Skip to content
Karma Sakha
Sign in

The Texts · Further Classical Jātaka / Muhūrta / Praśna

Vivāhapaṭala

विवाहपटल

Varāhamihira · 6th century CE · muhurta

What this text is

Varāhamihira on the election of a time for marriage — 91 verses, with no chapter division.

The month, the nakṣatra, the lagna and the planetary conditions for a wedding, and the faults that void them.

Its role in this app

The classical seat for /matching and for marriage muhūrta, which the app treats as separate questions and which this text treats together.

Editions our research holds

  • gretil

    GRETIL romanised; transliterated to Devanāgarī on ingest.

    copyright status unclear — treated as in-copyright · scan quality: good

What our reading found

Findings from this project's own verification passes — recorded because a source's defects are part of citing it honestly.

The work has NO chapter division and its verse ids are single-level, so it is held as one chapter. One verse id carries two stanzas.

The text itself

The Vivāhapaṭala is here in full. On 2026-09-23 the mūla verification of 2026-09 ruled every one of the 91 verses. 19 corrections were written — 17 on the lexicon, 2 on the metre — 72 verses were cleared, 14 variant readings went on the adjudication ledger, and 6 corrections are HELD for a plate pass (1.9, 1.10, 1.26, 1.33, 1.82, 1.90), each on a verse that is otherwise clear. One verse moved its English and its Hindi without moving a letter of its Sanskrit: at 1.64 the vivaraṇa glosses परः as अनन्तरं, and that settles an ambiguity our rendering had taken the other way. THE LENGTH STANDS AND IS NOT RE-ARGUED. expectedVerses is 92, on the basis already recorded, "editor-preface": the edition's own प्राक्कथन gives the mūla ślokas as 92 — विभिन्न छन्दका मूल श्लोक ९२ छन् — read by eye at 400 dpi on 2026-09-08. We hold 91 records, and the one that looks missing is not a verse. Record 14 carries two metrically distinct stanzas under a single number, verified on the plate the same day, and the colophon at printed p.73 closes the mūla at ॥९१॥. This pass placed all 91 of our records in the store's read of that edition, every one on an exact anchor and none unplaced. ⚠ AND HERE IS THE THING A READER WOULD OTHERWISE GET WRONG ABOUT THIS BOOK'S EVIDENCE. There is NO independent printing of this work here. Our Sanskrit is GRETIL's e-text, and that e-text names its own base on its header line: Devīprasāda Śarmā Lāṃsāla's edition of the Vivāhapaṭalam with Bhaṭṭotpala's vivaraṇa, Rāṣṭriya Abhilekhālaya, Kathmandu, saṃvat 2035. The single store vp-lamsala is a machine read of that same edition's plates, made on 2026-09-13. It was filed as a witness until 2026-09-22 and is now filed as the EXEMPLAR. So where it agrees with us, that is the keying holding up and not a second press: agreement here is identity, not corroboration. Its 82 disagreements are two machine transcriptions of one leaf falling out, and an instrument decides which of them is wrong, never a vote. That is why all 19 corrections rest on something internal to our own text — a form that is no Sanskrit word, a syllable count, a codepoint — and why the 6 held ones are held: they rest on what a machine read gives, and only the page can settle them. The independent evidence this book does have lies elsewhere: Bhaṭṭotpala's vivaraṇa, whose lemma shows what his own copy carried; the edition's apparatus, 25 [u. …] readings on 21 verses; its शुद्धिपत्रम् of 30 corrigenda, read by eye on 2026-09-08; and two verses transmitted elsewhere in this corpus, 1.83 = Bṛhat Saṃhitā 102.13 and 1.27 ≈ Vṛddha-Vasiṣṭha-saṃhitā 32.42. 91 of this text's 91 verses carry an English translation; 1 of 1 chapters are begun or finished (1). This is the whole work: 91 verses, plus 1 unit(s) individually declared absent with the reason on the record, against the 92 it is known to have. The Sanskrit is tier 'etext': one encoded source, machine-parsed, with 1 of 1 chapter(s) carrying a visual-validation record (0 audited) and 1 chapter(s) carrying an adjudication ledger. The app may say "our source reads…", naming the source; it may not say "the text reads…".

Verses are missing inside this text. Read the arithmetic carefully, because the shortfall is not what it looks like. Our 91 records reproduce the printing's own numbering, which runs 1..91 and closes ॥९१॥; the editor's own count of the mūla is 92 ślokas, and the extra one is inside our record 14, which carries two metrically distinct stanzas under a single number. So no whole verse of this printing is absent from our files. What IS missing is smaller and is declared: verse 55 reaches us as three quarters of an āryā — the printing sets two half-lines closing ॥५५॥ and then an orphan half closing ॥५५½॥, and prints no fourth quarter, so the verb governing 'having considered' survives only in Bhaṭṭotpala's gloss. And a passage that the Pīyūṣadhārā commentary on the Muhūrta Cintāmaṇi ascribes BY NAME to the Vārāhīya Vivāhapaṭala — per-graha vedha results for marriage — is nowhere in these 91 verses: वेध, वन्ध्या, लत्ता, नाडी, भकूट, मण्डप and वधूप्रवेश all return zero hits across the whole mūla. That is one recension being shorter than another recension a medieval commentator could read, not a hole in our copy of this one. ⚠ A CITATION TRAP COMES WITH THAT ARGUMENT AND ANYONE USING IT MUST CARRY IT: "the Vivāhapaṭala" in a secondary source does not mean this work. The same Pīyūṣadhārā commentary names a Vivāhapaṭala 16 times and qualifies the name differently almost every way it can — re-derived here by taking the immediate left context of every occurrence: वाराहीयविवाहपटले once (line 2272, ours), शार्ङ्गीयविवाहपटले four times, सप्तर्षिमतविवाहपटल once, and eight with no qualifier at all. So the gap declared above rests on the ONE occurrence that names Varāhamihira, and any future claim seated on "the Vivāhapaṭala" out of a secondary source must say which one it means before it is believed.

91 verses in the original Sanskrit with our own English translation, which is made from that Sanskrit and not adapted from any existing translation. Machine-parsed from GRETIL e-text (sa_varAhamihira-vivAhapaTala.txt), romanised IAST, transliterated to Devanagari by scripts/corpus/ingest-etext.mjs on 2026-09-01. Segmentation rule: Header stripped at the `# Text` sentinel (located, never offset-hardcoded). NO CHAPTER DIVISION EXISTS IN THE SOURCE — no `chap.` line anywhere, and the reference tags are single-level `VP_N`, not `VP_c.v`. All 91 verses are stored under ONE chapter, numbered 1 and (since 2026-09-08) titled विवाहपटलम् after the printing's own title page and running head; that container is this ingest's, not the work's, and is recorded as such here and in the profile's header. VERSE = the text from the end of the previous tag to the start of the next, TRUNCATED at the tag `VP_N`, joined with single spaces. THE DAṆḌA IS NOT A BOUNDARY AND IS ACTIVELY MISLEADING HERE: in 31 of the 91 blocks — VP_55, 56–68, 70, 71, 72 and 75–88 — the stanza-final `//` sits at the end of the FIRST line and a single `/` closes the block, the reverse of the other 60. (A wider test, `has a // anywhere but at the end`, catches 35: those 31 plus VP_14, 38, 69 and 90. This sentence read `34 of 91 … the other 57` until 2026-09-08; that count matched nothing — not 31, not 35, and not the 32 its own ranges summed to — and it named 69 and 90, which end in ॥ and do not fit the description, while omitting 55, which does fit and is the one block that is genuinely defective.) Read semantically the content of each block is the correct stanza; only the punctuation is inverted. Keying on `//` would corrupt 31 verses without changing any count. THE INVERSION SURVIVES INTO THE MŪLA AS PRINTED — those 31 verses carry ॥ in the middle and । at the end — because straightening it would be an editor mending a printing, and this ingest reports what the source says. A reader seeing ॥ mid-verse in this text is seeing the source, not a parse defect. TWO NUMBERS COVER MORE THAN ONE STANZA — VP_14 (two complete stanzas) and VP_55 (three half-lines). They are stored as the edition numbers them, because renumbering an edition is an editorial act and this is a machine ingest of one exemplar. APPARATUS — the mūla holds what the source prints AS the text; what it prints ABOUT the text is lifted into the verse's note, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to: 25 bracketed variant readings `[u. …]` (Bhaṭṭotpala) and 1 `[sic.]`. KEPT IN THE MŪLA, with its marks removed and the site recorded: the file's single parenthesis, `bhagavat(t)vam`, which supplies a letter inside a word. ROMANISATION: `/` and `//` become । and ॥; `''` (elided ā) is left as the source writes it and renders ऽऽ. Transliteration by scripts/translate/iast.mjs `fromIAST` (99.77% exact round-trip over the 852 constituted verses); no verse produced an unknown character, and any byte left unclassified after the apparatus rules throws rather than entering the corpus. NO INDEPENDENT CHECK WAS AVAILABLE. Its three sibling files each declare every chapter's verse total inline (`//eNN`) and all 57 declarations agree with their parses; this file declares none, so 91 is asserted by this parse and by the unbroken 1..91 tag run alone. THE PRINTING BEHIND THE E-TEXT IS NOW NAMED, AND ITS PLATES ARE HELD. The exemplar is Devīprasāda Śarmā, surnamed Lāṃsāla, ed., विवाहपटलम् with Bhaṭṭotpala's vivaraṇa and the editor's Nepali Bhāvabodhinī ṭīkā, published by the Rāṣṭriya Abhilekhālaya, काष्ठमण्डपः (Kathmandu), saṃvat २०३५ — transcribed from its own title page, not inferred and not copied from the e-text header; the printing names no era, so VS 2035 ≈ 1978–79 CE is an inference. Its प्राक्कथन states that its exemplar is a manuscript registered as no. 2291 in the Rāṣṭriya Abhilekhālaya's fourth register, and that the mūla runs to 92 ślokas in various metres. Its plates are at .tmp/hunt-2026-09-08/vivaha-patala/lamsala-A.pdf (90 pp, NO text layer, printed page = PDF index − 11); nine of those pages were read on 2026-09-08 and the chapter file's visualValidation record says which. THAT IS STILL ONE EXEMPLAR: two OCR scans of one printing are one witness, and Bhaṭṭotpala's commentary is bound inside it, so the tier stays 'etext'. THE EDITION'S NUMBERING IS NOT UNIFORM and must not be used as a boundary: it numbers some āryās once as a whole and splits others across ॥N॥ and ॥N½॥, and it also closes commentary blocks with ॥N½॥. Two of our records are mis-bounded as a result — VP_51 fuses the printing's ॥५०½॥ and ॥५१॥, which stand under two separate प्रतीक headings with separate glosses, and VP_55 holds a complete āryā ॥५५॥ plus an orphan half ॥५५½॥ whose companion the printing does not set. Neither is renumbered here: renumbering an edition is an editorial act, and every citation into this text is stable at 1..91.

Not yet independently audited. Every reading here was established and recorded by the process described above, but no fresh reader has re-derived these verses from the plates without seeing our record. When that was done for the first text we published, it found real errors — so treat this one as a first edition and check anything you intend to rely on. The evidence behind every verse is committed and readable.

26 reading disagreements were adjudicated and are recorded verse by verse. Every akṣara was legible.

Adhyāya 1 · विवाहपटलम्

अज्ञातमध्यान्तसमुद्भवाय सर्वात्मने सर्वगताय तस्मै । प्रणम्य देवाय मनोभवाय खलीकृतं येन जगत् समग्रम् ॥

ajñātamadhyāntasamudbhavāya sarvātmane sarvagatāya tasmai | praṇamya devāya manobhavāya khalīkṛtaṃ yena jagat samagram ||

Having bowed to that god Manobhava ⟨Love, the mind-born⟩ — whose middle, end and arising are unknown, the Self of all, gone everywhere — by whom the entire world has been made abject ⟨I begin⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: praṇamya is a gerund left hanging: the main verb of the opening benediction does not arrive until v. 4 (maṅgalam ādadhātu). khalīkṛta is 'ill-used, humiliated, brought low' — kept at its weight rather than softened to 'conquered'.

प्रजापतिर् मन्मथ एव यस्मात् कामाद् विना न प्रभवः प्रजानाम् । महत्सु सूक्ष्मेषु च सो ऽस्ति देवः सर्वात्मकः सर्वगतश् च यस्मात् ॥

prajāpatir manmatha eva yasmāt kāmād vinā na prabhavaḥ prajānām | mahatsu sūkṣmeṣu ca so 'sti devaḥ sarvātmakaḥ sarvagataś ca yasmāt ||

Manmatha alone is Prajāpati, since without desire ⟨kāma⟩ there is no bringing forth of creatures; and since that god abides in things great and in things minute, he is the Self of all and all-pervading.

यस्मात् परन् नापरम् अस्ति किञ्चित् सौक्ष्म्यान् महत्वाच् च यतश् च नान्यत् । तेनेदम् एकेन मनोभवेन व्याप्तं जगच् छार्ङ्गभृतेव सर्वम् ॥

yasmāt paran nāparam asti kiñcit saukṣmyān mahatvāc ca yataś ca nānyat | tenedam ekena manobhavena vyāptaṃ jagac chārṅgabhṛteva sarvam ||

Since there is nothing else beyond him, and since by reason of ⟨his⟩ subtlety and ⟨his⟩ greatness there is nothing other ⟨than him⟩, therefore by that one Manobhava this whole world is pervaded, as ⟨it is⟩ by the bearer of the Śārṅga bow ⟨Viṣṇu⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text romanises this word `chāṛṅga-` (= śārṅga- after sandhi with jagat) and the transliteration turned the r into an independent vowel ऋ, giving छाऋङ्ग, which Devanāgarī cannot write. CORRECTED 2026-09-08 to छार्ङ्ग; see this verse's revisions[]. The sense was never in doubt and no reading changed.

अगम्यगामी भगवान् प्रजेशः श्रोणीसहस्राङ्कतनुश् च शक्रः । चतुर्मुखो येन कृतश् च शम्भु समन्मथो मङ्गलम् आदधातु ॥

agamyagāmī bhagavān prajeśaḥ śroṇīsahasrāṅkatanuś ca śakraḥ | caturmukho yena kṛtaś ca śambhu samanmatho maṅgalam ādadhātu ||

Lord Prajeśa ⟨Brahmā⟩ ⟨was made⟩ a goer to the ungoable, and Śakra ⟨Indra⟩ one whose body is stamped with a thousand yoni-marks, and Śambhu ⟨Śiva⟩ was made four-faced by him — may that Śambhu, together with Manmatha, confer auspiciousness.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: caturmukhaḥ … śambhuḥ are both nominative singular with a singular kṛtaḥ, so 'four-faced' qualifies Śambhu (not Brahmā): the reference is the Tilottamā episode, where Śiva grows faces on every side and Indra is marked all over. śroṇī here carries the bhaga (yoni) sense, continuing the Ahalyā curse and setting up the pun of v. 5.

भगवान् अपि शार्ङ्गरथाङ्गधरो भगवत्त्वम् अवाप यतः । बहवो ऽस्य भगा इति तेन कृतं भगवान् इति नाम जगत् प्रथितम् ॥

bhagavān api śārṅgarathāṅgadharo bhagavattvam avāpa yataḥ | bahavo 'sya bhagā iti tena kṛtaṃ bhagavān iti nāma jagat prathitam ||

Even the Blessed One, bearer of the Śārṅga bow and the discus, attained his blessedness from this: 'many are his bhagas'. Thereby was made the name 'Bhagavān', renowned throughout the world.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: Reading(s) the edition supplies in parentheses and this ingest keeps in the mūla: bhagavat(t)vam.
  • About this edition: bhaga is deliberately two-way here — 'fortune, majesty' and 'vulva' — and the Kāma-stuti of vv. 1–4 (śroṇī-sahasrāṅka) makes the erotic sense the operative one; the Devanāgarī keeps both, English cannot. The edition's parenthesis bhagavat(t)vam is kept in the mūla.

सीतावियोगेन बहूनि दुःखान्य् आप्तानि रामेण सलक्ष्मणेन । तानीह संस्मृत्य कलौ सहस्राण्य् अष्टौ तथाष्टौ च विवाहितानि ॥

sītāviyogena bahūni duḥkhāny āptāni rāmeṇa salakṣmaṇena | tānīha saṃsmṛtya kalau sahasrāṇy aṣṭau tathāṣṭau ca vivāhitāni ||

Through separation from Sītā many sorrows were suffered by Rāma along with Lakṣmaṇa. Remembering those here, in the Kali ⟨age⟩ eight thousand and eight ⟨more⟩ were wedded.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The agent is not named; the contrast with Rāma's single lost wife points to Kṛṣṇa. sahasrāṇy aṣṭau tathāṣṭau ca is read literally here as 8,000 + 8; it can also be taken as 'eight thousands and eight ⟨thousands⟩' = 16,000, the traditional count of Kṛṣṇa's wives. The number is left as the words give it rather than resolved to the legend.

दुर्भगास् तनयवर्जिताश् च या निःश्वसन्ति वनिताः पतिव्रता । ताः कुदैवविनिपातयन्त्रिता नान्यजन्मजनितैः सुदुष्कृतैः ॥

durbhagās tanayavarjitāś ca yā niḥśvasanti vanitāḥ pativratā | tāḥ kudaivavinipātayantritā nānyajanmajanitaiḥ suduṣkṛtaiḥ ||

Those husband-devoted women who sigh, ill-fortuned and bereft of sons — they are shackled by the ruin brought by an evil daiva, not by grievous misdeeds committed in another birth.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The verse denies the karma explanation outright and pins the misery on daiva; in a marriage-muhūrta text daiva is the wedding moment itself, which is the argument the whole chapter then makes (cf. v. 15).

सुरभिकुसुमगन्धैस् तर्पयित्वा द्विजेन्द्रान् शुभतिथिदिवसर्क्षे दैववित्संप्रदिष्टे । उभयकुलविशुद्धे ज्ञातशीले सुरूपे प्रथमवयसि दद्यात् कन्यकां यौवनस्थे ॥

surabhikusumagandhais tarpayitvā dvijendrān śubhatithidivasarkṣe daivavitsaṃpradiṣṭe | ubhayakulaviśuddhe jñātaśīle surūpe prathamavayasi dadyāt kanyakāṃ yauvanasthe ||

Having gratified the foremost of the twice-born with fragrant flowers and perfumes, on an auspicious tithi, weekday and nakṣatra prescribed by one who knows daiva ⟨the astrologer⟩, one should give the maiden ⟨to a man⟩ pure in both lines, of known character, handsome, in his first age, standing in youth.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The mūla's dvijedrān is a printing slip for dvijendrān. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads द्विजेन्द्रान्; this sentence names dvijedrān, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

पुण्ये दिवसे ऽथवा क्षणे वैवाह्येषु च भेषु कारयेत् । घटकारमृदा सुलक्षणाम् इन्द्राणीं कुशलेन शिल्पिना ॥

puṇye divase 'thavā kṣaṇe vaivāhyeṣu ca bheṣu kārayet | ghaṭakāramṛdā sulakṣaṇām indrāṇīṃ kuśalena śilpinā ||

On an auspicious day, or at an auspicious moment, and in the nakṣatras fit for marriage, one should have an Indrāṇī ⟨image⟩ of good marks made by a skilled craftsman out of potter's clay.

कुसुम्भरक्ताम्बरभूषणोज्ज्वलाः साध्व्यः सुरूपाः सुभगाः कुलोद्भवाः । नदीं नयेयुः सरसो ऽथवा तटं कन्याम् अलङ्कृत्य सहेन्द्र जायया ॥

kusumbharaktāmbarabhūṣaṇojjvalāḥ sādhvyaḥ surūpāḥ subhagāḥ kulodbhavāḥ | nadīṃ nayeyuḥ saraso 'thavā taṭaṃ kanyām alaṅkṛtya sahendra jāyayā ||

Women resplendent in ornaments and garments dyed red with safflower — virtuous, fair of form, fortunate, born of good family — should adorn the maiden and lead her, together with Indra's consort ⟨the image⟩, to a river, or to the bank of a lake.

सूर्पेणदिक्षु प्रमदा बलिं ता दत्वा सकालीयकगन्धदिग्धाम् । कुसुम्भरक्ताम्बरवेष्टिताङ्गीं शचीसकाशं प्रमदा नयेयुः ॥

sūrpeṇadikṣu pramadā baliṃ tā datvā sakālīyakagandhadigdhām | kusumbharaktāmbaraveṣṭitāṅgīṃ śacīsakāśaṃ pramadā nayeyuḥ ||

Those women, having offered bali in the directions with a winnowing-fan, should lead ⟨the maiden⟩ — her limbs smeared with kālīyaka perfume and wrapped in safflower-red cloth — into the presence of Śacī ⟨Indrāṇī⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: pramadā stands twice in the one verse, at the start and at the end, which is redundant even for this text; the second is kept as the subject of nayeyuḥ and the first taken with the offering.

दध्योदनेन हविषा मधुना च कन्या संपूज्य शक्रदयितां च सलोहहस्ता । तूष्णीं प्रणम्य शिरसा गृहम् एव यायाद् देवीं प्रगृह्य मुदिता नियतैश् च केशैः ॥

dadhyodanena haviṣā madhunā ca kanyā saṃpūjya śakradayitāṃ ca salohahastā | tūṣṇīṃ praṇamya śirasā gṛham eva yāyād devīṃ pragṛhya muditā niyataiś ca keśaiḥ ||

The maiden, iron in her hand, having worshipped Śakra's beloved ⟨Indrāṇī⟩ with curd-rice, with oblation and with honey, bowing silently with her head, should take up the goddess and go to the house itself, glad, her hair bound.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. salohahastā]/.
  • About this edition: The mūla reads salohastā; Bhaṭṭotpala reads salohahastā ('iron in the hand'), which is what the sense requires and what is translated. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सलोहहस्ता; this sentence names salohastā, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

गृहे स्थितां तां पुरुहूतपत्नीं प्राङ्मध्यास्तमयेषु कन्या । स्रग्गन्धधूपैः प्रतिपूजयेच् च पाणीग्रहं यावद् उपागतेति ॥

gṛhe sthitāṃ tāṃ puruhūtapatnīṃ prāṅmadhyāstamayeṣu kanyā | sraggandhadhūpaiḥ pratipūjayec ca pāṇīgrahaṃ yāvad upāgateti ||

The maiden should worship with garlands, perfumes and incense that consort of Puruhūta ⟨Indrāṇī⟩ established in the house, at forenoon, midday and sunset, until she has come to the taking of the hand ⟨the wedding⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. sthitāṃ] · [u. pratipūjayec].
  • About this edition: The mūla's stitāṃ and pratipūjaṇec are printing slips; Bhaṭṭotpala reads sthitāṃ and pratipūjayec, which is what is translated. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads प्रतिपूजयेच् and स्थितां; this sentence names pratipūjaṇec and stitāṃ, the forms our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected them, and they are kept as history.]

रत्नानीन्दुकरः स्रजः शुभगता हर्म्योत्पलान्य् आसवः तांबूलं प्रवराम्बराणि रुचिरं गीतं विभूत्यश् चया । यस्मान् न स्त्रियम् अन्तरेण हि नृणां सर्वाण्य् अभिप्रीतये तस्माद् वच्मि तदाप्तियोग्यसमयो धर्मार्थकामाय च ॥ उक्तं जन्मनि यत् तद् एव भविता यद्य् अङ्गनानां फलम् । व्यर्थो न त्वयम् आदरं परिणये तत्काललग्नादिगः ॥

ratnānīndukaraḥ srajaḥ śubhagatā harmyotpalāny āsavaḥ tāṃbūlaṃ pravarāmbarāṇi ruciraṃ gītaṃ vibhūtyaś cayā | yasmān na striyam antareṇa hi nṛṇāṃ sarvāṇy abhiprītaye tasmād vacmi tadāptiyogyasamayo dharmārthakāmāya ca || uktaṃ janmani yat tad eva bhavitā yady aṅganānāṃ phalam | vyartho na tvayam ādaraṃ pariṇaye tatkālalagnādigaḥ ||

Jewels, the moon's rays, garlands, an auspicious gait, mansions, lotuses, wine, betel, the finest garments, lovely song, and whatever splendours there are — since for men none of these is a delight apart from a woman, therefore I declare the time fit for winning her, and for dharma, artha and kāma too. ⟨If it be said⟩ that the fruit of women will be only that which was declared at birth — still this regard for the lagna and the rest of that ⟨wedding⟩ moment is not in vain at the marriage.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: This record holds two metrically distinct units run together by the e-text (a śārdūlavikrīḍita and a following couplet), and both are rendered. śubhagatā in the list is doubtful — 'auspicious gait/bearing' is the reading taken; the word may be corrupt. ādaraṃ stands accusative where the syntax wants nominative ādaraḥ, and is so construed.

अज्ञातं प्रथमं प्रधानम् अपरं तद्व्यञ्जकं योषिताम् । उद्वाहे नियति नयत्य् अतिबलाद् वेलासमायुक् फलैः ॥

ajñātaṃ prathamaṃ pradhānam aparaṃ tadvyañjakaṃ yoṣitām | udvāhe niyati nayaty atibalād velāsamāyuk phalaiḥ ||

The first ⟨the nativity⟩ is unknown, though it is the primary thing; the other ⟨the wedding moment⟩ is what makes it manifest, in the case of women. At the marriage, the ⟨configuration⟩ conjoined with the hour leads ⟨her⟩, by its overwhelming strength, to a fixed destiny along with its fruits.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: niyati stands without its case-ending in the e-text; it is construed as the object of nayati (niyatiṃ). The verse states the chapter's premise: a woman's birth data being commonly unrecorded, the wedding moment is what discloses her nativity's fruit.

वात्स्यो वर्षम् अनोजम् इच्छति तथा एभ्यो जनश् चोत्तरं स्त्रीणां मानम् ऋतुं विहाय मुनयो माण्डव्यशिष्या जगुः । चैत्रं प्रोज्झ्य पराशरो कथयते दुर्भाग्यदं योषितां आषाढादिचतुष्टयेन शुभदं कैश् चित् प्रदिष्टं द्विजैः ॥

vātsyo varṣam anojam icchati tathā ebhyo janaś cottaraṃ strīṇāṃ mānam ṛtuṃ vihāya munayo māṇḍavyaśiṣyā jaguḥ | caitraṃ projjhya parāśaro kathayate durbhāgyadaṃ yoṣitāṃ āṣāḍhādicatuṣṭayena śubhadaṃ kaiś cit pradiṣṭaṃ dvijaiḥ ||

Vātsya wants a not-odd — an even — year ⟨for the bride⟩; and folk ⟨want⟩ the one after these. The sages who are Māṇḍavya's pupils declared the reckoning for women leaving the ṛtu aside. Parāśara, setting Caitra apart as giving ill fortune to women, declares ⟨the rest⟩; and by some twice-born the four ⟨months⟩ beginning with Āṣāḍha are prescribed as bestowing auspiciousness.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. nāmam].
  • About this edition: anoja = an-oja, 'not-odd', i.e. an even year of the bride's age. ṛtu here is the year of first menses. The clause tathaibhyo janaś cottaraṃ is elliptical — 'and folk ⟨want⟩ later than these' — and is rendered as it stands. Bhaṭṭotpala reads nāmam where the mūla has mānam; mānam ('reckoning, measure') is what is translated. parāśāro is a printing slip for parāśaraḥ. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads पराशरो; this sentence names parāśāro, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

श्रेष्ठं पक्षम् उषन्ति शुक्लम् असितस्याद्यं त्रिभागं तथा । रिक्तां प्रोज्झ्य तिथिं तथा त्वयनयोः सन्धिं च शेषाः शुभाः ॥

śreṣṭhaṃ pakṣam uṣanti śuklam asitasyādyaṃ tribhāgaṃ tathā | riktāṃ projjhya tithiṃ tathā tvayanayoḥ sandhiṃ ca śeṣāḥ śubhāḥ ||

They hold the bright ⟨śukla⟩ pakṣa to be best, and likewise the first third of the dark. Leaving aside the riktā tithi, and also the junction of the two ayanas, the rest are auspicious.

आग्नेयग्रहवासरेषु कलहः प्रीतिस् तु सत्सूत्तमान् । कैश्चित् स्थैर्यम् उषन्ति सौरदिवसे चान्द्रे ससापत्निकम् ॥

āgneyagrahavāsareṣu kalahaḥ prītis tu satsūttamān | kaiścit sthairyam uṣanti sauradivase cāndre sasāpatnikam ||

On the weekdays of the fiery grahas ⟨the Sun and Mars⟩, quarrel; but among the benefics ⟨their days give⟩ affection at its best. Some hold that on Saturn's day ⟨there is⟩ stability, and on the Moon's, a co-wife.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. satsūttamā]/.
  • About this edition: The mūla's satsūttamān (accusative plural) does not construe; Bhaṭṭotpala's satsūttamā (= satsu uttamā, nominative feminine agreeing with prītiḥ) does, and is what is translated. saura is taken as Saturn per the glossary, the Sun's day being already covered by āgneya. TWO WORDS OF THIS MŪLA WERE REPAIRED ON 2026-09-08 AND THE OLD FORM OF THIS NOTE IS WHY THEY HAD TO BE. It used to end 'samāpatnikam is read as sāpatnikam, the form the text itself uses at v.27' — a correct reading that was never carried into the text. The printing reads ससापत्निकम् at this line; समापत्निकम् was a keying misreading of सा as मा in the GRETIL e-text, and the mūla now reads what the plate reads. And स्थर्यम् was the printing's own misprint for स्थैर्यम्: the edition's शुद्धिपत्रम् (printed p.75) lists it at page १८ line १८ and corrects it, which is the single corrigendum of that sheet's thirty that touches our 91 verses. Neither repair moves the English or the Hindi, both of which already followed the corrected readings.

मृगशिरसि मघायां हस्तमित्रोत्तरासु स्वसननिर्ऋतिपूषाधातृदेवेषु चोढा । बहुसुतसुख दासीवित्तसौभाग्ययुक्ता जनयति परितोषं कन्यका बान्धवानाम् ॥

mṛgaśirasi maghāyāṃ hastamitrottarāsu svasananirṛtipūṣādhātṛdeveṣu coḍhā | bahusutasukha dāsīvittasaubhāgyayuktā janayati paritoṣaṃ kanyakā bāndhavānām ||

A maiden wedded in Mṛgaśiras, in Maghā, in Hasta, in Mitra ⟨Anurādhā⟩, in the Uttarās, and in ⟨the nakṣatras⟩ whose deities are Svasana ⟨Vāyu — Svātī⟩, Nirṛti ⟨Mūla⟩, Pūṣan ⟨Revatī⟩ and Dhātṛ ⟨Rohiṇī⟩ — endowed with many sons, happiness, maidservants, wealth and good fortune, gives contentment to her kinsfolk.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. sukha]dāsīvittasaubhāgyayuktā.
  • About this edition: The group is named by presiding deity, not by nakṣatra: Svasana/Vāyu = Svātī, Nirṛti = Mūla, Pūṣan = Revatī, Dhātṛ = Rohiṇī. Dhātṛ was left unglossed until 2026-09-08 because it is not fixed in the standard deity lists; our exemplar's own commentaries settle it — Bhaṭṭotpala glosses the list with रोहिणी, and Lāmsāla's Nepali Bhāvabodhinī on v.79 enumerates the same set, names Rohiṇī in it, and counts it as eleven, which is the count v.79's mūla states. Set for set, these eleven are Mṛgaśiras, Maghā, Hasta, Anurādhā, the three Uttarās, Svātī, Mūla, Revatī and Rohiṇī. The mūla's śukha is a slip for sukha, as Bhaṭṭotpala's reading confirms. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads बहुसुतसुख; this sentence names śukha, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

आर्द्राद्ये भचतुष्टये विधवता साग्नेययाम्ये स्मृता । शेषेष्व् अक्षयदोषशोकमरणं व्याध्याद्यनिष्टं बहुः ॥

ārdrādye bhacatuṣṭaye vidhavatā sāgneyayāmye smṛtā | śeṣeṣv akṣayadoṣaśokamaraṇaṃ vyādhyādyaniṣṭaṃ bahuḥ ||

In the tetrad of nakṣatras beginning with Ārdrā, together with the Āgneya ⟨Kṛttikā⟩ and the Yāmya ⟨Bharaṇī⟩, widowhood is recorded. In the remaining ones, unfailing blemish, sorrow and death, and much that is unwanted beginning with disease.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The tetrad beginning with Ārdrā is Ārdrā, Punarvasu, Puṣya, Āśleṣā; Āgneya = Kṛttikā, Yāmya = Bharaṇī. bahuḥ stands for bahu.

प्रीतिर् जन्मसु तारकासु परतः सञ्ज्ञानुरूपं फलम् । चन्द्रे चोपचया ऽऽद्यसप्तमगते सौभाग्यसौख्याप्तयः ॥

prītir janmasu tārakāsu parataḥ sañjñānurūpaṃ phalam | candre copacayā ''dyasaptamagate saubhāgyasaukhyāptayaḥ ||

Affection in the janma tārās; beyond that, the fruit accords with the name ⟨of each tārā⟩. And when the Moon has gone to an upacaya, or to the first or the seventh, ⟨there are⟩ attainments of good fortune and of ease.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The tārās counted from the janma-nakṣatra carry names (sampat, vipat, kṣema, pratyari, sādhaka, vadha, mitra, atimitra); the verse's rule is that each yields what its name says. upacaya = the 3rd, 6th, 10th and 11th.

नक्षत्रतुल्यं फलम् आह गर्गः क्षणेषु नक्षत्रपसञ्ज्ञितेषु हारीतबभ्रू द्विजदेवलश् च विष्टि विना ऽन्यत् करणं प्रशस्तम् ॥

nakṣatratulyaṃ phalam āha gargaḥ kṣaṇeṣu nakṣatrapasañjñiteṣu hārītababhrū dvijadevalaś ca viṣṭi vinā 'nyat karaṇaṃ praśastam ||

Garga says the fruit is equal to that of the nakṣatra in the ⟨moments⟩ that bear the names of the nakṣatra-lords. Hārīta and Babhru, and Devala the twice-born, ⟨say that⟩ any karaṇa other than Viṣṭi is commended.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: kṣeṇeṣu in the mūla is not a Sanskrit word; it is read as kṣaṇeṣu ('in the moments/muhūrtas'), which the following karaṇa clause supports. The identification is a conjecture and the word is flagged rather than silently corrected. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads क्षणेषु; this sentence names kṣeṇeṣu, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

तिथिदिनकरणर्क्षलग्नवीर्यं परिचयम् आह पराशरः क्रमेण । तिथिर् इति बलबान् वदन्ति गर्गाः करणबलाद् दिवसो ऽपि भागुरिश् च । दिनकरणबलाद् भृगुर् भवीर्यं बलम् उदयस्य जगाद जीवशर्मा ॥

tithidinakaraṇarkṣalagnavīryaṃ paricayam āha parāśaraḥ krameṇa | tithir iti balabān vadanti gargāḥ karaṇabalād divaso 'pi bhāguriś ca | dinakaraṇabalād bhṛgur bhavīryaṃ balam udayasya jagāda jīvaśarmā ||

Parāśara declares the strength of tithi, weekday, karaṇa, nakṣatra and lagna to increase in that order. The Gargas say the tithi is the strong one; and Bhāguri ⟨says⟩ the weekday too ⟨is stronger⟩ than the strength of the karaṇa. Bhṛgu ⟨holds⟩ the nakṣatra's strength ⟨greater⟩ than the strength of weekday and karaṇa; Jīvaśarman declared the strength of the rising ⟨lagna⟩ ⟨greatest of all⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: paricayam krameṇa = 'in progressive accumulation', i.e. each later member of the list is stronger than the one before. balabān stands for balavān.

करणभतिथयो ऽर्धभुक्तभोगाः स्वफलकरा न भवन्ति तत्र साम्ये । करणतिथिवासरोदयानां चरणविवृद्धिर् अनुक्रमात् फलानाम् ॥

karaṇabhatithayo 'rdhabhuktabhogāḥ svaphalakarā na bhavanti tatra sāmye | karaṇatithivāsarodayānāṃ caraṇavivṛddhir anukramāt phalānām ||

Karaṇa, nakṣatra and tithi whose span is half enjoyed do not produce their own fruit; there ⟨they stand⟩ in balance. Of karaṇa, tithi, weekday and the rising ⟨lagna⟩, ⟨there is⟩ an increase of the fruits by a quarter, in that order.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: vivṛtthiḥ in the mūla is a slip for vivṛddhiḥ. caraṇa = a quarter (pāda): the fruit grows by one quarter at each step of the sequence, which is the same ranking as v. 23 stated qualitatively.

षट्काष्टके मरणवैरवियोगदोषा द्विर् द्वादशे निधनता ऽप्रजाता त्रिकोणे । प्रीतिः परा निगदिता समसप्तकेषु शेषेष्व् अनेकविधसौख्यसुतार्थसंपत् ॥

ṣaṭkāṣṭake maraṇavairaviyogadoṣā dvir dvādaśe nidhanatā 'prajātā trikoṇe | prītiḥ parā nigaditā samasaptakeṣu śeṣeṣv anekavidhasaukhyasutārthasaṃpat ||

In the ṣaṭ-aṣṭaka ⟨6th–8th⟩ the faults of death, enmity and separation; in the dvir-dvādaśa ⟨2nd–12th⟩, deathliness; in the trikoṇa, childlessness. In the sama-saptaka ⟨mutual 7th⟩ supreme affection is declared; in the rest, manifold ease, sons, wealth and prosperity.

2 notes on this verse
  • Corroboration: The relations are between the two parties' janma-rāśis. This is the same rule, in the same order, that the later kūṭa literature carries, and it AGREES with it — a note here claimed the opposite until 2026-09-08. Muhūrta Cintāmaṇi 6.31 (research/translations/muhurta-chintamani/ch06.json) reads मृत्युः षडष्टके ज्ञेयोऽपत्यहानिर्नवात्मजे द्विर्द्वादशे निर्धनत्वं: death in 6/8, loss of children in 9/5, want of wealth in 2/12 — and research/assertions/matching/kutas.md records bhakūṭa as failing at 2/12, 5/9 and 6/8. On the one word where the two texts differ, VP's निधनता against MC's निर्धनत्वं, our own commentator removes the difference: Bhaṭṭotpala glosses निधनता as दारिद्र्यं ('poverty'), which is MC's word. So this is a lexical variant, not a doctrinal dissent.
  • Another reading: The printing's mūla reads निधनताऽप्रजाता, with a long ā (verified on both OCR scans of the printing, lamsala-A_djvu.txt:1821 and lamsala-B_djvu.txt:1679). Bhaṭṭotpala's own lemma in the vivaraṇa is the short form: `तथा द्विर्द्वादशे निधनता दारिद्र्यं भवति, त्रिकोणे नवपञ्चमेऽप्रजता अपत्यरहितता` (lamsala-B_djvu.txt:1682, quoted inline because .tmp/ is gitignored). A 2026-09-07 pass conjectured ऽप्रजता on metrical grounds — pāda b of this vasantatilakā wants a laghu at syllable 10. The conjecture is not adopted: the printing reads ऽप्रजाता, the short form is the commentator's lemma rather than his text, and the sense is identical either way.

षट्काष्टके ऽपि भवनाधिपम् एव भाव एकाधिपत्यम् अवलोक्य च वश्यराशिम् । कार्यो विवाहसमयः शुभकृत् सदुक्तस् तारा भवेद् यदि परस्परतो ऽनुकूला ॥

ṣaṭkāṣṭake 'pi bhavanādhipam eva bhāva ekādhipatyam avalokya ca vaśyarāśim | kāryo vivāhasamayaḥ śubhakṛt saduktas tārā bhaved yadi parasparato 'nukūlā ||

Even in a ṣaṭ-aṣṭaka, having regarded the sign-lord itself — a single lordship over the bhāvas — and the vaśya rāśi, the time of marriage may be made; it is called good and auspicious-making, if the tārās be mutually favourable.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. tārā].
  • About this edition: The mūla's stārā carries a stray sandhi ś; Bhaṭṭotpala reads tārā, which is what is translated. The rule cancels the v. 25 ṣaḍaṣṭaka fault where the two signs share one lord or stand in the vaśya relation. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads तारा; this sentence names stārā, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.] [2026-09-23: read by eye on Lāṃsāla's printing (lamsala-A.pdf, PDF p.39, printed p.27) at about 4x native, the press sets सदुक्तः– with a full visarga at a line end and स्तारा at the start of the next line. So the printing writes the sandhi twice, once as the visarga and once as the sibilant, and the stray ś is the printing's, not our keying's. The mūla now reads सदुक्तस् तारा: the visarga is dropped on the lexicon, and Bhaṭṭotpala's vivaraṇa on PDF p.40 (read by eye at about 1.5x) reads तारानुकूला.]

दारिद्र्यं रविणा कुजेन मरणं सौम्येन नस्युः प्रजाः दौर्भाग्यं गुरुणा सितेन सहिते चन्द्रेण सापत्निका । प्रव्रज्यार्कसुतेन सेन्दुजगुरौ वाञ्छन्ति केचिच् छुभम् व्याध्यैर् मृत्युर् अणंग्रहैर् बहुविधा दीक्षा प्रवासाः शुभैः ॥

dāridryaṃ raviṇā kujena maraṇaṃ saumyena nasyuḥ prajāḥ daurbhāgyaṃ guruṇā sitena sahite candreṇa sāpatnikā | pravrajyārkasutena sendujagurau vāñchanti kecic chubham vyādhyair mṛtyur aṇaṃgrahair bahuvidhā dīkṣā pravāsāḥ śubhaiḥ ||

⟨When joined with the Moon:⟩ with the Sun, poverty; with Mars, death; with Mercury, the offspring perish; with Jupiter, ill fortune; with Venus joined to the Moon, a woman with a co-wife; with the Sun's son ⟨Saturn⟩, renunciation. Some wish for auspiciousness when ⟨the Moon is⟩ with Mercury and Jupiter. From the ⟨malefic⟩ grahas, death by diseases; from the benefics, consecration of many kinds, and journeys abroad.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. dāridryaṃ] · [u. asaṅgrahair].
  • About this edition: saumya is Mercury here, not the benefic class, since the benefics are named separately at the close. The mūla's aṇaṃgrahaiḥ is corrupt; Bhaṭṭotpala reads asaṅgrahaiḥ, and the closing contrast with śubhaiḥ makes 'by the non-good ⟨malefic⟩ grahas' the sense translated — the word itself is not securely recoverable. dāridrayaṃ and chubham are slips for dāridryaṃ and śubham. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दारिद्र्यं; this sentence names dāridrayaṃ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

क्रिये कुमारेष्व् अनुरक्तचित्ता विहीनवित्ता गवि गोव्रता च । कुलद्वयानन्दकरी तृतीये कुलीरलग्ने कुलटा नृशंसा ॥

kriye kumāreṣv anuraktacittā vihīnavittā gavi govratā ca | kuladvayānandakarī tṛtīye kulīralagne kulaṭā nṛśaṃsā ||

In Kriya ⟨Aries⟩ her heart is attached to young men, and she is destitute of wealth; in Go ⟨Taurus⟩ she keeps a cow's vow; in the third ⟨Gemini⟩ she gives joy to both families; in the Kulīra ⟨Cancer⟩ lagna she is a wanton and cruel.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: kriya and kulīra are the Greek-derived sign-names Varāhamihira's school uses; go = Taurus, 'the third' = Gemini. govratā is left at its literal 'of cow-like observance' — patient and yoked — rather than resolved to either 'devoted' or 'cow-keeping'. kulaṭā nṛśaṃsā is rendered at full weight.

हरौ प्रसूता सकृद् आश्रिता पितुः पतिप्रिया ऽति श्वशुरस्य षष्ठभे । तुलादिमानार्थवती तुलाधरे तथालिनि क्रन्दति नित्यम् अस्थिरा ॥

harau prasūtā sakṛd āśritā pituḥ patipriyā 'ti śvaśurasya ṣaṣṭhabhe | tulādimānārthavatī tulādhare tathālini krandati nityam asthirā ||

In Hari ⟨Leo⟩ she bears children but once, dependent on her father; in the sixth sign ⟨Virgo⟩ exceedingly dear to her husband and to her father-in-law; in Tulādhara ⟨Libra⟩ she has wealth from the balance and ⟨other⟩ measures; and in Ali ⟨Scorpio⟩ she weeps constantly, unsteady.

धनुषि कुलटा तत्पूर्वार्द्धे सतीत्य् अपरे जगुः । मृगझषघटेष्व् अन्याशक्ता जराम् उपगच्छति ॥

dhanuṣi kulaṭā tatpūrvārddhe satīty apare jaguḥ | mṛgajhaṣaghaṭeṣv anyāśaktā jarām upagacchati ||

In Dhanus ⟨Sagittarius⟩ a wanton — but in its first half chaste, so others have sung. In Mṛga ⟨Capricorn⟩, Jhaṣa ⟨Pisces⟩ and Ghaṭa ⟨Aquarius⟩, attached to another ⟨man⟩, she comes to old age.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The signs are listed mṛga–jhaṣa–ghaṭa (Capricorn, Pisces, Aquarius), out of zodiacal order, and that order is kept as the mūla has it. jarām upagacchati is left literal — 'comes to old age' — the verse not saying whether long life or a wasted one is meant.

द्विपदभवनप्रापी यो ऽंशः स शुभो ऽन्यगृहोदये । द्विपदभवनेष्व् अप्य् अन्यांशा न भवन्ति शुभावहा ॥

dvipadabhavanaprāpī yo 'ṃśaḥ sa śubho 'nyagṛhodaye | dvipadabhavaneṣv apy anyāṃśā na bhavanti śubhāvahā ||

The aṃśa that falls in a biped ⟨human⟩ sign is auspicious when some other sign is rising; but even in biped signs, aṃśas ⟨of the other classes⟩ do not bring auspiciousness.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: dvipada-bhavana is the biped/human class of signs (glossary: nṛrāśi = human, biped sign); aṃśa here is the navāṃśa division.

भानुर् मृत्युर् न बहुधनतां भर्तृदायाद् अवित्तं बन्धुध्वंसं तनयविरहं भर्तृवृद्धिं परां च । वैधव्यं स्यान् न लघुमरणं धर्महानिं विशीलं लाभानेकान् व्ययम् अपि ददात्य् उद्गमर्क्षात् क्रमेण ॥

bhānur mṛtyur na bahudhanatāṃ bhartṛdāyād avittaṃ bandhudhvaṃsaṃ tanayavirahaṃ bhartṛvṛddhiṃ parāṃ ca | vaidhavyaṃ syān na laghumaraṇaṃ dharmahāniṃ viśīlaṃ lābhānekān vyayam api dadāty udgamarkṣāt krameṇa ||

The Sun, ⟨reckoned⟩ from the rising sign onward in order, gives: death; not much wealth; want of wealth though there be a husband's inheritance; ruin of kinsmen; loss of sons; the husband's supreme prosperity; widowhood; no easy death; loss of dharma; bad character; manifold gains; and expenditure as well.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. vittaṃ] · [u. prāk].
  • About this edition: Twelve results in order, one per bhāva from the lagna. Apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads vittaṃ (wealth) for the text's avittaṃ at item 3, and prāk elsewhere in the pāda; the reading adopted here is the e-text's own.
1.33a reading here is contested

शशिन्य् अश्वा सार्था तद् अनु शुभता बान्धवहिता विपुत्रा बन्ध्यार्ता भवति ससपत्ना ऽऽशुनिधना । जनित्री कन्यानाम् अथ विहतकर्मा ऽतिधनिनी व्ययाशक्तेत्य् एके जगुर् अशुभदा बन्धुषु जले ॥

śaśiny aśvā sārthā tad anu śubhatā bāndhavahitā viputrā bandhyārtā bhavati sasapatnā ''śunidhanā | janitrī kanyānām atha vihatakarmā 'tidhaninī vyayāśaktety eke jagur aśubhadā bandhuṣu jale ||

With the Moon ⟨so placed⟩: she loses her life ⟨aśvā⟩; wealthy; thereafter auspiciousness; a benefactor of her kinsfolk; sonless; barren and afflicted; having a co-wife; a swift death; a bearer of daughters; her work undone; exceedingly rich; powerless through expenditure — so some have declared; ⟨and it is⟩ a giver of inauspicious results in the fourth, the watery house of kinsmen.

3 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. sapatnā].
  • About this edition: Twelve items in order, as in v.32. The closing words aśubhadā bandhuṣu jale are difficult: bandhu and jala are both names of the 4th house, so they are taken here as one house named twice; a possible alternative is 'inauspicious to kinsmen when in a watery sign'. Apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads sapatnā for sasapatnā. [2026-09-23: Bhaṭṭotpala's gloss at this verse reads सुभगा, glossed सौभाग्योपेता भर्तृ वल्लभा ('fortunate, dear to her husband'), where the mūla has शुभता. Read by eye on Lāṃsāla's printing (lamsala-A.pdf, PDF p.47, printed p.35), the mūla line at about 4x–6x native sets श, then भ, then a third akṣara whose type failed in the copy we hold, then ā; the gloss line, at about 1.5x–2.5x, sets सुभगा with स. The mūla and its rendering keep our keying, शुभता, and the question stays open as a doubt on this verse.]
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: अश्वा is read two ways by our own commentator. At this verse Bhaṭṭotpala glosses it विगतप्राणा … म्रियते इत्यर्थः ('her breath gone — that is, she dies'), deriving it from śvas- , and records अधना ('without wealth') as the reading of केचित्, 'some'. At the parallel Saturn passage he glosses अश्वा as निर्धना, 'without wealth'. Both senses are therefore live in the same commentary. The rendering follows the gloss given AT THIS VERSE and keeps the other visible; until 2026-09-08 both languages silently printed the second sense only, and the Hindi printed the variant word अस्वा, which is not in the mūla.

मृत्युर् नैःस्वं सार्थता बन्धुवैरं न स्युः पुत्रा भर्तृवृद्धिं कुमैत्रीम् । रक्तस्रावो नानुकुल्ये च भर्तुः क्रव्याच्छैल्यं स्वाप्तिनाशं च भौमे ॥

mṛtyur naiḥsvaṃ sārthatā bandhuvairaṃ na syuḥ putrā bhartṛvṛddhiṃ kumaitrīm | raktasrāvo nānukulye ca bhartuḥ kravyācchailyaṃ svāptināśaṃ ca bhaume ||

Death; destitution; wealthiness; enmity with kinsmen; no sons; the husband's prosperity; ill friendship; flow of blood; no favour from the husband; flesh-eating ⟨ways⟩; hardness ⟨of nature⟩; and the destruction of what she herself has won — ⟨such are the results⟩ with Mars.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Twelve items, matching the pattern of vv. 32–33. kravyāc-chailyaṃ is split here as two items (kravyāt, flesh-eating; śailyaṃ, hardness/stoniness) because eleven items would otherwise leave a house unaccounted for; śailya may stand for śalya (a piercing pain). The split is the least forced reading, not a certain one.

भर्तृव्रता सुगृहिणी पतिपक्षपूज्या बन्ध्वर्चिता बहुसुता विजितारिपक्षा । बन्ध्या व्यसुर् नियमदानकृशाङ्गवित्ता मायावती धनवती व्ययनीय सौम्ये ॥

bhartṛvratā sugṛhiṇī patipakṣapūjyā bandhvarcitā bahusutā vijitāripakṣā | bandhyā vyasur niyamadānakṛśāṅgavittā māyāvatī dhanavatī vyayanīya saumye ||

Devoted to her husband; a good housewife; honoured by her husband's people; revered by her kinsfolk; blessed with many sons; conqueror of the enemy's party; barren; lifeless; her body and her wealth worn thin by vows and giving; full of guile; wealthy; a spender — ⟨such are the results⟩ with Mercury.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. vyayanī].
  • About this edition: Twelve items. saumya here is the graha Mercury, not the benefic class. niyamadānakṛśāṅgavittā is read as one compound (the ninth item, matching the dharma-bhāva). Apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads vyayanī for the text's vyayanīya; sense and metre want vyayanī.

पत्युः प्रिया ऽति धनिनी मुदिता धन्याढ्या पुत्रान्विता हतपरा न समेति भर्ता । क्षीणायुषा शुभरता शुभसिद्धकार्या स्वायान्विता तदुभयोपकृता च जीवे ॥

patyuḥ priyā 'ti dhaninī muditā dhanyāḍhyā putrānvitā hataparā na sameti bhartā | kṣīṇāyuṣā śubharatā śubhasiddhakāryā svāyānvitā tadubhayopakṛtā ca jīve ||

Dear to her husband; very wealthy; joyful; abounding in fortune; endowed with sons; destroyer of her adversaries; the husband does not come together ⟨with her⟩; of diminished lifespan; devoted to auspicious ⟨works⟩; her undertakings auspiciously accomplished; possessed of her own income; and benefited by both of those — ⟨such are the results⟩ with Jupiter.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Twelve items. The last, tad-ubhaya-upakṛtā, is left literal ('benefited by both of those'); the two referents are not named in the verse.

प्रिया पत्युर् लुब्धा पतिसहजशक्ता कुलहिता सुपुत्रा वैराढ्या तद् अनु कुलटा क्षिप्रनिधना । रता नित्यं धर्मे बहुकुशलकर्मण्य् अभिरता भवत्य् आयप्राया क्षपितविभवा चेति भृगुणा ॥

priyā patyur lubdhā patisahajaśaktā kulahitā suputrā vairāḍhyā tad anu kulaṭā kṣipranidhanā | ratā nityaṃ dharme bahukuśalakarmaṇy abhiratā bhavaty āyaprāyā kṣapitavibhavā ceti bhṛguṇā ||

Dear to her husband; greedy; attached to her husband's brother; a benefactor of the family; blessed with good sons; full of enmity; thereafter a wanton; a swift death; ever devoted to dharma; delighting in many meritorious works; abounding in income; her fortune wasted away — thus ⟨says Bhṛgu⟩, by Venus.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Twelve items. pati-sahaja-śaktā is rendered at its weight: sahaja is the husband's brother (and also the 3rd house, the third item's own place).

पुंश्चल्य् अस्वा बहुधनवती स्वल्पदुग्धार्कपुत्रे हृद्रोगाऽऽर्ता विनिहतपरा गर्भविस्रावशीला ॥ रोगान् मुक्ता स्खलितनियमा पापशीला ऽतिवित्ता पानैर् अर्थान् नयति विलयं प्राविलग्नात् क्रमेण ॥

puṃścaly asvā bahudhanavatī svalpadugdhārkaputre hṛdrogā''rtā vinihataparā garbhavisrāvaśīlā || rogān muktā skhalitaniyamā pāpaśīlā 'tivittā pānair arthān nayati vilayaṃ prāvilagnāt krameṇa ||

Unchaste; without property; possessed of much wealth; scant of milk; afflicted with heart disease; destroying her adversaries; given to miscarriage; freed from diseases; lapsed in her observances; of sinful conduct; exceedingly wealthy; she brings her wealth to ruin through drink — ⟨such are the results⟩ with Saturn, the Sun's son, from the ascendant onward in order.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Twelve items; prāvilagnāt krameṇa ('from the ascendant onward in order') states explicitly the reckoning implied in vv. 32–37.

सौम्या व्ययास्तनिधनं त्र्यरिभं च शुक्रे हित्वा स्थितस् त्रिधनलाभगतः शशाङ्कः । पापा त्रिषड्निधनलाभगता विवाहे हित्वा ऽष्टमं क्षितिजम् इष्टफलानि दद्युः ॥

saumyā vyayāstanidhanaṃ tryaribhaṃ ca śukre hitvā sthitas tridhanalābhagataḥ śaśāṅkaḥ | pāpā triṣaḍnidhanalābhagatā vivāhe hitvā 'ṣṭamaṃ kṣitijam iṣṭaphalāni dadyuḥ ||

Benefics — and Venus — stationed anywhere save the 12th, the 7th, the 8th, and the 3rd and 6th signs; the Moon gone to the 3rd, the 2nd or the 11th; and malefics gone to the 3rd, 6th, 8th or 11th, Mars excepting the 8th — these give the desired results at a marriage.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. śukraḥ].
  • About this edition: House numbers as named in the mūla: vyaya 12, asta 7, nidhana 8, tri 3, ari 6; tri 3, dhana 2, lābha 11; tri 3, ṣaṭ 6, nidhana 8, lābha 11; aṣṭama 8. Apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads śukraḥ (nominative, 'Venus' as a further subject) for the text's locative śukre; that reading is followed here because the locative leaves the sentence without a construction.

सुतहिबुकवियद्विलग्नधर्मेष्व् अमरगुरुर् यदि दानवार्चितो वा । यद् अशुभम् उपयाति तच् छुभत्वं शुभम् अपि वृद्धिम् उपैति तत्प्रभावात् ॥

sutahibukaviyadvilagnadharmeṣv amaragurur yadi dānavārcito vā | yad aśubham upayāti tac chubhatvaṃ śubham api vṛddhim upaiti tatprabhāvāt ||

If the guru of the gods ⟨Jupiter⟩, or he who is worshipped by the dānavas ⟨Venus⟩, is in the 5th, the 4th (hibuka), the 10th, the lagna, or the 9th, then whatever is inauspicious turns to auspiciousness, and what is auspicious attains increase, by his power.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: House-names in the mūla: suta 5, hibuka 4, viyat 10, vilagna 1, dharma 9. amara-guru is Jupiter; dānava-arcita ('worshipped by the dānavas') is Venus, their preceptor.

अनिष्टस्थानसंस्थो ऽपि प्रशस्तफलदः शशिः । सौम्यभागे ऽधिमित्रण बलिना चेन् निरीक्षितः ॥

aniṣṭasthānasaṃstho 'pi praśastaphaladaḥ śaśiḥ | saumyabhāge 'dhimitraṇa balinā cen nirīkṣitaḥ ||

Even the Moon placed in an undesirable house gives excellent results, if it stands in a benefic's division and is aspected by a strong great friend ⟨adhimitra⟩.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. 'dhimitreṇa].
  • About this edition: The e-text carries two slips here: 'dhimitraṇa for 'dhimitreṇa (Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, followed) and nirīkṣtaḥ for nirīkṣitaḥ. Neither affects the sense. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads निरीक्षितः; this sentence names nirīkṣtaḥ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
1.42a reading here is contested

नरग्रहबले स्त्रीणां पुमान् भवति बल्लभः । विपरीते ऽङ्गना भर्तुर् अर्थाद् अन्यत् प्रकल्पयेत् ॥

naragrahabale strīṇāṃ pumān bhavati ballabhaḥ | viparīte 'ṅganā bhartur arthād anyat prakalpayet ||

When the male grahas are strong in women's ⟨charts⟩, the man becomes the beloved; in the contrary case the woman ⟨does⟩. For the husband one should, by implication, reckon the opposite.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: bhartur arthād anyat prakalpayet is read as 'in the husband's ⟨chart⟩ infer the reverse'; it can also be construed 'the woman ⟨is⟩ the husband's beloved — the rest is to be inferred otherwise'. The Hindi keeps the ambiguity of the genitive that English must resolve.

शुक्रसूर्यास्तपतिषु शत्रुभे वा तदंशके । विरोधमूढा यात्य् आशु श्वश्रूश्वसुरभर्तृषु ॥

śukrasūryāstapatiṣu śatrubhe vā tadaṃśake | virodhamūḍhā yāty āśu śvaśrūśvasurabhartṛṣu ||

When Venus, the Sun and the lord of the 7th (asta) are in an enemy's sign or in its aṃśa, she swiftly comes, bewildered by strife, into conflict with mother-in-law, father-in-law and husband.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: asta = the 7th house (glossary), so asta-pati is its lord.

विलग्नांशः स्वनाथेन यद्य् उद्वाहे न दृश्यते । पुंविनाशस् ततो ऽस्तांशे यद्य् एवं योषितस् तथा ॥

vilagnāṃśaḥ svanāthena yady udvāhe na dṛśyate | puṃvināśas tato 'stāṃśe yady evaṃ yoṣitas tathā ||

If at a marriage the aṃśa of the lagna is not aspected by its own lord, thence comes the destruction of the man; if it is so with the aṃśa of the 7th (asta), then likewise ⟨the destruction⟩ of the woman.

गुरुसितयोर् उच्चगयोर् एकतमे वा विलग्नगे कन्या । राज्ञी भवत्य् असंशयम् एव गुरुसौम्ययोश् चोढा ॥

gurusitayor uccagayor ekatame vā vilagnage kanyā | rājñī bhavaty asaṃśayam eva gurusaumyayoś coḍhā ||

If Jupiter and Venus, ⟨both⟩ exalted, or one of the two, occupy the lagna, the girl becomes a queen — beyond all doubt; and so too ⟨does⟩ she who is wedded ⟨when⟩ Jupiter and Mercury ⟨are so placed⟩.

स्वजामित्रोदये लग्ने शुभे कार्या चतुर्थिका । स्ववर्णसदृशा जारास् त्र्याद्यैर् एकर्क्षसंस्थितैः ॥

svajāmitrodaye lagne śubhe kāryā caturthikā | svavarṇasadṛśā jārās tryādyair ekarkṣasaṃsthitaiḥ ||

When the lagna and its own 7th (jāmitra) are auspicious at the rising, the caturthikā ⟨rite⟩ is to be performed; ⟨but⟩ with three or more ⟨grahas⟩ standing together in one sign, ⟨she will have⟩ paramours of her own varṇa.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: jāmitra = the 7th house (glossary). caturthikā is the fourth-day marriage rite. The last clause is left at its weight: jāra is a paramour, not a suitor.

चरभवनगतं विहाय सत्यः शशिनम् उवाच शुभप्रदं विवाहे । मुनिवचनविरोधि तच् च सूत्रे न तु कथिते पवनर्क्षवैश्वदेवे ॥

carabhavanagataṃ vihāya satyaḥ śaśinam uvāca śubhapradaṃ vivāhe | munivacanavirodhi tac ca sūtre na tu kathite pavanarkṣavaiśvadeve ||

Satya declared the Moon — excepting one placed in a movable sign — to be a giver of auspicious results at a marriage; but that contradicts the sage's word, and in the sūtra the ⟨nakṣatras⟩ of the Wind and of the Viśvedevas are not spoken of.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: pavana-ṛkṣa is Svātī (deity Vāyu) and vaiśvadeva is Uttarāṣāḍhā (deity Viśvedevāḥ); the identifications are supplied in the Hindi and left as epithets in the English, as the mūla has them.

राश्युद्गमद्वादशराशिचक्रे युक्ता विवाहा मुनिभिः प्रदिष्टा । नामानि चक्रे ग्रहयोगलग्ने श्रीदेवकीर्तिः शृणु तस्य च ऽऽर्या ॥

rāśyudgamadvādaśarāśicakre yuktā vivāhā munibhiḥ pradiṣṭā | nāmāni cakre grahayogalagne śrīdevakīrtiḥ śṛṇu tasya ca ''ryā ||

In the twelve-sign cakra reckoned from the rising sign, the suitable marriages have been taught by the sages. Śrīdevakīrti assigned the names for the graha-combinations at the lagna; hear now his āryā ⟨verses⟩ on that.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: cakre is taken as the perfect of kṛ ('he made/assigned'), with nāmāni as its object; it could also be the locative of cakra ('in the cakra'), but then the sentence has no verb.

नन्दो भद्रो जीवो जीमूतः स्थावरो जयो विजयः । व्यालो रसातलमुखः क्षयस् तमो ऽन्त्यो विवाहगणः ॥

nando bhadro jīvo jīmūtaḥ sthāvaro jayo vijayaḥ | vyālo rasātalamukhaḥ kṣayas tamo 'ntyo vivāhagaṇaḥ ||

Nanda, Bhadra, Jīva, Jīmūta, Sthāvara, Jaya, Vijaya, Vyāla, Rasātala at the head ⟨of the rest⟩, Kṣaya, Tamas, and last ⟨of all⟩ — ⟨such is⟩ the series of marriage-gaṇas.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Eleven names are given plus antya, 'the last'; v.52 names that twelfth Kṛtānta, and v.53's division 3 + 4 + 5 confirms a set of twelve. rasātala-mukhaḥ is literally 'having Rasātala at its head' and is kept literal, since it may mark where the inauspicious group begins (cf. v.53 vyālādyeṣu).

सौम्ये विलग्ने नन्दः शुक्रे भद्रस् तथा गुरौ जीवः । आद्यन्तौ जीमूतः स्थावर इति मध्यमान्त्याभ्याम् ॥

saumye vilagne nandaḥ śukre bhadras tathā gurau jīvaḥ | ādyantau jīmūtaḥ sthāvara iti madhyamāntyābhyām ||

With Mercury in the lagna ⟨the yoga is⟩ Nanda, with Venus Bhadra, and with Jupiter Jīva. From the first and the last ⟨together⟩ comes Jīmūta; Sthāvara from the middle one and the last.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 'The first' is Mercury, 'the middle' Venus, 'the last' Jupiter, in the order just named.

सौम्यैर् अथ तैर् वा रविभौमशनैश्चरैः क्रमशः । सौम्यैः ज्ञेया सौम्या क्रूराः क्रुरैः समाख्याता ॥

saumyair atha tair vā ravibhaumaśanaiścaraiḥ kramaśaḥ | saumyaiḥ jñeyā saumyā krūrāḥ kruraiḥ samākhyātā ||

Then ⟨Jaya and Vijaya arise⟩ from the benefics, or from those same ⟨benefics⟩ with the Sun, Mars and Saturn respectively. From benefics benefic ⟨gaṇas⟩ are to be known; malefic ones are declared from malefics.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. krūraiḥ].
  • About this edition: THIS RECORD FUSES TWO UNITS THAT THE PRINTING SEPARATES, and that is why it looked defective. Read on the plate at printed p.52 = PDF index 63 of lamsala-A.pdf at 260 dpi: line 1 stands under its own प्रतीक `अथ शुभयोगानाह:--` and is numbered ॥५०½॥, with its own Bhaṭṭotpala gloss and its own Bhāvabodhinī; line 2 stands under `अत्र सामान्येन लग्नफलमाह:--` and is numbered ॥५१॥, with a second gloss. The e-text's tag VP_51 covers both, so our record carries an uttarārdha of verse 50 followed by the whole of verse 51. A 2026-09-07 pass read line 1's short mātrā count as a lacuna; it is not one — it is half of the preceding stanza. The verse still names no gaṇa, and the supplied 'Jaya and Vijaya' follow from the sequence of vv. 49–50 and 52, not from words in the mūla. The record is NOT renumbered: renumbering an edition is an editorial act, citations into this text are stable at 1..91, and the printing's own numbering is not uniform. Apparatus: the mūla prints क्रुरैः with a short vowel and Bhaṭṭotpala reads क्रूरैः, which is what the English follows — see discrepancies[].

दिनकरयोगाद् व्यालो भौमेन रसातलः क्षयः शनिना । तमसा तमो निरुक्तो ऽथान्त्ये केतो कृतान्तश् च ॥

dinakarayogād vyālo bhaumena rasātalaḥ kṣayaḥ śaninā | tamasā tamo nirukto 'thāntye keto kṛtāntaś ca ||

From conjunction with the Sun ⟨comes⟩ Vyāla; by Mars, Rasātala; Kṣaya by Saturn; by Tamas ⟨Rāhu⟩, Tamas is declared; and at the end, with Ketu, Kṛtānta.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. ketor].
  • About this edition: tamas is used twice — the graha Rāhu, and the gaṇa named after it. Apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads ketor ('from Ketu') for the text's keto.

त्रिषु नन्दादिषु राज्ञी चतुर्षु चातः परं महादेवी । व्यालाद्येषु च पञ्चषु विधवाः शोच्या दरिद्राश् च ॥

triṣu nandādiṣu rājñī caturṣu cātaḥ paraṃ mahādevī | vyālādyeṣu ca pañcaṣu vidhavāḥ śocyā daridrāś ca ||

In the three beginning with Nanda ⟨the bride becomes⟩ a queen; in the four next after these, a mahādevī; and in the five beginning with Vyāla ⟨brides become⟩ widows, pitiable, and poor.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: 3 + 4 + 5 = the twelve gaṇas of v.49. pañcaṣu is read as pañcasu ('in the five'), which the arithmetic requires; read as pañca-ṣaṭ ('five or six') the total would exceed twelve.

अनधिकृतः शुभकृत् स्याद् एते चन्द्रो ऽन्यथा ऽधिकृतः । तस्मात् विवाहसमये न केन चित् सङ्गतः शशी धन्यः ॥

anadhikṛtaḥ śubhakṛt syād ete candro 'nyathā 'dhikṛtaḥ | tasmāt vivāhasamaye na kena cit saṅgataḥ śaśī dhanyaḥ ||

The Moon not taken over ⟨by these⟩ is a doer of good; otherwise, taken over by them, ⟨it is not⟩. Therefore at the time of marriage the Moon joined with none ⟨of them⟩ is the blessed one.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. etaiś].
  • About this edition: Apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads etaiś (instrumental, 'by these') for the text's ete; the instrumental is what the sentence needs and is followed here.
1.55a reading here is contested

सप्त ते शशियोगा सौम्या सह सर्वकर्मसिद्धिकराः । अशुभफलदास् तु पापैः पत्युद्वहने विवर्ज्यास् ते ॥ तस्माद् एतान् योगान् मतिमां सञ्चिन्त्य सर्वकार्येषु ।

sapta te śaśiyogā saumyā saha sarvakarmasiddhikarāḥ | aśubhaphaladās tu pāpaiḥ patyudvahane vivarjyās te || tasmād etān yogān matimāṃ sañcintya sarvakāryeṣu |

Those seven Moon-yogas, ⟨formed⟩ together with benefics, accomplish every undertaking; but with malefics they give inauspicious results, and are to be shunned at the taking of a husband. Therefore let the man of judgement consider these yogas in all undertakings ⟨and employ them⟩.

3 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. saumyaiḥ] · matimāṃ[sic.] · [u. yuñjīta].
  • About this edition: THE FOURTH QUARTER IS NOT IN THE PRINTING AT ALL — the gap is the exemplar's, not this ingest's, and the edition marks it. Read on the plate at printed p.54 = PDF index 65 of lamsala-A.pdf at 260 dpi: the first two half-lines close ॥५५॥ as one complete āryā; the third then stands alone under its own प्रतीक `पुनरप्यत्रविशेषमाह:--`, closes ॥५५½॥, and nothing follows it before verse 56 begins. So the printing sets three quarters and numbers the orphan half as a half. The verb governing 'having considered' (sañcintya, printed sañcivtya) is therefore absent from the mūla; Bhaṭṭotpala supplies it in the vivaraṇa — `युञ्जीत प्रयुञ्जीत किन्त्वन्यत्र तु विवाहात्` — and the English and Hindi mark it as supplied. Apparatus also: saumyaiḥ (instrumental) for saumyā, and matimāṃ vouched for by the editor [sic.] where matimān is expected. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads सञ्चिन्त्य; this sentence names sañcivtya, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]
  • What the page would not yield: DECLARED GAP. Vivāhapaṭala 55 is transmitted to us as three quarters of an āryā and a half-verse with no companion. Counting mātrās by hand: 29 / 27 / 29. Lines 1+2 are one complete āryā; line 3 is a second pūrvārdha whose uttarārdha is in no witness we hold, and the only printing of this work marks the deficit in its own numbering (॥५५॥ then ॥५५½॥). We do not supply it, and no reader should take the rendering of line 3 as a complete stanza.

ऊढा नन्दे कन्या देवीशब्दं समाप्नुयाद् अचिरात् ॥ भवति नरेन्द्रजननी भर्तुः प्राणैः प्रिया चैव ।

ūḍhā nande kanyā devīśabdaṃ samāpnuyād acirāt || bhavati narendrajananī bhartuḥ prāṇaiḥ priyā caiva |

A girl wedded under Nanda soon attains the title of 'Devī'; she becomes the mother of a king, and is dear to her husband as his own breath.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: WITHDRAWN 2026-09-08. This note used to say that from here to v.60 the e-text's verse boundaries fall inside the āryās, each record carrying the second half of one stanza and the first half of the next. That is false, and if it were true 31 records would be mis-versified. Two instruments refute it. Metre: VP_60 counts 30 / 27, a textbook āryā; this record counts 30 / 25; VP_55's first two lines count 29 / 27. And the printing settles it outright — at printed p.54 = PDF index 65 of lamsala-A.pdf the two halves of this stanza are numbered ॥५६॥ and ॥५६½॥ and both are inside this record. What is true is what text.json already said: each record is one whole stanza whose punctuation is inverted, ॥ standing in the middle and । at the end.

भद्रे पाणिग्रहणे यदि नाम कुमारिका समुपयाति ॥ सा त्वरितान् नृपशब्दं करोति भर्तुः कुलस्यापि ।

bhadre pāṇigrahaṇe yadi nāma kumārikā samupayāti || sā tvaritān nṛpaśabdaṃ karoti bhartuḥ kulasyāpi |

If indeed a maiden comes to the taking of her hand under Bhadra, she swiftly brings the title of king to her husband and to his family too.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The e-text reads bhārtuḥ for bhartuḥ and tvaritān for tvaritāt; both are plainly slips of the printing and the sense is unaffected. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads भर्तुः; this sentence names bhārtuḥ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

परिणीता जीवाख्ये कन्या विजयाय कीर्त्यते भर्तुः ॥ प्राप्नोति सा त्रिवर्गं कुलद्वयं चापि नन्दयति ।

pariṇītā jīvākhye kanyā vijayāya kīrtyate bhartuḥ || prāpnoti sā trivargaṃ kuladvayaṃ cāpi nandayati |

A girl wedded under the one called Jīva is declared ⟨to conduce⟩ to her husband's victory; she attains the trivarga, and gladdens both families.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: trivarga = dharma, artha and kāma; left untranslated, as the app's vocabulary keeps it.

जीमूते परिणीता विपुलान् भोगान् महाफलान् भुक्त्वा ॥ दृष्ट्वा च नप्तृतनयान् सहभर्ता देवत्वम् ।

jīmūte pariṇītā vipulān bhogān mahāphalān bhuktvā || dṛṣṭvā ca naptṛtanayān sahabhartā devatvam |

She who is wedded under Jīmūta, having enjoyed abundant pleasures of great fruit, and having seen grandsons and sons, ⟨attains⟩ godhood together with her husband.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The finite verb is absent from this record: devatvam stands as an object with no governing verb. The explanation this note carried until 2026-09-08 — that 'the record is cut where the āryā is not' — was inherited from v.56's withdrawn note and is wrong; the record is one whole stanza. The uttarārdha is simply short, ~24 mātrās against 27, so the verb has dropped out of the line itself. The e-text also reads dṛṣdvā for dṛṣṭvā and sahabhartā for saha bhartrā. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दृष्ट्वा; this sentence names dṛṣdvā, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

स्थावरयोगे कन्या पाणिग्रहम् एत्य विपुलम् ऐश्वर्यम् ॥ भर्तुर् निधानलाभान् प्राप्य कुलस्योन्नतिं कुरुते ।

sthāvarayoge kanyā pāṇigraham etya vipulam aiśvaryam || bhartur nidhānalābhān prāpya kulasyonnatiṃ kurute |

A girl who comes to the taking of her hand under the Sthāvara yoga, having obtained vast lordship and her husband's gains of buried treasure, brings about the exaltation of the family.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: nidhāna-lābha is the finding of a hoard or buried treasure, not income in general.

पाणिग्रहम् एत्य जये जघन्यकुलजापि भर्तुर् ऐश्वर्यम् ॥ आवहति सदा कन्या निषेव्यमाना सपत्नीभिः ।

pāṇigraham etya jaye jaghanyakulajāpi bhartur aiśvaryam || āvahati sadā kanyā niṣevyamānā sapatnībhiḥ |

Coming to the taking of the hand ⟨in marriage⟩ in Jaya, a girl — even one born of the meanest family — always brings her husband lordship, and is waited upon by co-wives.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Jaya, and the Vijayā, Vyāla, Pātāla, Kṣaya, Tamas and Kṛtānta of vv. 62–67, are the proper names of the marriage-lagnas / yogas enumerated in this run; they are kept transliterated rather than translated, since the sense-words ('victory', 'serpent', 'the netherworld', 'decay', 'darkness', 'the Ender') are the names themselves.

विजयां प्राप्योद्वाहं प्राप्नोति सुतान् यशो ऽर्थलाभं च ॥ वंशस्य च प्रतिष्ठां परतो मरणाच् च सुरलोकम् ।

vijayāṃ prāpyodvāhaṃ prāpnoti sutān yaśo 'rthalābhaṃ ca || vaṃśasya ca pratiṣṭhāṃ parato maraṇāc ca suralokam |

Having attained Vijayā ⟨for⟩ the wedding, ⟨the bridegroom⟩ obtains sons, fame and gain of wealth, and the establishing of the lineage — and, past death, the world of the gods.

व्याले व्यालाकारा पाणिग्रहम् एति कन्यका दैवात् ॥ दारिद्र्यामययुक्ता नैकस्मिन् पुंसि सा रमते ।

vyāle vyālākārā pāṇigraham eti kanyakā daivāt || dāridryāmayayuktā naikasmin puṃsi sā ramate |

In Vyāla, if by fate a girl comes to the taking of the hand, she is serpent-shaped ⟨in nature⟩, beset with poverty and disease; she takes her pleasure in no one man.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: vyāla is both 'serpent' and 'beast of prey'; vyālākārā is left at the serpent sense, which the name of the yoga carries. naikasmin puṃsi sā ramate is a plain statement of unfaithfulness and is rendered as it stands.
1.64a reading here is contested

पातालनामनि गता पाणिग्रहणे च पञ्चमान् मासात् ॥ सा प्राप्य दोषम् अतुलं परः प्राणान् परित्यजति ।

pātālanāmani gatā pāṇigrahaṇe ca pañcamān māsāt || sā prāpya doṣam atulaṃ paraḥ prāṇān parityajati |

⟨A girl⟩ who has gone to the taking of the hand in the one named Pātāla — from the fifth month she, having incurred a matchless blemish, thereafter gives up her life-breaths.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: paraḥ prāṇān parityajati: paraḥ read as the nominative 'the other one', i.e. the husband, which the subject-shift after sā prāpya supports; it can also be taken adverbially ('thereafter'), which would leave the girl herself the one who dies. The Sanskrit does not settle it, and the Hindi keeps पर, which holds both. pañcamān māsāt ('from the fifth month') is ablative and is rendered as it stands, not converted to a span.
1.65a reading here is contested

क्षयम् आसाद्योद्वाहं कन्या पक्षद्वयात् पतिं हत्वा ॥ नीचेन तु सह भर्त्रा क्षपयति जाराग्निना गोत्रम् ।

kṣayam āsādyodvāhaṃ kanyā pakṣadvayāt patiṃ hatvā || nīcena tu saha bhartrā kṣapayati jārāgninā gotram |

A girl who gets her wedding in Kṣaya kills her husband within two fortnights; then, with a low-born man for husband, she consumes the lineage (gotra) by the fire of adultery.

2 notes on this verse
  • About this edition: pakṣadvayāt = two pakṣas, i.e. two fortnights; the number is the text's own. nīcena is the social sense 'low-born' here, not the technical nīca 'debilitated', since it qualifies bhartrā, a man.
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: नीचेन तु सह भर्त्रा is rendered 'with a low-born man for husband'. The astrological sense of nīca (a debilitated graha) is ruled out because the word qualifies a man, but the plain character sense — 'base, mean' — is equally available and is NOT ruled out by that argument. What supports the social reading here is the second half: गोत्रं क्षपयति, the ruin of the LINEAGE, which is a consequence of a mismatch of birth rather than of bad character. The rendering keeps the social sense on that ground and this note records that the other sense is live.
1.66a reading here is contested

पाणिग्रहस् तमसि चेल् लक्षणगुणवित्ततो ऽपि सम्पन्ना ॥ सप्तति रात्रात् क्षपयति यद्य् अपि जाता सुरेन्द्रेण ।

pāṇigrahas tamasi cel lakṣaṇaguṇavittato 'pi sampannā || saptati rātrāt kṣapayati yady api jātā surendreṇa |

If the taking of the hand falls in Tamas, then even a woman furnished with ⟨auspicious⟩ marks, virtues and wealth destroys ⟨her husband⟩ within seventy nights — even were she born of Indra himself.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The e-text splits saptati rātrāt, and seventy is rendered accordingly. The split is anomalous (saptati- would normally compound), and saptarātrāt, 'within seven nights', is the reading the metre and the parallel spans of vv. 64–65 would favour; no second witness is available here to decide it. The object of kṣapayati is unstated and is supplied as the husband from vv. 64–65 and 67.

यदि खलु कृतान्तयोगे परिणयम् आयति कन्यका दैवात् ॥ सा श्वसुरबन्धुवर्गं क्षपयत्य् अचिरेण कालेन ।

yadi khalu kṛtāntayoge pariṇayam āyati kanyakā daivāt || sā śvasurabandhuvargaṃ kṣapayaty acireṇa kālena |

If indeed by fate a girl comes to her wedding in the Kṛtānta yoga, she destroys her father-in-law's whole circle of kin in no long time.

आत्मोपेक्षकपोषकवधका इति राशयो ऽर्थतो ऽभिहितः ॥ एभ्यः शुभम् अशुभं वा निर्देश्या जन्मलग्नाभ्याम् ।

ātmopekṣakapoṣakavadhakā iti rāśayo 'rthato 'bhihitaḥ || ebhyaḥ śubham aśubhaṃ vā nirdeśyā janmalagnābhyām |

'Self' (ātman), 'indifferent' (upekṣaka), 'nourisher' (poṣaka) and 'slayer' (vadhaka) — thus are the rāśis named according to their sense. From these the auspicious or the inauspicious is to be pronounced by ⟨reckoning from⟩ the birth ⟨sign⟩ and the lagna.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: janmalagnābhyām is dual: two reckoning-points, the birth sign and the lagna, not the single compound 'birth-lagna'. The e-text's abhihitaḥ (masc. sg.) does not agree with rāśayaḥ (masc. pl.), and nirdeśyā stands where nirdeśyam is expected; both are taken as e-text slips and translated to sense.

आत्मेति जन्मलग्नं पञ्चम नवमं च कीर्तितं तस्मात् ॥ द्विषट्कदशमभवनम् उपेक्षकाख्यं विनिर्दिष्टम् ॥

ātmeti janmalagnaṃ pañcama navamaṃ ca kīrtitaṃ tasmāt || dviṣaṭkadaśamabhavanam upekṣakākhyaṃ vinirdiṣṭam ||

The birth ⟨sign⟩ and the lagna are called 'Self'; and the fifth and the ninth from it ⟨are so called too⟩. The second, sixth and tenth bhāvas are declared to bear the name upekṣaka, 'indifferent'.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: dviṣaṭkadaśama = 2nd, 6th, 10th. With v. 70 the four classes cover all twelve houses: ātman 1/5/9, upekṣaka 2/6/10, poṣaka 3/7/11, vadhaka 4/8/12.

दुश्चिक्यं जामित्रं चैकादशकं च पोषकं ज्ञेयम् ॥ द्वादशनिधनचतुर्थं वधकाख्यं शास्त्रनिर्दिष्टम् ।

duścikyaṃ jāmitraṃ caikādaśakaṃ ca poṣakaṃ jñeyam || dvādaśanidhanacaturthaṃ vadhakākhyaṃ śāstranirdiṣṭam |

The duścikya (the 3rd house), the jāmitra (the 7th house) and the eleventh are to be known as poṣaka, 'nourisher'; the twelfth, the nidhana (the 8th house) and the fourth are declared by the śāstra to bear the name vadhaka, 'slayer'.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: House-synonyms per GLOSSARY: duścikya = 3rd, jāmitra = 7th, nidhana = 8th.

हित्वा शशाङ्कं यदि सप्त सौम्यैः पञ्चाशुभैः किं कथिता न सप्त ॥ द्वित्र्यादियोगान् परिहृत्य कस्मान् नोक्तं शतं त्रिघनं विलग्ने ।

hitvā śaśāṅkaṃ yadi sapta saumyaiḥ pañcāśubhaiḥ kiṃ kathitā na sapta || dvitryādiyogān parihṛtya kasmān noktaṃ śataṃ trighanaṃ vilagne |

Leaving the Moon aside — if seven ⟨are told⟩ with the benefics and five with the malefics, why then have the seven not been told? And, passing over the combinations of two, of three and the rest, why has not the hundred ⟨together with⟩ the cube of three been stated for the lagna (vilagna)?

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: An objection (pūrvapakṣa) against the incompleteness of the enumeration, and the hardest verse in the run. trighana is literally 'the cube of three', 27; śataṃ trighanam therefore reads as 100 + 27 = 127, which is exactly the number of non-empty combinations of seven grahas (2⁷ − 1) — i.e. the objector asks why, the Moon excluded, all 127 possible lagna-combinations were not enumerated. The arithmetic of the first half (seven with benefics, five with malefics) is left as the text gives it; the numbers seven, five, seven, two, three, hundred and 'cube of three' are all the mūla's own and none has been converted.

देशाचारस् तावद् आदौ विचिन्त्यो देशे देशे या स्थिति सैव कार्या ॥ लोकद्विष्टां पण्डिता वर्जयन्ति दैवज्ञो ऽपि लोकमार्गेण यायात् ।

deśācāras tāvad ādau vicintyo deśe deśe yā sthiti saiva kāryā || lokadviṣṭāṃ paṇḍitā varjayanti daivajño 'pi lokamārgeṇa yāyāt |

First of all the custom of the country is to be weighed: in each country whatever the standing practice is, that alone is to be followed. What the people detest the learned avoid; the astrologer (daivajña) too should walk by the world's road.

बृहस्पतौ गोचरशोभनस्थे विवाहम् इच्छन्ति च दक्षिणात्याः । रवौ शुभस्थे च वदन्ति गौडा न गोचरो मालवके प्रमाणम् ॥

bṛhaspatau gocaraśobhanasthe vivāham icchanti ca dakṣiṇātyāḥ | ravau śubhasthe ca vadanti gauḍā na gocaro mālavake pramāṇam ||

The southerners want the marriage when Bṛhaspati (Jupiter) stands well in transit (gocara); the Gauḍas say ⟨it should be⟩ when the Sun stands auspiciously; among the Mālavakas gocara is no authority.

हरौ प्रसुप्ते न च दक्षिणायने न चैत्रमासे न च पुष्यसंज्ञिते । तिथौ च रिक्ते शशिनि क्षयङ्गते रवीन्दुभौमार्किदिनेषु चाशुभम् ॥

harau prasupte na ca dakṣiṇāyane na caitramāse na ca puṣyasaṃjñite | tithau ca rikte śaśini kṣayaṅgate ravīndubhaumārkidineṣu cāśubham ||

When Hari ⟨Viṣṇu⟩ is asleep ⟨no marriage⟩; nor in the southern course ⟨of the Sun⟩; nor in the month Caitra; nor in the ⟨month⟩ named Pauṣa; and on a riktā tithi, and when the Moon has gone to waning, and on the days of the Sun, the Moon, Mars and Saturn — ⟨all this is⟩ inauspicious.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: puṣyasaṃjñite is taken as the month Pauṣa, parallel to caitramāse, and not the nakṣatra Puṣya; the Hindi keeps पुष्य so the alternative stays visible. ravīndubhaumārki = Sun, Moon, Mars, Saturn — the four weekdays in the mūla's own order, unchanged.

व्यतिपातहतं दिनत्रयं व्यतिपातेन समं च वैधृतिम् ॥ तद् अपि स्फुटपातदर्शने द्विगुणं यदि वा न निश्चितम् ।

vyatipātahataṃ dinatrayaṃ vyatipātena samaṃ ca vaidhṛtim || tad api sphuṭapātadarśane dviguṇaṃ yadi vā na niścitam |

Three days struck by Vyatīpāta ⟨are to be shunned⟩, and Vaidhṛti is on a par with Vyatīpāta. That too is doubled when the true ⟨moment of the⟩ pāta is observed — or else it is not settled.

1.76a reading here is contested

व्यतिपातव्याघातः षष्ठे दशमे च वैधृतं धिष्ण्ये ॥ विक्षोभणगण्डान्ताव् अतिधृतिसंख्ये च व्याघातः ।

vyatipātavyāghātaḥ ṣaṣṭhe daśame ca vaidhṛtaṃ dhiṣṇye || vikṣobhaṇagaṇḍāntāv atidhṛtisaṃkhye ca vyāghātaḥ |

The stroke of Vyatipāta ⟨falls⟩ on the sixth and on the tenth, and Vaidhṛta on the ⟨last⟩ asterism (dhiṣṇya); Vikṣobhaṇa and Gaṇḍānta ⟨likewise⟩, and Vyāghāta at the number of atidhṛti ⟨= nineteen⟩.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: atidhṛti is the metre-name used as a number-word: 19. The verse is elliptical and its ordinals do not agree with the standard 27-yoga sequence (there Atigaṇḍa is 6th, Gaṇḍa 10th, Vyāghāta 13th, Vyatīpāta 17th, Parigha 19th, Vaidhṛti 27th); the numbers 6, 10 and 19 are therefore reproduced exactly as the mūla gives them and no correction has been made to fit that list. vyatipātavyāghātaḥ is read as a tatpuruṣa, 'the stroke of Vyatipāta'; it could also be the dvandva 'Vyatipāta and Vyāghāta', which would make Vyāghāta occur twice in one verse.

तद् इदं व्यतिपातं च कथयन्ति उत्तरदिक्स्थिताजनाः ॥ व्यतिपातवद् आकुलस्थितं बहुसिद्धान्तविशेषकारणे ।

tad idaṃ vyatipātaṃ ca kathayanti uttaradiksthitājanāḥ || vyatipātavad ākulasthitaṃ bahusiddhāntaviśeṣakāraṇe |

And this the people settled in the northern quarter call vyatipāta; ⟨the matter⟩ stands as confused as vyatipāta itself, by reason of the differences among the many siddhāntas.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: A pun the English cannot fully hold: the doctrine of vyatipāta is itself ākulasthita — 'in disarray' — like a vyatipāta.
1.78a reading here is contested

तथोत्तराः साकलसन्निकृष्टा माण्डव्यमातीयतुसार्द्धकेषु ॥ खशेषु हूणेषु न बाह्लिकेषु वा न, काणदेशेषु न गोपभोजाः ।

tathottarāḥ sākalasannikṛṣṭā māṇḍavyamātīyatusārddhakeṣu || khaśeṣu hūṇeṣu na bāhlikeṣu vā na, kāṇadeśeṣu na gopabhojāḥ |

So too the northerners, those close to Sākala, in the ⟨lands of the⟩ Māṇḍavyas ⟨…⟩; among the Khaśas, among the Hūṇas ⟨it is⟩ not ⟨so⟩, nor among the Bāhlikas; not in the Kāṇa countries; ⟨nor⟩ the Gopas and Bhojas.

2 notes on this verse
  • What the page would not yield: PARTLY UNREADABLE, and the gap is marked ⟨…⟩ in both languages. The compound māṇḍavyamātīyatusārddhakeṣu does not parse: Māṇḍavya is a known people-name, but -mātīya-tu-sārddhakeṣu is not resolvable into identifiable ethnonyms and the e-text carries no variant for it. The e-text also prints a stray comma inside the pāda (bāhlikeṣu vā na, kāṇadeśeṣu), which is not Sanskrit punctuation and marks the line as unstable. The surviving names — Sākala, Khaśa, Hūṇa, Bāhlika, the Kāṇa countries, Gopas and Bhojas — are rendered as read; the sense of the verse (a list of which regions do and do not follow the preceding usage) survives the gap, but which peoples fall on which side of the na cannot be recovered from this witness alone.
  • About this edition: BHAṬṬOTPALA CALLS THIS VERSE SPURIOUS, and nothing in our files said so until 2026-09-08. Immediately after it the vivaraṇa reads `अनार्षोऽयं श्लोकः । स्पष्टार्थः` — 'this śloka is not ārṣa; its sense is plain' (lamsala-B_djvu.txt:3624, quoted inline because .tmp/ is gitignored). The verse is nonetheless printed as text by the edition and is kept here as the edition prints it, with the commentator's verdict recorded. On the plate at printed p.66 = PDF index 77 of lamsala-A.pdf its two halves are numbered ॥७८॥ and ॥७८½॥, and the stray comma our other note flags (वा' न, काण देशेषु) is the printing's own, not this ingest's.
1.79a reading here is contested

एकादशोक्तानि शुभानि भानि शेषाण्य् अनिष्टानि विवाहकाले ॥ तत्राग्नि तारा शशिवीर्ययुक्ता त्रिंशन् मुहूर्ताश् च विचिन्तनीयाः ।

ekādaśoktāni śubhāni bhāni śeṣāṇy aniṣṭāni vivāhakāle || tatrāgni tārā śaśivīryayuktā triṃśan muhūrtāś ca vicintanīyāḥ |

Eleven asterisms are declared auspicious; the rest are unwanted at the time of marriage. Therein the star of Agni ⟨Kṛttikā⟩, the tārā joined with the Moon's strength, and the thirty muhūrtas are to be considered.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. tatrāpi].
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: Edition apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads tatrāpi for tatra ('there too'), which does not change the sense of the list. The second half is loosely compounded and the joins are uncertain: agni is taken as the deity of Kṛttikā and so the asterism, but it can also be read as the number-word three, and śaśivīryayuktā may qualify tārā (tārā-bala carrying candra-bala) or stand as a separate item. The counts eleven and thirty are the mūla's own.

तुलाधरस्त्रीमिथुनाद् विवाह लग्ने स्थिता पापफला न चान्ये ॥ त्रिंशांशकद्वादशभागभेदैर् द्रेष्काणहोराप्रमुखैर् विचिन्त्यः ।

tulādharastrīmithunād vivāha lagne sthitā pāpaphalā na cānye || triṃśāṃśakadvādaśabhāgabhedair dreṣkāṇahorāpramukhair vicintyaḥ |

Apart from Tulādhara ⟨Libra⟩, Strī ⟨Virgo⟩ and Mithuna ⟨Gemini⟩, ⟨a sign⟩ standing as the marriage lagna is of evil fruit, and no others ⟨are approved⟩. ⟨It⟩ is to be considered through the divisions of the triṃśāṃśaka and the dvādaśabhāga, and through the dreṣkāṇa, the horā and the rest.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. vihāya].
  • About this edition: tulādhara ('the scale-bearer') = Tulā/Libra, strī ('the woman') = Kanyā/Virgo, mithuna = Gemini — the three human signs. Edition apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads vihāya ('having left aside') where the e-text has vivāha; on that reading the ablative governs vihāya and the exclusive sense taken here is explicit rather than supplied. horā here is the varga (the half-sign division), not the ascendant or the hour — noted per GLOSSARY. dreṣkāṇa is the spelling this e-text uses.
1.81a reading here is contested

मासे नाष्टौ विष्टिदुष्टानि भानि तत्राप्य् एके रात्रिम् आहुर् दिनं च ॥ तिथ्यर्द्धे ऽन्त्ये प्राप्तिनाशौ च विष्टे चान्द्रं मानं विष्टिहेतु न शेषम् ।

māse nāṣṭau viṣṭiduṣṭāni bhāni tatrāpy eke rātrim āhur dinaṃ ca || tithyarddhe 'ntye prāptināśau ca viṣṭe cāndraṃ mānaṃ viṣṭihetu na śeṣam |

In a month eight ⟨periods⟩ are spoiled by viṣṭi; and even there some say ⟨it holds by⟩ night and ⟨others by⟩ day. In the last half of a tithi ⟨come⟩ gain and loss when viṣṭi ⟨falls⟩; the lunar reckoning is the ground of viṣṭi, and not the rest.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. viṣṭeḥ].
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: The printing reads मासे नाष्टौ, i.e. na aṣṭau, 'not eight' (read on the plate at printed p.67 = PDF index 78 of lamsala-A.pdf). Our mūla printed नाष्टाउ until 2026-09-08 — a transliteration artefact, not a reading; see this verse's revisions[]. The word is taken here as a segmentation artefact for māse 'ṣṭau, since eight viṣṭi (bhadrā) occurrences to the lunar month is the standing doctrine and the rest of the verse expounds rather than denies viṣṭi. If the negative is real the line is a denial of that count, which the surrounding polemic (vv. 71, 77, 82) would permit; the count eight is left in the rendering either way and this note carries the doubt. Edition apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads viṣṭeḥ (genitive) for viṣṭe.

प्राच्याः प्रायोः न्यूनवर्णाः सगोपाः संध्याकालं प्राहुर् इष्टं न शेषम् ॥ यावच् छान्तं गोरजो नाभ्युपेति तावत् तेषां चित्तशुद्धिर् विवाहे ।

prācyāḥ prāyoḥ nyūnavarṇāḥ sagopāḥ saṃdhyākālaṃ prāhur iṣṭaṃ na śeṣam || yāvac chāntaṃ gorajo nābhyupeti tāvat teṣāṃ cittaśuddhir vivāhe |

The easterners — mostly the lower castes, together with the cowherds — declare the twilight hour to be the wanted ⟨time⟩ and not the rest. So long as the settling cattle-dust has not come ⟨upon them⟩, so long they have ⟨no⟩ clearness of mind about the marriage.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: nyūnavarṇāḥ is the plain social claim 'of lower varṇa' and is rendered at its weight. The clause carries no second na, so the negation of the yāvat-clause is supplied into the tāvat-clause and marked; this is the godhūli-lagna of v. 83 stated as a custom. [2026-09-23: read by eye on Lāṃsāla's printing (lamsala-A.pdf, PDF p.80, printed p.68) at about 7.3x native, the press sets प्रायोः with a full visarga, and our mūla follows it. The rendering 'mostly' takes the word as the adverb प्रायः, as Bhaṭṭotpala's vivaraṇa on the same leaf does (प्रायो ग्रहणबाहुल्यार्थं, read by eye at about 2.6x). प्रायोः as printed could only be a genitive or locative dual of प्राय, and nothing in the sentence construes with it, so the question stays open as a doubt on this verse.]

गोपैर् यष्टयाहतानां खुरपुटदलिता या तु धूलिर् दिनान्ते सोद्वाहे सुन्दरीणां विपुलधनसुताश् चायुरारोग्यसंपत् ॥ तस्मिन् काले न चर्क्षं न च तिथिकरणं नैव लग्नं न योगः ख्यातः पुंसां सुखार्थं शमयति दुरितान्य् उत्थितं गोरजस् तु ।

gopair yaṣṭayāhatānāṃ khurapuṭadalitā yā tu dhūlir dinānte sodvāhe sundarīṇāṃ vipuladhanasutāś cāyurārogyasaṃpat || tasmin kāle na carkṣaṃ na ca tithikaraṇaṃ naiva lagnaṃ na yogaḥ khyātaḥ puṃsāṃ sukhārthaṃ śamayati duritāny utthitaṃ gorajas tu |

The dust crushed up by the hoof-cups of ⟨cattle⟩ struck with staves by the cowherds at the end of day — that ⟨dust⟩, at the wedding of fair maidens, ⟨gives⟩ abundant wealth and sons, and long life, health and prosperity. At that time neither the asterism (ṛkṣa), nor tithi and karaṇa, nor the lagna, nor the yoga ⟨is reckoned⟩: the risen cattle-dust is famed for men's happiness, and it quiets misfortunes.

3 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. yaṣṭyāhatānāṃ].
  • About this edition: Edition apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads yaṣṭyāhatānāṃ for the printing's yaṣṭayāhatānāṃ — the same word, correctly formed, and the one the sragdharā requires (21 syllables with yaṣṭyā, 22 with yaṣṭayā). The mūla keeps the printing; see discrepancies[]. The genitive āhatānāṃ has no expressed noun; 'cattle' is supplied from gopaiḥ and khurapuṭa. The published mūla read न च र्क्षं until 2026-09-08, which is not writable Devanāgarī; the printing sets नचर्क्षं as one word and the mūla now does too.
  • Corroboration: THIS VERSE IS ALSO BṚHAT SAṂHITĀ 102.13 (research/translations/brihat-samhita/ch102.json), which reaches us through a different transmission line — sanskritdocuments, from A. V. Tripathi's Sarasvatī Bhavan text, not from GRETIL's Lāmsāla. The two agree on this stanza except in pāda b, where ours reads विपुलधनसुताश् चायुरारोग्यसंपत् and V. Subrahmanya Sastri's printed Bṛhat Saṃhitā vol. II p.768 reads विपुलधनसुतारोग्यसौभाग्यकर्त्री. Both scan as sragdharā, so this is a recension divergence and not an error to be mended; it has a ledger row with the resolution left OPEN. ⚠ Two cautions for anyone citing across: BS 102.1–12 is the same doctrine in a different arrangement, not a second lineage — counting it as independent corroboration would be double-counting. And Sastri and M. Ramakrishna Bhat both number the Bṛhat Saṃhitā's Vivāhapaṭala chapter CIII (103) and attribute it to Vindhyavāsin, while the sanskritdocuments colophon reads इति श्रीवराहमिहिरकृतौ बृहत्संहितायां विवाहपटलाध्यायः समाप्तः ॥१०२॥; our own file is ch. 102 and our ch. 103 is ग्रहगोचराध्यायः.

कुलस्य देशस्य च चित्तवृत्तिर् न खण्डनिया विदुषा कदाचित् ॥ दोषः प्रतिस्यायकृतो ऽपि यो ऽत्र संभाव्यते ज्यौतिषिकस्य सो ऽज्ञैः ।

kulasya deśasya ca cittavṛttir na khaṇḍaniyā viduṣā kadācit || doṣaḥ pratisyāyakṛto 'pi yo 'tra saṃbhāvyate jyautiṣikasya so 'jñaiḥ |

The turn of mind of the family and of the country is never to be broken by a learned man. Even a fault produced by a head-cold is here imputed to the astrologer (jyautiṣika) — and that by the ignorant.

2 notes on this verse
  • Another reading: Apparatus printed beside the text in the source and therefore kept out of the mūla, quoted verbatim with the word it attaches to ([u. …] = Bhaṭṭotpala's reading, [sic.] = the editor vouching for what he found): [u. khaṇḍanīyā].
  • About this edition: Edition apparatus: Bhaṭṭotpala reads khaṇḍanīyā for the e-text's khaṇḍaniyā — the same word with the correct long ī. dosaḥ in the e-text is doṣaḥ. pratiśyāya is the ordinary head-cold/catarrh; the point is that fools blame the astrologer even for that. [2026-09-23: the mūla now reads दोषः; this sentence names dosaḥ, the form our text carried before the mūla-verification pass of 2026-09-23 corrected it, and it is kept as history.]

शास्त्रशरीरम् अबुध्वा बहुधा जल्पन्ति यद्य् अपि नानुमतम् ॥ काणानां विषयगतः प्राज्ञो निमिलयेन् नेत्रम् ।

śāstraśarīram abudhvā bahudhā jalpanti yady api nānumatam || kāṇānāṃ viṣayagataḥ prājño nimilayen netram |

Though, without grasping the body of the śāstra, they prattle in many ways what is not approved — the wise man who has come into the country of the one-eyed should shut ⟨one⟩ eye.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: nimilayen is nimīlayet, which Bhaṭṭotpala's gloss confirms (निर्मीलयेत्). अबुध्वा for the expected अबुद्ध्वा (the ktvā of √budh is buddhvā) is the printing's own reading and Bhaṭṭotpala's lemma reads it too, so it is NOT emended. A 2026-09-07 pass proposed correcting it on metrical grounds; that argument fails — abudhvā and abuddhvā scan identically, since the u is closed by a conjunct either way, and the pūrvārdha counts the same with both. The kāṇa ('one-eyed') proverb answers the kāṇadeśa of v. 78 and the counsel of v. 72: among the one-eyed, close an eye.

एवं विवाहसमये गमने प्रवेशे कार्येषु मङ्गलयुतेष्व् अथवा परेषु ॥ दोषं कुशिक्षितकुदैवविदो वदन्ति रागेण वा पटुधियो नमो ऽस्तु तेभ्यः ।

evaṃ vivāhasamaye gamane praveśe kāryeṣu maṅgalayuteṣv athavā pareṣu || doṣaṃ kuśikṣitakudaivavido vadanti rāgeṇa vā paṭudhiyo namo 'stu tebhyaḥ |

Thus at the time of marriage, in setting out, in entering ⟨a house⟩, in undertakings attended with auspicious rites or in the others, ill-taught knowers of bad astrology pronounce a fault — or the sharp-witted do so out of partiality. Homage be to them!

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: namo 'stu tebhyaḥ closes the verse sarcastically — the homage is a dismissal, and is left unglossed in both languages so the reader meets the same edge.
1.87a reading here is contested

गोचरशुद्धाव् इन्दुं कन्याया यत्नतः शुभं वीक्ष्य ॥ तिग्मकिरणश् च पुंसः शेषैर् अवर्णैर् अपि विवाहः ।

gocaraśuddhāv induṃ kanyāyā yatnataḥ śubhaṃ vīkṣya || tigmakiraṇaś ca puṃsaḥ śeṣair avarṇair api vivāhaḥ |

For purity of transit (gocara), having carefully seen that the girl's Moon (indu) is auspicious and the man's sharp-rayed one (the Sun), the marriage ⟨may be held⟩ even with the remaining ⟨factors⟩ uncommended.

1 note on this verse
  • Where the Sanskrit is open: tigmakiraṇa, 'the sharp-rayed one', is the Sun. śeṣair avarṇair api is uncertain: avarṇa is taken as 'uncommended, without praise', so the couple's own luminaries override the rest; it could also carry the social sense 'of unequal varṇa'. Both languages keep the word visible rather than resolving it silently.

न सकलगुणसंपल् लभ्यते ऽल्पैर् अहोभिर् बहुतरगुणयोगं योजयेत् मङ्गलेषु ॥ प्रभवति न हि दोषो भूरिभावे गुणानां सलिललव इवाग्नेः संप्रदीप्तेन्धनस्य ।

na sakalaguṇasaṃpal labhyate 'lpair ahobhir bahutaraguṇayogaṃ yojayet maṅgaleṣu || prabhavati na hi doṣo bhūribhāve guṇānāṃ salilalava ivāgneḥ saṃpradīptendhanasya |

A full complement of every merit is not to be had in a few days: in auspicious rites one should put together the combination (yoga) that carries the greater number of merits. For a fault does not prevail where merits are abundant — like a drop of water against a fire whose fuel is well ablaze.

गुणशतम् अपि दोषः कश्चिद् एको ऽपि वृद्धः क्षपयति यदि नान्यत् तद्विरोधिगुणो ऽस्ति । घटम् अपि परिपूर्णं पञ्चगव्यस्य शक्त्या मलिनयति सुराया बिन्दुर् एको ऽपि सर्वम् ॥

guṇaśatam api doṣaḥ kaścid eko 'pi vṛddhaḥ kṣapayati yadi nānyat tadvirodhiguṇo 'sti | ghaṭam api paripūrṇaṃ pañcagavyasya śaktyā malinayati surāyā bindur eko 'pi sarvam ||

Yet some one grown fault destroys even a hundred merits, if there is no other merit opposed to it — just as a single drop of liquor by its power defiles a whole jar filled with the pañcagavya.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: Set deliberately against v. 88, which said the opposite; the text leaves the two standing side by side. pañcagavya, the five products of the cow, is left untranslated — the force of the image is that the purest possible vessel is what one drop spoils.

कृतकौतुकमङ्गलो वरो मधुपर्काद्यशनाद् अनन्तरम् ॥ ज्वलिताग्निसमक्षमङ्गलं यद् अवाप्नोति शुभाशुभं च तम् ॥

kṛtakautukamaṅgalo varo madhuparkādyaśanād anantaram || jvalitāgnisamakṣamaṅgalaṃ yad avāpnoti śubhāśubhaṃ ca tam ||

The bridegroom for whom the kautuka-maṅgala has been performed — immediately after the eating of the madhuparka and the rest, ⟨at⟩ the auspicious moment in the sight of the kindled fire: whatever good or ill he obtains, ⟨he obtains⟩ from that.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The closing verse fixes the operative moment of the whole chapter: not the saṃkalpa or the procession, but the maṅgala before the kindled fire, straight after the madhuparka. kautuka-maṅgala is the tying of the auspicious wrist-cord. tam at the end has no clear antecedent in the e-text and is taken as resuming the moment; ⟨he obtains⟩ / ⟨होता है⟩ is supplied to close the sentence. [2026-09-23: read by eye on Lāṃsāla's printing (lamsala-A.pdf, PDF p.84, printed p.72) at about 5.2x native, the press sets शुभाशुभंचतम्, ending in म् with a virāma, so tam is the printing's word and not an e-text slip. Bhaṭṭotpala's vivaraṇa on the same leaf paraphrases with तत् (…यदंशका दवाप्नोति तत्तस्माच्छुभा शुभं लभते, read by eye at about 2.1x); his तत् is kept on the ledger as a rival, and the text keeps the printed तम्.]

चक्रे वराहमिहिरः प्रणिपत्य साधून् सम्यक् विवाहपटलं पृथुतां विहाय । पूर्वं च यद् युवतिजन्मविधौ मयोक्तं संचिन्त्य तच् च सदसत्परिकल्पनीयम् ॥

cakre varāhamihiraḥ praṇipatya sādhūn samyak vivāhapaṭalaṃ pṛthutāṃ vihāya | pūrvaṃ ca yad yuvatijanmavidhau mayoktaṃ saṃcintya tac ca sadasatparikalpanīyam ||

Varāhamihira, having bowed to the good, has composed the Vivāhapaṭala properly, setting prolixity aside. And what was said by me earlier in the rules for a woman's nativity — reflecting upon that too, the good and the ill ⟨of a match⟩ are to be worked out.

1 note on this verse
  • About this edition: The closing colophon of the work, in vasantatilakā, and the only verse in which the author names himself. Three points of construal: (1) samyak is taken with cakre ("composed properly"), and could equally be read with pṛthutāṃ vihāya ("abandoning prolixity altogether"); the sense is unaffected. (2) yuvatijanmavidhi is the author's cross-reference to his own treatment of women's nativities — the strījātaka chapter of the Bṛhajjātaka — not to anything in this work; rendered as "the rules for a woman's nativity" and kept as युवतिजन्म in the Hindi with the reference glossed, since Hindi can carry both the compound and its identification without choosing between them. (3) sadasat is the neuter dual-sense compound sat + asat, "the good and the bad"; it agrees with tat, so the clause is literally "that good-and-bad too is to be determined" — the object of the determination (a marriage's fitness) is supplied and marked. parikalpanīyam is a gerundive of obligation: the reader is instructed, not informed.

Use it freely — CC BY 4.0. This Sanskrit transcription and this English translation are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Copy them, print them, build on them; the only condition is attribution to Karma Sakha (karmasakha.com). The underlying work is ancient and in the public domain everywhere.

If you find an error, it is ours and we want it. Every reading on this page is recorded with the evidence behind it, so a disagreement can be argued about concretely rather than asserted.

Readings on this site cite texts at chapter level, with verse numbers only where our research verified the passage in a named edition. How conflicts between texts are resolved is documented on the conventions page.