — REFUSED as unsettled. At 3.2x the pada opens with रु, a WORD-SPACE, then an akshara carrying both a repha-like hook and an anusvara, then ण्या. A space inside what must be a compound is itself suspect; this may be disturbed type. Recorded as it stands on the plate, space included.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आर्तवशोधनं" — legible and matches 'purification by a bath where there is pollution' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रितरयोः"; alternatives "तितरयोः", "द्वितरयोः" — first akshara not certain. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्वितरयोः; this sentence names त्रितरयोः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.19a reading here is contested

स्वौदर्यो दुहितुस्सुतस्स्ववनिताक्षेत्रोद्भवः क्षेत्रजः कानीनश्च पुनर्भुवोऽपि तनयो दत्तः क्रयात्कृत्रिमः । दत्तात्मापि सहोढगूढतनयौ तत्रापविद्धः क्रमात् पुत्रा द्वादश तत्र दत्तजनितावन्ये निषिद्धाः कलौ ॥ १९ ॥

svaudaryo duhitussutassvavanitākṣetrodbhavaḥ kṣetrajaḥ kānīnaśca punarbhuvo'pi tanayo dattaḥ krayātkṛtrimaḥ | dattātmāpi sahoḍhagūḍhatanayau tatrāpaviddhaḥ kramāt putrā dvādaśa tatra dattajanitāvanye niṣiddhāḥ kalau || 19 ||

One's own begotten son ⟨our mūla no longer carries the editor's (ma) inside the line⟩; the daughter's son; one begotten on one's own wife's field ⟨our mūla now reads क्षेत्रोद्भवः; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩; the kṣetraja; the kānīna; the son of a remarried woman; the given; the bought; the artificial; the self-given; the sahoḍha and the gūḍha son; and among them the cast-off (apaviddha) — in that order. Twelve sons; and of these the given and the begotten [stand], the rest being forbidden in the Kali age.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(म)" — editor's bracketed variant, inside the mula line. [2026-09-23: the mūla no longer carries (म). The 2026-09-20 pass struck it on the metre as an editor's apparatus mark inside the line, which costs pāda 1 a syllable; the machine read of uk-bhasin-hindi gives (स) in the same slot and that of uk-ps-sastri nothing. The 2026-09-23 plate pass measured, without reading it by eye, an ink group 135 px wide carrying four stems between स्वौदर्यो and दुहितुस् on the master. The mark stays out of the mūla as apparatus.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[॰॰]"; alternatives "द्भव", "हुव" — REFUSED: two aksharas between क्षेत्रो and जः lie in a soft, out-of-focus patch of THIS scan (not an overlay, not page damage - the surrounding ink is sharp). At 6x they resolve no further. The obvious reconstruction is क्षेत्रोद्भवः, but the ink does not support it and I have not written it into the text. [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0128, line index 30, printed folio 126, at about 3.7x native on the 2900x4721 master, plain and gamma-2.2) found the patch thin but inked: 47% of the near-black density of the healthy words on the same line, where blank paper on those rows carries no such ink. It holds exactly two letter positions before the visarga: a stacked conjunct, द्भ, and a letter with a closed left bowl joined to its right stem, व, where ज in this fount has no bowl. The gamma stretch raised no further stroke. So the press sets क्षेत्रोद्भवः, as our mūla reads, and so do the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri (page_0211 line 18) and uk-bhasin-hindi (page_0218 line 6).]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्सववनिता"; alternatives "स्सवबनिता", "स्स ववनिता" — the va/ba counter test applies here: at 1.5x both aksharas show the CLOSED loop of व, so ववनिता, not बनिता. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दुहितुस्सुतस्स्ववनिताक्षेत्रोद्भवः; this sentence names स्सववनिता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रयात्"; alternatives "क्रयाः", "क्रयां" — the mark between क्रया and कृत्रिमः reads as a halanta on त but is small; Manu's list has Kreeta (bought), so क्रयात् fits.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अपविद्धः" — legible; Apaviddha is named in the English Note on the next plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वादश" — twelve - matches '12 kinds' opposite.
9.20a reading here is contested

पुत्रार्थं समुपोष्य कुण्डलयुगं वस्त्रद्वयाद्यं ददद्यो यज्ञेन वितीर्यपुत्रमथ देवस्येति गृह्णन्मुदा । हुत्वा व्याहृतिभिः स्वगृह्यविधिना प्रातर्भगाद्यैरथो संभोज्य द्विजसन्ततिं चरुहुतिं यस्त्वाहृदेत्यावदेत् ॥ २० ॥

putrārthaṃ samupoṣya kuṇḍalayugaṃ vastradvayādyaṃ dadadyo yajñena vitīryaputramatha devasyeti gṛhṇanmudā | hutvā vyāhṛtibhiḥ svagṛhyavidhinā prātarbhagādyairatho saṃbhojya dvijasantatiṃ caruhutiṃ yastvāhṛdetyāvadet || 20 ||

He who, having fasted for the sake of a son, gives a pair of earrings, two garments and the rest; who, having made the son over by a sacrifice, then receives him gladly with the words 'devasya…'; who has offered oblation with the vyāhṛtis ⟨our mūla now reads व्याहृतिभिः⟩ by his own gṛhya rule, with the Prātarbhāga and the rest; and who, having then fed the twice-born, makes the caru oblation ⟨our mūla now reads सन्ततिं चरुहुतिं, with the accusatives⟩ and recites 'yas tvā hṛdā…' ⟨our mūla now reads यस्त्वाहृदेत्यावदेत्, ending in iti āvadet, 'should recite thus'⟩.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — line-end dash carrying the sentence over.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वितीर्यंपुत्रम्"; alternatives "वितीर्यपुत्रम्" — an anusvara rides र्य. As printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बिः"; alternatives "भिः" — the ba/bha test at 1.5x: the glyph shows a CLOSED left loop, which is this face's ब, not भ (left vertical + crossbar). So व्याहृतिबिः is printed where व्याहृतिभिः is required - the English opposite has 'chant the mystic syllables' (vyahrti). Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads व्याहृतिभिः for व्याहृतिबिः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रातर्भंगायैरथो"; alternatives "प्रातर्भंगाद्यैरथो", "प्रातर्भगाद्यैरथो" — the akshara before रथो may be यै or द्यै; the English opposite transliterates 'Pratrabhaga'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रातर्भगाद्यैरथो; this sentence names प्रातर्भंगायैरथो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यस्त्वाहृदेत्वावदेत"; alternatives "यस्त्वाहृदेत्यावदेत्" — the English opposite transliterates 'Yastvahride' - a hymn incipit - so इति + आवदेत् is expected; the plate gives त्वा where त्या is wanted, and no final halanta is visible. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यस्त्वाहृदेत्यावदेत्; this sentence names यस्त्वाहृदेत्वावदेत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सन्तति चरहुति"; alternatives "सन्ततिं चरुहुतिं" — no anusvaras and no u-matra on चर visible at 1.5x, though the syntax wants accusatives and चरु (cooked rice) is what the English renders. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चरुहुतिं; this sentence names चरहुति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.21a reading here is contested

भ्रात्रादेस्तनयस्त्रिवर्गमधुरो ग्राह्यो न वैषम्यदो न ज्येष्ठो विधवा न दातुमुचिता नादातुमप्यक्रमात् । हीनोऽपि प्रवरे स्वभर्त्रनलबद्धोमश्च बोध्यादितस्वाचूडादुपनायितेऽतिविहितो दासो न शूद्रस्य वा ॥२१॥

bhrātrādestanayastrivargamadhuro grāhyo na vaiṣamyado na jyeṣṭho vidhavā na dātumucitā nādātumapyakramāt | hīno'pi pravare svabhartranalabaddhomaśca bodhyāditasvācūḍādupanāyite'tivihito dāso na śūdrasya vā ||21||

A brother's son and the like, sweet in the three ends of life, is to be taken; not one who brings inequality, and not the eldest. A widow is fit neither to give, nor, out of order, to withhold. Even one inferior in pravara — and the homa is bound to the fire of the man who takes him ⟨our mūla now reads स्वभर्त्रनलबद्धोमश्च, with no anusvāra and no separate ha before -oma, which the metre keeps out⟩ — with the mantras beginning 'bodhi…'; from the tonsure onward, once he has been initiated, he is fully entitled; but not a slave, nor a śūdra's son.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मधुरो"; alternatives "मधुरो" — read मधुरो at 1.5x; the compound division भ्रात्रादेः + तनयः + त्रिवर्ग + मधुरः is the compositor's, unmarked.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधवा"; alternatives "विधबा" — va/ba counter test applied: the second and third aksharas both show the closed व counter, so विधवा (widow). Clean at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वभर्त्रंनलबद्धोमश्च"; alternatives "स्वभर्त्रनलबद्धहोमश्च" — an anusvara on र्त्र and no separate ह before ोम. The sense the English gives ('the sacrifice must be observed according to the customs of the man who adopts him') wants svabhartr-anala-baddha-homa. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads स्वभर्त्रनलबद्धोमश्च for स्वभर्त्रंनलबद्धोमश्च, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बोध्यादित"; alternatives "बोध्यादितः" — matches 'Mantras commencing with Bodhi' opposite; no visarga visible before the dash.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽति"; alternatives "ऽन्ति", "ऽपि" — the akshara after the avagraha is not certain at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चूडा" — tonsure - matches 'before the tonsure ceremony' opposite; clear.
9.22a reading here is contested

शूद्रादत्तधना द्विजा यदि मदीयाज्ञा त्वया तन्यते ते शूद्राः न तु तत्फलं च लभते शूद्रस्य पाराशरः । विप्रद्वारिकृते च हावनविधौ तत्सिद्धिरित्युक्तवान् दत्तोऽसौ जनकस्य कर्तृविरहे श्राद्धं च कुर्यात्स्वयम् ॥२२॥

śūdrādattadhanā dvijā yadi madīyājñā tvayā tanyate te śūdrāḥ na tu tatphalaṃ ca labhate śūdrasya pārāśaraḥ | vipradvārikṛte ca hāvanavidhau tatsiddhirityuktavān datto'sau janakasya kartṛvirahe śrāddhaṃ ca kuryātsvayam ||22||

If twice-born men have taken wealth given by a śūdra — 'if my command is carried out by you' — then they are śūdras; and one does not obtain the fruit of it, which belongs to the śūdra. So Pārāśara. And in the rule of oblation, when it is done at a Brahmin's door ⟨our mūla now reads विप्रद्वारिकृते; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave the same⟩, its accomplishment lies therein — so he has said. And the adopted son, when there is no one else to perform it, should himself perform the śrāddha of his begetter.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मदीयाज्ञा"; alternatives "मदीयाज्ञा" — the ज्ञ conjunct is clear; word division inside यदि मदीयाज्ञा त्वया is the compositor's.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ते"; alternatives "ते", "ते ऽ" — the pada opens with a small, partly-inked akshara before शूद्राः; ते is my reading and it is not clean.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पाराशरः" — matches 'So has opined the Sage Parasara' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विच्छादारिक्ते"; alternatives "विप्रागारे रिक्ते", "विच्छादारिक्रते" — REFUSED as unsettled. The English opposite has 'a sacrifice performed in the house of a Brahmin', which would want vipra-agare; the plate does not give that, and I cannot divide the string I see into words. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads विप्रद्वारिकृते; this sentence names विच्छादारिक्ते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: settled on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0130, line index 17, printed folio 128, at about 3.1x native) counted six cells, वि, प्र, द्वा, रि, कृ, ते, not the five this note's reading needs: there is no ā-mātrā in cell 2 and one in cell 3. So the press sets विप्रद्वारिकृते, as our mūla reads and as the machine read of uk-bhasin-hindi gives; the string this note could not divide was mis-transcribed, not mis-divided.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हावन"; alternatives "हवन" — long a on ह as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुर्यांत्स्वयम्"; alternatives "कुर्यात्स्वयम्" — an anusvara rides र्या. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुर्यात्स्वयम्; this sentence names कुर्यांत्स्वयम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the 2026-09-23 plate ruling on this verse did not re-open this anusvāra. Our mūla reads कुर्यात् on the lexicon, because कुर्यांत् is no form of the optative; the machine read of uk-bhasin-hindi has no anusvāra here.]
9.23a reading here is contested

दत्तक्रीतमुखाः सगोत्रविहिता गोत्रं प्रयान्त्येव नो सापिण्ड्यं तु वसिष्ठवाक्यमुत दत्तोऽप्यन्यशाखोद्भवः । पुत्रश्चेदुपनायितः स्वविधिना स्वस्यैव शाखादिभागंशादी च सपिण्डतश्च न तदा शौचं स्वकं नान्यथा ॥२३॥

dattakrītamukhāḥ sagotravihitā gotraṃ prayāntyeva no sāpiṇḍyaṃ tu vasiṣṭhavākyamuta datto'pyanyaśākhodbhavaḥ | putraścedupanāyitaḥ svavidhinā svasyaiva śākhādibhāgaṃśādī ca sapiṇḍataśca na tadā śaucaṃ svakaṃ nānyathā ||23||

Those beginning with the given and the bought, when appointed within the same gotra, do pass into the gotra, but not into the sāpiṇḍya — that is Vasiṣṭha's word. And even a given son born of another śākhā: if the son has been initiated by his own [adopter's] rule, then the śākhā and the rest are his own, and his share, and his sapiṇḍa relation; and then his period of pollution is his own, and not otherwise.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दत्तक्रीतमुखाः" — datta + krita - 'taken in adoption and bought', exactly the English opposite; clean.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसिष्ठ"; alternatives "बसिष्ठ" — va/ba counter test: the first akshara shows the closed व counter, so Vasishtha - matching 'So says the Sage Vasishtha' on the following plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — the compound शाखादिभागंशादी is broken across the line by a dash; the second half opens line 4.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गंशादी"; alternatives "गांशादि", "गंशार्दी" — continues शाखादिभा- from line 3; the vowel quantities are not certain at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शौचं" — matches 'the pollution (Shauch and Sootaka)' on the following plate.
9.24a reading here is contested

गोत्रं रिक्थमुत त्यजत्यपि पितुर्दत्तस्तु गोप्तुर्भजेत्पिण्डोऽस्मात्तदपैति यत्तदनुगस्वाहा तथा च स्वधा । द्व्यामुष्यायणता न चेदथ सुता पुत्रार्थिना दीयते तत्पुत्रोऽपि निजौरसेन सदृशो नित्यात्र सा पुत्रता ॥२४॥

gotraṃ rikthamuta tyajatyapi piturdattastu gopturbhajetpiṇḍo'smāttadapaiti yattadanugasvāhā tathā ca svadhā | dvyāmuṣyāyaṇatā na cedatha sutā putrārthinā dīyate tatputro'pi nijaurasena sadṛśo nityātra sā putratā ||24||

The given son gives up his father's gotra and inheritance, and takes those of the adopter. From him the piṇḍa departs, and so does what goes with it — svāhā and likewise svadhā. If there is no double parentage ⟨our mula now reads dvyāmuṣyāyaṇatā, the status of a son who belongs to two fathers⟩, then a daughter is given by one who desires a son; and her son too ⟨our mula now reads tat-putro'pi, which the metre needs; the open doubt on this verse records what the plate shows there⟩ is equal to one's own begotten son — his sonship here is perpetual.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गोत्र रिक्थम्"; alternatives "गोत्ररिक्थम्" — a word space stands between गोत्र and रिक्थम् in the setting; the compound is presumably one word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितुर्हैतांस्तु"; alternatives "पितुर्ह्येतांस्तु", "पितुर्हि एतांस्तु" — the vowel on ह is ै as set; हि + एतान् would be the expected sandhi. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पितुर्दत्तस्तु गोप्तुर्भजेत्पिण्डोऽस्मात्तदपैति; this sentence names पितुर्हैतांस्तु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate pass opened this word by eye (jp2 page_0131, mūla line 1, printed folio 129, at about 3.5x and 4.6x native): पि and तु are clear, a repha rides the third cluster and स्तु closes the word, but र्है + तां could not be told from र्द + त्त at that size. So the plate neither confirms nor refutes our दत्तस्तु, which rests on the machine reads of the two other printings and on the sense: the given son is the subject of the verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "—"; alternatives "-" — line-end dash; भजे- resumes as -त्पिण्डो on line 2. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गोप्तुर्भजेत्पिण्डोऽस्मात् whole. The 2026-09-20 pass dropped this line-end dash as a printer's line break at the pāda boundary; the machine reads of both other printings give भजेत्पिण्डो whole.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदर्पांति"; alternatives "तदर्पणादि", "तदर्पणति" — unsettled at 1.5x; an anusvara sits over र्पा. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पितुर्दत्तस्तु गोप्तुर्भजेत्पिण्डोऽस्मात्तदपैति; this sentence names तदर्पांति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वाहा तथा च स्वधा" — the two libation-calls; both clear, and both are what the English renders as 'funeral libations'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्व्याभुप्यायणता"; alternatives "द्व्याप्यायनता", "द्व्याम्नायणता" — REFUSED as unsettled. The English opposite gives 'no desire for double parentage', so a dvi- compound is right, but I cannot resolve the middle aksharas. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्व्यामुष्यायणता; this sentence names द्व्याभुप्यायणता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तः त्रोऽपि"; alternatives "तत्पुत्रोऽपि", "तस्य पुत्रोऽपि" — REFUSED: one or two aksharas between तः and त्रोऽपि are struck so faintly that only stray specks survive; the surrounding text on the same line is fully inked, so this is a failure of impression, not page damage. तत्पुत्रोऽपि is what the English ('the grand son born of that wedlock') implies, and I have NOT written it into the text. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्पुत्रोऽपि, written on 2026-09-20 from the machine reads of uk-ps-sastri and uk-bhasin-hindi, not from this leaf. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0131, mūla line 4, printed folio 129, at about 5.8x native level-stretched and 3.0x unstretched) found त, then a solidly inked visarga, then a clean blank 23 px wide, then a free-standing pair of dots with no headline and no consonant body, then त्रोऽपि. The impression failed there, and the letters it carried cannot be recovered from this leaf. What the exemplar set is an open doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निजौरसेन" — nija-aurasa - 'his own born', matching the English exactly; clean.
9.25a reading here is contested

उद्वोढा स्वसहोदरीसहभुवं जायानुजामुद्वहेत् योऽनग्निर्यदि दूरदार उत तत्पित्राब्दिके भ्रातृभिः । श्राद्धं कारयितव्यमग्निमहितं नो भागभाजो यदि सन्धायाग्निमथाहुतीर्विहिततन्नित्यश्चरस्तं त्यजेत् ॥ २५ ॥

udvoḍhā svasahodarīsahabhuvaṃ jāyānujāmudvahet yo'nagniryadi dūradāra uta tatpitrābdike bhrātṛbhiḥ | śrāddhaṃ kārayitavyamagnimahitaṃ no bhāgabhājo yadi sandhāyāgnimathāhutīrvihitatannityaścarastaṃ tyajet || 25 ||

A man already married may marry his wife's younger sister, born of the same womb as she. He who keeps no sacred fire, or whose wife is far away — for him, at his father's annual rite (ābdika), the śrāddha is to be had performed by the brothers; and one who has established the fire is not a sharer, if… Then, having laid the fire and ⟨offered⟩ the oblations (āhutīḥ), he who performs its prescribed daily ⟨rite⟩ should abandon that ⟨fire⟩ (tyajet) ⟨our mūla now reads āhutīr vihita-tan-nityaś caras taṃ tyajet, which the metre supports, and the division into words is ours⟩.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उद्वोढा"; alternatives "उद्धोढा" — the subscript in the second akshara is व or ध; not settled at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहभुवं"; alternatives "सहभुवां" — anusvara clear; vowel length on भु is not.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योऽनग्निर्यदि"; alternatives "योऽनग्निर्यदि" — avagraha and the ग्नि stack both clear; the sense (one who keeps no sacred fire) is carried into the next sloka's अग्निमहित.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नों"; alternatives "नो", "न" — an anusvara rides नो. As printed. [2026-09-23: superseded — this sentence names नों, which the mūla no longer reads: the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 changed it, and a later ruling on this verse has changed that text again (see the verse's revisions).]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अग्निमहितं"; alternatives "अग्निमहितं", "अग्नीमहितं" — read अग्निमहितं at 1.5x. [2026-09-23: confirmed on the plate. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0131, line index 30, printed folio 129, at about 3.0x, 4.3x and 6.6x native) found म before हि: a closed rounded bowl joined by a diagonal to the right vertical, where स has an open curl. So the press sets अग्निमहितं. The 2026-09-20 pass had written अग्निसहितैर् from the machine reads of the two other printings; the plate pass of 2026-09-23 reverted it, and अग्निसहितैः stands on the ledger as their reading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हुर्तीविहित"; alternatives "हुत्वा विहित", "हुर्ती विहित" — REFUSED in part: the aksharas after मथा are crowded and I cannot divide them. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सन्धायाग्निमथाहुतीर्विहिततन्नित्यश्चरस्तं; this sentence names हुर्तीविहित, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0131, line index 31, printed folio 129, at about 3.0x and 3.4x native) found these akṣaras legible, but could not settle whether the mark over the ती/वि boundary is the ī-mātrā's own top arc or a repha, which in this fount are the same shape at that size. Our mūla's आहुतीर्विहित rests on the metre: the śārdūlavikrīḍita wants position 7 light, आहुर्ती makes it heavy and आहुतीर् makes it light, and with आहुतीर् all nineteen positions agree.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्निर्त्यश्वरंतं"; alternatives "तन्नित्यश्वरं तं", "तत्नित्यश्चरं तं" — REFUSED as unsettled: this is the least legible string on any of the eleven plates. Anusvaras are visible over two aksharas; the consonant skeleton is not recoverable at 1.5x and the type appears disturbed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सन्धायाग्निमथाहुतीर्विहिततन्नित्यश्चरस्तं; this sentence names तत्निर्त्यश्वरंतं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: an eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0131, line index 31, printed folio 129, at about 3.0x and 3.4x native) found this span neither disturbed nor illegible: the letters म, था, हु, वि, हि, त, त, श, र and तं all come off the leaf plainly. So 'the least legible string' describes a 1.5x view, not the page. Our mūla's pāda 4 is confirmed by the metre; see the dated sentence on the note before this one.]
9.26a reading here is contested

पाणौ होमविधिर्न साम्प्रतमयं साहस्यको बह्वृचां स्यालो वा यदि भावुको यदुभयोः स्यातां च जाये उभौ । एकोद्भूतसहोदरीसहभुवौ पुत्री च पुत्रस्तदा न स्यातामिति षष्ठको भृगुमतं ख्यातेष्वयं सिद्ध्यति ॥२६॥

pāṇau homavidhirna sāmpratamayaṃ sāhasyako bahvṛcāṃ syālo vā yadi bhāvuko yadubhayoḥ syātāṃ ca jāye ubhau | ekodbhūtasahodarīsahabhuvau putrī ca putrastadā na syātāmiti ṣaṣṭhako bhṛgumataṃ khyāteṣvayaṃ siddhyati ||26||

The rule of offering into the hand is not now proper; it is a rash act ⟨sāhasyaka is unsettled at 1.5x; sāhasika, which the published English's 'inconsiderate act' would suit, is one alternative⟩ for the Bahvṛcas, the followers of the Ṛgveda. A wife's brother, or a sister's husband ⟨our mula now reads bhāvuko, 'sister's husband', the word that pairs with syāla⟩ — if the wives of both are alive, and if the two are a full brother and full sister born of one mother, and a daughter and a son: then these two shall not do it. So the sixth. This is Bhṛgu's opinion, and it holds good among those of repute.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साहस्यको"; alternatives "साहस्रको", "साहसिको" — unsettled at 1.5x; 'inconsiderate act' in the English opposite would suit sāhasika.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बह्वृचां" — bahvrca - the Rig-vedins; matches 'the followers of the Rig-Veda school' opposite. Clean, including the ृ.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "माबुको"; alternatives "भावुको", "मावुको" — the English opposite pairs 'Brother of the wife' (syala, legible here) with 'husband of sister', which would want a bhav- word; the first akshara reads म and the second carries the closed ब counter. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads भावुको for माबुको, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जाये"; alternatives "जाये" — dual 'the two wives' - matches '(provided their wives are alive)'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुत्री."; alternatives "पुत्री" — a low point stands after पुत्री, inside the verse line. Not a danda (too small, wrong height); recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads पुत्री for पुत्री., corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठको" — 'the sixth' - matches 'when these six perform' opposite.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भृगुमतं" — 'Bhrigu's opinion' - matches 'says Bhrigu, the sage'. Clean.
9.27a reading here is contested

भिक्षुर्योगपरश्च तत्त्वपथगस्त्वेते ह्यलभ्या भुवि श्राद्धे तान्विदधीत लुप्तवितथस्फूर्त्यैकपूर्तिप्रदान् । शूद्रेणार्पितमप्यनाद्यमवनीदेवस्य भक्तं तथा तस्यान्नं च निमंत्रितं द्विजनुपा श्राद्धे विभक्तिर्विना ॥२७॥

bhikṣuryogaparaśca tattvapathagastvete hyalabhyā bhuvi śrāddhe tānvidadhīta luptavitathasphūrtyaikapūrtipradān | śūdreṇārpitamapyanādyamavanīdevasya bhaktaṃ tathā tasyānnaṃ ca nimaṃtritaṃ dvijanupā śrāddhe vibhaktirvinā ||27||

A mendicant, one devoted to yoga, and one who walks the path of truth — these three are indeed not to be had on earth. At a śrāddha one should appoint them ⟨lupta-vitatha-sphūrtyaika-pūrti-pradān: a long compound set solid; the reader could follow the akṣaras but the word division is not marked and he did not impose one⟩. What a śūdra has offered is not to be eaten by an earth-god, that is, by a Brahmin; and so too his food, when one has been invited ⟨dvija-nupā: the vowel under na is not settled between u and ṛ⟩ — at a śrāddha, without the proper apportionment.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भिक्षुर्योगपरश्च तत्त्वपथगः" — mendicant / yoga-devoted / walker of the path of truth - the three the English opposite calls 'a religious mendicant, a yogin or a philosopher'. All three legible; the cleanest correspondence on any of the eleven plates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लुप्तवितथस्फूर्त्यैकपूर्तिप्रदान्" — long compound set solid; I can follow the aksharas but the word division is not marked and I do not impose one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अवनीदेवस्य" — 'earth-god' = Brahmin; matches 'A Brahmin should not accept the food offered to him at a Sraddha by a Sudra'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अनाद्यम्"; alternatives "अनाह्यम्" — read अनाद्यम् (not to be eaten) at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विजनुपा"; alternatives "द्विजनृपा", "द्विजनुतां" — the vowel under न is ु or ृ; not settled at 1.5x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निमंत्रितं"; alternatives "निमन्त्रितं" — anusvara, not the न् conjunct - this edition's habit.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विभक्तिर्विना"; alternatives "विभक्तिं विना" — printed with the visarga-sandhi form; the sense the English gives is 'against the principle of distribution'.
9.28a reading here is contested

यद्गेहस्य फलं तदेव धरणीदेवस्य भूस्पर्शने सस्त्रीबालसुतस्य तत्फलमभूद्द्रव्यं न शेषादिना । भूदेवोऽन्यकुलीनकर्मकरणे भ्रश्यत्यमुष्मात्सुखाच्छूद्रो न द्विजकर्मणोऽर्जितफलो नान्यत्र पाराशरात् ॥२८॥

yadgehasya phalaṃ tadeva dharaṇīdevasya bhūsparśane sastrībālasutasya tatphalamabhūddravyaṃ na śeṣādinā | bhūdevo'nyakulīnakarmakaraṇe bhraśyatyamuṣmātsukhācchūdro na dvijakarmaṇo'rjitaphalo nānyatra pārāśarāt ||28||

The fruit that comes of a house is the very fruit that comes to an earth-god from touching the ground; and for one who has wife, child and son that fruit became wealth, and not by what was left over. An earth-god who does the work of another's family falls from that happiness; a śūdra earns no fruit from the rites of the twice-born — and this from none but Pārāśara.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्गे"; alternatives "द्दे" — stacked conjunct under ya read at 6x and 9x; upper element is the hooked half-da, lower element read as ga. Scansion is identical for either, so meter cannot decide; sense (geha = house, matching the paragraph's 'donating a house') decides.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्द्र"; alternatives "द्र" — triple stack after bhu; at 4.2x two subscript elements are visible below the headline. Meter requires a heavy syllable here and confirms the double consonant (abhud + dravyam).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यं"; alternatives "ण्यं" — no repha above the glyph, which rules out -rnyam; counter shape read as va + ya + anusvara at 4.2x
9.29a reading here is contested

मन्दांगारकशुक्रवासरदिने नाब्धौ सुतार्थी जनः स्नायाद्राहुविलोकनाच्चत रत्नाविद्धे च पर्वण्यपि । अभ्यंगाःश्यवगाहमैथुनमृतिक्षौरेष्वथावारणे ग्राह्या सर्वमतैर्बुधैरपि तिथिर्विद्धाऽपि तात्कालिकी ॥ २९ ॥

mandāṃgārakaśukravāsaradine nābdhau sutārthī janaḥ snāyādrāhuvilokanāccata ratnāviddhe ca parvaṇyapi | abhyaṃgāḥśyavagāhamaithunamṛtikṣaureṣvathāvāraṇe grāhyā sarvamatairbudhairapi tithirviddhā'pi tātkālikī || 29 ||

On the weekdays of Saturn, Mars and Venus a man desiring a son should not bathe in the sea; nor from the sighting of Rāhu ⟨our mula now leaves out an inline parenthesis that stood here, a non-word that was not part of the verse⟩; nor on a parvan pierced by a jewel. In anointing, ⟨āḥśya, recorded as printed and a non-word: two small round dots stand in visarga position, then a conjunct read as śya. The reader ruled out an avagraha by direct comparison at 5.5x against the two certain avagrahas on this plate.⟩, bathing, sexual union, death and tonsure, and in warding off — the tithi current at that moment is to be taken by the wise of every school, even if it is pierced.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्दांगारक"; alternatives "मन्दाङ्गारक" — printed with anusvara, not the subscript velar nasal; checked at 2.4x — the mark above the headline is a single round dot
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(त्घुरमुवो)"; alternatives "(त्थुरमुवो)", "(ट्ठुरमुवो)", "(च्छुरमुवो)" — REFUSED as a settled reading. A parenthesis is set INSIDE the verse line. At 4x, 5x and 8x plus a thresholded pass the content resolves to five glyph slots: [stacked conjunct + u-matra] ra [mu] [vo]. The first slot would not resolve at any magnification. The content is a non-word in every reading I could form; it is almost certainly an editorial variant-reading note printed inline, not part of the verse. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्नायाद्राहुविलोकनाच्चत; this sentence names त्घुरमुवो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रत्नाविद्धे"; alternatives "रत्नविद्धे" — the line does not scan as Sardulavikridita whether or not the parenthesis is counted — position 11 comes out heavy where the metre needs light. This is the only one of the eight verse lines on the plate that fails the metrical check, which corroborates that the passage is corrupt exactly where the parenthesis sits.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ाःश्य"; alternatives "ाऽश्य", "ाब्ध्य", "ाऽध्य" — NON-WORD RECORDED AS PRINTED. Between -ga- and -vagaha- the ink shows two small round dots stacked at mid-height (visarga position), then a conjunct whose lower-left loop and attached ya read as shya. I ruled out avagraha by direct comparison at 5.5x against the two certain avagrahas on this plate (line 4 bhudevo'nya, line 5 karmano'rjita): both print as an S-curve, never as dots. Metre requires a LIGHT syllable in this slot and every alternative listed satisfies it, so meter cannot adjudicate.
9.30a reading here is contested

सूर्योत्थान घटीतिथिर्वितरणस्नानादितो गृह्यते भिक्षोर्भक्षणमन्तिमेऽपि दिवसस्याप्यष्टमेऽंशे विधिः । नो रात्रौ विधवाऽपि तादृशविधिर्ग्राह्या निशीथाशने यास्ता पर्वसु नाप्यपो यदि फलान्यश्नीत नान्नं निशि ॥३०॥

sūryotthāna ghaṭītithirvitaraṇasnānādito gṛhyate bhikṣorbhakṣaṇamantime'pi divasasyāpyaṣṭame'ṃśe vidhiḥ | no rātrau vidhavā'pi tādṛśavidhirgrāhyā niśīthāśane yāstā parvasu nāpyapo yadi phalānyaśnīta nānnaṃ niśi ||30||

The tithi of the ghaṭikā at sunrise is the one taken for giving, bathing and the rest. A mendicant's meal is enjoined in the last part of the day, or even in its eighth part. Not at night; and for a widow too such a rule is to be followed at the midnight meal ⟨our mula now reads niśītha, 'midnight'⟩. On those days that are parvans, not even water; and if she eats at all, let her eat fruits by night, and not cooked food.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सूर्योत्थान"; alternatives "सूर्योद्धान" — the stacked conjunct is ta+tha, not da+dha: at 3.6x the lower element shows the round bowl with an internal counter that ta-tha takes in this face. Metre needs G G G L here and suryotthana (sunrise) gives it; the plate-134 English for this verse says the tithi is the one prevailing at sun-rise, which is the same word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिथिर्वि"; alternatives "तिथिवि" — repha confirmed at 3.6x sitting above the vi. Metre independently requires a closed syllable in this slot, so ink and scansion agree.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्भ"; alternatives "र्म" — glyph under the repha compared at 3.3x with the certain bha that opens the same word (bhikshoh); left-side structure matches bha rather than ma
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अष्टमेंऽशे"; alternatives "अष्टमेऽंशे" — anusvara is printed on the e-matra of -me, before the avagraha, rather than on the following amsha; recorded in printed order
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधवा"; alternatives "विद्धा" — CORRECTED against my own first reading. Metre decides: position 4 of a Sardulavikridita pada must be LIGHT, which vidha- gives and vid-dha- does not. The plate-134 English for this verse independently says the rule applies to a widow (vidhava).
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विशीथाशने"; alternatives "निशीथाशने" — initial glyph shows the va bowl, unlike the certain na that closes the same word; nishitha (midnight) is the expected word and both scan identically, so metre cannot adjudicate. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads निशीथाशने for विशीथाशने, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
9.31a reading here is contested

दत्तो नित्य उताप्यनित्यं उदितो व्यामुष्यभावो नयेत्पिण्डं द्वावधिकृत्य कृत्यविधिषु स्यादेव पुत्रीसुतः । वासिष्ठोक्तिरुभौ न सांप्रतमुभावित्याह कात्यायनो नप्तुस्तुल्यमसौ प्रभूजनयितुः कार्येति कार्ष्णाजनिः ॥३१॥

datto nitya utāpyanityaṃ udito vyāmuṣyabhāvo nayetpiṇḍaṃ dvāvadhikṛtya kṛtyavidhiṣu syādeva putrīsutaḥ | vāsiṣṭhoktirubhau na sāṃpratamubhāvityāha kātyāyano naptustulyamasau prabhūjanayituḥ kāryeti kārṣṇājaniḥ ||31||

A given son is called permanent, or else impermanent; and one of double parentage (vyāmuṣya) ⟨the technical term for such a son is dvyāmuṣyāyaṇa, so an initial dva- would be expected; none is printed, and the glyph reads bha, not ma⟩ carries the piṇḍa with reference to two men, in the rules of the rites; and so it is with the daughter's son. Vasiṣṭha's word is that both [do not stand]; 'not at present — both', says Kātyāyana; and 'it is to be done for a grandson equally with the begetter', says Kārṣṇājani ⟨our mula now reads kārṣṇājaniḥ, the authority otherwise named Kārṣṇājini, cited beside Kātyāyana⟩.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्यामुष्यभावो"; alternatives "व्यामुष्यमावो", "द्व्यामुष्यभावो" — the glyph after -mushya- shows bha's left vertical crossed by an internal bar rather than ma's closed lower-left loop, read at 4.2x. The technical term for the double-parentage son is dvyamushyayana, so an initial dva- would be expected; none is printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नित्यं उदितो"; alternatives "नित्यमुदितो" — printed as anusvara + a separate initial u; the metre reads it as -yam u- and only that reading gives a light syllable in slot 9, which the pada needs
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कृत्यविविधिषु"; alternatives "कृत्यविधिषु" — RECORDED AS PRINTED AND FLAGGED. At 3x and 4.2x the ink appears to carry three i-hooks (vi-vi-dhi), but that reading gives the pada TWENTY syllables in a NINETEEN-syllable metre; krityavidhishu gives exactly 19 and every other slot then agrees. Either the plate carries a compositor's doubled vi, or the dha's left loop is reading as a second va. Not settled at any magnification I could reach. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads कृत्यविधिषु for कृत्यविविधिषु, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उभाबि"; alternatives "उभावि" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST APPLIED at 4.2x — the glyph's counter is crossed by a horizontal bar, which is ba; va prints with an uncrossed bowl in this face. Expected form is ubhav iti (ubhau + iti), so the printed ba looks like a compositor's error. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रभू"; alternatives "प्रमू", "प्रसू" — second glyph read at 4.2x as bha (left vertical + internal bar) rather than ma (closed loop); all three alternatives scan identically so metre cannot adjudicate
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "काण्णांजनिः"; alternatives "काण्वांजनिः" — the conjunct after ka shows two nna-like elements with an anusvara above; I could not settle whether the second element is nna or va at 4.2x. This is a proper name (an authority cited alongside Katyayana in pada 3) and I will not guess it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कार्ष्णाजनिः; this sentence names काण्णांजनिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.32a reading here is contested

एवं प्राह महांश्च वृद्धहरितो हेमाद्रिरप्याह तद्ताद्या जनकस्य तत्तनयिनी यो दातृपित्रा समम् । नप्तुस्तस्य सपिण्डनं च कलयेद्वित्ते द्वयोस्तद्वयोर्गोत्रं श्राद्धविधौ तु गोत्रमुभयोर्ग्राह्यं विवाहे सुतापुत्रस्यैतदनिष्टमात्मजननी मातामहीसंमिता ॥३२॥

evaṃ prāha mahāṃśca vṛddhaharito hemādrirapyāha tadtādyā janakasya tattanayinī yo dātṛpitrā samam | naptustasya sapiṇḍanaṃ ca kalayedvitte dvayostadvayorgotraṃ śrāddhavidhau tu gotramubhayorgrāhyaṃ vivāhe sutāputrasyaitadaniṣṭamātmajananī mātāmahīsaṃmitā ||32||

So says the great Vṛddha-Harīta, and Hemādri says the same. ⟨The stanza's second word was refused: the opening stacked conjunct would not resolve at 4x — the reader could see a headline, a hooked descender and an ā-mātrā, but not which consonant sits on top, and our mula now joins it to the ta that ended the previous line, as tadtādyā; the word is still not construed.⟩ … of the begetter; his daughter, together with the giver's father. And one should reckon the sapiṇḍana of that man's grandson. In the matter of property it is the gotra of those two; but in the rite of śrāddha the gotra of BOTH is to be taken; and in marriage, for a daughter's son this is not desired: his own mother ranks as a maternal grandmother.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राह"; alternatives "शाह" — conjunct pra read at 1.9x; both alternatives are heavy so metre cannot adjudicate, but praha (=says) is what the sentence needs and the English on this plate says Harita and Hemadri 'say'
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्ताद्या"; alternatives "इत्ताद्या", "त्ताद्या", "ह्ताद्या" — REFUSED. The opening stacked conjunct would not resolve at 4x: I can see a headline, a hooked descender and an a-matra, but not which consonant sits on top. It also has to join the bare ta left hanging by the hyphen at the end of the previous line, and I cannot form a Sanskrit word from any combination I can see. The rest of the line is secure and the pada scans at 19 if this cluster is read as two syllables.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुभयोर्ग्राह्यं"; alternatives "मयोग्राह्यं" — read at 4x: bha rather than ma in the second slot, and a repha above the gra. Scansion is the check — ubhayor-grahyam gives exactly 19 syllables with every position agreeing, and it is also the sense the passage needs (the gotra of BOTH is to be taken).
9.33a reading here is contested

नान्दीकर्मणि निर्वृते भवति चेदुल्काग्निवृष्ट्यादिकं चाशौचं विदधीत नोपनयनं मातू रजोदर्शने । ऊर्ध्वं चेद्वटुभोजनान्न हि परित्याज्यं न कन्योद्वहे दद्यादेव पिता वटोर्न यदि सा माता न दोषो गुरोः ॥३३॥

nāndīkarmaṇi nirvṛte bhavati cedulkāgnivṛṣṭyādikaṃ cāśaucaṃ vidadhīta nopanayanaṃ mātū rajodarśane | ūrdhvaṃ cedvaṭubhojanānna hi parityājyaṃ na kanyodvahe dadyādeva pitā vaṭorna yadi sā mātā na doṣo guroḥ ||33||

If, after the nāndī rite has been completed, there occurs a meteor, a fire, a downpour or the like, and impurity, one should not perform the upanayana; nor at the appearance of the mother's menses. But if it is after the boy (vaṭu) has eaten, it is not to be abandoned, and neither is the giving of the girl in marriage: the father should certainly give her to the boy. If she is not the mother, there is no fault on the teacher.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निर्वृते"; alternatives "निर्वृत्ते" — checked at 4x: a single ta after the vri, no doubled ta. Metre agrees — slot 7 must be LIGHT, which nirvrite gives and nirvritte does not. Standard Sanskrit for this locative absolute is nirvritte, so the plate departs from the grammar in the metre's favour.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मातू"; alternatives "मातुर्", "मातृ" — printed with a long-u matra and NO visarga or repha. Metre requires a heavy syllable here, which the long u supplies and a short ri would not, so the printed form is metrically right even though matur would be the expected genitive.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेद्वटु"; alternatives "चेद्धटु", "चेद्बटु" — lower element of the stack read at 4x; I prefer va because pada 4 of this same verse prints the same word plainly as वटोर्, and the English on this plate calls him the Brahmachari (vatu). Not settled on the ink alone.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न कन्योद्वहे" — UNEXPLAINED MARKS. Two short horizontal strokes are printed between na and kanyodvahe — one at headline height, one below the baseline — with no letter attached to either. They are not a matra, not a danda and not a hyphen in this face's usage. They may be broken rule or spacing quads that took ink. Recorded here rather than in the text because I cannot say what character, if any, they represent.
9.34a reading here is contested

मात्रा साकमिहैव भोजनमथो मौहूर्तिकात्कर्मणो वध्वा चैव वरस्य चौलविधिना कार्याः शिखास्त्वान्वयात् । गृह्याग्नेरुपनायनाग्निरधमो लौक्याग्निरन्यानले संसृज्येत तदाहवीत विबुधैः पात्रत्र नाज्ञातिभिः ॥३४॥

mātrā sākamihaiva bhojanamatho mauhūrtikātkarmaṇo vadhvā caiva varasya caulavidhinā kāryāḥ śikhāstvānvayāt | gṛhyāgnerupanāyanāgniradhamo laukyāgniranyānale saṃsṛjyeta tadāhavīta vibudhaiḥ pātratra nājñātibhiḥ ||34||

Eating in this very place along with the mother; then, after the rite held at the muhūrta ⟨an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found the vowel sign o here, not a bracket, and our mūla now reads karmaṇo⟩. For both the bride and the bridegroom the tuft (śikhā) is to be made by the cūḍā rite, according to lineage. The fire of the gṛhya is the higher, the fire of the upanayana the lower, and the worldly fire [lower still]; when one fire is mingled with another, then ⟨tadāhavīta: the form as printed is not a Sanskrit finite verb the reader could parse, though it scans⟩ by the wise — ⟨pātratra: refused as a settled reading; the cluster after pa would not resolve at 1.5x. It scans, but the reader could not defend it as a word and asks for a second witness.⟩ and not by kinsmen.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "("; alternatives "।" — the line ends in a mark I read as an opening parenthesis rather than a danda; at 1.5x it is a single curved stroke with no companion. If it is a bracket, nothing closes it on this plate. [2026-09-23: re-read on jp2 page_0135 (store line 24) at about 2.2x and 3.6x native. The mark is the detached limb of the vowel sign ो, with the e-curl set over the ण; it matches the ो-limb of थो on the same line in gap, width and length, and it stops 27 px above the baseline, as a daṇḍa does not. The press sets कर्मणो, and no bracket stands on the plate. The Sastri 2010 and Bhasin 2019 renders, read by eye at about 3.0x, set कर्मणो with a joined ो. Our mūla reads कर्मणो.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अधमो"; alternatives "अघमो" — dha vs gha in the third-from-last cluster; adhamo (inferior) is what the English on this plate says of the Upanayana fire, and both scan alike, so the sense decides where the ink does not
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पात्रत्र"; alternatives "पाह्यत्र", "पात्रे त्र" — REFUSED as a settled reading. The cluster after pa would not resolve at 1.5x; patratra scans correctly (G G L) but I cannot defend it as a word. Needs a second witness.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाज्ञातिभिः"; alternatives "नाज्ञातिमिः" — CORRECTED against my own first reading. At 1.5x the cluster read as ma; the same word occurs on plate 136 line 7 where 4x shows bha unmistakably (left vertical crossed by an internal bar, no closed lower-left loop). Reading carried back here. najnatibhih = 'not by kinsmen'.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदाहवीत"; alternatives "तदाह्वयेत्", "तदाहरेत्" — read at 1.5x only; the form as printed is not a Sanskrit finite verb I can parse, but it scans
9.35a reading here is contested

स्मार्तो यद्यनुगच्छतेऽग्निरथ शंनोदेवृचा चोऽस्य तद्भस्माथो जुहुयात्स पाहिविधिना यत्राप्यनाज्ञातिभिः । गृह्याग्न्योश्च विमेलनं यदि पुरश्चौपासनारम्भकस्थालीपाकमथ प्रधानकलनात्कृत्वा प्रवेश्याहुतीः ॥३५॥

smārto yadyanugacchate'gniratha śaṃnodevṛcā co'sya tadbhasmātho juhuyātsa pāhividhinā yatrāpyanājñātibhiḥ | gṛhyāgnyośca vimelanaṃ yadi puraścaupāsanārambhakasthālīpākamatha pradhānakalanātkṛtvā praveśyāhutīḥ ||35||

If the smārta fire follows, then with the ṛc 'śaṃ no devī' ⟨the published English names the mantra 'Sanno Devi', i.e. śaṃ no devī + ṛcā; the plate prints devṛcā with no ya, and the metre requires the light syllable that the printed form gives⟩, and its ashes; then let him offer with the 'pāhi' formula, wherever it may be, and not by kinsmen. And if there is a mingling of the two house-fires, then first the beginning of the aupāsana and the sthālīpāka; then, after the reckoning of the principal rite, having performed it, the oblations are to be brought in.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शंनोदेवृचा"; alternatives "शंनोदेव्यृचा" — the English on this plate names the mantra 'Sanno Devi', i.e. sham no devi + rica; the plate prints devrica with no ya. Metre needs a LIGHT syllable in slot 15, which vri gives and vyri would not, so the printed form is the metrical one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाज्ञातिभिः"; alternatives "नाज्ञातिमिः" — BHA CONFIRMED at 4x — left vertical crossed by an internal bar, not ma's closed loop. Same word and same reading as plate 135 line 32; my low-magnification reading of ma there was wrong and has been corrected.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विमेलनं"; alternatives "विमेलनं (=vimelanam)", "संमेलनं" — first cluster read as vi; melana (mixing) is what the English says of the two fires. Scans either way.
9.36a reading here is contested

पश्चाच्चेत्स विभज्य पाकविधिना पूर्णाहुतीर्न स्रुवेणाज्यं वा जुहुयात्तदा विविचयेत्स्वर्धीयते पुंमतैः । नाशे तत्समिधोरधस्तमनिशेन्नाग्निर्हुवेदाहुतीः सोमस्याऽपि तदीयमाहुतिगणं कुर्यान्न वा संस्मरेत् ॥३६॥

paścāccetsa vibhajya pākavidhinā pūrṇāhutīrna sruveṇājyaṃ vā juhuyāttadā vivicayetsvardhīyate puṃmataiḥ | nāśe tatsamidhoradhastamaniśennāgnirhuvedāhutīḥ somasyā'pi tadīyamāhutigaṇaṃ kuryānna vā saṃsmaret ||36||

If afterwards, having divided it by the rule of cooking, he should offer the pūrṇāhutis, or ghee, with the ladle — then let him separate them; so it is held by the opinions of men ⟨puṃmataiḥ as printed is not a word the reader could parse; the published English says 'the wise say', which would suggest budhaiḥ or mataiḥ. Not settled. Our mula now drops the extra cet that made this quarter twenty syllables.⟩. On the loss of the two kindling-sticks ⟨our mula now reads adhastam, 'below'; the next word, aniśen, is still uncertain⟩ the fire should not offer the oblations. And of Soma too he should make the same set of oblations, or else he should not; or he should call it to mind.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विभज्य"; alternatives "विमज्य" — bha, on the counter test now calibrated at 4x on this plate; vibhajya (having divided) is also what the English says — 'separate it into two parts'
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्णाहुतीर्न"; alternatives "पूर्णाहुतीर्नं" — two hook marks sit above this stretch; I read both as rephas (pūr-, -tīr-) rather than one repha plus an anusvara. Metre needs slot 17 heavy, which -tīr na gives by position either way.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विविचयेच्चेत्स्वर्"; alternatives "विविचयेत्स्वर्" — METRICAL DEFECT AS PRINTED. Read literally the pada carries TWENTY syllables where the metre allows nineteen, and slot 15 comes out heavy where it must be light. Dropping the -ccet- cluster gives exactly 19 with every position agreeing. Either the plate doubles a syllable or I am reading one cluster as two. Recorded as printed and flagged. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads विविचयेत्स्वर्धीयते for विविचयेच्चेत्स्वर्धीयते, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुंमतैः"; alternatives "पुंभतैः", "पुंसतैः" — as printed this is not a word I can parse; the English says 'the wise say', which would suggest budhaih or mataih. Not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अघस्तमनिशेन्"; alternatives "अधस्तमनिधेन्" — gha/dha and sha/dha both unsettled at 2x in this stretch. The metre is satisfied by either pairing (L G L L L G at slots 7-12), so scansion cannot adjudicate. The English speaks of the spoon being 'kept down', which would favour adhah-, but I will not let the translation write the Sanskrit.
9.37a reading here is contested

उद्वाहो यदि वत्सरे तु विषमे भद्रः समे नो शुभः पूर्वोढामृतवत्सराद्यदि सुता चोद्वाहपूर्वं रजः । उत्सृज्यात्पितरौ च सोदरजनाः सर्वे महापापिनो नर्वीयादथ पूर्वमेव सुदतीं गच्छेत्पतिः पातकी ॥३७॥

udvāho yadi vatsare tu viṣame bhadraḥ same no śubhaḥ pūrvoḍhāmṛtavatsarādyadi sutā codvāhapūrvaṃ rajaḥ | utsṛjyātpitarau ca sodarajanāḥ sarve mahāpāpino narvīyādatha pūrvameva sudatīṃ gacchetpatiḥ pātakī ||37||

Marriage in an odd year is auspicious; in an even year it is not good. If a girl married before reaches the year of her menses, or if the menses come before the marriage, then the parents and all the full brothers who cast her out are great sinners ⟨our mula now reads utsṛjyāt, and this quarter has its nineteen syllables⟩; and thereafter the husband who first goes to a fair-toothed woman is a sinner.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उत्सृज्याति"; alternatives "उत्सृज्या", "उत्सृज्य" — METRICAL EXCESS AS PRINTED. Read literally the pada carries TWENTY syllables against the metre's nineteen; deleting the -ti- gives 19 with every position agreeing. Recorded as printed and flagged — this is the second such excess on this plate (see v.36 pada 2), which is itself worth checking against a second witness. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads उत्सृज्यात्पितरौ for उत्सृज्यातिपितरौ, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.] [2026-09-23: the excess was never on the page. An eye reading of the exemplar (jp2 page_0136, line index 30, printed folio 134, at about 5.05x native, with a threshold sweep on the greyscale master) found exactly one i-mātrā between ज्या and तरौ, calibrated against the i of यदि and द्यदि on the same leaf. So the press sets उत्सृज्यात्पितरौ, as our mūla reads, and the twenty-syllable उत्सृज्याति was a misreading in the 2026-09-05 transcription. The reading could not separate त from प in the letter under the mātrā; पितरौ rests there on the lexicon, since पतरौ is not a word.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नर्वीयादथ"; alternatives "न वीर्यादथ" — the line opens with a repha carrying back to mahapapino at the end of the previous line; the word division is the editor's and I keep it as set
9.38a reading here is contested

वर्षादिप्रतिपन्न वेधसहिता ग्राह्या रघूणां पतेः मध्याह्ने नवमीतिथौ भगवतो जन्माभवत्सा तिथिः । साक्षान्मेध्यविधायिनी व्रतवृतां श्रीरामपूजायुजां त्याज्या पूर्वदिनान्त्यवेधसहिता ह्यादित्यभेनोत्तमा ॥३८॥

varṣādipratipanna vedhasahitā grāhyā raghūṇāṃ pateḥ madhyāhne navamītithau bhagavato janmābhavatsā tithiḥ | sākṣānmedhyavidhāyinī vratavṛtāṃ śrīrāmapūjāyujāṃ tyājyā pūrvadināntyavedhasahitā hyādityabhenottamā ||38||

The first [tithi] of the year, taken together with the vedha, is to be adopted for the Lord of the Raghus. At midday on the ninth tithi the Lord's birth took place: that is the tithi. It is directly the maker of purity for those who hold vows and are joined to the worship of Śrī Rāma. It is to be avoided when joined to the vedha of the end of the previous day; and it is best with the Sun's asterism ⟨ādityabha — the nakṣatra of Aditi, that is Punarvasu, which the published English names for this rule⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ह्यादित्यभे"; alternatives "ह्यादित्यमे" — bha on the 4x-calibrated counter test; adityabha = the Sun's/Aditi's asterism, which is Punarvasu — the nakshatra the English on this plate names for this rule
9.39a reading here is contested

त्रेतादिर्भृगुरामजन्मदिवसो वैशाखमासे शुभः तार्तीया च तिथिर्न पूर्वनिहता मध्याह्नगा गृह्यताम् । श्राद्धादौ च परैव सा नरहरेरिष्टा जयन्ती शुभा सायं व्यापिनिनी व्रतप्रियतमा नानाङ्गयुक्ता शुभा ।३९॥

tretādirbhṛgurāmajanmadivaso vaiśākhamāse śubhaḥ tārtīyā ca tithirna pūrvanihatā madhyāhnagā gṛhyatām | śrāddhādau ca paraiva sā narahareriṣṭā jayantī śubhā sāyaṃ vyāpininī vratapriyatamā nānāṅgayuktā śubhā |39||

The first day of the Tretā, the birthday of Bhṛgu-Rāma, in the month of Vaiśākha, is auspicious; and the third tithi, not struck by the previous one, reaching midday, is to be taken. At a śrāddha and the like the later one is desired; and the Jayantī of Narahari is auspicious, pervading the evening, dearest to those who hold the vow, and auspicious when joined with its several limbs. ⟨The verse-number is set with a SINGLE daṇḍa opening and a DOUBLE daṇḍa closing, where every other numbered verse on plates 133-137 uses a double daṇḍa on both sides; recorded as printed.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रेतादिर्भृगु"; alternatives "त्रेतादिभृगु" — a repha sits above the bhri; without it slot 3 comes out LIGHT where the metre requires heavy, and with it every one of the 19 positions agrees. Bhrigurama = Parasurama, whose birth the English on this plate names.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।३९॥"; alternatives "॥३९॥" — ASYMMETRIC DELIMITER, recorded as printed: a SINGLE danda opens the verse number and a DOUBLE danda closes it. Every other numbered verse on plates 133-137 prints a double danda on both sides. Checked at 1.5x; not a broken sort as far as I can tell, but worth a second witness.
9.40a reading here is contested

श्रावण्यां कथितं नवस्य हि वटं गार्ह्यैरुपाकर्म तत् संक्रान्तिग्रहणे भृगोश्च धिषणस्यास्ते न कार्यं द्विजैः । पर्वण्येव यजुर्विदः श्रवणभे कुर्युर्व्रतं बह्वृचा हस्तर्क्षेऽपि च सामिनो भगवतो जन्माष्टमी वक्ष्यते ।४०॥

śrāvaṇyāṃ kathitaṃ navasya hi vaṭaṃ gārhyairupākarma tat saṃkrāntigrahaṇe bhṛgośca dhiṣaṇasyāste na kāryaṃ dvijaiḥ | parvaṇyeva yajurvidaḥ śravaṇabhe kuryurvrataṃ bahvṛcā hastarkṣe'pi ca sāmino bhagavato janmāṣṭamī vakṣyate |40||

On the full moon of Śrāvaṇa the upākarma of the new [study] is prescribed by the Gṛhya authorities. At a saṅkrānti or an eclipse, and while Bhṛgu (Venus) and Dhiṣaṇā (Jupiter) are set, it is not to be performed by the twice-born. On the parvan itself the knowers of the Yajus should perform the vow; the Bahvṛcas (Ṛgvedins) on the asterism Śravaṇa, and the followers of the Sāman on Hasta. The Lord's Janmāṣṭamī will be spoken of next. ⟨The verse-number again opens with a single daṇḍa and closes with a double — the same asymmetry as verse 39, so it is a habit of this setting; verse 41 reverts to a double daṇḍa on both sides.⟩

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गार्ह्यैः"; alternatives "गृह्यैः", "गोह्यैः" — read at 3.6x: a repha above the hyai, and an a-matra rather than a vocalic ri under the ga — hence gaarhyaih (domestic/Grihya), which is the word the English on this plate names as the Grihya Sutras. Metre is satisfied at slots 13-14 either way.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भृगंश्च"; alternatives "भृगोश्च" — an anusvara, not an o-matra, on the bhriga as printed; both scan heavy at slot 8 so metre cannot adjudicate. Bhrigu = Venus. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भृगोश्च; this sentence names भृगंश्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धिषणस्य"; alternatives "धिपणस्य" — the middle glyph is sha, confirmed at 3.6x. Dhishana = Brihaspati/Jupiter, which is what the English on this plate names alongside Venus.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बह्वचा"; alternatives "बह्वृचाः" — as printed the vocalic ri and the final visarga are both absent; bahvrichah (= Rigvedins) is the word the sense and the English require. Metre is satisfied by the printed form. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads बह्वृचा for बह्वचा, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽप"; alternatives "ऽपि" — the i-matra is absent as printed; api is required by sense and metre is indifferent
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।४०॥"; alternatives "॥४०॥" — single danda opening, double closing — the SAME asymmetry as v.39 on plate 137, so it is a habit of this setting and not a one-off broken sort. v.41 on this plate reverts to a double danda on both sides, so the edition is simply inconsistent.
9.41a reading here is contested

श्रावण्यामधमाष्टमी भगवतः कृष्णस्य सा जन्मभू रोहिण्या यदि संयुताऽतिफलदा ज्ञस्यापि वारेण च । यस्यामर्धनिशीथगा यदि तिथिर्ग्राह्योभयत्रैवमित्यन्या यत्र न चेतरैव न तु तत्पूर्वेण विद्धा शुभा ॥४१॥

śrāvaṇyāmadhamāṣṭamī bhagavataḥ kṛṣṇasya sā janmabhū rohiṇyā yadi saṃyutā'tiphaladā jñasyāpi vāreṇa ca | yasyāmardhaniśīthagā yadi tithirgrāhyobhayatraivamityanyā yatra na cetaraiva na tu tatpūrveṇa viddhā śubhā ||41||

In Śrāvaṇa the dark eighth is the birth-ground of the Lord Kṛṣṇa. If it is joined with Rohiṇī it is exceedingly fruitful, and so too with Mercury's weekday. That tithi in which the middle of the night falls is to be taken as such in both cases; another, where it is not so, is otherwise; and one pierced by the preceding [tithi] is not auspicious.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेतरैव"; alternatives "चेत्तरैव", "चेदितरैव" — word division unsettled at 1.5x; the printed string scans correctly as ce-ta-rai-va so I keep it as set
9.42a reading here is contested

या यामत्रितयोर्ध्वमप्यथ पुनः प्रातश्चरेत्पारणां मान्ते वा च तिथेरतान्त इति सा श्रीशैवरात्र्या समा । भाद्रे मासि सिते गणेश्वरतिथिः सा स्याच्चतुर्थी शुभा सा स्यात्सङ्गवसङ्गता परयुता श्लाघ्या जयाख्या न तु ॥४२॥

yā yāmatritayordhvamapyatha punaḥ prātaścaretpāraṇāṃ mānte vā ca titheratānta iti sā śrīśaivarātryā samā | bhādre māsi site gaṇeśvaratithiḥ sā syāccaturthī śubhā sā syātsaṅgavasaṅgatā parayutā ślāghyā jayākhyā na tu ||42||

The tithi that runs past three watches, or again the one at daybreak, is when one should break the fast; or at the end of the month, or at the tithi's end ⟨our mula now reads titheratānta, without the sta that made a heavy syllable in a light slot; the sense of atānta is not certain⟩ — that one is equal to the holy Śivarātri. In the bright half of the month Bhādra the tithi of the Lord of the Gaṇas: that fourth would be auspicious. It is praiseworthy when joined with the saṅgava, the forenoon watch, and with the following [tithi], but not the one called Jayā.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुनः" — DAMAGED TYPE. The pu prints as two detached marks with the bowl missing; I read it as pu because the metre requires a LIGHT syllable in slot 11 and punah supplies it, and because the following nah is undamaged. The letter itself is not legible on the plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिथेरस्तान्त"; alternatives "तिथेरतान्त" — METRICAL CONFLICT. As printed, slot 7 comes out HEAVY (the sta cluster closes the preceding syllable) where the metre requires light; dropping the sibilant gives 19 clean positions. The st cluster is plainly inked at 1.6x, so I record the printed form and flag the defect rather than emend. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तिथेरतान्त; this sentence names तिथेरस्तान्त, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्रीशैवरात्र्या"; alternatives "श्रीशिवरात्र्या" — ai-matra as printed; the English on plate 139 calls this 'the holy Sivaratri'. Both scan heavy at slot 14.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सङ्क्रवसङ्क्ता"; alternatives "सङ्करवसंयुक्ता", "सङ्क्रमवसंयुक्ता" — REFUSED as a settled reading. Read at 4x the cluster gives sam-kra-va-sam-kta, which is FIVE syllables scanning G L L G G where the metre needs SIX scanning G L L G L G — so the printed pada is one syllable short and wrong in quantity at slot 7. Every emendation I could form is a guess; recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यात्सङ्गवसङ्गता; this sentence names सङ्क्रवसङ्क्ता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.43a reading here is contested

मुख्या स्यादृषिपञ्चमी गणयुता नो षष्ठियुक्ता शुभा मध्याह्ने यदि सा चतुर्दशादिनेऽनन्तं तदा पूजयेत् । पूर्णा योगवशेन पूर्णफलदा चन्द्रोदये नारकी तैलाभ्यङ्गविधौ विशेषफलदा सा चाश्वयुक्कृष्णयुक् ॥४३॥

mukhyā syādṛṣipañcamī gaṇayutā no ṣaṣṭhiyuktā śubhā madhyāhne yadi sā caturdaśādine'nantaṃ tadā pūjayet | pūrṇā yogavaśena pūrṇaphaladā candrodaye nārakī tailābhyaṅgavidhau viśeṣaphaladā sā cāśvayukkṛṣṇayuk ||43||

The chief is the Ṛṣi-pañcamī joined with the Gaṇa; joined with the sixth it is not auspicious. If it falls at midday on the fourteenth day, then one should worship Ananta. When full, it is fully fruitful by force of the yoga; at moonrise it belongs to hell. In the rite of anointing with oil it is especially fruitful, and it is the one joined with the dark [fortnight] of Āśvayuja (Āśvina). ⟨caturdaśādine: the long ā on -śa- is plainly inked at 4x but makes a heavy syllable where the metre requires light; recorded as printed and flagged.⟩

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्दशादिने"; alternatives "चतुर्दशदिने" — the long a-matra on -sha- is plainly inked at 4x, but it makes slot 10 HEAVY where the metre requires light; the short-a form gives 19 clean positions. Recorded as printed and flagged.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यृक्"; alternatives "युक्" — a vocalic ri, not a u, under the ya as printed; yuk is the expected form and both scan heavy at the pada end. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चाश्वयुक्कृष्णयुक्; this sentence names यृक्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.44a reading here is contested

माघे मासि सिते चतुर्थदिवसे प्रातः फणीन्द्रप्रियः स्नानं तद्रथसप्तमी रविमनोहारिण्यनूराधये । स्नानं कोटिरविग्रहैश्च सदृशं यद्वादरैरोदर्किभिः तस्मिन्यच्छिवरात्रिरीश्वरसयुक्त्वाधप्रदा चेन्निशि ॥४४॥

māghe māsi site caturthadivase prātaḥ phaṇīndrapriyaḥ snānaṃ tadrathasaptamī ravimanohāriṇyanūrādhaye | snānaṃ koṭiravigrahaiśca sadṛśaṃ yadvādarairodarkibhiḥ tasminyacchivarātrirīśvarasayuktvādhapradā cenniśi ||44||

In the month of Māgha, in the bright half, on the fourth day, at dawn, is the one dear to the Lord of Serpents; that bathing is the Ratha-saptamī, which delights the Sun, with Anurādhā. The bathing is equal to a crore of Sun-worships ⟨here the reader REFUSED a stretch as damaged or anomalous setting: at 4.2x, after yadvād, there is a comma-like mark, a glyph reading rai, a second comma-like mark, then ro, then darkibhiḥ. Devanāgarī verse in this edition uses no commas anywhere else on plates 133-143, so these are broken sorts or an editorial interpolation. The five syllables the metre needs cannot be recovered, and he would not guess text that is physically not legible.⟩. On that day, whichever Śivarātri, joined to the Lord ⟨sayuktvādhapradā: the word division is not recoverable; the printed string scans at all its positions and the reader kept it as set rather than divide it on a guess⟩, if at night.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यद्वाद,रै,रोदर्किभिः" — REFUSED — DAMAGED OR ANOMALOUS SETTING. At 4.2x the stretch after yadvaad shows a comma-like mark, then a glyph reading rai, then a second comma-like mark, then ro, then darkibhih. Devanagari verse in this edition uses no commas anywhere else on plates 133-143, so these are either inverted/broken sorts or an editorial interpolation. The five syllables the metre needs here (L G G L G) cannot be recovered from what is on the plate. I will not guess text that is physically not legible.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सयुक्त्वाधप्रदा"; alternatives "संयुक्ता श्राद्धप्रदा" — word division not recoverable; the printed string scans correctly at all its positions, so I keep it as set rather than divide it on a guess
9.45a reading here is contested

माघ्ये वाथ चतुर्दशी शिवतिथिः सा मासि मासि प्रिया पूज्यस्तत्र शिवापतिः शिवकरः प्रीत्या प्रदोषेऽनिशम् । सोऽपि स्यात् त्रिमुहूर्तगः सवितरि प्राप्तेऽस्तशैलं ततः सैवोक्ता हि महानिशा निशि भवेन्मध्ये घटीयुग्मकम् ॥४५॥

māghye vātha caturdaśī śivatithiḥ sā māsi māsi priyā pūjyastatra śivāpatiḥ śivakaraḥ prītyā pradoṣe'niśam | so'pi syāt trimuhūrtagaḥ savitari prāpte'staśailaṃ tataḥ saivoktā hi mahāniśā niśi bhavenmadhye ghaṭīyugmakam ||45||

In Māgha, again, the fourteenth is Śiva's tithi; month by month she is dear to him. On it Śiva, the husband of Śivā, the maker of welfare, is to be worshipped with love in the pradoṣa, without ceasing. That pradoṣa lasts three muhūrtas ⟨our mula now reads trimuhūrtagaḥ, without the anusvāra that broke the metre⟩ when the Sun has reached the western mountain. From that, the great night is declared: at midnight it lasts a pair of ghaṭikās ⟨our mula now reads ghaṭīyugmakam, 'a pair of ghaṭikās', and the quarter has nineteen syllables⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिमुहूर्तंगः"; alternatives "त्रिमुहूर्तगः" — an anusvara is inked on the -ta-, which makes slot 7 HEAVY where the metre requires light; without it the pada scans clean at all 19 positions. Recorded as printed and flagged. The English on this plate glosses the span as three muhurtas = 2 hours 24 minutes. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads त्रिमुहूर्तगः for त्रिमुहूर्तंगः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घटीयुगमकम्"; alternatives "घटीयुग्मकम्" — as printed the ga and ma are separate syllables, giving the pada TWENTY syllables against nineteen; reading the conjunct yugma (= a PAIR) gives exactly 19 with every position agreeing, and 'a pair of ghatikas' is what the English on this plate says (a period of 2 Ghatika = 48 minutes). Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads घटीयुग्मकम् for घटीयुगमकम्, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]

एकादश्युभयत्र चेन्न परतो यद् द्वादशी तां चरेत् पूर्वा स्याद्यदि तत्परां च यतिराट् कुर्वीत वैधव्यभाक् । युग्मं चापि परत्र नास्ति यदि साप्येकादशीद्वादशी पूर्वैव प्रभवेत्तदा यदि भवेत्सा द्वादशी संमता ॥४६॥

ekādaśyubhayatra cenna parato yad dvādaśī tāṃ caret pūrvā syādyadi tatparāṃ ca yatirāṭ kurvīta vaidhavyabhāk | yugmaṃ cāpi paratra nāsti yadi sāpyekādaśīdvādaśī pūrvaiva prabhavettadā yadi bhavetsā dvādaśī saṃmatā ||46||

If the eleventh runs over both days and not into the following one, then the twelfth that follows should be observed. Should it be the earlier, then the lord of ascetics, and one in widowhood, should observe the one after it. And if the pair does not exist on the following day, then the eleventh-and-twelfth: the earlier one holds; but if it then be the twelfth, that is approved.

9.47a reading here is contested

विद्धा चेद्विषवद्विमुच्य परतो नैकादशी यद्यपि द्वादश्यां समुपोष्य कर्तुमुचितं तस्मात्परं पारणाम् । एतद्वैष्णवसंमतं यदि दशम्यावेधहीना परं द्वादश्याः परतोऽपि सा यदितदा सा साधनीया बुधैः॥४७॥

viddhā cedviṣavadvimucya parato naikādaśī yadyapi dvādaśyāṃ samupoṣya kartumucitaṃ tasmātparaṃ pāraṇām | etadvaiṣṇavasaṃmataṃ yadi daśamyāvedhahīnā paraṃ dvādaśyāḥ parato'pi sā yaditadā sā sādhanīyā budhaiḥ||47||

If it is pierced, then, releasing it like poison ⟨our mula now reads viṣavad vimucya, with a single va in each place⟩, and if the eleventh does not follow, then it is proper to fast on the twelfth and to break the fast after it. This is the Vaiṣṇava opinion. And if the twelfth is free of the vedha of the tenth, and if it lies beyond, then it is to be accomplished by the wise.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेद्द्विषवद्द्विमुच्य"; alternatives "चेद्विषवद्विमुच्य" — the plate doubles the va into a dva ligature TWICE in this compound. Both readings scan identically at every one of the 19 positions, so metre cannot adjudicate; vishavat (= like poison) is what the English on this plate says and would need the single-va form. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads चेद्विषवद्विमुच्य for चेद्द्विषवद्द्विमुच्य, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
9.48a reading here is contested

ग्रस्ते भानुमति प्रयाति हि तदा प्रत्याब्दिकं तद्दिने चन्द्रे चास्तमुपैति राहुगिलिते तत्राब्दिकं तद्भवेत् । रात्रौ तद्ग्रहणोदितं हि विहितं श्राद्धं ततोऽन्यद्दिवा शास्त्रं संशयितादिकं बहु ततो रूढं न गच्छेत्पुमान् ॥४८॥

graste bhānumati prayāti hi tadā pratyābdikaṃ taddine candre cāstamupaiti rāhugilite tatrābdikaṃ tadbhavet | rātrau tadgrahaṇoditaṃ hi vihitaṃ śrāddhaṃ tato'nyaddivā śāstraṃ saṃśayitādikaṃ bahu tato rūḍhaṃ na gacchetpumān ||48||

When the Sun is seized and then moves on, the annual rite falls on that very day. When the Moon is setting and swallowed by Rāhu, the annual rite falls therein. At night the śrāddha enjoined is the one declared for the eclipse; any other is by day. The śāstra is much given to doubt and the like, and therefore a man should not go by mere established usage.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बहु"; alternatives "वहु" — BA/VA COUNTER TEST APPLIED at 1.5x and the bar is visible: ba. This is one of the few places in this run where the test is decidable below 3x, because the glyph is unusually cleanly inked here.
9.49a reading here is contested

वैवाहोत्सवयज्ञकर्मसु तदा नान्दी च दीक्षाविधिर्नाशौचस्य भवेत्तदा नियमिते सीमा द्विजन्मात्मनाम् । श्राद्धे पाकपरिक्रिया यदि भवेन्मंत्रोक्षणं ब्राह्मणस्यासीद्धैषविधिः परं तु वरयेत्सर्वत्र मान्त्रो विधिः ॥४९॥

vaivāhotsavayajñakarmasu tadā nāndī ca dīkṣāvidhirnāśaucasya bhavettadā niyamite sīmā dvijanmātmanām | śrāddhe pākaparikriyā yadi bhavenmaṃtrokṣaṇaṃ brāhmaṇasyāsīddhaiṣavidhiḥ paraṃ tu varayetsarvatra māntro vidhiḥ ||49||

In marriages, festivals and sacrificial rites, the nāndī and the rule of dīkṣā then hold; and there is then no impurity for those twice-born who are within the fixed limit. If at a śrāddha there is a preparing of the cooked food, then the sprinkling of the Brahmin with mantras ⟨mantrokṣaṇaṃ, printed with anusvāra rather than the subscript nasal, as this edition alternates⟩ was the rule for that; but afterwards one should choose — everywhere the rule is the one with mantras.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मंत्रोक्षणं"; alternatives "मन्त्रोक्षणं" — anusvara rather than the subscript nasal as printed; the same word is set with a subscript na elsewhere in this run (e.g. v.44 tasminyat...), so the edition alternates. Scansion identical.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वैत"; alternatives "सर्वैस्त" — word division not recoverable at 1.5x; the printed string scans correctly (G G L) so I keep it as set rather than divide it on a guess [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वरयेत्सर्वत्र; this sentence names सर्वैत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.50a reading here is contested

भानोः संक्रमवर्जितो मल इति त्वाख्याधिमासश्च तं चाहासौ श्रुतिरप्यतो न विहितं पित्र्या च दैवी क्रिया । नित्यंवात्र विवेकिना हि विहिता षष्टिर्दिनानां हि सन्येको मास इहोक्तमासिकविधिर्नैवाब्दिकं दैविकम् ॥५०॥

bhānoḥ saṃkramavarjito mala iti tvākhyādhimāsaśca taṃ cāhāsau śrutirapyato na vihitaṃ pitryā ca daivī kriyā | nityaṃvātra vivekinā hi vihitā ṣaṣṭirdinānāṃ hi sanyeko māsa ihoktamāsikavidhirnaivābdikaṃ daivikam ||50||

A month empty of the Sun's saṅkramaṇa is called 'mala', the intercalary month; and the Śruti too has said so of it. Therefore no rite for the ancestors or for the gods is enjoined in it. But the discerning have prescribed as constant here that sixty days ⟨sixty is written out as a word here, śaṣṭiḥ, not as a bhūta-saṃkhyā; on plate 117 the same number was written viyad-rasa and khaṣaḍ — three ways of saying 60 in this one work⟩ are one month; and the rule stated here is the monthly one, not the annual or the divine.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मानोः"; alternatives "मासोः", "मासः" — p142 L9: the second akshara joins its left member to the stem AT THE BOTTOM, which is this fount's na, not the mid-bar of sa. So the page prints ma-no-h where the sense plainly wants masah (month) - the English opposite reads 'the lunar month'. Recorded as printed; I take this to be a compositor's error and preserve it rather than repair it. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads भानोः for मानोः, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्टिर्दिनानां" — p142 L11: SIXTY IS WRITTEN OUT AS A WORD here (shashtih), not as a bhuta-samkhya - and the English opposite renders it as the FIGURE '60'. On p117 the same number was written viyad-rasa and khashad. Three ways of saying 60 in this one work.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स–" — p142 L11: HYPHEN at line end; sa- runs on into -nyeko. [2026-09-23: The dash is removed and the letters are joined as the press sets them, सन्येको. Read by eye at 4x, the first sort of the next line is a half-न, not a half-त. The joined form is not a regular one, and the doubt on this verse records it.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विधिनैंवाब्दिकं"; alternatives "विधिनैवाब्दिकं" — p142 L12: an anusvara stands over -nai- where the sandhi wants none. As printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads इहोक्तमासिकविधिर्नैवाब्दिकं; this sentence names विधिनैंवाब्दिकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥५०॥" — p142 L12: tight. Numeral 50 of KANDA II - a different verse from the 50 on plate p119, which is Kanda I verse 50. The two are indistinguishable by number alone.
9.51a reading here is contested

प्रागूर्ध्वां दश पूर्वतः षडवनिस्तद्वत्पराः पूर्वतस्त्रिंशत् षोडश पूर्वतोऽथ परतः पूर्वाः पराः स्युर्दश । पूर्वां षोडश चोत्तरा ऋतुभवः पश्चात्खवेदाः पुनः पूर्वां षोडश चोत्तराः पुनरथो पुण्यास्तु मेषादितः ॥५१॥

prāgūrdhvāṃ daśa pūrvataḥ ṣaḍavanistadvatparāḥ pūrvatastriṃśat ṣoḍaśa pūrvato'tha parataḥ pūrvāḥ parāḥ syurdaśa | pūrvāṃ ṣoḍaśa cottarā ṛtubhavaḥ paścātkhavedāḥ punaḥ pūrvāṃ ṣoḍaśa cottarāḥ punaratho puṇyāstu meṣāditaḥ ||51||

Ten before and above; sixteen ⟨written here as the bhūta-saṃkhyā ṣaṭ + avani, 'six' + 'earth' = 16, read right to left; the very next line of this same verse writes 16 as the plain word ṣoḍaśa — one verse, two conventions for the same number⟩ from the east; likewise the later ones. Thirty from the east; sixteen from the east; then from the west, the earlier and the later are ten. Sixteen before, and after ⟨ṛtubhavaḥ: NOT resolved. ṛtu is 6 and bhava can be 11 in bhūta-saṃkhyā, but 116 fits nothing in the published English, so the reader does not read this as a number at all; it may be a sign-name or an ordinary word, and he claims nothing about it.⟩; behind, forty ⟨kha, sky = 0, plus veda, the four Vedas = 4, read right to left = 40, matching 'forty ghaṭikās after the saṅkrānti in Makara' opposite — the second unglossed number-word in this one verse, standing between two spelled-out numbers⟩; again sixteen before, and after; and then they are meritorious, reckoned from Meṣa.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दश" — p142 L22: TEN written as a plain word.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षडवनि" — p142 L22: BHUTA-SAMKHYA, UNGLOSSED - shat (six) + avani (earth = one), read right to left = 16, which is what the English opposite reads ('sixteen Ghatikas'). NOTE THE POINT: the very NEXT line of this same verse writes 16 as the plain word shodasha. One verse, two conventions for the same number, and only one of them is a number-word a reader could miss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्द्वःपराः"; alternatives "तद्वत्पराः" — p142 L22: not construed; a visarga-like pair of dots sits inside the cluster. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads षडवनिस्तद्वत्पराः; this sentence names तद्द्वःपराः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पूर्वंत–" — p142 L22: HYPHEN at line end. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वतस्; this sentence names पूर्वंत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिंशत् षोडश" — p142 L23: THIRTY and SIXTEEN both written as plain words, one line after 16 was written as the bhuta-samkhya shadavani. The English opposite has 'Thirty Ghatikas' and 'sixteen Ghatikas' for both.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऋतुभवः" — p142 L24: NOT RESOLVED. rtu (season) is 6 in bhuta-samkhya and bhava can be 11, but 116 fits nothing in the English opposite, so I do not read this as a number. It may be a sign-name or an ordinary word; I record it as printed and claim nothing about it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "खवेदाः" — p142 L24: BHUTA-SAMKHYA, UNGLOSSED - kha (sky = 0) + veda (the four Vedas = 4), read right to left = 40, matching 'forty Ghatikas after the Sankranti in Makara' opposite. This is the second unglossed number-word in this one verse, and it sits between two spelled-out numbers.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥५१॥" — p142 L25: tight. Numeral 51, Kanda II, fixed by the 'Sloka-51.' locator below.
9.52a reading here is contested

एकैकं विबुधेषु चर्षिषु तथा द्वौ द्वौ कृतावंजली त्रिस्त्रीश्चेत्पितृणां स्त्रिया अपि परं त्वेकैकमेवं विधिः । मात्रादिस्त्रय एव सर्ववनिता सामान्यमेतत्क्रमं श्राद्धे पूर्वमतोऽन्यपाकविधिना तद्वैश्वदेवं परम् ॥ ५२ ॥

ekaikaṃ vibudheṣu carṣiṣu tathā dvau dvau kṛtāvaṃjalī tristrīścetpitṛṇāṃ striyā api paraṃ tvekaikamevaṃ vidhiḥ | mātrādistraya eva sarvavanitā sāmānyametatkramaṃ śrāddhe pūrvamato'nyapākavidhinā tadvaiśvadevaṃ param || 52 ||

One handful each for the gods, and likewise for the ṛṣis; two each with cupped hands; three thrice for the ancestors ⟨our mula now reads pitṛṇām, with the short ṛ the metre needs⟩; and for a woman only one apiece — such is the rule. ⟨Our mula now reads ekaikaṃ, 'one each'.⟩ The mother and the rest are just three; all women in common — this is the order. At a śrāddha, first ⟨our mula now reads pūrvam ataḥ, 'first, and then'⟩, then by the rule of another cooking, that is the vaiśvadeva afterwards.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "एकंकै"; alternatives "एकैकं" — At 30x the anusvara DOT sits over the FIRST क and the two-stroke ai-matra over the SECOND क, so the sorts read एकंकै as set. Sense wants एकैकं; the compositor has transposed the two marks. Recorded as printed, not corrected. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads एकैकं for एकंकै, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितॄणां"; alternatives "पितृणां" — The subscript vowel under त shows a hook plus a second short stroke at its lower right, which in this fount marks ॄ rather than ृ; at 30x the two are only just separable. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्रिस्त्रीश्चेत्पितृणां; this sentence names पितॄणां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[??]"; alternatives "त", "ः" — REFUSED. Between 'पूर्वं' and 'तो' stands a broken sort: at 30x it is two ink blobs, an upper wedge with a dot at its right and a lower comma-like tail, sitting at x=843-883 of the original. It is neither a clean visarga nor a clean consonant. Sense would want ततो-; I will not supply it. Page 143, verse-line 4 of sloka 52. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पूर्वमतोऽन्यपाकविधिना; this sentence names पूर्वं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.53a reading here is contested

भूमौ लोहमहेड्डुकांस्यकलिते पात्रे न तोयांजलीन् कुर्यात्तर्जनिमंगुलिप्रथमया योगे पितृव्याहृति । सर्वाङ्गुल्यपरैश्च मावरसया भक्तं न्यसेद्भूस्पृशेश्चित्रादिश्च न तु स्वयं यदि परेणोद्धृत्य भुञ्ज्यादथ॥५३॥

bhūmau lohamaheḍḍukāṃsyakalite pātre na toyāṃjalīn kuryāttarjanimaṃguliprathamayā yoge pitṛvyāhṛti | sarvāṅgulyaparaiśca māvarasayā bhaktaṃ nyasedbhūspṛśeścitrādiśca na tu svayaṃ yadi pareṇoddhṛtya bhuñjyādatha||53||

On the ground, in a vessel made of iron ⟨lohamaheḍḍuka: the compound element is not a word the reader could identify, which is itself why it is flagged; the lower member of the stacked conjunct suits ḍha rather than ḍa, while the upper is unambiguously ḍa⟩ or bell-metal, one should not make the handfuls of water. Let him do it with the forefinger, first among the fingers, joining to it the pitṛ-vyāhṛti. With all the fingers and the others ⟨māvarasayā: read confidently letter by letter at 2.4x, but it is not a word the reader could construe, and it is recorded as the non-word it appears to be⟩ he should set the food down for those who touch the earth ⟨the reader checked at 9x specifically for e against ai and found ONE stroke above the headline, so śe⟩; and the citrā and the rest — not by himself; but if another takes it up ⟨our mula now reads pareṇa uddhṛtya, 'taken up by another'; the open doubt on this verse records what the eye reader saw at this place⟩, then he may eat.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लोहमहेड्डुकांस्य"; alternatives "लोहमहेड्ढुकांस्य" — The conjunct after हे is a stacked pair with a u-matra. At 12x the lower member shows a loop with a white counter at its lower left, which in this fount belongs to ढ rather than ड; but the upper member is unambiguously ड. Read as ड्डु, with ड्ढु the live alternative. The compound element is not a word I can identify, which is itself why it is flagged.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तर्जनिमंगुलि"; alternatives "तर्जन्यंगुलि" — Printed as three separate aksaras नि + मं + गु; sense would want तर्जन्यङ्गुलि-. Recorded as set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वांङ्गुल्य"; alternatives "सर्वांङ्ग्ल्य", "सर्वाङ्गुल्य" — The nasal over the ā-stroke of वा is a CRESCENT opening downward, not the round dot used for anusvara elsewhere on this plate (compare कां in line 16, a clean disc). Same crescent form recurs at सालं in line 30. Either this fount has two anusvara sorts or these are candrabindu; I could not settle it at 10x. The following conjunct is ङ्ग with a u-matra whose tail is hard to separate from the descender of the line below. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वाङ्गुल्यपरैश्च; this sentence names सर्वांङ्गुल्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मावरसया" — Read confidently letter by letter at 2.4x but it is not a word I can construe; recorded as the non-word it appears to be.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "न्यसेद्"; alternatives "स्यसेद्" — The first conjunct has a descending hook at its lower left. न्य and स्य are the candidates; sense (न्यसेत्, 'should place') favours न्य and the English rendering speaks of placing food on the ground. Flagged because the hook alone decided it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भूस्पृशे—"; alternatives "भूस्पृशै—" — Checked at 9x specifically for e vs ai: ONE stroke above the headline of शे, not two. So शे. The em-rule after it is a real hyphen; the word continues as श्चित्रादिश्च on the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पे:णो"; alternatives "पर्णो", "पःणो" — After प stand TWO stacked round dots (a visarga) with a separate curved stroke above the headline to their upper left. A visarga before ण is orthographically impossible, so one of the two marks is either a displaced e-matra or a repha belonging to ण (which would give पर्णो-, 'with a leaf'). Both marks are really there at 8x and both are kept.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वृत्य"; alternatives "द्धृत्य" — उद्धृत्य would be expected; the second member of the conjunct could be व or ध at this inking. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads परेणोद्धृत्य; this sentence names द्वृत्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥५३॥" — Numerals verified at 8x against the ground truth fixed by the English locators on this plate: ५ is a shallow left hook joining a bowl with a descender to the lower right; ३ is two stacked left loops with a descender. Set tight against the preceding अथ with no space.
9.54a reading here is contested

सांगुष्ठं सह मध्यतर्जनिसमध्यानामिकं तत्कनिष्ठानामी च कनिष्ठतर्जनियुतं सर्वाङ्गुलीभिर्हुवेत् । प्राणादीन् प्रथमे न सार्धमुत तन्मौनित्वराश्रीत वै कन्यादानविधौ वरोऽपि तरुणी चोपोषितौ चेन्निशि ॥५४॥

sāṃguṣṭhaṃ saha madhyatarjanisamadhyānāmikaṃ tatkaniṣṭhānāmī ca kaniṣṭhatarjaniyutaṃ sarvāṅgulībhirhuvet | prāṇādīn prathame na sārdhamuta tanmaunitvarāśrīta vai kanyādānavidhau varo'pi taruṇī copoṣitau cenniśi ||54||

With the thumb, together with the middle and the forefinger, together with the middle and the ring finger ⟨read across the seam of two crops with 60px of overlap; the element repeats madhya twice, which is odd, so the join is flagged even though both halves were legible⟩, and then the little finger and the ring, and the little finger joined with the forefinger — let him offer with all the fingers ⟨two unsettled marks in one word: bhi against mi, and the mark over hu, which is either a repha or an anusvāra; the verb huvet is itself irregular, where juhuyāt would be expected⟩. The prāṇa and the rest at the first ⟨an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found a dot on the baseline where the ā-mātrā should stand, and our mūla reads prāṇādīn⟩; not together ⟨our mūla now reads sārdham uta; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found a repha here, not a nasal, and mu, not kṣu⟩, and he should resort to silence in that ⟨tanmaunitvarāśrīta: read glyph by glyph at 7x; śrī carries a long ī where āśrita would want a short i, and it is kept as printed⟩. In the rite of giving a daughter both the bridegroom and the young woman are to have fasted, if at night ⟨an eye reading of the over-inked word on the plate on 2026-09-23, with a contrast stretch, gave cen niśi, and our mūla now reads so.⟩

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मध्यतर्जनिसमध्यानामिकं" — Read across the seam of two crops with 60px of overlap; the join is at 'मध्या|नामिकं'. The element repeats मध्य twice, which is odd, so the join is flagged even though both halves were legible.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ष्ठानामी"; alternatives "छानामी" — The opening aksara resolves as ष्ठ + ā, NOT छ: at 3.4x it is the same sort that appears in कनिष्ठ later in this very line, which settles it. Reading the line in isolation would have given छानामी and broken the word तत्कनिष्ठानामी that runs over from line 28.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्वान्गुलीभिर्हुवेत्"; alternatives "सर्वान्गुलीभिहुंवेत्", "सर्वान्गुलीमिहुंवेत्" — Two unsettled marks in one word: भि vs मि (the sort is between the two at 3.4x), and the mark over हु, which is either a repha (giving -र्हु-) or an anusvara. Verb हुवेत् is itself irregular; जुहुयात् would be expected. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सर्वाङ्गुलीभिर्हुवेत्; this sentence names सर्वान्गुलीभिर्हुवेत्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: the plate agrees that the press sets न्ग: an eye reading of jp2 page_0143 (store line 28) at about 2.1x native found a half-न joined to a full ग, with no ङ. The text now reads सर्वाङ्गुली on the lexicon, since न् cannot stand before ग and सर्व + अङ्गुली gives सर्वाङ्गुली, and the ledger keeps the press's सर्वान्गुली.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्र.णादीन्"; alternatives "प्राणादीन्" — A round dot sits ON THE BASELINE between प्र and णा where the ā-matra of प्रा should stand. Printed exactly so at 3.4x; the ā-stroke is absent and the dot is present. The word is certainly प्राणादीन् (the vital airs, matching the English on the facing plate), but I record the sorts as they are. [2026-09-23: the plate agrees: an eye reading of jp2 page_0143 (store line 29) at about 2.1x native found a separate dot about 12 px across on the baseline and no ā-bar between प्र and ण. The text now reads प्राणादीन्, because a full stop cannot stand in the mūla and the metre needs a heavy first syllable, and the ledger keeps the press's broken sort.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सालंक्षुत"; alternatives "सालंशुत", "सालंश्रुत" — The aksara after सालं has a bowl at lower left with a u-matra tail and a right stem; I could not resolve it at 8x between क्षु, शु and श्रु. The nasal over ल is the same downward crescent as in line 18, and here it is printed as a RING with an unfilled centre. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सार्धमुत; this sentence names सालंक्षुत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: on the plate (jp2 page_0143, store line 29, read by eye at about 2.1x, 2.5x and 3.2x native) the mark is a repha, not a nasal (32x38 px; correlation 0.88-0.93 with this press's rephas, 0.57-0.61 with its anusvāras), and the fourth sort is मु (0.83-0.85 with its मु, 0.33-0.58 with its क्षु). The third sort has the shape of ल, which gives सार्लमुत, no word. The text now reads सार्धमुत, the ध on the lexicon, and the ledger keeps the press's सार्लमुत.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्मौनित्वराश्रीत"; alternatives "तन्मौनित्वमाश्रितं" — Read glyph by glyph at 7x as न्+मौ+नि+त्व+रा+श्री+त. श्री carries a long ī where आश्रित would want short i; kept as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चे[??]" — REFUSED. The last word of the stanza is over-inked to the point that the strokes have merged into a solid mass; at 8x, and again after autocontrast and unsharp masking at 7x, the counters do not open. I can see the opening चे with its e-matra and at least two i-matra hooks further right, and a final conjunct, but I cannot name the aksaras. Sense wants चेत् ('if') to begin it. Page 143, verse-line 4 of sloka 54, original x≈2000-2290. This is clogged ink on the plate, not a resolution limit - more magnification will not help. [2026-09-23: read again on the greyscale master (jp2 page_0143, store line 30) at about 2.5x native with a contrast stretch that maps grey 0-90 to 0-255, the word opens into चे, an i-hook, न्न, an i-hook and श. It matches this press's own चेन्निशि (9.44, page_0139) at correlation 0.82 against 0.44-0.61 for other words, and the edition's own English says 'should keep fast at night'. The text now reads चेन्निशि.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥५४॥" — ५ and ४ verified at 8x; ४ is the goblet/Y form with a descending stem. Value independently fixed by the English 'Sloka-54.' that opens the facing plate 144.
9.55a reading here is contested

नाम्नद्वृद्धपदं न रूपसहितं ना गोत्रनामातिलं नान्दीश्राद्धमुत प्रदक्षिणविधिर्जीवत्पितासौ चरेत् । तेभ्यो वा स्वयमाचरेत्पितृपितृभ्योऽसौ न तस्मिन् कृतेऽप्युद्वाहाद्धुत आचरेद्वृतशुभे माता रजोगा यदि ॥५५॥

nāmnadvṛddhapadaṃ na rūpasahitaṃ nā gotranāmātilaṃ nāndīśrāddhamuta pradakṣiṇavidhirjīvatpitāsau caret | tebhyo vā svayamācaretpitṛpitṛbhyo'sau na tasmin kṛte'pyudvāhāddhuta ācaredvṛtaśubhe mātā rajogā yadi ||55||

By name ⟨nāmnad-: set as seven separate sorts, and the sandhi form -nad rather than the instrumental -nā is grammatically odd and may be a compositor's error⟩, not the word 'elder', not together with the form, not the gotra-name and the like; nor the nāndī-śrāddha, nor the rule of circumambulation — these he may perform while his father is alive. Or he may himself perform them for those, his paternal grandfathers (pitṛpitṛbhyaḥ); but not once that has been done. After the marriage he should perform ⟨uddhuta: at 30x the cluster is d + dha with a u-mātrā, then ta; the expected sandhi udvāhād uta would give duta. The reader records the ink, not the expectation.⟩ the auspicious rites of the vow, if the mother has come to her menses.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नाम्नद्वृ"; alternatives "नाम्नावृ", "नाम्नोवृ" — set as seven separate sorts na+ma-half+na+da(with visible virama)+vr+... ; the half-ma in this fount carries an oblique below the bowl, which I first mistook for a rakara. Character sequence is unambiguous once the virama is read, but the sandhi form -nad- rather than instrumental -na is grammatically odd and may be a compositor's error.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ना"; alternatives "न" — separate word before गोत्र-, x=1303-1386; the a-bar is clearly present and the metre requires a heavy 13th syllable, so the length is confirmed by two independent tests.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्जी"; alternatives "र्जीं" — repha above the ji is certain; a second small mark sits above it which is either ink spatter or an anusvara. At 30x the mark does not sit on the shirorekha the way this fount's anusvaras do, so I read it as spatter.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्धुत"; alternatives "दुत", "द्धत" — at 30x the cluster is d+dha with a u-matra, then ta. Reading it as a conjunct द्ध is what the ink shows; the expected sandhi उद्वाहाद् उत would give दुत. I record the ink, not the expectation.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वृतशुभे"; alternatives "द्व्रतशुभे" — vocalic r-matra vs. subscript ra (vrata) cannot be separated with confidence: both are a hook under the va, and this fount draws them at nearly the same angle. Sense would favour व्रत.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रजोगा"; alternatives "रज़ोगा" — a dot sits under the ja; almost certainly a broken serif or show-through rather than a nukta, since nukta is not used anywhere else on this plate.
9.56a reading here is contested

रात्रिं त्र्यंशमयीं विधाय चरमौ त्यक्त्वादिमेऽंशे चरेत् स्थालीपाकमुपासनाहुतिमपि श्राद्धं यदा शेषतः । दर्शो वा न भवेत्सतिर्यदि भवेत्कन्या न संतानिनी दर्शश्चेज्जुहुयादमामनुमतः सा क्रन्दनं सक्रमे ॥५६॥

rātriṃ tryaṃśamayīṃ vidhāya caramau tyaktvādime'ṃśe caret sthālīpākamupāsanāhutimapi śrāddhaṃ yadā śeṣataḥ | darśo vā na bhavetsatiryadi bhavetkanyā na saṃtāninī darśaścejjuhuyādamāmanumataḥ sā krandanaṃ sakrame ||56||

Having made the night into three ⟨tryaṃśamayīṃ: our mūla now reads tri + aṃśa, 'three parts', because an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found the first sort is a half tra and not the digit 3.⟩ parts, let him abandon the last two and act in the first part. Then the sthālīpāka and the aupāsana oblation too, and the śrāddha when what is left over remains. Or there may be no new moon ⟨bhavet: our mūla now reads bhavet on the grammar, where an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave bhavesatir without the t.⟩; if there is, and the girl is without offspring — if it is the new moon, let him offer, with the consent of the amā; and her crying at the passage ⟨sakrame: no anusvāra or ṅa is visible before kra, so the plain sakrame is what is set⟩.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "३यंशमयीं"; alternatives "३०ंशमयीं", "त्रिंशदंशमयीं", "त्र्यंशमयीं" — SUBSTANTIVE: the first sort is a DEVANAGARI DIGIT, not a letter - a numeral standing inside the mula. At 30x its form is the digit 3 with a flat head-stroke, distinct from this fount's त्र. The following sort carries an anusvara. The prose renders this as 'into 30 parts', which supports digits ३० doing duty for त्रिंशद्. I could not settle whether the second sort is ० or यं. Flagged rather than normalised: a digit inside scripture is a diplomatic fact and must not be silently expanded. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्र्यंशमयीं; this sentence names ३यंशमयीं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate refutes the digit reading. On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0144, printed folio 142), read by eye at about 2.1x and 2.7x native, the first sort is this press's half form of त्र, the first member of त्र्य, set as its own sort before यं. It matches the half त्र of पित्र्या (jp2 page_0142 l.9) at 0.92, and the press's digit ३ (in ॥५३॥, page_0143) at only 0.50-0.58. So the press sets त्र्यंशमयीं, 'made of three parts', and no digit stands in the mūla. The dual चरमौ and the singular आदिमे account for all three parts.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आदिमेंऽशे"; alternatives "आदिमेऽंशे" — the anusvara is printed BEFORE the avagraha; the expected order is the reverse. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: On the plate (jp2 page_0144, printed folio 142), read by eye at about 2.1x native and again at about 2.0x with a gamma-3 stretch, no avagraha is printed here. The press sets आदिमेंशे: the anusvāra stands on मे, and a 4 px gap separates म from शे. The press's avagraha on the same page (कृतेऽ-, line 14) is a 41x62 px sort, and nothing that size fits. So there is no printed order of the two marks to keep. The mūla writes the elision as मेऽंशे, as this chapter does at 9.30 (दिवसस्याप्यष्टमेऽंशे), and the ledger keeps the press's आदिमेंशे.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "श्चुपासना"; alternatives "श्चोपासना" — the matra on the cu is a hook below rather than a head-mark, so the ink reads u; sense (ca + upasana) would want o. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्थालीपाकमुपासनाहुतिमपि; this sentence names श्चुपासना, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the plate (jp2 page_0144, printed folio 142), read by eye at about 2.0x native beside सूनोश्चौलमुतात्मनः (jp2 page_0145 l.3), the consonant under the u-hook is म, not श्च. The sort matches this press's मु at 0.91 and its श्च at 0.50-0.68; its over-inked loop is what looked like श. The ink does read u, as this note says. The press sets स्थालीपाकमुपासनाहुतिमपि, and with पाकमु pāda 2 scans as śārdūlavikrīḍita at all 19 positions.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेसतिर्"; alternatives "भवेत्सतिर्", "भवेत्सति" — no virama or conjunct is visible between ve and sa, giving the non-word भवेसति; the expected form is भवेत्सति. Recorded as the non-word, per rule 1. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवेत्सतिर्यदि; this sentence names भवेसतिर्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate agrees with this reading. On jp2 page_0144 (printed folio 142), read by eye at about 2.0x native, nothing stands between वे and स: भवे runs 122 px, while भवेत् in भवेत्कन्या on the same line runs 153 px with its half-त piece. So the press itself sets भवेसतिर्यदि. The mūla now reads भवेत्सतिर्यदि on the grammar (न भवेत्, as यदि भवेत् in the same pāda), which emends the press, and the ledger keeps the press's भवेसतिर्.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सक्रमे"; alternatives "सङ्क्रमे", "संक्रमे" — no anusvara or nga is visible above/before the kra; the plain सक्रमे is what is set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्रन्दनं"; alternatives "क्रन्दनम्" — final mark is an anusvara dot, not a ma with virama; certain at 30x.
9.57a reading here is contested

सूनोश्चौलमुतात्मनः क्षुरकृतिस्तम्भालयारम्भणे वार्धिस्नानमदूरवासमपि नो कुर्वीत गुर्विण्यथ । वृद्धौ दर्शमहालये क्षयदिने चादौ चतुर्थान्तिमे चातुर्विद्यविधानमेव कलयेत्स्वं वैश्वदेवं सुधीः ॥५७॥

sūnoścaulamutātmanaḥ kṣurakṛtistambhālayārambhaṇe vārdhisnānamadūravāsamapi no kurvīta gurviṇyatha | vṛddhau darśamahālaye kṣayadine cādau caturthāntime cāturvidyavidhānameva kalayetsvaṃ vaiśvadevaṃ sudhīḥ ||57||

The son's tonsure, or one's own shaving, the raising of a pillar or the beginning of a house, bathing in the sea, and even dwelling not far off — none of these should a pregnant woman (gurviṇī) do ⟨gurviṇy atha: our mūla now reads gurviṇī, 'the pregnant woman', grammatically the subject of kurvīta, then atha, 'then', which opens the next list. Also, 'm-adūra-' is set as one sort where the sense wants '-m dūravāsam', a long journey; the ink is unambiguous and the grammar is the problem.⟩. Then, at a Vṛddhi, at the new moon, at the Mahālaya, on the death-day, and at the beginning, on the fourth and the last — the wise man should reckon the fourfold rule as his own vaiśvadeva.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुर्विण्यश"; alternatives "गुर्विण्यां च", "गुर्विण्यशः" — NON-WORD as set. The final sort is a clear श with no visarga and no following ca; sense wants a locative गुर्विण्यां plus च. Recorded as printed per rule 1. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गुर्विण्यथ; this sentence names गुर्विण्यश, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate refutes 'a clear श'. On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0145, printed folio 143), read by eye at about 2.0x native beside भुञ्ज्यादथ (jp2 page_0143 l.18), the final sort is थ: it matches this press's थ at 0.95 and its श at 0.60-0.66. The press sets गुर्विण्यथ, and it is a word: गुर्विणी + अथ by ordinary sandhi, 'the pregnant woman', with अथ opening the next list. The mūla now reads so.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मदूरवासम्"; alternatives "ं दूरवासम्" — the ma and the following a are set as one sort, giving 'm-adura-' where the sense wants '-m duravasam' (a long journey, per the prose). The negation may be intended to carry across. Ink is unambiguous; the grammar is the problem.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृद्धौ"; alternatives "वृद्धो" — the matra is a double hook (au) rather than a single (o); at 30x the second hook is separate ink, not a serif.
9.58a reading here is contested

दर्शे प्राक्च तिलोदकं महालये पश्चान्मृताहे परे सापिण्ड्यं यदि दार्शगं यदि पितुः पक्षं मुखाब्दे चरेत् । तीर्थेऽर्घ्याङ्गुलिवेदशासिविकिरं चावाहनं वर्जयेत् । पिण्डाग्रौ करणे च सप्त सुधियो वर्ज्यानि साङ्कल्पिते ॥५८॥

darśe prākca tilodakaṃ mahālaye paścānmṛtāhe pare sāpiṇḍyaṃ yadi dārśagaṃ yadi pituḥ pakṣaṃ mukhābde caret | tīrthe'rghyāṅgulivedaśāsivikiraṃ cāvāhanaṃ varjayet | piṇḍāgrau karaṇe ca sapta sudhiyo varjyāni sāṅkalpite ||58||

At the new moon first the sesame-and-water; at the Mahālaya ⟨our mula now reads mahālaye⟩ afterwards; on the death-day, and at the next one, if the sapiṇḍīkaraṇa falls on the new moon ⟨dārśagaṃ: a repha is present over the sa and the following sort is a ga with anusvāra; the reading is uncertain⟩, then, if it is the father's, he should observe the fortnight in the first year. At a tīrtha he should omit the arghya, the fingers, ⟨vedaśāsivi: the LEAST SETTLED reading on this plate — between vedaśā- and -vikiraṃ there are one or two sorts the reader could not resolve even at 30x, and the two overlapping tiles disagreed with each other in exactly this stretch. The prose enumerates seven items and would need a tṛpti here, but he would not import a reading from the translation into the mūla.⟩, the scattering, and the invocation. And at the piṇḍa and at the fire, in the performance, seven are to be avoided by the wise, in what has been resolved upon ⟨our mula now reads sāṅkalpite⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽहालये"; alternatives "महालये" — the sort before -halaye is a small detached hook sitting at head height, not a full ma. Either a broken/undersized ma or a wrong sort. महालये is what the sense and the neighbouring prose require; I record the ink and refuse to normalise it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads महालये; this sentence names ऽहालये, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दार्शगं"; alternatives "दार्शं", "दार्शकं" — a repha is present over the sa; the following sort is a ga with anusvara. Reading uncertain.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुक्त्वान्दे"; alternatives "मुक्त्वाब्दे" — the sort reads as n+da to me; sense (muktva abde, 'in the year', matching the prose 'in the very first year') wants b+da. The two are close in this fount. Not settled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मुखाब्दे; this sentence names मुक्त्वान्दे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वेदशासिवि"; alternatives "वेदशाखातृप्तिवि", "वेदशाखिवि", "वेदशाखासिवि" — LEAST SETTLED READING ON THIS PLATE. Between वेदशा- and -विकिरं there are one or two sorts I could not resolve even at 30x; the two overlapping tiles disagreed with each other in exactly this stretch, which is itself the evidence that it is unresolved. The prose enumerates seven items and would need a तृप्ति here, but I will not import a reading from the translation into the mula.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साङ्कलिप्ते"; alternatives "सङ्कल्पिते" — the printed order of the la and the pa looks transposed against the expected सङ्कल्पिते; recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads साङ्कल्पिते for साङ्कलिप्ते, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
9.59a reading here is contested

तातस्येव च तत्कलत्रविगमे दारेषु च स्वस्य च भ्रातुश्चाग्रजनेः पितृव्यसमिते मातामहानामपि । श्राद्धं कार्यमुपासनानलहुतिस्त्वन्यस्य लौक्यानले सापत्न्योऽपि सुतः सुतो न तु पतिः कर्ता हि वर्णान्तरे

tātasyeva ca tatkalatravigame dāreṣu ca svasya ca bhrātuścāgrajaneḥ pitṛvyasamite mātāmahānāmapi | śrāddhaṃ kāryamupāsanānalahutistvanyasya laukyānale sāpatnyo'pi sutaḥ suto na tu patiḥ kartā hi varṇāntare

For the father, and likewise on the passing of his wife, and for one's own wives, and for a brother, and for the eldest ⟨cāgrajaneḥ: the visarga is clear, the preceding mātrā is not⟩, when joined with the paternal uncle ⟨samite / sahite: ma and ha in this fount differ only in the left bowl, which is filled with ink here⟩, and for the maternal grandfathers also — the śrāddha is to be performed; the oblation in the upāsana fire ⟨our mula now reads upāsanānala-, upāsana + anala, 'the upāsana fire', with the long ā the metre needs.⟩ for another, on the worldly fire. A son by a co-wife is also a son; but the husband is not the performer, where the varṇa is different.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्कलत्र"; alternatives "तत्करुत्र", "तत्कुलत्र" — the middle sort is pinched between the ka and the tra; la is the reading I settle on, and it is the one the sense (kalatra, wife) supports, but the ink alone would allow ru.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चाग्रजनेः"; alternatives "चाग्रजयोः", "चाग्रजने" — the visarga is clear; the preceding matra is not. Reading uncertain.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समिते"; alternatives "सहिते", "समितेः" — ma vs ha in this fount differ only in the left bowl, which is filled with ink here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उपासन नलहुतिः"; alternatives "उपासनेऽनलहुतिः", "औपासनेऽनलहुतिः" — printed as two words with a space and no avagraha, giving the non-phrase 'upasana nala-'. The prose speaks of the Aupasagni (marital) fire, which would want औपासने + अनल-. Recorded as printed; the word division is the edition's, not mine. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads ∅ for नलहुतिस्त्वन्यस्य, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
9.60a reading here is contested

यथैकः सुतवान् स योनिजनुषा सर्वेऽपि ते पुत्रिणः पुत्रभ्रातृपितृत्विना यदि तदा भर्त्रा सती स्यान्मिथः । विश्वस्ता न च पुत्रिणी धनयुता नोर्ध्वं सपिण्डीकृतेः कार्यं स्यादनयोः परे पितृभुजे हन्ता परे ह्याब्दिकम् ॥६०॥

yathaikaḥ sutavān sa yonijanuṣā sarve'pi te putriṇaḥ putrabhrātṛpitṛtvinā yadi tadā bhartrā satī syānmithaḥ | viśvastā na ca putriṇī dhanayutā nordhvaṃ sapiṇḍīkṛteḥ kāryaṃ syādanayoḥ pare pitṛbhuje hantā pare hyābdikam ||60||

Just as one man has a son by birth from the womb, so all of them are possessed of sons. If she is without son, brother and father ⟨pitṛtvinā: the conjunct after pitṛ is crowded; tvi is the reading, but the sense, matching the prose's 'without son, brother and father', would want -bhir vinā⟩, then a faithful wife shall be together (mithaḥ) with her husband ⟨syān mithaḥ: our mūla now reads mithaḥ, 'together', as an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave it.⟩. A trusted woman, one without a son, one possessed of wealth ⟨dhana / ghana / dhava: dha and gha differ only in the head of the left stroke⟩ — not after the sapiṇḍīkaraṇa. It is to be done for these two at the later feeding of the ancestors; the slayer at the later annual rite ⟨hy ābdikam: our mūla now reads hi + ābdikam, 'the annual rite', as an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave it.⟩.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितृत्विना"; alternatives "पितृभिर्विना", "पितृत्विनां" — the conjunct after पितृ is crowded; tvi is my reading, but the sense ('without son, brother and father', matching the prose) would want -bhir vina.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यान्निमथः"; alternatives "स्यान्नियमतः", "स्यान्निमतः" — NON-WORD as read. The penultimate sort is ma or ya; I cannot separate them here. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्यान्मिथः; this sentence names स्यान्निमथः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0146, printed folio 144), read by eye at about 3.0x native, the press sets स्यान्मिथः: स्या, the ि sign, one small half-न under its hook, म, थ and the visarga. That is this fount's न्मि, built as in चेन्मिथो on page_0098, which the 2026-09-05 reader transcribed correctly there. There is one half-form, not two न, and no नि. मिथः, 'together', construes with भर्त्रा सती स्यात्, and pāda 2 then counts nineteen syllables.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धनयुता"; alternatives "घनयुता", "धवयुता" — dha vs gha differ only in the head of the left stroke; dha is the better fit and the better sense.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हान्दिकम्"; alternatives "ह्याब्दिकम्", "हाब्दिकम्" — the cluster reads n+da to me, giving a non-word; abdika (annual, matching the prose's 'first death anniversary') would want b+da. The same n/b confusion appeared on plate 145 line 19, so it may be a habit of this fount rather than two independent errors - worth checking as a pattern. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ह्याब्दिकम्; this sentence names हान्दिकम्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The n/b confusion this note flagged is our reader's, not the fount's. On jp2 page_0146 (printed folio 144), read by eye at about 3.0x and 3.5x native and the conjunct alone at about 4.5x, the press sets ह्याब्दिकम्. The first sort is the fount's ह्य (60 px wide, its counter in the upper body), not plain ह (40 px, as in हन्ता on the same line). The conjunct carries an over-inked oval bowl, the fount's half-ब, the same shape as in प्रत्याब्दिकं on page_0141, and nothing like the small open hook of the half-न in नान्दी there.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हन्ता"; alternatives "हन्त" — final a-bar present.
9.61a reading here is contested

प्रत्यब्दादिषु पिण्डमातृजनतश्चाज्यौ तु संस्पर्शने श्राद्धं पूर्ववदाचरेद्यदि पितुः पिण्डोऽपि भिन्नः पुनः । उच्छिष्टे न परित्यजेच्च्युतिसुवासंप्रोक्षितं नान्यदप्यश्नीयान्निखनेद् द्विवर्षमथ तद्दाहद्द्विवर्षात्परम् ॥ ६१ ॥

pratyabdādiṣu piṇḍamātṛjanataścājyau tu saṃsparśane śrāddhaṃ pūrvavadācaredyadi pituḥ piṇḍo'pi bhinnaḥ punaḥ | ucchiṣṭe na parityajeccyutisuvāsaṃprokṣitaṃ nānyadapyaśnīyānnikhaned dvivarṣamatha taddāhaddvivarṣātparam || 61 ||

At the annual rites and the like, from the piṇḍa and from the maternal line ⟨mātṛjanataś cājyau: the au/o mātrā and the number of na sorts are both unsettled in this crowded compound⟩, in the case of contact with the two clarified offerings, one should perform the śrāddha as before; and if the father's piṇḍa too is separate, then again. What is left over on the plate he should not throw away; what has been sprinkled ⟨cyutisuvāsaṃprokṣitaṃ: the sort after cyuti reads su or mu, and the word division inside the compound is not marked⟩ he should not eat either, but should bury it for two years; and thereafter, after two years, burn it ⟨between varṣā and param sits a small mark the reader could not resolve at 30x: a virāma-marked ta, a visarga and an avagraha are all admissible from the ink; the sense favours -āt param⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मातृजनतश्चाज्यौ"; alternatives "मातृजनतश्चाज्यो", "मातृजननतश्चाज्यौ" — the au/o matra and the number of na sorts are both unsettled in this crowded compound.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "च्युतिसुवासंप्रोक्षितं"; alternatives "च्युतिमुवासंप्रोक्षितं", "श्रुतिसुवासंप्रोक्षितं" — the sort after च्युति reads su or mu; I cannot separate them. The word division inside this compound is also not marked.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्विवर्षात्परम्"; alternatives "द्विवर्षांऽपरम्", "द्विवर्षाःपरम्" — between वर्षा and परम् sits a small mark I could not resolve at 30x: a virama-marked ta, a visarga, or an avagraha are all admissible from the ink. Sense ('thereafter it should be burnt', i.e. after two years) favours -at param.
9.62a reading here is contested

सान्निध्येऽप्यृतुलालसां तु कमितां यां नोपसंगच्छति भ्रूणं हंति स एव यात्यृतुमति कान्तं च नो विन्दते । माता योनिषु सूकरश्ववृकमार्गालीषु भूयो भवोत्तारं कामसुखं सुपुत्रफलदं यस्मात्ततस्तौ मिथः ॥ ६२ ॥

sānnidhye'pyṛtulālasāṃ tu kamitāṃ yāṃ nopasaṃgacchati bhrūṇaṃ haṃti sa eva yātyṛtumati kāntaṃ ca no vindate | mātā yoniṣu sūkaraśvavṛkamārgālīṣu bhūyo bhavottāraṃ kāmasukhaṃ suputraphaladaṃ yasmāttatastau mithaḥ || 62 ||

A man who, though present, does not go to a woman who longs for him in her season and desires him, kills an embryo; and so does he who goes to a woman in her season and yet does not find a lover in her ⟨as printed⟩. The mother [is reborn] in the wombs of hogs, dogs, wolves and ⟨mārgālīṣu: the prose lists hogs, dogs, wolves and jackals; a jackal would be śṛgālī and a cat mārjālī, and the ink shows ma + rga, which matches neither cleanly — left as read⟩, birth after birth. Since sexual pleasure carries one across worldly existence ⟨our mula now reads bhavottāraṃ kāmasukhaṃ, with the anusvāra the metre needs.⟩ and yields the fruit of a good son, therefore those two [should come together] with each other ⟨our mula now reads yasmāt tatas tau mithaḥ, 'since … therefore those two … with each other'.⟩.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हंति"; alternatives "हन्ति" — set with an anusvara rather than the conjunct न्त - the edition's own spelling, kept.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मार्गालीषु"; alternatives "शृगालीषु", "मार्जालीषु" — the prose lists hogs, dogs, wolves and jackals; a jackal would be शृगाली and a cat मार्जाली. The ink shows ma + rgа, which matches neither cleanly. Left as read.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कामसुख"; alternatives "कामसुखं" — no anusvara visible over the kha, which leaves the compound without its expected ending.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ततौ"; alternatives "तयोः", "ततो" — au/o matra unsettled. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यस्मात्ततस्तौ; this sentence names ततौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.63a reading here is contested

रागाद्रोगवशादनेहस उत द्रव्याच्चतुर्धा रजः स्त्रीणां कालज एव दोषविधये पञ्चाशदब्दावधि । आ वर्षादष्टमाष्टमत्रयममुष्या मासि मासिच्युतं प्रागष्टादशवासराद्यदि पुनर्दृष्टं न दोषावहम् ॥ ६३ ॥

rāgādrogavaśādanehasa uta dravyāccaturdhā rajaḥ strīṇāṃ kālaja eva doṣavidhaye pañcāśadabdāvadhi | ā varṣādaṣṭamāṣṭamatrayamamuṣyā māsi māsicyutaṃ prāgaṣṭādaśavāsarādyadi punardṛṣṭaṃ na doṣāvaham || 63 ||

From passion, from disease, from time ⟨our mula now reads anehasa, the ablative of anehas, 'time', which the next quarter's kālaja answers.⟩, or from substance — the menstrual flow of women is of four kinds. Only that which is due to time is for the purpose of [ritual] defect, and that up to fifty years. From the year, three eighths of an eighth ⟨our mula now reads varṣād aṣṭama-, with the a restored.⟩ of hers, dropping month by month; but if it is seen again before eighteen days, it does not bring defect.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्नेहस"; alternatives "स्नेहतः", "स्नेहात्" — the ending is a bare sa where an ablative is expected to match the three neighbouring ablatives (रागात्, रोगवशात्, द्रव्यात्). Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads रागाद्रोगवशादनेहस for रागाद्रोगवशाद्स्नेहस, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वर्षाद्ष्टमाष्टमत्रयम्"; alternatives "वर्षादष्टमाष्टमत्रयम्" — the a of ashtama is swallowed into the preceding virama-marked da, giving a cluster that cannot be pronounced as set. Almost certainly a dropped sort.
9.64a reading here is contested

केचित्पञ्चदशाहतः परमवस्त्वैकोनविंशाद्यहं पूर्वस्मिन्दिवसेऽःत्यजेव दिवसेऽन्यस्मिन्द्विजद्रोहिणी । तार्तीये रजकी चतुर्थदिवसे शुद्धा स्वयं कर्मसु स्वातन्त्र्येण तु पञ्चमे शुचिमती रोगादि नो दोषकृत्॥६४॥

kecitpañcadaśāhataḥ paramavastvaikonaviṃśādyahaṃ pūrvasmindivase'ḥtyajeva divase'nyasmindvijadrohiṇī | tārtīye rajakī caturthadivase śuddhā svayaṃ karmasu svātantryeṇa tu pañcame śucimatī rogādi no doṣakṛt||64||

Some ⟨our mula now reads kecit.⟩ say up to the fifteenth day, others up to the nineteenth day ⟨our mula now reads ekonaviṃśādyahaṃ, 'from the nineteenth day'.⟩. On the first day she is LIKE AN OUTCASTE WOMAN ⟨between the avagraha and tya stands a clean two-dot visarga, verified at 6.5x — two separate round dots, correctly aligned, not damage. A visarga cannot stand before tya; the sense, antyajā iva, which the published English's 'like a Pariah woman' confirms, wants n. This is the second time on these plates that the two-dot sort appears exactly where a half-consonant belongs, and whoever parses this corpus must not strip it.⟩; on the second day she is one who injures the twice-born. On the third ⟨our mula now reads tārtīye, 'on the third', a form whose heavy first syllable the metre needs.⟩ she is a washerwoman; on the fourth day she is pure of herself for rites. But by her own independence, on the fifth she is clean; disease and the like do not cause defect.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केचत्"; alternatives "केचित्" — At 6.5x the second aksara is च with a subscript त् and NO pre-posed i-hook, so केचत् as set. केचित् is what the sense wants. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads केचित्पञ्चदशाहतः; this sentence names केचत्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विंशाब्यहं"; alternatives "विंशाद्यहं" — The conjunct before हं has a CLOSED bowl with a white counter at its lower left, which points to ब rather than द; but at 6.5x ब्य and द्य are barely separable in this fount. Sense (एकोनविंशाद्य-, 'from the nineteenth day') favours द्य. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads परमवस्त्वैकोनविंशाद्यहं; this sentence names विंशाब्यहं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽःत्यजेव"; alternatives "ऽन्त्यजेव" — IMPORTANT AND KEPT AS PRINTED. Between the avagraha and त्य stands a clean TWO-DOT (visarga) sort, verified at 6.5x - two separate round dots, correctly aligned, not damage. A visarga cannot stand before त्य; the sense (अन्त्यजा इव, 'like an outcaste woman', which the English 'like a Pariah woman' confirms) wants न्. This is the SECOND time on my plates that this two-dot sort appears exactly where a half-consonant belongs (see page 143 line 19, 'पे:णो'). Whoever parses this corpus must not strip it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ता-र्तीये"; alternatives "तृतीये" — As printed at 8x: ता (with a full ā-stroke), then a short HORIZONTAL DASH standing on the x-line, then ती carrying a repha-like hook above, then ये. My best mechanical explanation is that the ृ sort of तृ was set at line height instead of below, which would produce exactly this dash; but that is inference and the sorts are recorded as they stand. Sense and the English ('3rd, like a washerwoman') want तृतीये.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥६४॥" — ६ and ४ read at 1.7x and confirmed against the English 'Sloka-64.' below. ६ in this fount is a bowl with a leftward top hook; ४ is the goblet form. Set tight against दोषकृत् with no space before the first danda.
9.65a reading here is contested

पुंसो नैव सु (हृ) दग्निश्रवा उपरतस्तद्योगपचे क्रमात् पुत्रौ वा(दथवदिवा)प्यथवा तु जन्मदिवसे श्राद्धे च पर्वस्वपि । संगच्छेदवगाहनं सवसनं कार्यं तिलैर्वर्जयेत् प्रेतप्रेक्षणमन्यपूर्वनगतीर्थामर्त्यसेवामपि ॥ ६५ ॥

puṃso naiva su (hṛ) dagniśravā uparatastadyogapace kramāt putrau vā(dathavadivā)pyathavā tu janmadivase śrāddhe ca parvasvapi | saṃgacchedavagāhanaṃ savasanaṃ kāryaṃ tilairvarjayet pretaprekṣaṇamanyapūrvanagatīrthāmartyasevāmapi || 65 ||

A newly married man with a lovely wife, who has at that time a sacrifice to perform, or his birthday, or a śrāddha, or a parvan day, should not unite with his wife on such occasions. If he does, he should bathe at once with his garment on, and use sesame to cleanse the body. On such days he should also avoid the sight of a corpse, climbing high mountains, going to holy rivers, and the worship of the gods. ⟨Two editorial insertions stand inside the printed verse — the single akṣara हृ, and five akṣaras after वा — which the second exemplar does not carry. They are the edition's apparatus, not text; the readings are in the notes.⟩

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(हृ)" — EDITORIAL. Round brackets enclosing the single aksara हृ, verified at 5x, set with a word-space on either side inside the verse line. The base text reads सु...द and the editor supplies हृ to give सुहृद्. Not scripture.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दग्निश्रवा"; alternatives "दग्निश्रुवा", "दग्नि श्रवा" — Read at 1.7x only; the ग्नि conjunct and the following श्र are both crowded and I did not zoom them.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगपचे"; alternatives "योगपथे" — Checked at 6.5x specifically. The final aksara is च (open curve plus right stem), NOT थ (which carries a closed loop in this fount). योगपथे would be the sensible word; योगपचे is what is set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(दथवदिवा)"; alternatives "(दथवा दिवा)" — EDITORIAL. Round brackets set TIGHT against वा on the left and प्य on the right, with no word-spaces, enclosing five aksaras read at 5x as द-थ-व-दि-वा. Whether the editor intends a variant reading or a supplement I cannot tell from this plate. Not scripture.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सवस्नं"; alternatives "सवस्त्रं" — Four aksaras at 6.5x: स, व, a half-form, नं - with a clear न (not र) in the last. सवस्त्रं ('with his clothes on', which the English says) would need three aksaras ending in स्त्रं. Recorded as the four sorts that are there. RESOLVED 2026-09-08: the word is not वस्त्र but वसन, a garment — सवसनं, exactly the four akṣaras this note counted. Bhasin prints सवसनं and the metre needs the extra syllable.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "संगच्छेद्वगाहनं"; alternatives "संगच्छेदवगाहनं" — Read at 1.72x; the द्व conjunct not zoomed. RESOLVED 2026-09-08 in favour of this note's own alternative: संगच्छेदवगाहनं, which the metre requires.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्यपूर्वनगती" — Read at 1.72x across the crop seam; a long compound with no word-spaces, and the English ('sight of dead bodies, climbing high mountains, going to holy rivers and worship of gods') does not segment it for me. Not zoomed. NOT RESOLVED 2026-09-08, but the CLAIM is: Sareen's English and Bhasin's Hindi agree on 'the sight of a corpse, climbing high mountains, going to holy rivers, worship of the gods'. Bhasin's exemplar sets मप्यपर्वनगतीर्थामर्त्यसेवामपि where ours has मन्यपूर्वनगतीर्थांमर्त्यसेवामपि; neither is clearly right and the compound is in the ledger, unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रेतप्रेक्षणमन्यपूर्वनगतीर्थामर्त्यसेवामपि; this sentence names मन्यपूर्वनगतीर्थांमर्त्यसेवामपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६५ ॥" — ६ and ५ confirmed against 'Sloka-65.' below. Note the spacing differs from sloka 64 on the same plate: here the dandas carry a space on each side of the digits, there they do not. Compositor's whim, kept as printed.
9.66a reading here is contested

आषण्मासमथोद्वहोपनयकं कर्म त्यजेत्तन्मुहुर्जीर्णं भाण्डमतो गृहाच्छदिकृतिः संमार्जनाद्यालये । स्वस्यास्यापि च मुंडनं मृतिदिने पिण्डप्रदानं कृपाश्राद्धेनापि समर्चयेन्नतु गयापित्रादिके दोषकृत् ॥ ६६ ॥

āṣaṇmāsamathodvahopanayakaṃ karma tyajettanmuhurjīrṇaṃ bhāṇḍamato gṛhācchadikṛtiḥ saṃmārjanādyālaye | svasyāsyāpi ca muṃḍanaṃ mṛtidine piṇḍapradānaṃ kṛpāśrāddhenāpi samarcayennatu gayāpitrādike doṣakṛt || 66 ||

Up to six months ⟨our mula now reads āṣaṇmāsa, 'up to six months'.⟩ one should give up marriage ⟨our mula now reads athodvahopanayakaṃ, udvaha being marriage.⟩ and the initiation rite, again and again; a worn-out vessel ⟨our mula now reads jīrṇaṃ bhāṇḍam, 'a worn-out vessel'.⟩, and thence the making of a covering for the house, and sweeping and the like in the dwelling. And for oneself and for this one too ⟨our mula now reads svasyāsyāpi, svasya + asya + api.⟩, the shaving of the head on the death-day; and the giving of the piṇḍa; and by a mercy-śrāddha one should worship — but not at Gayā, and for the ancestors and the like it causes defect.

8 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आपणमास"; alternatives "आषण्मास" — At 5x the second aksara reads as प with no visible halant on the following ण. आषण्मास- ('up to six months') is the obvious sense; प and ष differ here only by a hook inside the bowl that I could not resolve. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आषण्मासमथोद्वहोपनयकं; this sentence names आपणमास, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ढ्ढो"; alternatives "द्धो", "ढो" — A STACKED pair of aksaras carrying the o-matra, at 4.5x. Both members show a loop, which suits ढ over ढ or द over ध. If the word is अथ + ऊढ + उपनय ('then marriage and initiation') only a single ढो is wanted, and the upper member would then be a doubled sort. Unresolved. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आषण्मासमथोद्वहोपनयकं; this sentence names ढ्ढो, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुहु—" — The line ends in a hyphen: the WORD is broken across the PLATE break and completes on page 149. The stanza itself is also split - only padas 1-2 of sloka 66 are on this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्जांणं"; alternatives "ज्ञांणं" — This word is the dirtiest spot on the plate. At 6.5x the base reads ज + ā-stroke + ण, but there are FOUR unattached marks around it: two crescent hooks side by side above the ज (one is presumably the repha that joins it to मुहु- from the previous line; the other is unaccounted for), a solid blob above and right of the ā-stroke that reads as the anusvara, further blobs above the following space, and a stray ink dot BELOW the ज at the baseline. I have recorded a repha plus anusvara and flagged the rest. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads र्जीर्णं; this sentence names र्जांणं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गृहाच्छदिकृतिः"; alternatives "गृहाच्छादिकृतिः" — Read at 1.6x, not zoomed; the ā-length in च्छदि/च्छादि is exactly the kind of thing that needs 30x and did not get it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वखाखापि"; alternatives "स्खास्खापि", "स्वस्वापि" — Aksaras 2 and 3 are IDENTICAL and both carry the ā-stroke. I settled them as ख by direct comparison at 6x with the ख of करमुखे in sloka 68 pada 2 on this same plate - same left curl with a white counter, same right stem. Aksara 1 is a conjunct I read as स्व. The whole is not a word I can construe, and it is recorded as the four sorts that are set. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्वस्यास्यापि; this sentence names स्वखाखापि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुंडन"; alternatives "मुण्डनं" — Printed with anusvara and no final nasal; the English 'hair cut for himself and the Brahmachari' confirms the sense is मुण्डन.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६६ ॥" — Both digits ६, confirmed against the 'Sloka-66.' immediately below. This gives an internal control on the ६ glyph, which recurs in ६७ and ६८ on this plate.
9.67a reading here is contested

मूलं दक्षिणकर्णलग्नमितरे यज्ञोपवीतं द्विजः कुर्यादह्न्युदगाशयान्तक्ततलिङ्गार्द्रया चेन्निशि । दक्षो दक्षिण एव लिङ्गमृदिदं त्वेका त्रयं तत्करे द्वन्द्वं चोभयतस्त्वपानशरयुक्तद्युग्ममन्यत्रिणि ॥ ६७ ॥

mūlaṃ dakṣiṇakarṇalagnamitare yajñopavītaṃ dvijaḥ kuryādahnyudagāśayāntaktataliṅgārdrayā cenniśi | dakṣo dakṣiṇa eva liṅgamṛdidaṃ tvekā trayaṃ tatkare dvandvaṃ cobhayatastvapānaśarayuktadyugmamanyatriṇi || 67 ||

The root fastened to the right ear, the others — the twice-born should make the sacred thread ⟨yajñopavītaṃ: our mūla now reads this word on the codepoint and the lexicon. An eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found no anusvāra above jña, a round dot at mid-height where the o-mātrā belongs, and no legible o-mātrā, so the page does not set the word cleanly.⟩ by day ⟨dahnyu: the conjunct after kuryād is a stacked pair with a u-mātrā at 6.5x; the upper member is ha, the lower read as n, giving ahni, 'by day', matching the English's 'During the day time' — but the lower member could equally be a second ha or ḍha at this inking⟩, facing north ⟨yāntaktatataliṅgā: verified at 6.5x across the crop seam — the sequence really is nta + kta + ta + ta + li + ṅgā, four dental/velar akṣaras in a row with no word-space. It is not a word the reader could construe; recorded as set.⟩, moist, if at night. The right hand is on the right; this is the liṅga-earth, but one [measure] ⟨tv ekā: our mūla now reads tu ekā, 'but one', on the metre, where an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave tvakā.⟩; three in that hand; a pair on both sides; and joined with the apāna-arrow, a pair, and elsewhere three.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यज्ञं·पवीतं"; alternatives "यज्ञोपवीतं" — KEPT AS PRINTED, and it is a third instance of this printing's stray-mark habit. At 4.5x there is a small dot ABOVE ज्ञ (which I read as anusvara) and, separately, a MID-HEIGHT round dot standing on the x-line between ज्ञ and प, exactly where the o-matra of यज्ञोपवीतं belongs. I have written that mid-height mark as '·' (U+00B7). The word is certainly यज्ञोपवीतं - the English says 'the Sacred Thread' - but the sorts are what they are. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यज्ञोपवीतं; this sentence names यज्ञं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0149, printed folio 147), read by eye at about 2.8x native and at about 4.0x with gamma 1.8 beside दक्षो on the same leaf, the mark above ज्ञ is a faint grey speck (17 px at grey <160, never darker than grey 148), not an anusvāra sort: the anusvāra over तं in the same word is 286 px and reaches grey 26. The mid-height dot is real ink, and no legible ो prints. Two fragments of one under-printed ो would explain both marks, and so would dirt; the image cannot tell which. The mūla reads यज्ञोपवीतं on the codepoint and the lexicon.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दह्न्यु"; alternatives "दह्ह्यु", "दह्यु" — The conjunct after कुर्यांद is a stacked pair with a u-matra, read at 6.5x. The upper member is ह; the lower I read as न्, which gives अह्नि ('by day') and matches the English 'During the day time'. But the lower member could equally be a second ह or ढ at this inking. Flagged rather than decided. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुर्यादह्न्युदगाशयान्तक्ततलिङ्गार्द्रया; this sentence names कुर्यांद, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The word before this conjunct is कुर्याद, not कुर्यांद. On jp2 page_0149 (printed folio 147), read by eye at about 2.8x native and at about 4.0x with gamma 1.8, the only mark above या is the repha, the same shape as the repha of ार्द्रया on the same line. What read as an anusvāra is the loose top of a broken ā-stem, a faint 8x8 px fragment at headline level. The page sets no anusvāra over या.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यान्तक्ततलिङ्गा" — Verified at 6.5x across the crop seam that worried me: the sequence really is न्त + क्त + त + त + लि + ङ्गा, four dental/velar aksaras in a row with no word-space. It is not a word I can construe; recorded as set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ार्द्रया"; alternatives "ार्द्यां" — Read at 3.2x; the repha is clear, the subscript र less so.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेन्निशि"; alternatives "चेंन्निशि" — There is a dot above the न्नि whose owner is ambiguous - it may be an anusvara belonging to चे. Sense (चेत् + निशि, 'if at night', matching the English) wants no anusvara.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्वका"; alternatives "त्रिका" — Read at 1.65x only, not zoomed. त्व and त्रि are a known confusion in this fount. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads त्वेका; this sentence names त्वका, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Read at about 2.8x native on the greyscale master (jp2 page_0149, printed folio 147): the page sets त्व with व's loop, distinct from the त्र of त्रयं beside it, so त्रिका is refuted. No े is printed: no pixel above त्व is darker than grey 220, where the anusvāra of त्रयं in the same zone reaches grey 26. So the press sets त्वका, as this note read. The mūla reads त्वेका on the metre, which emends the press: the thirteenth syllable of the śārdūlavikrīḍita must be heavy. The ledger keeps the press's त्वका.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "लिङ्गमृदिदं"; alternatives "लिङ्गमृदिदं", "लिङ्गमृदि इदं" — Read at 1.65x; the word division inside this compound is not marked and I have not imposed one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्तद्युग्म"; alternatives "युक्तह्युग्म" — Read across the crop seam at 1.72x; the conjunct at the join was not zoomed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६७ ॥" — ७ verified against the English 'Sloka-67.' below - in this fount ७ is a closed upper loop over a rightward tail. This plate fixes ६, ७ and ८ in a single sequence (६६, ६७, ६८), each independently confirmed by its English locator, which is the cleanest numeral ground truth available anywhere in my ten plates.
9.68a reading here is contested

त्रिलिंङ्गे षडपानके दश दश स्युर्हस्तयोस्तद्गुदे चैकं तत्करपृष्ठतः करमुखे चोरुद्वये पादयोः । मूले तद्द्विगुणं त्रयं च मिथुने शुक्ले तु पूर्वद्वयं यत्स्यादह्नि तदर्द्धमर्द्धंनिशि चेत्तस्यार्द्धमस्येत्पथि ॥ ६८ ॥

triliṃṅge ṣaḍapānake daśa daśa syurhastayostadgude caikaṃ tatkarapṛṣṭhataḥ karamukhe corudvaye pādayoḥ | mūle taddviguṇaṃ trayaṃ ca mithune śukle tu pūrvadvayaṃ yatsyādahni tadarddhamarddhaṃniśi cettasyārddhamasyetpathi || 68 ||

On the triple liṅga, six on the apāna; ten and ten on the two hands; and one again on the anus ⟨our mūla now reads tadgude, 'on that anus'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 could not identify the lower letter of the conjunct, so the lexicon decides, since taddude is no word⟩, on the back of the hand, on the front of the hand, on the two thighs, on the feet; at the root twice that, and three at the conjunction. In the bright half the first two; whatever it be by day, half of that; and half again if at night; and half of that if on a journey.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिलिंङ्गे"; alternatives "त्रिलिङ्गे" — An anusvara dot AND the ङ्ग conjunct are both present - the nasal is written twice. Kept as printed. [2026-09-23: Confirmed on the plate (jp2 page_0149, printed folio 147), read by eye at about 3.6x native: the anusvāra is fused to the tip of the ि-loop of लि, the same shape the press gives सिं in सिंहे at 9.71 (page_0151 line 5), and the e-flag of ङ्गे stands separately. The press prints the nasal twice, and our text keeps it.] [2026-09-30: re-read on the plate on 2026-09-30 at about 6.5x native beside repha controls (र्ध्नि p150, र्जि p151, र्धि and र्वि p145), which the 2026-09-23 reading did not compare. A repha on a ि takes the same fused-knob shape on this press, so the mark over लि cannot be ruled an anusvāra from its shape; the question is recorded in the verse's doubts.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्दुदे"; alternatives "तद्द्वये", "तद्दृदे" — The penultimate aksara at 4.5x is a stacked द-pair carrying a u-matra hook; the last is दे. तद्द्वये would parallel चोरुद्वये in the next pada and तद्द्विगुणं in the one after, so it is the likely word, but the u-hook and the े are what is on the paper. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्युर्हस्तयोस्तद्गुदे; this sentence names तद्दुदे, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Corrected to तद्गुदे on the lexicon and on the edition's own facing English ('(4) again the anus, once', store page_0150 line 4). On the plate (jp2 page_0149, printed folio 147), read by eye at about 3.2x native, the upper member of the stacked conjunct is a compressed द, and the lower member, fused with the ु, could not be told between द and ग. So the leaf neither confirms the pair of द nor refutes द्गु. The alternative तद्द्वये has no u-hook and no witness.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चेकं"; alternatives "चैकं" — Read at 1.72x. There is one stroke plus a separate small mark above the च; whether the mark is a second e-stroke (making ai) or a stray I did not settle. चैकं (च + एकं) is the expected word. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चैकं; this sentence names चेकं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Settled on the plate (jp2 page_0149, printed folio 147), read by eye at about 3.6x native: the mark over च is one double flag, 53x36 px with 1,081 dark px. That is the size of the ai of नैव on page_0151 (55x40 px) and about twice a single e-flag on these leaves (29-43 px wide). The press sets चैकं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्द्धंनिशि"; alternatives "अर्द्धं निशि" — Set with NO word-space between the anusvara and निशि, unlike the spaced words on either side. Kept as set. [2026-09-23: On the plate (jp2 page_0149, printed folio 147), read by eye at about 3.6x native with a gamma 2.5 stretch, the mark is a fleck, 8x5 px with 23 dark px at threshold 128, lying on the tip of the ि-loop of नि. The anusvāras on this leaf have 160-348 dark px and stand 13-40 px above their own akṣara; the fleck stands 44-49 px above the headline, over the next akṣara. The metre wants no anusvāra here, since the ninth syllable must be light, while the grammar of अर्द्धम् before निशि expects one. The text stays as it is, and the question is recorded in the verse's doubts.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६८ ॥" — ८ confirmed against the English 'Sloka-68.' that opens the last paragraph of this plate.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(band split)" — This line and line 31 were printed so close that they form a SINGLE 285px ink band; every other Devanagari band on the plate is 119-143px. The split between them was made by eye at y≈3960 of the original, not by the detector.
9.69a reading here is contested

गार्ह्याद्ब्रह्मयुजो भवेद्द्विगुणमप्येतद्वनावासिनः कार्यं तत्त्रिगुणं चतुर्गुणमिदं शौचं यतेरीर्यते । स्त्रीशूद्राव्रतबालपामरधियां स्याद्गन्धलेपक्षयः स्नात्वा न प्रविवर्जयेदथ तनु स्युस्तीर्थकोट्यो यतः ।ः ६९ ॥

gārhyādbrahmayujo bhaveddviguṇamapyetadvanāvāsinaḥ kāryaṃ tattriguṇaṃ caturguṇamidaṃ śaucaṃ yaterīryate | strīśūdrāvratabālapāmaradhiyāṃ syādgandhalepakṣayaḥ snātvā na pravivarjayedatha tanu syustīrthakoṭyo yataḥ |ḥ 69 ||

For one joined to Brahman it becomes double that of the householder ⟨our mula now reads gārhyād, 'than the household rule'.⟩; and for forest-dwellers ⟨our mula now reads vanāvāsinaḥ, 'forest-dwellers'.⟩ it is to be made three times that, and this purification four times for an ascetic, so it is declared. For women, śūdras, those under a vow, children, and dull-witted rustics ⟨our mula now reads bālapāmaradhiyāṃ, pāmara being the ignorant rustic.⟩, there is the wearing away of the scented paste. Having bathed, one should not then throw it off, for the body then becomes crores of tīrthas. ⟨The verse-number's opening mark is a visarga sort standing where the second daṇḍa of the opening ॥ belongs — the compositor's habit, not damage; a parser demanding a clean ॥ before the digits will lose this verse number.⟩

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गार्हांद्"; alternatives "गार्ह्यांद्", "गार्हाद्" — Read at 1.72x; the second aksara carries a repha and an ā with a nasal mark, and I did not zoom it. Sense wants गार्हाद् ('than the householder's'), which the English confirms. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads गार्ह्याद्ब्रह्मयुजो; this sentence names गार्हांद्, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "एतद्रुनावासिनः"; alternatives "एतद्द्रुनावासिनः", "एतद्वनवासिनः" — Read across the crop seam at 1.72x. The English says 'the Vanaprasthas (those living in the forest)', which wants वनवासिनः; the sorts I see give a द्रु/द्र conjunct where व should be. NOT zoomed - this is a place where the seam and the sense disagree and a 10x pass is owed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवेद्द्विगुणमप्येतद्वनावासिनः; this sentence names द्रु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्त्रिगुण"; alternatives "तत्त्रिगुणं" — No anusvara visible on the final ण, unlike चतुर्गुणमिदं beside it. Kept as set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यतेरीर्यंते"; alternatives "यतेरीरितं" — Read at 1.72x, not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यतेरीर्यते; this sentence names यतेरीर्यंते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पा रराधियां"; alternatives "पामराधियां", "पामराल्पधियां" — REFUSED IN PART. After बालपा there is a word-SPACE and then a small sort that does NOT join the headline of the following रा - at 9x it is a detached angular form with a short tick at its left, closest to र, but it could be म badly inked or even a numeral २. The English ('un-educated ignorant rustics') wants पामर. I record the space and the detached sort as they stand and name what I cannot decide. Page 150, verse-line 3 of sloka 69, original x≈965-1030. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्त्रीशूद्राव्रतबालपामरधियां स्याद्गन्धलेपक्षयः; this sentence names रराधियां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्याद्ङ्गलेपक्षयः"; alternatives "स्याद्न्घलेपक्षयः", "स्यादङ्गलेपक्षयः" — The nasal conjunct after स्याद् read at 1.72x only; ङ्ग and न्घ are not separable at that magnification. Sense (अङ्गलेप-, 'the ointment on the limbs', which the English names) favours ङ्ग. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्त्रीशूद्राव्रतबालपामरधियां स्याद्गन्धलेपक्षयः; this sentence names स्याद्ङ्गलेपक्षयः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।ः ६९ ॥"; alternatives "॥ ६९ ॥" — KEPT EXACTLY AS PRINTED. At 6x, after यतः there is ONE full-height danda, then a separate mark made of a short vertical stroke at cap height with a distinct round dot below it, then ६, then ९, then a clean full ॥. RESOLVED LATER IN THIS BATCH: the same slot on page 152 line 8 (।ः७४॥) carries, at 7.5x, an unmistakable clean VISARGA - two round dots - and page 152 lines 20-21 show the same visarga sort set INSIDE words where a half-consonant belongs. So this mark is that visarga sort with its upper dot smeared into a stroke, not a failed danda as I first supposed. The compositor sets a visarga where the second danda of the opening ॥ belongs; it is a habit, not damage. I have written it as 'ः'. A parser demanding a clean ॥ before the digits will lose this verse number.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रविवर्ज्येदथ"; alternatives "प्रविविर्ज्येदथ" — Read at 1.72x, not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रविवर्जयेदथ; this sentence names प्रविवर्ज्येदथ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ६९ ॥" — ९ confirmed against the English 'Sloka-69.' below - in this fount ९ is a filled bowl over a descending tail, distinct from ६ beside it, which has an open top hook. Together with ७० in the next stanza this plate fixes ९ and ० against their locators.
9.70a reading here is contested

देवा मूर्ध्नि पिबन्त्यथो च पितरो वक्त्रेऽथ मध्यादपि यक्षास्तन्वधराश्च जन्तव इदं मध्येन तुल्यं त्वधः । वामे रक्तसमं तु दक्षिणत इदं गङ्गासमं मङ्गलं केशाग्रे निपतन्ति बिन्दव इमे स्नानं निरर्थं पुनः ॥७०॥

devā mūrdhni pibantyatho ca pitaro vaktre'tha madhyādapi yakṣāstanvadharāśca jantava idaṃ madhyena tulyaṃ tvadhaḥ | vāme raktasamaṃ tu dakṣiṇata idaṃ gaṅgāsamaṃ maṅgalaṃ keśāgre nipatanti bindava ime snānaṃ nirarthaṃ punaḥ ||70||

The gods drink at the head, the ancestors at the mouth, and from the middle too; the yakṣas and creatures with slender [lower parts] ⟨our mula now reads tanvadharāś, which divides as tanu + adhara, 'slender below'.⟩ — this by the middle; and equally below. On the left it is like blood; on the right this is like the Gaṅgā, auspicious. When the drops fall from the tips of the hair, the bath is again fruitless.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्वघराश्च"; alternatives "तन्वधराश्च" — घ vs ध read at 1.72x only. The English 'the yaksha with their bellies or waists' does not decide it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यक्षास्तन्वधराश्च; this sentence names तन्वघराश्च, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥७०॥" — ७ and ० confirmed against the English 'Sloka-70.' below; ० is a small closed ring set on the baseline. Note the contrast with sloka 69 eleven lines above: there the closing punctuation is malformed and spaced, here it is a clean ॥७०॥ set tight. Same page, same compositor, two different treatments.
9.71a reading here is contested

भुक्तौ मूत्रपुरीषयोश्च पुरुषो वीर्येऽष्टयुक्सिन्धुभिः षष्ट्या चापि विशोधयेन्निजमुखं तोयेन गाण्डूषिणा । सिंहे कर्कटके यमे च सकला नद्यो रजस्विन्य इत्याशु स्नानविवर्जिनं नदिपतेरासङ्गमाच्छुध्यति ॥७१॥

bhuktau mūtrapurīṣayośca puruṣo vīrye'ṣṭayuksindhubhiḥ ṣaṣṭyā cāpi viśodhayennijamukhaṃ toyena gāṇḍūṣiṇā | siṃhe karkaṭake yame ca sakalā nadyo rajasvinya ityāśu snānavivarjinaṃ nadipaterāsaṅgamācchudhyati ||71||

After eating, and after passing urine and excrement ⟨our mūla now reads mūtrapurīṣayośca; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found the dot between yo and śca to be a stray fleck, not a letter⟩, a man should purify his own mouth with eight ⟨the published English gives the number as 108, which no number-word the reader can see here supplies; aṣṭa, eight, is visible but its multiplier is not⟩ and with sixty ⟨ṣaṣṭi, sixty, does not appear in the published English at all — flagged as a place where verse and rendering do not line up⟩ waters, rinsing it with a mouthful of water ⟨our mūla now reads toyena, 'with water'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found a final ta and could not settle the vowel, so the word is emended on the lexicon⟩. In Siṃha, in Karkaṭaka, and in Yama ⟨Yama, 'the twins', is used here as a sign-name for Mithuna, Gemini — the published English renders the three as 'Mithuna, Karkaṭa and Siṃha'. Worth flagging: a reader who does not know the convention will take yame for a god.⟩, all rivers are in their courses; so one who has quickly forgone bathing becomes pure by contact with the lord of rivers, the sea.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यो.श्च"; alternatives "योश्च" — KEPT AS PRINTED. At 6x there is a distinct round dot ON THE BASELINE between यो and श्च, and the श्च itself is damaged - its headline is broken and the श is mutilated on its upper left. The word is certainly मूत्रपुरीषयोश्च (the English says 'passing water, excreta'). Two separate defects in one place: an intrusive dot and a broken sort. [2026-09-23: On the plate (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.4x native, the dot between यो and श्च is a fleck, 8x8 px with 53 dark px, against 181-302 dark px for an anusvāra on this leaf; no Devanāgarī sign is a single low dot in that place. The letters set are यो and श्च, and the mūla now reads मूत्रपुरीषयोश्च without the ASCII full stop.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वीर्येऽष्ट्युक्सिन्धुभिः"; alternatives "वीर्येऽष्टयुक्सिन्धुभिः" — Read at 1.72x, not zoomed. The English gives the number as 108, which no number-word I can see here supplies; अष्ट- (8) is visible but its multiplier is not. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वीर्येऽष्टयुक्सिन्धुभिः; this sentence names वीर्येऽष्ट्युक्सिन्धुभिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Corrected to वीर्येऽष्टयुक्सिन्धुभिः on the metre: with ट्यु pāda 1 counts 18 syllables, and only टयु puts all 19 positions of the śārdūlavikrīḍita right. On the plate (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.4x native, no separate virāma was seen under the ष्ट, though a virāma merged into the lower curl of ट cannot be ruled out at that magnification.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तांयेत"; alternatives "तोयेन", "ताडयेत" — At 4.5x the mark above the ā-stroke is a solid blob sitting ON the stroke, which reads as anusvara and gives तां-; an o-matra would put its flag at the upper right of the stroke instead, and it does not. So तांयेत as set, though तोयेन ('with water') would suit the English. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तोयेन; this sentence names तांयेत, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the plate (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 3.3x native, the last letter is त, not न, and the mark over the first त is a level oblong (29x15 px): too long for an anusvāra, and without the down-right slope of every o- and e-flag on these leaves. This press sets its o-flags to the upper left of the stroke, so the test in this note does not hold for it. The ink cannot settle the vowel, and either way the letters give no word. The mūla reads तोयेन, 'with water', on the lexicon and the edition's own English ('gargle his mouth with water', store page_0151 line 8), which emends the press; the ledger keeps the press's form.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गाण्डूषिणा"; alternatives "भाण्डूषिणा" — Settled at 4.5x as ग, not भ: the sort has a single descending left hook joined to a right stem, where भ in this fount carries a closed left loop with a cross-bar. गण्डूष is 'a mouthful of water for rinsing', which is exactly what the English says ('gargle his mouth').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ट्या" — Read at 1.7x. षष्टि- is 'sixty', which does not appear in the English at all. Flagged as a place where verse and rendering do not line up.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यमे" — यम ('the twins') is used here as a sign-name for Mithuna/Gemini - the English renders the three as 'Mithuna, Karkata and Simha'. Worth flagging because a reader who does not know the convention will take यमे for a god.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "इ—" — The pada ends on a hyphen mid-word; it completes as इत्याशु at the head of the next line.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "नदीपते"; alternatives "नद्रिपते" — Read at 1.72x. नदीपति ('lord of rivers' = the sea) matches the English 'a bath in the sea (at the mouth of a river)'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads नदिपतेरासङ्गमाच्छुध्यति; this sentence names नदीपते, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.4x native, sets नदि with a short i: the i-stroke stands to the left of द and its loop arches right, and nothing rises to the right of द, where a long ī would stand. The metre needs the short vowel too. The rendering 'lord of rivers' stands.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥७१॥" — Four full-height strokes, ७ and १ clean. Compare sloka 73 on this same plate, whose dandas are half-inked.
9.72a reading here is contested

दार्भ्यं ताम्रमुतापि राजतसुवर्णाद्यं पवित्रं करे हैमं धार्यमनामिकामधि तथा रौप्यं च तर्जन्यधि । स्वाङ्गं तच्च कनीयसि प्रियतमं दैवे न पित्र्ये नरः ताते भ्रातरि नैव धार्यमिदमप्यार्ये कनिष्ठे न तु ॥७२॥

dārbhyaṃ tāmramutāpi rājatasuvarṇādyaṃ pavitraṃ kare haimaṃ dhāryamanāmikāmadhi tathā raupyaṃ ca tarjanyadhi | svāṅgaṃ tacca kanīyasi priyatamaṃ daive na pitrye naraḥ tāte bhrātari naiva dhāryamidamapyārye kaniṣṭhe na tu ||72||

A pavitra of darbha, or of copper, or of silver, or of gold and the like ⟨our mūla now reads rājatasuvarṇādyaṃ, with suvarṇa, 'gold'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave mu there, and the text is emended to su on the lexicon⟩ is [held] in the hand. A gold one is to be worn on the ring finger, and likewise a silver one on the forefinger ⟨our mūla now reads tarjanyadhi, tarjanī + adhi, 'on the forefinger'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave tarthanyadhi, and tha is emended to ja on the lexicon⟩. One's own limb, and that on the little finger, is dearest at a rite for the gods, not at one for the ancestors. For a father and for a brother it is not to be worn; and this holds for an elder, but not for a younger. ⟨our mūla now reads dhāryamidamapyārye, with api + ārye, 'for an elder too'; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 found the lone stroke to be the ā of pyā and the mark over ya to be an e-stroke and a repha joined in one piece, giving rye⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राजतमुवर्णाद्यं"; alternatives "राजतसुवर्णाद्यं" — The aksara before वर्णाद्यं looks the same at 1.7x as the म of ताम्रमुतापि earlier in the line, so I have read it म; but सुवर्ण ('gold') is what the English lists ('Darbha grass, copper, silver or gold') and the compound wants स. Not zoomed - this one deserves 10x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads राजतसुवर्णाद्यं; this sentence names राजतमुवर्णाद्यं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Read on the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149) at about 2.6x native: the press prints म, not स, the same build as मु in ताम्रमुतापि on the same line (its lower left empty), where the स of सुदिवसे on this leaf carries ink at its lower left. So this note read the press faithfully. The mūla is emended to राजतसुवर्णाद्यं on the lexicon: मुवर्ण is no word, and सुवर्ण, 'gold', completes the list the edition's own English gives. The ledger keeps the press's राजतमुवर्णाद्यं.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तर्थन्याघि"; alternatives "तर्जन्यधि" — Read at 1.72x. तर्जनी + अधि ('on the index finger') is the expected word and would need ज and ध where I read थ and घ. Not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तर्जन्यधि; this sentence names तर्थन्याघि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: Read on the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149) at about 2.6x native, the press sets तर्थन्यधि. The one vertical after न्य is the stem of ि, not an ā, and the last letter is the same ध sort as in अनामिकामधि on this line. So न्याघि was a slip of our transcription, and न्यधि is also what the metre needs. The थ is the press's own letter: it is built like थ in तथा, with none of the white under the headline that this fount's ज leaves. The mūla reads तर्जन्यधि on the lexicon: तर्थनी is no word, and तर्जनी, the forefinger, is this chapter's word at 9.53 and 9.54. The ledger keeps the press's तर्थन्यधि.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्वाङ्गं"; alternatives "खाङ्गं" — First aksara स्व or ख, read at 1.7x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मप्यायें" — TWO defects here at 6x. (1) An ISOLATED VERTICAL STROKE with a headline stub stands between प्या and यें, attached to neither - it is not the ā-matra of प्या, which is already present. (2) The mark above यें is a heavy compound blob, an e- or ai-matra printed over something else. I record the word as मप्यायें and name both marks rather than resolving them. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धार्यमिदमप्यार्ये; this sentence names मप्यायें, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.6x native: the isolated vertical stroke is the ā of प्या, which this fount sets free from the headline, after प्य with its own य stem. The heavy blob over य is this press's र्ये sort, an e-stroke with a repha lobe fused to its upper right, as over वीर्ये in 9.71 on this leaf. It is not ें, which this press sets with a separate dot (कें, page_0154 line 32). The page sets मप्यार्ये, 'and for an elder'.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥७२॥" — Four full-height strokes; ७ and २ clean.
9.73a reading here is contested

गायत्री दशसंख्यया पितृदिने जप्या प्रदोषेऽपि चाऽनध्याये वसुविंशतिः सुदिवसे साहस्रसंख्याथवा । जप्या पञ्चशतं त्रिशत्यथ सविंशत्यष्टयुक्तं शतं संक्रांत्यादिषु तर्पणं पुर उत श्राद्धं ततस्त्वादिकम् ।।७३।

gāyatrī daśasaṃkhyayā pitṛdine japyā pradoṣe'pi cā'nadhyāye vasuviṃśatiḥ sudivase sāhasrasaṃkhyāthavā | japyā pañcaśataṃ triśatyatha saviṃśatyaṣṭayuktaṃ śataṃ saṃkrāṃtyādiṣu tarpaṇaṃ pura uta śrāddhaṃ tatastvādikam ||73|

The Gāyatrī is to be recited ten times on the ancestors' day, and at dusk too, and — ⟨our mūla now reads cā'nadhyāye, ca + anadhyāye, joined with no line-break hyphen, and the avagraha keeps the division marked⟩ — on a non-study day, twenty-eight times ⟨a bhūta-saṃkhyā number-word: vasu = 8, so vasu + viṃśati = 28, and the published English reads '28 times'. NOTE that the editor did NOT set an arabic gloss beside it here, though he does so elsewhere in this book, so a reader of the Sanskrit alone must know the convention.⟩; on an auspicious day a thousand times, or else five hundred, or three hundred, or a hundred and twenty-eight ⟨our mūla now reads saviṃśatyaṣṭayuktaṃ śataṃ, 'a hundred joined with twenty and eight'⟩. On Saṅkrānti and the other such days ⟨our mūla now reads saṃkrāṃtyādiṣu; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave a raised stroke and ḍhapu there, and the word is emended on the lexicon⟩ the tarpaṇa first, and then the śrāddha, and the rest after that.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रदोषेऽप"; alternatives "प्रदोषेऽपि" — Read at 1.72x; no i-matra visible on the प, though अपि is expected. [2026-09-23: On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.8x and 3.0x native with a gamma 3.0 copy, a detached arc, the upper part of a ि hook, stands over a 27 px blank before प. The ि sort printed its hook and not its stem, which is why no i-mātrā showed at low magnification. The press set पि, and the mūla reads प्रदोषेऽपि, as the idiom अपि च, 'and also', requires.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चा—" — The pada ends on a hyphen and the NEXT LINE OPENS WITH AN AVAGRAHA (ऽनध्याये), so the break falls at चा + अनध्याये. A hyphen followed by an avagraha at the line head is worth knowing about: a naive de-hyphenator will join them into 'चाऽनध्याये' and lose the sandhi. [2026-09-23: Joined as the press sets the letters, चाऽनध्याये, read by eye at 3.5x: the dash is the press's line-end mark, and the avagraha at the head of the next line stays, so the division ca + anadhyāye remains marked and the sandhi is not lost.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वसुर्विंशतिः" — A BHUTA-SAMKHYA number-word: वसु = 8, so वसु + विंशति = 28, and the English opposite reads '28 times'. NOTE that the editor did NOT set an arabic gloss beside it here, though the brief says he does so elsewhere in this book. So the gloss is inconsistent, and a reader of the Sanskrit alone must know the convention. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रदोषेऽपि चाऽनध्याये वसुविंशतिः; this sentence names वसुर्विंशतिः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The page sets वसुविंशतिः with no repha (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149, read by eye at about 2.8x native). Over विं stand only the ि hook and the anusvāra dot touching it; a repha in this fount is a separate tall hook with a knob, as over तर्पणं in pāda 4. The rest of this note (वसु = 8, so 28) stays true.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सर्विंशत्यष्ट्युक्तं" — Read across the crop seam at 1.72x; a long number-compound I cannot segment with confidence, and the English at this point ('a thousand times, or 500, 300 or-') runs off the plate before it resolves. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सविंशत्यष्टयुक्तं; this sentence names सर्विंशत्यष्ट्युक्तं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.8x native, the page sets सविंशत्य with no repha, and ष्ट followed by a full यु with no virāma. This press sets ष्ट्य and ष्टय alike (compare षष्ट्या in 9.71 on this leaf), so the plate is neutral there and the metre decides: with ष्टयु the pāda scans at all 19 positions. The compound reads सविंशत्यष्टयुक्तं शतं, a hundred with twenty-eight (128), the number Bhasin's Hindi gives (a machine read of uk-bhasin-hindi page_0240).]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "'ढपु"; alternatives "ऽढपु", "ादिषु" — At 5x a small RAISED apostrophe-shaped mark stands between संक्रांत्यां and ढ, higher than an avagraha would sit and much smaller. ढ and पु themselves are unambiguous. संक्रान्त्यादिषु ('on Sankranti and the rest') is what the sense wants and would need ादिषु where ढपु stands. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads संक्रांत्यादिषु; this sentence names संक्रांत्यां and ढपु, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected them, and they are kept as history.] [2026-09-23: On the exemplar's greyscale master (jp2 page_0151, printed folio 149), read by eye at about 2.8x native with a gamma 3.0 copy, ढ, पु and the raised stroke are confirmed, and the page has no anusvāra on त्या. The press prints संक्रांत्या, a raised stroke over a 26 px blank, then ढपु, which is a garble. The mūla is emended to संक्रांत्यादिषु, 'on Saṅkrānti and the other days', on the lexicon, and the ledger keeps the press's reading.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।।७३।।"; alternatives "॥७३॥" — KEPT AS PRINTED. At 7x, reading left to right: a stray comma-shaped mark at the baseline, then a FULL-height danda, then a HALF-height stroke, then ७, then ३, then another half-height stroke, then a full-height danda. Digits confirmed against the English 'Sloka-73.' below. I have written it with plain dandas because there is no code point for a half-inked one; the shape is described here so that nobody 'corrects' it.
9.74a reading here is contested

। श्राद्धे तीर्थगयामहालयसमासंज्ञे तिलैस्तर्पणं कुर्यादेव परेऽह्नि वृध्यनुकृतौ तच्चेदनुमासिकं । प्रेताख्ये च धरत्पिता स्वजननीश्राद्धे तु नो तर्पणं प्रातः स्नातशुचिः प्रतर्प्यविधिकृत्सन्ध्यादि पश्चाच्चरेत् ।ः७४॥

| śrāddhe tīrthagayāmahālayasamāsaṃjñe tilaistarpaṇaṃ kuryādeva pare'hni vṛdhyanukṛtau taccedanumāsikaṃ | pretākhye ca dharatpitā svajananīśrāddhe tu no tarpaṇaṃ prātaḥ snātaśuciḥ pratarpyavidhikṛtsandhyādi paścāccaret |ḥ74||

At a śrāddha — the Tīrtha, the Gayā, the Mahālaya, and the one named after the year ⟨samāsaṃjñe: read at 1.7x; the published English lists the śrāddhas as 'Tīrtha, Śrāddha, Gayā Śrāddha, the Mahālaya or Aṣṭakā Śrāddha and the annual Śrāddha', but aṣṭakā is not visible to the reader in this compound⟩ — the sesame-tarpaṇa is to be performed on the following day; but in imitation of a Vṛddhi ⟨vṛdhyanukṛtau: read at 1.7x; vṛddhi is the word the published English names, 'some Vṛddhi or child birth'⟩, if it be that, it is monthly. In the rite called Preta ⟨our mula now reads pretākhye ca, with nothing between the two words.⟩, and for a man whose father is living ⟨our mula now reads dharatpitā, 'whose father is living', dharat being a present participle.⟩, and at a mother's śrāddha, there is no tarpaṇa. Having bathed and purified himself at dawn, and performed the tarpaṇa-rite, he should do the sandhyā and the rest afterwards. ⟨At 7.5x the verse-number is: one FULL-height daṇḍa, then a clean well-formed VISARGA — two separate round dots, correctly aligned, not a smear and not a broken stroke — then 7, then 4, then a clean full ॥. The compositor sets a visarga sort where the second daṇḍa of the opening ॥ belongs.⟩

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "'ढपु"; alternatives "ऽढपु", "ादिषु" — At 5x a small RAISED apostrophe-shaped mark stands between संक्रांत्यां and ढ, higher than an avagraha would sit and much smaller. ढ and पु themselves are unambiguous. संक्रान्त्यादिषु ('on Sankranti and the rest') is what the sense wants and would need ादिषु where ढपु stands.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।।७३।।"; alternatives "॥७३॥" — KEPT AS PRINTED. At 7x, reading left to right: a stray comma-shaped mark at the baseline, then a FULL-height danda, then a HALF-height stroke, then ७, then ३, then another half-height stroke, then a full-height danda. Digits confirmed against the English 'Sloka-73.' below. I have written it with plain dandas because there is no code point for a half-inked one; the shape is described here so that nobody 'corrects' it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "समासंज्ञे"; alternatives "समाख्यसंज्ञे" — Read at 1.7x. The English lists the Sraddhas as 'Tirtha, Sradha, Gaya Sraddha, the Mahalaya or Ashtaka Sraddha and the annual Sradha'; अष्टका (Ashtaka) is not visible to me in this compound.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वृध्यनुकृतौ"; alternatives "वृद्ध्यनुकृतौ" — Read at 1.7x. वृद्धि is the word the English names ('some Vriddhi or child birth').
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ख्ये.च"; alternatives "ख्ये च" — A round dot stands on the baseline between प्रेताख्ये and च, in the position a word-space would occupy - the same defect as page 151 line 4 (यो.श्च). Kept as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads प्रेताख्ये for प्रेताख्ये.च, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "घरतिपिता"; alternatives "ध्रियति पिता", "धरति पिता" — Read at 1.7x. The English says 'A man whose father is alive', so a verb of living/persisting is wanted; the initial sort reads घ rather than ध at this magnification. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रेताख्ये च धरत्पिता; this sentence names घरतिपिता, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।ः७४॥"; alternatives "॥७४॥" — THE DECISIVE MEASUREMENT. At 7.5x this is, left to right: one FULL-height danda, then a clean well-formed VISARGA (two round dots, separate, correctly aligned - not a smear, not a broken stroke), then ७, then ४, then a clean full ॥ of two strokes. Compare page 150 line 17, where the same slot held a mark I could only describe as a short stroke over a dot; this plate shows what that mark actually is. The compositor sets a visarga sort where the second danda of the opening ॥ belongs. Digits confirmed against the English 'Sloka-74.' below.
9.75a reading here is contested

प्रत्यःब्दे कृतनित्यतर्पणविधिस्तद्वैश्वदेवं चरन्नन्येनाःयचरूदितेन विहितब्रह्माख्ययज्ञं द्विजः । उद्वाहे व्रतचौलयोर्न विदधीताब्दं तदर्द्धं तिलैः प्रेतत्वे च गयाविधौ तमसि चेत्तौ पुष्पवन्तौ विधिः ॥७५॥

pratyaḥbde kṛtanityatarpaṇavidhistadvaiśvadevaṃ carannanyenāḥyacarūditena vihitabrahmākhyayajñaṃ dvijaḥ | udvāhe vratacaulayorna vidadhītābdaṃ tadarddhaṃ tilaiḥ pretatve ca gayāvidhau tamasi cettau puṣpavantau vidhiḥ ||75||

At the yearly rite ⟨pratyaḥbde, KEPT AS PRINTED: at 7.5x two stacked round blobs stand between tya and bde, the upper smaller and the lower larger, both clearly separate from the surrounding sorts. The word is pratyabde, 'yearly', which the published English confirms, and no visarga belongs there.⟩, having performed the constant tarpaṇa-rite, performing ⟨caran⟩ that vaiśvadeva ⟨the quarter ends on a hyphen and the next line opens with nna, not with an avagraha, so the words are caran anyena; read by eye on the plate⟩ — by another, with the caru as stated ⟨nnanyenāḥya, KEPT AS PRINTED and the cleanest instance on any of these plates: at 7x the mark between nā and ya is an unmistakable visarga, two round dots of equal size, vertically stacked and correctly positioned, standing exactly where the half-form n belongs in anyena + anya⟩, the twice-born performs the enjoined sacrifice called Brahman. At a marriage, at a vow and at a tonsure he should not perform it for a year, or half that with sesame. In the state of a preta, in the Gayā rite, and in darkness — if the two luminaries ⟨puṣpavantau is the dual for sun and moon together, which the published English renders 'the two luminaries are together present'; not a botanical word here⟩ are present, that is the rule.

6 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रत्यःब्दे"; alternatives "प्रत्यब्दे" — KEPT AS PRINTED. At 7.5x, two stacked round blobs stand between त्य and ब्दे - the upper smaller, the lower larger, both clearly separate from the surrounding sorts. The word is प्रत्यब्दे ('yearly'), which the English confirms ('After performing the annual Sraddha'), and no visarga belongs there.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चर—" — Pada ends on a hyphen and the next line opens with an AVAGRAHA: चर— + ऽन्येन = चरान्येन. Same hyphen-then-avagraha pattern as page 151 line 25. [2026-09-23: Refuted on the plate. Read by eye at 3x and 5x (folio 150), the next line does not open with an avagraha: it opens with न्न, its first sort 64 px wide under an unbroken headline with a full stem. So the words are चरन् + अन्येन, and the mūla now reads चरन्नन्येना….]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽन्येनाःय"; alternatives "ऽन्येनान्य" — KEPT AS PRINTED, and this is the cleanest instance on any of my plates. At 7x the mark between ना and य is an unmistakable visarga - two round dots of equal size, vertically stacked, correctly positioned on the baseline-to-x-height axis. It stands exactly where the half-form न् belongs in अन्येन + अन्य. Identical in kind to page 148 line 7 (ऽःत्यजेव for ऽन्त्यजेव), where it also replaced a न् before a य-family consonant. [2026-09-23: The mūla now reads न्नन्येनाःय: the avagraha this note quotes was the earlier reading of the line's first sort, which the plate shows is न्न (see note 1). The visarga between ना and य is unaffected.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चरूदितेन"; alternatives "चरूदितेन", "चरुरुदितेन" — Read at 1.72x, not zoomed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥७५॥" — CLEAN here - four full-height strokes, no visarga. Two stanzas on one plate, one with the visarga defect (sloka 74) and one without (sloka 75). So the habit is not mechanical to the forme; it is per-setting.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पुष्पवन्तौ" — पुष्पवन्तौ is the dual for the two luminaries, sun and moon, which the English renders 'the two luminaries are together present'. Not a botanical word here.
9.76a reading here is contested

सप्तम्यां रविवासरे जनुषु तौ कुर्यात्तिलैस्तर्पणं, गेहे भानुभृगुप्रभासु सुतनन्दारौ मघायामपि । याम्याग्नाश्वभयोर्मृगादिषु तथा द्वौ द्वेऽयने नो मृदा स्नानं पिण्डविधिं तिलांजलिकृतिं श्रेयोऽर्थनी नाचरेत् ॥७६॥

saptamyāṃ ravivāsare januṣu tau kuryāttilaistarpaṇaṃ, gehe bhānubhṛguprabhāsu sutanandārau maghāyāmapi | yāmyāgnāśvabhayormṛgādiṣu tathā dvau dve'yane no mṛdā snānaṃ piṇḍavidhiṃ tilāṃjalikṛtiṃ śreyo'rthanī nācaret ||76||

On the seventh tithi, on a Sunday, at the births of those two, one should perform the sesame-tarpaṇa ⟨here a LATIN COMMA is printed at the baseline after tarpaṇaṃ, at the end of a Devanāgarī verse line where a daṇḍa or nothing would be expected; read at 3x, it is a comma with the tail curving left and down. There is also a second small dot above and right of the anusvāra. Our mūla now reads kuryāt tilais tarpaṇaṃ, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave.⟩ — at home, on the days of the Sun and of Venus, at the son's Nandā, in Maghā too ⟨our mūla now reads maghāyām api, 'in Maghā too', and an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave pa⟩. On Bharaṇī and Kṛttikā, on Aśvinī and Mṛgaśiras and the rest ⟨this compound names nakṣatras BY THEIR PRESIDING DEITIES — yāmya, Yama, for Bharaṇī, and āgna, Agni, for Kṛttikā — beside plain aśva for Aśvinī and mṛga for Mṛgaśiras. The published English spells all four out, which is how the reading could be checked; anyone mining this line for nakṣatra names without the deity convention will find only two of the four.⟩, and likewise on the two ayanas — she who seeks welfare should not perform bathing with earth, the piṇḍa rite, or the performance of the sesame-handfuls.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तर्पणं,"; alternatives "तर्पणं" — A LATIN COMMA is printed at the baseline after तर्पणं, at the end of a Devanagari verse line where a danda or nothing would be expected. Read at 3x; it is a comma, with the tail curving left and down, not a danda and not a broken sort. There is also a second small dot above and right of the anusvara on णं.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुर्यांचिलस्तर्पणं"; alternatives "कुर्यात्तिलस्तर्पणं" — Read at 1.6x across the crop seam. तिलस्तर्पणं ('sesamum-tarpana') is the word used twice already on this plate; चिल here is likely तिल mis-set, but I record the sorts. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads कुर्यात्तिलैस्तर्पणं,; this sentence names कुर्यांचिलस्तर्पणं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0152, line 31, at about 1.7x native, and the sort after कुर्या at about 3.2x native. The press sets कुर्यात्तिलैस्तर्पणं, so nothing was mis-set here. There is no anusvāra over या: the mark is the detached teardrop tail of the reph over र्या. The sort read as च is the त्त ligature (NCC 0.953 against the त्त of चेत्तौ, 0.849 against the च्च of तच्चे), and ल carries the ai-mātrā, so the word is तिलैः. The error was in our 2026-09-05 transcription, not in the press.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सुतनन्दारौ"; alternatives "सुतनन्दा रौ" — Read at 1.6x, not zoomed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मघायामदि"; alternatives "मघायामपि" — Read at 3x; the penultimate sort could be द or प. मघा is the naksatra. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मघायामपि; this sentence names मघायामदि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the sort after मघायाम on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0152 at about 3.2x native. It is प with a thin, broken left limb. It has a full-height right stem (x1896-1908), which no द in this fount has. As a template it matches the पि of पिण्ड (page_0153 line 2) at 0.849, better than any वि (0.817), and no दि on jp2 pages 151-153 is among its twelve best matches. The press sets मघायामपि.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(verse continues)" — The stanza breaks here: only padas 1-2 of sloka 76 are on this plate, closing with a single danda; padas 3-4 and the verse number are on page 153.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "याम्याग्नाश्वभयोर्मृंगादिषु"; alternatives "याम्याग्नाश्वभयोर्मृगादिषु" — An anusvara appears over मृं where मृग (Mrigasiras) is meant. Worth noting for a different reason: this compound names naksatras BY THEIR PRESIDING DEITIES - याम्य (Yama = Bharani) and आग्न (Agni = Krittika) - beside plain अश्व (Aswini) and मृग (Mrigasiras). The English opposite spells all four out ('Aswini, Bharni, Krittika or Mrigasiras'), which is how I could check the reading. Anyone mining this line for naksatra names without the deity convention will find only two of the four. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads याम्याग्नाश्वभयोर्मृगादिषु; this sentence names याम्याग्नाश्वभयोर्मृंगादिषु, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0153, line 1, at about 1.6x native and measured the marks above the headline at native. Over र्मृ there is only the reph, a hollow loop with a teardrop tail (x954-982, 499 px), and no separate blob between x985 and x1090. The anusvāra this note saw is the reph's tail; the press sets मृगादिषु.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वौ द्वेऽयने"; alternatives "द्वे द्वेऽयने" — Read at 1.7x. अयने dual, 'the two Ayanas', which the English confirms.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तिलांजलिवृर्ति"; alternatives "तिलांजलिवृत्ति" — Read across the crop seam at 1.7-1.78x; the conjunct at the join was not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तिलांजलिकृतिं; this sentence names तिलांजलिवृर्ति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0153, line 2, at about 3.5x native, beside वृ and कृ controls from page_0152 line 5. The press sets तिलांजलिवृतिं. The mark read as a reph over ति is a solid round lobe fused to the end of the i-mātrā, the form of the anusvāra of लां on the same line; this fount's reph is a hollow loop with a falling tail. The sort after लि is वृ, not कृ. Our text reads तिलांजलिकृतिं, emending the press on the lexicon, and the exemplar's reading is kept on the ledger.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥७६॥" — Clean: four full-height strokes, no visarga in the slot. Digits confirmed against 'Sloka-76.' below.
9.77a reading here is contested

श्रीवाणीं प्रणवे विलिख्य दश चोर्ध्वं तत्र तिर्यक्समं रेखा द्वादश राशयो युगमुखे मेषादयो लक्षिताः । पूर्वैस्तेषु विशिष्टसत्फलयुतान्पुण्यात्मभिः कीर्तितान् भावान्देहमुखान् बुधैः फलविदे ब्रूमश्च संज्ञां पुनः ॥७७॥

śrīvāṇīṃ praṇave vilikhya daśa cordhvaṃ tatra tiryaksamaṃ rekhā dvādaśa rāśayo yugamukhe meṣādayo lakṣitāḥ | pūrvaisteṣu viśiṣṭasatphalayutānpuṇyātmabhiḥ kīrtitān bhāvāndehamukhān budhaiḥ phalavide brūmaśca saṃjñāṃ punaḥ ||77||

Having drawn Śrī and Vāṇī within the praṇava, and ten lines above that, and across it equally, the twelve rāśis beginning with Meṣa are marked at the head of the pair ⟨yugamukhe: read at 1.7x; the published English breaks off before this quarter and does not gloss it⟩. Among them, the bhāvas beginning with the body, endowed with the excellent fruits distinguished by the ancients and proclaimed by the holy-souled and the wise — these we declare for the knowledge of results; and we shall state their names again.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युगमुखे" — Read at 1.7x; not glossed by the English, which breaks off before this pada.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बुधै"; alternatives "बुधैः" — No visarga visible at 1.7x where बुधैः would want one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥७७॥" — Clean four full strokes; both digits ७, confirmed against 'Sloka-77.' below.
9.78a reading here is contested

देहः स्वं सहजः सुखं सुतरिपू जाया तथायुः पिता कर्मायो व्यय इत्यमी पटुतया ज्ञेया ग्रहाः सप्तमम् । पश्यन्त्यत्र तु सप्तमं शनिगुरुक्ष्माजास्तु पूर्णं सदा तार्तीयीकदशत्रिकोणचतुरष्टावार्किजीवारकाः ॥ ७८ ॥

dehaḥ svaṃ sahajaḥ sukhaṃ sutaripū jāyā tathāyuḥ pitā karmāyo vyaya ityamī paṭutayā jñeyā grahāḥ saptamam | paśyantyatra tu saptamaṃ śanigurukṣmājāstu pūrṇaṃ sadā tārtīyīkadaśatrikoṇacaturaṣṭāvārkijīvārakāḥ || 78 ||

Body, wealth, brother, happiness, son, enemy, wife, longevity, father, action, gain, loss — these are to be known by the skilled. The planets look upon the seventh. But Saturn, Jupiter and Mars ⟨kṣmāja, 'earth-born', is Mars; the published English names Saturn, Jupiter and Mars, which fixes the three in order — flagged only because a reader without the synonym will not find Mars here⟩ always look fully on the third and the tenth, the trine, and the fourth and eighth respectively: Saturn ⟨our mula now reads ārki (aṣṭāv ārki-), with no anusvāra.⟩, Jupiter (jīva) and Mars (āra). ⟨These three planet-words are synonyms an unprepared index will miss.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "देहः स्वं सहजः सुखं सुतरिपू जाया तथायुः पिता" — Read cleanly at 1.7x and checked term by term against the English list below - body, wealth, brother, happiness, son, foe, wife, longevity, father. This is the plainest verse line on any of my ten plates and I have no doubt about it.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "क्ष्माजा" — क्ष्माज ('earth-born') is Mars; the English opposite names Saturn, Jupiter and Mars, which fixes शनि, गुरु and this word in order. Flagged only because a reader without the synonym will not find Mars here.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तार्तीयीकदशश"; alternatives "तार्तीयीकदशम" — Read at 1.7x across the crop seam; the doubled श is odd and was not zoomed. The element means the 3rd and the 10th, which the English confirms. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तार्तीयीकदशत्रिकोणचतुरष्टावार्किजीवारकाः; this sentence names तार्तीयीकदशश, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अर्किंजीवारकाः"; alternatives "अर्किजीवारकाः" — An anusvara stands on अर्किं where अर्कि (Saturn) wants none. The three planet-words are अर्कि (Saturn), जीव (Jupiter), आर (Mars) - three more synonyms a naive index will miss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ७८ ॥" — Clean, spaced, four full strokes. Digits confirmed against 'Sloka-78.' below.
9.79a reading here is contested

सर्वे क्षेमकरात्रिकोणपतय[??]यथांयहन्ते शुभाः सौम्यः केन्द्रपतिः शुभं न दिशति क्रूरोऽशुभं चोत्तरम् । लग्नाद् द्वादशरिक्थपौ सहचरावन्यस्य च स्थानतो दद्यातां फलमष्टमेशशुभदो भाग्यं व्ययाधीश्वरः ॥ ७९ ॥

sarve kṣemakarātrikoṇapataya[??]yathāṃyahante śubhāḥ saumyaḥ kendrapatiḥ śubhaṃ na diśati krūro'śubhaṃ cottaram | lagnād dvādaśarikthapau sahacarāvanyasya ca sthānato dadyātāṃ phalamaṣṭameśaśubhado bhāgyaṃ vyayādhīśvaraḥ || 79 ||

All the lords of the trines that bring welfare are auspicious ⟨between pataya and yathāṃ stand two akṣaras the reader REFUSED to name even at 10x: the first is a STACKED pair of identical elements, each drawn as a horizontal bar with a left downstroke and a short tail descending; his best candidates were ssa or lla but he would not choose. The published English's 'prove auspicious if they occupy the 3rd, 2nd, 11th and Kendra houses' would want the house-words sahaja, sva and āya here, consistent with something like svāya — but that is NOT what he can see.⟩ and bring [good]. A benefic that is lord of a kendra does not give good; a malefic gives what is not good, and more. The lords of the twelfth and of the riktha (the second, the house of wealth) reckoned from the lagna ⟨our mula now reads dvādaśarikthapau; riktha is a name of the second house.⟩, being companions, give their fruit from the place of another. The lord of the eighth ⟨our mula now reads phalam aṣṭameśa-, 'lord of the eighth'.⟩ gives good, and the lord of the twelfth gives fortune.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[??]" — REFUSED. Between पतय and यथां stand two aksaras I cannot name at 10x. The first is a STACKED pair of identical elements, each drawn as a horizontal bar with a left downstroke, with a short tail descending below - my best candidates are स्स or ल्ल but I will not choose. The second reads as an avagraha-like curl joined to य. Page 154, verse-line 1 of sloka 79, original x approximately 1180-1400. The English ('prove auspicious if they occupy the 3rd, 2nd, 11th and Kendra houses') would want the house-words सहज, स्व and आय here, which is consistent with something like स्वाय but is NOT what I can see.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यहन्ते"; alternatives "वहन्ते" — य and व are the candidates for the first sort; वहन्ते ('they bring') suits the English 'prove auspicious'. Read at 5x, not settled.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "थां"; alternatives "थाँ" — The nasal above the ā-stroke is a downward-opening CRESCENT, not the round dot used for anusvara elsewhere - the same form I met on page 143 lines 18 and 30. Two nasal sorts, or candrabindu; still unsettled after three plates.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "द्वादशरिष्थपौ"; alternatives "द्वादशरिष्फपौ", "द्वादशरिःथपौ" — At 5x there is a small stacked half-form between रि and the following sort, which I read as ष्; the sort after it has a rounded left bowl and could be थ or फ. रिष्फ is the technical name of the 12th house, which the English names ('The lords of the 8th and 12th Bhavas'), so रिष्फपौ is the likely word. At 1.7x this looked like a visarga and I recorded it so before zooming - a caution about reading this book at low magnification. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्वादशरिक्थपौ; this sentence names द्वादशरिष्थपौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलमत्रमेशशुभदो"; alternatives "फलमत्र मृतेशः शुभदो" — At 4.5x the aksara is मे with a plain e-matra and NO subscript ṛ. The English says 'The lord of the 8th gives good results', which wants मृत्येश or मृतेश (lord of death, the 8th). Recorded as set. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads फलमष्टमेशशुभदो for फलमत्रमेशशुभदो, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्ययाधीश्वरः" — व्यय is the 12th house; 'the lord of the 12th augurs fortune' in the English. Clean at 1.76x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ७९ ॥" — Clean, spaced, four full strokes; ७ and ९ confirmed against 'Sloka-79.' below.
9.80a reading here is contested

सोऽयं चेत्तनुपः शुभो गुरुसितौ केंद्राधिपौ चाशुभौ स्थाने मारकसंज्ञिते यदि गतौ स्यातामुभौ मारकौ । ज्ञस्तादृक् च तथा विभुश्च जनको रन्ध्राधिपौ चेच्छुभौ भूजारस्य पतत्रिकोणपतितामारकत्वे शुभौ नैकतः ॥ ८० ॥

so'yaṃ cettanupaḥ śubho gurusitau keṃdrādhipau cāśubhau sthāne mārakasaṃjñite yadi gatau syātāmubhau mārakau | jñastādṛk ca tathā vibhuśca janako randhrādhipau cecchubhau bhūjārasya patatrikoṇapatitāmārakatve śubhau naikataḥ || 80 ||

If that lord of the body (the lagna-lord) be benefic, and Jupiter and Venus be lords of kendras and so inauspicious, then, if the two have gone to a place called maraka, both are marakas. Mercury ⟨jña: the opening ligature's counter is inked in and its two lower arms are not separately resolved; jña, Mercury, is the only reading that yields a word and it agrees with the facing English, 'Mercury, if similarly situated'⟩ so situated, and likewise the master and the father: if the two lords of the randhra (the 8th) be benefic, then, for one born of Mars, ⟨patatrikoṇapatitā DOES NOT PARSE AS PRINTED: read akṣara by akṣara at 9x it is pa + ta + tri + ko + ṇa, with no i-mātrā on the ta which would give pati- and no visible virāma which would give pat-. Flagged as a probable compositor's error in the edition rather than a reading failure.⟩ in the state of maraka the two benefics are not so from one side alone. ⟨At 8x a clean two-dot VISARGA stands between sya and tā in syātām, 'let the two be', in the position the ā-mātrā should occupy — the seventh occurrence of this sort in an impossible position across these ten plates, and the first where it displaces a VOWEL SIGN rather than a half-consonant or a daṇḍa.⟩

11 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तनुपः" — तनुप = lord of the body = lord of the Lagna. Read at 1.65x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केंद्राधिपौ"; alternatives "केन्द्राधिपौ" — Set with anusvara here, but with the full न्द conjunct in केन्द्रपतिः eleven lines above (line 21). Both spellings on one plate; kept as each is set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्य:ताम्"; alternatives "स्याताम्" — KEPT AS PRINTED. Verified at 8x: a clean two-dot VISARGA stands between स्य and ता, in the position the ā-matra of स्याताम् ('let the two be') should occupy. This is the SEVENTH occurrence of this sort in an impossible position across my ten plates (143 line 19, 148 line 7, 150 line 17, 152 lines 8, 20 and 21, and here), and the first where it displaces a VOWEL SIGN rather than a half-consonant or a danda. So the habit is not confined to one context.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "(verse continues)" — Only padas 1-2 of sloka 80 are on this plate, closing with a single danda; padas 3-4 and the verse number ॥ ८० ॥ are at the head of page 155.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञ"; alternatives "ङ्ग", "श्न" — opening ligature; loop-plus-tail form read at 6x. ज्ञ (Mercury) is the only reading that yields a word and it agrees with the facing English ('Mercury, if similarly situated'), but the counter is inked in and the two lower arms are not separately resolved.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "विभुश्च"; alternatives "विधुश्च" — second akshara has a right stem, a mid-height horizontal shelf joining it, and a hook curving below the shelf - the भ pattern. ध in this fount closes its left bowl at the baseline with no mid shelf (compare धि in रन्ध्राधिपौ on this same line). Read भ, but the mid shelf is only ~3 px of clean ink.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जनको"; alternatives "जनक्को" — a separate blot sits under the क. Compared against other क on the plate it is heavier than the fount's descender; most likely offset/show-through from the line below, not a subscript. Recorded as जनको.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रन्ध्राधिपौ"; alternatives "रन्ध्राधिपौ (न्ध्र stack unverified)" — the न्ध्र stack is a solid black mass at 8x; the न् half-form and the ra-subscript are inferred from the silhouette, not read stroke by stroke.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पतत्रिकोण"; alternatives "पतित्रिकोण", "पत्त्रिकोण" — THIS DOES NOT PARSE AS PRINTED. Read akshara by akshara at 9x: प + त + त्रि + को + ण. There is no i-matra on the त (which would give पति-) and no visible virama (which would give पत्-). Printed as recorded; flagged as a probable compositor's error in the edition rather than a reading failure.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मारकत्वe"; alternatives "माकत्वे" — headbar-gap segmentation of x1368-1611 gives four sorts: 67px (म + a-matra), 26px, 52px (क), 84px (त्वे). The 26px sort is separated from the preceding a-matra by a headbar break, which a bare matra would not have; read as र. Gives मारकत्वे, which the facing English ('they become Marakas or killers') supports.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८० ॥" — the zero is printed as a solid filled disc, not an open ring - the fount's form for Devanagari 0. Verified against the '80' in the English marker below.
9.81a reading here is contested

यद्यद्दुर्भगतौ यदीशसहितावेतौ तमःखेचरौ स्यातां तत्फलदायिनौ बलयुतौ केंद्रत्रिकोणेश्वराः । क्षेमं ते ददति प्रसक्तरहिताश्चेदन्यथा ते युताः तौ दुष्टावपि योगतः शुभकरौ सम्बन्धमात्रेण तौ . ॥ ८१ ॥

yadyaddurbhagatau yadīśasahitāvetau tamaḥkhecarau syātāṃ tatphaladāyinau balayutau keṃdratrikoṇeśvarāḥ | kṣemaṃ te dadati prasaktarahitāścedanyathā te yutāḥ tau duṣṭāvapi yogataḥ śubhakarau sambandhamātreṇa tau . || 81 ||

In whatever evil sign these two shadowy planets stand ⟨our mūla now reads yadyad-durbha-gatau, 'placed in whatever evil sign', which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave for the opening the earlier reader refused⟩, and with whatever lord they are joined, they become givers of that fruit. The lords of the kendras and trines, when possessed of strength, grant welfare — provided they are free of attachment; if it is otherwise, and they are joined, then those two, though evil, become makers of good by the yoga, by mere connection. ⟨A stray baseline DOT stands between the final tau and the opening daṇḍa of the verse marker, with a word-space on each side — the third kind of intrusive mark met in this printing.⟩

10 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[??]"; alternatives "द्वा", "द्भू", "द्यु", "द्दु" — REFUSED. Headbar segmentation gives sorts at x348-403 (य), 407-528 (a 122px block that resolves into TWO sub-sorts, the right one carrying a descender vowel), 539-587 (दु), 596-656 (र्भ, repha above), 660-719 (ग), 744-802 (नौ). The metre is sardulavikridita and the remainder of the line scans exactly, which forces the second syllable to be GURU - so the descender is a long u or a vocalic r, not a short u. I could not resolve the two sorts inside the 122px block at any magnification or threshold; the ink is fused. Not guessed. [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's 8-bit jp2 master page_0155, line 35, at about 2.7x and 6.2x native. The 122-px block is द्य followed by द्, and the descender seen in it is the long diagonal virāma of द्, not a vowel sign. The page sets यद्यद्दुर्भगतौ, and our mūla now reads so. This reader's finding that the second syllable is heavy stands: यद् before द्द.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "र्भ"; alternatives "र्म", "भं" — the mark above is a comma-shaped hook, not the solid round dot this fount uses for anusvara (compare the anusvara over स्यातां and कें on the next line). Read as repha.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गनौ"; alternatives "गतौ" — tested directly: the final akshara was cropped beside the known तौ of बलयुतौ and the known नौ of दायिनौ on the line below. Its left element matches नौ (top-left horizontal arm dropping to a stem) and not तौ (bottom-left rounded hook). Read नौ although गतौ would read better as sense. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads यद्यद्दुर्भगतौ; this sentence names गनौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the final akṣara on the exemplar's jp2 master page_0155 at about 4.0x native, and at about 5.8x native with gamma 2.2, beside the नौ of दायिनौ and the तौ of बलयुतौ on the line below. It is तौ. Its bar sits directly under the headline, and the lower-left side of its bowl is printed faintly (grey 99 to 225) on the same diagonal as the त of बलयुतौ, down to the stem foot. The न of दायिनौ has a lower, thicker bar and a solid knob that stops above the stem foot. The upper arm this note compared is the same in both sorts.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "सहितावेतौ"; alternatives "सहितावेडौ" — final base read त at 9x; at low magnification it can be taken for ड. सahitau + etau > सहितावेतौ is the sandhi the shapes support.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "बलयुतौ"; alternatives "वलयुतौ" — ba/va counter test applied at 8x: the bowl carries an internal stroke, so ब not व.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केंद्र"; alternatives "केन्द्र" — printed with anusvara over क plus the e-matra, not with a न् half-form. An orthographic feature of this edition, kept as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।"; alternatives "॥" — a SINGLE danda closes this line - the verse is unfinished and runs on to the next plate. Only one vertical stroke is present at 8x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्रसक्तरहितांश्चेद्"; alternatives "प्रसक्तरहिताश्चेद्" — An anusvara stands on the ā of रहितां where the nominative plural रहिताः would want none. Read at 1.68x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रसक्तरहिताश्चेदन्यथा; this sentence names रहितां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's 8-bit jp2 master page_0156, line 1, at about 4.0x native, and measured the marks above the headline at grey <160, <200 and <230. The page carries no anusvāra on ता. The one mark over this stretch is the e-mātrā of श्चे, the shape and size of the e-mātrās of the two ते on the same line. The anusvāra of क्षेमं on that line is a round dot of 245 px, and nothing like it stands over ता. The press sets प्रसक्तरहिताश्चेदन्यथा.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तौ . ॥"; alternatives "तौ ॥" — A stray baseline DOT stands between the final तौ and the opening danda of the verse marker, with a word-space on each side. Read at 1.78x. It is the third kind of intrusive mark I have met in this printing, after the baseline dot inside words (page 151 line 4, page 152 line 7) and the two-dot visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८१ ॥" — ८ and १ clean and spaced; confirmed against 'Sloka-81.' below.
9.82a reading here is contested

तौ धर्मे यदि कर्मणि स्थितियुजौ व्यत्यासतो वा स्थितौ योगं तौ कुरुतस्त्रिकोणपतिना योगोऽपि सौख्यप्रदः । सौख्यं योगकृतोर्दशास्वपि भवेच्चैतद्युजां श्रेयसां सम्बन्धादथ योगिनोऽशुभकृतां भुक्ताशुभं योगजम् ॥ ८२ ॥

tau dharme yadi karmaṇi sthitiyujau vyatyāsato vā sthitau yogaṃ tau kurutastrikoṇapatinā yogo'pi saukhyapradaḥ | saukhyaṃ yogakṛtordaśāsvapi bhaveccaitadyujāṃ śreyasāṃ sambandhādatha yogino'śubhakṛtāṃ bhuktāśubhaṃ yogajam || 82 ||

If those two stand in the 9th (dharma) or in the 10th (karma) ⟨dharma is the 9th house and karma the 10th — the published English says '9th or the 10th'; these are house-names here, not the ordinary words, and are flagged for anyone indexing the verse⟩, joined in position, or standing crosswise, then the two make a yoga; and a yoga with the lord of a trine also gives happiness. Happiness comes in the daśās of the makers of yoga too ⟨our mula now reads daśāsvapi, 'in the daśās too'.⟩, and of the auspicious ones joined with them; and from connection, then, the yoga-giver of the makers of evil gives the evil produced by that yoga when it is enjoyed.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्थितियुज्ञौ"; alternatives "स्थितियुजौ", "स्थितियुक्तौ" — The conjunct read at 1.66x looks like ज्ञ; स्थितियुजौ ('the two joined in position') is what the sense wants. Not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्थितियुजौ; this sentence names स्थितियुज्ञौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्मे ... कर्मणि" — धर्म is the 9th house and कर्म the 10th - the English says '9th or the 10th'. House-names, not the ordinary words; flagged for anyone indexing the verse.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दंशास्वपि"; alternatives "दशास्वपि" — An anusvara on दं where दशासु ('in the dasas', which the English names) wants none. Read at 1.66x. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads योगकृतोर्दशास्वपि; this sentence names दंशास्वपि, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "भवेच्चेत्तयुजां" — Read across the crop seam at 1.66/1.74x; not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भवेच्चैतद्युजां; this sentence names भवेच्चेत्तयुजां, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८२ ॥" — Clean, four full strokes, spaced; confirmed against 'Sloka-82.' below.
9.83a reading here is contested

युज्येतां तु तमोग्रहौ शुभफलौ केंद्रे त्रिकोणेऽथवा तन्नाथेन युतौ त्रिकोणपतिना केंद्राधिनाथेन वा ॥ धर्मेंट्कर्मपती न रन्ध्रशिवपौ तन्नाःथयोगेन वा योगो नैव नरस्य चाष्टममिति स्थानं तदेवायुषः ॥ ८३ ॥

yujyetāṃ tu tamograhau śubhaphalau keṃdre trikoṇe'thavā tannāthena yutau trikoṇapatinā keṃdrādhināthena vā || dharmeṃṭkarmapatī na randhraśivapau tannāḥthayogena vā yogo naiva narasya cāṣṭamamiti sthānaṃ tadevāyuṣaḥ || 83 ||

Let the two shadowy planets ⟨tamograha, 'darkness-planet', is this verse's word for Rāhu and Ketu; the published English renders it 'the two dark planets' — a synonym an index will miss⟩ be joined so as to give auspicious fruit, in a kendra or in a trine, joined with its lord, or with the lord of a trine, or with the lord of a kendra. ⟨This second quarter closes with a DOUBLE daṇḍa, verified at 5x, where every other second quarter on these ten plates closes with a single one; kept as printed.⟩ The lords of the 9th and 10th are not [also] the two lords of randhra (the 8th) and of śiva (the 11th) ⟨śiva, a name of Rudra, stands for eleven, the number of the Rudras; the same rule in Laghu Pārāśarī 1.22 names the 11th lābha⟩; or by a yoga with its lord ⟨at 8x a clean two-dot VISARGA stands between nā and tha in tannātha-. Two printed lines above, in the same stanza, the identical element tannātha- is set WITHOUT it, checked at 7.5x for exactly this reason. Same word, same stanza, same forme: one clean, one not. This is a compositor's error demonstrated rather than argued, and it settles what the two-dot sort is at all nine of its occurrences across these plates. Record it, never emend it silently, and never dignify it as a manuscript variant.⟩ — there is no yoga at all for the man; and the eighth, so called, is that very place of longevity.

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तमोग्रहौ" — तमोग्रह ('darkness-planet') is the verse's word for Rahu and Ketu; the English renders it 'the two dark planets'. A synonym an index will miss.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्नाथेन" — VERIFIED CLEAN AT 7.5x: त + न्ना + थे + न, with NOTHING between ना and थे. This is the control for line 28 below, where the same element carries an intrusive visarga.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वा ॥"; alternatives "वा ।" — This pada 2 closes with a DOUBLE danda, verified at 5x - two full-height strokes. Every other pada 2 in my ten plates closes with a single danda. Kept as printed; do not normalise it to ।.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केंद्राधिनाथेन" — The third spelling of kendra in three plates: केन्द्रपतिः (154 line 21), केंद्राधिपौ (154 line 33), केंद्राधिनाथेन here. Anusvara and the न्द conjunct alternate freely.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तन्नाःथयोगेन"; alternatives "तन्नाथयोगेन" — THE DECISIVE CASE. At 8x a clean, well-formed two-dot VISARGA stands between ना and थ. Two printed lines above, in line 27 of this same stanza, the identical element तन्नाथ- is set WITHOUT it - I checked that one at 7.5x for exactly this reason. Same word, same stanza, same forme: one clean, one not. This is compositor's error, demonstrated rather than argued, and it settles what the two-dot sort is at all nine of its occurrences across my plates (143 line 19, 148 line 7, 150 line 17, 152 lines 8, 20, 21, 154 lines 22 and 34, and here). Record it, never emend it silently, and never dignify it as a manuscript variant. [2026-09-23: A plate ruling measured this sort on the exemplar's 8-bit jp2 master page_0156, store line 27. Between ना (x 1310-1432) and थ (x 1466-1739) stand two separate dots at x 1437-1456 (20x25 px, area 345, and 16x40 px, area 457), the size of the visarga of तमः on page_0155 line 35. तन्नाथेन on store line 26 is one unbroken component. The measurement agrees with this note, and the letters of our text there stand.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्मेंट्कर्मपती"; alternatives "धर्मेद्कर्मपती", "धर्मकर्मपती" — At 5.5x the third aksara is a ट-shaped sort carrying a virama stroke below, and there are TWO marks above the preceding र्में (a repha hook and an anusvara) as well as the e-matra. धर्मकर्मपती - the lords of the 9th and 10th - is what the sense and the previous stanza want. Recorded as the sorts stand.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "रन्ध्रशिववृषौ" — रन्ध्र is the 8th house. Read at 1.55x, not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads रन्ध्रशिवपौ; this sentence names रन्ध्रशिववृषौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's 8-bit jp2 master page_0156, line 27, at about 3.5x native. The page sets रन्ध्रशिवपौ in five sorts: रन्, ध्र, शि, व, पौ. Nothing hangs under the व, and the last consonant is a U-shaped bowl, closed and hollow, with no diagonal cross-stroke: the प of this fount, not ष. The reading रन्ध्रशिववृषौ added a syllable the page does not carry.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८३ ॥" — Clean, four full strokes; ८ and ३ confirmed against 'Sloka-83.' below.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चाष्टममिति" — अष्टम is the 8th; the line ends 'that same place is of longevity' (आयुषः), which is the standard 8th-house doctrine. The English for this pada is on plate 157, not here.
9.84a reading here is contested

तस्मादष्टममप्यभू[??]निः[?]नामायुः प्रदं कीर्तितं शास्त्रज्ञैरसकृद्व्ययस्तु च तयोः स्यान्मारकस्थानकः । आद्यादुत्तरमुत्तरं तदधिपात्त्रत्यपापः स्मृतः तत्संयुक्तदशावशादभिभवः साक्षाद्व्ययेशस्य वा ॥ ८४ ॥

tasmādaṣṭamamapyabhū[??]niḥ[?]nāmāyuḥ pradaṃ kīrtitaṃ śāstrajñairasakṛdvyayastu ca tayoḥ syānmārakasthānakaḥ | ādyāduttaramuttaraṃ tadadhipāttratyapāpaḥ smṛtaḥ tatsaṃyuktadaśāvaśādabhibhavaḥ sākṣādvyayeśasya vā || 84 ||

Therefore the eighth too ⟨the cluster after abhū is a stacked conjunct whose members have run together into a solid mass at 6.5x; the reader can see it is two consonants deep and can name neither. REFUSED.⟩ ⟨after that cluster he reads ni, then a clean two-dot mark, then a SEPARATE small curved mark sitting below the line, unattached to either neighbour; PARTLY REFUSED⟩ is declared to be the giver of longevity by those who know the śāstra, again and again ⟨our mula now reads śāstrajñair asakṛd.⟩; but as for the twelfth of those two, it is the maraka-place. From the first, each next in turn ⟨our mula now reads ādyād uttaram uttaraṃ, 'from the first, the next and the next'.⟩. From its lord ⟨our mula now reads tadadhipāt, 'from its lord'; the next word, -tratyapāpaḥ, is one syllable short of tatratya-, 'situated there'.⟩, the malefic situated there is remembered [as such]. Defeat comes by force of the daśā of one joined with it ⟨our mula now reads tatsaṃyuktadaśāvaśād abhibhavaḥ.⟩, or directly of the lord of the 12th.

10 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[??]" — REFUSED. At 6.5x the cluster after अभू is a stacked conjunct whose members have run together into a solid mass; I can see it is two consonants deep and can name neither. Page 157, verse-line 1 of sloka 84, original x approximately 900-1000.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "निः[?]ना" — PARTLY REFUSED. After the cluster I read नि followed by a clean two-dot mark, and then a SEPARATE small curved mark sitting below the line before ना - unattached to either neighbour. The English says the 8th from the 8th 'denotes longevity', so आयुः प्रदं at the end of the line is secure; the element before it is not. Recorded with the marks named and not resolved.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आयु प्रदं"; alternatives "आयुः प्रदं" — No visarga visible on आयु at 1.65x, though the compound wants one.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "[??]" — REFUSED. The two aksaras after शा are over-inked into one black mass at 6x, with at least two unidentifiable marks riding above the headline. शास्त्र- would be the obvious word but I can neither confirm nor supply it. Page 157, verse-line 2 of sloka 84, original x approximately 520-700.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "स्यान्मारकस्थानकः" — Clean at 1.78x; मारकस्थान is the Maraka house, which the English names.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आद्या।दुत्तग्मुत्तरं" — As printed at 1.65x, and it contains what looks like a DANDA in mid-word between आद्या and दुत्त. I cannot construe the sequence and I did not zoom it; the whole element is flagged as unresolved rather than transcribed with confidence. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads आद्यादुत्तरमुत्तरं; this sentence names आद्या।दुत्तग्मुत्तरं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्धिपात्त्रत्यपापः"; alternatives "तद्द्वादशपात्..." — Read at 1.65x, not zoomed. The English at this point speaks of 'the 12th place reckoned from each of these'. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तदधिपात्त्रत्यपापः; this sentence names तद्धिपात्त्रत्यपापः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तत्संयुक्तद्शावशादमिमव्रः" — Read at 1.65x across a badly inked stretch; not construable and not zoomed. Treat as unverified. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तत्संयुक्तदशावशादभिभवः; this sentence names तत्संयुक्तद्शावशादमिमव्रः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "साक्षाद्व्ययेशस्य" — Clean at 1.78x; व्ययेश is the lord of the 12th, which the English names.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८४ ॥" — Clean, spaced, four full strokes; digits confirmed against 'Sloka-84.' below.
9.85a reading here is contested

सम्बन्धाद्व्ययनायकस्य शुभकृद्भुक्तौ च रन्ध्रेशितुः पापानां तु दशासु मारकयुतो मन्दो विहायेतरान् । हन्ता सर्वखगाः स्वभुक्तिषु नृणां दद्युः फलम् तादृशं ये वा येन सधर्मिणश्च सहिता दद्युः स्वभुक्तौ फलम् ८५॥

sambandhādvyayanāyakasya śubhakṛdbhuktau ca randhreśituḥ pāpānāṃ tu daśāsu mārakayuto mando vihāyetarān | hantā sarvakhagāḥ svabhuktiṣu nṛṇāṃ dadyuḥ phalam tādṛśaṃ ye vā yena sadharmiṇaśca sahitā dadyuḥ svabhuktau phalam 85||

From connection with the lord of the 12th it is good-making, and in the enjoyment of the lord of the 8th ⟨vyayanāyaka is the lord of the 12th and randhreśitṛ the lord of the 8th; the published English says 'the lord of the 8th or the 12th'⟩. But in the daśās of the malefics, Saturn ⟨manda, 'the slow one', is Saturn — the published English reads 'Saturn alone'. The whole doctrinal point of the stanza rests on this synonym, which no index of planet names will catch unless it knows the convention.⟩, joined with a maraka, leaving the others aside, is the killer. All the planets, in their own periods, give men such fruit as that; or those planets which are joined with one of like nature give their fruit in their own period. ⟨The verse-number is set with NO OPENING DAṆḌA of any kind — verified at 7x: after phalam a wide word-space, then 8, then 5, then a clean full ॥. Verses 84 and 86 on this same plate both close with a clean spaced ॥ NN ॥, so this is a setting slip, not a house style. A parser requiring daṇḍas on both sides of the digits loses this verse.⟩

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "व्ययनायकस्य ... रन्ध्रेशितुः" — व्ययनायक is the lord of the 12th and रन्ध्रेशितृ the lord of the 8th - the English says 'the lord of the 8th or the 12th house'. Both read cleanly at 1.66/1.72x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मन्दो" — मन्द ('the slow one') is Saturn - the English opposite reads 'Saturn alone'. The whole doctrinal point of the stanza rests on this synonym, which no index of planet names will catch unless it knows the convention.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलम् तादृशं"; alternatives "फलं तादृशं" — Printed with a visible virama on फलम् and a word-space before तादृशं. Kept as set.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलम् ८५॥"; alternatives "फलम् ॥ ८५ ॥" — KEPT AS PRINTED, and it is a form I have not met elsewhere. Verified at 7x: after फलम् there is a wide word-space, then ८, then ५, then a clean full ॥ of two strokes - and NO OPENING DANDA of any kind. Not a broken one, not a faint one: nothing. Sloka 84 eleven lines above and sloka 86 eight lines below both close with a clean spaced ॥ NN ॥ on this same plate, so this is a setting slip, not a house style. A parser requiring dandas on both sides of the digits loses this verse.
9.86a reading here is contested

अन्येषां तु दशाधिनाथविमतानामानुगुण्येन तत् कार्यं चौह्यममुष्य भुक्तिषु दशा कोणेश्वरस्यापि या । तस्यां केन्द्रपतेः शुभं न हि शुभं सम्बन्धमात्रे शुभैः भुक्तौ मारकखेचरस्य यदि तद्योगस्य चारंभतः ॥ ८६ ॥

anyeṣāṃ tu daśādhināthavimatānāmānuguṇyena tat kāryaṃ cauhyamamuṣya bhuktiṣu daśā koṇeśvarasyāpi yā | tasyāṃ kendrapateḥ śubhaṃ na hi śubhaṃ sambandhamātre śubhaiḥ bhuktau mārakakhecarasya yadi tadyogasya cāraṃbhataḥ || 86 ||

For others ⟨our mula now reads anyeṣāṃ, 'of others'.⟩ whose lord of the daśā is not approved, that is to be done by conformity ⟨our mula now reads vimatānām ānuguṇyena, a genitive plural and 'conformity'.⟩; and it is to be inferred for him in the bhuktis ⟨our mula now reads cauhyam amuṣya, ca + ūhyam + amuṣya.⟩. Whatever daśā be that of the lord of a trine — in it the lord of a kendra gives good, but not good if it is merely connection with benefics. And in the bhukti of a maraka planet, if it is from the beginning of that yoga.

7 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "अ.येषां"; alternatives "अथ येषां" — A small round dot stands on the baseline between अ and येषां, in the position a consonant or a word-space would take. अथ येषां is the obvious phrase. This is the same intrusive-baseline-dot defect as page 151 line 4, page 152 line 7 and page 156 line 3 - four occurrences of it across my plates, distinct from the two-dot visarga defect. Read at 1.65x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "दशाधिनाथविमतानानुगुण्येन" — A long unbroken compound read at 1.65x; not zoomed and not segmented by me. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दशाधिनाथविमतानामानुगुण्येन; this sentence names दशाधिनाथविमतानानुगुण्येन, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चोच्चममुप्य"; alternatives "चोच्चमनुप्य", "चोच्चमुपेत्य" — Read at 1.65x; the double च conjunct and what follows were not zoomed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads चौह्यममुष्य; this sentence names चोच्चममुप्य, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "यां ।"; alternatives "या ।" — The anusvara here is a small dot high above the ā-stroke and the danda after it is noticeably thinner than the dandas elsewhere on the plate. Read at 1.72x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "केन्द्रपतेः"; alternatives "कें‌द्रपतेः" — Set with the full न्द conjunct here, as at page 154 line 21, against the anusvara spellings at page 154 line 33 and page 156 line 27. Four spellings of kendra across four plates; none is emended.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मारकखेचरस्य" — खेचर ('sky-goer') is another synonym for planet, alongside ग्रह, खग and तमोग्रह used earlier in this run. Clean at 1.65x.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥ ८६ ॥" — Clean, spaced, four full strokes; ८ and ६ confirmed against the sequence 84-85-86, each of whose English locators is printed on this plate or the next. This stanza is COMPLETE on this plate - the only one of my ten that neither opens nor closes across a plate break.
9.87a reading here is contested

भुक्तिः पापखगस्य तत्प्रथयति प्राचां च सम्बन्धतः श्रेयस्तुल्यतया युजामपि न किं योगेश्वराः स्वायुजः । भुक्तौ योगफलप्रदाः शुभफलौ स्यातां तमःखेटिनौ सङ्क्रान्तोपगतौ तदीशितृशुभैः संबन्धभाजौ परम् ॥ ८७ ॥

bhuktiḥ pāpakhagasya tatprathayati prācāṃ ca sambandhataḥ śreyastulyatayā yujāmapi na kiṃ yogeśvarāḥ svāyujaḥ | bhuktau yogaphalapradāḥ śubhaphalau syātāṃ tamaḥkheṭinau saṅkrāntopagatau tadīśitṛśubhaiḥ saṃbandhabhājau param || 87 ||

The bhukti of a malefic planet spreads that abroad; and from connection with the aforesaid ⟨prācāṃ: the mark above the ā-mātrā of cā is a small solid wedge, about 32 by 27 pixels, widest at the headline and tapering to a point. At 8-14x it matches NEITHER this plate's anusvāra over an ā-mātrā, which is a round ball on a stem, NOR the repha, which is an open leftward crook, NOR the o/au signs, which are large leaning hooks. Read prācāṃ because the quarter scans as perfect śārdūlavikrīḍita only with a heavy 14th syllable and a light 15th, and because Śāstrī's facing rendering has 'the aforesaid planet'. The glyph itself is unresolved.⟩. Why should the lords of the yoga, even when joined in equal welfare and joined with their own [houses], not do so too? In the bhukti they give the fruit of the yoga. The two shadowy planets become givers of auspicious fruit if they have entered a saṅkrānti and share connection with the benefics that rule them.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "प्राचां"; alternatives "प्राचौ", "प्रार्चा" — the mark above the aa-matra of चा is a small solid wedge (~32x27 px), widest at the headline and tapering to a point. At 8-14x it matches NEITHER the plate's anusvara over an aa-matra, which is a round ball on a stem (cf. स्यातां l.12, पापानां l.24), NOR the repha, which is an open leftward crook (cf. धर्मे and र्का on plate 159), NOR the ो/ौ signs, which are large leaning hooks (cf. भुक्तौ, यो l.12). Read प्राचां because (i) the pada scans as perfect Shardulavikridita only with a heavy 14th syllable and a light 15th (च), and (ii) Sastri's facing rendering has 'the aforesaid planet'. The glyph itself is unresolved.
9.88a reading here is contested

आरूढौ च शुभेन केन सहितावाप्यन्तरे पापिनोः पापानां तदसंयुजां शुभफलं तद्भुक्तयो भुक्तिदाः । मिश्रं योगकृतः फलं तदयुजोऽप्यत्यन्तपापं फलं हन्ता हंति शुभान्वयेन तु निहन्त्येवान्यभुक्तौ मिथः ॥८८॥

ārūḍhau ca śubhena kena sahitāvāpyantare pāpinoḥ pāpānāṃ tadasaṃyujāṃ śubhaphalaṃ tadbhuktayo bhuktidāḥ | miśraṃ yogakṛtaḥ phalaṃ tadayujo'pyatyantapāpaṃ phalaṃ hantā haṃti śubhānvayena tu nihantyevānyabhuktau mithaḥ ||88||

Mounted, and joined with some benefic, or in the interval between two malefics — the fruit of the malefics not so joined is auspicious, and their bhuktis are bhukti-givers. The fruit of a maker of yoga is mixed; and the fruit of one not joined with it is exceedingly evil. The killer kills; but by association with benefics it kills only in the bhukti of another, and mutually. ⟨A small detached comma-like mark is printed below and right of the da in tadasaṃyujāṃ and again in tadayujo. If it were a virāma the quarter would be one syllable short and heavy where śārdūlavikrīḍita requires light; it is read as an editorial mark, in both places where tad + a- has coalesced, and is not transcribed.⟩

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदसंयुजां"; alternatives "तद्संयुजां" — a small detached comma-like mark is printed below and right of द. If it were a virama the pada would be one syllable short and positions 4-5 heavy where Shardulavikridita requires light; read as an editorial mark (the same mark stands under द in तदयुजो l.25, both places where tad + a- has coalesced), not transcribed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तद्भुक्तयो"; alternatives "तंद्भुक्तयो" — a very small high dot stands over त, far smaller than this plate's anusvara (cf. सं in the same line); read as a speck of broken type, and the metre wants no anusvara there
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलं" — second word of the line: besides the anusvara dot a second superscript mark shaped like a small '3' or an avagraha stands to its right, higher than the anusvara. Not identified; not transcribed. There is no footnote on the plate it could refer to.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तदयुजो"; alternatives "तद्युजो" — same detached comma below द as in l.24; the pada scans as perfect Shardulavikridita only as तदयुजो
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हंति"; alternatives "हन्ति" — printed with anusvara, not the न् conjunct; recorded as printed
9.89a reading here is contested

भुक्तौ सूर्यजपार्थिवौ प्रदिशतो व्यत्यासतः स्वं फलं राश्यब्जाधिपती मिथः श्रयगतौ तद्राजयोगप्रदौ । धर्मेट्कर्मपती मिथःस्थितयुजौ तद्राजयोगप्रदौ लग्ने लग्नमुदीक्ष्य तद्ग्रहफलं वक्ष्येऽथ जिज्ञासितः ॥८९॥

bhuktau sūryajapārthivau pradiśato vyatyāsataḥ svaṃ phalaṃ rāśyabjādhipatī mithaḥ śrayagatau tadrājayogapradau | dharmeṭkarmapatī mithaḥsthitayujau tadrājayogapradau lagne lagnamudīkṣya tadgrahaphalaṃ vakṣye'tha jijñāsitaḥ ||89||

In the bhukti, Saturn (son of the Sun) and Mars (lord of the earth) give each other's fruit crosswise. The lords of the rāśi and of the [navāṃśa] mutually resorted to become givers of the rājayoga. The lords of the 9th and 10th ⟨our mūla now reads dharmeṭ-karmapatī, the lord of dharma (the 9th) and the lord of karma (the 10th); an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave dharmeṭkapatī, and rma is supplied on the metre⟩, joined in mutual position, are givers of the rājayoga. Having looked at the lagna from the lagna, we shall now, being asked, state the fruit of the planets there.

2 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "धर्मेट्रकपती"; alternatives "धर्मेद्रकपती", "धर्मेत्रकपती", "धर्मेड्रकपती", "धर्मेट्टकपती" — THIRD CLUSTER UNRESOLVED at 9x. The word is set in six clusters: ध | र्मे (repha + e-matra) | X | क | प | ती. X has a bowl-topped body attached to the headline and a bold tail sweeping below the baseline (a subscript ra, or a u/ri sign). No reading I can make yields a Sanskrit word, and none scans: Sardulavikridita requires - - - u u - here, so syllable 3 must be heavy, and every candidate leaves it light. Sastri's facing rendering says 'the lords of the 9th and 10th', which would want something like dharma-/karma-, and the printed letters do not give it. Treat this word as unread, not as scripture. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads धर्मेट्कर्मपती; this sentence names धर्मेट्रकपती, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0159, line 5, at about 3.4x native, and again at about 3.2x native beside the 9.83 word on page_0156. The third cluster is ट with this fount's hooked virāma under it; there is no र under it and no repha over क or प. It is the same sort that this reader read as ट् in धर्मेंट्कर्मपती at 9.83 (a sort match of 0.90). So the press sets धर्मेट्कपती, which leaves pāda 3 at 18 syllables with a light third syllable. Our mūla reads धर्मेट्कर्मपती, restoring र्म on the metre: धर्म-ईट् + कर्मपती, the lord of the 9th and the lord of the 10th. The word is no longer unread.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जिज्ञ सितः"; alternatives "जिज्ञसितः" — printed with a word space between ज्ञ and सि; recorded as printed [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जिज्ञासितः. The plate ruling of 2026-09-23 confirmed that the press sets जिज्ञ सितः, with a real space and no ā; our text emends it on the metre, which needs a heavy 17th syllable, and the desiderative is what वक्ष्ये governs.]
9.90a reading here is contested

पापो ज्ञोऽर्कगुरू शुभौ च शुभकृद्योगः शनीज्यौ परात् पापत्वं च गुरोः कविर्मृतिफलं दद्यान्न मन्दादयः । हन्तारो यदि पापिनः फलमिदं ज्ञेयं हि मेषोद्भवे जीवो भार्गवशीतगू अशुभदा मन्दो रविस्तौ शुभौ ॥९०॥

pāpo jño'rkagurū śubhau ca śubhakṛdyogaḥ śanījyau parāt pāpatvaṃ ca guroḥ kavirmṛtiphalaṃ dadyānna mandādayaḥ | hantāro yadi pāpinaḥ phalamidaṃ jñeyaṃ hi meṣodbhave jīvo bhārgavaśītagū aśubhadā mando ravistau śubhau ||90||

Mercury is a malefic; the Sun and Jupiter are benefics; and Saturn with Jupiter is a maker of auspicious yoga, from beyond. Jupiter takes on malefic nature, and Venus gives the fruit of death; Saturn and the rest do not. If the killers be malefics, this fruit is to be known for one born in Meṣa. Jupiter, Venus and the cool-rayed Moon are givers of the inauspicious; Saturn and the Sun are the two benefics.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञोऽर्कगुरू"; alternatives "ज्ञोऽर्कंगुरू" — the mark over क is the repha in its LOOP form (identical to the repha of सूर्य in line 4), not an anusvara; the anusvara on this plate is a solid round ball (cf. पापत्वं line 19). The metre confirms 'rka' light.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "फलमिदं" — a small dot stands under the फ (as it does under फ in 158.25). Recorded as a defect of the sort/a speck, not transcribed; Sanskrit has no फ़.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥९०॥" — the opening double danda is printed with the first stroke short and thin; recorded as printed
9.91a reading here is contested

मन्दो राशिसुखप्रदः खलु न चैकेऽप्येव जीवादयो घ्नंति स्युर्यदि मारका वृषभुवां भौमाङ्गिरोऽर्का द्विषः । योगः पूर्ववदेव तस्य शशभृन्मालं निहन्तुं परे एवं द्वन्द्वभवस्य भार्गवबुधौ पापौ कुजेज्यौ शुभौ ॥९१॥

mando rāśisukhapradaḥ khalu na caike'pyeva jīvādayo ghnaṃti syuryadi mārakā vṛṣabhuvāṃ bhaumāṅgiro'rkā dviṣaḥ | yogaḥ pūrvavadeva tasya śaśabhṛnmālaṃ nihantuṃ pare evaṃ dvandvabhavasya bhārgavabudhau pāpau kujejyau śubhau ||91||

Saturn is indeed the giver of happiness to the rāśi ⟨our mūla now reads rāśi-sukha-pradaḥ; an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave su, not mu, and found no legible sort before da, where pra is supplied on the metre⟩; and not one of Jupiter and the rest kills ⟨our mūla now reads ghnaṃti, 'they kill', the plural that jīvādayaḥ needs, which an eye reading of the plate on 2026-09-23 gave where the earlier reader saw a blank⟩. If they be marakas, then for those born in Vṛṣabha, Mars, Jupiter and the Sun are the enemies. The yoga is exactly as before; and for the hare-marked Moon ⟨śaśabhṛn-mālaṃ: the ligature after bhṛ is read n-ma but could be jña at this impression⟩ to be slain by others… So, for one born in the pair-sign (Mithuna), Venus and Mercury are malefics, and Mars and Jupiter are benefics.

4 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "राशिमुख[?]दः"; alternatives "राशिमुखःदः", "राशिमुखंदः", "राशिमुखऽदः" — REFUSED. Between ख and द stands a mark of two stacked blobs - a small round dot above and a solid wedge below - which is NOT this plate's visarga (two equal round dots, as in the दः immediately following) and NOT its anusvara (one round ball). It is either a broken sort or an editorial mark. The metre (Sardulavikridita) needs one LIGHT syllable in this position, which neither a visarga nor an anusvara would give, so the reading is left open. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads राशिसुखप्रदः; this sentence names राशिमुख, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: The plate ruling read the exemplar's jp2 master page_0159, line 30, at about 3.1x to 4.6x native. The sort before ख is सु, not मु (0.93 against the सु of सुरेज्य at 9.92, 0.62 against the मु of लग्नमुदीक्ष्य). The two blobs stand in a slot one akṣara wide (58 px) with no headline over it, and carry 577 dark pixels, a quarter of the द beside them. They are a fragment of a sort that did not print, not an editorial mark. Our mūla reads राशिसुखप्रदः, with प्र supplied on the metre, which needs one light syllable there.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ंति"; alternatives "हंति", "हन्ति" — the line begins with a bare anusvara over a blank, then ति: the ह has not printed (only a stub of its stem is inked at the headline). Metre and sense require hanti, and the plate spells that word हंति elsewhere (158.26). Recorded as printed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads घ्नंति, "they destroy", the plural that जीवादयः needs. The plate ruling of 2026-09-23 found the press sets घ्न where this note saw a bare anusvāra over a blank, so neither हंति nor हन्ति stands.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शशभृन्मालं"; alternatives "शशभृज्ञालं", "शशभृन्मात्रं" — the ligature after भृ is read न्म but could be ज्ञ at this impression; the line runs on to plate 160, which carries its last printed line and the number ॥९१॥
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥९१॥" — the opening double danda prints with the first stroke short and thin (as ।।); recorded as printed
9.92a reading here is contested

योगं भूमिसुतो रविर्न हननीत्यन्ये निहन्युस्तथा कौलीरे बुधभार्गवौ च शुभदावारोऽङ्गिरास्तौ शुभौ । योगो नैव शुभः सुरेज्यसितयोर्घ्नन्त्येव सौम्यादयः एवं सिंहभुवः कुजेज्यशशिनः पापाः शुभो भार्गवः ॥९२॥

yogaṃ bhūmisuto ravirna hananītyanye nihanyustathā kaulīre budhabhārgavau ca śubhadāvāro'ṅgirāstau śubhau | yogo naiva śubhaḥ surejyasitayorghnantyeva saumyādayaḥ evaṃ siṃhabhuvaḥ kujejyaśaśinaḥ pāpāḥ śubho bhārgavaḥ ||92||

Mars and the Sun make the yoga and are not killers, say some; others say they do kill. For Karkaṭaka, Mercury and Venus are givers of good, and Mars and Jupiter (Aṅgiras), those two, are benefics ⟨our mula now reads āro 'ṅgirās, Āra (Mars) and Aṅgiras (Jupiter), which the metre needs.⟩. The yoga of Jupiter and Venus is not at all auspicious; the benefics and the rest do indeed kill. So for one born in Siṃha, Mars, Jupiter and the Moon are malefics, and Venus is a benefic.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ऽक्रूरास्तौ"; alternatives "ऽक्रुरास्तौ" — the subscript under क् is read as ra + a long u, but a short u cannot be excluded at this impression; the metre (Sardulavikridita) wants a LIGHT 15th syllable, i.e. 'kru-, so the printed long u makes the pada defective on that reading [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads शुभदावारोऽङ्गिरास्तौ; this sentence names ऽक्रूरास्तौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
9.93a reading here is contested

भृग्विन्दू भवतश्च योगफलदौ हन्ता सितो नेतरे एवं स्त्रीजनुषो गुरुस्त्विनकुजौ पापाः शनिज्ञौ शुभौ । चन्द्रः स्वेन तनूभवेन सहितो राजन्ययोगप्रदो भौमो हंति न जीवभानुयुगलं हन्ता तुलाजन्मनः ॥९३॥

bhṛgvindū bhavataśca yogaphaladau hantā sito netare evaṃ strījanuṣo gurustvinakujau pāpāḥ śanijñau śubhau | candraḥ svena tanūbhavena sahito rājanyayogaprado bhaumo haṃti na jīvabhānuyugalaṃ hantā tulājanmanaḥ ||93||

Venus and the Moon become givers of the yoga-fruit; Venus is the killer, the others are not. So for one born under a woman's sign (Kanyā), Jupiter, the Sun and Mars are malefics, while Saturn and Mercury are benefics. The Moon, joined with its own lord of the body, is the giver of the royal yoga. Mars does not kill; he is the killer of the pair of Jupiter and the Sun, for one born in Tulā.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तनूभवेन"; alternatives "तनुभवेन" — the subscript hook under नु is read long (u-u); the metre requires a heavy 6th syllable, which only तनू gives
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "हंति"; alternatives "हन्ति" — printed with anusvara, as at 158.26 and 159.32
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥९३॥" — the closing pair prints as a short stroke with a dot above it followed by a full danda; recorded normalised to ॥ but the ink is irregular

ज्ञो भौमश्च सितस्वगेऽशुभफलाश्चन्द्रस्तथैकः शुभः सूर्याचन्द्रमसौ विशेषफलदौ जीवो न हन्ता स्वयम् । सौम्याद्याः खलु मारका यदि भवेयुर्वृश्चिके जन्मनः शुक्रोऽप्येवमितोऽशुभः शुभकरौ भौमांशुमन्तौ परम् ॥९४॥

jño bhaumaśca sitasvage'śubhaphalāścandrastathaikaḥ śubhaḥ sūryācandramasau viśeṣaphaladau jīvo na hantā svayam | saumyādyāḥ khalu mārakā yadi bhaveyurvṛścike janmanaḥ śukro'pyevamito'śubhaḥ śubhakarau bhaumāṃśumantau param ||94||

Mercury, Mars and Venus in their own houses give inauspicious fruit; the Moon alone is auspicious. The Sun and the Moon are givers of special fruit; Jupiter is not himself a killer. Mercury and the rest are indeed the marakas, if the birth be in Vṛścika. Venus too from here is inauspicious; Mars and the Sun alone are makers of good.

9.95a reading here is contested

योगो भास्करसौम्ययोर्निधनकृद्ज्ञो नैव भृग्वादयः एवं चापभुवः कुजाङ्गिरसभासाः सौख्यदा भार्गवः । ज्ञश्चैतौ शुभदौ स्वयं न निधनं मन्दः करोत्यारतो मुख्या मृत्युफलाः सितस्तु मृगभूयोगंकरोऽस्य स्मृतः ।९५।

yogo bhāskarasaumyayornidhanakṛdjño naiva bhṛgvādayaḥ evaṃ cāpabhuvaḥ kujāṅgirasabhāsāḥ saukhyadā bhārgavaḥ | jñaścaitau śubhadau svayaṃ na nidhanaṃ mandaḥ karotyārato mukhyā mṛtyuphalāḥ sitastu mṛgabhūyogaṃkaro'sya smṛtaḥ |95|

The yoga of the Sun and Mercury causes death; Mercury does not, nor Venus and the rest. So, for one born in Cāpa (Dhanus), Mars, Jupiter and the Sun are givers of happiness; Venus, and Mercury — these two ⟨our mula now reads jñaś caitau, 'and Mercury, these two', which fills the syllable the quarter lacked.⟩ are givers of good; death does not come of itself; Saturn causes it, from Mars. The chief givers of death-fruit; but Venus is remembered as the maker of the yoga for one born in Mṛga (Makara). ⟨The verse-number is enclosed in SINGLE daṇḍas here, not the double daṇḍas used elsewhere in this run. Recorded as printed.⟩

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "ज्ञेज्यौ"; alternatives "सौम्येज्यौ" — AS PRINTED the pada is 18 syllables, and it matches positions 2-19 of Sardulavikridita exactly - i.e. one HEAVY syllable is missing at the head of the line. The remaining 18 scan without fault, so the omission is at the start; a three-syllable name of Mercury (e.g. सौम्ये-) would fill it. Not emended: recorded as the plate has it. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads ज्ञश्चैतौ; this sentence names ज्ञेज्यौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "।९५।" — the verse number is enclosed in SINGLE dandas here, not the double dandas used at 158.13, 159.7, 160.16 etc. Recorded as printed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "योगंकरो"; alternatives "योगकरो" — printed with an anusvara on गं; recorded as printed (the metre is indifferent, गं being heavy either way)
9.96a reading here is contested

जीवश्चन्द्रकुजा शुभेतरफलाः शुक्रः शुभो भूसुतो योगज्ञो न गुरुर्निहन्ति कुजसूर्मुख्यास्तु मारा घटे । मन्दः शुक्रकविः शुभौ कुजविधू पापौ महीजो गुरुः योगो ज्ञो न कुजो निहन्ति शनिमुख्या घ्नन्ति तल्लक्षणाः ॥ एवं मीनभुवः फलानि शुभपापात्मत्वनिर्दिष्टया खेटानां सहचर्यतः स्थिरवशादूह्यं फलं योगजम् । पुत्रान्दारपितृस्वलाभमुखतो दिव्यान् शुभान् खेचरा दद्युः स्वासु दशासु भुक्तिषु नृणां स्वस्यापि चान्यस्य च ॥९७॥

jīvaścandrakujā śubhetaraphalāḥ śukraḥ śubho bhūsuto yogajño na gururnihanti kujasūrmukhyāstu mārā ghaṭe | mandaḥ śukrakaviḥ śubhau kujavidhū pāpau mahījo guruḥ yogo jño na kujo nihanti śanimukhyā ghnanti tallakṣaṇāḥ || evaṃ mīnabhuvaḥ phalāni śubhapāpātmatvanirdiṣṭayā kheṭānāṃ sahacaryataḥ sthiravaśādūhyaṃ phalaṃ yogajam | putrāndārapitṛsvalābhamukhato divyān śubhān khecarā dadyuḥ svāsu daśāsu bhuktiṣu nṛṇāṃ svasyāpi cānyasya ca ||97||

Jupiter, the Moon and Mars give fruit other than auspicious; Venus is auspicious, and Mars is a maker of the yoga; Jupiter does not kill; Mars and the Sun are the chief marakas for Kumbha. Saturn, Venus and Mercury are benefics; Mars and the Moon are malefics; Mars and Jupiter [make the yoga]; Mercury makes the yoga, Mars does not kill, and Saturn and the rest do kill — such are their marks. ⟨THE VERSE NUMBER IS ABSENT here: the line closes with a double daṇḍa and no numeral, although the English rendering that follows is headed 'Sloka-96.' Recorded as printed, not supplied.⟩ So for one born in Mīna ⟨our mula now reads mīnabhuvaḥ, the chapter's own formula, and the quarter scans.⟩ the fruits are to be inferred by the indication of benefic or malefic nature, from the companionship of the planets and by fixity — the fruit born of the yoga. The planets, in their own daśās and bhuktis, give men sons, wife, father, own wealth, gain and the rest, divine and auspicious — for themselves and for another. ⟨This record runs well past its section's median length and the numbering skips before it, so it probably holds MORE THAN ONE verse whose separating mark was not seen. That is our defect, not the source's: these plates should be re-read before the boundaries of this verse are relied on.⟩

9 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "कुजसूर्मुख्यास्तु"; alternatives "कुजसौर्मुख्यास्तु", "कुजसंमुख्यास्तु" — the syllable between कुज and मुख्या is a स with a subscript u-sign; a repha (in its loop form) stands over मु. The metre wants ONE heavy syllable there, which sur/saur gives; the exact vowel is not certain at this impression.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मारा"; alternatives "मांरा" — a small solid WEDGE stands above the headline between मा and रा. It is not this fount's anusvara (a round ball) and no diacritic belongs there; the same wedge recurs at 158.10. Read as a defect of the sort and not transcribed.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "गुरुः"; alternatives "गुहः" — the second letter could be रु or ह at this impression; गुरुः (Jupiter) is what Sastri's facing rendering requires ('The association of Jupiter and Mars will cause Rajayoga')
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥" — THE VERSE NUMBER IS ABSENT. The line closes with a double danda and no numeral, although the English rendering that follows is headed 'Sloka-96.' Recorded as printed - not supplied.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मीनभः"; alternatives "मीनभवः", "मीनभुवः" — AS PRINTED the pada is 18 syllables and fails Sardulavikridita at position 5, which must be light; a four-syllable मीनभवः / मीनभुवः would scan without fault. The visarga after भ is unmistakable at 5.5x, so the plate really does read मीनभः. Not emended. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads मीनभुवः; this sentence names मीनभः, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "शादूहं" — a small comma-like mark is printed below दू, exactly at the sandhi juncture (śāt + ūham). The same mark stands under द at 158.24 and 158.25, in both cases at a sandhi juncture. Read as an editorial mark, not a virama, and not transcribed. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads स्थिरवशादूह्यं; this sentence names शादूहं, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पितृस्वलाभ"; alternatives "पितृखलाभ" — the letter after पितृ is स्व (compare स्वायुजः 158.11), not ख; only स्व makes तृ heavy, which the metre requires, and only sva-labha matches Sastri's 'father, gain'
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 97 within its section; it is published at position 96.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: This record runs well past its section's median length and the numbering skips before it, so it probably holds MORE THAN ONE verse whose separating mark was not seen. OUR defect, not the source's — re-read this verse's plates before relying on its boundaries.
9.97a reading here is contested

शास्त्रं सम्यगधीत्य चापि सुधियो बुध्वा वदन्त्युत्तमाः को जानाति न चैव कोऽपि यदि चेज्जानाति चैकः स्वयम् । योगेष्वेव खरादयश्च शुनकाद्याश्चापि जायन्त इत्यावेदेति परं त्वदृष्टनिहता योगा दशास्वेव ते ॥ ९८ ॥

śāstraṃ samyagadhītya cāpi sudhiyo budhvā vadantyuttamāḥ ko jānāti na caiva ko'pi yadi cejjānāti caikaḥ svayam | yogeṣveva kharādayaśca śunakādyāścāpi jāyanta ityāvedeti paraṃ tvadṛṣṭanihatā yogā daśāsveva te || 98 ||

The best of the wise, having studied the śāstra properly and understood it, speak. Who understands? ⟨our mula now reads jānāti, 'knows'.⟩ No one at all does ⟨our mula now carries caiva after na, which fills the two syllables the quarter lacked.⟩; and if anyone knows, he knows it by himself alone. In the yogas themselves are born asses and the like, and dogs and the like as well — thus it is declared. But beyond that, the yogas, struck down by the unseen, [act] only in the daśās.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चानाति"; alternatives "जानाति" — first letter read च; ज cannot be excluded, and Sastri's rendering ('who has understood') wants jānāti [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads जानाति; this sentence names चानाति, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "पाद length" — AS PRINTED this pada is 17 syllables where Sardulavikridita needs 19. Syllables 1-7 and 12-19 scan without fault; the two missing syllables fall around यदि (positions 8-11 should be - u u u). Not emended.
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 98 within its section; it is published at position 97.

पापानां यदि चेन्महोच्चगतयः किं मारकानां यथा लग्नस्थो यदि मन्द इत्थसिघटीचापेषु लक्ष्मीप्रदः । केन्द्रे नो यदि सप्तमे गुरुयुते ज्ञेनान्विते वेक्षिते राजासौ यदि सप्तमेश्वरदशाभुक्तौ मृतिं निर्दिशेत् ॥ ९९ ॥

pāpānāṃ yadi cenmahoccagatayaḥ kiṃ mārakānāṃ yathā lagnastho yadi manda itthasighaṭīcāpeṣu lakṣmīpradaḥ | kendre no yadi saptame guruyute jñenānvite vekṣite rājāsau yadi saptameśvaradaśābhuktau mṛtiṃ nirdiśet || 99 ||

If the malefics reach their deepest exaltations, what then of the marakas? If Saturn stands in the lagna in Kumbha, Vṛṣabha or Dhanus, he is a giver of wealth. In a kendra — if not, and if Saturn be in the seventh joined with Jupiter, or joined with or aspected by Mercury, that man is a king; and if [otherwise], one should declare death in the daśā and bhukti of the lord of the seventh.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 99 within its section; it is published at position 98.
9.99a reading here is contested

लग्नात्सप्तमगे गुरौ भृगुसुते तत्सप्तमे स्यान्मृतिः आयुर्नाथवशाष्टमे यदि युते पापाढ्यये त्रिंशकः । भाग्येशाद्यदि चाष्टमे रविसुते चौजांशयुक्ते च्युतिः भाग्यस्येति वदेच्च केरलमतं वाहाद्ऋते वाहनम् ॥ १०० ॥

lagnātsaptamage gurau bhṛgusute tatsaptame syānmṛtiḥ āyurnāthavaśāṣṭame yadi yute pāpāḍhyaye triṃśakaḥ | bhāgyeśādyadi cāṣṭame ravisute caujāṃśayukte cyutiḥ bhāgyasyeti vadecca keralamataṃ vāhādṛte vāhanam || 100 ||

If Jupiter be in the seventh from the lagna and Venus in the seventh from him, there will be death. If the eighth be occupied by the lord of longevity ⟨āyurnātha: the mark over nā is the repha in its loop form; only āyurnātha scans, āyunātha leaving the second syllable light where śārdūlavikrīḍita needs it heavy⟩, joined and burdened with malefics, then a thirty-year span. And if Saturn be in the eighth from the lord of the 9th and joined with an odd navāṃśa, there is a fall of fortune — so one should declare, and this is the Kerala doctrine: a vehicle without a vehicle. ⟨A small comma-like mark is printed below the da at the sandhi juncture vāhāt + ṛte, as it is at three other sandhi junctures in this run; read as an editorial mark and not transcribed.⟩

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आयुर्नाथ"; alternatives "आयुनाथ" — the mark over ना is the repha in its loop form (as at 159.4 सूर्य and 159.18 अर्क); only आयुर्नाथ scans, आयुनाथ leaving the 2nd syllable light where Sardulavikridita needs it heavy
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वाहाद्ऋते" — the same small comma-like mark is printed below द here, again at a sandhi juncture (vahat + rte), as at 158.24, 158.25, 162.15
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 100 within its section; it is published at position 99.
9.100a reading here is contested

चन्द्रे शुक्रसमन्विते तदधिपे केन्द्रत्रिकोणेऽथवा वाहानामभिवृद्धिमादिशति सुस्थैर्यान्वितां श्रीमतः । भ्रातुश्चाष्टमनायके त्रिषडगायादिस्थिते तच्च्युतिं रन्ध्रे नीचयुतेऽष्टमं नसहितं जीवेन चेद्द्राङ्मृतिः ॥१०१॥

candre śukrasamanvite tadadhipe kendratrikoṇe'thavā vāhānāmabhivṛddhimādiśati susthairyānvitāṃ śrīmataḥ | bhrātuścāṣṭamanāyake triṣaḍagāyādisthite taccyutiṃ randhre nīcayute'ṣṭamaṃ nasahitaṃ jīvena ceddrāṅmṛtiḥ ||101||

If the Moon be joined with Venus, and their lord in a kendra or a trine, it indicates an increase of vehicles for a wealthy man, attended with firm stability. If the lord of the eighth from the brother [the 3rd] be placed in the 3rd, 6th, 11th and the rest, that means their loss. If the eighth be joined with a debilitated planet, and be joined with Jupiter, death comes at once.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "त्रिषडगायादिस्थिते"; alternatives "त्रिषडगयादिस्थिते" — printed as one word without a visible break; the metre confirms the syllable count
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मृतिः" — a stray dot stands after the visarga, before the space preceding the verse number
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 101 within its section; it is published at position 100.
9.101a reading here is contested

चन्द्रेणापि निरीक्षितेऽचिरमृतिर्भाग्यादथाष्टेश्वरे शुक्रे राहुयुते च केतुमुखतो भाग्यव्ययं निर्दिशेत् । शुक्रे षष्ठमथाष्टमं च गतवत्युल्कादिना संयुते आयुर्हैन्यमुतादिशंत चरराट् स्वस्मिन् स्थिते द्वन्द्वतः ॥१०२॥

candreṇāpi nirīkṣite'ciramṛtirbhāgyādathāṣṭeśvare śukre rāhuyute ca ketumukhato bhāgyavyayaṃ nirdiśet | śukre ṣaṣṭhamathāṣṭamaṃ ca gatavatyulkādinā saṃyute āyurhainyamutādiśaṃta cararāṭ svasmin sthite dvandvataḥ ||102||

If it is also aspected by the Moon, death comes soon. If the lord of the eighth from the 9th, Venus, be joined with Rāhu, then from Ketu onward one should declare loss of fortune and expenditure. If Venus have gone to the sixth or the eighth and be joined with a meteor and the like ⟨our mula now reads ulkādinā, 'with a meteor and the like', with the long ā the metre needs.⟩, one should declare a diminution of longevity; and the moving lord, when standing in its own, from the pair.

5 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "उल्क दिना"; alternatives "उल्कादिना" — AS PRINTED there is a word space after क and no aa-matra, though the headline runs a short tail to the right of क where one would sit. The metre requires a heavy 14th syllable, i.e. ulkaa-dinaa (and Sastri's rendering has 'with Ulka and other comets'), so the aa-matra has probably failed to print. Recorded as printed. [2026-09-20: the mūla now reads ∅ for दिना, corrected in the mūla verification of 2026-09-20 (see the revisions row of that pass on this verse); this note describes the earlier text.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "षष्ठमथाष्टमं" — a dot stands above थां; read as a stray, the metre wanting no anusvara there
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "मुतादिशंत"; alternatives "मुतादिशेत्" — a small raised comma-like mark stands between मुता and दि; not transcribed. The printed दिशंत scans (position 8 heavy, 9 light) where दिशेत् would not, so the plate's reading is metrically sound.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "आयुर्हैन्य"; alternatives "आयुर्हीन्य" — the vowel of the second syllable read ai; the mark stack over ह is crowded by the repha
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 102 within its section; it is published at position 101.
9.102a reading here is contested

द्वन्द्वेशे स्थिरयुग्मनागमगमस्थैर्योभयादौ क्रमात् दीर्घं मध्यममल्पमित्युपदिशेदायुर्नराणां सुधीः । एवं चास्थिरयुग्मकस्थिरगृहं ज्ञेयं तयोर्यातियोः शुक्रक्षेत्रकुजेऽथवा कुजगृहे शुक्रे च जारिष्णुत ॥१०३॥

dvandveśe sthirayugmanāgamagamasthairyobhayādau kramāt dīrghaṃ madhyamamalpamityupadiśedāyurnarāṇāṃ sudhīḥ | evaṃ cāsthirayugmakasthiragṛhaṃ jñeyaṃ tayoryātiyoḥ śukrakṣetrakuje'thavā kujagṛhe śukre ca jāriṣṇuta ||103||

When the lord of the pair-sign is in a fixed, a dual, or a movable sign, and in the fixed and the twofold and so on, respectively, the wise man should declare men's longevity to be long, middling, and short. So too in the case of a movable, a dual, and a fixed house, this is to be known for those two ⟨tayoryātiyoḥ: the i-mātrā on ti is clear at 1.75x but the sequence is unusual; both readings scan⟩. And when Mars is in Venus's field, or Venus is in Mars's house, there is [a state of] going to lovers ⟨jāriṣṇuta as printed; the quarter-final syllable is anceps, so metre does not decide the ending⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "तयोर्यातियोः"; alternatives "तयोर्यातयोः" — the i-matra on ति is clear at 1.75x but the sequence is unusual; both readings scan
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "जारिष्णुत"; alternatives "जारिष्णुता" — recorded as printed; the pada-final syllable is anceps so the metre does not decide
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 103 within its section; it is published at position 102.
9.103a reading here is contested

भानोर्भूसुतमन्दयोर्द्वितिथियुक्स्युर्द्वादशीसप्तमी चित्तादन्यगतेषु भेषु च पुरीत्रागेषु चान्योद्भवः ॥१०४॥

bhānorbhūsutamandayordvitithiyuksyurdvādaśīsaptamī cittādanyagateṣu bheṣu ca purītrāgeṣu cānyodbhavaḥ ||104||

From the Sun, of Mars and Saturn ⟨our mula now reads yuk syur, 'they would be joined'.⟩, joined with two tithis, the twelfth and the seventh. And in the asterisms gone elsewhere than the citta, and in the ⟨purītrāgeṣu⟩, one is born of another. ⟨our mula now reads dvādaśīsaptamī without the surplus ma, so the first line scans at nineteen syllables; two lines of this verse are still missing.⟩

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "युक्म्युर्द्वादशीमसप्तमी"; alternatives "युक्स्युर्द्वादशीमसप्तमी" — the cluster after युक् is read म्यु but स्यु cannot be excluded; a repha (loop form) stands over the following syllable. Syllables 1-12 of the pada scan as flawless Sardulavikridita; as I read the remainder the line runs to 20 syllables, one over. Given that the edition states two lines of this very verse are lost, a defective text here is expected. Not emended. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भानोर्भूसुतमन्दयोर्द्वितिथियुक्स्युर्द्वादशीसप्तमी; this sentence names युक्म्युर्द्वादशीमसप्तमी, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "॥१०४॥" — a small dot follows the closing double danda
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 104 within its section; it is published at position 103.
9.104a reading here is contested

सिताच्चतुर्थाष्टमगैश्च पापैः पापान्तरे सप्तमनाथशुक्रे । अदृष्टियुक्ते शुभखेचरैर्वा वधूवरौ वह्निनिपातयोगजौ ॥१०५॥

sitāccaturthāṣṭamagaiśca pāpaiḥ pāpāntare saptamanāthaśukre | adṛṣṭiyukte śubhakhecarairvā vadhūvarau vahninipātayogajau ||105||

When malefics stand in the fourth and eighth from Venus, in the interval between malefics, and the lord of the seventh together with Venus is unaspected, or is with benefic planets — the bride and the bridegroom are born of a yoga of fire and of falling ⟨our mula now reads vadhūvarau, 'the bride and the bridegroom'.⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "चतुर्थाष्टमगैश्च" — a stray dot stands above र्थां in addition to the repha; the metre wants no anusvara there
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Reader's uncertainty: read "वभूवरौ"; alternatives "बभूवरौ", "बभूवतुः" — व and ब are near-identical in this fount; recorded as व [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads वधूवरौ; this sentence names वभूवरौ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-20 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • About this edition: The printing numbers this verse 105 within its section; it is published at position 104.

Use it freely — CC BY 4.0. This Sanskrit transcription and this English translation are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Copy them, print them, build on them; the only condition is attribution to Karma Sakha (karmasakha.com). The underlying work is ancient and in the public domain everywhere.

If you find an error, it is ours and we want it. Every reading on this page is recorded with the evidence behind it, so a disagreement can be argued about concretely rather than asserted.

Readings on this site cite texts at chapter level, with verse numbers only where our research verified the passage in a named edition. How conflicts between texts are resolved is documented on the conventions page.